Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Samuel 19:20
For thy servant doth know that I have sinned: therefore, behold, I am come the first this day of all the house of Joseph to go down to meet my lord the king.
20. the house of Joseph ] The ten tribes of Israel as distinguished from Judah are thus named from Ephraim, the most powerful tribe among them (Gen 48:5). Cp. Psa 78:67-68 ; 1Ki 11:28; Amo 5:6. Shimei the Benjamite claims to be the first representative of Israel to welcome the king.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
This is the first time that the house of Joseph, or Joseph, stands for all the ten tribes of which Ephraim was the head and leader. While Saul of Benjamin was king, or while Mahanaim was the capital of his sons kingdom, it was not natural so to name them, nor does it seem so at first sight in the mouth of Shimei the Benjamite. But it is very possible that he used the phrase for the purpose of exculpating himself and his own tribe from having taken the initiative in the rebellion, anti of insinuating that they were drawn away by the preponderating influence of the great house of Joseph. On the other hand, the phrase may be an indication that the passage was written after the separation of the kingdom of Israel, when the phrase was a common one.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 20. For thy servant doth know that I have sinned] This was all he could do; his subsequent conduct alone could prove his sincerity. On such an avowal as this David could not but grant him his life.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Thy servant doth know that I have sinned; I do not excuse my sin, but with grief and shame confess it; in which case the Lord thy God is ready to pardon offenders, and so I trust wilt thou be.
I am come the first; the sense of my former sin now hath, and whilst I live will, make me the first and most forward in all acts of duty and service to thy majesty.
Of all the house of Joseph.
Object. He was a Benjamite, 2Sa 16:5. How then doth he make himself one of the house of Joseph?
Answ. The house of Joseph is here put, either,
1. For the ten tribes, which are oft distinguished from Judah, and then they are called the house of Joseph, as Zec 10:6. But this distinction was not made before the division of the people into two kingdoms; and even after that division Benjamin was constantly reckoned with Judah, and not with Joseph or Ephraim. Or,
2. For all the tribes of Israel, who are called the children of Joseph, Psa 77:15; compare Psa 80:1; 81:5; as well they might, not only because of Josephs eminency, (the most eminent persons and things being oft put for the rest of the kind,) and because the rights of primogeniture were in a great part devolved upon him, 1Ch 5:1; but also because Joseph had been as a father to them, and had nourished them all like children, as is expressed in the Hebrew text, Gen 47:12. But in this sense this was not true, for the house of Judah came before him, 2Sa 19:15.
Or rather,
3. For all the tribes except Judah, which are conveniently called the house of Joseph for the reasons now mentioned, and are fitly distinguished from Judah, because the rights of the first-born were divided between Judah and Joseph, 1Ch 5:2. And though Benjamin, after the division of the kingdoms, was fitly joined with Judah, because then they adhered to that tribe; yet before that time it was more conveniently joined with Joseph, because they marched under the standard of the house of Joseph, or of Ephraim, Num 10:22-24; whence it is that Ephraim, Benjamin, and Manasseh are put together, Psa 80:2.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
20. I am come the first . . . of allthe house of Josephthat is, before all the rest of Israel(Psa 77:15; Psa 80:1;Psa 81:5; Zec 10:6).
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
For thy servant doth know that I have sinned,…. He was sensible of it, and sorry for it, and publicly acknowledged it before all the men he brought with him, and before all the servants of David; and as a token of the sincerity of his repentance, and as an earnest of his future fidelity, he made this early submission:
therefore, behold, I am come the first this day of all the house of Joseph, to go down to meet my lord the king; but why does he make mention of the house of Joseph, when he was of the tribe of Benjamin? Kimchi says that Benjamin, Ephraim, and Manasseh, were called the house of Joseph; and it may be observed that it is sometimes used for all Israel, as in Ps 80:1; and he was the first of them that came, inasmuch as he came along with the men of Judah, who came first of all to fetch the king back; or Joseph may stand for the tribes of Israel, as distinct from Judah, and he was the first of them; some of the Jewish writers think he makes mention of the name of Joseph, because as the brethren of Joseph used him ill, and he returned good to them; so though he had used David ill, he hoped he would do as Joseph did, return good for evil; and others represent him as suggesting hereby to David, that all Israel had used him ill, and he worse than them all; and now he was come first, and they were all waiting what he would do to him, that if he received him kindly, all would come and make their peace with him.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
“For thy servant knoweth (i.e., I know) that I have sinned, and behold I have come to-day the first of the whole house of Joseph, to go to meet my lord the king.” By “the whole house of Joseph” we are to understand the rest of the tribes with the exception of Judah, who are called “all Israel” in 2Sa 19:12. There is no reason for the objection taken by Thenius and Bttcher to the expression . This rendering of the lxx ( ) does not prove that was the original reading, but only that the translator thought it necessary to explain by adding the gloss ; and the assertion that it was only in the oratorical style of a later period, when the kingdom had been divided, that Joseph became the party name of all that were not included in Judah, is overthrown by 1Ki 11:28. The designation of the tribes that opposed Judah by the name of the leading tribe ( Joseph: Jos 16:1) was as old as the jealousy between these tribes and Judah, which did not commence with the division of the kingdom, but was simply confirmed thereby into a permanent distinction. Shimei’s prayer for the forgiveness of his sin was no more a proof of sincere repentance than the reason which he adduced in support of his petition, namely that he was the first of all the house of Joseph to come and meet David. Shimei’s only desire was to secure impunity for himself. Abishai therefore replied (2Sa 19:21), “Shall not Shimei be put to death for this ( , for this, which he has just said and done), because he hath cursed the anointed of Jehovah?” (vid., 2Sa 16:5.). But David answered (2Sa 19:22), “What have I to do with you, ye sons of Zeruiah (cf. 2Sa 16:10), for ye become opponents to me to-day?” , an opponent, who places obstacles in the way (Num 22:22); here it signifies one who would draw away to evil. “Should any one be put to death in Israel to-day? for do I not know that I am this day king over Israel?” The reason assigned by David here for not punishing the blasphemer as he had deserved, by taking away his life, would have been a very laudable one if the king had really forgiven him. But as David when upon his deathbed charged his successor to punish Shimei for this cursing (1Ki 2:8-9), the favour shown him here was only a sign of David’s weakness, which was not worthy of imitation, the more especially as the king swore unto him (2Sa 19:24) that he should not die.
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
(20) The house of Joseph.Shimei was not strictly of the house of Joseph, but of Benjamin; and it is plain that Joseph, as the name of the most prominent member, stands for all the tribes outside of Judah. This usage is well recognised at a later time (see 1Ch. 5:1-2; Amo. 5:15), and it has hence been argued that it indicates a late date for the composition of the book; but it is also found in Psa. 80:1-2; Psa. 81:5 (the date of which it would be rash to attempt to fix), in the reign of Solomon, 1Ki. 11:28, and probably very early in Jdg. 1:35. There is no reason why the expression may not have been used at the earliest date when there began to be a certain separation and distinction between Judah and the other tribes, which was soon after the conquest of Canaan.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
20. The house of Joseph This designation is here used as synonymous with all Israel. In poetical and oratorical style this was a common term for Israel. Compare Psa 77:15; Psa 80:1; Psa 81:5. It probably grew out of the fact that Joseph received the rights of primogeniture which Reuben by transgression lost. 1Ch 5:1-2.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
2Sa 19:20. Firstof all the house of Joseph By the house of Joseph we may very well understand, all the tribes, in opposition to that of Judah, the rights of primogeniture having been divided betwixt Judah and Joseph, 1Ch 5:1. Indeed, when the separation of the two kingdoms of Judah and Israel took place, Benjamin made a part of the former; but before that time, this tribe was rather ranked under that of Joseph, together with those of Ephraim and Manasseh, Psa 80:2 because it belonged to the same standard. Num 2:18-22. The LXX translate, I am come before any of the house of Joseph; i.e. before any other.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
2Sa 19:20 For thy servant doth know that I have sinned: therefore, behold, I am come the first this day of all the house of Joseph to go down to meet my lord the king.
Ver. 20. For thy servant doth know that I have sinned. ] Thus the fox taken in a toil looketh pitifully, but it is only that he may get out. This confession was merely extorted by fear of punishment: it came not like water out of a spring, with a voluntary freeness, but like water out of a still, which is forced with fire.
I am come the first this day.
Of all the house of Joseph.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Joseph. Put by Figure of speech Metonymy (of Adjunct) for the two tribes (Ephraim and Manasseh), or for the ten tribes, Israel (Amo 6:6, Amo 6:15; Amo 6:6. Oba 1:18. Zec 10:6). Compare 2Sa 19:43. In Psa 80:1 with Psa 81:5, Joseph is put for the twelve tribes.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
I am come: Psa 78:34-37, Jer 22:23, Hos 5:15
Joseph: 2Sa 19:9, 2Sa 16:5, Gen 48:14, Gen 48:20, 1Ki 12:20, 1Ki 12:25, Hos 4:15-17, Hos 5:3
Reciprocal: Exo 10:16 – I have 1Ki 11:28 – the house Amo 5:6 – the house Oba 1:18 – the house of Joseph
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
19:20 For thy servant doth know that I have sinned: therefore, behold, I am come the first this day of all the house of {i} Joseph to go down to meet my lord the king.
(i) By Joseph he means Ephraim, Manasseh and Benjamin (of which he was) because those three were under one standard, Num 2:18.