5 9 (= ch. 1Ch 14:4-7<\/span> and 2Sa 5:14-16<\/span>). The Sons born to David in Jerusalem<\/p>\n 5<\/strong>. Shimea<\/em> ] in 1Ch 14:4<\/span> and 2Sa 5:14<\/span> (R.V.) Shammua<\/em>.<\/p>\n Nathan<\/em> ] Through him our Lord’s descent is traced in Luk 3:31<\/span>.<\/p>\n Solomon<\/em> ] Only here are other sons besides Solomon attributed to Bath-sheba.<\/p>\n Bathshua<\/em> ] is a slight variation in pronunciation (with a consequent variation in meaning) of Bath-sheba.<\/p>\n the daughter of Ammiel<\/em> ] of Eliam<\/em> (perhaps a by-form of Ammiel<\/em>) in 2Sa 11:3<\/span>. An Eliam son of Ahithophel, David’s counsellor, is mentioned in 2Sa 23:34<\/span>; Bath-sheba may therefore have been grand-daughter to Ahithophel. Notice that the Chronicler does not call Bath-sheba the wife of Uriah the Hittite<\/em>; he nowhere refers to David’s great sin.<\/p>\n Bathshua, the daughter of Ammiel – <\/B>Both names are here given in an unusual form, but it may be doubted whether in either case there has been any corruption. In Bathshua, for Bathsheba, a <\/span> (v<\/I>) replaces the <\/span> (b<\/I>) of the earlier writer, w and b having nearly the same sound. In Ammiel, for Eliam, the two elements which form the name are inverted, as in Jehoiachin =Jechoniah, and the like.<\/P><\/p>\n Verse 5<\/span>. Shimea, and Shobab<\/B><\/I>] Solomon is mentioned last<\/I>, though he was the eldest<\/I> of these four sons, because the genealogy was to be continued from him. Bath-shua<\/I> is the same as Bath-sheba,<\/I> the vau<\/I> being put by mistake in the former for beth<\/I> in the latter.<\/P> <\/p>\n Four; <\/B>all Davids children by her, as the text positively affirms; and therefore Solomon is called her <\/P> only son, <\/B>Pro 4:3<\/B><\/span>, because she loved him as if he had been so. <\/P> Ammiel, <\/B>called also <\/P> Eliam, <\/B>2Sa 11:3<\/B><\/span>. See Poole “2Sa 11:3<\/span>“. <\/P> <\/p>\n 5. four, of Bath-shua the daughterof Ammiel<\/B>or, “Bath-sheba” (2Sa11:3<\/span>), and there her father is called “Eliam.” Ofcourse Solomon was not her “only son,” but he is called so(Pr 4:3<\/span>) from the distinguishedaffection of which he was the object; and though the oldest, he isnamed the last of Bath-sheba’s children.<\/P><\/p>\n Ver. 5-8. And these were born unto him in Jerusalem<\/strong>,…. Whose names follow, in all nine; there are but seven mentioned in 2Sa 5:14<\/span> the reason of which see in the notes there;<\/p>\n [See comments on 2Sa 5:14]<\/span>.<\/p>\n [See comments on 2Sa 5:15]<\/span>.<\/p>\n [See comments on 2Sa 5:16]<\/span>. it may be observed that Bathsheba is here called Bathshua, and her father Ammiel, whose name is Eliam in 2Sa 11:3<\/span>, names of much the same signification.<\/p>\n (5-8) The thirteen sons born in Jerusalem. See 2Sa. 5:14-16<\/span>, and 1Ch. 14:4-7<\/span>, where this list is repeated with some variations (1Ch. 3:5<\/span>). The four sons of Bath-sheba, called here Bath-shua, a weakened form, if not a copyists error. By a similar change the Elishama of 1Ch. 3:6<\/span> appears in Samuel as Elishua.<\/p>\n Shimea<\/strong> (report) was a son of Jesse (1Ch. 2:13<\/span>). Perhaps, therefore, Shammua (famous) is correct here, as in Samuel.<\/p>\n Ammiel<\/strong> and Eliam are transposed forms of the same name, meaning El is a tribesman (am=gens, el<\/em> = deus<\/em>).<\/em> (Comp. Ahaziah and Jehoahaz, Nethaniah and Jehonathan, and many similar transpositions.) So in Gr. Theodoros and Dorotheos, Philotheos and Theophilos exist side by side.<\/p>\n 1Ch 3:5 And these were born unto him in Jerusalem; Shimea, and Shobab, and Nathan, and Solomon, four, of Bathshua the daughter of Ammiel:<\/p>\n Ver. 5. And Solomon, four.<\/strong> ] Not fourth: for he was the eldest of the four, and therefore the only beloved in the sight of his mother. Pro 4:3 <\/p>\n born . . . Jerusalem. Compare 2Sa 5:13-16. <\/p>\n Nathan. The son through whom the genealogy of Joseph is traced in Luk 3; and in Mat 1; after Solomon’s line failed in Jeconiah. See note on 1Ch 3:17. <\/p>\n Solomon. Through whom the line is traced in through whom the genealogy of Joseph, see Mat 1. <\/p>\n Bath-shua. Another name for Bath-sheba. Compare 2Sa 11:3. <\/p>\n Ammiel, or Eliam. Compare 2Sa 11:3. <\/p>\n Shimea: 1Ch 14:4, 2Sa 5:14, Shammuah <\/p>\n Nathan: 2Sa 7:2-4, 2Sa 12:1-15, Luk 3:31 <\/p>\n Solomon: 1Ch 28:5, 1Ch 28:6, 2Sa 12:24, 2Sa 12:25 <\/p>\n Bathshua: 2Sa 11:3, Bath-sheba, Mat 1:6 <\/p>\n Ammiel: 2Sa 11:3, Eliam <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Pro 4:3 – General<\/p>\n 1Ch 3:5. Of Bath-shua, the daugher of Ammiel In 2Sa 11:3, she is called Bath-sheba, as she is through the whole Scripture, and her father Eliam. Solomon was the eldest of these four sons; but is mentioned last, because the discourse was to return to his genealogy, 1Ch 3:10.<\/p>\n 3:5 And these were born unto him in Jerusalem; Shimea, and Shobab, and Nathan, and Solomon, four, of {c} Bathshua the daughter of Ammiel:<\/p>\n (c) Called also Bathsheba the daughter of Eliam: for they gave them various names.<\/p>\n And these were born unto him in Jerusalem; Shimea, and Shobab, and Nathan, and Solomon, four, of Bath-shua the daughter of Ammiel: 5 9 (= ch. 1Ch 14:4-7 and 2Sa 5:14-16). The Sons born to David in Jerusalem 5. Shimea ] in 1Ch 14:4 and 2Sa 5:14 (R.V.) Shammua. Nathan ] Through him our Lord’s … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Chronicles 3:5”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10378"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10378\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"