16<\/strong>. duke Korah<\/em> ] This name is out of place. It has come in from Gen 36:18<\/em><\/span>. The other names in Gen 36:15-16<\/em><\/span> are drawn from Gen 36:11-12<\/em><\/span>, while Korah, which occurs in Gen 36:14<\/em><\/span>, is mentioned again in Gen 36:18<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n Verse 16<\/span>. Duke Korah<\/B><\/I>] This Dr. Kennicott pronounces to be an interpolation. “It is certain, from Ge 36:4<\/span>, that Eliphaz was Esau’s son by Adah; and from Ge 36:11-12<\/span>, that Eliphaz<\/I> had but six<\/I> sons, Teman, Omar, Zepho, Gatam, Kenaz<\/I>, and Amalek<\/I>. It is also certain, from Ge 36:5<\/span>; Ge 36:14<\/span>, that Korah<\/I> was the son of Esau<\/I> (not of Eliphaz) by Aholibamah<\/I>; and as such he is properly mentioned in Ge 36:18<\/span>: These are the sons of Aholibamah, Esau’s wife: duke Jeush, duke Jaalam, DUKE KORAH. It is clear, therefore, that some transcriber has improperly inserted duke Korah<\/I> in Ge 36:16<\/span>; from which interpolation both the Samaritan text<\/I> and the Samaritan version<\/I> are free.” – KENNICOTT’S Remarks<\/I>. Everything considered, I incline to the opinion that these words were not originally in the text.<\/P><\/p>\n Korah<\/B> is not mentioned among the sons of Eliphaz, and therefore is thought to be his grandson. There is another Korah, Gen 36:14<\/span>,18<\/span>. <\/P><\/p>\n Duke Korah<\/strong>,…. Only among the sons of Eliphaz is reckoned Duke Korah, not before mentioned among his sons, and is left out in the Samaritan version; [See comments on Ge 36:7]<\/span>; to which it may be added, that according to Gerundinsis a, this is the same with Timna, related among the sons of Eliphaz, 1Ch 1:36<\/span>; who was called by his father Korah: or this might be a grandson of Eliphaz.<\/p>\n a Apud Menaasseh ut supra. (conciliator in Gen. Quaest. 57. p. 81.)<\/p>\n (16) <\/em>Duke Korah.<\/strong>The Samaritan Pentateuch rightly omits this name. He was a son of the Horite wife, Aholibamah.<\/p>\n On these verses I only remark, that the Hittites which also sprung from Esau, are here incorporated in the history. Gen 26:34<\/span> .<\/p>\n Duke Korah: As it is certain from Gen 36:4, that Eliphaz was Esau’s son by Adah, and from Gen 36:11, and Gen 36:12, that Eliphaz had but six sons, “Teman, Omar, Zepho, Gatam, Kenaz, and Amalek;” as is is also certain, from Gen 36:5, and Gen 36:14, that Korah was the son of Esau – not Eliphazby Aholibamah; and as the words duke Korah are omitted by both the Samaritan text and version, Dr. Kennicott pronounces them to be an interpolation. <\/p>\n duke: Exo 15:15 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Gen 14:7 – Amalekites Gen 36:40 – dukes Exo 17:8 – General<\/p>\n Duke Korah, duke Gatam, [and] duke Amalek: these [are] the dukes [that came] of Eliphaz in the land of Edom; these [were] the sons of Adah. 16. duke Korah ] This name is out of place. It has come in from Gen 36:18. The other names in Gen 36:15-16 are drawn from Gen 36:11-12, while … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Genesis 36:16”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1065","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1065","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1065"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1065\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"