4<\/strong>. Dodai an Ahohite<\/em> ] Perhaps we should read (cp. 1Ch 11:12<\/span>), “Eleazar the son of Dodo, the Ahohite.”<\/p>\n of his course<\/em> was Mikloth also the ruler<\/em> ] The words are corrupt and are omitted in the LXX. Perhaps the original text said that Mikloth (a Benjamite, 1Ch 8:32<\/span>) was deputy-ruler over this course. Cp. 1Ch 27:6<\/span>.<\/p>\n in his course likewise<\/em> ] R.V. and in his course<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Dodai The words Eleazar, son of, have probably fallen out before Dodai (or Dodo). According to Jewish tradition, EIeazar 1Ch 11:12<\/span> was cousin to David; his father, Dodai, being Jesses brother. Mikloth was probably second in command to Eleazar.<\/P> <\/p>\n Of his course was Mikloth the ruler; <\/B>who was either, <\/P> 1. The captain of this course after the death of this Dodai, as Zebadiah was after Asahel, 1Ch 27:7<\/span>. But the differing phrase there and here sufficiently intimates that the same thing is not meant in both places. Or, <\/P> 2. His lieutenant or deputy, in case of his necessary absence. But why should such a one be named here, and not in the rest of the courses? Or rather, <\/P> 3. One of the officers of his course, who seems here particularly to be named as a person then of great note and eminency. <\/P> <\/p>\n 4. second month was Dodai<\/B>or,”Dodo.” Here the text seems to require the supplement of”Eleazar the son of Dodo” (2Sa23:9<\/span>).<\/P><\/p>\n [See comments on 1Ch 27:2]<\/span><\/p>\n (4) Dodai an Ahohite.<\/strong>The Ahohite.<\/em> 1Ch. 11:11<\/span> proves that the right reading is Eliezer son of Dodai the Ahohite.<\/em><\/p>\n And of his course was Mikloth also the ruler.<\/strong>Literally, and his course, and Mikloth the prince<\/em> (ngd<\/em>);<\/em> which appears meaningless. Perhaps the and before Mikloth is spurious. (Comp. end of 1Ch. 27:6<\/span>.) The sense may then be that this division included Mikloth the prince, an unknown personage; or that Mikloth was the chief man in the division. (See 1Ch. 8:32<\/span>; 1Ch. 9:37<\/span>, where Mikloth is a Benjamite name.) The LXX. and Vulg. agree with Authorised Version; the Syriac and Arabic are wanting in this chapter.<\/p>\n Dodai = Dodo (2Sa 23:9). See note on 1Ch 25:11. <\/p>\n ruler = divisional officer. <\/p>\n second month <\/p>\n i.e. May. <\/p>\n Dodai: 1Ch 11:12, 2Sa 23:9, Dodo <\/p>\n Reciprocal: 2Sa 24:15 – the Lord<\/p>\n 1Ch 27:4. And Mikloth also was the ruler Either, 1st, The captain of this course after the death of this Dodai, as Zebadiah was after Asahel, 1Ch 27:7. Or, 2d, His lieutenant, or deputy, in case of his necessary absence. Or, rather, 3d, One of the officers of his course; who seems here to be particularly named, as a person then of great note and eminence.<\/p>\n 27:4 And over the course of the second month [was] Dodai an Ahohite, and of his course [was] Mikloth also the {b} ruler: in his course likewise [were] twenty and four thousand.<\/p>\n (b) That is, Dodais lieutenant.<\/p>\n And over the course of the second month [was] Dodai an Ahohite, and of his course [was] Mikloth also the ruler: in his course likewise [were] twenty and four thousand. 4. Dodai an Ahohite ] Perhaps we should read (cp. 1Ch 11:12), “Eleazar the son of Dodo, the Ahohite.” of his course was Mikloth also … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Chronicles 27:4”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11125"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11125\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"