{"id":11207,"date":"2022-09-24T03:55:53","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T08:55:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-chronicles-11\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T03:55:53","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T08:55:53","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-chronicles-11","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-chronicles-11\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Chronicles 1:1"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and the LORD his God [was] with him, and magnified him exceedingly. <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> Ch. <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1-6<\/span> (cp. <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:4<\/span>). Solomon&rsquo;s great Sacrifice at Gibeon<\/p>\n<p> 1. <em> was strengthened<\/em> ] or, <em> strengthened himself<\/em>, a favourite expression of the Chronicler; cp. <span class='bible'>2Ch 12:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 13:21<\/span> ( <em> waxed mighty<\/em>); 2Ch 17:1 ; <span class='bible'>2Ch 23:1<\/span>, etc.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1-12<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The splendid beginning<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>Solomons succession to the throne was providentially secured: The Lord his God was with him.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>Solomons claims to the throne were sanctioned by a representative assembly.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>Solomons accession to the throne was signalisd by solemn acts of worship.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>In obedience to Divine law.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>In appropriate magnificence.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>IV. <\/strong>Solomons accession to the throne was in a spirit of devout supplication. When Victoria learned that she was about to become Queen of England, her first words to the Archbishop of Canterbury were, I beg your grace to pray for me. Together they knelt, and the new reign began with prayer.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>V. <\/strong>Solomons accession to the throne was unequalled in splendour (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:12<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Outward splendour: Riches and wealth and honour.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Moral splendour: Wisdom and knowledge. (<em>James Wolfendale<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P ALIGN=\"CENTER\"><B>THE SECOND BOOK OF THE CHRONICLES<\/B><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\"> <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\"> <I>Chronological Notes relative to this Book<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\"> <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Year from the Creation, according to the English Bible, 2989.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Year before the Incarnation, 1015.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Year before the first Olympiad, 239.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Year before the building of Rome, according to Varro, 262.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Year of the Julian period, 3699.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Year of the Dionysian period, 507.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Cycle of the Sun, 3.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Cycle of the Moon, 13.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Year of Acastus, the second perpetual archon of the Athenians, 31.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Pyritiades was king over the Assyrians about this time, according to Scaliger and others. He was the <I>thirty-seventh<\/I> monarch, including Belus, according to Africanus; and the <I>thirty-third<\/I> according to Eusebius.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Year of Alba Sylvius, the sixth king of the Latins, 15.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  -Year of Solomon, king of the Hebrews, 1.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\"> <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\"> CHAPTER I<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\"> <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>Solomon, and the chiefs of the congregation, go to Gibeon,<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>where was the tabernacle of the Lord, and the brazen altar;<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>and there he offers a<\/I> thousand <I>sacrifices<\/I>, 1-6.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>The Lord appears to him in a dream, and gives him permission<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>to ask any gift<\/I>, 7.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>He asks wisdom<\/I>, 8-10,<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>which is granted; and riches, wealth, and honour besides<\/I>,<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   11, 12.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>His kingdom is established<\/I>, 13.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>His chariots, horsemen, and horses<\/I>, 14.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>His abundant riches<\/I>, 15.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>He brings horses, linen yarn, and chariots, at a fixed price,<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>out of Egypt<\/I>, 16, 17. <\/P> <P>                     NOTES ON CHAP. I<\/P> <P> <\/P> <P> Verse <span class='bible'>1<\/span>. <I><B>And Solomon the son of David<\/B><\/I>] The very beginning of this book shows that it is a <I>continuation<\/I> of the preceding, and should not be thus formally separated from it. See the <I>preface<\/I> to the first book. (Above)<\/P> <P> <\/P> <P> <I><B>The Lord his God<\/B><\/I><B> was <\/B><I><B>with him<\/B><\/I>] &#8220;The WORD of the Lord was his support.&#8221; &#8211; <I>Targum<\/I>.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>Was strengthened, <\/B>or <I>established<\/I>, after his seditious brother Adonijah and his partisans were suppressed; and he was received with the universal consent and joy of his princes and people. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom<\/strong>,&#8230;. Well settled and established on the throne of his father, after the death of some persons, from whom he might expect trouble, see <span class='bible'>1Ki 2:46<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>and the Lord God was with him<\/strong>; directing and instructing him, prospering and succeeding him: the Targum is,<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;the Word of the Lord was his help:&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> and magnified him exceedingly; see <span class='bible'>1Ch 29:25<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1-6<\/span> <\/p>\n<p><\/strong> The sacrifice at Gibeon, and the theophany. &#8211; <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1-6<\/span>. When Solomon had established himself upon his throne, he went with the princes and representatives of the congregation of Israel to Gibeon, to seek for the divine blessing upon his reign by a solemn sacrifice to be offered there before the tabernacle. <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1<\/span> forms, as it were, the superscription of the account of Solomon&#8217;s reign which follows. In   = Solomon established himself in his kingdom, i.e., he became strong and mighty in his kingdom, the older commentators saw a reference to the defeat of Adonijah, the pretender to the crown, and his followers (1 Kings 2). But this view of the words is too narrow; we find the same remark made of other kings whose succession to the throne had not been questioned (cf. <span class='bible'>2Ch 12:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 13:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 17:1<\/span>, and <span class='bible'>2Ch 21:4<\/span>), and the remark refers to the whole reign-to all that Solomon undertook in order to establish a firm dominion, not merely to his entry upon it. With this view of the words, the second clause, &ldquo;his God was with him, and made him very great,&rdquo; coincides. God gave His blessing to all that Solomon did for this end. With the last words cf. <span class='bible'>1Ch 29:25<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p> We have an account of the sacrifice at Gibeon (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:7-13<\/span>) in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:4-15<\/span> also. The two narratives agree in all the main points, but, in so far as their form is concerned, it is at once discernible that they are two independent descriptions of the same thing, but derived from the same sources. In 1 Kings 3 the theophany-in our text, on the contrary, that aspect of the sacrifice which connected it with the public worship-is more circumstantially narrated. While in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:4<\/span> it is briefly said the king went to Gibeon to sacrifice there, our historian records that Solomon summoned the princes and representatives of the people to this solemn act, and accompanied by them went to Gibeon. This sacrifice was no mere private sacrifice-it was the religious consecration of the opening of his reign, at which the estates of the kingdom were present as a matter of course. &ldquo;All Israel&rdquo; is defined by &ldquo;the princes over the thousands &#8230;, the judges, and all the honourable;&rdquo; then  is again taken up and explained by the apposition   : to all Israel, viz., the heads of the fathers&#8217;-houses.  is to be repeated before  . What Solomon said to all Israel through its representatives, is not communicated; but it may be gathered from what succeeds, that he summoned them to accompany him to Gibeon to offer the sacrifice. The reason why he offered his sacrifice at the  , i.e., place of sacrifice, is given in <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:3<\/span>. There the Mosaic tabernacle stood, yet without the ark, which David had caused to be brought up from Kirjath-jearim to Jerusalem (<span class='bible'>1Ch 13:1-14<\/span> and 15). In   the article in ba represents the relative  =  or     ; cf. <span class='bible'>Jdg 5:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rth 1:16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 21:19<\/span>; see on <span class='bible'>1Ch 26:28<\/span>. Although the ark was separated from the tabernacle, yet by the latter at Gibeon was the Mosaic altar of burnt-offering, and on that account the sanctuary at Gibeon was Jahve&#8217;s dwelling, and the legal place of worship for burnt-offerings of national-theocratic import. &ldquo;As our historian here brings forward emphatically the fact that Solomon offered his burnt-offering at the legal place of worship, so he points out in <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:28-30<\/span>:1, how David was only brought by extraordinary events, and special signs from God, to sacrifice on the altar of burnt-offering erected by him on the threshing-floor of Ornan, and also states how he was prevented from offering his burnt-offering in Gibeon&rdquo; (Berth.). As to Bezaleel, the maker of the brazen altar, cf. <span class='bible'>Exo 31:2<\/span> and <span class='bible'>Exo 37:1<\/span>. Instead of  , which most manuscripts and many editions have before  , and which the Targ. and Syr. also express, there is found in most editions of the 16th century, and also in manuscripts,  , which the lxx and Vulgate also read. The reading  is unquestionably better and more correct, and the Masoretic pointing  , <em> posuit <\/em>, has arisen by an undue assimilation of it to <span class='bible'>Exo 40:29<\/span>. The suffix in  does not refer to the altar, but to the preceding word  ; cf.   , <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:30<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 15:13<\/span>, etc.<\/p>\n<p> <strong> <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:7-10<\/span> <\/p>\n<p><\/strong> The theophany, cf. <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:5-15<\/span>. In that night, i.e., on the night succeeding the day of the sacrifice. The appearance of God by night points to a dream, and in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:5-15<\/span> we are expressly informed that He appeared in a vision. Solomon&#8217;s address to God, <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:8-10<\/span>, is in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:6-10<\/span> given more at length. The mode of expression brings to mind <span class='bible'>1Ch 17:23<\/span>, and recurs in <span class='bible'>2Ch 6:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 8:26<\/span>.  , with Pathach in the second syllable, elsewhere  (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:11<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:12<\/span>), occurs elsewhere only in <span class='bible'>Dan 1:4<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Dan 1:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Ecc 10:20<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p> <strong> <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:11-13<\/span> <\/p>\n<p><\/strong> The divine promise. Here  is strengthened by the addition  , treasures (<span class='bible'>Jos 22:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Ecc 5:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Ecc 6:2<\/span>).   , <em> ut judicare possis <\/em>. In general, the mode of expression is briefer than in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:11-13<\/span>, and the conditional promise, &ldquo;long life&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>1Ki 3:14<\/span>), is omitted, because Solomon did not fulfil the condition, and the promise was not fulfilled. In <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:13<\/span>  is unintelligible, and has probably come into our text only by a backward glance at <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:3<\/span>, instead of  , which the contents demand, and as the lxx and Vulgate have rightly translated it. The addition, &ldquo;from before the tabernacle,&rdquo; which seems superfluous after the preceding &ldquo;from the Bamah at Gibeon,&rdquo; is inserted in order again to point to the place of sacrifice at Gibeon, and to the legal validity of the sacrifices offered there (Berth.). According to <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:15<\/span>, Solomon, on his return to Jerusalem, offered before the ark still other burnt-offerings and thank-offerings, and prepared a meal for his servants. This is omitted by the author of the Chronicle, because these sacrifices had no ultimate import for Solomon&#8217;s reign, and not, as Then, supposes, because in his view only the sacrifices offered on the ancient brazen altar of burnt-offering belonging to the temple had legal validity. For he narrates at length in <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:18<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:26<\/span>. how God Himself directed David to sacrifice in Jerusalem, and how the sacrifice offered there was graciously accepted by fire from heaven, and the threshing-floor of Araunah thereby consecrated as a place of sacrifice; and it is only with the purpose of explaining to his readers why Solomon offered the solemn burnt-offering in Gibeon, and not, as we should have expected from 1 Chron 21, in Jerusalem, that he is so circumstantial in his statements as to the tabernacle. The last clause of <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:13<\/span>, &ldquo;and he was king over Israel,&rdquo; does not belong to the section treating of the sacrifice at Gibeon, but corresponds to the remark in <span class='bible'>1Ki 4:1<\/span>, and forms the transition to what follows.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Keil &amp; Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">God&#8217;s Goodness to Solomon.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"RIGHT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in\"> <SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">B. C.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"> 1015.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR>  <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1 And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and the <B>LORD<\/B> his God <I>was<\/I> with him, and magnified him exceedingly. &nbsp; 2 Then Solomon spake unto all Israel, to the captains of thousands and of hundreds, and to the judges, and to every governor in all Israel, the chief of the fathers. &nbsp; 3 So Solomon, and all the congregation with him, went to the high place that <I>was<\/I> at Gibeon; for there was the tabernacle of the congregation of God, which Moses the servant of the <B>LORD<\/B> had made in the wilderness. &nbsp; 4 But the ark of God had David brought up from Kirjath-jearim to <I>the place which<\/I> David had prepared for it: for he had pitched a tent for it at Jerusalem. &nbsp; 5 Moreover the brasen altar, that Bezaleel the son of Uri, the son of Hur, had made, he put before the tabernacle of the <B>LORD<\/B>: and Solomon and the congregation sought unto it. &nbsp; 6 And Solomon went up thither to the brasen altar before the <B>LORD<\/B>, which <I>was<\/I> at the tabernacle of the congregation, and offered a thousand burnt offerings upon it. &nbsp; 7 In that night did God appear unto Solomon, and said unto him, Ask what I shall give thee. &nbsp; 8 And Solomon said unto God, Thou hast shewed great mercy unto David my father, and hast made me to reign in his stead. &nbsp; 9 Now, O <B>LORD<\/B> God, let thy promise unto David my father be established: for thou hast made me king over a people like the dust of the earth in multitude. &nbsp; 10 Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people: for who can judge this thy people, <I>that is so<\/I> great? &nbsp; 11 And God said to Solomon, Because this was in thine heart, and thou hast not asked riches, wealth, or honour, nor the life of thine enemies, neither yet hast asked long life; but hast asked wisdom and knowledge for thyself, that thou mayest judge my people, over whom I have made thee king: &nbsp; 12 Wisdom and knowledge <I>is<\/I> granted unto thee; and I will give thee riches, and wealth, and honour, such as none of the kings have had that <I>have been<\/I> before thee, neither shall there any after thee have the like.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Here is, I. Solomon&#8217;s great prosperity, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 1<\/span>. Though he had a contested title, yet, God being with him, he was <I>strengthened in his kingdom;<\/I> his heart and hands were strengthened, and his interest in the people. God&#8217;s presence will be our strength.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. His great piety and devotion. His father was a prophet, a psalmist, and kept mostly to the ark; but Solomon, having read much in his Bible concerning the tabernacle which Moses built and the altars there, paid more respect to them than, it should seem, David had done. Both did well, and let neither be censured. If the zeal of one be carried out most to one instance of religion, and of another to some other instance, let them not judge nor despise each other.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1. All his great men must thus far be good men that they must join with him in worshipping God. He spoke to the captains and judges, the governors and chief of the fathers, to go with him to Gibeon, <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:3<\/span>. Authority and interest are well bestowed on those that will thus use them for the glory of God, and the promoting of religion. It is our duty to engage all with whom we have influence in the solemnities of religion, and it is very desirable to have many join with us in those solemnities&#8211;the more the better; it is the more like heaven. Solomon began his reign with this public pious visit to God&#8217;s altar, and it was a very good omen. Magistrates are then likely to do well for themselves and their people when they thus take God along with them at their setting out.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2. He offered abundance of sacrifices to God there (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 6<\/span>): 1000 <I>burnt-offerings,<\/I> and perhaps a greater number of peace-offerings, on which he and his company <I>feasted before the Lord.<\/I> Where God sows plentifully he expects to reap accordingly. His father David had left him flocks and herds in abundance (<span class='bible'>1Ch 27:29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 27:31<\/span>), and thus he gave God his dues out of them. The ark was at Jerusalem (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 4<\/span>), but the altar was at Gibeon (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 5<\/span>), and thither he brought his sacrifices; for <I>it is the altar that sanctifieth every gift.<\/I><\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3. He prayed a good prayer to God: this, with the answer to it, we had before, <span class='bible'>1 Kings iii. 5<\/span>, c. (1.) God bade him ask what he would not only that he might put him in the right way of obtaining the favours that were intended him (<I>Ask, and you shall receive, that your joy may be full<\/I>), but that he might try him, how he stood affected, and might discover what was in his heart. Men&#8217;s characters appear in their choices and desires. What wouldst thou <I>have?<\/I> tries a man as much as, What wouldst thou <I>do?<\/I> Thus God tried whether Solomon was one of the <I>children of this world,<\/I> that say, <I>Who will show us any good,<\/I> or of the children of light, that say, <I>Lord, lift up the light of thy countenance upon us.<\/I> As we choose we shall have, and that is likely to be our portion to which we give the preference, whether the wealth and pleasure of this world or spiritual riches or delights. (2.) Like a genuine son of David, he chose spiritual blessings rather than temporal. His petition here is, <I>Give me wisdom and knowledge.<\/I> He owns those to be desirable gifts, and God to be the giver of them, <span class='bible'>Prov. ii. 6<\/span>. God gave the faculty of understanding, and to him we must apply for the furniture of it. Two things are here pleaded which we had not in Kings:&#8211; [1.] <I>Thou hast made me reign in my father&#8217;s stead,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 8<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. &#8220;Lord, thou hast put me into this place, and therefore I can in faith ask of thee grace to enable me to do the duty of it.&#8221; What service we have reason to believe God calls us to we have reason to hope he will qualify us for. But that is not all. &#8220;Lord, thou hast put me into this place in the stead of David, the great and good man that filled it up so well; therefore give me wisdom, that Israel may not suffer damage by the change. Must I reign in my father&#8217;s stead? Lord, give me my father&#8217;s spirit.&#8221; Note, The eminency of those that went before us, and the obligation that lies upon us to keep up and carry on the good work they were engaged in, should provoke us to a gracious emulation, and quicken our prayers to God for wisdom and grace, that we may do the work of God in our day as faithfully and well as they did in theirs. [2.] <I>Let thy promise to David my father be established,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 9<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. He means the promise of concerning his successor. &#8220;In performance of that promise, <I>Lord, give me wisdom.<\/I>&#8221; We do not find that wisdom was any of the things promised, but it was necessary in order to the accomplishment of what was promised, <span class='bible'>2 Sam. vii. 13-15<\/span>. The promise was, <I>He shall build a house for my name, I will establish his throne, he shall be my son,<\/I> and <I>my mercy shall not depart from him.<\/I> &#8220;Now, Lord, unless thou give me wisdom, thy house will not be built, nor my throne established; I shall behave in a manner unbecoming my relation to thee as a Father, shall forfeit thy mercy, and fool it away; therefore, <I>Lord, give me wisdom.<\/I>&#8221; Note, <I>First,<\/I> God&#8217;s promises are our best pleas in prayer. <I>Remember thy word unto thy servant. Secondly,<\/I> Children may take the comfort of the promises of that covenant which their parents, in their baptism, laid claim to, and took hold of, for them. <I>Thirdly,<\/I> The best way to obtain the benefit of the promises and privileges of the covenant is to be earnest in prayer with God for wisdom and grace to do the duties of it.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4. He received a gracious answer to this prayer, <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:12<\/span>. (1.) God gave him the wisdom that he asked for because he asked for it. Wisdom is a gift that God gives as freely and liberally as any gift to those that value it, and wrestle for it; and will resolve to make use of it; and he upbraids not the poor petitioners with their folly, <span class='bible'>James i. 5<\/span>. God&#8217;s grace shall never be wanting to those who sincerely desire to know and do their duty. (2.) God gave him the wealth and honour which he did not ask for because he asked not for them. Those that pursue present things most earnestly are most likely to miss of them; while those that refer themselves to the providence of God, if they have not the most of those things, have the most comfort in them. Those that make this world their end come short of the other and are disappointed in this too; but those that make the other world their end shall not only obtain that, and full satisfaction in it, but shall enjoy as much as is convenient of this world in their way.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Introduction to First and Second Chronicles<\/p>\n<p>In the Hebrew original these two books were one book, but were divided in the Septuagint, or Greek version of the Old Testament. Their title in the Septuagint was Paralipomena, which means &#8220;things omitted, or left out,&#8221; evidently with reference to the Books of Samuel and Kings. However, this is not an accurate title, for much of the material in the Books of Chronicles is almost identically parallel to that in the other historical accounts of the kings. But they do also contain many things not related in Samuel and Kings, and in that sense are supplementary to those books. For that reason, and for the sake of chronological arrangement, most of the material of these books has been considered in this commentary in parallel with the accounts of Samuel and Kings.<\/p>\n<p>Chronicles begins with an extensive listing of genealogy, beginning with Adam and coming up approximately to the end of the exile. There is, then, a brief account of the death of Saul, the first king of Israel, in battle. The crowning of David follows, and the account proceeds with a history of the united kingdom to the death of Solomon. With the accession of Rehoboam, following the death of his father Solomon, very little is related of the history of the northern tribes, the account being devoted almost entirely to the chronicles of the Kingdom of Judah to its fall to the Chaldeans.<\/p>\n<p>Conservative opinion holds with the Jewish tradition that the scribe Ezra is the human author of the Chronicles, though some believe they may have been written as late as 250 B. C. Evidence in favor of Ezra&#8217;s authorship, after the exile, is preponderant, thus dating them about 400 B. C. The books have a decidedly priestly slant, for Ezra was a priest, and one purpose of their writing appears to be to show the preservation of the priestly line from Aaron and the kingly line from David. The author made considerable use of other sources, such as the books of the prophets: Nathan, Gad, Iddo, Abijah, Isaiah, and others. Of course these were not inspired writings, and the Holy Spirit guided the hand of the scribe of Chronicles in making a divinely accurate account from these. Differences between numbers and such, in comparison of Chronicles to the accounts of Samuel and Kings, are not of the original inspired account, but got into the present versions by scribal error.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong>THE SECOND BOOK OF CHRONICLES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>IN discussing the First Book of Chronicles we called attention to the fact that according to Usshers chronology, the two Books, not reckoning the table of genealogy, covered a space of 468 years of history; the First Book only 41 of these, and this second, 427. As to the authorship of these Books, Ezra is commonly accepted.<\/p>\n<p>The analysis of any book is largely the presentation of a personal view. One man divides this Second Book of Chronicles into two portions: The Reign of Solomon, chapters 1 to 9, and The Kings of Judah, chapters 10 to 36.<\/p>\n<p>Scofield in his reference Bible, says of this Book: It falls into eighteen divisions, by reigns, from Solomon to the captivities; records the division of the kingdom of David under Jeroboam and Rehoboam, and is marked by an ever growing apostasy, broken temporarily by reformations under Asa, Jehoshaphat, Joash, Hezekiah, and Josiah.<\/p>\n<p>It is our purpose to follow neither of these divisions, however natural they may be, but to discuss the volume under three heads: Solomon and the Temple; Rehoboam and the Division, and the History of Judah.<\/p>\n<p><span><\/span><strong>SOLOMON AND THE TEMPLE<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Book opens with a declaration concerning the new king, <em>And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and the Lord his God was with him, and magnified him exceedingly (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 1:1<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The history that follows gives occasion to say several things concerning this marvelous man of immortal reputation:<\/p>\n<p>First, <strong>Solomons kingship enjoyed an auspicious beginning. <\/strong>The man who ascends the throne under the favor of the Lord necessarily begins a reign of promise. If, as in Solomons case, he sensibly recognizes his responsibility and seeks wisdom from the only sufficient source, he adds greater certainty to his success. When, in addition to this, his objectives are high and God-honoring, the glory of his kingdom advances accordingly. Certainly, Solomons preparation to build the temple was not only a noble objective, but one in line with his kingly fathers purpose and prayers, and the great Heavenly Fathers will for him.<\/p>\n<p>The interesting history here of gathering materials and appointing men for this marvelous construction is made more interesting still by the kings personal supervision and spiritual interest. It takes some courage to conduct war, and we believe it takes almost more courage and even a clearer sense of God, to build sanctuaries, make their appointments according to the Divine pleasure, and call the people to worship within the spacious rooms of the same. Yet, when you have read but five chapters of this Book, you find such a work complete, and are not in the least amazed or even surprised to read, <em>The glory of the Lord had filled the house of God (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 5:14<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>It is doubtful whether any company of men have done more for the establishment of spirituality in the earth and for the strengthening of the souls of their fellows, than have those who brought sanctuaries into existence and led congregations of people to a genuine worship of the most high God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The on-going of this Book reveals Solomons conscious dependence. <\/strong>When the altar was erected he stood by it with outstretched hands <em>(<span class='bible'>2Ch 6:12<\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em> That is the attitude of prayer and possibly of adoration. When his lips parted to speak, he says,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>O Lord God of Israel, there is no God tike Thee in the heaven, nor in the earth; which keepest covenant, and shewest mercy unto Thy servants that walk before Thee with all their hearts:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Thou which hast kept with Thy servant David my father that which Thou hast promised him; and spakest with Thy mouth, and hast fulfilled it with Thine hand, as it is this day.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Now therefore, O Lord God of Israel, keep with Thy servant David my father that which Thou hast promised him, saying, There shall not fail thee a man in My sight to sit upon the throne of Israel; yet so that thy children take heed to their way to walk in My Law, as Thou hast walked before Me (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 6:14-16<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Now then, O Lord God of Israel, let Thy Word be verified, which Thou hast spoken unto Thy servant David (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 6:17<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Then follows an appeal that Gods eyes should be open upon their house day and night; that His ears should hearken to the prayers made in that place, and if sin were committed, that forgiveness should be granted, and if the people fail before the face of the enemy because of sin that they also should be pardoned; that if heaven be shut up on the same ground, upon repentance the dearth should end.<\/p>\n<p>Then he concludes in a more personal petition to Him:<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Then what prayer or what supplication soever shall be made of any man, or of all Thy people Israel, when every one shall know his own sore and his own grief, and shall spread forth his hands in this house:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Then hear Thou from Heaven Thy dwelling place, and forgive (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 6:29-30<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>These are only samples of the long petition that followed the dedicatory sermon. They wind up with a sentence like this: <em>O Lord God, turn not away the face of Thine anointed: remember the mercies of David Thy servant (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 6:42<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em> It is a model prayer; it is the petition of a sincere soul; it is the cry of one who knows that the mercy and love of God are the only grounds of hope.<\/p>\n<p>The further text records <strong>Solomons fame and death. <\/strong>That fame was based upon Solomons wisdom, accentuated doubtless by the magnificence of the temple, but made more honorable still in the extent of his organization, the luxury of his court and the wealth of his treasury.<\/p>\n<p>Evidently, among the rulers of the earth, the queen of Sheba held conspicuous place, and when the fame of Solomon reached her, she came to prove him with her questions, and impress him with her own riches and glory. The difficult questions were satisfactorily answered, the temple was adequately shown, the table of the king groaned with its good meats, the apparel of the servants was profoundly impressive, and the queen said to the king,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>It was a true report which I heard in mine own land of thine acts, and of thy wisdom:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Howbeit I believed not their words, until I came, and mine eyes had seen it: and, behold, the one half of the greatness of thy wisdom was not told me: for thou exceedest the fame that I heard.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Happy are thy men, and happy are these thy servants, winch stand continually before thee, and hear thy wisdom.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Blessed be the Lord thy God, which delighted in thee to set thee on his throne, to be king for the Lord thy God (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 9:5-8<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The compliment to the king is followed with a statement of Solomons annual income, the magnificence of his throne, the rich appointments of the palace, the extensive commercial importance of his kingdom, and the willing tributes of the earths lesser lords.<\/p>\n<p>Then, as if the task of telling all was too great, we have this record,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Now the rest of the acts of Solomon, first and last, are they not written in the book of Nathan the Prophet, and in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in the visions of Iddo the seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel forty years.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And Solomon slept with his fathers, and he was buried in the city of David his father: and Rehoboam his son reigned in his stead (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 9:29-31<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>It is a surprising end, and yet strangely true to human history. How many men spend all their days in preparing to live, and when the preparation seems almost complete, proceed to die? The last enemy is no respecter of persons. His bow is drawn against the great as well as the humble, the rich as well as the poor, the wise as well as the ignorant. Death respects neither thrones nor kings; he holds the key to the palace room, and even to the throne room. Kings may command their humbler fellows, and even counsel their equals; but where death calls, they also obey.<\/p>\n<p><strong>REHOBOAM AND THE DIVISION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The emptying of a throne is forever fraught with perils. The eternal and pertinent question is this, Who shall come after the king? The tenth chapter answered that concerning the throne of Israel. The answer was an ill omen! <strong>Rehoboams tyrannical spirit split the kingdom. <\/strong>When Jeroboam and all Israel came to him, saying, <em>Thy father made our yoke grievous: now therefore ease thou somewhat the grievous servitude of thy father, and his heavy yoke that he put upon us, and we will serve thee (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 10:4<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>), <\/em>they delicately referred to the increased taxation to which the luxurious court and the personal orgies of Solomon had given rise. They thought, as people commonly do, that the new rule would prove the peoples friend. Their hope was in vain.<\/p>\n<p>The old men, former counselors of Solomon, advised kindness and compassion; but the young bloods, spoiled by their fellowship with royalty, counseled increased oppression; and under their influence he said,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>My father made your yoke heavy, but I will add thereto: my father chastised you with whips, but I will chastise you with scorpions (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 10:14<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>It was enough. The war was on; and that war has never ended until this day, for Israel and Judah are not yet one. A man who divides brethren and sets them to battle, little understands the infinite reach of his mischief. The father of Modernism in America, when he fell asleep at a comparatively early age, little dreamed that he had set influences to work that would divide every denomination on the continent, destroy the fellowship of men who loved one another as twins are commonly supposed to love, wreck schools and churches by the thousand, and start a war that may easily exceed the famous Hundred Year War of history.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Israel and Judahblood brothersbecame the bitterest of enemies. <\/strong>For some reason Second Chronicles pays little attention to Israel, but proceeds to trace Judahs history to the year of Cyrus, king of Persia, or through a period of almost a half millennium. The family feud occasionally projects itself into the record, but for the most part, Israel is forgotten, and the doings of Judah are recorded in detail.<\/p>\n<p>The explanation of this is found in the circumstance that Jeroboam rejected the worship of Jehovah <em>(<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 11:14-15<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em> When God is once put away, when Gods priest is disposed of, and His minister is heard no more, then degeneracy compels a declining record.<\/p>\n<p>Unitarianism three quarters of a century ago denied the Lord. Its history has amounted to little; and if it were recorded, it would simply prove, as the Jeroboam movement, a breeding place of apostasy; and yet this record regards not one apostasy only, but two.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The man of many favors may forget God.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>When Rehoboam had established the kingdom, and had strengthened himself, he forsook the Law of the Lord, and all Israel with him (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 12:1<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>What a sad commentary on the uncertainty and unstability of human nature! The explanation of Rehoboams failure has fitted thousands, yea millions of cases. <em>He did evil, because he prepared not his heart to seek the Lord (<span class='bible'><em>2Ch 12:14<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em> Of all disappointments, none exceed thisto begin well and end badly; to give promise and create disappointment; to be the subject of Divine favor, and become the slave of Gods adversary.<\/p>\n<p><strong>THE HISTORY OF JUDAH<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Chapters 11 to 36 contain the roster of kings. <strong>The<\/strong> <strong>fortunes of the country answer accurately and inevitably to the characters of their rulers.<\/strong> On the whole, the history is a down-grade. In that respect, it runs true to form. The doctrine of evolution may find an illustration in national life if it goes from the simple to the complex, but in so far as it contends for improvement, history fails to illustrate it. Degeneracy of nations has more often taken place than has social and moral progress.<\/p>\n<p>The foundations of Judah were laid under David; the kingdoms glory appeared under Solomon. From that moment until this, one word expresses Judahs coursedecline.<\/p>\n<p>Africa was once an advanced nation, now a heathen one; Italy once ruled the world, now she holds an inconspicuous place; Greece once represented the climax of physical and mental accomplishment, now she boasts neither. The reasons for decline are varied, but in Judah they were one the God who had made her great was too often forgotten, too willingly offended. When the nations neglect the source of their strength, weakness naturally ensues. Judahs strength was in the Lord, and when her kings forgot Him, despised His Word, entered into unholy alliances that were followed by the people, her fame declined, and her land fainted.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The mixed social condition manifested her sinfulness. <\/strong>We have a phrase, Like people, like priest. We can paraphrase that, Like princes, like people. The study of these kings results in no compliment to human nature. Some of them were utterly evil; most of them were a mixture of the good and bad; two or three of them were sound. Among the utterly evil ones, Jehoram, Ahaziah, Athaliah, Manasseh, Amon and Jehoiakin held first place. The ones that represent a mixture of good and bad were Jeroboam, Jehoshaphat, Joash, Amaziah, Uzziah, Jehoiakim; while the truly good consisted of Jotham, Hezekiah and Josiah. In all probability the reign of each of these good kings was profoundly affected and made spiritually fruitful by the ministry of Isaiah, the greatest preacher among Old Testament Prophets. It is perhaps a fact of history that no rulers have ever proven faithful to God without the stimulating and salutary influence of the Gospel ministry.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The judgments and mercies of Second Chronicles alike vindicate Jehovah.<\/strong> In this record wickedness does not go unpunished; and yet it is a marvelous revelation of Divine mercy.<\/p>\n<p>There is never the least sign of penitence on the part of the ruler and the people without an immediate and generous response from Jehovah.<\/p>\n<p>When Jehoshaphat declined in his loyalty and effected a sinful coalition with Ahab, judgment fell; but instantly upon his repentance, mercy was shown. Judgment is always and everywhere Gods strange work, the work in which He takes no pleasure. <em>As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked (<span class='bible'><em>Eze 33:11<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Mercy is His nature, His essential character, for <em>to the Lord our God belong mercies and forgiveness. He that covereth his sins shall not prosper; but whoso confesseth and forsaketh them shall have mercy (<span class='bible'><em>Pro 28:13<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><\/em><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Bible of the Expositor and the Evangelist by Riley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>CRITICAL NOTES.] The reign of Solomon is comprised in nine chapters of this book, corresponding to 1 Kings 1-11, and forms the third part of the whole work. This chapter contains the sacrifice at Gibeon, the vision and the wealth of Solomon.<\/p>\n<p><em><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:1-6<\/span><\/em>.<em>Solomons offering at Gibeon. Strengthened<\/em>, a favourite word (cf. <span class='bible'>2Ch. 12:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch. 13:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch. 21:4<\/span>), meaning established, firmly settled in government. <em>Magnified<\/em> (<span class='bible'>1Ch. 29:25<\/span>). <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:2<\/span>. <em>All Israel<\/em>, by their representatives. <em>Captains<\/em> (<span class='bible'>1Ch. 27:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch. 28:1<\/span>). <em>Judges<\/em> desirable on all occasions like this (<span class='bible'>1Ch. 23:4<\/span>). <em>Chief of fathers<\/em>. Heads of families still recognised, though having no special function (cf. <em>Speak. Com.<\/em>). <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:3<\/span>. <em>Gibeon<\/em>. Through inroads of Philistines, tabernacle removed from Shiloh to Nob (<span class='bible'>1Sa. 21:1<\/span>); after destruction of Nob by Saul to Gibeon (<span class='bible'>1Sa. 22:9<\/span>). <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:4<\/span>. <em>Ark<\/em> separated from tabernacle, consequently two centres of worship (<em>cf.<\/em> account in 1 Chronicles 13, 15). <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:5<\/span>. <em>Altar<\/em> (marg.) was there; this, therefore, the legitimate place of worship. <em>Sought<\/em>, <em>i.e.<\/em>, frequented it, in the habit of making use of it [<em>Speak. Com.<\/em>]. Some give sought Him, the Lord.<\/p>\n<p><em><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:7-12<\/span><\/em>.<em>Solomons vision at Gibeon. Night<\/em>, after sacrifice, through dream (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 3:5-15<\/span>). <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:8<\/span>. <em>Me to reign<\/em>. First case of son succeeding father. <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:9<\/span>. <em>Promise<\/em>, special, made to David, that his successor should be wise and able to judge. Though no express record, <span class='bible'>Psalms 72<\/span>, amounts to nearly the same; a Psalm undoubtedly Messianic, yet its primary subject is Solomon. May we not understand Solomon here as calling upon God to make good this prophecy, to establish this implied promise? [<em>Speak. Com.<\/em>] <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:10<\/span>. <em>Knowledge<\/em>, insight (<em>cf.<\/em> <span class='bible'>Dan. 1:4-17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Ecc. 10:20<\/span>). <em>Wisdom<\/em>, the power of applying knowledge rightly. <em>Go out<\/em>, do all parts of the kingly office; reminding of <span class='bible'>Deu. 31:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa. 18:13-16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki. 3:7<\/span>. <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:11-12<\/span>. Gods answer. Long life omitted here, given in <span class='bible'>1Ki. 3:14<\/span>, conditionally. <em>Riches and wealth<\/em>, stores of commodities ready for use.<\/p>\n<p><em><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:13-17<\/span><\/em>.<em>Solomons riches came<\/em> from the high place that was at Gibeon to Jerusalem [<em>Speak. Com.<\/em>]. <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:14-17<\/span>. This passage is very nearly identical with <span class='bible'>1Ki. 10:26-29<\/span>. The only difference of any importance is the addition here (<span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:15<\/span>) of the words and gold, which do not occur in <span class='bible'>1Ki. 10:27<\/span>. The touch thus added is characteristic of the writers of writer of Chronicles, who is more rhetorical and more bold in his use of <em>hyperbole<\/em> than the author of Kings [<em>Speak. Com.<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><em>HOMILETICS<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE SPLENDID BEGINNING.<em><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:1-12<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Solomon <em>magnified<\/em> in character, accession, and choice. Many princes have had good fathers, wise training, and great privileges, but lacked wisdom and turned out badly. Solomon crowned while David lived, surrounded by a loyal people and blessed by Divine Providence. His beginning wise, most promising and glorious. <\/p>\n<p><strong>I. Solomons accession to the throne was providentially secured.<\/strong> The Lord his God was with him. Chosen, he was enthroned, not deprived of the kingdom. Endangered by sedition, he was strengthened, established. The feast of conspirators broken up. Adonijah fled to the altar for refuge. Gods providence opened up the way, and Gods promise was fulfilled. In allusion to the rapid suppression of resistance, and to this signal entrance on his new reign, without rival or rebel, Solomon declares, As the Lord liveth, which hath <em>established<\/em> me and <em>set me<\/em> on the throne of David my father, &amp;c. <\/p>\n<p><strong>II. Solomons claims to the throne were sanctioned by a representative assembly.<\/strong> He was confirmed by recognition and allegiance of all the tribes in representatives. Captains, judges, and heads of families, princes, and peopleall received him. Those in authority should side with right and use their influence to promote true religion and Gods glory. Weakness in kings, selfishness in rulers, and disaffection in people, outrage liberty, destroy the peace, and endanger the throne of kingdoms<\/p>\n<p>Let not the world see fear and sad mistrust<br \/>Govern the motion of a kingly eye [<em>Shakes.<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. Solomons accession to the throne was signalised by solemn acts of worship.<\/strong> All the congregation with him, a vast concourse of dignitaries in solemn procession on its way up the hill to Gibeon, six miles north of Jerusalem, to offer royal sacrifices! <\/p>\n<p>1. <em>In obedience to divine law<\/em>. The brazen altar was there (<span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:6<\/span>); that is, the Gibeonite sanctuary was still the legal, the official and historically rightful place for burnt offerings. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>In appropriate magnificence<\/em>. The holocaust became the rank and attests the splendour of the sovereign on this occasion. Sacrifices abundant. Zadok the officiating high priest (<span class='bible'>1Ch. 16:39<\/span>). The time-honoured altar prepared by the skill of Bezaleel in the wilderness (<span class='bible'>Exo. 38:1<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. Solomons accession to the throne was in a spirit of devout supplication.<\/strong> How many kings begin their reigns; how many youths in critical moments, turning-points in life, begin their course altogether differently! Alas! many gain distinctions, enter life fully equipped, for awhile out-distance others; but with the turn of fortune fall behind and end in ruin. Solomon remembered the position of his predecessor, his own youth and weakness, the responsibility under which he was placed, and made request for gifts and grace to help him. When Victoria learned that she was about to become Queen of England, her first words to the Archbishop of Canterbury were, I beg your Grace to pray for me. Together they knelt, and the new reign began with prayer. <\/p>\n<p><strong>V. Solomons accession to the throne was unequalled in splendour.<\/strong> None before him, nor after him, had the like (<span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:12<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Outward splendour<\/em>. Riches and wealth and honour. Good in themselves and good as a means of usefulness. The good which the world seeks; but this honour decays. All worldly greatness is fleeting in character and worthless at last. We brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Moral splendour<\/em>. Wisdom and knowledge higher than material wealth. The riches of Crsus would not add a fraction of value to a man. The gold is but the guinea stamp. How much better is it to get wisdom than gold! and to get understanding rather to be chosen than silver. Better, for it enriches its possessor, creates higher enjoyments, invests with greater dignity, and is destined to longer existence. King Solomon exceeded all the kings of the earth for riches and for wisdom.<\/p>\n<p>SOLOMONS CHOICE.<em><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:7-12<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Probably at the close of festivities on Gibeon, when the mind of Solomon had been elevated, and his heart touched, that God appeared to him in a dream; gave him the option of everything good in the world. He felt intense desire, and offered earnest prayer for wisdom. Whether the dream was imaginary or not, the choice was made, and Gods grant of it real. Learn<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. That ability to discharge the duties of our calling is most desirable.<\/strong> Some time since a paper appeared in a popular <em>Review<\/em> under the title, What knowledge is of most worth? the object of which was to show the sufficiency of what is generally called <em>science<\/em> to guide in life. The universal reply is <em>science<\/em>. This is the verdict on all counts. But what is meant by science? If mere education without religion, knowledge without wisdom, we cannot agree with it. There is a difference between science and wisdom. Wisdom is the right use of knowledge. <em>Science<\/em> seeks truth for its own sake, <em>wisdom<\/em> for practical uses. Science exercises the intellect, wisdom affects the heart. A man cannot be wise and able to fulfil his mission who does not use what he knows. Wisdom is the principal thing, therefore get wisdom, to govern as kings in righteousness and judgment, to rule as masters in the fear of the Lord, to win souls as ministers, for he that winneth souls is wise. <\/p>\n<p><strong>II. That this ability can only Come from God.<\/strong> Solomons surroundings favourable, education good, friends numerous, and wealth enormous, but he lacked wisdom, and looked to God for it. True wisdom is needed as much to build up the Christian Church, to govern a kingdom and rule a house, as to rear the tabernacle. If there be capacity, culture and application may make a scholar, a philosopher, or an orator. But the wisdom which is profitable to direct is the wisdom from above. We must look to the source from whence Bezaleel and Aholiab gained their skill and ability (<span class='bible'>Exo. 35:30-35<\/span>). Give me wisdom and knowledge. <\/p>\n<p><strong>III. That where the desire for this ability is supreme, God will honour and bless it.<\/strong> I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 3:13<\/span>). Great pretension to wisdom often covers the want of it. Shallow streams make greatest noise. There must be<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Intense desire<\/em>. A feeling of deep want. This was in thine heart. Opinionated, self-sufficient men will never get it. A craving for its possession, growing out of sense of need, a cry of the soul, Where shall wisdom be found? <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Earnest search<\/em>. Mere want or desire not enough. There must be <em>effort<\/em>, honest, strenuous, and persevering. A search as for silver and gold. If thou seekest her as silver, and search for her as for hid treasures, &amp;c. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>There must be prayer<\/em>. Give me now wisdom and knowledge. God will honour our petitions when sincere; will give inferior when we ask for superior blessings. God gave the wisdom asked, and the wealth unasked. If we value and pray for understanding, God will do for us exceeding abundantly above all that we can ask or think. If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally and upbraideth not, and it shall be given him.<\/p>\n<p>THE BLESSEDNESS OF WISDOM.<em><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:10-12<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>I. It helps to govern life.<\/strong> Who can judge this thy people? <\/p>\n<p>1. <em>By giving insight<\/em>. Knowledge of men and things, understanding of the times in which we live, and their demands upon us. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>By imparting activity<\/em>. That I may go out and come in before this people. Public activity unceasing and unchecked. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>By teaching us to avoid evil and do good<\/em>. Discretion shall <em>preserve<\/em> thee, understanding shall <em>keep<\/em> thee. When thou <em>goest<\/em> thy steps shall not be <em>straitened<\/em> (freedom in the great highway of life); and when thou <em>runnest<\/em> thou shalt not <em>stumble<\/em> (safety in activity) (<span class='bible'>Pro. 4:12<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p><strong>II. It endows with best wealth.<\/strong> Wealth of soul. For the soul to be without knowledge it is not good. Wealth of the character. She shall give to thine head an ornament of grace; a crown of glory shall she deliver to thee. An ornament better than kings robes, a crown not of fading laurels or rusting metal. Adornments of holiness preparing for the crown of glory which fadeth not away. Character better than cash, the only wealth that will go into the other world, and determine condition there. Treasures of wickedness profit nothing, but righteousness delivereth from death. <\/p>\n<p><strong>III. It ensures permanent good.<\/strong> It is excellent in itself, described as the fear of the Lord, and the knowledge of God, blessing the intellect and the heart. In this life often brings riches, honour, length of days, and unequalled privileges. But these things may all end. Heavenly wisdom is supereminent, an eternal possession, a treasure we can lay up in heaven. It sets before us the way of life, and secures our salvation. Worldly good pertains to earth only; here is limitless blessing helping to escape the miseries of false choice, and giving endless possession of perfect bliss.<\/p>\n<p><em>HOMILETIC HINTS AND SUGGESTIONS<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:1<\/span>. <em>God with him<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>1. God is often against the kings of the earth. This seen in the disasters which he brings on their armies, &amp;c., and may be illustrated by the histories of many kings mentioned in the Bible. <br \/>2. God is with some kings for the punishment of others. The wicked are the sword of God. <br \/>3. God was with Solomon for the good of Israel; with him in answer to prayer. <br \/>4. God was not with Solomon unconditionally [<em>Bib. Museum<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:7<\/span>. <em>How to get rich<\/em>. Ask what I shall give thee, &amp;c. Observe, for the acquirement of the highest wealth that asking<\/p>\n<p>1. Is the simplest method. Only a word. <\/p>\n<p>2. Is the divinely appointed method (<span class='bible'>Mat. 7:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar. 14:38<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>3. Is the only method. Purchase is impossible. Deserts? We have none. <br \/>4. Is the certain method. It never has failed yet. <br \/>5. Is the abundantly enforced method. Enforced by the whole Bible, by the story of Gods acts, the promises and exhortations, the life and death of Jesus. <br \/>6. Has ever been the abundantly successful method [<em>R. A. Griffin<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:7-10<\/span>. <em>Solomons Choice<\/em>. I. The address which God made to Solomon when He said, Ask, &amp;c., He does in effect make to each of us, especially to the young. II. Though we need not the qualification which Solomon required for his kingly office, yet we all need spiritual wisdom and understanding, and may therefore imitate his example. III. God is pleased with those who make the choice and offer up the prayer of Solomon. Because<\/p>\n<p>1. It is the effect of His grace; <br \/>2. It indicates opinions and feelings similar to his own; <br \/>3. It indicates humility; <br \/>4. It shows a benevolent concern for his glory, and for the happiness of their fellow-creatures; <br \/>5. It actually tends to promote his glory. IV. All who make this choice and adopt this prayer shall certainly be favoured with a wise and understanding heart [<em>Dr. Payson<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><em>The Prayer for Wisdom<\/em>. I. Come and see a youth who at a critical moment is found in prayer. II. Come and see a kings son who prays exclusively for wisdom. III. Come and see a humble one who prays not in vain. IV. Come and see here a favoured one who receives much more than he asks for. V. Come and see an unhappy one who by his own fault has forfeited the blessings of his prayer [<em>Dr. J. Van Oosterzee<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p>To know<\/p>\n<p>That which before us lies in daily life<br \/>Is the prime wisdom [<em>Milton<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><em>HOMILETICS<\/em><\/p>\n<p>SOLOMONS WEALTH.<em><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:13-17<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>This passage refers to commerce with Egypt in exports and imports, and is like <span class='bible'>1Ki. 10:26-29<\/span>. The road from Egypt to Syria not always under the control of the Israelites. Solomon gained complete possession of the country and took the trade in horses between Egypt and northern nations into his own hands. <\/p>\n<p><strong>I. Wealth derived from trading speculations.<\/strong> In addition to large treasures collected and bequeathed by his father, Solomons wealth derived from commerce with other nations. His fleets brought gold and silver from Ophir and Tharshish, and made them plenteous as stones in Jerusalem. His chariots and chariot horses or chargers were of the best kind of Egyptian breed and highly valued. Kings of the Hittites and Syria welcomed Jerusalem as the opening of an emporium for trade. Inland cities founded for special markets, and lofty towers on the coast pointed to commerce with distant countries. <\/p>\n<p><strong>II. Wealth acquired in opposition to Gods commands.<\/strong> The King forbidden to multiply horses and gold under the Theocracy (<span class='bible'>Deu. 17:16-17<\/span>). He must trust in the Lord God, not in chariots and horses (<span class='bible'>Psa. 20:7<\/span>). Besides, in a hilly country like Judea, cavalry of no essential service; and going to Egypt might open up the way to idolatry and corruption again. But Solomon must equal other nations, hence his passion for horses, a prohibited luxury, led to risk and excess. Wealth gained unjustly is held insecurely. Better is the poor that walketh in his uprightness than he that is perverse in his ways though he be rich. <\/p>\n<p><strong>III. Wealth therefore risky in its possession.<\/strong> Prosperity of Solomon his great misfortune. Indulgence outran want. Abundant leisure to gratify desires. Prosperous enterprises, rank, riches, and power were his. His fame spread and raised to the pinnacle of glory among nations. But ambition mastered him. Wealth the first step downwards. His wisdom availed little and his end ruin. Sad that a beginning so promising should end in consequences so fearful. The smallest departure from rectitude may lead to grievous errors and fearful miseries. Neither wealth nor worldly wisdom can check a downward course. The prosperity of fools shall destroy them. In all time of our wealth, good Lord, deliver us.<\/p>\n<p>THE KINGS MERCHANTS.<em><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:16<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Linen yarn<\/em> means influx (<em>mikre<\/em>), and thence import (<em>mabo<\/em>), contrast of export (Sept. <span class='bible'>1Ki. 10:28<\/span>); in which case the verse would run thus: And the export of horses for Solomon was from Egypt; and the import which the kings merchants took was an import in pricethat is, in money. It was more convenient for Solomon to send cash than commodities in exchange for the chariots and horses [<em>Murphy<\/em>]. <\/p>\n<p><strong>I. The advantages of commerce.<\/strong> In softening manners and breaking down prejudices. In helping industry, promoting peace, and stimulating into Natures resources. <\/p>\n<p><strong>II. The blessings of the nation whose sovereign takes an interest in commerce.<\/strong> Kings may aid in developing commerce, reviving depressed industries, and in adopting enlightened policy. Our own country privileged. As soon as the commercial spirit acquires vigour, says Robertson, and begins to gain an ascendant in any society, we discern a new genius in its policy, its alliances, its wars, and its negotiations.<\/p>\n<p>ILLUSTRATIONS TO CHAPTER 1<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:6<\/span>. The national worship was still in the unsettled state in which it had been since the first entrance into Palestine. The people sacrificed in high places. The chief local sanctity still adhered to the spot where the Tabernacle of the congregation stood, on what was called the great high-place of Gibeon. Hither as on a solemn pilgrimage, with a vast concourse of dignitaries, the young King came to offer royal sacrifices on his accession. A thousand victims were consumed on the ancient altar. The night was spent within the sacred city of Gibeon. And now occurred one of those prophetic dreams which had already been the means of Divine communication in the time of Samuel. Thrice in Solomons lifeat the three epochs of his rise, of his climax, of his fallis such a warning recorded [<em>Dean Stanley<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:10<\/span>. <em>Wisdom<\/em> consists chiefly in three things<\/p>\n<p>1. Knowledge to discern. <\/p>\n<p>2. Skill to <span class='bible'>Judges 3<\/span>. Activity to prosecute [<em>T. Watson<\/em>]. He showed his wisdom by asking for wisdom. He became wise because he had set his heart upon it [<em>Stanley<\/em>]. <em>Who can?<\/em> Wisdom is preferred to riches, to long life, and to victory over enemiesthe common ambition of kings. Honourable to any man, but especially to one so young as Solomon; the dictate of early piety and of the purest patriotism; expressing the most profound humility in circumstances favourable to the growth of pride; so moderate and so modest; breathing sentiments of the deepest gratitude to God, and of entire devotion to the public welfare [<em>Dr. T. Guthrie<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p>Wisdom is ofttimes nearer when we stoop<br \/>Than when we soar [<em>Wordsworth<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:11<\/span>. <em>In thine heart<\/em>. Without a rich heart wealth is an ugly beggar [<em>Emerson<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:12<\/span>. <em>I will give<\/em>. God is a light that is never darkened, an unwearied life that cannot die, a fountain always flowing, a garden of life, a seminary of wisdom, a radical beginning of all goodness [<em>Quarles<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:14-17<\/span>. <em>Prosperity<\/em>. Many are not able to suffer and endure prosperity; it is like the light of the sun to a weak eyeglorious indeed in itself, but not proportioned to such an instrument [<em>Jeremy Taylor<\/em>].<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>LESSON FOURTEEN 14 <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I. THE HISTORY OF KING SOLOMON<br \/>(<span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:1<\/span> to <span class='bible'>2Ch. 9:31<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>SOLOMONS KINGDOM<br \/>THE TEMPLE AND ITS FURNISHINGS<br \/>1. SOLOMON AT GIBEON (II Chronicles, Chapter 1)<\/p>\n<p><strong>INTRODUCTION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Solomons choice of wisdom qualified him to be a very effective leader of Israel. He is faithful as he begins to carry out the work that his father, David had committed to him. The details of the Temple and the elaborate appointments for its adornment describe the beauty of this amazing building.<\/p>\n<p><strong>TEXT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:1<\/span>. And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and Jehovah his God was with him, and magnified him exceedingly. 2. And Solomon spake unto all Israel, to the captains of thousands and of hundreds, and to the judges, and to every prince in all Israel the heads of the fathers houses. 3. So Solomon, and all the assembly with him, went to the high place that was at Gibeon; for there was the tent of meeting of God, which Moses the servant of Jehovah had made in the wilderness. 4. But the ark of God had David brought up from Kiriath-jearim to the place that David had prepared for it; for he had pitched a tent for it at Jerusalem. 5. Moreover the brazen altar, that Bezalel the son of Uri, the son of Hur, had made, was there before the tabernacle of Jehovah: and Solomon and the assembly sought unto it. 6. And Solomon went up thither to the brazen altar before Jehovah, which was at the tent of meeting, and offered a thousand burnt-offerings upon it.<\/p>\n<p>7. In that night did God appear unto Solomon, and said unto him,Ask what I shall give thee. 8. A nd Solomon said unto God, Thou hast showed great lovingkindness unto David my father, and hast made me king in his stead. 9. Now, O Jehovah God, let thy promise unto David my father be established; for thou hast made me king over a people like the dust of the earth in multitude. 10. Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people; for who can judge this thy people, that is so great? 11. And God said to Solomon, Because this was in thy heart, and thou hast not asked riches, wealth, or honor, nor the life of them that hate thee, neither yet hast asked long life; but hast asked wisdom and knowledge for thyself, that thou mayest judge my people, over whom I have made thee king: 12. wisdom and knowlege is granted unto thee? and I will give thee riches, and wealth, and honor, such as none of the kings have had that have been before thee; neither shall there any after thee have the like. 13. So Solomon came from the high place that was at Gibeon, from before the tent of meeting, unto Jerusalem; and he reigned over Israel.<br \/>14. And Solomon gathered chariots and horsemen: for he had a thousand and four hundred chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen, that he placed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem. 15. And the king made silver and gold to be in Jerusalem as stones, and cedars made he to be as the sycamore-trees that are in the lowland, for abundance. 16. And the horses which Solomon had were brought out of Egypt; the kings merchants received them in droves, each drove at a price. 17. And they fetched up and brought out of Egypt a chariot for six hundred shekels of silver, and a horse for a hundred and fifty: and so for all the kings of the Hittites, and the kings of Syria, did they bring them out by their means.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PARAPHRASE<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:1<\/span>. King Davids son Solomon was now the undisputed ruler of Israel, for the Lord his God had made him a powerful monarch. 2, 3. He summoned all the army officers and judges to Gibeon as well as all the political and religious leaders of Israel. He led them up to the hill to the old Tabernacle constructed by Moses, the Lords assistant, while he was in the wilderness. 4. (There was a later Tabernacle in Jerusalem, built by King David for the Ark of God when he removed it from Kiriath-jearim.) 5, 6. The bronze altar made by Bezalel (son of Uri, son of Hur) still stood in front of the old Tabernacle, and now Solomon and those he had invited assembled themselves before it, as he sacrificed upon it 1,000 burnt offerings to the Lord.<\/p>\n<p>7. That night God appeared to Solomon and told him, Ask me for anything, and I will give it to you! 8. Solomon replied, O God, you have been so kind and good to my father David, and now you have given me the kingdom9. this is all I want! For you have fulfilled your promise to David my father and have made me king over a nation as full of people as the earth is full of dust! 10. Now give me wisdom and knowledge to rule them properly, for who is able to govern by himself such a great nation as this one of yours? 11. God replied, Because your greatest desire is to help your people, and you havent asked for personal wealth and honor, and you havent asked me to curse your enemies, and you havent asked for a long life, but for wisdom and knowledge to properly guide my people12. yes, I am giving you the wisdom and knowledge you asked for! And I am also giving you such riches, wealth, and honor as no other king has ever had before you! And there will never again be so great a king in all the world! 13. Solomon then left the Tabernacle, returned down the hill, and went back to Jerusalem to rule Israel.<br \/>14. He built up a huge force of 1,400 chariots and recruited 12,000 cavalry to guard the cities where the chariots were garaged, though some, of course, were stationed at Jerusalem near the king. 15. During Solomons reign, silver and gold were as plentiful in Jerusalem as rocks on the road! And expensive cedar lumber was used like common sycamore! 16. Solomon sent horse-traders to Egypt to purchase entire herds at wholesale prices. 17. At that time Egyptian chariots sold for $400 each and horses for $100, delivered at Jerusalem. Many of these were then resold to the kings of the Hittites and Syria.<\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENTARY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>First and second Chronicles were considered as one book in the Hebrew canon. II Chronicles, chapter 1 concerns itself with the reign of Solomon, a very proper sequel to I Chronicles, chapter 29. <span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:1<\/span> repeats <span class='bible'>1Ch. 29:25<\/span>. Jehovah magnified Solomon exceedingly. In the transfer of authority from David to Solomon, the young king had every advantage which would promise a highly successful reign. As the human leader, Solomon was in complete control of the kingdom. All of the captains, judges, and princes gave attention to the kings words. Solomon was about twenty years of age when he became king. The prospects for a great era in Israels history were exceptionally good. One of Solomons first official acts was to call a grand assembly of all Israel to meet in Gibeon in Benjamin about five miles north of Jerusalem. At some time prior to this assembly the tabernacle (tent of meeting) had been set up at Gibeon. Everything that pertained to the tabernacle was there at Gibeon except the ark of the covenant which was in Jerusalem.[47] That which seemed so very important at this time in connection with the tabernacle was the altar of burnt offering. Bezalel is named as the one who had constructed the altar. This had been done in Moses day at Mount Sinai (<span class='bible'>Exo. 31:1-11<\/span>). The high place at Gibeon became very sacred to Solomon. He offered a thousand burnt offerings upon the altar. In spite of all the preparations made for the Temple, Solomon did not begin to build the great building until the fourth year of his reign (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 6:1<\/span>). In this period Solomon was often at Gibeon worshiping Jehovah.<\/p>\n<p>[47] Spence, H. D. M., The Pulpit Commentary, II Chronicles, p. 5<\/p>\n<p>On one of these Occasions at Gibeon God appeared to Solomon in a very vivid visitation. Jehovah graciously offered to grant any request Solomon might make. Considering the circumstances and the timing of this proposition, it was a time of real testing for the new king. The promised establishment of the house of David (<span class='bible'>2 Samuel 7<\/span>) was a consideration of primary importance. Solomon was very appreciative of Jehovahs blessings and he humbly admitted that he had a most demanding position to fill in behalf of a people who were like the dust of the earth, a great multitude. Solomons request for wisdom and knowledge revealed his strength of character. Knowledge has to do with any kind of factual information which might come to a persons consciousness. Wisdom is the practical application of knowledge. One acts wisely when he searches for all the facts that pertain to a given subject and decides what to do and say on the basis of what he has learned. On another occasion Solomon said, the fear of Jehovah is the beginning of wisdom (<span class='bible'>Pro. 9:10<\/span>). In order to be able to use all of the resources at his command, the king knew that he had to be humble in his relationship with Jehovah. The king had to move among Gods people. His every word and deed would be tested by fire. No mere human being relying upon himself could succeed in this high office. Jehovah knew Solomons heart and He was pleased at the kings request.<\/p>\n<p>The young king had made his decision and Jehovah did not hesitate to answer. For one in such a place as that in which Solomon found himself the kinds of things he could have requested were without limit. Without regard for others, the king could have acted like the prodigal son in Jesus parable. He chose the best way when he asked for wisdom and knowledge for the peoples benefit. Jehovah was well pleased. When God gives a person the capacity to know, there is no limit to the dimensions of that consciousness. Is it possible that the wonderful intellectual sensitivity which was Adams before he sinned is now in large measure given to Solomon by Jehovahs decree? Solomon was to be wise, not by natural endowment, not by diligent study on his own part. Solomons wisdom was Jehovahs gift to this select person. These unique gifts would bless the king and his people as long as both kept faith with God. If the king and Israel should break covenant, the very life-line with Jehovah would be severed. Riches, wealth, and honor would be Solomons portion. Even in these matters as a wise king he would use the kingdoms wealth to benefit the citizens and he would find in his personal honor additional opportunity to be Jehovahs humble servant. No king ever enjoyed a more exciting and promising beginning of a reign. In the glow of the sacred experience at Gibeon Solomon climbed the road to Jerusalem and began his reign.<br \/>Solomon soon involved himself in establishing chariotry installations in strategic places in the kingdom. Considered from a military standpoint, the horses and chariots were useful, but probably not necessary. Israel was already strong militarily. Fourteen hundred chariots and twelve thousand horses imported into Israel would cause some concern in Egypt and other surrounding countries. Egypt became a famous market for horses and chariots. People who lived in Asia Minor and other people who lived in the regions of Syria traded with Egypt. Horses could be purchased more cheaply than chariots. These were days of great prosperity in Israel. Tribute flowed into Solomons treasury in great abundance. The proverbial expression, gold like stones and cedars like sycamore trees, in an exaggerated way described good days in Israel.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>(<em>a<\/em>) The sacrifice at Gibeon, and Solomons dream (<span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:1-13<\/span>). (<em>b<\/em>) The kings chariots and horsemen, wealth and commerce (<span class='bible'>2Ch. 1:14-17<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>(1) <strong>And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom.<\/strong>Or, <em>showed himself strong over his kingdom;<\/em> firmly grasped the reins of power, and showed himself a strong ruler. (Comp. <span class='bible'>2Ch. 17:1<\/span>; also <span class='bible'>2Ch. 12:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch. 13:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch. 21:4<\/span>.) The chronicler omits all that is related in <span class='bible'>1 Kings 1, 2<\/span>, as not falling within the scope of his narrative. Comp. with this opening sentence <span class='bible'>1Ki. 2:46<\/span>, And the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon.<\/p>\n<p><strong>And the Lord his God was with him.<\/strong>Comp. <span class='bible'>1Ch. 11:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch. 9:20<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Magnified him exceedingly.<\/strong><span class='bible'>1Ch. 29:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch. 22:5<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 2Ch 1:10<\/strong><\/span> <strong> &nbsp;Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people: for who can judge this thy people, that is so great?<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 2Ch 1:10<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> &ldquo;Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people&rdquo; &#8211; <\/strong> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> This prayer for wisdom is based upon his father&#8217;s charge to him during his anointing as king. King David charged him to know God (<span class='bible'>1Ch 28:9<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>1Ch 28:9<\/span>, &ldquo;And thou, Solomon my son, know thou the God of thy father, and serve him with a perfect heart and with a willing mind: for the LORD searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all the imaginations of the thoughts: if thou seek him, he will be found of thee; but if thou forsake him, he will cast thee off for ever.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Everett&#8217;s Study Notes on the Holy Scriptures<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Solomon at Gibeon. <\/p>\n<p>v. l <strong> And Solomon, the son of David, was strengthened in his kingdom,<\/strong> he was generally and gladly acknowledged as the ruler of the nation, <strong> and the Lord, his God, was with him and magnified him exceedingly,<\/strong> giving him a distinction and a splendor which set him apart and made for proper reverence on the part of his subjects. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 2. Then Solomon spake unto all Israel,<\/strong> as represented in the usual way, <strong> to the captains of thousands and of hundreds, and to the judges, and to every governor in all Israel,<\/strong> the rulers of the tribes, the hereditary chieftains, <strong> the chief of the fathers,<\/strong> that is, of the father-houses. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 3. So Solomon and all the congregation with him,<\/strong> in the second year of his reign, <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:4<\/span>, <strong> went to the high place that was at Gibeon; for there was the Tabernacle of the Congregation of God, which Moses, the servant of the Lord, had made in the wilderness,<\/strong> Exodus 25, 26. This was still the official Sanctuary of the people, although the place for the Temple had been selected and the ark was resting under the Tabernacle of David in Jerusalem. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 4. But the ark of God,<\/strong> which for many years had not been at Gibeon, <strong> had David brought up from Kirjath-jearim to the place which David had prepared for it,<\/strong> <span class='bible'>2Sa 6:2-17<\/span>; <strong> for he had pitched a tent for it at Jerusalem. <\/p>\n<p>v. 5. Moreover, the brazen altar that Bezaleel, the son of Uri, the son of Hur, had made,<\/strong> <span class='bible'>Exo 31:2<\/span>, <strong> he put before the Tabernacle of the Lord,<\/strong> it still had its position before this legal Sanctuary of the nation; <strong> and Solomon and the congregation sought unto it,<\/strong> considering it their duty to present their offerings on the legally appointed altar. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 6. And Solomon went up thither to the brazen altar before the Lord which was at the Tabernacle of the Congregation, and offered a thousand burnt offerings upon it,<\/strong> this great sacrifice being made, of course, by the hands of the priests. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 7. In that night did God appear unto Solomon,<\/strong> in a dream or vision, <strong> and said unto him, Ask what I shall give thee. <\/strong> Cf <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:5<\/span>. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 8. And Solomon said unto God,<\/strong> the chief points of his prayer only being given here, <strong> Thou hast showed great mercy unto David, my father,<\/strong> a free acknowledgment of God&#8217;s unmerited grace and mercy, <strong> and hast made me to reign in his stead. <\/p>\n<p>v. 9. Now, O Lord God, let Thy promise unto David, my father, be established; for Thou hast made me king over a people like the dust of the earth in multitude,<\/strong> a task of ruling which was beyond any man&#8217;s natural ability. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 10. Give me, now, wisdom and knowledge,<\/strong> the latter including a deep and correct insight and understanding of affairs and business of the nation, <strong> that I may go out and come in before this people,<\/strong> in his entire public activity, in his relation to them as ruler; <strong> for who can judge this Thy people that is so great?<\/strong> Such a spirit of meekness and humility in a prayer, appealing to our heavenly Father as ignorant, inexperienced children. is well-pleasing to Him. At the same time, our prayer may rightly remind the Lord of all His promises. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 11. And God said to Solomon, Because this was in thine heart, and thou hast not asked riches, wealth, or honor,<\/strong> all gifts which the average Oriental monarch would have placed ahead of all others, nor the life of thine enemies, neither yet hast asked long life, but hast asked wisdom and knowledge for thyself that thou mayest judge My people, over whom I have made thee king, and who were in a very particular sense God&#8217;s own people, <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 12. wisdom and knowledge is granted unto thee, and I will give thee riches and wealth and honor such as none of the kings have had that have been before thee, neither shall there any after thee have the like. <\/strong> God granted Solomon much more than he had asked for, thus giving him a proof of His merciful bounty. The Lord hears the prayers of His children if they are made according to His will, especially such as pertain to spiritual gifts and benefits. Moreover, He often blesses His children also in temporal things, in matters pertaining to this life. If we but first seek the kingdom of God and His righteousness, all other things shall be added to us, <span class='bible'>Mat 6:33<\/span>. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>EXPOSITION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 1-9:31<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>CAREER<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>SOLOMON<\/strong> <strong>AS<\/strong> <strong>KING<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>UNITED<\/strong> <strong>KINGDOM<\/strong> is here commenced, covering the ground to the end of <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:1-31<\/span>. The same period is described in 1 Kings 1-11. And the following table of parallel passages (as given by Keil) may be put here for convenient reference: <\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:2-13<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki 3:4-15<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:14-17<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki 10:26-29<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 2:1-18<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki 5:15-18<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 3:1-5:1<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki 6:1-38<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 7:13-51<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 5:2<\/span> <\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki 7:8<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ki 7:10<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 7:11-22<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki 9:1-9<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 8:1-18<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki 9:10-28<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 9:1-12<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:13-28<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki 10:1-13<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:14-29<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 9:29-31<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki 11:41-43<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>The present chapter of seventeen verses tells<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> of Solomon&#8217;s sacrifice at &#8220;the high place of Gibeon,&#8221; whither he was accompanied by &#8220;all the congregation&#8221; (<span class='bible'>1Ki 11:1-6<\/span>). Next<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> of the vision given to him that same night, with his prayer and the answer vouchsafed to it (<span class='bible'>1Ki 11:7-12<\/span>). And lastly,<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> of the wealth and the signs of it which became his thereupon (<span class='bible'>1Ki 11:18-19<\/span>). <span class='bible'>1Ki 11:1-6<\/span>.<em>Solomon<\/em>&#8216;<em>s sacrifice<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Was strengthened in his<\/strong> <strong>kingdom. <\/strong>This expression, or one very closely resembling it, is frequently found both in Chronicles and elsewhere, so far as the English Version is concerned. But the verb in its present form (hithp. conjugation) is found<strong> <\/strong>in Chronicles, omitting other books, just fifteen times, and rarely, if ever, to the level of the mere passive voice. It carries rather the idea of a person who exerts himself, and does all that in him lies <em>to nerve himself <\/em>with strength for any object (<span class='bible'>1Ch 11:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 19:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 12:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 13:7<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 13:8<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 13:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 15:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 16:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 17:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 21:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 23:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 25:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 27:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 32:5<\/span>). It may suggest to us that Solomon threw the force of moral energy and resolution into his work and life at this period. <strong>The Lord his God was with him<\/strong>;<em> i.e. <\/em>Jehovah his God was with him. The parallels of this very simple and natural expression are too numerous for quotation. Some of the earliest are found in well-known connections in the Book of Genesis, as <em>e.g. <\/em><span class='bible'>Gen 21:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 26:28<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 28:15<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Gen 28:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 31:3<\/span>. Again, <span class='bible'>Num 14:14<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Num 14:43<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 23:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 14:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 6:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rth 2:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 17:37<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Sa 5:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 11:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 22:11<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 22:16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 15:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 19:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 36:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 5:14<\/span>. The beautiful New Testament equivalent occurs in <span class='bible'>2Th 3:16<\/span>, and elsewhere. Like some other of those earliest concisest religious expressions, brevity and simplicity are fully charged with suggestion. And the above quotations will be found to furnish examples of the manifold practical use of the Lord&#8217;s <em>presence <\/em>with any one. That presence may infer the help just of companionship, or of sure sympathy, or of needed counsel, or of strength in the hour of temptation, or of absolute practical help, or of the highest revealings of faith. The whole circle of need, of human and Christian need, the Divine presence &#8220;will supply&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Php 4:19<\/span>). The &#8220;need&#8221; of Solomon in his present position was patent and pressing. Would that he had always kept by the true supply of it! <strong>Magnified him exceedingly<\/strong>. This verb in its piel conjugation, signifying &#8220;to make grow,&#8221; occurs twenty-six times in the various books of the Old Testament, some of the more characteristic occurrences of it being found in the following passages: <span class='bible'>Gen 12:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 6:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 3:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 4:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 1:37<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ki 1:47<\/span>; 2Ki 10:6; <span class='bible'>1Ch 29:12<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 29:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Est 3:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job 7:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 34:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 69:31<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 1:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 44:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze 31:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 1:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Hos 9:12<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:2<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This verse and the following four supersede the one verse, <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:4<\/span>; and the five together give us, of course, a much fuller view of the events of the sacrifice. Our present verse purports to show the <em>representative <\/em>components of &#8220;all Israel&#8221; in a fourfold classification. <strong>Captains of thousands and of hundreds<\/strong> (see first <span class='bible'>1Ch 13:1<\/span>; 1Ch 27:1; <span class='bible'>1Ch 28:1<\/span>; and then <span class='bible'>Exo 18:21<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Exo 18:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 31:14<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Num 31:48<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Num 31:52<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Num 31:54<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 1:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 8:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 17:18<\/span>; 1Sa 18:13; <span class='bible'>1Sa 22:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Sa 18:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki 11:9<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ki 11:15<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ki 11:19<\/span>). <strong>The judges<\/strong>. The office and the person of the judge were held in high honour among the Jewish people from the first, and perhaps, also, with a noteworthy uniformity, even in the more degenerate periods of their history. Their commencement in patriarchal simplicity can be easily imagined, and receives illustration from such passages as <span class='bible'>Job 29:7<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Job 29:8<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Job 29:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job 32:9<\/span>. Their more formal development may be considered to date from the crisis related in <span class='bible'>Exo 18:14-24<\/span>. And the allusions to the judge and his office thenceforward sustain our impression of the honour in which they were held, arising, no doubt, largely from the deep-felt necessity for them, the more society crystallized (<span class='bible'>Num 25:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 16:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 19:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 21:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 8:33<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 23:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 26:29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 19:8-10<\/span>). In <span class='bible'>1Ch 23:24<\/span> we are told how David set apart &#8220;six thousand Levites&#8221; to be &#8220;officers and judges.&#8221; <strong>Every governor<\/strong>. The word employed here () is rendered by five different words in our Authorized Version: &#8220;prince&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Gen 17:20<\/span>, <em>passim<\/em>)<em>, <\/em>&#8220;ruler&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Exo 16:22<\/span>, <em>passim<\/em>)<em>, <\/em>&#8220;captain&#8221;<em> <\/em>(<span class='bible'>Num 2:3<\/span>, <em>passim<\/em>)<em>, <\/em>&#8220;chief&#8221; <span class='bible'>1Ch 3:24<\/span>, <em>passim<\/em>), and &#8220;governor&#8221; in the present passage only. It is evidently a term of generic signification, used of a king (<span class='bible'>1Ki 11:34<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze 12:10<\/span>); of leaders of the Ishmaelites (<span class='bible'>Gen 17:20<\/span>); of the captains of the tribes of Israel (<span class='bible'>Num 7:11<\/span>); of the chiefs of families (<span class='bible'>Num 3:24<\/span>); while the use of it (<span class='bible'>Gen 23:6<\/span>) to set forth the position of Abraham as one raised to eminence so high and undisputed that it might be clearly said to be God&#8217;s doing, is sufficient to determine its <em>central <\/em>signification<strong>. The chief of the fathers<\/strong>;<em> i.e.<\/em> the heads of the fathers. The first occurrence of the expression, &#8220;the heads of their fathers&#8217; houses&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Exo 6:14<\/span>), and of &#8220;the heads <em>of the fathers <\/em>of the Levites according to their families&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Exo 6:25<\/span>), sufficiently explains the original and perfectly natural meaning of the phrase. The great importance and significance of the position of the heads &#8220;of families&#8221; and &#8220;of houses&#8221; and&#8221; of fathers&#8221; in early patriarchal times must necessarily have declined by the time of Solomon, when the nation had received so much more of civil form and system. But the name remained, and the family and social position did not fail to make themselves felt, and finally the <em>official <\/em>recognition of them in David&#8217;s time is evidenced by <span class='bible'>1Ch 27:1<\/span>, and in Solomon&#8217;s time both by the present passage and <span class='bible'>2Ch 5:2<\/span> with its parallel <span class='bible'>1Ki 8:1<\/span>. Our present use of the expression ought probably to show it, in close apposition with the foregoing words, &#8220;to all Israel&#8221; (wrongly translated &#8220;in all Israel&#8221; in the Authorized Version), and which itself is a repetition of the &#8220;to all Israel&#8221; in the beginning of the verse. Although the existing Hebrew pointing of the verse does not favour the supposition, it may be that the writer means to emphasize Solomon&#8217;s summons as made both to the kingdom as such, and to the people also as a united people. We are not, indeed, told here, in so many words, what it was that Solomon said &#8220;to all Israel.&#8221; But there can be no doubt as to his object, as betrayed in the first clause of the following verse.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:3<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>All the congregation; <em>i.e.<\/em> in the persons of their captains, judges, princes, and family representatives. <strong>The high place  at Gibeon<\/strong>. It may readily be allowed that even nature and instinct would suggest a certain fitness in selecting <em>high <\/em>places, and the impressive grandeur of groves, for the<strong> <\/strong>worship of the High and Lofty One and for the offerings of sacrifice to him. It was not otherwise historically (<span class='bible'>Gen 12:7<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Gen 12:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 22:3<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Gen 22:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 31:54<\/span>). However<em>, first, <\/em>it was part of the education of a nation (situated in the heart of the young world) in the unity of the one God, that its worship should be offered in one place, and the smoke of its sacrifices ascend from <em>one <\/em>altar; and <em>secondly, <\/em>it was not difficult to foresee that the very force that lay in the associations, which dictated the choice of some places (not least, certainly, &#8220;the grove&#8221;), would constitute their weakness and snare. The prohibitions, therefore, of the Mosaic Law (<span class='bible'>Deu 12:5<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Deu 12:11<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Deu 12:14<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Deu 12:19<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Deu 12:21<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Deu 12:26<\/span>), witnessed to by such corroborations as are found in commands to obliterate certain Canaanitish traces, that looked long time a different way (Le <span class='bible'>2Ch 17:8<\/span>; 2Ch 26:1-23 :30; <span class='bible'>Num 33:52<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 33:29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 22:29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 20:23<\/span>), approve themselves as in thorough harmony with what all would feel to be the genius of the religious education of Israel, and, through Israel, of the nations of the world. The wonder that impresses us is rather that means were not found to abide by the &#8220;letter&#8221; of the Law to a far greater degree during all the generations that elapsed before the people were settled in their land, and were gathered in their temple so typical. Is it not possible to regard this as an impressive instance of how, even in a system that sought to be of the closest and most exclusive, the &#8220;<em>spirit,<\/em>&#8220;<em> <\/em>by force of circumstances, resented the tyrannous bondage of the &#8220;letter&#8221;? Anyway, for ages from the time of that prohibition, the nation had the moral principle as their guide rather than any possibility of keeping safe within a commandment&#8217;s &#8220;letter&#8221; (so see <span class='bible'>Jdg 6:25<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Jdg 6:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 13:17-24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 7:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 13:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 16:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 10:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 18:30<\/span>). Even now, accordingly, the prohibited is still the observed, and by Solomon, too, in the steps of David, even if it be necessary to describe it as the &#8220;winked at.&#8221;<em> <\/em>And to the &#8220;high place&#8221; at Gibeon Solomon and all the representatives, <em>the congregation <\/em>of Israel, have to repair in order to do sacrifice. The tabernacle was now at Gibeon, whither it had come from Nob (<span class='bible'>1Ch 16:39<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 16:40<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 21:1<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Sa 21:6<\/span>; from which latter reference, speaking of the &#8220;shew-bread,&#8221; it comes that we know the tabernacle to have resided at Nob awhile; for the circumstance is not positively narrated in any passage of the history (but see also <span class='bible'>1Sa 22:9<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Sa 22:11<\/span>). <em>Gibeon<\/em> was one of the four Hivite cities, the other three being Beeroth, Chephirah, and Kirjath-jearim. It had its first fame from its &#8220;wiliness&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Jos 9:3<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Jos 9:4<\/span>, etc.). By the directest road, it was five miles distant from Jerusalem, in the direction of the sea. It was further noted for the encounter between Joab and Abner (<span class='bible'>2Sa 2:12-17<\/span>). Again, for the slaying of Amasa by Joab (<span class='bible'>2Sa 20:6-10<\/span>), and for the death of Joab himself at the hand of Benalak, at the very horns of the altar (<span class='bible'>1Ki 2:28-34<\/span>). Although the exact date of the lodging of the tabernacle at Gibeon is not told us, nor even the person who was answerable for briging it there, yet there can be no reasonable doubt that it was David, as we read (<span class='bible'>1Ch 16:40<\/span>) of his appointing the priests to offer &#8220;the daily sacrifices&#8221; there, on the brazen altar of Moses, when Zadok was at their head, and Heman and Jeduthun were their resident musicians. In what particular part of Gibeon or of its immediate neighbourhood the tabernacle was stationed cannot be said with any certainty. Amid a considerable choice of likely places, one forming part of Gibeon itself, and just south of <em>El-Tib, <\/em>seems the likeliest, and to be preferred to the suggestion of Stanley, of <em>Neby-Samuil, <\/em>which is a mile distant. The present imposing occasion is the last of any importance on which Gibeon is brought before us (see also <span class='bible'>1Ki 8:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 9:35<\/span>). <strong>There was the tabernacle<\/strong>. The removal of the tabernacle to Gibeon no doubt followed immediately on the destruction of Nob by Saul (<span class='bible'>1Sa 22:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 16:39<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 16:40<\/span>, compared with 1Ch 16:37; <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:28<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:29<\/span>). <strong>Moses  made in the wilderness<\/strong> (see <span class='bible'>Exo 25:1-40<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 26:1-37<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 27:1-21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 33:7-10<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:4<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>But the ark<\/strong>. Again, as in <span class='bible'>1Ch 16:39<\/span>, the writer emphasizes the fact of the temporary divorce that had obtained between the ark and the tabernacle (so <span class='bible'>1Sa 6:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Sa 6:2-19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:2<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:4<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 13:3-14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 15:1-3<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 15:12-15<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 15:23-29<\/span>). <strong>David&#8217;s pitching of the tent<\/strong> for it is recorded emphatically <span class='bible'>1Ch 15:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 16:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Sa 6:17<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:5<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The brazen altar<\/strong>. This statement is introduced to lay stress on the fact that, though the ark indeed was not with the tabernacle, the brazen altar of burnt offering assuredly was there, this constituting the place, the proper spot, for sacrifice and worship. (For the account of the brazen altar and its making, see <span class='bible'>Exo 27:1-8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 38:1-7<\/span>; also <span class='bible'>Num 16:38<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Num 16:39<\/span>.) This altar of burnt offering is often spoken of as the altar, to distinguish it from the altar of incense (<span class='bible'>Exo 30:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 39:38<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 4:11<\/span>). <strong>Bezaleel<\/strong>. (For detailed genealogy, see our <span class='bible'>1Ch 2:3-20<\/span>; also <span class='bible'>Exo 31:2-5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 35:30-35<\/span>.) <strong>He put before<\/strong>. The reading (), &#8220;was <em>there <\/em>before<em>,<\/em>&#8220;<em> <\/em>is to be preferred, tallying as it does exactly with <span class='bible'>Exo 40:6<\/span>. This was the reading understood by the Septuagint and Vulgate. The majority of manuscripts, however, and the Syriac Version, have . <strong>Sought<\/strong> <strong>unto it<\/strong>. The analogy of the use of this word would make to be preferred the translation &#8220;sought him,&#8221;<em> i.e.<\/em> the &#8220;Jehovah&#8221; just spoken of. But whether the object of the verb be in this place Jehovah or the altar, it would seem probable that the clause purports to say that Solomon and his people were accustomed to repair thither, while now they were about to repair thither with a very vast burnt offering.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:6<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A thousand burnt offerings<\/strong>. The first instance of the burnt offering is <span class='bible'>Gen 8:20<\/span>, and thereafter in the same book <span class='bible'>Gen 15:9<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Gen 15:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 22:2<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Gen 22:7<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Gen 22:13<\/span>. It was manifestly the chiefest of the eucharistic kind of sacrifices, and for manifest reasons also was preceded by a &#8220;sin&#8221; offering (<span class='bible'>Exo 29:36-38<\/span>; Le <span class='bible'>Exo 8:14<\/span>, etc.). (For full details of the ceremonial, see <span class='bible'>Lev 1:1-17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 6:1-30<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 7:1-38<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 8:1-36<\/span>, <em>passim<\/em>) The extraordinary number of the burnt offerings on this and some similar occasions may well excite our wonder (<span class='bible'>Num 7:3<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Num 7:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 8:64<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 4:1<\/span> compared with <span class='bible'>2Ch 7:7<\/span>. See also Herod; &#8216;Hist.,&#8217; 7.43). The priests, of course, performed the sacrifices at the command of Solomon.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:7-12<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The <em>vision and prayer of Solomon, and God<\/em>&#8216;<em>s answer to that prayer. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:7<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>That night<\/strong>. This can mean no other night than that which followed the day (or the days) of sacrifices so multitudinous. The parallel account in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:5<\/span> tells us the way in which &#8220;God appeared to Solomon,&#8221; viz. by dream. The words of God&#8217;s offer, <strong>Ask what I shall give thee<\/strong>, are identical in the parallel place.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:8<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Thou hast showed great mercy unto David my father<\/strong>. These also are the exact words found in the parallel place, but they omit the words, &#8220;thy servant,&#8221; before &#8220;David,&#8221; found there. <strong>And hast made me to reign in his stead<\/strong>. This concise expression takes the place of two equivalent expressions, found at the end of the sixth and beginning of the seventh verses in the parallel passage, the former of which passages also describes it as &#8220;this great kindness,&#8221;<em> i.e. <\/em>kindness on the part of Goda description very much in harmony with David&#8217;s own grateful acknowledgment to God (<span class='bible'>1Ki 1:48<\/span>). Up to this point our present account differs from its parallel in cutting out Solomon&#8217;s eulogy of his father (&#8220;According as he walked before thee in truth and in righteousness and in uprightness of heart with thee&#8221;), and his humbler disparagement of himself (&#8220;And I, a little child, know not how to go out<strong> <\/strong>or come in&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:9<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Now, O Lord God, let thy promise unto David my father<\/strong> <strong>be established. <\/strong>This challenge on the part of Solomon, intended, without doubt, most reverently, is not given in the parallel place, and forms not only a distinctive but an interesting additional feature of the present account. It is thought by some that the &#8220;promise &#8220;here challenged is not very distinctly recorded anywhere, but surely passages like <span class='bible'>1Ch 17:12-14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 22:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 28:6<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 28:7<\/span> amply meet the case. See also <span class='bible'>2Sa 7:12<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Sa 7:15<\/span>. <strong>King over a people like the dust<\/strong>. It is noteworthy that, though the equivalent of this phrase is found in the parallel, the distinctiveness of this <em>simile <\/em>is not found there. (For the use of the simile to express a vast number, see <span class='bible'>Gen 28:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 23:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Zep 1:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Zec 9:3<\/span>.) It is not at all of frequent use in Scripture.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:10<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Give me now wisdom and knowledge<\/strong>. The force of the opening of this verse, and the relation of it to the former, are both prejudiced by the &#8220;now&#8221; () being deposed from its right position as the <em>first <\/em>word in the verse. For the rest of this verse, the parallel passage has &#8220;an understanding heart&#8221; in place of our &#8220;wisdom <em>and knowledge;<\/em>&#8220;<em> <\/em>and &#8220;that I may discern between good and bad,&#8221; in place of our <strong>that I may go out and come in before this people<\/strong>. In using the words, &#8220;wisdom and knowledge,&#8221; Solomon seems to have remembered well the prayer of his father (<span class='bible'>1Ch 22:12<\/span>). (For the pedigree of the simple and effective phrase, &#8220;know how to go out and come in,&#8221; see <span class='bible'>Num 27:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 31:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 18:13<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Sa 18:16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Sa 3:25<\/span>). It is at the same time refreshing to revisit the times when the most exalted nominal ruler was also the real ruler, as being the leader, the judge, the teacher in the highest sense, and &#8220;the feeder&#8221; of his people. Nor is it less refreshing to notice how, in Israel at least, the fact was so well recognized and honoured, that <em>justice <\/em>and <em>to judge just judgment <\/em>lay at the deepest foundation of civil society.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:11<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>With this verse the answer to Solomon&#8217;s prayer begins. It is here concisely given in two verses, but occupies five (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:10-14<\/span>) in the parallel place, including the verse not found here, which says, &#8220;The speech pleased the Lord, that Solomon had asked this thing.&#8221; Otherwise there is no essential difference of any importance, though it may be noted that the parallel gives voice to the promise of &#8220;length of days,&#8221; on the condition of Solomon fulfilling his part in showing obedience to the Divine will, and in following the steps of his father. <strong>Riches, wealth<\/strong> (). The most elementary idea of the former of these two words seems to be &#8220;straight growth,&#8221; &#8220;prosperity;&#8221; of the latter, &#8220;to gather together&#8221; or &#8220;heap up.&#8221; The former is found first in <span class='bible'>Gen 31:16<\/span>; and in the verb (hiph. conjugation) in <span class='bible'>Gen 14:23<\/span>. Afterwards it is found in almost all of the historical books, in the Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and in the prophets Jeremiah and Daniel. The latter word occurs only five times (<span class='bible'>Jos 22:8<\/span>; in this and the following verses; and in <span class='bible'>Ecc 5:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Ecc 6:2<\/span>). Its Chaldee form is also found in <span class='bible'>Ezr 6:8<\/span> and <span class='bible'>Ezr 7:26<\/span>. A comparison of these passages scarcely sustains the supposition of some, suggested by the derivation of the word, that it marks specially those stores of useful things which constituted largely the wealth of Old Testament times. <strong>Wisdom and knowledge<\/strong>. The distinction between these is evident, as also that they are needful complements of one another for the forming of a catholic, useful, sound character.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:12<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Such as none of the kings  before thee, neither  after thee. <\/strong>These words were sadly ominous of the short-lived glory of the kingdom Only two kings had reigned before Solomon in Israel, and the glory of the kingdom too surely culminated in his reign, and even before the end of it (<span class='bible'>2Ch 9:22<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 29:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Ecc 2:9<\/span>). On the other hand, the gratuitous and<strong> <\/strong>spontaneous fulness of promise in the Divine reply to a human prayer that &#8220;pleased&#8221; the Being invoked is most noticeable, and preached beforehand indeed, the lesson of the life of Jesus, &#8220;Seek ye first the kingdom  and all these things shall be added unto you&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Mat 6:33<\/span>). The contents of this verse are followed in the parallel by the words,&#8221; And Solomon awoke; and behold it was a dream.&#8221; There can be no doubt that what is here rehearsed did<strong> <\/strong>not lose any force or anything of reality from its transpiring in a dream, of which the abundantly open statement of the method of it, as in &#8220;sleep,&#8221; and in &#8220;a dream,&#8221; may be accepted as the first cogent evidence. But beside this, the frequent recital in the Old Testament of occasions when significant and weighty matters of business import were so conducted by the Divine will forms ample ground and defence for the other class of occasions, of which more spiritual matter was the subject (<span class='bible'>Gen 28:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 41:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 20:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 31:10<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Gen 31:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 37:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 40:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 41:32<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 7:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job 33:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 2:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 7:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 1:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 2:13<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Mat 2:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 27:19<\/span>). On the other hand, side by side with such passages are those that refer to dreams for their emptiness and transiency of impression, when similes of this kind of thing are required (<span class='bible'>Job 20:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 73:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 126:1<\/span>). This is not the place to enter into any argument of a metaphysical or physiological character respecting dreams, and what they may or may not avail. But as some persons know even too well how dreams have brought them most vivid, most torturing, and most exquisite experiences in turn, there will seem, to them at least, the less difficulty in admitting utterly their availableness for communications of highest import, not only from God to man, but under certain conditions from man to God. Without doubt, certain disabilities (and those, perhaps, more especially of the moral kind) attach to our mind in dreams. But do not dreams also find the scene of the keener activities of mind pure? Granted that the mind is then under ordinary circumstances without a certain control and self-commanding power, yet is it also in some large respects much more at liberty from that besetting tyranny of sense with which waking hours are so familiar! Hence its consummate daring and swiftness and versatility in dream beyond all that it knows in the body&#8217;s waking state.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:13<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Solomon<\/em>&#8216;<em>s return after sacrifice from Gibeon to Jerusalem, and from <\/em>&#8220;<em>before the tabernacle of the congregation<\/em>&#8220;<em> to <\/em>&#8220;<em>before<\/em> <em>the ark of the covenant of the Lord<\/em>&#8220;<em> in Mount Zion. <\/em>the condensed and cut-down method of Chronicles, and its strong preferences for <em>selecting <\/em>out of the various material at its command. <strong>The tabernacle of<\/strong> <strong>the congregation. <\/strong>This styling of the &#8220;tabernacle&#8221; is of very frequent occurrence. It is found above thirty times in Exodus, and fully as often in Leviticus and Numbers. Afterwards it is sprinkled more rarely in the historical books. The reason of its being styled &#8220;the tabernacle of the <em>congregation<\/em>&#8221; () is doubtfulperhaps because of the gatherings of the people in front of it, or possibly because of its being the place where God would meet with Moses. The other name, the tabernacle of &#8220;witness&#8221; or &#8220;testimony&#8221; or covenant&#8221; (; <span class='bible'>Num 9:15<\/span>, etc.), is not unfrequent. Hence the <strong>LXX<\/strong>.   <em>; <\/em>the Vulgate, <em>tabernaculum testimonii; <\/em>and Luther&#8217;s <em>Stifisuitten. <\/em>This verse very much stints the information contained in the parallel, to the effect that Solomon forthwith took his place before the ark of the covenant in Mount Zion, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings, and gave a feast to all his servants (<span class='bible'>2Sa 6:17-19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 16:1-3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 14:26-29<\/span>). <strong>And he reigned over Israel<\/strong>. These words seem nugatory both in themselves and as placed here. They probably stand for <span class='bible'>1Ki 4:1<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:14-17<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The <em>attraction to Jerusalem of the signs of wealthchariots, horses, etc.on the part of Solomon. <\/em>The excitement attending the great sacrifices at Gibeon, and before the ark in Jerusalem, had now subsided. And we obtain just a glimpse of the range of thought and purpose present to the mind of the reigning king. The largo expenditure of money would infer without fail the show of brilliant prosperity in the grand city for the time. Whether this would last, and whether it would not infer oppressive taxation somewhere or other (<span class='bible'>1Ki 9:15<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:21<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:25<\/span>) among the<strong> <\/strong>people, time would show. Had this expenditure been all to record, none could suppose the commencing of the practical part of the king&#8217;s reign either sound or auspicious. But, of course, it is to be qualified by other things that were transpiring, with which the parallel acquaints us (e.g. <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:16-28<\/span>), only in different order. We now, however, begin a rapid and self-contained sketch of the reign of Solomon to his very death (<span class='bible'>2Ch 9:1-31<\/span>.)the sketch one of marked characteristics, and in consistent keeping with the presumable objects of this work. For it is very much monopolized by the account of the temple.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:14<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The contents of this and the following three verses are identical with the parrallel <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:26-29<\/span>, except that the words, &#8220;and gold,&#8221; of our <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:15<\/span> (<span class='bible'>2Ch 9:20<\/span>) are not found there. The position of these four verses in the parallel, towards the close of the account of Solomon, would seem more natural than their position here, which has somewhat the appearance of a fragment interpolated, as on the other hand the account of the harlot-mothers there. <strong>Solomon gathered chariots and<\/strong> <strong>horsemen. <\/strong>The chariot was no institution of Israel (so <span class='bible'>Deu 20:1<\/span>), neither of their earliest ancestors, nor of those more proximate. The earliest occasions of the mention of it (<span class='bible'>Gen 41:43<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 46:29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 50:9<\/span>) are in connection with Egypt, and almost all subsequent occasions for a long stretch of time show it in connection with some foreign nation, till we read (<span class='bible'>2Sa 8:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 18:4<\/span>) of David &#8220;reserving horses&#8221; unhoughed &#8220;for a hundred chariots,&#8221; apparently also &#8220;reserved&#8221; out of the very much larger number which he had taken in battle from Hadadezer King of Zobah. The very genius of the character of God&#8217;s people, a <em>pilgrim<\/em>-genius, as well as their long-time pilgrim<em>-life, <\/em>quite accounts for the &#8220;chariot,&#8221; though it be a war-chariot, having never ranked among their treasures (<span class='bible'>Deu 17:16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 8:11<\/span>). Now, however, Solomon thinks it the time to make it a feature of the nation&#8217;s power and splendour. He gives the large order for fourteen hundred chariots apparently to Egypt (<span class='bible'>1Ki 10:17<\/span>; also <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:28<\/span>), the appropriate number of horses to which would be probably four thousand. Solomon&#8217;s fourteen hundred chariots were probably intended to exceed the numbers of the Egyptian king, of Hadadezer&#8217;s (<span class='bible'>2Sa 8:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 18:4<\/span>), and of the Syrians (<span class='bible'>2Sa 10:18<\/span>). But, on the other hand, see <span class='bible'>1Sa 13:5<\/span> and <span class='bible'>1Ch 19:7<\/span>, unless, as seems very probable, the numerals in these places are again incorrect. Dr. Smith&#8217;s &#8216;Dictionary of the Bible&#8217; contains an interesting article on the chariot (vol. 1:295). For significant allusions to the <em>horsemen<\/em>, reference may be made to <span class='bible'>1Sa 8:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 20:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki 2:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 21:7<\/span><strong>. Twelve thousand horsemen<\/strong>. These probably purport what we should call <em>horse-soldiers, <\/em>or cavalry. And. it is likely that they come to designate these in virtue of the Hebrew word here used () meaning horses of the cavalry sort (see Gesenius, &#8216;Lexicon,&#8217; <em>sub<\/em> <em>voce<\/em>). The chariot cities. In <span class='bible'>2Ch 8:5<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 8:6<\/span> we are expressly told that Solomon &#8220;built&#8221; purposely these cities, for the chariots and for the horsemen, just as he built the &#8220;store&#8221; cities (see also <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:17-19<\/span>; Xenoph; &#8216;Anab.,&#8217; <span class='bible'>1Ki 1:4<\/span>.  10).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:15<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>And gold<\/strong>. The omission of these words in the parallel (<span class='bible'>1Ki 10:27<\/span>) is remarkable in the light of what we read in <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:20<\/span>. We find the contents of this verse again in <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:27<\/span>; as also in the parallel (<span class='bible'>1Ki 10:27<\/span>), just quoted with the exception already named. <strong>Cedar trees<\/strong>. The meaning is felled trunks of cedar (<span class='bible'>1Ch 22:4<\/span>) (). Whether the wood intended is the cedar of Lebanon (<em>Pinus cedrus, <\/em>or <em>Cedrus conifera<\/em>)<em>, <\/em>&#8220;tall&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Isa 2:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 37:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 2:9<\/span>), &#8220;widespreading&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Eze 31:3<\/span>), odoriferous, with very few knots, and wonderfully resisting decay, is considered by authorities on such subjects still uncertain. Gesenius, in his &#8216;Lexicon,&#8217; <em>sub voc<\/em>; may be consulted, and the various Bible dictionaries, especially Dr. Smith&#8217;s, under &#8220;Cedar;&#8221; and Dr. Kitto&#8217;s &#8216;Cyclopaedia,&#8217; under &#8220;Eres.&#8221; The writer in Dr. Smith&#8217;s &#8216;Dictionary&#8217; suggests that under the one word &#8220;cedar,&#8221; the <em>Pinus cedrus, Pinus deodara, Yew, Taxus baccata, <\/em>and <em>Pinus sylvestris <\/em>(Scotch pine) were referred to popularly, and were employed when building purposes are in question. That the said variety was employed is likely enough, but that we are intended to understand this when the word &#8220;cedar&#8221; is used seems unlikely (see for further indication of this unlikeliness, the instancing of &#8220;firs&#8221; occasionally with &#8220;cedars,&#8221; <span class='bible'>1Ki 5:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 2:8<\/span>). <strong>Sycomore trees<\/strong> (). This word is found always in its present masc. plur. form except once, <span class='bible'>Psa 78:47<\/span>, where the plur. fem. form is found. The Greek equivalent in the Septuagint is always <em>; <\/em>but in the New Testament, and in the same treatise,<em> i.e.<\/em> the Gospel according to St. Luke, we find both  and  (<span class='bible'>Luk 17:6<\/span> and <span class='bible'>Luk 19:4<\/span> respectively). Now, the former of these trees is the well. known mulberry tree. But the latter is what is called the <em>fig-mulberry<\/em>, or the <em>sycamore-fig; <\/em>and this is the tree of the Old Testament. Its fruit resembles the fig, grows on sprigs shooting out of the thick stems themselves of the tree, and each fruit needs to be <em>punctured <\/em>a few days before gathering, if it is to be acceptable eating (<span class='bible'>Amo 7:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 9:10<\/span>). <strong>In the vale<\/strong>;<em> i.e. <\/em>in the lowland country, called the Shefelah. This is the middle one of the three divisions in which Judaea is sometimes describedmountain, lowland, and valley. This lowland was really the lowhills, between mountains and plain, near Lydda and Daroma (the &#8220;dry,&#8221; 1.q. Negeb, Deu 34:1-12 :13), while the valley was the valley of Jordan, from Jericho to Engedi.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:16<\/span><\/strong><strong>##<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Horses brought.; out of Egypt. <\/strong>Later on we read that horses were imported from other countries as well (<span class='bible'>2Ch 9:24<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:28<\/span>), as, for instance, from Arabia and Armenia (<span class='bible'>Eze 27:14<\/span>). <strong>Linen yarn<\/strong>. The words are without doubt wrong here. But it is impossible to say with any certainty what should be in their place. The Vulgate shows here <em>from Coa, <\/em>presumably meaning Tekoa, a small place on the road from Egypt to Jerusalem. It might not have been easy to surmise, however, so much as this, but for the fact that the Septuagint shows in the<strong> <\/strong>parallel place, &#8220;And from Tekoa&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Amo 1:1<\/span>). The Septuagint, however, has for the present place,          The Hebrew word here translated &#8220;linen yarn&#8221; is  (i.q.  niph. of , &#8220;to be gathered together&#8221;).&#8217; Gesenius, followed by De Wette (and others), and himself following Piscator  and Vatablus, would translate the word &#8220;company,&#8221; and read, &#8220;a company of the king&#8217;s merchants took a company (of horses) at a price.&#8221; Others would translate the word &#8220;import;&#8221; and read, &#8220;the import of the king&#8217;s merchants was an import at a price,&#8221;<em> i.e. <\/em>in money. Neither of these renderings can be considered really satisfactory. Some slight corruption of text still baulks us, therefore.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:17<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Six hundred shekels of silver<\/strong>. Some add up in this amount the vehicle itself, harness, horse or horses necessary to<strong> <\/strong>it, and the expense of <em>carriage <\/em>of the whole. Whether or no horses are included may be doubtful. The amount added up reaches, according to various estimates, 90 or 70. If we take the silver shekel at 3s. 4d. according to one of the later authorities, the amount will be 100; and so for a horse 25. <strong>For all the kings of the<\/strong> <strong>Hittites, and the kings of Syria; <\/strong>see <span class='bible'>2Ch 8:7<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 8:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:14<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:23<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:24<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:26<\/span>; 1Ki 4:21, <span class='bible'>1Ki 4:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki 7:6<\/span>; which last place in particular suggests that Solomon would be the more willing to <em>assist <\/em>neighbouring peoples in the purchase of horses, etc; who might be already tributary to him, or even vassals, or who might in future be in the better position to help him, when either required or hired to do so.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILETICS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1-17<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Each highest need of life offers to turn into the first accepted and best rewarded prayer of life.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This chapter of seventeen verses might remind us of a picture and its mount and frame, a precious stone and its setting. In this sense it is a unity. The first six verses are used just to prepare us for the contents of the six that follow; and the last five summarily assure us that the fulfilment did not fall short of, nor halt long behind, promise. The now sole reign of Solomon, begun with the blessing that causeth to prosper, seemed (all too briefly, perhaps) to direct itself spontaneously to those religious observances that alike rightly acknowledged the past goodness of God, and augured the very best of auguries for the future. For Solomon acted promptly and religiously himself, and also taught and led a whole nation, his own nation, to do the same, when he sought and repaired to &#8220;the brazen altar before the tabernacle of the Lord&#8221;that sacred and time-honoured tabernacle which &#8220;Moses the servant of the Lord had made in the wilderness.&#8221; Since that date, oh, what journeys it had made!what much more varied, stranger, wanderings and history it had representatively shared! What a career that nation escaped from Egypt now just five centuries had already run! what a mark on the very world&#8217;s history it had availed to make! But to the picture itself, rather than its surroundingspicture, parable, solemn and sweet reality, all in one! There are to be noticed and studied:<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> <em>the appearance to Solomon<\/em>; <\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> <em>the<\/em><strong><em> <\/em><\/strong><em>unhesitating prayer of Solomon<\/em>; <\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> <em>the answer and promise vouchsafed to Solomon<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>APPEARANCE<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>SOLOMON<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>The<\/em> <em>veritable fact in it; i.e.<\/em> that it was God who appeared. What we often vaguely call Providence; or a happy thought; or a sudden suggestion; or an unaccountable impression; or, worst of all, a chance of the waking mind or of the dream;should in devout language, and equally in devout truth, be called by the name that is Love, and that is also to be supremely feared.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>The method of it. <\/em>Probably enough in dream, in one or other of the <em>kinds <\/em>of dream, with which Scripture makes us familiar; the deeper dream, or that which young Samuel&#8217;s more resembled; or <em>thinking <\/em>in night&#8217;s deep stillness, with all its unstinted retrospect of the day on which it had just closed. In brief, whatever the absolute fact was, it is not necessary to suppose that God appeared then any more literally or visibly than now sometimes to us, or that he appears any <em>less really <\/em>many a time to us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>The<\/em> <em>times; i.e.<\/em> immediately upon Solomon&#8217;s practical conduct, right conduct, devout and religious conduct, and <em>conduct that drew in <\/em>with itself the nature, the idea, the fact of public worship, public service, the action of the combined Church. To human works no merit belongs. They claim no worthiness of <em>this <\/em>kind. They cannot earn or deserve anything of God. Yet is it to be most distinctly and unequivocally noted how often God appears to view <em>in connection <\/em>with human works, interposes to aid and bless in the very crises or sequel of rightly intended human endeavour or bold deed. It is as though he would graciously ever associate his noblest, kindest, freest giving with our deeds, so that they be simple and sincere deeds, that these may be reacted upon at other times by the quickening, encouraging memory thereof. It is not simply written that &#8220;God appeared&#8221; in the night, but emphatically &#8220;in <em>that <\/em>night.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>4<\/strong>. The <em>object, <\/em>or <em>very matter of it. <\/em>Astonishing to say, it is not to hear a petition, not to answer a petition, but positively to <em>ask <\/em>for a petitionto ask <em>to be asked for some good gift. <\/em>This, when projected upon the plain page of the Divine book, is recognized as amazing condescension; <em>but <\/em>it is nothing in excess of what is ever going on in God&#8217;s dealings with us. It comes of the fulness of his overflowing goodness, of his natural liberality, and of his unfeigned forgiving-ness of spirit, to his erring family.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5<\/strong><em>. The contradiction couched in it, <\/em>to<em> <\/em>the idea of human life, character, action, being based on any fatalistic scheme emanating from above. A man&#8217;s own choice is here asked, elicited, challenged, acceded to, and granted! And herein, in all five particulars, we have but expressed in graphic parable the facts between God and human, individual life in all ages.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>UNHESITATING<\/strong> <strong>PRAYER<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>SOLOMON<\/strong>. There cannot be held to be any doubt that this prayer was approved, divinely approved, in what it contained. It cannot, perhaps, be asserted as positively that it &#8220;lacked nothing,&#8221; and was as unchallengeable in what it did <em>not <\/em>contain. When we have travelled many a mile with Solomon, and have come to the latter milestones of his journey, thoughts make themselves a voice, and we fear that the prayer erred by defect. Let us take note first of what was incontestably good in it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>It found its spring in the sense of genuine responsibility<\/em>responsibility that had come from father to son, and more sacred and venerable for this; responsibility that was heightened by the memory of its being in matter that had. enlisted special Divine promise, and which promise must not be allowed to fall to the ground through lack of human co-operation; and responsibility because of the intrinsic nature of the subject in hand. Prayer thus rising to the surface is earnest, sincere, deep; and no doubt it was so now with Solomon.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>It was prayer relatively high in its aim, <\/em>by the expressed Divine admission and commendation here. &#8220;Wisdom and knowledge&#8221; were above &#8220;riches, wealth, honour, the life of enemies, or long life for self.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>It was prayer for means, strength, grace to do duty, <\/em>to be equal to the requirements of lofty duty, and duty that in its significance and its results looked far outside individual interest or individual interest and honour combined. The standpoint of <em>duty <\/em>is equally grand and momentous! There may be prayer for high possessionspossessions of knowledge and wisdom even, that have selfishness and ambition in them, but not a grain of grace or an atom of sense and love of duty, and acknowledging of solemn responsibility. Solomon&#8217;s prayer stands in vivid contrast to this sort of thing. He prayed for wisdom and knowledge that he might fill his father&#8217;s place worthily, his own place aright&#8221;serve his generation by the will of God,&#8221; and in thus doing &#8220;please God&#8221; himself!<\/p>\n<p><strong>4<\/strong>. <em>It was prayer that failed to make provision for the highest, deepest, surest needs of all; <\/em>viz. humility, personal, practical, preserving piety, ever &#8220;a clean heart&#8221; and the renewing ever of &#8220;a right spirit.&#8221; Of <em>these <\/em>things, masked in the prayer, nothing is promised in its answer; and the sad clue may lie herein to much in Solomon&#8217;s subsequent life. Thinking hereof, may we not lay it to heart for our own timely warning, when we are compelled to say of Solomon at this critical moment, &#8220;He left <em>unprayed <\/em>the things he ought to have prayed&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>ANSWER<\/strong> <strong>WITH<\/strong> <strong>PROMISE<\/strong> <strong>MADE<\/strong> <strong>BY<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>SOLOMON<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. It expressly said to him, it reminds ourselves, how God knows the heart and measures prayer by the heart. &#8220;Because,&#8221; he says, &#8220;this was in thy heart.&#8221; There is many a prayer of the lip, of memory, of habit, of superstitious sentiment, of some vague feeling of duty, but the heart is far away, and from such prayers, so-called, God himself is equally far away.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. God granted that petition, not <em>simply <\/em>because it was a heart&#8217;s true desire, but because it was also &#8220;most expedient&#8221;it was a true heart&#8217;s true desire! It was &#8220;most expedient&#8221; for Solomon, for the high place he held, and &#8220;all Israel&#8221;&#8221;thy people&#8221;over whom he reigned.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. God crowns the <em>answer <\/em>with promise as well. The precious thing granted by way of answer, incomparably the best thing by far, God wreathes with splendoura splendour, he expressly says, unknown before, and hereafter never to be eclipsed! So, how often has it been that those who have with single eye, steadfast heart, sought first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness, have found all other things added to them! So, how often has it been that &#8220;those who feared God&#8221; have found they &#8220;lacked <em>no <\/em>good thing&#8221;! And even earthly honour, earthly wealth, earthly good, have been bestowed with overflowing cup on those who could safely receive it, because they had shown they desired first, prayed first, for purer, higher goodthe real, the right, the true, the lasting.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILIES BY W. CLARKSON<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A bright beginning.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It is far from being everything when we make a good beginning; for many a bright beginning has a very dark ending. Yet is it a very great advantage to start well on our course. Few men ever commenced their career under more favourable auspices than did King Solomon, when &#8220;he sat on the throne of the Lord as king, instead of David his father&#8221; (<span class='bible'>1Ch 29:23<\/span>). He had much to sustain and to encourage him.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>HERITAGE<\/strong> <strong>HE<\/strong> <strong>HAD<\/strong> <strong>FROM<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>FATHER<\/strong>. It was much to him that he was &#8220;Solomon, <em>the son of David.<\/em>&#8220;<em> <\/em>He was known to be the favourite son and chosen heir of his illustrious father. All the strong attachment which the people felt for the late (or the dying) sovereign went to establish his son upon the throne. Solomon acceded to the gathering and deepening affection which his father David had been winning to himself through a long and prosperous reign. All the influence which an honoured and beloved leader can convey to his successor was communicated to him: <em>thus <\/em>was he &#8220;strengthened in the kingdom.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>CONSIDERABLE<\/strong> <strong>PERSONAL<\/strong> <strong>ADVANTAGES<\/strong>. &#8220;The Lord magnified him exceedingly.&#8221; Taking this with the same expression (and the words that accompany it) in <span class='bible'>1Ch 29:25<\/span>, we may safely infer that God had given him:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. A noble and commanding presence, such as attracts and affects those who behold it (see <span class='bible'>Psa 45:2<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. A winning address, a bearing and demeanour which drew men to him and called forth their good will.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. A mind of unusual capacity, an intellectual superiority that enabled him to acquit himself honourably in private and in public affairs. Thus was he &#8220;magnified exceedingly;&#8221; he was held in high honour, was &#8220;made great&#8221; in the estimation of all the people.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>FAVOURING<\/strong> <strong>PRESENCE<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>. &#8220;The Lord his God was with him.&#8221; How much is held and hidden in that simple phrase,&#8221; God was with him&#8221; (see <span class='bible'>Gen 21:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 39:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 18:14<\/span>)! It meant that God was with him to shield him from harm, to direct him in difficulty, to inspire him with wisdom, to sustain him in trial, to enrich him with every needful good. God was attending his steps and &#8220;laying his hand upon him.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We may say that this was not only a bright, but even a brilliant, beginning of the king&#8217;s career. We cannot hope for a commencement like that; that is only granted to the few, to the very few indeed. This is true, but it is also true that to most if not to all men, certainly to those of us who have a knowledge of God in Christ Jesus, there is possible a bright beginning of active life. In all or nearly all cases there is:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. A <em>heritage from those who have gone before us. <\/em>From our parents, from our forefathers, from the toil and struggle and suffering of our race, there comes to us a heritage of<strong> <\/strong>good. This may be material wealth; or, if not that, knowledge, truth, wisdom, precious thought in striking and powerful language, inspiring examples of heroic deeds and noble lives. If not sons of such fathers as David, we are the children of privilege, we are &#8220;the heirs of all the ages.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>Some personal advantages; <\/em>either in bodily skill, or in address, or in mental equipment, or in strength of will, or in force of character.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong><em>. God<\/em>&#8216;<em>s gracious and favouring presence. <\/em>For if we are &#8220;reconciled to him by the death of his Son,&#8221; we may most surely count on the promise that he will be &#8220;with us;&#8221; with us not only to observe our course and mark our life, but to direct our ways, to &#8220;strengthen&#8221; us in our sphere, however humble our kingdom may beto make our life fruitful of good and blessing, to enrich us with much pure and elevating joy, to guide us to the goal and to the prize. Let us but yield ourselves to him whose we are, and to that service where our freedom and our duty alike are found, and ours will be a bright beginning that shall have promise of a still fairer and brighter ending.C.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:3-5<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The ark and the altar; obedience and sacrifice.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>How came it to pass that the ark was in one place, and the tabernacle and the brazen altar in another? How did it happen that the ark was in Jerusalem, and the altar of sacrifice at Gibeon? Surely they should have been together. So it was originally ordained; so it was at the beginning; and that was the final disposition. There was something irregular and not according to the commandment in the arrangement described in the text. It is difficult to understand how such a departure from the Divine plan could exist in a dispensation in which careful and even minute conformity to detail was accounted a virtue. The connection and the disconnection of these two institutions may suggest to us<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>OUR<\/strong> <strong>TWOFOLD<\/strong> <strong>OBLIGATION<\/strong> <strong>AS<\/strong> <strong>SYMBOLIZED<\/strong> <strong>BY<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>ARK<\/strong> <strong>AND<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>ALTAR<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. Of these one is <em>worship <\/em>or <em>sacrifice. <\/em>Men approached the altar of Jehovah with their gifts or sacrifices, and they then came consciously into his presence; they brought their oblations to him; they made a direct appeal to him for his mercy and his blessing. This forms one part; and a large part, of the obligation under which we rest toward God. Jew or Gentile, under any dispensation whether old or new, we are sacredly bound to draw near to God in reverent worship, to bring to him our pure and our costly offerings, to entreat of him his Divine favour, to pay unto him our vows.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. The other is <em>obedience<\/em>. The ark contained the sacred tables of the Law on which were written by the hand of Moses the ten commandments. This was the great treasure of the ark, and it was always associated with these two tables; it was, therefore, the symbol of obedience. Both Jew and Gentile are under the very strongest bonds to &#8220;obey the voice of the<strong> <\/strong>Lord,&#8221; &#8220;to keep his commandments,&#8221; to do that which is right in his sight, and to shun all those things which he has condemned.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>OUR<\/strong> <strong>TEMPTATION<\/strong>. We are often tempted to do in life and in fact what was pictured hereto put a distance between the altar and the ark, between worship and obedience. Too often there is a very wide gap, even a deep gulf, between the two. One man makes everything of forms of devotion, and nothing of purity and excellence of conduct. Another makes everything of behaviour, and nothing of worship. We are<strong> <\/strong>led, either by the current of the time or by the inclination of our own individual tem- perament, to go off in one direction and to leave the highway of Divine wisdom; to exaggerate one aspect of truth and to depreciate another; to put asunder what God has joined together and meant to go together. And this exaggeration, this separation, ends in error, in faultiness, in serious departure from the mind and the will of God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>OUR<\/strong> <strong>WISDOM<\/strong>. As, later on, the ark and the altar were reunited, as they both stood within the precincts of the temple, and spoke of the vital connection between sacrifice and obedience, so should we see to it that, if there has been any separation of these two elements of piety in our experience, there should be a reunion and, in future, the closest association.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. The habit of obedience should include the act of worship; for worship is one of those things which God has enjoined.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. Each act of obedience should spring from the impulse which worship fostersa desire to please and honour the present and observant Lord.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. Worship should lead up to and end in obedience; for &#8220;to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams&#8221; The devotion that ends in service, in purity, in truthfulness, in fidelity, in self-forgetting kindness, is after the mind of Jesus Christ. Let the ark never be far from the altar, but worship and obedience be always in close companionship.C.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:7-12<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The Divine responsiveness, etc.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>From the interesting scene described in these verses (more fully in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:1-28<\/span>.) we may glean some lasting truths.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>WE<\/strong> <strong>MAY<\/strong> <strong>CONFIDENTLY<\/strong> <strong>RECKON<\/strong> <strong>ON<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>DIVINE<\/strong> <strong>RESPONSIVENESS<\/strong>. Solomon went to Gibeon with &#8220;all the congregation,&#8221; in very great state, to seek the Lord there, and there he offered abundant sacrifices (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:6<\/span>). And God responded to his act of piety by seeking him, by coming to him and making him a gracious and generous offer. Without any state, in lowliest obscurity, we may repair to the quiet and solitary place, and there seek God; and there, too, he will seek us and manifest himself to us, and he will bless and enrich us also. There is an unfailing and a large responsiveness in &#8220;him with whom we have to do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>HAS<\/strong> <strong>MANY<\/strong> <strong>WAYS<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>ACCESS<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>CHILDREN<\/strong>. (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:7<\/span>.) In Gibeon the Lord appeared to Solomon &#8220;in a dream by night&#8221; (<span class='bible'>1Ki 3:5<\/span>). At other times he appeared to his servants in a vision in their wakeful hours (<span class='bible'>Exo 3:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 6:1<\/span>). Our Lord was seen by the Apostle Paul under circumstances that were unique (<span class='bible'>Act 9:1-43<\/span>.), and subsequently he manifested himself in other ways to his servant. God has access to ushis childrenin many ways. At any time he may &#8220;lay his hand upon us;&#8221; he may make known his will to us. It is our wisdom to expect it; it is our duty to pray and to look for it.<\/p>\n<p>Ill. <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>SOLOMON<\/strong> <strong>SHOWED<\/strong> A <strong>DEEPER<\/strong> <strong>WISDOM<\/strong> <strong>THAN<\/strong> <strong>ANY<\/strong> <strong>HE<\/strong> <strong>ASKED<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>GIVE HIM<\/strong>. He asked for &#8220;wisdom and knowledge&#8221; (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:10<\/span>); and the wisdom he asked for was cleverness, penetration, political sagacity, subtlety of mind to read the thoughts of men, readiness to see at once what was the expedient policy to adopt, range of human learning. All this was valuable, and much to be desired; but all of this together was not wisdom of so deep and precious a kind as that shown by Solomon in making the<strong> <\/strong>choice he made. To ask for that gift which would enable him to fill well the sphere in which Divine providence had placed him,this was better than all possible intellectual equipments. No learning, no talent, no genius, is of such value and importance as the <em>spirit of fidelity. <\/em>Everything else without that will leave life a failure and make man a guilty being. But to be possessed with the spirit of faithfulness, to be supremely desirous of taking the part and doing the work to which God has called us,this is the true success, and this will end in well-being of a pure and lasting kind.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>WE<\/strong> <strong>SHOULD<\/strong> <strong>BE<\/strong> <strong>CONCERNED<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>MAINTAIN<\/strong> <strong>AND<\/strong> <strong>EVEN<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>ENLARGE<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>HERITAGE<\/strong> <strong>WE<\/strong> <strong>HAVE<\/strong> <strong>RECEIVED<\/strong>. (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:8<\/span>.) Solomon evidently felt deeply impressed, if not oppressed, with the thought that his father, David, had left a very great and serious charge in his hands, and he was rightly anxious that it should be well maintained. It becomes us, as members of. a family, as citizens of the nation, to consider what we have inherited from those who have gone before usfrom their labours and sufferings and prayers, and to ask ourselves what we are about to do to guard and to strengthen, and, if it may be so, to enlarge and enrich that precious legacy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>V.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>IF<\/strong> <strong>WE<\/strong> <strong>SEEK<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>BEST<\/strong> <strong>WE<\/strong> <strong>SHALL<\/strong> <strong>FIND<\/strong> <strong>MORE<\/strong> <strong>THAN<\/strong> <strong>WE<\/strong> <strong>SEEK<\/strong>. (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:11<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:12<\/span>.) Solomon&#8217;s happy experience of God&#8217;s graciousness is very far indeed from being singular. We may all participate here. If we seek rightness of soul with him we shall find it, end not only that, but a profound and most blessed peace of mind as well. If we seek purity of heart, we shall find what we seek, and happiness beside. If we seek the good of others we shall secure that end, and we shall at the same time be building up our own Christian character. Pursue the very best. and with the best of all will come that which is good, that which is not the highest, but which we shall be very glad to have and to enjoy.C.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:7<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>God&#8217;s offer to the young.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;What<em> <\/em>a splendid and enviable position!&#8221; we are<strong> <\/strong>inclined to say; &#8220;one removed from ours by the whole breadth of fortune. How utterly unlike the conditions under which we freed ourselves to-day!&#8221; But is it so? Is there<strong> <\/strong>not, on the other hand, quite as much of comparison as of contrast between the<strong> <\/strong>position of the young sovereign and our own, as we look forward to the future that awaits us? Does not God say to each one of us, &#8220;Ask what I shall give thee?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THERE<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> A <strong>NOBLE<\/strong> <strong>FUTURE<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>FRONT<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>US<\/strong>. Only a very small fraction of mankind may look for royalty or high rank, for large wealth or extensive power. But<strong> <\/strong>it is highly probable that if this were our lot, we should envy those who, in hummer spheres, were saved the many penalties of prominence and power. And, apart from this, there is a very true heritage which is open to us all. More or less at our command. arebeginning at the bottom of the scale, and moving upwards:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. Bodily comforts; and these lowest gratifications are the more worthy and lasting as they are more pure and moderate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. Human friendshipdomestic love, the sweet and sacred ties of the heart and the home.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. Mental activitythe intellectual enjoyment which comes from the observation of the works of God and the mastery of the works of men; all the keen, strong, elevating delights of the active mind.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4<\/strong>. The service of God, the friendship of Jesus Christ; thus realizing the end and attaining the true satisfaction of our being.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5<\/strong>. Working with God; out-working with him the great redemptive scheme he has designed and is effecting.<\/p>\n<p><strong>6<\/strong>. A high and happy place in the heavenly kingdom. Such large and noble heritage God offers to give the children of men, whether born in a palace or in a cottage.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>MAKES<\/strong> <strong>THIS<\/strong> <strong>OFFER<\/strong> <strong>ON<\/strong> <strong>CONDITIONS<\/strong>. His offer to Solomon was not absolutely unconditional; he would not have been the wise or learned man he became if he had not studied; nor the rich man he became if he had been a mere spendthrift, etc. God is <em>too kind <\/em>to any of his children to grant them his gifts without attaching Conditions which must be fulfilled. He says, &#8220;Here is my gift, but you must ask me for it; and the <em>way to ask <\/em>for it is <em>to fulfil the conditions <\/em>on which I bestow it. Shall I give you temporal prosperity? ask for it by being diligent, temperate, civil, faithful. Shall I give you human love, the esteem of those around you? ask for it by being virtuous, honourable, generous, amiable. Shall I give you knowledge, wisdom? ask for it by being studious. Shall I give you eternal life? ask for it by fulfilling the conditions on which it is promisedrepentance toward God, and faith in Jesus Christ. <em>Ask <\/em>what I shall give you; take the course which you know is the one constant antecedent of my bestowal.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>EVERYTHING<\/strong> <strong>HANGS<\/strong> <strong>ON<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>WISDOM<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>OUR<\/strong> <strong>CHOICE<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>It is sad to think that many go through life without caring <em>to accept God<\/em>&#8216;<em>s challenge <\/em>at all; they pass through a life charged with precious opportunities, freighted with golden chances, never caring to inquire how much they may make of the life that is slipping through their hands.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. Others deliberately choose <em>the lower good; <\/em>they ask for comfort, for pleasure, for gratification, for abundance of earthly good, or for nothing higher than human love.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. Our wisdom is to ask God for <em>the highest good; <\/em>for the diamond, and not the granite; for the cup that heals, and not for that which soothes; for the key that opens to the rich treasury, and not that which unlocks only a cabinet of curiosities; for that which will make the heart pure and holy, and the life noble and useful, and which will make death to be lighted up with a glorious hope;to ask for heavenly wisdom and eternal life. We should ask for the best because it <em>is <\/em>the best and highest; and also because, as with Solomon, it commands the lower good as well (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:11<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:12<\/span>). Let us seek first the kingdom of God, because that is the one good, the supreme thing to seek, and also because other and lower things are added to it (<span class='bible'>Mat 6:33<\/span>).C.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:13-17<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>From the altar to the throne.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A great step was now taken. Solomon, the young man, mounted the throne of his father David; in so doing he assumed the function of one who had behind him a large and varied experience, and who had above and around him the assured and proved loving-kindness of God. Solomon began his reign most promisingly. We gather<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>HE<\/strong> <strong>DID<\/strong> <strong>WELL<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>STEP<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>THRONE<\/strong> <strong>FROM<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>ALTAR<\/strong>. He came &#8220;<em>from before the tabernacle <\/em> and reigned&#8221; (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:13<\/span>). There could have been no place so suitable as that where Jehovah was worshipped from which to ascend to kingly power. There is no resort so good as the throne of grace, from which we can ascend any throne of authority or power to-day. It is well, indeed, to pass from intercourse with God to association with men and to the conduct of human affairs. The visit to the house of the Lord, fellowship with Christ at his table or in our own chamber, will give a calmness of spirit, an unselfishness of aim, and a steadfastness of principle which will go far to qualify us for the difficult duties and heavy burdens and  the serious battles of daily life.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>ONE<\/strong> <strong>MAN<\/strong> <strong>MAY<\/strong> <strong>HOLD<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>HAND<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>WELL<\/strong>&#8211;<strong>BEING<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>MANY<\/strong>. Solomon &#8220;reigned over Israel.&#8221; In those days <em>reigning meant governing. <\/em>And though the Hebrew monarchy was not actually absolute, it was invested with great power. A good sovereign wrought great blessings, and a bad one caused terrible evils to his country. Great power, in the shape of royal authority, has passed or is passing away. But still men &#8220;reign'&#8221;<em> <\/em>over otherslead, direct, rule, influence, mightily affect them for good or evil. Very great power has the statesman, the preacher, the poet, the principal, the teacher. The possession of power is usually esteemed a thing to be greatly coveted. But it is as full of solemn responsibility as it is of noble opportunity; it calls for a deep sense of obligation and accountability; also for peculiar prayerfulness of spirit and of habit. Humble and not proud, conscious of dependence on God and not self-sufficient, should be the man of high position and commanding influence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>AFFLUENCE<\/strong> <strong>MAY<\/strong> <strong>BE<\/strong> A <strong>GOOD<\/strong> <strong>SIGN<\/strong>, <strong>BUT<\/strong> <strong>IT<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> A <strong>PERILOUS<\/strong> <strong>CONDITION<\/strong>. All those instances of national prosperity related in the textthe abundance of horses and chariots, and of gold and silver, the cultivation of choice trees, etc.were signs that Jehovah was favouring the land, and that Solomon was fulfilling his early promise. But affluence, whether individual or national, is a dangerous condition. It tends to luxury; and luxury leads only too often to sloth and self-indulgence; and these lead straight to wrong-doing and impiety. It is &#8220;a slippery place,&#8221; where a few can walk without stumbling, but where the many slip. and fall.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. Envy not the greatly prosperous; plenteousness of gold and silver may impoverish the soul while it enriches the treasury.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. Care much, care most, for the abundance of Christian truth, of sterling principle, of generous helpfulness.C.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILIES BY T. WHITELAW<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1-6<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The beginning of a reign.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>I.  THE<\/strong> <strong>KING<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>PERSON<\/strong> <strong>MAGNIFIED<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>The<\/em> <em>owner of an auspicious nameSolomon, <\/em>&#8220;Peace,&#8221; equivalent to <em>Friederich <\/em>or <em>Frederick <\/em>Perhaps<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> alluding to the fact that when he was born his father was at peace with God (<span class='bible'>2Sa 12:24<\/span>). God&#8217;s mercies, especially to the soul, are worthy of commemoration (<span class='bible'>Psa 103:2<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> Reflecting the peace which at that time prevailed in the land, his birth most likely not having taken place till after the capture of Rabbah, and the termination of the Ammonitish war (Keil). When David&#8217;s greater son, the Prince of Peace, was born, &#8220;the (Roman) empire was peace.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> Prognosticating the peaceful character of his rule (<span class='bible'>Psa 72:7<\/span>), and the undisturbed rest of his reign (<span class='bible'>1Ki 4:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 22:9<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong><em>. The son of a distinguished fatherDavid. <\/em>Originally a Bethlehem shepherd-lad (<span class='bible'>1Sa 16:1<\/span>), Jesse&#8217;s youngest son climbed the giddy heights of fame with marvellous celerity and success, becoming in swift succession a brilliant warrior, a skilful harper, an agreeable courtier, a popular leader, a trusted sovereign, a sweet singer, a devout psalmist, a far-seeing prophet. Possessed of almost every qualification requisite to render him the idol of his fellows, he found the pathway of greatness easier to tread than do men of smaller stature and less-gifted soul. To have been the son of such a sire was no mean honour to Solomon, though it entailed upon him correspondingly large responsibility; while, if it multiplied his chances of achieving in the future a similar distinction for himself, it no less certainly created for him difficulties from which otherwise he might have been exempt.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. The <em>heir of a prosperous empireIsrael. <\/em>The kingdom inherited by Solomon had been carved by the sword of David. The Philistines had been driven back to their plains, retaining, however, the strongholds of Gath and Gezer at the edge of the hill country. The capital of the Ammonites, Rabbah, had been taken, and the census embraced all the Holy Land from Beersheba to Sidon, ruled by the king at Jerusalem&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4<\/strong>. The <em>representative of a Divine SuperiorJehovah. <\/em>Solomon ascended David&#8217;s throne by Divine right, because by Divine grace and for Divine ends (<span class='bible'>Psa 2:6<\/span>). Solomon was Jehovah&#8217;s vassal, and held his regal power only on condition of ruling in Jehovah&#8217;s name and for Jehovah&#8217;s glory (<span class='bible'>2Sa 22:3<\/span>). If Solomon was<strong> <\/strong>Israel&#8217;s king, Jehovah was Solomon&#8217;s.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>KING<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>THRONE<\/strong> <strong>ESTABLISHED<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. By removal of his enemies. <\/em>In particular by the execution of three dangerous characters.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> Joab, his cousin (<span class='bible'>1Ch 2:16<\/span>), a general of commanding abilities and restless ambition, who with the army at his<strong> <\/strong>back might soon have embroiled the land in war and prevented the hope of a peaceful reign from being realized.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> Shimei, a Benjamite, a personal enemy of David (<span class='bible'>2Sa 16:5-13<\/span>), who, besides having broken his parole (<span class='bible'>1Ki 2:36-46<\/span>), could not be trusted not to contrive mischief against David&#8217;s son.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> Adonijah, a half-brother of Solomon (<span class='bible'>2Sa 3:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 3:1<\/span>), a formidable rival, who, in virtue of his right of primogeniture, pretended to the crown, and might have been the means of stirring up civil faction in the land, Difficult to justify on grounds of Christian morality, these assassinations nevertheless contributed to the establishment of Solomon&#8217;s throne.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>By the union of his subjects. <\/em>As yet the empire was undivided. The ten tribes still adhered to the house of David. &#8220;All Israel obeyed him, and all the princes and the mighty men, and all the sons likewise of King David, submitted themselves unto Solomon the king&#8221; (<span class='bible'>1Ch 29:23<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ch 29:24<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>By the help of his God. <\/em>&#8220;The Lord his God was with him, and magnified him exceedingly.&#8221; As Divine grace set, so Divine power kept him on the throne. Without Heaven&#8217;s favour and assistance kings just as little as common men can prosper. As Jehovah giveth the kingdom to whomsoever he will (<span class='bible'>Dan 4:25<\/span>), so through him alone can kings reign (<span class='bible'>Pro 8:15<\/span>). He also removeth and setteth up kings (<span class='bible'>Dan 2:21<\/span>); yea, the hearts of kings are in his hand (<span class='bible'>Pro 21:1<\/span>). Jehovah was with Solomon in virtue of the promise made to David (<span class='bible'>2Sa 7:12<\/span>), and because of the piety which still distinguished himself (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:6<\/span>; cf. <span class='bible'>2Ch 15:2<\/span>). This was the true secret of Solomon&#8217;s prosperity upon the throne no less than of Joseph&#8217;s in the prison (<span class='bible'>Gen 39:2<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>KING<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>ALLEGIANCE<\/strong> <strong>TENDERED<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>Before the tabernacle of the Lord. <\/em>This then at Gibeon, five miles north-west of Jerusalem. Originally a Canaanitish royal city (<span class='bible'>Jos 9:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 10:2<\/span>), and afterwards the scene of a clever fraud perpetrated upon Joshua by its inhabitants, as well as of a bloody battle in their defence (<span class='bible'>Jos 10:1-14<\/span>), it latterly became in David&#8217;s time, because of the presence of the tabernacle, a Levitical city with a high place presided over by Zadok and his brethren (<span class='bible'>1Ch 16:39<\/span>). Thither accordingly Solomon repaired to inaugurate his reign by professing fealty and submission to the King of kings.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>With the offering of sacrifice. <\/em>Within the tabernacle court stood the brazen altar of Bezaleel (<span class='bible'>Exo 38:1<\/span>), upon which were offered a thousand burnt offeringsa magnificent service, even for a king, and symbolic of<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> the homage he presented to Jehovah,<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> the consecration he then made of himself to the work to which Jehovah had called him, and<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> the desire he cherished that his reign might be begun and ended in Jehovah&#8217;s favour and under Jehovah&#8217;s protection.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. &#8220;<em>In the presence of his people. <\/em>&#8220;All the congregation,&#8221; in its representatives, &#8220;went with him to the high place at Gibeon.&#8221; Not ashamed of his religion, Solomon acknowledged his dependence on and submission to Jehovah in the most public manner. So are kings, princes, subjects, all men, expected to confess God and Christ before men (<span class='bible'>Mat 10:32<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>Learn:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. The value of a good beginning, in business as in religion. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. The need of Divine assistance in all undertakings. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. The propriety of consecrating all to God in youth. <\/p>\n<p><strong>4<\/strong>. The possibility of declining from early faith. <\/p>\n<p><strong>5<\/strong>. The duty of never being ashamed of religion. <\/p>\n<p><strong>6<\/strong>. The melancholy fact that good men may do doubtful actions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>7<\/strong>. The beauty and propriety of social worship.W.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:7-12<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A young king&#8217;s choice.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>I.  THE<\/strong> <strong>PERMISSION<\/strong> <strong>GRANTED<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>SOLOMON<\/strong>. &#8220;Ask what I shall give thee.&#8221; Granted:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. By whom<\/em>?<em> God <\/em>(<em>Elohim<\/em>)<em>, <\/em>the Giver <em>par excellence, <\/em>of whom David had said, &#8220;All things come of thee&#8221; (<span class='bible'>1Ch 29:14<\/span>); &#8220;The earth is full of the goodness of the Lord&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Psa 33:5<\/span>); and whom a New Testament writer describes as &#8220;the Father of lights,&#8221; etc. (<span class='bible'>Jas 1:5<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Jas 1:17<\/span>). The invitation here accorded to Solomon, after the manner of Oriental monarchs (<span class='bible'>Est 5:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Est 9:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 14:7<\/span>), was and is pre-eminently after the manner of the King of kings (<span class='bible'>Mat 7:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jas 1:5<\/span>). Christ extends the same to his followers: &#8220;If ye shall ask anything in my Name, I will do it&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Joh 14:14<\/span>; cf. <span class='bible'>Joh 16:23<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Joh 16:24<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>When<\/em>?<em> <\/em>&#8220;In that night;&#8221;<em> i.e. <\/em>after the day in which Solomon had been offering sacrificenot without significance. God is not likely to appear at night, at least in grace, to them who have been unmindful of him throughout the day.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. How? In a dream-vision (<span class='bible'>1Ki 3:5<\/span>), which, however, warrants not the deduction that the incident had no solid basis of reality, and that here is only the record of a dream. Even were this correct, it would not be without value as showing the current and tenor of Solomon&#8217;s thoughts and feelings during the preceding day. Men seldom have pleasant dreams of God upon their midnight couches who have not had him in their thoughts all their waking hours. Yet that in Solomon&#8217;s dream were a veritable manifestation of God to his soul, and a <em>bona fide <\/em>transaction of asking and answering, of giving and receiving, is proved by the fact that Solomon obtained what he asked.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4<\/strong>. Why? To prove<strong> <\/strong>what was in Solomon&#8217;s heart, to test whether the ceremonies of the preceding day had been the outcome and expression of a genuinely devout soul, to ascertain whether he had ascended the throne with a clear grasp of the situation, whether he knew what he most required for the successful execution of his kingly office. So God still tests his people and men in general by extending to them a similar permission to that he gave Solomon (<span class='bible'>Mat 7:7<\/span>), and by occasionally in his providence bringing them into situations where they must choose, as Solomon was invited to do, what they shall have as their chief good.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>REQUEST<\/strong> <strong>PREFERRED<\/strong> <strong>BY<\/strong> <strong>SOLOMON<\/strong>. &#8220;Give me now wisdom and knowledge.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. The purport of this request. <\/em>If &#8220;wisdom &#8220;and&#8221; knowledge&#8221; are to be distinguished, which is doubtful, the former will be the general and the latter the particular, the former the principle the latter the application, the former the root the latter the fruit (cf. <span class='bible'>Pro 8:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph 1:17<\/span>); &#8220;wisdom,&#8221; the soul&#8217;s capacity for seeing truth and discerning its adaptations to the particular exigencies of life; &#8220;knowledge,&#8221; that truth as apprehended and possessed by the soul. Solomon craved the spirit of wisdom, that with clear and single vision he might &#8220;see&#8221; God&#8217;s will concerning himself in every situation in his future career, and the faculty of apprehension that he might always know what that will required him to do. No prayer could have been more appropriate in his lips at the important juncture in life at which he stood. No prayer could better befit any one at any juncture. The prime necessities of the soul arean eye to see and light to see with, a capacity to find out and comprehend God&#8217;s will concerning itself (<span class='bible'>Psa 143:8<\/span>). The Gentiles walk in the vanity of their minds, through the ignorance that is in them (<span class='bible'>Eph 4:18<\/span>). God&#8217;s people go astray mostly through defect of knowledge (<span class='bible'>Isa 5:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co 15:34<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>The reason of this request. <\/em>Solomon, conscious of inexperience and inability to discharge the duties of the kingly office, felt he could not rightly &#8220;go out and come in before&#8221; or &#8220;adequately judge&#8221; so great a people as Israel. A hopeful sign for Solomon it was that he knew and was willing to confess his want of wisdom and knowledge. As the first step towards holiness is to acknowledge sin, so the first genuine movement in the direction of self-improvement of any kind is the admission of defect. Solomon confessed himself a little child, who knew not how to go out or come in (<span class='bible'>1Ki 1:7<\/span>), and Tennyson in similar language depicts the natural condition of the race<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Behold, we know not anything;<br \/>So runs my dream; but what am I?<\/p>\n<p>An infant crying in the night,<br \/>An infant crying for the light,<\/p>\n<p>And with no language but a cry.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>(&#8216;In Memoriam,&#8217; 54.)<\/p>\n<p>It is doubtful, however, if that expresses the mood of any but the loftier spirits. When souls begin to cry for light they are no longer absolutely blind, but have become conscious of and are pained by the darkness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>The plea of this request. <\/em>Not that he was a great man&#8217;s son, and indeed a great man himself, at least in social position, or that his youth had been virtuously spent, and that he was even then piously inclined; but that God had graciously covenanted with David his father, promising to be a father to David&#8217;s son, and to establish David&#8217;s throne for ever (<span class='bible'>2Sa 7:12-16<\/span>). So with no plea but that of grace, and no argument but that of God&#8217;s covenant with men on the ground of Christ&#8217;s sacrifice, need suppliants on any errand approach the throne of God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>ANSWER<\/strong> <strong>RETURNED<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>SOLOMON<\/strong>. &#8220;<em>Wisdom <\/em>and knowledge is granted unto thee; and I will give thee,&#8221; etc.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>What Solomon had asked was obtained. <\/em>So God still gives to them that ask him for the higher blessings of his gracegives unconditionally, freely, and exactly as men ask. So Christ says to his disciples,&#8221; All things whatsoever ye desire in prayer, believing, ye shall receive &#8216; (<span class='bible'>Mat 21:22<\/span>). And even when they ask temporal or material blessings not inconsistent with their higher good, these are not withheld (<span class='bible'>Psa 84:11<\/span>). See the case of the blind men of Jericho who were cured (<span class='bible'>Mat 20:34<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>What Solomon had not asked was superadded. <\/em>He had not asked wealth, fame, power, or long life; and just because he had asked none of these<strong> <\/strong>things, lo! all these things were added. So Christ says, &#8220;Seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things [food, raiment, etc.] will be added&#8221;thrown into the bargain (<span class='bible'>Mat 6:33<\/span>); and Paul adds that &#8220;<em>God <\/em>is able to do for us exceeding abundantly above all we can ask or think&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Eph 3:20<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Eph 3:21<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>Learn:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. The liberty God&#8217;s people have in prayer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. The superiority of wisdom,<em> i.e. <\/em>of heavenly wisdom (<span class='bible'>Jas 3:17<\/span>), over all earthly things (<span class='bible'>Pro 4:7<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. The reality of answers to prayer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4<\/strong>. The profit of sometimes limiting our requests at God&#8217;s throne.W.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:13-17<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The glory of Solomon.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>I.  HIS<\/strong> <strong>SPLENDID<\/strong> <strong>EQUIPAGE<\/strong>. &#8220;Solomon gathered chariots and horsemen.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. A sign of great prosperity. <\/em>Mentioned on this account rather than as a proof of the expensiveness and burdensomeness of Solomon&#8217;s reign (Ewald).<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> A discrepancy. Solomon had 40,000 stalls (<span class='bible'>1Ki 4:26<\/span>; Josephus, &#8216;Ant. Jud.,&#8217; 8.2. 4); 12,000 horsemen and 1400 chariots (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:14<\/span>; 2Ch 10:1-19 :26); 4000 stalls and 12,000 horsemen (<span class='bible'>2Ch 9:25<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> An explanation. The stalls probably were 4000, the horsemen 12,000, and the chariots 1400. The Israelitish war-chariot, like the Egyptian and Assyrian, may have been two-horsed, in which case 1400 chariots would represent 2800 horses. A reserve force of 1200 would bring the total number of horses to 4000, which would require 4000 stalls: That the horsemen should be 12,000 may be explained by supposing that, as Solomon&#8217;s equestrian equipage was more for show than action, each horse may have had a rider as well as each chariot a charioteer; or the term &#8220;horsemen&#8221; may have embraced all persons connected with the equestrian service.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong><em>. An act of great wickedness. <\/em>If the Divine prohibition (<span class='bible'>Deu 17:16<\/span>) forbade not the actual possession of horses by Israelitish kings, it certainly condemned their indefinite multiplication. David respected this prohibition (<span class='bible'>2Sa 8:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 18:4<\/span>); Solomon overstepped its limits, consequently what Moses had predicted ensuedfirst Solomon sought a matrimonial alliance with (<span class='bible'>1Ki 3:1<\/span>), and then the people put their trust in, Egypt (<span class='bible'>2Ki 18:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 31:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Hos 7:11<\/span>). The glory of princes does not always harmonize with the commands of the King of kings. Solomon&#8217;s horsemen and chariots were partly kept in Jerusalem to augment his magnificence, and partly distributed through chariot-cities, not so much to overawe the people as for convenience in providing fodder for the beasts, and meeting the state necessities of the king.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>ENORMOUS<\/strong> <strong>WEALTH<\/strong>. The revenues of Solomon were:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>Varied. <\/em>Gold and silver and cedar wood; the precious metals obtained from Ophir, in South Arabia (Ewald, Keil, Bahr, etc.), by means of Tarshish ships (cf. the modern expressions, &#8220;India-men,&#8221; &#8220;Greenlanders&#8221;), which sailed from Ezion-geber, on the Red Sea (<span class='bible'>2Ch 9:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:26-28<\/span>), and also from the numerous Eastern potentates&#8221;all the kings of the earth&#8221; (<span class='bible'>2Ch 9:23<\/span>), who came to hear his wisdom, and brought every man his present, vessels of silver and vessels of gold (<span class='bible'>2Ch 9:24<\/span>); the timber purchased from Hiram of Tyre, and procured from Mount Lebanon (<span class='bible'>1Ki 5:10<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>Abundant. <\/em>Making large allowance for rhetorical exaggeration, the crown wealth in Solomon&#8217;s days was immense. Even if the gold and silver were barely as plentiful as stones (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:15<\/span>), one may judge of its quantity by the statements that &#8220;the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred and sixty-six talents&#8221;, besides that brought by chapmen, merchants, foreign kings, and provincial governors (<span class='bible'>2Ch 9:13<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:14<\/span>; I Kings <span class='bible'>2Ch 10:14<\/span>, <span class='bible'>2Ch 10:15<\/span>). This accumulation of wealth in the hands of the crown, more accordant with ancient than with modem practice, was likewise then more excusable than now for obvious religious as well as political reasons.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>COMMERCIAL<\/strong> <strong>ENTERPRISE<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>How far it extended. <\/em>To Egypt, The first mention of commercial intercourse between Israel and Egypt, this is also one of the earliest indications of contact between these two peoples since the Exodus; and the silence of Scripture as to Egypt during the long interval between the Exodus and the age of Solomon receives a striking confirmation from the monuments, which show &#8220;no really great or conquering monarch between Rameses <strong>III<\/strong>. and Sheshonk I.&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong><em>. In what it consisted. <\/em>Horses and chariots. A native of Armenia and Media, whence it was fetched by the Jews to Palestine (<span class='bible'>Ezr 2:66<\/span>), the horse had been used in Egypt from the earliest times (<span class='bible'>Gen 41:43<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 47:17<\/span>), and in Solomon&#8217;s time had been brought by the Egyptians to a high degree of cultivation in respect both of swiftness and couragetwo qualities highly serviceable for war. Hence Solomon naturally turned to the Nile valley when he thought of setting up an equestrian establishment. The manufacturing of war-chariots had also engaged the attention of the Pharaohs and their people; and these likewise were imported by the Israelitish monarch. Taking the shekel at 3s. 4d; the price of a horse was 25, and of a war-chariot (perhaps with two horses and harness) 100 sterling.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>By whom it was conducted. <\/em>By the king&#8217;s merchants, who were so called, not because, as foreign horse-dealers settled in the country, they were required to contribute to the king&#8217;s treasury a portion of their gains in the shape of an income-tax (Bertheau), but because they traded for the king (Keil), acting as his agents, going down to Egypt, purchasing the animals in droves, and fetching them up for his use. So skilful did these merchants show themselves both in judging of the animals and in driving bargains with Egyptian dealers, and so far had their fame travelled, that their services were sought for by the Hittite and Syrian kings of the day.<\/p>\n<p><strong>LESSONS<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. The criminality of disobedience. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. The danger of wealth. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. The advantages of trade and commerce.W.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Complete Pulpit Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2. SOLOMON2 Chronicles 1-9<\/p>\n<p><em>a<\/em>. His Solemn Sacrifice at Gibeon, and his Riches.Ch. 1<\/p>\n<p>. <em>The Sacrifice at Gibeon, and the Dream of Solomon:<\/em> <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1-13<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1<\/span> And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and 2the Lord his God was with him, and magnified him exceedingly. And Solomon said unto all Israel, to the captains of thousands, and of hundreds, and to the judges, and to every ruler in all Israel, the chiefs of houses. 3And Solomon, and all the congregation with him, went to the high place that was at Gibeon; for there was the tent of meeting of God, which Moses the servant of God had made in the wilderness. 4But the ark of God had David brought up from Kiriath-jearim to the place which David had prepared for 5it: for he had pitched a tent for it at Jerusalem. And the brazen altar, that Bezaleel the son of Uri, the son of Hur, had made, was there<span class=''>1<\/span> before the tabernacle of the Lord; and Solomon and the congregation sought him. 6And Solomon offered there before the Lord, on the brazen altar which belonged to the tent of meeting; and he offered upon it a thousand burnt-offerings.<\/p>\n<p>7In that night did God appear unto Solomon, and said unto him, Ask what I shall give thee. 8And Solomon said unto God, Thou hast showed great mercy unto David my father, and hast made me king in his stead. 9Now, O Lord God, Thy word unto David my father must be true; for Thou hast made me king over a people numerous as the dust of the earth. 10Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and in before this people; for who can judge this Thy great people. 11And God said unto Solomon, Because this was in thy heart, and thou hast not asked riches, treasures, and glory, nor the life of thine enemies, neither hast thou asked long life; but hast asked wisdom and knowledge for thyself, that thou mayest judge my people, over whom I have made thee king. 12Wisdom and knowledge are given unto thee, and riches and treasures and glory will I give thee, such as none of the kings that were before thee have had, and none after thee shall 13have the like. And Solomon came from<span class=''>2<\/span> the high place that was at Gibeon to Jerusalem, from before the tent of meeting and he reigned over Israel.<span class=''>3<\/span> <\/p>\n<p>. <em>Solomons Power and Wealth:<\/em> <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:14-17<\/span><\/p>\n<p>14And Solomon gathered chariots and riders: and he had a thousand and four hundred chariots, and twelve thousand riders; and he placed them in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem. 15And the king made silver and gold in Jerusalem as stones; and cedars he made as the sycamores that 16are in the Shephelah for abundance. And the export of horses for Solomon was out of Egypt; and the company of the kings merchants fetched a troop 17for a certain price. And they brought up, and took out of Egypt a chariot for six hundred silver shekels, and a horse for a hundred and fifty: and they brought them out for all the kings of the Hittites and the kings of Syria.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EXEGETICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. Preliminary Remark, and elucidation of <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1<\/span>.The accounts contained in the foregoing two small sections, to which <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:4-15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:26-29<\/span> are parallel, serve to introduce the report of the building and dedication of the temple, which occupy far the greatest space in the representation given by our author of the history of Solomon. As general superscription is prefixed <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1<\/span> : And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, properly, on, or with, his kingdom, ; comp.  , <span class='bible'>2Ch 17:1<\/span>, and <span class='bible'>2Ch 12:13<\/span>, 2Ch 13:21, <span class='bible'>2Ch 21:4<\/span>, which parallels likewise show that , be strengthened, does not refer to pretenders to the crown, by setting aside of whom confirmation follows; and hence there is here no concealed allusion to Adonijah (<span class='bible'>1 Kings 2<\/span> :).<em>And the Lord his God was with him<\/em> (comp. <span class='bible'>1Ch 9:9<\/span>), <em>and magnified him exceedingly<\/em>; comp. 1Ch 29:25; <span class='bible'>1Ch 22:5<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>2. The Sacrifice at Gibeon: <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:2-6<\/span>; comp. <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:4<\/span>.<em>And Solomon said unto all Israel, to the captains<\/em>, etc. This addition of the chiefs of the people and representatives of the kingdom at the sacrifice is not mentioned in the book of Kings; but the matter is understood of itself (comp. the similar cases in the history of David, <span class='bible'>1Ch 13:1<\/span> f., <span class='bible'>1Ch 23:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 28:1<\/span>).<em>The chiefs of houses<\/em>. Before  , is to be supplied, as the whole phrase is an explanatory apposition to .<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:4<\/span>. <em>For there was the tent of meeting of God<\/em>. Comp. on 1 Chron. 5:30 ff., <span class='bible'>1Ch 16:39<\/span> f.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:4<\/span>. <em>But the ark of God had David<\/em>, etc.; comp. 1 Chronicles 13, 15. For the elliptical construction , to (the place) which he prepared for it, where the article in  supplies the place of the relative , comp. 1Ch 15:12; <span class='bible'>1Ch 24:28<\/span>; also <span class='bible'>Jdg 5:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rth 1:5<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:5<\/span>. <em>And the brazen altar . . . was there before the tabernacle of the Lord<\/em>, that is, the Gibeonite sanctuary was still the legal, as it were the official and historically rightful place for burnt-offerings: comp. <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:29<\/span> f., where, on the occasion of the choice of the floor of Oman on Moriah for a place of burnt-offering, it is shown why David could not go to Gibeon to offer there. On Bezaleels construction of the brazen (copper) altar of burnt-offering, see <span class='bible'>Exo 31:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 37:1<\/span>. On the reading , as undoubtedly to be preferred to the Masoretic  (which arose from an unwarranted reference to <span class='bible'>Exo 40:29<\/span>), see Crit. Note.<em>And Solomon and the congregation sought him<\/em>, the Lord, not the altar; comp.  , <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:30<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 15:2<\/span>. Yet, for the reference of the verb to the altar, may be quoted (Luther: was wont to seek it), at all events, <span class='bible'>Amo 5:5<\/span>; comp. also <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:28<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:6<\/span>. <em>There before the Lord, on the brazen altar which was at the tent of meeting<\/em>. In the Heb.,   stands before the relative sentence   . Because the altar of burnt-offering had its place before the tabernacle (<span class='bible'>Exo 40:6<\/span>), it is designated as belonging to it; comp. <span class='bible'>1Ki 6:22<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>3. Gods Revelation to Solomon: <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:7-13<\/span>; comp. <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:5-15<\/span>.<em>In that night<\/em>, that followed the offering. That the manifestation of God to Solomon was effected by a nocturnal vision, seems at least to be indicated here, but is expressly stated in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:15<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:8<\/span>. <em>Thou hast showed great mercy unto David my father<\/em>. The fuller speech of Solomon in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:6-10<\/span> appears here (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:8-10<\/span>) much abbreviated.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:9<\/span>. <em>Thy word . . . must be true<\/em>, properly, must be established; comp. 1Ch 17:23; <span class='bible'>2Ch 6:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 8:26<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:10<\/span>. <em>Give me now wisdom and knowledge<\/em>.  (here with Pattach in the second syllable; elsewhere ; also <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:11-12<\/span>) denotes knowledge, insight, and is found, besides the present passage, only in <span class='bible'>Dan 1:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 1:17<\/span> and <span class='bible'>Ecc 10:20<\/span>.<em>That I may go out and in before this people<\/em>, may know all that belongs thereto, may worthily govern and defend them (Starke); the phrase, reminding us of <span class='bible'>Deu 31:2<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Sa 18:13<\/span>; 1Sa 18:16, <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:7<\/span>, denotes the unchecked public activity of the king toward his people.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:11<\/span>. <em>Because this was in thy heart; comp<\/em>. <span class='bible'>1Ch 22:7<\/span>.<em>Riches, treasures, and glory<\/em>. The same combination appears in <span class='bible'>Ecc 6:2<\/span>; , treasures, also in <span class='bible'>Ecc 5:18<\/span> (with ) and <span class='bible'>Jos 22:8<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:12<\/span>. <em>Wisdom . . . given to thee<\/em>. The construction  , as in <span class='bible'>Est 3:11<\/span> (<span class='bible'>1Ki 3:12<\/span>, , with the perf. ). In the following words, the Lord promises to Solomon riches, treasures, and glory indeed, but not long life, as in <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:14<\/span>. Whether this omission is intentional (because Solomon, on account of his subsequent fall, did not attain to old age) appears doubtful in the condensing manner of our author, which shows itself even in this promise of the Lord. On the ethical-eudmonistic sentence contained in <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:11-12<\/span> may be compared the word of Christ in the Sermon on the Mount: Seek ye first, etc., <span class='bible'>Mat 5:32<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:13<\/span>. <em>And Solomon came from the high place<\/em>. On the correctness of this reading (), see Crit. Note. The following addition: from the tent of meeting, which appears superfluous after from the high place, points again to the Gibeonite place of offering, and to the legal validity of the offerings presented there. Of the burnt and peace offerings, with the sacrificial feast, <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:15<\/span>, on the return of Solomon to Jerusalem before the ark, our author makes no mention, not because in his view the offering presented at the brazen altar in Gibeon only had legal validity (as Thenius thinks, in defiance of the express statements of our author, <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 21:26<\/span> ff.), but simply because these offerings, as well as the history there following (<span class='bible'>1Ki 3:26-28<\/span>) of the strife between the two women, and its settlement by the wise judgment of Solomon, appeared to be of no special importance for his plan (chiefly regarding the brilliant, glorious, and magnificent features of Solomons administration).<em>And he reigned over Israel<\/em>. These closing words of our verse are introductory to what follows, and would stand more suitably at the head of the following section, <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:14-17<\/span>, as they are found, <span class='bible'>1Ki 4:1<\/span>, in this more suitable position, and are there enlarged by the addition of  before , which the Syr. exhibits here (see Crit. Note).<\/p>\n<p>4. Solomons Power and Wealth: <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:14-17<\/span>.This short account of that which Solomon had in chariots, riders, and treasures, the Chronist presents as proof of the instant fulfilment of the promise of God to him in this passage, while in <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:26-29<\/span> it is found near the close of the reign of Solomon (parallel to the fuller account of a similar nature in <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:13<\/span> ff.). That accordingly that which is here recorded by our author is adduced a second time, the first time partly abbreviated, partly completed by additions see <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:25-28<\/span>), Thenius (on <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:26<\/span> ff.) explains by the assumption of a second occurrence of the section in his sources, and an inadvertent admission of both accounts, the identity of which was discovered too late. More correctly, Berth., Keil, etc., explain that the Chronist used his sources in a free and independent way, and accordingly of purpose admitted the partial repetition of the present account in <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:25<\/span> ff.<em>And he placed them in the chariot cities<\/em>. Instead of , laid them (so also <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:25<\/span> stands in <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:26<\/span> less definitely: , and he brought them; with regard to the number of the chariots (1400) and riders (12,000), the two texts agree. The chariot cities are cities in which the chariots and riders were stationed. They probably lay, partly near rich pasture grounds, partly in the neighbourhood of Egypt, principally in the south of the country; and the conjecture that the Simeonite towns Beth-marchaboth and Hazar-susim (<span class='bible'>1Ch 4:31<\/span>) belonged to them (Then., Berth., Kamph.) is on this account the more probable.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:15<\/span>. <em>And the king made silver and gold in Jerusalem as stones<\/em>. That the words and gold (), which are wanting in the parallels <span class='bible'>2Ch 9:27<\/span> and <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:27<\/span>, are to be erased, with the Pesch., in our passage also is very improbable; and the Sept. and Vulg. testify for their genuineness in this place. For <em>b<\/em>, comp. on <span class='bible'>1Ch 27:28<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:16<\/span>. <em>And the export of horses for Solomon<\/em>, properly, which belonged to Solomon.<em>The company of the kings merchants fetched a troop for a certain price<\/em>. Even so <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:28<\/span>, only that for the  there  is here twice written. For the correct understanding of the passage, see Bhr, <em>Bibelw<\/em>. vol. 7. p. 103.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ch 1:17<\/span>. <em>And they brought up, and took out of Egypt<\/em>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:29<\/span> : and there was fetched and brought out (  instead of our  ), otherwise literally as our passage, except that, perhaps by a corruption of the text, the  here wanting before   is rightly supplied. For the exposition, see also Bhr as above.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[1]<\/span>So according to the reading , which is attested by the Sept, Vulg, some mss., and most prints, while for the almost unmeaning  (<em>posuit<\/em>, he had set) the majority of mss. and the Chald. and the Syr. testify.<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[2]<\/span>The Sept., Vulg., Luther, etc., correctly: ; the  of the Masoretes, yielding no tolerable sense, appears to have crept into the text by looking back at <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:3<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[3]<\/span>The Peschito has over all Israel; comp. <span class='bible'>1Ki 4:1<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> CONTENTS<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> This second book of Chronicles takes up the subject of history where the former left off. Solomon&#8217;s entrance on his reign is here recorded: his solemn offering at Gibeon: his choice of wisdom: his strength, and riches.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> There is somewhat very interesting in this view of Solomon, on his entrance on his government. How beautiful is it to see magistrates first seeking grace and wisdom from the Lord, before that they take the reins of government into their hand. Is not the custom of our nation, in the election of chief magistrates in towns and cities, being preceded by prayer, to direct them in their choice; is it not taken from such scripture authority as this? I shall not offend, I hope, any of this character, (if peradventure any such should condescend to glance their eye on my Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary) when I add, it is a sight indeed most lovely, when men really and truly seek counsel from God on those occasions. Oh! what a beautiful portrait of magistracy hath Job drawn, when he says, I put on righteousness, and it clothed me; my judgment was as a robe and a diadem. I was eyes to the blind, and feet was I to the lame. I was a father to the poor, and the cause which I knew not I searched out. When Jesus, in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge, gives out of himself to the men that seek for him as for hidden treasure; then he is, and will be all this to his people. I would wish the Reader to peruse the whole passage. <span class='bible'>Job 29:5-17<\/span> . It should seem that the ark being at Jerusalem, and the altar at Gibeon, was for the present intended for the greater benefit of the church. Our Jesus is both the Ark and the Altar: and he, blessed be his name, is in all places, and with all his people always, even unto the end of the world. <span class='bible'>Mat 28:20<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 2Ch 1:1-12<\/p>\n<p> I. And Solomon [ 1Ki 2:46 ] the son of David was strengthened [a favourite expression with the writer of Chronicles. It recurs in chaps. <span class='bible'>1Ki 12:13<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>1Ki 13:21<\/span> ; and <span class='bible'>1Ki 21:4<\/span> . The meaning seems to be simply, &#8220;he became firmly settled in his government.&#8221; Comp. <span class='bible'>1Ki 2:12<\/span> , 1Ki 2:46 ] in his kingdom, and the Lord his God was with him [comp. <span class='bible'>1Ch 11:9<\/span> ; and see also <span class='bible'>Gen 39:2<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Exo 3:12<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Jos 1:5<\/span> ; 2Ch 15:9 ] and magnified him exceedingly.<\/p>\n<p> 2. Then Solomon spake unto all Israel, to the captains of thousands and of hundreds [see <span class='bible'>1Ch 27:1<\/span> ; 1Ch 28:1 ], and to the judges [David had made six thousand Levites &#8220;officers and judges&#8221; ( 1Ch 23:4 ). The &#8220;judge&#8221; among the Israelites was always regarded as a high functionary, whose presence was desirable on all occasions of importance], and to every governor [&#8220;prince,&#8221; or &#8220;man of rank&#8221;] in all Israel, the chief of the fathers.<\/p>\n<p> 3. So Solomon, and all the congregation with him, went to the high place that was at Gibeon; for there was the tabernacle of the congregation of God, which Moses the servant of the Lord had made in the wilderness.<\/p>\n<p> 4. But the ark of God had David brought up from Kirjath-jearim to the place which David had prepared for it: for he had pitched a tent for it at Jerusalem.<\/p>\n<p> 5. Moreover the brazen altar, that Bezaleel the son of Uri, the son of Hur, had made, he put before the tabernacle of the Lord: and Solomon and the congregation sought unto it.<\/p>\n<p> 6. And Solomon went up thither to the brazen altar before the Lord, which was at the tabernacle of the congregation, and offered a thousand burnt-offerings upon it.<\/p>\n<p> 7.  In that night [in the night which followed the conclusion of the sacrifice] did God appear [the most important point omitted in Chronicles, and supplied by Kings, is the <em> conditional<\/em> promise of long life made to Solomon ( 1Ki 3:14 ); while the chief point absent from Kings, and recorded by our author, is the solemn appeal made by Solomon to the promise of God to David his father ( 2Ch 1:9 ), which he now called upon God to &#8220;establish&#8221; or &#8220;perform&#8221;] unto Solomon, and said unto him, Ask what I shall give thee.<\/p>\n<p> 8. And Solomon said unto God, Thou hast shewed great mercy unto David my father, and hast made me to reign in his stead.<\/p>\n<p> 9. Now, O Lord God, let thy promise unto David my father be established: for thou hast made me king over a people like the dust of the earth in multitude.<\/p>\n<p> 10. Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people: for who can judge this thy people [for the decision of difficult cases, which in those days came immediately before the king, great discrimination and experience were requisite in order to distinguish at once right from wrong, and pass a just sentence. How old Solomon was at this time we do not know, scarcely more than twenty years] that is so great?<\/p>\n<p> 11. And God said to Solomon, Because this was in thine heart, and thou hast not asked riches, wealth, or honour, nor the life of thine enemies, neither yet hast asked long life; but hast asked wisdom and knowledge for thyself, that thou mayest judge my people, over whom I have made thee king:<\/p>\n<p> 12. Wisdom and knowledge is granted unto thee; and I will give thee riches, and wealth, and honour [ <em> The Speaker&#8217;s Commentary<\/em> upon this says: Remark that the writer says nothing of any promise to Solomon of &#8220;long life&#8221; which however had been mentioned in the preceding verse among the blessings which he might have been expected to ask. The reason for the omission would seem to lie in the writer&#8217;s desire to record only what is good of this great king. Long life was included in the promises made to him ( 1Ki 3:14 ): but it was granted conditionally, and Solomon not fulfilling the conditions, it did not take effect], such as none of the kings have had that have been before thee, neither shall there any after thee have the like.<\/p>\n<p><strong> Solomon&#8217;s Choice<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:6.12em'><em> &#8220;In that night did God appear unto Solomon, and said unto him, Ask what I shall give thee&#8221; (<\/em> 2Ch 1:7 <em> ).<\/p>\n<p><\/em><\/p>\n<p> WE know that this is a fact. Had it occurred once for all, we might have asked questions about it, but it occurs somewhere every night. God has done, as we have seen frequently in our Biblical studies, many things in the night-time. The darkness and the light are both alike unto him. Night is a geographical term. Even in some places on the earth it is hardly known, and in heaven it is wholly unknown; there is no night there. Here is the crisis of life the chance! Every man has it. Blessed are they whose eyes are open, whose ears are on the alert; for the opportunity may come at any moment, and the proposal may be made, either in the stillness of night, or amid the uproar and clamour of the busy day. But every soul has its opportunity, its asking-time, its hour when it may say anything to God. We speak sometimes of hours of great spiritual liberty, so that we who are dull of speech, poorly gifted in words, can say what we please, can utter all the desire of the heart, and plead right eloquently with God to fill both our hands with blessings. This is not in us. The ability to pray comes by the inspiration of God. When he asks a question he supplies the answer. God answers prayer because he prays. He answers himself. It is not we who pray; we clamour, we talk ignorantly, we use words, we represent false measures and values of things, and God is pleased to allow us so to talk, taking care that such rude speech is dissolved in high air: but when we <em> pray<\/em> it is he who prayeth in us. There is no mystery about the answering of prayer. A man can answer himself within given limits: God can answer himself without any limits or boundaries. The prayer that is answered is the prayer that is given. Inspired prayer is self-answering prayer. Yet sometimes God allows us to talk much folly to him. Even here providence is educative, and not judicial and chiding. We must get rid of many things before we can receive the right thing that is to be pronounced in pious language. Observe what an opportunity the king has &#8220;Ask what I shall give thee.&#8221; God always gives; he so loved the world that he gave till he had nothing else to give, for he parted with his only Son. So much is lost by men imagining that these great proposals were only given once for all to certain men of unique character and specific office; whereas all that is exceptional in providence is but indicative of the general method. We may turn history into prayer; we may remind God of his own example; we may go before him with chapter and verse, and plead with him book in hand, saying, Thy hand is not shortened that it cannot save; it did this miracle, and wrought this mighty sign and token: renew thy relations with an undeserving world. Sometimes we cannot pray at all; sometimes we are practically blank atheists, not theoretically; if we were well shaken, really awakened to an average attention, we should disclaim the imputation of being atheistical; but we are practically so many a day; we use high terms, sweet words, pious expressions, but they effect no miracles, they heal not the soul: at other times we can pray without ceasing; when we are told that it is time to arise, we say, Nay: let the sun stand still, and the moon, until we have out all this sweet communion with God. Let us not judge ourselves by the one occasion or by the other, lest in the one case we be swallowed up of despair and in the other be discontented with any spiritual experience short of ecstasy. We speak chidingly and upbraidingly of men who have had what we call their chance and have not availed themselves of it. Should a man come to poverty we review his life and say, He had no opportunity of doing better; he has made the best of his circumstances, and the best is but poor; he deserves sympathy: let us extend our help to him. Or we say, He has had his chance; he might have been as high as most of us; we remember the time when his life was crowned with a gracious opportunity; he was slothful, incapable; he was busy here and there, and the king passed by; and now we do not feel any kindling of real regard and interest in relation to him: he has had his chance, and he can have it no more. God gives every man his opportunity some in this form, some in that, and some in forms that are not at all patent except to the man himself. Is it possible that God may sometimes say to the soul, What shall I give thee? The soul should always have its prayer ready, not in mean detail, which always indicates more or less of calculation and selfishness, but in aspiration after God himself. How that prayer works will appear in the sequel.<\/p>\n<p> It must be exciting to listen to Solomon&#8217;s reply to such a question. Solomon said, <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:6.12em'><em> &#8220;Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people: for who can judge this thy people, that is so great?&#8221; (<\/em> 2Ch 1:10 <em> ).<\/p>\n<p><\/em><\/p>\n<p> In modern language, Solomon prayed to be qualified for his work. That was the sublime desire. First he recognised that the work itself was divine &#8220;For who can judge this thy people?&#8221; He was not doing atheistic work on supernatural inspiration. Many men would be glad to do that, to use all heaven&#8217;s light for the purpose of making themselves selfishly secure and comfortable. Many a man would use all the resources of the Church that he might double his individual prosperity. Solomon, on the other hand, recognises the divinity of the call, the divinity of his function; he says, I am appointed king by God to do God&#8217;s work, and what I want is not the office only but the ability to administer it with beneficent effect. This man will get an answer presently. He must be answered he builds himself upon a rock. There is no excitement of invention or ingenuity for the purpose of making some new request, some fanciful and whimsical petition. Solomon falls back upon the eternal commonplace that nothing is lasting that is not wise, nothing is useful that is not good. His prayer, therefore, would be: Connect me with thyself, thou living Fountain; or, Take up this little life, and make it one of the lamps of thy heaven, which are all fed by the invisible, the infinite Shekinah. Solomon would not be sustained in his vanity, or have his greatness multiplied; would not be loaded with additional purple, or enriched with increase of crown and gem and jewel: he would have wisdom the sagacious mind; not only sagacity, which men may respect but not love, but sagacity steeped in sacred sentiment, the sagacity that doubles itself by the inspiration of sympathy; he would have the statesman&#8217;s soul, and the royal soul that lives in others, reading their unuttered desires and responding in advance to the petitions which they are tremblingly formulating. A king should be beforehand. Thus would he be not royal only but almost divine; for it is God that proposes that man should ask; it is God who comes down with the gift, and says, Take it. So should it be with all greater souls leaders, parents, heads of houses, heads of business, they should have something to say, and they should always say it first. He leads best who is the first to utter the great word of offering, to create the solemn opportunity of life, to tempt the people by gracious suggestion into larger prayer and nobler, more confiding communion. Every man needs divine wisdom in order that he may do well his earthly work. You would light a lamp better if you first asked God to show you how to light it. It is a degrading doctrine which sets up a distinction between the temporalities and the spiritualities of the Church. There are no temporalities; the copper is to be turned into gold, the gold is to be turned into fine gold; the simplest labour is to be elevated to the rank and quality of sacrifice. Whatever, therefore, we may be heads of firms, or youngest helpers in business; great geniuses in commerce, or poor dull heads that must have everything taught and can only repeat prayers by rote, we all need wisdom for the discharge of our daily duty, then business becomes a sacrament; in the clink of gold there is music of another world, in the exchange and barter of life there is a form of religious intercourse.<\/p>\n<p> How will God treat a prayer like this? &#8220;And God said to Solomon, Because this was in thine heart&#8221; I will give thee everything along with it, &#8220;thou hast not asked riches, wealth, or honour, nor the life of thine enemies, neither yet hast asked long life:&#8221; all these prayers were already in heaven, uttered by other petitioners. We have said that we have talked selfishly to God; God here quotes by implication the selfishness by which he had been vainly importuned; he would seem to say, The prayers that have come up to me have been prayers for riches, wealth, honour, the life of enemies, and long life; these poor vapid prayers have been sent up to me from time immemorial; thou hast created a variety in petition, thou hast taken a point of departure; thou hast really prayed: I am surprised and pleased. So would God be represented by language that would accommodate the occasion with this feeble degree of expression. God himself has confessed to surprise and to grief, and has called upon the universe to share his amazement, because of certain issues. In this instance he quotes all the little prayers that had been offered, and says in effect, Solomon has surpassed all these; he has made no mention of them; he has gone for the inclusive blessing; he has asked the all-involving benefaction, therefore he shall have all the rest: <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:6.12em'><em> &#8220;Wisdom and knowledge is granted unto thee; and I will give thee riches, and wealth, and honour, such as none of the kings have had that have been before thee, neither shall there any after thee have the like&#8221; (<\/em> 2Ch 1:12 <em> ).<\/p>\n<p><\/em><\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you.&#8221; This was the teaching of a greater than Solomon. Sometimes a short prayer may be a long one. &#8220;Think not that ye shall be heard for your much speaking.&#8221; God supplements prayers; the sooner we get done the better, because then we leave God his opportunity; we take our position as initiators and give God his chance. He accepts it; he works miracles within the golden opportunity which our faith creates. He does not know where to stop. What a catalogue is this riches, and wealth, and honour, and promotion beyond all that is known in the history of royalty. We might have had more if we had asked for less. We have made great mistakes in prayer; we have said, Lord, make us strong in body: make our children all good and great men: give us great success in business to-day: create for us friends in all the field of life: and thus we have prayed ourselves out in trifling detail. Had we said, &#8220;Lord, not my will, but thine, be done,&#8221; he would have made our enemies dizzy, so that they could not tell east from west; he would have made them falter in their fulminations; he would have turned their objurgations into blessings; he would have melted their knee-joints, so that they could not have come upon us in fierce assault; he would have made the ground grow gold: but we have been petty, selfish, narrow, trustless. We have thought a prayer was comprehensive in proportion as it omitted nothing. What mistakes are made about comprehensive prayers! There is but one comprehensive prayer &#8220;Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven:&#8221; or, &#8220;Not my will, but thine, be done:&#8221; or, &#8220;God be merciful to me a sinner.&#8221; We find here and there in Holy Writ examples of these epitomising, all-including prayers. When we take up one of these and, so to say, send it to heaven by way of the cross, there shall come back to us answers like a great rain on a summer day.<\/p>\n<p><strong> Prayer<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Almighty God, we read of rest, Sabbath rest; it is of rest upon rest. As thou dost give grace upon grace and life upon life, so thou dost give rest upon rest; and that rest we now seek. Thou dost give rest unto them that come unto thee, for they cease from their heavy load and they forget their weariness, and they enter already into heaven&#8217;s infinite peace. Great peace have they that love thy law. This is not mere silence, or stillness, or quietness, but a great reconciliation of the human with the divine of our heart with thy will. We long for this rest; without it we are in tumult, in distress, and in great fear, so much so that the night encroaches upon the day, and the winter upon the spring and the very summer itself: but with thy Spirit dwelling in us we rest in the Lord and wait patiently for him; and we hear his coming in the quiet of the night, in the stillness of the sleeping-time, though he come with the noiselessness of a dream, and rise upon us without tumult like a vision. Fill us with thy peace! thy peace passeth understanding; it is not the world&#8217;s compromise: it is Christ&#8217;s own tranquillity. We would enjoy Sabbath in the wilderness rest-time immediately before war, so that in the fight itself we may know the mystery and benediction of peace. We thank thee for all the comfort of the week. Thou hast caused the light to drive away the darkness, and this is Sabbath day: the very clouds are filled with light, and heaven heightens itself for very gladness; behold, the time of the singing of birds has come. May there be music in our life, sweet and noble psalmody in our hearts; may our whole being be lifted up in solemn praise, so that we may live the truly Christian life the hidden life, the life that glorifies the truth, explaining it where words fail, and conveying to observers and hearers its ultimate meaning. But this is God&#8217;s miracle: it is not in man to do this: but by the mighty working of thy Spirit it may be done in every one of us poorest, meanest, lowliest. May we so know Christ that our very laughter shall be the gladness of solemnity, our recreation but a renewal of strength for sacrifice, and all our business a harvesting of stores to be used in doing good. Pity us where we are very weak. Dry our tears where we dare not touch them lest we blind the eyes that shed them. Grant unto us secret communion, unspoken fellowship, signs and tokens which the heart only can discern and apply. Be with all hearts that are full of solicitude, filled with wonders that are fears, and going out in anxieties which trouble the life, sowing it all over as with ice, covering it up in hard frost Good Lord, send the springtime into such lives yea, a taste of bright, sweet summer; and in the house of the Lord may all the battles of the world be forgotten. Give us a large vision of thyself and of thy kingdom; then all our fears shall be driven away: we shall see the most obstinate lay down his arms: the farthest-away prodigal turning round and coming home, and those that have given us most sorrow shall begin to give us richest joy. Thou knowest our life how it comes and goes and flickers; meanwhile, how it looks up into the sky and then looks down into the grave; and how, when we would pluck the fruit, the branch seems to lift itself above the hand. Have mercy upon us! Multiply thy lovingkindness toward us and comfort us with new supplies. Where there is special sorrow let there be special gladness also: where the grave has been dug under the hearthstone, let there be a great filling up of vacant spaces by a renewed and enlarged vision of thyself. Then shall men not seek the living among the dead, but say over their very graves, Our loved ones are not here: they are risen. We bless thee for bright example, for words remembered with sweet thankfulness, for patience in trial, for heroism in difficulty, and for the gentle charity that added new beauty to life. The Lord remember the bereaved and the sorrow-stricken and the sad, and give them brightness in the night-time yea, a great multitude of stars, and one brighter than the rest promising early day. Amen.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The People&#8217;s Bible by Joseph Parker<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong> XV<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> BOOKS ON THE REIGN OF SOLOMON; THE EMPIRE OF SOLOMON; SOLOMON&#8217;S INHERITANCE FROM HIS FATHER <span class='bible'>1Ki 2:1-46<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ; <span class='bible'>1Ch 29:23-25<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ; <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:1<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> We will begin on the reign of Solomon at page 164 of the Harmony.<\/p>\n<p> First of all I will give you a list of the books obtainable by you on the reign of Solomon. Your Bible text of the reign of Solomon includes 1 Kings 1-11; and 2 Chronicles 1-9 twenty chapters in all. These twenty chapters cover the reign of Solomon.<\/p>\n<p> Josephus comes next. I am naming books for students of the English Bible, not of the Hebrew Bible. The pertinent parts of Josephus are chapters 14-15 of the Seventh Book of Antiquities, and chapters 1-7 of the Eighth Book, i.e., nine chapters of Josephus. You can read those nine chapters of Josephus at one sitting.<\/p>\n<p> The next book I commend very highly on account of the simplicity of it (anybody can understand it), and also on account of the soundness and great scholarship of the author. It is Edersheim&#8217;s &#8220;History of Israel,&#8221; Volume V. In the fifth volume some of the chapters are devoted to the reign of Solomon. Anyone at one sitting ought to be able carefully to read over everything that Edersheim has to say on Solomon&#8217;s reign. The next book, the author of which is also a great scholar and a very celebrated man, but not so sound in the faith as Edersheim, is Stanley&#8217;s &#8220;Jewish Church.&#8221; There are three volumes, but only some chapters of the second volume treat of the reign of Solomon.<\/p>\n<p> The next book is also one of great scholarship and research, though its author is more of a radical critic than Stanley, and that is Geikie&#8217;s &#8220;Hours with the Bible.&#8221; There are about eight volumes of that book, but you want only that part on Solomon&#8217;s reign, a part of the third volume. It is better than either of the others in showing the political relation of Solomon&#8217;s kingdom to the other kingdoms of the world. It is superb on that.<\/p>\n<p> The next book, by Canon Farrar, <strong><em> The Life and Times of Solomon<\/em><\/strong> , is one of a series of books on the great Old Testament characters. On the Old Testament Farrar is decidedly a radical critic. He is better on the New Testament.<\/p>\n<p> The <strong><em> Bible Atlas<\/em><\/strong> comes next, which every Bible student and Sunday school teacher ought to have. It is studied in biblical introduction. Geography must precede history. In this book, pages 69-71, is all you need to consider on the reign of Solomon. It gives you several maps, then it gives you some comparative maps showing relative sizes. What it has to say in a historical way is very fine. You need it all the way through the study of the Bible, for it touches the whole history.<\/p>\n<p> Some remarks on Kings and Chronicles. The two books of Kings are, in the Hebrew, one book. The division took place when the Septuagint translation was made. This book of Kings covers more than four and one-half centuries, i.e., say from 1000 B.C. to about 585 B.C. Its original material was written by the contemporary prophets of Israel. Some prophet would write the annals of the kings during his time. The names of these prophets are Nathan, Ahijah, Iddo, Isaiah, and Jeremiah. Therefore when the Old Testament is divided into three parts Law, Prophets, and Psalms Samuel and Kings are always included in the Prophets because the author of the book was a prophet, and because the history itself is prophetic. The reign of every king of Judah or of Israel later, when the division took place, had its own annalist, and these annalists or historians were prophets. In this book reference is made to a book called the Acts of Solomon, and from a passage in 2 Chronicles we infer that it was written by three prophets Nathan, Ahijab, and Iddo. Sixteen times in the book of Kings there is reference to the Chronicles of the kings of Judah. Of course one man did not write all of those chronicles, but each prophet would write the chronicles of his day. There are many references also to the chronicles of the kings of Israel. Our book of Chronicles is a compilation from these original sources, probably by Ezra.<\/p>\n<p> Another remark on the book of Kings: Not only were its authors prophets, but the history was written from a prophetic point of view. The history of Israel is itself a prophecy. Our book of Chronicles is also unique. It is a post-exile compilation, i.e., after the return of the Jews from the Babylonian captivity, and therefore it has nothing to say about the ten tribes that went off with Jeroboam; it discusses only Judah. This book commences with Adam and comes down to Ezra&#8217;s time, on one line of messianic thought just one. While we use the material of the book of Chronicles in this Harmony, yet no man can understand the book of Chronicles except by independent study. It must be considered as the historical basis of the new probation after the exile, connecting with Ezra, Nehemiah, Daniel, and Esther, and also with the later prophets Ezekiel, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi. Suppose that there was no Bible at all up to 1 Chronicles; now that book is written so as to reach back to the creation to Adam and furnishes, as I said, the historic basis of the probation of the Jewish people after their return from exile. Confining itself to the Davidic line and to Judah, it comes on down to the troublous times of the restoration. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther complete the story.<\/p>\n<p> I discuss somewhat the empire of Solomon. A good map will show that the section conquered by Joshua was small compared with this empire of Solomon. The kingdom of Saul was a very small section, but by the conquests of David the boundary of the empire touched the Euphrates, which river was the boundary for a number of miles. Then the boundary came across to the Orontes River flowing north. Then it came down the eastern slope of the Lebanon Mountains, leaving a narrow strip next to the Mediterranean Sea Phoenicia which was not a part of Solomon&#8217;s kingdom, but was under an independent government Hiram, king of Tyre. From the lower part of Phoenicia the boundary followed the Mediterranean Sea until it came to the River of Egypt. The River of Egypt means one of the branches of the Nile, and that part of the territory David never conquered, but Solomon got it by dowry when he married Pharaoh&#8217;s daughter. The boundary then strikes across from the River of Egypt to the upper part of the Red Sea, the Gulf of Akabah, at a point called Eziongeber. That was the seaport through which Solomon&#8217;s navy reached the Indian Ocean, and the countries of the Orient, as through the seaport of Tyre he reached all the countries on the Mediterranean Sea and even around as far as Britain and Norway all around the shore of the Baltic Sea. This empire of Solomon is ten times as big as the kingdom of Saul. Consider the difference between 6,000 square miles and 60,000 square miles. You will notice that the eastern boundary of the empire touched the impassable desert at every point of the line. So with the great sea on the west and the desert on the east, there is only a narrow northern boundary and a narrow southern boundary to be safeguarded. You will observe that this empire as established by David and reigned over by Solomon was for the first time and the last time the greatest Oriental kingdom. There was no contemporaneous Oriental kingdom or empire equal to Solomon&#8217;s. I am not referring to extent of territory, but to authority, power, and rule. The reason is that Egypt has been greatly weakened, and just about Solomon&#8217;s time an entirely new dynasty comes in with which he intermarries, thus insuring perfect friendship on the south. Then it came at a time before the later Assyria and Babylonia have been established. The old Assyria and Babylonia at this juncture amounted to nothing, and Syria had become a part of Solomon&#8217;s empire. Through alliances with Phoenicia, which was the great sea power of the world at that date, and Egypt, there was no Oriental government that could compete with the empire of Solomon.<\/p>\n<p> It exactly fulfilled the promise that God made to Abraham as reported in <span class='bible'>Gen 15<\/span> . Just what God promised to Abraham as to the extent of the territory is fulfilled for the first time in David, and remains so throughout the reign of Solomon but never again. Then it exactly fulfils the prophecy written, as I am sure, by David himself, though attributed to Solomon, contained in <span class='bible'>Psa 72<\/span> . There the extent of his reign is set forth prophetically, as it is also set forth in the great promise made in <span class='bible'>2Sa 7<\/span> . The promise in <span class='bible'>2Sa 7<\/span> occasioned the psalm, and in its higher meaning is to be fulfilled in David&#8217;s greatest Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, when the empire shall be the world, as told us in the book of Revelation. Now consider briefly the relation of Solomon&#8217;s empire with outside nations. There is no chance for internal disturbance after Philistia, Syria, Ammon, Moab, and Edom have been conquered by David, but consider the relation of this empire with other foreign countries. First of all, in influence and importance is Phoenicia just a narrow strip of palm beach on the Mediterranean Sea, with the great mountains of Lebanon back of it, much like the Pacific slope in California, which is a very narrow slope with the Rocky Mountains back of it, and very much like the same Pacific slope in South America with the Andes back of it. The relation between Phoenicia and this empire was first established by David. Hiram, the king of Tyre, made a treaty with David just after David captured Jerusalem a treaty, the favors of which were all on one side, i.e., David got the favors. In other words, by virtue of the alliance made between Hiram and David, David got access to the vast timberlands on the Lebanon Mountains, the finest timber accessible to the then known world. He also got access to the quarries there. You will understand why Hiram would want to make an alliance with David if you will consider that when David captured all this country up to the River Euphrates and down to the River of Egypt he controlled every artery of land commerce upon which Phoenicia depended. It is difficult to realize the amount of travel and traffic coming down from the Euphrates by Damascus and then to Tyre, and from Tyre distributed to all the Mediterranean nations clear around to the Baltic Sea. Then the other line of trade was from the same Euphrates the caravan ways to Egypt. They would follow either side of the Jordan. From southern Judea there were three ways into Egypt one from Philistia following the Mediterranean coast line, one through the middle of the desert, and the one that Moses followed when he led the people out of Egypt. Now, as Tyre had little territory and was dependent upon its commerce, if a foreign hostile nation controlled all of the arteries on the land side, it would break up the commerce, on the sea side, for they would have nothing to transport for exchange. This alliance was of incalculable value both to Phoenicia and to the empire of Solomon. The one as a sea power controlled the outlet; the other as a land power controlled the inlet. While Solomon&#8217;s had a Mediterranean coast line there were no good seaports on it. Phoenicia was a great commercial country centering in Solomon&#8217;s time at Tyre. If you want to understand something of the nature of that commerce read <span class='bible'>Eze 27<\/span> on Tyre. It is the most vivid description of a commercial nation in the literature of the world. It describes Tyre as a ship of state, showing from what country she drew her products and her mercenaries, and you will find that all of Asia and the northern part of Africa, all the southern part of Europe, all the islands on the eastern shores of Europe, the British Isles, for instance, are mentioned in that description of the commerce of Phoenicia.<\/p>\n<p> I made a speech once before the Y. M. C. A. in Waco on &#8220;The Shipwreck of -Faith.&#8221; Faith was described its errors, in various ways. My part of it was to describe the shipwreck of faith. I got my imagery of the shipwreck from Ezekiel&#8217;s description of the shipwreck of Tyre&#8217;s ship of state. It is more interesting than any novel the account of the commerce outgoing from this city Tyre. It retained its great splendor and magnificence down to the time of Alexander the Great, who conquered it. The empire of Solomon had another relation to Phoenicia which I will discuss at a later time. We take up now the relation of Egypt to Solomon&#8217;s empire. Solomon controlled all of the continental trade that reached Egypt because it had to come entirely through the whole length of the territory of Solomon. It was necessary therefore for a good understanding to prevail between the Holy Land and Egypt, and it is the first good understanding since Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph, and as that relation was on account of a new dynasty coming in, so this relation is on account of an entirely new dynasty coming to the front in Egypt. In the later history of Israel you will find that Egypt, Phoenicia, and Babylonia on the Euphrates, and Nineveh, had much to do with this country in a hostile way. The advantages of the relations are with Israel only so long as it is the greater power. The touch of the empire with Oriental nations is its Euphrates border. There is no great nation at this time on the Tigris or the Euphrates to disturb Israel. The great nations there are coming but they are not, as yet.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Solomon&#8221; means &#8220;prince of peace.&#8221; His reign was a reign of peace peace with Egypt, peace with Phoenicia, peace with the Oriental nations beyond the Euphrates, and peace with Arabia. Solomon renewed the alliance with Hiram, king of Tyre, and rather cheated him in a trade, very much to Hiram&#8217;s disgust. That we will learn about a little later. Solomon, partly from political motives, married women of many foreign countries. Thus he secured the southern boundary by marrying the daughter of Pharaoh. He was a &#8220;very much married&#8221; man.<\/p>\n<p> Let us consider a little more particularly the commerce in Solomon&#8217;s day. As I told you, his part of the Mediterranean coast furnished very small means for great commerce, because it had no good seaports, and his country, up to David&#8217;s time, never touched any ocean or great sea in any other direction, but now it touched the Red Sea. Tyre becomes the servant of Solomon in reaching the whole world through the Mediterranean Sea. Then Solomon built a navy with the help of the Tyrian sailors at Eziongeber down on the Gulf of Akabah. We have an account of a visit he made to that place to see how his ships were coming along. He built a navy there, and through that navy he touched all the East Indies and the nations of the Pacific, all the archipelagoes of the Indian and Pacific oceans along the eastern and southern shores of Asia. We will come to some interesting accounts of this navy in the history, and of what those ships brought to him.<\/p>\n<p> The land commerce I have described) on the way from the Euphrates to Egypt, and on the same way from the Euphrates to Tyre. It was a period of activity and travel, in commerce, in trade, in manufacture. It was a live world in Solomon&#8217;s time.<\/p>\n<p> Our next question by way of introduction is what Solomon inherited from his father. I will give you a summary to show how much Solomon was indebted to his father. Some boys are very fortunate in the father&#8217;s providing for them. In the first place, he is entirely indebted to David for this big territory. He didn&#8217;t acquire it, but it cost David many a hard, bitter war; many a dreadful fight. On the maps in the Bible Atlas you will see where a number of these great battles were fought in David&#8217;s time, so that Solomon inherited his estate. The only part he added was the little strip of land next to Egypt that came with his marriage with the daughter of the king of Egypt as a dowry, and it didn&#8217;t hang on any longer than the wife did. The next thing inherited from his father was a united kingdom. He had nothing to do with that. David united the jealous warring tribes. We saw in the history of Joshua their intertribal differences, how their dissensions appear all through the book of Judges, all through the book of Samuel, and all through David&#8217;s life until he was crowned king of all Israel. The third thing of incalculable value that he inherited from David was organization. That organization reached to every department say, first, the army. David&#8217;s military system must have been the seed idea of the present German military system. I don&#8217;t see where else they got their method of organizing their army on such a large scale except from the account of David&#8217;s military organization. In the next place, the revenue was organized. Up to David&#8217;s time there was no revenue system or army. There was a big militia, but very unreliable. David organized both to a nicety, so that from every part of this country the stream of revenue continually flowed into his treasury without intermission.<\/p>\n<p> The next point of organization was religion. From Joshua&#8217;s time to David&#8217;s time the religious movements were on tangential lines. There was no long-settled place to worship; there was no general system of worship; there were no well-settled officers of worship and no adequate ritual. David organized it all. He had his central place of worship; he had his priests divided into twenty-four courses. He had his Levites all organized. He had the ritual of worship established, and he wrote songs for the entire convocation of Israel. The greater part of the Psalter was written by David. The times of worship were also systematized.<\/p>\n<p> From David&#8217;s time comes also a thoroughly trained prophetic class. Samuel started it when he established three or four seminaries. From that time on until prophecy in Old Testament times ceased, there was a live prophetic school of men who represented God and spoke to the consciences of kings and of the nation. A corps of these great prophets are turned over to Solomon and work with him. Among them were Nathan, Iddo, and Ahijah, and in later reigns many others.<\/p>\n<p> Solomon also inherited an organized educational system with these prophets from David. No intelligent mind can account for Solomon&#8217;s training and attainments except upon the pre-supposition of a system of-public instruction by prophets and priests. His attainments did not come by instinct or revelation. He had gifts, indeed, but when you read the history of Solomon you see the cultivation of the gifts. David&#8217;s system of public instruction accounts for Solomon. Through the prophets, particularly Nathan, came the fine education with which this man Solomon started in life. Then he inherited from David this alliance with Phoenicia. Moreover, he inherited from David treasures that stagger credulity in magnitude and variety spoils of all the great wars, gold and silver and jewels of the world.<\/p>\n<p> Commentators are tempted to change the Hebrew texts when they come to express the amount of the treasures that David accumulated. Everything that would be useful in the great work assigned to Solomon was ready to his hand. He inherited from his father even the plans as well as the material of the Temple, which is the greatest thing Solomon ever did the building of that house. All of its magnitude and the entire plan of it, with minute directions, came down to Solomon from David. The boy had only to reach to his desk and take out complete plans of what he had to do, as a king, and minute directions as to how everything was to be done; the place from which the material was to come, and last of all, the very labor that was to perform the work was organized on a scale that hadn&#8217;t been equalled since the pyramids of Egypt were built. Now that starts the boy off right well.<\/p>\n<p> Then his father had him installed into office before his own death to prevent any jar in the succession, and had the public men committed to him. The great leaders of Israel in all this great territory were assembled by David and pledged to support Solomon as his successor, and they did commit themselves by oath to his support. Now if the plans and the money and the material for the house and for all his other work, if the alliance and co-operation of other nations, if the organization of his own nation, came from his father, surely he was the heir to an immense inheritance. Not many of us started off that way. The most of us had to scratch right at the start.<\/p>\n<p> The next thing we inquire is, &#8220;What did he derive from God?&#8221; Of course indirectly all these came from God, but directly from God was first that divine providence which, at this time, brought in a new and friendly dynasty in Egypt, that weakened the Oriental nations so that none of them could be equal in power to Solomon. All this came from God&#8217;s providence. Then the direct gift of Wisdom. It was from God. He didn&#8217;t earn it, and he didn&#8217;t learn it in school. He got knowledge in school: &#8220;Knowledge comes, but wisdom lingers.&#8221; But he got wisdom from God. How remarkable that wisdom was we shall see in a succeeding chapter.<\/p>\n<p> A new era bad dawned on Solomon&#8217;s people. Heretofore they had lived a very simple life, having little contact with other nations and wishing to have none. Now they are brought in touch with the luxuries of the world through Pharaoh and Hiram. The whole country is on a boom, just such a boom as perhaps was never equalled in after times. Silver and gold become as common as pebbles along the bank of a brook. Agriculture, commerce, architecture, with all the arts and sciences, have quickened and broadened the national life, but with prosperity, commerce, and international touch comes danger to religious life. We will see if national alliances and intermarriages corrupt the pure worship of Jehovah. We will see if the Egyptian and Phoenician gods, with all their cruel and sensual worship, do not invade the Holy Land and prepare the way for the loss of God&#8217;s favor, the dismembering of the great empire, and its final destruction.<\/p>\n<p> If through the introduction of the false religions of these nations brought into contact with Israel through political and commercial relations, the true, pure religion of God is driven out, then it would have been better if Solomon had been like David in his early days, a poor boy, supporting himself by herding sheep.<\/p>\n<p> The divisions are: (1) The beginning of his reign. (2) The wisdom of Solomon. (3) The glory of Solomon. (4) The fall of Solomon.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> QUESTIONS<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. What books commended on the reign of Solomon?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. Who wrote the original material for Kings and Chronicles?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. Who, probably, compiled our book of Chronicles? (2) What is its viewpoint? (3) Its purpose?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. Give boundaries of Solomon&#8217;s empire. How does it compare with. Joshua&#8217;s territory, with Saul&#8217;s, and with David&#8217;s?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. What promise is fulfilled in it?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. What was the relation of Solomon&#8217;s empire with Phoenicia?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. What was the relation of his empire with Egypt?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. What was the relation of his empire with Oriental nations?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. Describe the commerce in Solomon&#8217;s day.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. What did Solomon inherit from his father?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. What did he inherit from God?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 12. Describe the new era for Solomon&#8217;s people, and its effect on their religion.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> XXVI<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> SOLOMON&#8217;S ACCESSION, MARRIAGE, DREAM, AND REMARKABLE WISDOM<\/p>\n<p> Same as for preceding chapter, and <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:1-28<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ; <span class='bible'>2Ch 1:2-13<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> This discussion commences the exposition of Solomon&#8217;s reign. It will be well for you to have your book open. If you have no Harmony, open your Bible at <span class='bible'>1Ki 2<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> 1 Kings 1-11 and 2 Chronicles 1-9 constitute the scriptural basis of the life of Solomon. We introduce this discussion with three passages of scripture:<\/p>\n<p> 1.<span class='bible'>Deu 17:14-20<\/span> :<\/p>\n<p> When thou art come unto the land which Jehovah thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shall dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like all the nations that are round about me; thou shalt surely set him king over thee, whom Jehovah thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee; thou mayest not put a foreigner over thee, who is not thy brother. Only he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt, to the end that he may multiply horses; forasmuch as Jehovah hath said unto you. Ye shall henceforth return no more that way. Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold. And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book, out of that which is before the priests the Levites: and it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life; that he may learn to fear Jehovah his God, to keep all the words of this law and these statutes, to do them; that his heart be not lifted up above his brethren, and that he turn not aside from the commandment, to the right hand, or to the left: to the end that he may prolong his days in his kingdom, he and his children, in the midst of Israel.<\/p>\n<p> On that law mark the method of succession in the Hebrew monarchy. It was not according to the law of primogeniture, i.e., the oldest son does not by law succeed his father. Indeed, we find that it is not according to heredity in a still larger sense. God changed the dynasty from Saul to David. Saul&#8217;s sons did not succeed him, but he created a new dynasty in David. When we come to study the divided kingdom we will notice quite a number of dynastic changes. But all the time in Judah the king is at least a descendant of David. The dynasty does not change in that kingdom. We have already seen the law of primogeniture set aside in God&#8217;s dealing with families. For instance, Isaac and not Ishmael becomes the head of the family, and Jacob and not Esau, and we see it extending even to the tribes. Not Reuben, who is unstable, but Judah, became the head of the tribes. Get before you clearly the kind of monarchy established. The king must not be a foreigner, like Herod the Idumean in Christ&#8217;s time. He must be one of the brethren, and then God must select him. A copy of the Pentateuch must be made especially for him and kept by him, in which he must read every day of his life and live and rule according to its teaching. The Pentateuch is the national constitution. And particularly, he is not to seek honor and riches for himself, and not to seek horses with a view of any return to Egypt, nor must he multiply wives to himself lest through his wives his heart be turned aside from God.<\/p>\n<p> 2. <span class='bible'>1Ch 22:9-10<\/span> . Here is God&#8217;s selection of David&#8217;s successor:<\/p>\n<p> Behold, a son shall be born to thee, who shall be a man of rest; and I will give him rest from all his enemies round about; for his name shall be Solomon, and I will give peace and quietness unto Israel in his days: he shall build a house for my name; and he shall be my son, and I will be his father; and I will establish the throne of his kingdom over Israel forever.<\/p>\n<p> So you see there that God, before this child is born, elects David&#8217;s successor and gives his name. &#8220;Solomon&#8221; is the God given name. He is also called Jedediah and Lemuel. But God gave him the name of Solomon.<\/p>\n<p> 3.<span class='bible'>Psa 72<\/span> is too long for me to quote, but you should read it and count it next in thought in the discussion. It is David&#8217;s prayer for this son, who succeeds him. The superscription says, &#8220;A psalm of Solomon,&#8221; but that is not true. Solomon never wrote <span class='bible'>Psa 72<\/span> , but David did. The subscription says, &#8220;The prayers of David, the son of Jesse, are ended.&#8221; David prays that God may give the king judgment and righteousness in order that he may properly judge the poor, and save the needy, and break in pieces the oppressor. And he goes on to describe that he shall have dominion from sea to sea and from the river unto the ends of the earth, and how the kings of the earth shall bring their gifts. <span class='bible'>Psa 72:17<\/span> says,<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;His name shall endure forever; His name shall be continued as long as the sun: And men shall be blessed in him; All nations shall call him happy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> It closes with &#8220;Let the whole earth be filled with his glory.&#8221; The primary reference is to Solomon. It is more largely fulfilled in the antitype of Solomon, the true Prince of Peace Jesus. Consider that law, that divine election and that prayer of the old father just as he is passing away, and you have not only the name of Solomon, and the character of his reign as a reign of peace, but you have also the prophetic element in Solomon and in Solomon&#8217;s reign looking forward to Christ.<\/p>\n<p> Our text declares that Solomon was thoroughly established upon the throne of his father David. &#8216;Solomon was quite a young man, and said to be wonderfully handsome and attractive. His establishment consisted first in the removal of inherited enemies, those that came to him from David&#8217;s side, who might have disturbed his kingdom. The first one of these enemies is his oldest brother, Adonijah. Adonijah thought that because he was the oldest son living after Absalom&#8217;s death, he ought to have the kingdom, and he prepared, as we learn in the history of David, to seize the kingdom, and as David was supposed to be in a dying condition he set up his claim, which, was forestalled by David&#8217;s having Solomon crowned king. Adonijah was forgiven for that offense, but the record tells us of a new offense. He comes to the mother of Solomon. People oftentimes try to reach those whom they wish to influence through the female members of the family, either the mother, the wife, the sister, or the daughter. The devil tried to get Adam that way and got there. Adonijah comes to the mother of Solomon and asks her to obtain the king&#8217;s permission that he may marry that beautiful young girl taken into David&#8217;s home and bed in his old age. The ordinary reader sees this as only an innocent request, but you must consider the Oriental custom. The successor of the king took possession of the harem of the preceding king. It is that way now in northern Africa, in Turkey, and in other countries. Absalom, you remember, did that in order to certify his claim to succeed his father. The context suggests that Joab was privy to Adonijah&#8217;s request. It means that though pardoned for the first rebellion, they were still contemplating giving an object lesson before the people that Adonijah was entitled to be king. Solomon understood it in one moment, and commanded Adonijah to be put to death.<\/p>\n<p> That removed all the cause of rebellion in the family. As soon as Joab heard of it, as a proof that he was a party in the matter, he ran to the altar and in accordance with what is called the &#8220;law of the sanctuary,&#8221; took hold of the horns of the altar. Now comes a general library question: Find the law of the sanctuary touching the horns of the altar in the book of Exodus, and state whether Solomon violated the law of the sanctuary in having Joab put to death while clinging to them. It is a custom, not merely of infidels but of semi-infidel preachers, to charge Solomon with having violated the law of the sanctuary in putting a man to death while clinging to its horns.<\/p>\n<p> Joab was put to death. He was a mighty man. There was no general of his age equal to him. Cromwell resembled him more than any man of modern times, in sternness of character, in quickness of decision and action. He was a nephew of David. David&#8217;s sister, Zeruiah, had three notable sons, all mighty men Joab, Abishai, and Asahel. David was put to shame more than once in his life through Joab, and on several occamions Joab was greater than the throne. Two of the crimes committed by him the killing of Amasa and Abner are punished in this death of Joab. It was on David&#8217;s conscience before he died that he had permitted this man to live. He had been of great service to David, and it did not seem appropriate that David should, even though justly, put to death one who had been so efficient in establishing him in his kingdom, and yet it was not right that this great man in his ill-doing should go unpunished, and so David bequeathed the solution to Solomon; in his wisdom he must find a way to punish Joab for his past misdeeds. Thus we come to the death of this great man Joab.<\/p>\n<p> It was prophesied that not a man should be left of the house of Eli, the usurping high priest before Samuel, and yet in spite of that prophecy we see Abiathar come to David and join him in the days of his exile and act as high priest, but now this Abiathar who did not follow Absalom, but who did follow Adonijah, and was in the conspiracy to defer the installation of Solomon and his kingdom, is degraded from the priesthood. Because of the friendship he had shown to David he is not put to death, but a conspirer endangers the safety of a monarch and he is sent to his own home to live as a common man. He occupies office no more, which disposes of that enemy.<\/p>\n<p> It becomes necessary, having disposed of these two enemies) to appoint successors to their great offices. The man after whom I was named, Benaiah, or as we spell it now, Benajah, was appointed to Joab&#8217;s office, and Zadok, a true lineal descendant of Aaron through his eldest son, is put at the head of the priesthood. This fulfils a prophecy that we considered in the book of Numbers. You remember Phinehas, concerning whom one of the three remarkable declarations on imputed righteousness in the Bible is made. It was prophesied that the descendants of Phinehas should occupy the high priesthood. That is fulfilled now for the first time when Zadok becomes the high priest of united Israel.<\/p>\n<p> The internal matters all now having been composed, this young man, as young men generally do, proposed to marry. He selected a wife for political reasons. He married the daughter of Pharaoh, king of Egypt. Here a general question: Was the marriage of Solomon to the daughter of Pharaoh a violation of the law not to inter-marry with the people around? Form your own judgment. Some of his marriages we know were violations. He married women that were Edomites and Hittites. The Edomites were kin to him, descendants of Esau, but the Hittite was one of the old Canaanitish nations. He married women from every direction, and largely for political reasons. Touching his first marriage we have <span class='bible'>Psa 45<\/span> . Primarily it refers to the consummation of this marriage. Prophetically it refers to the marriage of our Lord, the true Solomon, with his glorified church. Let us look at some of the references in <span class='bible'>Psa 45<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> My heart overfloweth with a goodly matter; I speak the things which I have made touching the king: My tongue is the pen of a ready writer. Thou art fairer than the children of men; Grace is poured into thy lips: Therefore God hath blessed thee forever. Gird thy sword upon thy thigh, O mighty one, Thy glory and thy majesty.<\/p>\n<p> Another part refers to the Bride:<\/p>\n<p> Kings&#8217; daughters are among thy honorable women: At thy right hand doth stand the queen in gold of Ophir. Hearken, O daughter, and consider, and incline thine ear; Forget also thine own people, and thy father&#8217;s house: So will the king desire thy beauty; For he is thy lord; and reverence thou him. And the daughter of Tyre shall be there with a gift; The rich among the people shall entreat thy favor. The king&#8217;s daughter within the palace is all glorious: Her clothing is inwrought with gold. She shall be led unto the king in broidered work: The virgins her companions that follow her Shall be brought unto thee. With gladness and rejoicing shall they be led: They shall enter into the king&#8217;s palace. Instead of thy fathers shall be thy children, Whom thou shalt make princes in all the earth. I will make thy name to be remembered in all generations: Therefore shall the peoples give thee thanks for ever and ever.<\/p>\n<p> Now we have the king presented to us as a puzzled worshiper. That is to say, there was in Jerusalem the ark of the covenant, in a special tent made for it by David; but there was at Gibeon the old tabernacle that Moses built and also the great brazen altar that Moses had made. Both were places of worship. Solomon determines to have, as a fitting introduction to his reign in which all people shall participate, the most imposing and magnificient religious service known in the world up to that time, and he proposes to have it at both places, first at Gibeon and then before the ark of the covenant at Jerusalem. The old law required only one place of sacrifice. Solomon and others before him might claim that the law was to become operative only after the nation was thoroughly established. Our text says that as a house for God had not yet been built, the people worshiped in high places. All through the books of Judges and 1 Samuel, including all the life of David, we see worship occasionally offered at other places than one central place, and particularly was this so after the Philistines had captured the ark and carried it away. So Solomon determines to hold his first service in the old tent that Moses made, and where the old brazen altar was, and then he would come back to Jerusalem and hold a duplicate service before the ark of the covenant in the place where David had put it. In order that this service might be truly national, he sends out a summons to every part of his empire that all the princes and chief men of the nation should come together and participate in this national offering. The record in speaking of it says that he offered a thousand burnt offerings. In the history of Xerxes, the king of Persia, when he was on his way to invade Greece and had come to the Hellespont, he offered a sacrifice of one thousand oxen to the gods. This says, &#8220;And Solomon went up thither to the brazen altar before the Lord, which was at the tent of meeting, and offered a thousand burnt offerings upon it.&#8221; That is a parallel in history.<\/p>\n<p> After this imposing ceremony Solomon slept, and sleeping, dreamed. More than once the Bible tells us that the most of dreams have no significance, but it also teaches us that in a number of special cases God makes his revelations through dreams; for example, the cases of Jacob, Joseph, and Nebuchadnezzar. Solomon&#8217;s dream was perhaps suggested by his father&#8217;s exhortations (See <span class='bible'>Pro 4:3-7<\/span> ) and his own impressions at this great gathering. For the first time in his reign be saw a national assembly, the great convocation of Israel. What a mighty people! What vast and varied interests! How complicated the problems of administration! How great the responsibility on him! He seemed to be appalled at the situation, and was asking himself how he, a boy, could meet it. Thinking thus he fell asleep, and in his sleep came this dream:<\/p>\n<p> In Gibeon the Lord appeared to Solomon in &amp; dream by night: and God said, Ask what I shall give thee. And Solomon said (and I do wish we could always have him as presented here), Thou hast showed unto thy servant David my father great kindness, according as he walked before thee in truth, and m righteousness, and in uprightness of heart with thee; and thou hast kept for him this great kindness, that thou hast given, him a son to sit on his throne, as it is this day. And now, O Jehovah my God thou hast made thy servant king instead of David my father: and I am but a little child; I know not how to go out or come in. And thy servant ie in the midst of thy people which thou hast chosen, a great people, that cannot be numbered nor counted for multitude. Give thy servant therefore an understanding heart to judge thy people, that I may discern between good and evil; for who is able to judge this thy great people?<\/p>\n<p> It is impossible for any candid mind to read that without being impressed by it. Let me assure you that whoever, on the threshold of any great enterprise, is without the spirit of true humility, is certain to fail. One of the best forecasts of success is that he sees the magnitude and difficulty of the work and realizes his own personal insufficiency and his entire dependence upon the divine help. Would that all of us had that spirit all the time! There is this thing about it: Whenever you lose humility, and begin to say, &#8220;All these things have I done,&#8221; then remember that &#8220;Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall.&#8221; The feet of pride are sure to slip in due time. Take the lesson to heart.<\/p>\n<p> I can&#8217;t conceive of anything more noble than Solomon&#8217;s sense of responsibility and humility before God. A boy made king, king of the elect nation, king of so great a people; in other words, the destiny of the whole world is involved in the mighty religious influences to go out from him and his people. Well might he say, &#8220;Lord, I am a little child. I don&#8217;t know how to go out and come in. Give me wisdom.&#8221; The saying pleased the Lord. I suggest a sermon: &#8220;Ask what I shall give thee.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> One Christmas when we had services in the old church at Waco and I preached the sermon, I took that text: &#8220;Ask what I shall give thee,&#8221; and I told them that every family represented in the congregation had either propounded or heard that question in connection with the day. The parent had said, &#8220;What shall I give thee, my son?&#8221; and all the young people had pondered the question: &#8220;I am to choose my gift and I have a large margin; what will I take?&#8221; My own little boy would say, &#8220;Give me an automobile.&#8221; &#8220;Ask what I shall give thee.&#8221; What a wonderful thing it is that God permits to us the statement of the desires of our hearts. Even if we keep on praying for an evil thing, in his anger he will sometimes give us what we ask.<\/p>\n<p> God&#8217;s answer not only gives Solomon what he asks for, but a number of other things honor and riches things that he did not ask for. He gave him wisdom, the capacity to rule this great people. Our record says, &#8220;I give thee a wise and understanding heart, so that there hath been none like thee before thee, neither after thee shall any arise like unto thee.&#8221; In this connection consider <span class='bible'>1Ki 4:29-34<\/span> :<\/p>\n<p> And God gave Solomon wisdom and understanding exceeding much, and largeness of heart, even as the sand that is on the seashore. And Solomon&#8217;s wisdom exceeded the wisdom of all the children of the east, and all the wisdom of Egypt. For he was wiser than all men; than Ethan, the Ezrahite, and Heman, and Calcol, and Darda, the sons of Mahol; and his fame was in all the nations round about. And he spake three thousand proverbs; and his songs were a thousand and five. And he spake of trees, from the cedar that is in Lebanon even unto the hyssop that springeth out of the wall: he spake also of beasts, and of birds, and of creeping things, and of fishes. And there came of all peoples to hear the wisdom of Solomon, from all kings of the earth, who had heard of his wisdom.<\/p>\n<p> Of that remarkable wisdom we speak particularly in the next chapter. An exemplification of his wisdom marks the beginning of his reign, which is here given. There came up a case to which there were no witnesses beyond the contestants themselves. Two mothers living together in the same house had children born to them, and one of the children dies. Then both mothers claim the living child. Nobody knows anything about the circumstances except the two women, and they come before the king to decide the contention. The first one claimed that it was her child. She says, &#8220;This other woman lost her baby; it died and while I was asleep she came and took my baby and put her dead baby in my baby&#8217;s place, and after awhile when I waked up I looked intently at this baby in my arms, and found it was dead, but it was not my baby.&#8221; Now a mother is certainly able to know her child. &#8220;I looked intently at it, it was not my baby, and I looked over there and I saw this other woman had my baby.&#8221; The other woman contended: &#8220;I say her baby died, and I am the mother of this live child.&#8221; Under the law everything must be confirmed by two or three witnesses, but here there is no evidence except the two parties in court. How will the young king handle the matter? He says, &#8220;Bring me a sword.&#8221; The sword is brought. &#8220;Cut that baby into halves and give each woman a half&#8221; not that he intended to kill the baby; he was only trying to get evidence. As soon as he said that both women speak. One of them said, &#8220;No! No! don&#8217;t kill the baby. I had rather give it up to the other woman.&#8221; The other woman said, &#8220;Yes, kill it and let each one of us have a part.&#8221; This gave Solomon his evidence. He knew what to decide. He says, &#8220;Give this baby to the woman who prefers to lose it rather than see it die. She is the mother.&#8221; The decision naturally attracted great attention, and the report of it spread Solomon&#8217;s fame far and wide.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> QUESTIONS<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p> 1. What was the first scripture used to introduce this lesson?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. Rehearse the items of the kingdom charter given in this scripture.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. What was the second scripture, and its import?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. What was the third scripture? Describe the kingdom according to this psalm. Who fulfilled this primarily? Who more largely fulfils it?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. In what did the establishment of Solomon on the throne consist, who was his first enemy, and how was he disposed of?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. Where do we find the law of the sanctuary? Did Solomon violate it in having Joab put to death while holding on to the horns of the altar?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. Who was appointed to fill Joab&#8217;s office? Abiathar&#8217;s?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. Was the marriage of Solomon to the daughter of the king of Egypt a violation of the law not to inter-marry with the people round about? What psalm touching this marriage?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. Describe Solomon as a puzzled worshiper.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. What was God&#8217;s proposition to Solomon, and Solomon&#8217;s request? What the lesson for us? What God&#8217;s answer to this request? Give an example of his wisdom as exercised.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: B.H. Carroll&#8217;s An Interpretation of the English Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 2Ch 1:1 And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and the LORD his God [was] with him, and magnified him exceedingly.<\/p>\n<p> Ver. 1. <strong> And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom.<\/strong> ] Defying the opposition of Adonijah and his accomplices. See <span class='bible'>1Ki 1:4-10<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 2 Chronicles Chapter 1<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 2 Chronicles 1-2:3<\/p>\n<p> We have seen that the first book of Chronicles has for its great object the setting aside of the fleshly choice of man in the kingdom for the man of God&#8217;s choice &#8211; David. Nevertheless there was a purpose of God brought out by David&#8217;s request to build the house of Jehovah. God meant it for another very near to David, but who was not David &#8211; not for him who had served Him so faithfully in suffering, but for the son about to reign in glory. The second book of Chronicles accordingly shows us the son come to the throne, and the temple accordingly built. But although there was this difference between David and his son &#8211; the combined types of our Lord Jesus Christ in His sufferings and His glory &#8211; nevertheless, we should greatly err if we supposed that David had not before God a better portion than his son. Faith is better than its own results, and if we could have heaven without the pathway of faith upon earth, we should never be so blest as we hope to be. It is here that we know God as none in heaven ever can know Him. When we go to heaven, we shall not lose this, but have it in its perfection. Thus God gives us the best place everywhere &#8211; the best place on earth, the best place in heaven &#8211; and this not because we deserve anything, but because Christ does.<\/p>\n<p> But it is Christ suffering first, and this has the priority. First must He suffer, and then must He be raised from the dead. His glory is the consequence of His sufferings. I do not speak, of course, of His personal external glory. That is another thing. I speak of the glory that He takes as man, for this is what brings us in, although it could not have been, had He not been God. But still, what belongs to God in itself, is incapable of being a matter of gift to man. It is impossible for anyone to become God. Jesus was God. He was God as the Word before He was the Man Christ Jesus &#8211; God from eternity to eternity. But here we are speaking of the type of the Lord as man and as king &#8211; in this, too, son &#8211; the son of the true <\/p>\n<p> beloved. But then it was David (which means &#8220;beloved&#8221;), not Solomon. Solomon was the man of peace that flowed from the special object of Jehovah&#8217;s love. Hence, therefore, as David enjoyed the love of God and His complacency in a way that Solomon did not, in a deeper and fuller way, in his sorrows and sufferings upon the earth in the path of faith, so also did David own God and cleave to God in a deeper way than Solomon ever did. This was remarkably shown by what we see in the earlier verses of this second book of Chronicles.<\/p>\n<p> The ark characterizes David; the brazen altar, Solomon. The difference is manifest. The ark was what no human eye saw, but it was nearest to God. The brazen altar was a great sight. It was there that the thousand bullocks were sacrificed. It was there that the people could witness a great and holy sight. But still, the one was before the people; the other was before God. This makes a mighty difference; and you will find just the same difference now between two Christians, one of whom is spiritual and the other unspiritual. It is not that they do not both love the Lord Jesus, for he is no Christian who loves Him not. &#8220;If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha.&#8221; But although there be no difference, at bottom, in the fact of love, still there is a very great difference in the measure of it; and the grand difference shows itself in this &#8211; that the unspiritual man loves the Lord because of what He is to him; the spiritual man appreciates what He is to God. This is no loss to himself, but very great gain, because what we are before God is very much more than what we are before men.<\/p>\n<p> Hence, therefore, the ark was very dear to David &#8211; much dearer than his throne. Solomon, I have no doubt, greatly valued his throne; but he valued also the altar of God. I say not that he did not value the ark, but after all it is &#8220;out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks&#8221;; and when we find men occupied with any one thing more than another, we may be sure that that object has the heart, because we are always characterized by what we seek. And hence the importance of our words. So the Lord teaches in <span class='bible'>Mat 12<\/span> . Our words, if we are honest, are the expression of the mind. I do not speak of dishonest people; but when people are sincere &#8211; and it is hoped that Christians, at any rate, seek with all their hearts thus to be &#8211; the mouth discloses the state of the heart; and therefore when we speak of ourselves, it is evident what is before us. When we are filled with the Lord Jesus, the mouth will not fail in its testimony; but it is the appreciation of Christ in His nearness to God rather than in His immediate bearing upon ourselves that marks the difference between spirituality and the want of it.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;And so Solomon went up thither to the brazen altar before Jehovah which was at the tabernacle of the congregation&#8221; (<span class='bible'>2Ch 1:6<\/span> ) just as the ark was brought up to the place which David had prepared for it &#8211; &#8220;and he offered a thousand burnt offerings upon it.&#8221; There all the congregation met God. It was the place of approach to God &#8211; not the place where God revealed Himself, but the place where man approached as near as he could to God. Nevertheless, God owns this, for it was good, though it was not the best &#8211; not the more excellent way.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;In that night did God appear unto Solomon, and said unto him, Ask what I shall give thee. And Solomon said unto God, Thou hast showed great mercy unto David my father.&#8221; Just as Moses and Joshua make up a compound type of Christ in the beginning of the history, so David and Solomon, now when the kingdom is set up. He therefore lays all the stress upon David.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;And hast made me to reign in his stead. Now, O Jehovah God, let thy promise unto David my father be established for Thou hast made me king over a people like the dust of the earth in multitude. Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people: for who can judge this Thy people, that is so great?&#8221; This was excellent. He did value the people; and he valued the people not because they were his people, but because they were God&#8217;s people. It makes all the difference new.<\/p>\n<p> Suppose in our relationship to the Church of God we regard any people as our people, we shall always be jealous about them &#8211; always be afraid of their listening to anybody but ourselves &#8211; always be anxious to mould and fashion their opinions according to our own, perhaps very narrow, minds. At any rate, no man &#8211; I care not how great &#8211; no man contains all the gifts; and this is not the order of God for His Church. The principle of God is directly the contrary. All things are ours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas; and therefore anything that hinders the action of all the gifts that God gives for God&#8217;s people is false in principle; and God&#8217;s people ought to hold themselves not only free, but bound to seek profit from all that God gives for their good, because they are God&#8217;s people. They do not belong to any man. It matters not how owned and honoured of God he might be, still the more honoured the more he would feel they are God&#8217;s people.<\/p>\n<p> And this is the very point that Peter so earnestly presses. It is rather badly given in our version. I will just draw attention to it for a moment. In the last chapter of his first epistle, Peter says to the elders, &#8220;Feed the flock of God.&#8221; That is the point that keeps us right. They are God&#8217;s flock, and we must take care what we do with God&#8217;s flock. We must take care that we have a right mind and a right object as to God&#8217;s flock. &#8220;Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre but of a ready mind; neither as being lords&#8221; &#8211; not &#8220;over God&#8217;s heritage.&#8221; You observe the word &#8220;God&#8217;s&#8221; is put in by the translators. It does not mean God&#8217;s heritage at all. The flock is God&#8217;s flock, but the point in the third verse is not at all that question, but what they were not to do. They were to feed the flock of God. That is the positive side. But here we have the negative side. &#8220;Neither as lording it over their own heritage&#8221; would be really the idea; that is, not treating it as a thing belonging to them &#8211; &#8220;neither as being lords over their own belongings&#8221; &#8211; if I may paraphrase the verse &#8211; &#8220;but as being ensamples to the flock.&#8221; That is, they were not to treat them as their own. This gives the force of the exhortation to the elders. They were to feed them as God&#8217;s flock; they were not to lord over them as their own belongings &#8211; their own heritage.<\/p>\n<p> Now, Solomon entered into this in his measure. He did not regard the people as his people, his to govern, his to serve God in, but God&#8217;s people entrusted to him. This gives seriousness; and, further. it exercises conscience. So he asked for wisdom, for surely be needed it. Had it been his own people, he might have had wisdom enough; but, being God&#8217;s people, he required wisdom from God; and therefore this is what he asked &#8211; not wealth or length of years. So God, accepting this request of Solomon&#8217;s heart, says, &#8220;Because this was in thine heart, and thou hast not asked riches, wealth, or honour, nor the life of thine enemies, neither yet hast asked long life; but hast asked wisdom and knowledge for thyself, that thou mayest judge My people, over whom I have made thee king.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> How wonderful the grace of God! &#8220;My people.&#8221; He was not ashamed of it. We shall see how poor and failing they were, but they were God&#8217;s people. Then it was a question of an earthly people &#8211; now of a heavenly &#8211; and our responsibility is as much greater than Israel&#8217;s as the heavens are above the earth. I mean that, as to our place now, we are put on a different rule &#8211; under a different regime altogether! &#8211; &#8220;wisdom and knowledge are granted unto thee; and I will give thee riches, and wealth, and honour, such as none of the kings have had that have been before thee, neither shall there any after thee have the like.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> And hence, therefore, we find that the Apostle feels the need of a new kind of wisdom; and God grants it and gives it, not merely to him; but we all need it, each in his place and for his mission. And where is that wisdom, and what? &#8220;Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.&#8221; Hence, therefore, we have got a wholly different kind of wisdom. Solomon&#8217;s wisdom was exercised from the cedar of Lebanon to the hyssop that grew on the wall. It was of the earth; it had to do with the human heart as well as all objects that were here below. And so we find it most divinely exercised in the book of Proverbs, which is a matchless collection of divine wisdom in earthly things. But it is another kind of wisdom that we find, now that Christ has been revealed and has taken His place in heaven, because the question is not what suits the earth, but what suits heaven &#8211; what suits the Lord Jesus glorified at the right hand of God. The Church is the body of Christ at the right hand of God.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Then Solomon came from his journey to the high place that was at Gibeon to Jerusalem from before the tabernacle of the congregation, and reigned over Israel. And Solomon gathered chariots and horsemen: and he had a thousand and four hundred chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen, which he placed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem. And the king made silver and gold at Jerusalem as plenteous as stones, and cedar trees made he as the sycamore trees that are in the vale for abundance.&#8221; There was the grandest witness of magnificence that ever was found in any city upon earth. Not even Augustus&#8217;s finding Rome brick and making it marble, was to be compared with Solomon. &#8220;And Solomon had horses brought out of Egypt, and linen yarn: the king&#8217;s merchants received the linen yarn at a price. And they fetched up and brought forth out of Egypt a chariot for six hundred shekels of silver, and an horse for an hundred and fifty: and so brought they out horses for all the kings of the Hittites, and for the kings of Syria, by their means.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> That is, we find everything here related, but not so as to manifest his faults. We knew very well that these horses, and, above all, the multiplying of his wives, became a great snare to Solomon; but the object of Chronicles is not to mention the king&#8217;s responsibility and the ways in which he broke down, so much as to bear witness to his being the witness of God&#8217;s purpose. In Kings, as I have already shown, we have the question of responsibility, in Chronicles, of divine counsel. That is the difference between the two books. They are not a mere repetition of each other. There is a sensible difference in the way in which even the same events are recorded; but this was not the will of man, but really the power of God, and God&#8217;s wisdom. And as David was hindered from the thought of his heart in building a temple, which was reserved for Solomon, so the Spirit of God soon lets us know that the grand point for which Solomon indeed reigns was the building of Jehovah&#8217;s house. &#8220;And Solomon determined to build an house for the name of Jehovah, and an house for his kingdom. And Solomon told out threescore and ten thousand men to bear burdens, and fourscore thousand to hew in the mountain, and three thousand and six hundred to oversee them. And Solomon sent to Huram the king of Tyre, saying, As thou didst deal with David my father, and didst send him cedars to build him an house to dwell therein, even so deal with me.&#8221; <span class='bible'>2Ch 2:1-3<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> So it will be in the kingdom of the Lord Jesus by-and-by. He, the head of Israel, will make use of the Gentiles; and the Gentiles, represented here by the king of Tyre, will bring of all their means, their wealth, their glory, in allegiance to the King of kings and Lord of lords. But it would be a great mistake to confound the character of that day with the principle of this. I know there are many dear children of God who think that it is for the glory of God to have architecture of a grand and imposing description, and music of the finest character to please the ear, and all things accordingly; but this is really the Jewish method of honouring God, and not the Christian one. On the contrary, that which is proper to us is prayer and singing in the Spirit and in the understanding; and whatever is not characterized by the Holy Ghost, and is not taken up directly by the Spirit to witness for the Lord Jesus Christ &#8211; whatever is not of faith now &#8211; is a total failure.<\/p>\n<p> Hence, mere imagery to represent truth, although an admirable thing in Jewish days, is altogether out of season in the present. It is going back to the nursery after we have attained our majority. It is playing at children again in divine things, which was exactly what the children of Israel were. They were in their minority, and they had the picture books that were suitable for the nursery. It was God&#8217;s nursery then, but it is a great mistake to go back to the nursery now; and this is exactly the mistake of ritualism in every form and in every measure. It is the greatest blunder to suppose that, because a thing is in the Bible, therefore it is always of the same authority. If that were the case, we ought to offer our he-goats and our bullocks much more; for there was, after all, a much more important witness to the sacrifice of Christ in these than in any other portion of the Jewish economy, as, indeed, they were before it. They were not merely the temporary institution of Israel; they were practiced by the faithful ever since sin came into the world. There would be very much more plausible ground, therefore, for an argument in favour of material sacrifices than for the mere splendour of the temple, or even the more modified show of the tabernacle. But the truth is, for us the true holy place is in the heavens; and it is, therefore, through the rent veil that we draw nigh, if we draw nigh to God at all; and any thought of an earthly holy place or sanctuary is a retrogression from Christianity to Judaism. I mention this because it is of all practical importance; and no Christian ought, therefore, to shrink from fairly looking at these things in the face. Is it not true? Is it not the very object of the Holy Ghost to bring even the Jews out of this? &#8211; not to lead the Gentiles back into it. Ritualism is the reversal of the instruction of the epistle to the Hebrews. It is apostasy in fact &#8211; apostasy from the truth of God that is revealed there &#8211; and therefore I hold that ritualism is not a mere harmless power Nor do I at all agree with those that say, Well, I can worship God as well in a cathedral as in a hut. I answer that I cannot worship Him at all where show suited to the world is the object, and that wherever I can be in unison with the crucified and rejected Saviour is the true place for a man of faith. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: William Kelly Major Works (New Testament)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>was strengthened: i.e. after the events recorded in 1Chr 28and 1Chr 29; 1Kings 1and 1Kings 2. <\/p>\n<p>the LORD. Hebrew. Jehovah. App-4. <\/p>\n<p>God. Hebrew. Elohim. App-4. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Let&#8217;s turn to II Chronicles chapter 1.<\/p>\n<p>I Chronicles brought us up unto the death of David, and II Chronicles begins with the reign of Saul and it covers the remaining history of the kings of Judah. Now this is the chronicles of the kings of Judah. It does not really deal with the kings of Israel, but concentrates upon the southern kingdom, the kingdom of Judah. There were, perhaps, chronicles of the kings of Israel. Those we do not have. But these are the chronicles of the kings of Judah, and I Chronicles occupies itself primarily with the kingdom of David. For it was under David that the kingdom was brought to the zenith, the apex of its glory and power. And Solomon stepped in and following his father who had laid a beautiful foundation and enjoyed, really, the benefits of his father&#8217;s reign.<\/p>\n<p>Under Solomon the kingdom began to deteriorate. And just so quickly the kingdom fell apart. At the death of Solomon, when his son Rehoboam took over, the kingdom became divided, and what was once a mighty, powerful kingdom soon became a weakened, such a weakened state that the glorious treasures that had been amassed by David and by Solomon were soon taken by Shishak, the king of Egypt. And the glory and the power and the wealth of the kingdom were soon destroyed.<\/p>\n<p>So, as we get into the second book of the Chronicles of the kings of Judah,<\/p>\n<p>Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and the LORD his God was with him, and magnified him exceedingly ( 2Ch 1:1 ).<\/p>\n<p>Solomon began his reign with great power. Power that was handed to him, really, from his father David. But also power from the Lord, because in the beginning Solomon&#8217;s heart was right before God.<\/p>\n<p>And Solomon gathered the people together at Gibeon, for the tabernacle of the Lord, at that time, was in Gibeon. Now there were two tabernacles at this time. David had erected a tent in Jerusalem for the Ark of the Covenant. When they brought the Ark of the Covenant back to Jerusalem, David made a tent for the Ark for the Covenant in Jerusalem. But the real worship center of the nation was still at Gibeon where the tabernacle, modeled after the tabernacle in the wilderness, existed, and the altar where they would go up to sacrifice unto God was at Gibeon.<\/p>\n<p>And so Solomon gathered the people together to the high place that was at Gibeon; for there was the tabernacle of the congregation similar to the one that they had had in the wilderness. And the ark of God David had brought from Kirjathjearim to Jerusalem and had built a tent for that. And Solomon went up there to this brass altar before the Lord, which was at the tabernacle of the congregation, and he offered a thousand burnt offerings upon it ( 2Ch 1:3 , 2Ch 1:4 , 2Ch 1:6 ).<\/p>\n<p>Now Solomon was an extravagant fellow. A thousand burnt offerings. And he was extravagant in all that he did.<\/p>\n<p>In that night did God appear unto Solomon, and said unto him, Ask what I shall give thee ( 2Ch 1:7 ).<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s almost like some of the plots of the fairy tales that you read, you know, the fairy goddess or the genie or whatever. Ask whatever you want. I sometimes wondered myself if God should come to me and say, &#8220;Ask what you want Me to give to you.&#8221; I&#8217;ve wondered what would I ask God for. What would be my request? And I&#8217;ve often thought as I mused on this, I think I would turn it right around and say, &#8220;God, You give me whatever You want to give me.&#8221; Because you see, I may be thinking of much less than what God wants to give. He loves me so much that He desires to just give to me. And I might be saying, &#8220;Lord, I&#8217;d like to have a thousand dollars.&#8221; And He may want to lay a million dollars on me. And why should I cut Him short?<\/p>\n<p>I think that we fail to realize how much God really loves us. And what God is willing to do for us. &#8220;For if God spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how much more then shall He not freely give us all things?&#8221; ( Rom 8:32 ) Look what God has already given for you. Consider it. He spared not His own Son, and if He spared not His own Son but delivered Him up for you, how much more will He freely give you all things? Jesus said, &#8220;Henceforth you&#8217;ve asked nothing in my name. Ask.&#8221; And in the Greek it&#8217;s in the intensive, which translated more literally would be, &#8220;Ask, please ask, that you may receive, that your joy may be full&#8221; ( Joh 16:24 ). God is wanting to bless you. God is wanting to bless your life, because God wants your life to be an instrument through which the world around you might know the joy and the blessing of serving the Lord. And so God desires, God delights in giving good things to His children.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Ask what I shall give thee.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And Solomon said, You have showed great mercy unto David my father, and You have made me to reign in his place. Now, O LORD God, let thy promise unto David my father be established: for You have made me the king over a people that are like the dust of the earth as far as number. Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people: for who can judge this thy people, that is so great? ( 2Ch 1:8-10 )<\/p>\n<p>So Solomon&#8217;s request, &#8220;Wisdom and knowledge, God. That I may know how to go in and out before these people, because the task that has been laid upon me, reigning over Your people, is greater than I can actually handle. And so, Father, grant me the wisdom and the knowledge, really, to do Your business. Grant me, Lord, that which I need to do the things that You want me to do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What a beautiful request. Now a little further on when we get into our reading next week, we&#8217;re going to find the prophet coming to Asa the king and declaring, &#8220;For the eyes of the Lord go to and fro throughout the entire earth to show Himself strong on behalf of those whose hearts are perfect towards Him&#8221; ( 2Ch 16:9 ). Now here&#8217;s Solomon expressing a heart that&#8217;s really sort of completely towards God. &#8220;Ask whatever you want, Solomon.&#8221; &#8220;Lord, I like to be famous. Lord, I like my footprint in Grauman&#8217;s Chinese. Lord, I&#8217;d like to be rich.&#8221; No, &#8220;Lord, You&#8217;ve placed a big, heavy responsibility upon me. You&#8217;ve made me the king in the place of my father over Your people. And God, I need wisdom and I need knowledge and just knowing how to do the work that you want done.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And God said to Solomon, Because this was in your heart, and you did not ask for riches, wealth, or honor, or you didn&#8217;t ask for the life of your enemies, neither did you ask long life for yourself; but you&#8217;ve asked for wisdom and knowledge for yourself, that you may judge my people, over whom I have made you king: wisdom and knowledge is granted unto you; and I will give you riches, and wealth, and honor, such as none of the kings have had that have been before you, neither shall there be any after you that will have the like. Then Solomon came from his journey to the high place that was at Gibeon to Jerusalem, from before the tabernacle of the congregation, and he reigned over Israel. And Solomon gathered chariots and horsemen: and he had a thousand four hundred chariots, twelve thousand horsemen, that he placed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem. And the king made silver and gold at Jerusalem as plenteous as stones, and cedar trees he made as common as the sycamore trees that grow in the vale abundantly. And Solomon had horses brought out of Egypt, and linen yarn: and the king&#8217;s merchants received the linen yarn at a price. And they brought up from Egypt the chariots for six hundred shekels of silver, horses for a hundred and fifty: and so brought they out horses for all of the kings of the Hittites, and for the kings of Syria, by their means ( 2Ch 1:11-17 ).<\/p>\n<p>In other words, they began to be horse traders. They began to sell them to the nations around, the Hittites, and the Syrians, and so forth. Now it is interesting that Solomon began this horse trading with Egypt, it would appear, very early in his career. And in so doing, he was beginning to plant the seeds of destruction and deterioration of his kingdom. For in Deuteronomy, the Lord gave the law concerning the kings of Israel, and in the seventeenth chapter, in the fourteenth verse, the Lord said to Moses, &#8220;When the people come into the land, and they possess it, and they will say, &#8216;We want a king like the nations that are about us.'&#8221; Then God gives requirements for the one that they should set forth as a king, but in verse sixteen, He said, &#8220;But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt, to the end that they should multiply horses&#8221; ( Deu 17:14 , Deu 17:16 ).<\/p>\n<p>Now what does God have against horses? Nothing. He created them. But in those days the horse was a definite, decisive kind of weapon in battle. They began to measure the strength of an army by the number of the horses. A man on horseback had a definite advantage, and a chariot was a fearsome, awesome weapon of war. Sort of like tanks against infantry today. And so God did not want them trusting in horses. And in Psalms it said, &#8220;A horse is a vain thing&#8221; ( Psa 33:17 ) as far as something to trust in. As it speaks about the contrasting, trusting in the Lord. &#8220;Some men trust in horses and some in chariots, but we will trust in the Lord our God&#8221; ( Psa 20:7 ). And so many of the psalms are addressed to the fact that people were putting trust in horses.<\/p>\n<p>Now the fact that Solomon began to amass this great number of horses, and for a time, Bible critics sort of assailed the biblical account because of the numbers of horses that Solomon had. And it tells how he built these cities and put stables in these cities and so forth. And now in the excavations, in many of these cities that Solomon had fortified, they have found, actually, the horse stables. In the city of Megiddo at the level of excavation that was at Solomon&#8217;s time, you can see these stone troughs that they had carved out for the water for the horses, and the feeding troughs and all. They are there today and in vast numbers. And it all verifies, really, the biblical account of the vast numbers of horses that Solomon gathered.<\/p>\n<p>And the tendency, though, was then to trust in the fact that you have in your army a certain number of horsemen and all. So it&#8217;s amazing to me that so soon Solomon would forsake the law of the Lord and would begin to sow the seeds that ultimately were to deteriorate the kingdom.     &#8220;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Through the Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2Ch 1:1-6<\/p>\n<p>Introduction<\/p>\n<p>I. THE UNITED KINGDOM FROM SOLOMON TO THE DIVISION (2 Chronicles 1-10)<\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:1-6<\/p>\n<p>SOLOMON AT GIBEON; GOD APPEARS IN A DREAM<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and Jehovah his God was with him, and magnified him exceedingly. And Solomon spake unto all Israel, to the captains of thousands and of hundreds, and to the judges, and to every prince in all Israel, the heads of the fathers&#8217; houses. So Solomon and all the assembly with him, went to the high place that was at Gibeon; for there was the tent of meeting of God, which Moses the servant of God had made in the wilderness. But the ark of God had David brought up from Kiriath-jearim to the place that David had prepared for it; for he had pitched a tent for it at Jerusalem. Moreover the brazen alter that Bezalel the son of Uri, the son of Hur, had made, was there before the tabernacle of Jehovah: and Solomon and the assembly sought unto it. And Solomon went up thither to the brazen altar before Jehovah, which was at the tent of meeting, and offered a thousand burnt-offerings upon it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The brazen altar that Bezalel &#8230; had made&#8221; (2Ch 1:5). Continually throughout Chronicles we find an acute consciousness of all that was written in the Pentateuch in the times of Moses. The references here are from Exo 17:10; Exo 28:1-8; Exo 31:2.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Solomon offered a thousand burnt-offerings upon it&#8221; (2Ch 1:6). This means that Solomon provided the burnt-offerings, not that he offered them personally, a duty that pertained to the priests. &#8220;This altar is mentioned as assurance that Gibeon was the proper place for sacrifice and worship.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>By beginning his record of Solomon&#8217;s reign in this manner, the Chronicler apparently sought to focus the attention of Israel upon their ancient heritage of the favor and blessing of God, and upon his deliverance of them from Egypt by the hand of Moses.<\/p>\n<p>E.M. Zerr:<\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:1. This and several verses following corresponds with 1Ki 3:1-15. Was strengthened denotes that Solomon was established on his throne. It sometimes happens that a man may take his place on the throne, but be in an uncertain condition because of some disturbance in the nation. It was not so with Solomon for all elements of the nation were favorable to him. <\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:2. Solomon spake. The second word is one with several meanings. It is rendered in the A. V. the most frequently by &#8220;speak&#8221; and &#8220;answer.&#8221; In a few instances it is translated &#8220;command.&#8221; The present verse merely says that Solomon spake to the people. We must conclude, therefore, that what he said included what was necessary to inform the people of the king&#8217;s desire of them, <\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:3. See my comments at 1Ki 8:2 on &#8220;high places.&#8221; The temple had not yet been built, so it was necessary to go to the tabernacle that was at Gibeon. <\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:4. The ark had been separated from the tabernacle at the battle with the Philistines. (1 Samuel 4.) It never was in its original place again, but was taken from place to place; first among the Philistines, then with the Israelites. It was at Kirjath-jearim for at least 20 years. (1Sa 7:2.) David finally moved it to Jerusalem and put it in a tent that he had pitched for it in the district of the city called Mount Zion or City of David. (2 Samuel 6.) <\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:5. The brazen altar was originally located before the tabernacle, just as it is described here. The statement indicates that a general disturbance had been made of the tabernacle and its furniture. This was caused by the Philistines, but we have no specific information of when it was done. <\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:6. The altar represented the major part of the congregational worship of the Jews. Solomon respected it by going to Gibeon to offer sacrifices upon it. His reign was just beginning and he was in the state of sincere devotion to God that led him for several years. It was fitting that he begin the great career with a season of public devotions, hence the statement in V. 3 that all the congregation went up. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>After all the careful preparations for building the Temple which we considered in our survey of the previous Book, we now come to the period in which Solomon entered into full possession of his kingdom and took up the great work entrusted to him. He commenced by gathering his people with him at a sacred act of worship. There God met with him in a special vision at night, and tested him by commanding him to ask of Him what he desired. The condition of his heart was clearly manifest in that he sought for the wisdom necessary to accomplish his work in the best possible way. His request showed a sense of responsibility, and also his realization that he could fulfil that responsibility only as he was divinely guided.<\/p>\n<p>God&#8217;s answer was a beautiful instance of the overflowing love and grace of the divine heart. All the things Solomon set aside for the sake of wisdom also were given him. It is impossible to read this story without the words, &#8220;Greater than Solomon,&#8221; being recalled to the mind, &#8220;Seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you.&#8221; So far as Solomon was concerned, it was a fine beginning.<\/p>\n<p>In the closing verses of the chapter we see on the divine side the fulfillment of the promise of material prosperity. These were the days of Israel&#8217;s greatest glory in this respect. The language of the chronicler is pictorial and forceful. Gold and silver were as common as stones; and the precious cedar timber was as plenteous as the commoner sycamore. There was nothing wrong in all this, but it created a very subtle peril. Prosperity is always a more insidious danger to men of faith than adversity. It is more than likely that the glamor of such affluence was already working evil in the king&#8217;s heart, as he multiplied his horses and chariots by traffic with Egypt. Commerce with Egypt is always dangerous to the people of God, and it is a very easy stage from the purchase of horses to the procuring of a wife. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: An Exposition on the Whole Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Analysis and Annotations<\/p>\n<p>I. THE REIGN OF SOLOMON<\/p>\n<p>1. The Beginning of Solomons Reign and the First Vision<\/p>\n<p>CHAPTER 1<\/p>\n<p>1. The Lord was with him (2Ch 1:1)<\/p>\n<p>2. At Gibeon (2Ch 1:2-6)<\/p>\n<p>3. The first vision (2Ch 1:7-12)<\/p>\n<p>4. His riches and prosperity (2Ch 1:13-17)<\/p>\n<p>The events connected with the beginning of Solomons reign and recorded in 1 Kings 1-3:3 are omitted in Chronicles. Second Chronicles begins with the statement that Solomon was strengthened in his kingdom, and the Lord his God was with him, and magnified him exceedingly. This shows the keynote of Chronicles. It is Jehovahs gracious dealing with the house of David and the bestowal of the promised blessing. In 1Ki 3:3 we read that Solomon loved the Lord.<\/p>\n<p>Here more of Gibeon is mentioned than in Kings. Gibeon was a great city, as one of the royal cities (Jos 10:2). Later Gibeon became the possession of the tribe of Benjamin and was made a priest-city. It was about two hours from Jerusalem. When Saul had destroyed Nob, the tabernacle was removed to Gibeon, where it remained till Solomon built the house of the LORD (1Ch 16:39; 1Ch 21:29; 1Ki 3:4; 2Ch 1:3). The ark had been brought from Kirjath-jearim, not far from Gibeon, to the tent which David had pitched for it in Jerusalem (2Sa 6:2; 1Ch 13:5-6), but the tabernacle and the brazen altar, that Bezaleel, the son of Uri, the son of Hur, had made remained at Gibeon. The high place at Gibeon means the elevation upon which the tabernacle and the altar stood. Originally there was at the same spot a Canaanitish place for the worship of idols. As long as the temple, that central place for worship chosen by God (Deu 12:11), was not standing, the worship of Jehovah in the Gibeon high place was not sinful. After the temple was built the high places became centers of idolatrous practices. Solomon and all the congregation with him gathered at Gibeon and sought the brazen altar and offered a thousand burnt offerings upon it. He began with this act of worship and it was the same night that God appeared unto Solomon. The Lord drew graciously near to him as the result of the sacrifices upon the brazen altar. The burnt-offering is the type of the perfect devotion and sacrifice of our Lord Jesus Christ, and it is this which makes us nigh. On the meaning of the great vision, Gods offer to Solomon, the Kings answer, see 1 Kings 3.<\/p>\n<p>After the vision and the Lords promise, I will give thee riches and wealth and honor, we hear of Solomons horses, horsemen and chariots. In 1 Kings, we find the same paragraph in another setting, that is, in chapter 10:26-29. He had 1,400 chariots and 12,000 horsemen and 4,000 stalls for horses. A great commerce seems to have been fostered by Solomon. While this showed the promise fulfilled, in that the Lord gave him riches and wealth, it also showed an unlawful desire for increase which was forbidden (Deu 17:16). Read comment on 1Ki 10:26-29.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gaebelein&#8217;s Annotated Bible (Commentary)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>was strengthened: 1Ki 2:12, 1Ki 2:46 <\/p>\n<p>the Lord: Gen 21:22, Gen 39:2, Gen 39:21, Exo 3:12, 1Ch 17:8, Mat 28:20 <\/p>\n<p>magnified: 1Ch 29:25, Phi 2:9-11 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Gen 26:28 &#8211; was with Jos 3:7 &#8211; magnify thee 1Ki 1:37 &#8211; As the 2Ch 6:10 &#8211; I am risen 2Ch 9:1 &#8211; fame 2Ch 11:17 &#8211; three years 2Ch 32:23 &#8211; he was magnified Ecc 2:9 &#8211; General<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>SOLOMONS REIGN<\/p>\n<p>HIS PRAYER AND ITS ANSWER (2Ch 1:1-3) <\/p>\n<p>With verses three and four compare 1 Chronicles 16, and especially 1Ch 16:37-40. The tabernacle at Gibeon was the legal place for worship, but the threshing-floor on Matthew Moriah was chosen by David for the reason given (1Ch 21:29). A comparison with the corresponding place in 1 Kings will show how this account is abbreviated as the matter was not necessary to the authors purpose. <\/p>\n<p>HIS POWER AND WEALTH (2Ch 1:14-17) <\/p>\n<p>This record is given in Kings near the close of the reign, but inserted here as a proof of the instant fulfillment of Gods promise. <\/p>\n<p>HIS CONSTRUCTION AND DEDICATION OF THE TEMPLE (2 Chronicles 2-7) <\/p>\n<p>Huram is the same with whom we have previously met. The two houses (2Ch 2:1) are the temple and Solomons palace. The description of the temple here differs in several particulars from that in Kings. For example, this is more particular as to the plan of the building but less so as to the time when it began; this speaks of the arrangement of the building and its furnishings in an unbroken narrative, but that has two interruptions; this arranges the objects differently and describes with more fullness in some cases, etc. But remember what has been said about the Holy Spirit as the real author of Scripture, and His right to use such liberty to emphasize certain facts or impress certain lessons as He desires. This does not take into account errors of copyists to which reference also has been made. <\/p>\n<p>Here the location of the temple is named for the first time (2Ch 3:1, compare Gen 22:2). Moriah means land of the appearing of the Lord. Note the reference to the brazen scaffold (2Ch 4:13) not given in Kings, the additional words at the close of Solomons prayer (2 Chron. 4:40-42), and the fuller account of the divine acceptance of the temple (2Ch 7:1-10). <\/p>\n<p>The large number of oxen and sheep offered in sacrifice is astounding (7:5), but Josephus in his Jewish Wars says that even in Roman times, 256,000 passover lambs were slain at Jerusalem within a few hours. A current commentator reminds us that these colossal offerings and festivals are no more astonishing to us than the magnitude of our steam or railway trade, or of modern warfare would be astonishing to the ancients. <\/p>\n<p>HIS EARTHLY END (2 Chronicles 8-9) <\/p>\n<p>In the first of these chapters we have brief notes of events recorded more at length in 1 Kings, for example: the building of certain cities, the palace for the daughter of the Egyptian king, the navigation to Ophir, etc. The comments upon these in that book occupy as much space as seems relatively necessary. <\/p>\n<p>In the next chapter the story of the Queen of Sheba is very much as in 1 Kings. <\/p>\n<p>QUESTIONS <\/p>\n<p>1. Where was the tabernacle of Moses at this period? <\/p>\n<p>2. Who is the real author of this book, and how does that fact bear on the differences in its record as compared with 1 Kings? <\/p>\n<p>3. How may other differences be explained? <\/p>\n<p>4. Tell what you know of the history of Matthew Moriah? <\/p>\n<p>5. Give a later parallel to the large number of sacrifices at the dedication of the temple. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: James Gray&#8217;s Concise Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2Ch 1:1-2. Solomon was strengthened in his kingdom  Or, established, after his seditious brother Adonijah and his partisans were suppressed; and he was received with the universal consent and joy of his princes and people. Solomon spake unto all Israel  Namely, concerning his intention of going to Gibeon, and that they should attend him thither, as the next verse shows. Authority and interest are well bestowed on those that will thus use them for the glory of God, and the promotion of religion. But it is the duty of all men to engage all they have any influence upon in the solemnities of religion, and very desirable to have many to join with them therein: the more the better: it makes these solemnities the more like heaven.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2Ch 1:1. And Solomon. The books of Chronicles are both one in the original, but the Latin church has thought proper to divide them into two; ending the first with Davids reign, and beginning the second with Solomons. The contents of the first ten or twelve chapters have been anticipated in the first book of Kings, and therefore few remarks will be required here.<\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:14. Solomon had a thousand and four hundred chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen. Each chariot contained a fighting captain, a powerful man on his left to support him, and one or two behind, to cut their way through the enemy. Solomon maintained a powerful standing army, to keep his allies in subjection, for he would not leave his country defenceless, while surrounding nations were in arms; yet he is called a prince of peace. While France boasts of a million of men in arms, England should not sleep.<\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:17. A horse for a hundred and fifty shekels. The shekel found in Italy weighed half an ounce of silver, value about half a crown. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Sutcliffe&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>PART III (2 Chronicles 1-9). The History of the Reign of Solomon<\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:1-13. Solomon at Gibeon (see notes on 1Ki 3:4-15).<\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:1-5. There is nothing corresponding to these verses in 1 K. excepting the reference to Gibeon in 1Ki 3:4.<\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:3. for there was the tent of meeting: the earlier history makes no mention of this; it was probably inserted by the Chronicler in order to explain away what would to him have appeared unthinkable in a God-fearing king, viz. worshipping at a high place (bamah); cf. Lev 17:8 f. The presence in Gibeon of the brazen altar, according to the Chronicler, would also, in his eyes, have justified Solomon in worshipping there; no mention is made, however, in 1Ki 3:4 of the brazen altar being at Gibeon.<\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:7-13. See notes on 1Ki 3:5-15, upon which this passage is based; the variations are unimportant.<\/p>\n<p>2Ch 1:14-17. Solomons Wealth (see notes on 1Ki 10:26-29 and cf. 1Ch 9:25-28).The position of this section, as compared with the sequence of the history in 1 K., suggests that the source which the Chronicler had before him was not in all respects identical with the present form of 1 K.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Peake&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Solomon began his reign strengthened by God and given great exaltation (v.1). At Solomon&#8217;s word all the chief men of Israel went up to the high place at Gibeon, where the tabernacle was at the time. There is no scriptural objection to this high place at the time, for it rather speaks of the place of exaltation given to the tabernacle. However, when Solomon had built the temple there was no more reason for the tabernacle: rather, the ark and all the tabernacle furniture was brought to the temple, signifying that all the truths of the tabernacle were incorporated into the temple, the place of God&#8217;s choosing (ch.5:5). After this, worship in the high places was disobedience to God, yet Solomon built high places for foreign gods (1Ki 11:7-8). But 2 Chronicles passes over the failures of Solomon, since the focus of the book is on God&#8217;s sovereign grace sustaining the king who was a picture of Christ.<\/p>\n<p>At this time, however, the ark was not in the tabernacle, but in a tent that David had pitched for it at Jerusalem (v.4). The bronze (or copper) altar that was made by Bezaleel (Exo 27:1-2) was in its proper place in front of the tabernacle (v.5), and Solomon and Israel met the Lord there. The altar symbolised his meeting the Lord in grace because of the value of the sacrifice placed on the altar but there was inconsistency in the ark not being present, for the ark speaks of Christ as the Sustainer of the throne of God, therefore of absolute authority. Grace and authority should always be together, but God bore with this inconsistency until the temple was built, then all was in proper order again.<\/p>\n<p>Young as Solomon was, he showed true devotion to the Lord in offering 1,000 burnt offerings on the altar (v.6). Thus, his reign began well. The same night God appeared to him to give him the opportunity of asking what God should give him (v.7). His response was good, for he first showed a humble attitude of thankfulness for the great mercy God had shown to David his father and toward Solomon also in making him king. He asked that the Lord&#8217;s promise to David might be established. that is, the promise of David&#8217;s seed reigning over Israel (v.9). This desire for the fulfilment of God&#8217;s word shows a heart dependent on God, which was specially true in Solomon&#8217;s younger years.<\/p>\n<p>Being impressed with the size of Israel&#8217;s population, Solomon felt his own insufficiency for the responsibility of ruling over them, so that he asked for wisdom and knowledge, so that he might go out and come in before the people (v.10). This prayer was good and God commended Solomon for asking for wisdom and knowledge, rather than for riches or honour or for the destruction of his enemies (v.11). Therefore, God told him his prayer was answered favourably, so that he was given wisdom and knowledge. But God added to this that He would give him riches, wealth and honour also, greater than any other king before or after him (v.12).<\/p>\n<p>Yet, let us observe the reason that Solomon asked for wisdom and knowledge: &#8211; &#8220;that I may go out and come in before this people.&#8221; No doubt he remembered what scripture said of David: &#8220;All Israel and Judah loved David because he went out and came in before them&#8221; (1Sa 18:16). This was a good testimony before others. Solomon was concerned about this, as we too ought to be. Yet he did not evidently realise that David&#8217;s good testimony was the result of much deeper exercise of heart than of concern about his testimony. Nor should we think primarily about how we affect others. Should we not first consider how we should please the Lord?<\/p>\n<p>The Lord graciously answered Solomon&#8217;s request for wisdom and knowledge, and in all history there has not been another like him in intellectual wisdom and knowledge. He also told him He would give him riches and honour. But Solomon would have been wiser to ask much more than this. Far instance, if he had known Scripture well he might have known that it would be a special temptation for a king to multiply wives and horses, and to greatly multiply riches, as Deu 17:14-20 indicates, and if he had prayed to be preserved from these evils, his history might have been much different. Perhaps he had not read Deu 17:1-20, but he ought to have read in the five books of Moses every day of his life, as Deu 17:18-19 tells us.<\/p>\n<p>SOLOMON&#8217;S WEALTH AND POWER <\/p>\n<p>(vv.13-17).<\/p>\n<p>Returning to Jerusalem, Solomon began his prosperous reign in gathering wealth that exceeded all the kingdoms of the earth. 1,400 chariots and 12,000 horsemen were gathered for the protection of his kingdom early in his reign. Not that he needed all this, for God was his protector and such peace was established in his days that these chariots and horsemen were not used for war. But of course other nations would not so likely challenge him when he was well prepared.<\/p>\n<p>He had such stores of silver and gold that they became as common as stones in Jerusalem (v.15), and cedar trees became as common as the sycamores. The cedars were imported from Lebanon. Also mentioned is that he imported horses from Egypt and Keveh, as well as chariots from Egypt. Solomon also made a great business of buying and selling horses and chariots, &#8211; buying from Egypt and selling to the Hittites and kings of Syria. Thus of course his wealth greatly increased.<\/p>\n<p>Actually, in this traffic with Egypt Solomon was disobedient to God. Nevertheless, God used even this disobedience for His own glory, for in Chronicles nothing is said about this matter being disobedience. The emphasis is rather on the fact that Solomon&#8217;s wealth, increased as it was by Gentile traffic, is a picture of the greater wealth and splendour of the millennial reign of the Lord Jesus, whose glory will be increased by tribute from the whole world (which is pictured by Egypt). Zec 14:16 bears witness to this future recognition of Christ by the nations.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Grant&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline\">III. THE REIGN OF SOLOMON CHS. 1-9 (cont. from 1 Chron.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Chronicler&rsquo;s main interest in David&rsquo;s reign in 1 Chronicles focused on the Davidic Covenant with God&rsquo;s promises to David and his descendants, including instructions for building the temple. In recounting the events of Solomon&rsquo;s reign, the writer proceeded to emphasize the temple that Solomon built. Almost everything he mentioned about Solomon ties in with the temple somehow. The writer of Kings, on the other hand, emphasized many different aspects of Solomon&rsquo;s reign, though his interest was particularly Solomon&rsquo;s fidelity to the Mosaic Covenant (1 Kings 1-11). In the rest of 2 Chronicles the writer likewise pointed out how the kings who succeeded Solomon cared for the temple and perpetuated temple worship.<\/p>\n<p>When the Chronicler wrote his history, there was controversy over the second temple (i.e., the temple that Ezra built). Some of the residents in and around Jerusalem opposed its construction (Ezr 4:4-24; Hag 1:2-4). If the returned exiles were to renew their (Mosaic) covenant relationship with God, they had to have a temple. There they could obey the laws regarding expiation of sin, worship, and fellowship with God (cf. Exo 25:8).<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, when the Chronicler lived, the Israelites realized that God had not fulfilled the promises concerning David&rsquo;s son completely in Solomon&rsquo;s day, or during any of his successors&rsquo; reigns. They looked for a Messiah to appear who would be both a king and a priest. The prophets had given revelation that such a person would come someday. He would be a perfect king who would rule the whole world, not just Israel (Psalms 2; et al.). Moreover he would be a priest, not of the Aaronic order, but of the order of Melchizedek (Psalms 110; et al.). David was the first king of Israel who served as a faithful priest after this order. He personally offered sacrifices and led the people in worship as well as in government. David&rsquo;s successors on the throne did the same things. The prophets promised that Messiah would build a house (temple) for God. He would give attention to His people&rsquo;s worship of God and their fellowship with God. He would be a man of peace compared to David, who was a man of war (1Ch 22:7-9). David&rsquo;s rule was the kind of rule the coming King would establish. Consequently, the writer of Chronicles measured all David&rsquo;s successors by the standard of David and his kingdom.<\/p>\n<p>Concern for temple worship marked David&rsquo;s rule (cf. 1 Chronicles 17-29). The King who would fulfill God&rsquo;s covenant promises to David would have to possess similar zeal for temple worship (cf. Joh 2:17). The writer viewed Solomon as a second David and compared him to David, as Joshua compares to Moses.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: See Raymond B. Dillard, 2 Chronicles, pp. 1-7; and H. G. M. Williamson, &quot;The Accession of Solomon in the Books of Chronicles,&quot; Vetus Testamentum 26 (1976):351-61.] <\/span> The Chronicler reviewed the histories of David&rsquo;s successors to see if any one of them was that King. He showed in 2 Chronicles that none was. He was yet to come.<\/p>\n<p>When Solomon began to rule, he stepped onto a political stage in the ancient Near East that God had prepared. There were no major empires reaching out to conquer surrounding territories, because the empires of the time had internal problems that demanded their attention. Some of them were experiencing harassment from their neighbors. Consequently, Solomon was free to solidify David&rsquo;s gains in an atmosphere of peace.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline\">A. Solomon&rsquo;s Wisdom and Prosperity ch. 1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Solomon had some serious weaknesses that the writer of Kings pointed out. However, the Chronicler presented a generally positive picture of this great ruler because Solomon did well regarding Yahweh worship at the temple. His people&rsquo;s spiritual life was one of Solomon&rsquo;s primary concerns. He devoted himself to making worship and fellowship with God possible for the Israelites. In this he was similar to the promised ideal King.<\/p>\n<p>One of Solomon&rsquo;s first official acts as king was to worship Yahweh (2Ch 1:3). This happened at Gibeon where the central sanctuary stood. David had taken the ark into Jerusalem, but the Mosaic tabernacle at Gibeon was still a legitimate place of worship. It was the only place where the priests could offer sacrifices on the bronze altar that apparently remained from the wilderness wanderings. The writer emphasized the legitimacy of Solomon&rsquo;s act of worship (2Ch 1:3-6). Other &quot;high places&quot; were contaminated by association with Baal worship and were, therefore, under God&rsquo;s ban, even if the Israelites used them to worship Yahweh (cf. Num 33:52; Deu 12:2).<\/p>\n<p>&quot;The second book [of Chronicles] begins, theologically and not just geographically, at Gibeon, for &rsquo;the bronze altar .&nbsp;.&nbsp;. was there&rsquo; (2Ch 1:5 a). The previous two chapters focus on what God does; these two [i.e., chs. 1 &amp; 2] turn our attention to what man will do in response.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Michael Wilcock, The Message of Chronicles, p. 122.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p>Solomon requested the wisdom he needed to understand and obey the Mosaic Law by which Israel&rsquo;s kings were to shepherd the nation (2Ch 1:10; cf. Deu 4:5-8; Deu 17:18-20; Mat 7:7; Jas 1:5). Solomon&rsquo;s heart was right, as David&rsquo;s had been. He wanted to serve God faithfully and to honor Him above himself. He was off to a good start as Israel&rsquo;s shepherd.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Solomon&rsquo;s repeated reference to his father, David, shows that he was in a sense praying in David&rsquo;s name. That is, he was relying on his relationship as David&rsquo;s son for favor with God.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: J. A. Thompson, 1, 2 Chronicles, p. 205.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&quot;The central teaching of chapter 1 .&nbsp;.&nbsp;. lies in Solomon&rsquo;s selfless prayer for wisdom, which was the precise characteristic that his father David had already invoked for him (1Ch 22:12).&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: J. Barton Payne, &quot;1, 2 Chronicles,&quot; in I Kings-Job, vol. 4 of The Expositor&rsquo;s Bible Commentary, p. 441.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&quot;The right place to begin was with God. His favor and direction alone could give health and peace to the nation. Once again, therefore, the king is portrayed in a favorable light not in order to obscure his sins but in order to make the point that the good things he did are what we should imitate.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Thompson, p. 202.] <\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>SOLOMON<\/p>\n<p>THE chroniclers history of Solomon is constructed on the same principles as that of David, and for similar reasons. The builder of the first Temple commanded the grateful reverence of a community whose national and religious life centered in the second Temple. While the Davidic king became the symbol of the hope of Israel, the Jews could not forget that this symbol derived much of its significance from the widespread dominion and royal magnificence of Solomon. The chronicler, indeed, attributes great splendor to the court of David, and ascribes to him a lions share in the Temple itself. He provided his successor with treasure and materials and even the complete plans, so that on the principle, &#8220;Qui facit per alium, facit per se,&#8221; David might have been credited with the actual building. Solomon was almost in the position of a modern engineer who puts together a steamer that has been built in sections. But, with all these limitations, the clear and obvious fact remained that Solomon actually built and dedicated the Temple. Moreover, the memory of his wealth and grandeur kept a firm hold on the popular imagination; and these conspicuous blessings were received as certain tokens of the favor of Jehovah.<\/p>\n<p>Solomons fame, however, was threefold: he was not only the Divinely appointed builder of the Temple and, by the same Divine grace, the richest and most powerful king of Israel: he had also received from Jehovah the gift of &#8220;wisdom and knowledge.&#8221; In his royal splendor and his sacred buildings he only differed in degree from other kings; but in his wisdom he stood alone, not only without equal, but almost without competitor. Herein he was under no obligation to his father, and the glory of Solomon could not be diminished by representing that he bad been anticipated by David. Hence the name of Solomon came to symbolize Hebrew learning and philosophy.<\/p>\n<p>In religious significance, however, Solomon cannot rank with David. The dynasty of Judah could have only one representative, and the founder and eponym of the royal house was the most important figure for the subsequent theology. The interest that later generations felt in Solomon lay apart from the main line of Jewish orthodoxy, and he is never mentioned by the prophets.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, the darker aspects of Solomons reign made more impression upon succeeding generations than even Davids sins and misfortunes. Occasional lapses into vices and cruelty might be forgiven or even forgotten; but the systematic oppression of Solomon rankled for long generations in the hearts of the people, and the prophets always remembered his wanton idolatry. His memory was further discredited by the disasters which marked the close of his own reign and the beginning of Rehoboams. Centuries later these feelings still prevailed. The prophets who adopted the Mosaic law for the closing period of the monarchy exhort the king to take warning by Solomon, and to multiply neither horses, nor wives, nor gold and silver. {Deu 17:16-17; Cf. 2Ch 1:14-17 and 1Ki 11:3-8}<\/p>\n<p>But as time went on Judah fell into growing poverty and distress, which came to a head in the Captivity and were renewed with the Restoration. The Jews were willing to forget Solomons faults in order that they might indulge in fond recollections of the material prosperity of his reign. Their experience of the culture of Babylon led them to feel greater interest and pride in his wisdom, and the figure of Solomon began to assume a mysterious grandeur, which has since become the nucleus for Jewish and Mohammedan legends. The chief monument of his fame in Jewish literature is the book of Proverbs, but his growing reputation is shown by the numerous Biblical and apocryphal works ascribed to him. His name was no doubt attached to Canticles because of a feature in his character which the chronicler ignores. His supposed authorship of Ecclesiastes and of the Wisdom of Solomon testifies to the fame of his wisdom, while the titles of the &#8220;Psalms of Solomon&#8221; and even of some canonical psalms credit him with spiritual feeling and poetic power.<\/p>\n<p>When the Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach proposes to &#8220;praise famous men,&#8221; it dwells upon Solomons temple and his wealth, and especially upon his wisdom; but it does not forget his failings. {Sir 47:12-21} Josephus celebrates his glory at great length. The New Testament has comparatively few notices of Solomon; but these include references to his wisdom, {Mat 12:42} his splendor, {Mat 6:29} and his temple. {Act 7:47} The Koran, however, far surpasses the New Testament in its interest in Solomon; and his name and his seal play a leading part in Jewish and Arabian magic. The bulk of this literature is later than the chronicler, but the renewed interest in the glory of Solomon must have begun before his time. Perhaps, by connecting the building of the Temple as far as possible with David, the chronicler marks his sense of <\/p>\n<p>Solomons unworthiness. On the other hand, there were many reasons why he should welcome the aid of popular sentiment to enable him to include Solomon among the ideal Hebrew kings. After all, Solomon had built and dedicated the Temple; he was the &#8220;pious founder,&#8221; and the beneficiaries of the foundation would wish to make the most of his piety. &#8220;Jehovah&#8221; had &#8220;magnified Solomon exceedingly in the sight of all Israel, and bestowed upon him such royal majesty as had not been on any king before him in Israel.&#8221; {1Ch 29:25} &#8220;King Solomon exceeded all the kings of the earth in riches and wisdom; and all the kings of the earth sought the presence of Solomon, to hear his wisdom, which God had put in his heart.&#8221; {2Ch 9:22-23} The chronicler would naturally wish to set forth the better side of Solomons character as an ideal of royal wisdom and splendor, devoted to the service of the sanctuary. Let us briefly compare Chronicles and Kings to see how he accomplished his purpose.<\/p>\n<p>The structure of the narrative in Kings rendered the task comparatively easy: it could be accomplished by removing the opening and closing sections and making a few minor changes in the intermediate portion. The opening section is the sequel to the conclusion of Davids reign; the chronicler omitted this conclusion, and therefore also its sequel. But the contents of this section were objectionable in themselves. Solomons admirers willingly forgot that his reign was inaugurated by the execution of Shimei, of his brother Adonijah, and of his fathers faithful minister Joab, and by the deposition of the high-priest Abiathar. The chronicler narrates with evident approval the strong measures of Ezra and Nehemiah against foreign marriages, and he is therefore not anxious to remind his readers that Solomon married Pharaohs daughter. He does not, however, carry out his plan consistently. Elsewhere he wishes to emphasize the sanctity of the Ark and tells us that &#8220;Solomon brought up the daughter of Pharaoh out of the city of David unto the house that he had built for her, for he said, My wife shall not dwell in the house of David, king of Israel, because the places are holy whereunto the ark of the Lord hath come.&#8221; {2Ch 8:11}<\/p>\n<p>In Kings the history of Solomon closes with a long account of his numerous wives and concubines, his idolatry and consequent misfortunes. All this is omitted by the chronicler; but later on, with his usual inconsistency, he allows Nehemiah to point the moral of a tale he has left untold: &#8220;Did not Solomon, king of Israel, sin by these things? Even him did strange women cause to sin.&#8221; {Neh 13:26} In the intervening section he omits the famous judgment of Solomon, probably on account of the character of the women concerned, he introduces sundry changes which naturally follow from his belief that the Levitical law was then in force. His feeling for the dignity of the chosen people and their king comes out rather curiously in two minor alterations. Both authorities agree in telling us that Solomon had recourse to forced labor for his building operations; in fact, after the usual Eastern fashion from the Pyramids down to the Suez Canal, Solomons temple and palaces were built by the corvee. According to the oldest narrative, he &#8220;raised a levy out of all Israel.&#8221; This suggests that forced labor was exacted from the Israelites themselves, and it would help to account for Jeroboams successful rebellion. The chronicler omits this statement as open to an interpretation derogatory to the dignity of the chosen people, and not only inserts a later explanation which he found in the book of Kings, but also another express statement that Solomon raised his levy of the &#8220;strangers that were in the land of Israel.&#8221; {2Ch 2:2; 2Ch 2:17-18; 2Ch 8:7-10} These statements may have been partly suggested by the existence of a class of Temple slaves called Solomons servants.<\/p>\n<p>The other instance relates to Solomons alliance with Hiram, king of Tyre. In the book of Kings we are told that &#8220;Solomon gave Hiram twenty cities in the land of Galilee.&#8221; {1Ki 9:11-12} There were indeed redeeming features connected with the transaction; the cities were not a very valuable possession for Hiram: &#8220;they pleased him not&#8221;; yet he &#8220;sent to the king six score talents of gold.&#8221; However, it seemed incredible to the chronicler that the most powerful and wealthy of the kings of Israel should either cede or sell any portion of Jehovahs inheritance. He emends the text of his authority so as to convert it into a causal reference to certain cities which Hiram had given to Solomon. {2Ch 8:1-2. R.V}<\/p>\n<p>We will now reproduce the story of Solomon as given by the chronicler. Solomon was the youngest of four sons born to David at Jerusalem by Bathshua, the daughter of Ammiel. Besides these three brothers, he had at least six other eider brothers. As in the cases of Isaac, Jacob, Judah, and David himself, the birthright fell to a younger son. In the prophetic utterance which foretold his birth, he was designated to succeed to his fathers throne and to build the Temple. At the great assembly which closed his fathers reign he received instructions as to the plans and services of the Temple, {1Ch 28:9} and was exhorted to discharge his duties faithfully. He was declared king according to the Divine choice, freely accepted by David and ratified by popular acclamation. At Davids death no one disputed his succession to the throne: &#8220;All Israel obeyed him; and all the princes and the mighty men and all the sons likewise of King David submitted themselves unto Solomon the king.&#8221; {1Ch 29:23-24}<\/p>\n<p>His first act after his accession was to sacrifice before the brazen altar of the ancient Tabernacle at Gideon. That night God appeared unto him &#8220;and said unto him, Ask what I shall give thee.&#8221; Solomon chose wisdom and knowledge to qualify-him for the arduous task of government. Having thus &#8220;sought first the kingdom of God and His righteousness,&#8221; all other things -&#8221; riches, wealth, and honor&#8221;-were added unto him. {2Ch 1:7-13}<\/p>\n<p>He returned to Jerusalem, gathered a great array of chariots and horses by means of traffic with Egypt, and accumulated great wealth, so that silver, and gold, and cedars became abundant at Jerusalem. {2Ch 1:14-17}<\/p>\n<p>He next proceeded with the building of the Temple, collected workmen, obtained timber from Lebanon and an artificer from Tyre. The Temple was duly erected and dedicated, the king taking the chief and most conspicuous part in all the proceedings. Special reference, however, is made to the presence of the priests and Levites at the dedication. On this occasion the ministry of the sanctuary was not confined to the course whose turn it was to officiate, but &#8220;all the priests that were present had sanctified themselves and did not keep their courses; also the Levites, which were the singers, all of them, even Asaph, Heman, Jeduthun, and their sons and their brethren, arrayed in fine linen, with cymbals, and psalteries, and harps, stood at the east end of the altar, and with them a hundred and twenty priests sounding with trumpets.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Solomons dedication prayer concludes with special petitions for the priests, the saints, and the king: &#8220;Now therefore arise, O Jehovah Elohim, into Thy resting-place, Thou and the ark of Thy strength; let Thy priests, O Jehovah Elohim, be clothed with salvation, and let Thy saints rejoice in goodness. O Jehovah Elohim, turn not away the face of Thine anointed; remember the mercies of David Thy servant.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>When David sacrificed at the threshing-floor of Ornan the Jebusite, the place had been indicated as the site of the future Temple by the descent of fire from heaven; and now, in token that the mercy shown to David should be continued to Solomon, the fire again fell from heaven, and consumed the burnt offering and the sacrifices; and the glory of Jehovah &#8220;filled the house of Jehovah,&#8221; as it had done earlier in the day, when the Ark was brought into the Temple. Solomon concluded the opening ceremonies by a great festival: for eight days the Feast of Tabernacles was observed according to the Levitical law, and seven days more were specially devoted to a dedication feast.<\/p>\n<p>Afterwards Jehovah appeared again to Solomon, as He had before at Gibeon, and told him that this prayer was accepted. Taking up the several petitions that the king had offered, He promised, &#8220;If I shut up heaven that there be no rain, or if I send pestilence among My people; if My people, which are called by My name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land. Now Mine eyes shall be open, and Mine ears attent, unto the prayer that is made in this place.&#8221; Thus Jehovah, in His gracious condescension, adopts Solomons own words to express His answer to the prayer. He allows Solomon to dictate the terms of the agreement, and merely appends His signature and seal.<\/p>\n<p>Besides the Temple, Solomon built palaces for himself and his wife, and fortified many cities, among the rest Hamath-zobah, formerly allied to David. He also organized the people for civil and military purposes.<\/p>\n<p>As far as the account of his reign is concerned, the Solomon of Chronicles appears as &#8220;the husband of one wife&#8221;; and that wife is the daughter of Pharaoh. A second, however, is mentioned later on as the mother of Rehoboam; she too was a &#8220;strange woman,&#8221; an Ammonitess, Naamah by name.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile Solomon was careful to maintain all the sacrifices and festivals ordained in the Levitical law, and all the musical and other arrangements for the sanctuary commanded by David, the man of God.<\/p>\n<p>We read next of his commerce by sea and land, his great wealth and wisdom, and the romantic visit of the queen of Sheba.<\/p>\n<p>And so the story of Solomon closes with this picture of royal state, &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The wealth of Ormus and of Ind, Or where the gorgeous East with richest hand Showers on her kings barbaric pearl and gold.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Wealth was combined with imperial power and Divine wisdom. Here, as in the case of Platos own pupils Dionysius and Dion of Syracuse, Platos dream came true; the prince was a philosopher, and the philosopher a prince.<\/p>\n<p>At first sight it seems as if this marriage of authority and wisdom had happier issue at Jerusalem than at Syracuse. Solomons history closes as brilliantly as Davids, and Solomon was subject to no Satanic possession and brought no pestilence upon Israel. But testimonials are chiefly significant in what they omit; and when we compare the conclusions of the histories of David and Solomon, we note suggestive differences.<\/p>\n<p>Solomons life does not close with any scene in which his people and his heir assemble to do him honor and to receive his last injunctions. There are no &#8220;last words&#8221; of the wise king; and it is not said of him that &#8220;he died in a good old age, full of days, riches, and honor.&#8221; &#8220;Solomon slept with his fathers, and he was buried in the city of David his father; and Rehoboam his son reigned in his stead&#8221; that is all. When the chronicler, the professed panegyrist of the house of David, brings his narrative of this great reign to so lame and impotent a conclusion, he really implies as severe a condemnation upon Solomon as the book of Kings does by its narrative of his sins.<\/p>\n<p>Thus the Solomon of Chronicles shows the same piety and devotion to the Temple and its ritual which were shown by his father. His prayer at the dedication of the Temple is parallel to similar utterances of David. Instead of being a general and a soldier, he is a scholar and a philosopher. He succeeded to the administrative abilities of his father; and his prayer displays a deep interest in the welfare of his subjects. His record-in Chronicles-is even more faultless than that of David. And yet the careful student with nothing but Chronicles, even without Ezra and Nehemiah, might somehow get the impression that the story of Solomon, like that of Cambuscan, had been &#8220;left half told.&#8221; In addition to the points suggested by a comparison with the history of David, there is a certain abruptness about its conclusion. The last fact noted of Solomon, before the formal statistics about &#8220;the rest of his acts&#8221; and the years of his reign, is that horses were brought for him &#8220;out of Egypt and out of all lands.&#8221; Elsewhere the chroniclers use of his materials shows a feeling for dramatic effect. We should not have expected him to close the history of a great reign by a reference to the kings trade in horses. {1Ch 9:28}<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps we are apt to read into Chronicles what we know from the book of Kings; yet surely this abrupt conclusion would have raised a suspicion that there were omissions, that facts had been suppressed because they could not bear the light. Upon the splendid figure of the great king, with his wealth and wisdom, his piety and devotion, rests the vague shadow of unnamed sins and unrecorded misfortunes. A suggestion of unhallowed mystery attaches itself to the name of the builder of the Temple, and Solomon is already on the way to become the Master of the Genii and the chief of magicians.<\/p>\n<p>When we turn to consider the spiritual significance of this ideal picture of the history and character of Solomon, we are confronted by a difficulty that attends the exposition of any ideal history. An authors ideal of kingship in the early stages of literature is usually as much one and indivisible as his ideal of priesthood, of the office of the prophet, and of the wicked king. His authorities may record different incidents in connection with each individual; but he emphasizes those which correspond with his ideal, or even anticipates the higher criticism by constructing incidents which seem required by the character and circumstances of his heroes. On the other hand, where the priest, or the prophet, or the king departs from the ideal, the incidents are minimized or passed over in silence. There will still be a certain variety because different individuals may present different elements of the ideal, and the chronicler does not insist on each of his good kings possessing all the characteristics of royal perfection. Still the tendency of the process is to make all the good kings alike. It would be monotonous to take each of them separately and deduce the lessons taught by their virtues, because the chroniclers intention is that they shall all teach the same lessons by the same kind of behavior described from the same point of view. David has a unique position, and has to be taken by himself; but in considering the features that must be added to the picture of David in order to complete the picture of the good king, it is convenient to group Solomon with the reforming kings of Judah. We shall therefore defer for more consecutive treatment the chroniclers account of their general characters and careers. Here we shall merely gather up the suggestions of the different narratives as to the chroniclers ideal Hebrew king. The leading points have already been indicated from the chroniclers history of David. The first and most indispensable feature is devotion to the temple at Jerusalem and the ritual of the Pentateuch. This has been abundantly illustrated from the account of Solomon. Taking the reforming kings in their order:-<\/p>\n<p>Asa removed the high places which were rivals of the Temple, renewed the altar of Jehovah, gathered the people together for a great sacrifice, and made munificent donations to the Temple treasury. {2Ch 15:18-19}<\/p>\n<p>Similarly Jehoshaphat took away the high places, and sent out a commission to teach the Law.<\/p>\n<p>Joash repaired the Temple; {2Ch 24:1-14} but, curiously enough, though Jehoram had restored the high places and Joash was acting under the direction of the high-priest Jehoiada, it is not stated that the high places were done away with. This is one of the chroniclers rather numerous oversights. Perhaps, however, he expected that so obvious a reform would be taken for granted. Amaziah was careful to observe &#8220;the law in the book of Moses&#8221; that &#8220;the children should not die for the fathers,&#8221; {2Ch 25:4} but Amaziah soon turned away from following Jehovah. This is perhaps the reason why in his case also nothing is said about doing away with the high places. Hezekiah had a special opportunity of showing his devotion to the Temple and the Law. The Temple had been polluted and closed by Ahaz, and its services discontinued. Hezekiah purified the Temple, reinstated the priests and Levites, and renewed the services; he made arrangements for the payment of the Temple revenues according to the provisions of the Levitical law, and took away the high places. He also held a reopening festival and a passover with numerous sacrifices. Manassehs repentance is indicated by the restoration of the Temple ritual. {2Ch 33:16} Josiah took away the high places, repaired the Temple, made the people enter into a covenant to observe the rediscovered Law, and, like Hezekiah, held a great Passover {2Ch 34:1-33; 2Ch 35:1-27} The reforming kings, like David and Solomon, are specially interested in the music of the Temple and in all the arrangements that have to do with the porters and doorkeepers and other classes of Levites. Their enthusiasm for the exclusive rights of the one Temple symbolizes their loyalty to the one God, Jehovah, and their hatred of idolatry. Zeal for Jehovah and His temple is still combined with uncompromising assertion of the royal supremacy in matters of religion. The king, and not the priest, is the highest spiritual authority in the nation. Solomon, Hezekiah, and Josiah control the arrangements for public worship as completely as Moses or David. Solomon receives Divine communications without the intervention of either priest or prophet; he himself offers the great dedication prayer, and when he makes an end of praying, fire comes down from heaven. Under Hezekiah the civil authorities decide when the passover shall be observed: &#8220;For the king had taken counsel, and his princes, and all the congregation in Jerusalem, to keep the passover in the second month.&#8221; {2Ch 30:2} The great reforms of Josiah are throughout initiated and controlled by the king. He himself goes up to the Temple and reads in the ears of the people all the words of the book of the covenant that was found in the house of Jehovah. The chronicler still adheres to the primitive idea of the theocracy, according to which the chief, or judge, or king is the representative of Jehovah. The title to the crown rests throughout on the grace of God and the will of the people. In Judah, however, the principle of hereditary succession prevails throughout. Athaliah is not really an exception: she reigned as the widow of a Davidic king. The double election of David by Jehovah and by Israel carried with it the election of his dynasty. The permanent rule of the house of David was secured by the Divine promise to its founder. Yet the title is not allowed to rest on mere hereditary right. Divine choice and popular recognition are recorded in the case of Solomon and other kings. &#8220;All Israel came to Shechem to make Rehoboam king,&#8221; and yet revolted from him when he refused to accept their conditions; but the obstinacy which caused the disruption &#8220;was brought about of God, that Jehovah might establish His word which He spake by the hand of Ahijah the Shilonite.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Ahaziah, Joash, Uzziah, Josiah, Jehoahaz, were all set upon the throne by the inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem. {2Ch 22:1, 2Ch 23:1-15, 2Ch 26:1, 2Ch 33:25, 2Ch 36:1} After Solomon the Divine appointment of kings is not expressly mentioned; Jehovahs control over the tenure of the throne is chiefly shown by the removal of unworthy occupants.<\/p>\n<p>It is interesting to note that the chronicler does not hesitate to record that of the last three sovereigns of Judah two were appointed by foreign kings: Jehoiakim was the nominee of Pharaoh Neco, king of Egypt; and the last king of all, Zedekiah, was appointed by Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon. In like manner, the Herods, the last rulers of the restored kingdom of Judah, were the nominees of the Roman emperors. Such nominations forcibly illustrate the degradations and ruin of the theocratic monarchy. But yet, according to the teaching of the prophets, Pharaoh and Nebuchadnezzar were tools in the hand of Jehovah: and their nomination was still an indirect Divine appointment. In the chroniclers time, however, Judah was thoroughly accustomed to receive her governors from a Persian or Greek king; and Jewish readers would not be scandalized by a similar state of affairs in the closing years of the earlier kingdom.<\/p>\n<p>Thus the reforming kings illustrate the ideal kingship set forth in the history of David and Solomon: the royal authority originates in, and is controlled by, the will of God and the consent of the people: the kings highest duty is the maintenance of the worship of Jehovah; but the king and people are supreme both in Church and state.<\/p>\n<p>The personal character of the good kings is also very similar to that of David and Solomon. Jehoshaphat, Hezekiah, and Josiah are men of spiritual feeling as well as careful observers of correct ritual. None of the good kings, with the exception of Joash and Josiah, are unsuccessful in war; and good reasons are given for the exceptions. They all display administrative ability by their buildings, the organization of the Temple services and the army, and the arrangements for the collection of the revenue, especially the dues of the priests and Levites.<\/p>\n<p>There is nothing, however, to indicate that the personal charm of Davids character was inherited by his descendants; but when biography is made merely a means of edification, it often loses those touches of nature which make the whole world kin, and are capable of exciting either admiration or disgust.<\/p>\n<p>The later narrative affords another illustration of the absence of any sentiment of humanity towards enemies. As in the case of David, the chronicler records the cruelty of a good king as if it were quite consistent with loyalty to Jehovah. Before he turned away from following Jehovah, Amaziah defeated the Edomites and smote ten thousand of them. Others were treated like some of the Malagasy martyrs: &#8220;And other ten thousand did the children of Judah carry away alive, and brought them unto the top of the rock, and cast them down from the top of the rock, that they all were broken in pieces.&#8221; {1Ch 25:11} In this case, however, the chronicler is not simply reproducing Kings: he has taken the trouble to supplement his main authority from some other source, probably local tradition. His insertion of this verse is another testimony to the undying hatred of Israel for Edom.<\/p>\n<p>But in one respect the reforming kings are sharply distinguished from David and Solomon. The record of their lives is by no means blameless, and their sins are visited by condign chastisement. They all, with the single exception of Jotham, come to a bad end. Asa consulted physicians, and was punished by being allowed to die of a painful disease. {2Ch 16:12} The last event of Jehoshaphats life was the ruin of the navy, which he had built in unholy alliance with Ahaziah, king of Israel, who did very wickedly. {2Ch 20:37} Joash murdered the prophet Zechariah, the son of the high-priest Jehoiada; his great host was routed by a small company of Syrians, and Joash himself was assassinated by his servants. {2Ch 24:20-27} Amaziah turned away from following Jehovah, and &#8220;brought the gods of the children of Self, and set them up to be his gods, and bowed down himself before them, and burned incense unto them.&#8221; He was accordingly defeated by Joash, king of Israel, and assassinated by his own people. {2Ch 25:14-27} Uzziah insisted on exercising the priestly function of burning incense to Jehovah, and so died a leper. {2Ch 26:16-23} &#8220;Even Hezekiah rendered not again according to the benefit done unto him, for his heart was lifted up in the business of ambassadors of the princes of Babylon; therefore there was wrath upon him and upon Judah and Jerusalem. Notwithstanding Hezekiah humbled himself for the pride of his heart, both he and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, so that the wrath of Jehovah came not upon them in the days of Hezekiah.&#8221; But yet the last days of Hezekiah were clouded by the thought that he was leaving the punishment of his sin as a legacy to Judah and the house of David. {2Ch 32:25-33} Josiah refused to heed the warning sent to him by God through the king of Egypt: &#8220;He hearkened not unto the words of Neco from the mouth of God, and came to fight in the valley of Megiddo&#8221;; and so Josiah died like Ahab: he was wounded by the archers, carried out of the battle in his chariot, and died at Jerusalem. {2Ch 35:20-27}<\/p>\n<p>The melancholy record of the misfortunes of the good kings in their closing years is also found in the book of Kings. There too Asa in his old age was diseased in his feet, Jehoshaphats ships were wrecked, Joash and Amaziah were assassinated, Uzziah became a leper, Hezekiah was rebuked for his pride, and Josiah slain at Megiddo. But, except in the case of Hezekiah, the book of Kings says nothing about the sins which, according to Chronicles, occasioned these sufferings and catastrophes. The narrative in the book of Kings carries upon the face of it the lesson that piety is not usually rewarded with unbroken prosperity, and that a pious career does not necessarily ensure a happy deathbed. The significance of the chroniclers additions will be considered elsewhere: what concerns us here is his departure from the principles he observed in dealing with the lives of David and Solomon. They also sinned and suffered; but the chronicler omits their sins and sufferings, especially in the case of Solomon. Why does he pursue an opposite course with other good kings and blacken their characters by perpetuating the memory of sins not mentioned in the book of Kings, instead of confining his record to the happier incidents of their career? Many considerations may have influenced him. The violent deaths of Joash, Amaziah, and Josiah could neither be ignored nor explained away. Hezekiahs sin and repentance are closely parallel to Davids in the matter of the census. Although Asas disease, Jehoshaphats alliance with Israel, and Uzziahs leprosy might easily have been omitted, yet, if some reformers must be allowed to remain imperfect, there was no imperative necessity to ignore the infirmities of the rest. The great advantage of the course pursued by the chronicler consisted in bringing out a clearly defined contrast between David and Solomon on the one hand and the reforming kings on the other. The piety of the latter is conformed to the chroniclers ideal; but the glory and devotion of the former are enhanced by the crimes and humiliation of the best of their successors. Hezekiah, doubtless, is not more culpable than David, but Davids pride was the first of a series of events which terminated in the building of the Temple; while the uplifting of Hezekiahs heart was a precursor of its destruction. Besides, Hezekiah ought to have profited by Davids experience.<\/p>\n<p>By developing this contrast, the chronicler renders the position of David and Solomon even more unique, illustrious, and full of religious significance.<\/p>\n<p>Thus as illustrations of ideal kingship the accounts of the good kings of Judah are altogether subordinate to the history of David and Solomon. While these kings of Judah remained loyal to Jehovah, they further illustrated the virtues of their great predecessors by showing how these virtues might have been exercised Under different circumstances: how David would have dealt with an Ethiopian invasion and what Solomon would have done if he had found the Temple desecrated and its services stopped. But no essential feature is added to the earlier pictures.<\/p>\n<p>The lapses of kings who began to walk in the law of the Lord and then fell away serve as foils to the undimmed glory of David and Solomon. Abrupt transitions within the limits of the individual lives of Asa, Joash, and Amaziah bring out the contrast between piety and apostasy with startling, dramatic effect.<\/p>\n<p>We return from this brief survey to consider the significance of the life of Solomon according to Chronicles. Its relation to the life of David is summed up in the name Solomon, the Prince of peace. David is the ideal king, winning by force of arms for Israel empire and victory, security at home and tribute from abroad. Utterly subdued by his prowess, the natural enemies of Israel no longer venture to disturb her tranquility. His successor inherits wide dominion, immense wealth, and assured peace. Solomon, the Prince of peace, is the ideal king, administering a great inheritance for the glory of Jehovah and His temple. His history in Chronicles is one of unbroken calm. He has a great army and many strong fortresses, but he never has occasion to use them. He implores Jehovah to be merciful to Israel when they suffer from the horrors of war; but he is interceding, not for his own subjects, but for future generations. In his time-<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;No war or battles sound <\/p>\n<p>Was heard the world around: <\/p>\n<p>The idle spear and shield were high uphung; <\/p>\n<p>The hooked chariot stood <\/p>\n<p>Unstained with hostile blood; <\/p>\n<p>The trumpet spake not to the armed throng.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps, to use a paradox, the greatest proof of Solomons wisdom was that he asked for wisdom. He realized at the outset of his career that a wide dominion is more easily won than governed, that to use great wealth honorably requires more skill and character than are needed to amass it. Today the world can boast half a dozen empires surpassing not merely Israel, but even Rome, in extent of dominion; the aggregate wealth of the world is far beyond the wildest dreams of the chronicler: but still the people perish for lack of knowledge. The physical and moral foulness of modern cities taints all the culture and tarnishes all the splendor of our civilization; classes and trades, employers and employed, maim and crush one another in blind struggles to work out a selfish salvation; newly devised organizations move their unwieldy masses-<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;like dragons of the prime That tare each other.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>They have a giants strength, and use it like a giant. Knowledge comes, but wisdom lingers; and the world waits for the reign of the Prince of peace who is not only the wise king, but the incarnate wisdom of God.<\/p>\n<p>Thus one striking suggestion of the chroniclers history of Solomon is the special need of wisdom and Divine guidance for the administration of a great and prosperous empire.<\/p>\n<p>Too much stress, however, must not be laid on the twofold personality of the ideal king. This feature is adopted from the history, and does not express any opinion of the chronicler that the characteristic gifts of David and Solomon could not be combined in a single individual. Many great generals have also been successful administrators. Before Julius Caesar was assassinated he had already shown his capacity to restore order and tranquility to the Roman world; Alexanders plans for the civil government of his conquests were as far-reaching as his warlike ambition; Diocletian reorganized the empire which his sword had re-established; Cromwells schemes of reform showed an almost prophetic insight into the future needs of the English people; the glory of Napoleons victories is a doubtful legacy to France compared with the solid benefits of his internal reforms.<\/p>\n<p>But even these instances, which illustrate the union of military genius and administrative ability, remind us that the assignment of success in war to one king and a reign of peace to the next is, after all, typical. The limits of human life narrow its possibilities. Caesars work had to be completed by Augustus; the great schemes of Alexander and Cromwell fell to the ground because no one arose to play Solomon to their David.<\/p>\n<p>The chronicler has specially emphasized the indebtedness of Solomon to David. According to his narrative, the great achievement of Solomons reign, the building of the Temple, has been rendered possible by Davids preparations. Quite apart from plans and materials, the chroniclers view of the credit due to David in this matter is only reasonable recognition of service rendered to the religion of Israel. Whoever provided the timber and stone, the silver and gold, for the Temple, David won for Jehovah the land and the city that were the outer courts of the sanctuary, and roused the national spirit that gave to Zion its most solemn consecration. Solomons temple was alike the symbol of Davids achievements and the coping-stone of his work.<\/p>\n<p>By compelling our attention to the dependence of the Prince of Peace upon the man who &#8220;had shed much blood,&#8221; the chronicler admonishes us against forgetting the price that has been paid for liberty and culture. The splendid courtiers whose &#8220;apparel&#8221; specially pleased the feminine tastes of the queen of Sheba might feel all the contempt of the superior person for Davids war-worn veterans. The latter probably were more at home in the &#8220;store cities&#8221; than at Jerusalem. But without the blood and toil of these rough soldiers Solomon would have had no opportunity to exchange riddles with his fair visitor and to dazzle her admiring eyes with the glories of his temple and palaces.<\/p>\n<p>The blessings of peace are not likely to be preserved unless men still appreciate and cherish the stern virtues that flourish in troubled times. If our own times become troubled, and their serenity be invaded by fierce conflict, it will be ours to remember that the rugged life of &#8220;the hold in the wilderness&#8221; and the struggles with the Philistines may enable a later generation to build its temple to the Lord and to learn the answers to &#8220;hard questions.&#8221; {2Ch 9:1} Moses and Joshua, David and Solomon, remind us again how the Divine work is handed on from generation to generation: Moses leads Israel through the wilderness, but Joshua brings them into the Land of Promise: David collects the materials, but Solomon builds the Temple. The settlement in Palestine and the building of the Temple were only episodes in the working out of the &#8220;one increasing purpose,&#8221; but one leader and one lifetime did not suffice for either episode. We grow impatient of the scale upon which God works: we want it reduced to the limits of our human faculties and of our earthly lives; yet all history preaches patience. In our demand for Divine interventions whereby-<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;sudden in a minute All is accomplished, and the work is done,&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>we are very Esaus, eager to sell the birthright of the future for a mess of pottage today.<\/p>\n<p>And the continuity of the Divine purpose is only realized through the continuity of human effort. We must indeed serve our own generation; but part of that service consists in providing that the next generation shall be trained to carry on the work, and that after David shall come Solomon-the Solomon of Chronicles, and not the Solomon of Kings-and that, if possible, Solomon shall not be succeeded by Rehoboam. As we attain this larger outlook, we shall be less tempted to employ doubtful means, which are supposed to be justified by their end; we shall be less enthusiastic for processes that bring &#8220;quick returns,&#8221; but give very &#8220;small profits&#8221; in the long run. Christian workers are a little too fond of spiritual jerry-building, as if sites in the kingdom of Heaven were let out on ninety-nine-year leases; but God builds for eternity, and we are fellow-workers together with Him.<\/p>\n<p>To complete the chroniclers picture of the ideal king, we have to add Davids warlike prowess and Solomons wisdom and splendor to the piety and graces common to both. The result is unique among the many pictures that have been drawn by historians, philosophers, and poets. It has a value of its own, because the chroniclers gifts in the way of history, philosophy, and poetry were entirely subordinated to his interest in theology; and most theologians have only been interested in the doctrine of the king when they could use it to gratify the vanity of a royal patron.<\/p>\n<p>The full-length portrait in Chronicles contrasts curiously with the little vignette preserved in the book which bears the name of Solomon. There, in the oracle which King Lemuels mother taught him, the king is simply admonished to avoid strange women and strong drink, to &#8220;judge righteously, and minister judgment to the poor and needy.&#8221; {Pro 31:1-9}<\/p>\n<p>To pass to more modern theology, the theory of the king that is implied in Chronicles has much in common with Wyclifs doctrine of dominion: they both recognize the sanctity of the royal power and its temporal supremacy, and they both hold that obedience to God is the condition of the continued exercise of legitimate rule. But the priest of Lutterworth was less ecclesiastical and more democratic than our Levite.<\/p>\n<p>A more orthodox authority on the Protestant doctrine of the king would be the Thirty-nine Articles. These, however, deal with the subject somewhat slightly. As far as they go, they are in harmony with the chronicler. They assert the unqualified supremacy of the king, both ecclesiastical and civil. Even &#8220;general councils may not be gathered together without the commandment and will of princes.&#8221; On the other hand, princes are not to imitate Uzziah in presuming to exercise the priestly function of offering incense: they are not to minister Gods word or sacraments.<\/p>\n<p>Outside theology the ideal of the king has been stated with greater fullness and freedom, but not many of the pictures drawn have much in common with the chroniclers David and Solomon. Machiavellis Prince and Bolingbrokes Patriot King belong to a different world; moreover, their method is philosophical, and not historical: they state a theory rather than draw a picture. Tennysons Arthur is what he himself calls him, an &#8220;ideal knight&#8221; rather than an ideal king. Perhaps the best parallels to David are to be found in the Cyrus of the Greek historians and philosophers and the Alfred of English story. Alfred indeed combines many of the features both of David and Solomon: he secured English unity, and was the founder of English culture and literature; he had a keen interest in ecclesiastical affairs; great gifts of administration, and much personal attractiveness. Cyrus, again, specially illustrates what we may call the posthumous fortunes of David: his name stood for the ideal of kingship with both Greeks and Persians, and in the &#8220;Cyropaedia&#8221; his life and character are made the basis of a picture of the ideal king.<\/p>\n<p>Many points are of course common to almost all such pictures; they portray the king as a capable and benevolent ruler and a man of high personal character. The distinctive characteristic of Chronicles is the stress laid on the piety of the king, his care for the honor of God and the spiritual welfare of his subjects. If the practical influence of this teaching has not been altogether beneficent, it is because men have too invariably connected spiritual profit with organization, and ceremonies, and forms of words, sound or otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>But today the doctrine of the state takes the place of the doctrine of the king. Instead of Cyropaedias we have Utopias. We are asked sometimes to look back, not to an ideal king, but to an ideal commonwealth, to the age of the Antonines or to some happy century of English history when we are told that the human race or the English people were &#8220;most happy and prosperous&#8221;; oftener we are invited to contemplate an imaginary future. We may add to those already made one or two further applications of the chroniclers principles to the modern state. His method suggests that the perfect society will have the virtues of our actual life without its vices, and that the possibilities of the future are best divined from a careful study of the past. The devotion of his kings to the Temple symbolizes the truth that the ideal state is impossible without recognition of a Divine presence and obedience to a Divine will.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And Solomon the son of David was strengthened in his kingdom, and the LORD his God [was] with him, and magnified him exceedingly. Ch. 2Ch 1:1-6 (cp. 1Ki 3:4). Solomon&rsquo;s great Sacrifice at Gibeon 1. was strengthened ] or, strengthened himself, a favourite expression of the Chronicler; cp. 2Ch 12:13; 2Ch 13:21 ( waxed mighty); &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-chronicles-11\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Chronicles 1:1&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11207\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}