11<\/strong>. Amariah<\/em> ] Perhaps he who is mentioned 1Ch 6:11<\/span> [5:37, Heb<\/em>.].<\/p>\n officers before you<\/em> ] i.e. waiting to execute your instructions.<\/p>\n Deal courageously<\/em> ] Render, Be strong and work<\/strong> (as in Hag 2:4<\/span>).<\/p>\n shall be with the good<\/em> ] R.V. be with the good<\/strong> (a blessing rather than a promise).<\/p>\n In religious causes, Amariah, the high priest, was to preside over the court; in civil or criminal causes, Zebadiah was to be president. And to Levites, other than the judges, he assigned the subordinate offices about the court.<\/P><\/p>\n 2Ch 19:11<\/span><\/p>\n Deal courageously, and the Lord shall be with the good.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n The blessedness of the good<\/strong><\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>The only way in which men become good–by faith in Christ and the consequent reception of the Holy Spirit to create us anew.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>The principal ingredients of the goodness of the regenerate.<\/p>\n (1)<\/strong> Integrity of character.<\/p>\n (2)<\/strong> Benevolence of character.<\/p>\n (3)<\/strong> Piety of character.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>From the purposes of God and the relation in which His people stand to <\/strong>Him.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>By the promises of Scripture.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>By all experience and by all history.<\/p>\n Conclusion:<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>He shall be with the good nationally if they act consistently and faithfully.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>He shall be with them individually. Fear not that He will ever leave His work of grace unfinished in you. (J<\/em>. Leifchild<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n A tonic promise<\/strong><\/p>\n Explain what is meant by good. The melancholy fact that all men are not good. The promise of the text justifies three inquiries.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>Why should the good be fearful? They that be with us, etc.<\/em><\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>How can bad designs finally prevail?<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>How are <\/strong>men to know that God is surely with them?<\/p>\n The answer involves character: the good. God identifies Himself with all that is good in thought as well as in act; in purpose as well as in service. Even when the godly man ceaseth God will maintain the cause that is good. This promise, like all the promises of God, is designated not as a sedative, but a stimulant. Deal courageously! See how the <\/strong>text might have read: The Lord shall be with the good, therefore sit still; the Lord shall be with the good, therefore let wickedness have its own way in the world; the Lord shall be with the good, therefore pay no attention to self-discipline. The text reads contrariwise. The Lord is with the good, therefore deal courageously. Goodness is not to be merely passive–it is to be aggressive, defiant of all evil. (J. Parker, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Courage<\/strong><\/p>\n Probably few of us ever sufficiently consider the value and need of courage in order to any high condition of character. There are to be found in one of the letters of one of the most interesting men of modern times these words, How rare is it to have a friend who will defend you thoroughly and boldly! Mr. 1. <\/strong>In speaking of courage let us recognise that there is animal courage as well as intellectual and moral courage. Animal courage is of the lowest kind. Oftentimes it is nothing more than bull-dog ferocity. It oftentimes makes men good soldiers, successful pugilists, stalwart seamen–even daring adventurers. Men may have it without any intellectual or moral courage. A little of it is good. An excess tends to brutality. This form of courage–the courage to take physical punishment without flinching–is of a kind which the most uncultured and unrefined can appreciate. It will always have an attraction for the coarse, undeveloped, and unrespectable classes of society.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>Intellectual courage is of another order, and indicates a superior type of man. It means practically the ability to think for ones self, and to follow out ones thinkings to their inevitable conclusions. It is necessary, however, to guard this language. Taking opinions into ones mind is not thinking. There is a period in our life when we have more conceit than wisdom, and more independence than politeness. We say to ourselves and others that we mean to do our own thinking, which often amounts to this–that we mean to assert ourselves as not agreeing with certain persons who are said to be narrow and exclusive, and agreeing with those who shake themselves free from everybody else except a few intellectual rakes and dandies. Alas, how silly it all seems when we get a little older! Then it appears to us that it was the want of ability to think which made us so impertinent and ridiculous. Of course all young birds have to learn to do their own flying, and, after rolling and tumbling about for awhile, they settle down to do it precisely after the fashion of the old birds. So, also, with thinking. From the beginning even until now it has been done in exactly the same way. The process has consisted of the discernments of comparisons and contrasts, likenesses and unlikenesses, of induction, deduction, and inference. Every man has to do his own thinking to some extent, as every man has to do his own sating and his own digesting. There is no possibility of any one eating our food for us, or digesting it for us. And no man can possibly begin at the beginning of things, and think out each problem of life as if no one had been on the earth before him. The present is so related to the past, as that the past is in it and the future is in it. Everything is in the present. We inherit the earth, not as it first came out from the hands of the Creator before man was on it, but as it is, modified by mans co-operation with God. So of everything–that which is moral and mental as well as that which is material. In each department of things there are men who have thinking power and erudition far, far beyond what is possible to us. In each department they are our helpers, our instructors; yes, our masters. That independence which we assume in youth is only ignorance, foolishness, unthinkingness. The greatest men the world has ever known have been the most receptive and dependent men; the most diligent students, the aptest learners. If I am to learn painting it would be folly indeed if I said, I am going to be independent of Murillo and Raphael, of Turner and Correggio and Rubens and all other artists who have gone before me. So in music the man who thinks for himself and never appropriates the science of others is idiotic. So everywhere in all departments. Not less so in theology, the revelation of God and of man, and of the relation of the human to the Divine. If I set up on my own account, and did not open my mind to the thinkings of others, the name of Verdant Green would be the only name that could fit me. I would have our younger people distinguish between two ideas which are very distinct, and yet are often confounded the one with the other–viz., thinking for ones self and cultivating a spirit of truth. The truth is that which corresponds to the fact. As a fact reports itself to your mind that is the truth for you. By and by as your mind grows it may report itself somewhat differently, then there will be something added to the original impression, and that will be the truth. Now, intellectual courage consists in this perfect truthfulness–this faithfulness to report what you see and recognise. It may sometimes put you in seeming inconsistency with yourself. It may subject you to being accused of inconsistency. But never mind. God does not ask us to be consistent–on that shallow view of consistency–but to be faithful and true. There is a deeper consistency–a nobler consistency. If I see a thing very partially in youth, because of the undeveloped condition of my mind, and see it more completely in manhood, because I have had more experience and more vision; if I truly say what I saw then and truly say what I see now, though I see now more than I saw then, am I not consistent–more nobly consistent–than I should be if I were afraid, under more experience, to contradict my former self? What is life for if not to educate us into deeper and larger views of truth? Only we must take good heed that they are deeper and larger. Many people change, but their change is not growth. Let us recognise that, in order to be assured of the leading of the Spirit of God into all truth, we must have intellectual courage–the courage to follow the truth wherever it leads and to own up to believing that it is the truth. Often it takes even sublime courage to do it. Every child ought to read the story of the martyrs of old. It is dreadful to think how little the religion of some of us means. The loss of the ability to grow deep-rooted convictions, and the loss of courage to be faithful in owning to them, is, wherever it occurs, a dreadful loss. It means the loss of that nobility of soul the possession of which is one of the surest marks of our being children of God.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>But of all kinds of courage, moral courage is the noblest. Of course it enters into intellectual courage. The two are not distinct, and yet while intellectual courage implies thinking power and faithful following where the light seems to be, moral courage does not necessarily mean the courage of the crack thinker, but the courage of character; the courage which acts conscientiously in trying circumstances. For instance, the liar is always the coward. A man lies because he has not the courage to speak the truth and take the consequences. There is one exception to that rule. It is conceivable that a really truthful man might need courage to tell a lie which he thought would shelter a friend from injury or harm. My intellect may sometimes stand in contradiction to my conscience, but conscience is given me to act by. In matters of duty, therefore, I am bound to obey my conscience rather than my intellect. Hence moral courage amounts pretty much to this–the steady, persistent following of the light which is in conscience. It involves, of course, the bringing of the conscience into the light, where it may be illuminated, for conscience is a light receiver, not a light originator. Courage, and much of it, is needed to act always and everywhere conscientiously. Intelligence is needed to distinguish between conscience and prejudice. Many a man assumes to be acting conscientiously when he is really acting only from prejudice and feeling. If he quietly took himself to task, he would recognise his true motive. Conscience represents Gods judgment throne. The very fact that a man condemns himself in spite of his natural unwillingness to do it, proves that the voice of conscience is not his own voice.<\/p>\n 4. <\/strong>But how are we to get the courage we need–intellectual courage to follow the truth wherever it leads, to utter it always in love, but to utter it; and the moral courage to obey conscience? Where did those apostles in the early Christian days get theirs? Few of them were more than average men. At the approach of calamity all the disciples forsook Jesus and fled. If there was an exception it was John. Peter disgraced himself pitifully. Yet within a few weeks we find men of such sublime courage that we hardly recognise them as the same men. Not Luther himself at the Diet of Worms, challenging the old ecclesiastical order of centuries, was braver. Not the Prince de Conde was braver as he stood before the King of France when given the choice of three things–first, to go to Mass; second, to die; third, to be imprisoned for life. He replied with regard to the first, I am fully determined never to go to Mass; as to the other two I am so perfectly indifferent that I leave the choice to your Majesty. These are illustrations of the noble courage of noble men. They seem phenomenal and unusual. But there may be here amongst us men and women, yes, and children, capable of as determined a courage if put in similar circumstances. None of us can tell what we should do in any condition till we get there. It requires as much courage to suffer and be quiet and self-controlled as it does to act. Nothing is more admirable than the quiet domestic courage which many illustrate. I am inclined to adopt and endorse the words of one who has written, few <\/em>persons have courage enough to appear as good as they really are. That is the essence of moral courage. The religious life of business men is very shy and timid. There are men in this and every congregation who feel and believe more–far more–than they act. Sydney Smith has said that a great deal of talent is lost to the world for the want of a little courage. With more truth still we may say that a great deal of influence is lost to the Church for want of a little courage. I believe that few persons have the courage to appear as good as they really are. Courage is opposed to the spirit of compromise–the spirit of indolence–the spirit of silence when silence will be interpreted as consent on our part to what we do not believe. The spirit of fear, of indolence, of compromise, of guilty silence has to be overcome. How? The Spirit of God is granted to every seeking soul that the soul may overcome. (Reuen Thomas, D<\/em>.D<\/em>.)<\/p>\n .<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Verse 11<\/span>. Behold, Amariah<\/B><\/I>] Here was a two-fold jurisdiction, ecclesiastical<\/I> and civil<\/I>: in the ecclesiastical court<\/I>, Amariah the high-priest was supreme judge<\/I>, in the civil court<\/I>, Zebadiah was supreme. To assist both the Levites<\/I> were a sort of counsellors<\/I>.<\/P> <\/P> WITHOUT good and wholesome laws<\/I>, no nation can be prosperous: and vain are the best laws if they be not judiciously<\/I> and conscientiously<\/I> administered. The things of GOD and the things of the KING should never be confounded in the administration of justice. Amariah the priest, and Zebadiah the ruler, should ever have their distinct places of jurisdiction.<\/P> <\/p>\n Is over you; <\/B>shall be your president to direct and assist you. <\/P> In all matters of the Lord; <\/B>in spiritual or ecclesiastical matters. <\/P> The ruler of the house of Judah; <\/B>either, <\/P> 1. The prince, or chief ruler, under the king, of the tribe of Judah, which is called <\/P> the house of Judah, <\/B>2Sa 2:4<\/B><\/span>,7<\/span>,10<\/span>; 1Ki 12:21<\/span>,23<\/span>; 1Ch 28:4<\/span>; Jer 13:11<\/span>; Eze 4:6<\/span>. Or, <\/P> 2. The ruler of the kings house, which also seems to be called the house of Judah, 2Ch 22:10<\/span>, and more fitly the kings house of Judah<\/I>, Jer 22:6<\/span>. And who so fit to manage the kings matters as the ruler of the kings house? <\/P> For all the kings matters; <\/B>for civil causes or controversies which might arise either between the king and his people, or between subject and subject, which may be called the kings matters<\/I>, because it was a principal part of his office to see them justly decided. <\/P> The Levites shall be officers before you; <\/B>they shall be at your command to see your just sentences executed; which work was fitly committed to the Levites, as persons who might add their instructions to the corrections, and might work the guilty to an acknowledgment of their fault, and a submission to their punishment. And so this is an argument to encourage the judges to proceed courageously and vigorously in their work, because they had the Levites to stand by them and assist them. <\/P> The Lord shall be with the good, <\/B>i. e. shall protect and bless good judges in their doing of good and just things. <\/P> <\/p>\n And, behold, Amariah the chief priest is over you in all matters of the Lord<\/strong>,…. He being high priest, presided in this court in all things sacred, or which respected the worship of God; and was present to give his advice, and direct in the determination of all such matters that should come before them, according to the laws and statutes provided in such cases; though it may be he was only a common priest that was chief over them, or the president of this court:<\/p>\n and Zebadiah the son of Ishmael, the ruler of the house of Judah<\/strong>; the prince of the tribe of Judah:<\/p>\n for all the king’s matters<\/strong>; such as related to civil government, and which were not so clearly determined by positive laws:<\/p>\n also the Levites shall be officers before you<\/strong>; to execute the sentences that should be passed by them:<\/p>\n deal courageously<\/strong>; fear not the faces of any, but judge righteously and faithfully:<\/p>\n and the Lord shall be with the good<\/strong>; with good men that do good, to bestow all needful good upon them, to protect and defend them; the Targum is,<\/p>\n “the Word of the Lord shall be for your help, who is good.”<\/p>\n (11) And behold.<\/strong>For the form of the sentence, comp. 1Ch. 28:21<\/span>.<\/p>\n Amariah the chief priest.<\/strong>Rather, High Priest<\/em> (ha-rosh<\/em>),<\/em> the Head (2Ch. 24:6<\/span>). Vulg., sacerdos et pontifex vester. In 1Ch. 6:11<\/span> Amariah is the fifth from Zadok, the famous High Priest of David and Solomons time. As Jehoshaphat was the fifth king from David, the name Amariah probably denotes the same person in both places.<\/p>\n Over you in all matters of the Lord.<\/strong>The High Priest was naturally declared the President of the Court in all spiritual cases (see on 2Ch. 19:8<\/span>).<\/p>\n Zebadiah the son of Ishmael<\/strong> (or, Zachariah the son of Shemaiah,<\/em> Syr. and Arab.) the ruler of the house of Judah, the nagd,<\/em> emr, or tribal prince, was appointed President of the Court in civil causes (for all the kings matters).<\/p>\n Also the Levites shall be officers.<\/strong>Literally. And Writers shall the Levites be;<\/em> inferior officials of the Court, such as scribes and notaries.<\/p>\n Before you.<\/strong>In your presence, and under your direction (2Ch. 14:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n Deal courageously.<\/strong>Literally, be strong and act.<\/em> A favourite locution of the chroniclers. (Comp. 1Ch. 28:10<\/span>; 1Ch. 28:20<\/span>.)<\/p>\n The Lord shall be.<\/strong>Or, Jehovah be!<\/em> a wish or prayer. This too is a characteristic expression of the writer. (Comp. 1Ch. 9:20<\/span>, 1Ch. 15:2<\/span>, 1<\/span> Chron. 20:17.)<\/p>\n 11<\/strong>. <\/strong> Amariah the chief priest <\/strong> This dignitary would naturally and of right have oversight of all questions concerning religion and worship, as Zebadiah the ruler of the house of Judah<\/strong>, (that is, the tribal prince, and probably oldest and most honoured representative of his tribe,) would have oversight of all civil suits that came to Jerusalem. <\/p>\n Matters of the Lord king’s matters <\/strong> See the note on 2Ch 19:8<\/span>.<\/p>\n REFLECTIONS<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Reader! let us pause over the history here presented to us, and gather from the perusal some of those sweet and interesting instructions which are presented to our meditation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n In the peaceable and happy return of Jehoshaphat to his house after so merciful a deliverance, let us learn to estimate divine mercies, and rightly to receive them. Is not every return to our house, to our families, to our home, a token of divine favour? And are not those mercies heightened if, at any time, like Jehoshaphat, we have gone out without prayer, without seeking the divine blessing, without divine direction; nay, perhaps, like Jehoshaphat, in opposition to the divine will and pleasure. Nay, more than these; when, as in the instance before us, our return to our house in peace hath been distinguished from others who, like Ahab, went out in health as Jehoshaphat, but returned no more. What numberless examples of a similar kind are going on in the present hour in the world, in which we are called upon to mark the distinguishing mercy? And shall not our unthinking hearts sometimes pause, and behold the Lord’s hand in conducting out, and bringing home in peace and safety.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n And if a real follower of the Lord Jesus be brought to such views of divine favor, will he not eye the tokens as tenfold brighter, and enjoy them with tenfold sweetness, when viewing them as covenant blessings, and accepting them as such from his interest in Jesus! Hath a God in Christ entailed blessings both on soul and body; hath he promised, by virtue of covenant redemption in the blood and righteousness of his dear Son, to bless his people both in their basket and in their store; in their going out and their coming in; blessings in the city, and blessings in the field; blessings in time, and blessings to all eternity? and shall not every follower of the Lord Jesus find a relish and a sweetness of the richest kind from perceiving the covenant love with which everyone of them is brought home to the heart, marked in the plainest characters of the Father’s love, the Saviour’s grace, and the Spirit’s fellowship. Yes! thou dearest Jesus! when I see thy love in the mercy, and the precious fruits, of thy redemption in the favor, be it what it may; whether at going out, or returning home in peace, then will my joy be full. It is Jesus in the blessing, and the love of Jesus with the blessing, which gives the finishing relish to all, and furnishes a joy unspeakable and full of glory.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n In the faithfulness of the prophet let us not only behold the loveliness of being always firm in the cause of the Lord, but pray for grace to follow so bright an example. An openness and integrity of conduct in speaking truths, however unpleasant, is not limited to the ministry; there are few characters in life but may find occasion for the exercise of it in numberless situations: a father to his child, or a servant to his master. And when God and our conscience demands such services there should be no hesitation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Lastly. In the reformation set up by Jehoshaphat, we may gather a sweet and precious instruction, how grace operates, when the Lord awakens it in the mind. We hear no reproof, no expostulation, no anger, no excuse on the part of Jehoshaphat, towards the prophet. Grace was in the heart of Jehoshaphat, while the prophet was delivering his message from the Lord. And the blessed effects of both, in the word of the Lord from without, and the grace of the Lord within, wrought those sweet consequences in the mind of Jehoshaphat. Let us learn from hence how to estimate the work of grace. It is not he which merely confesseth sin, but the promise is, he that confesseth and forsaketh it, shall, through Jesus and his complete salvation, find mercy.<\/p>\n 2Ch 19:11 And, behold, Amariah the chief priest [is] over you in all matters of the LORD; and Zebadiah the son of Ishmael, the ruler of the house of Judah, for all the king’s matters: also the Levites [shall be] officers before you. Deal courageously, and the LORD shall be with the good.<\/p>\n Ver. 11. In all the matters of the Lord.<\/strong> ] In matters ecclesiastical. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n For all the king’s matters,] i.e., <\/em> In civil affairs. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n And the Levites shall be officers before you.<\/strong> ] Apparitores, lectores, praefecti,<\/em> to see things rightly carried and good laws executed. The Greeks had their , officers of the same sort. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Deal courageously.<\/strong> ] Heb., Take courage and do, a<\/em> i.e., <\/em> do your office, forti et excelso animo.<\/em> Fear no colours, but act vigorously, and the work is done. Possunt,<\/em> saith he, quia posse videntur.<\/em> They are able who seem to be able. Historians ascribe most of Alexander’s success to his courage: he never thought anything unfeasible. The ruler’s offering must be a male; the people’s might be a female, Lev 4:22-23<\/span> ; <\/em> Lev 4:27-28 to show that a ruler or judge must be of a masculine spirit. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n And the Lord shall be with the good.<\/strong> ] To protect and direct them; to assist and accept them; to reward their integrity, what hardship soever here they meet with: as Judge Hales did, being imprisoned in the Marshalsea, Counter, and Fleet, because that in the beginning of Queen Mary’s reign, before any new laws were yet made, he did at the Quarter Sessions give charge upon the statutes made in the time of King Henry VIII and Edward VI, for supremacy and religion. b<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n a<\/em> Audete et agite.<\/em> , Be prepared and act. <\/p>\n b<\/em> Act. and Mon., 1282.<\/p>\n Amariah. The fifth high priest from Zadok (1Ch 6:11), Jehoshaphat being the fifth king from David. <\/p>\n all matters of the LORD. Probably refers to spiritual, or ecclesiastical matters. <\/p>\n Deal courageously = be strong, and act. <\/p>\n Amariah: 1Ch 6:11 <\/p>\n all matters: 2Ch 19:8, 1Ch 26:30, Mal 2:7 <\/p>\n Deal courageously: Heb. Take courage and do, Jos 1:6, Jos 1:9, 1Ch 22:11, 1Ch 22:16, 1Ch 22:19, 1Co 16:13, 2Ti 2:1 <\/p>\n the Lord: 2Ch 19:6, 2Ch 15:2, Psa 18:25, Psa 18:26, Joh 14:23, Joh 14:24, Rom 2:4-13, Phi 4:8, Phi 4:9 <\/p>\n the good: Psa 37:23, Psa 112:5, Pro 2:20, Ecc 2:26, Luk 23:50, Act 11:24 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: 1Sa 14:45 – he hath 1Ch 26:32 – and affairs 2Ch 15:8 – took courage 2Ch 20:1 – after this also 2Ch 34:13 – officers Ezr 7:5 – chief priest Neh 11:11 – the ruler<\/p>\n 2Ch 19:11. The chief priest is over you Shall be your president to direct and assist you; in all matters of the Lord In spiritual or ecclesiastical matters. And Zebadiah, the ruler of the house of Judah The prince, or chief ruler, under the king, of the tribe of Judah; for all the kings matters For civil causes, or controversies, either between the king and his people, or between subject and subject, which may be called the kings matters, because it was a principal part of his office to see them justly decided. The Levites shall be officers before you Shall be at your command, to see your just sentences executed; which work was fitly committed to the Levites, as persons who might add their instructions to the corrections, and might bring the guilty to an acknowledgment of their fault, and a submission to their punishment. Deal courageously Act with resolution, and fear not the face of man; but be bold and daring in the discharge of your duty. And the Lord shall be with the good Shall protect and bless good judges in their pronouncing just sentences, and doing good things. <\/p>\n 19:11 And, behold, Amariah the chief priest [is] over you in all matters of the LORD; and Zebadiah the son of Ishmael, the ruler of the house of Judah, for all the {h} king’s matters: also the Levites [shall be] officers {i} before you. Deal courageously, and the LORD shall be with the {k} good.<\/p>\n (h) Shall be chief overseer of the public affairs of the realm.<\/p>\n (i) They will have the handling of inferior causes.<\/p>\n (k) God will assist them that do justice.<\/p>\n And, behold, Amariah the chief priest [is] over you in all matters of the LORD; and Zebadiah the son of Ishmael, the ruler of the house of Judah, for all the king’s matters: also the Levites [shall be] officers before you. Deal courageously, and the LORD shall be with the good. 11. Amariah ] Perhaps … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Chronicles 19:11”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11599","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11599"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11599\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
I.<\/strong> <\/em><\/strong>Who are the good? The Scripture points out two things on this subject.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>The meaning of this declaration and how its truth is supported. The Lord shall be with the good. This means that the Lord will be with them in the supply of His Spirit, in providing for them in providence, preserving them from trouble, supporting them in it, or delivering them out of it, and blessing others for their sakes. This truth is justified–<\/p>\n
missed an opportunity of doing this for me, and has not <\/strong>the courage to do it now as he ought to do, leaving me in consequence defenceless against a slander, though I put the proof into his hands. How indispensable strength is for high goodness-strength moral or intellectual, neither depending necessarily on physical strength. Many a man neglects to live a Christian life not because he lacks Christian sympathies, sentiments, and feelings, not even because he has no Christian ideas, but simply for lack of courage to put himself where he properly belongs. This lack of courage denotes, of course, either want of confidence in himself or want of depth of feeling as to religious truth, or fear of some man or men, which fear has too much influence over him to allow him to act conscientiously and in the line of his best sympathies.<\/p>\n
<\/strong><\/p>\nFuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"