2<\/strong>. howbeit he entered not into the temple of the Lord<\/em> ] Kings has a different limitation, viz., “howbeit the high places were not removed.”<\/p>\n did yet corruptly<\/em> ] In Kings, “sacrificed and burnt incense still in the high places.”<\/p>\n Verse 2<\/span>. He entered not into the temple<\/B><\/I>] He copied his father’s conduct as far as it was constitutional; and avoided his transgression. See the preceding chapter. (2Ch 26<\/span>)<\/P> <\/p>\n He entered not into the temple of the Lord, <\/B>to wit, to offer incense. But seeing this was not commendable, how is this mentioned as an exception from the foregoing character, that he did as his father did in that which was right, &c.? <\/P> Answ.<\/B> It is an exception only from the last clause, where also one word may be supplied out of the foregoing words, as is most usual in Scripture; thus, He did <\/P> according to all that his father Uzziah did; <\/B>then it fitly follows, howbeit, &c., i.e. except in his miscarriages. <\/P> <\/p>\n 2. he did that which was right<\/B>Thegeneral rectitude of his government is described by representing itas conducted on the excellent principles which had guided the earlypart of his father’s reign. <\/P> the people did yetcorruptly<\/B>(See 2Ki 15:35<\/span>);but the description here is more emphatic, that though Jotham didmuch to promote the good of his kingdom and aimed at a thoroughreformation in religion, the widespread and inveterate wickedness ofthe people frustrated all his laudable efforts.<\/P><\/p>\n And he did that which was right<\/strong>,….<\/p>\n [See comments on 2Ki 15:34]<\/span>,<\/p>\n howbeit, he entered not into the temple of the Lord<\/strong>; to burn incense, as his father did; he did according to his good ways, but not his evil ones:<\/p>\n and the people did yet corruptly<\/strong>; in sacrificing and burning incense in the high places, 2Ki 15:35<\/span> which some think Joash himself did, and is meant in the preceding clause; but the sense given is best.<\/p>\n (2) Howbeit he entered not.<\/strong>The chronicler adds<\/em> this reservation upon the preceding general statement. The author of Kings, having said nothing of Uzziahs sacrilege, had no need to make such an exception.<\/p>\n And the people did yet corruptly.<\/strong>Still used to deal corruptly;<\/em> a paraphrase of what we read in 2Ki. 15:35<\/span>, the people still used to sacrifice and burn incense on the high places.<\/em> We know further, from the extant utterances of the prophets of those days, that a deep-seated moral corruption was sapping the strength of the nation. (Comp. Mic. 3:10-12<\/span>; Hos. 4:1-2<\/span>.)<\/p>\n 2Ch 27:2<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>And the people did yet corruptly.<\/em><\/strong><\/strong> And the people yet worshipped corruptly, <\/em>see 2Ki 15:35<\/span>. <\/p>\n Though Jotham did not invade the priests office as his father had done, yet what is said of him concerning his doing right in the sight of the Lord, must be accepted much in the same sense as what was said of Uzziah. The people, it is said, did corruptly. I think it important that the Reader should be reminded that it was during this man’s reign, and in the latter part of the reign of his father, that the prophet Isaiah flourished and delivered his prophecy, which he calls a vision. See Isa 1:1<\/span> .<\/p>\n 2Ch 27:2 And he did [that which was] right in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his father Uzziah did: howbeit he entered not into the temple of the LORD. And the people did yet corruptly.<\/p>\n Ver. 2. And he did that which was right.<\/strong> ] See 2Ki 15:34<\/span> . Josephus saith that no virtue was wanting unto him, and that he was pious, just, public spirited, &c. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Howbeit he entered not into the temple,<\/strong> ] viz., To encroach upon the priest’s office; to serve God, no doubt but he entered into it frequently. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n And the people did yet corruptly.<\/strong> ] By sacrificing and burning incense still in the high places, 2Ki 15:35 though Isaiah, Hosea, Micah, and other holy prophets then living showed them their sin. To this day, people will not leave their old evil customs, though never so much preached down.<\/p>\n the LORD. Hebrew. Jehovah. App-4. <\/p>\n according to all: i.e. to all the good, not the evil. Hence the “howbeit”, which follows. <\/p>\n entered not into. As his father had done (2Ch 26:16). Not like Ahaz (2Ch 28:24). <\/p>\n And he did: 2Ch 26:4, 2Ki 15:34 <\/p>\n he entered not: He copied his father’s conduct as far as it was pious and constitutional; and avoided his transgression. 2Ch 26:16-21, Psa 119:120, Act 5:13 <\/p>\n the people: 2Ki 15:35 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Neh 1:7 – corruptly Isa 2:8 – is full<\/p>\n 27:2 And he did [that which was] right in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his father Uzziah did: howbeit he entered not into the {a} temple of the LORD. And the people did yet {b} corruptly.<\/p>\n (a) That is, to offer incense against the word of God, which is spoken of in the commendation of Jotham.<\/p>\n (b) They were not completely purged from idolatry.<\/p>\n And he did [that which was] right in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his father Uzziah did: howbeit he entered not into the temple of the LORD. And the people did yet corruptly. 2. howbeit he entered not into the temple of the Lord ] Kings has a different limitation, viz., … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Chronicles 27:2”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11769\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"