26. Lamech<\/B>a different personfrom the one mentioned in the preceding chapter [Ge4:18<\/span>]. Like his namesake, however, he also spoke in numbers onoccasion of the birth of Noahthat is, “rest” or”comfort” [Ge 5:29<\/span>,Margin<\/I>]. “The allusion is, undoubtedly, to the penalconsequences of the fall in earthly toils and sufferings, and to thehope of a Deliverer, excited by the promise made to Eve. That thisexpectation was founded on a divine communication we infer from theimportance attached to it and the confidence of its expression”[PETER SMITH].<\/P><\/p>\n And Methuselah lived, after he begat Lamech, seven hundred eighty and two years<\/strong>,…. The Greek version is eight hundred and two years, and so makes the sum total of his life the same; but the Samaritan version only six hundred and fifty three, and so makes his whole life but seven hundred and twenty; and thus, instead of being the oldest, he is made the youngest of the antediluvian patriarchs, excepting his father Enoch:<\/p>\n and begat sons and daughters<\/strong>; some, it is highly probable, before he beget Lamech, since then he was near two hundred years of age, as well as others after<\/p>\n Gen 5:26 And Methuselah lived after he begat Lamech seven hundred eighty and two years, and begat sons and daughters:<\/p>\n Ver. 26. And Methuselah lived.<\/strong> ] But had the less joy of his longest life, because he lived in the very rust of that iron age; <\/em> and so felt ultima senescentis mundi deliria<\/em> , the utmost dotages of that decrepit old world.<\/p>\n begat sons: Gen 5:4<\/p>\n And Methuselah lived after he begot Lamech seven hundred eighty and two years, and begot sons and daughters: 26. Lamecha different personfrom the one mentioned in the preceding chapter [Ge4:18]. Like his namesake, however, he also spoke in numbers onoccasion of the birth of Noahthat is, “rest” or”comfort” [Ge 5:29,Margin]. “The allusion is, undoubtedly, to … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Genesis 5:26”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"