21<\/strong>. given to change<\/em> ] i.e. are of a revolutionary and subversive spirit, whether in religion or in politics.<\/p>\n Them that are given to change – <\/B>Those that seek to set aside the worship of the true God, or the authority of the true king, who represents Him.<\/P> <\/p>\n Pro 24:21<\/span><\/p>\n My son, fear thou the Lord and the king.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n Duty to God and the king<\/strong><\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>To fear God is to have awful apprehensions of Him in our thoughts, and to walk carefully before Him in our actions. This fear is the bottom of all true spiritual wisdom; the security against all other fears; a preservative against all sin and wilful offence; and a good preparative for the peace and welfare of society, by restraining peoples minds within the due limits of their subjection, that we may lead quiet and peaceable lives in all godliness and honesty.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>To fear the king we stand obliged both in conscience to God and out of interest to ourselves, seeing that he is the public guardian, upon whose well-doing the welfare of the whole community depends.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>The sum of all religion is to be as pure in holiness, so peaceable in righteousness, when we order ourselves piously to God and obediently to the magistrate. The interests of religion and policy are so nearly twisted and woven together that they cannot be severed from one another without the utmost hazard to both. Rebellion and schism are wont to go hand in hand together.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>As an expedient for the duty. The way to keep in the fear of God and the king is to forbear the company of these restless folk, to keep at a distance from them, and have nothing to do with them.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>As a consequent of this duty. He that hath any fear of God and the king will keep himself within compass. A pious soul, a loyal heart, will admit of nothing that may shake or call in question its fidelity.<\/p>\n As to these changers–<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>Inquire who they are. Iterantes, men who go over things again and never have done. Variantes, who vary their course through all points of the compass. Detractors, that speak evil of dignities, both temporal and spiritual. Declinantes, stragglers, who go out of Gods and the kings highway.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>What is it not to meddle with them? It is to mark these men, and observe the dangerous mixture of their fine parts and foul designs. Consider well the tendency and drift of such principles as theirs.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>The reasons why such men are not to be meddled with. There is no knowing how far they may lead you. Though you may be innocent, you may get wrapped up in others guilt. If you escape now, you will suffer one day, in the peace of thy conscience. And thou dost endanger the eternal safety of thy soul. Since it is so, let us take heed to ourselves, and establish our spirits in the fear of the Lord and the king, and as we wish well to our own persons and to our posterity after us, let us have nothing to do with these changers. (Adam Littleton, D<\/em>.D<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Our duty to God and man<\/strong><\/p>\n Civil government is the great comprehensive worldly blessing; for it is the foundation of peace and quiet, the spring and fountain of all those inestimable advantages which adorn and felicitate human societies.<\/p>\n Religion in national life<\/strong><\/p>\n Religious loyalty<\/strong><\/p>\n The possession of power is one thing; guidance how to use it is another. The sacred writings contemplated your present as well as your future. The present, what is it but the future begun? The future, what is it but the present completed? He will most enjoy the glories of the future whose life of practical holiness best attests the work of grace within him now. The whole power of this verse consists in its unity. It is not, My son, fear thou the Lord, and then, My son, fear thou the king; but, My son, fear thou the Lord and the king.<\/p>\n Advice and penalty<\/strong><\/p>\n Fear God and king<\/strong><\/p>\n The word fear expresses the general idea of reverence, or of holding in awe. God is to be feared according to the nature and authority of His government, kings according to the nature and authority of theirs; God supremely, kings subordinately; God as the source of all power, kings as holding theirs of God, and responsible to Him for the use they make of it. God for His character; kings simply as the representatives of power. God with a fear ever associated with the love of complacency; kings with as much love as their personal character admits of. (R<\/em>. Wardlaw, D<\/em>.D<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Loyalty of the Christian spirit<\/strong><\/p>\n Dr. Buchsel, speaking of the conventicles in Germany, early in the century, in which evangelical piety, which had no voice in the Churches, found refuge, says: I noticed that all of this way of thinking, however much they suspected regularly ordained ministers and Church authorities, yet appeared to place heartfelt confidence in the king. They were universally persuaded that his majesty personally was well inclined towards them. The king was invariably prayed for with the utmost affection. (J<\/em>. F<\/em>. B<\/em>. Tinling, B<\/em>.A<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n And meddle not with them that are given to change. Given to change<\/strong><\/p>\n Harmony and order preserve societies, when all men that are in a subordinate state do readily yield to him who is the supreme according to Gods law. Maximus Tyrius, the Platonist, speaks of three sorts of government–monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. One end of religion is to be serviceable even to the political and civil interests of mankind; and because there can be no temporal felicity without peace, nor peace without loyal and dutiful submission, the text calls on all such as would be truly happy to fear God and the king.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>A retinue of the most mischievous concomitants and effects, as war, bloodshed, confusion, rapine, the subversion of laws, and ruin of families, follow upon these restless changes, these evils of innovation.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>Change of government is rarely attempted but under some cleanly disguise and popular pretence. Popular states have been erected by the popular tricks of men.<\/p>\n Recommend three practical things–<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>The fear of the Lord. No confidence can be placed but in men who act upon the right principles of religion and honesty.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>The fear of the king is coercive of obedience.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>Avoid the company of restless spirits; have no fellowship with them. (Edward Pelling<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The fewer changes the better<\/strong><\/p>\n Mans power of adapting himself to new spheres and work is placed within such strict limitations, that the fewer changes he makes in life the better. There is a law of limitation for animals and men. And the facts respecting the limited range enjoyed by some animals are not more noteworthy than are those respecting the limited range of some men. There are some persons who do well enough in the dull dreary region of a cold official life, whose existence is unendurable in the midst of the associations of wit and romance. The red-tape species die if brought away from the frigid regions of officialism and formality; and there are many poor men who live honest, useful lives in the scenes of indigence who, when fortune unexpectedly transports them into the luxuriant scenes of opulence and gaiety, die from some one or other of the results of the change for which they were not constituted. Many attempts have been made to remove very good men from one position to another, and the result has been a termination of their usefulness, and often of their life. The notion that men can adapt themselves to anything is an error arising from want of observation. There is a sphere for every man; and, as a rule, the removal of him when he is fairly acclimatised either renders him useless altogether, or makes it necessary that he should be sustained by artificial inventions, and in that case he cannot lead that natural life which is necessary in the full development of his powers. It will also be found that these difficulties in adapting men to great changes of position increase with their age. (R<\/em>. J<\/em>. Graves, F<\/em>.R<\/em>.S<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Improvement justifies change<\/strong><\/p>\n To oppose all changes is to set up a plea of perfection. Every improvement (and where is there not need for improvement?) is a change. But public evils are not to be mended by railing. To be given to change; to alter for the sake of altering; to be weary of the old and captivated with the new, however untried; to make experiments upon modes of government, is a fearful hazard. It is losing the substance of real good in the dream of imaginary improvements; as if we must undo everything rather than be idle. (G. Bridges, M<\/em>.A<\/em>.)<\/p>\n Verse 21<\/span>. My son, fear thou the Lord and the king<\/B><\/I>] Pay to each the homage due: to the LORD, Divine honour and adoration; to the king<\/I>, civil respect, civil honour, and political obedience.<\/P> <\/P> Meddle not with them that are given to change<\/B><\/I>] im shonim al titharab<\/I>: “And with the changelings mingle not thyself.” The innovators<\/I>; those who are always for making experiments on modes of government, forms of religion, &c. The most dangerous spirit that can infect the human mind.<\/P> <\/p>\n Fear thou the Lord and the king; <\/B>honour and obey both God and the king, and all in authority. He puts God before the king, because God is to be served in the first place, and our obedience is to be giver, to kings only in subordination to God, and not in those things which are contrary to the will and command of God, as is manifest both from plain Scripture, as Act 5:29<\/span>, and from the judgment and practice of wise and sober heathens. <\/P> Meddle not with them, <\/B>Heb. mix not thyself with them<\/I>, either in their counsels and practices, or in familiar conversation, that are given to change; that love or use changes; that are unstable in their obedience to God or to the king, and are prone to rebellion against either of them. Those men that wickedly forsake God, and break his laws, are said to change their God, Jer 2:11<\/span>, and to <\/P> change Gods judgments and ordinances,<\/B> Isa 24:5<\/span>; Eze 5:6<\/span>. <\/P> <\/p>\n 21, 22.<\/B> A warning againstimpiety and resistance to lawful rule (Rom 13:1-7<\/span>;1Pe 2:17<\/span>). <\/P> meddle . . . change<\/B>(CompareMargin<\/I>), literally, “mingle not yourself,” avoid thesociety of restless persons.<\/P><\/p>\n My son, fear thou the Lord, and the king<\/strong>,…. First the Lord, and then the king; and such as fear the Lord are generally loyal to their king; the fear of God includes love to him, reverence of him, faith in him, submission to him, and the whole worship of him, inward and outward, attended with holiness of life and conversation: and the king, who is under God, is to be feared also, with a fear suitable to him; he is to be loved and reverenced, to be trusted in and submitted to, in everything consistent with the fear of God and obedience to him; in whatever is not contrary to his laws, commands, and ordinances; see 1Pe 2:13<\/span>;<\/p>\n [and] meddle not with them that are given to change<\/strong>; in political things; that are for new laws, new forms of government, a new ministry, and a new king; never easy with the government under which they are, but are continually entering into plots, conspiracies, and rebellions, who, instead of fearing God and the king, change the laws and commandments of God and the king, and therefore to be shunned. Some render it, “with rebels”; the Targum and Syriac version, “with fools”; as all such persons are, and should be avoided as scandalous and dangerous: mix not with them, as the word s signifies; keep no company, and have no conversation with them, lest you be brought into danger and mischief by them. Or who are given to change in religious things; make innovations in doctrine and practice, always love to hear or say some now thing; turn with every wind, and shift as that does; are tossed about with every wind of doctrine, fickle and inconstant, carried about like meteors in the air, with “divers and strange doctrines”; such as disagree with the perfections of God, the doctrines of Christ and his apostles, the Scriptures of truth, the analogy of faith, anti form of sound words; and so the word here used signifies “divers”, and is so rendered Es 3:8<\/span>; and may design such who hold doctrines and give into practices divers and different from the faith once delivered to the saints, and from the institutions and appointments of Christ; innovations in doctrine and worship ought not to be admitted of; and such who are for introducing them should not be meddled or mixed with; they should not be countenanced and encouraged; they should not be attended upon or given heed unto; have no fellowship, and join not in communion with them. This is interpreted by some of such who repeat t their sins after repentance, or who return a second time to their wickedness after they have repented, as Ben Melech observes.<\/p>\n s “ne misceas te”, Pagninus, Montanus; “ne commisceto te”, Junius Tremellius, Piscator, so Michaelis, Schultens. t “cum iterantibus”, Pagninus, Montanus “sub iniquitates suas”; so some in Vatablus, Baynus.<\/p>\n A warning against rebellious thoughts against God and the king:<\/p>\n 21 My son, honour Jahve and the king,<\/p>\n And involve not thyself with those who are otherwise disposed;<\/p>\n 22 For suddenly their calamity ariseth,<\/p>\n And the end of their years, who knoweth it?<\/p>\n The verb , proceeding from the primary idea of folding ( complicare, duplicare <\/em>), signifies transitively to do twice, to repeat, Pro 17:9<\/span>; Pro 26:11<\/span>, according to which Kimchi here inappropriately thinks on relapsing; and intransitively, to change, to be different, Est 1:7<\/span>; Est 3:8<\/span>. The Syr. and Targ. translate the word , fools; but the Kal<\/em> ( ) occurs, indeed, in the Syr., but not in the Heb., in the meaning alienata est <\/em> ( mens ejus <\/em>); and besides, this meaning, alieni <\/em>, is not appropriate here. A few, however, with Saadia (cf. Deutsch-Morgenlndische Zeitschr<\/em>. xxi. 616), the dualists (Manichees), understand it in a dogmatic sense; but then must be denom. of , while much more it is its root-word. Either means those who change, novantes <\/em> = novarum rerum studiosi <\/em>, which is, however, exposed to this objection, that the Heb. , in the transitive sense to change, does not elsewhere occur; or it means, according to the usus loq<\/em>., diversos <\/em> = diversum sentientes <\/em> (C. B. Michaelis and others), and that with reference to 21a: (Meri, Immanuel), or (Ahron b. Joseph). Thus they are called (for it is a common name of a particular class of men) dissidents, oppositionists, or revolutionaries, who recognise neither the monarchy of Jahve, the King of kings, nor that of the earthly king, which perhaps Jerome here means by the word detractoribus <\/em> (= detractatoribus <\/em>). The Venet<\/em>. incorrectly, , i.e.<\/em>, . with at Pro 14:10<\/span>, meant to mix oneself up with something, here with , to mix oneself with some one, i.e.<\/em>, to make common cause with him.<\/p>\n The reason assigned in Pro 24:22<\/span> is, that although such persons as reject by thought and action human and divine law may for a long time escape punishment, yet suddenly merited ruin falls on them. is, according to its primary signification, weighty, oppressive misfortune, vid<\/em>., i. 27. In it is thought of as hostile power (Hos 10:14<\/span>); or the rising up of God as Judge ( e.g.<\/em>, Isa 33:10<\/span>) is transferred to the means of executing judgment. (= of or ro , Arab. fad , fut. jafudu or jafdu , a stronger power of bad , cogn. ) is destruction (Arab. fied , fd , death); this word occurs, besides here, only thrice in the Book of Job. But to what does refer? Certainly not to Jahve and the king (lxx, Schultens, Umbreit, and Bertheau), for in itself it is doubtful to interpret the genit. after as designating the subject, but improper to comprehend God and man under one cipher. Rather it may refer to two, of whom one class refuse to God, the other to the king, the honour that is due (Jerome, Luther, and at last Zckler); but in the foregoing, two are not distinguished, and the want of reverence for God, and for the magistrates appointed by Him, is usually met with, because standing in interchangeable relationship, in one and the same persons. Is there some misprint then in this word? Ewald suggests , i.e.<\/em>, of those who show themselves as ( altercatores <\/em>) towards God and the king. In view of , Exo 32:25<\/span>, this brevity of expression must be regarded as possible. But if this were the meaning of the word, then it ought to have stood in the first member ( ), and not in the second. No other conjecture presents itself. Thus is perhaps to be referred to the , and those who engage with them: join thyself not with the opposers; for suddenly misfortune will come upon them, and the destruction of both (of themselves and their partisans), who knows it? But that also is not satisfactory, for after the address was to have been expected, 22b. Nothing remains, therefore, but to understand , with the Syr. and Targ., as at Job 36:11<\/span>; the proverb falls into rhythms and , and . But “the end of their year” is not equivalent to the hour of their death (Hitzig), because for this (cf. Arab. feid and fd , death) was necessary; but to the expiring, the vanishing, the passing by of the year during which they have succeeded in maintaining their ground and playing a part. There will commence a time which no one knows beforehand when all is over with them. In this sense, “who knoweth,” with its object, is equivalent to “suddenly ariseth,” with its subject. In the lxx, after Pro 24:22<\/span>, there follow one distich of the relations of man to the word of God as deciding their fate, one distich of fidelity as a duty towards the king, and the duty of the king, and one pentastich or hexastich of the power of the tongue and of the anger of the king. The Heb. text knows nothing of these three proverbs. Ewald has, Jahrb<\/em>. xi. 18f., attempted to translate them into Heb., and is of opinion that they are worthy of being regarded as original component parts of chap. 1-29, and that they ought certainly to have come in after Pro 24:22<\/span>. We doubt this originality, but recognise their translation from the Heb. Then follows in the lxx the series of Prov; Pro 30:1-14<\/span>, which in the Heb. text bear the superscription of “the Words of Agur;” the second half of the “Words of Agur,” together with the “Words of Lemuel,” stand after Pro 24:34<\/span> of the Heb. text. The state of the matter is this, that in the copy from which the Alexandrines translated the Appendix 30:1-31:9, stood half of it, after the “Words of the Wise” [which extend from Pro 22:17<\/span> to Pro 24:22<\/span>], and half after the supplement headed “these also are from wise men” [Pro 24:23-34<\/span>], so that only the proverbial ode in praise of the excellent matron [Pro 31:10<\/span>] remains as an appendix to the Book of Hezekiah’s collection, chap. 25-29.<\/p>\n 21 My son, fear thou the LORD<\/B> and the king: and<\/I> meddle not with them that are given to change: 22 For their calamity shall rise suddenly; and who knoweth the ruin of them both?<\/P> Note, 1. Religion and loyalty must go together. As men, it is our duty to honour our Creator, to worship and reverence him, and to be always in his fear; as members of a community, incorporated for mutual benefit, it is our duty to be faithful and dutiful to the government God has set over us, Rom 13:1<\/span>; Rom 13:2<\/span>. Those that are truly religious will be loyal, in conscience towards God; the godly in the land will be the quite in the land;<\/I> and those are not truly loyal, or will be so no longer than is for their interest, that are not religious. How should he be true to his prince that is false to his God? And, if they come in competition, it is an adjudged case, we must obey God rather than men.<\/I> 2. Innovations in both are to be dreaded. Have nothing to do, he does not say, with those that change,<\/I> for there may be cause to change for the better, but those that are given to change,<\/I> that affect change for change-sake, out of a peevish discontent with that which is and a fondness for novelty, or a desire to fish in troubled waters: Meddle not with those that are given to change<\/I> either in religion or in a civil government; come not into their secret;<\/I> join not with them in their cabals, nor enter into the mystery of their iniquity. 3. Those that are of restless, factious, turbulent spirits, commonly pull mischief upon their own heads ere they are aware: Their calamity shall rise suddenly.<\/I> Though they carry on their designs with the utmost secresy, they will be discovered, and brought to condign punishment, when they little think of it. Who knows<\/I> the time and manner of the ruin<\/I> which both God and the king will bring on their contemners, both<\/I> on them and those that meddle with them?<\/P> <\/p>\n Good Citizenship<\/strong><\/p>\n Verses 21-22 affirm the basics of good citizenship. Fear the LORD, honor civil authority, and meddle not with them that rebel against law and order. In the days these Proverbs were written, Israel was subject to God and a divinely appointed king responsible to God for leading them in civil and spiritual activity, Pro 14:34<\/span>; Ezr 7:26<\/span>; Exo 22:28<\/span>. The New Testament carried these good citizenship principles forward, 1Pe 2:13-17<\/span>; Rom 13:1-7<\/span>. Ruin awaits both he who fears not God and he who respects not civil authority.<\/p>\n CRITICAL NOTES.<\/p>\n Pro. 24:21<\/span><\/strong>. Given to change<\/strong>, literally otherwise disposed<\/em>, or, according to Miller, repeaters, turners back<\/em>. <\/p>\n Pro. 24:22<\/span><\/strong>. The ruin of them both<\/strong>, etc. This phrase is variously rendered, and different meanings are also attached to the same rendering. Delitzsch follows the Syriac version, and reads, the end of their years, who knoweth it?<\/em> But Zckler adopts the reading of the Authorised version, which is supported by the Vulgate, by Luther, Ewald, Elster, and others. Some understand the word both<\/em> to refer to those who rebel against God, and those who rebel against the king (so Zckler), while others apply it to God and the king, and the ruin<\/em> foretold as that proceeding from them. Here begins a short appendix to the third main division of the book of Proverbs, the first clause of Pro. 24:33<\/span> being its superscription, which is almost in the same words as that which introduces the division itself. (See chap. Pro. 22:17<\/span>.) It extends only to the end of the chapter, and consists of maxims which have no apparent connection with each other. <\/p>\n MAIN HOMILETICS OF <\/em>Pro. 24:21-22<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n RULE AND REVERENCE<\/p>\n I. The rule of some men and the subjection of others is a Divine ordination<\/strong>. God, by creating men with such different gifts and with powers of mind and body so unequal, evidently intends that society should not be on a dead level, but that in all communities there should be some recognised head. And the tendency of men in all ages to unite under some leader whom they deem worthy to be their head points to an instinct in human nature which we must refer to a Divine origin. The law of subjection and dominion has its place in the natural world. The entire solar system is held together by the subjection of the lesser bodies to one which is greater than all, and as the planets move in their orbits around the sun they seem like so many obedient subjects doing homage to their monarch, while their attendant satellites are in their turn subject to them. And the constant operation of this material law is productive of the most beneficial results. In like manner the observation of some such law among free and intelligent creatures is necessary to the order and consequent peace of society.<\/p>\n II. But the deference of the subject to his earthly ruler must be always subordinate to the will of the Divine ruler of both<\/strong>. There are cases in which to fear the king<\/em>, in the sense of obeying him, would be to dishonour God, and times when he who demands obedience refuses to comply with the Divine demands upon himself. It is obvious therefore that the fear of the earthly king can only be carried so far as is consistent with loyal obedience to the King of all the kings of the earth. The first precept of the wise man in this verse admits of no limitation, but the second must be limited by the first. But those who have been the most faithful servants of God have ever been most ready to render honour to whom honour is due<\/em> (Rom. 13:7<\/span>); and when duty has compelled them to disobey their commands they have done so with all due respect for their lawful authority. That fear of God which compels them to disobey unrighteous laws makes them obedient subjects to lawful rule, and constrains them, so far as is possible, to live as peaceable citizens.<\/p>\n III. Therefore the peace of a kingdom and the stability of a throne will be in proportion to the reverence of king and people for the Divine will<\/strong>. The fear of God is the great adjusting power in all relations of life. When it governs in the family the parents are loved and honoured by the children, and the childrens welfare is the constant care of the parents. It is this fear of God alone that can solve the vexed problem of the relations between masters and servants, between capital and labour, and between monarchs and people. Where it is wanting there will be a weak rule on the one hand, and a niggardly service and a halfhearted obedience on the other, and both are responsible for those outbursts of disorder which involve both in a common calamity.<\/p>\n OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS<\/em><\/p>\n The connection of the two fears in the passage before us is evidently intended to impress the one by the other:If you fear God, fear the king. God, whom you are bound supremely to fear, and whose fear should produce obedience to His will, has enjoined the fear of earthly rulers: so that a failure in the fear due to them<\/em>, becomes a violation of the fear due to Him<\/em>.<\/p>\n I need hardly say, that by the king<\/em> we are to understand the government of the country<\/em>. It may be monarchical, or it may not. We are by no means to look upon such expressions as this, in Scripture, as attaching the authority of inspiration to one form of government more than to another. Respecting the comparative merits of different forms, the word of God should not be regarded as giving any decision, whether for the kingly, the aristocratical, the popular, or the mixed. The respect, or fear, is due to the legislative and executive powers<\/em>, of whichsoever description these may be.Wardlaw<\/em>.<\/p>\n Submission of heart and life to the King Eternal overrides and controls, yet does not injure a citizens allegiance to an earthly ruler. The fear of the Lord must go first, but the fear of the king may follow. The supreme does not crush, it protects the subordinate. Although the heart is full of piety, there is plenty of room for patriotism. Nay, more, patriotism nowhere gets full scope except in a heart that is already pervaded by piety. These elements are like the two chief constituent gases of the atmosphere. The space which envelopes the globe is full of one gasit is also full of the other. To discharge the nitrogen would not make the space capable of containing more of the oxygen. The absence of the one constituent destroys the quality but does not enlarge the quantity of the other. Take away godliness, and your loyalty, without being increased in amount, is seriously deteriorated in kind. Take away loyalty, and you run great risk of spoiling the purity of the remanent godliness. Gods works are all goodHis combinations are all beneficial. If we attempt to mend, we shall certainly mar them. Go forward in your allegiance to the powers that be, not until you think you have gone far enough, but until you come upon the law of God, claiming the space in front for Himself, and absolutely forbidding your advance. Go forward with the fear of the king, unless and until the fear of the Lord cross your path like a wall. No feasible rule can be laid down except what the Scriptures contain. Let any man try to write down a scale showing when and where private persons may lawfully resist public authority, and he will soon be convinced that the case is hopeless. Every attempt to define the liberty of rebellion will be found to open a door to anarchy. In point of fact, very little of the liberty that now exists in the world has been achieved by violent resistance to governments because of oppression in temporal things.Arnot<\/em>.<\/p>\n (21) Them that are given to change.<\/strong>Perhaps rather, those who think differently. 21<\/strong>. <\/strong> Meddle not <\/strong> Mingle not, associate not, with them that are given to change revolters, revolutionists, innovators, reckless agitators; disorganizers, disturbers of the peace, whether in Church or State; “men that are seditious.” Geneva Bible. <\/em> The precept is a general one, and as such subject to exceptions and limitations. It is here, no doubt, specially directed against those who would set aside the service of the true God and of the true king, who was supposed to represent him. Comp. Pro 16:14<\/span>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n v. 21. My son, fear thou the Lord and the king,<\/strong> the government established by Jehovah, 1Pe 2:17<\/span>; Rom 13:1<\/span>, and meddle not with them that are given to change,<\/strong> those who are always dissatisfied with the government and therefore are always planning revolutions; <\/p>\n Pro 24:21-22<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>My son fear thou the Lord, <\/em><\/strong>&c.<\/strong> The LXX, read, My son,<\/em> fear God and the king; and be not disobedient to either of them: <\/em>Pro 24:22<\/span> Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
I. <\/strong>A double duty laid down. Or rather, a single duty, one included and comprehended in the other. Fear here is a comprehensive notion to contain in it all those duties which we owe to God principally, and to the king subordinately.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>The caution.<\/p>\n
I. <\/strong>The duties which we owe to God and the king. The fear of God is oftentimes put for the whole sum of religion. We are also to fear the king, and though there is not an equal reason, yet there is a sufficient one for this fear. The king is Gods vicegerent and representative. And there must be something to work upon mens fears as well as to convince their understandings, before they will learn or practise the duty of subjection. Religion and loyalty have a close dependence on each other, and a strict connection with each other. No man can be truly religious who is not a good subject. No man can be steadily and immovably loyal who is not truly and sincerely religious.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>A proper means prescribed for securing and preserving us in our duty. Beware of those who are given to changes, e.g., the atheist, the restless, the rebellious. (William Stainforth<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
I. <\/strong>The perfections which render God the object of our fear.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>The fear of God and the king is the best preservative against the disturbers of the peace and quiet of all government. It is the foundation of all those virtues from which the peace and happiness of governments must arise, and the most effectual restraint upon the vicious appetites and passions of men. Those in whom this principle rules cannot help looking upon others as the servants of one Sovereign Master, and this consideration must dispose them to have the tenderest regard for their welfare, and tie them together by the strictest bands of fraternal love and friendship. And this principle must naturally contribute to the regulating and composing those disorderly affections and passions which are the great enemies and disturbers of the peace of mankind. Religion fixes that levity and weakness of mind which is so natural to man; it unites his actions and resolutions to one great end, and makes them consistent and regular; and is the best cure of that restlessness of mind which closely adheres to our very natures, and renders us dissatisfied with what we are, or what we at present possess or enjoy; and too often disposes us wantonly to desire changes for the very sake of changing. (John Wilcox, D<\/em>.D<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
I. <\/strong>The remarkable command. There is much force in that word, fear thou<\/em>. <\/em>Be unmoved by any motives, or influences, or <\/strong>examples, which may press you to do otherwise than thus. If all around you are wrong, fear thou. Multitudes do not prove a matter to be right. Act for yourself, and do not fear to stand alone. The command here is, fear both God and the king. You must do the latter if the former be regarded. The fear of God brings with it a principle of obedience, which will influence your conduct in all things. The two things are united morally, and so a true Christian must be a good subject.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>The danger of forgetting this command. The antithesis is very striking. Meddle not with them that are given to change. But change must not be confused with progress and improvement. Change means things that imperil primary principles of righteousness.<\/p>\n
III. <\/strong>The results of neglecting this command. Their calamity shall come suddenly. Apply–To serve your generation by the will of God is one of the duties and privileges of your present state. You will do it if you fear both God and the king. (George Venables<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
I. <\/strong>The advice. The commendation My son stands first. This is such a counsel as a father would give a son. And that it is no evil one we may be sure. There is in this counsel a single act–fear–and a double object–God and the king. The main drift of the advice is, a resentive against meddling with certain persons. It consists of two counter points. Do this and eschew that. Follow one, fly the other.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>The penalty. It is punishment enough for a man not to follow good counsel when it is given him. Yet God hath so ordered, as there goeth ever some further evil with the contempt of good counsel. The penalty is no less than destruction and ruin; a sudden destruction, an unknown ruin. Solomon sits here as a counsellor and as a judge–a counsellor to advise, a judge to pronounce. Hear his counsel, then; if not, hear your sentence. Choose which verse you will be in. In one of them we must be. In the verse of counsel, Fear God and the king, or in the verse of penalty, For their destruction, etc. <\/em>(Bp<\/em>. Lancelot Andrewes<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/strong><\/p>\n
I. <\/strong>An affirmative command. That we express that humble and universal fear which is due to Gods majesty, and that becoming reverence which is due to the kings majesty for Gods sake. (This subject not now treated fully.)<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>A negative precept. That we have nothing to do with those who, when things are well, under pretence of mending would fain mar all, and alter everything, whether it be religion, or laws, or government, that lieth in their way. Some render the verse thus, Meddle not with them that act their iniquities over again; them that are disobedient and disloyal afresh; them that repeat their old sins against the king and his regalities; them that are for a change, but not of their own principles and courses. Solomons own experience led him to warn his son against intractable and ungrateful men. Other expositors do not so restrain the sense of the text, but interpret it generally of all that are given to change, though some of them for a considerable time may have kept touch with the government: Meddle not with them that change their good principles; with them that warp their obedience; with them that are unsteady and inconsistent with themselves, and observe the pulse of the times. Men should be quiet and dutiful, and contented with their lot when things are well and in their right channel, and not abet the practices of those who cannot be at ease until the mire be stirred, and the wheel be turned upside down. Reasons for this advice of the text:<\/p>\nFuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
<\/em><\/p>\nFuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n