{"id":21852,"date":"2022-09-24T09:13:05","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T14:13:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-daniel-44\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T09:13:05","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T14:13:05","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-daniel-44","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-daniel-44\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 4:4"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in mine house, and flourishing in my palace: <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 4<\/strong>. <em> at rest<\/em> ] or <em> at ease, prosperous<\/em>. The word suggests the idea of contentment and security, in a good or a bad sense, according to the context (<span class='bible'>Job 16:12<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Psa 122:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job 12:6<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Psa 73:12<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><em> flourishing<\/em> ] The word is applied properly to a tree, and means <em> spreading, luxuriant<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Deu 12:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 14:23<\/span>, <em> al.<\/em>). A.V., R.V., &lsquo;green,&rsquo; which is correct only in so far as a luxuriant tree is also commonly a &lsquo;green&rsquo; one: it is used figuratively of persons, as here, in <span class='bible'>Psa 92:14<\/span> (cf. <span class='bible'>Psa 52:8<\/span>).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 4 18<\/strong>. Nebuchadnezzar describes his dream, which, as the wise men of Babylon were unable to interpret it, he laid before Daniel.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest &#8211; <\/B>Some manuscripts in the Greek add here, In the eighteenth year of his reign Nebuchadnezzar said. These words, however, are not in the Hebrew, and are of no authority. The word rendered at rest (<span class='_800000'><\/span> <I>sh<\/I><SUP><I>e<\/I><\/SUP><I>leh<\/I>) means, to be secure; to be free from apprehension or alarm. He designs to describe a state of tranquility and security. Greek, at peace &#8211; <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span> <I>eireneuon<\/I>: enjoying peace, or in a condition to enjoy peace. His wars were over; his kingdom was tranquil; he had built a magnificent capital; he had gathered around him the wealth and the luxuries of the world, and he was now in a condition to pass away the remainder of his life in ease and happiness.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>In mine house &#8211; <\/B>In his royal residence. It is possible that the two words here &#8211; house and palace &#8211; may refer to somewhat different things: the former &#8211; house &#8211; more particularly to his own private family &#8211; is domestic relations as a man; and the latter &#8211; palace &#8211; to those connected with the government who resided in his palace. If this is so, then the passage would mean that all around him was peaceful, and that from no source had he any cause of disquiet. In his own private family &#8211; embracing his wife and children; and in the arrangements of the palace &#8211; embracing those who had charge of public affairs, he had no cause of uneasiness.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>And flourishing in my palace &#8211; <\/B>Greek, <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">    <\/SPAN><\/span> <I>euthenon<\/I> <I>epi<\/I> <I>tou<\/I> <I>thronou<\/I> <I>mou<\/I> &#8211; literally, abundant upon my throne; that is, he was tranquil, calm, prosperous on his throne. The Chaldee word (<span class='_800000'><\/span> <I>raanan<\/I>) means, properly, green; as, for example, of leaves or foliage. Compare the Hebrew word in <span class='bible'>Jer 17:8<\/span>; He shall be as a tree planted by the waters &#8211; her leaf shall be green. <span class='bible'>Deu 12:2<\/span>, under every green tree, <span class='bible'>2Ki 16:4<\/span>. A green and flourishing tree becomes thus the emblem of prosperity. See <span class='bible'>Psa 1:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 37:35<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 92:12-14<\/span>. The general meaning here is, that he was enjoying abundant prosperity. His kingdom was at peace, and in his own home he had every means of tranquil enjoyment.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> Verse <span class='bible'>4<\/span>. <I><B>I &#8211; was at rest<\/B><\/I>] I had returned to my palace in Babylon after having subdued Syria, Phoenicia, Judea, Egypt, and Arabia. It was probably these great conquests that puffed him up with pride, and brought that chastisement upon him which he afterwards describes. See the dream of the <I>emblematical tree<\/I> explained.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> At rest when his wars were over, which were great, and he victorious. Then I sat down quiet, enjoying the spoils of my enemies. <\/P> <P><B>In my palace; <\/B>which was most magnificent, there I lived in all delights and grandeur. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P><B>4. I was . . . at rest<\/B>my warsover, my kingdom at peace. <\/P><P>       <B>flourishing<\/B>&#8220;green.&#8221;Image from a tree (<span class='bible'>Jer 17:8<\/span>).Prosperous (<span class='bible'>Job 15:32<\/span>).<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown&#8217;s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in mine house<\/strong>,&#8230;. Being returned from his wars, and having obtained victory over the Egyptians, and other nations, and made himself an universal monarch; and now was in entire rest from all his enemies; enjoying himself in his family, and among his courtiers, and nothing to disturb him from any quarter. Josephus b says this was a little after the history of the former chapter; but it must be many years after that: he reigned forty five years; one year after this dream, it came to pass; it was seven years fulfilling, and he lived after his restoration a year or two; so that this must be about the thirty fifth year of his reign. Bishop Usher c and Mr. Whiston d place it in the year of the world 3434 A.M., and before Christ 570; and so Dr. Prideaux e. Mr. Bedford f puts it in the year 569:<\/p>\n<p><strong>and flourishing in my palace<\/strong>: in health of body, in rigour of mind, abounding with riches; indulging himself in all sensual pleasures; adored by his subjects, caressed by his courtiers, and in fame throughout the whole world: a new palace was built by him, of which <span class='bible'>Da 4:30<\/span>, being, as Dr. Prideaux g says, four times as large as the old one; eight miles in compass; surrounded with three walls; and had hanging gardens in it, he made for his wife.<\/p>\n<p>b Joseph. Antiqu. l. 10. c. 10. sect. 6. c Annales Vet. Test. A. M. 3434. d Chronological Tables, cent. 10. e Connexion, p. 92. f Scripture Chronology, p. 710. g Connexion, &amp;c. par. 1, B. 2. p. 102.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(4:1)<\/p>\n<p> With Daniel 4:1 (v. 4) Nebuchadnezzar begins the narration of his wonderful experience. When he was at rest in his palace and prospering, he had a dream as he lay upon his bed which made him afraid and perplexed.  , <em> quiet, in undisturbed, secure prosperity<\/em>.  , properly <em> growing green<\/em>, of the fresh, vigorous growth of a tree, to which the happiness and prosperity of men are often compared; e.g., in Ps. 52:10 (8), <span class='bible'>Psa 92:12<\/span> (10). Here plainly the word is chosen with reference to the tree which had been seen in the dream. From this description of his prosperity it appears that after his victories Nebuchadnezzar enjoyed the fruit of his exploits, was firmly established on his throne, and, as appears from v. 26 (<span class='bible'>Dan 4:29<\/span>)f., a year after his dream could look with pleasure and pride on the completion of his splendid buildings in Babylon; and therefore this event belongs to the last half of his reign.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Keil &amp; Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">Nebuchadnezzar&#8217;s Second Dream; Nebuchadnezzar Relates His Dream.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"RIGHT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in\"> <SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><FONT SIZE=\"1\" STYLE=\"font-size: 8pt\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">B. C.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"> 570.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/FONT><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR>  <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4 I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in mine house, and flourishing in my palace: &nbsp; 5 I saw a dream which made me afraid, and the thoughts upon my bed and the visions of my head troubled me. &nbsp; 6 Therefore made I a decree to bring in all the wise <I>men<\/I> of Babylon before me, that they might make known unto me the interpretation of the dream. &nbsp; 7 Then came in the magicians, the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the soothsayers: and I told the dream before them; but they did not make known unto me the interpretation thereof. &nbsp; 8 But at the last Daniel came in before me, whose name <I>was<\/I> Belteshazzar, according to the name of my god, and in whom <I>is<\/I> the spirit of the holy gods: and before him I told the dream, <I>saying,<\/I> &nbsp; 9 O Belteshazzar, master of the magicians, because I know that the spirit of the holy gods <I>is<\/I> in thee, and no secret troubleth thee, tell me the visions of my dream that I have seen, and the interpretation thereof. &nbsp; 10 Thus <I>were<\/I> the visions of mine head in my bed; I saw, and behold a tree in the midst of the earth, and the height thereof <I>was<\/I> great. &nbsp; 11 The tree grew, and was strong, and the height thereof reached unto heaven, and the sight thereof to the end of all the earth: &nbsp; 12 The leaves thereof <I>were<\/I> fair, and the fruit thereof much, and in it <I>was<\/I> meat for all: the beasts of the field had shadow under it, and the fowls of the heaven dwelt in the boughs thereof, and all flesh was fed of it. &nbsp; 13 I saw in the visions of my head upon my bed, and, behold, a watcher and a holy one came down from heaven; &nbsp; 14 He cried aloud, and said thus, Hew down the tree, and cut off his branches, shake off his leaves, and scatter his fruit: let the beasts get away from under it, and the fowls from his branches: &nbsp; 15 Nevertheless leave the stump of his roots in the earth, even with a band of iron and brass, in the tender grass of the field; and let it be wet with the dew of heaven, and <I>let<\/I> his portion <I>be<\/I> with the beasts in the grass of the earth: &nbsp; 16 Let his heart be changed from man&#8217;s, and let a beast&#8217;s heart be given unto him; and let seven times pass over him. &nbsp; 17 This matter <I>is<\/I> by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men. &nbsp; 18 This dream I king Nebuchadnezzar have seen. Now thou, O Belteshazzar, declare the interpretation thereof, forasmuch as all the wise <I>men<\/I> of my kingdom are not able to make known unto me the interpretation: but thou <I>art<\/I> able; for the spirit of the holy gods <I>is<\/I> in thee.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Nebuchadnezzar, before he relates the judgments of God that had been wrought upon him for his pride, gives an account of the fair warning he had of them before they came, a due regard to which might have prevented them. But he was <I>told of them,<\/I> and of the issue of them, <I>before they came to pass, that, when they did come to pass,<\/I> by comparing them with the prediction of them, he might see, and say, that they were the Lord&#8217;s doing, and might be brought to believe that there is a divine revelation in the world, as well as a divine Providence, and that the works of God agree with his word.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Now, in the account he here gives of his dream, by which he had notice of what was coming, we may observe,<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I. The time when this alarm was given to him (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 4<\/span>); it was when he was <I>at rest in his house, and flourishing in his palace.<\/I> He had lately conquered Egypt, and with it completed his victories, and ended his wars, and made himself monarch of all those parts of the world, which was about the thirty-fourth or thirty-fifth year of his reign, <span class='bible'>Ezek. xxix. 17<\/span>. Then he had this dream, which was accomplished about a year after. Seven years his distraction continued, upon his recovery from which he penned this declaration, lived about two years after, and died in his forty-fifth year. He had undergone a long fatigue in his wars, had made many a tedious and dangerous campaign in the field; but now at length he is <I>at rest in his house,<\/I> and there is <I>no adversary, nor any evil occurrent.<\/I> Note, God can reach the greatest of men with his terrors even when they are most secure, and think themselves at rest and flourishing.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. The impression it made upon him (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 5<\/span>): <I>I saw a dream which made me afraid.<\/I> One would think no little thing would frighten him that had been a man of war from his youth, and used to look the perils of war in the face without change of countenance; yet, when God pleases, a dream strikes a terror upon him. His bed, no doubt, was soft, and easy, and well-guarded, and yet his own <I>thoughts upon his bed<\/I> made him uneasy, and the <I>visions of his head,<\/I> the creatures of his own imagination, <I>troubled him.<\/I> Note, God can make the greatest of men uneasy even when they say to their souls, <I>Take your ease, eat, drink, and be merry;<\/I> he can make those that have been the troublers of the world, and have tormented thousands, to be their own troublers, their own tormentors, and those that have been <I>the terror of the mighty<\/I> a terror to themselves. By the consternation which this dream put him into, and the impression it made upon him, he perceived it to be, not an ordinary dream, but sent of God on a special errand.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; III. His consulting, in vain, with the magicians and astrologers concerning the meaning of it. He had not now forgotten the dream, as before, <span class='bible'><I>ch.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> ii.<\/span> He had it ready enough, but he wanted to know the interpretation of it and what was prefigured by it, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 6<\/span>. Orders are immediately given to summon <I>all the wise men of Babylon<\/I> that were such fools as to pretend by magic, divination, inspecting the entrails of beasts, or observations of the stars, to predict things to come: they must all come together, to see if any, or all of them in consultation, could interpret the king&#8217;s dream. It is probable that these people had sometimes, in a like case, given the king some sort of satisfaction, and by the rules of their art had answered the king&#8217;s queries so as to please him, whether it were right or wrong, hit or missed; but now his expectation from them was disappointed: He <I>told them the dream<\/I> (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 7<\/span>), but they <I>could not tell him the interpretation of it,<\/I> though they had boasted, with great assurance (<span class='bible'>Dan 2:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 2:7<\/span>), that, if they had but the dream told them, they would without fail interpret it. But the key of this dream was in a sacred prophecy (<span class='bible'>Ezek. xxxi. 3<\/span>, c.), where the Assyrian is compared, as Nebuchadnezzar here, to a <I>tree cut down,<\/I> for his pride and that was a book they had not studied, nor acquainted themselves with, else they might have been let into the mystery of this dream. Providence ordered it so that they should be first puzzled with it, that Daniel&#8217;s interpreting it afterwards might redound to the glory of the God of Daniel. Now was fulfilled what Isaiah foretold (<span class='bible'>Isa 47:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 47:13<\/span>), that when the ruin of Babylon was drawing on her <I>enchantments and sorceries,<\/I> her <I>astrologers<\/I> and <I>star-gazers,<\/I> should not be able to do her any service.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; IV. The court he made to Daniel, to engage him to expound his dream to him: <I>At the last Daniel came in.<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 8<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. Either he declined associating with the rest because of their badness, or they declined his company because of his goodness; or perhaps the king would rather that his own magicians should have the honour of doing it if they could than that Daniel should have it; or Daniel, being <I>governor<\/I> of the wise men (<span class='bible'><I>ch.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> ii. 48<\/span>), was, as is usual, last consulted. Many make God&#8217;s word their last refuge, and never have recourse to it till they are driven off from all other succours. He compliments Daniel very highly, takes notice of the name which he had himself given him, in the choice of which he thinks he was very happy and that it was a good omen: &#8220;His <I>name was Belteshazzar,<\/I> from <I>Bel, the name of my god.<\/I>&#8221; He applauds his rare endowments: He has <I>the spirit of the holy gods,<\/I> so he tells him to his face (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 9<\/span>), with which we may suppose that Daniel was so far from being puffed up that he was rather very much grieved to hear that which he had by gift from the God of Israel, the true and living God, ascribed to Nebuchadnezzar&#8217;s god, a dunghill deity. Here is a strange medley in Nebuchadnezzar, but such as is commonly found in those that side with their corruptions against their convictions. 1. He retains the language and dialect of his idolatry, and therefore, it is to be feared, is no convert to the faith and worship of the living God. He is an idolater, and his speech betrayeth him. For he speaks of many gods, and is brought to acquiesce in one as sufficient, no, not in him who is all-sufficient. And some think, when he speaks of <I>the spirit of the holy gods,<\/I> that he supposes there are some evil malignant deities, whom men are concerned to worship, only to prevent their doing them a mischief, and some who are good beneficent deities, and that by the spirit of the latter Daniel was animated. He also owns that Bel was his god still, though he had once and again acknowledged the <I>God of Israel<\/I> to be Lord of all, <span class='bible'>Dan 2:47<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 3:29<\/span>. He also applauds Daniel, not as <I>a servant of God,<\/I> but as <I>master of the magicians<\/I> (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 9<\/span>), supposing his knowledge to differ from theirs, not in kind, but only in degree; and he consulted him not as a prophet, but as a celebrated magician, so endeavouring to save the credit of the art when those blundered and were nonplussed who were masters of the art. See how close his idolatry sat to him. He has got a notion of many gods, and has chosen Bel for his god, and he cannot persuade himself to quit either his notion or his choice, though the absurdity of both had been evidenced to him, more than once, beyond contradiction. He, like other heathens, would not change his gods, though they were no gods, <span class='bible'>Jer. ii. 11<\/span>. Many persist in a false way only because they think they cannot in honour leave it. See how loose his convictions sat, and how easily he had dropped them. He once called the God of Israel a <I>God of gods,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> ch.<\/span><span class='bible'> ii. 47<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. Now he sets him upon a level with the rest of those whom he calls the <I>holy gods.<\/I> Note, If convictions be not speedily prosecuted, it is a thousand to one but in a little time they will be quite lost and forgotten. Nebuchadnezzar, not going forward with the acknowledgements he had been brought to make of the sovereignty of the true God, soon <I>went backwards,<\/I> and relapsed to the same veneration he had always had for his false gods. And yet, 2. He professes a great opinion of Daniel, whom he knows to be a servant of the true God, and of him only. He looked upon him as one that had such an insight, such a foresight, as none of his magicians had: <I>I know that no secret troubles thee.<\/I> Note, The spirit of prophecy quite outdoes the spirit of divination, even the enemies themselves being judges; for so it was adjudged here, upon a fair trial of skill.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; V. The particular account he gives him of his dream.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1. He saw a stately flourishing tree, remarkable above all the trees of the wood. This tree was <I>planted in the midst of the earth<\/I> (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 10<\/span>), fitly representing him who reigned in Babylon, which was about the midst of the then known world. His dignity and eminency above all his neighbours were signified by the height of this tree, which was <I>exceedingly great;<\/I> it <I>reached unto heaven.<\/I> He over-topped those about him, and aimed to have divine honours given him; nay, he over-powered those about him, and the potent armies he had the command of, with which he carried all before him, are signified by the strength of this tree: it <I>grew and was strong.<\/I> And so much were Nebuchadnezzar and his growing greatness the talk of the nations, so much had they their eye upon him (some a jealous eye, all a wondering eye), that the sight of this tree is said to be <I>to the end of all the earth.<\/I> This tree had every thing in it that was pleasant to the eye and good for food (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 12<\/span>); <I>The leaves thereof were fair,<\/I> denoting the pomp and splendour of Nebuchadnezzar&#8217;s court, which was the wonder of strangers and the glory of his own subjects. Nor was this tree for sight and state only, but for use. (1.) For protection; the boughs of it were for shelter both to the beasts and to the fowls. Princes should be a screen to their subjects <I>from the heat<\/I> and <I>from the storm,<\/I> should expose themselves to secure them, and study how to make them safe and easy. If the bramble be <I>promoted over the trees,<\/I> he invites them to come and <I>trust in his shadow,<\/I> such as it is, <span class='bible'>Judg. ix. 15<\/span>. It is protection that draws allegiance. The kings of the earth are to their subjects but as the shadow of a great tree; but Christ is to his subjects as the <I>shadow of a great rock,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Isa. xxxii. 2<\/I><\/span>. Nay, because that, though strong, may be cold, they are said to be hidden under the <I>shadow of his wings<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Ps. xvii. 8<\/span>), where they are not only safe, but warm. (2.) For provision, The Assyrian was compared to a <I>cedar<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Ezek. xxxi. 6<\/span>), which affords shadow only; but this tree here had much fruit&#8211;in it was <I>meat for all<\/I> and <I>all flesh was fed of it.<\/I> This mighty monarch, it should seem by this, not only was great, but did good; he did not impoverish, but enrich his country, and by his power and interest abroad brought wealth and trade to it. Those that <I>exercise authority<\/I> would be called <I>benefactors<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Luke xxii. 25<\/span>), and the most effectual course they can take to support their authority is to be really benefactors. And see what is the best that great men, with their wealth and power can attain to, and that is to have the honour of having many to live upon them and to be maintained by them; for, <I>as goods are increased, those are increased that eat them.<\/I><\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2. He heard the doom of this tree read, which he perfectly remembered, and related here, perhaps word for word as he heard it. The sentence was passed upon it by an angel, whom he saw <I>come down from heaven,<\/I> and heard proclaim this sentence aloud. This angel is here called a <I>watcher,<\/I> or <I>watchman,<\/I> not only because angels by their nature are spirits, and therefore neither slumber nor sleep, but because by their office they are <I>ministering spirits,<\/I> and attend continually to their ministrations, watching all opportunities of serving their great Master. They, as watchers, encamp round those that fear God, to deliver them, and <I>bear them up in their hands.<\/I> This angel was a <I>messenger,<\/I> or <I>ambassador<\/I> (so some read it), and a <I>holy one. Holiness becomes God&#8217;s house;<\/I> therefore angels that attend and are employed by him are <I>holy ones;<\/I> they preserve the purity and rectitude of their nature, and are in every thing conformable to the divine will. Let us review the doom passed upon the tree.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (1.) Orders are given that it be cut down (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 14<\/span>); now also <I>the axe is laid to the root<\/I> of this tree. Though it is ever so high, ever so strong, that cannot secure it when its day comes to fall; the beasts and fowls, that are sheltered in and under the boughs of it, are driven away and dispersed; the branches are cropped, the leaves shaken off, and the fruit scattered. Note, Worldly prosperity in its highest degree is a very uncertain thing; and it is no uncommon thing for those that have lived in the greatest pomp and power to be stripped of all that which they trusted to and gloried in. By the turns of providence, those who made a figure become captives, those who lived in plenty, and above what they had, are reduced to straits, and live far below what they had, and those perhaps are brought to be beholden to others who once had many depending upon them and making suit to them. But the <I>trees of righteousness,<\/I> that are <I>planted in the house of the Lord<\/I> and bring forth fruit to him, shall not be cut down, nor shall their leaf wither.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (2.) Care is taken that the root be preserved (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 15<\/span>); &#8220;<I>Leave the stump of it in the earth,<\/I> exposed to all weathers. There let it lie neglected and buried in the grass. Let the beasts that formerly sheltered themselves under the boughs now repose themselves upon the stump; but that it may not be raked to pieces, nor trodden to dirt, and to show that it is yet reserved for better days, let it be hooped round with <I>a band of iron and brass,<\/I> to keep it firm.&#8221; Note, God in judgment remembers mercy; and may yet have good things in store for those whose condition seems most forlorn. There is <I>hope of a tree, if it be cut down, that it will sprout again, that through the scent of water it will bud,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Job xiv. 7-9<\/I><\/span>.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (3.) The meaning of this is explained by the angel himself to Nebuchadnezzar, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 16<\/span>. Whoever is the person signified by this tree he is sentenced to be deposed from the honour, state, and dignity of a man, to be deprived of the use of his reason, and to be and live like a brute, till <I>seven times pass over him. Let a beast&#8217;s heart be given unto him.<\/I> This is surely the saddest and sorest of all temporal judgments, worse a thousand times than death, and though, like it, least felt by those that lie under it, yet to be dreaded and deprecated more than any other. Nay, whatever outward affliction God is pleased to lay upon us, we have reason to bear it patiently, and to be thankful that he continues to us the use of our reason and the peace of our consciences. But those proud tyrants who <I>set their heart as the heart of God<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Ezek. xxvii. 2<\/span>) may justly be deprived of the heart of man, and have a beast&#8217;s heart given them.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (4.) The truth of it is confirmed (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 17<\/span>); <I>This matter is by the decree of the watchers and the demand by the word of the holy ones.<\/I> God has determined it, as a righteous Judge; he has signed this edict; pursuant to his eternal counsel, the decree has gone forth, And, [1.] The angels of heaven have subscribed to it, as attesting it, approving it, and applauding it. It is by <I>the decree of the watchers;<\/I> not that the great God needs the counsel or concurrence of the angels in any thing he determines or does, but, as he uses their ministration in executing his counsels, so he is sometimes represented, after the manner of men, as if he consulted them. <I>Whom shall I send?<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Isa. vi. 8<\/I><\/span>. <I>Who shall persuade Ahab?<\/I><span class='bible'><I> 1 Kings xxii. 20<\/I><\/span>. So it denotes the solemnity of this sentence. The king&#8217;s breves, or short writs, pass, <I>Teste me ipso&#8211;in my presence;<\/I> but charters used to be signed, <I>His testibus&#8211;In the presence of us whose names are under-written;<\/I> such was Nebuchadnezzar&#8217;s doom; it was by the <I>decree of the watchers.<\/I> [2.] The saints on earth petitioned for it, as well as the angels in heaven: <I>The demand is by the word of the holy ones.<\/I> God&#8217;s suffering people, that had long groaned under the heavy yoke of Nebuchadnezzar&#8217;s tyranny, cried to him for vengeance; they made the demand, and God gave this answer to it; for, when the <I>oppressed cry to God, he will hear,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Exod. xxii. 27<\/I><\/span>. Sentence was passed, in Ahab&#8217;s time, that there should be no more rain, at Elijah&#8217;s word, when he <I>made intercession against Israel,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> 1 Kings xvii. 1<\/I><\/span>.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (5.) The design of it is declared. Orders are given for the cutting down of this tree, <I>to the intent that the living may know that the Most High rules.<\/I> This judgment must be executed, to convince the unthinking, unbelieving, world, that <I>verily there is a God that judges in the earth,<\/I> a God that governs the world, that not only has a kingdom of his own in it, and administers the affairs of that kingdom, but rules also <I>in the kingdom of men,<\/I> in the dominion that one man has over another, and <I>gives<\/I> that <I>to whomsoever he will;<\/I> from him promotion comes, <span class='bible'>Psa 75:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 75:7<\/span>. He advances men to power and dominion that little expected it, and crosses the projects of the ambitious and aspiring. Sometimes he <I>sets up the basest of men,<\/I> and serves his own purposes by them. He sets up mean men, as David from the sheepfold; <I>he raises the poor out of the dust,<\/I> to <I>set them among princes,<\/I><span class='bible'>Psa 113:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 113:8<\/span>. Nay, sometimes he sets up bad men, to be a scourge to a provoking people. Thus he can do, thus he may do, thus he often does, and <I>gives not account of any of his matters.<\/I> By humbling Nebuchadnezzar it was designed that the living should be made to know this. The dead know it, that have gone to the world of spirits, the world of retribution; they know that <I>the Most High rules;<\/I> but the living must be made to know it and lay it to heart, that they may make their peace with God before it be too late.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Thus has Nebuchadnezzar fully and faithfully related his dream, what he saw and what he heard, and then demands of Daniel the interpretation of it (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 18<\/span>), for he found that no one else was able to interpret it, but was confident that he was: <I>For the spirit of the holy gods is in thee,<\/I> or of the <I>Holy God,<\/I> the proper title of the God of Israel. Much may be expected from those that have in them the <I>Spirit of the Holy God.<\/I> Whether Nebuchadnezzar had any jealousy that it was his own doom that was read by this dream does not appear; perhaps he was so vain and secure as to imagine that it was some other prince that was a rival with him, whose fall he had the pleasing prospect of given him in this dream; but, be it for him or against him, he is very solicitous to know the true meaning of it and depends upon Daniel to give it to him. Now, When God gives us general warnings of his judgments we should be desirous to understand his mind in them, to hear <I>the Lord&#8217;s voice crying in the city.<\/I><\/P> <P><I><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>NEBUCHADNEZZAR&#8217;S TREE-VISION Verses 4-18:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Verses 4, 5<\/strong> relate that while king Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in his own residence and flourishing, at the height of prosperity, in his palace, he had another dream; He was resting from many battles. Peace and prosperity had come to him, <span class='bible'>Job 15:32<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 17:8<\/span>; See v. 10. In this state another dream came to shock him with trembling fear. The flashing thoughts of the vision upon his bed troubled his head, gave him a splitting headache, caused him to &#8220;come unglued,&#8221; as that in <span class='bible'>Dan 2:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 2:28<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 6 asserts <\/strong>that as a result of this upsetting dream he made another decree, to call in all the wise men of Babylon before him, that he might relate this dream, which he remembered, But he wanted an interpretation from them of the meaning or import of the dream, as in <span class='bible'>Dan 2:1-2<\/span>. Strange that he did not call Daniel; But the Chaldean wise men were their national confidants, their magi for such. God reserved His servant Daniel for the worst to magnify Himself through him, <span class='bible'>Gal 6:9<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 7 relates <\/strong>that the Chaldean magicians, astrologers, and soothsayers came from far and near and appeared before Nebuchadnezzar. He related the dream to them in detail; But they could not give him the interpretation of it. They <strong>could not recall <\/strong>1) the one that had formerly &#8220;went from him,&#8221; Or 2) <strong>interpret <\/strong>the one he could recall. Their gods were too dumb, see? <span class='bible'>Dan 2:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 115:4-9<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 8 relates <\/strong>that at the conclusion and failure of all Nebuchadnezzar&#8217;s efforts to find an interpretation from his heathen magi, of every god and cult, he turned to Daniel to whom he had given the name Belteshazzar, <span class='bible'>Dan 1:7<\/span>, in honor of his personal god Bel. Then he asserted that in him (Daniel) was the spirit (dynamic power) of the holy gods, all combined as he viewed it from an heathen king&#8217;s view, <span class='bible'>Psa 25:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 63:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 2:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 5:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 5:14<\/span>. Then he told the dream that he had related to his magi, which they could not interpret, to Daniel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 9 is a direct address <\/strong>of Nebuchadnezzar to Belteshazzar. He addressed Daniel as &#8220;master of the magicians,&#8221; because he said, &#8220;I know that the spirit of the holy gods (the sum of them) is in thee,&#8221; in your power. He knew on the basis of Daniel&#8217;s former help to him, <span class='bible'>Dan 2:48<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 5:11<\/span>. Then he proceeded to express his faith that no secret troubled Daniel. On the basis of this testimony of his faith in Daniel he asked him to tell him the visions of his dream and the interpretation of them, which he believed Daniel could do without difficulty. Only the true God is holy; <strong>False gods and prophets did not even consider one another holy, <\/strong><span class='bible'>Deu 32:31<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 63:11<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 10 recounts <\/strong>the vision Nebuchadnezzar saw, as he lay by night upon his bed; He beheld first a great tree, of great height, in the midst of the earth, as a symbol of a great king, which he was, v. 22; <span class='bible'>Eze 31:1-14<\/span> describes an Assyrian leader as a great &#8220;cedar in Lebanon.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verses 11, 12 state <\/strong>that the tree grew, was strong, and its height reached unto, toward heaven; the leaves of it were fair, of good color; and the fruit of it was abundant for meat or food. His food was temporary, not like that Jesus gives, <span class='bible'>Joh 6:51<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 6:58<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 13:32<\/span>. The beasts of the field came to rest in its shade, and the fowls of the air roosted or lighted on its limbs; and all flesh of man, beasts, and fowl fed of this mighty tree-ruler of earth&#8217;s center, <span class='bible'>Eze 17:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze 3:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lam 4:20<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 13 continues <\/strong>that Nebuchadnezzar saw in his visions upon his bed, as he then recalled, a watcher, even an holy watcher descended from heaven, with a mission message, v. 17, 23. See also <span class='bible'>Joe 1:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Zec 8:3<\/span>. Angels do come down from heaven, as watchful ministers to do God&#8217;s will among men, in blessing the righteous and judging or smiting the wicked, at the bidding of the Lord still, <span class='bible'>Psa 103:20-21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 34:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Heb 1:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 4:16-17<\/span>; See also <span class='bible'>Gen 28:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 32:1-2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 16:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Pro 15:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 32:19<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 14 reports <\/strong>that the holy, heaven sent watchman, cried out loud, in a thunderous judgment tone to &#8220;hew down the tree, cut off the limbs, shake off the leaves, and scatter the fruit; let the beasts be driven away from under the shadow area about it and the fowls from off its limbs or branches,&#8221; The implication is one of warning before judgment, a principle of Divine justice in judgment, <span class='bible'>Mat 3:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 7:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 13:6-10<\/span>; for such calls of judgment consider <span class='bible'>Rev 14:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rev 14:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze 31:12<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 15 adds <\/strong>however that the stump or trunk of the tree is to be left intact, even supported by a band of iron and brass, in the tender grass of the field. It was to be wet with the dew of heaven; And his portion of food or livelihood was to be &#8220;with the beasts in the grass of the earth.&#8221; This stump or trunk alludes to Nebuchadnezzar&#8217;s remaining king over the great golden empire; But he was to become a maniac, a lunatic, under Divine judgment, a deranged king who would eat grass like a dumb animal, v. 24, 25; <span class='bible'>Isa 11:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job 14:7-9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 5:18-24<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 16 continues <\/strong>the judgment words of the heaven-sent watchman as he announced that his heart (affection) would be changed from that of a man to that of a beast that would be given to him, until &#8220;seven times&#8221; had passed over him, or complete waves of judgment had fallen on him, in recurring seizures of periodic, insanity, <span class='bible'>Dan 12:7<\/span>; See also <span class='bible'>Dan 5:21<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 17 announces <\/strong>that this decree is of the &#8220;watchers&#8221; and the mandate is by the word of the holy ones, ministering servants of God, <span class='bible'>Heb 1:14<\/span>. The decree was &#8220;to the intent,&#8221; in order that, the living (all men) might know, recognize, or comprehend that the most high (Jehovah God) continually rules in the kingdom of men, <span class='bible'>Psa 9:16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 2:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 4:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 4:32<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 5:21<\/span>. And He gives it to whoever He wills, even setting up over it the basest of men, to receive glory in them, <span class='bible'>Dan 5:18-22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 8:28<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job 1:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job 2:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 2:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 1:52<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 18 concludes <\/strong>the testimony of Nebuchadnezzar as he related it to Daniel. He then addressed Daniel, by his magi name Belteshazzar, asking that he interpret this dream for him, a thing he affirmed all the Chaldean wise men were unable to do. He added in essence, you can do it Daniel, because &#8220;the spirit of the holy gods is (exists) in you.&#8221; He had acknowledged this before, but not accepted Daniel&#8217;s God as his own god. Like Pilate he tried to &#8220;play two sides of the fence,&#8221; <span class='bible'>Gen 41:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 41:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 19:3<\/span>; Isaiah 47; Isaiah 12-14; <span class='bible'>Dan 2:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 5:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan 5:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 27:15-25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 23:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 23:14-15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 23:21<\/span>. He compromised his convictions, resisting the spirit until He may have wound up in hell, <span class='bible'>Pro 29:1<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Nebuchadnezzar here explains how he acknowledged the Supreme God. He does not relate the proofs which he had previously received; but since his pride was subdued in this last dream, he makes a passing allusion to it. Meanwhile, as he doubtless recalled his former dreams to mind, and condemned himself for his ingratitude, in burying in oblivion this great power of God, and in wiping away the remembrance of those benefits by which God had adorned him. Here, however, he speaks only of his last dream, which we shall see in its own place. But before he comes as far as the dream, he says,  he was at rest.   &#1513;&#1500;&#1492; , seleh,  signifies &#8220; rest  &#8221; and &#8220; happiness;  &#8221; and since prosperity renders men secure, it is metaphorically used for &#8220; security.  &#8221; David, when he pronounces the same sentence upon himself, uses the same words: (<span class='bible'>Psa 30:6<\/span>,) &#8220;I said in my prosperity,&#8221; or rest;  &#1513;&#1500;&#1493;&#1492;,  selueh,  which some translate &#8220;abundance;&#8221; but it rather signifies a quiet or prosperous state. Nebuchadnezzar, therefore, here marks the circumstance of time; hence we may know him to have been divinely seized, because prosperous fortune had rendered him stupid and drunken. There is nothing surprising in this, for the old and common proverb is, &#8220;fullness is the parent of ferocity,&#8221; as we see horses when too much fed, prance about and throw their riders. Thus also it happens with men. For if God treats them rather indulgently and liberally, they become fierce and insolent towards all men, and strike off God&#8217;s yoke, and forget themselves to be but men. And when this happened to David, what shall happen to the profane and to others who are still too much devoted to the world? For David confesses himself to have been so deceived by his quiet and felicity, as to determine within himself that he had nothing else to fear, &#8212; &#8220;I said in my happiness,&#8221; or my quiet, &#8220;I shall not be removed;&#8221; and he afterwards adds, <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>O Lord, thou didst chastise me, and I was laid low.&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Psa 38:7<\/span>.) <\/p>\n<p> Since, therefore, David promised himself perpetual quiet in the world, because God spared him for a time, how ought our tranquillity to be suspected lest we should grow torpid on our lees? Nebuchadnezzar, then, does not recite this in vain &#8212;  I was quiet at home, I flourished in my palace,  since this was the cause of his confidence and pride, and of his carelessly despising God. He afterwards adds, he  saw a dream and was disturbed  He, doubtless, wished here to distinguish his dreams from common ones, which often arise from either a disturbance of the brain, or our daily thoughts, or other causes, as we have elsewhere seen. It is not  necessary  to repeat what we have already treated more copiously. It is sufficient to state, briefly, how this dream, in which God previously informed him of the future punishment at hand, is separated from others which are either troubled:, or fluctuating, or without reason. He, says, therefore, he saw a dream, and was disturbed,  while he was awake. He adds,  his thoughts were upon his bed;  and then,  he was disturbed by visions of the head  These expressions only look towards that heavenly oracle, or vision, or dream, of which we shall afterwards speak more fully. It follows,  he put forth a decree to summon all the wise men of Babylon to explain,  or make manifest, the interpretation of the dream  Doubtless the king often dreamt, and did not always call together the Magi and soothsayers, and astrologers, and others who were skilled in the science of divination, or at least professed to be so. He did not consult them on all his dreams; but because God had inscribed in his heart a distinct mark by which he had denoted this dream, hence the king could not rest till he heard its interpretation. As we previously saw the authority of the first dream about the Four Monarchies and the Eternal Kingdom of Christ confirmed, so the king perceived this one to have proceeded from heaves. There is another difference between this dream and the one formerly explained. For God blotted out the remembrance of the dream about the Four Monarchies from King Nebuchadnezzar, so that it became necessary for Daniel to bring his dream before the king, and at the same time to add the interpretation. Daniel was then more obscure, for although he proved himself to have excelled all the Chaldeans, yet King Nebuchadnezzar would have wondered at him less if he had only been an interpreter of a dream. God wished, therefore, to acquire greater reverence for his Prophet and his doctrine, when he enjoined upon him two duties; first, the divination of the dream itself, and then the explanation of its sense and purpose. In this second dream Daniel is only an interpreter. God had already sufficiently proved him to be endued with a heavenly spirit, when Nebuchadnezzar not only called him among the rest of the Magi, but separated him from them all. He afterwards says: <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Calvin&#8217;s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><em>HOMILETICS<\/em><\/p>\n<p>SECT. XV.THE DREAM OF THE TREE AND ITS INTERPRETATION (Chap. <span class='bible'>Dan. 4:4-26<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>We come to the occasion of the royal proclamation. This was a dream and its remarkable fulfilment, the second prophetic dream vouchsafed to the king. The present one bearing more especially on the king himself. Its results, however, such as to affect his whole empire, but more particularly the Jews that were in it. The dream and its fulfilment an important step towards the release of the Jews, and at the same time towards the spread of the knowledge of the true God, and the preparation for the advent of the promised Messiah. We notice<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. The dream itself<\/strong>. And here observe<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>The time and circumstances of it<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:4<\/span>). I was at rest in mine house. At rest, after his conflicts and conquests. Probably calculating on ending his days in peace and prosperity, and enjoying the fruits of all his toils and hardships. Like the rich fool in the parable, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease; eat, drink, and be merry (<span class='bible'>Luk. 12:16-21<\/span>). A godless rest one soon to be disturbed. A poor rest that which the world can give. Jobs experience: I said, I shall die in my nest. Yet, how soon was that nest to be rifled! Flourishing in my palace. Nebuchadnezzar now in the heyday of his prosperity, flourishing like a green bay-tree. Everywhere successful in his campaigns, and now the established head of the first universal empire. In his palace, not in his tent or on the battlefield. A palace, however, unable to exclude death from our thoughts or disturbing dreams from our slumbers. A princes palace as liable as a peasants cottage to the upbraidings of conscience, and to the forebodings of death and a judgment to come.<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The contents of the dream<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:10-17<\/span>). Here we have <\/p>\n<p>(1.) <em>An immense, wide-spreading, fruit-bearing tree<\/em>, a tree in its appearance and extent probably something like the banyan of the East, and seen still growing [106]. A large and noble tree, such as are common in Oriental countries; a well-known symbol for a powerful monarch or a prosperous individual. So of Pharaoh and his power (<span class='bible'>Eze. 31:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze. 17:22<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>(2.) <em>A command from a superior being to cut it down;<\/em> that being called a watcher and a holy one [107], having all the appearance of an angel, while the matter is said by him to be from the decree [108] of the watchers, and the demand [109] by the word of the holy ones (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:17<\/span>), as if coming forth from the celestial council. <\/p>\n<p>(3.) <em>The slump to be left in the ground<\/em>, and made firm by a band of iron and brass [110], forbidding attempts to uproot it. <\/p>\n<p>(4.) An intimation, by the same voice, that by the tree and its stump was represented a <em>man<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>(5.) The command that a <em>mans heart should be taken from him<\/em>, and that a <em>beasts<\/em> heart be given him instead, indicating the privation of intellect, with the appetites and desires of a beast of the field. <\/p>\n<p>(6.) The <em>continuance<\/em> of this degradation to be a period here mystically termed seven times [111].<\/p>\n<p>[106]  <em>The tree grew and was strong<\/em>. The perfects  (<em>rebhah<\/em>) and  (<em>teqiph<\/em>) express not the condition of the tree, but its increasing greatness and growth. Ch. B. Michaelis properly remarks, that Nebuchadnezzar saw the tree gradually grow and become always the stronger.<em>Keil<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>[107]  <em>A watcher and a holy one<\/em>. <em>The decree of the watchers<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan. 4:17<\/span>).  (<em>ir<\/em>),  (<em>oor<\/em>), to watch, be awake. According to Gesenius, a name given to angels, as watching over the world and the affairs of men. The Sept, Greek Venetian, and the Hebrew versions have angels; while Aquila and Symmachus have , and the Vulgate vigil, a watcher. Bertholdt compares them with the seven Amshaspands of the Persians, who are called watchers of the world. Keil opposes the idea that the language is formed in accordance with this Persian representation. The term watcher is applied by the Fathers and in the apocryphal Book of Enoch to evil angels as well as good ones. Nork thinks that Daniel here spoke the astrological language of the Babylonian Magi. More correct, however, to say that Nebuchadnezzar thus spoke. According to Calvin, a certain angel was doubtless intended, angels being so called either from their sleepless nature, or from their office as ministers of Gods wakeful providence, and as being always awake to their duty. From <span class='bible'>Dan. 4:17<\/span>, Corn, a Lapide thinks the tutelary angel of Babylon is meant. The term holy one added to indicate a <em>good<\/em> angel, the  <em>vaw<\/em>, and, being redundant, or rather denoting <em>even<\/em>, or that is. So Grotius and others. Hengstenberg remarks that the whole is made perfectly clear from the Babylonian religious ideas, with which of necessity the divine revelation made to Nebuchadnezzar would be mixed up in his mind. He quotes from Diodorus Siculus, who says that to the star-gods (the five planets) thirty others are subordinated, whom they call gods of counsel,   (, <em>irin<\/em>), half of whom have the superintendence of the regions under the earth, while the others overlook what is going on among men and in heaven. Keil observes: The decree of the watchers is a conception not Biblical, but Babylonian-heathen. According to the doctrine of Scripture, the angels do not determine the fate of men, but God alone does, around whom the angels stand as ministering spirits to fulfil His commands and to make known His counsels to men. To instruct the king that his religious conceptions of the gods, the  (<em>irin<\/em>), watchers, or  , were erroneous, was not necessary for the purpose of the divine message, which was to lead Nebuchadnezzar to an acknowledgment of the Most High, Daniel doing this afterwards by explaining that the decree was from the Most High Himself.<\/p>\n<p>[108]  <em>This matter is by the decree of the watchers<\/em>,  (<em>pithgama<\/em>), definite form of  (<em>pithgam<\/em>), matter (<span class='bible'>Dan. 3:16<\/span>, at which see note). Here, a <em>message<\/em>. By the decree,  (<em>bigzerath<\/em>), by or in the decree; from  (<em>gezar<\/em>), to cut, mark off, hence to define, determine; whence the term  (<em>gozrin<\/em>), to denote astrologers, as defining the fortunes of individuals from the position of the stars at the time of their birth, or as dividing the sky into various signs, like the ancient augurs. The message consists in or rests on the decree of the watchers.  (<em>gezerah<\/em>), the unchangeable decision, the divine inevitable decree imposed on men and human things (Buxtorf); the Fate in which the Chaldeans believed.<em>Keil<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>[109]  <em>The demand<\/em>,  (<em>sheelta<\/em>), a request, inquiry, or demand, from  (<em>sheal<\/em>), to ask. Keil, however, thinks that the meaning, lying in the etymon, <em>request<\/em> or <em>question<\/em>, is not here suitable, but only the derivative meaning, <em>matter<\/em>, as the object of the request or inquiry. The word (or utterance) of the holy ones (or watchers) is the matter. Older interpreters regarded the word as indicating the petition either of angels or men. Calvin and Junius refer it to the angels who accused Nebuchadnezzar before God, and who urged him by their prayers to humble the proud and exalt himself alone. Lyranus, whom Gaussen follows, thinks of the prayers of the saints in Babylon. They prayed, says M. Gaussen, for the conversion of the king, and God answers their prayers by bringing him for a time into the deepest humiliation. Polanus and Willet apply it to the angels, as only desiring that Gods decree might be accepted, and that the sentence given in heaven by God might be executed by men upon earth. Henry remarks: The saints on earth petitioned for it, as well as the angels in heaven, Gods suffering people crying to Him for vengeance.<\/p>\n<p>[110]  <em>A band of iron and brass<\/em>. Keil thinks the idea is not congruous to the stump of a tree, and that the words refer certainly to Nebuchadnezzar, though not to be understood, with Jerome and others, of the binding of the madman with chains, but figuratively or spiritually of the withdrawal of free self-determination through the fetter of madness (comp. <span class='bible'>Psa. 107:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job. 36:8<\/span>). The interpretation, however, refers it to the making his kingdom secure to him after his affliction (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:26<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>[111]  <em>Seven times<\/em>. The expression enigmatical and the meaning uncertain, though probably denoting seven years, the usual interpretation.<em>Josephus, Junius, colampadius, &amp;c<\/em>. Grotius thinks seven years intended, according to the Chaldean mode of speaking, a year being the most common measure of time. Bullinger and others regard the term as indefinite. So Calvin, who, however, thinks it to indicate a long period, and probably seven years. Keil considers the duration of the divine punishment decreed against Nebuchadnezzar, for purposes connected with the history of redemption, uncertain whether to be understood as years, months, or weeks. So Hengstenberg, who remarks: It must not be said that  (<em>iddan<\/em>), chap. <span class='bible'>Dan. 7:25<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Dan. 12:7<\/span>, occurs in the sense of <em>years:<\/em> it stands in both passages properly, as here, in the independent sense of <em>time;<\/em> the more strict definition is not in the word, but is only given afterwards. But even granting that a definite period was pointed out, we should not be warranted to assume seven years any more than seven other portions of time, however large or small they might be. Nor is a period of seven years at all required for the occurrence of what is related in the narrative. Some, mentioned in Pooles Synopsis, have supposed that the seven years were changed into seven mouths at the prayers of Daniel; while some Jewish writers, as Aben Ezra and Abarbanel, considered the time to be seven weeks. There is little doubt, however, that the period ordinarily understood, viz., seven years, is the correct one. Dr. Rule remarks that times for years is not unusual, and the phrase reminds one of the Gothic and Anglo-Saxon use of <em>winters<\/em> for years, as in <span class='bible'>Luk. 2:42<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 8:57<\/span>. The term times is well known in prophetic Scripture, especially in the expression time, times, and half a time, occurring both in Daniel and the Apocalypse, and is always understood of years, whether literal or figurative. Some students of prophecy have considered the seven times of Nebuchadnezzars madness as at once symbolical and prophetical, and as related both to the seven times of Israels threatened chastisement (<span class='bible'>Lev. 26:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev. 26:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev. 26:28<\/span>), and the time, times, and half a time,which is simply their half. Mr. Birks, in his Elements of Prophecy, remarks: The king himself represents the succession of imperial sovereignty till the kingdom of Christ should come; the seven times that passed over him must therefore represent the whole period of debasement in the Gentile kingdom, from the times of Nebuchadnezzar till their full redemption. These seven times of the Gentiles, says Mr. Bickersteth, began with the subjection of Israel under Shalmaneser. Following Mr. Birks and Mr. Bickersteth, Mr. Guinness (Approaching Time of the End) says, The vision of the <em>tree<\/em> is not more symbolic of Nebuchadnezzars seven years insanity, than that incident itself is typical of certain moral and chronological features of the succession of Gentile monarchies, of which Nebuchadnezzar was both head and representative. These features, he remarks, have been ignorance of God, idolatry, and cruel persecution of the saintsNebuchadnezzars own previous character. The incidents in his life too, he thinks, answer to events in the scale of nations and centuries with which history makes us familiar. So the seven years bestial degradation of the monarch during his insanity answer to the period of Gentile rule represented by the wild beasts of a subsequent vision.<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Its effect upon the king<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:5<\/span>). His disturbance probably from the apprehension that the dream was of a supernatural character and foreboded evil. Dreams believed at that period to be often of such a character [112]. Often productive of powerful emotions, both of pleasure and pain, though more frequently the latter. Dreams in general from the multitude of business; yet not always so. The mind in sleep accessible to God and to good or evil spirits. Thou scarest me with dreams. If a dream can so disturb, what the reality? A relief often to find that it was only a dream. Yet dreams graciously employed in the economy of divine providence (<span class='bible'>Job. 33:15-18<\/span>). Sometimes made to contribute both to the preserving of a life and the saving of a soul.<\/p>\n<p>[112]  The reader of the Iliad will remember the words, expressive of the confident belief of the period, which Homer puts into the mouth of one of his heroes<\/p>\n<p>      .<em>Iliad<\/em>, A. 63.<\/p>\n<p>For even a dream too is from Jove.<\/p>\n<p>4. <em>The search for its interpretation<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:6<\/span>). The king anxious to have his dream explained. Henry observes: When God gives us general warnings of His judgments, we should be desirous to understand His mind in them. The interpretation of dreams an ancient belief. Such belief founded on a reality. The evidence of a connection between the visible and invisible worlds. The interpretation of dreams a study and profession in Babylon. One of the forms of soothsaying, and carried on for private gain. Generally an imposture, and failing when most needed. Josephs elevation in Egypt and Daniels in Babylon due to the interpretation of dreams, not as a human art but a divine illumination. Four classes of pretenders to such knowledge brought before the king [113]. All obliged to acknowledge their inability. Yet possibly, as time-servers, and actuated by personal considerations, now kept back by fear, the dream being obviously one of a sinister character, with a bearing upon the king himself. No small amount of courage required to declare to an Eastern despot the meaning of such a dream even when perceived. Daniel only sent for as a last resource. Faithful ministers most valued in a time of trouble or on a dying bed, but often not applied to till then.<\/p>\n<p>[113]  <em>Then came in the magicians<\/em>, <em>&amp;c<\/em>, See note under chap. <span class='bible'>Dan. 2:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Dan. 2:27<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. The interpretation<\/strong>. We notice<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>The effect of the meaning of the dream on Daniel himself<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:19<\/span>). The truth made known to Daniel at once. That truth distressing to the prophet because foreboding disaster to his royal master. His sensibility honourable to his humanity, his loyalty, and his religion. The dream only such as to distress all true friends of the king [114]. Faithful ministers deeply affected themselves by the denunciations they have to deliver to impenitent hearers. Paul the subject of continual sorrow of heart for his unbelieving countrymen. Tenderness and compassion among the most necessary qualifications for a minister of the gospel. The bowels of the Master needed.<\/p>\n<p>[114]  <em>The dream be to them that hate thee<\/em>, <em>&amp;c<\/em>. That is, may it be fulfilled to them, or rest upon them. So Keil, who remarks: As Daniel at once understood the interpretation of the dream, he was for a moment so astonished that he could not speak for terror at the thoughts which moved his soul. This amazement seized him because he wished well to the king, and yet he must now announce to him a weighty judgment from God. He renders  (<em>shaah<\/em>), an instant or moment, instead of an hour.<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The kings appeal<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:19<\/span>). Desires Daniel to declare the interpretation, whatever evil it may forbode to himself. A good sign and a mark of sincerity when a man desires the truth to be faithfully told, however it may seem to go against him. Ahab an opposite example. I hate him; for he doth not prophesy good concerning me, but evil (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 22:8<\/span>). Something much more hopeful in Nebuchadnezzar.<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>The interpretation itself<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:20-26<\/span>). Its details: <\/p>\n<p>(1.) The tree is the king himself. <br \/>(2.) He was to be deprived of his reason, and thus to be driven from among men to dwell with the beasts of the field, eating grass like one of them [115]. <\/p>\n<p>(3.) This condition of things was to continue for a lengthened period, only, however, obscurely and enigmatically intimated as seven times that should pass over him; long enough for his entire aspect to become changed, although only until the end designed should be accomplished, and he should learn that not man, but the Most High, ruleth in the kingdom of men (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:25<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>(4.) His kingdom however should, in the meantime, be preserved to him, so that on the return of his reason he might again possess it Doleful tidings to the king, yet mixed with mercy. A dark cloud, but with a silver lining to it. So the gospel reveals the wrath of God against sin, but points the sinner to a refuge from that wrath. He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him (<span class='bible'>Joh. 3:36<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>[115]  <em>They shall make thee to eat grass as oxen<\/em>. According to the Syriac or Chaldaic idiom, for Thou shalt be made, &amp;c, the indefinite plural standing for the passive. The subject thus remains altogether indefinite, so that one has neither to think of men or angels as the instruments of the infliction. As to the eating of grass, says Rsch, quoted by Keil, there is nothing to perplex or that needs to be explained. It is a circumstance that has occurred in recent times, as, <em>e.g.<\/em>, in the case of a woman in the Wtemberg asylum for the insane. Keil also, in a note, quotes Friedreich, who observes, that sometimes in physical maladies the nails assume a peculiarly monstrous luxuriance with deformity; and that it is an actual experience that the hair, the more it is exposed to the influence of the rough weather and to the suns rays, the more does it grow in hardness, and thus becomes like unto the feathers of an eagle. See further under next Section.<\/p>\n<p>4. <em>The exhortation accompanying it<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:27<\/span>). Daniel yearns for the kings welfare. Not satisfied with merely declaring the truth, adds faithful counsel and loving exhortation. An example to ministers. Warm and faithful application of a discourse a thing never to be omitted. The nail not merely to be made sharp, but driven in,fastened by the Master of assemblies. Daniels counsel to the king is<\/p>\n<p>(1.) To <em>give up sin<\/em> [116]. No favour with God nor peace to ourselves till rebellion against God is given up. No peace to the wicked. Sin the great attracting rod to Gods wrath. The kings character and life here too plainly but faithfully indicated. <\/p>\n<p>(2.) To <em>practise righteousness<\/em>. Well-doing in general, and justice to his subjects in particular [117]. Not enough to cease to do evil; we must learn to do well. Duty has two sides, a positive and a negative,thou shalt as well as thou shalt not. Not sufficient to be negatively good. The kings character and life again hinted at. Oppression and injustice the usual accompaniments of despotism. <\/p>\n<p>(3.) To <em>show mercy to the poor<\/em>. Something more than mere justice. Kings as well as their subjects to be not only just, but kind and merciful In relation to men, justice and mercy the two duties which God requires of us. He hath showed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee but to do justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Justice and mercy the reflection of Gods own character. Mercy that in which we are especially to resemble him. Be ye merciful, as your Heavenly Father is merciful. To love and do good to our fellow-men only another form of justice. Love a debt due to each. That debt never fully paid. Every man his neighbours debtor. That due to every one which we would wish every one to do to us in similar circumstances. Nebuchadnezzars past life again alluded to. Selfishness rather than regard to the poor the likely character of a despot. The greatest works in Egypt and India accomplished through the forced labours of the poor under the terror of the lash.<\/p>\n<p>[116]  <em>Break off thy sins<\/em>.  (<em>perooq<\/em>), from  (<em>peraq<\/em>), to break off, break in pieces, hence to separate, disjoin, put at a distance. Theodotion and the Vulgate improperly render the word by one which means, to redeem. But, though in the Targums,  is used for  (<em>gaal<\/em>), and  (<em>padhah<\/em>), <em>to loosen, to unbind<\/em>, of redeeming or ransoming of the first-born, an inheritance, or any other valuable possession, yet this use of the word by no means accords with sins as the object, because sins are not goods which one redeems or ransoms so as to retain them for his own use.<em>Keil<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>[117]  <em>By righteousness<\/em>. Theodotion and the Vulgate commit a further error by rendering this word alms. The passage, says Keil, is thus made to teach the doctrine of salvation by works,Redeem thy sins by alms. In this rendering they are followed by many Church Fathers and Rabbis; the later Jews holding the doctrine of the merit of works, while, as Keil observes in a footnote, the Catholic Church regards this passage as a <em>locus classicus<\/em> for the doctrine of the merit of works, against which the <em>Apologia Conf. August<\/em>, first set forth the right exposition. The same expositor remarks:  (<em>tsedhaqah<\/em>, righteousness) nowhere in the Old Testament means <em>good-doing<\/em> or <em>alms<\/em>. This meaning the self-righteous Rabbis first gave to the word in their writings. Daniel recommends the king to practise righteousness as the chief virtue of a ruler, in contrast to the unrighteousness of the despots, as Hgstb., Hv., Hofm., and Klief. have justly observed. It may be noticed here that the term righteousness () appears from the New Testament to have come to be used by the Jews in the time of the Saviour, and subsequently by Jewish Christians and others, in the sense of <em>alms<\/em>. In <span class='bible'>Mat. 6:1<\/span>, while our version has do not thine alms, some ancient Greek copies have do not thy righteousness. The translators of the Bible, therefore, placed righteousness in the margin, while the Revisers of the New Testament have inserted it in the text as the preferable reading. The first verse, however, is the only place in the context where the word is used; in all the rest, <span class='bible'>Dan. 4:2-4<\/span>, the word is alms (). Righteousness is not to be confounded with alms. Calvin, however, thinks righteousness here means the same as grace or pity; the word pity or mercy being added by way of explanation, righteousness embracing all the duties of charity. Righteousness, indeed, as meaning almsgiving, may have been adopted from <span class='bible'>Psa. 112:9<\/span>, which the apostle seems to have understood and quoted in that sense, <span class='bible'>2Co. 9:9<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>5. <em>The encouragement<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Dan. 4:27<\/span>). If it may be a lengthening of thy tranquillity; marg. a healing of thine error [118]. Hope ever held out to the penitent. Let the wicked forsake his way, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Isa. 55:7<\/span>). The threatened doom might not only be delayed, but possibly averted. So in the case of Nineveh. Who knoweth if he will return and repent, and leave a blessing behind him? (<span class='bible'>Joe. 2:14<\/span>). God, even when grievously offended, not inexorable. Hezekiahs prayer added fifteen years to his life. So might Nebuchadnezzars repentance. Or if the doom must come, the days might be shortened. The specified time of its continuance indefinite. Seven times might be seven years or seven months. Or a happy future might be made to succeed. A probationary period of twelve months afforded. Mercy Jehovahs darling attribute. He delighteth in mercy. Afflicteth not willingly, neither doth grieve the children of men. Ready to forgive. The father runs to receive with the kiss of forgiveness the returning prodigal.<\/p>\n<p>[118]  <em>A lengthening of thy tranquillity;<\/em> marg. <em>a healing of thine error<\/em>. The Greek translator improperly has perhaps God will be long-suffering to thee; and the Vulgate, perhaps He will pardon thy faults.  (<em>area<\/em>), says Keil, means <em>continuance<\/em> or <em>length of time<\/em>, as <span class='bible'>Dan. 7:12<\/span>; and  (<em>sheleva<\/em>), <em>rest, safety<\/em>, as the Hebrew  (<em>shalvah<\/em>), here <em>the peaceful prosperity of life;<\/em> hence the proper rendering, If there may be a continuance of prosperity of life, of which the condition placed before the king is reformation of life, the giving up of injustice and cruelty to the poor, and the practice of righteousness and mercy. Calvin prefers the rendering that stands in the margin: As if he had said, This is the proper and genuine medicine; adding that the more received sense is, This medicine may be suitable to the error. Calvin and Polanus thought the calamity might be alleviated, though the punishment might be inflicted. Willet observes that Daniel sustains the double character of a prophet and a faithful counsellor; knowing that if the king humbled himself in time, it would not be unprofitable for him, he counsels him, if so it stood with Gods good pleasure. Daniel, says Keil, knew nothing of a heathen <em>Fatum<\/em>, but he knew that the judgments of God were directed against men according to their conduct, and that punishment threatened could only be averted by repentance.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(4) <strong>Flourishing.<\/strong>A word generally employed to signify the growth of trees. Here, no doubt, it is suggested by the dream which follows, and is for that reason selected by Daniel. It may be observed that the LXX. version here, as in <span class='bible'>Dan. 3:1<\/span>, gives the eighteenth year as the date.<\/p>\n<p><strong>My palace.<\/strong>See Layards <em>Nineveh and Babylon,<\/em> p. 506.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 4<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> In the original text this is the beginning of chapter 4. For the palace of Nebuchadnezzar see Introduction, III, 3, 4.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> Concerns About His Dream.<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&lsquo;I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in my house and flourishing in my palace. I saw a dream which made me afraid. And the imaginings on my bed, and the visions of my head, troubled me.&rsquo;<\/p>\n<p> Everything was going well for Nebuchadnezzar, and his life was flourishing (literally &lsquo;growing green&rsquo; &#8211; an idea that connected with the dream). He had gained many victories and had spent much time engaging with enemies with great success. He had become one of the great historical figures of all time. But now he was enjoying a period of rest and enjoyment in his palace. Trouble seemed far away. And then his dreams began to trouble him. These were possibly early signs of the mental disturbance that would finally, humanly speaking, result in the blackness of depression that later came over him. Inspiration is often connected with manic depression.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><em><span class='bible'>Dan 4:4<\/span><\/em><\/strong><strong>. <\/strong><strong><em>I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest, <\/em><\/strong><strong>&amp;c.<\/strong> Nebuchadnezzar, after having subjected to his empire Syria, Phoenicia, Judaea, Egypt, and Arabia, returned to Babylon, full of glory; and, inflated with this prosperity, he enjoyed in peace the fruit of his conquests; seeing nothing in all Asia which did not submit to his authority, till God troubled his repose by the uneasy dream which he sent him. See Calmet. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Observe several striking particulars in this man&#8217;s account. First, he tells us, that he was at rest in his house, and flourishing. Yes! the word of God teacheth the people of God to be on the lookout for the sudden downfall of sinners. When such say peace and safety, then sudden destruction cometh upon them as upon a woman in travail, so that they cannot escape. I venture on this occasion to observe, that God&#8217;s people are not as attentive as they ought to be, and as the word of the Lord recommends them to be, to those sudden judgments of God upon the enemies of his Christ. For though the great day of their ruin is deferred to that day, when the Lord will arise to punish the ungodly, and to minister true judgment to the people; yet, very frequently now, the Lord speaks in a loud voice, for his people, and to his people, in the striking chastisement shown to the Christ-despising generation of the present day. Reader! I pray you henceforth, look more to this in what is going on in the world, and depend upon it, you will find continual instances in proof, that, for the oppression of the poor, and the sighing of the needy, the Lord doth arise. <span class='bible'>Psa 12:5<\/span> . Secondly, in this account of Nebuchadnezzar, he is compelled to see and to confess, that his misery was of the Lord. Here was a bitter aggravation of his ruin. It was that God whom he had defied, which now smote him, and which made every scourge a scorpion. Thirdly, the wretch trembled, he tells us, in the very recollection of his vision. His own mind, his own conscience, his own guilty fears, sounded the alarm, and left him no retreat. What an awful representation of this kind the man of God hath given of this state of hell upon earth, <span class='bible'>Deu 28:65-67<\/span> . Fourthly, the magicians and wise men he consulted could afford him no help: no, not so much as to be able to explain to him what he wanted to know. Reader! think what a dreadful state that is, when a soul is out of Christ, and under the alarms of a guilty conscience, which no brother, no kind neighbor, no tender-hearted friend, can in the least minister unto. Precious Jesus! how sweet is it to have thee for a brother upon all occasions of sorrow! thou art indeed one born for adversity. <span class='bible'>Pro 17:17<\/span> . Fifthly, behold the necessity imposed upon him to send for Daniel, whose advice he had so set at nought, and whose God he had so boldly despised. Such is the case not unfrequently in ordinary life. Who so laughed at as God&#8217;s faithful servants, by the sinner in the days of his jollity and mirth? Who so earnestly sought after in the day of sickness and death? When the Reader hath paused sufficiently over these solemn considerations, as they arise out of the view of the state of Nebuchadnezzar&#8217;s mind; let him attend to the several features of the alarming vision of the night, with which the Lord visited the King, according to the interpretation of Daniel.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Dan 4:4 I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in mine house, and flourishing in my palace:<\/p>\n<p> Ver. 4. <strong> I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in my house.<\/strong> ] Having subdued all mine enemies round about. But in the year of my triumph, behold a vision of my downfall. <em> Suspecta nobis debet esse tranquillitas.<\/em> <\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/p>\n<p> And flourishing in my palace.<\/strong> ] But flourishing estates free not the mind of burdensome cares. Ecc 5:12 <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Dan 4:4-9<\/p>\n<p> 4I, Nebuchadnezzar, was at ease in my house and flourishing in my palace. 5I saw a dream and it made me fearful; and these fantasies as I lay on my bed and the visions in my mind kept alarming me. 6So I gave orders to bring into my presence all the wise men of Babylon, that they might make known to me the interpretation of the dream. 7Then the magicians, the conjurers, the Chaldeans and the diviners came in and I related the dream to them, but they could not make its interpretation known to me. 8But finally Daniel came in before me, whose name is Belteshazzar according to the name of my god, and in whom is a spirit of the holy gods; and I related the dream to him, saying, 9&#8217;O Belteshazzar, chief of the magicians, since I know that a spirit of the holy gods is in you and no mystery baffles you, tell me the visions of my dream which I have seen, along with its interpretation.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Dan 4:4<\/p>\n<p>NASB&#8217;was at ease in my house and flourishing in my palace&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>NKJV&#8217;was at rest in my house, and flourishing in my palace&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>NRSV&#8217;was living at ease in my home and prospering in my palace&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>TEV&#8217;was living comfortably in my palace&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>NJBwas living comfortably in my house, prosperously in my palace&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>This is another example of Semitic parallelism (as is Dan 4:5). Nebuchadnezzar was experiencing the kind of prosperity that he had wished his hearers in Dan 4:1.<\/p>\n<p>This seems to be an allusion to the up-coming dream of a glorious tree. This type of human arrogance is prophesied in Isa 47:7-8. Isaiah 13-14, 46-47 are oracles of judgment against Babylon, which becomes the biblical symbol of human arrogance and pride.<\/p>\n<p>Dan 4:5-7 Again the impotence of Babylon and its wise men is contrasted with the wise power and control of the God of Judah and her people.<\/p>\n<p>Dan 4:6 &#8216;So I gave orders&#8217; Nebuchadnezzar can make decrees (cf. Dan 2:9; Dan 2:15; Dan 3:10; Dan 3:29), but he could not produce the desired result (and neither could his wise men). This is in stark contrast to God&#8217;s will being accomplished.<\/p>\n<p>Dan 4:7 For the meaning of these terms see Dan 1:20 or Dan 2:2.<\/p>\n<p> they could not make known its interpretation It is unusual that they did not attempt an interpretation, given the fact that Nebuchadnezzar had revealed the dream. Possibly they were able to interpret it, but were afraid to.<\/p>\n<p>It is surprising that Nebuchadnezzar calls on the same group of wise men which he previously had no confidence in (cf. Dan 2:4-13), and also that he had forgotten his own decrees (Dan 2:4-49; Dan 3:29) relating to YHWH.<\/p>\n<p>Dan 4:8 Daniel means God is my judge (BDB 1088).<\/p>\n<p> Belteshazzar Daniel&#8217;s name implies a Babylonian deity, may protect his life (BDB 1084). The Babylonian pantheon developed from the Sumerian pantheon. Originally deities were the patrons of specific cities. The god, Marduk, was known as lord. Bel was originally the patron god of the city of Nippur, but came to be identified with Marduk, the pagan god of the city of Babylon (i.e. Bel, cf Isa 46:1; Jer 50:2; Jer 51:44). It is uncertain exactly which god is implied by Daniel&#8217;s name, but Marduk became the chief god of Babylon. Although Bel looks to be a part of Daniel&#8217;s Babylonian name, it is not. Dan 4:8 functions as a parenthesis explaining the name, Belteshazzar (cf. NKJV, NRSV, TEV).<\/p>\n<p>NASB, NRSVa spirit of the holy gods<\/p>\n<p>NKJVthe Spirit of the Holy God<\/p>\n<p>TEV, NJB,<\/p>\n<p>JPS, NEBthe spirit of the holy gods<\/p>\n<p>If this phrase is from a polytheist (cf. Dan 4:8 a; Dan 5:11; Dan 5:14) then surely this is not a reference to YHWH or His Spirit (the textual evidence is that the qualifying ADJECTIVE holy is PLURAL, however, there is a Hebrew PLURAL equivalent in Jos 24:19). The context (Dan 4:9) implies that Nebuchadnezzar remembered Daniel&#8217;s previous help of dream interpretation in chapter 2; if so, then this could be translated like the NKJV (cf. Dan 4:9; Dan 4:18). Remember the consistent theological emphasis is YHWH&#8217;s power and control versus the Babylonian pantheon and government (cf. Dan 2:20-23). The spirit would be understood as YHWH&#8217;s influence in Daniel&#8217;s giftedness (cf. Dan 2:27-28; Dan 2:30; Dan 2:47).<\/p>\n<p>This Aramaic phrase is similar to the Hebrew phrase used of Joseph in Gen 41:38. Both Joseph and Daniel served pagan kings and interpreted their dreams.<\/p>\n<p>SPECIAL TOPIC: SPIRIT IN THE BIBLE <\/p>\n<p>SPECIAL TOPIC: HOLY <\/p>\n<p>Dan 4:9 the chief of the magicians Daniel was trained in the language and traditions of the Chaldeans (cf. Dan 1:4). He was made the leader of the Babylonian wise men (cf. Dan 1:20; Dan 2:48). Daniel&#8217;s abilities were from YHWH, not from Babylonian magic. These Babylonian wise men failed again and again (cf. Dan 2:1-13; Dan 4:7; Dan 4:18). Daniel&#8217;s position caused later Jewish rabbis to criticize his cooperation with pagan culture and governments.<\/p>\n<p>NASBtell me the vision<\/p>\n<p>NKJVexplain to me the vision<\/p>\n<p>NRSVhear the dream<\/p>\n<p>TEVthis is my dream<\/p>\n<p>NJBthis is the dream<\/p>\n<p>From these English translations it is obvious there are at least two ways to interpret the Aramaic text: (1) Nebuchadnezzar wanted Daniel to reveal the dream and its interpretation, like chapter 2 (NASB, NKJV) or (2) Nebuchadnezzar told Daniel the dream (as he did the other wise men, cf. Dan 4:7 and NRSV, TEV, NJB) and wanted him to give the interpretation. The second makes sense contextually, but demands a revocalization of the Masoretic Consonantal Text.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Dan 4:4<\/p>\n<p>Dan 4:4  IH576 NebuchadnezzarH5020 wasH1934 at restH7954 in mine house,H1005 and flourishingH7487 in my palace:H1965 <\/p>\n<p>Dan 4:4<\/p>\n<p>I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in mine house, and flourishing in my palace:<\/p>\n<p>Nebuchadnezzar identifies himself as the one who is experiencing the following events he is about to reveal.  He declared that he was at ease, living the good life of a prosperous and powerful king.  Safe, and secure and wealthy, he was the epitome of glory, wealth and power. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>I Nebuchadnezzar: After he had successfully finished his wars in Syria, Egypt, etc., and the immense improvements and buildings at Babylon, and in the enjoyment of uninterrupted peace and prosperity in his palace. <\/p>\n<p>was: Psa 30:6, Psa 30:7, Isa 47:7, Isa 47:8, Isa 56:12, Jer 48:11, Eze 28:2-5, Eze 28:17, Eze 29:3, Zep 1:12, Luk 12:19, Luk 12:20, 1Th 5:2, 1Th 5:3 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: 1Ch 17:1 &#8211; as David Est 1:2 &#8211; sat Dan 4:19 &#8211; let<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Dan 4:4. With this verse begins the report of Nebuchadnezzars experience that is referred to in the preceding verses. The icing was at rest which is defined In the lexicon, &#8220;to be secure, and flourishing means to be prosperous. He seems to have been lulled into a feeling of assurance that nothing could ever happen to endanger his independence as a monarch over the whole civilized world.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Dan 4:4-5. I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest, &amp;c.  Nebuchadnezzar, for the extent of his dominion, and the great revenues it supplied; for his unrivalled success in war; for the magnificence and splendour of his court; and for his stupendous works and improvements at Babylon, was the greatest monarch, not only of his own times, but incomparably the greatest the world had ever seen. At a time when he was at rest in his house, and flourishing in his palace; having lately subjected to his empire Syria, Phenicia, Judea, Egypt, and Arabia, and returned to Babylon inflated with his success and victories, and being in the meridian of his glory, and thinking of nothing but enjoying in peace the fruit of his conquests, he was unexpectedly alarmed, and thrown into trouble and distress, by a prophetic dream which he here records. Thus Gods particular judgments often resemble the general one in their coming suddenly and unexpectedly, when men indulge themselves in carnal security.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>4:4 I Nebuchadnezzar was at {a} rest in mine house, and flourishing in my palace:<\/p>\n<p>(a) There was no trouble that might cause me to dream, and therefore it came only from God.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline\">2. The king&rsquo;s frustration over his second dream 4:4-9<\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>As mentioned above, the time of this dream was apparently later in Nebuchadnezzar&rsquo;s reign. Historians have identified a seven-year period during his reign when he engaged in no military activity (ca. 582-575 B.C.).<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Ibid., pp. 59-60.] <\/span> This may be the seven years during which he was temporarily insane. If so, he may have had this dream in 583 or 582 B.C. If this is the true date, Nebuchadnezzar would have defeated the Egyptians under Pharaoh Hophra (in 588-587 B.C.), and would have destroyed Jerusalem (in 586 B.C.) before he had this dream. In any case, he was at ease and resting in his palace when God gave him this revelation. Nebuchadnezzar described himself as &quot;flourishing&quot; in his palace, in terms that in the original language picture him flourishing as a green plant. This king built the famous Hanging Gardens of Babylon, which enriched his naturally arid capital with luxuriant foliage. His description of himself here anticipates the figure of the tree in his dream that represented him.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in mine house, and flourishing in my palace: 4. at rest ] or at ease, prosperous. The word suggests the idea of contentment and security, in a good or a bad sense, according to the context (Job 16:12, Psa 122:6; Job 12:6, Psa 73:12). flourishing ] The word is applied &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-daniel-44\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 4:4&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21852"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21852\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}