20<\/strong>. And<\/em> concerning<\/strong> the ten horns that were<\/em> on<\/strong> his head<\/em>, and the<\/strong> other which came up, and before<\/em> which<\/strong>, &c.] See Dan 7:8<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n even of that horn<\/em>, &c.] and as regards<\/strong> that horn<\/em>, it<\/strong> had eyes<\/em>, &c.<\/p>\n very great things<\/em> ] great things<\/strong>: the expression is exactly the same as in Dan 7:8<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n whose look<\/em>, &c.] whose<\/em> appearance<\/strong> was<\/em> greater<\/strong> than<\/em> (that of) its<\/strong> fellows<\/em>. The adj. is the usual one for ‘great’ in Aramaic. The horn, though called a ‘little’ one ( Dan 7:8<\/em><\/span>), must be supposed to have grown rapidly to a portentous size: cf. esp. Dan 8:9<\/span>.<\/p>\n And of the ten horns … – <\/B>See the notes at Dan 7:7-8<\/span>.<\/P> Whose look was more stout than his fellows – <\/B>literally, whose aspect was greater than that of its companions. This does not mean that its look or aspect was more fierce or severe than that of the others, but that the appearance of the horn was greater – <\/span> rab<\/I>. In Dan 7:8<\/span>, this is described as a little horn; and to understand this, and reconcile the two, we must suppose that the seer watched this as it grew until it became the largest of the number. Three fell before it, and it outgrew in size all the others until it became the most prominent. This would clearly denote that the kingdom or the authority referred to by this eleventh horn would be more distinct and prominent than either of the others – would become so conspicuous and important as in fact to concentrate and embody all the power of the beast.<\/P> <\/p>\n And of the ten horns; <\/B>what they meant. <\/P> Whose look was more stout than his fellows, <\/B>i.e. he had more power and more fierceness. This is wont to be interpreted of Antiochus, and the persecuting emperors, because it agrees well to them. <\/P> <\/p>\n 20. look . . . more stout than . . .fellows<\/B>namely, than that of the other horns.<\/P><\/p>\n And of the ten horns<\/strong>,…. That is, Daniel desired to know the truth of the ten horns, or the meaning of them what they signified, and who they pointed at, of which in Da 7:7<\/span>, here it is added,<\/p>\n that were in his head<\/strong>; observing the situation of them; thought the horns of a beast could hardly be thought to be elsewhere:<\/p>\n and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell<\/strong>; particularly he was very desirous to know the meaning of a single horn, which rose up among the rest, and before which three of the other horns fell, being plucked up by the roots:<\/p>\n even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things<\/strong>: [See comments on Da 7:8]<\/span>:<\/p>\n whose look was more stout than his fellows<\/strong>; than the other beasts, or rather than the other horns; either than his fellow bishops, claiming an authority over them, as being universal bishop; or than the kings and princes of the earth, setting up himself above all that is called god, emperors and kings; taking to himself all power in heaven and in earth; a power to depose kings, and absolve their subjects from allegiance to them, and even over the consciences of men; so that his look is more bold and impudent than others, as well as more fierce and terrible, threatening kings and kingdoms with his bulls, anathemas, and interdicts: or, “whose appearance is greater than his fellows” i; in pomp and splendour, making a greater show and figure than the kings of the earth, and claiming a superiority over them.<\/p>\n i “cujus aspectus”, Munster; “et aspectus ejus major sociis suis”, Pagninus.<\/p>\n He says, therefore, He also inquired about the ten horns which were on the head of the beast, and of the other horn which had arisen, meaning the small one, and concerning the three horns falling from the face of the beast. We have shewn how provinces were denoted by the tell horns, and how the difference between the Roman Empire and other monarchies was pointed out, because there never was one supreme ruler at Rome, except when Syria and Marius exercised their usurped authority — but each for only a short time. Here then the continual state of the Roman Empire is under review, for it was not simply a single animal, as it had ten horns. A finite number is put for an indefinite one. With regard to the little horn, I said it referred to the Caesars, who attracted the whole government of the state to themselves, after depriving the people of their liberty and the senate of their power, while even under their sway some dignity was continued to the senate and some majesty retained by the people. We have explained also how the three horns were broken; that is, how craftily the Caesars infringed upon and diminished the strength of both people and senate. Lastly, we have accounted for this little horn being displayed with human eyes, since the Caesars exercised their dominion with cunning, when they pretended to be only tribunes of the people, and allowed the ensigns of empire to remain in the hands of the consuls; for when they came into the senate, they sat in a lowly situation in curule scats prepared for the tribunes. As, therefore, they tyrannized with such cleverness and cunning, instead of by open violence, they are said to be endowed with the eyes of a man. Then as to the tongue, the sense is the same; for although they always professed the consular power to be supreme in the state, yet they could not restrain themselves, but vomited forth many reproachful speeches. On the one side, we see them remarkable for eyes, and on the other, for the tongue. And its aspect was terrible beyond its companions This seems not to belong peculiarly to the little horn which had arisen among the ten, but rather to the fourth beast. But if any one wishes to understand it of the little horn, I will not contest the point, as it will thus make tolerable sense. But I rather embrace my former opinion, for it is not surprising to find the Prophet after his discourse on the little horn, returning to the beast himself. <\/p>\n Dan 7:20 And of the ten horns that [were] in his head, and [of] the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even [of] that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look [was] more stout than his fellows.<\/p>\n Ver. 20. And of the ten horns.<\/strong> ] See Dan 7:7<\/span> . <\/p>\n <\/p>\n And of the other that came up.<\/strong> ] See Dan 7:8<\/span> . <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Whose look was more stout than his fellows,<\/strong> ] i.e., <\/em> Than the ten horns. Antichrist exalteth himself above kings, and above all that is august. 2Th 2:4 See Trapp on “<\/em> 2Th 2:4 “<\/em> <\/p>\n the other: i.e. the little horn of Dan 7:8, which is still future. See App-90; and Compare Dan 8:9-12, Dan 8:23-25, and note on Dan 7:8. <\/p>\n spake. See note on “speaking”, Dan 7:8. <\/p>\n Dan 7:20<\/p>\n Dan 7:20 And ofH5922 the tenH6236 hornsH7162 thatH1768 were in his head,H7217 and of the otherH317 whichH1768 came up,H5559 and beforeH4481 H6925 whom threeH8532 fell;H5308 even of thatH1797 hornH7162 that had eyes,H5870 and a mouthH6433 that spakeH4449 very great things,H7260 whose lookH2376 was more stoutH7229 thanH4481 his fellows.H2273 <\/p>\n Dan 7:20<\/p>\n And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows.<\/p>\n This is a recounting of what Daniel had previously stated about the fourth beast. Of interest here is the account of the beast speaking great things as recorded in Rev 13:5, “And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies”.<\/p>\n the ten horns: The ten kingdoms into which the western Roman empire was divided; which were primarily, according to Machiavel and Bp. Lloyd: <\/p>\n 1. The Huns in Hungary 356 2. The Ostrogoths in Moesia 377 3. The Visigoths in Pannonia 378 4. The Sueves and Alans in Gascoigne and Spain 407 5. The Vandals in Africa 407 6. The Franks in France 407 7. The Burgundians in Burgundy 407 8. The Heruli and Turingi in Italy 476 9. The Saxons and Angles in Britain 476 10. The Lombards, first upon the Danube, and afterwards in Italy 526 <\/p>\n Though the ten kingdoms differed from these in later periods, and were sometimes more or less, yet they were still known by that name. Dan 7:8, Dan 7:11, Dan 7:23, Dan 8:9-11 <\/p>\n whose look: Dan 11:36, Dan 11:37 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Num 24:24 – Chittim Psa 75:4 – Lift Psa 89:44 – cast Pro 14:3 – the mouth Isa 3:9 – The show Dan 7:24 – the ten Dan 7:25 – he shall speak Dan 8:23 – a king Hag 2:7 – I will shake 2Ti 3:1 – perilous Rev 12:3 – ten Rev 13:1 – having Rev 13:15 – cause Rev 17:3 – full Rev 17:12 – the ten<\/p>\n 7:20 And of the ten horns that [were] in his head, and [of] the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even [of] that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose {k} look [was] more stout than his fellows.<\/p>\n (k) This is meant of the fourth beast, which was more terrible than the others.<\/p>\n And of the ten horns that [were] in his head, and [of] the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even [of] that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spoke very great things, whose look [was] more stout than his fellows. 20. And concerning the ten horns that were on his … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 7:20”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21964","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21964"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21964\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"