11<\/strong>. Because<\/em> ] Rather, For<\/strong>. It is a justification of the foregoing threat.<\/p>\n hath made many altars to sin<\/em> ] In times of national trouble, sacrifices were multiplied, to propitiate the national God (comp. Isa 1:11<\/span>). But as no corresponding effort was made to purify the conduct and the character, such sacrifices did but increase the load of the national guilt. Instead of ‘many sacrifices’, Hosea says ‘many altars’ because there was even less attempt in the times of Hosea and Isaiah to centralize worship in the northern kingdom than in the southern. The strict rule of Deuteronomy (one temple and one altar) seems at present far removed from the general consciousness. See Introduction, part v.<\/p>\n altars shall be unto him to sin<\/em> ] Rather, ( yea<\/strong>,) altars are to him for sinning<\/strong> ( thereby<\/strong>). There is no unfairness on Jehovah’s part; Israel cannot pretend ignorance of His will.<\/p>\n Because Ephraim hath made many altars to sin, altars shall indeed be unto him to sin – <\/B>that is, they shall be proved to him to be so, by the punishment which they shall draw upon him. The prophet had first shown them their folly in forsaking God for the help of man; now he shows them the folly of attempting to secure themselves by their great shew and pretences of religion and devotion in a false way. God had appointed one altar at Jerusalem. There He willed the sacrifices to be offered, which He would accept. To multiply altars, much more to set up altars against the one altar, was to multiply sin. Hosea charges Israel elsewhere with this multiplying of altars, as a grievous sin. According to the multitude of his fruit, he hath increased altars. Their altars are as heaps in the furrows of the field Hos 10:1<\/span>; Hos 12:11<\/span>. They pretended doubtless, that they did it for a religious end, that they might thereon offer sacrifices for the expiation of their sins and appeasing of God. They endeavored to unite their own selfwill and the outward service of God. Therein they might deceive themselves; but they could not deceive God. He calls their act by its true name. To make altars at their own pleasure and to offer sacrifices upon them, under any pretence whatever, was to sin. So then, as many altars as they reared, so often did they repeat their sin; and this sin should be their only fruit. They should be, but only for sin. So God says of the two calves, This thing became a sin 1Ki 12:30<\/span>, and of the indiscriminate consecration of priests (not of the family of Aaron), This thing became sin unto the house of Jeroboam, even to cut it off and to destroy it from the face of the earth 1Ki 13:33-34<\/span>.<\/P> <\/p>\n Hos 8:11<\/span><\/p>\n Ephraim hath made many altars to sin.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n Perversion of worship<\/strong><\/p>\n Israel was to have only one altar. Ephraim had built a number of altars in different places. Men have perverted worship, not only by making false gods, but by making false altars for the true God.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>It is a very propagative sin. Once admit a wrong thing in worship, and that one thing will multiply itself; superstition will give it fertility.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>It is a self-punishing sin. This is the heavy judgment of God, to give men their hearts desire in what is evil.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>God has given us laws concerning worship.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>These laws are oft repeated.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>These oft-repeated laws leave false worshippers Without excuse. (Homilist.<\/em>)<\/p>\n Verse 11<\/span>. Many altars to sin<\/B><\/I>] Though it does not appear that the Jews in Babylon were obliged to worship the idols of the country, except in the case mentioned by Daniel, yet it was far otherwise with the Israelites in Assyria, and the other countries of their dispersion. Because they had made many altars to sin while they were in their own land, they were obliged to continue<\/I> in the land of their captivity a similar system of idolatry against their will. Thus they felt and saw the evil of their idolatry, without power to help themselves.<\/P> <\/p>\n Because:<\/B> this refers to what follows. <\/P> Ephraim hath made many altars; <\/B>multiplied either to many idols, every one having his altar, or multiplied altars in several places to the same idol. They had many high places, and altars in all of them. <\/P> To sin; <\/B>both as acting against the law of God, which required but one altar, and also these altars were to sin, in that they were for sacrifices to be offered on them to idols. These persons did not intend them for sin, but their good intention did not, could not change the thing, it was sin, however they intended. <\/P> Altars, <\/B>either those here erected, or those they shall find in Assyria when they come captives thither, <\/P> shall be unto him to sin; <\/B>either because forced in captivity to worship Assyrian idols, and to attend their altars and sacrifices, or else by a just and dreadful judgment from God delivering them over to their wilful blindness and idolatrous heart: since they would never be reclaimed, nor taken off from sinful multiplying altars, let them follow their own hearts, and set up what they will; much like that Rev 22:11<\/span>. Or else thus, Altars shall be the occasion of his greater guilt and punishment, his altars, i.e. his idolatrous worship, shall be that sin that ruins him. <\/P> <\/p>\n 11.<\/B> God in righteous retributiongives them up to their own way; the sin becomes its own punishment(Pr 1:31<\/span>). <\/P> many altars<\/B>inopposition to God’s law (Deu 12:5<\/span>;Deu 12:6<\/span>; Deu 12:13<\/span>;Deu 12:14<\/span>). <\/P> to sin . . . to sin<\/B>Theiraltars which were “sin” (whatever religious intentions theymight plead) should be treated as such, and be the source of theirpunishment (1Ki 12:30<\/span>; 1Ki 13:34<\/span>).<\/P><\/p>\n Because Ephraim hath, made many altars to sin<\/strong>,…. Not with an intention to commit sin, but to offer sacrifice for sin, and make atonement for it, as they thought; but these altars being erected for the sake of idols, and sacrifices offered on them to them, they sinned in so doing, and were the cause of sin in others, who were drawn into it by their example; as they were made to sin, or drawn into it, by Jeroboam their king, These altars were those set up at Dan and Bethel, and in all high places, and tops of mountains, where they sacrificed to idols; and which was contrary to the express command of God, who required sacrifice only at one place, and on one altar, De 12:5<\/span>; typical of the one altar Christ, and his alone sacrifice, who is the only Mediator between God and man; and they are guilty of the same crime as Ephraim here, who make use of more, or neglect him;<\/p>\n altars shall be unto him for sin<\/strong>; either these same altars, and the sacrifices offered on them, shall be reckoned and imputed to him as sins, trod shall be the cause of his condemnation and punishment: or, “let the altars be unto him for sin”, so some n; since he will have them, let him have them, and go on in sinning, till he has filled up the measure of his sins, and brought on him just condemnation; or else other altars are meant, even in the land of Assyria, where, since they were so fond of multiplying altars, they should have altars enough to sin at, whereby their sins would be increased, and their punishment for them aggravated. The Targum is,<\/p>\n “seeing the house of Ephraim hath multiplied altars to sin, the altars of their idols shall he to them for a stumbling block,”<\/p>\n or ruin; so sin is taken in a different sense, both for guilt, and the punishment of it.<\/p>\n n “santo ergo illi altaria ad peccandum”, Rivet.<\/p>\n This threat is accounted for in Hos 8:11<\/span>., by an allusion to the sins of Israel. Hos 8:11<\/span>. “For Ephraim has multiplied altars for sinning, the altars have become to him for sinning. Hos 8:12<\/span>. I wrote to him the fulnesses of my law; they were counted as a strange thing.” Israel was to have only one altar, and that in the place where the Lord would reveal His name (Deu 12:5<\/span>.). But instead of that, Ephraim had built a number of altars in different places, to multiply the sin of idolatry, and thereby heap more and more guilt upon itself. is used, in the first clause, for the act of sin; and in the second, for the consequences of that act. And this was not done from ignorance of the divine will, but from neglect of the divine commandments. is a historical present, indicating that what had occurred was continuing still. These words refer unquestionably to the great number of the laws written in the Mosaic thorah . , according to the chethib , with dropped, equivalent to , as in 1Ch 29:7<\/span>, ten thousand, myriads. The Masoretes, who supposed the number to be used in an arithmetical sense, altered it, as conjecturally unsuitable, into , multitudes, although does not occur anywhere else in the plural. The expression “the myriads of my law” is hyperbolical, to indicate the almost innumerable multitude of the different commandments contained in the law. It was also in a misapprehension of the nature of the hyperbole that the supposition originated, that was a hypothetical future (Jerome). , like something foreign, which does not concern them at all.<\/p>\n The Prophet here again inveighs against the idolatry of the people, which was, however, counted then the best religion; for the Israelites, as it has been said were become hardened in their superstitions, and had long before fallen away from the pure and lawful worship of God. And we know, that where error has once prevailed, it attains firmness by length of time: hence the Israelites had become hardened in their perverted and fictitious worship. They thought that they did the most meritorious deed whenever they sacrificed, while at the same time, they provoked in this way the wrath of God more and more against themselves. And as they had become thus hardened, the Prophet says, that they multiplied for themselves altars for the purpose of sinning, and that there would be altars for them to sin It was (as I have already said) most difficult to persuade theme that their altars were for the purpose of sinnings and that the more attentive they were in worshipping God, the more grievously they sinned. <\/p>\n We see how Papists of this day glory in their abominations. It is certain that they do nothing but what is accursed before God; for there reigns among them every kind of filthiness, and there is no purity whatever: they therefore continue to offend God as it were designedly. Put at the same time it is their highest holiness to multiply altars: the same also was the prevailing error in the Prophet’s time. This was the reason why he said, that altars were multiplied in order to sin Who at this day can persuade the Papists, that many chapels as they build, are so many sins by which they provoke the wrath of God? But the faithful ought to be content, not with one altar, (for there is now no need of an altar,) but they ought to be content with a common table. The Papists, on the contrary, build altars to themselves without end, where they sacrifice; and they think that God is thus bound to them as by so many chains: as many chapels as are under the papacy are, they think, so many holds for God, ( dei carceres ,) and that God is there held inclosed. But if any one should say, that so many fiends ( Diabolos ) dwell in such places, we know how furiously angry they would be. <\/p>\n It is then no superfluous repetition, when the Prophet says, that altars were multiplied in order to sin; and then, that altars would be for sin: for in the second clause, he speaks of the punishment which God would inflict on superstitious men. In the first clause, he shows that their good intentions were frivolous, and that they were greatly deceived, when at their pleasure they devised for themselves various forms of worship. This is one thing. Then it follows, There shall then be to them altars to sin; as they would not willingly repent, nor embrace salutary admonitions, God would at last really show how much he valued what they called their good intentions; for now a dreadful vengeance was at hand, which would prove to them, that in increasing altars, they did nothing else but increase sins. It then follows — <\/p>\n CRITICAL NOTES<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Hos. 8:11<\/span><\/strong>. Many<\/strong>] Israel should only have one altar (Deu. 12:3<\/span>; Deu. 12:5<\/span>). To sin<\/strong>] Altars made by them should be the source of their punishment; they shall go where there is nothing but altars. <\/p>\n Hos. 8:12<\/span><\/strong>. Written<\/strong>] Lit. I write. Israel could not plead ignorance; no excuse for men now, with the written word. Great<\/strong>] Deu. 4:6<\/span>; Deu. 4:8<\/span>. Wondrous<\/em> things (Psa. 119:18<\/span>; Psa. 147:19-20<\/span>), a great many things, expressing the care and condescension of God and the comprehensiveness of his word. All the greater is that guilt which regards these commands as strange, no concern of theirs, though specially for them. <\/p>\n Hos. 8:13<\/span><\/strong>. Sacrifices<\/strong>] multiplied with the altars. Slain-offerings were presented for gifts. Offerings which should be burnt for me they slay and devour. They profaned the sacrifice, and were concerned only about the flesh. Rem<\/strong>-] Sins for which sacrifices were thought to atone. To Eg<\/strong>-] A type of renewed bondage, like that from which they were delivered; abandonment to abject condition (Deu. 28:68<\/span>). <\/p>\n HOMILETICS<\/em><\/p>\n AGGRAVATED GUILT.Hos. 8:11-13<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n The prophet had first shown them their folly in forsaking God for the help of man; now he shows them the folly of attempting to secure themselves by their great show, pretences of religion, and devotion in a false way. God had appointed one<\/em> altar at Jerusalem. There he willed the sacrifice to be offered, which he would accept. To multiply altars, much more to set up altars against the one altar, was to multiply sin. Hosea charges Israel elsewhere with this multiplying of altars as a grievous sin (Hos. 10:1<\/span>; Hos. 12:11<\/span>).<\/p>\n I. In multiplying altars<\/strong>. Ephraim hath made many altars. Opposing the commandment of God (Deu. 12:5<\/span>), strengthening the habit of sin (1Ki. 12:30<\/span>), repeating their own folly, and increasing their own punishment. Altars shall be unto him to sin. <\/p>\n II. In despising the law<\/strong>. God had given the law, written and expounded it by Moses and the prophets, and continually renewed the knowledge of it, so that they had no excuse for their sin. God has written the law for us by his providence and gospel. His agency is ever fulfilling it; yet men deny it, count it a strange thing, a word with which they have nothing to do. The excuses which men make for rejecting it are not pleas, but sins in the sight of God. <\/p>\n III. In offering lifeless sacrifices<\/strong>. They sacrifice flesh for the sacrifices of mine offerings. <\/p>\n 1. It was mere external worship<\/em>. It was mere flesh<\/em>, not a true sacrifice. External worship without internal ceremony, without sanctity, is like a dead carcase, not a living sacrifice. The Lord accepts it not. <\/p>\n 2. It was mere selfish worship<\/em>,and eat it. Sacrifices which should have been burnt for God they slaughtered and devoured. They were concerned only about temporal affairs. We cannot atone for contempt of God by forms of our own. Dissembled holiness is double iniquity. There is only one sacrifice for sin; if that be rejected, sins will be remembered and punished. The devices of selfishness and will-worship can never avert, will only hasten, the penal consequences of sin. The sacrifice of the wicked is abomination, how much more when he bringeth it with a wicked mind?<\/p>\n PERVERSION OF WORSHIP.Hos. 8:11-12<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n The passage leads us to notice the perversion of worship<\/em>. This is one of the oldest, the most prevalent and the most hateful sins amongst mankind. Men have perverted worship, not only by making false gods, but by making false altars for the true God. There is only one altar in true worship, and that altar is Christ (Heb. 13:10<\/span>). Two remarks in relation to false worship. I. It is a great<\/em> sin. First, It is a very propagative<\/em> sin. Ephraim hath made many altars. If men leave the rule, says an old author, they know not where to stay, hence the multiplying of things thus amongst the Papists, five hundred altars in some one temple. How sublimely antagonistic the Jews were to the introduction of any altar but one (Jos. 22:11<\/span>), but now they had many. Once admit a wrong thing in worship, and that one thing will multiply itself; superstition will give it fertility. The Romish Church is a sad illustration of this, and the Anglican Church in some sections is multiplying examples. Secondly, It is a self-punishing<\/em> sin. Altars shall be unto him to sin. The idea probably is, As you have gone on persisting to multiply altars against my will, I will let you alone, you shall go on, your altars shall be a sin unto you. That is, thus seeing they will have them, they shall have them; they shall have enough of them. They refuse to see the light, they are prejudiced against the way of Gods worship; let them have their desires; let them have governors to establish by their authority, and teachers to defend by subtle arguments what they wish for; they multiply altars to sin, and they shall be to sin, even to harden them. This is the judgment of God, to give men their hearts desire in what is evil. And as it shall be to them for sin, so it shall be to them for misery, the fruit of sin. II. It is a sin against great light<\/em>. I have written to him the great things of my law, &c. They could not say they sinned in ignorance; God gave them directions most concise and abundant concerning the nature and object of true worship. Some translate the wordsI may prescribe my laws to them by myriads, they will treat it as a strange thing. First, God has given us laws<\/em> concerning worship. Secondly, Those laws are oft-repeated<\/em>. By myriads or by thousands. We have line upon line, and precept upon precept. Thirdly, These oft-repeated laws leave false worshippers without excuse<\/em> [The Homilist<\/em>].<\/p>\n HOMILETIC HINTS AND OUTLINES<\/em><\/p>\n Hos. 8:13<\/span>. Many altars<\/em>. Altars to God, altars to man, altars to pleasure, &c. Sin its own punishment. It has fruit<\/em>, and the fruit shall not only be gathered, but eaten. Men constantly live in the fruit of their own doings (Pro. 1:31<\/span>). Many altars, many sins, and many punishments. As men are most fearfully plagued when they go on in sin and perish, so when they do not stand in awe of the sin of their course, it is righteous of God to make them feel how ill sin is and how displeased he is with it; for the words import that they shall be given up to that sin; and as they sinned and cared not, so the Lord would make it to be seen to be sin indeed, and make them feel how sad that is [Hutcheson<\/em>].<\/p>\n Hos. 8:12<\/span>. Scripture slighted. I. Divine in their origin<\/em>. God the authorI have written. Given by inspiration of Godthe grandest and sublimest origin from whence anything can come Then regard its authority, love its truthfulness, and obey its precepts. II. Excellent in its nature<\/em>the great things of my law. The word gives the idea of things heaped together, then greatness and increase from the overflow. Hence the contents of Scripture<\/p>\n 1. Are great<\/em>, containing the great things of God (Act. 2:11<\/span>). <\/p>\n 2. Wonderful<\/em> (Psa. 119:18<\/span>; Deu. 4:6<\/span>; Deu. 4:8<\/span>). <\/p>\n 3. Varied<\/em>, or manifold (Eph. 3:10<\/span>). III. Specific in its form<\/em>. I have written<\/em>. Nature and philosophy teach us to record our laws and hand them down to future generations in a permanent form. A written revelation is necessary for all ages, and has manifold advantages above an oral one. God uttered his word at first, writes it afresh in the wonders of his providence, the work of his Spirit, and the preaching of the gospel. The Bible is a revelation of Gods will, full and free, adapted to our wants and circumstances, and worthy of all acceptation. IV. Despised in its mission<\/em>. Accounted, reckoned as or like a strange thing; as if an alien, or something with which men have no concern. <\/p>\n 1. Some<\/em> reject it as a revelation from God. <\/p>\n 2. Others disregard it as a standard of duty. <\/p>\n 3. By all it is neglected and unread. It is a book unknown, misunderstood, and despised. Men excuse themselves; consider the Scripture unreasonable in its demands, an enemy to liberty, progress, and science. But given by inspiration of God, profitable for doctrine and correction (2Ti. 3:16<\/span>), the Bible can never be set aside as useless and effete. God writes to warn us of this danger and deprive us of excuse.<\/p>\n Hos. 8:13<\/span>. Many engage only in the external duties of religion. Disregarding Gods rule, they fix up their own, and obey that no further than personal ends uphold them. All is not given to God; they must eat part and share with him. God will have all or none. The sacrifice must be burnt<\/em>, and self devoted entirely to him.<\/p>\n God does not connive at sinwill remember<\/em> and visit<\/em> it with judgments here and punishment hereafter. God seems to man to forget his sins, when he forbears to punish them; to remember<\/em> them, when he punishes.<\/p>\n ILLUSTRATIONS TO CHAPTER 8<\/p>\n Hos. 8:10-11<\/span>. Sin increased<\/em>. Sin is like a stone which is cast into water, and multiplies itself by infinite circles [Basil<\/em>]. All sin and wickedness in mans spirit hath the central force and energy of hell in it, and is perpetually pressing down towards it as towards its own place. The devilish nature is always within the central attractions of hell, and its own weight instigates and accelerates its motion thither [John Smith<\/em>].<\/p>\n Hos. 8:12<\/span>. Scripture<\/em>. I am of opinion that the Holy Scriptures contain more sublimity and beauty, more pure morality, more important history, and finer strains of poetry and eloquence, than can be collected from all other books in any age or language [Sir W. Jones<\/em>]. There are many books which are good and sound, but, like half-pence, there goes a great quantity to a little amount. There are a few silver<\/em> books, and a very few golden<\/em> books; but I have one book worth more than all, called the Bible<\/em>, and that is a book of bank-notes [J. Newton<\/em>].<\/p>\n There is not a more evident testimony of a corrupt and depraved disposition than an irreverent treatment of sacred things, a contempt of anything that carries on it a Divine impression, or an obstinate neglect of any of those ordinances which the wisdom of God has appointed to support and preserve his religion in the world [Bp Gibson<\/em>].<\/p>\n Hos. 8:13<\/span>. Sacrifice<\/em>. He was a man who stole the livery of heaven to serve the devil in [Pollock<\/em>].<\/p>\n Where the fear of God is, there is the keeping of his commands; and where the keeping of the commandments, there is the cleansing of the flesh; which flesh is a cloud before the souls eye, and suffers it not purely to see the beam of heavenly light, and worship God upon such sacrifices.<\/p>\n The gods themselves throw incense. [Shakespeare<\/em>.]<\/p>\n (11) Many altars.<\/strong>Multiplication of altars was condemned in the law (Deu. 12:5<\/span> seq.<\/em>).<\/em> The narrative in Joshua 22<\/span> shows that unity of altar and sanctuary was essential to the unity of the nation. The last clause should be rendered, he had altars for sinning.<\/em> The worship of God was degraded into the sensuous approaching Baal-worship. In the first clause sin equals transgression, in the last transgression plus<\/em> guilt and peril.<\/p>\n Because Ephraim has multiplied altars for sinning,<\/p>\n Altars have been to him for sinning.’<\/p>\n Meanwhile they have also continued to multiply altars at which they could sin (or ‘offer a sin offering’), establishing their altars ‘on every high hill and under every green tree’. Indeed all that their altars had done for them was to make them sin even more deeply. And this was true whether they were syncretistic altars at which both YHWH and Baal were worshipped, or altars merely for the Baalim.<\/p>\n We should not overlook the fact that according to Elijah there were a number of legitimate ‘altars of YHWH’ in Israel which had been torn down because of the new Baal cult (1Ki 18:30<\/span>; 1Ki 19:10<\/span>), which may subsequently have been restored (without them there could have been no legitimate worship in Israel), but those are not in mind here.<\/p>\n Hos 8:11<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>Because Ephraim hath made, <\/em><\/strong>&c.<\/strong> This verse may be thus paraphrased: “Since Ephraim, forsaking God, and that one altar, at which alone he required them to serve him, idolatrously multiplied altars to themselves,altars against his command; (to do which was manifestly a sin in them;) therefore should those their beloved altars be accordingly occasions of great sin; and as such imputed to them to their condemnation. God would give them up to run on in their evil courses, till their iniquity was full, and they ripe for destruction; and then deliver them into the hands of their enemies, who should compel them to do that service at and to their <\/em>idolatrous altars, which should appear a manifest punishment so them for those of their own. So should they be punished by that wherein they had offended.” See Pococke. <\/p>\n Hos 8:11 Because Ephraim hath made many altars to sin, altars shall be unto him to sin.<\/p>\n Ver. 11. Because Ephraim hath made many altars to sin<\/strong> ] Because he hath multiplied altars against God’s express command, Lev 17:3-9 Deu 12:5-7 Jos 22:22-23<\/span> Jer 11:13<\/span> ; and that, to sin; as if it were on purpose to cross and provoke the Lord to anger by their superstitions and will worship, and to despite him with seeming honours (for displeasing service is double dishonour), therefore he shall have enough of it ere I have done with it. He shall be given up to a reprobate sense; that going on from one sin to another, he may fill up his measure, till wrath come upon him to the utmost. <\/p>\n “ Per quod quis peccat, per idem punitur et ipse.<\/em> ”<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Idolatry is sin with an accent, wickedness with a witness, 1Ki 15:30<\/span> ; 1Ki 15:34 ; 1Ki 16:2<\/span> ; 1Ki 12:30<\/span> ; 1Ki 13:34<\/span> , and shall be punished accordingly; for so the Chaldee paraphraseth here; Because they have multiplied their altars for sin, the altars of their idols shall be their ruin. There is one Hebrew word for sin and punishment: sin hails hell at the very heels of it, as one saith wittily. Polanus upon this text hath these three profitable observations. First, that as in the Old Testament one only altar was set up by God’s command in the tabernacle and temple, so also in the New Testament we have no other altar but Christ, Heb 13:10<\/span> . (Iren. lib. 4, contra Haeres, cap. 34.) Secondly, as the Israelites sinned in multiplying altars, so do the Papists most grievously, in that, not content with Christ and his satisfactory sacrifice alone, they set up other altars, and bring in other expiatory sacrifices. Thirdly, as the Israelites made many altars to sin, though they pretended good intention and devotion, so the Papists at this day multiply altars (even hundreds in some one church in Rome). to sin, though they falsely pretend their good retention therein, and the preservation and augmentation of God’s service.<\/p>\n NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Hos 8:11-14<\/p>\n 11Since Ephraim has multiplied altars for sin,<\/p>\n They have become altars of sinning for him.<\/p>\n 12Though I wrote for him ten thousand precepts of My law,<\/p>\n They are regarded as a strange thing.<\/p>\n 13As for My sacrificial gifts,<\/p>\n They sacrifice the flesh and eat it,<\/p>\n But the LORD has taken no delight in them.<\/p>\n Now He will remember their iniquity,<\/p>\n And punish them for their sins;<\/p>\n They will return to Egypt.<\/p>\n 14For Israel has forgotten his Maker and built palaces;<\/p>\n And Judah has multiplied fortified cities,<\/p>\n But I will send a fire on its cities that it may consume its palatial dwellings.<\/p>\n Hos 8:11 Ephraim has multiplied altars for sin This refers either to (1) the golden calf worship at both Dan and Bethel or (2) the local Ba’al shrines in each village on every high hill. The irony is that Israel’s religiosity was not helpful, but disastrous! The phrase altars for sin is repeated twice for emphasis.<\/p>\n Hos 8:12 Though I wrote for him ten thousand precepts of My law God has clearly and repeatedly revealed Himself to them (i.e., ten thousand precepts, e.g., Hos 11:2 and 2Ki 17:13-15 for Judah). Their problem was not lack of information, but lack of (1) truth; (2) covenant loyalty; and (3) personal faith (cf. Hos 4:1)! They rebelled against God’s light and truth.<\/p>\n NASB, NRSVThey are regarded as a strange thing<\/p>\n NKJVBut they were considered a strange thing<\/p>\n TEVBut they reject them as strange and foreign<\/p>\n NJBEphraim regards it as alien to him<\/p>\n The term strange thing (DBD 266, KB 267, Qal ACTIVE PARTICIPLE) is used in several senses:<\/p>\n 1. non-family members (e.g., Deu 25:5; Hos 5:7)<\/p>\n 2. not conforming to proper regulations<\/p>\n a. incense, Exo 30:9<\/p>\n b. fire, Lev 10:1<\/p>\n 3. adulterers, e.g., Pro 2:16; Pro 5:3; Pro 5:20; Pro 7:5; Pro 22:14<\/p>\n 4. foreigners (enemies, invaders), e.g., Hos 7:9; Hos 8:7; Isa 1:7; Isa 25:2; Isa 25:5; Isa 29:5; Isa 61:5; Jer 51:51; Eze 28:7; Eze 28:10<\/p>\n God’s law had become to them as a non-family foreigner!<\/p>\n Hos 8:13 They sacrificed the flesh and ate it Notice the use of NOUN (BDB 257) and VERB (BDB 256) for emphasis. This seems to refer to the selfish motive of appetite in the performing of religious ritual, especially the communal meal (cf. Lev 7:15-18).<\/p>\n But the LORD has taken no delight in them The term delight (BDB 953, KB 1280, Qal PERFECT) means accept (people, cf. Jer 14:10; Eze 20:40 and sacrifices, cf. Jer 14:12; Eze 20:41). This verse and concept are paralleled by Hos 5:6. God is only pleased with cultic ritual when it is accompanied by heartfelt faith and obedience (cf. Amo 5:21-27 : Mic 6:6-8).<\/p>\n Now He will remember their iniquity See note at Hos 7:2.<\/p>\n They will return to Egypt This seems be a metaphor for a reverse Exodus or a way of referring to slavery (cf. Hos 7:16; Hos 9:3). When you compare this to Hos 11:5 it seems like a contradiction. However, I think this is using Egypt as a symbol of slavery. Israel will return to slavery, but this time it will be to the nation of Assyria (i.e., exile).<\/p>\n Israel will not turn (i.e., repent BDB 996, KB 1427) so she will return (i.e., exile, same VERB).<\/p>\n Hos 8:14 Israel has forgotten Israel has forgotten (BDB 1013, KB 1484, Qal IMPERFECT) God and His covenant (cf. Hos 2:13; Hos 4:6; Hos 13:6), so God will remember (cf. Hos 8:13 d) her iniquities!<\/p>\n Maker This is the DIRECT OBJECT of forgotten and it is a Qal ACTIVE PARTICIPLE of the VERB to make (BDB 793, KB 889). There is an irony between Israel making idols (i.e., golden calves) for themselves (cf. Hos 8:6) and forgetting the One who made them (cf. Gen 1:26; Isa 17:7).<\/p>\n It is possible that maker refers to God’s initiation to form a people (i.e., call of Abraham, the Exodus, the giving of the Law at Sinai), not Genesis.<\/p>\n built palaces. . .fortified cities Israel was trusting in her wealth (cf. Hos 8:14 c). Judah was trusting in her military might. The Maker is not impressed by human makings. They will be destroyed! In 2Ki 18:13 Sennacherib is said to have captured all of the fortified cities of Judah.<\/p>\n I will send fire NIDOTTE, vol. 1, p. 533, the punishment prophesied for Israel’s enemies often included the burning of cities (Jer 43:12-13; Jer 49:27), expressed with particular effect in Amo 1:4; Amo 1:7; Amo 1:10; Amo 1:12; Amo 1:14; Amo 2:2; Amo 2:5; Hos 8:14, where the concept of holy war probably lies behind the formula, I will send fire upon…’ If so, then instead of God fighting for and defending Israel, He is the very One who is her enemy! What a shocking reversal, so characteristic of the prophets’ messages!<\/p>\n DISCUSSION QUESTIONS<\/p>\n This is a study guide commentary which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.<\/p>\n These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought provoking, not definitive.<\/p>\n 1. Who does the they refer to in Hos 8:4?<\/p>\n 2. Why was golden calf worship such an abomination to YHWH?<\/p>\n 3. Is Hos 8:13 in contradiction to Hos 11:5?<\/p>\n many: Hos 10:1, Hos 10:2, Hos 10:8, Hos 12:11, Isa 10:10, Isa 10:11 <\/p>\n altars: Deu 4:28, Jer 16:13 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Exo 32:5 – Aaron Deu 9:21 – I took Isa 31:7 – for a sin Hos 5:3 – Ephraim<\/p>\n Hos 8:11. Another wording of this verse would be to say that Ephraim (the 10-tribe kingdom) had sinned by making many idols or altars for the false worship. Therefore, the nation was destined to continue that abominable practice while suffering the punishment of exile in the country from which the abomination was learned.<\/p>\n Hos 8:11-12. Because Ephraim hath made many altars to sin Since the Israelites, forsaking that one altar at which alone God required them to serve him, idolatrously multiplied altars to themselves, altars against Gods command; (to do which was manifestly a sin in them;) therefore shall those, their beloved altars, be accordingly occasions of great sin, and as such imputed to them to their condemnation. The meaning is, that<\/p>\n God would give them up, to run on in their evil courses, till their iniquity was full, and they were ripe for destruction; and then that God would deliver them into the hands of their enemies, who should compel them to do that service at, and to, their idolatrous altars, which should appear a manifest punishment to them for those of their own. So should they be punished by that wherein they had offended. Pocock. I have written to him the great things of my law Or, many things, as may be translated. The Vulgate renders it, multiplices leges meas, my manifold laws. That law which I gave them by Moses, containing rules excellent in themselves, and such as would have made them great in the eyes of their neighbours, they have disregarded, as if it had neither reason nor authority, and did not concern them: see Deu 4:6; Deu 4:8.<\/p>\n Making altars, palaces, and fortified cities 8:11-14<\/span><\/p>\n In rebellion against Yahweh’s covenant the Israelites had also built many altars (Deuteronomy 12). They built them to offer many sin offerings, but since God had not authorized these altars they became places for sinning rather than places for worshipping. More altars simply meant more sinning.<\/p>\n Because Ephraim hath made many altars to sin, altars shall be unto him to sin. 11. Because ] Rather, For. It is a justification of the foregoing threat. hath made many altars to sin ] In times of national trouble, sacrifices were multiplied, to propitiate the national God (comp. Isa 1:11). But as no corresponding … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Hosea 8:11”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22216"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22216\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
I. <\/strong>False worship is a great sin.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>It is a sin against great light. Israel could not say it sinned in ignorance.<\/p>\nFuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"