{"id":22407,"date":"2022-09-24T09:30:11","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T14:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-amos-31\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T09:30:11","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T14:30:11","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-amos-31","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-amos-31\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Amos 3:1"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> Hear this word that the LORD hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 1<\/strong>. <em> the whole family<\/em> ] The expression used includes naturally Judah, though, as the context shews, Amos is practically thinking only of Israel. For <em> family<\/em>, used in the sense of a whole people, cf. <span class='bible'><em> Amo 3:2<\/em><\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 8:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mic 2:3<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">Amos, like Hosea, rebukes Israel directly, Judah indirectly. He had warned each nation separately. Now, ere he concentrates himself on Israel, he sums up what he had before said to Judah and in the Person of God. Ye have been alike in My gifts to you, alike in your waste of them and your sins; alike ye shall be in your punishment. What was said to Israel was said also to Judah: what was directed first to the former people, belongs to us, the later. What Jesus said to the Apostles, He said also to the Church, and to single souls, What I say unto you, I say unto all, Watch <span class='bible'>Mar 13:37<\/span>.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Hear ye this word &#8211; <\/B>With that solemn threefold call, so frequent in the Old Testament, he summons them thrice <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 4:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 5:1<\/span>, as in the Name of the Holy Trinity, to hear Gods words. : The prophet, at the outset of the chapter, rouses the hearers to anxious consideration. For the words of the most High God are to be heard, not with a superficial, unawed, wandering mind, but with reverence, fear, and love.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>That the Lord hath spoken against &#8211; <\/B>(and upon) you, (coming down from heaven <span class='bible'>Heb 12:25<\/span>, both upon and against them) the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt To Abraham God had said, in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed <span class='bible'>Gen 12:3<\/span>. So now, in withdrawing that blessing from them. He takes it away from them, family by family <span class='bible'>Zec 12:12<\/span>. He includes them, one and all, and Judah also, since all had been brought out of Egypt.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-8<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>You only have I known of all the families of the earth.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sin in the highly-favoured<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This is shameful ingratitude. The honour and blessing conferred on the Israelites gave the stain of ingratitude to every act of transgression of which they were guilty. It is direct rebellion. You only have I known, so as to reveal to you My will. Iniquity in you is disobedience to express commands, revolt against My authority. It is a dishonour offered to God. The privilege of being called after the name of God brings with it the danger of profaning that name by transgression. The nearer in privilege, the nearer we are to judgment. Distinguished blessings are leading to distinguished reward, or to distinguished punishment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>We are taught here that the providence of God prepares good and evil for man. View what are called common mercies in their origin, and understand the loving-kindness of the Lord. Evil is also prepared for the sinner, in the sense of calamity, judgment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>We are taught by the prophets vindication of the doctrine of a special providence to be very earnest when affliction comes in, working together with God, that it may do us good. Remember that God intended that sorrow to come as it did come, and when it did come.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>When the trumpet of Gods Word is sounded by His ministers, let us give heed to the note of warning or exhortation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>When there is evil in the land, let us with reverence acknowledge the hand of God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. <\/strong>The Lord revealeth His secret to His servants the prophets.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> He does this by giving them spiritual apprehension of the truths of His Holy Word, causes them to see terror in the threatenings thereof, sweetness in its promises, duty in its precepts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> Nothing is coming upon man that has not been revealed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> The Holy Spirit directs the thoughts and words of His ministering servants, so as best to suit the particular need of those whom they address. At all times the sincere preaching of the Word may be expected to give offence. See how dangerous is the conduct of those who despise, oppose, revile, and persecute men of God for telling them plain truth with faithfulness and honesty. See where the true strength of a faithful dispenser of Gods Word lies. The strength of the servant lies in his conviction that he is doing his Masters will. (<em>Vincent W. Ryan, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Elected for what?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here was this desert prophet, with keen, prayer-washed eyes, piercing through the shows of things to the unclean realities behind. He disinterred the moral corruption that lurked behind their whited professions. What answer did the people make to this rude child of the desert? He stood there, rude in speech and in dress, despised by the official priest, a mere field-preacher, proclaiming to the grandees of the metropolis that the moral corruption of the people was eating away the vital elements of the national strength and that in galloping consumption they were hastening on to a terrible and fatal retribution. What answer did they make? They fell back upon their belief in God. Their reply to the herdman was found in their doctrine of providence. What was that doctrine? It was this<strong>: <\/strong>Their nation was the favourite of the Lord. They were hedged about with peculiar sanctities. We only are known unto the Lord. Only between us and the Lord is there the intercourse which implies security. Thy threats, O Amos, are as noisy nothings. They are meaningless and terrorless. Such was the refuge in which the people found their security. We are the children of privilege. Privilege implies favour. Favour guarantees security. Such was their doctrine of election, and I am not altogether sure that their doctrine is banished from the minds of all men to-day. Now let us mark the answer of the Lord through the mouth of His prophet. We have heard the false doctrine of election; now let us hear the true doctrine which is enshrined in the words of our text. You only have I known of all the families of the earth<strong>: <\/strong>therefore&#8211;note the swift, piercing logic&#8211;therefore I will punish you. The false doctrine ran thus&#8211;You only have I known<strong>: <\/strong>therefore I will indulge you. The true doctrine culminates in fire&#8211;You only have I known<strong>: <\/strong>therefore I will punish you. You only have I known&#8211;I marked you out for special office. I appointed you to discharge a special function. I elected you to special service. But the office has been prostituted. The function has been ignored. The service has been despised. Therefore I will punish you. I singled you out from among men, that all men through you might be blessed. But ye have defiled your mission, and, instead of being a centre of saving health, ye have become a noisome pestilence. That is the expression of a Divine method of government which prevails in all time. Election does not mean security. Security is dependent upon the discharge of the duty which election creates. There is an aristocracy of the election, a chosen few, and these are they who have fulfilled the obligations of their election, and are therefore qualified to enter into the peace and joy of their Lord. Election therefore does not, in the first place, create security. It creates responsibility, and my security or insecurity depends upon the manner in which that responsibility is regarded. There is nothing which can ensure the protecting presence of the Most High God except moral agreement. Can two walk together . . .? cries the prophet in the verse which follows my text. Can two walk together, except they be agreed? If there is to be helpful and intimate companionship between two people, there must be profound agreement, and if I am to enjoy the companionship of the great God, with all that that companionship means of consoling and sheltering grace, if God and I are to walk together, we must be agreed, and my part of the agreement must be faithful and unconditional obedience to all His revealed will. Election; the prophet declared that it could only be found in the fact of obedience. They had been elected to duty; not in the election, but in the duty would they find the defences which are as invulnerable ramparts against their foes. Election means selection to service. The Lords specialities are for the sake of generalities. An individual is elected that he may serve a nation. A nation is elected that she may serve a race. A call is not a self-securing privilege; it is the entrustment of an office. To evade my responsibility is to destroy my defences, and to bring down swift retribution from God.  You only have I known<strong>: <\/strong>therefore I will punish you. Election, then, means selection for special service. This doctrine of election is here applied to nations. Certain nations are specially known by God. He whispers to them peculiar secrets, that they may proclaim them upon the house-tops to the nations of the world. Greece was specially known by God. The warm breath of the Lord came upon her people, and endowed her with that exquisite sense of the beautiful which has made her distinguished among all the nations of time. She revelled in the joy of perception, and exulted in the creation of lovely forms. God opened her eyes to the holiness of beauty, and gave her a mission to the race. And the Gentiles have come to her light. All the nations go to Greece to school. We go to the treasury of her graces for our own adornments. The Lord God elected her by special endowment, that by her election she might serve a race. Rome was specially known by God. She was His own handiwork. He fashioned her into special aptitude, giving her the endowment of a peculiar passion for order, a genius for polity, government, and empire. He breathed into her life the instinct of law, and by the speciality of her election He determined the speciality of her mission. And the Gentiles have come to her light. The foundations of modern jurisprudence are laid in ancient Rome. She has been the schoolmistress to all the nations. Israel was specially known by God. He breathed into her life a special genius for religion, a rare instinct for the Unseen and Eternal. To her He whispered the sublime truth of the unity of God and the august verities of the moral law. And the Gentiles have come to her light. Just as beauty is of the Greeks, and law of the Romans, so salvation is of the Jews! Israel was exalted, as a city set upon a hill, that the light of revelation might shine out upon the nation, yea, even upon them that were afar off. May it not be that the Lord has held secret communion with every nation, and whispered to her some peculiar message which makes her life distinctive and unique? It is along this line that I can travel with the least trembling when I contemplate the appalling divisions which distract the race. I gain some assurance from a broad application of this doctrine of election. Each nation has been specially elected. All nations are dependent upon each; each is dependent upon all. Because of the Divine distribution of gifts absolute severance is impossible. The eye cannot say to the hand, I have no need of thee<strong>: <\/strong>nor, again, the head to the feet, I have no need of you. Each nation is specially known of God, specially elected to unique and individual service. In this doctrine of the election of nations, which is an election to mutual service, and which entails mutual dependence, I base my hope of the ultimate practical comity of nations, and the realised brotherhood of the race. But now let us apply the prophets doctrine to the life of the individual, as we have applied it to the life of the nation. The prophets doctrine is this&#8211;election is not election to security, except through the discharge of obligation. Election is election to the service of o hers. How many of us, then, have been elected? Are there any exempt from the election? We are all known, all elected, all called&#8211;for the election is a call to individual faithfulness, and our response will determine whether the election shall issue in sunshine or in fire. Each life has its own peculiar mission. God appoints for each a special and individual task. My mission is my election. I may not know what my mission is. That matters not. God knows. My part is to discharge the duty that lies nearest, and then the next, and the next, and the next, and God will guide and control the connected purpose and mission. How can I turn the election into a glad consciousness of protecting providence and eternal security? By a spirit of obedience. By faithfulness in that which is least. (<em>J. H. Jowett, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Humiliation under Gods chastisement<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We enjoy great and peculiar privileges as a people. Religious light; civil liberty; public credit; individual exertions; private wealth; national power; commercial prosperity. Let us not forget that privilege involves responsibility. The very adoption of sons carries with it the certainty of fatherly correction; for what son is there whom the father chasteneth not? We must be prepared to expect that, as there are occasions where a fathers love is manifested in the correction of his child, and the affection that he feels is expressed by the chastisement he applies, so there are times when the same necessity may compel God to adopt a different mode of treatment from that which He generally employs, and to prove the love that He feels for His children by the judgments that He brings upon them. Nothing seems more natural, nothing more probable, than that a period of great scientific advancement, and of great commercial prosperity, should be a season of great forgetfulness of God. There are multitudes who habitually forget their dependence on God; who form their plans, pursue their inquiries, calculate their gains, without reference to Him. If punishment is to begin, where can it begin so appropriately as in noticing that forgetfulness of God which seems to be the sin that doth most, easily beset us; and in teaching us the humbling but unwelcome truth of our entire dependence on God? In time of national distress, let us pray, as Elijah prayed; and as his prayers prevailed for the people, when the people had avowed their allegiance to God, so let us hope that the prayer of faith shall still maintain its character, and that to an humbled, penitent, and believing people the blessing will never be refused. (<em>Henry Raikes, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gods alarm to Great Britain<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In this chapter we have a denunciation of judgments against Israel, together with the grounds and reasons of it. Notice&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The special regard God had to His people. It is as if He should say, My heart has been set upon you, My thoughts of kindness have been peculiarly towards and concerning you.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The awful visitation which even Gods regard to them engaged Him to bring upon them. <em><\/em>Therefore<em> <\/em>I will punish you. As to Israelites indeed, though God visits their iniquities with temporal judgments, it is with a design of love and of advantage to their souls. 3<strong>: <\/strong>The ground and reason of this, and that was their iniquities. I will punish you for all your iniquities.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>What have been Great Britains eminent mercies?<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Our temporal mercies, which purely relate to the things of this life.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Our mercies with regard to religious concerns, and to spiritual and eternal blessings.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>What have been our abuses of these eminent mercies? How have we rioted upon the bounties of providence! Has not our plenty been turned into means and occasions of feeding our pride and ambition, our intemperance, luxury, and debauchery? How unfruitful have we been under the means of grace. Has not the Holy Spirit, been grieved and provoked to withdraw from our solemn assemblies? And when we speak of religion, have we much more than the name?<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>What reason we have to fear that God will visit us with judgments for all these iniquities and abuses of his mercies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Our provocations are exceeding great.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The honour of God, as the great Governor of the world, is concerned to show His righteous resentment against a professing people that are guilty of such exceeding high provocations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>The threatenings of Gods Word give us reason to fear His bringing judgments upon us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>The examples God has made of other communities, and particularly of His professing people, for their iniquities, may justly raise our fears of His doing the same by us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. <\/strong>God has already taken up a controversy with us.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>IV. <\/strong>What course is to be taken for preventing such awful visitations? Public national sins must be followed with public national breaking them off by repentance and returning to the Lord. When dangers lie at the door of kingdoms and nations, the only method of preventing them, according to Gods ordinary rule of procedure in His government of this world, is national humiliation, fasting, and repentance for and departure from the provoking evils that have incensed His wrath against us, with earnest supplication and prayer for national forgiveness of national sins. (<em>J. Guyse, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>National privileges<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A<em> <\/em>nations guilt and punishment are graduated according to the scale of its privileges.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>Our privileges. Knowledge, as it relates to God, signifies approval, love. Israel had been unto the Lord a peculiar treasure above all people. Is there not a remarkable parallel between our own position and that of ancient Israel? When we pass in review our own national history we may well stand amazed at Gods marvellous dealings with us. To us, pre eminently and emphatically, beyond all nations of the earth, has the kingdom of God, taken from the Jews for their unworthiness, been given. Truly our privileges are as incomparable as they are priceless.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>Our penalties. Whether as a Church or a nation, we should be on our guard against unfaithfulness. We have the Word of the living God in our keeping. But are we as faithful to this trust as we ought to be? Do we not sometimes give a very halting and restricted testimony to the truth?<em> <\/em>(<em>R. W. Forrest, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Privilege and punishment<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>The privilege. So surpassing had been the tenderness of God, so intimate the relationship in which He had stood to them, that it appeared as if He had ignored all other nations to magnify His mercy to them. They alone had had the presence of God in their midst, with a Divinely appointed priesthood, and a law given by the mouth of God. Other nations were as worthy as they. It was only the mercy of God which had chosen them. God exalts His people now to the highest privilege. He reveals His truth and makes known His character to them.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>The punishment. This was a necessary result of their trangression.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Because theirs was no common sin. The clearest light, the richest mercy, the strongest warnings, the most awful threatenings failed to deter them from wandering into forbidden paths. Punishment is proportioned to privilege. Can we wonder, then, that Divine indignation should be kindled against those who multiplied trangressions?<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>It was necessary that God should vindicate His own character. He had taught them by warning and example how deeply He hated sin. The story of Achan, the history of the spies, the fate of the whole congregation of Israel showed that the wrath of God was revealed from heaven against all ungodliness of men.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>To a certain extent the punishment was remedial. God hoped to awaken the people from the stupor into which sin had thrown them. (<em>J. Telford, B. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>A specially blest people<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Now it is a fact that some men are far more highly favoured by heaven than others. Some have more health, some more riches, some more intellect, some more friendships, some more means of spiritual improve ment.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>They are oftentimes the greatest sinners. Who of all the people on the face of the earth were greater sinners than the Israelites? Yet they were specially favoured of heaven. England is a specially favoured land, but where is there more moral corruption? It is true that civilisation has so decorated it that its loathsomeness is to some extent concealed; but here it is. The corpse is painted, but it is still a putrid mass.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>They are exposed to special punishment. Therefore will I punish you for all your iniquities. It will be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment, etc. Therefore I will punish you. I who know all your sins, I who abhor all your sins, I who have power to punish you.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>They should, like all people, place them selves in harmony with God. Can two walk together, except they be agreed? <\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Agreement with God is essential to the well-being of all intelligent existences. No spirit in the universe can be happy without thorough harmony with the will and mind of God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The condition of all sinners is that of hostility to the will of God. (<em>Homilist.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\"> CHAPTER III <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>This chapter begins with reproving the twelve tribes in<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>general<\/I>, 1, 2;<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>and then particularly the kingdom of Israel, whose capital was<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>Samaria. Thee prophet assures them that, while they were at<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>variance with God, it would be unreasonable in them to expect<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>his presence or favour<\/I>, 3-8.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>Other neighbouring nations are then called upon to take warning<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>from the judgments about to be inflicted upon the house of<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>Israel, which would be so general that only a small remnant<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>should escape them<\/I>, 9-15.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>The image used by the prophet on this occasion,<\/I> (see <span class='bible'>Am 3:12<\/span>,)<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>and borrowed from his former calling, is very natural and<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>significant, and not a little dignified by the inspired<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>writer&#8217;s lofty air and manner.<\/I> <\/P> <P>                     NOTES ON CHAP. III<\/P> <P> <\/P> <P> Verse <span class='bible'>1<\/span>. <I><B>Against the whole family<\/B><\/I>] That is, all, both the kingdoms of Israel and Judah. In this all the <I>twelve<\/I> tribes are included.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>Hear, <\/B>with ear and mind, consider it well, for this is to hear indeed. <\/P> <P><B>This word, <\/B>which is spoken, and the thing decreed too, of God. <\/P> <P><B>The Lord hath spoken; <\/B>the Lord, who did show you greatest kindness, and whom you have repaid with greatest ingratitude, the everlasting God, who changeth not, hath determined and declared his determinate purpose; against you; or to, or concerning; for if menaces are words against them, yet advice, exhortations, and promises are to, and concerning, those to whom they are spoken. <\/P> <P><B>O children of Israel; <\/B>subjects of Jeroboam the Second, now king of the ten tribes. <\/P> <P><B>Against the whole family:<\/B> and let the two tribes consider too how far they are concerned in the prophets reproving for sin, calling to repent of sin, and threatening it they do not repent. <\/P> <P><B>Brought up from the land of Egypt:<\/B> see <span class='bible'>Amo 2:10<\/span>. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P><B>1. children of Israel<\/B>notmerely the ten tribes, but &#8220;the <I>whole family<\/I> brought upfrom Egypt&#8221;; all the descendants of Jacob, including Judah andBenjamin. Compare <span class='bible'>Jer 8:3<\/span>;<span class='bible'>Mic 2:3<\/span>, on &#8220;family&#8221;for the nation. However, as the prophecy following refers to the tentribes, <I>they<\/I> must be chiefly, if not solely, meant: they werethe majority of the nation; and so Amos concedes what they so oftenboasted, that they were the elect people of God [CALVIN],<I>but<\/I> implies that this only heightens their sins.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown&#8217;s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken against you, O children of Israel<\/strong>,&#8230;. The prophecy against Israel begins in the preceding chapter, where notice is taken of their sins, at least some of them, and of their aggravated circumstances, and sure destruction; and here they are called upon to hearken and listen to what the Lord by his prophet had spoken, and was about to speak unto them; and to &#8220;receive&#8221; this word, as the Targum; to receive it as the word of God, and not men, and with all humility and reverence; and to take it, and apply it to themselves, to whom it justly belonged; and to make a proper use and improvement of it by humiliation and reformation. A word this was,<\/p>\n<p><strong>against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt<\/strong>; it was but a family that went down into Egypt, and, though it greatly increased there, it was no more when it was brought up from thence: a family under the peculiar care of Jehovah, as the bringing them out of Egypt, out of the house of bondage, when greatly distressed there, abundantly shows; and which was a wonderful blessing and favour; and therefore often mentioned, and led on to many other blessings and mercies: a family which was the Lord&#8217;s own, and therefore he had a right to chastise and correct them for their sins. It seems by this phrase, &#8220;the whole family&#8221;, as if the two tribes of Judah and Benjamin were included: though the prophecy seems chiefly intended against the ten tribes, which went by the name of Israel, ever since the breach in Rehoboam&#8217;s time, as distinct from Judah;<\/p>\n<p><strong>saying<\/strong>; as follows:<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span> and <span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span> contain the introduction and the leading thought of the whole of the prophetic proclamation. <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span>. <em> &ldquo;Hear this word which Jehovah speaketh concerning you, O sons of Israel, concerning the whole family which I have brought up out of the land of Egypt, saying:<\/em> <span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span>. <em> You only have I acknowledge of all the families of the earth; therefore will I visit all your iniquities upon you.&rdquo; <\/em> The word of the Lord is addressed to all the family of Israel, which God had brought up out of Egypt, that is to say, to all the twelve tribes of the covenant nation, although in what follows it is the ten tribes of Israel alone who are primarily threatened with the destruction of the kingdom, to indicate at the very outset that Judah might anticipate a similar fate if it did not turn to its God with sincerity. The threat is introduced by the thought that its divine election would not secure the sinful nation against punishment, but that, on the contrary, the relation of grace into which the Lord had entered with Israel demanded the punishment of all evil deeds. This cuts off the root of all false confidence in divine election. &ldquo;To whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required. The greater the measure of grace, the greater also is the punishment if it is neglected or despised.&rdquo; This is the fundamental law of the kingdom of God.  does not mean to know, to become acquainted with, or to take knowledge of a person (Hitzig), but acknowledge. Acknowledgment on the part of God is not merely taking notice, but is energetic, embracing man in his inmost being, embracing and penetrating with divine love; so that  not only includes the idea of love and care, as in <span class='bible'>Hos 13:5<\/span>, but expresses generally the gracious fellowship of the Lord with Israel, as in <span class='bible'>Gen 18:19<\/span>, and is practically equivalent to electing, including both the motive and the result of election. And because Jehovah had acknowledged, i.e., had singled out and chosen Israel as the nation best fitted to be the vehicle of His salvation, He must of necessity punish all its misdeeds, in order to purify it from the dross of sin, and make it a holy vessel of His saving grace.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Keil &amp; Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">God&#8217;s Remonstrance with Israel.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"RIGHT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in\"> <SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">B. C.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"> 790.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR>  <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1 Hear this word that the <B>LORD<\/B> hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, &nbsp; 2 You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. &nbsp; 3 Can two walk together, except they be agreed? &nbsp; 4 Will a lion roar in the forest, when he hath no prey? will a young lion cry out of his den, if he have taken nothing? &nbsp; 5 Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where no gin <I>is<\/I> for him? shall <I>one<\/I> take up a snare from the earth, and have taken nothing at all? &nbsp; 6 Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the <B>LORD<\/B> hath not done <I>it?<\/I> &nbsp; 7 Surely the Lord G<B>OD<\/B> will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. &nbsp; 8 The lion hath roared, who will not fear? the Lord G<B>OD<\/B> hath spoken, who can but prophesy?<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The scope of these verses is to convince the people of Israel that God had a controversy with them. That which the prophet has to say to them is to let them know that the Lord has something to say against them, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 1<\/span>. They were his peculiar people above others, knew his name, and were called by it; <I>nevertheless he had something against them,<\/I> and they were called to hear what it was, that they might consider what answer they should make, as the prisoner at the bar is told to hearken to his indictment. The <I>children of Israel<\/I> would not regard the words of counsel and comfort that God had many a time spoken to them, and now they shall be made to hear the word of reproof and threatening that the Lord has spoken against them; for he will act as he has spoken.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I. Let them know that the gracious cognizance God has taken of them, and the favours he has bestowed upon them, should not exempt them from the punishment due to them for their sins. Israel is a <I>family<\/I> that <I>God brought up out of the land of Egypt,<\/I> (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 1<\/span>), and it was no more than a family when it went down thither; thence God delivered it; thence he fetched it to be a family to himself. It is not only the ten tribes, the kingdom of Israel, that must take notice of this, but that of Judah also, for it is spoken against the whole <I>family<\/I> that God <I>brought up out of Egypt.<\/I> It is a family that God has bestowed distinguishing favours upon, has owned in a peculiar manner. <I>You only have I known of all the families of the earth.<\/I> Note, God&#8217;s church in the world is a family dignified above all the families of the earth. Those that know God are known of him. <I>In Judah is God known,<\/I> and therefore Judah is more than any people known of God. God has <I>known<\/I> them, that is, he has chosen them, covenanted with them, and conversed with them as his acquaintance. Now, one would think, it should follow, &#8220;Therefore I will spare you, will connive at your faults, and excuse you.&#8221; No: <I>Therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities.<\/I> Note, The distinguishing favours of God to us, if they do not serve to restrain us from sin, shall not serve to exempt us from punishment; nay, the nearer any are to God in profession, and the kinder notice he has taken of them, the more surely, the more quickly, and the more severely will he reckon with them, if they by a course of wilful sin profane their character, disgrace their relation to him, violate their engagements, and put a slight upon the favours and honours with which they have been distinguished. <I>Therefore<\/I> they shall be punished, because their sins dishonour him, affront him, and grieve him, more than the sins of others, and because it is necessary that God should vindicate his own honour by making it appear that he hates sin and hates it most in those that are nearest to him; if they be but as bad as others, they shall be punished worse than others, because it is justly expected that they should be so much better than others. <I>Judgment begins at the house of God,<\/I> begins at the sanctuary; for God will be sanctified either by or upon those that <I>come nigh unto him,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Lev. x. 3<\/I><\/span>.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. Let them know that they could not expect any comfortable communion with God unless they first made their peace with him (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 3<\/span>): <I>Can two walk together except they be agreed?<\/I> No; how should they? Where there is not friendship there can be no fellowship; if two persons be at variance, they must first accommodate the matters in difference between them before there can be any interchanging of good offices. Israel has affronted God, had broken their covenant with him, and ill-requited his favours to them; and yet they expected that he should continue to walk with them, should take their part, act for them, and give them assurances of his presence with them, though they took no care by repentance and reformation to <I>agree with their adversary<\/I> and to turn away his wrath. &#8220;But how can that be?&#8221; says God. &#8220;While you continue to <I>walk contrary to God<\/I> you can look for no other than that he should <I>walk contrary to you,<\/I>&#8221; <span class='bible'>Lev 26:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 26:24<\/span>. Note, We cannot expect that God should be present with us, or act for us, unless we be reconciled to him. God and man cannot <I>walk together except they be agreed.<\/I> Unless we agree with God in our end, which is his glory, we cannot walk with him by the way.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; III. Let them know that the warnings God gave them of judgments approaching were not causeless and groundless, merely to amuse them, but certain declarations of the wrath of God against them, which (if they did not speedily repent) they would infallibly feel the effects of (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 4<\/span>): &#8220;<I>Will a lion roar in the forest when he has no prey<\/I> in view? No: he roars upon his prey. Nor will a <I>young lion cry out of his den<\/I> if the old lion <I>have taken nothing<\/I> to bring home to him; nor would God thus give you warning both by the threatenings of his word, and by less judgments, if you had not by your sins made yourselves a prey to his wrath, nor if he were not really about to fall upon you with desolating destroying judgments.&#8221; Note, The threatenings of the word and providence of God are not bugbears, to frighten children and fools, but are certain inferences from the sin of man and certain presages of the judgments of God.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; IV. Let them know that, as their own wickedness was the procuring cause of these judgments, so they shall not be removed till they have done their work, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 5<\/span>. When God has come forth to contend with a sinful people it is necessary that they should understand, 1. That it is their own sin that has entangled them; for <I>can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth where no gin is for him?<\/I> No, nature does not lay snares for the creatures, but the art of men; a bird is not taken in a snare by chance, but with the fowler&#8217;s design; so the providence of God prepares trouble for sinners, and it is <I>in the work of their own hands<\/I> that they <I>are snared.<\/I> Affliction does not <I>spring out of the dust,<\/I> but it is God&#8217;s justice, and <I>our own wickedness,<\/I> that <I>correct us.<\/I> 2. It is nothing but their own repentance that can disentangle them; for <I>shall one take up a snare from the earth,<\/I> which he laid with design, except he have <I>taken something<\/I> as he designed? So neither will God remove the affliction he has sent till it have done its work and accomplished that for which he sent it. If our hearts be duly humbled, and we are brought by our afflictions to confess and forsake our sins, then the snare has taken something, then the point is gained, the end is answered, and then, and not till then, the <I>snare is broken,<\/I> is taken up from the earth, and <I>we are delivered<\/I> in love and mercy.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; V. Let them know that all their troubles came from the hand of God&#8217;s providence and from the counsel of his will (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 6<\/span>): <I>Shall there be evil in a city,<\/I> in a family, in a nation, <I>and the Lord has not done it,<\/I> appointed it, and performed what he appointed? The evil of sin is from ourselves; it is our own doing. But the evil of trouble, personal or public, is from God, and is his doing; whoever are the instruments, God is the principal agent. <I>Out of his mouth both evil and good proceed.<\/I> This consideration, that, whatever evil is in the city, the Lord has done it, should engage us patiently to bear our share in public calamities and to study to answer God&#8217;s intention in them.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; VI. Let them know that their prophets, who give them warning of judgments approaching, deliver nothing to them but what they have <I>received from the Lord<\/I> to be delivered to his people. 1. God makes it known beforehand to the prophets (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 7<\/span>): <I>Surely the Lord Jehovah will do nothing,<\/I> none of that evil in the city spoken of (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 6<\/span>), <I>but he reveals it to his servants the prophets,<\/I> though to others it is a secret. Therefore those know not what they do who make light of the warnings which the prophets give them, in God&#8217;s name. Observe, God&#8217;s prophets are <I>his servants,<\/I> whom he employs to go on his errands to the children of men. The <I>secret<\/I> of God is with them; it is in some sense with all <I>the righteous<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Prov. iii. 32<\/span>), with <I>all that fear God<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Ps. xxv. 14<\/span>), but in a peculiar manner with the prophets, to whom the Spirit of prophecy is a Spirit of revelation. It would have put honour enough upon prophets if it had been only said that sometimes God is pleased to reveal to his prophets what he designs to do, but it speaks something very great to say that he <I>does nothing<\/I> but what he <I>reveals to them,<\/I> as if they were <I>the men of his counsel. Shall I hide from Abraham,<\/I> who is a prophet, <I>the thing which I do?<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Gen. xviii. 17<\/I><\/span>. God will therefore be sure to reckon with those that put contempt on the prophets, whom he puts this honour upon. 2. The prophets cannot but make that known to the people which God has made known to them (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 8<\/span>): <I>The Lord God has spoken; who can but prophesy?<\/I> His prophets, to whom he has spoken in secret by dreams and visions, cannot but speak in public to the people what they have heard from God. They are so full of those things themselves, so well assured concerning them, and so much affected with them, that they cannot but speak of them; for <I>out of the abundance of the heart<\/I> the mouth will speak. <I>I believed; therefore have I spoken,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Acts iv. 20<\/I><\/span>. Nay, and besides the prophetic impulse which went along with the inspiration, and made the word <I>like a fire in their bones<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Jer. xx. 9<\/span>), they received a command from God to deliver what they had been charged with; and they would have been false to their trust if they had not done it. <I>Necessity was laid upon them,<\/I> as upon the preachers of the gospel, <span class='bible'>1 Cor. ix. 16<\/span>.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; VII. Let them know that they ought to tremble before God upon the fair warning he had given them, as they would, 1. Upon the sounding of a trumpet, to give notice of the approach of the enemy, that all may stand upon their guard and stand to their arms: <I>Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people be not afraid,<\/I> or <I>run together?<\/I> so some read it, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 6<\/span>. Will they not immediately come together in a fright, to consider what is best to be done for the common safety? Yet when God by his prophets gives them notice of their danger, and summons them to come and enlist themselves under his banner, it makes no impression; they will sooner give credit to a watchman on their walls than to a prophet sent of God, will sooner obey the summons of the governor of their city than the orders given them by the Governor of the world. God says, <I>Hearken to the voice of the trumpet;<\/I> but <I>they will not hearken,<\/I> nay, and they tell him plainly that they will not, <span class='bible'>Jer. vi. 17<\/span>. 2. Upon the roaring of a lion. God is sometimes <I>as a lion, and a young lion, to the house of Judah,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Hos. v. 14<\/I><\/span>. The lion roars before he tears; thus God warns before he wounds. If therefore the lion roars upon a poor traveller (as he did against Samson, <span class='bible'>Judg. xiv. 5<\/span>), he cannot but be put into great consternation; yet the <I>Lord roars out of Zion<\/I> (<span class='bible'><I>ch.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> i. 2<\/span>), and none are afraid, but they go on securely as if they were in no danger. Note, The fair warning given to a careless world, if it be not taken, will aggravate its condemnation another day. The lion roared, and they were not moved with fear to prepare an ark. O the amazing stupidity of an unbelieving world, that will not be wrought upon, no, not by the <I>terrors of the Lord!<\/I><\/P> <P><I><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p style='margin-left:8.575em'><strong>AMOS &#8211; CHAPTER 3<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.54em'>GOD&#8217;S COMPLAINT AGAINST THE WHOLE HOUSE OF JACOB<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:8.42em'>(Amos ch. 3 through 9:1-10)<\/p>\n<p>Verses 1-15:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 1 recounts <\/strong>a direct address from God, to the whole &#8220;family of Jacob,&#8221; all Israel, whom He had long since brought up to Palestine from the lower level of Egypt, to &#8220;hear,&#8221; or give special respect to His voice, <span class='bible'>Luk 14:35<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 10:17<\/span>. Both the ten tribes of the northern kingdom, whose judgment was at hand, and all the twelve tribes are referred to at times as God&#8217;s family, meaning His nation, national Israel, His wife, <span class='bible'>Jer 3:1-22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 8:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mic 2:3<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 2 affirms <\/strong>that Israel only, as His chosen nation, does He know and has He known, acknowledged as His own, through His covenants. These are the greater reasons for their need to obey and<\/p>\n<p>of chastisement for their disobedience, <span class='bible'>Exo 19:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 4:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jas 4:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 12:47<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 3 begins <\/strong>a succession of seven rhetoric questions, the nature of which language reflects a negative answer to the question. For instance, the question &#8220;can two walk together except they are agreed, can they?&#8221; God can not walk (fellowship) His own people, His own profligate wife any longer, is the idea, because of her base whoredoms, <span class='bible'>Jer 3:6-14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 3:20<\/span>. He who once walked in fellowship with and among them must now appear in righteous judgment only, <span class='bible'>Lev 26:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 54:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Co 6:16-17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph 5:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jas 4:4<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 4 continues <\/strong>the idea that a lion will not roar in the forest except he has prey, will he? The answer is &#8220;no,&#8221; and God will not roar against them except it be that they are justly prey to His judgment anger, <span class='bible'>Mat 24:28<\/span>. As the old lion will not roar except the prey be in sight, so will the young lion (the whelp) lie silent in his den, before he is weaned, until the smell of blood is nearby. Even so the prophets of God cry out, <span class='bible'>Amo 1:1-2<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 5 asserts <\/strong>as birds are not taken without trap or snare-nets, or taken up until they have entrapped their prey, even so God has not only warned and threatened judgment upon Israel, but will also execute it, <span class='bible'>Num 32:23<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 6 continues <\/strong>that rhetoric method of prophetic revelation by raising questions that clearly implies the true answer. The idea is &#8220;a trumpet can not be blown in the city and the people not be afraid, can it?&#8221; You answer. And &#8220;there will not be evil (great, calamitous judgment) in the city, and the Lord didn&#8217;t cause it, can there?&#8221; You answer. The prophet simply informs sinning Israel that pending evil judgment should arouse them from their self-sufficiency and imagined self-security, <span class='bible'>Eze 33:1-5<\/span>. Israel was at ease, not believing the message the Lord sent them by His prophet Amos.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 7 then <\/strong>gives a summary affirmative to the questions of verses 3-6, assuring that God would do nothing against His own family (Israel) who he had brought out of Egypt, walked with her and known exclusively so long as His wife, without revealing it to His true prophets to share with them, verses 1, 2. He thus affirms the inspiration and message by His prophets, <span class='bible'>Gen 18:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 4:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rev 22:19<\/span>. God reveals Himself in special ways to his own, <span class='bible'>Psa 25:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 15:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 17:25-26<\/span>. Fault found against God&#8217;s prophets&#8217; messages were groundless, without justification, <span class='bible'>Jer 20:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze 9:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 18:17<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 8 assures that <\/strong>none can keep from fearing when a lion roars, ch. 1:2 and v. 4 above; So the prophet can but speak when the Lord gives Him the awful judgment message and says &#8220;give it to the people.&#8221; He must obey God, even as every believer when he hears and knows God&#8217;s will, <span class='bible'>Act 4:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act 5:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act 5:29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co 9:16<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 9 calls upon Amos <\/strong>and the prophets of Israel and Judah to publish from the palaces or chief residences of Ashdod, where the princes and rulers of the Philistines resided, through all the land, even into Egypt, from the flat-roof-house tops of all the lands, to assemble themselves upon the mountains of Samaria. There the Egyptians and Philistines, chief enemies of Israel, were witnesses of her coming just punishment. These heathen nations beheld the tumult of violent and oppressive crimes committed by the Israelites toward one another, <span class='bible'>Job 35:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Ecc 4:1<\/span>. They became witnesses of unrighteousness that prevailed among God&#8217;s people, who claimed to be righteous, v. 13, <span class='bible'>Pro 29:1<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 10 charges <\/strong>that Israel and Judah, God&#8217;s own people, had turned with seared and obstinate conscience to moral corruption, so that they could no longer do right, <span class='bible'>Jer 4:22<\/span>. Their hearts were hardened against honesty in business matters, so that they behaved as thugs, bandits, and robbers to enrich their palace coffers, even among the rulers, <span class='bible'>Pro 10:2<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 11 again asserts <\/strong>that the message of the Lord to this sinful family of Israel and Judah was that an adversary would shortly surround them and bring down their vaunted power. The palaces or the residences of their princes and rulers would be destroyed, as a just retribution for their sins, v. 10; It happened when Shalmaneser, King of Syria came upon them shortly, <span class='bible'>2Ki 17:5<\/span>; Their strength failed, <span class='bible'>Pro 10:15<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 12 then affirms <\/strong>that as surely as the shepherd brought two, leg-fragments or the piece of an ear, from slain sheep, so would God eventually rescue His people from her enemies, <span class='bible'>Gen 31:39<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 22:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ti 4:17<\/span>; This certain judgment was to reach all in Israel, even in Samaria and Damascus, who dwelt in the &#8220;corner of a bed,&#8221; or &#8220;in a couch,&#8221; meaning all who lived luxuriously, <span class='bible'>Amo 4:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 4:4<\/span>. To be rich, powerful politically, and at ease in Samaria and Damascus, routes of travel for the invading army, would not keep any in Israel from certain judgment soon.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 13 again calls <\/strong>on the people of Israel, gathered at Bethel&#8217;s altars of idolatry, to hear this message, as one given of God, directly for them. The Lord God, the God of heaven&#8217;s hosts, cared for them, in spite of their spiritually adulterous ways, <span class='bible'>Jer 3:1-25<\/span>. Or it may be that the princes of Egypt and Philistia of v. 9 were also to hear and simply be witnesses to the just judgment He was about to inflict on His people.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 14 announces <\/strong>that when God should visit Israel&#8217;s transgressions with judgment it would come specifically to the altars at Bethel to cut off their horns, where the golden calves were worshipped. There &#8220;the altar,&#8221; chief one, and other imitation altars, should be completely destroyed, as described <span class='bible'>1Ki 12:32<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 13:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki 23:15-16<\/span>. After God&#8217;s altar, all others were divisive, <span class='bible'>Deu 12:4-14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 4:21-24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 18:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Heb 13:10-14<\/span>. From the great altar of calves erected by Jeroboam in Bethel many other similar ones were built. Sin breeds, and spreads like a cancer, as men sow it, See? <span class='bible'>Gal 6:7-8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ti 2:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki 10:1<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 15 announces <\/strong>that Israel&#8217;s houses, resided in by monarchs, would be destroyed. The monarchs and wealthy had different houses for winter and summer. The summer houses were on the mountain or among forests where it was coolest, facing the east of north. The winter houses were in sheltered lowlands, facing the south to benefit most from the sunshine. Yet all these were to be smitten by Divine judgment, <span class='bible'>Jdg 3:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 36:22<\/span>. Like Ahab&#8217;s house, many in Israel had come to be inlaid with walls, doors, and ceiling of ivory, <span class='bible'>1Ki 22:39<\/span>. But no ornament avails if righteousness be lacking in the day of judgment, <span class='bible'>Pro 10:12<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> The Prophet wished doubtless by these words to confirm his own authority, for he saw that his doctrine was regarded with contempt: and it is probable that the words recited here were not only once delivered by him, but had been often repeated. We know how great was the pride and confidence of that people: it was therefore needful to beat it down, that they might be habituated to dread and fear, when God reproved them by his Prophets. <\/p>\n<p> It was then the common mode of speaking, when he said,  Hear the word which God has spoken concerning your, O children of Israel.  He brings forward here the name of God, that they might know that they had not to do with a mortal man, or with a shepherd, such as he was. We then observe here, what I have just referred to, and that is, that the Prophet seeks to strengthen his authority as a teacher, that he might gain more respect among the people. But he adds,  concerning the whole family which I brought up out of Egypt  It is certain that this discourse was not addressed except to the ten tribes; why, then, does the Prophet speak here so generally? Even because the kingdom of Israel formed the greater portion of the race of Abraham, and on this account they boasted that the adoption continued to be possessed by them. Since, then, they despised the tribe of Judah, and the half-tribe of Benjamin, which was connected with it, and had ever boasted of their great number, the Prophet says here, by way of concession, that they were indeed the blessed seed, the posterity of Abraham; in a word, the elect people, whom God had redeemed from Egypt. Then the Prophet includes not here the kingdom of Judah, but concedes to the Israelites what they boasted, &#8212; that they were the elect people, the holy race of Abraham, the very nation which had been miraculously delivered. &#8220;Let, then,&#8221; he says, &#8220;all these boastings be granted, yet God will not, on this account, desist from executing his judgment upon them.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p> We now apprehend the design of the Prophet: he first seeks to gain respect for his doctrine, and takes occasion to speak of his own vocation, that he brought nothing of his own, but only discharged faithfully the office committed to him; yea, that he was the organ of the Holy Spirit, and adduced nothing from his own mind, but only spoke what the Lord had commanded him. And then, as the Israelites, relying on their large number, thought that wrong was done them, when they were severely reprehended by the Prophets, and as there was an absurd rivalship between them and the kingdom of Judah, the Prophet concedes to them that for which they were foolishly proud; but, at the same time, he shows that they in vain confided in their number, inasmuch as God summoned them to judgment, though they were the elect people, and the holy seed, and the redeemed nation. These are the main points. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Calvin&#8217;s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong>AMOSOR HEATHENISMANCIENT <span><\/span>AND MODERN<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'><strong>Amo 1:1<\/strong><\/span><strong> to <span class='bible'><strong>Amo 9:15<\/strong><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>THE opening sentences of this Book give us briefly, and yet somewhat fully, the history of the Prophet whose name it wears. He belonged to the herdmen of Tekoa, and prophesied in the days when Uzziah was king of Judah, and Jeroboam, Son of Joash, sat upon the throne of Israel, and two years before the earthquake.<\/p>\n<p>There are few Prophets the date of whose living is so definitely fixed. It is known that Uzziah and Jeroboam were contemporary kings in the period 809 to 784 B. C. It is certain, therefore, that sometime in these twenty-five seasons, Amos spoke. Some have thought to fix it accurately by referring to the history of this earthquake, which was one of the most terrible visitations the country had ever known of its kind. Josephus assigned, as the immediate occasion of this earthquake, the act of pride on the part of Uzziah in offering incense, for which God smote him with leprosy, and says<em>, Meanwhile a great earthquake shook the ground and the Temple parting, a bright ray of the sun shone forth and fell upon the kings face, so that forthwith the leprosy came over him. And above the city, at the place called Eroge, the western half of a hill was broken off and rolled half a mile to the mountain Eastward, and there stayed, blocking up the ways, and the kings garden.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>But it ought to be said, in all candor, that those people who swear by Josephus, but doubt the inspiration of the biblical writers, have poor occasion for their conduct. This ancient Jewish historian is so often writing down legend, tradition, and even his own imagination, for history, that one dare not receive his statement concerning this earthquake as authentic, and the very year of Amos writing remains undetermined.<\/p>\n<p>The place of his residence is put past dispute, however. It was at Tekoa, a little village twelve to fourteen miles from Jerusalem, and six miles south of old Bethlehem, the very one whence Joab brought the wise woman to intercede for Absalom, and which the king Rehoboam made a fortified town.<\/p>\n<p>His humble station was also affirmed; not even the owner of sheep, but a hireling, who as opportunity offered, followed the herds; and when there was no employment in that avocation, turned to the gathering and selling of sycamore fruit or figs.<\/p>\n<p>The most of the Old Testament Prophets are the sons of honored fathers, descendants from famed families; but already God is beginning to manifest forth the fact, which finds so many illustrations in New Testament teachers, namely,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>How that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>That no flesh should glory in His presence? (<span class='bible'><em>1Co 1:27-29<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>But in keeping with the humble station of this man, and his equally humble estimate of self, he spent only a single verse upon his personal history, <\/p>\n<p>as if the man were of little moment; while Gods message to the people was the subject of supreme concern.<\/p>\n<p>With what a sentence did he smite the ears of his auditors<em>The Lord will roar from Zion, and utter His voice from Jerusalem; and the habitations of the shepherds shall mourn, and the top of Carmel shall wither.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>It is not difficult to imagine him a successful street preacher, for these words were doubtless uttered in the alley-like avenues of Jerusalem. When he had finished that first sentence, every Jew within hearing of it would be riveted in attention, and ready to give eager ear to all that followed. It is interesting now to note, either the consummate genius of the speaker, or else Gods evident inspiration for both arrangement and expression of his thought.<\/p>\n<p>It seems to me that this Book, upon close study, falls naturally into four parts and considered as a sermon or discourse, is ideal in its arrangement.<\/p>\n<p>The first of these divisions has to do with<\/p>\n<p><span><\/span><strong>THE PROPHETS NEIGHBORS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'><strong>Amo 1:3<\/strong><\/span><strong> to <span class='bible'><strong>Amo 2:3<\/strong><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>From <span class='bible'>Amo 1:3<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Amo 2:3<\/span> Amos speaks solely concerning the heathen round about. He denounces Damascus; he condemns Gaza; he excoriates Tyrus; he reproves Edom, he censures Ammon; and delivers sentence against Moab. What an introduction for a street discourse in Jerusalem! Every Jewish auditor would be delighted, for these were their hated enemies, and to have a man whose very mien and tongue told of his Divine appointment to the order of Prophet, utter such excoriations, would arouse the smouldering hatred which the Jews held against these into a flame of enthusiasm for the man speaking such words.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Now, before passing from this subject, let us see some essential truths suggested in these sentences.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>First of all, <strong>The Prophets ministry is predetermined.<\/strong> His speech was no trick of the elocutionist to catch his auditors by condemning their enemies. Amos disclaims all originality and responsibility for these words, introducing his deliverance by the sentence, <em>Thus saith the Lord. <\/em>There are people who seem to entertain an impression that a prophet has no right to interfere in any affairs of another, and no occasion to condemn even the bad doings of his neighbors. It is not unusual to hear it said, You belong in the Church; and at the most your ministry should spend itself within the circle of her membership. You may have a right to instruct her youth, and even admonish her adults, but what have you to do with others? Those politicians who live and move in another realm; those science Professors who instruct Truth in skepticism, those liquor sellers who lure you to debauch, that realm of commerce, created for barter, not to speak of other confessedly unchristian circleswhat business have you with them?<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>They recognize no allegiance to your views, no obligation to your opinions; they regard your speech, concerning their conduct, a presumption. Why, therefore, persist in taking upon yourself a service which is despised by the very ones of whom you speak?<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Amos answer to all of this is sufficient! <em>Thus saith the Lord.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>That is the answer of every true prophet. He is not spying out his neighbors sins, and speaking against them because the sermon brings him either pleasure or profit, but because God has said,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Preach the Word; he instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>* * But after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And they shall turn away their ears from the Truth, and shall be turned unto fables. <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry? (<span class='bible'><em>2Ti 4:2-5<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Only a few years ago some nominal Christians all over this country were voicing a certain amount of sympathy with the Boxer movement; and taking their cue from the cry of these murderers Down with the foreign devils, asked, What right have we to force our views upon these people when they do not want them?a question which can be answered in two sentences. Christians never force their views upon any, only preach them; and their warrant for doing that is in His Word. He who created China and has never signed a quitclaim to His right in that land and that people, namely, Jesus Himself, says, <em>Go ye therefore, and teach ail nations, baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Gods Prophets who call the Chinese to repentance, are there, commissioned of God Himself. Who will object to His conduct? Shall the creature take issue with the Creator?<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Prophets message also is God-given. <\/strong>When Amos uttered these words concerning Damascus, and Gaza, and Tyrus, and Edom, and Ammon, and Moab, he was not speaking of himself, <em>But I will send a fire into the house of Hazael<\/em> and <em>I will send a fire on the wall of Gaza,<\/em> and <em>I will send a fire on the wall of Tyrus<\/em> and <em>I will send a fire upon Teman,<\/em> etc., etc. Such would have been utterly meaningless had it originated at the mouth of the Prophet.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>There are many people who object to Gods fire, kindled against His enemies, consuming the wicked. But let us not quarrel with Gods Prophet. This blaze was not born of his breath. When the minister reads from Revelation, <em>The fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death, <\/em>dont quarrel with John for the speech. Like Amos of old, his authority for the utterance is in the sentence <em>Thus saith the Lord.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>When Hugh Latimer, one New Years day, went along with the bishop and nobles, who were carrying their presents to the king, with a Bible in his hand, and presented that as His gift, and the king opening it read, <em>Whoremongers and adulterers God will judge<\/em> he was angry with Latimer; and, Herrick says, It is a wonder that bluff and fiery King Hall did not take off Hughs head.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Possibly the reason is found in the fact that even that fiery king knew that these were not Latimers words, and whatever quarrel he had was with God. The man who delivers Gods message is not to be blamed; and the man who does not present it is not Gods Prophet! <em>How shall they preach except they be sent?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>When Moses was called to be a Prophet for God he poorly apprehended the Prophets part. His answer was <em>O my Lord, I am not eloquent, neither heretofore, nor since Thou hast spoken unto Thy servant: but I am slow of speech, and of a slow tongue.<\/em> And the Lord answered him, <em>Who hath made mans mouth<\/em> * * <em>Go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say.<\/em> The man, who, like Amos, gets his message from God is Gods minister.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This Prophets judgment represents Divine justice. <\/strong>When he says <em>For three transgressions,<\/em> and <em>for four,<\/em> of Damascus, Gaza, Tyrus, Edom, Ammon, Moab, <em>I will send a fire, <\/em>there is absolute justice in the sentence declared. Damascus must suffer because they have <em>Threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron;<\/em> Gaza because they have <em>carried away captive the whole captivity, to deliver them up to Edom;<\/em> Tyrus, for participating in the same, and forgetting <em>the brotherly covenant;<\/em> Edom because he <em>did pursue his brother with the sword, and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, and he kept his wrath for ever; <\/em>Ammon because he <em>ripped up the women with child <\/em>* * <em>that they might enlarge their border:<\/em> and Moab because <em>he burned the bones of the king of Edom into lime. Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Men did not object when houses, infected with the black plague, were burned. There are some infections that can only be consumed in the flame. And there are some sins which can never be removed away save by the fire of Divine judgment; and that judgment always represents Divine justice also.<\/p>\n<p>Not a few people have spoken to me concerning a sermon once delivered by my colleague, Dr. Frost, expressing their gratitude in that he made it clear that the innocent were never punished on account of the guilty; and that the guilty never suffered above their deserts; and that judgment was always tempered with mercy.<\/p>\n<p>I confess to surprise that these things should strike any as new truths; they are as old as Revelation itself. Aye, they are inseparable from the very character of God.<\/p>\n<p>John Watson, in his Mind of the Master tells us that what has filled many honorable minds with resentment and rebellion is not the fact of separation, but the principle of execution; not the dislike of an assortment, but the fear that it will not be into good and bad. And he continues, But Jesus rested judgment on the firm foundation of what each man is in the sight of the Eternal. He anticipated no protest in His parables against the justice of this evidence; none has ever been made from any quarter. The wheat is gathered into the garner. What else could one do with wheat? The tares are burned in the fire. What else could one do with tares? When the net comes to the shore, the good fish are gathered into vessels; no one would throw them away. The bad are cast aside; no one would leave them to contaminate the good. The supercilious guests who did not value the great supper were left severely alone. If men do not care for Heaven, they will not be forced into it. The outcasts, who had never dared to dream of such a supper, were compelled to come. If men hunger for the best, the best shall be theirs.<\/p>\n<p>That is the truth of Gods judgment everywhere. And when He consumed these nations with the besom of destruction it was only because to continue them would be to condone sin by reproducing sinners, and stain the earth, calling into question His own wisdom by letting iniquity go unpunished. Say what you will of these judgments, you must commend their justice. Who art thou that repliest against God?<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>But from the Prophets neighbors we turn to<\/p>\n<p><span><\/span><strong>THE PROPHETS NATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'><strong>Amo 2:4<\/strong><\/span><strong> to <span class='bible'><strong>Amo 6:14<\/strong><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>To be sure Amos belonged by birth to Judah, but both these nations were his, by kinship, and by Divine appointment of Prophet to them. He came out of Judah, but he spake to Judah and to Israel. What a change must have come over the audience when this man, with eloquent speech, flaming with the evident enthusiasm of a Divine commission, turned suddenly from his denouncement of neighbors, to a kindred condemnation of the favored nations.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>For three transgressions of Judah, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have despised the Law of the Lord, and have not kept His Commandments, and their lies caused them to err, after the which their fathers have walked:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>But I will send a fire upon Judah, and it shall devour the palaces of Jerusalem.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Thus saith the Lord: For three transgressions of Israel, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they sold the righteous for silver, and the poor for a pair of shoes (<span class='bible'><em>Amo 2:4-6<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'><strong>Heathenism is not all with the heathen. <\/strong>You read the words of this Prophet from <span class='bible'>Amo 2:4<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Amo 6:14<\/span> and you will find the elect backsliders, and indulging in the abominations of their neighbors. It is a phrase employed too often, I fear, by those unwilling to go, or through their gold and silver to send, Why be interested in the heathen or foreign lands when there are so many heathen at home?<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Such speak better than they desire. The heathen are at home; aye, the heathen, here, were the very company who called themselves saints. And this Prophets descriptions are not ancient; they are up to date!<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>No single discourse upon which my hand has fallen has been comparable in clearness of expression, and vigor of thought, to one, once delivered by my late loved friend, Dr. John O. Rust, on The New Heathenism, and printed in the Presbyterian Quarterly, October, 1902, and reprinted in pamphlet form by Whittet and Shepperson, of Richmond, Va. Rusts opening sentence is, We are prone to think that we have left heathenism far behind us in the centuries of the past; or that it is banished from our shores to hide its shame in the remote and darkened corners of the earth; and one is almost stung into a feeling of resentment when the charge is made that there is a lively revival of heathenism at our very doors, here in enlightened America, in this blessed day of grace.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Then Rust continues to show that commercialism has carried many a so-called Christian into heathen practices. The poet has written:<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>It is success that colors all in life;Success makes fools admired, makes villains honest;All the proud virtues of this vaunting world Fawns on success and power, howeer acquired.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Rust thinks stheticism also has been chosen as a term with which to clothe our cultured heathenism. He says, When the people get rich suddenly they wish to acquire culture quickly. The consequence is that elegant ladies and gentlemen, strong in the languor of luxury, lounge in dainty drawing-rooms, and cultivate an Attic difference to virtue, and a Roman contempt for enthusiasm of robust manhood.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Occultism has, within the last ten years, enjoyed a ridiculous revival. Teachers whose chief qualifications are long hair and soiled linen, profess an acquaintance with the mysteries of philosophy which would appall the real learning of the world. Hypnotists reveal the deep secrets of psychology on a months tuition which has been hidden from the wisdom of the world for ages. And the amazing thing about it is that thousands of people listen to the babble of these fellows who will not heed the oracles of God. A certain statistician has computed that there has been an increase of 300 per cent in fools in this country in the last fifty years, and one is half inclined to believe the estimate.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Socialism represents an extreme reaction against the proud, arrogant and esoteric tendencies, and by its very consciousness of wrong, it is attempting to get its rights by an attack upon all society.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Now I confess it was most interesting to me to take that address of Rusts, and compare his words with those of the Prophet Amos. Commercialism cursed Gods people in the times of Amos also, and they were called to judgment because they <em>sold the righteous for silver, and the poor for a pair of shoes.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>stheticism found then the same sensual expression which it is receiving today, <em>They<\/em> [<em>stretched<\/em>] <em>themselves upon clothes laid to pledge by every altar. They [drank] the wine of the condemned in the house of their god.<\/em> By their increased riches, through the oppression of the poor, they bought unto themselves beds of ivory, and stretched themselves upon their couches, and ate the lambs out of the flock, and the calves out of the midst of the stall, and chanted to the sound of the viol, and invented to themselves instruments of music, defaming David, by saying they were the same as his; and setting aside the little glasses, emptied great bowls of wine.<\/p>\n<p>And, by anointing themselves with the chief ointment imagined that they were a sweet incense to God, forgetting to grieve for the affliction of Joseph, until the <strong>drunkards of Ephraim<\/strong> came to be a byword in the streets of Jerusalem.<\/p>\n<p>As to Occultism, they turned from the worship of the True God to such false shrines and sorcerers that a temple to Asherah was restored in Samaria; the gold and silver images to Baal were set up; the smoke of sacrifice to idols could be seen upon their mountain tops, and incense smelt in the shade of every grove until the word was <strong>Gilead was given to idols.<\/strong> They transgressed at Bethel, and multiplied transgressions at Gilgal.<\/p>\n<p>And then the socialism that always attends oppression! Selfish and sensual living stirred in the breasts of the unsuccessful, and made it easy to bring against their divided forces nations that should <strong>afflict them from the entering of Hamath unto the river of the wilderness.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Beloved, what greater danger to the land in which we live than these same, before which the ancient people of God sadly fell? Is not the Church itself threatened by commercialism in which, as Rust puts it, The evangelist has become the finangelist? The denominations which twenty-five years ago existed on a creedal basis, today continue on a commercial basis. Are not our missionary treasuries pauper-stricken too often because even the people who wear the Name of God, have learned to love palatial residences, and expend upon person and pleasure the whole of their income. And, are not many being brought to the bar of judgment and condemned with the charge having been substantiated against them, by the Lord God Himself, <em>In tithes and offerings<\/em> ye have robbed Me?<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Let us see another thing to be inferred from the language of the Prophet Amos. <strong>Sonship does not insure against chastisement.<\/strong> The true father may witness the most evil deeds upon the part of his neighbors child without speaking a word of correction, or claiming the right of chastisement. But not so when his own children go into sin. His very love of them compels their correction; while his past favors give him that paternal prerogative, God makes that the basis of Israels chastisement. He reminds the Children of Israel that He alone had brought them up from Egypt, saying, <em>You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>It is an Old Testament illustration of the New Testament assertion, <em>Whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth.<\/em> For those who have been the recipients of Divine favor in our day, the poets sentences speak this same truth.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>But if your ears refuse The language of His grace,Your hearts grow hard, like stubborn Jews,That unbelieving race.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>The Lord with vengeance drest,Shall lift His hand and swear,You that despised My promised restShall have no portion there.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'><strong>Beastly conduct necessitates bitter correction. <\/strong>Sometime when you have looked upon people whose moral filth and sensual living was such that your whole nature reacted from the sight, you have been tempted to adopt the language of the street and call them cattle. Perhaps you did not know that it was also the language of Scripture, and that it is possible for men to go so deeply into sin that God looks upon their condition as that of a beast in an unclean stall.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>To these ancient Israelites He said,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Hear this Word, ye kine of Bashan, that are in the mountain of Samaria, which oppress the poor, which crush the needy, which say to their masters, Bring, and let us drink.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>The Lord God hath sworn by His holiness, that, lo, the days shall come upon you, that He will take you away with hooks, and your posterity with fishhooks.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And ye shall go out at the breaches, every cow at that which is before her; and ye shall cast them into the palace, saith the Lord (<span class='bible'><em>Amo 4:1-3<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>These are rude words of the Prophet; but let us remember that they were not his words, but Gods instead. It is an awful thing for one to come to that moral condition where his conduct reminds God of the cattle of the field!<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Such a condition cannot be covered over by feasts, offerings and ceremonies. It is in vain for such to come to Bethel, which means the House of God, and to Gilgal to bring sacrifice every morning, and tithes after three years, and offer a sacrifice of thanksgiving with leaven, and proclaim and publish a free offering. As Joseph Parker says, There is one thing wanting in all that elegant program, and for want of that one thing the whole arrangement dies in the air like a gilded bubble. What is omitted from this rehearsal? The sin offering, the trespass offering. They will come with sacrifices every morning as donor to God; they will come with service and sacrifice of thanksgiving with leaven; they will throw money into the treasury, and announce the sum in plain figures. But where is penitence? Where is contrition? Where is heart-wringing? Where is the tearing conscience, the presence of tormenting agony in the innermost life? Most worship is partial; many will have a little partial religion. Some attention has to be paid to custom, to the habit, wont, and use of life; some mean coin must at least be thrown into the treasury, and thrown in with some ostentation; hymns must be sung, and fault must be found with the music, and judgment must be pronounced upon the rabbi, the priest, the teacher for the time being, and for a certain period there must be an odor of sanctity about what we say and do. All this trickery is possible; but it never reaches the Heaven of God. And God only answers it all by saying,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Seek not Beth-el, nor enter into Gilgal, and pass not to Beersheba * *.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Seek the Lord, and ye shall live * *.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Seek Him that maketh the seven stars and Orion, and turneth the shadow of death into the morning, and maketh the day dark with night: that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth: The Lord is His Name (<span class='bible'><em>Amo 5:5-6<\/em><\/span><em>; <span class='bible'><em>Amo 5:8<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>But to pass on in our study of this Book, we come upon<\/p>\n<p><strong>THE PROPHETS OPPONENTS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'><strong>Amo 7:1<\/strong><\/span><strong> to <span class='bible'><strong>Amo 9:10<\/strong><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It would be a marvel indeed if such a man as this went on without opposition. They beheaded Paul; they killed James, the Just; they crucified Jesus, and Amos reveals no spirit of compromise. How then can he hope to pass on in peace?<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.225em'><strong>The Prophet cannot escape the opponent. <\/strong>There is an Amaziah for every Amos. He will send to Jeroboam, the king, saying,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Amos hath conspired against thee in the midst of the House of Israel: the land is not able to bear all his words.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>For thus Amos saith, Jeroboam shall die by the sword, and Israel shall surely be led away captive out of their own land (<span class='bible'><em>Amo 7:10-11<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.225em'>It is not pleasant to be pricked by the truth; to be irritated by an inspired word; to feel the lash upon the conscience, quickened by Sacred Scripture; and men always have opposed it, and they always will.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.225em'>Perhaps in modern times we have had no more faithful minister of the Gospel than was Charles Spurgeon. But he had to learn how to be slandered, he says, in order that he might be made useful to God. His statement is, Down on my knees I have often fallen, with the hot sweat rising from my brow, under some fresh slander poured upon me; in an agony of grief my heart has been well-nigh broken; till at last I learned the art of bearing all and caring for none. * * If to be made as the mire of the streets again, if to be the laughing-stock of fools and the song of the drunkard once more will make me more serviceable to my Master, and more useful to His cause, I will prefer it to all this multitude, or to all the applause that man could give.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.225em'>That was exactly Amos answer when told to prophesy no more at Beth-el, since it was the kings chapel, and the kings court. He replied, confessing his humble estimate of himself,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>I was no Prophet, neither was I a Prophets son; but I was an herdman, and a gatherer of sycamore fruit:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And the Lord took me as I followed the flock, and the Lord send unto me, Go, prophesy unto My people Israel.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Now therefore hear thou the Word of the Lord.<\/p>\n<p>It is the only answer one needs to make to his opponent; and it is the only answer one can make that carries with it any assurance of success. Do you remember that when David, the lad, after being scoffed by his elder brother, and scorned by Goliath, the giant, said to that Philistine, <em>Thou contest to me with a sword, and with a spear and with a shield: but I come to thee in the Name of the Lord of Hosts. <\/em>Oh, beloved, whoever our opponents are, and whatever our opposition, that is the only Name in which we can stand; and that Name is sufficient!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Speaking in that Name we cannot be silenced by secular powers.<\/strong> Amaziah, in his inability to meet Amos single-handed, tried the trick of the pious politician, namely, arraying the secular powers against this servant of the Lord. It is an old trick; it was done in the days of Elisha; and repeated in the days of the Son of Man. He was charged with opposition to Caesar; as were His Apostles with rebellion against the civil government. It is most amazing how patriotic some men become, once the preaching of the truth reveals their personal sins, and those which they have in common with so-called statesmen, at one and the same time.<\/p>\n<p>They are not welcomed by the fallen, and sometimes are most bitterly opposed by men who have proclaimed themselves children of the King. Be it remembered, however, that the same Amaziahs who rise to charge Gods Prophets with treason will be compelled to listen, eventually, to the Divine sentence of the Lord,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Thou sayest, Prophesy not against Israel, and drop not thy word against the House of Isaac.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Therefore thus saith the Lord; Thy wife shall be an harlot in the city, and thy sons and thy daughters shall fall by the sword, and thy land shall be divided by line; and thou shalt die in a polluted land: and Israel shall surely go into captivity forth of his land (<span class='bible'><em>Amo 7:16-17<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>And yet<strong>The Christians courage will accord with the Divine commission.<\/strong> Amos only needs to answer, <em>The Lord took me as I followed the flock, and<\/em> * * <em>said unto me, Go, prophesy unto My people Israel.<\/em> When you have spoken in the language of Scripture, and are conscious that your purpose was to help and not hinder; to reform and not deform; to convert and not divert, then fear will flee away, and like Peter and the other Apostles of Jesus, you can answer the command of silence, <em>We ought to obey God rather than man,<\/em> and <em>We are His witnesses of these things.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>S. E. Herrick, speaking of Savonarola, in the times when all Florence was ablaze, having been basely betrayed by their ruler, says that Savonarola remained the one calm spirit, and assigns as the reason, He is the man who dwells unmoved in <em>(<\/em><em>The secret place of the Most High,<\/em> and <em>under the shadow of the Almighty <\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Every man ought to dwell there who is consciously seeking the glory of God, and faithfully presenting the Truth of God. Paul seems to have entertained that opinion of the whole Christian life, when he wrote the Ephesians,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of His might.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with Truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And your feet shod with the preparation of the Gospel of Peace;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked (<span class='bible'><em>Eph 6:10-16<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This Book concludes with the<\/p>\n<p><strong>PROPHETS PREDICTION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 9:11-15<\/span><\/p>\n<p>I want to make that also the conclusion of this chapter. This prediction is brief, but how blessed!<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>In that day will I raise up the Tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old: That they may possess the remnant of Edom, and of all the heathen, which are called by My Name, saith the Lord that doeth this.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that the plowman shall overtake the reaper, and the treader of grapes him that soweth seed; and the mountains shall drop sweet wine, and all the hills shall melt.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And I will bring again the captivity of My people Israel, and they shall build the waste cities, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine thereof; they shall also make gardens, and eat the fruit of them.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land which I have given them, saith the Lord thy God (<span class='bible'><em>Amo 9:11-15<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Take the three points of this prediction and delight thyself in them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The restitution of the House of David is pledged.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>That day will I raise up the Tabernacle.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span><\/span>That promise is found in a hundred forms in this Old Testament, and was made the occasion of James appeal to missionary endeavor, when, at the council of Jerusalem, he stood before the people saying,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Men and brethren, hearken unto me:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for His Name.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And to this agree the Words of the Prophets; as it is written,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>After this I will return, and will build again the Tabernacle of David, which is fallen dawn.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Simeon did not see that Tabernacle rebuilt; James was not privileged to witness it; nor have we; and yet the Word of the Lord will not fail. The House of David is yet to be exalted in the earth.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Dr. Gordon tells us, There is a fragment of Jewish legend that has floated down to us, which represents two venerable rabbis as musing among the ruins of Jerusalem after its destruction. One is giving way to unrestrained lamentation, saying, Alas! alas! this is the end of all. Our beautiful city is no more; our Temple is laid waste, our brethren are driven away into captivity. The other, with greater cheerfulness, replies: True; but let us learn from the verity of Gods judgments, which we behold about us, the certainty of His mercies. He hath said, <strong>I will destroy Jerusalem,<\/strong> and we see that He hath done it. But hath He not also said, <strong>I will rebuild Jerusalem,<\/strong> and shall we not believe Him? The latter rabbi was right! The same God who, by His might, said to His people, <em>I will sift the House of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve;<\/em> and speedily fulfilled the threat, also declared of one day in the future, <em>In that day will I raise up the Tabernacle of David that is fallen.<\/em> He will fulfil His promise. <em>And I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old: that they may possess the remnant of Edom, and of all the heathen, which are called by My Name, saith the Lord that doeth this (<span class='bible'><em>Amo 9:11-12<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'><strong>There is your pledge of the gathering out of the Gentiles.<\/strong> The heathen which are called by Gods Name. Isaiah had long ago said, <em>The Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising.<\/em> Jesus once reminded the multitudes of the promises of God concerning His Son<em>In His Name shall the Gentiles trust.<\/em> But more explicit still is that other statement of His concerning the destiny of Jerusalem<em>Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Beloved, this is your age and mine; the period in which we who were aliens, by nature, are being grafted into the True Vine. Arthur T. Pierson has at some time expressed the thought that he never succeeds in winning a soul to the Saviour without entertaining the hope that this may be the last man needful to the filling up of the time of the Gentiles. But, oh, how such a suggestion ought to stir apprehension in the breasts of all Gentile-unbelievers, lest we approach the day of the Lord, and the time of our opportunity will be past!<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>Finally:<strong>The Prophet also predicts the return of the Jews to their own land.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>I will bring again the captivity of My people of Israel, and they shall build the waste cities, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine thereof; they shall also make gardens, and eat the fruit of them.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land which I have given them, saith the Lord thy God (<span class='bible'><em>Amo 9:14-15<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:0.075em'>My brethren sometimes ask whether I see what appears clear evidences of the signs of the times; and if I do, there is something marvelous in this Zionist movement. Only a short time ago a clipping from your own paper here says that in the city of Milwaukee alone thousands of Jews have given their most ardent support to this Zionist movement to buy back again their own land, and make it the place of refuge to their persecuted people. So the movement has enlisted the Jews of St. Paul and Minneapolis. They do not see the significance of such a barter, but who knows but God is already beginning to fulfil literally those promises of His Word,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>Surely the isles shall wait for Me, and the ships of Tarshish first, to bring thy sons from far * *.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And the sons of strangers shall build up thy walls, and their kings shall minister unto thee: for in My wrath I smote thee, but in My favour have I had mercy on thee (<span class='bible'><em>Isa 60:9-10<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:2.1em'>And again,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion (<span class='bible'><em>Jer 3:14<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The first-fruits of that final restoration which is fully pledged, and made emphatic by a hundred repetitions, and when, according to Jeremiah, God will gather the remnant of His scattered flock out of all countries into which He has driven them, and bring them again into their fold. And they shall be fruitful and increase, for in those days He will raise up unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and execute judgment and justice in the earth <em>(<span class='bible'><em>Jer 23:3<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>; <span class='bible'><em>Jer 23:5<\/em><\/span><\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>O then that I <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Might live, and see the olive bear <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Her proper branches, which now lie <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Scattered each where,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And without root and sap decay,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Cast by the husbandman away,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And sure it is not far!<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:9.45em'>For surely He <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Who loved the world so as to give<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>His only Son to make us free,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Whose Spirit, too, doth mourn and grieve<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>To see man lost, will, for old love,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>From your dark hearts this veil remove.<\/p>\n<p><span><\/span><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Bible of the Expositor and the Evangelist by Riley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>CRITICAL NOTES<\/strong>.] <strong>Hear<\/strong>] Cf. beginning of chaps. 5 &amp; 6, indicating this chap. to be one whole address. <strong>Whole]<\/strong> Though the ten tribes threatened, yet all Israel are concerned and warned. <\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo. 3:2<\/span><\/strong>. <strong>Known]<\/strong> Not only love and care, but gracious fellowship and treatment (<span class='bible'>Exo. 19:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu. 4:20<\/span>); including both the motive and result of election. <\/p>\n<p><em>HOMILETICS<\/em><\/p>\n<p>GODS CHASTISEMENT OF A COVENANT PEOPLE.<em><span class='bible'>Amo. 3:1-2<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Before the end of chastisement can be answered its nature must be discerned. In itself it may seem of no moment, but when viewed as the expression of Gods purpose it is significant. Israel therefore should hear, for God Himself speaks and will punish. Thrice does Amos address the same solemn call to a nation whose former favours do not exempt from impending ruinHear this word.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. The grounds for chastisement<\/strong>. God always deals wisely, and often gives reasons for certain proceedings against us. The grounds of Israels punishment are specified. <\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Peculiar relationship abused<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>(1) <em>Individually<\/em> abusedchildren of Israel. Each member of the tribes, every person in the nation, was owned and cared for by God. <\/p>\n<p>(2) <em>Socially abused<\/em>the whole family. God separated them from others, and united them into one family. This was a natural protest against selfishness, a merciful design to secure obedience to the Supreme Lawgiver, and a method of Divine mercy to mankind. At that time will I be the God of all the <em>families<\/em> of Israel. But Israel cherished not the disposition of children and disowned their relation to God. If I be your father where is mine honour? <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Distinguished privileges neglected<\/em>. Which I brought up from the land of Egypt. They were redeemed from bondage and brought up, led to Canaan. This redemption was like a second creation, and a special ground for gratitude. But Gods goodness to the nation was forgotten, and his gifts despised. Remarkable deliverances are remembered by God, and should be improved by us. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Special obligations denied<\/em>. God blessed and loved them like no other people. You only have I known of all the families of the earth. Others were aliens; they were children. They were distinguished by rank and favour, made a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth. But they dishonoured their character, and violated their obligations to God. Iniquity in some is disobedience to express commands, revolt against Divine authority, and the addition of ingratitude to sin. Forget not all his benefits. <\/p>\n<p><strong>II. The design of chastisement<\/strong>. The nearer to God the greater the fall from him. Professors can either praise or profane the name of God. Their sins are more provoking than those of other men. They are against greater light, a higher principle of life, and more exalted relationship. God will not wink at sin in his most favoured children. Therefore will I punish you for all your iniquities. <\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Punishment to purify moral character<\/em>. God will have all his children to be like him. Bastards may escape, but sons must be chastised. Luther cried, Strike on, Lord, strike on, for now I know that I am thy child. As a man chasteneth his son, so the Lord thy God chasteneth thee. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Punishment to fit for greater service<\/em>. Afflictions remind us of forgotten duty, give discipline for future life, and fit us for a world of sin and sorrow. They make us more fervent and holy, stronger with God and more pitiful to men.<\/p>\n<p>More skilful in self-knowledge, ever more pure<br \/>As tempted more; more able to endure<br \/>As more exposed to suffering and distress;<br \/>Thence also more alive to tenderness [<em>Wordsworth<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Punishment to warn others of danger<\/em>. Against the whole family was the judgment denounced. They were the elect and beloved of God, but their sins only deepened their guilt and made them a warning to others. The lessons imparted to one people are for the benefit of another. There is unity and aim in the moral life of all nations. Exalted privileges everywhere bring heavier responsibility, and shameful abuse severer punishment. Hear this word of the Lord. For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God; and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?<\/p>\n<p>ILLUSTRATIONS TO CHAPTER 3<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo. 3:1-2<\/span>. <em>Special favours<\/em>. Men are not to be envied simply because they are endowed with special favours. Those very endowments, unless they are faithfully used, only augment responsibility, deepen guilt, and ensure a more terrible retribution. Where much has been given much will be required. It will be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment, &amp;c. [<em>Dr Thomas<\/em>].<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>PENITENCE PROMOTEDREASON CALLS FOR REPENTANCE THE LORD DOES NOT ROAR WITHOUT CAUSE<\/p>\n<p>TEXT: <span class='bible'>Amo. 3:1-8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1<\/p>\n<p>Hear this word that Jehovah hath spoken against you, O children of Israel against the whole family which I brought up out of the land of Egypt, saying,<\/p>\n<p>2<\/p>\n<p>You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will visit upon you all your iniquities.<\/p>\n<p>3<\/p>\n<p>Shall two walk together, except they have agreed?<\/p>\n<p>4<\/p>\n<p>Will a lion roar in the forest, when he hath no prey? Will a young lion cry out of his den, if he have taken nothing?<\/p>\n<p>5<\/p>\n<p>Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where no gin is set for him? shall a snare spring up from the ground, and have taken nothing at all?<\/p>\n<p>6<\/p>\n<p>Shall the trumpet be blown in a city, and the people not be afraid? shall evil befall a city, and Jehovah hath not done it?<\/p>\n<p>7<\/p>\n<p>Surely the Lord Jehovah will do nothing, except he reveal his secret unto his servants the prophets.<\/p>\n<p>8<\/p>\n<p>The lion hath roared; who will not fear? The Lord Jehovah hath spoken; who can but prophesy?<\/p>\n<p><strong>QUERIES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>Doesnt God know any other people than Israelites?<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>What is the message of the epigrams in <span class='bible'>Amo. 3:3-6<\/span>?<\/p>\n<p>c.<\/p>\n<p>Does Jehovah reveal every thing He does to the prophets?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>PARAPHRASE<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Listen, you chosen people, to the indictment which the Lord brings against youagainst all the covenant people which I brought up out of the land of Egypt! Be reasonable, and think: I chose you over all the other nations of the earth to grant special knowledge and privileges and you are unique in being blessed; it is logical, then, since you have openly defied Me and disobeyed Me that I should punish you with a special severity! Does not common sense tell you that when two people meet together at an appointed time and place there was a previous cause for such a meetingan agreement to do so? Will a lion roar in the forest without causeunless his prey is doomed? or will the young lion growl in his den if he has not taken his prey there for his feast? Does a bird ever get trapped unless someone places a trap there to catch it? or when you see a trap being sprung does it not indicate to you some cause behind its springing? What if the warning signal is blown on the trumpet in a citywill the people pay no attention to it and go on their way heedless? I have been blowing a warning trumpet in your ears over and overdo you not realize that the evils which have befallen you in the past were from Me as warnings? Most assuredly God will not visit His judgment upon anyone without first warning them by revealing it through His messengers. But I tell you truly, God has roared like a lion who is about to pounce on His preywhoever does not fear is doomed! The Lord God has spoken! His prophet cannot remain silenthe must deliver the Lords message!<\/p>\n<p><strong>SUMMARY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In a series of seven questions the Lord teaches a lesson in clear logical thinking in matters of sin and judgment, privilege and responsibility.<\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo. 3:1-2<\/span> HEAR THIS WORD . . . AGAINST THE WHOLE FAMILY WHICH I BROUGHT UP OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT . . . YOU ONLY HAVE I KNOWN . . . I WILL VISIT UPON YOU ALL YOUR INIQUITIES. Gods indictment is against the whole covenant people. Judah has already been warned (<span class='bible'>Amo. 2:4<\/span>) that she will be judged. But for the moment this particular prophet is concerned with the northern kingdom, Israel. No other people on earth were, at that time, privileged to be the recipients of the grace of God and the oracles of God in such a measure as Israel. She was a favored nation in this respect. Much was given her, much was expected! <span class='bible'>Romans 9, 10<\/span>, <span class='bible'>11<\/span> show in no uncertain terms that Gods choice of Israel was not due to any necessary merit in the case of Israel whereby God owed it to them. Their special privilege came by the Divine sovereign choice of God, Their blessing was unmerited favorgrace! This unique distinction demanded from its very uniqueness a special obligation of reciprocal love and obedience on the part of Israel (<span class='bible'>Exo. 19:5-6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu. 4:5-8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu. 32:34<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa. 147:19-20<\/span>). With greater privilege comes more severe punishment if the obligations are despised (<span class='bible'>Lev. 26:14<\/span> ff).<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo. 3:3-6<\/span> SHALL TWO WALK TOGETHER, EXCEPT THEY HAVE AGREED? . . . SHALL THE TRUMPET BE BLOWN IN A CITY, AND THE PEOPLE NOT BE AFRAID? SHALL EVIL BEFALL A CITY, AND JEHOVAH HATH NOT DONE IT? In a series of seven questions the Lord teaches a lesson in clear logical thinking in matters pertaining to sin-punishment relationships. Reason demands repentance! <span class='bible'>Amo. 3:3<\/span> has often been quoted in treatises on Unity. However, <span class='bible'>Amo. 3:3<\/span> has nothing to do with the subject of unity. It is simply an illustration of the universal law of cause and effect! Two people do not meet and walk together (effect) without previously making some appointment (cause) or arrangement to do so. Just so, says Amos, since every effect has its cause, your sin will cause Gods judgment to come upon you due to the special relationship between you and God and even as God promised in His word.<\/p>\n<p>These people of Israel had rationalized their sins so long they had lost the ability to see the very basic principle of cause and effect and to apply this to their relationship to God. But God is roaring like a liondoes a lion roar in the forest unless his victim is doomed? God does not roar without a cause any more than a lion does!<\/p>\n<p>Birds caught in a snare logically demands that someone previously had set the snare. And when one sees a snare being sprung he must logically reason that something caused it to spring.<br \/>If a mighty blast of the warning trumpet is blown in the city do the people pay no attention to it? Do not all the disasters happening even now in your cities and villages sound a warning trumpet to you that God is beginning His judgment? How senseless and indifferent can this nation be? But, just like the unbelieving and scoffing today, Israel probably rationalized, All these droughts, famines, disasters, wars are bound to happen in every country. But the prophet warns them, Shall evil befall a city, and Jehovah hath not done it? Local and national calamities are not due merely to natural causes, are not only the consequence of human mistakes, or faulty legislation, or political folly, or inadequate statesmanship. These and other matters may be secondary or contributory causes. But the Prime Mover of this Universe is Jehovah God! He has done it (<span class='bible'>Isa. 45:1-7<\/span>)! God is the author of both wed and woe! He does what He does from a just cause and for a just and merciful purpose. He does what He does from an omniscient sovereignty! The cause is mans sin, against which God has warned man time and again. The purpose is to warn man against rebelling against his Creator and to call the sinner to repentance, back to his God, the highest Good! Whatever the Lord does, whether tribulation or triumph, is good (<span class='bible'>Rom. 8:28<\/span>) Incidentally, there is excellent manuscript evidence today that <span class='bible'>Rom. 8:28<\/span> should be translated, God works all things together for good . . . etc. instead of All things work together for good . . . etc. This divine sovereignty working all things, weal and woe, together to serve His purposes, is one of the exhilarating thrusts of prophetic literature!<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo. 3:7-8<\/span> SURELY THE LORD . . . WILL DO NOTHING, EXCEPT HE REVEAL HIS SECRET UNTO HIS SERVANTS THE PROPHETS . . . THE LORD . . . HATH SPOKEN; WHO CAN BUT PROPHESY? God takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked (<span class='bible'>Eze. 33:11-20<\/span>); He is not willing that any should perish (<span class='bible'>2Pe. 3:9<\/span>); so He revealed His secret plans for the judgment of the wicked and the salvation of the righteous to His prophets (watchmen and shepherds) (<span class='bible'>Isaiah 6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jeremiah 1<\/span>, etc.) and they revealed them to man as facts to be believed; commands to be obeyed; warnings to be heeded; promises to be enjoyed. In the sure word of prophecy we have a light shining in a dark place, (<span class='bible'>2Pe. 1:16-21<\/span>); in His word we have all things that pertain to life and godliness (<span class='bible'>2Pe. 1:3-4<\/span>); in His word we have doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction in righteousness that the man of God might be complete, thoroughly furnished unto every good work, (<span class='bible'>2Ti. 3:16<\/span>). So the Lord has roared; who is so insensible that he will not fear? God has spoken; how can Gods messenger be silent? Even as Paul said, Woe is me, if I preach not the gospel . . . Necessity is laid upon every man called of God (and all Christians are called of God); the love of Christ should constrain every man (<span class='bible'>2Co. 5:11-15<\/span>) and knowing the fear of the Lord, we should persuade men! The Lord has spoken; who can but preach!<\/p>\n<p><strong>QUIZ<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>In what way did God know the covenant people?<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>What scriptures should they have known that promised severe punishment if they forgot His commandments?<\/p>\n<p>3.<\/p>\n<p>What universal principle of reasoning is taught in <span class='bible'>Amo. 3:3-6<\/span>?<\/p>\n<p>4.<\/p>\n<p>Is God actually the author of woe? What scripture says so?<\/p>\n<p>5.<\/p>\n<p>Why does God bring woe upon men?<\/p>\n<p>6.<\/p>\n<p>In what way is God justified when He punishes men for their sins?<\/p>\n<p>7.<\/p>\n<p>Why should men who know Gods will speak to other men about it?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(1) <strong>Children of Israel<\/strong> rather than house of Israel is a phrase not so usual in Amos. Hence in many MSS. the latter phrase is substituted. There is, however, significance in the former, as Amos addresses himself to both kingdoms in the phrase the whole family. Yet the kingdom of the Ten Tribes seems to be chiefly in the mind of the prophet.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 1, 2<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> <em> Failure to recognize responsibilities brings judgment. <\/em> If <span class='bible'>Amo 2:6-16<\/span>, is called the thesis of the Book of Amos, <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-2<\/span>, may properly be called the thesis of Amos 3-6, for the four chapters are entirely given up to an expansion of the truth that the failure of Israel to recognize its obligations makes inevitable its doom.<\/p>\n<p><strong> Hear this word <\/strong> A solemn summons to pay strictest attention to the words of the prophet, for he is about to utter a divinely given message. <\/p>\n<p><strong> The whole family <\/strong> Both Israel and Judah, though Amos deals chiefly with Israel. <em> Family <\/em> nation (compare <span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mic 2:3<\/span>). Brought up See on <span class='bible'>Amo 2:10<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Have I known <\/strong> And know still (G.-K., 106g). On the significance of <em> know <\/em> see on <span class='bible'>Hos 8:4<\/span>; here the word is used in a favorable sense, including choice and continuous care (<span class='bible'>Hos 13:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 1:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Isa 5:1-7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 3:1<\/span>). In a qualified sense Jehovah <em> knew <\/em> all the nations of the earth (<span class='bible'>Amo 9:7<\/span>; compare <span class='bible'>Amo 1:3<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Amo 2:5<\/span>). To this assertion of Amos the people would readily assent, but the inference drawn by the prophet would bring a surprise; they would have continued, &ldquo;therefore he will always be on our side.&rdquo; How different the prophet&rsquo;s inference! <\/p>\n<p><strong> Therefore <\/strong> Because I have chosen and blessed you (compare <span class='bible'>Amo 2:9<\/span> ff.). <\/p>\n<p><strong> Punish <\/strong> &ldquo;To whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required. The greater the measure of grace, the greater also is the punishment, if it is neglected or despised&rdquo; (compare <span class='bible'>Jer 7:3-15<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p><strong> All <\/strong> No excuses will be countenanced, no mercy shown.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> The Covenant Relationship Between YHWH And His People (<span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:1-8<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> The covenant relationship between YHWH and His people is revealed in this carefully constructed passage in which there is constant reference to that relationship in one way or another. It can be analysed as follows:<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> a <\/strong> Hear this word that YHWH has spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up out of the land of Egypt (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> &ldquo;Saying, &lsquo;You only have I known of all the families of the earth.&rsquo; Therefore I will visit on you all your iniquities&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> &ldquo;Will two walk together, except they have agreed?&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> d <\/strong> &ldquo;Will a lion roar in the forest, when he has no prey? Will a young lion cry out of his den, if he has taken nothing?&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:4<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> d <\/strong> &ldquo;Can a bird fall in a snare on the earth, where no gin is set for him? Will a snare spring up from the ground, and have taken nothing at all?&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> &ldquo;Will the ram&rsquo;s horn be blown in a city, and the people not be afraid? Will evil befall a city, and YHWH has not done it?&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:6<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> &ldquo;Surely the Lord YHWH will do nothing, except he reveal his secret to his servants the prophets&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> a <\/strong> &ldquo;The lion has roared, who will not fear? The Lord YHWH has spoken, who can but prophesy?&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p> Note that in &lsquo;a&rsquo; YHWH has spoken His word against the whole family (Israel and Judah) whom He brought out of the land of Egypt, and in the parallel the Lion has roared, for the Lord YHWH has spoken. In &lsquo;b&rsquo; the special relationship between YHWH and His people is emphasised, and in the parallel the special relationship between YHWH and His prophets. In &lsquo;c&rsquo; for two to walk together they must be in agreement, and in the parallel the now disobedient people are afraid and it is YHWH Who has done it (because they were no longer in agreement). Centrally in &lsquo;d&rsquo; we have a picture of the Lion Who has taken His prey, Who is contrasted with the people who like birds have fallen into the snare.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:1-2<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong> The Call For Israel To Consider YHWH&rsquo;s Special Relationship With Them A Relationship Which Makes Special Demands Upon Them (<span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:1-2<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ).<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:1-2<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&ldquo;Hear this word that YHWH has spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up out of the land of Egypt, saying, &lsquo;You only have I known of all the families of the earth.&rsquo; Therefore I will visit on you all your iniquities.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;Hear this word that YHWH has spoken &#8212;&rsquo; emphasises the seriousness of what he is about to say, and introduces a new oracle. What YHWH has spoken will surely come about. The language in these verses connects the children of Israel up with <span class='bible'>Exo 20:2<\/span>, &lsquo;I am YHWH your God&nbsp; <em> Who brought you out of the land of Egypt<\/em> &rsquo;, and thus with the covenant of Sinai. Furthermore at that time YHWH had seen them as &lsquo;My son, My firstborn&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Exo 4:22<\/span>). They were His family (<span class='bible'>Deu 14:1<\/span> &#8211; &lsquo;you are the sons of YHWH your God&rsquo;). They were to be &lsquo;My own treasured possession among all peoples&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Exo 19:5<\/span>). And He had &lsquo;known them&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Gen 18:19<\/span>) uniquely out of &lsquo;all the families of the earth&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Gen 12:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 28:14<\/span> -both Judah and Israel are now in mind) in order that they might be a blessing to the world. They may have considered that that put them in a privileged position, a position which made them feel superior, and to a certain extent it was true, but YHWH wanted them to know that it in fact put them in a dangerous position. For how can two (YHWH and Israel) walk together except they be agreed? Thus it was precisely because they were His chosen and elect people that He would visit on them &lsquo;all their iniquities&rsquo; which were to be seen as totally inexcusable in those whom YHWH has chosen. They above all were seen to be without excuse.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;You only have I known of all the families of the earth.&rsquo; This phrase ties up very much with YHWH&rsquo;s first call to Abraham. His purpose then had been that through His &lsquo;knowing&rsquo; Abraham &lsquo;all the families of the earth&rsquo; would be blessed (see <span class='bible'>Gen 12:3<\/span> combined with <span class='bible'>Gen 18:19<\/span>). And this was later confirmed to Israel (Jacob) in <span class='bible'>Gen 28:14<\/span> which indicates that &lsquo;all the families of the earth&rsquo; are waiting for the blessing that will come on them through Abraham&rsquo;s and Israel&rsquo;s (Jacob&rsquo;s) seed. And that would be because of YHWH&rsquo;s special &lsquo;knowing&rsquo; of Abraham, and through him his seed (see <span class='bible'>Gen 18:19<\/span>). And in <span class='bible'>Gen 18:19<\/span> we are told that YHWH had distinctively &lsquo;known&rsquo; Abraham with the express understanding that he would command his children and his household, and their descendants, to keep the way of YHWH, and to do justice and righteousness, so that by that means they might be a blessing to all the families of the earth. In other words such elective knowledge by YHWH made great demands on them. And it was through obedient response to those demands that blessing should have come on all the families of the earth. That was why their disobedience was so heinous.<\/p>\n<p> In the same way we who are &lsquo;elect according to the foreknowledge of God and sanctified by the Holy Spirit unto the obedience of Jesus Christ and the sprinkling of His blood&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>1Pe 1:1-2<\/span>) are bound to that obedience, and those who have been &lsquo;chosen in Him before the foundation of the world&rsquo; have been so in order that they may be &lsquo;holy and without blame before Him in love&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Eph 1:4<\/span>). It puts us under a great responsibility.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:3-8<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong> A Series Of Questions In Which Israel Are Asked To Consider The Consequences Of Their Situation (<span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:3-8<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Some see these question as simply illustrating cause and effect from everyday examples, with the aim of seeking to obtain a negative reply from each question until at last Amos suddenly puts in the crunch question (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:6<\/span> b). And for some of his listeners that might well have been how they saw it. (Each receives what he is willing to hear). But when we consider that Amos had initially opened his prophecy with a reference to YHWH as acting like a lion (&lsquo;YHWH will roar from ZION, and utter His voice from Jerusalem&rsquo; &#8211; <span class='bible'>Amo 1:2<\/span>), and applies a similar parallel in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span> (the lion has roared, who will not fear? The Lord YHWH has spoken who can but prophesy?&rsquo;), the context demands that we see in them more than that. The roaring of the lion must surely be seen as indicating that YHWH was speaking to his people. And what more effective picture of the future of sinful Israel than that of a frightened bird caught in a snare? Thus we see each question as being pregnant with significance in the context. With this in mind let us first look at them as a whole.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:3-6<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Will two walk together, except they have agreed?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Will a lion roar in the forest, when he has no prey?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Will a young lion cry out of his den, if he has taken nothing?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Can a bird fall in a snare on the earth, where no gin is set for him?<\/p>\n<p> Will a snare spring up from the ground, and have taken nothing at all?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Will the ram&rsquo;s horn be blown in a city, and the people not be afraid?<\/p>\n<p> Will evil befall a city, and YHWH has not done it?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Like the parables of Jesus the questions at first appear to be dealing with commonplaces, but once we pierce underneath them we discover that each line has a special significance in context. How can YHWH and Israel walk together unless they are in agreement? Does not the roaring of YHWH indicate that a prey has been caught (Israel). Will not the fall of Israel indicate that a snare had been set for them by YHWH? Can His snare fail in the accomplishing of His purpose, the ensnaring of Israel?<\/p>\n<p> The final two lines then apply the &lsquo;hidden&rsquo; meaning more openly as they draw attention to the besieging of a city. The sounding of the ram&rsquo;s horn is a signal of danger threatening, warning all to flee to the refuge of the city. And when evil comes on a city it is the sign that YHWH is active against it. Thus what is to happen to Israel will be proof positive that it is YHWH Who is acting against them. With this in mind we shall therefore consider the statements line by line:<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:3<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&ldquo;Will two walk together, except they have agreed?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> While this is certainly a general saying indicating the importance of two people agreeing if they are to walk together, for it is true that no two people will continually stay together unless they are at one with each other, in context its significance goes much deeper than that. For in the light of <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-2<\/span> YHWH is pointing out that He and His people cannot walk together in the covenant, in spite of His &lsquo;knowing&rsquo; them, unless they are both in agreement about the need to walk together. Indeed His purpose in &lsquo;knowing&rsquo; them had specifically been in order that they might walk in agreement with Him. And that they are not in such agreement has come out by the fact of their iniquities.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;Walking with or before YHWH&rsquo; is a regular Scriptural picture of His people walking in obedience with or before Him. Consider, for example, <span class='bible'>Gen 5:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 6:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 17:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 26:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 26:27-28<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 11:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 13:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 23:14<\/span>; 1Sa 2:30 ; <span class='bible'>1Sa 2:35<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Sa 7:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 2:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 8:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:4<\/span>. And the idea of &lsquo;walking in His ways&rsquo; appears more times than we could mention. Thus what is in mind here is that YHWH and His people cannot walk together, because His people are walking in iniquity.<\/p>\n<p> In other words, referring back to <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-2<\/span>, Amos is pointing out that if they had wished to enjoy the blessing of being &lsquo;known&rsquo; by YHWH as Abraham had been, they should have walked with Him with a like mind and a similar obedience, instead of walking in the way of iniquity. And it was because of those iniquities that YHWH could no longer walk with them. Their sinfulness had made it impossible. For those people whom YHWH has &lsquo;known&rsquo; do walk in His ways, as Abraham did. (In the words of Jesus, &lsquo;My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me &#8212;&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Joh 10:28<\/span>)).<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:4<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Will a lion roar in the forest, when he has no prey?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Will a young lion cry out of his den, if he has taken nothing?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> With <span class='bible'>Amo 1:2<\/span> in mind this is pointing out that YHWH would not have roared from Zion had He not had a prey in mind. Nor would He have roared through His prophets unless He had intended to fulfil what they said (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span>). Thus the fact that YHWH is now roaring at them demonstrates that He sees them as a prey which He has taken, and means that they should therefore consider that that in itself demonstrated their precarious position.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:5<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p> Can a bird fall in a snare on the earth, where no gin is set for him?<\/p>\n<p> Will a snare spring up from the ground, and have taken nothing at all?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Thus Israel should consider that the fact that they are to be taken in a snare is proof positive that it is YHWH Who has set a snare for them, and that when that snare is sprung it will not fail to catch its prey (of course earthly hunters regularly came across snares which had been sprung and had taken nothing, but Amos&rsquo;s point is that it will not happen with the divine Hunter). In other words their coming fall is inevitable.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:6<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p> Will the ram&rsquo;s horn be blown in a city, and the people not be afraid?<\/p>\n<p> Will evil befall a city, and YHWH has not done it?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> The sudden intensification in thought that occurs here is brought out by a change in the interrogative particle to &rsquo;im from ha. Now we are getting down to the patent facts. The blowing of a ram&rsquo;s horn in a city for no apparent reason would immediately strike fear into the hearts of those who heard it (compare <span class='bible'>1Ki 1:41<\/span>). In those days no one blew a ram&rsquo;s horn for fun. It was a serious matter. And if it was unexpected (and not the regular blowing of rams&rsquo; horns at a suitable feast) it clearly indicated danger, and people would be afraid. Those within the city would know that they should prepare for siege. Those outside the city would know that they should flee into the city for refuge. And in the same way now that YHWH was blowing His ram&rsquo;s horn through his prophets Israel would do well to fear (&lsquo;the lion has roared, who will not fear?&rsquo; &#8211; <span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span>). Let them then listen to Amos&rsquo;s warning. Let them recognise that the evil that he has prophesied against Israel will actually be due to the activity of YHWH and will certainly come upon them. Indeed nothing happens without YHWH&rsquo;s say-so, for all is under His control, so that they will then know that it is YHWH Who has acted against them.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:7-8<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong> He Assures Them That YHWH Does Nothing Without Revealing It To His Servants the Prophets So That They Need Not Be Caught Totally By Surprise By His Actions. However As YHWH Has Spoken Through The Prophets They Would Do Well To Take Heed (<span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:7-8<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Nevertheless he stresses that YHWH always gives forewarning. He never does anything without revealing it to His servants the prophets, and that with the intention of winning His people to repentance. And that is what He has done here. He has roared from Jerusalem (<span class='bible'>Amo 1:2<\/span>). Should they not then be afraid? And it is because YHWH has spoken that the prophets must prophesy, even when forbidden to do so. It is Amos&rsquo;s justification of his presence in Israel.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:7<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&ldquo;Surely the Lord YHWH will do nothing, except he reveal his secret to his servants the prophets.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> These words stress the fairness and nobility of YHWH. While he owes men nothing, nevertheless He never does anything without giving due warning. Indeed that is why He has sent prophets. It was precisely in order to give warning so that men may have the opportunity to repent.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;His servants the prophets.&rsquo; The phrase occurs a number of times in 2 Kings and regularly in Jeremiah. It occurs on the lips of the young prophet sent by Elisha on his approach to Jehu to prepare him for kingship (<span class='bible'>2Ki 9:7<\/span>), and in <span class='bible'>2Ki 17:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki 17:23<\/span> it is assumed as regularly used by prophets and seers prior to the fall of Samaria. There are no good grounds for denying it to Amos, (nor incidentally for calling it &lsquo;Deuteronomic&rsquo;).<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:8<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&ldquo;The lion has roared, who will not fear? The Lord YHWH has spoken, who can but prophesy?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> And in this present situation let his hearers be in no doubt. YHWH has roared (<span class='bible'>Amo 1:2<\/span>), should they not then be afraid? And the Sovereign YHWH has spoken, and therefore His prophets must prophesy. Both are constrained, the people by fear and the prophets by YHWH. That is why he, a Judaean, has come from Judah bearing the burden of the Lord&rsquo;s message. It is because he has been constrained by YHWH.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> The Inevitability Of Judgment, Both Because Of What YHWH Is, And Because He Will Act (<span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:1-10<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Following up on the idea in <span class='bible'>Amo 2:9-10<\/span> Amos commences this section of his prophecy (introduced by &lsquo;hear this word&rsquo; compare <span class='bible'>Amo 4:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 5:1<\/span>), with a reminder of Israel&rsquo;s deliverance from Egypt and YHWH&rsquo;s subsequent covenant with them at Sinai, which are the consequence of His having especially chosen them by entering into a covenant relationship with them (by His having &lsquo;known them&rsquo;), and emphasises the fact that One Who has revealed the fullness of His moral requirements in such a way must inevitably judge those who, having embraced them, ignored them. That is why Israel can be more certain of judgment than all the others who had previously been condemned in his sevenfold condemnation.<\/p>\n<p> He then follows this declaration up with a list of contrasts which draw attention to the fact that each thing has its consequence, and the examples are carefully constructed to convey an important message. Thus two (a moral YHWH and a disobedient Israel) cannot walk together unless they are in agreement, which they patently are not. That is why YHWH is like a lion roaring over its prey (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span>), in contrast with Israel who are like a twittering bird caught in YHWH&rsquo;s snare (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:5<\/span>). And it is all because they are not walking in agreement. The people in the city hear the ram&rsquo;s horn warning of danger, and are consequently afraid, thinking that the danger comes from an external source, while all the time the evil will come on them because YHWH, Who is like a lion towards those who behave wrongly, is responsible for what will happen to them (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:6<\/span>). And all this He has revealed to His servants the prophets, with whom He&nbsp; <em> is<\/em> &nbsp;in agreement.<\/p>\n<p> Foreign nations are then called on to witness what was to happen to YHWH&rsquo;s people because they had failed to do what was right (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:9-10<\/span>), for even pagan nations will recognise the depths of their sinfulness in treating YHWH as they have. The consequence will be that they will soon find themselves surrounded by enemies (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:11<\/span>). Like a lion YHWH is about to eat up His erring people (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:12<\/span>), and the scraps will be there to prove that it has happened.<\/p>\n<p> The passage finally closes with a declaration that as a consequence YHWH will bring judgment on the false altars at Bethel, and on the palaces and mansions of the wealthy, because both of these are evidence of Israel&rsquo;s failure to fulfil the covenant. And all this is as a result of the word of YHWH (&lsquo;says YHWH&rsquo;).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> The Lord Has Spoken, Who Will Declare His Word? <\/strong> <strong><em> <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-8<\/span><\/em><\/strong> opens and closes with the statement that the Lord has spoken. In this passage of Scripture the Lord&rsquo;s voice is compared to the roar of a lion, as in the opening verses of Amos, &ldquo;The LORD will roar from Zion.&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Amo 1:2<\/span>) These verses are written poetically in Hebrew parallelisms. The central message of this passage is that the Lord is asking Israel why none of them is proclaiming national repentance in an acknowledgment that Lord has brought calamities upon His people. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:3<\/strong><\/span> <strong> &nbsp;Can two walk together, except they be agreed?<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span><\/strong> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> Man cannot walk with God except he be agreed with God on what the Bible says. God is unchangeable (<span class='bible'>Jas 1:17<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Jas 1:17<\/span>, &ldquo;Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Mal 3:6<\/span>, &ldquo;For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Man was made in God&rsquo;s image, not vice verse. So man, if he truly desires to walk with God, will have to be conformed to the image of His Son, Jesus (<span class='bible'>Rom 8:29<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Rom 8:29<\/span>, &ldquo;For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Amo 3:3<\/strong><\/span> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span><\/em><\/strong> applies to people fellowshipping together. This is why many marriages cannot have a close fellowship. Each person is a different individual. Therefore to walk in fellowship, an individual must agree upon God&rsquo;s word to come into one mind and one accord. This is why God wrote <span class='bible'>2Co 6:14-18<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>2Co 6:14-18<\/span>, &ldquo;Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> A believer cannot be in fellowship with an unbeliever and the believer be walking according to God&rsquo;s Holy commandments. Note:<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Jas 4:4<\/span>, &ldquo;Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God ? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Everett&#8217;s Study Notes on the Holy Scriptures<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/p>\n<p>The Lord Ready to Punish<\/p>\n<p> v. 1. Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken against you, O children of Israel,<\/strong> all the descendants of Jacob being here addressed, <strong> against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt,<\/strong> by the mighty deliverance which resulted in their becoming His covenant people, <strong> saying,<\/strong> <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 2. You only have I known of all the families of the earth,<\/strong> acknowledging them and choosing them on the basis of His peculiar favor toward them; <strong> therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities;<\/strong> for the greater the privileges granted, the heavier is the punishment for the abuse of them, as the transgression is made worse by ingratitude. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 3. Can two walk together except they be agreed?<\/strong> This and the following propositions, bringing out illustrations from daily life, are intended to substantiate the prophet&#8217;s right to speak to the people in this manner, even if they were inclined to resent his sharp words. Jehovah and His prophet are in perfect agreement, as the sequel was bound to show. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 4. Will a lion roar in the forest when he hath no prey?<\/strong> Jehovah is the lion, and His roaring is that of satisfaction over the certainty that His prey cannot escape, that is, that Israel, in its present state of mind, will surely be punished. <strong> Will a young lion cry out of his den,<\/strong> with a satisfied roaring, <strong> if he have taken nothing?<\/strong> In the same way Jehovah already has the guilty people in His power and is ready to carry out His judgment upon them. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 5. Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth,<\/strong> a trap placed on the ground, <strong> where no gin is for him?<\/strong> That is: Could destruction come upon Israel if his own sin-fullness did not draw him into it?. <strong> Shall one take up a snare from the earth and have taken nothing at all?<\/strong> literally, &#8220;Does the trap rise from the ground if a snared bird does not cause it to do so?&#8221; that Isaiah Did Israel, knowing his own corruptness, hope to escape destruction, which was bound to take hold of him? <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 6. Shall a trumpet be blown in the city and the people not be afraid?<\/strong> As the signal of the trumpet was intended to arouse the people out of their security, so the message of the prophet was intended to awaken the people of Israel to the peril of their position. <strong> Shall there be evil in a city and the Lord hath not done it?<\/strong> The destruction which would strike Israel on account of the iniquities of the people was indeed planned by Jehovah, who in this sense is the Author of the calamities which come upon men on account of their sins. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 7. Surely the Lord God will do nothing but He revealeth His secret unto His servants, the prophets,<\/strong> that is, Jehovah does not send His judgments without warning, but gives the people knowledge of His counsel and opportunity to turn from their evil ways. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 8. The lion hath roared,<\/strong> in sounding the warning of his approach, <strong> who will not fear? The Lord God hath spoken, who can but prophesy?<\/strong> Amos was simply carrying out the work of his calling in announcing to his people the impending judgment of Jehovah. Even so the servants of God are bound to make known His holy will, regardless of the manner in which their hearers react to the truth. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>EXPOSITION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Verse 1-ch. 6:14<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Part <strong>II<\/strong>. <strong>THREE<\/strong> <strong>ADDRESSES<\/strong> <strong>PARTICULARIZING<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>SINS<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>ISRAEL<\/strong> <strong>AND<\/strong> <strong>ANNOUNCING<\/strong> <strong>IMMINENT<\/strong> <strong>JUDGMENT<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-15<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em> 1. First address: the prophet begins by showing Israel&#8217;s ingratitude for past mercies <\/em>(<span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span>)<em>, and his own commission to announce the coming judgment <\/em>(<span class='bible'>Amo 3:3-8<\/span>)<em>. They have drawn this upon themselves by iniquities which astonish even heathen nations; and they shall be punished by the overthrow of the kingdom and the destruction of their city<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:9-15<\/span>)<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The peculiar favour which God has shown the Israelites enhances the guilt of their ingratitude and increases their punishment. <strong>Hear this word. <\/strong>Each address (<span class='bible'>Amo 4:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 5:1<\/span>) begins with this solemn call. <strong>O children of Israel.<\/strong> The summons is addressed to the twelve tribes, as the following words prove; but the succeeding denunciation is confined to Israel, Judah being only indirectly warned that she may expect a similar fate unless she turns in time. <strong>I brought up from the land of Egypt.<\/strong> This is mentioned as the crowning act of God&#8217;s favour (<span class='bible'>Amo 2:10<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Have I known;<\/strong> <em>i.e. <\/em>loved, acknowledged, chosen. So in <span class='bible'>Hos 13:5<\/span> God says. &#8220;I knew thee in the wilderness;&#8221; and St. Paul (<span class='bible'>2Ti 2:19<\/span>), &#8220;The Lord knoweth them that are his&#8221; (comp. <span class='bible'>Nah 1:7<\/span>). The peculiar relation in which God allowed Israel to stand to him is much dwelt upon (see <span class='bible'>Deu 4:8<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Deu 4:20<\/span>; Deu 14:2; <span class='bible'>2Sa 7:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 17:21<\/span>). <strong>Therefore I will punish you; <\/strong>literally, <em>visit upon you. <\/em>They must not presume upon their privileges; the retention of God&#8217;s favour depended upon obedience to his Word (<span class='bible'>Exo 19:5<\/span>): the nearer they were brought to God, the greater their guilt if they fell from him. Unlike the nations denounced in the former chapters, Israel had sinned against light and knowledge and love, therefore the sentence on her must be heavier (comp. <span class='bible'>Eze 9:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 12:47<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Pe 4:17<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:3-8<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Before announcing more particularly the coming judgment, Amos, by a series of little parables or comparisons, establishes his right to prophesy, and intimates the necessity laid upon him to deliver his message. He illustrates the truths that all effects have causes, and that from the cause you can infer the effect.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Can two walk together except they be agreed?<\/strong> or, <em>except they have agreed? <\/em>The &#8220;two&#8221; are God&#8217;s judgment and the prophet&#8217;s word. These do, not coincide by mere chance, no more than two persons pursue in company the same end without previous agreement. The prophet announces God&#8217;s judgment because God has commissioned him; the prophet is of one mind with God, therefore the Lord is with him, and confirms his words. The application of the parables is seen in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span>. The Septuagint, reading differently, has, &#8220;except they know one another.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:4<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Will a lion roar,<\/strong> etc.? The lion roars when he has his pray in sight, and is about to spring upon it. So God makes the prophet utter his voice because he is ready to execute vengeance. The second clause expresses the same fact in different terms. The young lion (<em>kephir<\/em>)<em> <\/em>is not a whelp, but one able to provide for itself. He growls over the prey which he has in his lair. So Israel lies helpless as the words of God&#8217;s threatenings strike upon him.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:5<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The thought here is that the punishment is deserved as well as certain. A bird is not caught unless a trap is set for it. The trap which the sinner sets for himself is sin. <strong>Can a bird fall in a snare <\/strong>(<em>pach<\/em>)<strong><em> <\/em><\/strong><strong>upon the earth, where no gin <\/strong>(<em>moqesh<\/em>)<em> <\/em><strong>is for him?<\/strong> <em>i.e.<\/em> is set for him? The &#8220;gin&#8221; is a net with a stick for a spring, which flew up when touched, carrying part of the net with it, and thus the bird was enclosed and caught (see Kitto, &#8216;Cyclop.,&#8217; <em>s.v.<\/em> &#8220;Fowling,&#8221; 2.36). The <strong>LXX<\/strong>. probably read <em>yoqesh, <\/em>as they translate,  , &#8220;without a fowler.&#8221; So the Vulgate, <em>absque aucupe. <\/em>The second clause should be, <em>Shall a snare <\/em>(<em>pach<\/em>) <em>spring up from the ground without taking anything? <\/em>The<em> <\/em>snare, or trap stick, would not rise if it had not caught something. The sin is there, and the sinners shall surely not escape. When God appoints retributive punishments for the guilty, and announces the same by his prophets, they may be expected with absolute certainty.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:6<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The prophet must needs speak: shall not his denunciation arouse alarm among the people, as the trumpet suddenly heard in a city excites the terror of the inhabitants (comp. <span class='bible'>Eze 33:2-5<\/span>)? Shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it? The &#8220;evil&#8221; is affliction, calamity, <em>malum poenae. <\/em>As states have no future, all temporal calamities in their case may rightly be regarded as the punishment of sin. Thus the ruin impending, on Israel was sent by the Lord, whose agent was the enemy now approaching. All phenomena are ascribed in the Bible to Divine operation, no second causes being allowed to interfere with this appropriation (see Job 1:1-22.; <span class='bible'>1Sa 18:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 22:19<\/span>, etc.; <span class='bible'>Isa 45:7<\/span>). The verb &#8220;do&#8221; is often used absolutely, the context defining the result (see note on <span class='bible'>Hag 2:4<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This and the following verse apply the foregoing, parables All the evils announced come from the Lord; but he brings none of them on the people without first warning by his prophets (comp. <span class='bible'>Joh 13:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 14:29<\/span>). <strong>His secret<\/strong> (<em>sod<\/em>); unrevealed till then. Septuagint, , &#8220;instruction;&#8221; so the Arabic.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As the lion&#8217;s roar forces every one to fear, so the Divine call of the prophet forces him to speak (<span class='bible'>Jer 20:9<\/span>; Eze 2:8; <span class='bible'>1Co 9:16<\/span>, etc.). St. Gregory, moralizing, takes the lion in a spiritual sense: &#8220;After the power of his Creator has been made known to him, the strength of his adversary ought not to be concealed from him, in order that he might submit himself the more humbly to his defender, the more accurately he had learned the wickedness of his enemy, and might more ardently seek his Creator, the more terrible he found the enemy to be whom he had to avoid. For it is certain that he who less understands the danger he has escaped, loves his deliverer has; and that he who considers the strength of his adversary to be feeble, regards the solace of his defender as worthless&#8221; (&#8216;Moral.,&#8217; 32:14). Of course, this exposition does not regard the context.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:9-15<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Having vindicated his own commission, Amos proclaims what God purposes to do unto Israel. He is bidden to summon the heathen Ashdod and Egypt to bear witness to the iniquities of Samaria, which should bring about the overthrow of the kingdom, the destruction of the city with its altars and palaces, and the exile of the people.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:9<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ashdod<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>Amo 1:8<\/span>). God bids the prophets (<strong>publish ye<\/strong>) summon the inhabitants of the palaces of Philistia (of which Ashdod is the representative) and Egypt, because they had been the chief enemies of his people, and in their sight had mighty works been wrought for Israel; thus they could appreciate her iniquity and ingratitude. Some, translating <em>al <\/em>&#8220;upon,&#8221; say that the prophets are bidden publish their message upon the flat roofs of the palaces, that it may be heard far and near. Keil thinks that not all the inhabitants of the town are summoned, but only those who live in the palaces, who alone &#8220;could pronounce a correct sentence as to the mode of life commonly adopted in the palaces of Samaria.&#8221; But this seems an unnecessary refinement. The Septuagint reads,    <em>, <\/em>&#8220;Proclaim ye to the regions among the Assryians,&#8221; doubtless by some mistake of copyists. <strong>Assemble yourselves upon the mountains of Samaria. <\/strong>The city of Samaria was built on a hill which stands alone in the valley or basin, but it is surrounded by higher <em>mountains<\/em>, from whence, though at some distance, spectators could look down into its streets, and, as from the seats in an amphitheatre, behold the iniquities transacted there. Their implacable enemies, the Philistines, and those they were then courting, the Egyptians (<span class='bible'>Heb 7:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Heb 12:1<\/span>), are alike called to witness this spectacle. <strong>Tumult<\/strong>; the disorder, where might makes right. <strong>LXX<\/strong>;  <em>, <\/em>&#8220;many marvels,&#8221; as if the sight were a surprise even to the heathen. <strong>The oppressed<\/strong> (<em>ashuqim<\/em>);<em> <\/em>better, the oppressions, <em>i.e.<\/em> of the weak at the hands of the powerful (comp. <span class='bible'>Amo 2:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 4:1<\/span>). It was to the eternal disgrace of Israel that there were doings in her cities which the very heathen would condemn.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:10<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>They know not how to do right. <\/strong>The Samaritans have lost all sense of justice, the foundation of social life (<span class='bible'>Jer 4:22<\/span>). <strong>LXX<\/strong>;      <em>, <\/em>&#8220;She knew not what things shall be before her.&#8221; <strong>Store up violence; <\/strong><em>i.e.<\/em> the fruits of violence and robbery, what they had wrung from the poor by oppression and rapine.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:11<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>An adversary.<\/strong> The Hebrew is forcible, the Lord speaking as though he saw the fee present: &#8220;an enemy and around the land.&#8221; Ewald and Hitzig take <em>tsar <\/em>as an abstract noun, &#8220;distress;&#8221; the <strong>LXX<\/strong>. and Aquila, pointing it differently, read, <em>, <\/em>but the continuation of the sentence is scarcely to be deemed a translation,     <em> <\/em>&#8220;Thy land shall be made desolate round about thee&#8221;<em> <\/em>The adversary meant is Shalmaneser, who attacked Israel more than once and besieged Samaria; or his successor, Sargon, who claims to have reduced the city and removed the inhabitants (<span class='bible'>2Ki 17:1-41<\/span> and <span class='bible'>2Ki 18:9<\/span>, etc.; see Introduction to Micah). <strong>Thy strength. <\/strong>All wherein thou trustedst shall be brought down to the ground (<span class='bible'>Oba 1:3<\/span>). <strong>Palaces<\/strong>, in which were stored the fruits of injustice and rapine (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:10<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:12<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The prophet shows that the chastisement is inevitable, and that only the smallest remnant, the most worthless among the inhabitants, and they with much difficulty, can escape. The illustration from a common incident in a shepherd&#8217;s life is very natural in Amos. <strong>Taketh<\/strong>; better, <em>rescueth<\/em>. So below, <strong>shall be taken out;<\/strong> <em>shall be rescued<\/em>. The usual explanation is that a shepherd attacks the lion which has seized one of his sheep, and rescues from it the most worthless parts&#8221;a couple of shank bones or a bit, or tip, of an ear<em>.<\/em>&#8220;<em> <\/em>But as an attack on a lion would be an abnormal act of courage on the part of a shepherd, and the comparison is with things likely and usual, it is probable that the meaning is that the shepherd finds only these poor remnants after the lion has left his prey. So such a poor remnant shall be rescued from the ten tribes of Israel. <strong>That dwell in Samaria in the corner of a bed;<\/strong> that sit at ease, lounging in the cosiest corner of the divan, an image of indolent ease and careless security in the face of impending judgment. <strong>And in Damascus in a couch;<\/strong> <strong>LXX<\/strong>;   : Vulgate, <em>et in Damasci grabato<\/em>. The Syriac and Jewish Versions agree in considering the word &#8220;Damascus&#8221; to be a proper name. The other modern rendering takes it to mean the material which we call &#8220;damask,&#8221; or something similar. Hence our Revised Version gives, &#8220;on the silken cushions of a bed;&#8221; and others, &#8220;on the damask of a couch.&#8221; Dr. Pusey retains the old rendering, on the grounds that there is no evidence to prove that the manufactures for which Damascus was celebrated in after time existed at this period, its exports being then wine and white wool (<span class='bible'>Eze 27:18<\/span>), and that the Arabic word <em>dimakso <\/em>(which critics have cited as connected with the term &#8220;damask&#8221;) has nothing to do with Damascus, and meant raw, not manufactured, &#8220;silk.&#8221; He translates, &#8220;in Damascus, a couch,&#8221; and explains this to mean that Damascus, which Jeroboam <strong>II<\/strong> had won for Israel (<span class='bible'>2Ki 14:28<\/span>), &#8220;was a canopied couch to them, in which they stayed themselves<em>.<\/em>&#8220;<em> <\/em>This agrees with the ancient Jewish interpretation, which explains the clause to mean that the Israelites would some day depend for help on the Syrians represented by Damascus A third exposition, favoured by the Latin Vulgate, makes the words to mean, &#8220;on a couch of Damascus;&#8221; <em>i.e.<\/em> a Syrian couch of a costly and luxurious nature. This comes to the same as the modern rendering given, above and seems to be the easiest explanation of the expression. The difficulty depends chiefly on the punctuation of the word ; or them may be some corruption in the text. What the <strong>LXX<\/strong>. meant by their rendering is problematical,      <em>, <\/em>&#8220;The children of Israel who dwell in Samaria in the presence of the tribe and in Damascus.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:13<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Hear ye;<\/strong> Septuagint,  , &#8220;Hear, O ye priests.&#8221; The address is to the heathen, already summoned (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:9<\/span>) to witness the sins of Israel, and now called to witness her punishment, <strong>In the house; <\/strong>better, <em>against the house of Jacob, <\/em>the tribes of Israel (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span>). <strong>God of hosts.<\/strong> God of the powers of heaven and earth, and therefore able to execute his threats. Septuagint,  <em>, <\/em>&#8220;the Almighty.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:14<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>That in the day,<\/strong> etc. This verse is rightly joined to the preceding, as it particularizes the threats which the heathen are summoned to testify. <strong>Visit upon;<\/strong> equivalent to &#8220;punish&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Zep 1:8<\/span>). <strong>Altars of Bethal.<\/strong> We read of one altar being set up by Jeroboam I (<span class='bible'>1Ki 12:29<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ki 12:33<\/span>), but doubtless others had been added in the course of time. The denunciation of <span class='bible'>1Ki 13:2<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ki 13:3<\/span> is here repeated. <strong>The horns of the altar. <\/strong>These were certain projections at the four angles of the altar, perhaps in the form of an ox&#8217;s horn, on which the blood of the sin offering was smeared, and which therefore were considered the holiest part of the altar (see <span class='bible'>Exo 27:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 29:12<\/span>; Le <span class='bible'>Exo 16:18<\/span>). The instruments of idolatry or impure worship should share the destruction of the idolaters.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:15<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The winter house.<\/strong> The luxurious habits of kings and princes had led them to have different houses for the various seasons of the year, facing north or south as the case might be (comp. <span class='bible'>Jdg 3:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 36:22<\/span>). Septuagint,    <em>, <\/em>&#8220;the turreted house,&#8221; which Jerome explains, <em>Domum pinnatam, eo quod ostiola habeat per fenestras, et quasi pinnas, ad magnitudinem frigoris depellendam.<\/em><strong><em> <\/em><\/strong><strong>Houses of ivory; <\/strong>panelled or inlaid with ivory, such as Ahab had (<span class='bible'>1Ki 22:39<\/span>). Solomon&#8217;s throne was thus decorated (<span class='bible'>1Ki 10:18<\/span>; comp. <span class='bible'>Psa 45:8<\/span>). (For the Assyrian practice of veneering in ivory, see Rawlinson, &#8216;Ancient Monarchies,&#8217; 1:463; comp. also Homer, &#8216;Od.,&#8217; 4.73; Virgil, &#8216;<strong>AE<\/strong>neid,&#8217; 6:895.) <strong>The great houses;<\/strong> better, <em>many houses<\/em>;<em> <\/em>Septuagint,   <em>, <\/em>&#8220;many other houses.&#8221; Not only palaces, but many private houses, shall be destroyed (comp. <span class='bible'>Isa 5:9<\/span>, where the same words are used).<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILETICS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span><\/strong><strong>, <\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The judgment of apostates a foregone conclusion.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This chapter, like <span class='bible'>Amo 5:1-27<\/span>. and 6; opens with a call to attention. God is going to speak, and his voice is worth listening to. He is going to speak a word, moreover, the issues of which are capital. To attend to his communication is as vitally important as dutiful.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>, <strong>WHO<\/strong> <strong>HAD<\/strong> <strong>ONLY<\/strong> <strong>SPOKEN<\/strong> <strong>ABOUT<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>HEATHEN<\/strong>, <strong>SPEAKS<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>ISRAEL<\/strong>. Syria and Edom and Tyre may never have heard of the doom to which they were going down. Their first intimation of the tempest of Divine wrath was likely the falling of the first drops. Their chance of repentance and escape was in this way minimized. Left in ignorance of the danger of advance, there was little likelihood of their turning hack of their own accord. But Israel hears from inspired lips that never lied the guilt of her sin, and its inevitable end. This putting of &#8220;prophecy between his secret and its execution&#8221; is a special favour on God&#8217;s side, and a corresponding advantage on her side, whilst, like all advantage, it involves a proportionate responsibility.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>SPECIAL<\/strong> <strong>REGARD<\/strong> <strong>FOR<\/strong> <strong>ISRAEL<\/strong> <strong>HAD<\/strong> <strong>EXPRESSED<\/strong> <strong>ITSELF<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>PECULIAR<\/strong> <strong>FAVOURS<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. He had constituted them a family by themselves. <\/em>Other nations in their rise had been left to circumstances and the play of natural affinities. Israel had been called out of the peoples, constituted a nation by itself, furnished with a national organization and policy, and set consciously to work out an exalted destiny. This was fitted to awake a lofty national aspiration, and give direction and dignity to the national life. The choosing of God&#8217;s people out of the world is the beginning of his favours.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>He had brought them out of Egypt. <\/em>This was an act of Divine power, an instance of Divine championship, an expression of Divine distinguishing favour, and a beginning of Divine help, which contained in it the promise of more to come. Conversion, following on election (<span class='bible'>Act 13:48<\/span>), is another privilege of God&#8217;s people, and another spur to grateful service.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong><em>. He had taken them into intimate personal relations. <\/em>&#8220;Known,&#8221; etc. This is &#8220;practically equivalent to electing, including both the motive and result of election&#8221; (Keil). God took special notice of them, set them in a gracious relation to himself, acknowledged them to be his people, and brought to hear on them the influences that are over coming forth on those in covenant with him. <\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>JUDGMENT<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>INEVITABLE<\/strong> <strong>WHERE<\/strong> <strong>MERCY<\/strong> <strong>HAS<\/strong> <strong>BEEN<\/strong> <strong>RECEIVED<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>VAIN<\/strong>. &#8220;Therefore will I visit,&#8221; etc. (<span class='bible'>Amo 5:2<\/span>). Mercy extended is made here the ground of judgment denounced. Each gift bestowed in the past is a count in the present indictment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>It is inevitable as punishment. <\/em>Sin by God&#8217;s professing people is specially heinous. It involves ingratitude to a special Benefactor, insensibility to his love, contempt of his gifts, and disregard of special claims on their allegiance. The guilt is in every aspect extreme, and so the punishment is sure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>It is inevitable as testimony. <\/em>God&#8217;s honour is closely identified with his people&#8217;s conduct, which must therefore be closely looked after. Any sin in it must be rigidly punished if God would vindicate his purity and impartiality, hating sin as such, and wherever it appears. &#8220;It is necessary that God should vindicate his own honour by making it appear that he hates sin, and hates it most in those that are nearest him&#8221; (M. Henry).<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>It is inevitable as discipline. <\/em>Judgments are corrective as well as putative, In this aspect they are sure, and will be severe in proportion to the love and mercy despised. Whom God leaves without correction he bastardizes (<span class='bible'>Heb 12:8<\/span>), but he expresses fatherly interest in the application of the rod. Judgment with Israel was just a change of corrective treatment. Mercy had failed, and now love would try another way, that nothing might be left undone to separate Israel from sin. This is why judgment begins at the house of God.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:3-8<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No smoke without fire.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>God cannot utter empty threats. His every declaration is <em>bona fide. <\/em>When he roars he is about to rend. Let, then, the doomed sinner tremble. For all his insensibility he is no better than a dead man.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>SIN<\/strong> <strong>INVOLVES<\/strong> <strong>DISCONNECTION<\/strong> <strong>FROM<\/strong> A <strong>HOLY<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>. &#8220;Can two walk together,&#8221; etc.? This deep principle involves that:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>Israel, quarrelling with God, cannot reckon on his company. <\/em>For so far God had associated with them. In Egypt, in the wilderness, in Canaan, he had vouchsafed them close companionship. But their rebellious attitude against him, approaching as it was a climax of irreconcilableness, must make a continuance of intimate relations impossible.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>The prophet, walking as he did with God, must be regarded as in agreement with him, and so expressing his will. <\/em>Amos spoke as God&#8217;s servant and mouthpiece. He looked at Israel&#8217;s sin from God&#8217;s standpoint. In reference to it he was as emphatically associated with God as he was dissociated from them. Underlying this formal association it must be believed there was real agreement. &#8220;He whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>WHEN<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>THUNDER<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>THREATENINGS<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>HEARD<\/strong>, <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>LIGHTNING<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>JUDGMENTS<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>IMMINENT<\/strong>. That peril is sure and near is tangent in a series of similes of a graphic kind.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>When God utters his war cry it is evident that he is just about to strike his enemy. <\/em>(Verse 4.) The lion roars when he has marked his prey, and is about to spring. God sees the sinful nation ripe for judgment. He sees that the time for sending it has come. His roar out of Zion (<span class='bible'>Amo 1:2<\/span>) is, therefore, the prelude to striking his prey forthwith. &#8220;The thrcatenings of the Word and providence of God are not bugbears to frighten children and fools, but are certain inferences from the sin of man and certain presages of the judgments of God&#8221; (M. Henry).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>When God reaches forth his hand there is something to take, and within his reach. <\/em>(Verse 5.) It is the lighting of the bird on the trap that snaps it. If there were no trap laid no bird would be caught. If there were no bird in the trap it would not rise from the ground. Israel is the bird, and God is the Fowler, and his judgment is the snare, and the lesson of all is that she is already in God&#8217;s destroying grasp.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>When some are already alarmed it shows that danger to all is real and close. <\/em>(Verse 6, &#8220;Is a trumpet blown,&#8221; etc.?) The prophet, who knew what was coming, was alarmed, and those like minded with him. The note of alarm was already ringing over the land. Signs of evil will not show themselves until the evil is comparatively at hand. So surely as the smoke rises the fire is kindling.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4<\/strong>. <em>When misfortune falls it is a proof that God has been at work. <\/em>&#8220;Does misfortune happen in the city,&#8221; etc.? (verse 6). &#8220;All things are of God,&#8221; is an axiom that in one sense or other covers all events, whether good or bad. The qualification of it is that the sin of any of them is exclusively of man. God &#8220;creates evil&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Isa 45:7<\/span>)the evil of sufferingwhilst the evil of sin he allows us to create, that he may bring out of it greater good.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>WARNS<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>PROPHETS<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>EVIL<\/strong> <strong>BEFORE<\/strong> <strong>IT<\/strong> <strong>COMES<\/strong>. (Verse 7.) The prophet is a negotiator, hearing the truth from God, and handing it on to men. God does not destroy men unwarned, nor warn them but through his accredited messengers. The history of his judgments illustrates this. Through Noah he revealed the coming deluge, through Lot the destruction of Sodom, through Joseph the famine in Egypt, through Moses the Egyptian plagues, through Jonah the sentence on Nineveh, and through Christ and his apostles the destruction of Jerusalem. &#8220;Thus God has ever warned the world of coming judgments in order that it may not incur them&#8221; (Lange). &#8220;He foretelleth the evil to come that he may not be compelled to inflict it&#8221; (Pusey).<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV.<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>TRUE<\/strong> <strong>PROPHETS<\/strong> <strong>CANNOT<\/strong> <strong>BUT<\/strong> <strong>SPEAK<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>MESSAGE<\/strong>. (Verse 8.) It is his will that they should prophesy. He tells them his purposes mainly with a view to this. To prophesy is their function and duty, and is made their business. They are moved at the sight of coming evil. They are in sympathy with the Divine compassion, giving a last chance to the doomed; and so, like the apostles, they &#8220;cannot but speak the things they have seen and heard&#8221; (<span class='bible'>1Co 9:16<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Co 9:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act 4:19<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Act 4:20<\/span>). &#8220;Moses was not excused though slow of speech, nor Isaiah though of polluted lips, nor Jeremiah because he was a child. Ezekiel was bidden &#8216;be not rebellious like that rebellious house;&#8217; and when Jeremiah would keep silence he saith, &#8216;His Word was in mine heart as a burning fire, shut up in my bones, and I was weary with forbearing, and I could not stay'&#8221; (Pusey). Taken in connection, verses 7 and 8 reveal a perfect arrangement for making known God&#8217;s purpose in reference to sin. God anticipates action by a communication to his prophets, and the prophets execute orders, and hand the communication on.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The inevitable punishment of Christian sin.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You only have I known of all the families of the earth, therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities.&#8221; These words are at once an accusation, a condemnation, and a sentence. What God had done for Israel in vain was a ground and the measure of what he now must do against them. Blessing abused is but the faggot feeding the fire of merited curse. They had given themselves up to wickedness, and the fire tongue of a lofty privilege sits above every sin, revealing its demon face.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THERE<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> A <strong>GRACIOUS<\/strong> <strong>SENSE<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>WHICH<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>KNOWS<\/strong> <strong>MEN<\/strong>. &#8220;I know my sheep;&#8221; &#8220;I never knew you.&#8221; These sentences mean salvation and condemnation respectively. For God to know men is with them a question of life and death. This knowledge may be:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>National. <\/em>It was so with Israel. &#8220;You only have I known.&#8221; This meant that God loved them (<span class='bible'>Deu 10:15<\/span>), chose them (<span class='bible'>Deu 7:6<\/span>), formally acknowledged them as his people (<span class='bible'>Deu 14:2<\/span>), and gave them privilegesnot necessarily saving in every Case of light (<span class='bible'>Psa 147:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 3:2<\/span>), and help (<span class='bible'>Psa 136:10-24<\/span>), and fellowship (<span class='bible'>Exo 20:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 14:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 4:7<\/span>), and promise (<span class='bible'>Rom 9:4<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Rom 9:5<\/span>), answering to this visible relation. This knowledge may also be:<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>Personal. <\/em>Then it means, in addition to what has been mentioned, the forth-putting of Divine energy in them, making them new creatures m Christ, and so &#8220;partakers of the Divine nature&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Gal 6:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Pe 1:4<\/span>). God brings them into his family (<span class='bible'>Gal 3:26<\/span>) by this spiritual birth (<span class='bible'>Joh 1:13<\/span>), calls them sons (<span class='bible'>1Jn 3:1<\/span>), makes them coheirs with Christ (<span class='bible'>Rom 8:17<\/span>), and gives them all family privileges and graces, chiefest of these the spirit of adoption, by which we cry, &#8220;Abba, Father&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Gal 4:6<\/span>). Man, in fact, is by nature an alien and a stranger, and for God to know him is to substitute a gracious for his natural relation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THIS<\/strong> <strong>KNOWLEDGE<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> A <strong>SPECIAL<\/strong>, <strong>NOT<\/strong> A <strong>GENERAL<\/strong>, <strong>AFFECTION<\/strong>. &#8220;You only.&#8221; There are gifts of God that are indiscriminate (<span class='bible'>Job 25:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 5:45<\/span>). Man gets them as man, and irrespective of personal character. But spiritual gifts are necessarily confined to the spiritual circle. It is evident as regards God&#8217;s gracious knowledge of men.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. That it rests on a minority of the race. <\/em>Israel at best was little among the nations of the earth. In comparison with the Chaldeae, Medo-Persian, Greek, or Roman empires, it was scarcely worthy of being named; and a dozen peoples bordered Palestine from time to time, any one of which, in the natural course, would have wiped it off the earth. Yet, passing by the many and the mighty, God says to single, feeble Israel, &#8220;You only have I known of all the families of the earth&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Deu 4:32-38<\/span>). And this action is of a piece with other Divine action for similar purposes. The saints are now, and have always been, a &#8220;little flock.&#8221; It is the few who go in at the &#8220;strait gate&#8221; of the kingdom. Even the nominally Christian peoples are less than a third of the population of the earth. If out of the number of these were taken the actual Christians, the true believers in Christ, the saintly company would assume smaller dimensions still. This state of matters will no doubt be reversed before the dispensation ends. Christ &#8220;in all things shall have the pre-eminence,&#8221; and the minority which his followers compose will, during the millennial era, be converted into a vast majority (<span class='bible'>Isa 11:9<\/span>). Meantime God looks on a small circle of transfigured souls, and says, &#8220;You only have I known.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>It does not follow human probabilities. <\/em>If any single nation was to be made the repository of revealed truth, and the teacher of the other nations, we should have expected one or other of the four universal empires to be chosen for the purpose, rather than a second or third rate power, located in a circumscribed and excentric spot. Then the typical Jew was, like his ancestor Jacob, a sordid fellow, deficient in the more heroic qualities, and, from the standpoint of the natural, decidedly inferior to his brother the Edomite, or almost any neighbour you would select. The greater readiness with which the Gentiles received the gospel, when it came to them, would seem, moreover, to indicate that they would have responded more worthily to the Divine Old Testament culture than Israel did, if it had pleased God to bring it to bear. It is the same with individuals. Not only does God pass by the rich and great for the humble poor (<span class='bible'>Jas 2:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co 1:26-28<\/span>), but he passes by the wise and prudent, and gives the light of his salvation to babes (<span class='bible'>Mat 11:25<\/span>). It is not the great geniuses of society, but the commonplace average men, who form the circle of the saints. The reasons for this are adequate, but God keeps them to himself. Obvious to reason in many cases, they are not revealed, because in many others they would be above it, and God acts without reasons given, that &#8220;no flesh may glory in his presence.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>IT<\/strong> <strong>DOES<\/strong> <strong>NOT<\/strong> <strong>INEVITABLY<\/strong> <strong>PREVENT<\/strong> <strong>SIN<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>OBJECT<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>IT<\/strong>. The life of the Hebrews was as a whole above the moral level of the heathen life around them. But still it was far from pure. If we subtracted from Jewish history all that arises out of sin, and the punishment of it, comparatively little would remain. So little congenial to human nature is God&#8217;s service, and so congenial the service of sin, that Israel was perpetually turning aside after the idols of the heathen, whilst in no instance did the heathen ever turn from their idols to God (<span class='bible'>Jer 2:11<\/span>). And not only does outward religious privilege fail to put an end to the sinful life, it is to some extent the same with inward religious principle. The saint remains a sinner all his days. Grace, like the house of David, is getting stronger with him, and corruption, like the house of Saul, is getting weaker through life. But it is still with him as with the apostle, striving after perfection, yet burdened with a feeling of the surviving power of sin (<span class='bible'>Php 3:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 7:24<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV.<\/strong> <strong>IT<\/strong> <strong>DOES<\/strong> <strong>MAKE<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>PUNISHMENT<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>SIN<\/strong> <strong>ON<\/strong> <strong>EARTH<\/strong> <strong>CERTAIN<\/strong>. &#8220;Therefore will I punish you.&#8221; Sin inside the kingdom necessitates punishment, and will be visited with it promptly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>Because it is guiltiest as against God. <\/em>More has been done to prevent it than in other cases. It is sin against light (<span class='bible'>Jas 4:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 12:47<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Luk 12:48<\/span>), against love (<span class='bible'>2Co 5:14<\/span>), against favours (<span class='bible'>Psa 103:2<\/span>), against restraining grace (<span class='bible'>1Jn 3:9<\/span>). In proportion to the strength and number of deterrent influences against which sin is committed must be the strength of our sinful bent, and so the guilt of our wrong doing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong><em>. Because it is most hurtful as against his cause. <\/em>The sin of the wicked is natural. It is to be expected from one who consults lust and serves the devil. It is done, moreover, from the standpoint of opposition to God, and responsibility for it is thus kept outside the spiritual circle. God and his cause are not dishonoured in the eyes of men by what is formally done against them. It is sin by the professedly righteous that brings righteousness into disrepute. Religion is charged with all the evil that is done in its name. The more closely identified wrong doing is with the Christian name, the more hurtful is it to the Christian cause. Therefore Christian sin, in addition to the general reasons, involves punishment for reasons peculiar to itself. If God would have his Church a tree for the healing of the nations, he must lop off every unsound and rotten branch.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>Because it is most incompatible with the destiny of the person sinning. <\/em>The sin of the wicked need not necessarily be punished here. It will be amply visited on him throughout eternity. It is quite in the line of the man&#8217;s life course that he should suffer the vengeance of eternal fire. But the sin of the righteous presents a different aspect. Its commission is the contradiction of his gracious nature, and its future punishment would be the contradiction of his exalted destiny. It is vital to his well being that the judgment, inevitable somewhere, should fall here (<span class='bible'>Psa 89:30-33<\/span>). Only thus can his happy immortality be safeguarded. The present destruction of his flesh conditions the saving of his spirit in the day of the Lord Jesus (<span class='bible'>1Co 5:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Communion and concord inseparable.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Do two walk together unless they have agreed?&#8221; The special reference of this general question is not apparent. But the scope of the context suggests two points on either or both of which it would throw light. The one is the prophet&#8217;s claim to be speaking the truth, the other is the people&#8217;s claim to be doing the right. Between his words and their works there was utter incompatibility. Those must he wrong if these were right, and <em>vice versa. <\/em>And the axiom quoted supplies a decisive test. Amos walked with Godthere could be no denying that; took his side and sought his glory amidst prevailing defection and disobedience. Must it not be argued from this that he was at one with God, and so in all his utterances spoke agreeably to his will? Israel, on the other hand, had clearly not agreed with God, for they were red handed in rebellion against him. Was not the inference from this resistless that they could not walk with him, here by faith or hereafter by sight? Consider here<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>WALKING<\/strong> <strong>WITH<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>IDEAL<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>HUMAN<\/strong> <strong>LIFE<\/strong>. &#8220;Enoch walked with God.&#8221; That is a short biography. But there is more in it, more important in its character and more adequately expressed than in many an octavo volume. &#8220;They shall walk with me in white&#8221; is a summary of the joy and glory of redeemed spirits on high. And life below is ideal in proportion as it approximates the life above. To walk with God implies:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. Theft we walk with the same purpose as God. <\/em>The <em>raison d<\/em>&#8216;<em>etre <\/em>of things is God&#8217;s glory first (<span class='bible'>Rom 11:36<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Col 1:16<\/span>), the good of his people next (<span class='bible'>2Co 4:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 8:28<\/span>), then the happiness of the race (<span class='bible'>1Ti 4:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 6:10<\/span>), and ultimately the well being of the planet as a whole (<span class='bible'>Psa 36:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 8:20<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Rom 8:21<\/span>). The attainment of these objects in this order is God&#8217;s purpose as revealed in Scripture. With this purpose it is the design and nature of religion to make man at one. By creating him in God&#8217;s image he is endowed with a spiritual nature which exalts God (<span class='bible'>1Co 10:31<\/span>), loves the brethren (<span class='bible'>1Jn 3:4<\/span>), consults the interests of others (<span class='bible'>Php 2:4<\/span>), and regards the life even of the beasts (<span class='bible'>Pro 2:10<\/span>). In proportion as the godly endorse and homologate the Divine purpose thus are they in the image of Christ (<span class='bible'>Joh 12:28<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 13:1<\/span>, etc.) and do they walk with God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>That we walk like God<\/em>. &#8220;The Christian,&#8221; says Joseph Cook, &#8220;is a man who has changed eyes with God.&#8221; Subtle affinities have arisen involving a marvellous unity of thought and aim. The end of our walking is God&#8217;s end, and naturally his way becomes our way. &#8220;The secret of the Lord is with them that fear him.&#8221; In Christ, &#8220;the Image of the invisible God,&#8221; it became an open secret to all who believe. He has left &#8220;us an example,&#8221; and there are no relations in life to which it does not apply. We &#8220;follow his steps,&#8221; and by consequence walk like God, being &#8220;imitators of him as dear children.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>That we walk in company with God<\/em>. The ungodly are far from God, and of set purpose keep their distance. But faith brings near and keeps near his side. The humble, contrite heart, which is the home of faith, is also the temple of God (<span class='bible'>Isa 57:15<\/span>). The love by which faith works is his welcome and feast (<span class='bible'>Rev 3:20<\/span>). The believer lives in God&#8217;s presence. He walks by faith, holding on as it were by the Divine hand. It is the promise and the thought of God&#8217;s presence with him that makes the journey light (<span class='bible'>Isa 43:2<\/span>), whilst the reality of it is the guarantee of safety and ease. God with us, we have unfailing provision, unerring guidance, and an invincible escort. No marvel if they who thus travel &#8220;go from strength to strength.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>AGREEMENT<\/strong> <strong>WITH<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>CONDITION<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>WALKING<\/strong> <strong>WITH<\/strong> <strong>HIM<\/strong>. Walking with God is not an occasional act, but a habit of life, and must arise out of an established relation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>.<em> The parties must both be willing<\/em>. Men are naturally at enmity with God, and so averse to his company. They know not and desire not to know his ways, and the expression of this feeling is the &#8220;Depart from us!&#8221; in which they decline the establishment of spiritual relations (<span class='bible'>Job 21:14<\/span>). The operation of grace, however, is one &#8220;to will and to do of God&#8217;s good pleasure,&#8221; and the result of it is &#8220;a willing people in the day of God&#8217;s power.&#8221; They choose God (<span class='bible'>Jos 24:15<\/span>), desire his fellowship, and adopt the course that will best consist with its enjoyment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong><em>. They must have arranged it. <\/em>&#8220;Unless they have agreed.&#8221; Spiritual relations are not accidental relations, nor such as men may drift into unconsciously. There are understood objects to be intelligently adopted. There are explicit terms (<span class='bible'>Mat 16:24<\/span>) to be deliberately accepted. There is a distinct transaction in which God and his way are adopted, and made our life King and life programme respectively (<span class='bible'>Hos 14:2<\/span>). If it be a question of faith, we say, &#8220;Lord, I believe.&#8221; If it be a question of penitence, we say, &#8220;I abhor myself, and repent.&#8221; If it be a question of allegiance, we declare, &#8220;I will be for the Lord.&#8221; If it be a question of fellowship, we vow, &#8220;I will walk before the Lord in the land of the living.&#8221; Our walking with God is not only with consent, but by arrangement, duly and solemnly subscribed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>They must be congenial spirits. <\/em>Like draws to like. Companionship with God bases itself in conformity to him. If there be no affinity there will be no association. If this fails, association will be broken off. Duty must be our choice, or it will never be begun; and our joy, or it will never be continued. Walking with God implies a previous coming to him, and both are conditioned by a spiritual change creating us in the Divine image. Hearts have begun to beat in unison when hands are clasped for life.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>BEARING<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>THIS<\/strong> <strong>MAXIM<\/strong> <strong>ON<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>CASE<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>HAND<\/strong>. The two whose walking together is in question are Jehovah and the prophet, according to some; Jehovah and the nation, according to others. But as it is a general maxim, it may be legitimately applied to both, and every other case on which it can throw light.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>The words of a teacher who walks with God will be on the whole agreeable to his will. <\/em>The authenticity of Amos&#8217;s message was called in question by many. But he was on God&#8217;s side in this controversy with Israel. He spoke as it were out of the arms of the Divine fellowship. The truth of his deliverance was therefore a foregone conclusion. With every religious teacher the same principle holds. Communion with God gives insight into truth attainable in no other way. It conditions that &#8220;unction from the Holy One&#8221; by which &#8220;we know all things.&#8221; The best guarantee of orthodoxy is to be spiritually minded. &#8220;The anointing&#8221; by Christ in the work of grace, among other benefits, &#8220;teacheth of all things, and is truth&#8221; (<span class='bible'>1Jn 2:27<\/span>). Let a man read the Bible, so to speak, over God&#8217;s shoulder, and the thing he will read out of it will be truth.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>A<\/em> <em>life of rebellion cannot possibly be a walk with God. <\/em>The prophet foretold to Israel a final rupture of visible covenant relations. And the prophecy was along the lines of natural fitness. The parties were already alienated in heart and sympathy, and in the nature of things formal separation must follow. To walk with God whilst fighting with him was an unworkable arrangement. The men who try it are men whose religious life is failure. When hearts go apart their owners go after them; and the soul, loveless today, will be godless tomorrow. Sinful man will have it so, and a holy God can have it no otherwise. Alienation leads to apostasy, and the apostate is <em>ipso facto <\/em>an outlaw. Are our affections given to Christ in self-surrender and love and happy trust? It is the one condition of walking with him to any purpose of spiritual effect. Is the dedication made maintained in unswerving true allegiance? See to that, for the beginning of estrangement is as the letting out of water, and what is deflection now will be defection in the next stage.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:6<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Calamity one of the works of God.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It is not sin, but suffering, that is here meant. We are to regard temporal calamities as the warning voice of God, a manifestation of his character, and a corrective expression of his displeasure. God maintains his controversy with Israel. The verses before contain language of unimpeachable equity, ill-requited kindness, and injured honour. On every ground the threatened punishment was merited, and only in mercy had it been suspended so long. There is a natural atheism in the human heart, a constantly prevailing tendency to forgot God. This tendency is most powerful in prosperity, and must often be counterworked by a dispensation of adversity. Not that Divine judgments, acting on human corruption, necessarily lead to repentance. But in God&#8217;s hand they have often been overruled to this effect, and it is in this reclaiming and reforming capacity that they are alluded to in this text.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>WE<\/strong> <strong>DISTINGUISH<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>AGENCY<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>JEHOVAH<\/strong> <strong>FROM<\/strong> <strong>CHANCE<\/strong>. &#8220;Chance&#8221; is a word much used, and little understood. When we say that an event has happened by chance, we mean either that it had no cause, which is atheism, or that we do not know the cause, which is an abuse of language. Chance, in fact, is nothing but a term of human ignorance. Yet the use of the word implies either atheism, denying the Divine existence, or naturalism, denying his superintending agency; the two coming to the same thing, for we might as well have no God as no providence. The sentiment of our text is the refutation of both, and as such is but the echo of all Scripture. &#8220;All things are of God.&#8221; Not creation only, but providence, which is as wonderful as a continuous creation. Not great events only, but the very least, without any one of which the whole machinery would be incapable of a single revolution. How beautifully yet powerfully is this brought out by Christ in his illustration from the sparrows (<span class='bible'>Mat 10:29-31<\/span>)! If a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without our Father, much less can a whole city. When evil is in a city, it is not a visitation of chance, but of the hand of God, under which it has come.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>DIVINE<\/strong> <strong>AGENCY<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>HERB<\/strong> <strong>DISTINGUISHED<\/strong> <strong>FROM<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>IDOLS<\/strong>. Something to worship is a necessity of human nature. Hence men, when they forsake the true God, set up a false one in his place. The existence and power of this idol they believe without proof, and even against presumption. Unconquerable incredulity in reference to the true God becomes irrational credulity in reference to the false once. Thus atheism is more a question of the heart than of the head. Men do not like to retain God in their knowledge (<span class='bible'>Rom 1:23<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Rom 1:28<\/span>), and so discard him for gods of their own devising. This fact shows polytheism a term of atheism. And it was demonstrably so with the Jews. The obverse of apostasy with them was always idolatry; and this text affirms that Jehovah, whom they had forsaken, not any senseless idol which they had chosen, dominated history and sent good and evil to men (see <span class='bible'>Isa 41:21-24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 10:3-16<\/span>). We think we are in no danger of making their mistake. But the world, in its ambition, avarice, or pleasure, may take away our hearts from God, and become their idol, climbing to his throne. And we give it credit often for what God does and alone can do, and to that extent misread the providential events in which God is dealing with us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>DIVINE<\/strong> <strong>AGENCY<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>BE<\/strong> <strong>DISTINGUISHED<\/strong> <strong>FROM<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>AGENCY<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>SECOND<\/strong> <strong>CAUSES<\/strong>. The deification of nature is a common practice. Conventionally, nature is a kind of mystical personification of some unknown existence, and to which the omnipotence denied to God is freely attributed. If &#8220;nature&#8221; does a thing, it is assumed that God has no hand in it, and that it wants no explanation further. &#8220;Nature is that created realm of being or substance which has an acting, a going on or process from within itself, under and by its own laws&#8221; (Bushnell). But these laws are just &#8220;the actuating power of God.&#8221; They are not powers in themselves, but only the rules according to which his power operates. We have various kinds of seasons which we trace to various causes in nature. But these are second causes, and under the sovereign control of the First Cause. &#8220;Can the heavens give showers? art not thou he, O Lord our God?&#8230; for thou hast made all these things&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Jer 14:22<\/span>). Air, earth, and sea, and all that they contain, are subject to him (<span class='bible'>Psa 104:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 148:8<\/span>). From the natural cause of this or that we must rise to him who makes it what and puts it where it is, and gives it a commission to work. &#8220;All things are of God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This truth philosophy, though eagle-eyed<br \/>In nature&#8217;s tendencies, oft o&#8217;erlooks;<br \/>And having found his instrument, forgets<br \/>Or disregards, or, more presumptuous still,<br \/>Denies the Power that wields it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The same principle rules events in which men are agents. &#8220;Men are in God&#8217;s hand&#8221; as well as matter. The King of Assyria was simply the rod with which God struck Israel (<span class='bible'>Isa 10:5-16<\/span>). <em>In attributing temporal evils to God<\/em>&#8216;<em>s sovereign control of things, distinguish between sovereignty and caprice<\/em>. What God does he could assign the best of reasons for. He exercises his sovereignty in declining to do so. But he tells us that the great general cause of suffering is sin. Evil does not come on us as creatures, but as sinners. The infliction of it has not to do with sovereignty, but with equity. All good is from God, all evil from the sinner. All good is gratuitous, all evil is deserved. All evil is righteous retribution, all good is free and sovereign love. Nor is suffering destitute of a large benevolent element. On the contrary, it often serves a merciful purpose, and would always do so were it properly received. When the sun of prosperity fails to soften, God casts men into the furnace of trial, if perchance the stronger method may prevail. If there be evil in your city, then consider who sends it, on what account, and for what purpose; so, it may be, you will &#8220;turn to him that smiteth you,&#8221; as he means you should. (From a sermon by Ralph Wardlaw, D.D; supplemented and condensed.)<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The hounds that bay before they bite.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The prophet speaks here as if he were announcing axiomatic truth. And it is nothing less. It might be argued from reason; it is historic fact; and it is a prominent Scripture doctrine.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>JUDGMENT<\/strong> <strong>NEVER<\/strong> <strong>COMES<\/strong> <strong>WITHOUT<\/strong> <strong>WARNING<\/strong>. The Deluge, the destruction of Sodom, the plagues of Egypt, and the fall of Jerusalem, are cases in point. Sometimes judgment has taken people unawares (<span class='bible'>Mat 24:39<\/span>), but this is because the warning has been disregarded (<span class='bible'>Gen 19:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 6:3<\/span>). When there has been no warning the judgment has been provoked, not by a course of wickedness, but by a single flagrant transgression in connection with which warning was out of the question (<span class='bible'>Exo 32:27<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Exo 32:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 26:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act 12:23<\/span>). The warning of coming judgment is:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>A disclosure of sin. <\/em>To allow men to sin unheeded, and to find it satisfactory, would be to amnesty evil doing and practically to encourage it. To erect the gallows of impending judgment, on the other hand, brings into sight the fact of sin, and emphasizes its demerit. Next to execution, the sentence of death is a revelation to the criminal of the enormity of his crime. It is a mental association of guilt with penalty, and so measuring of its moral proportions. It is also:<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>A deterrent from sin. <\/em>Judgment executed without warning loses half its value. The fear of the rod is a wholesome restraint on the folly of the child; greater often than the actual blow, because it operates through a longer Period. God&#8217;s moral government in its relation to sin aims at cure rather than mere punishment, at prevention rather than either. His blows fall only after his threats have failed to move (<span class='bible'>Pro 1:24<\/span>, etc.; <span class='bible'>Jer 6:10<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Jer 6:11<\/span>). Accordingly:<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong><em>. To denounce judgment sometimes makes it unnecessary to inflict it. <\/em>A notable instance was that of Nineveh. If her repentance were more common, her escape would be more common also (<span class='bible'>Mat 12:41<\/span>). God frights with the thunder of his threats, that he may not be compelled to smite with the lightning, of his judgments. He makes a display of his resistless forces that the rebels may yield without going into action. &#8220;Turn ye, turn ye: why will ye die?&#8221; that is the message of his open preparations to destroy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THIS<\/strong> <strong>WARNING<\/strong> <strong>REACHES<\/strong> <strong>MEN<\/strong> <strong>THROUGH<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>PROPHETS<\/strong>. On his way to the establishment of personal relations, God always treats with men through mediators. Covenants are made with representatives, such as Adam, Noah, Abraham, and Christ. Justifying righteousness is negotiated typically through a priesthood, and antitypically through Jesus Christ. So saving knowledge is negotiated through the Holy Ghost, and by the instrumentality of inspired men.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>This was<\/em> <em>the only feasible way. <\/em>Not every man is fit to receive a revelation direct from God. To do so implies mental and moral conditions that are realized in but a small percentage of men. His revelation must reach many through a third party in any case. If the worse qualified must be spoken to through the better qualified, it is only carrying out the principle to speak to both through the best qualified of all, <em>i.e.<\/em> the prophet selected by God himself. The Scripture is God&#8217;s revelation, and adequate to man&#8217;s need (<span class='bible'>2Ti 3:15-17<\/span>). The attempt to substitute for it an &#8220;inner light&#8221; or any other device, is to substitute our own nonentity for God&#8217;s reality.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>It tends to call faith into action<\/em>. God wants his Word believed. And he wants it believed in a certain way and on certain grounds. To believe what we see is not the faith he wants (<span class='bible'>Joh 20:29<\/span>), nor properly faith at all. &#8220;Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.&#8221; Only such believing is intelligent or voluntary, and therefore possesed of moral qualities. If God revealed his will directly to each individual, bearing it in resistlessly on his consciousness, the moral discipline involved in faith would be lost to men.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>It secures a record of God<\/em>&#8216;<em>s message for universal use<\/em>. A revelation given to men individually would be only for the individual, and for the time then being, It would neither be common property nor permanent property. And it is worth being made both. God&#8217;s way is one in all ages. He is in the came mind about sin, and deals with it on the same principles always. The record of what he has done is the prophecy of what in similar circumstances he will do. The prophet wrote so much of his message as had permanent interest, and the aggregate of such inspired deliverances is the Scripture, which is &#8220;a light in a dark place until the day dawn.&#8221; It is not a revelation for an individual merely. Having served its turn with one, it is no less available for others in endless succession.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>PROPHETS<\/strong> <strong>ARE<\/strong> <strong>FIRST<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>ALL<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>SERVANTS<\/strong>. &#8220;His servants the prophets.&#8221; The explanatory words, &#8220;his servants,&#8221; widen greatly the sentiment of the clause.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. To prophesy under Divine direction is itself an act of service. <\/em>There is a wide sense in which all are God&#8217;s servants who carry out any of his purposes. Thus Cyrus and Nebuchadnezzar (<span class='bible'>Isa 45:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 25:9<\/span>) are styled respectively the &#8220;anointed&#8221; and the &#8220;servant&#8221; of God, because they were designated to and did a work for him. This was a purely external relation, but it was real. All the prophets, even the wicked Balaam, were God&#8217;s servants in this sense. They represented his interest. They went his errand. They carried his message. They laboured to accomplish his purpose. Their exercise of the prophetic office was service.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>Official relations have their basis in personal relations. <\/em>Shepherds and sheep alike come into the fold by the Door, Jesus Christ (<span class='bible'>Joh 10:1-14<\/span>). All come in to the effect of their own salvation first, and being in fall into rank as gatherers-in of others. First faith, and then works, is thus the spiritual order; faith establishing personal relations with Christ, and work, among other things, trying to get others to do likewise. Hence Church officers are to be chosen out of the number of Church members. The conditions of spiritual work are spiritual gifts, and the condition of spiritual gifts is to be in the spiritual connection (<span class='bible'>Joh 14:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph 2:18<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:9-12<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The prophet gets his heavy commission.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It is Jehovah that speaks. He addresses the prophets (Keil), or the heathen (Lange), or the heathen through the prophets. The passage is a summons to the nations to appear as witnesses of Israel&#8217;s flagrant sin, and her dreadful punishment. There are many articles in her predicted woe. Not least of these is condemnation by the heathen, who for less heinous sins were to be themselves destroyed. When a professed follower of God apostatizes in such a fashion that even God&#8217;s enemies cry shame, and endures a corresponding punishment in their sight, the cup of his iniquity and of his retribution are both full.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>CRIME<\/strong> <strong>CHANCED<\/strong>. There are many counts in this grave indictment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>The confusion of sordid money seeking. <\/em>&#8220;See the great confusions in the midst thereof.&#8221; The restlessness of greed, the fever of speculation, the wrangling of barter, and the tumult of audacious extortion are all included here. The mingling of excitement, disorder, and noise in a struggle for money, suggest a scene in which little is left to fancy with one who has been &#8220;on &#8216;Change.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>The oppression of power without principle. <\/em>&#8220;And the oppressed in the heart thereof.&#8221; From fraud to oppression is but a single step, and a short one. It is simply a question of power. The swindler would steal if he could. The thief would rob with violence if he dare. When dishonesty, moreover, prevails in private life, a system of public plunder is only a question of opportunity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>Wrong doing till the way to do right had been forgotten. <\/em>&#8220;They know not to do right.&#8221; &#8220;In the nature of things every sin against light draws blood on the spiritual retina&#8221; (Joseph Cook). Men are both hardened and blinded by a course of sin. Evil actions repeated become habits, and evil habits indulged in work themselves into the very texture of the soul. The wrong of ill-doing soon ceases to be felt, which naturally leads to its ceasing to be seen (<span class='bible'>Jer 4:22<\/span>; cf. <span class='bible'>Rom 16:19<\/span>). When we can sin without conscience, we are very near to sinning without consciousness, The way to preserve a good conscience, a conscience that knows evil and condemns it, is to respect its least dictate. &#8220;Sow an act, and you reap a habit; sow a habit, and you reap a character; sew a character, and you reap a destiny.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>4<\/strong>. <em>Putting by plunder in More. <\/em>&#8220;Who store up violence and devastation in their palaces.&#8221; Plunder has not even the poor excuse of need. It is practised gratuitously, as without limit. The poor were fleeced and impoverished, that the sordid rich might heap up enormous and superfluous stores. And by the terms there was stored up not only the spoil of violence, but violence itself, <em>Pari passu<\/em>, with the accumulation of ill-gotten gain was the heaping up of the sin of their unrighteous getting, whilst in heaping up sin they were necessarily treasuring up wrath (<span class='bible'>Rom 2:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>WITNESSES<\/strong> <strong>SUMMONED<\/strong>. &#8220;Assemble upon the mountains,&#8221; etc. A reference to the topography of Samaria brings out the graphic fitness of the language here. The city was built on a hill, surrounded and overlooked by mountains higher than itself, and from the tops of which the nations could look down into the very streets, and observe the daily doings of the inhabitants. As regards these we notice:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>Abandonment in sin is a sight for a man<\/em>&#8216;<em>s worst enemy to see. <\/em>The certainty, severity, and nearness of avenging judgment makes sin, from even the low utilitarian standpoint, the greatest possible evil. The enemy, who rejoices in our ill, can find no such occasion of malignant joy as our giving ourselves up to sin. After the fact that it offends God, the strongest argument against sin is the fact, the obverse of the other, that it pleases the devil and wicked men.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong><em>. When men lose the sense of sin, God appeals to their sense of shame. <\/em>It is strange that the sense of shame should survive the sense of sin, but so it is. We fear men more than God. We are not ashamed to do what we would be very much ashamed to acknowledge. The poet&#8217;s sarcasm is just, that in the matter of sin our care is &#8220;not to leave undone, but keep unknown.&#8221; The bitterness of punishment is greatly aggravated by its being inflicted in the presence of an exulting enemy. Philistia and Egypt were, moreover, the enemies whose cognizance of their way and end Israel would most feel and fear (<span class='bible'>2Sa 1:20<\/span>). To this last shred of feeling on which a motive could lay hold Jehovah here appeals. They would be a gazing stock to their bitterest enemies. &#8220;Like the woman set in the midst amid one encircling sea of accusing, insulting faces, with none to pity, none to intercede, none to show mercy to them who had showed no mercy. Faint image of the shame of that day when not men&#8217;s deeds only, but the secrets of all hearts, shall be revealed, and they shall begin &#8216;to say to the mountains, Fall on us, and to the hills, Cover us'&#8221; (Pusey).<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>The pupil in the art of ill-doing often outdoes the master<\/em>. It is assumed that even Egypt and Philistia would be shocked at the sight of the wrong doing of apostate Israel, and so become witnesses against them. Yet Egypt had taught them &#8220;oppression,&#8221; and Philistia had given them many a lesson in &#8220;violence and devastation.&#8221; The art of wrong doing advances with rapid strides as it is handed on. The son of the &#8220;smart&#8221; trader is a swindler, the son of the swindler is the burglar, the son of the burglar is the robber assassin. The pupil of the religious liberal is the rationalist, and the pupil of the rationalist is the atheist. Begin by imitating wicked men, and you will end by outstripping them in sin.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>SENTENCE<\/strong> <strong>PRONOUNCED<\/strong>. This is at once heavy in its nature and explicit in its details. We see here that:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. When God<\/em>&#8216;<em>s judgments come against a man they surround him. <\/em>(<span class='bible'>Amo 3:11<\/span>, &#8220;An enemy, and that round about the land.&#8221;) The impossibility of escaping when God attacks is axiomatic. Punishment is in such a way interwoven with sin that they cannot be dissociated. When we sin against God we sin against the nature of things. Physical, mental, and social law jump each with moral law, are broken in the breach of it, and so are each of them a channel to guide to us the full flood of retribution. &#8220;Though hand join in hand, yet shall not the wicked go unpunished.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong><em>. When God strikes a sinner he strikes him on the seat of his sin<\/em>. &#8220;And he shall bring down,&#8221; etc. (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:11<\/span>); &#8220;That dwell in Samaria,&#8221; etc. (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:12<\/span>). The strong had oppressed and pillaged the weak, and God&#8217;s hand would fall on their strength. In the palaces the spoil of violence had been heaped up, and the palaces should be the special prey of the plunderer. The beds and couches which had ministered to their sinful indulgence would be carried away to the last stick. It is so always. The punishment of drunkenness, uncleanness, pride, theft, lying, comes in many ways, but in every case pre-eminently through the lust or appetite involved. This is according to natural laws, but is none the less the arrangement of God. He lure put latent in every power a mystic spark, which, if the power be abused, becomes a retributive fire to burn the breaker of his Law.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>When sin is adequately punished the sinner<\/em>&#8216;<em>s well being is practically <\/em>destroyed. &#8220;Delivers out of the mouth of the lion two shin bones and an ear lappet,&#8221; etc. (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:12<\/span>). These are paltry leavings, not worth the rescue. And such, and so insignificant, would be the surviving good of Israel, when God&#8217;s controversy was settled. Where the scythe of God&#8217;s judgment has passed there is little left for the gleaner. The detected thief, the broken down sensualist, the besotted drunkard, what is each but a human wreck? The kernel of life is wasted, and only a husk remains. No wallflower of good can ever grow to cover these wrecks of time.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:13-15<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The residue of Israel&#8217;s woe.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Those who had been called to witness the sin of Israel are now summoned to hear and report her sentence. In connection with this we see that<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>EVEN<\/strong> <strong>HEATHENS<\/strong> <strong>CAN<\/strong> <strong>TESTIFY<\/strong> <strong>AGAINST<\/strong> <strong>APOSTATE<\/strong> <strong>ISRAEL<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>JUDGMENT<\/strong>. To testify is not merely to convey intelligence; it contains in it the idea of protest, <em>i.e.<\/em> testifying against.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>The heathen had a natural sense of right and wrong. <\/em>Paul says they &#8220;show the work of the law written in their hearts,&#8221; and &#8220;are a law unto themselves.&#8221; A rule of duty is included in the constitution of their nature. They know right from wrong, arid are governed by a sense of obligation. They could, therefore, judge the conduct of Israel. They could see and testify that it did not come up to even their own imperfect standard of right.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>They had been truer to their standard of right than Israel had. <\/em>Paul tells us that the heathen had not been true to their light (<span class='bible'>Rom 1:21-28<\/span>), and that the punishment of that was diminished light. But they had been truer, on the whole, than Israel had been to hers. Their morality was not so far below Israel&#8217;s as their inferior light would lead us to expect. Hence the assumption that they would be shocked at Israel&#8217;s manifold corruptions. Moral deterioration is measured, not so much by the absolute amount and kind of wrong doing as by the extent to which it falls below the known standard of right. Other things being equal, he is relatively the best man who most closely follows his light (<span class='bible'>Joh 3:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 2:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong><em>. They would learn something for themselves from this bearing. <\/em>Discrimination would see that Israel&#8217;s sin was not a result, but the contradiction, of the national religion; that it was an evil result of heathen influence, and involving the heathen more or less in its guilt; that Israel&#8217;s God was a God that judgeth righteously, and taketh vengeance on evil doers; and that judgment, beginning at God&#8217;s chosen people, would not miss his open enemies. The very act of testifying against Israel, moreover, would involve such an exercise of the moral sense, in reference to their sin, as could not fail to be beneficial.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>SIN<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>PUNISHED<\/strong> <strong>BY<\/strong> <strong>BEING<\/strong> <strong>RETURNED<\/strong> <strong>ON<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>SINNER<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>HEAD<\/strong>. &#8220;When I visit Israel&#8217;s transgression upon him.&#8221; The sin not only leads to the punishment, but as it were re-embodies itself in it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>The memory of it haunts him. <\/em>When sin is done it is not done with. Like the dead bird around the Ancient Mariner&#8217;s neck, an avenging Providence ties the memory of it to our soul. Like the crime of Eugene Aram, it becomes an evil haunting memory, to dog our steps forever.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And still no peace for the restless clay<\/p>\n<p>Will wave or mould allow;<\/p>\n<p>The horrid thing pursues my soul<\/p>\n<p>It stands before me now.&#8221;<br \/>(Hood.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong><em> The permanent evil consequences of it keep it before the memory. <\/em>The sins of youth are the sowing of which the sufferings of manhood and age are the harvesta harvest too constantly and painfully reaped to allow the harvester to forget. The sins of one man are the fruitful source of the sins and sorrows of many, and find in each of these a mentor who makes it impossible to forget. In addition to tile sinner and the sinned against, wrong doing injures those whose well being depends on either. It is thus a poison tree that forks and branches in the bearing of its deadly fruit. While the evil consequences of his wrong doing are around him, and propagating themselves in ever-widening circles, the sinner apart from conscience cannot get his iniquities out of sight.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong><em>. Not seldom the punishment is a resurrection of the sin itself. <\/em>Laban&#8217;s trick on Jacob was a repetition of Jacob&#8217;s trick on Isaac (<span class='bible'>Gen 29:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 27:15-27<\/span>). The deaths of Haman and Jezebel were similarly adjusted punishments. So with the cutting off the thumbs and great toes of the arch-mutilator Adoni-bezek (<span class='bible'>Jdg 1:6<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Jdg 1:7<\/span>). In such cases the sin is palpably returned in retribution on the sinner&#8217;s head.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>IDOL<\/strong> <strong>WORSHIP<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> A <strong>SIMULATION<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>WORSHIP<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>. &#8220;The altars of Bethel, and the horns of the altar.&#8221; Both in the use of an altar and in the form of the altar used the idol worship set up by Jeroboam was a plagiarism from the worship of Jehovah.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>Man cannot create in religion, but he can adapt. <\/em>He can form no idea of spiritual things apart from Divine revelation (<span class='bible'>1Co 2:9<\/span>). At the same time, God&#8217;s revelation of spiritual things is too pure for his taste. The result is that he compromises the matter by adopting ready-made ordinances, and loading them with his own corrupt spirit and meaning.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>Idolatrous worship seems less of an apostasy in proportion as it retains the forms of true worship. <\/em>The devil lets man down into idolatry as into other sin by easy stages. First he parts with the spirit of true worship, whilst retaining the form. Then he parts with the object of it, corrupting the form. Then he adopts a new object, and adapts to its worship the already corrupted form. And so with all sin, which is spiritual idolatry. Man does not first abandon the forms of godliness, and then the practice of it. He gives up the substance of it as a matter of taste, and tries to salve his conscience for this by adhering to its forms (<span class='bible'>2Ti 3:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong><em>. This also makes it more plausible and insidious. <\/em>The worship set up in Dan and Bethel by Jeroboam was not idol worship pure and simple. It was the worship of God by means of idols, and in forms which mimicked the worship at Jerusalem. Heresy at the outset always masquerades in the guise of truth. By adopting the sheep&#8217;s clothing the wolf gets easy access to the fold. It is only after he has entered, and the danger of eviction is over, that his true character is assumed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV.<\/strong> <strong>ONE<\/strong> <strong>IDOL<\/strong> <strong>BREEDS<\/strong> <strong>MANY<\/strong>. &#8220;The altars of Bethel.&#8221; There was but one sacrificial altar in connection with the worship of Jehovah, but when many gods were invented, many altars were provided to correspond to them. This multiplication of idols is accounted for by the fact that:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><em>. Evil naturally spreads. <\/em>One sin leads to more. Covetousness leads to theft, drunkenness to uncleanness, all three often to murder, and almost every sin to deceit and lying. No man can set up one sinful idol and say he will have no more. It will bring others with it whether he will or no. It is the first swallow of the summer of evil doing, and heralds a coming flock.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>Idolatry must become polytheism in the attempt to meet the spiritual wants of men<\/em>. God is an infinite Being, and so can meet our human necessity all round. But an idol is the creation of a finite mind, and so a finite thing. It is to meet one need of our nature, the need that was uppermost in the consciousness of the inventor. But a different need will be uppermost in another worshipper, and a different idol will be wanted to meet his case. Accordingly, in the mythology were many gods, who distributed among them the various functions necessary to complete the circle of human good. It was, in fact, an attempt, by multiplying deities indefinitely, to provide a substitute for the infinite God of revelation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>A worship that is all error is more logical than one that is half truth. <\/em>Everything has its own proper form. You do not find an eagle in the form of a dove, nor an apple in the form of a plum, nor an evil principle in the form of a good one. If such a form is artificially put round it, the result is a palpable misfit. Polytheism is the nearest approach to logical idolatry, and in proportion as it is self-consistent is dangerous, and wins its way.<\/p>\n<p><strong>V.<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>FIRST<\/strong> <strong>THING<\/strong> <strong>JUDGMENT<\/strong> <strong>DOES<\/strong> <strong>AGAINST<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>IDOLATER<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>DEPRIVE<\/strong> <strong>HIM<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>GODS<\/strong>. &#8220;The horns of the altar shall be cut off,&#8221; etc. This would put an effectual stop to the idol worship. We thus see that:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>God wants his judgments to be recognized<\/em>. He never punishes men incognito. When he puts forth his power he wants men to see that it is his (<span class='bible'>Exo 7:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 20:28<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze 6:7<\/span>), and striking the very seat of sin inflicts a stroke at once significant and effectual, a revelation at once of the Divine hand and power.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong><em>. He wants them to be effective. <\/em>The moral effect of a judgment depends very much on our knowing whence it comes. If we recognize it as sent by God, it is tenfold more impressive. Now, to exercise the maximum of beneficial influence with the minimum of afflictive visitation is ever God&#8217;s way (<span class='bible'>Lam 3:32<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Lam 3:33<\/span>). He does not strike an aimless or a needless blow. Each stroke is meant to tell, and the medicine of affliction is stopped the moment the patient is cured.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. <em>Idolatry is at the root of all other sin. <\/em>It is the complement of atheism, which is radically the heart departing from God. It is a sublimated self-worship, making an idol of our own mental creation. A god dethroned, and a self enthroned, is a state of things which &#8220;contains the promise and potency&#8221; of all evil. To strike at Israel&#8217;s idolatry was to lay the axe to the root of the national evil. The idols abolished, and God restored to the national heart, its life would be again a consecrated one. <\/p>\n<p><strong>VI.<\/strong> <strong>MAN<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>SELF<\/strong>&#8211;<strong>INDULGENCE<\/strong>, <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>DEAREST<\/strong> <strong>IDOL<\/strong> <strong>HE<\/strong> <strong>HAS<\/strong>, <strong>WILL<\/strong> <strong>BE<\/strong> <strong>TAKEN<\/strong> <strong>FROM<\/strong> <strong>HIM<\/strong> <strong>ALONG<\/strong> <strong>WITH<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>REST<\/strong>. (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:15<\/span>, &#8220;And I will smite,&#8221; etc.) Luxuries long enjoyed become necessities of life, and no judgment would be thorough that left them untouched. Self-indulgence, if it were left, would soon invent a new idolatry for its own accommodation. It is only by making a clean sweep of the idols already in possession that God can get his place in the sinner&#8217;s heart.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILIES BY J.R. THOMSON<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span><\/strong><strong>, <\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Sin against light and love.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This language of reproach and threatening was addressed to Israel and Judah. Yet all who occupy a parallel position of privilege, and who are guilty of similar insensibility, ingratitude, and apostasy, are subject to the condemnation and the penalty pronounced upon the favoured but sinful descendants of Israel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>UNPARALLELED<\/strong> <strong>FAVOURS<\/strong> <strong>ARE<\/strong> <strong>RECOUNTED<\/strong>. As a matter of history, Israel had been treated in a singular manner, with unique favour. However we may explain the fact, a fact it is which is here recalled to the memory of the too oblivions Hebrews.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. Israel had been treated as the family of God. The heavenly Father had cared for, provided for, and protected his peculiar family, the children whom he had adopted.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. Israel had been brought up from the land of Egypt. To the marvellous deliverance and interposition recorded by Moses, to the equally marvellous guidance and guardianship experienced in the wilderness of wandering, the sacred writers frequently refer. This is not surprising; for never was a more signal instance of Divine compassion than that afforded in the earlier passages of the national life of the chosen people.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. Israel had been the object of the Divine knowledge, By this we understand (for the language is accommodated to our human weakness) that God had regarded and selected Israel in his inscrutable wisdom for a certain purpose, viz. in order by Israel to make himself known to mankind at large. A peculiar honour was conferred upon the Hebrew nation, not, however, for any excellence or worthiness in them, but for reasons larger and higher than any which were generally apprehended.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>UNPARALLELED<\/strong> <strong>INIQUITIES<\/strong> <strong>ARE<\/strong> <strong>IMPUTED<\/strong>. Idolatry was charged upon those who had been distinguished as the recipients of the revelation of the Divine unity. Immorality of various kinds was rife amongst those who enjoyed the advantage of the purest moral code known amongst the nations of mankind. The just principle was applied, &#8220;To whom much is given of him will be much required.&#8221; And the application of this principle made manifest the peculiar guilt of Israel. The Word of the Lord by his prophet was therefore righteously severe; other nations were guilty of equal enormities, but the privileges of Israel rendered their iniquities more reprehensible.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>UNPARALLELED<\/strong> <strong>CHASTISEMENT<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>THREATENED<\/strong>. <em>All <\/em>the iniquities of Israel were to be visited by Divine correction. In the remainder of his prophecies Amos enlarges upon this theme. Whether we consider the captivities and humiliations undergone by the favoured nation in the period immediately succeeding, or the history of subsequent centuries, we see the truth of this prediction. Much more apparent is it when we look at the national life of Israel as a whole; and, connecting the earlier apostasies with the rejection of the Messiah, recognize in the present dispersion of. the tribes the fulfilment of a Divine purpose and the inculcation of a Divine lesson.T.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Harmonious fellowship.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>These words have passed into a proverb, which fact is in itself a proof that they accord with human experience.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>HARMONY<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>SENTIMENT<\/strong> <strong>AND<\/strong> <strong>PURPOSE<\/strong> <strong>ALONE<\/strong> <strong>CAN<\/strong> <strong>ENSURE<\/strong> <strong>AGREEMENT<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>LIFE<\/strong>. The spiritual is a key to the outward life. And this holds not only with regard to the individual, but with regard to society. Because people live together in a house, they are not necessarily a true family; because they meet together in an ecclesiastical building, they are not therefore a true congregation; because they occupy the same territory, they are not therefore a true nation. There must be inner accord in order that fellowship may be real.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>WANT<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>HARMONY<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>HEART<\/strong> <strong>WILL<\/strong> <strong>SURELY<\/strong> <strong>MANIFEST<\/strong> <strong>ITSELF<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>LIFE<\/strong>. This is the other side of the same law. The strifes of society are an indication of conflicting principles. Even Christ came to send, not peace, but a sword. Where there is no agreement, one will walk in this road and another in that. External uniformity is of little value. In fact, manifest discord may be of service in revealing the want of spiritual unity, and so leading to repentance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>RELATION<\/strong> <strong>BETWEEN<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>AND<\/strong> <strong>MAN<\/strong> <strong>AGREEMENT<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>ONLY<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>BE<\/strong> <strong>ATTAINED<\/strong> <strong>BY<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>CONFORMITY<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>MAN<\/strong>&#8216;S <strong>MIND<\/strong> <strong>AND<\/strong> <strong>WILL<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>&#8216;S. It is not to be expected, it is not to be desired, that God&#8217;s purpose should bend to man&#8217;s. The human ignorance must accept the Divine wisdom, and the human error and sin must embrace the Divine grace and holiness. Such is the teaching of revelation, of the Law, and of the gospel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV.<\/strong> <strong>WHERE<\/strong> <strong>THERE<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>WANT<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>HARMONY<\/strong> <strong>BETWEEN<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>. Now, it is a fact that some men are far more highly favoured by Heaven than others. Some have more health, some more riches, some more intellect, some more friendships, some more means of spiritual improvement. We offer three remarks about specially favoured people.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THEY<\/strong> <strong>ARE<\/strong> <strong>OFTENTIMES<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>GREATEST<\/strong> <strong>SINNERS<\/strong>. Who of all the people on the face of the earth were greater sinners than the Israelites? Yet they were specially favoured of Heaven. There was not a crime they did not commit; and they filled up the measure of their iniquity by crucifying the Son of God. England is a <em>specially favoured land, <\/em>but where is there more moral corruption? The fountain of moral iniquity is as deep, as full, as noxious, as active, here as in the darkest and most corrupt parts of the earth. It is true that civilization has so decorated it that its loathsomeness is to some extent concealed; but here it is. The corpse is painted, but it is still a putrid mass.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THEY<\/strong> <strong>ARE<\/strong> <strong>EXPOSED<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>SPECIAL<\/strong> <strong>PUNISHMENT<\/strong>. &#8220;Therefore will I punish you for all your iniquities.&#8221; Men are not to be envied simply because they are endowed with special favours. Those very endowments, unless they are faithfully used, only augment responsibility, deepen guilt, and ensure a more terrible retribution. Where much has been given, much will be required. &#8220;It will be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment,&#8221; etc. &#8220;Therefore will I punish you.&#8221; I who know all your sins, I who abhor all your sins, I who have power to punish you, will execute vengeance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>THEY<\/strong> <strong>SHOULD<\/strong>, <strong>LIKE<\/strong> <strong>ALL<\/strong> <strong>PEOPLE<\/strong>, <strong>PLACE<\/strong> <strong>THEMSELVES<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>HARMONY<\/strong> <strong>WITH<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong>. &#8220;Can two walk together, except they be agreed?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. <em>Agreement with God is essential to the well being of all intelligent existences. <\/em>No spirit in the universe can be happy without thorough harmony with the will and mind of God. Heaven is happy because of this harmony; hell is miserable because of antagonism to the Divine mind.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. <em>The condition of all sinners is that of hostility to the will of God. <\/em>Indeed, enmity to God is the essence of sin. What, then, is the conclusion? <em>Reconciliation<\/em>. &#8220;We beseech you on behalf of Christ, be ye reconciled unto God&#8221; (<span class='bible'>2Co 5:20<\/span>).D.T. <\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:4-6<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Retribution.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Will a lion roar in the forest, when he hath no prey?&#8221; etc. These verses suggest certain remarks on retribution.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>RETRIBUTION<\/strong> <strong>SPRINGS<\/strong> <strong>OUT<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>NATURE<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>THINGS<\/strong>. The lion roars in the forest for prey; the young lion cries in his den from an instinct of nature. They are hungry, and they roar; they crave for food, and they cry; this is natural. The lion is quiet till he sees his prey, but roars at the sight of it, and thereby inspires it with such terror that it is deprived of the power of escape. In like manner the young lion which has been weaned and is just beginning to hunt for prey, will lie silent in the den till it is brought near, when the smell of it will rouse him from his quiet. Poiset, in his travels, states that the lion has two different modes of hunting his prey. When not very hungry, he contents himself with watching behind a bush for the animal which is the object of his attack, till it approaches; when by a sudden leap he springs at it, and seldom misses his aim. But if he is famished he does not proceed so quietly; but, impatient and full of rage, he leaves his den and fills with his terrific roar the echoing forest. His voice inspires all beings with terror; no creature deems itself safe in its retreat; all flee they know not whither, and by this means some fall into his fangs. The naturalness of punishment, perhaps, is the point at which the prophet aims in the similitude. It is so with moral retribution. It arises from the constitution of things. Punishment grows out of vice. Misery follows iniquity. Every sin carries with it its own penalty. It does not require the Almighty to inflict any positive suffering on the sinner. He has only to leave him alone, and his sins will find him out.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>RETRIBUTION<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>NOT<\/strong> <strong>ACCIDENTAL<\/strong>, <strong>BUT<\/strong> <strong>ARRANGED<\/strong>. &#8220;Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where no gin is for him? shall one take up a snare from the earth, and have taken nothing at all?&#8221; The bird is not taken in a snare by chance. The fowler has been there and made preparation for its entanglement and death. Every sinner is a bird that must be caught; the snare is laid in the constitution of things. Instruments were prepared by the providence of God for the capture of the Israelites, which would certainly do their work.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>RETRIBUTION<\/strong> <strong>ALWAYS<\/strong> <strong>SOUNDS<\/strong> A <strong>TIMELY<\/strong> <strong>ALARM<\/strong>. &#8220;Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid?&#8221; Heaven does not punish without warnings. Nature warns, providence warns, conscience warns; there is no sinful soul in which the trumpet of alarm does not sound.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV.<\/strong> <strong>RETRIBUTION<\/strong>, <strong>HOWEVER<\/strong> <strong>IT<\/strong> <strong>COMES<\/strong>, <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>ALWAYS<\/strong> <strong>DIVINE<\/strong>. &#8220;Shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it?&#8221; God is in all. He has established the connection between sin and suffering. He has planned and laid the snare. The everlasting destruction with which the sinner is punished comes from the presence of the Lord and the glory of his power.D.T.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span><\/strong><strong>, <\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The irrepressibility of moral truth.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets,&#8221; etc. These words mean that although punishment for the guilty Israelites was natural, arranged, and withal Divine, yet it would come according to a warning made to them through the prophets, and which these would feel compelled to deliver. The words suggest two remarks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>GOD<\/strong> <strong>HAS<\/strong> <strong>MADE<\/strong> A <strong>SPECIAL<\/strong> <strong>REVELATION<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>SERVANTS<\/strong>. &#8220;He revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.&#8221; In all ages God has selected men to whom he has made communications of himself. In times past he spake unto the fathers by the prophets. In truth, he makes <em>special<\/em> revelations of himself to all true men. &#8220;Shall I hide from Abraham the thing that I do?&#8221; &#8220;The secrets of the Lord are with them that fear him, and he will show them his covenant.&#8221; God has given to all men a general revelation. In nature without and within, in the material domain, and in the spiritual. But he makes a special revelation to some. The Bible is indeed a special revelation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. Special in its <em>occasion<\/em>. It is made on account of the abnormal moral condition into which man has fallenmade in consequence of human sin and its dire consequences. Had there been no sin, in all probability we should have had no written revelation. The great book of nature would have sufficed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. Special in its <em>doctrines<\/em> The grand characteristic truth is thisthat God so loved men as sinners that he gave his only begotten Son for their redemption. This is the epitome of the gospel, <\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>RIGHT<\/strong> <strong>RECEPTION<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>THIS<\/strong> <strong>SPECIAL<\/strong> <strong>REVELATION<\/strong> <strong>NECESSITATES<\/strong> <strong>PREACHING<\/strong>. &#8220;The lion hath roared, who will not fear? the Lord God hath spoken, who can but prophesy?&#8221; The idea is that the men who have rightly taken the truth into them can no more conceal it than men can avoid terror at the roar of the lion. There are some truths which men may receive and feel no disposition to communicate, such as the truths of abstract science, which have no relation to the social heart. But gospel truths have such a relation to the tenderest and profoundest affections of the spirit, that their genuine recipients find them to be irrepressible. They feel like Jeremiah, that they have fire shut up in their bones; like the apostles before the Sanhedrin, &#8220;We cannot but speak the things that we have seen and heard;&#8221; like Paul, &#8220;Necessity is laid upon me to preach the gospel.&#8221; &#8220;Who can but prophesy?&#8221; None but those who have not received the truth.D.T.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:10<\/span><\/strong><strong>, <\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:11<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Rectitude.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;For they know not to do right, saith the Lord, who store up violence and robbery in their palaces,&#8221; etc. We derive from this passage three general remarks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>THERE<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>AN<\/strong> <strong>ETERNAL<\/strong> <strong>LAW<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> &#8220;<strong>RIGHT<\/strong>&#8221; <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>SHOULD<\/strong> <strong>GOVERN<\/strong> <strong>MAN<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>ALL<\/strong> <strong>HIS<\/strong> <strong>RELATIONS<\/strong>. Right, as a sentiment, is one of the deepest, most ineradicable, and operative <em>sentiments <\/em>in humanity. All men feel that there is such a thing as right. What the right is, is a subject on which there has been and is a variety of opinion. Right implies a standard, and men differ about the standard. Some say the law of your country is the standard; some say public sentiment is the standard; some say temporal expediency is the standard. All these are fearfully mistaken. Philosophy and the Bible teach that there is but one standardthat is the <em>will <\/em>of the Creator. That will he reveals in many waysin nature, in history, in conscience, in Christ. Conformity to that will is <em>right.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. The law of right should govern man in his relations with <em>God. <\/em>That law saysThank the kindest Being most, love the best Being most, reverence the greatest Being most. &#8220;Thou shalt love the Lord thy God,&#8221; etc.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. The law of right should govern man in his relation to <em>his fellow men. <\/em>&#8220;Whatsoever ye would that men should do unto you, do ye even so unto them.&#8221; This law of right is <em>immutable. <\/em>It admits of no modification. It is <em>universal. <\/em>It is binding alike on all moral beings in the universe. It is <em>benevolent. <\/em>It seeks the happiness of all. Earth will be Paradise again when the will of God is done here &#8220;as it is in heaven.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> A <strong>PRACTICAL<\/strong> <strong>DISREGARD<\/strong> <strong>OF<\/strong> <strong>THIS<\/strong> <strong>LAW<\/strong> <strong>LEADS<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>FRAUD<\/strong> <strong>AND<\/strong> <strong>VIOLENCE<\/strong>. &#8220;For they know not to do right, saith the Lord, who store up violence and robbery in their palaces.&#8221; The magnates of Samaria had no respect for the practice of right, hence they &#8220;stored up violence and robbery in their palaces.&#8221; Fraud and violence are the <em>two great primary crimes in all social life. <\/em>By the former men are deceived, befooled, rifled of their rights, and disappointed of their hopes and expectations. Never was fraud stronger in England than todayfraud in literature, commerce, religion, legislation. By the latter, men are disabled, wounded, crushed, murdered. Can the history of the world furnish more terrible manifeststions of violence than we have had in the wars of Christendom in this age? Why this fraud and violence? Why are these devils let loose to fill the world with lamentation and woe? The answer is in the text, &#8220;Men know not to do right&#8221; That is, they do not practise the right.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>THAT<\/strong> <strong>FRAUD<\/strong> <strong>AND<\/strong> <strong>VIOLENCE<\/strong> <strong>MUST<\/strong> <strong>ULTIMATELY<\/strong> <strong>MEET<\/strong> <strong>WITH<\/strong> <strong>CONDIGN<\/strong> <strong>PUNISHMENT<\/strong>. &#8220;Therefore thus saith the Lord God; An adversary there shall be even round about the land; and he shall bring down thy strength from thee, and thy palaces shall be spoiled.&#8221; How was this realized? &#8220;Against him came up Shalmaneser King of Assyria; and Hoshea became his servant, and gave him presents &#8230;. In the ninth year of Hoshea the King of Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away into Assyria, and placed them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes&#8221; (2Ki 3-6; <span class='bible'>2Ki 18:9-11<\/span>). The cheats and. murderers of mankind will, as sure as there is justice in the world, meet with a terrible doom. Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are moth eaten. Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days. Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of sabaoth. Ye have lived in pleasure on the earth, and been wanton; ye have nourished your hearts, as in a day of slaughter. Ye have condemned and killed the just; and he doth not resist you&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Jas 5:1-6<\/span>). &#8220;Punishment is the recoil of crime; and the strength of the back stroke is in proportion to the original blow.&#8221;D.T.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Amo 3:13-15<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>National judgments.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Hear ye, and testify in the house of Jacob, saith the Lord God, the God of hosts,&#8221; etc. The same persons are here addressed who in the ninth verse were summoned from Philistia and Egypt. They were now to testify to the facts of the case, that it might be seen that the punishment inflicted upon the inhabitants was richly deserved. The subject of the words is <em>national judgment, <\/em>which we are here led to regard in three aspects.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>RELATION<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>THE<\/strong> <strong>TRUE<\/strong> <strong>PROPHETS<\/strong>. &#8220;Hear ye, and testify in the house of Jacob.&#8221; We may perhaps regard the words also as spoken to the prophets. Hear, ye prophets.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. The prophets were to <em>make themselves acquainted with the coming judgments. <\/em>They were to be watchmen who were to descry afar the coming danger. All true ministers of religion should by earnest study acquaint themselves with the terrible punishment that awaits the guilty world.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. The prophets were to <em>announce the coming, judgment. <\/em>&#8220;Hear ye, and testify.&#8221; Their work is to sound the alarm, to blow the trumpet. &#8220;So thou, O son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore thou shall hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Eze 33:7<\/span>). One of the chief duties of a true minister is to &#8220;warn every man&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Col 1:28<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>II.<\/strong> <strong>IN<\/strong> <strong>RELATION<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>ITS<\/strong> <strong>MORAL<\/strong> <strong>CAUSE<\/strong>. What was the cause of these threatened judgments? Here it is. &#8220;I shall visit the transgressions of Israel.&#8221; Judgments do not come on men as a matter of necessity; they do not roll on man like the billows of ocean on the shore, by blind force; nor do they come because the Governor of the universe is malevolent, and has pleasure in the sufferings of his creatures. No; he is love. He &#8220;desireth not the death of a sinner.&#8221; They come because of sin. The sins of a nation draw judgment after them as the moon draws after it the billows that beat upon the shore. Let no nation hope to escape judgments until it gets rid of sin. Judgments are but sins ripened into a harvest, subterranean fires breaking into volcanoes. Eternal love requires for the order and happiness of the universe that sins and sorrows, transgressions and troubles, should be inseparably linked together.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III.<\/strong> <strong>IS<\/strong> <strong>RELATION<\/strong> <strong>TO<\/strong> <strong>ITS<\/strong> <strong>TERRIBLE<\/strong> <strong>ISSUES<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. There is the deprivation of <em>religious institutions. <\/em>&#8220;I will also visit the altars of Bethel: and the horns of the altar shall be cut off, and fall to the ground.&#8221; &#8220;Signal vengeance was to be taken on the place whence all the evils which spread through the ten tribes originated. The &#8216;horns&#8217; were four projecting points, in the shape of horns, at the corners of ancient altars. They may be seen in the representations of those dug up by Belzoni in Egypt. As they were ornamental, the action here described was designed to express the contempt in which the altar would be held by the Assyrians.&#8221; Corrupt punishment for a nation&#8217;s transgressions would involve the ruin of religious institutions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. There is a deprivation of all their <em>conveniences and luxuries. <\/em>&#8220;And I will smite the winter house with the summer house; and the houses of ivory shall perish, and the great houses shall have an end, saith the Lord<em>.<\/em>&#8220;<em> <\/em>Eastern monarchs and princes, we are told, have summer as well as winter houses. The &#8220;ivory houses&#8221; do not mean houses composed of that material, but richly ornamented dwellings. These were to be destroyed. &#8220;The pomp or pleasantness of men&#8217;s houses,&#8221; says Matthew Henry, &#8220;will be so far from fortifying them against God&#8217;s judgments, that it will make them the more grievous and vexatious, as their extravagance about them will be put to the score of their sins and follies.&#8221;D.T.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Complete Pulpit Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><em><span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span><\/em><\/strong><strong>. <\/strong><strong><em>Hear this word<\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong> This is a continuation of the discourse in the preceding chapter. After having denounced upon the Israelites of the ten tribes the evils there recorded, Amos here speaks to the whole race of Jacob, to the Hebrews of the two kingdoms of Judah and Israel. Afterwards he addresses those of the ten tribes only. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>CHAPTERS 36<\/p>\n<p>II. <em>To the Kingdom of Israel, especially to its Great Men<\/em>, the Divine Judgment is announced upon the Prevailing Sins, unless Men seek the Lord.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amos 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1. <em>As surely as the Prophet bears the Divine Commission, will God punish Israel.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>1 Hear this word,<\/p>\n<p>Which Jehovah speaks concerning you, ye sons of Israel,<br \/>Concerning the whole family<br \/>Which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying,<\/p>\n<p>2 You only have I known of all the families of the earth;<\/p>\n<p>Therefore will I visit upon you all your iniquities.<\/p>\n<p>3 Do two walk together<\/p>\n<p>Unless they have agreed<span class=''>1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>4 Does the lion roar in the forest<\/p>\n<p>When he has no prey?<br \/>Does the young lion utter his cry out of his den<br \/>Unless he has taken something?<\/p>\n<p>5 Does a bird fall into a trap<span class=''>2<\/span> on the ground<\/p>\n<p>When there is no snare for him?<br \/>Does the trap rise up from the earth<br \/>Without catching anything at all?<\/p>\n<p>6 Or is a trumpet blown in a city,<\/p>\n<p>And the people are not alarmed?<br \/>Or does misfortune occur in a city,<br \/>And Jehovah has not caused it?<\/p>\n<p>7 [No;] for<span class=''>3<\/span> the Lord Jehovah does nothing<\/p>\n<p>Without having revealed his secret to his servants, the prophets.<\/p>\n<p>8 The lion roars,<\/p>\n<p>Who does not fear?<br \/>The Lord Jehovah speaks,<br \/>Who must not prophesy?<\/p>\n<p>9 Make it heard over the palaces in Ashdod,<\/p>\n<p>And over the palaces in the land of Egypt,<br \/>And say, assemble upon the mountains of Samaria,<br \/>And see the great confusions in the midst thereof,<span class=''>4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>And the oppressed in the heart thereof.<\/p>\n<p>10 And they know not to do right, saith Jehovah,<\/p>\n<p>They who store up violence and devastation in their palaces.<\/p>\n<p>11 Therefore thus saith the Lord Jehovah,<\/p>\n<p>An enemy, and that round about the land!<span class=''>5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>And he shall bring down thy strength<span class=''>6<\/span> from thee,<\/p>\n<p>And thy palaces shall be plundered.<\/p>\n<p>12 Thus saith Jehovah,<\/p>\n<p>As the shepherd rescues from the mouth of the lion<br \/>Two legs or an ear-lappet,<br \/>So shall the sons of Israel deliver themselves;<br \/>They who sit in Samaria<br \/>On the corner of the couch and on the damask of the bed.<span class=''>7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>13 Hear ye and testify to the house of Jacob,<\/p>\n<p>Saith the Lord Jehovah, the God of Hosts:<\/p>\n<p>14 That in the day when I visit Israels transgressions upon him,<\/p>\n<p>I will visit the altars of Bethel,<br \/>And the horns of the altar<span class=''>8<\/span> shall be cut off and fall to the ground.<\/p>\n<p>15 And I will smite the winter-house with the summer-house,<\/p>\n<p>And the houses of ivory shall perish,<span class=''>9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>And many<span class=''>10<\/span> houses shall disappear.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<span class='bible'> Amo 3:1-2<\/span>. Hear <strong>this word which Jehovah, etc.<\/strong> Hear this word. This phrase is repeated at the beginning of chaps, 5. and 6. It therefore shows this chapter to contain <em>one<\/em> address complete in itself. See the Introduction. <strong>Upon the whole family.<\/strong> Although afterwards destruction is threatened only against the ten tribes, yet here the entire race is included. The people as a whole were known and chosen of God, and therefore the punishment of sin is set forth in universal terms. Just so far as sin extends, punishment will and must come. Certainly this occurred first in the case of the ten tribes, but how little Judah could count upon being spared, has already been seen in <span class='bible'>Amo 5:4<\/span>, etc.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span>. <strong>Only you have I known.<\/strong> This is equivalent to I have chosen, since the knowing expresses a relation of sympathy and love, as the motive and the result of the election.<\/p>\n<p>2.<span class='bible'> Amo 3:3-8<\/span>. <strong>Do two walk together, etc.<\/strong> The general announcement of a punitive judgment is followedwithout any apparent connection with the foregoingby a series of propositions illustrated by examples from daily life. Plainly, these perhaps proverbial phrases are here introduced only by way of comparison. They illustrate the principle that every effect has its cause.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:4<\/span>. <strong>When he has no prey, refers, as<\/strong> Keil justly states, not to the actual seizing of the prey by the lion, but to his having it before him so that it cannot escape. In like manner, the phrase in the second clause, unless he has taken something, is to be explained. The lion makes his capture not merely when he has seized and is rending the prey, but when it is so near that escape is impossible. [The lion, as a rule, roars most terribly when it has the prey in sight, upon which it immediately springs. Bochart.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:5<\/span>. <strong>Does the trap rise up?<\/strong> because lifted up by the bird flying away. <strong>Without catching<\/strong>, <em>i. e.<\/em> the bird.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:6<\/span>. In the first member the usual order of these propositions is reversed, and the cause is mentioned first,the blowing of the trumpet,and the result follows. In the second, the other order is restored. In this last, similes are abandoned, and the discourse states directly what had been implied in numerous comparisons. As little as two can walk together without, etc., etc.; so little can misfortune occur in a city without the Lords hand; or rather, as in all these eases, one thing is the result of the other as its cause, so is it here. Misfortune in the city is the result, the Lord is the cause. Even this is to be considered as a kind of proverbial speech, but it explains the subject treated of in this passage. The prophet has threatened the whole people in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span>, with a visitation from God. Against this the consciousness of Israel revolts, especially because the visitation is to come from God, their own God, Jehovah. Therefore the prophet proves the correctness of his declaration by these examples, in which he traces with the certainty of the strictest logic every effect to a cause, and so every misfortune in the city to Jehovah as its., author (and to his punitive righteousness as the cause). If this be so, every objection is obviated. Whatever misfortune exists must be traced back to Jehovah. This however is not proved, but only illustrated, by the examples cited, which show simply that as every event has its cause, so also must misfortune; so that the question remains, Is this result to be attributed to Jehovahs activity? The answer to this is found in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:7-8<\/span>, which must be taken together, since it is only thus that they furnish the desired proof.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span>. <strong>For presupposes the answer No, to the foregoing questions, especially the last.<\/strong> No, misfortune does not occur without Jehovahs hand, for, etc. The proof in the first instance is this: Jehovah does nothing without having disclosed his secret, <em>i.e.<\/em> his secret counsel, to his servants, the prophets. The latter is certainly not the cause, but it is the indispensable condition of Jehovahs activity, so that between the two there is a necessary connection. But this very revelation to the prophets has as an inevitable result (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span>), their prophesying, which again is illustrated by an example drawn from experience, <strong>the lion roars<\/strong>, etc. so that this prophesying is not an accidental or capricious thing, but proceeds from a <em>causa sufficiens<\/em>, which lies in Jehovah himself. Therefore the meaning is: when the prophet speaks or predicts, Jehovah has revealed it to him, and the former is the result of the latter. But if Jehovah has made a revelation to him, then what he predicts, namely, misfortune, is really impending from Jehovah. The Lord will let it come. He will not indeed in the absence of such a revelation; but wherever this occurs, it is a token that He will bring it to pass. Therefore a prophecy, a foretelling of calamity by a prophet, is a voucherthat the calamity is from the Lord, that a causal connection exists between the two as certain as that between the things mentioned in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:3-6<\/span>. Otherwise, the prophet could not announce such a calamity, since he announces only what Jehovah reveals to him, but must announce that. The divine origin of his prophecy is to the prophet, therefore, the basis on which he proceeds as on a certain reality, and from this he argues and proves the divine authorship of the fact which he predicts, namely, a punitive judgment. Thus is sustained the truth of the saying, that Jehovah would visit Israel.Only in this way do we understand the  in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span>. It is therefore a reversal of the order of thought when most interpreters say that from <span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span> the prophet is proving the divine origin of his prophecy against the objection that he spoke only from subjective influences, <em>i.e.<\/em>, as little can a prophet speak without a divine impulse as any other effect can be produced without a cause (B. Baur). No, the prophet does not justify himself or his calling, he is sure of that; he only seeks to convince his hearers or readers that they are really to expect the judgment which he announces, and to this end he uses the fact that prophecy comes from God.Concerning the examples in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span> ff. Baur correctly remarks, There is no occasion to regard them as anything more than mere analogies representing the general relation of cause and effect, or to assign to each case a special reference to the prophets thought, <em>e. g.<\/em>, the <em>two<\/em> as a figure of God and the people, the <em>lion<\/em> as representing Jehovah, and the prey and the bird, the wicked, etc. Such a method leads to constrained refinements, as may be seen in Keil, <em>in loc.<\/em> The illustration of one principle by so many examples may seem somewhat tedious, but to understand it, one must consider the partiality of the Orientals for figurative and proverbial speeches, which leads them to express in these concrete forms even such an abstract truth as the relation of cause and effect. There is nothing strange, therefore, in finding such a representation coming from the herdman of Tekoa.<\/p>\n<p>3.<span class='bible'> Amo 3:9-15<\/span>. Here the Lords purpose respecting the sinful people is openly declared.<\/p>\n<p>(a.) <span class='bible'>Amo 3:9-10<\/span>. <em>The sins.<\/em><strong>Make it heard<\/strong>, etc. Not only are the sins to be punished set forth, but the heathen are summoned as witnesses. This turn in the address indicates that the sinfulness is very great, enough even to surprise the heathen, and thus puts Israel to shame.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:9<\/span>. <em>Publish ye.<\/em> Jehovah is the speaker, and we must regard the command as addressed to the people in these heathen lands. <strong>The palaces<\/strong>, <em>i. e.<\/em>, those who dwell there, are to be informed, because the question concerns what is done in the palaces of Samaria. <strong>Ashdod<\/strong>, as part for the whole, is put for the Philistines, who were regarded by Israel as godless heathen. <strong>Egypt<\/strong>, whose unrighteousness and ungodliness Israel had once abundantly experienced (Keil).<strong>On the mountains of Samaria<\/strong>, <em>i. e.<\/em> around Samaria, whence they could look into the city.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:10<\/span>. <strong>They know not to do right.<\/strong> They do not understand it, so accustomed are they to unrighteousness. <strong>They who store up violence<\/strong>, etc.; evil treasures which, so far from helping, destroy them.<\/p>\n<p>(b.) <span class='bible'>Amo 3:11-15<\/span>. <strong>Therefore thus saith<\/strong>, etc.,  may be abstract or concrete. The latter is more probable, especially as in that case it is naturally connected with the verb  which otherwise would require Jehovah to be understood as its subject. The clause is an emphatic assertion in the form of an exclamation.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:12<\/span>. In this plundering of Samaria, the great men will be able to save their lives only to the smallest extent and with the greatest difficulty Both points are suggested in the comparison. (A pair of shin-bones and a piece, <em>i. e.<\/em> a lappet, of the ear. Keil.)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:13<\/span>. Renews the threatening and raises it still higher. There will be an utter destruction <strong>Hear ye<\/strong>, etc., is addressed to the Israelites, as in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span>, since among even these God has those who will testify what He is going to do. They shall, when summoned as witnesses of wrong doing, announce also the punishment of Israel. <strong>House of Jacob<\/strong> means all Israel, <em>i. e.<\/em>, the twelve tribes; even Judah should hear it so as to learn a lesson. The Divine names are accumulated for emphasis; the threat of such a God ought to make a deep impression. The visitation of Israel will begin with the destruction of the altars in Bethel, <em>i. e.<\/em>, of idolatry, the religious source of the moral corruption. This is more closely defined by the cutting off of the horns, which destroys the significance of the altar.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:15<\/span>. <strong>Winter houses and summer houses<\/strong> are primarily those of the royal family, but perhaps also those of the noblemen.The threatened judgment, therefore, is the overthrow of Samaria, especially its palaces, with the complete extermination of the inhabitants (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:12<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>1. Israel stands to us as a constant example both of the unsearchable riches of grace which God bestows and of the inconceivable judgments He sends upon those who receive his grace in vain. (Rieger.) Here again the bringing out of Egypt appears as the fundamental act of Gods grace. It is mentioned alone, because by it as the condition of its outer and inner existence was Israel constituted the people of God. This bringing out, however, includes the guidance, through the wilderness and the giving of the law. This people alone did God know; to them alone He stood in a relation of nearness and confidence; all others were aliens. Therefore so much the greater their guilt, and the move certain their punishment.<\/p>\n<p>2. The sin of Israel, especially of the ten tribes, is apostasy, at least in the calf-worship (comp. <span class='bible'>Amo 3:14<\/span>, chaps, <span class='bible'>Amo 4:4<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Amo 5:5<\/span>). But that which particularly provokes rebuke and menace is, as appears by chap. 2. and the following chapters, the extreme moral corruption, which naturally is regarded as the violation of the divine commands, covetousness and luxury, and in connection therewith, the shameless disregard of the elementary duties due to our neighbors, violent oppression of the poor. This last is continually the subject of sharp censure (cf. 2, 6, 7, and subsequently <span class='bible'>Amo 4:1<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Amo 5:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 5:11-12<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Amo 6:12<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Amo 8:5-6<\/span>). The poor always stand under the especial protection of the divine law, a peculiar feature of which is its compassion for the lowly, as the Mosaic institute shows in many of its provisions. How fully the prophet was in sympathy with this trait, is shown by the fact that upon no point is he so zealous as upon the oppression of the poor. This was doubtless because such instances frequently occurred; still it is significant that instead of merely touching them and then passing on, he brings them forward and brands them with an especial stigma. To pervert the way of the poor, as it was before expressed in chap. 1.<span class='bible'> Amo 3:7<\/span>, is, as it were, the unpardonable sin. For this reason the prophets rebuke is addressed mainly to the great, the higher classes; but certainly not because these alone were corrupt while the lower classes needed no particular censure, although at bottom this was the fact. Are we then to recognize a democratic feature in the circumstance, and observe how a man of the people, a herdman, feels himself called chiefly to scourge the sins of the nobles and especially those by which the humble suffered? If it is correct to assert that God called and employed him to chastise such sins, we may admit this. Only let us not ascribe to Amos that modern democratic view which reviles the higher classes because it condemns all distinctions of ranks. Rather the reverse is true of Amos. He inveighs against the sins of the great, just because their position is so important, because he knows that upon their conduct depends the weal or the woe of the community, for if corruption prevails in their circles, the foundations of the national prosperity are undermined and shaken. With equal or even greater propriety may one ascribe an aristocratic leaning to our prophet, but after a proper manner, <em>i. e.<\/em>, he considers the position of the higher classes very important, but for that very reason very responsible, and holds that their rights and privileges impose corresponding duties. They have much ability, but much is also expected from them, to whom much is given, etc. And if they mistake and abuse their position, so much the heavier is their guilt and the greater the harm they work. Their degeneracy at last brings destruction upon the whole. If then a prophet were silent, or censured only the lowly and not the high, he would be justly chargeable with servility and fear of men, which would ill agree with his call to be a witness of divine truth (cf. chap, 4. <strong>Doctrinal and Ethical<\/strong>, 2).<\/p>\n<p>3. Misfortune as a punishment comes only from Jehovah. It comes not of itself nor is casual, but has a definite cause and author, who is Jehovah He who chose and blessed his people, the same punishes them. Men may struggle against this truth, but still it remains incontestable. And when a doubt of the divine authorship intrudes, there comes a voucher in the words of the prophets. Before God executes anything, He reveals it to his servants, and these cannot but declare what is thus revealed. A calamity announced by them is a punishment proceeding from God.<\/p>\n<p>4. The lofty significance of prophecy is strongly expressed in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:7-8<\/span>. The prophets are not only Gods servants in general, but are also entrusted with his secret, his counsel, <em>i. e.<\/em>, what He proposes respecting his people. Yes, he does nothing until He has revealed it to the prophets. Thus He, as it were, binds himself to them. Is it asked, Why? The answer is, The aim of the revelation is to secure its announcement, as it is expressly said (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span>), the speaking of God to his servants necessarily leads them to prophesy. The object of their utterances is simple and single, to set plainly before men the severity of God against sin, the truth of his punitive righteousness. If this is done, so to speak, in the interest of God, naturally it is still more in the interest of men. These are to learn how the matter stands with them and what threatens them, so as to take warning while there is time. And if men do take warningfor this is the implied thought,then God does nothing, <em>i. e.<\/em>, does not carry out his secret counsel. Therefore He, as it were, puts prophecy between his secret and its execution, and so prophecy is justly reckoned among Israels peculiar privileges (comp. <span class='bible'>Amo 2:11<\/span> and the remarks there). Well remarks Rieger in reference to the present times: Those to whom God has intrusted the duty of bearing witness to his truth in the world now, cannot put themselves on a level with his ancient prophets, nor should they indulge any natural passion herein. Yet it is very significant that the Lord Jesus addressed to the overseers of the churches of Asia the precious testimony of his revelation, and therein the secret counsel by which Gods wrath is fulfilled, and thus indicated for all time the participation of the teachers office in the judgments of God, partly in foreseeing them, partly in foretelling them, and partly, moreover, in influencing them for good by prayer and watchfulness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:1<\/span>. <em>Hear the word which Jehovah speaks to you.<\/em> Here we learn that Gods Word should be preached in such way that its hearers should recognize that it is intended for and applies to them. For when it is declared only in general terms, especially as respects Gods wrath against sin, the people commonly sit and think it does not concern them but only folks in far-off lands. It should be said, Hear what the Lord says to you who sit here under the pulpit.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:2<\/span>. <em>You only<\/em>, etc.<em>therefore I will<\/em>, etc. This is a wonderful inference. We should rather expect; therefore will I spare you. But we see that the Lord is accustomed to punish those who have received much at his hands more severely than others not so favored. For his kindness is not intended to encourage us in sin, but to render j us through gratitude more devoted to Him. He has chosen us in Christ that we should be holy and blameless before Him in love (<span class='bible'>Ephesians 1<\/span>.), but where this result does not follow, Gods goodness ceases, and his punishments fall the heavier.(W. S.)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span> ff. The comparisons here may be practically explained as (1) teaching us what just grounds God has for his punishments. If two walk together, they must agree, but you, He says, do not agree with me, but are my foes, by your evil works, and therefore I cannot walk with you in complacency. (2) As a lion does not roar unless the prey is just before him, so my threatenings are not uttered unless I see men just ready to fall, as it were, a prey to my wrath. Of this, however, they think lightly, and deem any calamity that befalls them an accident. But (3) just as little as a bird falls into the net without a fowler, or a fowler lifts the snare without having caught something, so little does misfortune occur without Gods mind and will, who does not give up his purpose but carries it out unless withheld by a true repentance. As every one fears when the trumpet announces the enemy near at hand, so should my people when my prophets announce to them judgment for their sins. These similes remind us of the divine providence in punishments. They do not fall promiscuously, but in the righteous retribution of God, who determines beforehand who shall suffer and who escape.<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Amo 3:6<\/span>. <em>Does misfortune occur<\/em>, etc. Evil which is sin, the Lord hath not done; evil which is punishment for sin, the Lord bringeth. (Augustine.)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span>. <em>The Lord Jehovah does nothing<\/em>, etc. God has ever warned the world of coming judgments in order that it may not incur them. As Chrysostom says, He has revealed to us hell in order that we may escape hell. He warned Noah of the coming deluge. He told Abram and Lot of the future judgment of the cities of the plain. He revealed to Joseph the seven years of famine, and to Moses the ten plagues, and to Jonah the destruction of Nineveh; and by Christ He foretold the fall of Jerusalem; and Christ has warned all of his own future coming to judge the world. God does this that men may repent; and that if they obstinately continue in sin, He may be justified in executing punishment upon them. (Wordsworth.)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:8<\/span>. <em>Who does not fear?<\/em> There is cause for you to fear when God roars from Zion, but if ye fear not, the prophets dare not but fear. So Paul says, Woe is unto me if I preach not the Gospel. So Peter and John, We cannot but speak the things we have seen and heard. Moses was not excused, though slow of speech; nor Isaiah, though of polluted lips; nor Jeremiah, because he was a child. And Ezekiel was bidden, Be not rebellious like that rebellious house. (Pusey.)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:9<\/span>. <em>Publish in the palaces<\/em>, etc. Since ye disbelieve, I will manifest to Ashdodites and Egyptians the transgressions of which ye are guilty. (Theodoret.) Shame towards man survives shame towards God. What men are not ashamed to do, they are ashamed to confess that they have done. Nay, to avoid a little passing shame, they rush upon everlasting shame. So God employs all inferior motives, shame, fear, hope of things present, if by any means He can win men not to offend Him. (<em>Ibid.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:10<\/span>. <em>They know not<\/em>, etc. It is a part of the miserable blindness of sin, that while the soul acquires a quick insight into evil, it becomes at last not only paralyzed to do good, but unable to perceive it. <em>Store up violence.<\/em> They stored up, as they deemed, the gains and fruits; but it was in truth the sins themselves, as a treasure of wrath against the day of wrath. (<em>Ibid.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:11<\/span>. <em>Therefore thus saith<\/em>, etc. There was no human redress. The oppressor was mighty, but mightier the avenger of the poor. Man would not help, therefore God would. <em>Thy palaces shall be spoiled.<\/em> Those palaces in which they had heaped up the spoils of the oppressed. Mens sins are in Gods providence the means of their punishment. Their spoiling should invite the spoiler, their oppressions should attract the oppressor. (<em>Ibid.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:12<\/span>. <em>As the shepherd rescues<\/em>, etc. Amos as well as Joel (<span class='bible'>Joel 2:32<\/span>) preaches the same solemn sentence, so repeated through the prophets, a remnant only shall be saved. So it was in the captivity of the ten tribes. So it was in Judah. In the Gospel, not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble were called, but God chose the poor of this world, and the Good Shepherd rescued from the mouth of the lion those whom man despised. (<em>Ibid.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:13<\/span>. <em>Hear ye and testify.<\/em> It is of little avail to testify, unless we first hear; nor can man bear witness to what he doth not know; nor will words make an impression, <em>i. e.<\/em>, be stamped on mens souls, unless the soul which utters them have first hearkened unto them. (<em>Ibid.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:14<\/span>. <em>In the day when I visit<\/em>, etc. Scripture speaks of visiting offenses upon, because in Gods providence, the sin returns upon a mans own head. It is not only the cause of his punishment but a part of it. The memory of a mans sins will be apart of his eternal suffering. (<em>Ibid.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:14<\/span>. <em>The altars<\/em>, etc. The vengeance of a just and holy God will one day certainly root out false worship.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:15<\/span>. <em>The winter-house and<\/em>, etc. What are the palaces and pleasure-houses of the wicked in the time of judgment, but a brand which kindles the wrath of the Lord.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[1]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:3<\/span>.. To <em>meet together<\/em> at an appointed time and place.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[2]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:5<\/span>. is the fowlers net, , the springe or snare which holds the bird fast.  belongs to  [In order to catch a bird in the net, a springe must be laid for it.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[3]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:7<\/span>.. Not surely, as in E. T., a signification which it never has, but, for, in connection with a negative implied in its relation to what precedes. Cf. <span class='bible'>Mic 6:4<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Job 31:18<\/span>.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[4]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:9<\/span>., <em>noise, disorder<\/em>, denotes a state of confusion, resulting from a complete overturning of right, such as is expressed by , probably to be taken as an abstract, the oppression (of the poor) or possibly concrete, the oppressed.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[5]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:11<\/span>., <em>thy strength, i.e.<\/em>, Samarias.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[6]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:11<\/span>. is explanatory, and that round about the land, <em>i.e.<\/em>, will come and attack it on all sides.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[7]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:12<\/span>. , the corner of the divan. the most convenient for repose, , <em>damask<\/em>, covered with a costly stuff. [Pusey and Wordsworth revert to the old view (Sept., Vulgate, Syriac, Targum), which is followed in the Authorized Version, and interpret, and recline on Damascus as a couch, but their reasons do not seem to have much weight.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[8]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:14<\/span>. is the singular of species, and is equivalent to a plural.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[9]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:15<\/span>.I vory houses are such as have their apartments adorned with inlaid ivory (cf. <span class='bible'>1Ki 22:39<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[10]<\/span><span class='bible'>Amo 3:15<\/span>., not large as E T., but many.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> CONTENTS<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> The subject is continued through this Chapter, which formed a part in the conclusion of the former. Israel is still before the judgment seat, and the Lord is expostulating with his people.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> I beg the Reader to notice what I before remarked in the preceding Chapter, though Judah and Israel were separately there arraigned, yet here the whole family arc considered as one, consequently Judah is included. And I do as earnestly beg the Reader to remark with me, that the family name and relationship between God and. his people is still the same. Though Israel and Judah are rebellious, yet still children, though rebellious children. Though outcasts, yet still God&#8217;s outcasts; this feature is never lost sight of in the word of God. <span class='bible'>Isa 16:3<\/span> . And I still beg once more the Reader to observe, that in the punishment of Israel, it is as God&#8217;s Israel; yea, the Lord declares that the correction of them is on this account; because them only the Lord knew of all the families of the earth; that is, knew them in covenant relationship; and therefore the Lord would correct them for their iniquities. Reader! pause over the whole, and stand amazed at the goodness of God! Behold! how even in chastisements the Lord manifests his love to Israel. Read some of the many scriptures to this amount, and form your own conclusions accordingly. If we see at any time a man correcting a child, we may be sure from the act itself, it is the child&#8217;s own father. <span class='bible'>Heb 12:5-10<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> The Accusing Word<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:6.12em'><span class='bible'>Amo 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> It is difficult to give attention to accusing words. They do not conciliate; they do not appease wrath; they do not draw the speaker and the hearer together in mutually affectionate fellowship. We cry for sweet words, consolatory promises, tender expressions, and we are willing to pay men a price for telling lies that will for the moment soothe the pain that nothing but spiritual surgery can extirpate. It is a charge against the pulpit, the prophetic office, the whole ministerial function, that it will cry, Peace, peace, where there is no peace; that it will daub the wall with untempered mortar; that it will prophesy smooth things if it may but be allowed to sit down at the festival of wealth, and enjoy the banquet of mammon. Now and again it does us good to hear the voice of judgment, the tone of rebuke, the criticism of righteousness. When a man comes and offers us this advantage, we may say, &#8220;Physician, heal thyself&#8221;; but when any authority that assumes to be divine undertakes to deal with our infirmity, with our iniquity, with our selfishness, it will be wise on our part to hear how far that authority can vindicate its own divinity. It is the glory of the Bible that it never accuses man without disclosing the reason for the accusation. God does not thunder against man because he delights to show his Omnipotence, or exercise the prerogative of deity; he never simply confounds the intelligence of men; he comes before his creatures with reasons; explicitly does he state the bases on which he proceeds in his strange work of judgment, and he first secures the consent of the conscience before he lays his lash on the back of our iniquities. It is not a pleasant vocation to be summoned from the plough and from the fruit-house in order to denounce the sins of the age. The prophets were not called to easy positions; they were without salary, without official status granted by kings and councillors; they were the offscouring of the earth, they were the sensationalists of their day; there was no name too humiliating to be withheld from them by tongues gifted with the genius of malevolent misrepresentation. All this is forgotten; all this is lost in our idolatry of respectability. The Jonahs that raved in the streets of the city were accounted mad, and mad they will always be counted; the men who utter things we do not understand, and do not tax our moral attention, and do not make our home-life uncomfortable, and do not tear to pieces our personal complacency, are men who will be allowed to eat the fat things of prosperity, and lie down on the velvet couch of popularity. Amos was the sensation of his day. He laid about him like one infested with a spirit that could not be quelled. He raved, he shouted, he thundered, he foamed at the mouth; when men passed him they were glad to escape from the influence of a fanatic. Yet this is the man who is worshipped to-day as an ancient prophet, and whose words are quoted as the basis of discourses which utterly fail to catch the inflation and holy madness of his enthusiasm. The Church loves to have it so. The Church can devour any amount of self-complacency; to be pricked, to be irritated, to feel the flagellating lash upon the conscience, is not the trick of the Church to-day, is not the luxury of modern piety. Therefore we have distributed our workers; we have built places in which sensationalists may cry themselves to peace, and we have assigned them positions in their own journalism in which they may utter their maledictions and their benedictions where we do not come under the influence of either. The Church could not to-day receive an Amos; the ancient prophets could have no place in the modern sanctuary. It is a lie to think that that which was once sensational has ceased to be sensational. If Christ&#8217;s was not sensational preaching, then the fourfold account of his ministry is a fourfold misrepresentation. When a man&#8217;s congregation will arise and thrust him out of the synagogue, and take him to a hill in order to cast him headlong down in order that he may be killed when that experience is described as other than sensational, the church has added to the iniquity of indifference the immorality of not understanding the language in which its own Gospel is declared. To-day no minister is cast down from the top of a hill; to-day ministers are applauded in proportion to their ability to bewilder the people, and to so affect their imagination with cloudy presences and rhetorical spectres as to turn their attention wholly and absolutely away from the monitions and claims of conscience.<\/p>\n<p> Now the Lord puts into the mouth of the prophet Amos a style of utterance which never occurred to the unconscious ploughman. The farm servant whom we have just described begins to speak parables in enigmas. In short, hurrying questions, like messages delivered in whispers, the prophet sets forth parable after parable. Not one of the parables is elaborated; therefore they have been supposed to be mere inquiries. Thus we do injustice to the Word of God. The word &#8220;mere,&#8221; as a term excluding the universe, as applied to any one text, is a piece of practical blasphemy. No one can tell how much there is in any single line of God&#8217;s book. They are the great interpreters who find everything in one word, who find the universe in the word God, who find infinity and eternity in the same verbal sanctuary; and they mistake the prophecies who imagine that with lexicon and with history they can tell where prophecy begins and ends. Prophecy begins in eternity and ends in eternity; and they are not expositors of the word, but robbers of the treasury of Christ, who limit the range of any single spiritual implication of Holy Writ. There has come into the later pulpit instruction of young students a fallacy, a most mischievous sophism, which is depriving the ministry of some of its noblest attributes, and robbing it of some of its larger possibilities of usefulness. The fallacy is that men can read into the Bible something that is not in it. That is only possible when the something read into it is either, first, iniquitous, or, secondly, is wanting in magnanimity. Whoever reads into the Bible anything that patronises shortcoming of a moral kind is not an expositor, but a debaser of Holy Scripture; and whosoever reads into the Bible anything that is exclusive, sectarian, bigoted, and to the disadvantage of the millions of the ages, is not an expositor, he is a liar. Whoever finds in prophetic words, or apostolic reasonings and benedictions, new and higher heavens, broader and brighter skies, poesies too large and tender for human words, is not reading something into the Bible, but is operating along the prophetic line, is pursuing to still fuller issue apostolic meaning; and it is the gift of God in that man that he sees the flower in the seed, the golden harvest in the handful of grain, and all the glory of Bashan in one poor looking little acorn. When the florist takes a flower of one kind and a flower of another, and so treats them as to bring them into unity, and produce an almost third quantity in floriculture, he is not reading something into nature, he is developing something that, was in nature before he was born, something that was in the <em> Let there be,<\/em> the fiat that made nature God&#8217;s lower sanctuary. So there shall arise in the ages to come men who will so treat the prophets and the apostles, Moses and the Lamb, as to show that the Bible was not a full-grown garden, but a great seed-house in which was all manner of seed, to be reverently, lovingly, faithfully handled and distributed and applied, until it spread itself in blushing flower, in tender beauty, in sacred bloom, in infinite fruitfulness over all the spaces of human imagination and human service.<\/p>\n<p> So regarded, these inquiries of Amos become pictures in germ, parables in protoplasm, the very beginning of those educational exercises that challenge the imagination, and lure the fancy beyond the gates that are never shut; the gates that are closed, indeed, but which will fall back in the far-away blue horizon the moment they are tapped by him that knocks reverently, and with the persistence of devoted love. Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you. It hath not entered into the heart of man to conceive all that God has laid up in the Bible. When the word-splitter has done, then the greater annotator takes up the work, and carries it to nobler issues and applications. The dictionary has a work to do in the exposition of the Bible. No wise man will lightly dismiss the word-critic; the lexicographer may also be an ally and a fellow-worshipper, but after he has arranged the words, and set them in their grammatical arrangement and perspective, then must come the man who, mayhap, will know nothing of the science of grammar, but having the gift of the spirit, the genius of sympathy, will, out of grammatically arranged materials, make heavens higher than we have ever seen, describe horizons that make the orbits of any planets small circlets; and with such men we must move if we would allow our religious imagination to be trained, chastened, and abundantly enriched.<\/p>\n<p> Look at the inquiries: &#8220;Can two walk together, except they be agreed?&#8221; No man can tell where that parable ends. First of all, it is generally omitted to point out where it begins. What is the point of the inquiry? In the first instance it is a point that relates to God. Thus the parable will read: How can I, the living, true, pure, holy God, walk with you when your policies are full of deceit, and the beds on which you lie have been stolen from the poor? The inquiry has been narrowed down to merely human limits, as if it were a question relating to passing fellowships, transient acquaintances, ecclesiastical relationships; as if it amounted simply to reciprocity of opinion; as: Two men think alike, and therefore they may belong to the same religious community; two men think alike, and therefore they may expel a third man who has the temerity to differ from them; two men have so appropriated God and all God&#8217;s universe, that if any man shall attempt to take an inch of either without first consulting them, they will combine that they may anathematise and then destroy him. This is not the meaning of the passage in any sense. There is no requirement of uniformity of opinion anywhere in God&#8217;s book. Blessed be God! the Lord knows that in the matter of opinion his creatures, shaped in his own form, must have boundless liberty. No two men can think alike, can be identical in opinion, or in intellectual judgment. Thank God, the Lord knew this, and therefore he called around him, when he came in the form of his Son, men of all kinds and grades of intellect, and all degrees of fancy and of mental power and of moral habitude, that they might in their twelvefoldness show that the way into the city is by a twelvefold gate, and that the Gospel looks in all directions, and has something to say to every man in the tongue in which he was born. The inquiry, however, does relate to moral considerations. How can the honest man and the thief be partners in the same business? How can the Christian and the atheist so enter into articles of association that the one man shall be able to say his prayers, while the other man is denying his God and robbing the public? The question is severely moral, because primarily it relates to the possibility of God walking with man when man is seeking to do that which is evil. The Lord declares that he can have no connection whatever with bad people. The prayers of the wicked are an abomination unto him; when they make prayers they throw filth in the very face of heaven; when they go to church they defile the golden pavement of the sanctuary; when they open their polluted lips to sing the psalms and hymns of the holy house they attempt, mumblingly and feebly indeed, but certainly, to set falsehood to music. God has left every Church that has left him. Here he states the reason for his abandonment. He says in effect, We are not agreed, and therefore we cannot walk together; you have left me, and therefore I must leave you.<\/p>\n<p> Another parable is in the question, &#8220;Will a lion roar in the forest, when he hath no prey? Will a young lion cry out of his den, if he have taken nothing?&#8221; Before the lion springs upon his prey he roars as if in triumph, because the prey is delivered to his paw. And so it is with men who are both bad and good; bad men have their seasons of rejoicing over fallen honour, over disenchanted influence, over the downfall of sanctified excellence; but the point of this parable may be, that when the Lord roars from Zion, as we have just seen him doing, he means his very roar to be the beginning of a Gospel. What is the meaning of that roar? It is a warning; and when the Lord warns, the Lord wishes those who are warned to have an opportunity of escaping. When he blows the war trumpet in Zion it is that he may alarm the cowards, not into deeper cowardice, but shame them back to their loyalty and their courage. Thus the Lord uses the trumpet of providence, the trumpet of events. If we had ears to hear we should detect in many a sound in the resonant air the meaning that God is nigh at hand, awaking the sleepers, alarming those who are at ease in Zion. The daily journal cannot exhaust the meaning of providence. Probably there is hardly a daily journal that acknowledges in so many words that there is any providence at all. We require a larger and bolder annotation of events than can be given by merely political seers. The world is not a political club; the world is a school, a scene of discipline, a theatre of preparation and probation; and only the religious genius, only the prophetic spirit, can interpret the action, the colour, the movement, the suggestion of all that takes place within the limits even of a single day. Encourage every Amos to ask his question. The inquiry may appear sometimes to be feeble, and sometimes to be foolish; it may express to those who do not understand the case the speaker&#8217;s weakness; but to those who have understanding of the times, and the gift of reading providence, the inquiry of seers, prophets, apostles may be as a key that opens some hitherto unopened gate to admit the age into some larger pasture or wider liberty.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it?&#8221; That is another parable. It is not to be exegetically cleared up, or comprehended and concluded. It opens the whole mystery of the origin and operation of evil. There cannot be a devil in the universe without the Lord having created him. The origin of evil is not the greatest mystery in the universe; the origin of God must ever be the one mystery of all thought. God himself is a greater mystery than can be any mystery that occurs under his throne. It is certain, however, that in this instance we must distinguish between two evils. There is an evil of iniquity, and there is an evil of punishment. There is a wrongdoing, and there is a consequence that follows upon that wrongdoing. The parable may be here limited to the latter interpretation. Can there be evil, of the nature of judgment, punishment, infliction for wrongdoing, in a city, and the Lord hath not done it? The Lord is the chastiser of wrong; the Lord is the author of hell. It is fashionable to turn away with gestures of dissent or of disgust from the mere mention of perdition; but God dug that pit, God filled that pit with fire and brimstone, God made hell; or there is a power beyond him that has turned part of his universe into offensiveness in his nostrils. God could not have a universe such as this universe is in its probationary periods without making in it a hell. We must have houses of punishment, prisons of discipline, jails in which we confine for a time the rottenness of society, that its pestilential influence may be withdrawn from the social atmosphere. What shall come in the ages, who can tell? who knows what God may be doing even in perdition? There we must not follow our imagination, because we have no explicit revelation to sustain it in its adventures. It is enough for us to know two things: first, thank God, that all evil is burned; and to know, secondly, that God is love, and that his judgment has in it an element of mercy in all history, and therefore may have in it an element of mercy in all futurity. Foolish is he, almost to the point of profanity, who dogmatises in the presence of this infinite problem. But we may say iniquity deserves to be burned for ever, and we can say, with all the houses of ancient history, &#8220;His mercy endureth for ever.&#8221; We are to recognise God&#8217;s presence in all the judgments that befall a city. The city is under God&#8217;s care. The city is a unit as well as the family; the family is a unit as well as the individual, and therefore God deals with the unit in its own way, and after its own measure, and according to its own peculiarities. If there is a pestilence in a land it may be of the Lord&#8217;s sending; we may have our theories as to disinfection and caretaking and attention to all sanitary regimen and discipline and law all that may be useful and unquestionably pertinent within given limits; but there are pestilences that sanitation has not explained, there are pestilences that sanitation has never overtaken. Look at the larger explanations and implications, and never be satisfied with thinking that any torch can hold all the light of the sun, or that any human heart, how brilliant and novel soever, can express the decree, or symbolise the full purpose of God.<\/p>\n<p> Thus the prophet continues his noble career, challenging imagination by questions, exciting attention by inquiries, and anticipating Christ&#8217;s own method of teaching when he spoke a parable, and left it to the people to find out the interpretation. O wondrous beyond all other sights ever set forth in human pictorial representation is the sight of Jesus talking in parable to a hostile audience! They are charmed with the speech; they never heard their language spoken before so purely, pathetically, plaintively, suggestively; but when that wizard speaker comes to a close, and looks round to see the effect of his speech, we read, &#8220;They perceived that he spake this parable concerning themselves.&#8221; So long as it remained a parable, it remained a picture; when it became an application it became a judgment, and no sooner did these men feel the sting of fire upon their consciences, than they rose, and would have thrust down to death the speaker who enchanted their imagination.<\/p>\n<p> When will Amos return? When will the Son of man send a vicegerent that shall speak in his own tone and represent his own earnestness? Until then the congregation occupies itself in somnolent admiration, and the Church turns itself into an institution devoted to the barren process of mutual congratulation. The church is wrong. All archbishops and bishops, all popes and presbyters, all nonconformist ministers and evangelists, are alike in this condemnation. There does not issue from the pulpit of the church, taking the word Church in its largest explication, that tremendous voice of thunder which is an eternal challenge to all evil, and a perpetual terror to all evildoers. So long as the House of Lords and the House of Commons, so long as the House of Senate and of Congress, and the Body Legislative, so long as the parliaments of all countries can say, &#8220;We may do as we like, for the clergy are dumb dogs that cannot bark,&#8221; we shall have a decadent church; but when the Church in all its departments, in all its sections, is ardent with the fire of the divine presence; when it will overhaul all legislative enactments; when it will discuss them at the altar; when it will dispute over them under the very shadow of the Cross; when bishops, men of learning, presbyters and ministers, men of practical experience and burning eloquence, arise and say, &#8220;You shall not damn this nation, unless you do it in the face of our protest,&#8221; when that day comes, know ye that the Lord has come. Even so, Lord Jesus, come quickly!<\/p>\n<p><strong> Prayer<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Almighty God, it is a fearful thing to fall into thy hands when thou dost arise to judge the earth; yet God is love, and it is better to fall into the hands of God than into the hands of men. Thou dost not willingly grieve or afflict thy children. Judgment is thy strange work, mercy is thy delight; in wrath thou dost remember mercy, and even in thy judgment thou callest to mind that we are but dust. Who can stand before the Lord when he ariseth? Who can answer the thunder of the Most High? When thou dost plead against us with all thy power behold we wither away; but thou comest to us in gentleness, in pity, in tears, in redeeming compassion. If we will rend our hearts and not our garments, if we will make confession of sin, and cry unto the Lord for pardon at the Cross of Christ, and for the sake of his work, behold all heaven is not enough for us, thou dost fill us with gladness and promise us immortality. We thank thee for all thy light and care, thy wisdom and strength, thy grace all-healing, all-conquering; and for the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, profitable to direct, and working in us evermore the miracle of sanctification. Good is the Lord; the will of the Lord be done, the judgment of the Most High be turned aside by the work of the Saviour, and all the tenderness of the Cross be revealed unto us that we may not die in the darkness of despair. We pray at the Cross; we sing at the Cross; we remember and forget our sins at the Cross. O hear us in heaven thy dwelling-place, and when thou hearest, Lord, forgive! Take away from us thy rebuke, and hide not thyself from our petition. Amen.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The People&#8217;s Bible by Joseph Parker<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong> VI<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> THE BOOK OF AMOS PART 2<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-9:15<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Helps commended: (1) &#8220;Bible Commentary,&#8221; (2) &#8220;Pulpit Commentary,&#8221; (3) Pusey&#8217;s Minor Prophets, (4) &#8220;Benson&#8217;s Commentary.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> The section, <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-6:14<\/span> , consists of three parts, or three distinct addresses, each commencing with the words, &#8220;Hear this word.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> The first address consists, in particular, of the verdict and sentence of Jehovah against all Israel, and is divided as follows: (1) a principle stated (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-8<\/span> ); (2) a reason assigned (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:9-12<\/span> ); (3) a sentence announced (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:13-15<\/span> ).<\/p>\n<p> The principle stated in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-8<\/span> is that an effect proves a cause. This principle is enforced by seven illustrative questions, viz: (1) communion proves agreement; (2) the lion&#8217;s roar proves the prey; (3) the cry of the young lion proves the prey possessed; (4) the fall of the bird proves the bait; (5) the springing of the snare proves the bird to be taken; (6) the sounding of the trumpet proves the alarm; (7) calamity in the city proves Jehovah. The application of all this is made by the prophet) bringing in his text, as follows: &#8220;The lion [Jehovah] hath roared; therefore I fear. The Lord hath spoken, therefore I prophesy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 3:9-12<\/span> we hear the prophet giving a special invitation to the Philistines and Egyptians, Israel&#8217;s inveterate enemies, to assemble in Samaria to witness the great wickedness and destruction of Israel because they did not do right, storing up violence and robbery in their palaces, and whose tumults and oppressions abounded toward the people. The judgment to follow was to be like the work of the lion devouring his prey.<\/p>\n<p> The sentence announced (<span class='bible'>Amo 3:13-15<\/span> ) is the complete destruction of Israel, and the thoroughness of its execution is indicated by the sentence of destruction against its objects and places of worship and the smiting of the habitations of the rulers, showing the complete desolation of their city, Samaria.<\/p>\n<p> The second address consists, in particular, of an indictment and a summons of Jehovah, and its parts are as follows: (1) the king of Bashan threatened (<span class='bible'>Amo 4:1-3<\/span> ); (2) a sarcastic command (<span class='bible'>Amo 4:4-5<\/span> ) ; (3) a list of providences (<span class='bible'>Amo 4:6-11<\/span> ); (4) a summons to an account (<span class='bible'>Amo 4:12-13<\/span> ).<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 4:1-3<\/span> we have Jehovah&#8217;s threat against the carousing and oppressive women. Bashan was famous for its flocks and herds. The proud and luxurious matrons of Israel are here described as like the cattle of Bashan, because the cattle of the pastures of Bashan were uncommonly large, wanton, and headstrong by reason of their full feeding. These women because of their luxuries were oppressing the poor and crushing the needy. How perverted their natures must have been from the true instincts of womanhood! But such is the effect of luxury without grace. How depraved and animal-like to say, &#8220;Bring and let us drink,&#8221; but such are the marks of a well-developed animal nature. No wonder that just here we should hear Jehovah&#8217;s oath and threat announced: &#8220;they shall take you away with hooks,&#8221; indicating their humiliation in contrast with their present luxury and pride. How true the proverb: &#8220;Pride goeth before a fall.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 4:4-5<\/span> we have a sample of the prophet&#8217;s sarcasm, commanding the people to multiply their offerings in their transgression at Gilgal and Bethel, the two most prominent places of worship in Israel. At these places they worshiped the calf after the pattern of Jeroboam 1.<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 4:6-11<\/span> there are mentioned five distinct providences of the Lord as follows: (2) a scarcity of food, or a famine, per- haps the famine of <span class='bible'>2Ki 8:1<\/span> ; (2) a severe drought; (3) a blasting with mildew; (4) a pestilence; (5) a destruction of cities. The express purpose of all these was to turn the people unto Jehovah. This is an everlasting refutation of the contention that God&#8217;s providences do not come into the realm of the temporal. He sent the famine, he sent the drought, he sent the blasting and mildew, he sent the pestilence, and he overthrew the cities, and why not believe that he &#8220;is the same yesterday and today, yea and for ever&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Heb 13:8<\/span> )? A great text is found in <span class='bible'>Amo 4:11<\/span> , and also in <span class='bible'>Amo 4:12<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 4:12-13<\/span> we have the summons to get ready to meet a powerful and angry God. He had exhausted his mercy and chastisements to bring them back but all these things had failed, after which he calls them to meet him in judgment. So we may say that God is now in Christ exhausting his mercy and visiting the world with chastisements and when all has failed, he says to the one who has rejected his mercy and treated lightly his visitation, &#8220;Prepare to meet thy God,&#8221; and it is appropriate to say that we may prepare to meet God in Christ, or we must meet him in judgment out of Christ, and out of Christ, &#8220;God is a consuming fire.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> The third address consists of repeated announcements of judgments, with appeals to turn and do good, and its parts are as follows: (1) a lamentation, an exhortation, and a hope for the remnant (<span class='bible'>Amo 5:1-15<\/span> ) ; (2) another lamentation, a woe, a disgust, and a judgment (<span class='bible'>Amo 5:16-27<\/span> ); (3) another woe, an abhorrence, and a certain judgment (<span class='bible'>Amo 8:1-14<\/span> ).<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 5:1-15<\/span> we have a lamentation, an exhortation, and a hope expressed. The lamentation is that of the prophet himself, over the condition of Israel and the judgment already decreed. The exhortation is to repentance and to seek the true God. The hope is, that through repentance, a remnant of Israel may be saved. In <span class='bible'>Amo 5:16-27<\/span> we have another lamentation, a woe, a disgust, and a judgment. The lamentation in this instance is that of the people when Jehovah comes in judgment upon the land; the woe is pronounced upon the hypocrite who wishes for the day of Jehovah, for it will be to him an awful day; the disgust here is that of Jehovah at their feasts, offerings, and music, because of their sins, and the judgment denounced is their captivity, beyond Damascus, or their captivity by the Assyrians. In <span class='bible'>Amo 6:1-14<\/span> we have another woe, an abhorrence and a certain judgment. The woe in this passage is to the rich, luxurious oppressors who feel secure; the abhorrence is that of Jehovah for the excellency, or pride, of Jacob. As a result of it all there is denounced against Israel again her certain doom and the extent of it particularly noted.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Amo 7:1-9:10<\/span> consists of revelations for all Israel, conveyed by means of visions. The several parts of this section are as follows: (1) the locusts, (2) the fire, (3) the plumb line, (4) the basket of fruit, (5) Jehovah himself. In <span class='bible'>Amo 7:1-3<\/span> we have the prophet&#8217;s vision of the locusts which are represented as eating the grass of the land, the latter growth after the king&#8217;s mowing. This signified a threatened judgment, which is the threatened invasion of Pul (Tiglathpileser II) (<span class='bible'>2Ki 15:1-17<\/span> ff.), but it was restrained by the intercession of the prophet, at which Jehovah repented and judgment was arrested.<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 7:4-6<\/span> we have the prophet&#8217;s vision of fire which is represented as devouring the deep and was making for the land. This signified a threatened judgment more severe than the other, which is the second invasion of Tiglath-pileser II, who conquered Gilead and the northern part of the kingdom and carried some of the people captive to Assyria (<span class='bible'>2Ki 15:29<\/span> ). This, too, was restrained by the intercession of the prophet, at which God repented and arrested the judgment.<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 7:7-9<\/span> we have the prophet&#8217;s vision of the plumb line in the hand of Jehovah by which he signified that justice was to be meted out to Israel and that judgment was determined. So the prophet holds his peace and makes no more intercession. This judgment was irremediable and typified the final conquest by Shalmaneser.<\/p>\n<p> Just after the vision of the plumb line there follows the incident of the interference of Amaziah, the priest of Bethel. This Amaziah was an imposter, and yet held the position of priest. He reported to Jeroboam what Amos was saying, advising his exile. He, moreover, attempted to appeal to the fear of Amos, and advised him to flee to Judah. The answer of Amos was full of dignity, born of the consciousness of the divine authority of his mission. He declared that he was no prophet, but that Jehovah had taken him and spoken to him; thus he had become a prophet in very deed. Then he prophesied against Amaziah declaring that God&#8217;s judgment would overtake him and Israel.<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 8:1-14<\/span> we have the vision of a basket of ripe, summer fruit which indicates that the people were ripe for judgment and that judgment was imminent. Jehovah declared that the end had come; that he would not pass by them any more. This announcement was followed, on the part of the prophet, by an impassioned address to the money-makers, in which he declared the effect of their lust for gain, viz: they swallowed the needy and caused the poor to fail. He described the intensity of that lust, thus: the new moon and sabbath were irksome. Then follows a figurative description of judgment, which declared Jehovah&#8217;s perpetual consciousness of these things and his consequent retribution. The final issue of judgment the prophet declared to be a famine of the words of the Lord, as a result of which there would come eager and fruitless search, followed by the fainting of youth because of their thirst for a knowledge of God. All this finds fulfilment in the events which followed in the history of Israel. They were deprived of prophets and revelations after Amos and Hosea, and the captivity came according to this prophecy, during which they had no prophets in the strange land of their captivity. This is a foreshadowing of Israel&#8217;s condition today. She rejected the Messiah and for these two thousand years she has been without a prophet, priest or Urim and Thummim, no revelation from God to cheer their dark and gloomy hearts.<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 9:1-10<\/span> we have the vision of God himself standing beside the altar which symbolizes judgment executed, though there was no symbol, or sign. We hear the manifesto of Jehovah himself. It is one of the most awe-inspiring visions of the whole Bible. The message proceeded in two phases: First, an announcement of judgment irrevocable and irresistible; secondly, a declaration of the procedure so reasonable and discriminative. Jehovah is seen standing by the altar, declaring the stroke of destruction to be inevitable, and all attempts at escape futile, because he has proceeded to action. While the judgment is to be reasonable and discriminative, the claims in which Israel had trusted were nothing. They became as the children of the Ethiopians. The Philistines and the Syrians had also been led by God. The eyes of Jehovah were on the sinful kingdom and the sifting process must go forward but no grain of wheat should perish.<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 9:11-15<\/span> , we have a most consoling conclusion of this prophecy in sundry evangelical promises, after so many very severe and sharp menaces.<\/p>\n<p> The phrase, &#8220;In that day,&#8221; refers to the time after the events previously mentioned had been fulfilled and extends into the messianic age. See <span class='bible'>Act 15:16<\/span> . But what does the prophet mean by raising up the tabernacle of David? The promise, doubtless, at least in the first place, was intended of the return of the Jews from the land of their captivity, their resettlement in Judea, rebuilding Jerusalem, and attaining to the height of power and glory which they enjoyed under the Maccabees. This restoration was an event so extraordinary, and the hope of it so necessary to be maintained in the minds of the Jewish people, in order to their support under the calamity of their seventy years of captivity, that God was pleased to foretell it by the mouth of all his prophets. This prophecy however must be extended to the days of the Messiah, and to the calling of the Gentiles to the knowledge of the true God, according to <span class='bible'>Act 15:16<\/span> . They did not possess the remnant of Edom until after their restoration in the days of Hyrcanus, when they made an entire conquest of Edom, but the statement which follows, viz: &#8220;and all the nations that are called by my name,&#8221; goes farther into the future and, at least, intimates the salvation of the Gentiles.<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Amo 9:13<\/span> we have the promise of the blessings of grace to come in the messianic age in which the reaping shall be so great that the reapers cannot get out of the way of the sowers. This we see fulfilled now sometimes in a small way but these times of harvest are but the firstfruits of the harvest which is to follow, especially, the harvest that is to follow in the millennium. The promise of <span class='bible'>Amo 9:14-15<\/span> will find its complete fulfilment at the return of the Jews to their own land and their conversion which will usher in the millennium and extend the glorious kingdom of our Lord.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> QUESTIONS<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. Of what in general, does the section, <span class='bible'>Amo 3:1-6:14<\/span> consist and how does each part commence?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. Of what, in particular, does the first address consist and what its parts?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. What is the principle stated in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:13<\/span> , how illustrated and what the application?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. In <span class='bible'>Amo 3:9-12<\/span> who were invited to witness Israel&#8217;s doom, what the reason assigned and what was to be the character of the judgment to come upon Israel?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. What the sentence announced in <span class='bible'>Amo 3:13-15<\/span> , and how is the thoroughness of its execution indicated?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. Of what, in particular, does the second address consist and what its parts?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. What the force and application of &#8220;ye kine of Bashan&#8221; and what the threat against them?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. What of the sarcastic command of <span class='bible'>Amo 4:4-5<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. What the items of providence cited and what their purpose as expressed by the prophet in <span class='bible'>Amo 4:6-11<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. What the summons of <span class='bible'>Amo 4:12-13<\/span> , and what application may be made of such texts in preaching?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. Of what, in particular, does the third address consist, and what its<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 12. What the lamentation, what the exhortation and what the hope, of <span class='bible'>Amo 5:1-15<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 13. What the lamentation, what the woe, what the disgust, and what. The judgment of <span class='bible'>Amo 5:16-27<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 14. What the woe, what the abhorrence and what the certain judgment of <span class='bible'>Amo 6:1-14<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 15. Of what, in general, does the section, <span class='bible'>Amo 7:1-9:10<\/span> , consist, and what are its several parts?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 16. What is the vision of locusts and what its interpretation?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 17. What the vision of fire and what its interpretation?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 18. What the vision of the plumb line and what its interpretation?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 19. What historical incident follows the vision of the plumb line and what the several points of the story in detail?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 20. What the vision of the basket of fruit, what its interpretation and what the prophet&#8217;s explanation following?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 21. What the vision of God himself and what its interpretation?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 22. What, in general, the prophecy of <span class='bible'>Amo 9:11-15<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 23. What the meaning of the phrase, &#8220;In that day&#8221;?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 24. What does the prophet mean by raising up the tabernacle of David?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 25. When did they possess the remnant of Edom?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 26. What the meaning of <span class='bible'>Amo 9:13<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 27. What the fulfilment of <span class='bible'>Amo 9:14-15<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: B.H. Carroll&#8217;s An Interpretation of the English Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Amo 3:1 Hear this word that the LORD hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying,<\/p>\n<p> Ver. 1. <strong> Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken, &amp;c.<\/strong> ] Here beginneth the second sermon, tending to confirm what had been affirmed in the former, and evincing the equity of the judgments there threatened for their hateful ingratitude and other horrible offences, condemned and cried out upon by the very heathens. <\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/p>\n<p> Hear this word<\/strong> ] <em> Verbum hoc decretorium,<\/em> this notable word. There are three articles in the original; and there is not the least tittle in the text upon which there hangeth not a mountain of sense, said the Rabbis; this next verse (    ; so <span class='bible'>Mat 22:21<\/span> ;   Y  Y ). <\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/p>\n<p> That the Lord hath spoken<\/strong> ] And shall he not do it? Who ever waxed fierce against God and prospered? <span class='bible'>Job 9:4<\/span> . <\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/p>\n<p> Against you, O children of Israel<\/strong> ] By his word Christ many times secretly smites the earth, <span class='bible'>Isa 11:4<\/span> , that is, the consciences of carnal men, glued to the earth: He sets a continual edge upon the word, and consumes them by his rebukes, till he have wearied them with his secret buffets and terrors; and then in the end casts them into a reprobate sense, as he did the Pharisees, who were <em> toties puncti et repuncti, minime tamen ad resipiscentiam compuncti.<\/em> <\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/p>\n<p> Against the whole family<\/strong> ] The <em> Dodecaphylon,<\/em> all the twelve tribes, the whole house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, <span class='bible'>Isa 48:1<\/span> ; God stands not upon multitudes, <span class='bible'>Psa 9:17<\/span> , nor matters whether it be against a nation that he speaketh and acteth, or against a man only, <span class='bible'>Job 34:29<\/span> . <\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/p>\n<p> Which I brought up from the land of Egypt<\/strong> ] This they often hear of by way of exprobation, as <span class='bible'>Amo 2:10<\/span> . God seeming to repent him for their detestable unthankfulness, as David did of the kindness he had shown unworthy Nabal, in safe guarding his substance, <span class='bible'>1Sa 25:7<\/span> ; and to complain, as Frederick III, Emperor of Germany did, that of those courtiers whom he had advanced he found scarcely any that proved faithful to him, but the worse for his courtesy; or as Queen Elizabeth, that in trust she had found treason.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Amo 3:1-8<\/p>\n<p> 1Hear this word which the LORD has spoken against you, sons of Israel, against the entire family which He brought up from the land of Egypt:<\/p>\n<p> 2You only have I chosen among all the families of the earth;<\/p>\n<p> Therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities.<\/p>\n<p> 3Do two men walk together unless they have made an appointment?<\/p>\n<p> 4Does a lion roar in the forest when he has no prey?<\/p>\n<p> Does a young lion growl from his den unless he has captured something?<\/p>\n<p> 5Does a bird fall into a trap on the ground when there is no bait in it?<\/p>\n<p> Does a trap spring up from the earth when it captures nothing at all?<\/p>\n<p> 6If a trumpet is blown in a city will not the people tremble?<\/p>\n<p> If a calamity occurs in a city has not the LORD done it?<\/p>\n<p> 7Surely the LORD God does nothing<\/p>\n<p> Unless He reveals His secret counsel<\/p>\n<p> To His servants the prophets.<\/p>\n<p> 8A lion has roared! Who will not fear?<\/p>\n<p> The Lord GOD has spoken! Who can but prophesy?<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:1-15 Notice the structure of chapter three.<\/p>\n<p>1. Amos addresses the nation of Israel, Amo 3:1<\/p>\n<p>2. YHWH addresses the nation, Amo 3:2 <\/p>\n<p>3. Amos asks rhetorical questions and makes a conclusion, Amo 3:3-8<\/p>\n<p>4. YHWH speaks, Amo 3:9-15<\/p>\n<p>The UBS, A Translator&#8217;s Handbook on the Book of Amos, sees Amo 3:1-2 as a summary statement concluding chapters 1-2 (p. 55). However, no modern English translation follows this structure.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:1 Hear This is the Hebrew VERB Shema (BDB 1033, KB 1570, Qal IMPERATIVE), which means to hear so as to do (e.g., Deu 5:1; Deu 6:4; Deu 9:1). Knowledge of God always involves obedience (cf. Amo 3:1; Amo 3:13; Amo 4:1; Amo 5:1; Amo 8:4). There are covenant benefits and requirements! See Special Topic: Keep .<\/p>\n<p> which the LORD has spoken against you, sons of Israel, against the entire family Amos has set up this condemnation of Israel by first condemning the surrounding nations, even Judah!<\/p>\n<p>NASBsons of Israel<\/p>\n<p>NKJVO children of Israel<\/p>\n<p>NRSVO people of Israel<\/p>\n<p>TEVthe entire nation<\/p>\n<p>NJBIsraelites<\/p>\n<p>There is a purposeful ambiguity in this phrase. In one sense it refers to all the tribes of Israel, but in another, to the Northern Ten Tribes who split away under Jeroboam I in 922 B.C. Amo 3:2 obviously includes all descendants of Jacob.<\/p>\n<p> against the entire family One reason modern western people misunderstand the OT is its focus on corporality, while most westerners focus on individual rights. The ancient people lived or died together. They lived for the good of the aggregate.<\/p>\n<p>It is hard for moderns to fathom this sense of corporality. It involves corporate sin and guilt, but not corporate righteousness. Righteousness was an individual matter of faith, repentance, obedience, and worship. God&#8217;s judgment of His people impacted both the sinful and innocent.<\/p>\n<p>If this concept is brought over into today, it would require an understanding that humans are responsible for their personal relationship to God, as well as sharing the corporate guilt of their societies! Sin is both commission and omission. It also implies there are national, temporal judgments, which are designed (cf. Deuteronomy 27-29) to cause sinners to turn or return to God.<\/p>\n<p> which he brought up from the land of Egypt The VERB (BDB 748, KB 828) is a Hiphil PERFECT. The Exodus experience is the first national event for the Jewish people (cf. Amo 2:10; Amo 9:7). God was faithful, but this was matched by the continual unfaithfulness of the descendants of the Patriarchs (both Israel and Judah, i.e., the entire family, cf. Nehemiah 9; Acts 7).<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:2 You only have I chosen among all the families of the earth This is an emphasis on God&#8217;s unique election of the descendants of Abraham for a special service (cf. Gen 12:1-3; Gen 18:18; Exo 19:5-6; Deu 7:6-8; Deu 14:2; Hos 2:20), which involves the evangelization of all peoples. If all humans are made in God&#8217;s image (Gen 1:26-27) and if Gen 3:15 is a promise of their redemption, then Abraham&#8217;s call was a call to bring all humans to God (cf. Gen 12:3).<\/p>\n<p>The term chosen is literally known (BDB 393, KB 390, Qal PERFECT) and has the connotation of personal relationship (e.g., Gen 4:1; Gen 29:5; Exo 1:8; Deu 11:28; 1Ki 8:39; Psa 139:4; Jer 1:4; Hos 5:3). It is this intimate acquaintance with God and His Word (e.g., Deu 34:10) that makes their sins so repugnant. YHWH chose them to be a channel of knowledge, blessing, and salvation to all the sons and daughters of Adam. But instead, Israel took advantage of her special call, relationship, and knowledge. She was to influence the nations, but the nations influenced her!<\/p>\n<p> Therefore, I will punish you for all your iniquities This word for iniquities (BDB 730) is used only here in the book of Amos, but it is used often in Hosea (cf. Hos 4:8; Hos 5:5; Hos 7:1; Hos 8:13; Hos 9:7; Hos 9:9; Hos 10:10; Hos 12:8; Hos 13:12; Hos 14:1-2) and twice in Micah (cf. Mic 7:18-19). It means iniquity, guilt, or punishment of iniquity. In chapters one and two a different word (i.e., transgressions BDB 833) for sin was used, which focused on mankind&#8217;s fallen nature. In chapter three it is the consequences of evil (i.e., punishment of iniquity) that are being emphasized. Grace is free, but it brings great responsibility. The Jews were chosen, not to be pampered and privileged, but to be servants and priests to reach the whole world (e.g., Gen 12:3; Exo 19:4-6; Joh 3:16; 1Jn 2:2; 1Jn 4:14). The covenant consequences of Deuteronomy 27-29 are becoming a reality. Election and the consequences of our choices are both valid theological poles! To be biblical we must affirm both, not choose one!<\/p>\n<p>The VERB (BDB 823, KB 955, Qal IMPERFECT) can mean punish (e.g., Hos 1:4; Hos 2:15; Hos 8:13; Hos 9:9) or visit. Possibly the Israelites expected YHWH to visit them with covenant blessing, but instead He came to punish them for their flagrant covenantal violations (cf. Amo 5:18-20). Covenant violations bring violent covenant curses (cf. Deuteronomy 27-29).<\/p>\n<p>It must be remembered that possibly the best metaphors to help humans understand God come from the home. God&#8217;s parental love is such that He will not allow sin to totally destroy His relationship with estranged children. Discipline (i.e., judgment) is also an act of love and mercy! The goal is never short term comfort or prosperity, but long term fellowship and intimacy! See Special Topic: Know .<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:3-8 These verses show that nothing just happens; there is a plan, a purpose with a resulting consequence. The context relates this either to God&#8217;s covenant relationship with Israel or God&#8217;s speaking through the prophets. This series of questions shows a cause and effect relationship, so too, God&#8217;s covenant with Israel (cf. Deuteronomy 27-29).<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:3 appointment This Hebrew word (BDB 416, KB 419, Niphal PERFECT) primarily means a prearranged appointment (e.g., Jos 11:5; Neh 6:10; Job 2:11).<\/p>\n<p> One wonders if in this context the two men represent<\/p>\n<p>1. God and the prophets (cf. Amo 3:7):<\/p>\n<p>2. God and Israel (cf. Amo 3:2, if so the term takes on adversarial connotation, cf. NIDOTTE, vol. 2, p. 484); or<\/p>\n<p>3. a common proverb from daily life.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:5 For an interesting discussion of animal traps see James M. Freeman, Manners and Customs of the Bible, p. 228.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:6 a trumpet is blown in the city In our day it would be something like a warning signal (cf. Eze 33:2-5).<\/p>\n<p> will not the people tremble This VERB (BDB 353, KB 350, Qal IMPERFECT) means tremble in fear. It is used in several contexts.<\/p>\n<p>1. the very presence of YHWH (e.g., Exo 19:16; Exo 19:18)<\/p>\n<p>2. YHWH coming in judgment (e.g., Isa 10:29; Isa 19:16; Isa 32:11; Isa 41:5)<\/p>\n<p>3. the effect of bad news on people (e.g., Gen 27:33; Gen 42:28; 1Ki 1:49)<\/p>\n<p>In #Amos 3 fits the context best, but #1 and #2 are surely in mind!<\/p>\n<p> If a calamity occurs in a city has not the LORD done it An example of these covenantal consequences (cf. Deuteronomy 27-29) can be seen in Amo 4:6-11. The OT asserts the full sovereignty of God over all events (i.e., one causality in the universe, e.g., 2Ch 20:6; Ecc 7:14; Isa 14:24-27; Isa 43:13; Isa 45:7; Isa 54:16; Jer 18:11; Lam 3:33-38). For a good discussion of God and evil see Hard Sayings of the Bible, pp. 305-306.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:7-8 These are extremely important verses which emphasize God&#8217;s forewarnings to His people through His prophets. The people are responsible because they knew God&#8217;s word and will (cf. Amo 4:13), yet they rejected it (cf. Amo 2:12; Hos 11:1-4).<\/p>\n<p>This concept of predictive prophecy is the most convincing way to show modern people the uniqueness and inspiration of the Bible. No other world religion book has predictive prophecy! There are different kinds of prophecy, such as multi-fulfillment, typological, apocalyptic, but here I am talking about direct, specific, historical prediction, like Mic 5:2. Predictive prophecy was God&#8217;s gift to His people to assure them of His control of all things (international, national, and individual). For modern people seeking evidence in a search for who to believe, it is a powerful witness!<\/p>\n<p>Prophecy shows that God began the time-space continuum and He will bring it to an appropriate close. For the OT believer the beginning and the end are inseparably linked (linear time vs. cyclical time).<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:8 a This is the climactic truth of the entire series of questions. It refers to the very beginning of the prophecy (cf. Amo 1:2)! God is actively involved in human affairs. He has chosen Israel for a purpose (universal knowledge and redemption), but they have violated His purposes, therefore, judgment is His act of mercy for the purpose of restoring them to covenantal purity and purpose (cf. Amo 9:7-15).<\/p>\n<p>One theological question of Amos is who will be judged?<\/p>\n<p>1. all Israel (cf. Amo 9:8)<\/p>\n<p>2. sinners in Israel (cf. Amo 9:10)<\/p>\n<p>3. both Israel and Judah (cf. Amo 3:1)<\/p>\n<p>The house of David will be restored (cf. Amo 9:11), which implies that covenant purpose continues!<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:8 b This is a personal insight from Amos. This famous phrase describes what all humans feel when they have been called by God to speak for Him. Isaiah cried out, Woe is me, for I am ruined (cf. Isa 6:5). Jeremiah called it a fire in his bones (cf. Jer 20:9).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>the LORD. Hebrew. Jehovah. App-4. <\/p>\n<p>children = sons. Some codices, with one early printed edition, Aram, and Septuagint, read &#8220;house&#8221;. Either reading shows that these chapters relate to the twelve-tribed nation (see p. 1206). <\/p>\n<p>I brought up, &amp;c. Reference to Pentateuch (Exo 12:51, &amp;c.) <\/p>\n<p>you only have I known, &amp;c. See the Structure above. Reference to Pentateuch (Deu 7:6). App-92. Compare Psa 147:19, Psa 147:20. <\/p>\n<p>earth = soil. Hebrew. addamah. <\/p>\n<p>punish you = visit upon you, as in Amo 3:14. Reference to Pentateuch (Exo 32:34). App-92. iniquities. Hebrew. `avah. App-44. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Chapter 3<\/p>\n<p>Hear this word [Amos said] that the LORD hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, and against the whole family ( Amo 3:1 )<\/p>\n<p>So that would include Judah also.<\/p>\n<p>which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying ( Amo 3:1 ),<\/p>\n<p>God now is talking to His people, and it&#8217;s almost a lamentation. For God said,<\/p>\n<p>You only have I known of all of the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for your iniquities ( Amo 3:2 ).<\/p>\n<p>A nation that had special privileges is also a nation that has great responsibilities. &#8220;To whom much is given, much is required&#8221; ( Luk 12:48 ). Israel had been given so much by God. &#8220;What advantage then,&#8221; Paul said, &#8220;hath the Jew?&#8221; His answer to his own question is, &#8220;Much and in every way, for unto them are committed the oracles of God&#8221; ( Rom 3:1-2 ). Unto them were the fathers, unto them were the statutes and the judgments given. He speaks of the tremendous advantages that they had because God had dealt with them as a nation, as a people. But that only increases their responsibility to God.<\/p>\n<p>We look at the United States, again, a nation that was nurtured by God, blessed by God. &#8220;America, America, God shed His grace on thee.&#8221; But the fact that we have been so blessed by God only gives us a greater moral obligation to commit ourselves to God, and to represent God before the earth. But even as Israel failed, so are we failing. And when God&#8217;s people fail in their responsibility, then God punishes them. God said, &#8220;I will punish you for your iniquity.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And now some rhetorical type of questions that the Lord asked the people. Number one being:<\/p>\n<p>Can two walk together, except they be agreed? ( Amo 3:3 )<\/p>\n<p>Can you walk in harmony? Can you walk in unity unless there&#8217;s an agreement? Of course the answer is, no. Now how can you walk with God if you&#8217;re not in agreement with God? How can you walk with God and continue in iniquity, and in unrighteousness, and in sin? The answer is, you can&#8217;t. You cannot walk with a holy God in a state of iniquity. &#8220;Can two walk together, except they be agreed?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Will a lion roar in the forest, when he has no prey? ( Amo 3:4 )<\/p>\n<p>No, he roars when he has conquered the prey, when he has destroyed it, when he stands above it.<\/p>\n<p>will the young lions cry out of his den, if he has taken nothing? Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where there&#8217;s been no trap set for him? ( Amo 3:4-5 )<\/p>\n<p>No, a bird doesn&#8217;t fall except there is a trap.<\/p>\n<p>shall one take up a snare from the earth, and have taken nothing at all? Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? ( Amo 3:5-6 )<\/p>\n<p>Putting it more into modern terminology, &#8220;Can the air raid sirens go off and people not be afraid?&#8221; I will never forget when we were in Bat Yam outside of Tel Aviv during the 1967 war. As we were there in the hotel just twenty minutes from Egypt by jet, and the Egyptians, of course, were across the Suez Canal and fighting in the Sinai. In the middle of the night about one, two o&#8217;clock in the morning, the old air raid sirens began to wail. Now we were the first major building along the Mediterranean from Egypt, and all of our group&#8230; Of course, it was a blackout and we all made our way to the basement where there was the air raid shelter. We had some unique experiences getting there in the dark, rousted out of the sleep. Some ladies were wanting their husbands to wait for them while they put on their makeup. Crazy things that you&#8217;ll do. But I&#8217;ll tell you, there is something that is quite terrifying in the darkness of the night, hearing those sirens wail. And knowing that it&#8217;s quite possible that bombs will be falling in that very area.<\/p>\n<p>Now, in ancient Israel the sound of the trumpet was the sound of the alarm, &#8220;The enemy is coming!&#8221; When the trumpets would begin to sound, the fear would grip the hearts of the people. So the question, &#8220;Shall a trumpet be blown in the city and the people not be afraid?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>shall there be an evil in the city and the LORD hath not done it? ( Amo 3:6 )<\/p>\n<p>That is, the evil, and in this sense, as it is so often in the Old Testament, the evil of judgment. People are confused because in Isaiah God said, &#8220;Have not I created evil?&#8221; They say, &#8220;Ooh! How is it that a holy God created evil?&#8221; The word evil is used in the sense of having brought judgment which affect is always evil upon the people for whom the judgment came. So, &#8220;Can there be the evil of judgment and God has not brought it?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he reveals his secret unto his servants the prophets ( Amo 3:7 ).<\/p>\n<p>Interesting that he is saying that, &#8220;God is not gonna work, God is not gonna move, God is not gonna judge, except He reveals it to His prophets.&#8221; So before the judgment came, the prophets were warning the people that God was going to judge.<\/p>\n<p>The lion hath roared, and who will not fear? the Lord GOD hath spoken, and who can but prophesy? ( Amo 3:8 )<\/p>\n<p>I mean, as Jeremiah, when he was prophesying, they told him to shut up. He wouldn&#8217;t do it so they threw him in the dungeon. There he got a case of the &#8220;poor me&#8217;s&#8221; and he began to complain to God about the treatment that God gave to His servant the prophet. He said, &#8220;I was determined. I wasn&#8217;t gonna speak anymore in the name of the Lord. I&#8217;ve had it! You know, this is it. They&#8217;re gonna treat me like this, I&#8217;m just not gonna tell them God&#8217;s word again. I&#8217;m not gonna speak anymore in the name of the Lord.&#8221; He said, &#8220;But His word was like fire in my bones, and I became weary trying to keep quiet.&#8221; I mean, it&#8217;s just something, I&#8230; You know, as Peter said when he was commanded not to speak anymore in the name of Jesus, he said, &#8220;We cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard. We&#8217;re not gonna obey your commands. We can&#8217;t help it. We cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.&#8221; Paul speaks of the constraining love of Christ. The Lord has spoken, how can you be silent?<\/p>\n<p>who can but prophesy? So publish in the palaces of Ashdod [the Philistine city on the coast], the palaces in the land of Egypt, and say, Assemble yourselves upon the mountains of Samaria, and behold the great tumults in the midst thereof, and the oppressed in the midst thereof. For they know not to do right, saith the LORD, who store up violence and robbery in their palaces. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; An adversary there shall be even round about the land; and he shall bring down thy strength from thee, and thy palaces shall be spoiled. Thus saith the LORD; As the shepherd taketh out of the mouth of the lion two legs, or a piece of an ear; so shall the children of Israel be taken out that dwell in Samaria in the corner of a bed, and in Damascus in a couch. Hear ye, and testify in the house of Jacob, saith the Lord GOD, the God of hosts ( Amo 3:8-13 ),<\/p>\n<p>Now remember this guy is a shepherd, a herdsman, and in those days there were lions in the land of Israel. You remember that David when he was telling king Saul his qualifications to go out against the giant, he said, &#8220;One day I was watching my dad&#8217;s sheep and a lion came out and grabbed one of the sheep and started dragging it away. I took and I killed the lion. Then a bear grabbed one of the sheep and I killed the bear. The God who delivered the lion and the bear into my hand is able to deliver this uncircumcised Philistine. I&#8217;m ready to go.&#8221; You remember with Sampson on the road down to Timnah the lion came out and jumped him.<\/p>\n<p>So the shepherds, one of the problems that the shepherds had to deal with were the lions who would take the sheep. So as a shepherd he had had the experience of catching a lion, but it had already devoured the sheep until there were just a couple of legs left, or just a piece of an ear. And you have that disappointing experience of getting there too late to rescue the sheep.<\/p>\n<p>So it is interesting how that being a shepherd, he is weaving in talk of the nature. The shepherds living out as they did, conscious of the heavens, conscious of the nature, and things of nature. So he speaks to the people in allegories with very natural references.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Hear ye and testify in the house of Jacob, saith the Lord God, the God of hosts.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That, in the day that I shall visit the transgressions of Israel upon him, I will also visit the altars of Bethel ( Amo 3:14 ):<\/p>\n<p>Now Bethel is where they had established the worship of the cow, the calf worship in Israel. As Jeroboam had set up the calf in Bethel, and in Dan, and the places for false gods in Gilgal and all, and the people were idolatrous and worshiping these other gods, so now God is speaking out against the altars they had built at Bethel. &#8220;In the day that I visit the transgressions of Israel upon him I will also visit the altars of Bethel.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>and the horns of the altar shall be cut off, and fall to the ground. And I will smite the winter house with the summer house; and the houses of ivory shall perish ( Amo 3:14-15 ),<\/p>\n<p>Actually, there in Samaria king Ahab had built a beautiful palace, furnished it with ivory, and it was one of the great wonders, really, of glory and splendor and wealth, the house of ivory. But the prophet speaks out against the house of ivory.<\/p>\n<p>and the great houses shall have an end, saith the LORD ( Amo 3:15 ). &#8220;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Through the Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Amo 3:1-8<\/p>\n<p>PENITENCE PROMOTED-<\/p>\n<p>REASON CALLS FOR REPENTANCE- <\/p>\n<p>THE LORD DOES NOT ROAR WITHOUT CAUSE<\/p>\n<p>TEXT: Amo 3:1-8<\/p>\n<p>In a series of seven questions the Lord teaches a lesson in clear logical thinking in matters of sin and judgment, privilege and responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:1-2 HEAR THIS WORD . . . AGAINST THE WHOLE FAMILY WHICH I BROUGHT UP OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT . . . YOU ONLY HAVE I KNOWN . . . I WILL VISIT UPON YOU ALL YOUR INIQUITIES. Gods indictment is against the whole covenant people. Judah has already been warned (Amo 2:4) that she will be judged. But for the moment this particular prophet is concerned with the northern kingdom, Israel. No other people on earth were, at that time, privileged to be the recipients of the grace of God and the oracles of God in such a measure as Israel. She was a favored nation in this respect. Much was given her, much was expected! Romans 9, 10, 11 show in no uncertain terms that Gods choice of Israel was not due to any necessary merit in the case of Israel whereby God owed it to them. Their special privilege came by the Divine sovereign choice of God, Their blessing was unmerited favor-grace! This unique distinction demanded from its very uniqueness a special obligation of reciprocal love and obedience on the part of Israel (Exo 19:5-6; Deu 4:5-8; Deu 32:34; Psa 147:19-20). With greater privilege comes more severe punishment if the obligations are despised (Lev 26:14 ff).  <\/p>\n<p>Zerr:  Amo 3:1. The chief part of the nation to which this book is directed is the 10-tribe kingdom, but a part of it is so composed that it may he properly addressed to the whole family of Israel.  Amo 3:2. You. only have I known means that God had not recognized or accepted any other family. It is forcefully expressed in Deu 7:6 as follows: &#8220;The Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people upon the face of the earth.&#8221; This favor placed them under greater obligation to eonduct themselves in a manner pleasing to Him. They did not do so, therefore it was divinely decreed to punish you for all your iniquities.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:3-6 SHALL TWO WALK TOGETHER, EXCEPT THEY HAVE AGREED? . . . SHALL THE TRUMPET BE BLOWN IN A CITY, AND THE PEOPLE NOT BE AFRAID? SHALL EVIL BEFALL A CITY, AND JEHOVAH HATH NOT DONE IT? In a series of seven questions the Lord teaches a lesson in clear logical thinking in matters pertaining to sin-punishment relationships. Reason demands repentance! Amo 3:3 has often been quoted in treatises on Unity. However, Amo 3:3 has nothing to do with the subject of unity. It is simply an illustration of the universal law of cause and effect! Two people do not meet and walk together (effect) without previously making some appointment (cause) or arrangement to do so. Just so, says Amos, since every effect has its cause, your sin will cause Gods judgment to come upon you due to the special relationship between you and God and even as God promised in His word.<\/p>\n<p>These people of Israel had rationalized their sins so long they had lost the ability to see the very basic principle of cause and effect and to apply this to their relationship to God. But God is roaring like a lion-does a lion roar in the forest unless his victim is doomed? God does not roar without a cause any more than a lion does!  Birds caught in a snare logically demands that someone previously had set the snare. And when one sees a snare being sprung he must logically reason that something caused it to spring.  <\/p>\n<p>Zerr:  Amo 3:3. Two men might unexpectedly come together while each is out walking and that would not require any previous understanding, but they would not continue their walk together without it. Together is from yachad, which Strong defines, Properly a unit, i. e. (adverbially) unitedly.&#8221; This means not only that the two might, happen to walk in the same general direction, but that they were doing so as a unit of action. The statement (in question form) is that the men will not do so except they be agreed. That word is the key to the whole passage. It is from yaap and Strongs definition is, A primitive root; to fix upon (by agreement or appointment); by implication lo meet (at a stated time), to summon (to trial), to direct (in a certain quarter or position), to engage (for marriage).&#8221; Moffatt renders the word have planned It. I have gone into much detail here because of the fundamental importance of the subject being considered. The principle is clearly set forth that in matters of right and wrong it is not enough that the parties be all striving for the same place,&#8221; and that they be a united in their activities. Not only so, but that unity must have been agreed upon by tbe parties proposing to walk together. Since the actual case at hand is that of &#8220;walking with God, it is a foregone conclusion that He is the one to do all the planning, and that man is expected and should be glad to agree to the plan.  Amo 3:4-6. I have grouped these verses into one paragraph because they are all written for one purpose, and that may well be expressed by the phrase, no effect without a cause.&#8221; For instance, a lion does not roar if there is no prey; a bird cannot be entrapped unless there is a trap; a snare cannot be taken up if there is no snare to take; a trumpet would not be blown unless there was some danger to be announced. Evil is used in the sense of some chastisement, and its presence is proof that there is some cause for It in the mind of the Lord.<\/p>\n<p>If a mighty blast of the warning trumpet is blown in the city do the people pay no attention to it? Do not all the disasters happening even now in your cities and villages sound a warning trumpet to you that God is beginning His judgment? How senseless and indifferent can this nation be? But, just like the unbelieving and scoffing today, Israel probably rationalized, All these droughts, famines, disasters, wars are bound to happen in every country. But the prophet warns them, Shall evil befall a city, and Jehovah hath not done it? Local and national calamities are not due merely to natural causes, are not only the consequence of human mistakes, or faulty legislation, or political folly, or inadequate statesmanship. These and other matters may be secondary or contributory causes. But the Prime Mover of this Universe is Jehovah God! He has done it (Isa 45:1-7)! God is the author of both wed and woe! He does what He does from a just cause and for a just and merciful purpose. He does what He does from an omniscient sovereignty! The cause is mans sin, against which God has warned man time and again. The purpose is to warn man against rebelling against his Creator and to call the sinner to repentance, back to his God, the highest Good! Whatever the Lord does, whether tribulation or triumph, is good (Rom 8:28) Incidentally, there is excellent manuscript evidence today that Rom 8:28 should be translated, God works all things together for good . . . etc. instead of All things work together for good . . . etc. This divine sovereignty working all things, weal and woe, together to serve His purposes, is one of the exhilarating thrusts of prophetic literature!<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:7-8 SURELY THE LORD . . . WILL DO NOTHING, EXCEPT HE REVEAL HIS SECRET UNTO HIS SERVANTS THE PROPHETS . . . THE LORD . . . HATH SPOKEN; WHO CAN BUT PROPHESY? God takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Eze 33:11-20); He is not willing that any should perish (2Pe 3:9); so He revealed His secret plans for the judgment of the wicked and the salvation of the righteous to His prophets (watchmen and shepherds) (Isaiah 6; Jeremiah 1, etc.) and they revealed them to man as facts to be believed; commands to be obeyed; warnings to be heeded; promises to be enjoyed. In the sure word of prophecy we have a light shining in a dark place, (2Pe 1:16-21); in His word we have all things that pertain to life and godliness (2Pe 1:3-4); in His word we have doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction in righteousness that the man of God might be complete, thoroughly furnished unto every good work, (2Ti 3:16). So the Lord has roared; who is so insensible that he will not fear? God has spoken; how can Gods messenger be silent? Even as Paul said, Woe is me, if I preach not the gospel . . . Necessity is laid upon every man called of God (and all Christians are called of God); the love of Christ should constrain every man (2Co 5:11-15) and knowing the fear of the Lord, we should persuade men! The Lord has spoken; who can but preach!  <\/p>\n<p>Zerr:  Amo 3:7. God will not cause any false alarm, and when He instructs the prophets to sound a warning, there is a cause for it.  Amo 3:8. In view of the foregoing logical conclusions, how foolish it would be were the people not to fear since the lion (God) has roared; and what neglect of duty it would be for the prophets not to utter the predictions of warning since the Lord has spoken of them through the channel of inspiration.<\/p>\n<p>Questions<\/p>\n<p>1. In what way did God know the covenant people?<\/p>\n<p>2. What scriptures should they have known that promised severe punishment if they forgot His commandments?<\/p>\n<p>3. What universal principle of reasoning is taught in Amo 3:3-6?<\/p>\n<p>4. Is God actually the author of woe? What scripture says so?<\/p>\n<p>5. Why does God bring woe upon men?<\/p>\n<p>6. In what way is God justified when He punishes men for their sins?<\/p>\n<p>7. Why should men who know Gods will speak to other men about it?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Having thus uttered the declamations of Jehovah&#8217;s judgment on all the nations, the prophet delivered his special message to Israel in a series of three discourses. In each the introductory word is, &#8220;Hear this word.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The first discourse consists of a statement of Jehovah&#8217;s verdict and sentence. It opens with a simple announcement that the privileged people were to be punished; their privileges were named, and their punishment described.<\/p>\n<p>In view of the probability that the people would object to his message, the prophet, in an interpolation, defended himself. By a series of seven questions he illustrated a principle which may thus be stated-an effect proves a cause. The illustrations may be summarized thus: communion proves agreement; the lion roaring proves the prey; the cry of the young lion proves the prey possessed; the fall of a bird proves the bait; the springing of the snare proves the bird to be taken; the trumpet proves alarm; calamity in the city proves Jehovah. From this principle the prophet deduced an application: Jehovah hath roared, therefore fear; Jehovah hath spoken, therefore prophesy.<\/p>\n<p>Turning back to the main argument, Amos proclaimed the punishment of the privileged and declared its reason. The reason was stated to the heathen, who were invited to witness the justice of the doom.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: An Exposition on the Whole Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>the Lords Word Must Come True <\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:1-15<\/p>\n<p>The closer our relationship with God, the more searching His scrutiny and chastening. The sins of Gods children which may seem of slight consequence are rigorously dealt with by their Heavenly Father, who loves them too well to allow their life to be permanently injured. It is because God loves us that He is so quick in detecting the least symptoms of disease. But we must agree with Him as to the sinfulness of sin, the need of cleansing, the hopelessness of our old nature, and the worlds urgent need both of our sympathy and sacrifice. So only shall we walk with God as Enoch did. The soul that is one with Him is on the alert, as is the traveler who hears the lions roar in the forest. Watch; ye know not the hour!<\/p>\n<p>The nobles of Egypt and Philistia are summoned to view the sins of Samaria and to confirm the justice of her penalty. From all sides the invader would descend on the recreant land. Only a fragment should escape, like the small piece of a lamb rescued from the jaws of the savage beast of prey. The couch of luxury, the bed of sloth, the golden calf of Beth-el-all marked the degeneracy of the Chosen People. May the sorrows through which the world is passing at this hour be the means of cleansing human society from these same evils that our Christian civilization may escape the penalties that overtook Israel!<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: F.B. Meyer&#8217;s Through the Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Chapter 3<\/p>\n<p>The Chastisement of the Chosen Nation<\/p>\n<p>With this chapter the second division of the prophecy begins, going on to the end of chapter 6, embracing the word of the Lord to Israel, a last solemn remonstrance ere carrying out the predicted judgment we have just been noticing.<\/p>\n<p>It is not merely the ten tribes that Amos addresses under the name of sons of Israel in this prophecy, but the whole family which [the Lord] brought up from the land of Egypt (ver. 1). They are viewed as one nation though divided into two kingdoms at that time. Their special privileges made them far more responsible than their ignorant heathen neighbors. You only, He says, have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities (ver. 2). This is a divine principle we should never lose sight of. Responsibility flows from relationship. Because Jehovah had separated Israel from the nations, and taken them into covenant with Himself, they were expected to yield that obedience which their favored position demanded; otherwise they must be the special objects of His disciplinary dealing. The same is true as to the assembly of God in this dispensation, viewed collectively, and of every individual saint likewise. We are called to walk worthy of our exalted vocation; and if we do not, we incur our Fathers discipline. Nor does chastisement prove that Gods heart is hardened against us; but the contrary. It is His love that leads Him so to act. The world may go on in its folly, and know little of such governmental care; but it must be otherwise with the people who are called by the name of the Lord.<\/p>\n<p>Verse 3 lets us into the secret of true fellowship. Two can walk together only when they are agreed. It is not a question of seeing all details alike, but of having common thoughts as to the ground of their communion together. God cannot walk with gainsayers in that intimate, happy sense that is here contemplated. Neither can saints walk together in holy association if the one seeks to honor God, and the other has lapsed into loose thoughts and evil ways.<\/p>\n<p>Beginning with verse 4, the prophet declares the reason for his message. Results spring from adequate causes. The trumpet was to be blown, that the people might tremble, for God was about to bring evil upon them. Shall there be evil in the city, and the Lord hath not done it? is His challenge. This verse has perturbed some, over-zealous for the reputation of the Lord of hosts. But evil is, of course, calamity (not sin), as we have seen in the first chapter of Joel, and which God uses as His rod of discipline. Of this Amos was to warn the careless inhabitants of the cities of Israel.<\/p>\n<p>He has good cause to prophesy. God has revealed His secrets to him. Therefore he must boldly proclaim them. The Lord God hath spoken; who can but prophesy? (vers. 4-8). This is high ground indeed; but it is the only proper ground for one who essays to minister divine truth. If God has not spoken, then one mans guess is as good as anothers; one philosophers speculations are as worthy of credence or consideration as those of his fellows. But if God Himself has spoken, as He has in His Word, that at once settles everything for the one who fears Him. His servant has naught to do but proclaim what has been revealed, rejecting oppositions of science, falsely so called, and all vain imaginations.<\/p>\n<p>This is the value of Scripture; and of this Satan would subtly seek to rob us at the present time. God has revealed His will in His Word. The Lord God will do nothing, but He revealeth His secret unto His servants the prophets. Therefore the man of faith accepts the prophetic writings, to which the Lord Jesus has set His seal, as a final court of appeal; knowing that holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. Here faith triumphs, where mere reason stumbles in the dark; vainly endeavoring to peer into the future, to explain the past, or to understand the present.<\/p>\n<p>It has often been alleged by opponents of the inspiration of the Bible that unless we were prepared to believe that the writers of the various books were infallible, it was idle to talk of the unerring Scriptures; and this in face of the solemn declaration of the Lord Jesus that the Scripture cannot be broken. But the question of human infallibility does not come in at all. When God speaks, one needs but to be obedient, not infallible, in giving out what He has made known. So it was with Amos and his fellow-servants of the prophetic band. An amanuensis need not have exact knowledge of the events concerning which he writes at the dictation of another. He hears the word, and transcribes accordingly. Thus can we understand the Old Testament writers, searching what, or what manner of time, the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify (or point out) when He testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the glories that should follow. It is only unbelief that could make any difficulty here.<\/p>\n<p>The prophetic message is given in vers. 9 to 15. Israels dispersion is foretold; but that a remnant shall be saved is likewise made known.<\/p>\n<p>In the palaces of Philistia and Egypt it is to be published that, because of their sins, the Lord God would no longer be a bulwark to His people. The nations that had once been witnesses of His power would now witness His righteousness. When His people walked not with Him, He could only give them up to chastisement.<\/p>\n<p>But as the Eastern shepherd taketh out of the mouth of the lion two legs, or a piece of an ear; so shall the children of Israel be delivered that dwell in Samaria in the corner of a bed, and in Damascus on a couch. The shepherd who lost one of the flock would have to be responsible for the same, unless he could bring proof that it was torn of beasts; therefore his anxiety to recover a portion, if only the tip of an ear, of the creature devoured. So shall God preserve a portion of Israel, though a very small remnant, from being devoured by the wild beasts of the Gentile empires. Their transgressions must be visited upon them because of their idolatrous practices, of which the altar at Bethel, set up by Jeroboam the son of Nebat, was a standing memorial. Its fall would involve the destruction of those who gloried in their wealth and reveled in luxury, careless of the fallen state of Israel. This is more fully gone into in ch. 6:1-6, which will be noticed in its place.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentaries on the New Testament and Prophets<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Amo 3:3<\/p>\n<p>The words of our text are in themselves so general, that they might very well stand alone as a proverbial truth, capable of a vast variety of applications. They would furnish an ample theme for many important lessons of practical prudence. It must be understood that the &#8220;walking together&#8221; signifies co-operation, a working together for some common end. And then we see at once how impossible this is, without some previous agreement.<\/p>\n<p>I. It is recorded of Enoch and of Noah that each of them walked with God. With regard to other holy men, it is said of some, that they walked before God-as Abraham was charged to do by the Lord Himself: &#8220;Walk before Me, and be thou perfect&#8221;-of others, that they walked &#8220;after God.&#8221; The various forms of expression may be considered as amounting to nearly the same thing, as denoting an extraordinary degree of piety and holiness in the persons so described.<\/p>\n<p>II. Israel&#8217;s walking with God in the ordinances of His house, could, in the case of individual members of the Church, be no proof of their agreement with Him. The difference between the form and the substance, and the utter worthlessness of the form when separated from the substance, was never overlooked; and it was one of the themes on which the prophets dwelt most frequently in strains of the most solemn warning. If the agreement did not previously exist, the most exact observance of the legal ceremonies not only was quite powerless to produce it, but had the effect of widening the breach.<\/p>\n<p>III. In the worship of the Church on earth there is, and always must be, an admixture of elements foreign to its real nature, but needed for the supply of our temporal wants. Still this worship may and should be, whatever it may be beside, the highest expression, the culmination and efflorescence, of the Christian life. If the flower, which witnesses to the healthy life and growth of the plant, is severed from the stalk, it soon fades and withers, loses its colours and its fragrance, and is only fit to be swept away as worthless refuse. So it is with our worship; though its words should be suited to the lips of seraphs, and its forms worthy of the court of heaven, if it is to us a mere outward thing, having no root or ground in our inner life.<\/p>\n<p> bishop Thirlwall, Good Words, 1876, p. 125.<\/p>\n<p>Applying the text to God&#8217;s law and man&#8217;s conscience, the first question is, How they fell out; and the second, How they fell in again. Sin is the cause of the quarrel, and righteousness by faith is the way to peace.<\/p>\n<p>I. The Disagreement. Notice separately the fact and its consequences. (i) The fact that there is an alienation. God&#8217;s law is His manifested will for the government of His creatures. It is the reflection cast down on earth of His own holiness. His moral law, ruling spirits, is as inexorable as His physical law, ruling matter. It knows of no yielding, no compunction. The conscience of man is that part of his wonderful frame that comes into closest contact with God&#8217;s law-the part of the man that lies next to the fiery law, and feels its burning. When first the conscience is informed and awaked, it discovers itself guilty, and the law angry. There is not peace between the two, and by the constitution of both, they are neighbours. They touch at all points, as the air touches the earth or the sea; neither the one nor the other can avoid the contact. There is need of peace in so close a union; but there is not peace. The law&#8217;s enmity against a guilty moral being is intense and total. (ii) The consequence of this disagreement between the two is, they cannot walk together. Enmity tends to produce distance. Distance is disobedience. To walk with the law, is to live righteously; not to walk with the law, is to live in sin. Where love is the fulfilling of the law, hate and distance must be the highest disobedience.<\/p>\n<p>II. The Reconciliation. (1) The nature of the reconciliation and the means of attaining it. The agreement between the law and the conscience is a part of the great reconciliation between God and man, which is effected in and by Jesus Christ. He is our peace. Peace of conscience follows in the train of justification. (2) The effect of the agreement is obedience to the law-that is, the whole Word of God. When there is a quarrel between friends, and a mutual distrust, there is no walking together; but when the enmity is removed and friendship restored, you may soon see the friends by each other&#8217;s side again; so also is it with the law and the conscience. It ceases to accuse, and you cease to keep it at a distance.<\/p>\n<p> W. Arnot, Roots and Fruits of the Christian Life, p. 314.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Can two walk together except they be agreed?&#8221; is the first of a long string of questions forming an animated and striking passage, but not very easy to interpret. The general idea seems to be that every effect has a cause, and every cause an effect. If the question of the text belongs, as it appears to do, to the same subject with the rest, it seems to say that if two persons take a journey, or so much as a walk in each other&#8217;s company, that very fact implies a foregoing cause, which is, in this case, the mutual consent or agreement of the two persons concerned.<\/p>\n<p>We have here before us two thoughts.<\/p>\n<p>I. Life is a Divine-human companionship. It is a walk, a little circuit from the door to the door, a circumscribed round for health and for business, of which home is alike the place left and the place returned to-the door of crossing in the morning, the door of re-entrance at evening. You will say this gives the idea of monotony and uneventfulness; it seems to exclude any possibilities of great change or high ambition. Be it so; it is the more like most lives, the average existences, not of the great and noble, but of the bulk and multitude of our fellow-creatures. To walk with God is a different figure from that of travelling or voyaging under God&#8217;s charge or supervision; to walk with God is to take the daily round of common being in God&#8217;s company, with God for your companion. To walk with God is to have God with you, consciously, and by choice, in the everyday occupation and the everyday society. To walk with God is to lead a godly and a Christian life.<\/p>\n<p>II. The condition of that companionship is a Divine-human agreement. The text says that there must be a consenting will, there must be a harmony of feeling on the two sides to make the Divine-human companionship possible, otherwise it will degenerate into an empty profession, a heartless form, a riven bond, a broken vow.<\/p>\n<p> C. J. Vaughan, Family Churchman, Oct. 6th, 1886.<\/p>\n<p> I. Religion is, essentially, a social thing. The tendency of all sin is towards solitude. It is to division, to a narrow and a narrowing division. For the most part, as a man becomes wicked, he becomes solitary. The object of the grace of God is always union, union of every kind. It makes one Christ in two hearts and that makes two hearts one: it makes two hearts like Christ, and the resemblance leads them to draw together. They walk together because they are agreed.<\/p>\n<p>II. If you look at man as a social being you may conceive him in three relations. There is his relation to his fellow-man; there is his relation to angels; there is his relation to God. With these three different beings man has to walk. And in each case God lays down one rule, that before there can be harmony in action there must be agreement in principle. To take the metaphor of a walk: they must be agreed as to where they are going, and by what path they are travelling. They need not always exactly place step with step. But the end must be the same end, and the means must be generally the same.<\/p>\n<p>III. What is God&#8217;s end? Always and invariably His own glory. And what is the path which leads to it? Only one-holiness. The path of holiness, to the glory of God. That walk may be rough, but you walk with God.<\/p>\n<p> J. Vaughan, Fifty Sermons, 2nd series, p. 242.<\/p>\n<p>References: Amo 3:3.-Spurgeon, Sermons, vol. x., No. 597; J. Cook, Christian World Pulpit, vol. xi., p. 181; G. Brooks, Outlines of Sermons, p. 164. Amo 3:3-6.-Spurgeon, Sermons, vol. xii., No. 705. Amo 3:6.-G. Brooks, Outlines of Sermons, p. 295; Spurgeon, Sermons, vol. vii., No. 426; F. Hastings, Christian World Pulpit, vol. xxxii., p. 346. Amo 3:7, Amo 3:8.-Homiletic Magazine, vol. vi., p. 73. Amo 3:11-15.-Ibid., p. 74. Amo 4:1-3.-Ibid., p. 139. Amo 4:2.-E. D. Solomon, Christian World Pulpit, vol. xvi., p. 101. Amo 4:4, Amo 4:5.-Homiletic Magazine, vol. vi., p. 140. Amo 4:6, Amo 4:11.-Ibid., p. 198.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Sermon Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>II. THE PROPHETIC MESSAGES UNCOVERING <\/p>\n<p>THE CONDITION OF THE PEOPLE<\/p>\n<p>CHAPTER 3 <\/p>\n<p>The First Discourse<\/p>\n<p>1. There is cause for judgment (Amo 3:1-8) <\/p>\n<p>2. The coming judgment visitation (Amo 3:9-15) <\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:1-8. Hear this word that the LORD hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, You have I only known of all the families of the earth, therefore will I punish you for all your iniquities. This is the solemn beginning of the special messages addressed to the nation by the humble herdman of Tekoa. The Lord had singled them out from the other nations. He had separated them unto Himself. With His mighty power and outstretched arm He had delivered them from the house of bondage and brought them to the land promised unto their fathers. He had revealed Himself and made known His will to them exclusively. He had entered with them into covenant and called them to be a kingdom of priests and a holy nation Exo 19:6. Hence their responsibility was very great, for the degree of relationship is always the degree of responsibility. The divine election of the twelve tribes does not insure against punishment, but that intimate relationship into which the Lord had entered with Israel broken and violated by sin, demanded a correspondingly great punishment. To whomsoever much is given of him shall much be required. Our Lord expressed the same truth in Mat 11:1-30 when he denounced the cities in which great miracles had been done and they believed not and declared that it shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon in the day of judgment than for them.<\/p>\n<p>To demonstrate the rightful cause of judgment Amos speaks now in a number of brief similes. There are six of them in the form of questions. Can two walk together, except they be agreed? Fellowship is only possible on the ground of separation; a holy God demands a holy people. In their state of licentious idolatry and gross injustice the Lord could not own them. Then follow brief questions indicating that which would happen to them. Like a roaring lion, or a young lion, the Lord would come upon them. They will be caught in a snare and a trap. The blowing of the trumpet denotes that evil was to come upon them. Shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD has not done it? It is hard to believe that certain men have taken this statement and teach on account of it that God is the author of moral evil&#8211;of sin. The context shows that this is not in view here at all. A holy God who cannot be tempted with evil, who is light and in whom there is no darkness at all, does not put moral evil in the world. The evil is of a punitive character such as invasion by hostile forces, the sword, the famine and the pestilence.<\/p>\n<p>And the Lord Jehovah will do nothing, but He revealeth His secrets unto His servants, the prophets. These secrets are made known to us in the prophetic Word and not, as some claim, in special visions. The Spirit of God, the author of the Word, shows to Gods people in His Word things to come Joh 15:15; 1Co 2:10-16. The result of such knowledge of the secrets of the Lord concerning the future is stated in 2Pe 3:17, Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own steadfastness. (See also 2Pe 3:14.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:9-15. This paragraph begins with a striking call. The speaker is the Lord and He addresses the prophets and commands them to cry in the palaces of Ashdod (Philistia) and in Egypt so that they may see and know the wicked acts of Samaria, and thus bear witness against Israel. Thus the Lord exposed them to their enemies. Then the coming adversary is announced who would encircle the land and humiliate the proud nation, so that her palaces would be spoiled. Then the herd man speaks in a parable familiar to him from his life as a shepherd. When the beast of prey devours a sheep the shepherd must bring proof of it, so he is anxious to recover a part of the slain animal and tries to snatch away from the devouring lion either the legs of the sheep, or even a small piece of the ear, so as to show the rest was eaten by the lion. Such would be the case with the people in their luxurious living, and only a small remnant is to escape the coming slaughter by the lion, the Gentile world power. The transgressions of Israel will be visited; the idol altars of Bethel will be overthrown in that visitation and all their prosperity and luxury would then end and instead of living in winter and summer houses, they would become homeless.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gaebelein&#8217;s Annotated Bible (Commentary)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>whole family <\/p>\n<p>The language here, and the expression &#8220;house of Jacob,&#8221; Amo 3:13 evidently gives the prophecy a wider application than to &#8220;Israel,&#8221; the ten-tribe northern kingdom, though the judgment was, in the event, executed first upon the northern kingdom. 2Ki 17:18-23. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Hear: 2Ch 20:15, Isa 46:3, Isa 48:12, Hos 4:1, Hos 5:1, Mic 3:1, Rev 2:29 <\/p>\n<p>against: Jer 8:3, Jer 31:1, Jer 33:24-26, Eze 37:16, Eze 37:17 <\/p>\n<p>which: Amo 2:10 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: 1Ki 22:28 &#8211; Hearken Isa 1:2 &#8211; for the Lord Isa 1:10 &#8211; Hear Eze 33:3 &#8211; he blow Joe 1:2 &#8211; Hear Amo 5:1 &#8211; Hear Mic 1:1 &#8211; concerning Mic 2:3 &#8211; this family Mic 6:1 &#8211; ye Zep 2:5 &#8211; the word<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Amo 3:1. The chief part of the nation to which this book is directed is the 10-tribe kingdom, but a part of it is so composed that it may he properly addressed to the whole family of Israel.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Amo 3:1-2. Hear this word against the whole family, &amp;c.  All that family of which Jacob, or Israel, was the head. The word family is equivalent to people here and in the following verse. You only have I known  Acknowledged, by revealing myself to you, protecting you, and conferring on you peculiar privileges. Therefore will I punish you  Your sins, therefore, shall be punished, and that in an exemplary manner; because you have sinned against greater light and higher obligations than other nations are or have been favoured with; and you have manifested an ungrateful, as well as a disobedient spirit. For the same reason the angel is commanded to begin his execution at the sanctuary, Eze 9:6; and St. Peter observes, that judgment must begin at the house of God, 1Pe 4:17 : see also the margin.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Amo 3:1. Against the whole family of the twelve tribes, which I brought up from Egypt. It was a laborious work to make them hear. The prophets did not confine their labours to local districts.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:2. You only have I known of all the families of the earth. When they had become idolaters, the Lord, ever rich in mercy, called Abraham out of Chaldea. Ingratitude is therefore the greatest reproach to any people. On this sin the fine allegory of Ezekiel is built; on this, the keen reproach of queen Dido is turned on neas. See Ezekiel 16.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:4. Will a lion roar in the forest when he hath no prey? The combined armies of Egypt and Philistia, invading the land, shall be as the lions of the forest in full pursuit of prey. They will shed the blood of the people like water.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:7. He revealeth his secret to the prophets. See on Psa 25:14. All the oriental nations had their pretended seers or prophets, who were regarded as a kind of court chaplains.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:9. Publish in the palaces of Ashdod, and in the palaces of Egypt, my high commands to go against backsliding Israel. God, in like manner, commissioned the Assyrian, the rod of his anger, to go against a hypocritical nation. Isa 10:5. Wars and sieges are the Lords doings: in him alone is our help.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:12. Out of the mouth of the lion two legs, or a piece of an ear. This simile shows how small was the remnant of the ten tribes which Salmanezer carried away from Samaria. 2Ki 17:6. Nine tenths of them had perished, as in Amo 5:3.<\/p>\n<p>The corner of a bed. Lying on the side of their bed, and in their damask couches. So the Vulgate may be read. All oriental nations indolently recline on couches; and the corner of a bed or couch is reckoned the most honourable seat. Harmer, vol. 2:60. See the Synopsis on the word Damascus in the text.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:15. I will smite the winter house with the summer house. Kings and princes in general have their town and country houses; and mention is made of the winter palace of the kings of Judea. Jer 36:22. The opulent citizens in all places build mansions on the rising ground; the people of London, by visits to the coasts, provided they are temperate, revive their health and strength by such excursions. But the sins of Israel turned all the enlivened cosmography of the country into mournful desolations.<\/p>\n<p>REFLECTIONS.<\/p>\n<p>The prophet here infers the fury of the divine vengeance, from the impetuosity of the spirit. It was as the vehemence of a father lamenting the profligacy of his children; it was as the fury of a lion roaring on his prey; it was as the blowing of a trumpet in the time of danger. Nor could it be otherwise: for how could God and Israel walk together when they were totally disagreed.<\/p>\n<p>The danger threatened was the coming of Pharaoh-necho on the mountains of Samaria with a great army; for the Lord did nothing of this nature without revealing it to his servants the prophets. He revealed his secrets to them, and invited them to trace the wisdom and equity of his ways for the instruction of the church, that all men might learn out of the scriptures the ways of righteousness and truth. Yet when we suffer evil from men by war, or by fire, we should take it as more from the hand of God than from the enemy.<\/p>\n<p>The Lord in early visitations mixes mercy with judgment. He would not now utterly exterminate Israel. But as a shepherd delivers a part of the prey out of the mouth of the lion, so he caused the Egyptians to be smitten near the Euphrates, and Samaria received a reprieve. Happy is the sinner who profits by the gentler strokes of justice.<\/p>\n<p>But the heaviest strokes fell on the priests, the princes, and the nobles of Israel; and this was heavier still, because they sat at ease on couches of effeminate pleasure. They had winter houses in the city, and country residences for the summer. They took the lead in every corruption and crime; and now God was resolved that they should take the lead in the reception of punishment. While the generous invader pitied to touch the cottage, he took peculiar pride to plunder, to burn and demolish the lordly mansion; and to make the haughty the most unhappy in the land. The humble shrub is bended by the hurricane, while the stately oak is stripped of its verdure, and dismembered of its branches. Thus it is safest for all men to place a humble reliance on providence, and repose their confidence in the divine protection. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Sutcliffe&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Amo 3:1-8. Israels Responsibility and the Prophets Obligation.Amos, after addressing the children of Israel, includes Judah by adding the whole family, unless this is a gloss, as it may be, since the inclusion of Judah here seems inappropriate. Yahweh had selected Israel for special notice and favour. On that account its apostasy and sin were all the more deserving of punishment. The law of cause and effect applies here as elsewhere. When two walk in accord (so Ehrlich, comparing Gen 22:8), the reason is that they have made an appointment (mg.). When a lion roars, it is because he scents the prey. When vv.  young lion growls from his lair, it is because he has made a capture. When a bird falls on the ground, it is because a boomerang has struck it. When a trap springs up from the ground, it is because it has caught something. When a horn is blown in the city, it is because there is some cause for alarm. And when some calamity befalls a city, it is because Yahweh has caused it. In like manner when the prophets speak, it is because Yahweh has revealed His secret to them (Amo 3:7 may, however, be a gloss). So Amos own speaking and prophesying are due to the same law of cause and effect.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:3. except they have agreed: LXX for ndu implies ndu, unless they know each other. This would give the words a more general application. But for safety two men journeying through a desert may agree to walk together without knowing one another.<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:5 a. Translate, Will a bird fall to the earth (omitting pah here with LXX), when there is no boomerang for it? Mokesh here probably denotes a boomerang such as we find depicted on Egyptian monuments (so Marti; see W. Max Mueller, Asien und Europa, 123f.).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Peake&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold\">Israel&rsquo;s unique relationship with Yahweh 3:1-2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Amos called all the Israelites to hear a message from their Lord. He referred to them as those whom Yahweh had redeemed from Egypt, reminding them of the unique privilege they enjoyed. He also mentioned that the Israelites, among all the peoples of the world, had a special relationship to the Lord. &quot;You only&quot; is in the emphatic first position in the Hebrew sentence. This is an allusion to the covenant that God had made with the Israelites at Mt. Sinai (cf. Exo 19:3-6; Deu 28:1-14). God had chosen (known, Heb. <span style=\"font-style:italic\">yada&rsquo;<\/span>; cf. Jer 1:5) the Israelites in that He had made a commitment to them as His vassal in a covenant relationship.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: See H. B. Huffmon, &quot;The Treaty Background of Hebrew Yada&rsquo;,&quot; Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 181 (February 1966):31-37.] <\/span> He had also revealed Himself to the Israelites as He had done to no other people. God said He would punish His people for their iniquities because they were sins against His unusual blessings (cf. Amo 3:14). Greater privilege always results in greater responsibility (cf. Luk 12:48). Amo 3:2; Amo 3:14 both contain promises that God would punish His people, forming an <span style=\"font-style:italic\">inclusio<\/span> or literary envelope around the whole passage.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;A similar injunction to hear what God has to say formerly introduced his commands in the Sinai covenant. Now, it introduces his covenant lawsuit against his rebellious people, who are in fact his family.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Niehaus, p. 375.] <\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>CIVILIZATION AND JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>Amo 3:1-15 &#8211; Amo 4:3<\/p>\n<p>WE now enter the Second Section of the Book of Amos: chapters 3-6. It is a collection of various oracles of denunciation, grouped partly by the recurrence of the formula &#8220;Hear this word,&#8221; which stands at the head of our present chapters 3, 4, and 5, which are therefore probably due to it; partly by two cries of &#8220;Woe&#8221; at Amo 5:18 and Amo 6:1; and also by the fact that each of the groups thus started leads up to an emphatic, though not at first detailed, prediction of the nations doom. {Amo 3:13-15; Amo 4:3; Amo 4:12; Amo 5:16-17; Amo 5:26-27; Amo 6:14} Within these divisions lie a number of short indictments, sentences of judgment, and the like, which have no further logical connection than is supplied by their general sameness of subject, and a perceptible increase of articulateness from beginning to end of the Section. The sins of Israel are more detailed, and the judgment of war, coming from the North, advances gradually till we discern the unmistakable ranks of Assyria. But there are various parentheses and interruptions, which cause the student of the text no little difficulty. Some of these, however, may be only apparent: it will always be a question whether their want of immediate connection with what precedes them is not due to the loss of several words from the text rather than to their own intrusion into it. Of others it is true that they are obviously out of place as they lie; their removal brings together verses which evidently belong to each other. Even such parentheses, however, may be from Amos himself. It is only where a verse, besides interrupting the argument, seems to reflect a historical situation later than the prophets day, that we can be sure it is not his own. And in all this textual criticism we must keep in mind that the obscurity of the present text of a verse, so far from being an adequate proof of its subsequent insertion, may be the very token of its antiquity, scribes or translators of later date having been unable to understand it. To reject a verse, only because we do not see the connection, would surely be as arbitrary as the opposite habit of those who, missing a connection, invent one, and then exhibit their artificial joint as evidence of the integrity of the whole passage. In fact we must avoid all headstrong surgery, for to a great extent we work in the dark.<\/p>\n<p>The general subject of the Section may be indicated by the title: Religion and Civilization. A vigorous community, wealthy, cultured, and honestly religious, are, at a time of settled peace and growing power, threatened, in the name of the God of justice, with their complete political overthrow. Their civilization is counted for nothing; their religion, on which they base their confidence, is denounced as false and unavailing. These two subjects are not, and could not have been, separated by the prophet in any one of his oracles. But in the first, the briefest, and most summary of these, chapters 3-4:3, it is mainly with the doom of the civil structure of Israels life that Amos deals; and it will be more convenient for us to take them first, with all due reference to the echoes of them in later parts of the Section. From Amo 4:4-6. it is the Religion and its false peace which he assaults; and we shall take that in the next chapter. First, then, Civilization and Judgment (Amo 3:1-15; Amo 4:1-3); second, The False Peace of Ritual (Amo 4:4-6).<\/p>\n<p>These few brief oracles open upon the same note as that in which the previous Section closed-that the crimes of Israel are greater than those of the heathen; and that the peoples peculiar relation to God means, not their security, but their greater judgment. It is then affirmed that Israels wealth and social life are so sapped by luxury and injustice that the nation must perish. And, as in every luxurious community the women deserve especial blame, the last of the group of oracles is reserved for them. {Amo 4:1-3}<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Hear this word, which Jehovah hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Judah as well as North Israel, so that we see the vanity of a criticism which would cast out of the Book of Amos as unauthentic every reference to Judah. &#8220;Only you have I known of all the families of the ground&#8221;-not world, but &#8220;ground,&#8221; purposely chosen to stamp the meanness and mortality of them all-&#8220;therefore will I visit upon you all your iniquities.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This famous text has been called by various writers &#8220;the keynote,&#8221; &#8220;the license,&#8221; and &#8220;the charter&#8221; of prophecy. But the names are too petty for what is not less than the fulmination of an element. It is a peal of thunder we hear. It is, in a moment, the explosion and discharge of the full storm of prophecy. As when from a burst cloud the streams immediately below rise suddenly and all their banks are overflowed, so the prophecies that follow surge and rise clear of the old limits of Israels faith by the unconfined, unmeasured flood of heavens justice that breaks forth by this single verse. Now, once for all, are submerged the lines of custom and tradition within which the course of religion has hitherto flowed; and, as it were, the surface of the world is altered. It is a crisis which has happened more than once again in history: when helpless man has felt the absolute relentlessness of the moral issues of life; their renunciation of the past, however much they have helped to form it; their sacrifice of every development however costly, and of every hope however pure; their deafness to prayer, their indifference to penitence; when no faith saves a Church, no courage a people, no culture or prestige even the most exalted order of men; but at the bare hands of a judgment, uncouth of voice and often unconscious of a Divine mission, the results of a great civilization are for its sins swept remorselessly away.<\/p>\n<p>Before the storm bursts, we learn by its lightnings some truths from the old life that is to be destroyed. &#8220;You only have I known of all the families of the ground: therefore will I visit your iniquities upon you.&#8221; Religion is no insurance against judgment, no mere atonement and escape from consequences. Escape! Religion is only opportunity-the greatest moral opportunity which men have, and which if they violate nothing remains for them but a certain fearful looking forward unto judgment. You only have I known; and because you did not take the moral advantage of My intercourse, because you felt it only as privilege and pride, pardon for the past and security for the future, therefore doom the more inexorable awaits you.<\/p>\n<p>Then as if the people had interrupted him with the question, What sign do you give us that this judgment is near?-Amos goes aside into that noble digression (Amo 3:3-8) on the harmony between the prophets word and the imminent events of the time, which we have already studied. From this apologia, Amo 3:9 returns to the note of Amo 3:1-2 and develops it. Not only is Israels responsibility greater than that of other peoples. Her crimes themselves are more heinous. &#8220;Make proclamation over the palaces in Ashdod&#8221;-if we are not to read Assyria here, then the name of Ashdod has perhaps been selected from all other heathen names because of its similarity to the Hebrew word for that &#8220;violence&#8221; with which Amos is charging the people-&#8220;and over the palaces of the land of Egypt, and say, Gather upon the Mount of Samaria and see! Confusions manifold in the midst of her; violence to her very core! Yea, they know not how to do uprightness, saith Jehovah, who store up wrong and violence in their palaces.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;To their crimes,&#8221; said the satirist of the Romans, &#8220;they owe their gardens, palaces, stables, and fine old plate.&#8221; And William Langland declared of the rich English of his day:-&#8220;For toke thei on trewly they tymbred not so height Ne boughte non burgages be ye full certayne.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Therefore thus saith the Lord Jehovah: Siege and Blockade of the Land. And they shall bring down from off thee thy fortresses, and plundered shall be thy palaces.&#8221; Yet this shall be no ordinary, tide of Eastern war, to ebb like the Syrian as it flowed, and leave the nation to rally on their land again. For Assyria devours the peoples. &#8220;Thus saith Jehovah: As the shepherd saveth from the mouth of the lion a pair of shinbones or a bit of an ear, so shall the children of Israel be saved-they who sit in Samaria in the corner of the diwan and on a couch.&#8221; The description, as will be seen from the note below, is obscure. Some think it is intended to satirize a novel and affected fashion of sitting adopted by the rich. Much more probably it means that carnal security in the luxuries of civilization which Amos threatens more than once in similar phrases. The corner of the diwan is in Eastern houses the seat of honor. To this desert shepherd, with only the hard ground to rest on, the couches and ivory-mounted diwans of the rich must have seemed the very symbols of extravagance. But the pampered bodies that loll their lazy lengths upon them shall be left like the crumbs of a lions meal-&#8220;two shin-bones and the bit of an ear!&#8221; Their whole civilization shall perish with them. &#8220;Hearken and testify against the house of Israel-oracle of the Lord Jehovah, God of Hosts&#8221;-those addressed are still the heathen summoned in Amo 3:14-15. &#8220;For on the day when I visit the crimes of Israel upon him, I shall then make visitation upon the altars of Bethel, and the horns of the altar,&#8221; which men grasp in their last despair, &#8220;shall be smitten and fall to the earth. And I will strike the winter-house upon the summer-house, and the ivory houses Shall perish, yea, swept away shall be houses many-oracle of Jehovah.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But the luxury of no civilization can be measured without its women, and to the women of Samaria Amos now turns with the most scornful of all his words. &#8220;Hear this word&#8221;-this for you-&#8220;kine of Bashan that are in the mount of Samaria, that oppress the poor, that crush the needy, that say to their lords, Bring, and let us drink. Sworn hath the Lord Jehovah by His holiness, lo, days are coming when there shall be a taking away of you with hooks, and of the last of you with fish-hooks.&#8221; They put hooks in the nostrils of unruly cattle, and the figure is often applied to human captives; but so many should these cattle of Samaria be that for the &#8220;last of them fish-hooks&#8221; must be used. &#8220;Yea, by the breaches&#8221; in the wall of the stormed city &#8220;shall ye go out, every one headlong, and ye shall be cast oracle of Jehovah.&#8221; It is a cowherds rough picture of women: a troop of kine-heavy, heedless animals, trampling in their anxiety for food upon every frail and lowly object in the way. But there is a prophets insight into character. Not of Jezebels, or Messalinas, or Lady Macbeths is it spoken, but of the ordinary matrons of Samaria. Thoughtlessness and luxury are able to make brutes out of women of gentle nurture, with homes and a religion.<\/p>\n<p>Such are these three or four short oracles of Amos. They are probably among his earliest-the first peremptory challenges of prophecy to, that great stronghold which before forty years she is to see thrown down in obedience to her word. As yet, however, there seems to be nothing to justify the menaces of Amos. Fair and stable rises the structure of Israels life. A nation, who know themselves elect; who in politics are prosperous and in religion proof to every doubt, build high their palaces, see the skies above them unclouded, and bask in their pride, heavens favorites without an ear. This man, solitary and sudden from his desert, springs upon them in the name of God and their poor. Straighter word never came from Deity: &#8220;Jehovah hath spoken, who can but prophesy?&#8221; The insight of it, the justice of it, are alike convincing. Yet at first it appears as if it were sped on the personal and very human passion of its herald. For Amos not only uses the deserts cruelties-the lions to the sheep-to figure Gods impending judgment upon His people, but he enforces the latter with all a desert-bred mans horror of cities and civilization. It is their costly furniture, their lavish and complex building, on which he sees the storm break. We seem to hear again that frequent phrase of the previous section: &#8220;the fire shall devour the palaces thereof.&#8221; The palaces, he says, are simply storehouses of oppression; the palaces will be plundered. Here, as throughout his book, couches and diwans draw forth the scorn of a man accustomed to the simple furniture of the tent. But observe his especial hatred of houses. Four times in one verse he smites them: &#8220;winter-house on summer-house and the ivory houses shall perish-yea, houses manifold, saith the Lord.&#8221; So in another oracle of the same section: &#8220;Houses of ashlar ye have built, and ye shall not inhabit them; vineyards of delight have ye planted, and ye shall not drink of their wine.&#8221; {Amo 5:11} And in another: &#8220;I loathe the pride of Jacob, and his palaces I hate; and I will give up a city and all that is in it For, lo, the Lord is about to command, and He will smite the great house into ruins and the small house into splinters.&#8221; {Amo 6:8; Amo 6:11} No wonder that such a prophet found war with its breached walls insufficient, and welcomed, as the full ally of his word, the earthquake itself.<\/p>\n<p>Yet all this is no mere desert razzia in the name of the Lord, a nomads hatred of cities and the culture of settled men. It is not a temper; it is a vision of history. In the only argument which these early oracles contain, Amos claims to have events on the side of his word. &#8220;Shall the lion roar and not be catching&#8221; something? Neither does the prophet speak till he knows that God is ready to act. History accepted this claim. Amos spoke about 755. In 734 Tiglath-Pileser swept Gilead and Galilee; in 724 Shalmaneser overran the rest of Northern Israel: &#8220;siege and blockade of the whole land!&#8221; For three years the Mount of Samaria was invested, and then taken; the houses overthrown, the rich and the delicate led away captive. It happened as Amos foretold; for it was not the shepherds rage within him that spoke. He had &#8220;seen the Lord standing, and He said, Smite.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But this assault of a desert nomad upon the structure of a nations life raises many echoes in history and some questions in our own minds today. Again and again have civilizations far more powerful than Israels been threatened by the desert in the name of God, and in good faith it has been proclaimed by the prophets of Christianity and other religions that Gods kingdom cannot come on earth till the wealth, the culture, the civil order, which men have taken centuries to build, have been swept away by some great political convulsion. Today Christianity herself suffers the same assaults, and is told by many, the high life and honest intention of whom cannot be doubted, that till the civilization which she has so much helped to create is destroyed, there is no hope for the purity or the progress of the race. And Christianity, too, has doubts within herself. What is the world which our Master refused in the Mount of Temptation, and so often and so sternly told us that it must perish?-how much of our wealth, of our culture, of our politics, of the whole fabric of our society? No thoughtful and religious man, when confronted with civilization, not in its ideal, but in one of those forms which give it its very name, the life of a large city, can fail to ask, How much of this deserves the judgment of God? How much must be overthrown, before His will is done on earth? All these questions rise in the ears and the heart of a generation, which more than any other has been brought face to face with the ruins of empires and civilizations, which have endured longer, and in their day seemed more stable, than her own.<\/p>\n<p>In face of the confused thinking and fanatic speech which have risen on all such topics, it seems to me that the Hebrew prophets supply us with four cardinal rules.<\/p>\n<p>First, of course, they insist that it is the moral question upon which the fate of a civilization is, decided. By what means has the system grown? Is justice observed in essence as well as form? Is there freedom, or is the prophet silenced? Does luxury or self-denial prevail? Do the rich make life hard for the poor? Is childhood sheltered and is innocence respected? By these, claim the prophets, a nation stands or falls; and history has proved the claim on wider worlds than they dreamt of.<\/p>\n<p>But by themselves moral reasons are never enough to justify a prediction of speedy doom upon any system or society. None of the prophets began to foretell the fall of Israel till they read, with keener eyes than their contemporaries, the signs of it in current history. And this, I take it, was the point which made a notable difference between them, and one who like them scourged the social wrongs of his civilization, yet never spoke a word of its fall. Juvenal nowhere calls down judgments, except upon individuals. In his time there were no signs of the decline of the empire, even though, as he marks, there was a flight from the capital of the virtue which was to keep the empire alive. But the prophets had political proof of the nearness of Gods judgment, and they spoke in the power of its coincidence with the moral corruption of their people.<\/p>\n<p>Again, if conscience and history (both of them, to the prophets, being witnesses of God) thus combine to announce the early doom of a civilization, neither the religion that may-have helped to build it, nor any remnant virtue in it, nor its ancient value to God, can avail to save. We are tempted to judge that the long and costly development of ages is cruelly thrown away by the convulsion and collapse of an empire; it feels impious to think that the patience, the providence, the millennial discipline of the Almighty are to be in a moment abandoned to some rude and savage force. But we are wrong. &#8220;You only have I known of all the families of the ground,&#8221; yet I must &#8220;visit upon you your iniquities.&#8221; Nothing is too costly for justice. And God finds some other way of conserving the real results of the past.<\/p>\n<p>Again, it is a corollary of all this, that the sentence upon civilization must often seem to come by voices that are insane, and its execution by means that are criminal. Of course, when civilization is arraigned as a whole, and its overthrow demanded, there may be nothing behind the attack but jealousy or greed, the fanaticism of ignorant men or the madness of disordered lives. But this is not necessarily the case. For God has often in history chosen the outsider as the herald of doom, and sent the barbarian as its instrument. By the statesmen and patriots of Israel, Amos must have been regarded as a mere savage, with a savages hate of civilization. But we know what he answered when Amaziah called him rebel. And it was not only for its suddenness that the apostles said the &#8220;day of the Lord should come as a thief,&#8221; but also because of its methods. For over and over again has doom been pronounced, and pronounced truly, by men who in the eyes of civilization were criminals and monsters.<\/p>\n<p>Now apply these four principles to the question of ourselves. It will scarcely be denied that our civilization tolerates, and in part lives by, the existence of vices which, as we all admit, ruined the ancient empires. Are the political possibilities of overthrow also present? That there exist among us means of new historic convulsions is a thing hard for us to admit. But the signs cannot be hid. When we see the jealousies of the Christian peoples, and their enormous preparations for battle; the arsenals of Europe which a few sparks, may blow up; the millions of soldiers one mans word may mobilize; when we imagine the opportunities which a general war would furnish to the discontented masses of the European proletariat-we must surely acknowledge the existence of forces capable of inflicting calamities, so severe as to affect not merely this nationality or that type of culture, but the very vigor and progress of civilization herself; and all this without our looking beyond Christendom, or taking into account the rise of the yellow races to a consciousness of their approach to equality with ourselves. If, then, in the eyes of the Divine justice Christendom merits judgment, -if life continue to be left so hard to the poor; if innocence be still an impossibility for so much of the childhood of the Christian nations; if with so many of the leaders of civilization prurience be lifted to the level of an art, and licentiousness followed as a cult; if we continue to pour the evils of our civilization upon the barbarian, and &#8220;the vices of our young nobles,&#8221; to paraphrase Juvenal, &#8220;are aped in&#8221; Hindustan, -then let us know that the means of a judgment more awful than any which has yet scourged a delinquent civilization are extant and actual among us. And if one should reply, that our Christianity makes all the difference, that God cannot undo the development of nineteen centuries, or cannot overthrow the peoples of His Son, -let us remember that God does justice at whatever cost; that as He did not spare Israel at the hands of Assyria, so He did not spare Christianity in the East when the barbarians of the desert found her careless and corrupt. &#8220;You only have I known of all the families of the ground, therefore will I visit upon you all your iniquities.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>THE PROBLEM THAT AMOS LEFT<\/p>\n<p>AMOS was a preacher of righteousness almost wholly in its judicial and punitive offices. Exposing the moral conditions of society in his day, emphasizing on the one hand its obduracy and on the other the intolerableness of it, he asserted that nothing could avert the inevitable doom-neither Israels devotion to Jehovah nor Jehovahs interest in Israel. &#8220;You alone have I known of all the families of the ground: therefore will I visit upon you all your iniquities.&#8221; The visitation was to take place in war and in the captivity of the people. This is practically the whole message of the prophet Amos.<\/p>\n<p>That he added to it the promise of restoration which now closes his book, we have seen to be extremely improbable. Yet even if that promise is his own, Amos does not tell us how the restoration is to be brought about. With Wonderful insight and patience he has traced the captivity of Israel to moral causes. But he does not show what moral change in the exiles is to justify their restoration, or by what means such a moral change is to be effected. We are left to infer the conditions and the means of redemption from the principles which Amos enforced while there yet seemed time to pray for the doomed people: &#8220;Seek the Lord and ye shall live.&#8221; (Amo 5:4) According to this, the moral renewal of Israel must precede their restoration; but the prophet seems to make no great effort to effect the renewal. In short Amos illustrates the easily-forgotten truth that a preacher to the conscience is not necessarily a preacher of repentance.<\/p>\n<p>Of the great antitheses between which religion moves, Law and Love, Amos had therefore been the prophet of Law. But we must not imagine that the association of Love with the Deity was strange to him. This could not be to any Israelite who remembered the past of his people-the romance of their origins and early struggles for freedom. Israel had always felt the grace of their God; and unless we be wrong about the date of the great poem in the end of Deuteronomy, they had lately celebrated that grace in lines of exquisite beauty and tenderness:-<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;He found him in a desert land, In a waste and a howling wilderness. He compassed him about, cared for him, Kept him as the apple of His eye. As an eagle stirreth up his nest, Fluttereth over his young, Spreadeth his wings, taketh them, Beareth them up on his pinions-So Jehovah alone led him.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The patience of the Lord with their waywardness and their stubbornness had been the ethical influence on Israels life at a time when they had probably neither code of law nor system of doctrine. &#8220;Thy gentleness,&#8221; as an early Psalmist says for his people, &#8220;Thy gentleness hath made me great.&#8221; {Psa 18:1-50} Amos is not unaware of this ancient grace of Jehovah. But he speaks of it in a fashion which shows that he feels it to be exhausted and without hope for his generation &#8220;I brought you up out of the land of Egypt, and led you forty years in the wilderness, to possess the land of the Amorites. And I raised up of your sons for prophets and of your young men for Nazarites.&#8221; {Amo 2:10} But this can now only fill the cup of the nations sin. &#8220;You alone have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore will I visit upon you all your iniquities.&#8221; {Amo 3:2} Jehovahs ancient Love but strengthens now the justice and the impetus of His Law.<\/p>\n<p>We perceive, then, the problem which Amos left to prophecy. It was not to discover Love in the Deity whom he had so absolutely identified with Law. The Love of God needed no discovery among a people with the Deliverance, the Exodus, the Wilderness, and the Gift of the Land in their memories. But the problem was to prove in God so great and new a mercy as was capable of matching that Law, which the abuse of His millennial gentleness now only the more fully justified. There was needed a prophet to arise with as keen a conscience of Law as Amos himself, and yet affirm that Love was greater still; to admit that Israel were doomed, and yet promise their redemption by processes as reasonable and as ethical as those by which the doom had been rendered inevitable. The prophet of Conscience had to be followed by the prophet of Repentance.<\/p>\n<p>Such a one was found in Hosea, the son of Beeri, a citizen and probably a priest of Northern Israel, whose very name, Salvation, the synonym of Joshua and of Jesus, breathed the larger hope, which it was his glory to bear to his people. Before we see how for this task Hosea was equipped with the love and sympathy which Amos lacked, let us do two things. Let us appreciate the magnitude of the task itself, set to him first of prophets; and let us remind ourselves that, greatly as he achieved it, the task was not one which could be achieved even by him once for all, but that it presents itself to religion again and again in the course of her development.<\/p>\n<p>For the first of these duties, it is enough to recall how much all subsequent prophecy derives from Hosea. We shall not exaggerate if we say that there is no truth uttered by later prophets about the Divine Grace, which we do not find in germ in him. Isaiah of Jerusalem was a greater statesman and a more powerful writer, but he had not Hoseas tenderness and insight into motive and character. Hoseas marvelous sympathy both with the people and with God is sufficient to foreshadow every grief, every hope, every gospel, which make the Books of Jeremiah and the great Prophet of the Exile exhaustless in their spiritual value for mankind. These others explored the kingdom of God: it was Hosea who took it by storm. {Mat 11:12} He is the first prophet of Grace, Israels earliest Evangelist; yet with as keen a sense of law, and of the inevitableness of ethical discipline, as Amos himself.<\/p>\n<p>But the task which Hosea accomplished was not one that could be accomplished once for all. The interest of his book is not merely historical. For so often as a generation is shocked out of its old religious ideals, as Amos shocked Israel, by a realism and a discovery of law, which have no respect for ideals, however ancient and however dear to the human heart, but work their own pitiless way to doom inevitable; so often must the Book of Hosea have a practical value for living men. At such a crisis we stand today. The older Evangelical assurance, the older Evangelical ideals have to some extent been rendered impossible by the realism to which the sciences, both physical and historical, have most healthily recalled us, and by their wonderful revelation of Law working through nature and society without respect to our creeds and pious hopes. The question presses: Is it still possible to believe in repentance and conversion, still possible to preach the power of God to save, whether the individual or society, from the forces of heredity and of habit? We can at least learn how Hosea mastered the very similar problem which Amos left to him, and how, with a moral realism no less stern than his predecessor and a moral standard every whit as high, he proclaimed Love to be the ultimate element in religion; not only because it moves man to a repentance and God to a redemption more sovereign than any law; but because if neglected or abused, whether as love of man or love of God, it enforces a doom still more inexorable than that required by violated truth or by outraged justice. Love our Savior, Love our almighty and unfailing Father, but, just because of this, Love our most awful Judge-we turn to the life and the message in which this eternal theme was first unfolded.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hear this word that the LORD hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, 1. the whole family ] The expression used includes naturally Judah, though, as the context shews, Amos is practically thinking only of Israel. For family, used in &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-amos-31\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Amos 3:1&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22407","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22407","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22407"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22407\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22407"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22407"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22407"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}