{"id":22575,"date":"2022-09-24T09:35:18","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T14:35:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-jonah-36\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T09:35:18","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T14:35:18","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-jonah-36","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-jonah-36\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Jonah 3:6"},"content":{"rendered":"

For word came unto the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, and he laid his robe from him, and covered [him] with sackcloth, and sat in ashes. <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n

6<\/strong>. For word came unto<\/em> ] Rather, And the tidings reached<\/strong>, R.V. The introduction of the word “for” for “and” in A.V. is of the nature of a gloss. Our translators appear to have taken the view that Jon 3:5<\/em><\/span> states generally<\/em> the effect of Jonah’s preaching upon the Ninevites, and that Jon 3:6-9<\/em><\/span> relate more particularly how the fast mentioned in Jon 3:5<\/em><\/span> was brought about. “They proclaimed a fast,” I said, “and it was by a royal edict that they did so, for<\/em> the report of what was going on was brought to the king, and he too was moved like his people, and both inaugurated in his own person and instituted by his authority a national fast.” The statement in Jon 3:5<\/em><\/span>, however, is not necessarily proleptical. It may be intended by the writer to describe the effect produced in each district of the city as Jonah reached it, before<\/em> the Court had any knowledge of what was going on. The people were first impressed, and then their rulers. The tide of penitence and humiliation rose higher and higher, till it reached and included the king and his nobles, and what had been done by spontaneous action, or local authority, received the final sanction and imprimatur of the central government. Whichever view be adopted, the literal translation should be retained.<\/p>\n

he arose from his throne<\/em>, &c.] It is in favour of the view that the people did not wait for the royal edict to commence their fast, that the king himself seems to have been the subject of immediate and strong emotion, as soon as the tidings reached him. He first, as by a resistless impulse, humbled himself to the dust, and then took measures, out of the depth of his humiliation, that his subjects should be humbled with him.<\/p>\n

The outward form which the humiliation both of king and people took was that common in the East (comp. Eze 26:16<\/span>; and see Dictionary of the Bible<\/em>, Article Mourning<\/em>), as we know both from sacred and secular writings. In the case of the king of Assyria it is the more remarkable both because of his characteristic pride as “the great king” (2Ki 18:19<\/span>; 2Ki 18:28<\/span>), and because of the pomp and luxury with which he was ordinarily surrounded. No greater contrast could well be conceived than between the royal “robe” and “sackcloth,” or between the heap of “ashes” and the king’s “throne.” “In the bas-relief I am describing,” writes Layard, “the dress of a king consisted of a long flowing garment, edged with fringes and tassels, descending to his ankles, and confined at the waist by a girdle. Over this robe a second, similarly ornamented and open in front, appears to have been thrown. From his shoulders fell a cape or hood, also adorned with tassels, and to it were attached two long ribbons or lappets. He wore the conical mitre, or tiara, which distinguishes the monarch in Assyrian bas-reliefs, and appears to have been reserved for him alone Around the neck of the king was a necklace. He wore ear-rings, and his arms, which were bare from a little above the elbow, were encircled by armlets and bracelets remarkable for the beauty of their forms. The clasps were formed by the heads of animals, and the centre by stars and rosettes, probably inlaid with precious stones.” ( Nineveh<\/em>, abridged edition, 1851, p. 97.)<\/p>\n

Of the throne the same writer says, “The thrones or arm-chairs, supported by animals and human figures, resemble those of the ancient Egyptians, and of the monuments of Kouyunjik, Khorsabad and Persepolis. They also remind us of the throne of Solomon, which had ‘stays (or arms) on either side on the place of the seat, and two lions stood by the stays<\/em>. And twelve lions stood there, on the one side and on the other, upon the six steps.’ ” 1Ki 10:19-20<\/span>. ( lb.<\/em> p. 164.)<\/p>\n

his robe<\/em> ] The same word is used of Achan’s “goodly Babylonish garment,” Jos 7:21<\/span>, which this may have resembled. But it is also used of a garment of rough hair-cloth, Gen 25:25<\/span>; Zec 13:4<\/span>, and of Elijah’s hairy “mantle,” or cloak, 1Ki 19:13 ; 1Ki 19:19<\/span>. The root-meaning of the word is size, amplitude.<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

For word came – <\/B>, rather, And the matter came, i. e., the whole account, as we say. The word, word, throughout Holy Scripture, as in so many languages stands for that which is reported of. The whole account, namely, how this stranger, in strange austere attire, had come, what had happened to him before he came, how he preached, how the people had believed him, what they had done, as had just been related, came to the king. The form of words implies that what Jonah relates in this verse took place after what had been mentioned before. People are slow to carry to sovereigns matters of distress, in which they cannot help. This was no matter of peril from man, in which the counsel or energy of the king could be of use. Anyhow it came to him last. But when it came to him, he disdained not to follow the example of those below him. He was not jealous of his prerogative, or that his advice had not been had; but, in the common peril, acted as his subjects had, and humbled himself as they did. Yet this king was the king of Nineveh, the king, whose name was dreaded far and wide, whose will none who disputed, prospered . He who was accounted and was the greatest of the kings of the earth, was not held back by any thought of his own splendor, greatness or dignity, from fleeing as a suppliant to the mercy of God, and inciting others by his example to the same earnesthess. The kings of Assyria were religious, according to their light. They ascribed all their victories to their god, Asshur . When the king came to hear of One who had a might such as he had not seen, he believed in Him.<\/P>

And he arose from his throne – <\/B>He lost no time; he heard, and he arose . It denotes great earnestness, haste, diligence. And he laid his robe from him. This was the large costly upper garment, so called from its amplitude It is the name of the goodly Babylonian garment Jos 7:21<\/span> which Achan coveted. As worn by kings, it was the most magnificent part of their dress, and a special part of their state. Kings were buried as they lived, in splendid apparel; and rich adornments were buried with them. The king of Nineveh dreads no charge of precipitancy nor mans judgment . He exchanges purple, gold, gems for the simple rough and sordid sackcloth, and his throne for the most abject ashes, the humblest thing he could do, fulfilling a deeper degree of humility than is related of the people.<\/P>

Strange credulity, had Jonahs message not been true; strange madness of unbelief which does not repent when a Greater than Jonah cries Mat 4:17<\/span>, Repent ye, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. Strange garb for the king, in the eyes of a luxurious age; acceptable in His who said Mat 11:21<\/span>, if the mighty works which have been done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes . Many wish to repent, yet so as not to part with their luxuries or the vanity of their dress, like the Greek who said he would like to be a philosopher, yet in a few things, not altogether. To whom we may answer, delicate food and costly dress agree not with penitence; and that is no great grief which never comes to light . It was a marvelous thing, that purple was outvied by sackcloth. Sackcloth availed, what the purple robe availed not. What the diadem accomplished not, the ashes accomplished. Seest thou, I said not groundlessly that we should fear, not fasting but drunkenness and satiety? For drunkenness and satiety shook the city through and through, and were about to overthrow it; when it was reeling and about to fall, fasting stablished it . The king had conquered enemies by valor; he conquered God by humility. Wise king, who, for the saving of his people, owns himself a sinner rather than a king. He forgets that he is a king, fearing God, the King of all; he remembereth not his own power, coming to own the power of the Godhead. Marvelous! While he remembereth not that he is a king of men, he beginneth to be a king of righteousness. The prince, becoming religious, lost not his empire but changed it. Before, he held the princedom of military discipline; now, he obtained the princedom in heavenly disciplines.<\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Verse 6<\/span>. Word came unto the king<\/B><\/I>] This, some think, was Pul<\/I>; others, Sardanapalus<\/I> his son, king of Assyria, who flourished in the reign of Jeroboam the Second: but it seems more probable that the monarch here alluded to was a king of Assyria contemporary with Joash, king of Judah. It was by the decree of the king that the fast was instituted, and became general.<\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

This now accounteth for the peoples proclaiming a fast, Jon 3:5<\/span>, they did it because it was commanded, and they had the kings example herein. <\/P>

Word came to the king:<\/B> whether Jonah did particularly speak to his hearers to send word to the king, or whether the strangeness of the thing might move some or other to report it to the courtiers, and they to the king, is not specified; certain it is that the king had word brought him, and it was considered by him: nor is it said who this king was; Sardanapalus seems too early, Pul-belochus is with more probability thought to be this king. <\/P>

Arose from his throne; <\/B>came down from his royal seat. <\/P>

Laid his robe from him; <\/B>put off his rich, gorgeous, and luxurious apparel. <\/P>

Covered him with sackcloth; <\/B>put on the rough and uneasy garments of a mourner. <\/P>

And sat in ashes, <\/B>as Est 4:3<\/span>; Job 2:8<\/span>; 42:6<\/span>. <\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

6. in ashes<\/B>emblem of thedeepest humiliation (Job 2:8<\/span>;Eze 27:30<\/span>).<\/P><\/p>\n

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

For word came unto the king of Nineveh<\/strong>,…. Who was not Sardanapalus, a very dissolute prince, and abandoned to his lusts; but rather Pul, the same that came against Menahem king of Israel,<\/p>\n

2Ki 15:19<\/span>, as Bishop Usher s thinks; to him news were brought that there was such a prophet come into the city, and published such and such things, which met with credit among the people; and that these, of all ranks and degrees, age and sex, were afflicted with it, and thrown into the utmost concern about it; so very swiftly did the ministry of Jonah spread in the city; and what he delivered was so quickly carried from one to another, that in one day’s time it reached the palace, and the royal ear:<\/p>\n

and he arose from his throne<\/strong>; where he sat in great majesty and splendour, encircled by his nobles, receiving their caresses and compliments; or, it may be, giving audience to foreign ambassadors, sent to court his friendship and alliance; or hearing causes, and redressing the grievances of his subjects; for he appears to be one that did not indulge himself in hunting, and such like exercises, or in his lusts and pleasures:<\/p>\n

and he laid his robe from him<\/strong>; his royal apparel, his imperial robe, and garments of his glory, as the Targum; or his glorious garments, with which he was richly and most magnificently arrayed; he put off these, and left his throne, in token of his concern at hearing such dismal tidings as the overthrow of his capital city, and of his humiliation and abasement:<\/p>\n

and covered [him] with sackcloth<\/strong>; which was very rough and coarse, and must be very disagreeable to a person so tender and delicate, and was what the meanest of his subjects wore on this occasion:<\/p>\n

and sat in ashes<\/strong>; or “in the” or “that ashes” t; used in such times of mourning, which were either strewed under him, or put upon his head; and this, with the other, were done to afflict the body, and affect the mind with a sense of sin, and the misery threatened for sin, and to shaw deep humiliation for it.<\/p>\n

s Annales Vet. Test. A. M. 3233. Vid. Rollin’s Ancient History, vol. 2. p. 30. t “in cinere illo”, Vatablus, Tarnovius.<\/p>\n

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

It is uncertain whether Jonah had preached for some days in the city before it was known to the king. This is indeed the common opinion; for interpreters so expound the verse, which says that word was brought to the king, as though the king himself knew, that the whole city was in commotion through the preaching of Jonah: but the words admit of a different sense, that is that the preaching of Jonah immediately reached the king; and I am disposed to take this view, as Jonah seems here to explain how the Ninevites were led to put on sackcloth. He had before spoken briefly on the subject, but he now explains what took place more fully; and we know that it was commonly the manner of the Hebrews — to relate the chief points in few words, and then to add an explanation. As then Jonah had said in the last verse that the Ninevites had put on sackcloth, and proclaimed a fast, so he now seems to express more distinctly how this happened, that is, through the royal edict. And it is by no means probable that a fast was proclaimed in the royal city by the mere consent of the people, as the king and his counselors were there present. Inasmuch then as it appears more reasonable that the edict respecting the fast had proceeded from the king, I am therefore inclined so to connect the two verses, as that the first briefly mentions the fruit which followed the preaching of Jonah, and that the second is added as an explanation, for it gives a fuller account of what took place. <\/p>\n

Jonah then now says, that a fast was proclaimed by the Ninevites, for the king and his council had so appointed: and I regard the verb ויגע, uigo, as being in the pluperfect tense, When word had come to the king; (45) for Jonah now states the reason why the Ninevites proclaimed a fast; it was because the king had been apprised of the preaching of Jonah, and had called together his counselors. It was then a public edict, and not any movement among the people, capriciously made, as it sometimes happens. He says, that it was an edict published by the authority of the king and his council, or his nobles. At the same time, some take טעם, thom, as meaning reason or approbation. טעם, thom, means to taste, and Jonah afterwards uses the verb in this sense; but it is to be taken here in a metaphorical sense for counsel; And I think this meaning is more suitable to this passage. I come now to the subject. <\/p>\n

It is worthy of being noticed, that the king of so splendid a city (46), nay, at that time the greatest monarch, should have rendered himself so submissive to the exhortation of Jonah: for we see how proud kings are; as they think themselves exempt from the common lot of men, so they carry themselves above all laws. Hence it comes, that they will have all things to be lawful for them; and while they give loose reins to their lusts they cannot bear to be admonished, even by their equals. But Jonah was a stranger and of a humble condition: that he therefore so touched the heart of the king, must be ascribed to the hidden power of God, which he puts forth through his word whenever he pleases. God does not indeed work alike by the preaching of his word, he does not always keep to the same course; but, when he pleases, he so efficaciously touches the hearts of men, that the success of his word exceeds all expectation, as in the memorable example presented to us here. Who could have said that a heathen king, who had ever lived according to his own will, who had no feeling as to true and genuine religion, would have been thus in an instant subdued? For he put aside his royal dress, laid himself in the dust, and clothed himself in sackcloth. We hence see that God not only spoke by the mouth of Jonah, but added power to his word. <\/p>\n

We must also bear in mind what Christ says, that the men of Nineveh would rise up in judgment against that generation, as they had repented at the preaching of Jonah; and “Behold,” he said, “a greater than Jonah is here,” (Mat 12:41<\/span>.) Christ, at this day, proclaims the voice of his Gospel; for though he is not here in a visible form among us, he yet speaks by his ministers. If we despise his doctrine, how can our obstinacy and hardness be excused, since the Ninevites, who had no knowledge of the true doctrine of religion, who were imbued with no religious principles, were so suddenly converted by the preaching of Jonah? And that their repentance was sincere we may conclude from this circumstance — that the preaching of Jonah was severe, for he denounced destruction on a most powerful city; this might have instantly inflamed the king’s mind with rage and fury; and that he was calmly humbled, was certainly a proof of no common change. We have then here a remarkable instance of penitence, — that the king should have so forgotten himself and his dignity, as to throw aside his splendid dress, to put on sackcloth, and to lie down on ashes. <\/p>\n

But as to fasting and sackcloth, it is very true, as we have observed in our remarks on Joel, that repentance consists not in these external things: for God cares not for outward rites, and all those things which are resplendent in the sight of men are worthless before him; what indeed he requires, is sincerity of heart. Hence what Jonah here says of fasting, and other outward performances, ought to be referred to their legitimate end, — that the Ninevites intended thus to show that they were justly summoned as guilty before God’s tribunal, and also, that they humbly deprecated the wrath of their judge. Fasting then and sackcloth were only an external profession of repentance. Were any one to fast all his life, and to put on sackcloth, and to scatter dust on himself, and not to connect with all this a sincerity of heart, he would do nothing but mock God. (47) Hence these outward performances are, in themselves, of small or of no value, except when preceded by an interior feeling of heart, and men be on this account led to manifest such outward evidences. Whenever then Scripture mentions fasting, and ashes, and sackcloth, we must bear in mind that these things are set before us as the outward signs of repentance which when not genuine do nothing else but provoke the wrath of God; but when true, they are approved of God on account of the end in view, and not that they avail, of themselves, to pacify his wrath, or to expiate sins. <\/p>\n

If now any one asks whether penitence is always to be accompanied with fasting, ashes, and sackcloth, the answer is at hand, — that the faithful ought through their whole life to repent: for except everyone of us continually strives to renounce himself and his former life, he has not yet learned what it is to serve God; for we must ever contend with the flesh. But though there is a continual exercise of repentance, yet fasting is not required of us always. It then follows that fasting is a public and solemn testimony of repentance, when there appears to be some extraordinary evidence of God’s wrath. Thus have we seen that the Jews were by Joel called to lie in ashes, and to put on sackcloth because God had come forth, as it were, armed against them; and all the Prophets had declared that destruction was nigh the people. In the same manner the Ninevites, when terrified by this dreadful edict, put on sackcloth proclaimed a fasts because this was usually done in extremities. We now then perceive why the king, having himself put on sackcloth, enjoined on the whole people both fasting and other tokens of repentance. <\/p>\n

(45) Grotius, as well as Junius and Tremelius, had the same view of the verse, by rendering the verb in the tense here proposed. Quia pervenerat is the version of the former; and the version of the latter is, Quu enim pervenisset Our own version and that of Newcome seem also to favor this view, by rendering ו “for,” as giving a reason for what is said in the preceding verse: but Henderson has “and,” and Marckius the same, and also the Septuagint. What Calvin states as to the manner of speaking often adopted in Hebre, is no doubt true. But Henry thinks that the people “led the way,” and that what they commenced was afterwards enforced and made general by the order of the king and his nobles. — Ed. <\/p>\n

(46) Who this king was is a matter of conjecture. “About thirteen years,” says Newcome, “after the death of Jeroboam II., king of Israel, Pul, king of Assyria, invaded Israel. So that Pul, or his predecessor, may have been the king here mentioned.” Others think that he was Sardanapalus, a character notorious in history for his luxurious, effeminate, and debauched life. — Ed. <\/p>\n

(47) Ον τη νηστεια προσεσχεν, αλλα τη αποχη των κακων — “He [God] did not regard fasting, but abstinence from evils.” — Theodoret. “It is not enough,” says Henry, “to fast for sin, but we must fast from sin, and in order to the success of our prayers, must no more regard iniquity in our hearts… The work of a fast-day is not done with the day; no, then the hardest and most needful part of the work begins, which is to turn from sin, and to live a new life, and not to return with the dog to his vomit.” — Ed. <\/p>\n

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

(6) For word came.<\/strong>Rather, And the matter reached.<\/em> The Authorised Version treats the royal edict that follows as the same with the proclamation<\/em> in Jon. 3:5<\/span>. This is possible, but it is more probable that the writer intended to describe the effect produced on each district of the vast city in succession, and on all grades of people. The piercing cry uttered from street to street, from square to square, reaches at last the king on his throne of state.<\/p>\n

And he laid<\/strong> . . .Stripping off the state mantle (the Hebrew word implies amplitude.<\/em> See 1Ki. 19:13<\/span>.) It is interesting to find it used of the Babylonish garment, found in Achans tent. See Jos. 7:21<\/span>), the monarch assumes a mourning dress. To form a conception of the change involved, the descriptions of Assyrian royal magnificence should be studied in Layard, or their representations in the Assyrian courts of the Crystal Palace. For the usual signs of Oriental mourning, comp. Gen. 37:34<\/span>; 2Sa. 3:31<\/span>; Job. 2:8<\/span>; Psa. 35:13<\/span>; Eze. 26:16<\/span>, &c.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

‘And the news reached the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, and laid his robe from him, and covered himself with sackcloth, and sat in ashes.’<\/p>\n

The news of their response reached the king of Nineveh. The fact that the news had taken some time to reach him may suggest that he was in one of the other sister-cities at the time. And on hearing what had happened, and no doubt Jonah’s message, he too responded, rose from his throne, and covered himself with sackcloth and sat in ashes. If the forces of Urartu were at present in the ascendancy we can appreciate why such a message as Jonah’s might cause such a stir. The idea that Nineveh might be overthrown could well have been seen as a real possibility. An appeal to the gods would then be seen as their only hope. But we are not given the reason, only the result.<\/p>\n

The description ‘king of Nineveh’ does not conflict with the fact that he was also king of Assyria. To speak of a king in terms of a principal city was common practise (see e.g. 1Ki 21:1<\/span>; Deu 4:2<\/span>; Deu 4:23<\/span>, with Deu 1:4<\/span>; Deu 3:2<\/span>; Deu 4:46<\/span>; Jdg 4:17<\/span> with Jdg 4:2<\/span>; Jdg 4:23<\/span>). In this case it emphasised his close relationship with Nineveh.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Jon 3:6<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>For word came unto the king of Nineveh<\/em><\/strong><\/strong> For word had come, <\/em>or, For the thing had reached unto, <\/em>&c. This king most probably was Pul, the father of Sardanapalus, who, dying about the year of the world 3237, might have been upon the throne at the time when Jonah went to Nineveh; for this happened under Jeroboam the second. See Calmet, and Usher. <\/p>\n

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Jon 3:6 For word came unto the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, and he laid his robe from him, and covered [him] with sackcloth, and sat in ashes.<\/p>\n

Ver. 6. For word came unto the king of Nineveh<\/strong> ] I can hardly believe that this was Sardanapalus, as some will carry it, but some other better prince, that, Vespasian-like, was patientissimus veri,<\/em> very tolerant of the truth, one that had those about him that would tell him the truth of things, and he was content to hear it, and submit to it (Quintilian). Like enough it is, that this was but harsh news to him at first hearing; but when he had well considered it, and taken advice upon it, he set upon a reformation. Our chroniclers tell us of a poor hermit that came to Richard I, A. D. 1195, and, preaching to him the words of eternal life, bade him be mindful of the overthrow of Sodom, and to abstain from things unlawful. Otherwise, said he, the deserved vengeance of God will come upon thee. The hermit being gone, the king at first seemed to slight his words. But, afterwards falling sick, he more seriously bethought himself; and, waxing sound in soul as well as body, he grew more devout and charitable to the poor, rising early and not departing from the church till divine service were finished. If the King of Nineveh had ever heard of Jonah’s being in the whale’s belly, it might well be some inducement to him to believe his preaching, it might do him no less good than John Frith’s book, called “A Preparation to the Cross,” brought in a fish’s belly to the University of Cambridge a little before the commencement, did to some good people here, that had hearts to make use of it. One grave divine (Mr Jeremiah Dike) gave this note upon it in a sermon before the parliament, over 20 years since: That such a book should be brought in such a manner, and to such a place, and at such a time, when by reason of people’s confluence out of all parts notice might be given to all places of the land, in mine apprehension it can be construed for no less than a Divine warning, and to have this voice with it, England, prepare for the cross. <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

He arose from his throne<\/strong> ] Laid aside his state, as the Great Turk also doth, at this day, when he entereth into his temple to pray. Jer 13:18<\/span> , “Say unto the king and to the queen, Humble yourselves, sit down: for your principalities shall come down, even to the crown of your glory.” This great king could not but know himself to be a great sinner; and that his sins had done much harm: 1. By imputation: for plectuntur Achivi,<\/em> the people often pray for their rulers’ follies, as in David’s days, 2Sa 24:2<\/span> . By imitation: for magnates are magnets, they draw many by their example; and as bad humours flow from the head to the body, so do bad rulers corrupt the rest. This conscious and (as some think) conscientious king therefore riseth up from his throne (as Eglon, that unwieldy king of Moab, had once done to hear God’s message by Ehud, Jdg 3:20 ), et qui paulo ante sedebat superbus in folio, nunc iacet humilis in solo,<\/em> he lieth low, and putteth his mouth in the dust, Lam 3:29<\/span> , laying aside all cogitation and pride of his kingly majesty; together with all soft and sumptuous raiment, that nest of pride, as one calleth it. <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

He laid his robe from him<\/strong> ] Paludamentum suum,<\/em> saith Tremelius; but that is a cloak which the Roman emperors used to put on when they went forth to battle, and therefore not so proper here (as Piscator thinks), since there was no visible enemy, which makes the Ninevites’ repentance the more remarkable. Mercer rendereth it Chlamydem suam,<\/em> his imperial cloak; the Chaldee, his precious garments. The word signifieth his sumptuous and gorgeous attire, his cloak of state, no less costly, perhaps, than that of Alcisthenes, the Sybarite, sold to the Carthaginians by Dionysius for 120 talents; or that of Demetrius of Macedon, which none of his successors would wear, propter invidiosam impendii magnificentiam,<\/em> for the exceeding great costliness thereof. This robe or purple and other ornaments the King of Nineveh laid aside, as was fit, in this day of restraint, as a fast day is fitly called. So “the children of Israel stripped themselves of their ornaments by the mount Horeb,” where they had made a golden calf, Exo 33:6<\/span> . “For the Lord had said to Moses, Say unto the children of Israel, Ye are a stiffnecked people: I will come up into the midst of thee, and consume thee: therefore now put off thy ornaments from thee, that I may know what to do unto thee,” Exo 33:5<\/span> , that I may determine how to dispose of thee: and this is spoken after the manner of men, who judge by the outward actions, as Gen 18:21<\/span> ; Gen 22:12<\/span> , for otherwise, God knoweth all his works from the beginning of the world, Act 15:18<\/span> . But he speaketh this here as if he would hereby judge by their repentance, whether it were true or false. The prophet Isaiah objects it to those of his time for a foul fault, “Behold, in the day of your fast ye find your pleasure,” Isa 58:3<\/span> . <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

And covered him with sackcloth<\/strong> ] And so, as Chrysostom hath it, quod non poterat diadema, id saccus obtinuit; sicut ferrum potest quod aurum non potest.<\/em> Sackcloth could prevail more than silk, as iron can do what gold cannot. <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

And sat in ashes<\/strong> ] In cinere illo,<\/em> so Vatablus rendereth it; in that ashes wherein he used to sit when he most mourned. Our sorrow for sin should be the deepest of all sorrows, Zec 12:11-13<\/span> . See Trapp on “<\/em> Zec 12:11 “<\/em> See Trapp on “<\/em> Zec 12:12 “<\/em> See Trapp on “<\/em> Zec 12:13 “<\/em> <\/p>\n

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

word: Jer 13:18 <\/p>\n

and he arose: Psa 2:10-12, Jam 1:9, Jam 1:10, Jam 4:6-10 <\/p>\n

and covered: Est 4:1-4, Job 2:8, Job 42:6, Jer 6:26, Lam 3:29, Dan 9:3, Mic 1:10, Mat 11:21, Luk 10:13 <\/p>\n

Reciprocal: Exo 9:20 – General Exo 33:4 – and no Jos 7:6 – put dust 1Ki 20:31 – put sackcloth 1Ki 21:27 – he rent 2Ki 22:11 – that he rent 1Ch 21:16 – clothed Isa 15:3 – their streets Isa 22:12 – to baldness Isa 37:1 – he rent Isa 47:1 – down Isa 58:3 – in Jer 36:13 – General Jer 36:24 – nor rent Lam 3:16 – covered me with ashes Eze 26:16 – come Eze 27:30 – they shall wallow Zec 12:12 – the family of the house of David apart Act 9:9 – General<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Jon 3:6. This verse tells us that the foregoing actions of the people had been by the direction of the king. He also set the example of penitence by temporarily deposing himself and putting on the customary sackcloth and sitting in the ashes.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Jon 3:5 could be a general record of the response of the Ninevites and Jon 3:6-9 a more detailed account of what happened. Even the king responded by repenting. The king of Nineveh would probably have been the king of Assyria since Nineveh was a leading city of the empire. Similarly King Ahab of Israel was the "king of Samaria" (1Ki 21:1), King Ahaziah of Israel was the "king of Samaria" (2Ki 1:3), and King Ben-hadad of Aram was the "king of Damascus" (2Ch 24:23). However the writer described this man as the king of Nineveh. The explanation may be that the focus of Jonah’s prophecy was specifically Nineveh (Jon 3:4), not the whole Assyrian Empire. His name, though of interest to us, was unnecessary to the writer.<\/p>\n

Who was this king? He was probably one of the Assyrian kings who ruled during or near the regency of Jeroboam II in Israel (793-753 B.C.). [Note: See The Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament, p. 1463.] <\/span><\/p>\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n
\n

Assyrian Kings Contemporary with Jeroboam II<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Adad-nirari III<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

811-783 B.C.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Shalmaneser IV<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

783-772 B.C.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Ashur-dan III<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

772-754 B.C.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Ashur-nirari V<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

754-746 B.C.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

Of these perhaps Ashur-dan III is the most likely possibility. [Note: Stuart, pp. 491-97.] <\/span><\/p>\n

". . . the first half of the eighth century is one of the most poorly documented periods of Assyrian history." [Note: Alexander, p. 123.] <\/span><\/p>\n

"There is something affecting in the picture of this Oriental monarch so swiftly casting aside such gorgeous robes and taking the place of the penitent. He had the virtue of not holding back in his approach to God." [Note: Gaebelein, p. 106.] <\/span><\/p>\n

"It must be remembered that an Assyrian king, as a syncretist, would hardly wish automatically to deny the validity of any god or any prophet. And does not an outsider often command far more respect than those with whom one regularly deals-even in the case of prophets and other clergy (cf. Melchizedek and Abraham, Gen 14:17-24; Moses and Pharaoh, Exodus 5-14; Balaam and Balak, Numbers 22-24; the Levite from Bethlehem and the Danites, Judges 17-18; etc.)?" [Note: Stuart, p. 491.] <\/span><\/p>\n

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

For word came unto the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, and he laid his robe from him, and covered [him] with sackcloth, and sat in ashes. 6. For word came unto ] Rather, And the tidings reached, R.V. The introduction of the word “for” for “and” in A.V. is of the … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Jonah 3:6”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}