The string of his tongue was loosed – <\/B>The difficulty in his speaking was removed.<\/P> <\/p>\nFuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Verse 35<\/span>. He spake plain.<\/B><\/I>] , distinctly, without<\/I> stammering<\/I>. One MS. has, And he spoke, praising God<\/I>. There is no doubt of this: but the evangelist, I think, did not write these words.<\/P> <\/p>\n 35. And straightway his ears wereopened<\/B>This is mentioned first as the source of the otherderangement. <\/P> and the string of his tonguewas loosed, and he spake plain<\/B>The cure was thus alikeinstantaneous and perfect.<\/P><\/p>\n And straightway his ears were opened<\/strong>,…. It is in the Greek text, “his hearings”; the instruments of his hearing, and so rightly rendered, “his ears”: the Persic version reads, “both his ears”; but the word “both” is unnecessary, since the word, “ears”, takes in both. Such a power went along with the words of Christ, when he said, “be opened”; that immediately, as soon as ever the words were pronounced, the man’s hearing came to him, and he heard as quick as ever he did before he lost it, or, as any other man:<\/p>\n and the string of his tongue<\/strong>; which caused it to cleave to his jaws, or the roof of his mouth, and hindered him from speaking plainly,<\/p>\n was loosed, and he spake plain<\/strong>; , “easily”, as the Syriac version renders it; without any difficulty to himself, and so as to be readily understood by others. Thus those whose ears are opened, and whose tongues are loosed in a spiritual manner by Christ, speak plainly of what they have heard and seen, and felt; they can give a plain and clear account of the work of God upon their souls; how they have been convinced of the impurity of their nature, the corruptions of their hearts, and the exceeding sinfulness of sin, in heart, lip, and life; how they have seen Christ to be an all sufficient and suitable Saviour, and have been directed, and encouraged, to go to him, for healing, pardon, righteousness, and everlasting salvation; they can tell what promises have been applied to them, and what comforts they have enjoyed; how busy Satan has been with them; and what temptations of his they have been delivered out of, and by what means: in a word, they can speak plainly of the love of God to them; of the glories and excellencies of Christ; of their faith and hope in him, and love to him; and of the operations of the Spirit of God upon their hearts; and of the glories of the world to come, they are in the expectation of, so far as they are taught of God.<\/p>\n He spake plain <\/B> ( <\/SPAN><\/span>). He began to speak correctly. Inchoative imperfect tense. <\/P> <\/p>\n Plain [] <\/SPAN><\/span>. Lit., rightly. So Wyc.<\/P> <\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n 1) ”And straightway his ears were opened,” <\/strong>(kai enoigesan autou hai akoni) “And his ears were opened,” he was caused to hear, his deafness was gone, as declared Job 33:16<\/span>; Job 36:10<\/span>; Job 36:13-15<\/span>.<\/p>\n 2) “And the<\/strong> string of his tongue was loosed,” <\/strong>(kai euthus eluthe ho desmos tes glosses autou) ”And instantly the bond (impediment) of his tongue was loosened or released,” his tongue affliction became healed, or taken away, without any surgery, any operation.<\/p>\n 3) “And<\/strong> he spake plain.” <\/strong>(kai elalei orthos) ”And he spoke in a correct manner,” correctly, without an impediment, obstruction, impairment or a problem, emotionally or physically. This implies that he had formerly been able to make only inarticulate sounds, sounds without clear meaning or speech understanding, Isa 35:5-6<\/span>.<\/p>\n (35) His ears.<\/strong>Literally, his hearing,<\/em> or, as the word is in the plural, his organs of hearing.<\/em><\/p>\n The string of his tongue.<\/strong>Better, bond,<\/em> that which confined and hampered his speech. (Comp. Luk. 13:16<\/span>.) There is no ground for thinking that St. Mark used the word in any anatomical sense, as the English word seems to suggest, for a nerve or tendon, as in the eye-strings of the original text of the Rock of Ages.<\/p>\n 35<\/strong>. <\/strong> The string of his tongue was loosed <\/em> This cannot be well understood in a metaphorical sense, and therefore clearly shows that it was a case of a fettering membrane upon the tongue.<\/p>\n 35 And straightway his ears were opened, and the string of his tongue was loosed, and he spake plain. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n Ver. 35. His ears were opened<\/strong> ] So are the ears of all that belong to Christ, and their tongues loosed to his praise, which before were bound by Satan. Oh, pray that God would make the bore of our ears as wide as may be, and teach us that “pure language,” Zep 3:9<\/span> , that our tongues may run “as the pen of a ready writer,”Psa 45:1<\/span>Psa 45:1<\/span> . <\/p>\n 35. <\/strong> <\/strong> the hindrance, whatever it was, which prevented him from speaking before.<\/p>\n Mar 7:35<\/span> . , literally, the hearings, here the instruments of hearing, the ears. So often in classics. , he began to speak in a proper or ordinary manner, implying that in his dumb condition he had been able only to make inarticulate sounds.<\/p>\n straightway = immediately. See note on Mar 1:10, Mar 1:12. <\/p>\n string = band. Not a physiological or technical ex pression, but the bond of demoniac influence which is thus indicated. The Papyri contain detailed prescriptions for “binding” a man; and cases are particu larly common in which a man’s tongue is specially to be bound. See Prof. Deissmann’s Light from the Ancient East, pp. 306-310. The Lord alludes to this in Luk 13:16. <\/p>\n loosed. The demoniac’s fetters were loosed, and the work of Satan was undone. <\/p>\n spake = began speaking. <\/p>\n plain = correctly. Denoting the fact of articulation, not the words spoken. <\/p>\n 35. -the hindrance, whatever it was, which prevented him from speaking before.<\/p>\n Mar 7:35. ) that is to say, his powers of hearing. Not merely the one passage for sound in the ear.<\/p>\n Mar 2:12, Psa 33:9, Isa 32:3, Isa 32:4, Isa 35:5, Isa 35:6, Mat 11:5 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Mat 12:22 – he healed<\/p>\n 5<\/p>\n As usual, the cure was straightway and not a prolonged affair.<\/p>\n Mar 7:35. The string of his tongue, the impediment, whatever it was, was loosed, was removed.<\/p>\n And he spake plainly (or rightly ). It is not necessarily implied that he was able to speak in some way before the cure. Mark shows, in his account of the miracles, a preference for those healings, in which the gradual process of the cure, as connected with the instrument and the development of it, is vividly presented (Lange).<\/p>\n Verse 35 <\/p>\n The string of his tongue; the difficulty, whatever it was.<\/p>\n And straightway his ears were opened, and the string of his tongue was loosed, and he spake plain. The string of his tongue was loosed – The difficulty in his speaking was removed. Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible Verse 35. He spake plain.] , distinctly, without stammering. One MS. has, And he spoke, … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Mark 7:35”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24485\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"