{"id":24598,"date":"2022-09-24T10:39:36","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T15:39:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-mark-1023\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T10:39:36","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T15:39:36","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-mark-1023","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-mark-1023\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Mark 10:23"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 23<\/strong>. <em> looked round about<\/em> ] &ldquo;Spe describitur vultus Christi, affectui conveniens, et affectibus auditorum attemperatus.&rdquo; Bengel. Comp. <span class='bible'>Mar 3:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar 3:34<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar 8:34<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 6:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 22:61<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar 10:23-27<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! <\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Wealth a fearful snare to the soul<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Scriptures represent wealth, when used aright, as a distinguished blessing.<\/p>\n<p>It may, and ought to, lead men nearer to God, instead of driving them far from Him.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. <\/strong>The pride of life. The Scriptures speak of this as one of the most operative causes of human destruction. An inordinate and unreasonable self-esteem excludes God from the heart.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. <\/strong>A strong impression of their personal independence. Though men are absolutely dependent on God, and to a great extent on one another, there is in all a natural feeling of independence. Nor will it be denied that wealth is very apt to foster this unseemly self-reliance, and this haughty contempt of God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. <\/strong>Their attachment to this world. There is no room in the heart for God where it is preoccupied by the world.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. <\/strong>Their cares and perplexities. Wherever you fired the greatest amount of secular care and solicitude, there, rest assured, is the greatest danger of losing the soul.<\/p>\n<p><strong>V. <\/strong>The best means of grace are rarely used with the rich and affluent. God has formed no purpose to save any man irrespective of the appointed means. From these views several reflections may naturally arise.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>What melancholy evidence does this subject furnish of the strange depravity of the human heart.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Do not envy the rich.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Our subject then admonishes us to take care how we heap up riches.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>Our subject affectionately addresses itself to the rich. Of all those who have hope towards God, the rich are most in danger of losing the savour and usefulness of piety, and of being scarcely saved. And that your riches may prove a blessing, mud not a curse, set not your hearts upon them, be not conformed to this world, use this world as not abusing it, for the fashion of this world passeth away. You are Gods stewards, and must give an account of your stewardship. And to the rich who are not pious, let me say, is there not fearful reason to apprehend that you will never enter the kingdom of God? Everything is leagued against you.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. <\/strong>Let me say to all, while you envy not the affluent study to do them good. (<em>Gardiner Spring, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Use and abuse of riches<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Riches neither further nor hinder salvation in themselves, but as they are used: as a cipher by itself is nothing, but a figure being set before it, it increaseth the sum. Wealth, if well used, is an ornament, an encouragement to duty, and an instrument of much good. All the danger lies in loving these things. Have them we may, and use them too, as a traveller doth his staff, to help him the sooner to his journeys end; but when we pass away our hearts to them, they become a mischief  Let not, therefore, the bramble be king: let not earthly things bear rule over thy affections. fire will arise out of them, that will consume thy cedars, and emasculate all the powers of thy soul, as they did Solomons, whose wealth did him more hurt than his wisdom good. How many have we nowadays who, when poor, could read, pray, etc., but who, now they have grown rich, resemble the moon, which, grown full, gets farthest off from the sun, never suffers eclipse but then, and that by earths interposition! Let rich men therefore take heed how they handle their thorns: let them gird up the loins of their minds, lest their long garments hinder them in the way to heaven; let them see to it, that they be not tied to their abundance, as little Lentulus was said to have been to his long sword; that they be not held prisoners in those golden fetters, as the king of Armenia was by Anthony, and so sent by him as a present to Cleopatra; lest at length they send their mammon of unrighteousness, as Croesus did his fetters, for a present to the devil, who had deluded him with false hopes of victory. (<em>John Trapp.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Wealth not always desirable<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>How many can form any estimate as to whether it is best for them to be prosperous or not? If I should consult the wheat growing in spring in the field as to what was best for it, the wheat would say, Let me alone. Let the rain feed me. Let the winds gently strengthen me. Let me grow to my full height and size. But ah! the land on which that wheat is sown is over-rich; and if the wheat grows to its full height and size, it will be so fag and heavy that it will break, and fall down, and be lost. So the farmer turns in his cattle, and they browse the wheat. They eat it down to the ground. And by and by, later, when it is allowed to grow, it has been so weakened by this cruel pasturage that it will not become so rank as to break down, but will stand erect, and carry its head up, and ripen its grain. Many men will bear browsing. They get too fat, and cannot carry themselves upright and firm, and they break and fall down; and the best of them lies in the dirt; and all that stands up is straw and stubble  Who knows what is best for him? Some men can endure prosperity, and some cannot; but who can discriminate between them? (<em>H. W. Beecher.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Wealth genders pride<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Who almost is there whose heart does not swell with his bags? and whose thoughts do not follow the proportions of his condition? What difference has been seen in the same man poor and preferred? his mind, like a mushroom, has shot up in a night; his business is first to forget himself, and then his friends. When the sun shines, then the peacock displays his train. (<em>R. South, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The rich should grow more humble<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When flowers are full of heaven-descended dews, they always hang their heads; but men hold theirs the higher, the more they receive-getting proud as they get full. (<em>H. W. Beecher.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Riches often debase the character<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>See yonder lake! The bigger the stream that runs into it-lying so beautiful and peaceful in the bosom of the shaggy mountain-the bigger the stream it discharges to water the plains, and, like the path of a Christian, wend its bright and blissful way on to its parent sea. But, in sad contrast with that, the more money some men gain, the less they give; in proportion as their wealth increases, their charities diminish. Have we not met it, mourned over it, and seen how a man, setting his heart on gold, and hasting to be rich, came to resemble a vessel with a narrow, contracted neck, out of which water flows less freely when it is full than when it is nearly empty? As there is a law in physics to explain that fact, there is a law in morals to explain this. So long as a man has no hope of becoming rich; so long as he has enough of bread to eat, of raiment to put on, of health and strength to do his work and fight his honest way on in the world, he has all man really needs-having that, he does not set his heart on riches; he is a noble, unselfish, generous, large-hearted, and, for his circumstances, an open-handed man. But by success in business or otherwise, let a fortune come within his reach, and he clutches at it-grasps it. Then what a change! His eye, and ear, and hand close; his sympathies grow dull and blunt; his heart contracts and petrifies. Strange to say, plenty in such cases feeds not poverty but penuriousness; and the ambition of riches opens a door to the meanest avarice. (<em>T. Guthrie, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Uncertainty of riches<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>How often have I thought of riches, when, intruding on their lone domain, I have seen a covey of wild fowl, from the reeds of the lake or the heather of the hillside, rise clamorous on the wing and fly away! Has not many a man who hasted to be rich, and made gold his god, lived to become a bankrupt and die a beggar!-buried among the ruins of his ambitious schemes. (<em>T. Guthrie, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Wealth involves danger<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It was as much as we could do to keep our feet upon the splendid mosaic floor of the Palace Giovanelli, at Venice; we found no such difficulty in the cottage of the poor glass blower in the rear. Is it one of the advantages of wealth to have ones abode polished till all comfort vanishes, and the very floor is as smooth and dangerous as a sheet of ice, or is this merely an accidental circumstance typical of the dangers of abundance? Observation shows us that there is a fascination in wealth which renders it extremely difficult for the possessors of it to maintain their equilibrium; and this is more especially the case where money is suddenly acquired; then, unless grace prevents, pride, affectation, and other mean vices stupify the brain with their sickening fumes, and he who was respectable in poverty, becomes despicable in prosperity. Pride may lurk under a threadbare cloak, but it prefers the comely broadcloth of the merchants coat: moths will eat any of our garments, but they seem to fly first to the costly furs. It is so much the easier for men to fall when walking on wealths sea of glass, because all men aid them to, do so. Flatterers haunt not cottages: the poor may hear an honest word from his neighbour, but etiquette forbids that the rich man should enjoy the like privilege; for is it not a maxim in Babylon, that rich men have no faults, or only such as their money, like charity, covereth with a mantle? What man can help slipping when everybody is intent upon greasing his ways, so that the smallest chance of standing may be denied him? The worlds proverb is, God help the poor, for the rich can help themselves; but to our mind, it is just the rich who have most need of heavens help. Dives in scarlet is worse off than Lazarus in rags, unless Divine love shall uphold him. (<em>C. H. Spurgeon.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Riches are perilous to the soul<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Christ does not speak of an impossibility, but of the difficulty of it and the rareness of it. Job unfolded the riddle, and got through the needles eye with three thousand camels. But it is hard to be wealthy, and not wanton: too often are riches, like bird lime, hindering the soul in its flight towards heaven. (<em>G. Swinnock.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The snares of affluence<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong><strong><em> <\/em><\/strong>The snares of affluence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>It begets on inordinate love of pleasure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>It banishes from the memory all considerations of God and religion.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>It produces an insensibility to the attractions of the gospel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. <\/strong>The practical reflections that are suggested by the snares of affluence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Affluence is not a proof of a state of grace.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The loss of wealth may be a spiritual gain.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Both religion and happiness abound most in the middle region, between extreme wealth and extreme poverty.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>The hope of heaven should reconcile us to present hardship. (<em>Plans of Sermons.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ruined by riches<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Do not be over-anxious about riches. Get as much of true wisdom and goodness as you can, but be satisfied with a very moderate portion of this worlds good. Riches may prove a curse as well as a blessing. I was walking through an orchard, looking about me, when I saw a low tree laden more heavily with fruit than the rest. On a nearer examination, it appeared that the tree had been dragged to the very earth, and broken by the weight of its treasures. Oh! said I, gazing on the tree, here lies one who has been ruined by his riches. In another part of my walk I came up with a shepherd, who was lamenting the loss of a sheep that lay mangled and dead at his feet. On inquiry about the matter, he told me that a strange dog had attacked the flock; that the rest of the sheep had got away through a hole in the hedge, but that the ram now dead had more wool on his back than the rest, and the thorns of the hedge held him fast till the dog had worried him. Here is another, said I, ruined by his riches. At the close of my ramble I met a man hobbling along on two wooden legs, leaning on two sticks. Tell me, said I, my poor fellow, how you came to lose your legs? Why, sir, said he, in my younger days I was a soldier. With a few comrades I attacked a party of the enemy, and overcame them, and we began to load ourselves with spoil. My comrades were satisfied with little, but I burdened myself with as much as I could carry. We were pursued; my companions escaped, but I was overtaken and so cruelly wounded that I only saved my life afterwards by losing my legs. It was a bad affair, sir; but it is too late to repent it now. Ah, friend, thought I, like the fruit tree and the mangled sheep, you may date your downfall to your possessions. It was your riches that ruined you. When I see so many rich people, as I do, caring so much for their bodies and so little for their souls, I pity them from the bottom of my heart, and sometimes think there are as many ruined by riches as by poverty. They that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition (<span class='bible'>1Ti 6:9<\/span>). The prayer will suit you, perhaps, as well as it does me, Give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with food convenient for me: lest I be full, and deny Thee, and say, Who is the Lord? or lest I be poor, and steal, and take the name of my God in vain (<span class='bible'>Pro 30:8-9<\/span>). (<em>Old Humphrey.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>A man of the world<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Interpreter takes them apart again, and has them first in a room where was a man that could lock no way but downwards, with a muck rake in his hand. There stood also One over his head, with a celestial crown in His hand, and proffered to give him that crown for his muck rake; but the man did neither look up nor regard, but raked to himself the straws, the small sticks, and the dust of the floor. Then said Christiana, I persuade myself that I know somewhat the meaning of this; for this is a figure of a man of this world; is it not, good sir? Thou hast said the right, said the Interpreter; and his muck rake doth show his carnal mind. And whereas thou seest him rather give heed to rake up straws and sticks, and the dust of the floor, than to what He says that calls to him from above, with the celestial crown in His hand, it is to show that heaven is but as a fable to some, and that things here are counted the only things substantial. Now, whereas it was also showed thee that the man could look no way but downwards, it is to let thee know that earthly things, when they are with power upon mens mind, quite carry their hearts away from God. Then said Christiana, Oh, deliver me from this muck rake! That prayer, said the Interpreter, has lain by till it is almost rusty. Give me not riches (<span class='bible'>Pro 30:8<\/span>) is scarce the prayer of one of ten thousand. Straws and sticks and dust, with most, are the great things now looked after. (<em>John Bunyan.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>A man in danger through riches<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As a Christian man was passing out of church he met an old acquaintance whom he had not seen for several years. In the brief interview he seriously said to him, I understand that you are in great danger. The remark was heard with surprise. The friend addressed was not aware of any danger, and eagerly inquired what was meant. The answer was, I have been informed that you are getting rich. Men of this class are not accustomed to suspect danger from such a cause. They see none, and they see no reason why others should. And yet they are in peril; they are in great peril. They are in danger of making a god of mammon instead of the living God. They are in danger of seeking to lay up their treasures on the earth instead of in heaven, as the Saviour exhorts them to do. To His disciples He said, Verily, I say unto you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of God. And Paul thus wrote: They that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Engrossed in worldly cares<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We keep ourselves in such a continual hurry and crowd of cares, thoughts, and employments about the things of the body, that we can find little time to be alone, communing with our own hearts about our great concernments in eternity. It is with many of us as it was with Archimedes, who was so intent upon drawing his mathematical schemes, that though all the city was in alarm, the enemy had taken it by storm, the streets filled with dead bodies, the soldiers come into his particular house, nay, entered his very study, and plucked him by the sleeve, before he took any notice of it. Even so, many mens hearts are so profoundly immersed and drowned in earthly cares, thoughts, projects, or pleasures, that death must come to their very houses, yea, and pull them by the sleeve, and tell them its errand, before they will begin to awake, and come to a serious consideration of things more important. (<em>Flavel.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sanctified wealth is a blessing, not a hindrance, to its possessor<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Two men have recently passed away, whose history, as one turns from their graves to sum it up, is at once a poem and a benediction. They were both men of large wealth and of inherited culture. They were both men with an intense love of life, and most human enjoyment of its pleasures. There have not lived in our generation two men who were more thoroughly alive, to their very finger ends, or who were more conspicuously exposed to the manifold dangers of the possession of great wealth. And yet who, in thinking of them, ever thought of their money? And when they died the other day, bereaving the two chief cities of our land with a sense of personal loss, who asked concerning either of them so beggarly a question as, What did he leave? What did they leave? They left each of them the fragrance of a good name, which is as ointment poured out. They left their image stamped in the hearts of thousands of men, women, and children, whose lives they had brightened and ennobled and blessed. Above all, they left a lesson to you and me of what men can be and do who say to wealth and the world, You are my servant, not my master! I will not be slothful in business; I will be fervent in spirit, but it shall be always serving the Lord. They have taught two great communities that it is possible to be rich and not selfish, to have wealth and not be enslaved by it, to use the world as not abusing it. And today, William Welsh, in the Indian wigwam in Niobrara, among the boys of Girard College with whom he spent a part of every Sunday of his life, in the homes of the working men of Frankford whom he taught to love him as brother man;-and Theodore Roosevelt in the newsboys lodging house, in the cripples hospital, in the heart of the little Italian flower girl who brought her offering of grateful love to his door the day he died, have left behind them monuments the like of which mere wealth could never rear, and the proudest achievements of human genius never hope to win. They will be remembered when the men of great fortune who have filled the brief hour with the fame of their millions shall have vanished into merited oblivion. They may have been poorer than these, but the world is richer because they were in it, and the influence of their large-hearted and unselfish lives will be owned and honoured when the mere hoarders of the day have ceased to have any slightest interest or influence among men, save as subjects of the somewhat curious and somewhat contemptuous study of the moral anatomist. (<em>Bishop H. C. Potter.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Right use of wealth<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Wealth is dangerous; and the worshipper of mammon, whether he dwell in a palace or a hovel, will find it equally hard to secure an entrance into the kingdom of God. But wealth, like other dangerous powers, may be subjected to a wise discipline and a resolute control. Lightning is dangerous, but men have mastered it and made it do their bidding. Master your meaner lust for gain, and then make it do your bidding in the service of your heavenly Master. It is not how many bonds you have in a bank vault, or how much plate on your sideboard, that God looks to see, but how many lives have been brightened and how many sorrows have been healed by the gifts of your love. The cause of Christ, the cause of truth, the cause of humanity, need your gifts. But none of them need them half as much as you yourself need the blessed and ennobling education of being permitted to give them. (<em>Bishop H. C. Potter.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Christians laden with wealth<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Crossing the Col DObbia, the mule laden with our luggage sank in the snow, nor could it be recovered, until its load was removed; then, but not till then, it scrambled out of the hole it had made, and pursued its journey. It reminded us of mariners casting out the lading into the sea to save the vessel, and we were led to meditate on the dangers of Christians heavily laden with earthly possessions, and the wise way in which the gracious Father unloads them by their losses, that they may be enabled to pursue their journey to heaven, and no longer sink in the snow of carnal mindedness. (<em>C. H. Spurgeon.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>In an interesting article in the <em>Expositor <\/em>(1st series, 3.375), Canon Farrar mentions that some modem travellers in the East state that houses are sometimes provided with smaller gates in or by the side of larger ones, and that the former are called <em>Es summ el kayut, <\/em>the hole, or eye, of the needle. He also gives the following extract from the letter of a correspondent:-In the summer of 1835, when travelling in the western part of Africa (Morocco), I took up my abode for a time in the house of a Jew named Bendelak. The house was built quadrangular, having an open court, in which beautiful plants were flourishing, and where the family sat in the heat of the day beneath a large awning. High double gates faced the streets, not unlike our coach house doors, in one of which was a smaller door which served as an entrance to the court. Being seated one day in a balcony of the upper chamber, I suddenly heard the exclamation, Shut the needles eye; shut the eye. Looking down, I saw a stray camel trying to push through the little open doorway. Shortly afterwards I questioned the master of the house (a man whom I can never recall to mind without feelings of the utmost respect), and learnt from him that the double doors were always called the needle, and the little door the needles eye, which explanation, of course, reminded me forcibly of the well-known passage in St. Matthew. Bendelak assured me that no camel would push through the eye unless driven by stick or hunger and always without any back load. If the allusion of Christ be to this, it forcibly teaches the lesson that a rich man must strive and humble himself, must be willing to leave behind the load of his riches, must hunger for the bread of heaven, or he can never pass through the narrow way that leadeth unto life eternal.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The danger of riches<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>In the first place comes, very naturally, the idea of the young, that riches, in and of themselves, create happiness. A mans happiness depends upon what he is. If his feelings are right, and he is capable of being happy, riches will make him happy; but if these conditions do not exist, then riches will not make him happy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Then comes the idea that riches are a substitute for character in the eyes of men. There is an impression, if a man is only rich, he can do what he has a mind to, and that the world will accept his riches in lieu of excellence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Passing to another great peril, riches and the pursuit of them are apt to absorb the life and time of men to a degree that shall harness them to mere external things, so that they have very little leisure and less disposition for self-culture.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>Riches are apt to lift a man away from sympathy with common humanity; and that is always a sign of, and a step toward, deterioration.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. <\/strong>Then there is a great tendency in riches to pamper a mans pride. (<em>H. W. Beecher.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Riches do not of themselves create happiness<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>New, it is very true that riches are a power which, if rightly applied or used, may create happiness; but it is not true that riches, in and of themselves, ever do make men happy; and this indiscriminate notion, as an ideal on which they base their life, will be fatal to their happiness. If a man is prepared for happiness riches can make him happy. A man is an organ. I do not care if Beethoven is put before an organ that has not a pipe, and whose bellows is split, I do not care who plays on such an instrument as that, you will not get any music. And if the organ were perfect, and there was nobody that knew how to play, you would not get any music either. Where you get music you must have two things: a good instrument and a good performer on it. Now happiness, conducted on a great scale in life, requires that there should be a performer-and riches are the performer; but what does it play on? An empty case, a wind bag, a leathern pocket, an old iron chest, a rusty old miser. Do riches bring out anything in the way of happiness? Of themselves, no, they do not. The rich are not the happy folks in the world, as a rule. A great many of them are the most happy people on the globe; a man who has riches, and is otherwise rightly attuned, certainly can command as much happiness as any other man on the face of the earth; nobody can be any happier than he has the capacity of being. A man is happy according as he can generate sensibility of brain and nerve. Some men generate only five pounds, some generate fifteen pounds, and some generate twenty-five pounds. So some men can be happy a little bit, while others can be happy a great deal. Some men are not bigger than a daisy, and they can have only so much sunlight as can get into their disc. A man cannot be happy in one spot and miserable everywhere else, any more than he can have the toothache and feel well everywhere else but in his tooth. Happiness must have harmony in it. Where there is not harmony there is no happiness. If two-thirds of a mans nature is morbid and wrong, the other third is not going to rule them down, and compel happiness. I think that when a man has good manners, and is a gentleman, good clothes are very becoming and comfortable to him, and pleasant to everybody else; but good clothes do not make a gentleman, any more than riches make a man happy. (<em>H. W. Beecher.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Man more than money<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I do not object to a mans having a good deal of property; I do not object to his having beautiful grounds, and making them shine like a garden of Eden, if he can; I do not object to his building himself a magnificent mansion, and storing it with whatever art can give; I admire the grounds, I admire the house, I admire the furniture, and I justify them. But now let me see the <em>man. <\/em>When a man has risen in wealth so that he can have fine grounds, a fine house and fine furniture, he ought to have something even grander in himself; and yet how many men are there that are like a monkey in an oriental palace, men that are ignorant, empty, narrow, conceited, poverty-stricken inside, but that outside glow like a rainbow! How many men there are that make the power of money in their hands simply picturesque, grotesque! (<em>H. W. Beecher.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who then can be saved?<\/strong><em>&#8211;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>The disciples wondering at the difficulties of salvation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Salvation! What so desirable and necessary? Why so difficult to obtain.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. <\/strong>You know what salvation is. Deliverance from condemnation, and placing us, pure and happy, in Gods kingdom. We must take care that we do not mistake as to where the difficulty lies. It is not in God, not in Christ; milling and able to save to the uttermost.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>There is the difficulty arising out of the pride of our hearts-the difficulty of falling in with Gods way of saving us. Salvation of grace troubles us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>There is the difficulty of complying with Gods terms of salvation. We trace this to unbelief. The tidings of the gospel seem too good to be credited.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>The difficulty of our seeking, or even accepting, such a salvation as God offers. It is a deliverance from the love and power of sin. We are by nature unholy, salvation crucifies all that nature delights in; hence difficulty.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. <\/strong>What the disciples felt at the prospect of these difficulties.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Wonder. They were astonished out of measure. There was a time when we considered salvation easy; God was regarded as merciful. No sooner did the Holy Spirit make us alive to our spiritual welfare, than wonder came as described in the text. They wondered at the patience of God, at His amazing grace, and the mountain of difficulties which lies between them and heaven.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The other feeling we discover in these men is despair-Who then can be saved? We must learn to look beyond our spiritual difficulties, if ever we would be carried over them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. <\/strong>Our Lords judgment concerning this matter. You are right, He says, up to a certain point; beyond that you are altogether wrong.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>They were partially right. It is difficult for a man to overcome the difficulties between him and heaven. He is weak as well as sinful; must despair of his own power to attain salvation. Self-sufficiency, like self-righteousness, insurmountable obstacle in our journey heavenwards.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>But these disciples were also wrong. He tells them that salvation was never intended to be mans work; but Gods. What omnipotence undertakes can be carried through.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>How compassionately He says this-You have felt My power, difficulties have vanished.<\/p>\n<p>Apply:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Some of you know nothing at all of the difficulties of salvation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Others of you, like those disciples, have just begun to see the difficulties that lie before you.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>A few of you have been long accustomed to spiritual difficulties. (<em>C. Bradley.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The difficulties of salvation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>I.<\/strong><strong><em> <\/em><\/strong>Let us notice mole particularly some of the difficulties in the way of salvation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The truths to be believed are some of them very mysterious.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The sacrifices to be made are also in some degree painful.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>The dispositions to be exercised are such as are contrary to the natural bias of our depraved hearts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>The duties to be performed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. <\/strong>The trouble and danger to which religion exposes its professors.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. <\/strong>Attempt to answer the inquiry-Who then can be saved? Certainly not those who neglect the means of salvation; nor those who prefer other things before it; nor those who think to attain it in any other way than God has appointed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Such shall be saved as are appointed to it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Those shall be saved who are truly desirous of it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Those who come to Christ for salvation shall be sure to obtain it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>Such as endure to the end shall be saved. (<em>B. Beddome, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>See Poole on &#8220;<span class='bible'>Mat 10:23<\/span>&#8220;, and following verses to <span class='bible'>Mat 10:26<\/span>, where the same history occurred, and all the additions to it here are opened. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>And Jesus looked round about<\/strong>,&#8230;. To see what effect the discourse he had with the young man, and the consequence of it, had upon his disciples; as also to raise their attention to what he was about, to say:<\/p>\n<p><strong>and saith unto his disciples, how hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!<\/strong> the Gospel dispensation, by embracing the doctrines, and submitting to the ordinances of it;<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>[See comments on Mt 19:23]<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>Looked round about <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>). Another picture of the looks of Jesus and in Mark alone as in <span class='bible'>Mark 3:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mark 3:34<\/span>. &#8220;To see what impression the incident had made on the Twelve&#8221; (Bruce). &#8220;When the man was gone the Lord&#8217;s eye swept round the circle of the Twelve, as he drew for them the lesson of the incident&#8221; (Swete).<\/P> <P><B>How hardly <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"> <\/SPAN><\/span>). So <span class='bible'>Lu 18:24<\/span>. <span class='bible'>Mt 19:23<\/span> has it: &#8220;With difficulty (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>) shall a rich man.&#8221; See on Matthew for this word. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Robertson&#8217;s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1) <strong>&#8221;And Jesus looked round about,&#8221;<\/strong> (kai periblepsamenos ho lesous) &#8221;And Jesus looking around about,&#8221; Him at the disciples, to observe their response to this emotion packed occasion, to see what kind of impression the incident had made on the twelve.<\/p>\n<p>2)<strong> &#8220;And saith<\/strong> <strong>unto His disciples,&#8221; <\/strong>legei tois mathetais autou) &#8221;He said to His disciples,&#8221; to break the air of emotional shock, with the covetous Judas Iscariot, who carried the money bag, and was a thief observing what our Lord had said, <span class='bible'>Joh 12:3-6<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>3) <strong>&#8220;How hardly shall they that have riches,&#8221;<\/strong> (pos duskolos hoi ta chremata echontes) &#8221;How hardly shall those having, holding, or possessing riches,&#8221; trusting in riches or wealth, holding on to or grasping earthly gain so covetously, <span class='bible'>1Ti 6:10-11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ti 6:17-19<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>4) <strong>&#8221;Enter into the kingdom of God!&#8221;<\/strong> (eis ten basileian tou theou eiseleusontai) &#8220;Enter into the kingdom of God,&#8221; the spiritual field of labors of God, <span class='bible'>Luk 12:33<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 18:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 19:23<\/span>. Riches do not afford one either a sure passage to heaven or a sure damnation in hell &#8211; Neither does poverty. But the lesson is that trust in riches, being a slave-servant to riches, at the price -of rejecting the call of Jesus Christ to pardon and forgiveness of sins, and His call to obedient service, will damn the soul of unbelievers in hell, and bring a saved one who has lived unfaithfully to a place where he is saved as if by fire, without rewards, <span class='bible'>1Co 3:13-15<\/span>: <span class='bible'>1Ti 5:10-19<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><em>CRITICAL AND EXEGETICAL NOTES<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:24<\/span>. See R.V. text and margin.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:25<\/span>. <strong>It is easier for a camel<\/strong>.This is (as Dr. J. Morison aptly remarks) a fine, bold, hieroglyphic, hyperbolical way of speaking, that need impose on no one with a spark of poetry in his soul. The key to its import is hung at the girdle of common sense. Southey caught its spirit:<\/p>\n<p>I would ride the camel,<\/p>\n<p>Yea, leap him flying, through the needles eye,<br \/>As easily as such a pampered soul<br \/>Could pass the narrow gate.<\/p>\n<p>The text, he says, is gospel-wisdom. The Saviour intended to represent vividly and memorably the extraordinary difficulty of discharging the responsibilities and overcoming the temptations of riches.<\/p>\n<p><em>MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.<\/em><em><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:23-27<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>(PARALLELS: <span class='bible'>Mat. 19:23-26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk. 18:24-27<\/span>.)<\/p>\n<p><em>Mundane trust a barrier<\/em>.Men are ever astonished when taken out of their own little grooves. Enlarge a mans world and wonderment is the result. Jesus never wondered at His own sayings: it is impossible that He should have so done; and when, as here, He uses the word impossible, He simply accommodates Himself to the finite capacity of His auditory. There is no such word as impossible in heavens vocabulary. The interpretation often given to this passage is too limited in its application; because<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. Sometimes it is regarded as a reflexion by Jesus Christ upon worldly wealth<\/strong>.The rich, the poor, the high, the low, the old, the young, were all alike to Him. He looked not to condition, but to character. Jesus is not here talking against wealth, but against trust in riches, a thing altogether different.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. Jesus is often regarded as referring here only to very rich men<\/strong>.This is one reason why all men pass the text on to their more wealthy neighbours, as being more applicable to them than to themselves. They forget that wealth is relativeforget that it is as possible to be purse-proud of five pounds as of fifty, and of fifty as of fifty thousand. Trustfulness in riches is a question of disposition and not of length of purse.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. Jesus Christ is sometimes thought to be referring here only to the realm of the objective<\/strong>.No doubt the text was suggested to the mind of our Lord by His conversation with the rich young man, the weak point in whose character was love of money. But we should be careful not to mistake parts for wholescareful lest we conclude that the sayings of Jesus contain no more than what lies upon their surface. So that between the lines we may thus read: Verily, verily, I say unto you, How hardly shall they that have learning, or physical strength, or intellectual power, or are socially high, or outwardly circumspect, enter into the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for those who place their chief trust in these things to enter into the kingdom of God.<em>J. S. Swan<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>OUTLINES AND COMMENTS ON THE VERSES<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:23-25<\/span>. <em>Money<\/em>.The subject of money is largely dealt with in the Bibleas much so in the New Testament as in the Old; and no unprejudiced mind will easily escape from the following conclusions about it: <\/p>\n<p>1. That all moneys belong to God, as their Creator and Proprietor (<span class='bible'>Hag. 2:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa. 50:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co. 10:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co. 10:28<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>2. That He has consequently the right to every penny we may think our own, and considers Himself <em>robbed<\/em> if we do not honour Him with our substance (<span class='bible'>Mal. 3:8<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>3. That we are in danger of putting money in Gods place, and thereby becoming idolatrous (<span class='bible'>Exo. 32:31<\/span>). We are all prone to the same sin. <\/p>\n<p>4. That, as a counteractive, God commands us to give it away to Him; or, what is equivalent, to good and charitable objects. Thus the Jews were from the very beginning habituated to pay tithes; and Christians are under similar orders to give liberally of their means for the support and extension of the gospel (<span class='bible'>2Co. 8:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Co. 9:7<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>5. That covetousness is a great evil, and leads to many others (<span class='bible'>1Ti. 6:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Pro. 11:28<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>6. That to be rich is to be in great spiritual difficulties. The young man became <em>sad<\/em> when Christ bade him sell off and give to the poor. <\/p>\n<p>7. That, in this view of it, it is surely better to be poor. <br \/>8. That under the Christian dispensation the amount to be given is left to conscience. It is a duty, however, that those to whom God has given most should give Him most. <\/p>\n<p>9. That to give liberally to God entails no lossnot even loss in kind. Given from proper motives, many a subscription of one pound sterling has filled a mans barns or brought him a hundred per cent. It does not follow that you have really saved your money though you have withheld it (<span class='bible'>2Co. 9:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Pro. 11:24<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>10. That the miser may live and die in poverty. Judas hanged himself. Many a rich but illiberal man has died a pauper; and many a poor but liberal man has lived to be opulent and a blessing. I admired the reply that I once got from a liberal lady to a remark that she was too generous with her means. No, no, she said; I am generous only to myself. I wish to keep my money; therefore I clip its wings, lest it fly away; for you know it is written, Riches certainly make themselves wings; they fly away as an eagle toward heaven. <br \/>11. That to be rich in grace is far better than to be rich in gold. Devils shall knock in vain at heavens gate, but Lazarus enters. <br \/>12. That the Lord Jesus Christ is the only one to whom money can be safely entrusted. Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive riches.<em>John Macfarlane, LL.D<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:23<\/span>. <em>Riches a hindrance<\/em>.Christ plainly saysbecause the world needed to be plainly toldthat they who <em>have<\/em> riches (literally, things they can make use of) with difficulty enter into the kingdom of God. He says not a syllable about excess of riches. He says nothing about the life to come. There is nothing said about its being <em>impossible<\/em> for the man with riches to enter, but there is the definite statement that those who have affairs, businesses, and the results which come from such, shall find it hard to enter. This applies quite as much to the poor as to the well-to-do, and it is concerned with the life that now is. The kingdom of God means those over whom God reigns with undivided rule, where His laws are His subjects law, His will their will, His ways their ways. With all of uswhatever our riches may be, whether the weekly wage which just provides the things honest, or the wealth of some merchant princeit is with difficulty that we keep ourselves from being of the world; it is hardly that we enter into the kingdom of God; it is with difficulty that we subserve its advance.<em>J. W. Owen<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:24<\/span>. <em>Disentangled from possessions<\/em>.The poor are sooner astonished at these words than the rich are so much as moved by them: the reason is, because men see the danger of others better than their own. It is much easier for a man to be contented without those things which he has not than to disengage himself from those which he possesses and not to trust in them. The poor may find a sufficient ground of trust and confidence in their poverty, since the kingdom of God is theirs; but the rich have reason to tremble in the midst of their riches. Whoever finds in them his rest, his joy, and his happiness, never thinks of seeking for these things in God. And there lies the greatest misery.<em>P. Quesnel<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:25<\/span>. <em>Camel and needles eye<\/em>.The illustration is drawn from one of the common, popular stories in the East, which would be recognised by all. There were far-spread tales and legends of some enchanted city, with a gate of entrance which was a needles eye. Among the applicants for admission was a rich merchant, riding on a camel, with its long neck and humped back, packed with precious wares. The rich man, who trusts in riches, fares like the merchant of the story. He cannot pass through the magic gate into the radiant city without the Divine spell which makes him free of the land of the spirit.<em>Bishop Wm. Alexander<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:27<\/span>. <em>Salvation in the hands of God<\/em>.It is the comfort of the humble that their salvation is in the hands of God; and it is the blindness of the proud that they would have theirs in their own. A true Christian is not at all alarmed to find here that without grace his salvation is impossible, because he knows that God can do everything for him, and that he himself can do all things in God through Jesus Christ.<em>P. Quesnel<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>With God all things are possible<\/em>.Thus God saved Zaccheus, and in this our day some rich and noble men seem to abound in every Christian grace; but though it be possible with God, we may be sure that the Lord did not intend by these words to cancel the warnings He had just uttered. Does the Lord here mean that all things are equally easy to God? By no means. All things may be equally easy to Him as looked at from the side of mere powermere physical force; but God does not deal with intelligent creatures in the way of overwhelming power. So far as their will is concerned He deals with them, then, after such sort that they should co-operate with Him and yield willingly to Him; and the Lord, if He teaches us anything by the whole matter, teaches us this, that it requires more spiritual effort on Gods part to deliver a man from the love of the world when the mans wealth enables him to enjoy all that the world has to offer.<em>M. F. Sadler<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>ILLUSTRATIONS TO CHAPTER 10<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:23-27<\/span>. <em>The peril of property<\/em>.No wonder that Anthony, the father of monasticism in Egypt, went out from the church in Thebes where this passage had been read, to give away his ancestral estates, to put his sister into the fellowship and care of pious virgins, and to go himself poor and alone into the solitude of the cliffs! No wonder that in the early centuries the vow of poverty became the threshold article of every Christian life, and, with its twin principle of celibacy, became the foundation of the great monastic orders in the Church! But surely a rich man can be a Christian, and a poor man may be a sinner! For a ragged coat and a diamond ring have no moral quality or spiritual character in themselves. Ah, no! It is not money, but the love of it, that keeps men out of the Fathers house. And so, as we strike the bell or fire the gun to arouse the sleeping village, or dash cold water in the face of the fainting, the Son of God would bestir men to the possibilities of peril which lurk in the possession of property.<\/p>\n<p><em>Covetous to the last<\/em>.We read not long ago the experience of an English clergyman called to the death-bed of a wealthy parishioner. As he kneeled at his bedside, his pastor twice requested him to take his hand as he prayed for his upholding in that solemn hour; but the dying man declined to give it. After the end had come, and they had turned down the coverlet, his rigid hands were found holding the safe-key in their death-grip. No hand of fellowship for his minister, because he could not loose his hold upon the key to the safe-vault! The power of hands which hold in their palms such possibilities of help and service is beyond our arithmetic to compute. The peril, here and hereafter, which waits upon the misuse of such a power is infinite.<\/p>\n<p><em>Impedimenta<\/em>.Lord Bacon, who was a prince of modern worldly philosophers, and who never spoke merely from a spiritual plane in his treatment of practical themes of thought, says emphatically: I cannot call riches better than the baggage of virtue. The Roman word is better, <em>impedimenta<\/em>; for as the baggage is to an army, so is riches to virtue: it cannot be spared, nor left behind, but it hindereth the march; yea, and the care of it sometimes loseth or disturbeth the victory. Then, in commenting on the suggestion that riches will enable men to purchase themselves successes, Bacon adds that certainly great riches have sold more men than they have bought out.<\/p>\n<p><em>The weight of riches<\/em>.An opulent merchant having received a sum of money, was putting the ducats one by one into a pair of scales, in order to ascertain that they were not too light. For my part, said Gotthold, who was present, I should be more afraid of their being too heavy. How so? inquired the merchant. Do you not think, rejoined Gotthold, that money is too heavy when bedewed with the blood of the poor, the sweat of the laborious, and the tears of the widow and the orphan, or when loaded with the curses of those who, by fraud or violence, have been robbed of it. I will hope, however, that there are no pieces of this description in that heap of yours, or rather I will not fear that there are any. Suffer me, however, without offence, to express the wish that you will always make your conscience your scales, and weigh in it your dollars and ducats to ascertain that they are of proper weight, and have been honestly acquired. Many a man never learns, until he is struggling with death, how difficult, or rather impossible, it is to force a soul burdened with unrighteous gain through the strait gate which leadeth unto life. Take heed, then, that no such gain ever burdens yours. The more he carries, the more the pilgrim sweats and pants as he climbs the steep; and the more the conscience is oppressed with dishonesty and fraud, the harder will the struggle of a death-bed be.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:23<\/span>. <em>The giver of wealth forgotten<\/em>.Among the legends of Hindostan is one that illustrates these words of our Saviour. One Rawana, a Brahmin, was offered by his god anything that he might name. Rawana prayed his god to bestow upon him the government of the world. His god immediately granted his wish. Then he prayed for ten heads, with which to see and rule the world. After Rawana had well fortified himself, and was surrounded by riches, honours, and praise, he forgot his god Ixora, and bade all the people worship him, an act which greatly angered the god Ixora, and he destroyed Rawana. How true to human nature was the course of Rawana! And how many we find to-day that have forgotten the God that gave them all they possess!<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:24<\/span>. <em>Peril of riches<\/em>.When Alexander the Great sent a rich present to Phocian the Athenian, the latter asked why he had been the object of so splendid a gift. On hearing that it was because the king considered him the most virtuous man in Athens, he replied, If he wishes me to preserve my virtue, let him keep his riches, and forthwith sent back the present to Alexander.<\/p>\n<p><em>Hard to leave<\/em>.When Garrick shewed Dr. Johnson his fine house, gardens, statues, pictures, etc., at Hampton Court, what ideas did they awaken in the mind of that great man? Instead of a flattering compliment, which was expected, Ah! David, David, said the doctor, these are the things which make a death-bed terrible!<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:25<\/span>. <em>Rich men like camels<\/em>.It were no bad comparison to liken mere rich men to camels and mules; for they often pursue their devious way over hills and mountains, laden with Indian purple, with gems, aromas, and generous wines upon their backs, attended, too, by a long line of servants as a safeguard on their way. Soon, however, they come to their evening halting-place, and forthwith their precious burdens are taken from their backs; and they, now wearied and stripped of their lading and their retinue of slaves, shew nothing but livid marks of stripes. So, also, those who glitter in gold and purple raiment, when the evening of life comes rushing on them, have naught to shew but marks and wounds of sin impressed upon them by their evil use of riches.<em>St. Augustine<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:27<\/span>. <em>All things possible to God<\/em>.I was pacing to and fro, awaiting a train within a railway station. There were others in the great room, and it was singular none of them had observed it beforea sparrow imprisoned within the sliding window sashes. He had thought he saw a way, but it was a glass wall. He had beaten his wings to tatters, and his fair plumage into rags. The glass was opaque with the stains of his denuded cuticle, and streaked with blood. He may have been in this crystal dungeon for hours, and fighting till he sank into quiet from exhaustion, from which reviving again to fight as when I first heard him. Could I be denied it, as I sprang to that heavy frame and sent it with a bang to the ceiling, letting the oppressed go free? Does not Christ, the Sent to open prison doors, feel a grander propulsion to liberate unhappy men, who thought they saw a way, but found themselves in dreadful bonds of poverty, or pain, or dishonour, or conscious sin? Suppose the sparrow had piped out to me, in shrill treble, that he wanted no mercy, but justice; that he could conduct his own life; that he scorned to be beholden unto any one. It is an analogue of many human souls, who are whipping their wings to shreds against the impossible, while to God all things are possible, even their setting free.<em>E. J. Haynes<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>C. THE RICH MAN AND HEAVEN 10:23-27<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>TEXT 10:23-27<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! And the disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished exceedingly, saying unto him, Then who can be saved? Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for all things are possible with God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>THOUGHT QUESTIONS 10:23-27<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>544.<\/p>\n<p>Why mention the appearance or looks of Jesus?<\/p>\n<p>545.<\/p>\n<p>Show how appropriate this question was.<\/p>\n<p>546.<\/p>\n<p>What is the kingdom of God as used here?<\/p>\n<p>547.<\/p>\n<p>Why were the disciples so amazed?<\/p>\n<p>548.<\/p>\n<p>Show how the exaggerated illustration of the camel and the needles eye fit the circumstance.<\/p>\n<p>549.<\/p>\n<p>Did the disciples believe there was some connection between being rich and Gods approval? Discuss.<\/p>\n<p>550.<\/p>\n<p>Did the disciples thinkif a rich man cannot be saved no one can be saved? Why?<\/p>\n<p>551.<\/p>\n<p>What was impossible and possible in the salvation of a rich man?<\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>TIME.MarchA.D. 30. Shortly after the conversation with the rich young ruler.<br \/>PLACE.In Pereathe east side of the Jordan, near the borders of Judea.<\/p>\n<p>PARALLEL ACCOUNTS.<span class='bible'>Mat. 19:23-26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk. 18:24-27<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>OUTLINE.1. Jesus states the rich mans poor chances for heaven, <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:23<\/span>. <span class='bible'>2<\/span>. The disciples are very surprised, <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:24<\/span> a, <span class='bible'>3<\/span>. Jesus repeats with emphasis and illustration His first assertion, <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:24<\/span> b  <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:25<\/span>. <span class='bible'>4<\/span>. Who can be saved?God can make it possible, <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:26-27<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ANALYSIS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I.<\/p>\n<p>JESUS STATES THE RICH MANS POOR CHANCES FOR HEAVEN, <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:23<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>This was said as Jesus looked intently into the faces of His disciples.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>It is almost impossible for a rich man to be saved.<\/p>\n<p>II.<\/p>\n<p>THE DISCIPLES ARE VERY SURPRISED, <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:24<\/span> a.<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>This surprise was because of their thought that a man was rich because God had blessed him.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>Jesus had flatly contradicted their concept.<\/p>\n<p>III.<\/p>\n<p>JESUS REPEATS WITH EMPHASIS AND ILLUSTRATION HIS FIRST ASSERTION, <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:24<\/span> b  <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:25<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>Jesus calls His disciples children (in understanding) as He repeats His statement.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>The possibility is like that of a camel going through the eye of a needle.<\/p>\n<p>IV.<\/p>\n<p>WHO THEN CAN BE SAVED?GOD CAN MAKE IT POSSIBLE, <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:26-27<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>The increased amazement of the disciples.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>Jesus again looked searchingly at themwhat man cannot do, God can do.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EXPLANATORY NOTES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I.<\/p>\n<p>JESUS STATES THE RICH MANS POOR CHANCES FOR HEAVEN.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:23<\/span>. Now again the deliberate look of Jesus round the whole circle of his disciples, gazing into each face, impressed itself on the memory of Marks informant, His saying, How hardlyi.e. with what difficultyshall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! is amply confirmed by experience. Christian men often become rich, but rich men rarely become Christians. The reason is not far to seek: the process of gaining wealth encourages self-seeking, and the possession of it encourages self-importance; but the spirit that can enter the kingdom is the spirit of a little child.<\/p>\n<p>II.<\/p>\n<p>THE DISCIPLES ARE VERY SURPRISED.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:24<\/span> a. This remarkable verse is peculiar to Mark. The astonishment of the disciples was natural, with their ideas of the kingdom. Hard for rich men! What can he mean? All the splendid imagery of the prophets (as in <span class='bible'>Isaiah 60<\/span>) might rise in their minds to contradict him; and the idea of delivering Israel from oppression by a kingdom that rich men could scarcely enter must have seemed to them absurd.<\/p>\n<p>III.<\/p>\n<p>JESUS REPEATS WITH EMPHASIS AND ILLUSTRATION HIS FIRST ASSERTION.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:24<\/span> b  <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:25<\/span>. Jesus solemnly repeated his hard saying; yet his mood was tender, as his word Children shows, here alone addressed to them. (Little children, in <span class='bible'>Joh. 13:33<\/span>.)According to the common reading, the repetition of the saying explains and softens it by the modification. How hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter. But there seems sufficient reason to accept the reading of ancient manuscripts by which the words for them that trust in riches are omitted. In that case the repetition of the saying removes it from the special case of rich men and applies the sentiment more widely: Children, how hard it is to enter into the kingdom of God! Plainly, such a remark was a natural outcome of the incident, for it was not chiefly his riches, but his heart, that sent the man away sorrowful, and a like heart is in all men. To all men, therefore, rich or poor, it is by nature hard to enter into the kingdom of Godhard in itself, since sin is what it is.Let us not be afraid that such a text will prove too discouraging. It is better to know things as they are; and perhaps the doctrine of free grace has been so used as to lead to an untrue idea of the easiness of salvation.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:25<\/span>. It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle. This comparison may have been proverbial, as the Talmud contains, at a later date, a closely similar saying. The Koran exactly reproduces it from the New Testament. As for the popular explanationthat the small gate in the city wall, too narrow for a camel to pass through, was called the needles eyethere is no sufficient evidence of the antiquity of such a use of the name. The comparison needs no special explanation; it is a strong way of representing impossibility: It is so hard for sinful men, rich or poor, to enter the kingdom, that for a rich manone who is especially involved in the unchildlike habits of the worldto enter is harder than for a camel to go through a needles eye. This is no contradiction of any gracious and winning Scripture. It is the Saviours emphatic statement of a fact, parallel to <span class='bible'>Luk. 13:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk. 14:26-33<\/span>, and to many other of his words.<\/p>\n<p>IV.<\/p>\n<p>WHO THEN CAN BE SAVED?GOD CAN MAKE IT POSSIBLE.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 10:26-27<\/span>. Astonished before; astonished out of measure now.The inquiry was among themselves, a whispering of amazement. Who then can be saved? With such a standard, how would the kingdom receive any one? For was not the love of money everywhere? and how could the kingdom live, with a law so strict?Jesus looking upon them. Again Peter remembered his look. The word, both here and in <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:21<\/span>, is the same as in <span class='bible'>Luk. 22:61<\/span>; The Lord turned and looked on Peter,With men it is impossible, Not now difficult, but more. On human principles or by any power of man it cannot be done; the proud man cannot be brought into the kingdom of the humble, or the worldly-minded rich man into the kingdom of the poor in spirit, So in <span class='bible'>Joh. 3:3<\/span> : Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God,But not with God: for with God all things are possible, He can make new creatures of men; he can impart the spirit of the kingdom. He has command, too, of all means, earthly and heavenly. So he can bring into his kingdom men who are spiritually incompatible with it, (See <span class='bible'>1Ti. 1:12-17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co. 15:9-10<\/span>,) The implication is that, even though this case looks so hopeless, God can yet find means of bringing the unwilling rich man to a better mind. In his hands are even life and death. (W. N. Clarke)<\/p>\n<p><strong>FACT QUESTIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>10:23-27<\/p>\n<p>583.<\/p>\n<p>Why is it that Christian men often become rich, but rich men rarely become Christians?<\/p>\n<p>584.<\/p>\n<p>What could arise in the mind of the disciples to contradict the words of Jesus?<\/p>\n<p>585.<\/p>\n<p>Is the thought of difficulty in entering the kingdom general or specific? i.e. does this principle apply to allexplain.<\/p>\n<p>586.<\/p>\n<p>Is there any truth in the thought of a needles gate in the city wall of Jerusalem? Why was this explanation offered in the first place?<\/p>\n<p>587.<\/p>\n<p>Why were the disciples particularly amazed at this time?<\/p>\n<p>588.<\/p>\n<p>How will God make the impossible possible? Discuss.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(23) <strong>And Jesus looked round.<\/strong>The glance and gesture are mentioned by St. Mark only.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> &lsquo;And Jesus looked round about and says to his disciples, &ldquo;With what great difficulty shall those who have riches enter under the Kingly Rule of God.&rdquo; &rsquo;<\/p>\n<p> Heavy of heart for the rich man Jesus wanted the lesson that they had seen in His dealings with him to come home to all the disciples. He wanted them to see that when it came to response to Him the rich were at a definite disadvantage for they had too much to lose. In order to come under the Kingly Rule of God total obedience was required, and riches made that difficult when there was a world in need. That as why there would be few who could cope with riches and discipleship at the same time. For being under the Kingly Rule of God meant living as God required, and riches tended to make men live as their lusts required.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>The lesson of riches:<\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 23<\/strong>. <strong> And Jesus looked round about and saith unto His disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 24<\/strong>. <strong> And the disciples were astonished at His words. But Jesus answereth again and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 25<\/strong>. <strong> It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.<\/p>\n<p><\/strong> Jesus looked round in the circle of the disciples to see what kind of an impression the incident had made on them. Then He said, very impressively, that those possessing riches would only with difficulty enter into the kingdom of God, come to faith, and finally get to heaven. And as the disciples wondered concerning these words, He repeated the saying, making it a little plainer for their benefit. Trusting in this world&#8217;s goods makes it impossible for a person to enter into the kingdom of God. For under Him the rule holds good that a person may have this world&#8217;s goods by God&#8217;s blessing, for God distributes them as He sees fit. But, incidentally, those, that are rich and are Christians at the same time, hold these goods as though they possessed them not. They consider. themselves only the stewards of God, whom God has entrusted with more than others, and therefore will hold responsible in a greater measure. They are therefore not really rich in the sense which the children of this world attach to the term. Jesus brings out the gravity of the situation still more emphatically by stating, in the form of an Oriental proverb, that it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. This is in no way an exaggeration, for even as it is possible for anyone to come to faith and remain faithful to the end only by the power of the Holy Ghost, so it is true especially in the case of such as have a special hobby on earth which they love, to which they cling. Such conduct, whether it concerns riches, or goods, or lusts, or wife, or children, hinders the work of the Spirit.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>DISCOURSE: 1440<br \/>THE DANGER OF RICHES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar 10:23-25<\/span>. <em>And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! And the Disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>IN the perusal of history, it is desirable not merely to treasure up facts in our minds, but to deduce from them such observations as shall increase our stock of practical and useful knowledge. It will be to little purpose to have our memory stored with events, unless our judgment be matured by suitable reflections upon them. In reference to the sacred history, this remark is still more obvious and important. Very little benefit would accrue to a person from knowing, that a rich young man had turned away from Christ, because he disliked the directions which our Lord had given him. If we would derive any material instruction from this event, we should consider what aspect it has upon the manners of men in general: we should, after the example which our Lord himself has set us, contemplate the effects which wealth generally produces on those who possess it, and the obstacles which it lays in our way to the kingdom of heaven.<br \/>In confirmation of our Lords reflection, we shall endeavour to shew, whence it is that it is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.<\/p>\n<p>I.<\/p>\n<p>It is difficult for a person to have riches, and not to <em>love<\/em> them<\/p>\n<p>Riches almost universally fascinate the minds of men<br \/>[Persons of opulence see what respect their wealth procures for them; that they are objects of admiration and envy to all around them; and that, by means of their money, they can obtain all the comforts and luxuries of life. Hence they are ready to conceive that riches are really good, and almost necessarily conducive to the happiness of those who possess them. Under this idea, their affections are easily attracted towards them, and they are ready to congratulate themselves on their own peculiarly favoured lot. Hence that caution of the Psalmists, If riches increase, set not your heart upon them.]<br \/>But in proportion as they engage our hearts, they obstruct our way to heaven<br \/>[We are commanded not to set our affections on things below, but on things above. This prohibition extends to riches, and to every thing else that fascinates the carnal mind. The reason of it is moreover assigned by God himself, namely, that the love of this world neither proceeds from him, nor leads to him, but is absolutely incompatible with real love to him [Note: <span class='bible'>1Jn 2:15-16<\/span>.]. Let it only then be acknowledged, that the love of God is necessary to the attainment or enjoyment of heaven; and then it will follow, that the person, who loves his riches, cannot attain heaven; nor could he enjoy it, even if he were admitted there: he has in his bosom an object that rivals God: and God is a jealous God, who will never accept a divided heart. We never can serve God and Mammon. If our treasure be on earth, our heart will be there also: and if it be looked to as the source of our happiness, Woe unto us; for we have received our consolation.]<\/p>\n<p>II.<\/p>\n<p>It is difficult for a person to have riches, and not <em>be puffed up by<\/em> them<\/p>\n<p>Pride is too generally an attendant on riches<br \/>[As great respect is paid to riches, the people who possess them are apt to think that they deserve it. They arrogate it to themselves; they are offended, if any persons refuse to gratify them with the homage which they claim. They shew in their look, their dress, their manner of speaking, yea, in their very gait, they think themselves to be somebody. They expect their wishes to be consulted, and their judgment to be followed. They are impatient of contradiction. They do not like, either in public or in private, to be told of their faults. If a minister deal faithfully with their consciences, they rather condemn <em>him<\/em> for (what they will call) his rudeness or harshness, than <em>themselves<\/em> for their departure from God. How commonly this disposition springs from riches, we may judge from that direction which is given to ministers; Charge them who are rich in this world, that they be not high-minded [Note: <span class='bible'>1Ti 6:17<\/span>.].]<\/p>\n<p>And this also, if indulged, will exclude us from heaven<br \/>[Pride was not made for man: The proud in heart are an abomination to the Lord: whoever he be, God will certainly abase him. Not Hezekiah himself shall escape without deep humiliation [Note: <span class='bible'>2Ch 32:25-26<\/span>.]; nor even then, without severe chastisements [Note: <span class='bible'>Isa 39:4-7<\/span>.]. If we be lifted up with pride, (whatever be the occasion,) we shall fall into the condemnation of the devil. The characteristic mark of every true Christian, and of all that shall be admitted into heaven, is humility; Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Worldly poverty is not more opposite to wealth, than spiritual poverty is to pride. The true Christian will prefer others in honour before himself, and account himself, less than the least of all saints. But, inasmuch as wealth has a directly opposite tendency, it is hostile to the interests of Christianity, and to the salvation of all who possess it.]<\/p>\n<p>III.<\/p>\n<p>It is difficult for a person to have riches, and not <em>be corrupted by<\/em> them<\/p>\n<p>Whatever a corrupt heart can desire, is attainable through riches<br \/>[Wealth opens a way for all manner of sensuality and self-indulgence: and, at the same time that it gives us facilities for gratifying our evil inclinations, it leads us into such habits as greatly dispose us to sin. A luxurious table draws us to intemperance; intemperance inflames our passions; and affluence opens an easy way to the indulgence of them. The rich even think that they are, in a measure, licensed to commit iniquity: and, in their eyes, intemperance and lewdness are, at the most, no more than venial follies, which they can commit without shame, and look back upon without remorse.<br \/>But where riches do not produce this effect, they still exceedingly corrupt the soul. They habituate us to easy indolent habits, that are very contrary to those self-denying exercises in which the Christian should be employed. They lead us into the company of those whose minds are least spiritual, and from whose conversation and example we can derive least profit. They induce parents to seek connexions for their children rather among the opulent than among the good. They not unfrequently draw persons into great speculations, which fill them with anxiety, and encumber them with oppressive cares. Strange as it may seem, they often prove incentives to avarice, as well as to prodigality, and to an oppression of others, as well as to the gratifying of ourselves. Hence, whenever the term lucre is mentioned in the New Testament, the term filthy is invariably associated with it.]<br \/>And the more our corruptions are indulged, the more certain we are of perishing in final ruin<br \/>[We are warned, that to be carnally-minded is death: and the final ruin of a very large portion of those who hear the Gospel is ascribed to the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches, which choke the word that they hear, and render it unfruitful. The love of money, we are told, is the root of all evil; and they who even desire to be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. Inasmuch as riches induce us principally to mind earthly things, they make us enemies of the cross of Christ, and bring us to destruction as our end.]<\/p>\n<p>IV.<\/p>\n<p>It is difficult to have riches, and not <em>trust in<\/em> them<\/p>\n<p>Wealth, whilst it gains our affections, is apt to become also a ground of our confidence<br \/>[The rich mans wealth, says Solomon, is his strong city. We are apt to rely upon it, as a source both of present and future happiness. We seem, when possessed of riches, to be out of the reach of harm. When poor, we more habitually and more sensibly feel our dependence on Providence; but, when rich, we think we have no need of religion to make us happy, or of God to provide for us: we are ready to say, like the Rich Man in the Gospel, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry. In like manner, we think that we have no reason to fear about the future world. We are ready to imagine, that God will pay the same deference to wealth as our fellow-creatures do. We have no conception that a rich man, unless he has been guilty of some peculiarly enormous crimes, can be cast into hell. It is in vain that we read of the Rich Man lifting up his eyes in torments: we take for granted, that a rich man, if he have been tolerably decent in his deportment, must of necessity go to heaven: and a rich man will not endure, for the most part, to have a doubt of his future happiness suggested to him. It is not without reason, therefore, that St. Paul says, Charge them that are rich in this world, that they trust not in uncertain riches.]<br \/>But to place our confidence in any thing but God, is certain ruin<br \/>[God denounces a curse on those who make flesh their arm; and he represents their conduct as a departure of their hearts from him. And Job informs us, that the saying to the gold, Thou art my confidence, is an iniquity to be punished by the Judge, and a denial of the God that is above.]<\/p>\n<p>V.<\/p>\n<p>It is difficult to have riches, and not cleave to them <em>in preference to Christ<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This is the point more especially referred to in the text itself<br \/>[The reason assigned for the young mans forsaking Christ was, that he had great possessions: and hence our Lords reflection on the almost insurmountable difficulties which riches interpose in our way to heaven. The fact is, that though every one is not called to renounce his riches precisely in the same way that this opulent ruler was, every one is required to sit loose to them, and to be willing to renounce them all, whenever they shall stand in competition with his duty to God. And there is no man, who is not called to make some sacrifices for Christ. Now a rich mans reputation is exceedingly dear to him; and his interests in the world appear to him of almost incalculable importance: and, if he be called to renounce them all, the sacrifice appears too great to be endured. He hopes he shall find out an easier way to heaven; and chooses rather to risk the salvation of his soul, than to subject himself to such grievous trials in order to obtain it. Even those who have tasted somewhat of the sweetness of religion are sometimes drawn away, like Demas; and forsake their Saviour from love to this present world.]<br \/>But in choosing our portion now, we choose for eternity<br \/>[We must reap according to what we sow: he that soweth to the flesh must, of the flesh, reap corruption. We must part with all if we would have the pearl of great price. If we do not forsake all for Christ, we cannot be his disciples. We must count all things but loss for him. We must hate father and mother, and houses and lands, yea and our lives also, for his sake. If we will not lose our lives for him here, we never can find life in the eternal world.]<\/p>\n<p>Infer<br \/>1.<\/p>\n<p>How little true faith is there in the world!<\/p>\n<p>[Where is the man, who, if offered great riches, would be afraid to accept them, lest they should impede his way to heaven? or, when congratulated on his attainment of wealth, would damp the ardour of his friends by entreating rather an interest in their prayers, that the newly-acquired riches might not corrupt and destroy his soul? Where is the man possessed of riches, who does not think his way to heaven as easy as that of any other person? In short, where is the person who does not say in his heart, Give me riches: I will run the risk of their doing me any harm: I have no doubt I shall get to heaven with them as easily as without them? But would it be thus, if we really believed the words of our blessed Lord? Alas! even the Apostles themselves scarcely knew how to receive so hard a saying: we are told, that they were astonished out of measure. But it becomes us to credit the assertion of Him who could not err, and would not deceive.]<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>What reason have the poor to be satisfied with their lot!<\/p>\n<p>[If rich men have the advantage of them with respect to this world, the poor have incomparably better prospects with respect to the world to come. These are free and unincumbered, and ready, as it were, to run the race that is set before them; while the others are impeded by their lusts as with flowing garments, and have their feet laden with thick clay. These in multitudes flock to heaven, as doves to their windows, whilst very few of the others ever attain the heavenly prize [Note: <span class='bible'>1Co 1:26-28<\/span>. <span class='bible'>Jam 2:5<\/span>.]. It must not however be imagined that the poor will be saved, <em>because<\/em> they are poor; any more than the rich will perish, <em>because<\/em> they are rich. All must run, if they would obtain the prize. He who regards the salvation of his soul as the one thing needful, shall be saved, whether rich or poor; and he who does not, will perish. Neither the riches of the one, nor the poverty of the other, will avail him any thing. The only inquiry will be, Who among them was rich towards God? and their several attainments in real piety will be the only ground of distinction between them. Yet, inasmuch as a state of poverty renders us less exposed to temptation than wealth, it may well be endured with patience, and improved with gratitude. Even, if we have (through misfortunes of any kind) experienced a transition from wealth to poverty, we may well be reconciled to the change (however painful it may be to flesh and blood); since the loss we sustain may be in fact our greatest advantage: we have lost perhaps the cargo, which, if suffered to continue on board, would utterly have sunk the ship.]<\/p>\n<p>3.<\/p>\n<p>How thankful should we be that help is laid on One that is mighty!<\/p>\n<p>[When the Apostles exclaimed, Who then can be saved? they were consoled with the declaration, that all things were possible with God. Now this is our comfort, that all fulness is treasured up for us in Christ; and that he is able to save to the uttermost all that come unto God by him. None then need despair: however great our temptations may be, He knoweth how to deliver the godly out of them, and to preserve them blameless unto his heavenly kingdom. He can uphold a Joseph, a David, and a Daniel, amidst all the splendour of courts, as well as under the pressure of the heaviest trials. Let all then put their trust in Jesus, even in that almighty Saviour, whose grace is sufficient for them, and through whose strengthening communications they shall be able to do all things: so shall Abraham the rich and prosperous, and Lazarus the poor and indigent, rejoice together in Gods kingdom for ever and ever.]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Charles Simeon&#8217;s Horae Homileticae (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> The Disciples Astonished<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:6.12em'> Mar 10:23-30<\/p>\n<p> Jesus Christ is here moralising; that is to say, turning an incident to moral and spiritual account and use. He is musing aloud. The little transient anecdote has passed, but Jesus Christ&#8217;s doctrine respecting the event abides for ever, an eternal voice in the Church. Mark is the only writer who takes notice of the look and gesture of our Lord on this memorable occasion. We have noted often that Mark is the one who takes most notice of the Lord&#8217;s looks, as if the devoted disciple never turned his eyes away from the Lord&#8217;s expressive face; as if indeed the tongue could not say all that Christ wanted to say; as if he who would know the Lord&#8217;s meaning wholly must keep his eyes steadfastly on the Lord&#8217;s countenance. Although Jesus Christ is moralising, he is not conceding anything. He does not call the young, rich man back, and say, You can take this kingdom upon your own terms. Jesus Christ does not build up his party or Church or society by compromise. The Lord&#8217;s Church is a Church of the Cross, a society of crucified hearts. No man is in the Church who has not been crucified. He may be inquiring about the Church; he may even entertain admiration for the framework and general policy of the Church; but he is not inside until he has entered by the door of the Cross. There is no other door. We are crucified with Christ, or we are not in his society. Who, then, is in the Church? We must lay emphasis upon this word &#8220;hardly,&#8221; so as to get out of it the meaning with what infinite difficulty shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God. They will barely get in; they will hardly be in at all; if they do enter in it will be by an agony not to be expressed in words. It is much to have a Lord that recognises difficulties. This Lord of ours is not one who, by a wave of the hand, passes men into the Church; he says, It is hard work getting into the kingdom of God; it is difficult to give up one world for another. Here is the one world; it is visible, tangible, what we call real (though therein we are false), what we call certain (though therein we repeat our falsehood). Where is the kingdom of God? When you have found God you will find his kingdom. The kingdom of God is not in meat or in drink; the kingdom of God cometh not with observation; the kingdom of God is not a visible framework which men can estimate and walk around and form opinions about; the kingdom of God is a new consciousness, a new selfhood, a new creatureship, a new life, the beginning and pledge of eternity. If the kingdom of God were a set of doctrines which we could buy or appropriate or understand, we might as well have that kingdom as not have it; for it amounts to nothing more than assenting to a number of things which other men have written at the dictation of other men ages past, and if there is anything in it we may as well have it. That is not the kingdom of God; that is a make-up of man&#8217;s own; the kingdom of God is spiritual, penetrative, vital; changing the spirit, changing the soul. If any man be in Christ Jesus, he is a new creature; the old self is not only dead, but buried, forgotten; every thought, every impulse, every desire is new. If the Lord did not recognise difficulties some of us could not live. It is hard for some men to pray; it is good for you to whom it is hard if you can get as far in prayer as &#8220;Our Father.&#8221; If you put a full-stop there it will be taken as if other men had spoken all the prayer, clear away down to the resonant and grateful Amen. That is all you could do. You did that with difficulty; you are of the earth earthy; you love the world, you hug the dust, you are the victims of the senses: yet there is just one feeble ray of the upper light struggling with the darkness of your materialism, and you have got as by miracle and agony to &#8220;Our Father.&#8221; It is easy for other man to pray; prayer becomes their native tongue: silence to them would be penalty; they must speak devotional language, fall into devotional attitudes, and their very sighing is attuned to a religious emphasis. But it is hard for such men in some cases to give. That is their curse; they will pray with you all day, but they will not give you anything. It is easy for some men to give time, advice, sympathy; but it is impossible for them to give money. It is easy to others to give money, but they cannot or will not give time; they are busy, busy doing nothing; busy wasting their lives; busy pursuing nothing, and overtaking it. One man&#8217;s difficulty is another man&#8217;s pleasure. For want of this discrimination we have talked in cruel generalities, so that they to whom another feather&#8217;s weight would become a burden intolerable, have been distressed for want of that fine discrimination which separates character from character, not in vulgar lumpishness, but in fine gradation, in exquisite weight and balance.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God.&#8221; Then is it easy for poverty to enter that kingdom? It is as difficult for poverty to get in as for wealth to get in. There is no virtue in poverty; there is no vice in wealth. The more the good man has the better. I pray that every good man may become just as rich as he can bear to be, and yet retain his piety, because the more he has the more the poor have; he is only treasurer, steward, custodian for Christ. How hardly, with what difficulty, shall they that have any kind of riches enter into the kingdom of God! Do not limit the word &#8220;riches&#8221; to the word &#8220;money.&#8221; There are many kinds of riches, and all kinds of riches constitute difficulties in the way of spiritualisation. The poorest, commonest kind of wealth is money. Some are wealthy in morality. They can never see the kingdom of God. No &#8220;good&#8221; man can enter the kingdom of God: his goodness will be the ruin of him. Here is a young man who has kept all the commandments; not a day or a week, but all his life; handled them with consummate ease, made familiars of them, pets, idols; done them over and over again, could not help doing them, liked to do them. Was he in the kingdom of God? He was not within millions of leagues of that dominion of light and love and liberty, growth and progress and beauty, sweetness and security, benevolence divine. The difficulty is that some persons cannot distinguish between morality and Christianity. Morality is a question of manner. Etymologically, &#8220;morals&#8221; is a word which means manners; it means indeed manners that might be limited by attitudes, relations of an external and mechanical kind. Does piety of the true sort, then, exclude morality? Nay, verily, it includes it and glorifies it; puts it in its right place; divests it of all propitiatory value, and looks upon it as a necessity, arising spontaneously out of vital relations with God. It is not to be exhumed, it is to be emitted as flowers emit their fragrance. Persons who are rich in their respectability are not in the Church; persons who can sneer at the ill-behaviour of others are not in the Church; people who can point a finger of scorn at an erring life are not in the Church of Christ; people who are so noble as never to forgive have nothing to do with Christ, and ought never to mention his name by way of profession. There are men who are theologically exact enough to preside over a theological perdition, but who are not Christians; they can hold grudges in their hearts against other men. The man who can hold a grudge cannot pray; no prayer can get through a throat stuffed with that wool. We know nothing about this kingdom of God as revealed in Christ until we are prepared to be crucified in every finger, in every hair of the head, and to have spear-thrusts all over the life. Who, then, is in the kingdom of God? O thou cruel question, ring on! we cannot answer thee. Some are rich in ancestry. They are the most difficult persons in the world to deal with; they are nothing in themselves, but, oh, how grand they are in their predecessors, who in their turn were nothing, but grand in their progenitors. The most curious part of the psychology of such a case is that such people are often as humble as humility itself in ninety-nine points, but on the hundredth point the sky is not blue enough to shine upon them, and the sun acquires his dignity through lighting them to their occupation. All this must be cut off, or there will be no kingdom of God. Little mechanical morals, musty antiquated respectability, and even intellectual genius, and money, must all be cut off, one after the other, or all together: such tumours overswell the man, so that he cannot crush himself into God&#8217;s narrow door. This is Christianity.<\/p>\n<p> Look at the poor disciples! &#8220;They were astonished at his words;&#8221; and again ( Mar 10:26 ), &#8220;And they were astonished out of measure.&#8221; What a difference between the Lord and his followers! Jesus Christ spoke from an altitude that made the whole universe on a level; but those who were dwelling a thousand worlds lower down in the great house of space were amazed and bewildered, embarrassed and overwhelmed, by everything the great Lord said. This is not wholly to be deprecated. Even astonishment has a part to play in our spiritual education. When we have reached the <em> nil admirari<\/em> stage of development, at which we wonder at nothing, we might as well have the extinguisher placed upon us, for the universe is played out, and creation is underfoot, a thing without value, fascination, or utility. Blessed is he who keeps his astonishment young, fresh, expressive; happy in perpetual festival is he who still loves the wayside flowers, and who when he sees the first violet exclaims as if he had seen a new planet. Do not let little things lose their charm; do not allow spring to come back with her lapful of simple beautiful field-flowers and you take no notice of the largess; welcome the vernal queen. What she brings is from heaven: all flowers grow there; here they are exotics: let them take you back, by progress, beauty, suggestion, unspoken sympathy, to their native clime: flowers are the thoughts of God. At the same time our piety must pass beyond the stage of astonishment, and find its rest in the point of service. Christianity must renew its youth by giving itself away for the benefit of others.<\/p>\n<p> How impossible it is to crush all self-consciousness out of men! No sooner had Peter heard this discourse, so tender in its eloquence, than he began to say unto the Lord, &#8220;Lo, we have left all.&#8221; Think of Peter&#8217;s &#8220;all&#8221;! How long would it take to write an inventory of that fisherman&#8217;s &#8220;all&#8221;? Yet he pronounced the word &#8220;all&#8221; with such elongated emphasis that anybody would have thought he had really made some sacrifice for Christ. How nobly did the Saviour reply; how he blotted out Peter&#8217;s contribution; how he made the senior apostle ashamed of himself, as he &#8220;answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel&#8217;s, but he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life.&#8221; Every man is overpaid. Here we see the right use of religious hyperbole or exaggeration. Think of a man having a hundred mothers! Jesus Christ often uses self-correcting phrases. The Lord often puts our lessons at the point of impossibility, that we may next drop to the point of reality. &#8220;An hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands.&#8221; Every Christian has these; the realisation is already accomplished. All houses belong to the Christian heart; all children belong to the regenerated, Christ-expressing soul; the last born into the family of God owns creation: other ownership is legal, nominal, mechanical. The poet holds the landscape, and no other man ever did hold it; the Christian holds all wheatfields and vineyards, the cattle upon a thousand hills are his; nay, saith Paul, when we are counting up our little riches, all things are yours, angels, and principalities, and powers, and things present, and things to come, and height and depth, and life and death, are yours. We do not realise our possessions; we turn whiningly away from infinite riches, and groan because the body has certain wants which cannot be instantaneously appeased or satisfied. We must live in divine exultancy; we must find our riches in God. Herein is it true that no good soul can ever be poor; herein is the twenty-third psalm the psalm of life &#8220;The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The People&#8217;s Bible by Joseph Parker<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 23 And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! <strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Ver. 23. <strong> That have riches<\/strong> ] Or rather, are had of riches. Have them we may, love them we may not, <span class='bible'>1Jn 2:15<\/span> . <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 23 31.<\/strong> ] Here our Mar 10:24 is a most important addition; the rest is much alike in the three. In that verse we have all misunderstanding of our Lord&rsquo;s saying removed, and &ldquo;the proverb,&rdquo; as Wesley well observes (Stier ii. p. 290), &ldquo;shifted to this ground: &lsquo;It is easier for a camel, &amp;c. than for a rich man <em> to cast off his trust<\/em> in his riches.&rsquo; &rdquo; Yet the power of divine grace can and does accomplish even this.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Henry Alford&#8217;s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Mar 10:23-27<\/span> . <em> The moral of the story given for the benefit of the disciples<\/em> ,  (<span class='bible'>Mar 3:5<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Mar 3:34<\/span> ), looking around, to see what impression the incident had made on the Twelve.  =  , Euthy.   ., with what difficulty!   , wealth collectively held by the rich class (Meyer).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Mar 10:23-27<\/p>\n<p> 23And Jesus, looking around, said to His disciples, &#8220;How hard it will be for those who are wealthy to enter the kingdom of God!&#8221; 24The disciples were amazed at His words. But Jesus answered again and said to them, &#8220;Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! 25It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.&#8221; 26They were even more astonished and said to Him, &#8220;Then who can be saved?&#8221; 27Looking at them, Jesus said, &#8220;With people it is impossible, but not with God; for all things are possible with God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mar 10:23 &#8220;And Jesus, looking around&#8221; This expression is used several times to denote that Jesus took notice of how His teachings affected others (cf. Mar 3:5; Mar 3:34; Mar 5:32; Mar 10:23; Mar 11:11). Only Luk 6:10 is a parallel. This is uniquely a memory of Peter.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;How hard it will be for those who are wealthy to enter the kingdom of God'&#8221; This would have been so surprising to the disciples (cf. Mar 10:24). The OT traditional view, based on Deuteronomy 27-28, was that wealth and health were related to one&#8217;s covenant performance and God&#8217;s blessing. This is the very issue addressed by Job and Psalms 73. Wealthy humans tend to trust in their own resources instead of God.<\/p>\n<p>SPECIAL TOPIC: WEALTH <\/p>\n<p>Mar 10:24 &#8220;&#8216;Children'&#8221; Jesus called the disciples by the term used in His previous teaching session (cf. Mar 10:13-16). This reenforces that &#8220;children&#8221; refers to adult believers.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God'&#8221; This is a shocking statement. Salvation is a free gift in the finished work of Christ for anyone\/everyone who responds by repentance and faith. The problem comes when we somehow think we deserve it or merit it! Faith is hard for prideful, self-sufficient, fallen humanity. We would like it better if our relationship with God was difficult and hard so that we could take pride in our achieving it, but as it is, God&#8217;s way of repentance and faith is humiliating to fallen mankind, especially wealthy, educated, privileged mankind.<\/p>\n<p>Because this verse is so terse several ancient scribes tried to limit its scope by inserting a qualifying phrase (cf. Bruce M. Metzger&#8217;s A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament:<\/p>\n<p>1.  &#8220;for those who trust in riches&#8221; found in MSS A, C, D, and the Textus Receptus<\/p>\n<p>2.  &#8220;a rich man&#8221; in MS W<\/p>\n<p>3.  &#8220;those who have possessions&#8221; in minuscule 1241<\/p>\n<p>Mar 10:25 &#8220;&#8216;camel to go through the eye of a needle'&#8221; Like Mat 23:24, this phrase is an Oriental overstatement. Several scribes and many commentators have tried to explain this statement as (1) a word play between &#8220;camel&#8221; (kamlos) and &#8220;rope&#8221; (kamilus), which comes from the fifth century or (2) using &#8220;needle&#8217;s eye&#8221; to refer to a small gate in one of the large gates of Jerusalem, but neither of these have historical evidence (cf. Fee and Stuart&#8217;s How To Read the Bible For All Its Worth, p.21). These attempts miss the point of the hyperbole (cf. Mat 19:24; Luk 18:25).<\/p>\n<p>Mar 10:26 &#8220;astonished&#8221; Mark often uses this term (ekplssomai) to describe how the people reacted to Jesus&#8217; teachings and actions (cf. Mar 1:22; Mar 6:2; Mar 7:37; Mar 10:26; Mar 11:18; and a synonym thambe in Mar 10:24). Jesus&#8217; message was so different from the rabbis, both in form (i.e., His authority) and message (i.e., the nature of the Kingdom).<\/p>\n<p>NASB&#8221;saying to Him&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NKJV&#8221;saying among themselves&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NRSV&#8221;said to one another&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>TEV&#8221;asked one another&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NJB&#8221;saying to one another&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>These differing translations relate to various Greek manuscript variants.<\/p>\n<p>1. NKJV, MSS A, D, W, and Textus Receptus<\/p>\n<p>2. NRSV, TEV, NJB, MS M* and the Peshitta translation<\/p>\n<p>3. NASB, MSS , B, and C<\/p>\n<p>4. one minuscule manuscript (i.e., 569) and some Coptic translations omit the phrase, as do Mat 19:25 and Luk 18:26<\/p>\n<p>Mar 10:27 This verse&#8217;s emphasis on the grace of God is such a welcome balance to the radical nature of NT discipleship. Humans are unable to approach a holy God, but the wonderful, amazing truth is that He approaches us!<\/p>\n<p>This saying may be an OT allusion to Gen 18:14 or Jer 32:17; Jer 32:24. Mankind&#8217;s only hope is in the character, promises, and actions of the one true God!<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>hardly = difficultly. Because of their own reluc tance to part with riches: not from denial of God&#8217;s mercy. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>23-31.] Here our Mar 10:24 is a most important addition; the rest is much alike in the three. In that verse we have all misunderstanding of our Lords saying removed, and the proverb, as Wesley well observes (Stier ii. p. 290), shifted to this ground: It is easier for a camel, &amp;c. than for a rich man to cast off his trust in his riches.   Yet the power of divine grace can and does accomplish even this.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 10:23. , having looked round about) We have often the look [countenance] of Christ described, corresponding as it did to His inward feeling, and adapted to the inward feelings of His hearers: Comp. Mar 5:21; Mar 5:27.-, how) The proposition stated is, A rich man is with difficulty saved: the subject of the proposition is limited in Mar 10:24 [They that trust in riches being substituted for, they that have riches]: the predicate is enlarged [amplified: Mar 10:25 being the amplification of the simple predicate, enter into the kingdom of God]. They [the subject and predicate of the proposition, A rich man is with difficulty saved] differ in the abstract; they for the most part agree in the concrete.[15]-   , they that have riches) The few have most of the wealth of the world.<\/p>\n<p>[15] As a matter of fact, and not reasoning a priori, rich men are with difficulty saved.-ED. and TRANSL.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 10:23-27<\/p>\n<p>4. THE DANGER OF RICHES<\/p>\n<p>Mar 10:23-27<\/p>\n<p>(Mat 19:23-26; Luk 18:24-27)<\/p>\n<p>23 And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!&#8211;[When the young man went away sorrowful Jesus was sad. He and the angels in heaven rejoice when a sinner repents. They are sad and sorrowful when one&#8211;especially one so near the kingdom as this man seemed to be&#8211;turns from the way of truth. So he looked round about upon his disciples, to see the effect on their minds doubtless, and to prepare them for the truth he now wishes to enforce by this example. He said it is hard for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven. This means that, under the rule or laws of God, it is difficult for a rich man to do this, because the riches gain such a hold on his affections, and make such a demand upon his time, that they leave neither disposition nor time to obey God.]<\/p>\n<p>24 And the disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!&#8211;[The astonishment was the greater because among the Jews riches were accounted the blessing of God bestowed for fidelity to him. They recognized that sometime a prosperity might come to a course of wickedness, hut it would he short-lived, and that permanent prosperity was a sure sign of the blessing of God. They were, then, the more astonished when Jesus said: &#8220;How hardly&#8221;&#8211;with what difficulty&#8211;&#8220;shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!&#8221; He means to say it is exceedingly difficult for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. They were not only amazed but terrified at the thought, because some of them possessed property, and they thought the statement cut them off.] But those already rich are not the only persons exposed to this danger. Those who are eager in the pursuit of wealth are equally exposed; for the apostle (1Ti 6:9) said: &#8220;But they that are minded to be rich fall into a temptation and a snare and many foolish and hurtful lusts, such as drown men in destruction and perdition.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>25 It is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.&#8211;This was used to denote that a thing was impossible, or exceedingly difficult. [There have been many explanations of this sentence. Some say there was a passage through the walls of Jerusalem very difficult for the camel with its load to pass through; others make the camel a cable that is difficult to pass through the eye of a needle. He had said it was impossible for a rich man&#8211;one who trusted in riches, one who refused to give up his riches at the demand of Jesus&#8211;to be saved, and this illustration was used to enforce that impossibility. This being so, we see nothing to be gained by changing the plain meaning of the language. It is impossible for a man who trusts in riches&#8211;whose affections are set on riches, who makes the gaining of riches the end of his labors, who refuses to give up his riches to subserve the cause of God and the good of man&#8211;to bring himself under the laws of God; and the figure that most forcibly expressed that impossibility most faithfully serves the master&#8217;s purpose. Let us not try to weaken the force of the illustration, but urge it as a truth that will judge us at the last day. This still the more astonished them, and they asked, &#8220;Then who can be saved?&#8221; Clearly the apostles understood it to condemn all classes of people. We apply it to the millionaire, and think it does not apply to us; but it means all whose affections are placed on money. A man who lets the attainment of five dollars hinder his obedience to God as much falls under the condemnation of this law as he who lets the attainment of ten thousand dollars come between him and obedience to God. It is the spirit with which we view money, not the amount.] There are two classes of men whom Jesus considers rich and are here condemned. Namely, one who loves his riches, and makes an idol of them; the other who supremely desires to be rich. In other words, one who already &#8220;has it&#8221; and is making an idol of it, and one who does not have it, but is seeking it through undue means, and will make an idol of it if he gets it. Note that Christ did not condemn riches but the abuse of riches&#8211;the love of it. (1Ti 6:10.) Extreme poverty may become as dangerous as extreme riches for the reason each has its own peculiar temptations. Then, let us pray the prayer of Agur, the son of Jakeh, and ask the position of mediocrity (Prow. 30:8, 9), neither poverty nor riches. A man may have great wealth, and love God more than the wealth, and be a Christian; just as a poor man may have little, and love that little more than God, and never be a Christian. The principle works both ways.<\/p>\n<p>26 And they were astonished exceedingly, saying unto him, Then who can be saved?&#8211;[Their astonishment knew no bounds. They understood it to condemn every one who possessed or labored for property and asked the question in despair.]<\/p>\n<p>27 Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible,&#8211;It is beyond human power for any to be saved&#8211;to men influenced by the world this seems to be unwise. Worldly motives and principles cannot induce people to cease to trust in riches. Something more than the wisdom of men and the inducements of the world is necessary to accomplish this.<\/p>\n<p>but not with God: for all things are possible with God.&#8211;[He looked upon them in their amazement and despondency, and said, &#8220;With men it is impossible.&#8221; These things to men seem impossible&#8211;that is, it is impossible for a man to give up his love for what he has in order to honor God and help his suffering and needy fellow men. Left to their own unaided efforts and to human helps, this must fail. But &#8220;all things are possible with God.&#8221; God can school and train men to give up all for Christ. To do it to the least of these his disciples is to do good to Christ. The evil of riches and the struggle for riches is presented frequently in the Bible.]<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>True Riches and Real Greatness <\/p>\n<p>Mar 10:23-52<\/p>\n<p>Wealth brings many temptations. It is not said that rich men cannot get through the gate, but they will have to stoop very low and be stripped of the love of wealth, though not necessarily of wealth itself. In Christs kingdom to give all is to get all. The surrendered life needs no pity, for what it loses on the material side is more than compensated by its enormous spiritual gains, Mar 10:30-31. Perhaps the request of the two brethren was dictated rather by the desire to be near the Master than by ambition; but in any case there is only one price to be paid. We must know the fellowship of His sufferings, if we are to share His glory, 2Ti 2:11, etc. It is easy to say, We are able; but had they not experienced the day of Pentecost, these two aspirants had certainly failed, Php 4:13. If you are not called to suffer with Him, then serve. Service like Christs will bring you near His throne, as will also a share in His suffering. With us as with Bartimaeus, obstacles and difficulties should not daunt, but rather incite to more eager prayers. Christ is ever saying to men-Courage! Only faith could make a blind man cast away his garment, but he knew that he would be able to find it again with the sight that Jesus would certainly bestow.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: F.B. Meyer&#8217;s Through the Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>looked: Mar 3:5, Mar 5:32 <\/p>\n<p>How: Mat 19:23-26, Luk 18:24, 1Co 1:26, Jam 2:5, Jam 4:4 <\/p>\n<p>enter: Mar 10:15, Mat 18:3, Joh 3:5, 2Pe 1:11 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Psa 62:10 &#8211; riches Mat 7:21 &#8211; shall Mat 13:22 &#8211; the care Mar 15:43 &#8211; an Luk 20:17 &#8211; beheld<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>THE CHURCH AND WEALTH<\/p>\n<p>And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto His disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! And the disciples were amazed at His words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished exceedingly.<\/p>\n<p>Mar 10:23-26 (R.V. marg.)<\/p>\n<p>These, and the like, words of our Lord have stood over against the Church in many ages and many lands, convicting it of a great unreality; but over against no Church and in no age have they sounded a more solemn protest than against our own to-day. Are we of the Church of England to-day faithful, as a great body of disciples should be, to our Masters teaching about wealth? This teaching is not a matter of a few words here and there. It is embodied in His whole life and method.<\/p>\n<p>I. The powerlessness of the Church.Surely I have laboured in vain, and spent my strength for naught! Such a feeling is in the mind of very many of us as we take stock of the powerlessness of the Church, in spite of even splendid exceptions in this or that parish, to produce any broad, corporate effect, to make any effective spiritual appeal by its own proper influence, in England to-day. We are not in touch with the mass of the labouring people. Is not this because we are the Church of the rich rather than of the poorof capital rather than of labour? By this I mean that in the strata of society the Church works from above rather than from below. The opinions and the prejudices that are associated with its administration as a whole are the opinions and the prejudices of the higher and higher-middle classes, rather than of the wage-earners. This becomes the more apparent if you contrast the Church of England in this respect with the Roman Catholic Church in Ireland or with the Presbyterian Churches of Scotland, at least as they have stood, up to the rise of the vast industrial cities like Glasgow or Dundee, where I suppose that labour stands as much aloof from any existing religious organisation as in our English cities.<\/p>\n<p>II. The test of vitality.It is the chief test of the vitality of a Church of Christ in any country that it should represent the poor, the wage-earners, those who live by manual labour: that it should be a community in which the labourers hold the prerogative position. There is our great failure. Yet we have laboured very hard for the poor and amongst them. At the hand of Him Who said, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these My brethren, ye have done it unto Me, there is laid up a rich store of benediction for men and women, priests and laymen innumerable, whose unselfish, unremitting, unrequited toil is really known only in the heart of our Lord. That is our real comfort. We are sure that all this labour will not be in vain.<\/p>\n<p>III. Lines of recovery.It, as it were, authorises us to claim illumination and guidance in reversing the great wrong and in averting the great judgment; or rather it authorises us to claim strength to make the right use of Divine chastisements. Let me indicate some lines of hopeful recovery.<\/p>\n<p>(a) The Church must set itself deliberately and of set purpose, as far as possible, to get rid of the administration of relief from the ministry of the Word and Sacraments, and to associate it with the State, the municipality, and voluntary organisations of citizens on a purely secular basis.<\/p>\n<p>(b) We want to make the most of what we have already. We have a really considerable body of communicants who are artisans; but we need to give them their true place and influence, and to mass them, so that their corporate effect shall tell. We must prevent the parishioners of poor parishes being ousted by those who come from outside.<\/p>\n<p>(c) To do all this safely we must act on the basis of a true sacerdotalism. The ministerial priesthood is in charge of the Word and Sacraments, and the clergy should help every confirmed person to claim his or her place in the priestly body, and to learn to act on the apostolic pattern.<\/p>\n<p>(d) We must dissociate the clergy from being identified with the wealthier classes.<\/p>\n<p>These things are difficult. Such fundamental social changes are hard to bring about. We are an unimaginative and conservative people. True, quite true. But the beginnings are in prayer and penitence and right desire, and in giving the first place in our minds and counsels to the matters that are really of first importance.<\/p>\n<p>Bishop Gore.<\/p>\n<p>Illustration<\/p>\n<p>Oh! how different would be the position of the Church if we clergy would sacrifice everything to concentrate ourselves upon really bringing out the social meaning of our Sacraments, upon really understanding and giving voice to the spirit of Christian brotherhood, upon really making ourselves the organs for expressing social justice and uttering effectively the Divine wrath upon all that degrades and crushes the weak and ignorant and poor. Oh! how different would be our moral appeal if Christs claim upon wealthChrists claim for great sacrifices, great abandonments, as the normal exhibitions of a converted heartwere really once again the claim of the actual Church upon clergy and laity. But all this is only to ask that we should in penitence and prayer, give ourselves to teaching the faith and practice of Christendom as it is in the Bible. How, then, would many of the questions which now bulk biggest as Church questions take a very subordinate place! Truly we have protected the letter of Scripture, while its spirit of judgment and justice was being ignored; we have contended for ceremonial liberty, while the fundamental meaning of our sacraments of brotherhood was being parodied by a miserable religious selfishness.<\/p>\n<p>(SECOND OUTLINE)<\/p>\n<p>CHRISTIANITY AND RICHES<\/p>\n<p>If we are right in understanding by eternal life the highest life the soul is capable of living, we see that in the case of this youth it could only be obtained by absolute surrender of all that he could call his own. Earthly possessions were keeping him back from true blessedness. Can Christs teaching, How hardly shall they that have riches, etc., be reconciled with the condition of our modern world? There is a twofold danger(a) of explaining Christs words away, and (b) of interpreting them too literally.<\/p>\n<p>I. The spirit of Christs words.Clearly we should be explaining those words away were we to say that they have no reference to property, or that those words contain no special and solemn warning for the well-to-do in regard to that hindrance to which Christ has pointed as besetting their entrance into life. The disciples asked each other in dismay, Who then can be saved? And that question shows that they took their Master to be referring not to men of great wealth alone, but to a much larger class. The youth whom they saw going away sorrowful had great possessions, it is said; but who shall say what degree of wealth that expression describes? It has a different meaning in every rank of society, in every country, in every condition. There is, in fact, no absolute criterion of wealth; the affluence of yesterday becomes the competence of to-day and the poverty of to-morrow. Every increase of means involves increase of claims, and increase in many cases so great that a nominal fortune affords but an uncertain measure of what is really at the disposal of its possessor. The truth is that no inventory of goods and chattels, no figure we can name, will suffice to define what our Lord meant by a rich man, and for this reason: that from the moral and spiritual point of view, which was His, it is not the actual amount that matters, but the space it occupies in the heart, the hold it has got upon the affections.<\/p>\n<p>II. Moral peril.No man who is keeping guard over his desires, and asking himself, as we are all bound to ask ourselves day by day, what it is that for him makes life worth living, will underrate the moral peril of riches; who, indeed, will dare to say that for him it does not exist who remembers what a host of haunting terrors drop off and vanish for the happy man who attains to this small competence, and what an enviable escape from corroding anxiety and care there is for the man that has reached the independence of the safest investment? Can one wonder that to most people money-seeking should be the highest pursuit, and accumulated property the first and almost only thing worthy of a sensible mans ambition? It was a saying of Carlyles that an Englishmans hell is want of money and failure to acquire property. The advice of Iago, Put money in thy purse, is no longer the cynical counsel of a mammon-worshipper, but the practical wisdom of a man of the world, who has explored all the avenues to success, and finds one, and only one, to recommend.<\/p>\n<p>III. Take heed.Living under such conditions as we do, in a society deeply and increasingly tainted with mammon-worship, if we are to remain Christians in any sense we must take heed to our ways, and watch narrowly all our thoughts. We require, one and all, to be revising the estimate of life and objects by the light of that teaching which shall never pass away. Let us distinguish between those who present, roughly speaking, two types of character. Of the one you can say money belongs to him; he is its master; it is his instrument. Of the other you say he belongs to his money; he has given it the mastery, and he is its slave; he drudges for it, and he will drudge in an ever-deepening servitude, till the hour when he must leave it all behind. And this is the rich man in Christs sense; this is the man who trusts in his riches; whose deity, whatever he may profess, is the almighty dollar, governing the whole extent of his energies, dictating his whole estimate of men and things.<\/p>\n<p>Rev. Canon Duckworth.<\/p>\n<p>Illustration<\/p>\n<p>Not a few have made the sacrifice from which the young man flinched. In the life of St. Anthony, the father of the monastic system, we read that going into the church one day in early years, when the story we are studying happened to be the Gospel, he took our Lords demand upon the young ruler as a direct message to himself, and at once proceeded to distribute to the inhabitants of his native village the splendid estates he had inherited, reserving only a small portion of property for his sister. Not long after he was moved to give this away as well, and to place his sister in a society of religious recluses, while he himself embraced a life of the most rigid asceticism. In the course of the Christian centuries there have been many imitators of St. Anthony. That same voice which spoke so clearly to him persuaded St. Francis of Assisi to forsake his own people and fathers house for a company of barefooted friars bound to lifelong poverty; and many more have been disquieted by the doubt whether the command on which these men literally acted was not somehow binding upon them.<\/p>\n<p>(THIRD OUTLINE)<\/p>\n<p>THE LOVE OF MONEY<\/p>\n<p>Sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, was the direct command of Jesus to the rich young ruler, noble in character, desiring perfection, but mastered, owned by his possessions, forced to make the Great Refusal. Ninety-nine rich Christians to-day out of every hundred are making just the same refusal, serenely confident that the order has naught to do with them.<\/p>\n<p>I. It is the teaching of Jesus, it seems to me, that the best environment for our souls is neither poverty nor riches, but simple competencethat condition of life which He Himself consecrated by adopting it.<\/p>\n<p>II. The most popular of English professions, money-making for personal enjoyment, is prohibited to the Christian. Obviously, no man following and believing Jesus, and desiring heaven, would deliberately adopt a mode of life which would make it hard to enter there.<\/p>\n<p>III. We disguise the issue.We disguise it by our orthodox confession that wealth is a trust, not an absolute ownership. It is true: it is Christs doctrine, and in theory we gladly acknowledge it. Money is a stewardship. The Christian possessing riches is merely a trustee. Consider, then. What sort of a name do you apply to a trustee who appropriates to his own personal use and indulgence nine-tenths of the property assigned to him in trust for the benefit of others? Is he fraudulent?<\/p>\n<p>IV. If these are the Christian doctrines, if wealth is either to be no longer sought for, or if inherited to be distributed in benefactions, what will become of civilisation? Civilisation! We are not civilised. There is no such thing known yet on the earth. What we have is an industrial chaos, based upon egoism and strife and greed. Competition, not brotherhood is the note of it. It is for the few, not the many. It means, in this land, a million over-rich people at the top, a million paupers at the bottom, three millions wretchedly, cruelly poor, ten millions oppressed by care and terror. It means millionaires and sweated industries. It means palaces and slums side by side. It means the massacre of the innocents in all our large cities, a population physically deteriorating year by year. It means epicurean banquets and insane luxury, coexistent with starving school-children. It means huge fortunes for Stock Exchange gamblers and Napoleons of finance; half a crown a week and a loaf of bread for noble, honest labourers who have toiled hard for half a century. It means labour divorced from joy, men transformed into machines, life for the majority dull, grey-tinted, monotonous.<\/p>\n<p>V. And because of all these cruelties and injustices, because Christians have discarded the social teaching of Jesus, because Christian teachers will not, or dare not, proclaim what He proclaimed, we have lost the hearts of the working-classes. The common people heard Jesus gladly. They stand aloof from the Christianity of to-day. It is no use hiding the fact. The rich and the comfortable fill our churches; the masses are outside. The main cause of their alienation is the monstrous contradiction between Christian ethics and the state of society which Christians tolerate.<\/p>\n<p>VI. There is only one remedy: Back to Christ. Some day there will arise a Christian commonwealth which will loyally accept His teaching, and believe the words of the Son of God. In that Kingdom of Heaven on earth there will be neither rich nor poor. It will contain no leisured class, no idle drones. He that will not work, neither should he eat. It will be a league of brothers, not a hateful, warring, discordant chaos of anarchic commercialism. Captains of industry will displace the fortune-hunters. Work shall be a joy, not a curse. Luxurywhatever forms of it are pure and of good reportmusic, art, knowledgewill be enjoyed in common. And every man faithful to duty and righteousness shall live with hope in his heart. Already there are signs of the dawn of a brighter day.<\/p>\n<p>Rev. W. Hudson Shaw.<\/p>\n<p>Illustration<\/p>\n<p>I had a parishioner once, a most pious Christian who knew all the Church collects by heart, possessor of a fortune of 60,000. Suddenly he lost it all, and was reduced to a modest income of 3 a week. It broke his heart: he turned his face to the wall and died; life was no longer worth living. What the Emperor Hadrian said in the second century is, alas! largely true of the English to-day. They have, he declared, but one Godmoney: it is he alone that Christians, Jews, and all the rest adore. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Church Pulpit Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Chapter 27.<\/p>\n<p>Christ&#8217;s Teaching About Wealth<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto His disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the Kingdom of God! And the disciples were astonished at His words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the Kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God. And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.&#8221;-Mar 10:23-27.<\/p>\n<p>Why the Lesson was given.<\/p>\n<p>The conversation here given followed immediately upon the incident of the rich young ruler, and was indeed suggested by it. The departure of the young ruler was the text, and these verses were the sermon Christ preached upon it. Or, if you like to put it in a slightly different way, in the preceding paragraph you have the story; in this paragraph Christ points the moral. The departure of the young ruler showed how fierce and strong are the foes that come between a man and eternal life. There is, as John Bunyan puts it, a crowd barring the way to the palace gate. And a man needs to be not only of a stout countenance, but also of a very brave heart, if he is to bid defiance to that armed throng, and say to the man with the inkhorn, &#8220;Set down my name, sir.&#8221; We have all to &#8220;agonise,&#8221; if we would enter in by the strait gate. And that is why, when the young ruler went away, &#8220;Jesus looked round about, and saith unto His disciples, how hardly&#8221;-i.e. with what difficulty-&#8220;shall they that have riches&#8221;-or rather, &#8220;shall they that have the riches, the possessions of the world&#8221;-&#8220;enter into the Kingdom of God!&#8221; (Mar 10:23).<\/p>\n<p>The Lord&#8217;s Look and Words.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;He looked round about&#8221;; withdrawing His gaze from the retreating figure of the young ruler, he turned it upon the Twelve. He knew that the love of money, which had caused the young ruler to make the &#8220;great refusal,&#8221; was already doing its deadly work in Judas&#8217; soul. And perhaps it was on Judas&#8217; face the eyes of the Lord rested, as it was to Judas&#8217; heart and conscience that He spoke, when He said, How hardly-with what difficulty-shall they who have the good things of life enter into the Kingdom of God?<\/p>\n<p>The Disciples&#8217; Amazement<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And the disciples,&#8221; we read, &#8220;were amazed at His words&#8221; (Mar 10:24). They destroyed every notion about wealth the disciples had ever cherished. They had been brought up on the Old Testament; and there wealth is repeatedly spoken of as a sign of God&#8217;s favour. So the Wise Man says of wisdom, &#8220;Length of days is in her right hand, and in her left hand are riches and honour&#8221; (Pro 3:16). Thus Christ&#8217;s dictum overturned all their inherited ideas. They themselves were looking forward to material rewards-to princedoms and dominions and thrones. And here Christ declares that that very thing which they had been taught to desire, and to regard as a proof of the Divine favour, was not a blessing, but something like a curse; not a help, but a hindrance, an almost insurmountable obstacle to the possession of the Kingdom. And here I prefer the reading noted in the Revised Version margin, which omits the words &#8220;those that trust in riches.&#8221; According to the oldest MSS., what Jesus said when He saw the bewilderment His first remark had caused, was this, &#8220;Children, how hard it is to enter the Kingdom of God!&#8221; He enlarges His field of vision. He makes His first statement, &#8220;Children-you notice the tenderness of His address-&#8220;I said a moment ago, it is hard for the rich man to enter the Kingdom of God. It is hard for every one. There are barriers in every one&#8217;s way. It is a strait gate and a narrow way for all. But it is specially hard for the rich. It is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Camel and the Needle&#8217;s Eye.<\/p>\n<p>Attempts have been made to soften this figure of the camel and the needle&#8217;s eye. Some have suggested that the word &#8220;camel&#8221; in the Greek is a mistake for &#8220;cable.&#8221; And others, accepting &#8220;camel&#8221; as correct, have suggested that the &#8220;needle&#8217;s eye&#8221; is to be understood as a small side-gate near the great gate in Jerusalem. But the phrase must be accepted just as it stands. It is exactly the kind of striking, hyperbolical figure in which an Eastern speaker would delight. Southey caught its spirit when he wrote:-<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I would ride the camel,<\/p>\n<p>Yea, leap him flying, through the needle&#8217;s eye,<\/p>\n<p>As easily as such a pampered soul<\/p>\n<p>Could pass the narrow gate.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It is a proverbial expression, meant to represent vividly and memorably the extraordinary difficulty of discharging the responsibilities and overcoming the temptations of riches. So the Lord&#8217;s answer to the disciples&#8217; wonder was simply to emphasize His former statement.<\/p>\n<p>The Difference God makes.<\/p>\n<p>The Lord&#8217;s repetition of His statement only intensified the disciples&#8217; amazement. &#8220;They were astonished exceedingly,&#8221; saying unto Him, &#8220;Then who can be saved?&#8221; They began to be dimly conscious of difficulties of which they had never before dreamed. Their minds had travelled beyond the cares of the rich. A new conception of the Kingdom began to dawn upon them. They began to tremble about any one&#8217;s salvation. &#8220;Who then can be saved?&#8221; they asked. And Jesus replied, &#8220;With men it is impossible, but not with God&#8221; (Mar 10:27). If it depended upon men themselves, their own unaided efforts, their own righteousness, they would never gain the Kingdom. But with God all things are possible. With God to help, the impossible may become actual, and man, yes, even the rich man, may enter the Kingdom of God.<\/p>\n<p>The Legitimacy of Wealth.<\/p>\n<p>And now as to the light this passage throws upon our Lord&#8217;s teaching about wealth. Upon the general subject I will say but one or two words. There is a school amongst us that asserts that Jesus condemned wealth altogether, and that a rich Christian is therefore a contradiction in terms. I think, from my study of the Gospels, that this school is quite wrong. Of course ill-gotten wealth is absolutely debarred to the Christian. Money made in dishonest ways, or gained by oppression, by sweated labour, for instance, is unchristian money. But I do not see how anyone can read the Gospels without finding that Jesus admits the legitimacy of wealth. It is implied in the parables of the Talents and the Pounds. It is implied here in this story of the young ruler. Jesus does not deny the man&#8217;s right to his wealth. He only urges the surrender of it as the way to perfection. That is to say, the surrender of wealth is not an economic principle, it is simply in this case a matter of moral choice. Jesus does not enjoin the monkish vow of poverty upon His followers. Anthony, who, on reading the story of the young ruler, forthwith distributed to the villagers his large fertile estates, inherited from his father, sent his sister to be educated with a society of pious virgins, and then settled down to a rigidly ascetic life, was imitating the letter, and not the spirit of Scripture. And when Renan says that the monk is in a sense the only true Christian, he is repeating Anthony&#8217;s mistake. Jesus nowhere holds that every Christian must sacrifice his wealth, and take the vow of poverty.<\/p>\n<p>-And its True Use.<\/p>\n<p>Not only so, but our Lord obviously teaches that wealth may be made beneficent; that it can minister not simply to the good of others, but also to the good of a man&#8217;s own soul. That is surely the whole teaching of the parable of the Unrighteous Steward. Men can make friends even of the unrighteous mammon. They can turn a thing so pregnant with peril as wealth into a great means of blessing. Surely we have seen illustrations of all this in the cases of men-of whom our own days supply many striking and familiar examples-whose wealth has been employed in a gracious, helpful and Christian ministry.<\/p>\n<p>The Perils of Wealth.<\/p>\n<p>But, while Jesus admits the legitimacy of wealth, and allows that money may be transfigured into a minister of grace, no one can read the New Testament with any attention without seeing that the main point He emphasizes is, not its legitimacy, nor its possibilities of gracious ministry, but its perils-its menacing and deadly perils. Again and again He bids men be on the watch against the fascinations of wealth. He obviously regards mammon as the chief rival and antagonist of God in the affections of men. Again and again He bids men beware of covetousness. And perhaps His insistence upon the perils of wealth reaches its climax in the words, &#8220;It is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye, than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God&#8221; (Mar 10:25).<\/p>\n<p>Men absorbed in Wealth.<\/p>\n<p>Now can we discover what, according to our Lord, are the perils of wealth that make Him so insistent in His warnings against it? I think we can. (1) First of all, our Lord saw that wealth had a strange but fatal power of absorbing the affections of the soul, and so becoming the rival and antagonist of God. That is what had happened in the case of this young ruler. God claims the first place in every soul. He will not take the second place; He will be loved best, or not at all. I dare say the young ruler thought he loved God best. But when the choice had to be made, it was his gold he loved best. He did not possess his riches, his riches possessed him. They had monopolised God&#8217;s place. Living as we do in a materialistic age, we do not need any one to tell us that there are multitudes of mammon-worshippers all about us still, men who give to wealth the place in their hearts that properly belongs to God.<\/p>\n<p>Men trusting in Wealth.<\/p>\n<p>(2) A second peril which Christ saw attached to wealth was this-those who had great possessions were always tempted to trust in them. Money has not only the power of absorbing the heart, it has also the power of satisfying it. Take the parable of the Rich Fool as an illustration. His barns and storehouses were full; he seemed quite immune against trouble and distress. &#8220;Soul, thou hast much goods,&#8221; he said, &#8220;laid up for many years, eat, drink, be merry.&#8221; The fact that he had such abundant wealth blinded him to his lack of spiritual things. He thought himself rich and increased with goods, and in need of nothing, and when he was ushered into eternity that night, he went into it as a blind and miserable and naked soul. This is no imaginary peril. The possession of earthly wealth may blind a man to his need of lasting riches. The man who has much treasure on earth is in danger of not feeling the need of treasure in heaven. And so the possession of &#8220;uncertain riches&#8221; often spells the ruin of the soul; and &#8220;great possessions&#8221; often mean the sacrifice of the inheritance incorruptible and undefiled. For the condition of receiving the &#8220;eternal life&#8221; is a sense of need. &#8220;He hath filled the hungry with good things.&#8221; But those who have this world&#8217;s goods often feel no sense of need, and so the rich go empty away. What profit is it for a man to have all his treasures on earth, when he himself is made for eternity? &#8220;Do you know,&#8221; said a man-I think to John Bright-&#8220;he died worth a million.&#8221; &#8220;Yes,&#8221; replied Bright, &#8220;and that was all he was worth.&#8221; What unutterable tragedy such a sentence hides! &#8220;All he was worth.&#8221; And it had all to be left.<\/p>\n<p>Men the Prey of Covetousness.<\/p>\n<p>(3) Further, the possession of wealth is apt to beget a spirit of covetousness, and covetousness, is itself a sin, and the fruitful mother of sins. &#8220;Take heed,&#8221; said our Lord, &#8220;and keep yourselves from covetousness.&#8221; Covetousness, He knew, was one of the most deadly enemies of the soul. It warps and shrivels and deadens the soul. It makes it insensible to the higher and holier appeals. Men grow in fortune, and get further and further away from God. Their bank balances increase, and their stock of sympathy and pity and love diminishes. There is nothing like covetousness for stifling the religious life. It chokes the Word, so that there is more hope for the drunkard and the sensualist than for the man whom avarice holds in its grip. And not only is covetousness itself a sin, but it begets sin. &#8220;The love of money is a root of all kinds of evil,&#8221; says the Apostle (1Ti 6:10). It was so in the Lord&#8217;s own day. Witness the Pharisees devouring widows&#8217; houses, and the priests turning the very Temple into a den of thieves. It is so now. Think what greed is doing in this land of ours. Most of the wrongs from which we suffer spring from this one bitter root. There would be scarcely any social problem left, if only men&#8217;s hearts were delivered from this blighting and sinful love.<\/p>\n<p>The Christian&#8217;s Duty.<\/p>\n<p>What, then, is the Christian man&#8217;s attitude towards wealth? Wealth, remember, is a relative term. I have known the small patrimony of the poor as perilous to the soul as the mighty fortunes of the rich. Covetousness is not necessarily a matter of thousands or millions. Silas Marner with his small store of gold coins was as much a victim to it as any financier who is adding his thousand to thousand. What, then, is the Christian&#8217;s duty towards his wealth, whether it be great or small? Must he deny himself of it? Not necessarily. But he must keep himself master of it. He must not let it master him. I have a friend who said to me that when he was about twenty-five years of age, when money began to come to him, he found he had to face the question whether he would be master of his wealth, or would let his wealth master him. He said that by God&#8217;s grace he would be master of his wealth. It was no vain resolve; he holds his money with a loose grip; it is to him an agent for usefulness. He gives, as he puts it, pound for pound of his income to the Lord. He has made to himself friends of the mammon of unrighteousness. That is the way to treat wealth, whether large or small-be its master. And with none of us must wealth be the aim of life. &#8220;Little children, guard yourselves from idols&#8221; (1Jn 5:21). It is the last word of Scripture. And mammon is the idol most of our people worship. But the new earth would be here, if we seriously heeded these words of Christ, &#8220;Be not therefore anxious, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?&#8230; But seek ye first His Kingdom and His righteousness&#8221; (Mat 6:31, Mat 6:33).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Gospel According to St. Mark: A Devotional Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>3<\/p>\n<p>How hardly shall they . . . enter the kingdom, of God. The reader should see the comments covering this whole event at Mat 19:20-27.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 10:23. Looked round. A second look of Jesus, in earnest sadness, we may well suppose.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>From this discourse of our holy Lord&#8217;s concerning the danger of riches, and the difficulty that attends rich men in their way to heaven, we may collect and gather, <\/p>\n<p>First, That rich men do certainly meet with more difficulties in their way to heaven than other men. It is difficult to withdraw their affections from riches, to place their supreme love upon God in the midst of their abundance. It is difficult to depend entirely upon God in a rich condition; for the rich man&#8217;s wealth is his strong tower.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, That yet the fault lies not in riches, but in rich men: who by placing their trust, and reposing their confidence in riches do render themselves incapable of the kingdom of God.<\/p>\n<p>Observe, 3. The proverbial speech which our Saviour makes use of to set forth the difficulty of a rich man&#8217;s salvation: It is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye. This was a proverb among the Jews, signifying a thing of great difficulty, next to an impossibility; and it implies thus much, that it is not only a very great difficulty, but an utter impossibility, for such as abound in worldly wealth, and place their confidence therein, to be saved, without an extraordinary grace and assistance from God. It is hard for God to make a rich man happy, because he thinks himself happy without God.<\/p>\n<p>Observe, 4. The disciples are affected with wonder and admiration at this doctrine of our Saviour&#8217;s, and cry out, Who then can be saved?<\/p>\n<p>Learn thence, That such are the special and peculiar difficulties which lie in the rich man&#8217;s way to salvation, that their getting to heaven is matter of wonder and admiration to the disciples of Christ.<\/p>\n<p>Observe, 5. How our Saviour resolves this doubt, by telling his disciples, that what was impossible with men, was possible with God; implying, that is is impossible for any man, rich or poor by his own natural strength to get to heaven.<\/p>\n<p>And, 2. That when we are discouraged with the sense of our own impotency, we should consider the power of God, and fix our faith upon it: With God all things are possible.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 10:23-27. Jesus looked round about  On all that were about him; and saith to his disciples, How hardly,  , with how great difficulty, shall they that have riches  Not only that love them, but that possess them; enter into the kingdom of God  Respecting this difficulty, see note on Mat 19:23-24. And the disciples were astonished at his words  For they were ready to imagine that ere long all the rich and great people of the country would appear for their Master, and fix him on the throne of Israel. But Jesus answereth again  To that surprise which he saw in their countenances; Children, &amp;c.  See how he softens the harsh truth, by the manner of delivering it! And yet without retracting or abating one tittle: How hard is it for them that trust in riches  Either for defence, or happiness, or deliverance from the thousand dangers that life is continually exposed to. That these cannot enter into Gods glorious kingdom, is clear and undeniable; but it is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye, than for a man to have riches, and not trust in them. Therefore, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. And they were astonished out of measure   , they were more abundantly struck with astonishment, more even than before; having now heard Christs repetition and illustration of what he had said before; saying, Who then can be saved?  Who that are rich can ever get to heaven? and what a discouragement will it be to others, to see the rich and the great neglecting salvation, and turning the means of their happiness and usefulness into the instruments of their destruction? And Jesus looking upon them, &amp;c.  See on Mat 19:25-26.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 10:23 And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!  24 And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!  25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.  26 And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? <\/p>\n<p>The shock of the disciples seems to indicate that this was some serious new teaching from the Lord.  In light of the Jewish leadership and their fine robes and probably riches it would give bad light upon those that would lead the populous.<\/p>\n<p>Not unlike our own day and one must wonder just how many of the rich preachers of our own day are actually saved.  If they are saved it might indicate that they are a bit far from their supposed to be spiritual roots.<\/p>\n<p>Internet boards for pastors are full of discussions about pay packages, housing allowances, parsonages and the like.  There is more concern about what the other guy is making than how the Lord is blessing Him.  Many are near vain and greedy in their discussion of financial things.<\/p>\n<p>Sure finances are a consideration but when someone mentions Mat 6:33 and the fact that if God takes care of the bird of the air will he not take care of you they are met with the disgust usually accorded only a pervert.  God watches the birds, so He most certainly watches over us and will take care of us in His own time and His own will.<\/p>\n<p>Mat 6:33-34 &#8220;But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.  34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day [is] the evil thereof.&#8221;  Yes, of course this is a kingdom context but if He is caring for the birds in this context He most likely is taking care of them in all contexts be it kingdom or church age.<\/p>\n<p>Soap box now empty.<\/p>\n<p>Now moving on to the text, of course this is in the context of the rich man who just went away sad and this man was fresh upon their minds.  Christ just expands upon what He has already made clear.  It is difficult for a rich person to enter the kingdom.  Not that the way is blocked by security guards that inspect bank accounts, purses and billfolds but rather that the bank accounts, purses and billfolds keep the person&#8217;s interest away from the kingdom and focused upon the riches.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!  24 And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!  25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The sentence &#8220;But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!&#8221; is interesting.  What has this to do with children?  Does He turn to the children mentioned in the previous context to ask them the question?<\/p>\n<p>Wesley takes this to be Christ using a mild term in addressing the disciples instead of a more formal term that might have indicated dissatisfaction.  Gill points out that disciples were often called children, and also wisely suggests that the disciples were looking for a literal kingdom to be set up soon.  They would have assumed that the rich Jews of their day would be ushered in with the rest of the nation.<\/p>\n<p>It was the disciples that were being addressed as children and not as a looking down upon them but it would seem just an endearing term of a teacher for his students.<\/p>\n<p>In relation to the rich entering the kingdom it is very obvious to one that has been poor just what the Lord was getting at.  If you have nothing, if you are under trials and if you are sick of this life then the next life is something to behold and desire thus much more acceptable.  However for the rich &#8211; think about it.  They have need of nothing; they can buy their wants, desires, and have all that they could want.  To be confronted by another life far-off in the future why would they consider it?  They have everything they could desire &#8220;here and now,&#8221; so why bother with the &#8220;there and after?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As to the eye of the needle, most often it is related to a small gate into Jerusalem that a camel had to kneel on its knees to crawl through.  I have heard many pastors present this as fact.  However the Net Bible note mentions that this gate did not exist in the time of the Lord, that it was added in the middle ages.<\/p>\n<p>Gill points out that this was a common phrase to describe anything that was absurd.  He quotes one phrase that used an elephant rather than a camel.  I&#8217;m sure that many in my high school days would have said that it would be easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for Stan Derickson to become anything in later life.  Nothing meant in a derogatory way, just an observing of facts and probabilities. <\/p>\n<p>The term translated &#8220;eye&#8221; in Mark is meant of a hole made by wearing away.  While living in Hawaii we saw what was called a blowhole.  It was a hole in the rock on the coast.  As the waves would roll in under the rocks the pressure would force water through the hole forming a geyser of water.  The hole was present due to the wearing away of the waves upon the bottom of the rock.  This is the idea of the term which Mark used.  Other gospel writers used a term more consistent with the eye of a needle.<\/p>\n<p>Just why Mark chose this word is not known.  I must wonder if it wasn&#8217;t his attempt to illustrate just how hard it was for a rich man to enter into the kingdom.  It would take the wearing away of many attempts for the rich man to enter in, picturing the terrible difficulty.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s take a quick look at verse 26.  &#8220;And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The disciples wondered if a rich person has difficulty then who can be saved.  Consider the basis for their astonishment for a moment.  Why would they think that?  Why would it be difficult for others if it was difficult for the rich?<\/p>\n<p>Might their thinking be running along the lines of riches can buy their way into the kingdom?  Might their thinking be running along the lines of the rich can buy their power and their prestige and that is getting them into the kingdom?  Seems to me the only reason that they would have been astonished is that they had some concept of works or purchasing their way into the kingdom.<\/p>\n<p>Not only were they astonished they were astonished out of measure.  They were REALLY astonished.  There must have been something very strong in all their minds that would have brought this shock upon them.  Some idea of Judaism that they had been taught that was totally counter to what the Lord had told them.<\/p>\n<p>Matthew Henry supposes that the disciples were thinking that the rich have more opportunity to do good with their possessions, thus would have an easier time entering the kingdom.  This relates well with what has already been mentioned as to works.  He continues to observe that the kingdom was coming and they supposed it to be a physical kingdom that would have rich people coming into it since kingdoms were usually full of the rich and powerful.<\/p>\n<p>The Net Bible note mentions that they may have been assuming that the rich were BLESSED with their riches, thus if they have difficulty how can an unblessed poor person hope to be saved.<\/p>\n<p>The word translated &#8220;astonished&#8221; relates to being struck or hit with a blow and the shock\/surprise of such a thing.  This really was a shock to the disciples, more than just a new teaching but something that shook them to their core.  <\/p>\n<p>I suspect that they were shocked to the extent that they wondered at their own ability to be saved if the rich have a hard time, then so much the worse for them.  It might also be the fact that the disciples knew they could not make it through the eye of a needle either, so how could anyone be saved.<\/p>\n<p>We now launch into the Lord&#8217;s response to their astonishment.  Indeed, Peter gets right down to the basics and tells the Lord that they had left all to follow Him.  In short he seems to be saying; Lord we left all so we can never be rich, what about us?  How can we be saved is the implication.<\/p>\n<p>The Lord reassures the disciples that they are in line for future blessing as well as eternal life.  He does however predicate all on the fact that it is not them that is going to accomplish this but God.  <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Mr. D&#8217;s Notes on Selected New Testament Books by Stanley Derickson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold\">Jesus&rsquo; teaching concerning riches 10:23-31 (cf. Matthew 19:23-30; Luke 18:24-30)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Jesus used the incident just past to teach His disciples about riches. Matthew&rsquo;s account is the fullest.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>The case of this unbeliever had important significance for Jesus&rsquo; believing disciples. Rather than being a preview of divine eternal blessing, wealth could be a barrier to obtaining it. Jesus did not envy the rich, as most of His contemporaries did. He pitied them.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Hiebert, p. 249.] <\/span> Wealth does not exclude a person from the kingdom, but it gives him a handicap.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>CHAPTER 10:23-31 (Mar 10:23-31)<\/p>\n<p>WHO THEN CAN BE SAVED?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto His disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! And the disciples were amazed at His words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished exceedingly, saying unto Him, Then who can be saved? Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for all things are possible with God. Peter began to say unto Him, Lo, we have left all, and have followed Thee. Jesus said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or mother, or father, or children, or lands, for My sake, and for the gospel&#8217;s sake, but he shall receive a hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life. But many that are first shall be last; and the last first.&#8221; Mar 10:23-31 (R.V.)<\/p>\n<p>AS the rich man turned away with the arrow in his breast, Jesus looked round about on His disciples. The Gospels, and especially St. Mark, often mention the gaze of Jesus, and all who know the power of an intense and pure nature silently searching others, the piercing intuition, the calm judgment which sometimes looks out of holy eyes, can well understand the reason. Disappointed love was in His look, and that compassionate protest against harsh judgments which presently went on to admit that the necessary demand was hard. Some, perhaps, who had begun to scorn the ruler in his defeat, were reminded of frailties of their own, and had to ask, Shall I next be judged? And one was among them, pilfering from the bag what was intended for the poor, to whom that look of Christ must have been very terrible. Unless we remember Judas, we shall not comprehend all the fitness of the repeated and earnest warnings of Jesus against covetousness. Never was secret sin dealt with so faithfully as his.<\/p>\n<p>And now Jesus, as He looks around, says, &#8220;How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God.&#8221; But the disciples were amazed. To the ancient Jew, from Abraham to Solomon, riches appeared to be a sign of the Divine favor, and if the pathetic figure of Job reminded him how much sorrow might befall the just, yet the story showed even him at the end more prosperous than at the beginning. In the time of Jesus, the chiefs of their religion were greedily using their position as a means of amassing enormous fortunes. To be told that wealth was a positive hindrance on the way to God was wonderful indeed.<\/p>\n<p>When Jesus modified His utterance, it was not to correct Himself, like one who had heedlessly gone beyond His meaning. His third speech reiterated the first, declaring that a manifest and proverbial physical impossibility was not so hard as for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God, here or hereafter. But He interposed a saying which both explained the first one and enlarged its scope. &#8220;Children&#8221; He begins, like one who pitied their inexperience and dealt gently with their perplexities, &#8220;Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God.&#8221; And therefore is it hard for all the rich, since they must wrestle against this temptation to trust in their possessions. It is exactly in this spirit that St. James, who quoted Jesus more than any of the later writers of Scripture, charges the rich that they be not high-minded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God. Immediately before, Jesus had told them how alone the kingdom might be entered, even by becoming as little children; lowly, dependent, willing to receive all at the hands of a superior. Would riches help them to do this? Is it easier to pray for daily bread when one has much goods laid up for many years? Is it easier to feel that God alone can make us drink of true pleasures as of a river, when a hundred luxuries and indulgences lull us in sloth or allure us into excess? Hereupon the disciples perceived what was more alarming still, that not alone do rich men trust in riches, but all who confound possessions with satisfaction, all who dream that to have much is to be blessed, as if property were character. They were right. We may follow the guidance of Mammon beckoning from afar, with a trust as idolatrous as if we held his hand. But who could abide a principle so exacting? It was the revelation of a new danger, and they were astonished exceedingly, saying, Then who can be saved? Again Jesus looked upon them, with solemn but reassuring gaze. They had learned the secret of the new life, the natural impossibility throwing us back in helpless appeal to the powers of the world to come. &#8220;With men it is impossible, but not with God, for all things are possible with God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Peter, not easily nor long to be discouraged, now saw ground for hope. If the same danger existed for rich and poor, then either might be encouraged by having surmounted it, and the apostles had done what the rich man failed to do &#8212; they had left all and followed Jesus. The claim has provoked undue censure, as if too much were made out of a very trifling sacrifice, a couple of boats and a paltry trade. But the objectors have missed the point; the apostles really broke away from the service of the world when they left their nets and followed Jesus. Their world was perhaps a narrow one, but He Who reckoned two mites a greater offering that the total of the gifts of many rich casting in much, was unlikely to despise a fisherman or a publican who laid all his living upon the altar. The fault, if fault there were, lay rather in the satisfaction with which Peter contemplates their decision as now irrevocable and secure, so that nothing remained except to claim the reward, which St. Matthew tells us he very distinctly did. The young man should have had treasure in heaven: what then should they have?<\/p>\n<p>But in truth, their hardest battles with worldliness lay still before them, and he who thought he stood might well take heed lest he fell. They would presently unite in censuring a woman&#8217;s costly gift to Him, for Whom they professed to have surrendered all. Peter himself would shrink from his Master&#8217;s side. And what a satire upon this confident claim would it have been, could the heart of Judas then and there have been revealed to them.<\/p>\n<p>The answer of our Lord is sufficiently remarkable. St. Matthew tells how frankly and fully He acknowledged their collective services, and what a large reward He promised, when they should sit with Him on thrones, judging their nation. So far was that generous heart from weighing their losses in a worldly scale, or criticizing the form of a demand which was not all unreasonable.<\/p>\n<p>But St. Mark lays exclusive stress upon other and sobering considerations, which also St. Matthew has recorded.<\/p>\n<p>There is a certain tone of egoism in the words, &#8220;Lo, we . . . what shall we have?&#8221; And Jesus corrects this in the gentlest way, by laying down such a general rule as implies that many others will do the same, &#8220;there is no man&#8221; whose self sacrifice shall go without its reward.<\/p>\n<p>Secondary and lower motives begin to mingle with the generous ardor of self-sacrifice as soon as it is careful to record its losses, and inquire about its wages. Such motives are not absolutely forbidden, but they must never push into the foremost place. The crown of glory animated and sustained St. Paul, but it was for Christ, and not for this that he suffered the loss of all things.<\/p>\n<p>Jesus accordingly demands purity of motive. The sacrifice must not be for ambition, even with aspirations prolonged across the frontiers of eternity: it must be altogether &#8220;for My sake and for the gospel&#8217;s sake.&#8221; And here we observe once more the portentous demand of Christ&#8217;s person upon His followers. They are servants of no ethical or theological system, however lofty. Christ does not regard Himself and them, as alike devoted to some cause above and external to them all. To Him they are to be consecrated, and to the gospel, which, as we have seen, is the story of His Life, Death and Resurrection. For Him they are to break the dearest and strongest of earthly ties. He had just proclaimed how indissoluble was the marriage bond. No man should sever those whom God had joined. But St. Luke informs us that to forsake even a wife for Christ&#8217;s sake, was a deed worthy of being rewarded an hundredfold. Nor does He mention any higher being in whose name the sacrifice is demanded. Now this is at least implicitly the view of His own personality, which some profess to find only in St. John.<\/p>\n<p>Again, there was perhaps an undertone of complaint in Peter&#8217;s question, as if no compensation for all their sacrifices were hitherto bestowed. What should their compensation be? But Christ declares that losses endured for Him are abundantly repaid here on earth, in this present time, and even amid the fires of persecution. Houses and lands are replaced by the consciousness of inviolable shelter and inexhaustible provision. &#8220;Whither wilt thou betake thyself to find covert?&#8221; asks the menacing cardinal; but Luther answers, &#8220;Under the heaven of God.&#8221; And if dearest friends be estranged, or of necessity abandoned, then, in such times of high attainment and strong spiritual insight, membership in the Divine family is felt to be no more unreal tie, and earthly relationships are well recovered in the vast fraternity of souls. Brethren, and sisters, and mothers, are thus restored an hundredfold; but although a father is also lost, we do not hear that a hundred fathers shall be given back, for in the spiritual family that place is reserved for One.<\/p>\n<p>Lastly, Jesus reminded them that the race was not yet over; that many first shall be last and the last first. We know how Judas by transgression fell, and how the persecuting Saul became not a whit behind the very chiefest apostle. But this word remains for the warning and incitement of all Christians, even unto the end of the world. There are &#8220;many&#8221; such.<\/p>\n<p>Next after this warning, comes yet another prediction of His own suffering, with the added circumstances of horror. Would they who were now first remain faithful? or should another take their bishopric?<\/p>\n<p>With a darkening heart Judas heard, and made his choice.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! 23. looked round about ] &ldquo;Spe describitur vultus Christi, affectui conveniens, et affectibus auditorum attemperatus.&rdquo; Bengel. Comp. Mar 3:5; Mar 3:34; Mar 8:34; Luk 6:10; Luk 22:61. Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-mark-1023\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Mark 10:23&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24598\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}