{"id":24698,"date":"2022-09-24T10:42:46","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T15:42:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-mark-1238\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T10:42:46","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T15:42:46","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-mark-1238","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-mark-1238\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Mark 12:38"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and [love] salutations in the marketplaces, <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 38 40<\/strong>. Admonition to beware of the Scribes<\/p>\n<p><strong> 38<\/strong>. <em> And he said<\/em> ] The terrible denunciations of the moral and religious shortcomings of the leaders of the nation, which now fall from our Lord&rsquo;s lips, are given far more fully by St Matthew, <span class='bible'>Mat 23:1-39<\/span>. It was only the Jewish Christians, for whom that Evangelist wrote, who could at once, and at that time, understand and enter into the terrible declension of Pharisaic Judaism. To the Gentile Christians of Rome, for whom St Mark wrote, &ldquo;the great woe-speech&rdquo; would be to a certain extent unintelligible. Hence the picture of the Scribes is here shortly given in their three principal features; (1) ambition, (2) avarice, and (3) hypocritical external piety.<\/p>\n<p><em> in long clothing<\/em> ] &ldquo;at wolen wandre in stoolis,&rdquo; Wyclif. <em> Stoolis<\/em> from Latin <em> stola<\/em> = a robe. They came out to pray in long sweeping robes, wearing phylacteries of extra size, and exaggerated tassels, hung at the corners of their <em> talliths<\/em>. Many such were doubtless to be seen at Jerusalem at this very time, who had come up to celebrate the Feast of the Passover. See note on p. 64.<\/p>\n<p><em> love salutations<\/em> ] The sounding title of &ldquo;Rabbi,&rdquo; &ldquo;Rabbi.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>In his doctrine &#8211; <\/B>In his teaching, for so it should be rendered.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Beware of the scribes &#8211; <\/B>Be on your guard. Be cautious about hearing them or following them.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Scribes &#8211; <\/B>The learned men of the Jewish nation.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Which love to go in long clothing &#8211; <\/B>In long, flowing robes, as significant of their consequence, leisure, and learning.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Salutations &#8230; &#8211; <\/B>See the notes at <span class='bible'>Mat 23:6-7<\/span>.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar 12:38-40<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Beware of the Scribes which love to go in long clothing.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recklessness of ambition<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There is the Synagogue of Ambition, whose bond of union is the lust of place and of power. Let Diotrephes be its representative, who, loved to have the preeminence, and whom St. John censured for this ambitious temper, which tempted him, though nominally a member-perhaps a minister-of the early church, violently to reject the best Christians. What are not men ready to do to gratify an inordinate and insatiate ambition! You know how the old Romans built their military roads. They projected them in a mathematical line, straight to the point of termination, and everything had to give way, there could be no deviation. And so on went the road, bridging rivers, filling up ravines, hewing down hills, levelling forests, cutting its way through every obstacle! Just so men set their lust upon self-emolument, some height of ambition, the attainment of place, rank, power, and hew their way toward it not minding what gives way. No obstacle is insurmountable, health, happiness, home comfort, honesty, integrity, conscience, the law of God, everything is sacrificed to the god of ambition. (<em>Christian Age.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Yielding the preeminence<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Old Dr. Alexander used to say to us students, Young brethren, envy is a besetting sin with the ministry: you must keep that abominable spirit under. When a servant of Christ is willing to take a back seat, or to yield the preeminence to others, he is making a surrender which is well pleasing to his meek and lowly Master. One of the hardest things to many a Christian is to serve his Saviour as a private, when his pride tells him that he ought to wear a shoulder strap in Christs army. (<em>Christian Age.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long prayers.<br \/>Prayers judged by weight, not length<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>God takes not mens prayers by tale, but by weight. He respecteth not the arithmetic of our prayers, how many there are; nor the rhetoric of our prayers, how eloquent they are; nor the geometry of our prayers, how long they are; nor the music of our prayers, the sweetness of our voice; nor the logic of our prayers, nor the method of them; but the divinity of our prayers is that which He so much esteemeth. He looketh not for any James with horny knees through assiduity in prayer; nor for any Bartholomew with a century of prayers for the morning, and as many for the evening; but St. Paul, his frequency of praying with fervency of spirit, without all tedious prolixites and vain babblings, this it is that God makes most account of. It is not a servants going to and fro, but the despatch of his business, that pleases his master. It is not the loudness of a preachers voice, but the holiness of the matter and the spirit of the preacher, that moves a wise and intelligent hearer. So here, not gifts, but graces in prayer move the Lord. But these long prayers of the Pharisees were so much the worse, because thereby they sought to entitle God to their sin, yea, they merely mocked Him, fleering in His face. (<em>John Trapp.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>  Verse 38.  <I><B>Beware of the scribes<\/B><\/I>] <span class='_0000ff'><span class='bible'>See Clarke on <\/span><span class='bible'>Mt 23:1<\/span><\/span>, &amp;c.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>See Poole on &#8220;<span class='bible'>Mat 23:5<\/span>&#8220;, and following verses to <span class='bible'>Mat 23:7<\/span>, See Poole on &#8220;<span class='bible'>Mat 23:14<\/span>&#8220;. The more men and women want of real worth and value, the more they seek themselves a reputation from their habits, either the gravity, or the riches and gaudery, of them; and the more they court titles of honour and dignity, and affect external respect. Whereas nobler souls despise these things, being like pictures well drawn, which need no superscription to tell men what or whose they are. Good men are satisfied from themselves, and as not careless of their reputation, so neither careful who men say that they are. But these verses are more fully discoursed on Matthew twenty-three, to which I refer the reader for satisfaction. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P><B>38. And he said unto them in hisdoctrine<\/B>rather, &#8220;in His teaching&#8221;; implying thatthis was but a specimen of an extended discourse, which Matthew givesin full (<span class='bible'>Mt 23:1-39<\/span>).Luke says (<span class='bible'>Lu 20:45<\/span>) this was&#8221;in the audience of all the people said unto His disciples.&#8221;<\/P><P>       <B>Beware of the scribes, whichlove<\/B>or like. <\/P><P>       <B>to go in long clothing<\/B>(seeon <span class='bible'>Mt 23:5<\/span>). <\/P><P>       <B>and <\/B><I><B>love<\/B><\/I><B>salutations in the market-places,<\/B><\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown&#8217;s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>And he said unto them in his doctrine<\/strong>,&#8230;. As he was preaching, not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the multitude, and to his disciples particularly; and to them in the audience of the people, as appears from <span class='bible'>Mt 23:1<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Beware of the Scribes<\/strong>; for though he had just spoken favourably of one of them, this was but a single man, and a singular instance; the body of that set of men, were very bad in their principles and practices, and therefore to be avoided, and that for the reasons following:<\/p>\n<p><strong>which love to go in long clothing<\/strong>; the Persic version renders it, &#8220;who affect to walk in coats and garments conspicuous, and in long robes&#8221;; such as were very particular, and different from others, and out of the common way of apparel; and so were observable and taken notice of by others: very likely it may have reference to the common length of their fringes on the borders of their outward garment, which they enlarged beyond others; <span class='bible'>[See comments on Mt 23:5]<\/span>;<\/p>\n<p><strong>and [love] salutations the market places<\/strong>; or &#8220;streets&#8221;, as the Syriac and Arabic versions render it, in any public places, where there was a resort of men, and they were taken notice with respect, in a public manner. The Syriac Persic supply the word &#8220;love&#8221;, as we do from <span class='bible'>Mt 23:6<\/span>,<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>[See comments on Mt 23:6]<\/span>,<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>[See comments on Mt 23:7]<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>Beware of the scribes <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">   <\/SPAN><\/span>). Jesus now turns to the multitudes and to his disciples (<span class='bible'>Mt 23:1<\/span>) and warns them against the scribes and the Pharisees while they are still there to hear his denunciation. The scribes were the professional teachers of the current Judaism and were nearly all Pharisees. Mark (<span class='bible'>Mr 14:38-40<\/span>) gives a mere summary sketch of this bold and terrific indictment as preserved in <span class='bible'>Mt 23<\/span> in words that fairly blister today. <span class='bible'>Lu 20:45-47<\/span> follows Mark closely. See <span class='bible'>Mt 8:15<\/span> for this same use of <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"> <\/SPAN><\/span> with the ablative. It is usually called a translation-Hebraism, a usage not found with <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span> in the older Greek. But the papyri give it, a vivid vernacular idiom. &#8220;Beware of the Jews&#8221; (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">    <\/SPAN><\/span>, Berl. G. U. 1079. A.D. 41). See Robertson, <I>Grammar<\/I>, p. 577. The pride of the pompous scribes is itemized by Mark:<\/P> <P><B>To walk in long robes <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>),<\/P> <P><B>stoles <\/B>, the dress of dignitaries like kings and priests.<\/P> <P><B>Salutations in the marketplaces <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">   <\/SPAN><\/span>), where the people could see their dignity recognized. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Robertson&#8217;s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>Desire [<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">] <\/SPAN><\/span>. See on <span class='bible'>Mt 1:19<\/span>.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Vincent&#8217;s Word Studies in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1) <strong>&#8220;And He said unto them<\/strong> <strong>in His doctrine,&#8221; <\/strong>(kai en te didache autou eiegen) &#8220;And in His teaching He said to them,&#8221; as in <span class='bible'>Mar 4:12<\/span>. He warned the masses of common, simple people, not hypocritical elite, <span class='bible'>Mar 12:37<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>2) <strong>&#8220;Beware<\/strong> <strong>of the scribes,&#8221; <\/strong>(blepete apo ton grammateon) &#8220;Beware (stay away from) or avoid the scribes,&#8221; <span class='bible'>Mat 23:1-3<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>a) <strong>&#8220;Which<\/strong> <strong>love to go in long clothing <\/strong>&#8221; (ton thelonton en stolais peripatein) &#8220;Those who just love to parade around continually in long stoles, or clothes,&#8221; like children in pretence of show, <span class='bible'>Luk 20:46<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 23:5<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>b) <strong>&#8220;And<\/strong> <strong>love salutations,&#8221; <\/strong>(kai aspasmous) &#8220;And whose first love is to be piously greeted or saluted,&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>c) <strong>&#8220;In the market places,&#8217; I<\/strong> (en tais agorais) &#8220;in the market places,&#8221; the places of open trade and commerce, where they may be seen of many people, <span class='bible'>Mat 23:7<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><em>CRITICAL AND EXEGETICAL NOTES<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 12:39<\/span>. <strong>Uppermost rooms at feasts<\/strong>.<em>Chief places in the suppers<\/em>the most important meal of the day, and the most fashionable entertainment.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 12:40<\/span>. <strong>Greater damnation<\/strong>.<em>A heavier sentence<\/em> or <em>doom<\/em> than that awaiting other sinners. Christ always denounces the hypocrite as a villain of double dye.<\/p>\n<p><em>MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.<\/em><em><span class='bible'>Mar. 12:38-40<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>(PARALLELS: <span class='bible'>Mat. 23:13-39<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk. 20:45-47<\/span>.)<\/p>\n<p><em>Character and conduct of scribes denounced<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. Their loud professions of sanctity and their ostentatious devotions are censured<\/strong>.Long prayers may sometimes be the outcome of deep feeling and many needs; they may, as in the case of the scribes, be a cloak for sin. Long robes, like long prayers, may be a profession with which nothing spiritual corresponds.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. Their love of pre-eminence is blamed<\/strong>.Both in Church and State they loved to be supreme, and in all social relations they sought the honour which cometh from man.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. Their cruel rapacity is held up to obloquy<\/strong>.The bereaved and defenceless were their victims.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. Christ predicts the condemnation of such sinners, and at the same time puts the people on their guard against them<\/strong>.Against the wrongs and cruelties, the assumptions and errors of such pretenders, the Good Shepherd would fain protect His feeble and defenceless sheep.<em>J. R. Thomson<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>OUTLINES AND COMMENTS ON THE VERSES<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 12:38-40<\/span>. <em>Needful cautions<\/em>.I. In that our Lord warns the common people, and His own disciples too, to beware of following the evil and corrupt life and example of the scribes, we may gather that there is much danger of infection to the people of God by the evil and corrupt lives of such as are called to be public pastors and teachers of the Church, when they do not live answerably to this calling, but loosely, profanely, wickedly. <\/p>\n<p>2. Christians must take heed of being corrupted by the evil example and practice of such as are outwardly called to the ministerial office, and yet are men of corrupt and vicious life. Though they may and vicious life. Though they may and ought to hear the doctrine preached by such, and to embrace and follow it, so far as they preach the truth (<span class='bible'>Mat. 23:3<\/span>), yet they must beware of following the evil example and practice of such pastors.<em>G. Petter<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>ILLUSTRATIONS TO CHAPTER 12<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 12:38-39<\/span>. <em>The Synagogue of Ambition<\/em>.There is the Synagogue of Ambition, whose bond of union is the lust of place and of power. Let Diotrephes be its representative, who loved to have the pre-eminence, and whom St. John censured for this ambitious temper, which tempted him, though nominally a memberperhaps a ministerof the early Church, violently to reject the best Christians. What are not men ready to do to gratify an inordinate and insatiate ambition! You know how the old Romans built their military roads. They projected them in a mathematical line, straight to the point of termination, and everything had to give way, there could be no deviation. And so on went the road, bridging rivers, filling up ravines, hewing down hills, levelling forests, cutting its way through every obstacle! Just so men set their lust upon self-emolument, some height of ambition, the attainment of place, rank, power, and hew their way toward it, not minding what gives way. No obstacle is insurmountable; health, happiness, home-comfort, honesty, integrity, conscience, the law of God, everything is sacrificed to the god of ambition.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar. 12:40<\/span>. <em>A devourer of widows houses<\/em>.In the town of Lresided a prosperous and pious sadler. He had a wife, but no family; and at her entreaty he took into his home a boy, a relative of his own. The wife tended him, mothered him, taught him. He learned the business, and grew up to his manhood. Before that time the wife became a confirmed invalid from rheumatism, and soon lay helpless in one room, when her husband was stricken with acute disease and lay dying in another. Under solemn promise to the dying man, and with great shew of piety, the young man secured that all the property should be left to him, solemnly pledging himself to care lovingly for that invalid wife to her last day. No sooner was the husband laid in his grave than that young man turned the poor invalid out of house and home, and even compelled her to find money among her friends with which to purchase the very furniture she brought to the home at her marriage. And, broken-hearted, the poor woman soon died in a strangers shelter. They say that man is prosperous to-day. Who of us would change lots with that devourer of widows houses?<\/p>\n<p><em>Prayers judged by weight, not length<\/em>.God takes not mens prayers by tale, but by weight. He respecteth not the arithmetic of our prayers, how many there are; nor the rhetoric of our prayers, how eloquent they are; nor the geometry of our prayers, how long they are; nor the music of our prayers, the sweetness of our voice; nor the logic of our prayers, nor the method of them; but the divinity of our prayers is that which He so much esteemeth. He looketh not for any James with horny knees through assuidity in prayer; nor for any Bartholomew with a century of prayers for the morning, and as many for the evening; but St. Paul, his frequency of praying with fervency of spirit, without all tedious prolixities and vain babblings, this it is that God makes most account of. It is not a servants going to and fro, but the despatch of his business, that pleases his master. It is not the loudness of a preachers voice, but the holiness of the matter and the spirit of the preacher, that moves a wise and intelligent hearer. So here, not gifts, but graces in prayer, move the Lord. But these long prayers of the Pharisees were so much the worse because thereby they sought to entitle God to their sin, yea, they merely mocked Him, fleering in His face.<em>J. Trapp<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>8. JESUS WARNS AGAINST THE SCRIBES 12:38-40 <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>TEXT 12:38-40<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>And in his teaching he said, Beware of the scribes, which desire to walk in long robes, and to have salutations in the market-places, and chief seats in the synagogues, and chief places at feasts: they which devour widows houses, and for a pretence make long prayers; these shall receive greater condemnation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>THOUGHT QUESTIONS 12:38-40<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>685.<\/p>\n<p>Were some of the scribes present to hear this warning? Wasnt this unfair to the honest scribes? Discuss.<\/p>\n<p>686.<\/p>\n<p>What is inferred in the reference to the long robes?<\/p>\n<p>687.<\/p>\n<p>Why desire the salutations in the market-places?<\/p>\n<p>688.<\/p>\n<p>What advantage was there in the chief seats?<\/p>\n<p>689.<\/p>\n<p>How would scribes be especially prepared or able to devour widows houses?<\/p>\n<p>690.<\/p>\n<p>How was it possible to rob and pray in the same day?<\/p>\n<p>691.<\/p>\n<p>Why would long prayers be needed by these scribes?<\/p>\n<p>692.<\/p>\n<p>Is Jesus teaching measures of punishment in hell?<\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>TIME.A.D. 30Tuesday, April 4.<br \/>PLACE.The temple area, probably the court of the Gentiles.<\/p>\n<p>PARALLEL ACCOUNTS.<span class='bible'>Mat. 23:1-39<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk. 20:45-47<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>OUTLINE.1. Beware of certain scribes, <span class='bible'>Mar. 12:38-39<\/span>. <span class='bible'>2<\/span>. They devour widows houses, <span class='bible'>Mar. 12:40<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ANALYSIS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I.<\/p>\n<p>BEWARE OF CERTAIN SCRIBES, <span class='bible'>Mar. 12:38-39<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>Those who love to walk in long robes.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>Those who love to be greeted in the market-places.<\/p>\n<p>3.<\/p>\n<p>Those who want the chief seats in the synagogue and at feasts.<\/p>\n<p>II.<\/p>\n<p>THEY DEVOUR WIDOWS HOUSES, <span class='bible'>Mar. 12:40<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>To cover up their crime they pray long prayers (in public).<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>They should receive heavier judgment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EXPLANATORY NOTES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I.<\/p>\n<p>BEWARE OF CERTAIN SCRIBES.<\/p>\n<p>How much of Matthews twenty-third chapter is parallel, as having been now uttered, it is perhaps impossible to say. A large part of that chapter has a close parallel in <span class='bible'>Luk. 11:37-52<\/span>, and <span class='bible'>Luk. 13:34-35<\/span> is identical with the conclusion of the discourse in Matthew. According to <span class='bible'>Luke 11<\/span>, the chief part of this discourse was spoken in a Pharisees house, somewhere in Perea, It seems most probable that Matthew, not having recorded the Perean ministry, here combined several discourses of denunciation, which were actually delivered at various times. At the same time, the brief report in Mark and Luke may be only a fragment of what was said on this occasion. This appears to have been his last word with his enemies, as the discourse of John 14-16 was his last word with friends.<\/p>\n<p>Beware of the scribes, which lovecorrectly, desireto go in long clothing, and (desire) salutations in the market-places, Luke inserts love before salutations, but Mark carries the verb desire through the sentence.In long clothing. Liddell and Scott render in full dressi.e. in whatever official robes they were entitled to wear; not, as Jesus, in the clothing of common life.Salutations, formal and prolix, forbidden by Jesus to his disciples on their journeys for work (<span class='bible'>Luk. 10:4<\/span>).Chief seats in the synagogues. The seats nearest to where the sacred rolls of the law were kept.Uppermost roomschief places, or couchesat feasts. The places of honor at the table. Uppermost rooms was once intelligible, but is strangely misleading now. Room meant place, not apartment, when the translators used it thus. (For explanation of the allusion, see <span class='bible'>Luk. 14:7-11<\/span>.)<\/p>\n<p>II.<\/p>\n<p>THEY DEVOUR WIDOWS HOUSES.<\/p>\n<p>Devour widows houses. As if this were what they fed upon in their first places at the feasts. Covetous designs that we cannot further specify are meant. Insinuating themselves with defenceless women, as if they would truly be their defenders (Theophylact),These shall receive greateror more abundantdamnation, or condemnation. Greater, because they had misused their spiritual privileges, betrayed the trust of the simple, and brought reproach upon the name of God.Our Lords denunciations of the representatives of Judaism in his day seem terribly severe and almost cruel; but what is known of the absurd and heartless refinements of the Pharisaism of that age fully supports the strong language that he used. What must have been the indignation of such a soul as his at such perversion of the religion of his Father! (W. N. Clarke)<\/p>\n<p><strong>FACT QUESTIONS <\/strong><strong>12:38-40<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>804.<\/p>\n<p>How much of <span class='bible'>Mat. 23:1-39<\/span> is parallel to this account? Discuss.<\/p>\n<p>805.<\/p>\n<p>How do Mark and Luke relate to the longer discourse of Matt.?<\/p>\n<p>806.<\/p>\n<p>What did the love of full dress indicate?<\/p>\n<p>807.<\/p>\n<p>Is there something wrong in greeting one another? Cf. <span class='bible'>Luk. 10:4<\/span>Discuss.<\/p>\n<p>808.<\/p>\n<p>Where were the chief seats?<\/p>\n<p>809.<\/p>\n<p>What is meant by rooms in K.J.V.?<\/p>\n<p>810.<\/p>\n<p>Wasnt our Lord terribly severe with the religious leaders of His day?<\/p>\n<p>811.<\/p>\n<p>Discuss the deadly danger of pretence in prayer. i.e. today?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(38-40) <strong>In his doctrine.<\/strong>Better, <em>in His teaching.<\/em> See Notes on <span class='bible'>Mat. 23:1-7<\/span>. St. Marks report is characteristically brief as compared with St. Matthew, and would seem to have been drawn from the same source as St. Lukes (<span class='bible'>Luk. 20:45-47<\/span>).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> &lsquo;And in his teaching he said, &ldquo;Beware of the scribes who desire to walk in long robes, and to be saluted in the marketplaces, and the chief seats in the synagogues, and chief places at feasts, they who devour widow&rsquo;s houses and for a pretence make long prayers. These will receive greater condemnation.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> He continued His ministry to the common people by warning them against certain types of Scribe. A number were godly and wise men but many had become spiritually proud and self-seeking.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;Long robes.&rsquo; This refers to the festal gowns of the day which were particularly ostentatious and possibly had longer tassels (long robes). At times like the Passover they walked around in them seeking the admiration of the people because of their obvious piety and importance.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;To be saluted &#8211;.&rsquo; The people would hail them as &lsquo;Rabbi&rsquo; (&lsquo;my great one&rsquo;) with great respect, and they loved it and sought it, compare <span class='bible'>Mat 23:7-12<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;The chief seats.&rsquo; They sat in the special seats which were placed for them at the front of the synagogues facing the people where all could see them and admire them.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;Chief places at feasts.&rsquo; They would sit there at the highest level so that even their compatriots would think that they were important, and sometimes had to face the humiliation of being &lsquo;demoted&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 14:9<\/span>). Like many they had come to think of themselves more highly that they ought to think. This is a common danger for men in any group where some are seen as more important than others (compare <span class='bible'>Rom 12:3<\/span>), something which Jesus constantly warned against (<span class='bible'>Mar 10:42-44<\/span>). So those who are called to serve in the church need to ask themselves whether their real aim is humble service, or whether it is to have a prominent place. If the latter they take up their position only in order to receive condemnation.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;They who devour widow&rsquo;s houses.&rsquo; Probably by abusing their generosity, although it may have included failure in trusteeship. Rabbis would be looked on as trustworthy executors, even though they were often poor. Widow&rsquo;s could be especially vulnerable in the face of their religious grandeur and seeming piety, and easily persuaded to give hospitality (being &lsquo;eaten out of house and home?&rsquo;) or donations beyond their means, even possibly to the extent of giving their houses to subsidise the Temple worship. All who seek donations to a religious cause should heed this warning. It is true that the Rabbis were not allowed to receive money for teaching, but there were always ways round it for those who were unscrupulous. (This is in deliberate contrast with the widow who freely gave more than she could afford. But that was of her own free will, not because she had been manipulated).<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;And for a pretence make long prayers.&rsquo; Ever a danger in spiritual circles. They thought that the length of their prayers denoted the level of their spirituality. Instead it often demonstrated their arrogance and hypocrisy. Perhaps the long prayers were in order to impress the widows and play on their generosity.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;These will receive greater condemnation.&rdquo; They claimed to be teachers and therefore they have no excuse for their failure (compare <span class='bible'>Jas 3:1<\/span>). Note the assumption of s degree of punishment greater than for &lsquo;common people&rsquo;, because they are using a pretence of piety in order to achieve unworthy ends.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> Jesus&rsquo; Criticism of Certain Rabbis and The Contrast Made By Him of A Widow&rsquo;s Generosity (12:38-44).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Having been challenged by the different leading parties in Judaism, and having given them a final weighing up, Jesus now feels a responsibility to warn the people against the Scribes, whose influence over the people was so great. The ideas here are expanded on in <span class='bible'>Matthew 23<\/span>. Mark&rsquo;s rendering gives us very much a summary. There is a threefold contrast in what follows. Firstly, the Rabbis are described as those who devour widows&rsquo; houses, that is, as those who persuade them to give them gifts far beyond their means. They are depicted as greedy to receive such gifts. Secondly in what follows the widow is described as giving all that she had to God. Her unacclaimed generosity is seen as in strong contrast with the greed of the Scribes. Thirdly the disciples are meanwhile seen as admiring the Temple, and its adornments when they should have been admiring the widow&rsquo;s two mites. Only Jesus sees through to what is essential.<\/p>\n<p><strong> Analysis.<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> And in His teaching He said, &ldquo;Beware of the Scribes&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Mar 12:38<\/span> a).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> &ldquo;Who desire to walk in long robes&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Mar 12:38<\/span> b).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> &ldquo;And to be saluted in the marketplaces&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Mar 12:38<\/span> c).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> &ldquo;And the chief seats in the synagogues, and chief places at feasts&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Mar 12:39<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> &ldquo;They who devour widow&rsquo;s houses&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Mar 12:40<\/span> a).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> &ldquo;And for a pretence make long prayers&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Mar 12:40<\/span> b).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> &ldquo;These will receive greater condemnation&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Mar 12:40<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p> Note how in &lsquo;a&rsquo; they are to beware of the Scribes, because is the parallel they deserve condemnation. In &lsquo;b&rsquo; they desire to walk in long robes to be seen of men, and in the parallel they pray extended prayers for a similar reason. In &lsquo;c&rsquo; they like being saluted in places of business and activity and the places where people go, and in the parallel demonstrate their own unseemly &lsquo;business&rsquo; activity by taking undue advantage of helpless women in the places where they live, while centrally in &lsquo;d&rsquo; they love to be honoured in their religious activities.<\/p>\n<p> There is an interesting contrast here between the requirement made to the Scribe earlier to love God with heart, soul, mind and strength, in every aspect of life, and the picture of these men who love themselves with all their heart, soul, mind and strength, in every aspect of life.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>A last warning of Jesus:<\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 38<\/strong>. <strong> And He said unto them in His doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the marketplaces,<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 39<\/strong>. <strong> and the chief seats in the synagogues, and the uppermost room at feasts;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 40<\/strong>. <strong> which devour widows&#8217; houses, and for a pretense make long prayers: these shall receive greater damnation.<\/p>\n<p><\/strong> Mark gives only a very short section of the last woe of Jesus upon the scribes and Pharisees, but a passage which exhibits very well the hollowness and the mockery of their hypocrisy. Jesus warns the people against the scribes and their hypocritical ways. They should look, they should watch out for them. And now He characterizes them properly, He shows up their sham and deceit. Their desire, their one supreme wish is to wear garments which called men&#8217;s attention to them; they take a childish pleasure in bedecking themselves. Long robes they affected, like persons of great distinction, with exceptionally large tassels trailing along the ground. In these they loved to walk about, with no other object than to attract the attention of the multitude. They also loved to be greeted in the market-place; they liked the salutation Master; it gratified their vanity and their self-importance. For the same reason they chose the most prominent seats in the synagogues, those reserved for the elders of the congregation, where they would be sure to be noticed. When they were invited to dinner, they did not wait to be placed by the host, but chose the sofa of the honored guest, often usurping the place of guests more honorable than they. And to this vanity was added selfishness and greed. By promising prayers to widows, and then pompously delivering such intercessions for their welfare, they obtained money. For these prayers, purposely long and pompous, were only a blind to hide their real aim, namely, that of getting money, thus devouring the property, the houses, of the widows. This special form of avarice seems to be rampant in many parts of Christendom to this very hour, for the masses for the dead in the Roman Church certainly come under this heading, and the many prayers in the various cults are not one whit better. Christ&#8217;s judgment upon them all is short and severe: They will receive the greater damnation. Their hypocrisy is open before the eyes of the Judge and will receive the punishment commensurate with its damnableness.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><em><span class='bible'>Mar 12:38<\/span><\/em><\/strong><strong>. <\/strong><strong><em>Long clothing,<\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong> <em>Long garments, <\/em>or <em>robes. <\/em><em><span class='bible'>Mar 12:39<\/span><\/em>. <em>Rooms<\/em>] <em>Seats.<\/em> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Mar 12:38-40<\/span> . Comp. on <span class='bible'>Mat 23:1<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Mat 23:6-7<\/span> (14). Mark gives only a short fragment (and <span class='bible'>Luk 20:45-47<\/span> follows him) of the great and vehement original speech of severe rebuke, which Matthew has adopted in full from the collection of Logia.<\/p>\n<p>  ] as <span class='bible'>Mar 8:15<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p>  ] <em> quippe qui volunt<\/em> , desire, <em> i.e. lay claim to<\/em> as a privilege. &ldquo; <em> Velle<\/em> saepe rem per se indifferentem malam facit,&rdquo; Bengel.<\/p>\n<p>  ] <em> i.e.<\/em> in long stately <em> robes<\/em> , as  , even without more precise definition, is frequently used ( 1Ma 6:16 ; <span class='bible'>Luk 15:22<\/span> ; Marc. Anton. i. 7). Grotius well remarks that the  is &ldquo;gravitatis index.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>  ] governed by  . See Winer, p. 509 [E. T. 722].<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Mar 12:40<\/span> .    .  .  .] is usually not separated from what precedes, so that the nominative would come in instead of the genitive, bringing into more independent and emphatic prominence the description of their character. See Bernhardy, p. 68 f.; Buttmann, <em> neut. Gram.<\/em> p. 69 [E. T. 79]. But it is more suited to the vehement emotion of the discourse (with which also the asyndetic form of <span class='bible'>Mar 12:40<\/span> is in keeping), along with Grotius, Bengel, Lachmann, Tischendorf, Ewald (doubtfully also Winer, p. 165 [E. T. 228]), to begin with   a new sentence, which runs on to  : <em> the devourers of widows&rsquo; houses  these shall<\/em> (in the Messianic judgment) <em> receive a greater condemnation<\/em> !<\/p>\n<p> ] is the simple copula: <em> those devouring widows&rsquo; houses and<\/em> (and withal) <em> by way of pretence uttering long prayers<\/em> (in order to conceal under them their pitiless greed).<\/p>\n<p>  ]           , Theophylact.<\/p>\n<p>    .]        , Theophylact.<\/p>\n<p>  ]              ,         , Victor Antiochenus.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer&#8217;s New Testament Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>7.<em> The Lords Public Admonition to beware of the Scribes.<\/em> <span class='bible'>Mar 12:38-40<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(Parallels: Matthew , 23.; <span class='bible'>Luk 20:45-47<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>38And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and <em>love<\/em> salutations in the market-places, 39And the chief seats in the syna 40 gogues, and the uppermost rooms at feasts; Which devour widows, houses, and for a pretence make long prayers: these shall receive greater damnation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>See Matthew<\/em>, and the parallels in <em>Luke<\/em>.Mark, like Luke, gives us, of the great denunciatory speech against the Pharisees and scribes which Matthew records, but a very brief warning against the scribes. And how exactly accordant with the intention of his Gospel! It was only the Jewish Christians, for whom Matthew wrote, who <em>could<\/em> at once, and at that time, be summoned to gaze upon the pharisaic Judaism in all the blackness of its sunken state; for young Gentile Christians, the great punitive speech was to a certain extent unintelligible, and was besides too strong food. Hence the picture of the scribes is briefly given in their three principal features: ambition, avarice, and hypocritical external piety. The address is made up of the introductory word of warning by the Lord against the Pharisees, and of the first woe denounced by Him against them. The expression in Matthew, Do not ye after their works, is here, Beware of them. The religious enlarging of the garments, as Matthew relates it, is here briefly given in the going about in long clothing. The seeking of greetings precedes the desire for the chief seats in the synagogue, and the civic seats of honor; while the anxious listening for the salutation of Rabbi is passed over. With these chief seats at festivals is admirably united the devouring of widows houses, under pretence of long prayers, according to the first woe of Matthew. The address to the Pharisees, which we find in Matthew gradually passing into a direct, pointed attack, is here everywhere changed to the representation in the third person. Mark agrees almost verbally with Luke.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar 12:38<\/span>. <strong>Which love<\/strong>, .Meyer: Demand, claim. But they did not first claim the walking about in long robes: they actually did this; and that, too, with pleasure, consciousness, and deliberation. They loved this, had pleasure in this.<strong>In long clothing<\/strong>.Gerlach: Because they imitated the priests, who were the nobles of the Jewish people. But are not the priests themselves included? Braune: Because they imitated the venerable matrons. Jewish Rabbis imitate women! The reference is undoubtedly to their wandering about the streets and public places with marks of distinction significant of religiousness, in long robes of office and rank; hence also in gowns and robes of various orders.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Mar 12:40<\/span>. <strong>Which devour<\/strong>.Grotius, Bengel, [Lachmann], and others, make a new sentence begin with of  . As administrators, guardians, representatives of unprotected widows (Theophylact); or also by embezzling the funds of the temple-foundations.For the more lengthened denunciation, <em>see Matthew<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. <em>See Matthew<\/em>.We have here three points of contrast: 1. Public appearance,the proud walk in long trailing garments (devotion), the love of greetings (frivolity). 2. Demeanor in society,love of the chief ecclesiastical seat, and at the same time of the places of honor at banquets and festive entertainments. 3. Personal and secret conduct,the appropriation of the goods of the poor, under the veil and pretence of long prayers, and of supplications for the poor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Comp. <em>Matthew<\/em>.The scribes distinguished as the worst of the Pharisees.The false scribes are considered in three different ways, apart from the Scriptures: <span class=''>22<\/span> 1. Upon the streets; 2. in business and at banquets; 3. as the appropriators of inheritances in families, and by secret means.The veil of hypocrisy is a transparent covering: 1. The covering, <em>a<\/em>. the long robes, <em>b<\/em>. the long prayers; 2. the transparency of the covering, <em>a<\/em>. the walking about to be seen, <em>b<\/em>. the lust for the seats of honor, festive banquets, and unrighteous gain.The hypocrites terrible picture: 1. His public appearance contradicts his secret conduct; 2. his external importance, and desire to be important, is in contradiction to his internal emptiness and unworthiness.The extent to which a hypocritical profession is carried, is the measure of approaching punishment.Satan, who clothes himself as an angel of light, and plays the part of mans friend, is the archetype of all hypocrisy.<\/p>\n<p>Starke:As sinners are distinguished, so are their punishments.The confession of sin mitigates the judgment; to hide sin, under the pretence of Gods service, makes the judgment heavier and more terrible, <span class='bible'>Pro 28:13<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Braune (upon the long clothing):Somewhat as formerly many clergymen were wont to seek especial dignity from the size of their wigs, and the monks from their cowls and rosaries.Stier:Satan was the first who exalted himself to be brought low (the opposite of Christ).<\/p>\n<p>Schleiermacher:They used their piety only for external profit.Brieger:It is to be remarked, that Jesus pictures forth not individual scribes, but the whole sect. There were not wanting a few in whom better tendencies were to be found; <em>see<\/em> <span class='bible'>Mar 12:28-34<\/span>.The warning has a twofold intention: first, we are not to allow ourselves to be deceived by them; second, we are not to imitate their conduct.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[22]<\/span>[There is a play here upon words in the original: <em>Schrift gelehrten<\/em> ausserhalb der <em>Schrift<\/em>.<em>Ed<\/em>.]<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong> XVIII<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> ANOTHER QUESTION AND ITS ANSWER; HIS LAST PUBLIC DISCOURSE; OVER AGAINST THE TREASURY<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> Harmony, pages 155-159 and <span class='bible'>Mat 22:34-23:39<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ; <span class='bible'>Mar 12:38-44<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ; <span class='bible'>Luk 20:41-21:4<\/span><\/strong> <strong> .<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> This section commences on page 155 of the Harmony and consists of the last question of Christ&#8217;s enemies, differing bitterly among themselves, yet led by a common interest, conspired to test, tempt, and ensnare him by hard questions. He had answered the question concerning his authority, the question concerning paying tribute to Caesar, and the resurrection question. The Pharisees, seeing that he had muzzled the Sadducees, rapidly held a council, selected with great care the form of a final question and a representative to propound it. It will be understood that this representative is a better man than those he represents, but he speaks representatively. And the word &#8220;tempt&#8221; is used in its usual bad sense. They consulted first as to what question should be propounded. Second, who should propound it. The querist was a lawyer. The word &#8220;lawyer&#8221; in the Bible does not mean altogether what our word &#8220;lawyer&#8221; means. A lawyer in the time of Moses and after, and especially in mediaeval ages, was one who was an expert in both civil and canon law, or ecclesiastical law. The first business of a scribe was to copy the text, then expound it. And after a while they became authorities both on text and exposition, and from them originated the meaning of the degree LL. D., the word &#8220;laws&#8221; being plural, that is, one being skilled in both civil and canon law. In all countries where there is a union of church and state there are two forms of law, one applying to ecclesiastical matters and the other to civil matters. Oftentimes the two blend. A matter can be both civil and ecclesiastical.<\/p>\n<p> It is quite important here to note the precise form of the question they propound. Following the Greek literally this is the question: &#8220;What sort of commandment is great?&#8221; We usually understand that the question seeks to find a distinction between the various commandments of the moral law, as to relative importance. This seems not to have been their idea. There would not have been a snare in such a question. Let us see if we can find just what was the snare. They themselves continually distinguished between a commandment that was written and a commandment that was oral or traditional. And they were accustomed to put the traditional law above the written law. One of themselves had said, &#8220;The commandments of the written law are sometimes weighty, and sometimes little, but the commandments of the scribes are always weighty.&#8221; So when they put the question in this form, &#8220;What sort of commandment is great?&#8221; they want to commit him either for or against the oral law. If he decides against the oral or traditional law they hope to make capital out of it before the people, who were very much devoted to the traditional law. Now, from the very beginning there had been a marked difference between them and him on the meaning of law. When he says law he means only the written law. When they say law they mean both the written and the oral law. All through the Sermon on the Mount we see how he magnifies the written law, and throws contempt upon their traditional law. He shows that in their construction of traditional law they oftentimes set aside the written law entirely. We have considered a case already where they set aside the commandment, &#8220;Honor thy father and thy mother,&#8221; by following the traditional law, to the effect that if a man said to himself that the money with which he ought to help the aged, feeble parents was in his mind consecrated to something else, that would exclude him from piety toward his father and mother, that is, relieve him from the burden of taking care of them. All along he has been setting aside their conception of law. Now their hope is that if he takes his old ground, that only written law is great, it would turn away from him the people who believed in the oral law. We have a passage in Mark often quoted in baptismal controversies showing how punctilious they were in their observance of their traditional law, the diligent washing of their hands and, when they returned from the market, the dipping of themselves lest they had contracted ceremonial defilement by touch with unclean people. And even the dipping of their tables and beds, and anything that might by a possibility have become ceremonially defiled. Hence the form of this question: &#8220;What sort of commandment is great?&#8221; In other words, &#8220;Do you say that only the written law is great, or do you agree with us that the traditional law is even greater?&#8221; He replies by a quotation from the Pentateuch. The first part of his answer is from <span class='bible'>Deu 6:4<\/span> , the second part from <span class='bible'>Lev 19:18<\/span> . He says, &#8220;Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength. This is the great and first commandment. The second like unto it is this, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.&#8221; Here he accepts the condensation of all the first table of the law by Moses into one commandment and his condemnation of the second table of the law into another commandment.<\/p>\n<p> Spurgeon, while seeming to misapprehend the precise point of this question propounded to Christ, has a great sermon on the text, &#8220;The first and the great commandment.&#8221; To love God supremely is first in order of position in the Ten Commandments. It is first in order of importance. It is first and greatest because it includes the second. That is to say, unless we love God supremely we can never obey the second commandment to love our neighbor as ourself. Some magnify the first table of the law and disregard the second. They think that if they pray and pay tithes to God, and do not worship images) and keep the sabbath day, it makes little difference how they do toward their neighbors. They may refuse to honor their parents, steal, lie, commit adultery, if only they comply with what they think is the .First Commandment. On the other hand it is the custom of the world to utterly disregard the First Commandment and magnify the Second. Businessmen on the streets conceive of law simply as it relates to our fellow man. They think if we kill nobody, do not wrong our neighbor in any respect, we are all right. Their stress is on morality, but our Lord shows an indissoluble connection between the two commandments: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and thy neighbor as thyself. He conceives of no sound morality apart from supreme love of God.<\/p>\n<p> This representative LLD who propounded this question was much interested in our Lord&#8217;s answer. It becomes evident that he is a better man than those who loaded him with the question. He expresses hearty approval of Christ&#8217;s answer, and our Lord said that he was not far from the kingdom.<\/p>\n<p> As usual, our Lord follows up his victory. He puts a question before the Pharisees are scattered. They still stand grouped where they had consulted to determine what question should be propounded to him. So he propounds a counter question. &#8220;What think ye of Christ? Whose son is he?&#8221; They readily answered as any Jew would have answered, &#8220;The Son of David.&#8221; Then he puts a question with a barb on it: &#8220;If he is only the Son of David, how is it that David, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, calls him Lord, in <span class='bible'>Psa 110<\/span> , to wit: The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand?&#8221; The object of his question is to correct their limited conception of the Messiah. They were disposed to look at him as a mere human Jewish king establishing an earthly government and raising the throne of David so as to bear reign over the whole Gentile world. His object is to convince them that the Messiah foretold in their Old Testament was not merely a man, and to prove it by David: &#8220;The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand.&#8221; He wants to bring out the thought which he himself later expressed to John in Revelation: &#8220;I am the root as well as the offspring of David.&#8221; In the divine sense he is the source of David; in the flesh he is the offspring of David. This statement of our Lord is of incalculable value in its bearing on the radical criticism. They do not hesitate to say that David never wrote <span class='bible'>Psa 110<\/span> . Jesus says that he did. He explicitly ascribed that psalm to David. They say the psalms are not inspired. Jesus says that David wrote that psalm in the Spirit. They deny any reference to a coming One in that psalm. Jesus shows that there is a reference to himself, the coming Messiah. It is a little remarkable that this particular psalm is quoted oftener in the New Testament as messianic than any other passage in the Old Testament. Our Lord himself quotes it more than once. Peter quotes it in his great address recorded in <span class='bible'>Act 2<\/span> , and yet again in his first letter. Paul quotes it expressly in his first letter to the Corinthians, and again in the letter to the Ephesians and four times in the letter to the Hebrews, and all of them say that David wrote it; that David wrote it by inspiration; and that David wrote it with reference to the coming Messiah. And so we come to the end of the great catechism. It has been a duel to the death.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> THE LAST PUBLIC DISCOURSE OF OUR LORD<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> We do not mean to intimate that Christ will not hereafter speak to his disciples. We mean that this discourse that we are now to consider ends his public ministry to the Jews. He considers the battle ended. They have rejected him, and now he makes the most serious indictment against the nation and its rulers known in the annals of time. It is the sharpest arraignment and the deepest denunciation to be found in the whole Bible.<\/p>\n<p> This discourse consists, first, of a great indictment; second, the denunciation of a great penalty; third, the suggestion of a great hope. Let us see then what is the indictment.<\/p>\n<p> We have already learned from the preceding discussion that the chief item of the indictment is their rejection of the Messiah and their purpose to murder him. Then follows the other items of the indictment relating particularly to the leaders: First, sitting in the seat of authority, they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne upon the people, which they themselves will not move with their finger. Second, all their works are done to be seen of men, hence they make broad their phylacteries, enlarge the borders of their garments, love the chief places at feasts and the chief seats in the synagogues, and salutations in the marketplaces to be called rabbi. Third, they shut up the kingdom of heaven against men, themselves not entering nor suffering those to enter who would enter. Fourth, they compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is become so, he is made twofold more a son of hell than themselves. Fifth, they swear by the lesser things, disregarding the greater, swearing by the gift on the altar as more than the altar which sanctifies the gift, swearing by the gold of the Temple as more than the Temple itself. Sixth, they tithe mint and anise and cummin and ignore the weightier matters of the law judgment, mercy, and faith strain out a gnat and swallow a camel. Seventh, they cleanse the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within are full of extortion and excess, as whited sepulchres, outwardly appearing beautiful, while inwardly they are full of dead men&#8217;s bones and all uncleanness, so they outwardly appear righteous unto men, but inwardly are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. Eighth, they are as monument-builders garnishing the tombs of the righteous, as if they thus said, &#8220;We would never have been partakers in the blood of the prophets.&#8221; All the time they are sons in spirit, as well as in flesh, of them that slew the prophets. In this way they fill up the measure of their fathers. And now comes<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> THE PENALTY<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Upon you shall come all the righteous blood shed on the earth, from the blood of Abel, the righteous, unto the blood of Zachariah, son of Barachiah. . . . Your house is left unto you desolate.&#8221; It has long been a puzzle to the thinker how the blood of Abel should came on the Jewish people, who, in their father Abraham, originated so many years subsequent to Abel. The answer to the puzzle is this: Abel and all subsequent martyrs believed in salvation by a coming Messiah. This doctrine was the hope of the whole world. And when the Jewish nation was established they were made the custodians of this doctrine. To them were committed the oracles of God. If, therefore, when the Messiah comes, to whom Abel and every martyr had looked forward, and the Jews rejected and killed that Messiah, they sin, not only against the Messiah, and not only against themselves, but they sin against the whole world. They sin against the hope of the world. If their attitude toward the Messiah is true, then Abel died in vain. If they alone of all the nations were entrusted with the doctrine of Abel&#8217;s saving faith, and they repudiate that doctrine, on them comes the blood of Abel. The penalty denounced is not merely the destruction of the Holy City and the sacred Temple, and the dispersion of the Jewish nation, but it is a desolation a tribulation that shall last through all the ages until the coming of the Gentiles be fulfilled. Therefore, as we learn later, it is called a trouble such as the world had never known before and would never know again. It is surprising that commentators, in discussing &#8220;the great tribulation&#8221; set forth in our Lord&#8217;s great prophecy, make it a general tribulation bearing upon Gentile nations. It is exclusively a Jewish tribulation, which has already lasted about 1900 years. Nor is the end yet in sight. They were on probation twenty centuries as the bearers of the oracles of God. Their tribulation has already lasted nearly twenty centuries.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> THE GREAT HOPE <\/strong> The great hope is suggested in this final word of his discourse, &#8220;Ye shall not see me henceforth till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Mat 23:39<\/span> ). So, that the last word to the Jews, the last public message, touches the second advent of our Lord.<\/p>\n<p> Following this discourse we have an account of Jesus seated over against the treasury and beholding how men put money into the treasury. What a lesson is here! Christ watching the contributions, noting the amount, noting the motive, measuring the relative importance of the contributions, not by the amount, but by the unselfish sacrifice in the donation.<\/p>\n<p> In my young days I preached a sermon to the Waco Association on this text, on the theme, &#8220;The Treasury of God&#8217;s People, and Christ&#8217;s Observation of the Contributions to This Fund.&#8221; The association called for its publication. The discussion was an epoch in the history of the association. From that time on enlargements in both spirituality and gifts, and broader fields came to Waco Association. Always before God&#8217;s people should be this picture of Christ sitting over against the treasury watching how men put money into the treasury. (The author&#8217;s sermon to which references are here made will be found in his first book of sermons.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> QUESTIONS<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. What was the Pharisees&#8217; last effort to entangle Christ by questioning him, how did they proceed and what two points upon which they consulted?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. What is the meaning and usage of the words &#8220;lawyer&#8221; and &#8220;doctor&#8221;?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. What was the form of the question they propounded to Christ and why important to note its form?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. What difference between the Pharisees&#8217; use of the word &#8220;law,&#8221; and Christ&#8217;s use of it and in what did the trap here set for our Lord consist?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. What was Christ&#8217;s attitude toward their oral law, what example of their setting aside the written commandment cited, and what example of their punctiliousness in the observance of their oral law given?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. State clearly the question as they propounded it to him and give his answer verbatim.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. What sermon cited on this passage, what is the substance of it, and what application of this interpretation to our own generation?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. What evidence here that this lawyer was better than those whom he represented?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. How does Christ follow up his victory in this instance?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. What was their answer to his question, what his second question and what the purpose of our Lord in these last questions?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. What is the value of this statement of Christ in its bearing on radical criticism and what is the fallacy of the position of the radical critics in this case?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 12. Of what does our Lord&#8217;s last public discourse consist?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 13. What items of the indictment?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 14. What penalty denounced and its meaning and application?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 15. What great hope suggested and its far-reaching meaning?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 16. What great lesson of Christ and the treasury?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: B.H. Carroll&#8217;s An Interpretation of the English Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 38 And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and <em> love<\/em> salutations in the marketplaces, <strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Ver. 38. <strong> Love to go in long clothing<\/strong> ] Down to the heels, as senators, or counsellors. A garment that Christ himself wore, as being a citizen or free denizen of Capernaum. But he loved not to go in it, as these Pharisees, these glorious masters of the Jews; <em> a<\/em> he affected not this habit more than another out of pride and vain glory, to be looked at, and admired by the common people. This they thought a goodly business.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><em> a<\/em>   , <em> voluerunt cum summa cupiditate.<\/em> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 38 40.<\/strong> ] DENUNCIATION OF THE SCRIBES. <span class='bible'>Luk 20:45-47<\/span> . These verses, nearly verbatim the same in the two Evangelists, and derived from a common report, are an abridgment of the discourse which occupies the greater part of <span class='bible'>Mat 23<\/span> with the additions of <strong> <\/strong> <strong> . <\/strong> <strong>  <\/strong> <strong> . <\/strong> <strong> <\/strong> <strong> .,<\/strong> and <strong>  <\/strong> <strong> . <\/strong> <strong> <\/strong> (see [40] Matt., text, and var. readd.). The words <strong>   <\/strong> <strong> . <\/strong> <strong> <\/strong> <strong> .<\/strong> seem to imply that Mark <em> understood it as a compendium<\/em> .<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3em'> [40] When, in the Gospels, and in the Evangelic statement, <span class='bible'>1Co 11:23-25<\/span> , the sign () occurs in a reference, it is signified that the word occurs <em> in the parallel place<\/em> in the other Gospels, which will always be found indicated <em> at the head of the note<\/em> on the paragraph. When the sign () is <em> qualified<\/em> , thus, &lsquo; Mk.,&rsquo; or &lsquo; Mt. Mk.,&rsquo; &amp;c., it is signified that the word occurs <em> in the parallel place in that Gospel or Gospels, but not in the other or others<\/em> .<\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong> and the following accusatives are governed. by <strong> <\/strong> <strong> .<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>  <\/strong> may either be dependent on the preceding by a broken construction, or may be the beginning of a new sentence of exclamation, as Meyer takes it. The former is to me the more probable, and I have punctuated accordingly. It is a change of construction not without example in the classics: Herod. i. 51,     ,    . See also reff. The art. points them out graphically. They <em> devoured widows&rsquo; houses<\/em> , by attaching them to themselves, and so persuading them to minister to them of their substance. A trace of this practice (but there out of gratitude and love) on the part of the Jewish women, is found in <span class='bible'>Luk 8:2-3<\/span> . What words can better describe the corrupt practices of the so-called priesthood of Rome, than these of our Lord? The <strong> <\/strong> was, to make their sanctity appear to these women, and so win their favour.<\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong> because ye have joined thieving with hypocrisy.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Henry Alford&#8217;s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Mar 12:38-40<\/span> . <em> Warning against the influence of the scribes<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Luk 20:45-47<\/span> ). As if encouraged by the manifest sympathy of the crowd, Jesus proceeds to warn them against the baleful influence of their religious guides.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Mar 12:38<\/span> .     .: this expression alone suffices to show that what Mk. here gives is but a fragment of a larger discourse of the same type an anti-scribal manifesto. Here again the evangelist bears faithful witness to a great body of  he does not record. <span class='bible'>Mat 23<\/span> shows how much he omits at this point.  : the imperfect here may be taken as suggesting that what follows is but a sample = He was saying things like this.   as in <span class='bible'>Mar 8:15<\/span> .  , desiring, not so much claiming as their privilege (Meyer) as taking a childish pleasure in =  , <span class='bible'>Luk 20:46<\/span> .   , in long robes, worn by persons of rank and distinction (&ldquo;gravitatis index,&rdquo; Grotius), possibly worn specially long by the scribes that the tassels attached might trail on the ground. So Wnsche, <em> ad loc.<\/em> <em> vide<\/em> picture of Pharisee in his robes in Lund, <em> Heiligthmer<\/em> .  : infinitive, depending on  followed by accusatives,  , etc., depending on same word: <em> oratio variata, vide<\/em> <span class='bible'>Mat 23:6<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Mar 12:38-40<\/p>\n<p> 38In His teaching He was saying: &#8220;Beware of the scribes who like to walk around in long robes, and like respectful greetings in the market places, 39and chief seats in the synagogues and places of honor at banquets, 40who devour widows&#8217; houses, and for appearance&#8217;s sake offer long prayers; these will receive greater condemnation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mar 12:38 &#8220;&#8216;the scribes who like to'&#8221; The temporal connection between Mar 12:25-27 and Mar 12:38-40 is uncertain. Obviously He is addressing the same category of leaders (i.e., scribes), but it is uncertain if the scribes of 35-37 are being addressed or other scribes who like to flaunt their religion. Surely Jesus&#8217; words also relate to the Sadducees and the Pharisees who put on a religious show in order to be recognized by the people.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;who like to walk around in long robes'&#8221; This refers to a distinctive white linen tallith with large blue tassels worn by the scribes. The Talmud taught that one is required to stand in the presence of a rabbi. These men liked this special treatment (i.e., distinctive prayer shawls, respectful greetings, best seats in worship, and place of honor at meals). They had it all, but missed Christ!<\/p>\n<p>Mar 12:40 &#8220;&#8216;who devour widow&#8217;s houses'&#8221; This may be metaphorical language referring to (1) the burden of almsgiving that these leaders required of all the people or (2) the practice of convincing widows to give their inheritance (i.e., livelihood) to the temple. This thereby refers to the manipulative fund-raising techniques of the religious leaders.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;for appearance&#8217;s sake offer long prayers'&#8221; They prayed to be seen by others, not heard by God. Their religion was an outward show (cf. Isa 29:13; Mat 7:21-23; Col 2:16-23), but they did not recognize God&#8217;s greatest gift!<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;they will receive greater condemnation&#8221; Their religious faith was an outward show, not an active inner faith of love and service (cf. Mar 12:28-34). This phrase may reflect (1) degrees of punishment (cf. Mat 10:15; Mat 11:22; Mat 11:24; Mat 18:6; Mat 25:21; Mat 25:23; Luk 12:47-48; Luk 20:47; Jas 3:1) or (2) Oriental metaphorical overstatement (i.e., hyperbole).<\/p>\n<p>SPECIAL TOPIC: DEGREES OF REWARDS AND PUNISHMENT <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>doctrine = teaching. <\/p>\n<p>Beware = take heed. App-133. <\/p>\n<p>of = away from (Greek. apo. App-104.): i.e. take heed [and keep] away from. Not the some word as in Mar 12:44. <\/p>\n<p>love = desire, or will to. Greek. thelo. App-102. <\/p>\n<p>go = walk about. <\/p>\n<p>long clothing = robes. Greek. stolais. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>38-40.] DENUNCIATION OF THE SCRIBES. Luk 20:45-47. These verses, nearly verbatim the same in the two Evangelists, and derived from a common report, are an abridgment of the discourse which occupies the greater part of Matthew 23-with the additions of .  . ., and  .  (see [40] Matt., text, and var. readd.). The words   . . seem to imply that Mark understood it as a compendium.<\/p>\n<p>[40] When, in the Gospels, and in the Evangelic statement, 1Co 11:23-25, the sign () occurs in a reference, it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in the other Gospels, which will always be found indicated at the head of the note on the paragraph. When the sign () is qualified, thus,  Mk., or  Mt. Mk., &amp;c., it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in that Gospel or Gospels, but not in the other or others.<\/p>\n<p> and the following accusatives are governed. by .<\/p>\n<p>  may either be dependent on the preceding by a broken construction, or may be the beginning of a new sentence of exclamation, as Meyer takes it. The former is to me the more probable, and I have punctuated accordingly. It is a change of construction not without example in the classics: Herod. i. 51,    ,   . See also reff. The art. points them out graphically. They devoured widows houses, by attaching them to themselves, and so persuading them to minister to them of their substance. A trace of this practice (but there out of gratitude and love) on the part of the Jewish women, is found in Luk 8:2-3. What words can better describe the corrupt practices of the so-called priesthood of Rome, than these of our Lord? The  was, to make their sanctity appear to these women, and so win their favour.<\/p>\n<p>-because ye have joined thieving with hypocrisy.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 12:38. , unto them) Especially to the disciples, Luk 20:45. [, beware) lest ye incur the same condemnation, Mar 12:40.-V. g.]-, the Scribes) An open accusation.-, who wish) The wish or intention often make an act, which is in itself indifferent [neither good nor bad], a bad one: but the verb , I will, or wish, often includes the act in it, whether good, Mat 20:14, or bad, Gal 4:9. And it is a characteristic, even in the present day, of false theologians, to be captivated with splendour of robes, with sustaining the leading parts as to celebrity, with a display of offices and honours, as also of their intercessory prayers before others.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 12:38-40<\/p>\n<p>11. DENUNCIATION OF THE SCRIBES<\/p>\n<p>Mar 12:38-40<\/p>\n<p>(Matthew 23; Luk 22:45-47)<\/p>\n<p>38 And in his teaching he said, Beware of the scribes,&#8211;Be on your guard against the teaching of the scribes. Be cautious about hearing and following these learned men of the Jews.<\/p>\n<p>who desire&#8211;This states their uppermost passion&#8211;their love and desire of display and honor &#8220;to be seen of men.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>to walk&#8211;Around displaying themselves as much as possible &#8220;to be seen of men.&#8221; (Mat 23:5.)<\/p>\n<p>in long robes,&#8211;This describes their dress.<\/p>\n<p>and to have salutations&#8211;Complimentary greetings. Marks of particular respect shown them in public places.<\/p>\n<p>in the marketplaces,&#8211;Places where they bought and sold&#8211;places where multitudes of people were assembled together.<\/p>\n<p>39 and chief seats in the synagogues,&#8211;The seats usually occupied by the elders of the synagogues, near the pulpit. They loved and desired places of distinctions. (Mat 4:23.)<\/p>\n<p>and chief places at feasts:&#8211;The most honorable positions at the table during public feasts. Jesus forbade his followers to seek such places or titles of distinction. (Mat 23:7-8.)<\/p>\n<p>The command here is an express command to his disciples not to receive such a title of distinction. They were not to covet it; they were not to seek it; they were not to do anything that implied a wish or a willingness that it should be appended to their names. Everything which would tend to make a distinction among them, or destroy their parity; everything which would lead the world to suppose that there were ranks and grades among them as servants, they were to avoid. It is to be observed that the command is that they were not to receive the title, &#8220;Be not ye called Rabbi.&#8221; The Savior did not forbid them giving the title to others, not disciples, when it was customary or not regarded as improper (Act 26:25); but they were not to receive it. It was to be unknown among them. This title corresponds with the title &#8220;Doctor of Divinity,&#8221; and other degrees as applied to preachers of the gospel; and so far as I can see, the spirit of the Savior&#8217;s command is violated by the reception of such a title or titles as it would have been by their being called Rabbi. It is a literary distinction. It does not appropriately pertain to office. It makes a distinction among preachers. It tends to engender pride, and a sense of superiority in those who obtain it; and envy and a sense of inferiority in those who do not; and the whole spirit and tendency of it is contrary to the &#8220;simplicity and the purity that is toward Christ.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>40 they that devour widows&#8217; houses,&#8211;Here our Savior points out other evil traits of character of the scribes. These scribes devoured the families of widows, or the means of supporting their families. What means they used to accomplish this evil work, we may not fully know. Probably they did it under the pretense of counseling them in the knowledge of law and in the management of their estates. In some way they took advantage of these poor women and robbed them of their means of support.<\/p>\n<p>and for a pretence make long prayers;&#8211;As a pretext. They used religion, making a mask of it, to gain the confidence of people so they could rob even the most helpless.<\/p>\n<p>these shall receive greater condemnation.&#8211;As the prayers were made for deception and for no other purpose, and made long in order to more effectually accomplish the evil purpose, they only added to the wickedness which they were designed to conceal. For the double sin of hypocrisy and fraudulent injustice, they should meet a terrible doom. The damnation was greater because the wickedness was greater. So it must ever be with men who use the cloak of religion to serve the devil in.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>said: Mar 4:2 <\/p>\n<p>Beware: Mat 10:17, Mat 23:1-7, Luk 20:45-47 <\/p>\n<p>which: Mat 6:5, Luk 11:43, Luk 14:7-11, 3Jo 1:9 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Mat 7:15 &#8211; Beware Mat 23:2 &#8211; General Mat 23:6 &#8211; General Luk 20:46 &#8211; which<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Chapter 17.<\/p>\n<p>The Great Indictment<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And He said unto them in His doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the market-places, and the chief seats in the synagogues, and the uppermost rooms at feasts: which devour widows&#8217; houses, and for a pretence make long prayers: these shall receive greater damnation.&#8221;-Mar 12:38-40.<\/p>\n<p>The Scribes and the Lord.<\/p>\n<p>All throughout our Lord&#8217;s career His Scribes and Pharisees had taken up an attitude of hostility against Him. From the very first they had criticised His actions, disputed His claims, and in every way tried to discredit Him in the eyes of the people. Neither the wisdom of Christ&#8217;s words, nor the beneficence of His works stirred any feeling of wonder or appreciation in their breasts. Mr Prejudice, with his sixty deaf men, was in possession of every gate that led to the citadel of their souls. How inveterate was the prejudice, and how bitter the hate may be judged by the account they gave of His mighty works. &#8220;He hath Beelzebub,&#8221; they said, &#8220;and by the prince of the devils casteth He out devils.&#8221; It was the Galilean Scribes who in their blind and obstinate prejudice had said that wicked thing against the Lord. But the Jerusalem Scribes were of the same bigoted and bitter temper. They saw no beauty in Christ that they should desire Him. In public, they continually tried to thwart Him in His work and to humiliate Him in the eyes of the people; in secret they constantly plotted His death. This day of questioning and debate had sufficiently displayed the spirit they were of. For Jesus knew, and probably the people knew also, that the questions which had been submitted to Him were prompted not by a genuine desire to know, but were the offspring of a malice and an envy and a hate that were as cruel as the grave.<\/p>\n<p>The Lord and the Scribes.<\/p>\n<p>And now, when the questionings were all over, Jesus turns to the crowd and speaks to them about the character of His questioners. In one of the most terrible and awesome passages, not only in Scripture but in the whole of literature, our Lord tears away the garb of sanctimoniousness and piety these rabbis wore, and revealed them for the hypocrites, the mummers, the playactors they really were. I have wondered sometimes how these Scribes must have felt as Jesus went on with His searching and remorseless exposure of their hypocrisy. In Rev 6:15-17 we read of certain men who cry to the mountains and to the rocks, &#8220;Fall on us, and hide us from the face of Him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb.&#8221; And I have imagined that these Scribes and Pharisees must have wished they could hide anywhere out of sight of those clear eyes that read their souls like an open book, and out of hearing of those terrible words that fell upon their ears like the stroke of doom. It is the merest resume of the Great Indictment that we get here. For the complete and detailed account of our Lord&#8217;s denunciation of the Scribes you must turn to Matthew xxiii. From the account Matthew gives we know that our Lord piled up one solemn and terrible &#8220;woe&#8221; upon another-until the indictment became absolutely crushing and overwhelming. It is only the gist of that terrific speech that Mark gives us here, and we must read and interpret what Mark says in the light of Matthew&#8217;s fuller narrative.<\/p>\n<p>The Wrath of the Lamb.<\/p>\n<p>But before we examine Christ&#8217;s accusations against the Scribes, let us note that the chief interest and importance of this paragraph consists, not in the exposure it makes of the hypocrisy of the Scribes, but in the light it throws on the character of Jesus Himself. We see our Lord here in a strange aspect! This Man Who cries, &#8220;Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites,&#8221; is not like the &#8220;gentle Jesus&#8221; we sing about. There is something fierce, hot, scorching about the whole of this passage. What we get here is not the gentleness of Christ, but the anger of Christ. No! I withdraw that word anger. It carries with it just a suggestion of personal passion and pique. And there was no trace of personal temper in the whole of this tremendous indictment. The word for the burning, holy indignation of this passage is not anger but wrath. The wrath of Christ! We do not often speak of it. Perhaps in our conceptions of Christ we leave no room for it. And yet, my reading of the Gospels convinces me that Christ&#8217;s wrath is as real as His love.<\/p>\n<p>The Tenderness of Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n<p>-And His Sternness.<\/p>\n<p>It is, indeed, impossible to exaggerate the tenderness of Jesus. Nothing could be more gentle and gracious than His treatment, for instance, of Jairus&#8217; little daughter; or of that poor timid soul who touched the hem of His garment in the press, and stole healing virtue from Him; nothing could be more exquisitely tender than His treatment of Zacchus, and indeed the whole publican class; nothing could be more beautifully kind than His treatment of the weak but penitent Peter. But with all His kindness, and gentleness, and tenderness Christ was not soft. There is another and very different aspect to Christ&#8217;s character. If you want to get the complete view of Christ&#8217;s character you must read not only the story of how He welcomed publicans and sinners to Him-you must read also that other story of how He swept the Temple Courts clean of the mob of traffickers who bought and sold in its courts. If you want the complete view of Christ&#8217;s character you must not only read the story of how He said to the outcast publican-Thou also art a Son of Abraham,-you must read also the story of how He cried out against the religious leaders of the day, saying, &#8220;Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites.&#8221; The wrath of Christ is as real as His love, and room must be made for it in any conception of the Christ that aspires to be complete.<\/p>\n<p>-Its Necessary Place in His Character.<\/p>\n<p>I will go a step further and say that Christ&#8217;s wrath is an element in the perfection of His character. We conspire to ignore it in these days under the mistaken idea that somehow or other it takes from the glory and perfection of Christ to suppose that He could be wrathful. On the contrary, it is the people who ignore the wrath who sacrifice the perfection of Christ. I will for ever refuse the epithet &#8220;good&#8221; to the man who is incapable of a holy flame of indignation in the presence of wrong and sin. The man who is never angry is morally anaemic. He is not good; he is weak. The father who can never be wrathful with his child, who weakly smiles at his child&#8217;s wrongdoing, is not a &#8220;good&#8221; father, he is about as bad a father as a child could have. It is high time we revised our ideas of what goodness is and ceased to identify it with a weak and soft amiability. Christ&#8217;s holy wrath is, then, an element in His perfection. He was no soft and weak sentimentalist as a great deal of current religious thought and speech make Him out to have been. He was holy as well as tender, He was entirely good. In His passion for purity He flamed like a refiner&#8217;s fire, and wicked men could not abide the day of His coming. That is the aspect of Christ we get here.<\/p>\n<p>A Modern Need.<\/p>\n<p>There is scarcely anything we need more in these days than a quickened sense of the holiness of our Lord and His sacred wrath against sin. We have lost the saving and purifying sense of fear. &#8220;Nobody,&#8221; as Dr Dale said to Dr Berry, &#8220;is afraid of God now.&#8221; And as a result, the seriousness and the solemnity and the awe have passed out of our religious life. Religion has degenerated into an amiability-into a cheap optimism. There is nothing wrong-or if there is, everything and everybody will come all right and (as in the popular novel of the day) we are all going to be happy ever after. It would do us good to read a terrible passage like this upon our knees, that we may learn that the &#8220;wrath&#8221; of Christ is no figure of speech, and may acquire that godly fear which is the very beginning of wisdom.<\/p>\n<p>Christ as Saviour; but Judge also.<\/p>\n<p>And while this passage reminds us that we must make room for holy wrath as well as for love in our conception of Christ, so it reminds us that He is not simply Saviour-He is Judge as well. Am I wrong in saying that this again is an oft neglected aspect of the office and work of Christ? We are constantly talking about Jesus as Saviour. And we cannot talk too much. For the announcement of His Saviour-hood is the very core of the good news we have to proclaim to the world. That is how Christ was first announced in the ears of men. &#8220;There is born unto you this day in the city of David a Saviour which is Christ the Lord.&#8221; But that is not all. No one can read the New Testament without seeing that Christ is more than Saviour, He is also Judge. The Father &#8220;hath committed all Judgment unto the Son&#8221; (Joh 5:22). Before Him all nations are to be gathered. By their attitude to Him men&#8217;s destinies are to be settled. Let us never forget that He Who wants to be our Saviour is certain to be our Judge.<\/p>\n<p>Love on Fire.<\/p>\n<p>I should be giving a wrong impression of this passage if I made out it was all wrath and indignation. There is love in it as well, for the word &#8220;woe&#8221; which fell time after time from Christ&#8217;s lips, is an exclamation no less of pity than of condemnation. We speak of a thing as a &#8220;woeful pity.&#8221; And so one of the old Greek Fathers entitles this terrible passage &#8220;Christ&#8217;s Commiseration of the Scribes and Pharisees.&#8221; Even while pronouncing sentence upon them, He yearned over them with a great compassion. There is love in the very wrath of the Lord. There is a wistful pleading even in His indignation. His wrath, as someone has said, is but His love on fire.<\/p>\n<p>Can Men Speak as Christ Spoke?<\/p>\n<p>This paragraph raises another very interesting and important question, and that is this-how far is this terrible indictment of our Lord&#8217;s to be imitated by modern ministers in their preaching? I will content myself with just two words on this point. First of all, before we speak with the severity and directness of this great sermon, we ought to be able to read the human heart as Jesus did. He had a right to speak like this, for He knew what was in man; He read the hearts of these Scribes like an open book. But for the rest of us, who do not thus know the heart, perhaps we had better recall the word of the Lord where He says, &#8220;Judge not, that ye be not judged.&#8221; And yet, in the second place, we must remember that the Christian preacher is not set in his place to prophesy smooth things. He is set in his place to declare the truth-even when the truth is bitter, unpalatable and painful. His duty is not merely to denounce sin in general terms; he must also, when occasion demands, rebuke the sinner; he must dare to say to him, with the plain, remorseless severity of the old Book, &#8220;Thou art the man.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Sins Denounced:<\/p>\n<p>-Ostentation and Pride.<\/p>\n<p>Avarice.<\/p>\n<p>And now let us look at the accusation itself. The Scribes, remember, were the religious teachers of the Jews-they were, as we should say, the ministers of that day. Look at the charges Jesus brings against these men who paraded as the ministers of God. He accuses them of ostentation and pride. They walked about, as Dr Salmond says, in stately, flowing robes, like those of kings and priests. They were all eagerness to have salutations in the market-places, i.e. to have sounding titles like Rabbi addressed to them in public. They liked also to have the chief seats in the synagogue-the seats or benches, Dr Salmond explains, reserved for the elders, in front of the ark and facing the people. They were sticklers for order of precedence. They insisted upon their dignity. But pride and ostentation were not the chief sins of the Scribes. They were also guilty of avarice. &#8220;They devoured widows&#8217; houses,&#8221; says our Lord. For they were lawyers as well as religious teachers. Necessarily they would be used for the making of wills and other legal business. And they used the opportunity their legal position gave them to enrich themselves at the expense of the poor and the defenceless. Dr David Smith reminds us that in pre-reformation times, it was a custom in our own land, when a peasant died, for the priest to visit the stricken dwelling not to comfort the widow and the orphans but to claim the &#8220;cors-present&#8221;-the best cow and the coverlet of the bed or the deceased&#8217;s outer garment. And the Scribes were guilty of a similar rapacity so that one great Rabbi could say about the impoverishment of a certain widow, &#8220;The stroke of the Pharisees has touched you.&#8221; And our Lord&#8217;s indignation waxed hot against these false shepherds who, instead of caring for the defenceless sheep of their charge, harried and rent them.<\/p>\n<p>-Hypocrisy.<\/p>\n<p>But even avarice was not their blackest and deepest crime. Their wickedness culminated in this, &#8220;for a pretence they made long prayers.&#8221; In other words, although they were the religious teachers of Judaea, their religion was all a sham. Their piety was all a parade and a pretence. They were-to use the word, which, according to Matthew&#8217;s account, Jesus again and again applied to them-hypocrites, mummers, make-believes, play-actors. And they adopted this cloak of piety in order that under the shadow of it, they might the more easily practise the wickedness to which they were in their hearts addicted. So we may take this terrible indictment as Christ&#8217;s condemnation of the religious sham.<\/p>\n<p>Our own Danger.<\/p>\n<p>There are no Scribes or Pharisees in these days of ours, but the sin which called down upon Scribes and Pharisees this stern indictment exists still. The religious pretender, the counterfeit Christian is alive still. Indeed it will profit us all in face of this great indictment to fall on our knees and ask, Is it I? Is it the substance of religion we have or only the shadow of it? Are we good coin or base metal? Do we do the will or do we simply say, &#8220;Lord, Lord&#8221;? And this is our Lord&#8217;s condemnation of those who are religious simply to please men. I ought to withdraw that word religious and say those who make a show of religion in order to please men. That is what the Scribes and Pharisees did; they gave their alms and offered their sacrifices and said their prayers to be seen of men. And there is a parade of religion which men and women still adopt in order to be respectable. Society around them may demand a certain amount (not too much) and a certain type of religion. And so they go to Church-because it is the correct thing-to be seen of men, not to hold fellowship with God. And this terrible sermon is our Lord&#8217;s condemnation and repudiation of that miserable conventional religion. It is also His stern condemnation of those who make religion a cloak for wrongdoing. &#8220;The man who lives for avarice and ambition has his condemnation. But the man who does this under the cover of a loud religious profession has greater condemnation still.&#8221; These scribes made their long prayers a means of devouring widow&#8217;s houses the more easily. They turned religion into an instrument of wickedness.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Greater Condemnation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These shall receive greater condemnation&#8221;-greater than that of the open, avowed, and notorious sinner. Greater than that of the publicans and harlots and sinners whom these Scribes cast out. It is a singular thing that Christ&#8217;s sternest words were reserved not for the open and notorious sinners but for the hypocrites, the sinners who wore the mask of goodness. Sham religion, false goodness was, in our Lord&#8217;s eyes, worse than open badness, and it would receive &#8220;greater condemnation.&#8221; None of us is likely to be reckoned amongst the publicans and sinners! But it is possible some of us may fall under the condemnation of these Scribes.<\/p>\n<p>Tests.<\/p>\n<p>Is our religion real, genuine, true? There are two or three tests which it will profit us to apply to our religion. Here is one-&#8220;Let everyone that nameth the name of the Lord depart from unrighteousness&#8221; (2Ti 2:19). Here is another-&#8220;By this shall all men know that ye are My disciples, if ye have love one to another&#8221; (Joh 13:35). Here is yet a third-&#8220;Every one that hath this hope set on him purifieth himself, even as He is pure&#8221; (1Jn 3:3). Here is yet a fourth-&#8220;Pure religion and undefiled before our God and the Father is this, to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world&#8221; (Jam 1:27). Do we satisfy the tests?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Gospel According to St. Mark: A Devotional Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>8<\/p>\n<p>Long clothing was worn to attract attention and obtain special salutations in public such as the market places where many people resorted.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 12:38. The phrase unto them is to be omitted. The discourse was both to the multitude (Mar 12:39) and to his disciples (comp. Matt and Luke).<\/p>\n<p>In his teaching; implying that much more was said.<\/p>\n<p>Beware, be on your guard against.<\/p>\n<p>The scribes. Matthew: the scribes and the Pharisees. See Mat 23:2.<\/p>\n<p>Desire. A description of the scribes as a body, not of a certain class among them. There were few to whom this description could not apply.<\/p>\n<p>To walk in robes, displaying their flowing robes as a sign of their official position. Desiring to display a sign of ecclesiastical dignity is here condemned. Monks have generally adopted long robes, and too often the length of a clerical coat is the measure of the Pharisaical tendency among Protestants. Comp, further on Mat 23:6-7.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Observe here, What it is that our Saviour condemns; not civil salutations in the market-place, not the chief seats in synagogues, not the uppermost rooms at feasts; but their fond affecting of these things, and their ambitious aspiring after them. It was not their taking, but their loving, the uppermost rooms a feasts, which Christ condemns. <\/p>\n<p>Observe, 2. How our Saviour condemns the Pharisees for their gross hypocrisy, in covering over their covetousness with a pretence of religion, making long prayers in the temple and synagogues for widows, and thereupon persuading them to give bountifully to corban; that is, the common treasury for the temple, some part of which was employed for their maintenance.<\/p>\n<p>Whence we learn, That it is no new thing for designing hypcocrites to cover the foulest transgressions with the cloke of religion. The Pharisees made long prayers a cloak and cover for their covetousness.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 12:38-40. Beware of the scribes  See that ye do not imitate their hypocrisy, or imbibe their principles, and be on your guard against their insidious counsels and designs. There was an absolute necessity for these repeated cautions of our Lord. For, considering the inveterate prejudices of these scribes against him and his doctrine, it could never be supposed that the common people would receive the gospel till these incorrigible blasphemers of it were brought to just disgrace. Yet he delayed speaking in this manner till a little before his passion, as knowing what effect it would quickly produce. Which love to go in long clothing, &amp;c.  Here our Lord assigns the reason why he bid his disciples beware of imitating them. They were excessively proud and arrogant, as was plain from their affected gravity of dress, from the anxiety which they discovered to get the principal seats at feasts, and all public meetings, as things belonging to them, on account of their superior worth, and from their courting to be saluted in the streets with particular marks of respect, and to be addressed with the sounding titles of rabbi, father, and master; thinking such public acknowledgments of their merits due from all who met them. To this their excessive pride the Jewish teachers added an unbounded covetousness and sensuality, which did not suffer the substance even of widows to escape them. For the evangelist informs us, that they devoured widows houses, possessing themselves of their property by various acts of deception, and lived luxuriously thereon. And for a pretence  To cover their crying immoralities; made long prayers  With a great show of piety, hoping thereby to engage the esteem and confidence of others, that they might have the greater opportunity to injure and defraud them. These shall receive the greater damnation  Their complicated wickedness, particularly making their pretended piety a cloak to their covetousness and luxury, shall cost them dear; and they shall be more dreadfully punished than if they had never prayed at all, nor made any pretences to religion. See notes on Mat 23:1-14.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>CX. <\/p>\n<p>JESUS&#8217; LAST PUBLIC DISCOURSE. DENUNCIATION <\/p>\n<p>OF SCRIBES AND PHARISEES. <\/p>\n<p>(In the court of the Temple. Tuesday, April 4, A. D. 30.) <\/p>\n<p>aMATT. XXIII. 1-39; bMARK XII. 38-40; cLUKE XX. 45-47. <\/p>\n<p>   a1 Then spake Jesus  b38 And in his teaching cin the hearing of all the people he said unto athe multitudes, and to his disciples [he spoke in the most public manner],  2 saying,  c46 Beware of the scribes, aThe scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses&#8217; seat:  3 all things whatsoever they bid you, these do and observe: but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. [As teachers of the law of Moses the scribes and Pharisees were the only religious guides whom the people had, so they were obliged to follow them as expounders of that law, but they were no means to look to them as living exemplification of that law.]  4 Yea, they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men&#8217;s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with their fingers. [The law itself was a heavy yoke ( Act 15:10), but these teachers added to the burden of it a vast volume of traditions, but they themselves did not keep these traditions, excusing themselves by inventing subtle distinctions like those in reference to the Corban ( Mat 15:4-6) and to oaths ( Mat 15:16-22). See Exo 13:3-10, Exo 13:11-16, Deu 6:4-9, Deu 11:13-21. These were enclosed in a leather case and were fastened to the forehead and left arm. The authority for wearing them was purely traditional, and the practice seems to have arisen from a literal interpretation of Exo 13:9, Exo 13:16, Deu 6:8, Deu 11:18. The Pharisees made the leather case large, that their righteousness might be more conspicuous], and enlarge the borders of their garments [These were the fringes mentioned in Num 15:38, Num 15:39. But the Pharisees offended again, even in their obedience, by wearing broader fringes than other people, that they might appear more religious], cwho desire to walk in long robes [This robe was a professional dress, as marked as that worn by priests and kings. It showed that its wearer was professionally religious],  a6 and love the chief places at feasts [see Exo 22:22-24, Deu 27:19.]  a8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your teacher [Christ], and all ye are brethren.  9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, even he who is in heaven.  10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even the Christ.  11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant. [See pp. 557, 558.]  12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be humbled; and whosoever shall humble himself shall be exalted. [See pp. 431, 494, 537. Thus Jesus reproves those who make religion a matter of praise-seeking ostentation, whether they do so by seeking position, or by peculiarity of dress, or by assuming or accepting titles of honor or distinction. This sin of ostentation was the first enumerated sin of the Pharisees.]  13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye enter not in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering in to enter. [Our Lord&#8217;s language is figurative and presents the kingdom of God as a house around the door of which the Pharisees have gathered, not entering in themselves, and blocking the way against those who would enter. This they did by their opposition to Jesus. For a similar charge see p. 315.]  15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte; and when he is become so, ye make him twofold more a son of hell than yourselves. [Proselytes here meant are not those converted from heathenism to worship God, but Jews converted to Phariseeism. These become worse than their instructors, because each generation drifted farther from the law and became more zealously and completely devoted to the traditions.]  16 Woe unto you, ye blind guides [Jesus above denounced them for their hypocrisy, but this woe is pronounced upon them for their [608] ignorance and folly], that say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor. [The word &#8220;debtor&#8221; is here meant to describe one who owes it to himself and to God to keep his oath. The Pharisees graduated oaths according to their own foolish conceptions of the sanctity of the object invoked, so that if the object by which a man swore was not sacred enough, he was not forsworn if he did not keep his oath. Esteeming the gold of the temple more sacred than the temple itself, they held that an oath by the former was binding while an oath by the latter was not. The gold meant is probably the golden ornaments on the temple.]  17 Ye fools and blind: for which is greater, the gold, or the temple that hath sanctified the gold?  18 And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gift that is upon it, he is a debtor.  19 Ye blind: for which is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift?  20 He therefore that sweareth by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon.  21 And he that sweareth by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein.  22 And he that sweareth by the heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon. [Our Lord designed to teach that all oaths were binding. See p. 243.]  23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye tithe mint and anise and cummin, and have left undone the weightier matters of the law, justice, and mercy, and faith: but these ye ought to have done, and not to have left the other undone. [See p. 313. The anise was used for medical purposes and also for culinary seasoning, so that Pliny says &#8220;the kitchen can not be without it.&#8221; Cummin also was a condiment and a medicine, the bruised seed mixed with wine being used as a styptic, especially after circumcision. It was also used as an ingredient for salves and plasters such as were applied to the ulcers of cattle produced from the bites, grubs, etc., of insects.]  24 Ye blind guides, that strain out the gnat, and [609] swallow the camel! [A proverbial expression, indicating care for little faults and a corresponding unconcern for big ones.]  25 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye cleanse the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full from extortion and excess. [Jesus here compares the Pharisees to a woman who washes the outside of her dishes and leaves the inside unclean. But in describing that inner uncleanness he passes from the figure to the reality, and specifies that it consists of extortion and self-indulgence. They made their outside clean by traditionary ablutions. See pp. 393, 394.]  26 Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first the inside of the cup and of the platter, that the outside thereof may become clean also. [Here again the literal peeps through the figurative: a pure inner life makes clean outward conduct.]  27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which outwardly appear beautiful, but inwardly are full of dead men&#8217;s bones, and of all uncleanness.  28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but inwardly ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. [Luke records Jesus as having taught this lesson by an exactly opposite figure. See p. 313. There men were contaminated by the touch of a grave because there was nothing outside to notify them of its presence. Here men are contaminated by the same thing because the outside is rendered so white and beautiful that men are deceived into thinking that the inside is harmless.]  29 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and garnish the tombs of the righteous,  30 and say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we should not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.  31 Wherefore ye witness to yourselves, that ye are sons of them that slew the prophets.  32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. [See p. 314.]  33 Ye serpents, ye offspring of vipers, how shall ye escape the judgment of hell? [See p. 73.]  34 Therefore, behold, I send unto you [610] prophets, and wise men, and scribes: some of them shall ye kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city:  35 that upon you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth, from the blood of Abel the righteous unto the blood of Zachariah son of Barachiah, whom ye slew between the sanctuary and the altar.  36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. [See pp. 314, 315.]  37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, that killeth the prophets, and stoneth them that are sent unto her! how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!  38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.  39 For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. [See pp. 491, 492.]<\/p>\n<p> [FFG 606-611]<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>WARNINGS AGAINST THE EVIL EXAMPLE OF THE SCRIBES  AND PHARISEES<\/p>\n<p>It is still Wednesday, and the last day our Lord ever spoke in the temple. These scribes and Pharisees are thronging Him on all sides, being the great and influential people of the Church. He acquits Himself of all responsibility by publicly exposing their evil example, and warning the people against following them. N.B.  All this He did boldly in their presence; meanwhile they got so awfully mad that they laid violent hands on Him and took His life. Two hundred millions of martyrs have traveled the same road to bloody death. Lord, help us to be true, and tell the whole truth, even under the most embarrassing environments, fearless of men and devils!<\/p>\n<p>Luk 20:45-46; Mar 12:38-39. And He spoke to them in His teaching, Beware of the scribes, who wish to walk about in robes, and receive salutations in the markets, and the first seats in the synagogues, and the first couches in the suppers. All this pompous display panders to pride, feeds vanity, and grieves the Holy Spirit now as in the days of Christ; and is more abominable in preachers and Church members than in debauchees and prostitutes.<\/p>\n<p>Mat 23:1-12. Then Jesus spoke to the multitudes and to His disciples, saying, The scribes and Pharisees sat in the seat of Moses. Therefore, all things so many as they may say to you to observe, keep and perform; but do not according to their works; for they say, and do not. For they bind heavy burdens and difficult to be borne, and place them on the shoulders of the people; and they do not wish to touch them with their finger.<\/p>\n<p>How lamentably do we see this identical maladministration on the part of many leading clergymen this day, taxing their members heavily, and even oppressively, while they do not tax themselves! It is a shame for a pastor to enforce the tithe law among his members and not personally lead the way in keeping it. The truth of it is, the tithe is the minimum. We all ought to go vastly beyond it, even to the half of our income in many instances; but the preachers, true to their attitude as leaders of the flock, ought to excel all their members in self-denial, frugality, economy, and consequent liberality to the heathen, the poor, and every laudable philanthropy.<\/p>\n<p>They do all their works to be seen by the people. O what abominable pride! Who is guilty? But Jesus is speaking of the preachers. They broaden their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments. These phylacteries were strips of parchment, on which passages of Scripture were written, and swinging about as they moved hither and thither, made quite a conspicuous display. Lord deliver us from all needless ornamentation of every sort!<\/p>\n<p>They love the first couch at the suppers, and the first seats in the synagogues, and salutations in the forums, and to be called by the people, Doctor, Doctor. Be ye not called Doctor: for one is your Teacher, even Christ: and you are all brothers. Doctor is a Latin word, from doceo, to teach, and literally means a teacher. Here you see that our Savior forbids the use of the honorary epithet, as no man has anything to teach, Christ being our only Teacher, while we are all disciples  i.e., students; for this is the meaning of disciple. This is certainly a final settlement of all questions appertaining to the honorary appellation of Doctor as applied to a minister of the gospel. Of course, we can not control the people in their salutations; but we certainly should never recognize the title, nor use it in its application to ourselves, nor encourage the use of it on the part of others. As Jesus well says, none of us preachers are Doctors  i.e., teachers  but all students at the feet of Jesus, who is our only Teacher. As Jesus here well says, we are all brothers. So let us lay aside all of this Babylonian pomposity, which sacrifices to pride and grieves the Holy Spirit, and henceforth salute one another by the humble and loving appellation of Brother and Sister.<\/p>\n<p>Call no one father upon the earth: for one is your Father, who is in the heavens. This sweeps away the vanity of Romanism, calling their priests Father; while the Protestants salute their preachers with Doctor, which means teacher. Be not called teachers: for one is your Teacher, Christ. Lord, help us all to abide with Thee in loving obedience in this matter as in all others!<\/p>\n<p>But let him who is the greater of you, be your servant: for whosoever shall exalt himself, shall be abased; and whosoever shall humble himself, shall be exalted. All these manifestations of pride grieve the Holy Spirit away and ruin religion. The leading preacher should invariably lead the way in self-denial, self-sacrifice, humility, and meekness; otherwise he is utterly unworthy to be a leader. Why will not the preachers and Church members hear the voice of Jesus, and govern themselves accordingly? If we do not learn of Him, and walk in His commandments, we will erelong encounter the awful embarrassment of the guest at the marriage feast without the wedding garment.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: William Godbey&#8217;s Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Mar 12:38-40. A Warning Against the Scribes.These verses read like a summary of or a fragment from the longer discourse in Q. The reference to widows houses is found only in Mk. Its meaning is obscure. Did they take rich fees for pious services, or press the rights of creditors against widows harshly? Alike their social ambitions and their impoverishing of widows turn their prayers into pretence. These criticisms seem rather sweeping if aimed at a class. But it is difficult to judge, without the actual context and without fuller knowledge of Jesus contemporaries.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Peake&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>12:38 And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the marketplaces, 39 And the chief seats in the synagogues, and the uppermost rooms at feasts: 40 Which devour widows&#8217; houses, and for a pretence make long prayers: these shall receive greater damnation. <\/p>\n<p>Upppppppsssss, there is that nasty word DOCTRINE that preachers hate. You see them scattering to all the dark corners when someone mentions doctrine or theology. I&#8217;ve mentioned before the many many times I have heard men in the pulpit deride doctrine and theology as if it were the plague to be avoided as if it were a terminal thing for the believer.<\/p>\n<p>This word is the same word used many times for teaching in the New Testament. There is nothing sinister about it, just the teaching of the Word. Always amazes me that men deride that which they are engaged in &#8211; or in some cases should be engaged in. Teaching is the reason for going to church, it is so sad that so many churches have none. Much of the &#8220;teaching&#8221; in the church is little more than Readers Digest type shortening of the world&#8217;s philosophy.<\/p>\n<p>Beware of the scribes:<\/p>\n<p>They loved the following things:1. To go in long clothing: Flowing robes might be the idea &#8211; the going in clothing was not wrong but the loving of it was &#8211; the super self-evaluation that was going on with them was the problem. They were just too stuck on themselves.<\/p>\n<p>Not unlike some today that are proud of their dress in church be it academic robes, suits, Easter dress, or casual, none are wrong, but the pride oft times involved might well be a problem for the person.<\/p>\n<p>2. Love salutations in the marketplace: This would be salutations that called attention to those that were involved. Anything to draw attention to themselves. <\/p>\n<p>Not unlike many cell phone users that parade around with their phone to their ear strutting as if they were really something more than they really are. How arrogant a person who leaves their phone on in church and even how much more arrogant the one that answers it in church or a meeting. It has been reported that people fake talking on the cell phone &#8211; now give one reason a person would do that other than pride and arrogance. How self important must that person be.<\/p>\n<p>We have all seen this sort of person in our own time &#8211; one that is loud and obvious in their plea for attention from all in the area as they greet one another.<\/p>\n<p>3. Love the chief seats in the synagogue: You know the ones; they are the ones in back just like in most of our churches, where you can head for the door if things get to hurtful to the soul &#8211; not. There are always special seats reserved for important people. In our churches they would be the ones on the platform for special speakers, the pastor and song leader. <\/p>\n<p>I would assume similar seats were reserved in the synagogue for those in leadership and most certainly they would be sought by any self absorbed person who wanted more and more attention.<\/p>\n<p>4. Love the uppermost rooms at feasts: This is an unfortunate translation, the thought being that they love the prominent place at meals or feasts. The custom then was to be prostrate on large pillows at the table. In our culture we have the head table or speakers table and that is where these men loved to be seated. <\/p>\n<p>They had in mind the center of attention as could easily be anticipated from the rest of the passage.<\/p>\n<p>Now a little personal account, I am not one of these. If there is a greeting in the marketplace I want it quiet and unnoticed. I hate attention, if speaking I usually am in the last row of the church where nobody is watching me if at all possible. If I am on the platform I try for the seat behind the pulpit. At dinners I find the place most out of the way where the chances of someone sitting with me are least.<\/p>\n<p>As to long robes, when graduating from a second bachelors program I was talking to my church history professor. It was hot, we were standing outside in the sun in black robes waiting for things to begin and I was reminded of some of his comments from church history where some ofthese TRADITIONS started and how foolish such traditions were. When I reminded him of his comments all he could do was hang his head and admit we were in the middle of foolish tradition.<\/p>\n<p>I do not describe myself for attention, nor to say how spiritual I am but to point out that this activity of the Jewish leaders might be related to personality traits to some extent, but attention once found can be easily addictive. Beware its wiles young graduate when you start receiving it &#8211; humility is the better.<\/p>\n<p>On top of that they devour widows&#8217; houses: It is obvious that they were doing more than just accepting the offerings of the widows, but actually taking them to the cleaners. <\/p>\n<p>In some churches that are well established in older neighborhoods there are many widows that give and give and then when they die they give some more. I question not their motivation, but I might wonder at the churches that keep accepting such offerings that are sacrificial to put to the high wages of staff and programs.<\/p>\n<p>Years ago we received a newsmagazine from one of the colleges I had attended. The cover was a copy of a handwritten note from an old man and his wife. The wife had received a little &#8220;birthday&#8221; money and she had her husband send it to the school. Five dollars from an old woman giving of all she had to the school that took the rest of the paper to speak of the massive building programs, sports programs and travel programs that were being planned &#8211; well and the massive pleas for more money. <\/p>\n<p>I could just bet when that old woman sent her five dollars in she was not picturing in her mind assisting to send a faculty member to Europe for a trip. In short be wise and careful how you spend the offerings of your people and be aware of your widows. Are they giving more than they are able and suffering physically for it? Not to say you should not accept the offerings of the saints, but watchfulness over the sheep is always good.<\/p>\n<p>On top of that they make long prayers for a pretense: Prayer in public is a hard subject to evaluate. There are people who pray as if your undivided attention were their very existence and the person may be as genuine as can be. Others are doing it to look spiritual and to gain attention for their status as a prayer.<\/p>\n<p>Be careful in evaluating the prayers of others, it is hard to determine at times. The quiet person will pray and you wonder if they are spiritual at all since they are so halting and short in their speaking with the Lord. Prayer is the most personal part of the spiritual life so do not find yourself setting a status bar in your mind and aligning different ones to different levels.<\/p>\n<p>The text mentions length as a criteria and this may well be the key. When I was small we attended a church where an older pastor was ministering. Part of the congregation wanted him out and ultimately they called a second pastor that was young. Both men tried their best to minister in this divided situation but it was not working. The church decided to have a prayer service to determine the direction of the church. They started the prayer time and three hours later my mother sent me home due to my sore seat of the pants and complete boredom. Not being a believer at the time I wondered at the foolishness of such &#8220;prayers&#8221; that went on and on and on. Some of the people were out for show in my mind and I also felt that many were so phony in asking God to do what they wanted rather than them finding what God might want and doing that.<\/p>\n<p>Beware the phony prayer for show, you are not impressing God and He is the only one you need to deal with. He can understand short concise sentences just as easily as long detailed explanatory short stories. He does not need the fifty dollar words, He is capable of all sorts of language, dialect and verbiage. Just talk with Him and you will know that He is listening. More does not mean He listens more, only that you are repeating yourself to a God that understands the first time you say it.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These shall receive greater damnation.&#8221; These refer to the men and not their prayers.<\/p>\n<p>Now let me take you on a little rabbit trail. This idea of a greater damnation indicates that there are levels of damnation in some way. We are not told how this works but it is a Biblical truth. There are levels of reward for the believer so to have levels of damnation for the lost seems quite consistent. The fact that Revelation mentions that the lost are judged by their works is another indicator of this &#8220;level of punishment.&#8221; 2Co 11:15 tells us that the Devil&#8217;s assistants will also be judged according to their works in some manner. (Rev 20:12-13 &#8220;And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is [the book] of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. 13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.&#8221;) <\/p>\n<p>When I was growing up there was a comic that was based on this premise. Rather than being just a strip of pictures it was one large picture of a scene in hell. The scene always depicted how different people would be treated and tormented in hell. The strip was called, if memory serves me well, Hatlo&#8217;s Inferno.<\/p>\n<p>Just one example would be the person that never stops talking would be gagged and surrounded by dozens of people that will never ever stop talking.<\/p>\n<p>Now, of course this idea of various levels of torment needs to be understood in light of the fact that they all are in eternal punishment in hell, even though there might be levels within that terrible torment.<\/p>\n<p>One final thought before we leave the Scribes. The word translated &#8220;beware&#8221; has the thought of perceive or realize. It relates to watching as well for you cannot perceive without watching. Be watchful of people like the Scribes, watch out for people like the Scribes. How do you do that? <\/p>\n<p>By watching for people that exhibit the qualities of the Scribes.<\/p>\n<p>Watch out for and avoid people that love fancy clothes for attention&#8217;s sake. Beware of peoplethat love to make a show of that they know and who they greet. Take note of people that like to bring attention to themselves in church. Beware those that want the attention at the potluck and take note of those that abuse the widows. Note the phony prayers of these folks as well.<\/p>\n<p>These folks are phony and out for their own self-adulation as well as to seek the adulation of all that they meet and associate with. These folks are not humble &#8211; they are the opposite. Mark them, take note of them and beware of them. Do not become like them, and avoid their teaching would be the underlying thought since they had been misleading the people about who Christ was. They were attempting to lead the people away from their Messiah come.<\/p>\n<p>Years ago John R. Rice was speaking at a church in town along with another prominent man. I had enjoyed some of Rice&#8217;s books and wanted to go hear him. The other man spoke first and what an arrogant and proud man he seemed during and after his message. It is of note that I remember nothing of his message but remember everything of his attitude, air and demeanor.<\/p>\n<p>When he started twisting arms for the offering we had our fill and left the meeting. He was asking those that were going to give a certain amount to raise their hands, then those that were going to give an even higher amount were to stand for the adulation of the folks around them, my what showmanship! In short he was expanding his pride to those that he was trying to encourage in his own shortfall. It was obviously working for those that stood looked around in all directions to be sure everyone got to see their face and know what they were doing. Oh how everyone knew what they were doing &#8211; if only the proud had known how they appeared to others.<\/p>\n<p>When he closed his message and began to pray the pianist started playing softly. He stopped short and in a very curt way told the pianist to stop playing, that he did not need music when he prayed. The wife happened to listen to his radio program the next day and music was playing in the background when he prayed. <\/p>\n<p>From the reports that I have read his humility did not decrease over the years and many have warned of his teachings. I am sure the man had a lot of good to tell the church, but I am also afraid much of it was lost in his arrogance, self righteousness and poor teaching. Sadly many have followed in his stead to repeat the problems that they learned from the master. <\/p>\n<p>Be very careful who you hitch your wagon to. If you take an example to follow make it one that would fit into the image of Christ, not the image of the Scribes.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Mr. D&#8217;s Notes on Selected New Testament Books by Stanley Derickson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>12:38 {6} And he said unto them in {g} his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in {h} long clothing, and [love] salutations in the marketplaces,<\/p>\n<p>(6) The manners of ministers are not to be followed rashly as an example.<\/p>\n<p>(g) While he taught them.<\/p>\n<p>(h) The word is a &#8220;stole&#8221;, which is a kind of woman&#8217;s garment that goes down even to the heels, and is taken generally to refer to any pleasant looking garment, but in this place it seems to signify the fringed garment mentioned in De 22:12 .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline\">3. Jesus&rsquo; condemnation of hypocrisy and commendation of reality 12:38-44<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Jesus proceeded to condemn His accusers who had condemned Him. They had condemned Him because He did not fit their ideas of Messiah. He had shown that the Old Testament presented a different Messiah than the one they wanted. Now He condemned them for failing to measure up to what the Old Testament required of them. This section concludes Mark&rsquo;s account of Jesus&rsquo; public ministry and resumes Jesus&rsquo; teaching of His disciples.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold\">Jesus&rsquo; condemnation of hypocrisy 12:38-40 (cf. Matthew 23:1-39; Luke 20:45-47)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Mark condensed Jesus&rsquo; comments that Matthew recorded extensively to give the essence of Jesus&rsquo; criticism. These words signal Jesus&rsquo; final break with Israel&rsquo;s official leaders.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Jesus condemned the religious leaders for having the attitude of lords rather than that of servants. He spoke of the religious teachers as a group, though there were exceptional individuals, of course (cf., e.g., Mar 12:34). Most Israelites of this time venerated the scribes with unbounded respect.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: See Lane, pp. 339-40, for some examples.] <\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and [love] salutations in the marketplaces, 38 40. Admonition to beware of the Scribes 38. And he said ] The terrible denunciations of the moral and religious shortcomings of the leaders of the nation, which now &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-mark-1238\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Mark 12:38&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24698"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24698\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}