25<\/strong>. if he gain the whole world<\/em> ] It was by the constant repetition of this verse that Ignatius Loyola won the life-long devotion of St Francis Xavier.<\/p>\n lose himself or be cast away<\/em> ] Rather, destroy himself, and suffer loss.<\/p>\n Luk 9:25<\/span><\/p>\n What is a man advantaged<\/em><\/p>\n A wreck<\/strong><\/p>\n Did you ever see a wreck?<\/p>\n I remember being one winters night in a little town on the coast of Wales. We were sitting by the fire, cheerful, and we heard, while there, a sudden noise: we looked out into the night; there was a deep fog over the sea; we could scarcely see the cliffs; the wind was very high; there was a drizzling rain; and suddenly we heard the scream of voices; then the boom of the guns over the water; then stillness; then the clatter of feet along the street; the life boat and the life buoy. Human life in danger. We thought we discried the dark mass heaving over the black billows, lit up by the ray of the guns and the blue lights; but the sound of the surf and the roar of the breakers carried all away; they carried her <\/em>away. That night she struck on the rocks. I walked down in the morning to look at her lying on the beach. I could not help saying, How human this is; how life-like! There she lay–the pride and hope of her owners–stripped; masts, sails, shrouds, broken, ragged, torn, gone; and yet much had depended on her. She had been launched with many hopes and expectations. All gone–a melancholy wreck! The winds howled through as they lifted her ragged shrouds. She could not, as once she might have done, repel them and make them her ministers. The sun shone on her, through her cabin windows and port-hole, but awakened no answering glory oil her deck. She was a lost ship–melancholy type of a lost soul. (E. Paxton Hood.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The loss of the soul<\/strong><\/p>\n 1.<\/strong> Think of its power. <\/p>\n (1)<\/strong> It can sin. It is capable of moral wrong. The soul has had power to disturb the universe. <\/p>\n (2)<\/strong> It can suffer. Oh, how it can suffer, remorse, conscience, despair! Nay, we estimate the greatness of the soul by its power to suffer. <\/p>\n (3)<\/strong> It can think. How it can think! Can be even wild with thought, and rend the poor body as the strong wind rends oaks and rocks! <\/p>\n 2.<\/strong> Its duration. For ever: no cessation. <\/p>\n 1.<\/strong> Ignorance. <\/p>\n 2.<\/strong> Error. <\/p>\n 3.<\/strong> Passion. <\/p>\n 4.<\/strong> A perverted will: underlying the whole. <\/p>\n These are the marks of human nature in its present state. And to be lost, is to love our natural state, and to persist in it. You may remember an incident in the united lives of two men, with whose labours and lives, it may be, you have on the whole little sympathy. When Francis Xavier, the youthful, the eloquent, the noble, was engaged in the pursuits of his varied and wonderful mind, in Paris, in the university, and its more romantic neighbourhood, as he yielded himself to the fascinations mingling around him, there stepped forth and spoke to him a plainly dressed and powerful preacher of lofty bearing and stern deportment, mighty in the assumption of a voluntary poverty–Ignatius Loyola. Francis, said he, What shall it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? He would not let the youth go. He attended the hall where Xavier delivered his eloquent prelections; he stood and listened before the orators chair; but when the applause had subsided, and the crowd had retired, then he was by the side of the eloquent scholar. He touched him on the shoulder; Francis, said he, What shall it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Noble as he was, Xavier was not rich; his affairs became embarrassed; he needed help. The stern apostle of voluntary poverty did not forsake; he came to him with assistance; he produced mysterious aid; but, as he put the bag into the hands of his friend, he was ready with his old question, Francis, What shall it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? They wandered together by the banks of the Seine; they trod together through its groves of trees, and wound their way into its lovely recesses; but even as the enthusiastic and imaginative Xavier paused, enraptured before the spectacle of some astonishing beauty, some enchanting or spell-compelling spot, the voice thrilled through him: Francis, What shall it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? And the reader knows that earnestness subdued the eloquent scholar, and he became the comrade and the disciple of Ignatius Loyola. You have heard of the Mammoth Cave in America–a world under the ground–how many miles no one can tell, rivers, lakes, chambers, immense territories all in darkness, where the light of the sun never penetrated. But nineteen miles within the cave, 450 feet beneath the soil, there was yet a descent called the Bottomless Pit. Down into that no man would go; they had sounded 150 feet, and yet had not reached the depth; no man would go; the guide refused 500 dollars offered him to go. At length a poor man came, a young man, and he determined he would descend. Ropes were procured, and he descended 150 feet. He walked among those galleries of darkness, alone, through those depths and corridors of gloom; he began to ascend, but as he ascended he stayed to throw himself into an interminable cave on the side of the pit; there as he roamed through its fissures, his light went out–no light–and alone in that gloom–lost! And the light was kindled again; but he found, as he began to ascend, the rope was on fire. Ah! what shall he do now? What think you, ascending–looking up to that faint ray, and the fire burning–burning. But it was <\/em>extinguished, he was <\/em>saved. But is it not the very picture of a poor soul? In the deep night, the light extinguished. And sometimes those very powers by which he might ascend,–his passions, his intellect, his will, only kindling to ruin him–affections which might unite to God, turning to fire to separate him for ever. <\/p>\n Save your soul<\/strong><\/p>\n If temporal affairs impose upon a man a large measure of labour and solicitude, how much more should he exercise the utmost diligence in behalf of his eternal welfare? <\/p>\n 1.<\/strong> The chief solicitude of God is for our salvation. <\/p>\n 2.<\/strong> The question is of everlasting weal or woe. <\/p>\n 3.<\/strong> Therefore Jesus warns us with the most tender anxiety–<\/p>\n (1)<\/strong> To work our salvation before <\/em>all things. <\/p>\n (2)<\/strong> To work our salvation in <\/em>all things. <\/p>\n (3)<\/strong> To take care of our salvation at all times, <\/em>and give it our own personal attention. <\/p>\n 1.<\/strong> Everywhere we may observe an all-absorbing care for temporal affairs and earthly possessions. <\/p>\n (1)<\/strong> The heart of man is attached to them; restless his desire to acquire them; great his sorrow at their loss.<\/p>\n (2)<\/strong> All activity of man is centred upon them. Men are grovelling in the dust. <\/p>\n 2.<\/strong> Negligence in regard to heavenly things. <\/p>\n (1)<\/strong> No earnest examination of the condition of the soul. <\/p>\n (2)<\/strong> Carelessness in regard to the means of salvation. <\/p>\n 3.<\/strong> Men appear to be without conscience in regard to the salvation of others. <\/p>\n (1)<\/strong> Careless parents, educating their children for everything except the one thing necessary. <\/p>\n (2)<\/strong> Cruel seducers, showing heartless indifference to their own and others salvation. <\/p>\n 4.<\/strong> Let us look back at our past life. <\/p>\n (1)<\/strong> How many opportunities has God granted us to save our souls! Time, the Word of God, misfortunes, &c. <\/p>\n (2)<\/strong> How little is it that we have given to God! What use have we made of our time? For whom have we laboured? Have we laid up treasures for the world to come? <\/p>\n (3)<\/strong> What folly! All our trouble for nothing! We run after the mists and clouds, and neglect that which is everlasting. We frustrate the merciful designs and endeavours of God. (Tourbe.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Money given as the punishment of avarice<\/strong><\/p>\n We read of a Spanish general who was so fond of money that the enemies into whose hands he had fallen, tortured and killed him by pouring melted gold down his throat in mockery of his covetousness. So Satan now often makes money unlawfully acquired, the very means of tormenting the miserable beings who have sold their consciences to obtain it. (Family Treasury.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Bad bargains<\/strong><\/p>\n A Sunday-school teacher, when speaking about the passage, Buy the truth, and sell it not, said that the man who buys the truth, at whatever cost, makes a good bargain. He then asked his boys if any of them remembered an instance in the Scriptures of a bad bargain. These answers were given–<\/p>\n 1.<\/strong> Esau made a bad bargain when he sold his birthright for a mess of pottage. <\/p>\n 2.<\/strong> Judas made a bad bargain when he sold Jesus for thirty pieces of silver. <\/p>\n 3.<\/strong> He makes a bad bargain, who, to gain the whole world, loses his own soul. <\/p>\n The world cannot give peace<\/strong><\/p>\n There was one living who, scarcely in a figure, might be said to have the whole world. The Roman Emperor Tiberius was at that moment infinitely the most powerful of living men, the absolute, undisputed, deified ruler of all that was fairest and richest in the kingdoms of the earth. There was no control to his power, no limit to his wealth, no restraint upon his pleasures. And, to yield himself still more unreservedly to the boundless self-gratification of a voluptuous luxury, not long after this time he chose for himself a home on one of the loveliest spots on the earths surface, under the shadow of the slumbering volcano, upon an enchanting islet in one of the most softly delicious climates of the world. What came of it all? He was, as Pliny calls him, Tristissimus ut constat hominum, <\/em>confessedly the most gloomy of mankind. And there, from this home of his hidden infamies, from this island where, on a scale so splendid, he had tried the experiment of what happiness can be achieved by pressing the worlds most absolute authority and the worlds guiltiest indulgencies into the service of an exclusively selfish life, he wrote to his servile and corrupted senate, What to write to you, conscript fathers, or how to write, or what not to write, may all the gods and goddesses destroy me, worse than I feel that they are daily destroying me, if I know. Rarely has there been vouchsafed to the world a more overwhelming proof that its richest gifts are but fairy gold that turns to dust and dross. (Archdeacon Earrar.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n A crime against the life of the soul<\/strong><\/p>\n When, <\/em>a half-century ago, the famous Kaspar Hauser appeared in the streets of Nuremberg, having been released from a dungeon in which he had been confined from infancy, having never seen the face or heard the voice of man, nor gone without the walls of his prison, nor seen the full light of day, a distinguished lawyer in Germany wrote a legal history of the case, which he entitled, A Crime against the Life of the Soul. It was well named But it is no worse than the treatment some men bestow upon their own souls As the poor German youth was at length thrust out into the world for which he was unfitted, with untrained senses in a world of sense, without speech in a world of language, with a dormant mind in a world of thought, so many go out of this world with no preparation in that part of their nature that will most be called into use. (Theodore T. Munger.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Secure the soul<\/strong><\/p>\n What wise man would fetch gold out of a fiery crucible, hazard himself to endless woes, for a few waterish pleasures, and give his soul to the devil, as some Popes did for the short enjoyment of the Papal dignity. What was this but to win Venice, and then to be hanged at the gates thereof, as the proverb is. In great fires men look first to their jewels, then to their lumber; so should these see first to their souls to secure them, and then take care of the outward man. The soldier cares not how his buckler speeds, so his body be kept thereby from deadly thrusts. (J. Trapp.<\/em>)<\/p>\n Verse 25. Lose himself<\/B><\/I>] That is, his life<\/I> or soul<\/I>. See the parallel places, Mt 16:25<\/span>; Mr 8:35<\/span>, and especially the note on the former.<\/P> <\/P> Or be cast away?<\/B><\/I>] Or receive<\/I> spiritual damage<\/I> . I have added the word spiritual<\/I> here, which I conceive to be necessarily implied. Because, if a man received only temporal<\/I> damage in some respect or other, yet gaining<\/I> the whole world<\/I> must amply compensate him. But if he should receive spiritual<\/I> damage – hurt to his soul in the smallest degree, the possession of the universe could not indemnify him. Earthly goods may repair earthly losses, but they cannot repair any breach that may be made in the peace<\/I> or holiness<\/I> of the soul. See Clarke on Mt 16:26<\/span>.<\/P><\/p>\n See Poole on “Mat 16:26<\/span>“, See Poole on “Mar 8:36<\/span>“. <\/P> <\/p>\n For what is a man advantaged if he gain the whole world<\/strong>,…. Or what profit will it be unto him? all the honours, riches, and enjoyments of it will be of no use and service to him if he himself is lost:<\/p>\n and lose himself<\/strong>; or his own soul; for he that loses his soul, which is his better and immortal part, loses himself:<\/p>\n or be cast away<\/strong>: finally, and eternally, or “suffer loss” of eternal happiness and glory; that is, perishes, and is destroyed with an everlasting destruction; [See comments on Mt 16:26]<\/span>.<\/p>\n Gain [] <\/SPAN><\/span>. A merchant ‘s word. Jesus is putting the case as a common – sense question of profit and loss. <\/P> Lose [] <\/SPAN><\/span>. “When he might have been saved” (Bengel). This word, in classical Greek, is used : <\/P> 1. Of death in battle or elsewhere. <\/P> 2. Of laying waste, as a city or heritage. <\/P> 3. Of losing of life, property, or other objects. As an active verb, to kill or demolish. <\/P> 4. Of being demoralized, morally abandoned or ruined, as children under bad influences. In New Testament of killing (Mt 2:13<\/span>; Mt 12:14<\/span>). Of destroying and perishing, not only of human life, but of material and intellectual things (1Co 1:19<\/span>; Joh 6:27<\/span>; Mr 2:22<\/span>; 1Pe 1:7<\/span>; Jas 1:11<\/span>; Heb 1:11<\/span>). Of losing (Mt 10:6<\/span>, 42<\/span>; Luk 14:4<\/span>, 6<\/span>, 8<\/span>). Of moral abandonment (Luk 14:24<\/span>, 32<\/span>). Of the doom of the inpenitent (Mt 10:28<\/span>; Luk 13:3<\/span>; Joh 3:15<\/span>; Joh 10:28<\/span>; 2Pe 3:9<\/span>; Rom 2:12<\/span>). <\/P> Cast away [] <\/SPAN><\/span>. Another business term. The word means to fine, amerce, mulct; to punish by exacting forfeit. Hence Rev., correctly, forfeit his own self. See on win your souls, Luk 21:19<\/span>. Also on Mt 16:26<\/span>.<\/P> <\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n 1) “For what is a man advantaged,” <\/strong>(ti gar opheleitai anthropos) “For just what is a man profited,” gained, what kind of gain is it? Mat 12:26<\/span>; Jas 5:1-6<\/span>; When judgment comes and the true existence of man is entered upon, Ec 12,13,14; Mat 12:36-37<\/span>; 1Co 5:10<\/span>.<\/p>\n 2) “If he gain the whole world,” <\/strong>(kerdesas ton kosmon holon) “Gaining the whole world, “the whole universe, bit by bit, if one were able to do it. None has, but many have come to ruin following covetously after the pleasures, riches, and lusts of the world, as a first priority of their carnal, covetous, selfish desires, Luk 12:16-21<\/span>; Luk 16:19-21<\/span>; 1Ti 5:9-10<\/span>.<\/p>\n 3) “And lose himself, or be cast away?” <\/strong>(heauton de apolesas e zemiotheis) “Yet losing himself or suffering loss (of his whole life)?” forfeit his own usefulness for God, 1Jn 2:17-19<\/span>; 1Ti 6:17<\/span>.<\/p>\n (25) And lose himself, or be cast away.<\/strong>Better, destroy himself,<\/em> or suffer loss.<\/em> The first word expresses a more direct act, as of self-destruction, and the second (see Note on Mat. 16:16<\/span>) implies the thought of the forfeiture of something precious rather than of being absolutely rejected. It presents, so to speak, a slightly softened aspect of the previous words.<\/p>\n “For what is a man profited, if he gain the whole world, and lose or forfeit his own self?”<\/p>\n So He puts to those who were following Him (and to us) the ultimate challenge. Of what advantage is there for anyone to gain the whole world at the expense of eternal life? Men have stood astride their world many times in history, and they have received much glory, but in the end all have died, and perished. Not one is alive today. And thus ultimately they have lost all. They may be names in the history books, but their names are not written in Heaven. Are they, asks Jesus, gainers or losers? But to the one who comes to Him He gives eternal life. By giving up what they cannot finally keep, they gain what they cannot lose. In return, however, they must be ready to lay their lives on the line for Him, and to follow Him utterly. This is a constant theme in the New Testament (Joh 3:17<\/span>; Joh 3:19 ; 1Co 1:18-31<\/span>; 2Co 4:18<\/span>; Gal 2:20 ; 2Pe 1:4<\/span>; 1Jn 2:15-16<\/span>).<\/p>\n Luk 9:25<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>Or be cast away?<\/em><\/strong><\/strong> This expression does not signify merely to lose life, <\/em>which might be applied to a man, who accidentally met death in the pursuit of gain, (as a merchant, who should be lost in his voyage;) but it properly imports undergoing a capital punishment, which is an idea of much greater terror, as well as of stricter propriety in the present case; and it were to be wished that it might be seriously considered by every one in this aweful view. See on Mar 8:38<\/span>. Our Lord frequently after this repeated the prediction of his sufferings. (See Luk 9:22<\/span> and compare Mat 17:22<\/span>; Mat 20:18<\/span>; Mat 26:2<\/span>. <\/span>Luk 17:25<\/span>; Luk 22:15<\/span>.) But it is remarkable, that on none of those occasions was the prophesy delivered to any but the twelve, and a few select women, Ch. Luk 24:6-8<\/span> one instance excepted; namely, Ch. Luk 17:25<\/span> where it was expressed in terms somewhat obscure. The multitude of the disciples were never let into the secret, because it might have made them desert Christ; as they had not, like the apostles, raised expectations of peculiar preferments in his kingdom to bias their understandings, and hinder them from perceiving the meaning of the prediction. It is true, he foretold his resurrection from the dead more publicly; for oftener than once he appealed to it, as the principal proof of his mission, even in the presence of the priests, as is evident from Mat 27:63<\/span>. <\/p>\n 25 For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away? <\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n Ver. 25. See Mat 16:26<\/span> ; Mar 8:36<\/span> . <\/p>\n 25.<\/strong> ] <\/strong> = Matt., Mark: his life,<\/strong> in the highest sense.<\/p>\n Luk 9:25<\/span> . = losing, or receiving damage in, his own self (Field, Ot. Nor.<\/em> ). The idea expressed by the second participle seems to be that even though it does not come to absolute loss, yet if gaining the world involve damage to the self, the moral personality taint, lowering of the tone, vulgarising of the soul we lose much more than we gain.<\/p>\n man. Greek. anthropos. App-123. <\/p>\n advantaged = profited. <\/p>\n if he gain = having gained. A mercantile word. world. Greek kosmos. App-129. <\/p>\n and lose himself = having destroyed himself. <\/p>\n be cast away = suffer loss. Another mercantile word. <\/p>\n 25.] = Matt., Mark:-his life, in the highest sense.<\/p>\n Luk 9:25. , having destroyed himself) when he might have been saved [Luk 9:24].-, having incurred loss [having become a castaway]) when he might have gained [Luk 9:25] himself.<\/p>\n what: Luk 4:5-7, Luk 12:19-21, Luk 16:24, Luk 16:25, Psa 49:6-8, Mat 16:26, Mar 8:36, Mar 9:43-48, Act 1:18, Act 1:25, 2Pe 2:15-17, Rev 18:7, Rev 18:8 <\/p>\n himself: Or, as in the parallel passage, () [Strong’s G5590], [Strong’s G847], “his soul,” or life. <\/p>\n be: Mat 13:48, Mat 13:50, 1Co 9:27 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Job 27:8 – General Ecc 3:6 – time to get Mat 5:29 – for Mat 18:9 – rather Luk 17:33 – General Act 27:19 – we 1Co 15:32 – what<\/p>\n 5<\/p>\n The thought is that the things of this world altogether are not as valuable as the soul of man. If he exchanges his soul to gain the world it will be a transaction in which there will be no profit.<\/p>\n Here our Saviour goes on to show the folly of those that for saving their temporal lives will expose their eternal life, or the life of their souls, to hazard and danger; yea, sometimes by refusing to lay down our temporal life for Christ, we lose thay also; which renders it the greatest folly in the world to refuse to part with any enjoyment, even life itself, at the call and command of Christ. <\/p>\n Vers. 25-27 are the confirmation (for) of this Maschal, and first of all, Luk 9:25-26, of the first proposition. Jesus supposes, Luk 9:25, the act of saving one’s own life, accomplished with the most complete success…., amounting to a gain of the whole world. But in this very moment the master of this magnificent domain finds himself condemned to perish! What gain! To draw in a lottery a gallery of pictures…, and at the same time to become blind! The expression , or suffering loss, is difficult. In Matthew and Mark this word, completed by , corresponds to in Luke; but in Luke it must express a different idea. We may understand with it either the world or , himself, suffering the loss of this world already gained, or (which is more natural) losing himself altogether (), or even merely suffering some small loss in his own person. It is not necessary that the chastisement should amount to total perdition; the smallest injury to the human personality will be found to be a greater evil than all the advantages accruing from the possession of the whole world. <\/p>\n The losing oneself [the loss of the personality] mentioned in Luk 9:25 consists, according to Luk 9:26 (for), in being denied by Jesus in the day of His glory. The expression, to be ashamed of Jesus, might be applied to the Jews, because fear of their rulers hindered them from declaring themselves for Him; but in this context it is more natural to apply it to disciples whose fidelity gives way before ridicule or violence. The Cantabrigiensis omits the word , which leads to the sense: ashamed of me and mine. This reading would recommend itself if better supported, and if the word (my words) was not confirmed by the parallel expression of Mark (Mar 8:35): for my sake and the gospel’s. The glory of the royal advent of Jesus will be, first, that of His own personal appearing; next, the glory of God; lastly, the glory of the angels,all these several glories will be mingled together in the incomparable splendour of that great day (2Th 1:7-10). Thus, says Gess, to be worthy of this man is the new and paramount principle. This is no mere spiritualization of the Mosaic law; it is a revolution in the religious and moral intuitions of mankind. <\/p>\n Ver. 27 is the justification of the promise in Luk 9:24 b (find his life by losing it), as Luk 9:25-26 explained the threatening of 24a. It forms in the three Syn. the conclusion of this discourse, and the transition to the narrative of the transfiguration; but could any of the evangelists have applied to such an exceptional and transitory incident this expression: the coming of the kingdom of Christ (Matthew), or of God (Mark and Luke)?<\/p>\n Meyer thinks that this saying can only apply to the Parousia, to which the preceding verse referred, and which was believed to be very near. But could Jesus have laboured under this misconception (see the refutation of this opinion at chap. 21)? Or has the meaning of His words been altered by tradition? The latter view only would be tenable. Many, urging the difference between Matthew’s expression (until they have seen the Son of man coming in His kingdom) and that of Mark (…the kingdom of God come with power) or of Luke (…the kingdom of God), think that the notion of the Parousia has been designedly erased from the text of Matthew by the other two, because they wrote after the fall of Jerusalem. Comp. also the relation between Matthew 24, where the confusion of the two events appears evident, and Luke 21, where it is avoided. But, 1. It is to be observed that this confusion is found in Mark (xiii.) exactly the same as in Matthew (xxiv.). Now, if Mark had corrected Matthew for the reason alleged in the passage before us, how much more would he have corrected him in chap. 13, where it is not a single isolated passage that is in question, but where the subject of the Parousia is the chief matter of discourse! And if the form of expression in Mark is not the result of an intentional correction, but of a simple difference in the mode of transmission, why might it not be the same also with the very similar form that occurs in ?Luke 2. There is a very marked distinction both in Mark and Luke, a sort of gradation and antithesis between this saying and the precedingin Luke by means of the particle , and further: And I also say that this recompense promised to the faithful confessors shall be enjoyed by some of you before you die; and in Mark, in a still more striking manner, by the interruption of the discourse and the commencement of a new phrase: And He said to them (Luk 9:1). So that the idea of the Parousia must be set aside as far as the texts of Mark and Luke are concerned. It may even be doubted whether it is contained in Matthew’s expression; comp. Mat 26:64 : Henceforth [from now] ye shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven. The expression henceforth does not permit of our thinking of the Parousia. But this saying is very similar to the one before us. Others apply this promise to the fall of Jerusalem, or to the establishment of the kingdom of God among the heathen, or to the descent of the Holy Spirit. But inasmuch as these events were outward facts, and all who were contemporary with them were witnesses of them, we cannot by this reference explain , some, which announces an exceptional privilege. After all, is the Lord’s meaning so difficult to apprehend? Seeing the kingdom of God, in His teaching, is a spiritual fact, in accordance with the inward nature of the kingdom itself; comp. Luk 17:21 : The kingdom of God is within you (see the explanation of this passage). For this reason, in order to enjoy this sight, a new sense and a new birth are needed; Joh 3:3 : Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. This thought satisfactorily explains the present promise as expressed in Luke and Mark. To explain Matthew’s expression, we must remember that the work of the Holy Spirit pre-eminently consists in giving us a lively conviction of the exaltation and heavenly glory of Jesus (Joh 16:14). The , some, are therefore all those then present who should receive the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, and behold with their inward eye those wonderful works of God, which Jesus calls His kingdom, or the kingdom of God. In this way is explained the gradation from Luk 9:26 to Luk 9:27 in Mark and Luke: Whoever shall give his own life shall find it again, not only at the end of time, but even in this life (at Pentecost). If this explanation be inadmissible, it must be conceded that this promise is based on a confusion of the fall of Jerusalem with the Parousia; and this would be a proof that our Gospel as well as Matthew’s was written before that catastrophe. must not be connected with : Verily I say to you. It should be placed before the verb, as the is in the two other Syn.; and Luke more generally makes use of (three times in the Gospel, twice in the Acts). It must, then, belong to : There are certainly among you.<\/p>\n The Alex. reading , here, must be preferred to the received reading, , which is taken from the other Syn. <\/p>\n For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away? 25. if he gain the whole world ] It was by the constant repetition of this verse that Ignatius Loyola won the life-long devotion of St Francis Xavier. lose himself or be cast away ] Rather, … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 9:25”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25310\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
I. <\/strong>MAN HAS A SOUL.. The soul touches the highest part of the universe. Nature ministers to nature; but nature cannot feed the soul. The fruits, and grapes, and animals cannot contribute to the being of the soul. God, who is its Parent, can alone minister to it. This is that difference between the spirit of the beast which goeth downward, and the spirit of man which goeth upward. We are dust and Deity, says a great poet: most true. This is our original Turn into reality the great fact that you have a soul. Did you ever hear how Fichte awoke the consciousness of his hearers? He pointed to the wall, the white wall. Gentlemen, said he, I want you to think the wall. Have you thought the wall? Now, think the man that thought the wall. Ah! to do that is to realize to ourselves our soul. <\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>IT IS OF INFINITE VALUE. <\/p>\n
III. <\/strong>A SOUL MAY BE LOST. Nay, every soul in the world is, in fact, lost. Do you know it? do you feel it? Lost! For there are but two ways in the universe–Gods and mans. To be lost, is to wander into the far country, and to attempt to feed an angel nature with the husks that the swine eat. Picture to yourselves the man on the dark moor at night among the mountains–amidst the mists–lost. I may mention four causes of the loss of the soul. <\/p>\n
IV. <\/strong>And why? FOR THE SOUL MAY BE SAVED. Surely no person will say, What shall I do to be saved? But if so, I have only to say, Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved. And if you say, I cannot believe, in a word, I have only to say–say thou to God, I will not let Thee go except Thou bless me. Pray, and you shall not fail to obtain the knowledge of Christ and Him crucified. (E. Paxton Hood.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
I. <\/strong>NOTHING IS MORE NECESSARY THAN TO SAVE OUR SOULS. <\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>NOTHING IS MORE RARE THAN THIS SOLICITUDE. <\/p>\nFuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"