{"id":25618,"date":"2022-09-24T11:12:10","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T16:12:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-luke-1616\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T11:12:10","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T16:12:10","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-luke-1616","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-luke-1616\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 16:16"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> The law and the prophets [were] until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it. <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 16<\/strong>. <em> The law and the prophets were until John<\/em> ] This is one of our Lord&rsquo;s clearest intimations that the aeon of the Law and the Prophets was now merging into a new dispensation, since they were only &ldquo;a shadow of things to come,&rdquo; <span class='bible'>Col 2:17<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><em> every man presseth into it<\/em> ] The word implies &lsquo;is making <em> forcible <\/em> entrance into it,&rsquo; <span class='bible'>Mat 11:12-13<\/span>. The allusion is to the eagerness with which the message of the kingdom was accepted by the publicans and the people generally, <span class='bible'>Luk 7:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 12:19<\/span>. The other rendering, &lsquo;every man useth violence against it,&rsquo; does not agree so well with the parallel passage in St Matthew.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">See the notes at <span class='bible'>Mat 11:12-14<\/span>.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Every man &#8211; <\/B>Many people, or multitudes. This is an expression that is very common, as when we say everybody is engaged in a piece of business, meaning that it occupies general attention.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> Verse <span class='bible'>16<\/span>. <I><B>The law and the prophets<\/B><\/I><B> were <\/B><I><B>until John<\/B><\/I>] The law and the prophets continued to be the sole <I>teachers<\/I> till John came, who <I>first<\/I> began to proclaim the <I>glad tidings<\/I> of the <I>kingdom of God<\/I>: and now, he who wishes to be made a partaker of the blessings of that kingdom must <I>rush speedily<\/I> into it; as there will be but a short time before an utter destruction shall fall upon this ungodly race. They who wish to be saved must imitate those who <I>take a city by storm &#8211; rush into it<\/I>, without delay, as the Romans are about to do into Jerusalem. <I>See also Clarke on &#8220;<\/I><span class='bible'><I>Mt 11:12<\/I><\/span><I>&#8220;<\/I>.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> We had the sum of these words: See Poole on &#8220;<span class='bible'>Mat 11:12-13<\/span>&#8220;. The connection of these words in this place seems to be this: Do not think it strange that I preach some doctrines to you which seem new to you, though indeed they are no other than was before contained in the precepts of the Old Testament; for the law and the prophets, the preaching of them, held but till John, since whose time the gospel hath been preached, which gives you a clearer light into the will of God than you had before; and it pleaseth God to give it a great acceptation in the world, though you reject it; <\/P> <P><B>every man presseth<\/B>, that is, many press,<B> into it<\/B>; so as God will not want a people, though you mock and deride the gospel, instead of embracing of it, as you ought to do. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P><B>16. The law,<\/B> c.(See <span class='bible'>Mt11:13<\/span>). <\/P><P>       <B>and every man presseth,<\/B>&amp;c.Publicans and sinners, all indiscriminately, are eagerlypressing into it and ye, interested adherents of the mere forms of aneconomy which is passing away, &#8220;discerning not the signs of thistime,&#8221; will allow the tide to go past you and be found astranded monument of blindness and obstinacy.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown&#8217;s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>The law and the prophets were until John<\/strong>,&#8230;. Till the time that John the Baptist began his ministry; for till then, the law and the prophets, with the Hagiographa, or holy writings, for into these three parts the Jews divided the books of the Old Testament, were the only writings they had; and which contained the whole of the revelation granted to them; and which they wrested, and put false glosses on; and therefore it was no wonder that they derided Christ, and despised his ministry: and whereas spiritual things were promised in these writings, under the notion of temporal ones; which they not understanding, might imagine the doctrine of Christ, concerning the contempt of worldly riches, was contrary to: and since they valued themselves on having the law and the prophets, Christ observes, that<\/p>\n<p><strong>since that time, the kingdom of God is preached<\/strong>; the Gospel, and the mysteries of relating to the kingdom of the Messiah, his person, office, and grace; and to the kingdom of grace, which lies not in outward, but in inward and spiritual things; and to the kingdom of heaven, or glory hereafter; and which is a superior dispensation to that of the law and the prophets, and sets things in a clearer, plainer, and better light:<\/p>\n<p><strong>and every man presseth into it<\/strong>; the Gospel dispensation, the kingdom of the Messiah; &#8220;that he may enter into it&#8221;, as the Syriac and Persic versions add; which the Scribes and Pharisees did all they could to hinder; see <span class='bible'>Mt 23:13<\/span> large multitudes crowded the ministry of John, of Christ, and of his apostles; the people flocked in great numbers to hear the word, and seemed disposed to embrace the doctrines of the Gospel, and the ordinances of it; they pressed on one another to hear it, and through many difficulties, discouragements, and obstacles, the Pharisees threw in their way; there was scarce a man but seemed very desirous of attending upon the preaching of it, and pressed hard for it; and with much force and violence, with great eagerness and endeavour broke his way to it; though a different sense is given by others reading the words, and &#8220;every one suffers violence to himself for it&#8221;, as the Arabic version; or &#8220;is oppressed for it&#8221;, as the Ethiopic; that is, suffers reproach, contradiction, and persecution, for the sake of hearing it.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>Entereth violently into it <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">  <\/SPAN><\/span>). A corresponding saying occurs in <span class='bible'>Mt 11:12<\/span> in a very different context. In both the verb <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>, occurs also, but nowhere else in the N.T. It is present middle here and can be middle or passive in Matthew, which see. It is rare in late prose. Deissmann (<I>Bible Studies<\/I>, p. 258) cites an inscription where <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span> is reflexive middle and used absolutely. Here the meaning clearly is that everyone forces his way into the kingdom of God, a plea for moral enthusiasm and spiritual passion and energy that some today affect to despise. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Robertson&#8217;s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>Presseth. Rev., entereth violently. See on <span class='bible'>Mt 11:12<\/span>. Wyc., maketh violence into it. Tynd., striveth to go in.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Vincent&#8217;s Word Studies in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1) <strong>&#8220;The law and the prophets were until John&#8221; <\/strong>(ho nomos kai hoi prophetai tou theou) &#8220;The law and the prophets were (existed) until John,&#8221; in force, <span class='bible'>Mat 11:12<\/span>. John the Baptist, who was heaven&#8217;s delegated missionary to prepare the way for Jesus and establishment of the church, the New Covenant house of worship and service, <span class='bible'>Isa 40:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 3:1-3<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>2) <strong>&#8220;Since that time the kingdom of God is preached,&#8221; <\/strong>(apo tote he basileia tou theou euangelelizetai) &#8220;From then (that time) the kingdom of God is being preached,&#8221; as God sent both John and Jesus to preach it, <span class='bible'>Joh 1:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 1:33<\/span>; and when John preached repentance, belief, or trust in the coming savior, requisite to baptism, he as Jesus later, <span class='bible'>Mat 3:1-8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 4:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 4:1-2<\/span>; prepared people for the kingdom of God, through the ministry of the &#8220;kingdom of heaven,&#8221; the church administrative institutional agency of the kingdom of God, in this age, <span class='bible'>Mat 28:18-20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar 1:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 20:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act 1:8<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>3) <strong>&#8220;And every man presseth into it.&#8221; <\/strong>(kai pas eis auten blazetai) &#8220;And everyone (all manner of persons) is pressing into it,&#8221; the fishermen, tax collectors, even &#8220;publicans and sinners,&#8221; <span class='bible'>Luk 7:29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 12:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 11:12-13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 13:1-35<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 16:1-28<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 18:1-35<\/span>, were crowding or striving to enter, <span class='bible'>Luk 13:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 11:12<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 16:16<\/span><\/p>\n<p>.  The Law and the Prophets were till John  Our Lord had said that the earnestness of the people was a prelude to those things which  the Prophets  had foretold as to the future renovation of the Church. He now compares the ministry of John to  the Law and the Prophets  &#8220;It is not wonderful,&#8221; he tells us, &#8220;that God should now act so powerfully on the minds of men; for he is not as formerly, seen at a distance under dark shadows, but appears openly and at hand for the establishment of his kingdom.&#8221; Hence it follows, that those who obstinately reject  John&#8217;s  doctrine are less excusable than those who despised  the Law and the Prophets  <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Calvin&#8217;s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(16) <strong>The law and the prophets were until John.<\/strong>See Notes on <span class='bible'>Mat. 11:14-15<\/span>. What had then been said to the disciples of the Baptist is now reproduced to our Lords own disciples and to the Pharisees. The latter had closed their eyes to the fact that all previous revelations led up to the work of John, as that in its turn was preparatory for the work of Christ.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Every man presseth . . .<\/strong>The fact asserted, that of a rush, as we should say, into the Kingdom, but a rush from which the Pharisees had held aloof, answers to the stronger expression in St. Matthew (<span class='bible'>Mat. 11:12<\/span>), the violent take it by force.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 16<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> <em> Until John<\/em> God&rsquo;s <em> law <\/em> and the <em> prophets, <\/em> which condemn wickedness in the <em> highest <\/em> as well as the lowest, reached as far as John, the rebuker of Herod&rsquo;s adultery. <\/p>\n<p><em> Every man<\/em> Even this crowd of publicans and sinners. <\/p>\n<p><em> Presseth<\/em> Pushes himself in with whatever success he may.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> &ldquo;The law and the prophets were until John, from that time the Good News of the Kingly Rule of God is preached, and every man enters violently into it (or &lsquo;every man is overpowered by it&rsquo;).&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Their next major failure lay in their having failed to recognise God&rsquo;s intervention in history. They professed to honour the Law and the Prophets, and that was good in so far as it was true, but they had failed to recognise that with the coming of John the Baptiser, and especially in His own coming, these were in process of fulfilment. Now as promised by <span class='bible'>Isa 61:1-2<\/span> the Good News of the Kingly Rule of God (<span class='bible'>Luk 4:43<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 8:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act 8:12<\/span>) was being proclaimed, and men were &lsquo;pressing into it with great violence&rsquo;. They were &lsquo;striving to enter in at the narrow door&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 13:24<\/span>). They were &lsquo;taking up their crosses and following Him&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 14:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 9:23<\/span>). A great work of revival was taking place. The Pharisees themselves, on the other hand, having failed to recognise it, were failing to enter. That was their problem. They were so bound by their own teaching that they failed to recognise heavenly realities. And in the same way they also failed to recognise the dangers of wealth and divorce, which hit at the very root of men&rsquo;s lives.<\/p>\n<p> Alternately the verb can be translated as in the passive voice in which case it means &lsquo;every man is overpowered by it&rsquo;. Then we may see it as signifying that the fire of His word, which He has cast on the earth, has possessed them (<span class='bible'>Luk 12:49<\/span>), the Kingly Rule of God has overpowered them and taken them captive.<\/p>\n<p> Whichever is the case the &lsquo;all&rsquo; refers to the disciples to whom He had spoken the previous parable. In contrast with the Pharisees they have revealed their determination to be under the Kingly Rule of God.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><em><span class='bible'>Luk 16:16-18<\/span><\/em><\/strong><strong>. <\/strong><strong><em>The law and the prophets were until John:<\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong> Our Lord having in the preceding verse developed the specious and hypocritical pretences of the Pharisees, observes to them, with respect to his own conduct, which they blamed so much, that the law and the prophets, the dispensation which made a distinction between men, accountingsome clean and others unclean, continued till John came; and that from the commencement of his ministry, <em>the kingdom of heaven, <\/em>or gospel dispensation, was in some degree preached, which admitted all persons upon repentance, without distinction:<em>every man presseth into it, <\/em>harlots, publicans, and sinners. Yet lest they might have imagined that in speaking thus, he lessened the authority of the law, (by which the distinction between clean and unclean things had been established,) he added, <span class='bible'>Luk 16:17<\/span>. <em>It is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than for one tittle of the law to fail.<\/em>&#8220;The ceremonial and typical law must befulfilled in me, as well as the law of innocence; and the moral in the righteousness of my followers (<span class='bible'>Mat 5:17<\/span>.): and to shew how far I am from allowing the least breach of the law, or countenancing impurity of life in my followers, I do absolutely condemn a practical tenet very common among you, and teach in contradiction to it, that <em>whoever putteth away his wife. <\/em>&amp;c.&#8221; <span class='bible'>Luk 16:18<\/span>. These hypocrites, while they feigned a high veneration for the law, bytheir exact observation of lesser duties, violated on many occasions its greatest and mostsacredprecepts.Forexample,they defiled themselves with the pollutions of lust; though they were so scrupulous of touching things unclean, that they would not go into the company of publicans, lest they might have been polluted by them. Nor was this an accusation without grounds; for their lust discovered itself by their frequent divorces. They put away their wives as often as they took any disgust at them, or liked other women better. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Luk 16:16-17<\/span> . The sequence of thought is: after Jesus had declared His judgment on His adversaries, according to which, moreover, they belong to the category of the    .  , He now tells them <em> on the ground of what standard<\/em> this judgment has reference to them, namely, <em> on the ground of the Mosaic law<\/em> (comp. <span class='bible'>Joh 5:45<\/span> ), of which not the smallest element should lose its validity by the fact that since John the kingdom of the Messiah was announced, and every man endeavoured forcibly to come into it. The stress lies on <span class='bible'>Luk 16:17<\/span> , and <span class='bible'>Luk 16:16<\/span> is preparatory, but finds its motive in the fact that the announcement of the kingdom, and the general endeavour after the kingdom which had begun from the time of John, might easily throw upon Jesus the suspicion of putting back the old principle, that of the law, into the shade. But no; no single  of the law fails, and that is the standard according to which ye are an abomination in the sight of God. [202] <em> The want of connection<\/em> is only external, not in the sequence of thought, and hence is not, as with Schulz, Strauss, and de Wette (comp. also Bleek), to be referred to mistaken recollections from Matthew. Already the source of Luke&rsquo;s account of the journey had <em> here<\/em> operated in <span class='bible'>Luk 16:16-18<\/span> , which in Matthew has its <em> historical<\/em> position. Luke follows his source of information, but it is not without plan that he has supplemented from the <em> Logia<\/em> (Holtzmann), nor has he pieced the passages together like mosaic (Weizscker).<\/p>\n<p>   .     .] We are not to supply (following <span class='bible'>Mat 11:13<\/span> )  (Euthymius Zigabenus, and many others), but from what follows (see Khner, II. p. 605),  . [203] As the law and the prophets were announced down to the time of John, so from that time onwards (even through John himself) the joyful tidings of the kingdom of the Messiah appeared, and with what result! <em> Every man<\/em> [204] <em> presses forcibly into it<\/em> ; &ldquo;vi ingruit <em> pia<\/em> ,&rdquo; Bengel. Comp. <em> Xen. Cyr.<\/em> iii. 3. 69:     ; Thucyd. i. 63. 4 : <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> , vii. 69. 4 : <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> . See on <span class='bible'>Mat 11:12<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p><strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> ] <em> to fall into decay<\/em> , with reference to its obligation, the opposite of <em> remaining in force<\/em> . Comp. <span class='bible'>1Co 13:8<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Rom 9:6<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Rth 3:18<\/span> ; Jdt 6:9 , and elsewhere; Herod. vii. 18; Plat. <em> Eut.<\/em> p. 14 D. Moreover, see on <span class='bible'>Mat 5:18<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> The  , <span class='bible'>Luk 16:17<\/span> , is not to be taken in any other sense than in <span class='bible'>Luk 16:16<\/span> (in opposition to Volkmar, p. 208, who understands the <em> moral law<\/em> contained in the legal code); but assuredly the <em> continuance<\/em> here declared, the <em> remaining in force<\/em> of the  , is referred to its ideal contents. The reading of Marcion: <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> , instead of <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> , is not the original text, as though Luke had transposed <span class='bible'>Mat 5:18<\/span> into its opposite, but an inappropriate dogmatic alteration (in opposition to Baur, Hilgenfeld). Comp. Ritschl in the <em> Theol. Jahrb.<\/em> 1851, p. 351 f.; Kstlin, p. 303 f.; Zeller, <em> Apost<\/em> . p. 15 f.; Franck in the <em> Stud. u. Krit.<\/em> 1855, p. 311 f.; Volkmar, p. 207 ff., whose conjecture,     , is, moreover, quite superfluous. Against the supposed antinomianism of Luke, see generally Holtzmann, p. 397; Lechler, <em> Apost. Zeit.<\/em> p. 157 f.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3em'> [202] Grotius and others assume as the connection: &ldquo;Ne miremini, si majora dilectionis opera nunc quam olim exigantur; id enim postulat temporum ratio. Mosis et prophetarum libri  functi sunt velut puerorum magisterio;  a Johanne incipit aetas melior,&rdquo; etc. Against this is ver. 17, and, in general (comp. Calovius), the manner in which Jesus honours the law (comp. ver. 31).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3em'> [203] Others supplement  (de Wette, comp. Ewald), which likewise is allowable, and instead of this Theophylact, correctly explaining, places    . In the place of the Old Testament preaching has now appeared since John the New Testament preaching. But thereby the <em> annulling<\/em> of the law is not declared (in opposition to Baur, according to whom Luke must have transformed the words of <span class='bible'>Mat 11:13<\/span> to this meaning), but, as ver. 17 shows, the obligation of the law is established in a higher sense. This is also in opposition to Schenkel, p. 385, who, mistaking the connection, considers ver. 17 as an assertion of the Pharisees, and ver. 18 as its confutation, but that already Luke himself has ceased to perceive the relation between the two verses. Nay, Schenkel even <em> strikes at<\/em> <span class='bible'>Mat 5:18<\/span> f. Keim rightly says that Jesus <em> nowhere<\/em> in the synoptic Gospels has declared the abolition of the law. See his <em> Geschichtl. Chr.<\/em> p. 57 f.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3em'> [204] A <em> popular<\/em> expression of the <em> general<\/em> urgency. Hence  is neither to be pressed, nor, with Bengel, to be supplemented by  . Moreover,  is not to be taken of that &ldquo;quod fieri <em> debeat<\/em> &rdquo; (so Elwert, <em> Quaest. et observatt. ad philol. sacr.<\/em> 1860, p. 20).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer&#8217;s New Testament Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>DISCOURSE: 1548<br \/>PRESSING INTO THE KINGDOM<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 16:16<\/span>. <em>The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>WHEREVER the Gospel is preached with fidelity and earnestness, the places of worship are, for the most part, well attended. And this is often made a ground of joyful congratulation. But if, instead of comparing the attendance of persons at such places of worship with that which is seen at other Churches, we were to compare it with what took place at the first introduction of Christianity, we should see in it nothing but an occasion of shame and sorrow. Under the law and the prophets, that is, during the Mosaic dispensation, there was but little of preaching: but when John, the forerunner of our Lord, came, he preached much and often; and so powerful were his ministrations, that persons of all ranks and orders pressed into that kingdom, which he sought and laboured to establish. Let us then, for our humiliation, consider,<\/p>\n<p>I.<\/p>\n<p>The effects of Johns preaching<\/p>\n<p>He preached the kingdom of God<br \/>[By the kingdom of God I understand, the kingdom of the Messiah, or the reign of Christ in the world and in the heart. He declared that Christ was come: and he pointed him out to the people as that very Lamb of God who taketh away the sins of the world. He called men to repentance, and to an acknowledgment of the Saviour, by being baptized in his name; and announced that as the sure and only way of obtaining the remission of their sins [Note: <span class='bible'>Luk 3:3<\/span>.]   ]<\/p>\n<p>Immediately, such was the impression on all descriptions of persons, that every one pressed into it<br \/>[Most surprising was the effect of his ministrations. Persons flocked from every quarter, to be baptized of him. Pharisees and Sadducees, distant as they were from each other in their principles, equally felt the power of his word, and came to be baptized of him. Nay, all Jerusalem, and all Juda, and all the region round about Jordan, were so wrought upon, that they actually submitted to his baptism, making public confession of their sins [Note: <span class='bible'>Mat 3:5-7<\/span>.]. They sought instruction also from him, every one (soldiers, publicans, and the people generally) being willing and desirous to approve his sincerity before God, by abandoning all the evils to which he had been particularly prone, and by practising those duties which would most adorn his holy profession [Note: <span class='bible'>Luk 3:10-14<\/span>.]. Many of them, it is to be feared, went back afterwards: but such, at the time, was the power of the Gospel as ministered by him.]<\/p>\n<p>Let us compare with this,<\/p>\n<p>II.<\/p>\n<p>The effect of Gospel ordinances in our day<\/p>\n<p>We preach the kingdom of God, even as he did<br \/>[Our blessed Lord commanded, that repentance and remission of sins should be preached among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem [Note: <span class='bible'>Luk 24:47<\/span>.]: and the Apostles obeyed this injunction, preaching this doctrine to the Jews first [Note: <span class='bible'>Act 5:31<\/span>.], and afterwards to the Gentiles [Note: <span class='bible'>Act 20:21<\/span>.]. The same injunction, also, do we obey. You yourselves will bear us witness, that the great subject of all our ministrations is, repentance towards God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. Yea, like St. Paul, we have determined to know nothing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified [Note: <span class='bible'>1Co 2:2<\/span>.]. We proclaim the Lord Jesus to be King in Zion: we call upon you to submit yourselves to him: we declare that his blood was shed for the sins of the whole world [Note: <span class='bible'>1Jn 2:2<\/span>.]; and that all who believe in him shall be justified from all things, from which they could not be justified by the law of Moses [Note: <span class='bible'>Act 13:38-39<\/span>.]. In this respect we have even the advantage of John the Baptist: for he could only proclaim what the Lord Jesus <em>should do;<\/em> whereas we declare to you what he <em>has done<\/em>   ]<\/p>\n<p>And what is the effect of <em>our<\/em> ministrations?<\/p>\n<p>[Do <em>we<\/em> see <em>every one<\/em> pressing into this kingdom? I had almost asked, Where we do see <em>any one<\/em> pressing into it as he ought? Alas! the word which we preach, comes, to the generality, in word only, and not in power: with many it is regarded only as a cunningly-devised fable: with many who approve of it, it has no practical effect: they are pleased with it only as with the melody of one who plays well upon an instrument [Note: <span class='bible'>Eze 33:31-32<\/span>.]: and, of those who feel somewhat of its power, how few <em>press into<\/em> the kingdom with that earnestness which becomes them! Look and see around; are there any flocking unto the Lord, as doves to their windows [Note: <span class='bible'>Isa 60:8<\/span>.]? Where do we find people <em>pressing<\/em>, as it were, through all the obstacles which the world, the flesh, and the devil, can lay in their way, and counting all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus their Lord [Note: <span class='bible'>Php 3:8<\/span>.]? Let the state of <em>our<\/em> auditors in general be viewed, and there is reason to weep over them with floods of tears. And let even the more approved amongst us be brought to the test of Scripture experience, and of by far the greater number we must stand in doubt, whether Christ be indeed as yet truly formed in them [Note: <span class='bible'>Gal 4:19-20<\/span>.].]<\/p>\n<p>Address<br \/>1.<\/p>\n<p>Those who are but little influenced by what they hear<\/p>\n<p>[Ah! how many of you are of this description! And are you content that it shall be always thus? Will you still hold fast the delusion that you shall win the race without running, and gain the victory without fighting? If success be not the portion of those who so demean themselves in relation to earthly things, how can you imagine it will in reference to heavenly things? Will it be no matter of regret to you in a dying hour, that you have been so supine and careless? or, if Satan be permitted to blind you then, will it be no grief to you when you shall open your eyes in the eternal world? O awake from your stupor: and to-day, whilst it is called today, harden not your hearts, lest God should swear, in his wrath, that you shall never enter into his rest [Note: <span class='bible'>Heb 3:7-11<\/span>.].]<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>Those who feel some desire to enter into the kingdom<\/p>\n<p>[I thank God, if there be in any of you a good desire. But did you never hear what our blessed Lord has said, that many shall <em>seek<\/em> to enter into the kingdom, and not be able [Note: <span class='bible'>Luk 13:24<\/span>.]. How comes this? They seek, with good desires; but they do not <em>strive<\/em> with the full bent and determination of their hearts. But <em>this<\/em> is necessary, indispensably necessary, to the attainment of Gods heavenly kingdom. The pursuit of it must be regarded by you as the one thing needful [Note: <span class='bible'>Luk 10:42<\/span>.]. It must be entered upon with the same spirit as David manifested, when he said, One thing have I desired of the Lord, which <em>I will seek: after<\/em> [Note: <span class='bible'>Psa 27:4<\/span>.]. You must engage in it with all your might [Note: <span class='bible'>Ecc 9:10<\/span>.]: and, instead of ever looking upon your attainments with complacency, or feeling yourselves at liberty to relax your ardour, you must, with Paul, forget what is behind, and reach forward to that which is before, and press towards the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus [Note: <span class='bible'>Php 3:13-14<\/span>.]. There must be no looking back, after you have once put your hand to the plough [Note: <span class='bible'>Luk 9:62<\/span>.]; no weariness in well-doing [Note: <span class='bible'>Gal 6:9<\/span>.]: you must endure unto the end, if ever you would be saved [Note: <span class='bible'>Mat 10:22<\/span>.]: and, like the manslayer, never rest a moment, till you enter the gates of the heavenly city [Note: <span class='bible'>Num 35:11-12<\/span>.].]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Charles Simeon&#8217;s Horae Homileticae (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> (16) The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it. (17) And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away, than one tittle of the law to fail. (18) Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband, committeth adultery.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> The last of those verses hath been very fully considered in the subject, <span class='bible'>Mar 10:1<\/span> , etc. And the first of them in the doctrine, hath been also somewhat noticed, <span class='bible'>Mat 11:12<\/span> . But on this subject I would take occasion in this place to add, that the pressing into the kingdom of God could never be meant by our Lord as intimating an holy pressure. That multitudes flocked to hear John preach, and so they did to hear Christ, is true; but this, for the most part, was mere curiosity, and, as Jesus told them, for the loaves and fishes. <span class='bible'>Joh 6:26<\/span> . The kingdom of heaven suffering violence, means more, a persecution from the world than from the haste which mere sermon followers run to hear them, or from the earnest petitions of truly-awakened souls, who seek acceptance in Christ. And our Lord evidently in this place, as well as in the parallel one of Matthew, meant to say, that while his sheep knew his voice, and followed him, and he gave to them eternal life, the great mass of the Christ-despising age he was going in and out among, only pressed upon him to hear, but not to regard. See <span class='bible'>Mat 11:16-26<\/span> , and note.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 16 The law and the prophets <em> were<\/em> until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it. <strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Ver. 16. See <span class='bible'>Mat 11:11<\/span> . <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 16.<\/strong> ] See Mat 11:12 and note. After <strong> <\/strong> <strong> .<\/strong> supply  , not (Meyer)  , which would be inapplicable to the law and the prophets.<\/p>\n<p> The connexion is, &lsquo; <em> Ye are they that justify yourselves before men; ye are no publicans and sinners, no poor and needy, but righteous, and increased with this world&rsquo;s<\/em> <em> goods. But, since John, a kingdom has been preached, into which every one, publicans and sinners too<\/em> (  [98]  , ch. Luk 15:1 ) <em> are pressing in. The true relation however of that kingdom to the law is not as ye suppose, to destroy the law<\/em> ( Mat 5:17 ), <em> but to fulfil<\/em> .&rsquo; Then, as an example, our Lord reiterates the decision which He had before given on a point much controverted among the Jews the law of adultery. But this He does, not <em> without occasion given<\/em> , and close connexion with the circumstances, and with what had before been said. As early as Tertullian, cont. Marc. iv. 34, vol. ii. p. 443, it was remarked, that an allusion was meant here to the adultery of Herod Antipas with his brother Philip&rsquo;s wife, which the Pharisees had tacitly sanctioned, thus allowing an open breach of that law which Christ came to fulfil. To this mention of Herod&rsquo;s crime the   gave relevance. Still the idea must not be too lightly assumed. Bleek&rsquo;s remark is worth notice, that, had such an allusion been intended, the last words of the verse would have been otherwise expressed. Antipas had not <em> married a divorced woman<\/em> , but abduced a married woman from her husband.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3em'> [98] When, in the Gospels, and in the Evangelic statement, <span class='bible'>1Co 11:23-25<\/span> , the sign () occurs in a reference, it is signified that the word occurs <em> in the parallel place<\/em> in the other Gospels, which will always be found indicated <em> at the head of the note<\/em> on the paragraph. When the sign () is <em> qualified<\/em> , thus, &lsquo; Mk.,&rsquo; or &lsquo; Mt. Mk.,&rsquo; &amp;c., it is signified that the word occurs <em> in the parallel place in that Gospel or Gospels, but not in the other or others<\/em> .<\/p>\n<p> See on <span class='bible'>Mat 5:32<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Henry Alford&#8217;s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Luk 16:16<\/span> = <span class='bible'>Mat 11:12-13<\/span> , inverted, introduced here in view of <span class='bible'>Luk 16:31<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Luk 16:16-17<\/p>\n<p> 16&#8243;The Law and the Prophets were proclaimed until John; since that time the gospel of the kingdom of God has been preached, and everyone is forcing his way into it. 17But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of a letter of the Law to fail.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Luk 16:16-18 As a commentator I feel so unsure about the meaning of these verses. They seem so unrelated and out of place. I am sure they are sayings of Jesus, but why Luke chose to put them into this context remains a mystery to me. Here is a good place to remind interpreters that clear texts must interpret difficult texts. It would be inappropriate to use these verses, or for that matter Luke 16, as the only biblical support for any doctrine or application. The overall meaning of Luke 15-16 is clear, but we must not push the details into doctrine.<\/p>\n<p>Luk 16:16 &#8220;The Law and the Prophets&#8221; These were two of the three sections of the Hebrew Canon. Therefore, this phrase refers to the entire OT being in effect (cf. Luk 16:29; Luk 24:44; Mat 5:17; Mat 7:12; Mat 22:40; Act 13:15; Act 28:23).<\/p>\n<p>SPECIAL TOPIC: THE DIVISIONS OF THE HEBREW BIBLE <\/p>\n<p> &#8220;until John&#8221; John the Baptist was the last OT prophet and the first preacher of the New Age (cf. Mat 11:13). He was the theological and temporal watershed between the Old Covenant in Moses and the New Covenant in Christ.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;the gospel of the kingdom of God has been preached&#8221; The NASB, NRSV, and TEV include the term &#8220;gospel&#8221; or &#8220;Good News&#8221; in their translations, but this is not in the Greek text. It comes by implication from the verb &#8220;to preach&#8221; (euangeliz), which means &#8220;to proclaim good news&#8221; (cf. Luk 4:18; Luk 9:6).<\/p>\n<p>For &#8220;the kingdom of God&#8221; see Special Topic at Luk 4:21.<\/p>\n<p>NASB, NJB&#8221;everyone is forcing his way into it&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NKJV&#8221;everyone is pressing into it&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NRSV&#8221;everyone tries to enter it by force&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>TEV&#8221;everyone forces their way in&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Everyone&#8221; is a hyperbole but it refers to those who hear the gospel.<\/p>\n<p>This refers to the enthusiasm of the religious outcasts (i.e., the verb is a present middle [deponent] indicative) in accepting the teachings of Jesus versus the stand-offishness and rejection of the religious leaders. This saying of Jesus is used in a very different sense in Mat 11:12.<\/p>\n<p>It is possible that the verb is not middle but passive, denoting that those who hear the gospel preached are urged (by the Spirit) to respond in repentance and faith (NET Bible, p. 1856).<\/p>\n<p>The Septuagint uses this same verb in a passive sense in Gen 33:11 and Jdg 19:7. It may be used in a passive sense in Mat 11:12.<\/p>\n<p>Luk 16:17 Jesus, though asserting a new day had come with the proclamation of His gospel, nevertheless affirmed the stability and eternality of the OT (cf. Mat 5:17-20). Jesus rejected the Oral Tradition of the Jews and its interpretations (cf. Mat 5:21-48) and even changed some OT requirements (cf. Mar 7:19, food laws; Mat 19:7-8, divorce and remarriage), thereby showing His superiority, even over Scripture!<\/p>\n<p>NASB, NRSV&#8221;one stroke of a letter&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NKJV&#8221;one tittle&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>TEV&#8221;the smallest detail&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NJB&#8221;one little stroke&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The word kepaia literally means &#8220;a horn,&#8221; which in this context, refers to the small points or lines that distinguished one Hebrew letter from another (cf. Mat 5:18). Therefore, the TEV expresses the meaning well. However, remember how Jesus commonly used hyperbole. This probably means the OT is God&#8217;s revelation and it remains so. It is a permanent reflection of God&#8217;s character and purpose. It surely does not mean that detailed observance of all OT ceremonial and cultic requirements is God&#8217;s will for all humans. Luk 16:16 has asserted that a new day of openness and availability has arrived in Christ. Acts 15 clearly shows that Gentiles (Luke&#8217;s audience) do not have to become practicing Jews to become Christians. See Paul&#8217;s discussion of the purpose of the OT in Galatians 3 (www.freebiblecommentary.org ).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>The law. See note on Mat 5:17. <\/p>\n<p>since that time = since (Greek. apo. App-104.) then. <\/p>\n<p>the kingdom of God. See App-114. <\/p>\n<p>preached. Greek. euangelizo. See App-121. <\/p>\n<p>every man. Greek. pas, all. Put by Figure of speech Synecdoche (of the Genus), App-6, for many. &#8220;But not ye! &#8220;<\/p>\n<p>presseth. See note on Mat 11:12. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>16.] See Mat 11:12 and note. After . supply , not (Meyer) , which would be inapplicable to the law and the prophets.<\/p>\n<p>The connexion is,-Ye are they that justify yourselves before men; ye are no publicans and sinners,-no poor and needy,-but righteous, and increased with this worlds goods. But, since John, a kingdom has been preached, into which every one, publicans and sinners too ( [98] , ch. Luk 15:1) are pressing in. The true relation however of that kingdom to the law is not as ye suppose, to destroy the law (Mat 5:17), but to fulfil. Then, as an example, our Lord reiterates the decision which He had before given on a point much controverted among the Jews-the law of adultery. But this He does, not without occasion given, and close connexion with the circumstances, and with what had before been said. As early as Tertullian, cont. Marc. iv. 34, vol. ii. p. 443, it was remarked, that an allusion was meant here to the adultery of Herod Antipas with his brother Philips wife, which the Pharisees had tacitly sanctioned, thus allowing an open breach of that law which Christ came to fulfil. To this mention of Herods crime the   gave relevance. Still the idea must not be too lightly assumed. Bleeks remark is worth notice, that, had such an allusion been intended, the last words of the verse would have been otherwise expressed. Antipas had not married a divorced woman, but abduced a married woman from her husband.<\/p>\n<p>[98] When, in the Gospels, and in the Evangelic statement, 1Co 11:23-25, the sign () occurs in a reference, it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in the other Gospels, which will always be found indicated at the head of the note on the paragraph. When the sign () is qualified, thus,  Mk., or  Mt. Mk., &amp;c., it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in that Gospel or Gospels, but not in the other or others.<\/p>\n<p>See on Mat 5:32.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Luk 16:16.  , the law) Supply the predicate have prophesied (prophetizaverunt), [answering to the antithetic expression, , the Gospel kingdom of God is preached.- , and every one) Comp. ch. 15. [Then drew near all the publicans and sinners, etc.]-) with pious violence presses into it (assails it). Resolve the sentence thus,  (,)      .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>the kingdom <\/p>\n<p>(See Scofield &#8220;Mat 11:12&#8221;). <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Law: Luk 16:29, Luk 16:31, Mat 11:9-14, Joh 1:45, Act 3:18, Act 3:24, Act 3:25 <\/p>\n<p>the kingdom: Luk 9:2, Luk 10:9, Luk 10:11, Mat 3:2, Mat 4:17, Mat 10:7, Mar 1:14 <\/p>\n<p>and every: Luk 7:26-29, Mat 21:32, Mar 1:45, Joh 11:48, Joh 12:19 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Exo 19:24 &#8211; but let Mat 3:5 &#8211; General Mat 11:12 &#8211; from Mat 12:28 &#8211; then Mat 17:3 &#8211; Elias Luk 17:20 &#8211; when the Joh 5:4 &#8211; first Act 20:25 &#8211; preaching Act 24:14 &#8211; in the law Phi 3:14 &#8211; press Heb 4:11 &#8211; Let Rev 22:6 &#8211; the holy<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>6<\/p>\n<p>Law and prophets until John. After the last prophet (Malachi)<\/p>\n<p>laid down his pen, the world heard no more revelation from God until John<\/p>\n<p>broke the silence by his preaching in the wilderness. Since then the kingdom of heaven was preached, but that does not say it was set up by him. Every man presseth into it. The kingdom of God existed in preparation before it was in existence in fact. (See Mat 11:12.) Presseth into it means those who accepted the preach. ing of John did so under the pressure of conscience, and in spite of opposition.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>     The law and the prophets were until John:  since that time the kingdom of God is preached,  and every man presseth into it. <\/p>\n<p>     [And every one presseth into it.]  These words may be varied into a sense plainly contrary;  so far that they may either denote the entertainment or the persecution of the gospel.  Saith Beza:  Every one breaketh into it by force;  which points at the former sense of these words.  Vulgar:  Every one commits violence upon it;  which points to the latter.  I have admitted of the former,  as that which is the most received sense of that passage in Mat 11:12;  but the latter seems more agreeable in this place,  if you will suppose a continued discourse in our Saviour from Luk 16:15,  and that one verse depends upon another.  They do indeed seem independent,  and incoherent one with another;  and yet there is no reason why we may not suppose a connexion,  though at the first view it is not so perspicuous.  We may observe the manner of the schools in this very difficulty.  In both the Talmuds,  what frequent transitions are there infinitely obscure and inextricable at first sight,  and seemingly of no kind of coherence;  which yet the expositors have made very plain and perspicuous,  very coherent with one another.<\/p>\n<p>     I would therefore join and continue the discourse in some such way as this:  &#8220;You laugh me to scorn;  and have my doctrine in derision,  boasting yourselves above the sphere of it,  as if nothing I said belonged at all to you.  Nor do I wonder at it;  for whereas the Law and the Prophets were until John,  yet did you deal no otherwise with them,  but changed and wrested them at your pleasure by your traditions and the false glosses ye have put upon them.  And when with John Baptist the kingdom of heaven arose and made its entry among you,  every one useth violence and hostility against it;  by contradiction,  persecution,  and laughing it to scorn.  And yet,  though you by your foolish traditions have made even the whole law void and of none effect,  it is easier certainly for heaven and earth to pass away,  than that one tittle of the law should fail.  Take but an instance in the first and most ancient precept of the law,  &#8216;The man shall cleave unto his wife&#8217;;  which you,  by your traditions and arbitrary divorces,  have reduced to nothing;  but that still remains,  and will remain for ever,  in its full force and virtue;  and he that puts away his wife (according to the licentiousness of your divorces) and marrieth another,  committeth adultery.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Lightfoot Commentary Gospels<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Luk 16:16-17. These verses may be thus paraphrased: I have said that you are not justified in the sight of God, but are an abomination; and the standard of this judgment is one that you acknowledge.<\/p>\n<p>The law and the prophets were until John, that completed the preparatory work, and since that time the kingdom of God has been preached, and every one (people of all classes, publicans and sinners) forceth his way into it; but, lest you might infer that I deny your righteousness by some new rule, I declare to you, it is easier, etc., Mat 11:12-13; Mat 5:18.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Our Saviour in these words gives the Pharisees to understand that their contempt of his person and doctrine was the more inexcusable, because they lived in and under the clearest light of the gospel: the preaching of the law and the prophets continued but until John the Baptist came among you; since which time the gospel has been clearly preached both by him and myself unto you; and it has pleased God to give my doctrine great acceptation in the world. Though you Pharisees reject it, yet every one, that is, very many, press into it; so that the doctrine which you mock, the holy doctrine of the gospel, others will embrace. Yet lest, while Christ spoke thus highly of the gospel, the Pharisees should reproach him as a destroyer of the law, he shows that the obligation of the moral law was of eternal force, and that heaven and earth should sooner pass, than the obligation of the law cease; which yet the Pharisees most shamefully violated, particularly the seventh commandment, which they brake by permitting and practising divorces, upon upon unjustifiable grounds. <\/p>\n<p>Learn hence, that the moral law, in all the branches of it, which is summarily comprehended in the ten commandments, is an eternal rule of life and manners, which is to stand in force as long as the world stands, and the frame of heaven and earth endures.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Luk 16:16-18. The law and the prophets were in force until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached  The gospel dispensation takes place, and humble, upright men, receive it with inexpressible earnestness. Dr. Whitbys paraphrase on this passage shows its connection with the preceding paragraph, thus: It is not to be wondered that you now hear from John and me higher precepts of charity and contempt of the world, than you find in the law or prophets, which moved you to your duty by promises of temporal blessings in the land of Canaan; since now the kingdom of heaven is preached, and every one that enters into it forces his way by breaking through the love of temporal concerns and sensual pleasures. For, to give you another instance (see Luk 16:18) of a like nature, whereas the law admitted of divorces at the pleasure of the husband, by reason of the hardness of your hearts, the gospel forbids this now on any other score than that of fornication, which, from the nature of the sin, dissolves the marriage. Yet, that you may not cavil at me as a dissolver of the law, I declare that all the moral precepts of it shall obtain and be of perpetual obligation under the gospel dispensation. Every man presseth into it  The intention of this clause, says Dr. Campbell, is manifestly to inform us, not how great the number was of those who entered into the kingdom of God, but what the manner was in which all who entered obtained admission. The import, therefore, is only, Every one who entereth it, entereth it by force. We know that during our Lords ministry, which was (as Johns also was) among the Jews, both his success, and that of the Baptist, were comparatively small. Christs flock was literally, even to the last,  , a very little flock. It was not till after he was lifted up upon the cross, that, according to his own prediction, he drew all men to him. See on Mat 11:12. It is easier for heaven and earth to pass  For the whole system of created nature to be destroyed, than for one tittle of the law to fail, or the least precept of it to be set aside as faulty. See note on Mat 5:18. Whosoever putteth away his wife, &amp;c.  And far from doing any thing to lessen or abate the force of it, I rather assert it in its utmost extent and spirituality, forbidding all divorces, except for the cause of adultery, and even looking on a woman so as to desire her. See on Mat 5:28; Mat 5:32.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Vers. 16-18. The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it. 17. But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than for one tittle of the law to fail. 18. Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.<\/p>\n<p>But, adds Jesus (Luk 16:16), a new era is beginning, and with it your usurped dominion comes to an end. Since the time of John, that law and those prophets which you have made your pedestal in Israel are replaced by a new dispensation. To the religious aristocracy which you had succeeded in founding there follows a kingdom of God equally open to every man (); all have access to it as well as you!  should not be taken in the passive sense, as Hilgenfeld would have it: Every man is constrained by the gospel, but as a middle, in the sense of to hasten, to throw themselves. There is, as it were, a dense crowd pressing through the gate which is now open, and every one, even the lowest of the publicans, is free to enter. Recall here the parables of chap. 15. But while this repentant crowd penetrates into the kingdom (Luk 7:29), the Pharisees and scribes remain without, like the elder son in the preceding parable. Let them beware, however! That legal system on which they have founded their throne in Israel is about to crumble to pieces (Luk 16:16); while the law itself, which they violate at the very moment they make it their boast, shall remain as the eternal expression of divine holiness, and as the dreadful standard by which they shall be judged (Luk 16:17). The  is adversative: but. It indicates the contrast between the end of the legal economy and the permanence of the law. This contrast reminds us of the antitheses of Matthew 5, of which this saying is a sort of summary: Ye have heard that it was said&#8230;; but I say unto you&#8230; Jesus only abolishes the law by fulfilling it and confirming it spiritually., diminutive of , horn, denotes the small lines or hooks of the Hebrew letters. The least element of divine holiness which the law contains has more reality and durability than the whole visible universe. <\/p>\n<p>The two verses, Luk 16:16-17, are put by Matthew in the discourse of Jesus regarding John the Baptist, Luk 11:12-13, inversely in point of order. We can easily understand how the mention of John the Baptist, Luk 16:16, led Matthew to insert this saying in the discourse which Jesus pronounced on His forerunner. We have seen that in that same discourse, as given by Luke (chap. 7), this declaration was with great advantage replaced by a somewhat different saying, Luk 16:29-30; and if, as Bleek owns (i. p. 454 et seq.), Luke decidedly deserves the preference as to the tenor of the words, it will doubtless be the same as to the place which he assigns them; for it is in general on this second point that his superiority appears. <\/p>\n<p>Ver. 18. Not only in spite of the abolition of the legal form will the law continue in its substance; but if this substance even comes to be modified in the new economy, it will be in the direction of still greater severity. Jesus gives as an example the law of divorce. This same idea meets us, Mat 5:31-32; it tallies fully with the meaning of the declaration, Mat 19:3 et seq., Mar 10:2 et seq., which was uttered in this same journey, and almost at the same period. Jesus explains to the same class of hearers as in our passage, to the Pharisees namely, that if Moses authorized divorce, merely confining himself to guard it by some restrictions, there was a forsaking for a time of the true moral point of view already proclaimed Genesis 2, and which He, Jesus, came to re-establish in its purity. Luke and Matthew do not speak of the case of voluntary separation on the part of the woman referred to by Mark (Mar 10:12) and Paul (1Co 7:10-11). And Paul does not expressly interdict the divorced man, as Mark does, from contracting a second marriage. Those shades in such a precept cannot be voluntary; they represent natural variations due to tradition (Syn.) or to the nature of the context (Paul).<\/p>\n<p>The parallels quoted leave no doubt as to the real connection of Luk 16:18 with Luk 16:17. The asyndeton between those two verses is explained by the fragmentary character of Luke&#8217;s report. What remains to us of this discourse resembles the peaks of a mountain chain, the base of which is concealed from view, and must be reconstructed by reflection. As to the compiler, he has evidently refrained from filling up at his own hand the blanks in his document. The disjointed character of this account has been turned into an accusation against him; but it ought rather to be regarded as a proof of his conscientious fidelity. <\/p>\n<p>Does the context, as we have just established it, leave anything to be desired? Has Holtzmann ground for regarding this piece as a collection of sentences thrown together at random? Or is it necessary, in order to justify Luk 16:18, to regard it, with Schleiermacher, as an allusion to the divorce of Herod Antipas from the daughter of Aretas, and his unlawful marriage with Herodias,a crime which the scribes and Pharisees had not the courage to condemn like John the Baptist? Or, finally, must we, with Olshausen, take the idea of divorce in a spiritual sense, and apply it to the emancipation of believers from the yoke of the law, agreeably to Rom 7:1 et seq.? No; the explanation which we have given, as well as the authenticity of the context, appear to be sufficiently established by the parallels quoted (Mat 5:18-19; Mat 5:31-32; Mat 19:3 et seq.; Mar 10:2 et seq.). <\/p>\n<p>The saying of Luk 16:17, proclaiming the eternal duration of the law, has appeared to some critics incompatible with the Pauline character of Luke&#8217;s Gospel. Hilgenfeld alleges that the canonical text of Luke is falsified, and that the true original form of this passage, as well as of many others, has been preserved by Marcion, who reads: It is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of my sayings to fail. But, 1. The manifest incompatibility of our canonical text with Marcion&#8217;s system renders it, on the contrary, very probable that it was Marcion who in this case, as in so many others, accommodated the text to his dogmatic point of view. 2. Could Jesus have applied the word tittle to His own sayings before they had been expressed in writing? 3. The parallel, Mat 5:18, proves that the expression in its original meaning really applied to the law. If such was the primary application in the mind of Jesus, would it not be extremely surprising if, after an earlier Luke had departed from it, the more modern Luke should have reverted to it? Besides, this supposition, combated by Zeller, is withdrawn by Volkmar, who first gave it forth (Die Evangel, p. 481). Zeller, however, supposes that the evangelist, feeling the anti-Pauline tendency of this saying, designedly enclosed it between two others, intended to show the reader that it was not to be taken in its literal sense. But would it not have been far simpler to omit it altogether? And does not so much artifice contrast with the simplicity of our Gospels? <\/p>\n<p>According to the Talmud, Tract. Gittin (Luk 9:10), Hillel, the grandfather of Gamaliel, the man whom our moderns would adopt as the master of Jesus Christ, taught that the husband is entitled to put away his wife when she burns his dinner. We can understand how, in view of such pharisaic teachings, Jesus felt the need of protesting, not only by affirming the maintenance of moral obligation as contained in the law, but even by announcing that the new doctrine would in this respect exceed the severity of the old, and would conclusively raise the moral obligation to the height of the ideal. The declaration of Jesus, Luk 16:17, about the maintenance of the law, is, besides, perfectly at one with St. Paul&#8217;s view (1Co 7:19): The keeping of the commandments of God is everything; comp. Rom 2:12 : As many as have sinned under the law, shall be judged by the law. <\/p>\n<p>On the basis of this introduction, announcing to the Pharisees the end of their paraded show of righteousness and the advent of real holiness, there rises by way of example the following parable. To the words of Luk 16:15, that which is highly esteemed among men, there corresponds the representation of the sumptuous and brilliant life of the rich man; to the predicate, is an abomination in the sight of God (same verse), the description of his punishment in Hades; to the declaration of Luk 16:17 regarding the permanence of the law, the reply of Abraham: they have Moses and the prophets. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>THE KINGDOM OF GOD<\/p>\n<p>Luk 16:16-18. The law and the prophets were till John; since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every one passeth into it. These Pharisees hung on His track like lightning on the skirts of the clouds, barking and snapping at everything He said; because the red-hot truth which Jesus preached was awfully repellent to these galvanized hypocrites, who, with their preachers to help them, were laboring incessantly to justify themselves, and were professedly great sticklers for the law and the prophets; i.e., the O. T. Scriptures. Jesus here informs them that the old dispensation actually wound up with John the Baptist, the last of the prophets, who formally superseded it by introducing Jesus to the world, and ceremonially inaugurating Him into His official Messiahship. As He is Mediatorial King, His very office, preaching, and presence normally introduce the kingdom whithersoever He goes. Hence He announces to them that the kingdom of God has superseded the law and the prophets, and every truly. awakened soul is pressing into it. It is equally true this day.<\/p>\n<p>The kingdom of God is all and in all to every true heart, and throughout the evangelical world there is a constant pressing into it. We enter it through the narrow gate of regeneration, and are established in it by the stupendous work of entire sanctification.<\/p>\n<p>But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than one item of the law to fall. Though we live in the dispensation of the gospel kingdom, which superseded that of the law and the prophets, as our Savior well reminds us, we must not conclude that a solitary. item of the law is ignored or becomes null and void. The ceremonial law of bloody sacrifices, symbolizing the vicarious atonement, was all fulfilled, when Jesus bled and died on the cross. The vast expurgatory watery. ablutions, symbolizing the sanctification of the Spirit, were fulfilled when the Holy Ghost descended in fiery baptisms on the day of Pentecost. The supersession of the law and the prophets by the kingdom of God is only affected so far as the O. T. symbolism is verified in N. T. experiences.<\/p>\n<p>Every one putting away his wife, and marrying another, committeth adultery; and every one marrying her who has been put away by her husband, committeth adultery. The Jews had very loose views on the marriage relation, frequently sending away the wife for a diversity of trivial causes, supplying her place by another. They claimed that they had a right under the law of Moses to do those things; meanwhile they set great store on those privileges. Jesus, knowing the hearts of those corrupt, bigoted Pharisees, exposes their spiritual obliquity by these plain deliverances in reference to the marriage relation. Those scribes and Pharisees had ingeniously manipulated the Scriptures of Moses mad the prophets, misconstruing them in the defense of their iniquitous lives.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: William Godbey&#8217;s Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>16:16 {5} The law and the prophets [were] until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.<\/p>\n<p>(5) The Pharisees despised the excellency of the new covenant with respect to the old, being ignorant of the perfect righteousness of the law; and Christ declares by the seventh commandment how they were false expounders of the law.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>The Hebrew Scriptures should have been of primary importance to the Pharisees. They pointed to the coming of Messiah. Since John the Baptist had come the message that he and Jesus had proclaimed had been that the Messiah was present and the kingdom was at hand. A new era had begun with John&rsquo;s preaching, not the kingdom. The Pharisees had disregarded that preaching and in doing so had rejected the teaching of the Old Testament even though their fellow Jews were trying to get into the kingdom (cf. Luk 13:24; Luk 14:15; Mar 7:8-9).<\/p>\n<p>The fact that Jesus said something similar about the kingdom on another occasion that Matthew recorded has raised questions about Jesus&rsquo; meaning here and there (cf. Mat 11:12-13). In Matthew, Jesus&rsquo; point was this. The Jewish religious leaders were trying to bring in the kingdom in their own carnal way while refusing to accept God&rsquo;s way that John and Jesus announced. In the different teaching situation that Luke recorded, Jesus said something similar but slightly different. His point here was that many of the Jews were eager to enter the kingdom, but the religious leaders were hindering them by rejecting John and Jesus&rsquo; ministries.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left:36pt\">&quot;. . . those pressing into the kingdom must be at least as much in earnest as the violent men of Palestine who tried to bring in the kingdom by force of arms. In the context we may think of men like the astute steward.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Morris, p. 251.] <\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The law and the prophets [were] until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it. 16. The law and the prophets were until John ] This is one of our Lord&rsquo;s clearest intimations that the aeon of the Law and the Prophets was now merging into a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-luke-1616\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 16:16&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25618\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}