Nay – <\/B>No. They will not hear Moses and the prophets. They have heard them so long in vain, that there is no prospect now that they will attend to the message; but if one should go to them directly from the eternal world they would hear him. The novelty of the message would attract their attention, and they would listen to what he would say.<\/P> <\/p>\nFuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Verse 30<\/span>. If one went to them from the dead<\/B><\/I>, &c.] Many are desirous to see an inhabitant of the other world, and converse with him, in order to know what passes there. Make way! Here is a damned soul, which Jesus Christ has evoked from the hell of fire! Hear him! Hear him tell of his torments! Hear him utter his regrets! “But we cannot see him.” No: God has, in his mercy, spared you for the present this punishment. How could you<\/I> bear the sight of this damned spirit? Your very nature would fail at the appearance. Jesus keeps him as it were behind the curtain, and holds a conversation with him in your hearing, which you have neither faith<\/I> nor courage<\/I> sufficient to hold with him yourselves.<\/P> <\/p>\n How vain is man in his imaginations: We are prone all of us to think after the rate that this rich man is here brought in speaking; that although persons be deaf to the sound of the word, yet some sensible evidence of the wrath of God would make a change in their hearts and lives. There is no such thing. There is not, possibly, in all the book of God a text that more speaks the desperate hardness of a sinners heart than this, nor a text which looks more dreadfully upon persons sitting under the means of grace, reading and hearing the word of God, and yet find not their hearts so affected with the reading and hearing of it, as thereby to be brought to repentance, and faith, and such holiness of life as it requireth. If it were possible that such men and women should see one come out of the bottomless pit, tearing his hair, and wringing his hands, and gnashing his teeth, and bewailing his misery, and begging of them to be wise by his example, telling them for what sins he is made so miserable, and with tears and highest expressions of passion beseeching them that while they have time they would leave off those courses, acquaint themselves with God, and be at peace, that thereby good might come unto them, they would not yet believe nor repent; nor would this have any further effect upon them, than a little passion, till they could get the din out of their ears. For though sensible evidence be the highest advantage in the world to moral persuasion, yet these things are under no Divine appointment to such an effect. Henceforth let us wonder no more that a drunkard sees his companion drop down dead before him, yet presently cries again, Fill the glass; that hundreds of sinners are daily hurried down to hell in their wickedness, and yet their companions take no warning. In a fight at sea or land hundreds drop, yet their companions do not fly, but are held up by their stomachs and passion, and their ears are made deaf by the noise of the drums and trumpets. So in the world hundreds of sinners drop down daily into the pit, yet the rest of their companions tumble their companions into their graves, and never consider the work of the Lord, nor consider the operation of his hands, till they also like sheep be laid in the grave, and death comes to feed upon them, and hell to devour them also. This now to those that duly consider not things, and in particular do not consider this text, seemeth strange and amazing. But it is no more to be wondered at than that hundreds read and hear the word of God, and are not by it converted and changed. It is not to be expected that any providence of God should work upon those souls any saving change, upon whom the word doth not work. That is the ordinance of God, with which the Holy Spirit joins itself, which alone can produce this change. If God works not this change thus, he will work it by nothing else; though he sometimes maketh use of such providences towards souls to whom he intends good, to make them observe and attend to the word better, in order to so blessed an effect. <\/P> <\/p>\n 30. Nay<\/B>giving the lie toAbraham. <\/P> but if one went unto themfrom the dead, they will repent<\/B>a principle of awful magnitudeand importance. The greatest miracle will have no effect on those whoare determined not to believe. A real<\/I> Lazarus soon “rosefrom the dead,” but the sight of him by crowds of people,inclined thereby to Christ, only crowned the unbelief and hastenedthe murderous plots of the Pharisees against the Lord of glory; norhas His own resurrection, far more overpowering, yet won over that”crooked and perverse nation.”<\/P><\/p>\n And he said, nay, father Abraham<\/strong>,…. He contradicts his father Abraham, or at least desires it might not be so; this way he suggests, was not so right, and would not succeed; for he knew his brethren were a rebellious, and stiffnecked people, and would not hear Moses and the prophets, notwithstanding all their outward boast of them, and pretensions of regard to them:<\/p>\n but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent<\/strong>; but alas! repentance is not of man’s will, but a gift of God’s grace; nor could these men repent, because in a judicial way their eyes were shut, their ears were stopped, and their hearts were hardened; and though Christ came in person to them, and preached, as never man did, with power and authority, and confirmed his doctrine with miracles, yet they repented not, nor did they when he arose from the dead.<\/p>\n They will repent <\/B> (<\/SPAN><\/span>). The Rich Man had failed to do this and he now sees that it is the one thing lacking. It is not wealth, not poverty, not alms, not influence, but repentance that is needed. He had thought repentance was for others, not for all. <\/P> <\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n 1) “And he said, Nay, father Abraham:” <\/strong>(ho de eipen ouchi pater Abraam) “Then he replied, no, father Abraham,” they are not enough, this theologian in hell reasoned; Still his attitude was that of the Pharisee, who considered himself righteous and wiser than others, Luk 18:9-11<\/span>.<\/p>\n 2) “But if one went unto them from the dead,” (air <\/strong>ean tis apo nekron poreuthe pros autous) “But if someone should go directly to them from the dead,” from out of the tombs to my father’s house; Though he was sincere he was wrong, Joh 5:40<\/span>; Joh 8:24<\/span>. The “if” consideration would not help. No special reports of belief or repentance is heard from the raising of Lazarus of Bethany.<\/p>\n 3) “They will repent.” <\/strong>(metanoesousin) “They will (then) repent.” The lost in hell know that only those who repent can stay out of hell, Luk 13:3<\/span>; Luk 13:5<\/span>; Act 17:30-31<\/span>; 2Co 7:10<\/span>; 2Pe 3:9<\/span>.<\/p>\n 30. Nay, father Abraham. This is a personification, as we have said, which expresses rather the feelings of the living than the anxiety of the dead. The doctrine of the Law is little esteemed by the world, the Prophets are neglected, and no man submits to hear God speaking in his own manner. Some would desire that angels should descend from heaven; others, that the dead should come out of their graves; others, that new miracles should be performed every day to sanction what they hear; and others, that voices should be heard from the sky. (312) But if God were pleased to comply with all their foolish wishes, it would be of no advantage to them; for God has included in his word all that is necessary to be known, and the authority of this word has been attested and proved by authentic seals. Besides, faith does not depend on miracles, or any extraordinary sign, but is the peculiar gift of the Spirit, and is produced by means of the word. Lastly, it is the prerogative of God to draw us to himself, and he is pleased to work effectually through his own word. There is not the slightest reason, therefore, to expect that those means, which withdraw us from obedience to the word, will be of any service to us. I freely acknowledge, that there is nothing to which the flesh is more strongly inclined than to listen to vain revelations; and we see how eagerly those men, to whom the whole of Scripture is an object of dislike, throw themselves into the snares of Satan. Hence have arisen necromancy and other delusions, which the world not only receives with avidity, but runs after with furious rage. But all that is here affirmed by Christ is, that even the dead could not reform, (313) or bring to a sound mind, those who are deaf and obstinate against the instructions of the law. <\/p>\n (312) “ Les autres, que Dieu parlast a eux du ciel en personne;”— “others, that God would speak to them from heaven in person.” <\/p>\n (313) “ Ne s’amenderont point, mesmes quand les morts viendroyent parler a eux, et les advertir;” — “will not reform, even though the dead should come to talk to them and warn them.” <\/p>\n (30) But if one went unto them from the dead.<\/strong>The words are in accordance with the general Jewish craving for a sign, as the only proof of a revelation from God. (See Notes on Mat. 12:33<\/span>; Mat. 16:1<\/span>; 1Co. 1:22<\/span>.) The return of one who had passed into the unseen world and brought back a report of its realities would rouse, the rich man thought, the most apathetic. So far the picture is generic, but if we follow up the suggestion which has thrown light upon the parable before, we shall find here also a more individualising feature. It is specially recorded of the Tetrarch that he had hoped to see some miracle done by Jesus (Luk. 23:8<\/span>). He had given utterance, when he heard of the miracles that had been actually wrought, to the belief that John the Baptist was risen from the dead (see Note on Mat. 14:2<\/span>), and yet that belief had not brought him one step nearer to repentance.<\/p>\n ‘And he said, “No, father Abraham, but if one go to them from the dead, they will repent.” ’<\/p>\n The rich man was a typical Jew. He believed in being given wonderful signs. He was not alone. The Jews were always seeking signs. And the reason for this was because their past history had been full of signs that God was with them. They were like children wanting a repetition of the display. Yet the point is that if those signs from the past would not convince them, why should present signs? Interestingly enough God would shortly give the Jews the sign that they wanted in the raising of another Lazarus (God has a sense of what is apposite), and what did the Jews do? They planned to put him to death (Joh 12:10<\/span>). Many people today are similar. They say that they would believe if only they saw signs. But Jesus is making clear that while that may be so, it would not be a belief worth having. Why, says the rich man, if one goes to them from the dead they will repent. No, says Jesus, not if they are the kind who do not listen to the word of God.<\/p>\n Luk 16:30-31<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>But if one went unto them, <\/em><\/strong>&c.<\/strong> It is uncertain whether the rich man by “one from the dead,” meant an apparition or a resurrection. His words are capable of either sense; yet the quality of the persons to whom this message was to be sent makes it more probable that he meant an apparition: for, without doubt, the character which Josephus gives us of the Jews in high life, namely, that they were generally Sadducees, <\/em>was applicable to those brethren: so that, disbelieving the existence of souls in a separate state, nothing more was necessary, in the opinion of their brother, to convince them, than that they should see an apparition, or spirit, from the invisible world. But Abraham tells the rich man, that if they hearkened not to Moses and the prophets, neither would they be persuaded to a thorough repentance and conversion, though one should arise from the dead to visit them; that is, If they be so immersed in vice as to be careless of a future state, and inattentive to the evidences of it, which God has already afforded them by the ministration of Moses and the prophets, they would, for the same reason, reject all other means whatsoever, which God should make use of for their conviction and conversion; even though he should send one from the dead to preach to them. Bishop Atterbury has fully and excellently shewn the justice of Abraham’s assertion here, in his Discourse on this text, which deserves an attentive perusal, and to which we refer our readers with great pleasure. See Atterb. vol. 2: Serm. 2. The impenitence of many who saw another Lazarus raised from the dead, Joh 11:46<\/span> and the wickedness of the soldiers who were eye-witnesses to the resurrection of Christ, and who yet that very day suffered themselves to be hired to bear a false testimony against it, Mat 28:14-15<\/span> are most affecting and astonishing illustrations of this truth; for each of those miracles was far more convincing, than such an apparition as is here referred to, would have been. <\/p>\n Inferences <\/em>drawn from the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, Luk 16:19-31<\/span>. From this parable we are taught several important lessons, as, <\/p>\n 1. That one may be great and renowned, and highly esteemed among men, who is entirely obscure and vulgar in the sight of God, nay, and an abomination unto him; <\/em>(see Luk 16:15<\/span>.) for what can be greater or better in the eyes of men, than to live adorned with all the splendour of wealth, luxury, and honours;and more disgraceful in the sight of God, than to be polluted with sin, and fit only for the flames of hell? On the other hand, the parable teaches, that some who appear mean and despicable to the eyes of their fellows, are men of great worth, and highly beloved of God. Wealth, therefore, and power, and grandeur, are not to be coveted, neither is poverty to be dreaded; since that honour which is the chief charm of the one, and that reproach which is the bitterest sting of the other, are in the aggregate of things without foundation. <\/p>\n 2. We are taught, secondly, from this parable, that the souls of men are immortal; that they subsist in a separate state after the dissolution of the body, and that they are rewarded or punished according to our actions in this life;doctrines very necessary to be asserted in those days, as well as the present; when it was fashionable, as now, to believe the mortality of the soul, and to argue in defence of that pernicious error. It farther teaches, that the miseries of the poor who have lived righteously, and the happiness of the rich who have lived wickedly, end with this life; that the several stations in which they have lived, together with the past occurrences and actions of their lives are distinctly remembered and reflected on by them; that the remembrance of past pains and pleasures will not lessen, but rather increase the joys of the one, and the sorrows of the other; and consequently, that we make a very false judgment of each other’s condition, when we think any man happy because he is rich, or miserable because he is poor. But in particular, all who make it their chief business to procure the pleasures of sense, neglecting to form their minds by all the means of grace to a relish of spiritual and divine pleasures, may in this parable see their sad, but certain end. They shall be excluded for ever from the presence of God, as incapable of his joys, although they may have pursued their pleasures with no visible injury to any person. But if men not accused of injustice in getting riches, are thus punished for the bad use that they have made of them, what must be their misery, who both acquire them unjustly, and use them sinfully!And as this parable admonishes the rich, so is it profitable for the instruction and comfort of the poor; for it teaches them the proper method of bringing their afflictions to a happy issue, and shews them that God will distribute the rewards and punishments of the life to come impartially, and without respect of persons.<\/em> <\/p>\n 4. This parable teaches us the greatness of the punishment of the damned, Luk 16:23<\/span>. And in hell he lifted up his eyes, <\/em>&c. In what manner the flames of hell operate upon the damned, ever tormenting without annihilating, we are not able at present to explain. Additionally to these will be the never-dying worm. <\/em>If wicked men retain the passions, appetites, and desires which were predominant in them upon earth, as it is highly probable they will, (see Gal 6:7<\/span>.)these desires being for ever deprived of their objects, it must occasion a misery, which they only can conceive, who have felt what it is to lose, without hope of recovery, that which they are most passionately fond of; and to be racked with the violence of desires, which, they are sensible, can never be gratified. Or, although the passions themselves should perish with their objects, a direful, eternal melancholy must necessarily ensue from the want of all desire and enjoyment, the misery of which is not to be conceived. In such a state, the bitter reflections which the damned will make on the happiness that they have lost, must raise in them a dreadful storm of self-condemnation, envy, and despair. Besides, their consciences, provoked by the evil actions of their lives, and now, as it were, let loose upon them, will prove more inexorable than ravening wolves; and the torment which they shall occasion, will, in respect of its perpetuity, be as if a never-dying worm <\/em>was always consuming them. And this latter torment will probably be far more terrible than the other; for the misery arising from those agonizing reflections must be of the most intense kind: and as there is not any thing in that state to divert the thoughts of the damned from them, they must be uninterrupted also, not admitting of the least alleviation or refreshment! <\/p>\n 5. It appears likewise from the parable before us, that men’s states are unalterably fixed after death; so that it is in vain to hope for any end of their misery who are miserable, and unreasonable to fear any change of their prosperity who are happy. REFLECTIONS.<\/strong>1st, To direct us in the right improvement of worldly wealth, we have, <\/p>\n 1. The parable of the unjust steward. God is our master and lord: all who are entrusted with any of his gifts, are his stewards, and should improve them to his glory. This man was accused of waiting his master’s goods; and how justly liable are we to the same charge? How often have we abused the substance that we have enjoyed, and the abilities we have been blest with, to God’s dishonour? In consequence of his ill management, he is called to an account, and ordered to leave the service; and a terrible reckoning will that be for us, if, hurried away by death, we are called to God’s bar, cut off in the midst of our sins, and banished for ever from his presence. Too lazy to dig for his maintenance, and too proud to beg, he resolves, by deeper frauds, to secure for himself a maintenance; and calling privately his lord’s debtors, whose accounts were in his hands, he agreed with them to draw a new state of their debts, abating twenty measures of wheat to one, and fifty of oil to another; thus endeavouring to make them his friends, that, when he was dismissed from his lord’s service, he might have their houses to receive him. See the Annotations for another explanation. Note; <\/em>(1.) One step in sin always tends to lead on to farther abominations. (2.) Pride and laziness often drive men to the most wicked methods to supply their wants, unable to bear the labours of honest industry for a subsistence, or to submit to ask relief. (3.) They who trust too much to stewards, and seldom inspect their own accounts, will usually suffer for it. <\/p>\n 2. The lord commended the unjust steward’s conduct; not as truly laudable in itself, but as an instance of foresight, care, and contrivance, worthy of imitation in a better way; for the children of this world, <\/em>such as this man was, who place their happiness in earth and a portion here below, are in their generation wiser, <\/em>act more prudently, and shew greater industry to secure worldly advantages, than the children of light <\/em>do to obtain the infinitely more momentous acquisitions of grace and glory. Let us go to them, therefore, to learn, and be ashamed to see ourselves outdone in diligence by those who pursue a perishing world, when we have at stake the interest of an immortal soul and an aweful eternity. <\/p>\n 3. Christ applies the parable to his disciples. I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness, <\/em>employ your worldly goods in such a way, as shall be to your own advantage in the day of judgment; that when ye fail, <\/em>and at death this perishing world is left behind with all its enjoyments they may receive you into everlasting habitations, <\/em>they who have received the comfort of your bounty, God’s poor saints, or God himself, who will reward such works of faith and labours of love to the faithful, with everlasting glory. Note; <\/em>(1.) This world’s wealth is called the mammon of unrighteousness, <\/em>or of deceit, <\/em>because usually it is abused to the vilest purposes, and too often gotten by unjust and deceitful means. (2.) The only way of turning those riches to our advantage, which others abuse to their ruin, is by employing them for the glory of God, and the good of our fellow-creatures; and then they will be blessings. (3.) At death all things here below fail us, nothing of our earthly affluence can go down with us to the grave: unless we have sent our treasures before us, they can then afford us no satisfaction. (4.) Our one great business here below, is to secure for ourselves the everlasting habitations; and though no money can purchase a mansion in glory, yet will they, who have laid out their talents in God’s blessed service, find themselves hereafter repaid with the richest interest. <\/p>\n 4. Our Lord enforces his exhortation by the following arguments, (1.) That a constant mis-improvement of the gifts of God’s providence must effectually exclude us from the treasures of his grace and glory; for as a servant who is faithful in a little matter gains our confidence to be entrusted with more;so where he is unjust in trifles, no prudent master would care to employ him in matters of greater importance. If therefore we be unfaithful in the abuse of worldly things, it cannot be thought we should make a better improvement of the nobler talents, the means of divine wisdom and grace; and therefore these true riches <\/em>he will justly withhold from us; and if we have behaved as dishonest stewards in that which God has entrusted us with, and which is not our own but his, how can it be expected that we should possess that good part, <\/em>the riches of glory, which most properly may be called our own, <\/em>if once possessed, as being bestowed, not as a talent to be improved, but as an eternal inheritance? (2.) It is impossible to serve two matters, God and mammon, because, their demands being opposite and contradictory, so far as we love and serve the world, we must hate and disobey God: and, on the other hand, if we love and serve him, we must be dead to the world, and ready to forego all its honours, interests, pleasures, and esteem, whenever they stand in competition with his glory. God requires the heart; he cannot suffer a rival, nor will admit of an allowed partition: to attempt to reconcile the inconsistent services of God and mammon, is all that the devil asks to ensure our ruin. <\/p>\n 5.The Pharisees were highly offended with truths which touched them so nearly. Their character was drawn in this unjust steward; and their covetous, worldly-minded hearts, under all their most plausible guise of religion, were the slaves of mammon: they treated him therefore with the greatest disdain and contempt. Note; <\/em>(1.) The inordinate love of this world is the bane of many a fair professor. (2.) When the word of God presses the conscience hard, the obstinate sinner often affects to despise, and turn off with a laugh, what he feels himself unable to answer. (3.) If we be treated with insult and derision by those to whom we minister the Gospel, let us remember that Jesus our Master endured the like treatment before us. <\/p>\n 6. Christ sharply rebukes their hypocrisy and worldly-mindedness. He despised their reviling, yet warns them of their ruin, that they might yet repent of their sins, before it was too late. Ye are they which justify yourselves before men, <\/em>pretending the strictest piety and most scrupulous devotion; but God knoweth your hearts, <\/em>that they are full of deadly poison, of pride, envy, covetousness, falsehood, and oppression: for that which is highly esteemed amongst men, <\/em>these pompous shows of exterior sanctity, is abomination in the sight of God, <\/em>who sees the odious principles which actuate your whole conduct, and abhors all your pretended services. Note; <\/em>(1.) The most rigid services of mere formal religion, instead of justifying men before God, render them only the more abhorred. (2.) The opinion of the world is a very fallacious rule of judgment: usually the most admired characters in the eyes of men, are in the Divine regards an abomination; and they who are set up as patterns of piety, will be found in fact a sink of iniquity. <\/p>\n 7. He turns to the poor publicans and sinners, whom the Pharisees despised, encouraging them to press into that kingdom which his grace had opened to them. The Old Testament dispensation was now at its close; the prophesies concerning the Messiah were about to receive their accomplishment; and the free grace of the gospel to be universally published through the world; when the distinction of Jew and Gentile should cease. Every sinner therefore, without exclusion of any, is welcome to the Saviour, and sure to find mercy, if he come to him. And these glad tidings engaged the hearts of many, whom the self-righteous Pharisees despised, to press into the Messiah’s kingdom amidst all opposition. Note; <\/em>They must strive against the world, who would enter into heaven. <\/p>\n 8. He precludes an objection which his self-righteous enemies would be ready to start; that he meant to invalidate the authority of the divine law. No. The frame of heaven and earth shall sooner be dissolved, than one tittle of the law can fail; all the prophesies, types, and figures, must receive their accomplishment; the precepts, in their true spiritual meaning, were now more than ever explained by Christ’s preaching, and magnified by his own obedience to them: and, far from admitting a laxer system of moral duty, this holy law must abide as the unchangeable rule of righteousness; and conformity to it would now be enforced by the strongest motives: as for instance, in the article of marriage: divorce, under the law of Moses, was permitted, to prevent greater evils; but under the gospel it is entirely prohibited, and marriage restored to its primitive institution, nothing being admitted as a plea for its dissolution, but unfaithfulness to the marriage-bed. Whoever therefore for any other cause putteth away his wife, and marries again, is an adulterer; as he is also, who shall marry her that is divorced. The gospel, wherever it is truly received, strikes at the root of corrupt affections, and engages us to walk, not after the flesh, but after the spirit. <\/p>\n 2nd, The parable given us by our Lord, Luk 16:19<\/span>, &c. seems to be particularly designed to rebuke the pride of the Jews, who, enriched with outward privileges, treated the poor Gentiles with disdain, as unworthy a place among the dogs of their flock; and yet there was grace in store for the poor diseased sinners whom they despised, while they themselves, through their unbelief and impenitence, would be rejected and ruined. It is also more generally applicable to what we see sadly verified every day, that rich epicures wallow in luxury, while God’s dear children pine under want and hunger; whose end will be as it is here represented; where the veil is taken off from the world to come; and we behold the glories of the one, and the unutterable miseries of the other. <\/p>\n 1. The state of a rich wicked man is set before us. There was a certain rich man, <\/em>whose fortune enabled him to gratify every appetite: he appeared in the most splendid robes, equalling the majesty of princes, clothed in purple and fine linen, and <\/em>his table was spread with every delicacy, he fared sumptuously every day. <\/em>It may be said, where is the harm of this? he was born to his estate, and the expence was no more than he could afford. Admit the fact. The harm was not in the use, but the abuse, of the creatures of God. He lived a life of sensuality, and sat unconcerned about the miseries of others. And it is designed to teach us, (1.) That this world’s riches are often given to those who know not God; and that his love and favour are never to be judged of by outward things. (2.) That wealth and affluence are dangerous to the soul, and, affording the means to gratify men’s bestial appetites, often plunge them in perdition and destruction. <\/p>\n 2. The state of a poor godly man. He is called Lazarus; <\/em>and to the miseries of poverty was added the more afflicting portion of a nauseous disease: wanting a morsel of bread, overspread with ulcers, without even rags to cover them, unable to walk, he is carried to the rich man’s gate, and laid on the cold ground, desiring to be fed, if but with the crumbs which fell from the table. We hear no complaints from him, no murmuring at his condition. Behold here the condition of a dear saint of God; and learn of him, (1.) Not to estimate a man’s spiritual state by his afflictions: for it is often seen, that those whom the Lord most loveth, he is pleased most severely to exercise. (2.) Patient submission to God’s providential chastisements is a gracious proof of our adoption. <\/p>\n 3. Death at last came with a friendly hand to remove at once all the poor beggar’s miseries. Emaciated with hunger and disease, worn down with pain and misery, he closed his eyes, and bid adieu to human wretchedness; seeking a refuge in the grave, where the wicked cease from troubling. We hear of no burial given him: perhaps some hole was dug to remove the nuisance out of the way; and, buried with the burial of an ass, not a friend perhaps followed the bier, not a tear was dropped over the grave: but he rests in peace; and now his eternal triumphs begin: attending angels, who minister for the heirs of salvation, and hover round their dying beds, received the departing spirit, and, on their wings mounting to the skies, shouted aloud, Lift up your heads, ye gates, and be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors, that an heir of glory may come in. Led to his seat on high, admitted to the richest entertainments of that blest world, he is placed next to Abraham, and receives that distinguished honour of leaning on the patriarch’s bosom. What a glorious prospect does this present! amidst all our present evils, how should such a hope support and comfort us! Death must be the farthest limits of the sufferings of a faithful soul; beyond the grave, all is happiness eternal, and bliss uninterrupted. 5. In this fearful situation we have the rich man’s request. He cried <\/em>with eagerness and importunity, extorted by the pangs that he felt. How different from the songs of riot, that before echoed through his palace! Father Abraham, have mercy on me: <\/em>perhaps in his cups he had ridiculed the old story of Abraham; or, it may be, he had depended upon his outward privileges as descended from him, but now found how vain were his expectations. Note; <\/em>Many, who have never prayed before, may pray loud enough in hell, but pray in vain. His request seems small, Send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his danger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame: <\/em>how is his proud crest fallen? He little thought once that he should be so reduced. Observe, (1.) His complaint. I am tormented in this flame. <\/em>Damned sinners have nothing but wrath before them, which preys like fire upon their souls, as much as their bodies shall be tortured by the everlasting burnings. They who will not hear and fear, and do no more wickedly in this day of mercy, will then feel, when every pang will be embittered with despair. (2.) The day is near, when they who despised the people of God, will be glad to receive from them the least favours. <\/p>\n 6. Abraham’s answer is most confounding and upbraiding: for in the state of the damned no requests are granted, not even a drop of water to cool a flaming tongue. They who neglect the day of grace, have nothing before them but misery, without abasement, and without end. Son, remember that thou in thy life-time, receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things; but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. <\/em>(1.) He addresses him as a son, <\/em>the remembrance of which relation aggravated the guilt of his degenerate conduct. Our abused privileges will increase the measure of our guilt. (2.) He bids him remember; <\/em>for conscience then will be awake, and self-tormenting reflections embitter every pang. The sinner will remember every means of grace that he has trifled with, every call of God that he has slighted, every affliction which he has misimproved, every blessing that he has abused. (3.) He reminds him of the good things <\/em>which he had received, and misapplied; unthankful for them; placing his happiness in them; and, as he reckoned these during life his chief good, he had his all in hand, and nothing to expect after death but wrath to the uttermost. (4.) He leads him to reflect on the evil things <\/em>that Lazarus had received; which he had patiently borne. (5.) He bids him now observe how the tables are turned: he is comforted; <\/em>the miseries of a faithful child of God, however sharp, are, comparatively speaking, light afflictions, which are but for a moment: death will put an end to every sorrow, and instantly his everlasting bliss will commence. But thou art tormented: <\/em>the triumphing of the wicked is but for a moment; that can carry nothing with them into the grave; and the joys and delights, in which they placed all their happiness before, will only make the change more terrible, when they are driven into the everlasting burnings, where there is weeping, and wailing and gnashing of teeth. (6.) He leaves him without hope of mercy, or prospect of the least relief: for, besides all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, <\/em>impassable on either side; so that they who would pass from hence to you cannot: <\/em>if a glorified saint wished to afford the least relief to damned sinners, it would be in vain: not that he will ever feel such a desire, but will approve and applaud the justice of God in their eternal torments. Neither can they pass to us that would come from thence: <\/em>when once the soul enters into the state of damnation, despair seals up the door of mercy; no gleam of hope is ever again afforded: the decree once gone forth, is irreversible; as the tree falleth, it must lie. How awful! how awakening the thought! Sinner, hear, and tremble. The door of mercy is not yet shut against thee. Oh flee quickly thither. Cry mightily to God, if yet there may be hope; in a moment it will be too late to knock, when the door shall be shut. <\/p>\n 7. Again he prefers another request, but meets with a second repulse. Since he is doomed in despair to suffer himself, he cannot, without increasing horror, reflect on meeting his brethren in that place of torment, whom he probably had been greatly instrumental to ruin by his bad example and influence, and whose upbraidings he wished to prevent: for not love of their souls, but desire to prevent an increase of his own misery, seems to have dictated the request. Earnestly therefore does he intreat, that if Lazarus may not come to him, he may go to them, and prevent their <\/em>eternal ruin, if he may not alleviate his <\/em>torment. Note; <\/em>They who have been tempters to others, and companions in sin, will shortly become mutual tormentors. Abraham denies the request: it is unnecessary. They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. <\/em>They wanted not the means of conviction and conversion, if they did not obstinately harden their hearts. Note; <\/em>The scriptures are the ordinary means that God employs to turn men’s hearts. They who neglect to attend to these sacred oracles, are left to their own devices, and sealed up under wrath. <\/p>\n 8. Once more he redoubles his plea, yet meets with no more success. In the state of the damned no prayers are answered; it is here alone that prayers can profit us. He replied, Nay, father Abraham; <\/em>though they may pay no regard to Moses and the prophets, (too long, it may be, accustomed so treat all revelation with contempt) yet, if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent: <\/em>such a messenger must needs carry conviction along with him, and compel them to turn from the error of their ways. So ready are foolish men to be requiring evidence which God is not pleased to give, and which, should he comply with their request, would still be utterly ineffectual: for, as Abraham declares, if they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead. <\/em>Indeed it is impossible that they should. One from the dead could not speak with more authority and certainty than the scriptures. We should have much more reason there to suspect a delusion, than in the oracles of truth. And though we might perhaps be terrified with the apparition, our hearts could never be changed thereby, since the power of God alone can effect that. We should by degrees recover from the fright, or be laughed out of our fears, and our corruptions would soon get the better of our convictions. The word of God therefore is ordinarily the only and sufficient means that he is pleased to use: it is presumption in us to prescribe, and folly to desire any other. If we harden our hearts against the warnings therein contained, visits from the dead, yea, being dragged through the belly of hell itself, and sent back again to earth, would be utterly ineffectual to convert our souls. To the law, therefore, and the testimony. <\/em>Isa 8:19-20<\/span>. <\/p>\n 30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n Ver. 30. They will repent<\/strong> ] Bellarmine is of the opinion that one glimpse of hell were enough to make a man not only turn Christian and sober, but anchorite and monk; to live after the strictest rule that might be. Such a sight or report might work much upon the judgment, but it is the gospel only that works upon the affections, and produceth repentance never to be repented of. <\/p>\n 30, 31.<\/strong> ] <\/strong> not, ‘ they will not hear them:<\/em> ’ he could not tell that, and besides, it would have taken away much of the ground of the answer of Abraham: the word deprecates leaving their salvation in such uncertainty<\/em> , as the chance of their hearing Moses and the Prophets seems to him to imply. ‘ Leave it not so, when it might be at once and for ever done by sending them one from the dead<\/em> .’<\/p>\n Abraham’s answer, besides opening to us a depth in the human heart, has a plain application to the Pharisees, to whom the parable was spoken. They would not hear Moses and the Prophets: Christ rose from the dead, but He did not go to them;<\/em> this verse is not so<\/em> worded, ‘they would have rejected Him, had He done so:’ the fact<\/em> merely is here supposed, and that in the very phrase which so often belongs to His own resurrection. They were not persuaded did not believe, though One rose from the dead. To deny altogether this allusion, is to rest contented with merely the surface of the parable.<\/p>\n Observe, Abraham does not say, ‘they will not repent<\/em> ’ but, ‘they will not believe, be persuaded:<\/em> ’ which is another and a deeper thing.<\/p>\n Luther does not seem to conclude rightly, that this disproves<\/em> the possibility of appearances of the dead. It only says, that such appearances will not bring about faith<\/em> in the human soul: but that they may not serve other ends in God’s dealings with men, it does not assert. There is no gulf between the earth<\/em> and Hades: and the very form of Abraham’s answer, setting forth no impossibility in this second case, as in the former, would seem to imply its possibility<\/em> , if requisite.<\/p>\n We can hardly pass over the identity of the name<\/em> LAZARUS with that of him who actually was recalled from the dead<\/em> , but whose return, far from persuading the Pharisees, was the immediate exciting cause of their crowning act of unbelief.<\/p>\n Luk 16:30<\/span> . , a decided negative = nay! that is not enough; so he knew from his own experience; the Scriptures very good doubtless, but men are accustomed<\/em> to them. : something unusual<\/em> , the preaching of a dead man returned to life, that might do.<\/p>\n Nay. Greek ouchi. App-105. <\/p>\n if. Implying a contingency. See App-118. <\/p>\n from = away from. App-104. Contrast the Lord’s ek (App-104 in next clause). <\/p>\n the dead. No Art. See App-139. <\/p>\n repent. See App-111. <\/p>\n 30, 31.] -not, they will not hear them: he could not tell that, and besides, it would have taken away much of the ground of the answer of Abraham:-the word deprecates leaving their salvation in such uncertainty, as the chance of their hearing Moses and the Prophets seems to him to imply.-Leave it not so, when it might be at once and for ever done by sending them one from the dead.<\/p>\n Abrahams answer, besides opening to us a depth in the human heart, has a plain application to the Pharisees, to whom the parable was spoken. They would not hear Moses and the Prophets:-Christ rose from the dead, but He did not go to them;-this verse is not so worded, they would have rejected Him, had He done so:-the fact merely is here supposed, and that in the very phrase which so often belongs to His own resurrection. They were not persuaded-did not believe, though One rose from the dead. To deny altogether this allusion, is to rest contented with merely the surface of the parable.<\/p>\n Observe, Abraham does not say, they will not repent-but, they will not believe, be persuaded: which is another and a deeper thing.<\/p>\n Luther does not seem to conclude rightly, that this disproves the possibility of appearances of the dead. It only says, that such appearances will not bring about faith in the human soul: but that they may not serve other ends in Gods dealings with men, it does not assert. There is no gulf between the earth and Hades: and the very form of Abrahams answer, setting forth no impossibility in this second case, as in the former, would seem to imply its possibility, if requisite.<\/p>\n We can hardly pass over the identity of the name LAZARUS with that of him who actually was recalled from the dead, but whose return, far from persuading the Pharisees, was the immediate exciting cause of their crowning act of unbelief.<\/p>\n Luk 16:30. , nay) Therefore the rich man during his life did not know the plan of salvation; and the wretched man, after having left behind his luxury, brought with him into hell his low estimation for Scripture. Hence he gave a counsel (proposed a plan) by no means in accordance with true theology. He supposed that, as he himself was now affected, so the survivors will presently be sure to be affected. Do thou [reader] rather look upon Lazarus whilst still living; so there will be no need of Lazarus appearing after death. Ungodly men demand that in one moment the reality of things invisible should be shown to themselves, first of all, in a manner altogether palpable, and such as to exclude the possibility of faith:[179] they shrink back from laborious investigation, faith, and patience.-, one) Lazarus, or some one else.- , from the dead) Therefore the rich man had not believed, neither did his brothers then believe, that there is a hell or a state of blessedness. It is not professed Sadduceeism, as the tenet of a sect, which is to be inferred from this [as the condemning characteristic of the rich man], but practical atheism, wherewith even not merely the Sadducees, but the Pharisees also were tainted, with (i.e. notwithstanding) all their hypocrisy. They were really deriding mockers, Luk 16:14. And it is probable that five Pharisees are stigmatized in Luk 16:28 above the rest.-, they will repent) That there is need of repentance, all are aware, even without apparitions: for even the self-indulger knew this in hell; although he could not comprehend that Moses and prophets aim at enforcing this same truth.<\/p>\n [179] For where sight is, there is no scope for faith, which is trust or belief in things unseen.-E. and T.<\/p>\n repent: Luk 13:3, Luk 13:5, Rev 16:9-11 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Mat 3:2 – Repent Luk 16:24 – Father Luk 24:37 – General Joh 11:46 – General Rom 9:7 – because Jam 2:21 – Abraham<\/p>\n VAIN HOPES<\/p>\n And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.<\/p>\n Luk 16:30-31<\/p>\n We may profitably consider what this means in its application to our own life. Such a warning is evidently meant to remind us that the mystery of sin in human life is not to be got rid of by any such reliance on vague hopes.<\/p>\n I. This mystery of sin in the heart and life, misleading, weakening, dragging us down, means in fact the subtle, poisonous, creeping power which evil inclinations exercise over a weak and depraved will. Are we, then, to trust to some sudden visitation from above, for which we make no preparation, to break down or overthrow a power of this kind? On the contrary, the words of this parable stand here to declare to us that it is nothing less than perversity and folly in any man to go on either defiling his nature, or degrading it, or even neglecting to strengthen and support it, under this delusion that some day the breath of heaven will sweep it clean or give it new vigour.<\/p>\n II. Instead of vaguely trusting to the hope of what some future call or help or happy visitation may do for us, let us obey the Divine injunction, which, when rightly understood, is very pressing, urging us, as we hope to see good days, to be very jealous of our present life and its tendencies; let us do this, standing always firm and immovable in the things that are pure and of good report.<\/p>\n III. At present we know that the way of Christ is still open before us, and that He calls us with a voice which never grows weary; but we feel equally that the future is dark, if we waste or misuse the present, and we do not know how long the heavenward path may be as open, or as easy, as it is to-day. For the question is not a question of Gods untiring patience or the never-failing love of Christ. The question is rather, whether it is not folly to expect that God will send upon us some other more powerful regenerating and strengthening influence, if we are now neglecting all this care and love and patient striving on our behalf.<\/p>\n Bishop Percival.<\/p>\n (SECOND OUTLINE)<\/p>\n THE TESTIMONY OF SCRIPTURE<\/p>\n To gather clearly the force of these words, you must carry in your minds that Moses and the Prophets comprised the whole Bible, as it then existed, for the canon of the New Testament was not then formed. It is the same as if he had said, If they do not believe the Bible, neither would they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.<\/p>\n And now, what is the argument?<\/p>\n I. It is the great general truth that every man has provided for him, and within his grasp, all that is necessary for his salvation. It is certain that we are all of us often disposed to speculate, and to indulge fancies, and even to judge, and practically to blame, God in this matter. We think, If God had but dealt with me as I have seen Him deal with other persons, how much more religious I should have been than I am now! Many are actually waiting at this moment for some such thing as that.<\/p>\n II. Does not the Spirit draw you now?Is not the truth that you now know, larger than the truth that you obey? and, therefore, is not it all that you, at this moment, could bear? Are you not painfully conscious that if you would but act out the convictions given you, you would soon become a better man? Are not you perfectly aware that every good gift we have would increase, if only we exercised it? It is a very ignorant and foolish thought which those have who think that outward circumstances can do much for the soul of man! The worst circumstances cannot really hinder you, and the best cannot truly improve you! There is nothing but gracesovereign, omnipotent grace, that can ever touch a mans heart. A miracle, without grace, can do nothing, and grace, without a miracle, can do everything.<\/p>\n III. What are the means by which grace acts?And the answer is The Bible. If they hear not Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. Do not doubt, but earnestly believe, that each time you peruse the Bible, God has some new special message which He is speaking to your soul. Let this be the attitude of your open, eager, waiting mind, Speak, Lord, for Thy servant heareth. In this way you will hear Moses and the Prophets, yet not them, but Him who sent them.<\/p>\n Rev. James Vaughan.<\/p>\n 0<\/p>\n The object the rich man thought of accomplishing was the repentance of his brethren. The evidence shows that here was a family of the prosperous ranks of society, abusing their wealth and being unconcerned about the less fortunate ones.<\/p>\n Luk 16:30. Nay, father Abraham. This scarcely means: they will not hear them, but rather, Nay, but make the matter more sure. The advocate of more decided spiritual manifestations is a lost and still impenitent soul, without real discernment as to the best means of grace.<\/p>\n As if he had said, they have always had Moses and the prophets in their hands, but yet their hearts remain impenitent; but if a special messenger be sent to them from the dead, this will not fail to awaken them, and bring them to repentance. <\/p>\n Learn hence, how prone we are to dislike God’s method and means which he has appointed for reclaiming us from our sins, and imagine some methods of our own would be more successful. The scriptures read, the word preached, the sacraments administered; these are the ordinary means which the wisdom of God has appointed for men’s conviction; and if we think a messenger from the dead would be a more conducible means, the next verse will confute us, and thoroughly satisfy us, that whom the scripture convinces not, probably nothing will; for thus it follows:<\/p>\n Luk 16:30-31. And he said, Nay, father Abraham, &c. He answered, that the writings of Moses and the prophets had proved ineffectual to himself, and he feared would be so to his brethren; but that they would certainly change their sentiments, and reform their lives, if one actually appeared to them from the dead. It is uncertain, says Dr. Macknight, whether the rich man, by one from the dead, meant an apparition, or a resurrection. His words are capable of either sense: yet the quality of the persons to whom this messenger was to be sent, makes it more probable that he meant an apparition. For, without doubt, the character Josephus gives us of the Jews in high life, namely, that they were generally Sadducees, was applicable to those brethren; so that, disbelieving the existence of souls in a separate state, nothing more was necessary, in the opinion of their brother, to convince them, than that they should see a real apparition, or spirit from the invisible world. And he said, If they hear not Moses, &c. Abraham tells the rich man, that if they did not hearken to Moses and the prophets, neither would they be persuaded to a thorough repentance and reformation, though a person should come back from the dead to visit them: for though such an event might indeed alarm them for a time, the same prejudices and lusts, which had led them to despise or disregard those methods of instruction which God had afforded them, would also lead them, ere long, to slight and neglect such an awful appearance as he desired they might see. If it be objected here, that Moses nowhere expressly asserts a future state of rewards and punishments, it may be replied, that the facts recorded by him strongly enforce the natural arguments in proof of it; and the prophets speak plainly of it in many places. Bishops Atterbury and Sherlock have shown clearly and fully the justness of Abrahams assertion here, in their excellent discourses on this text, which well deserve the attentive perusal of every professor of Christianity. The impenitence of many who saw another Lazarus raised from the dead, (Joh 11:46,) and the wickedness of the soldiers who were eye-witnesses to the resurrection of Christ, and yet, that very day, suffered themselves to be hired to bear a false testimony against it, (Mat 28:4; Mat 28:15,) are most affecting and astonishing illustrations of this truth; for each of these miracles was far more convincing than such an appearance as is here referred to would have been. Doddridge. Certainly, if men be so immersed in vice and wickedness as to be inattentive to the evidences of a future state, which God has already afforded them by the inspired writings; or, if they be careless about such a state, they would, for the same reasons, reject all other means whatsoever, which God might make use of for their conviction and reformation. Reader, put thy own heart to the trial: dost thou really believe the awful representation of future things given in this parable by him who is ordained judge of the living and dead? Dost thou really believe that a life of sin and voluptuousness; of worldly-mindedness, love of pleasure, honour, or profit, will assuredly bring thy soul to the place of torment, where a drop of water is not to be had? If thou dost believe this, what madness is it to continue one moment in such a state, and to have less regard for thy own most precious soul, than a damned spirit had for the souls of his relations! But if thou believe not, what thinkest thou would persuade thee of the truth? Would it convince thee, were the request of the rich man on behalf of his brethren granted thee, and one came from the dead to testify to thee these dreadful truths? Do not mistake the matter: if thou dost not believe upon the abundant evidence already given, sufficient to convince any reasonable thinking man, whose eyes are not entirely blinded by worldly lusts and pleasures, neither wouldest thou be persuaded though a spirit came back from the dead to warn thee. Abraham assures the rich man, that if the writings of Moses and the prophets, though far less clear and explicit on the subject of a future state than the Scriptures of the New Testament, did not convince his brethren of the reality of it, they world not be persuaded though one rose from the dead; how much more, then, may we assert, that a persons coming from the dead would not persuade those who resist the much greater evidence with which we are favoured since life and immortality have been brought to light by the gospel. If men regard not the public revelation, which has been confirmed by miracles, and the evident accomplishment of a variety of prophecies, neither would they be influenced by a private testimony given to themselves: for, 1st, A messenger from the dead could say no more than what is said in the Scriptures, nor say it with more authority. 2d, There would be much more reason to suspect an event of that kind to be a delusion than to suspect the Scriptures to be so; and those that are infidels in the one case would certainly be so in the other. 3d, The same strength of depravity that resists the convictions of the written word, would certainly triumph over those produced by a witness from the dead. 4th, The Scripture is now Gods ordinary way of making known his mind to us, and a way perfectly sufficient; and it would be presumption for us to prescribe any other; nor have we any ground to expect or pray for the grace of God to accompany or bless any other way, when that is rejected and set aside. Let us, then, not desire or look for any other, but be wise, and pay a greater deference than we have done to the exceeding goodness of our God, for having given us so clear a revelation of his will in the blessed Scriptures, and so plainly marked out before us the way to future felicity and glory! Let us well consider the foundation on which those Scriptures stand, and take them for our guide, assured that their authority is divine, and their instructions all- sufficient. From them let us, as reasonable men, as men peculiarly favoured with so inestimable a treasure from the great King of heaven; from them let us weigh in the balance of true reason the gains of time and eternity: let us put into one scale the enjoyment of all our hearts could wish upon earth, and in the other the suffering of unutterable and everlasting misery: and how light will the scale of earthly happiness be to that of endless torment! Let us put into one scale the denial of all our evil affections, nay, and a life of poverty and suffering; and in the other the gain of everlasting felicity; and how light, how very light, will all the sufferings of time be to the exquisite joys and glories of eternity. See Dodds Discourses on the Miracles and Parables. <\/p>\n And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. Nay – No. They will not hear Moses and the prophets. They have heard them so long in vain, that there is no prospect now that they will attend to the message; but if one should go … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 16:30”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25632","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25632"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25632\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25632"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
3. We are also informed, that men shall be punished hereafter for their worldly-mindedness, and heedlessness with respect to religious matter; for being immersed in pleasures, and for not using their riches aright, as well as for crimes of a grosser nature. In which view, it affords a fit caution to all the great and rich, to beware of the rocks on which they are most apt to split. This great man, who fell into the flames of hell, is not charged with murder, adultery, injustice, oppression, or lying; he is not even charged with being remarkably uncharitable. Lazarus lay commonly at his gate, and got his maintenance there, such as it was, or he would not have been laid there daily; nor would the rich man have desired Abraham to send him with a drop of water to cool his tongue, <\/em>had he not imagined that gratitude would prompt him to undertake the office with cheerfulness. The rich man’s sin, therefore, was his living in luxury and pleasure: which made him, on the one hand, neglect religion, for the cultivating of which he had the best opportunities; and, on the other, cherish atheistical principles, particularly such as flow from believing the mortality of the soul. If so, all who resemble this person in his character, should take warning by his punishment; nor delude themselves with the thought, that because they live free from the more scandalous vices, they shall escape damnation. <\/p>\n
Lastly, we may observe from this parable, that if the evidences of a future state already proposed, do not persuade men, they will not be persuaded by any extraordinary evidences which can be afforded, consistently with the freedom requisite to render them accountable for their actions. The truth is, we do not call the reality of a future state in question, either because it is not demonstrated by sufficient arguments, or because we are not able to comprehend them. Every man has within his own breast that which leadeth him to the acknowledgment of this grand, this fundamental doctrine of religion;a certain foreboding of immortality, which it is not in his power ever to banish. But, being addicted to sin, on account of the present pleasures attending it, we vehemently wish that there were no future state; and in consequence of these wishes, we will not allow ourselves to weigh the arguments offered on its behalf; and so at length come to work ourselves into an actual disbelief of it. Or, if the truth proving too hard for us, should constrain our assent, the habit of yielding to our passions which we labour under, has influence sufficient to make us act contrary to our convictions. Wherefore, though the evidence of a future state was more clear and forcible than it is, men might hinder themselves from seeing it, just as they hinder themselves from seeing the evidence by which it is at present supported. In a word, the proofs of the soul’s immortality have always, through the grace of God, been sufficient to persuade those who have any candour or desire after goodness; and to demand more is unreasonable, because, though it were given, it might prove ineffectual. If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. <\/em>Accordingly, Abraham’s assertion is verified by daily experience: for they who look on all that the eternal Son of God (who actually rose from the dead<\/em>) has said concerning the punishments of the damned, as so many idle tales, would pay little regard to any thing that could be told them, even by a person risen from the dead. <\/p>\n
4. The rich man also died, and was buried. <\/em>Probably his funeral was pompous, as his living was grand. A noble tomb received the corpse, and spices and perfumes made the clods of the valley sweet unto him; while perhaps charity wept on the monument, and the flattering marble proclaimed his munificence, liberality, and all the virtues that ever yet adorned man. How vain this pageantry! to which the body is now insensible: and the soul, alas! whither is it fled? In hell he lifted up his eyes, being in torments, <\/em>the just punishment of his abused affluence: and now how changed are circumstances! He seeth with astonishment Abraham afar off, <\/em>and Lazarus, <\/em>the poor despised Lazarus, in his bosom, <\/em>admitted to this state of high honour and dignity. Note; <\/em>(1.) The misery of the wicked, and the happiness of the just, immediately commence at their death. (2.) Every sight which the damned behold, is aggravating; even the prospects of heaven can only torment them with the views of that glory, into which they must never enter. <\/p>\nFuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Church Pulpit Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"