Verse 29. It rained fire and brimstone<\/B><\/I>] Instead of it<\/I> rained, Ge 19:24<\/span> justifies the insertion of the pronoun he<\/I>, as implied in the verb ; for it is there said that Jehovah rained fire and brimstone from Jehovah out of heaven<\/I>.<\/P> <\/p>\n But the same day Lot went out of Sodom<\/strong>,…. Being plucked and brought from thence by the angels early in the morning; and a fine morning it was; the sun was risen, and shone out upon the earth, as Lot got into Zoar, Ge 19:15<\/span>. “The Jews” i say it was the sixteenth day of Nisan:<\/p>\n it rained fire and brimstone from heaven<\/strong>; the Syriac version reads, “the Lord rained”; so it is said in Ge 19:24<\/span> “the Lord rained from the Lord”; Jehovah the Son, rained from Jehovah the Father; or the word of the Lord, as the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem render it; and which is no inconsiderable proof of the deity of Christ: and the Persic version here reads, “God rained”; and so this amazing shower of fire and brimstone, and which was a violent storm of thunder and lightning, is ascribed to God in<\/p>\n [See comments on 2Pe 2:6]<\/span>. The Hebrew word, , used in<\/p>\n Ge 19:24<\/span> though it is rendered in the Targum of Jonathan,<\/p>\n , and by the Septuagint, ; both which words signify “sulphur”, or brimstone; and which last word is used here, following the Greek version; yet it is observed, by some learned men, that it rather signifies “pitch”, or “rosin”, which proceeds from some sort of trees; and indeed, by its derivation, it seems to signify something belonging to or that comes out of the wood of Gopher, of which the ark was made, Ge 6:14<\/span> which some think to be the pine tree, from whence comes pitch: and this, though it comes from the inside of a tree, may as well be said to be rained from heaven, as brimstone, which is taken out of the bowels of the earth: and the rather, since pitch is sometimes fluid; and especially it being combustible, may be joined with fire, as well as sulphur, or brimstone; though a shower of neither, can be accounted for in an ordinary way, but must be extraordinary and miraculous: the destruction of this city, with others, by fire from heaven, and the lake Asphaltites, being a bituminous and sulphureous one, into which the tract of land they stood upon was converted, are confirmed by the testimonies of Heathen writers; as Tacitus k, Solinus l, Strabo m, Justin n, and Pliny o; as well as by Josephus p, and Philo the Jew q.<\/p>\n And destroyed them all<\/strong>; all the inhabitants of Sodom, and all of Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim; and which was an ensample of the destruction of Jerusalem, and the land of Judea. De 29:23<\/span> and of the burning of the world, and of the perdition of the wicked in hell, 2Pe 2:6<\/span>.<\/p>\n i Bereshit Rabba, sect. 50. fol. 45. 3. k Hist. l. 5. l Polyhistor. c. 48. m Geograph. l. 16. n Histor. l. 36. c. 3. o Nat. Hist. l. 5. c. 16. p Antiqu. l. 1. c. 11. sect. 4. & de Bello Jud. l. 5. c. 21. q De Vita Mosis, l. 2. p. 662.<\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n 1) “But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom,” <\/strong>(he de hemera ekselthen Lot apo Sodomon) “Then on the very same day Lot went out and away from Sodom,” when led out by good and mercy-serving angels, Gen 19:16<\/span>. Lot had lost his testimony and influence over all his family because of his own sins and even his own good name, so that we are warned, “remember Lot, remember Lot’s wife,” Luk 17:32<\/span>.<\/p>\n 2) “It rained fire and brimstone from heaven,” <\/strong>(ebreksen pur kai theion ap ouranous) “it rained both fire and brimstone from the upper heaven region,” 2Pe 2:6<\/span>; Gen 19:24<\/span>.<\/p>\n 3) “And destroyed them all.” <\/strong>(kai apolesen pantas) “And it destroyed all,” all things in that area of the earth, Gen 19:25<\/span>; as an example of God’s abhorrence for sin, and man’s disregard for holy separated living, Jud 1:7<\/span>. All things were destroyed, except Lot and his two daughters, including his wife in her final disobedient act, when she turned back, or looked back, and became a pillar of salt, good for nothing, Gen 19:26<\/span>.<\/p>\n (29) It rained fire and brimstone.<\/strong>The combination of the two Greek words is found in the LXX. version of Gen. 19:24<\/span>, and obviously suggested the like combination here and in Rev. 14:10<\/span>; Rev. 20:13<\/span>; Rev. 21:8<\/span>.<\/p>\n 29<\/strong>. <\/strong> Rained fire and brimstone<\/em> A terrible likeness of a flaming fire, <\/em> described, in 2Th 1:8<\/span>, as attending the Second Coming <\/em> of the Son of man.<\/p>\n Passages belonging to the Olivet discourse<\/em>, (Matthew 24, 25<\/span>,) furnished by a fourth reporter, <\/em> 31-37.<\/p>\n Luk 17:31-33<\/span> belong after Mat 24:16<\/span>, and apply to Jerusalem’s destruction. Luk 17:34-36<\/span> are to be identified with Mat 24:40-41<\/span>, and apply to the Second Advent. See our notes on the passages in Matthew.<\/p>\n 29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them<\/em> all. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n Ver. 29. But the same day<\/strong> ] A fair sunshine morning had a foul dismal evening. Nescis quid serus vesper vehat.<\/em> Thou knowest not what a great bellied day may bring forth. Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.<\/em> Think every day thy last day. (Horat.) <\/p>\n 29.<\/strong> ] <\/strong> ,<\/strong> impersonal, not . That such an expression as is used Mat 5:45<\/span> , is no proof that when is used impersonally the sacred name is to be supplied.<\/p>\n Luk 17:31 refers immediately to the example of Sodom just related. In Mat 24:16-18 it finds its place by a reference to the destruction of Jerusalem, see there.<\/p>\n Luk 17:29<\/span> . ( ): an old poetic word used in late Greek for , to rain. is the modern Greek for rain ( vide<\/em> Mat 5:45<\/span> ).<\/p>\n of = from. Greek. apo. App-104. <\/p>\n from. Greek. apo. App-104. <\/p>\n destroyed. Greek. apollumi. Compare Luk 4:34. &c. <\/p>\n 29.] , impersonal, not . That such an expression as is used Mat 5:45, is no proof that when is used impersonally the sacred name is to be supplied.<\/p>\n Luk 17:31 refers immediately to the example of Sodom just related. In Mat 24:16-18 it finds its place by a reference to the destruction of Jerusalem, see there.<\/p>\n Gen 19:16-25, Deu 29:23-25, Isa 1:9, Isa 13:19, Jer 50:40, Hos 11:8, Amo 4:11, Zep 2:9, Mat 11:23, Mat 11:24, 2Pe 2:6, Jud 1:7, Rev 11:8 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Gen 4:17 – and he Gen 19:24 – the Lord Job 21:13 – They Job 22:20 – the fire Psa 11:6 – Upon Isa 34:9 – General Jer 20:16 – as Rev 20:9 – and fire<\/p>\n 9<\/p>\n From this verse through 32, the Lord is speaking of the destruction of Jerusalem. He is making the point that, when the evidences of that event are apparent, the disciples should lose no time in “fleeing to the mountains” (Mat 24:16), because there would not be much more time for escape. As an argument on that point, he states that the raining of fire on Sodom came the same day that Lot escaped from the city.<\/p>\n But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed [them] all. Verse 29. It rained fire and brimstone] Instead of it rained, Ge 19:24 justifies the insertion of the pronoun he, as implied in the verb ; for it is there said that Jehovah rained … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 17:29”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25662","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25662"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25662\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25662"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"