{"id":25688,"date":"2022-09-24T11:14:22","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T16:14:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-luke-1818\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T11:14:22","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T16:14:22","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-luke-1818","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-luke-1818\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 18:18"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 18-30. <\/strong> The Great Refusal. The Young Ruler who loved Riches more than Christ.<\/p>\n<p><strong> 18<\/strong>. <em> a certain ruler<\/em> ] St Matthew (<span class='bible'>Mat 19:20<\/span>) only calls him &ldquo;a young man.&rdquo; He was probably the young and wealthy ruler of a synagogue. The touch added by St Mark (<span class='bible'>Luk 10:17<\/span>), that he suddenly ran up and fell on his knees before Him, seems to imply that he was eager to catch the opportunity of speaking to Jesus before He started on a journey, probably the journey from the Peraean Bethany, beyond Jordan (<span class='bible'>Joh 10:41-42<\/span>), to the Bethany near Jerusalem, to raise Lazarus.<\/p>\n<p><em> Good Master<\/em> ] This title was an impropriety, almost an impertinence; for the title &lsquo;good&rsquo; was never addressed to Rabbis by their pupils. Therefore to address Jesus thus was to assume a tone almost of patronage. Moreover, as the young Ruler did not look on Jesus as divine, it was to assume a false standpoint altogether.<\/p>\n<p><em> what shall I do to inherit eternal life?<\/em> ] In St Matthew the question runs, &lsquo;what <em> good<\/em> thing shall I do?&rsquo; Here, again, the young ruler betrays a false standpoint, as though &lsquo;eternal life&rsquo; were to be won by quantitative works, or by some single act of goodness, by <em> doing<\/em> and not by <em> being.<\/em> It was indeed the fundamental error of his whole class. <span class='bible'>Rom 9:32<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:18-30<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p><strong>The rich youths address to Christ<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>THE FAVOURABLE TRAITS OF CHARACTER EXHIBITED IN THE QUESTION PROPOSED BY THIS YOUNG MAN. <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> The question itself was of supreme importance. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> The question was a personal one. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> The question was put at an interesting period of life. <\/p>\n<p><strong>4.<\/strong> The question was put by one who possessed an abundance of riches.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5.<\/strong> The question was put with feelings of great modesty and respect. <\/p>\n<p><strong>6.<\/strong> The question was put with great sincerity and earnestness of spirit.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>THE DEFECTS WHICH WERE ELICITED BY THE SAVIOUR. <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> He evidently expected salvation by the works of the law. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> He was held in bondage by one reigning idol. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> He was unwilling to yield to the extensive requirements of the Saviour. <\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>THE LESSONS WHICH HIS HISTORY FURNISHES. <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> The exceeding deceitfulness of earthly riches. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> That we may go far in religious practices, and yet not be saved. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> We are in great danger from spiritual deception. <\/p>\n<p><strong>4.<\/strong> Religion requires a total surrender of ourselves to God. (<em>J. Burns, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Thou knowest the commandments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Keep the commandments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>INQUIRE INTO THE DESIGN WITH WHICH OUR SAVIOUR SPOKE THESE WORDS. His aim was to expose ignorance, self-righteousness, and insincerity, in one whom the spectators were doubtless admiring for his apparent devotion. <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> The man was ignorant of Christs real character. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> He expected life as the reward of his own merit. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> He was not sincerely willing to sacrifice anything for the kingdom of heavens sake. <\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>ENDEAVOUR TO PROMOTE A SIMILAR DESIGN BY A FAITHFUL APPLICATION OF THEM TO OURSELVES. If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. These words, duly considered, may&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> Convince us of sin. There is no doubt, that we ought to keep the commandments. But, have we done so? <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> Drive us to Christ as a Refuge. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> Guide the steps of the justified believer. The curse of the law it at an end&#8211;not its obligation. (<em>J. Jowett, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Yet lackest thou one thing<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>One weak spot<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When Jesus tells us that we cannot be His disciples so long as we lack one thing, does He mean that we must have supplied every moral defect, must have attained every grace, must have vanquished every spiritual enemy, and, in fact, have ceased to sin, before we can be His disciples? That would be simply saying that none of us can hope to be a Christian unless he is morally perfect; and that of course involves the converse, that every true Christian is thus morally perfect, The shock this statement gives to our common sense, and its manifest contradiction of the whole drift of the New Testament, at once drives us from any such interpretation. We find a consistent meaning, I suppose, if we understand Him as declaring that no heart is really Christianized, or converted, so long as there is any one conscious, deliberate, or intentional reservation from entire obedience to the Divine will. So that if I say, Here is one particular sin which I must continue to practise; all the rest of my conduct I freely conform to Gods law, but this known wrong I must continue to do&#8211;then I am no Christian. If you single out some one chosen indulgence, however secret&#8211;a dubious custom in business, a fault of the tongue or temper&#8211;and, placing y our hand over that, reply to the all-searching commandment of the Most High, This I cannot let go; this is too sweet to me, or too profitable to me, or too tightly inter woven with my constitutional predilections, or too hard to be put off&#8211;then the quality of a disciple is not in you. There is a portion of your being which you do not mean, or try, to consecrate to heaven. And that single persistent offence vitiates the whole character. It keeps you, as a man, as a whole man, on the self side or world-side, and away from Christs side. For it not only shuts off righteousness from one district of your nature, and so abridges the quantity of your life, but it inflicts the much more radical damage of denying the supremacy of the law of righteousness, and thus corrupts the quality. It practically rejects the heavenly rule when that rule crosses the private inclination. And that is the essence of rebellion. (<em>Bishop F. D. Huntington.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The test-point<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When Jesus spoke thus of one thing fatally lacking to the Jewish ruler, He spoke to us all. But with this difference: that one subtle passion which spoils the whole character for us may not be his passion. With him it seems to have been avarice; he could not bear to turn his private property into public charity. His religion broke down just there: in other respects he had done admirably; he had kept other commandments to the letter&#8211;aye, to the letter; not perhaps in the spirit, for all true obedience has one spirit. But so far his literal, formal obedience came, and there gave out. But then you may happen to be so constituted that such an abandonment of wealth would be a very small sacrifice&#8211;one of the least that could be required of you; you are not naturally sordid; you are more inclined to be prodigal; and so this would not be a test-point with you. But there is a test-point about you somewhere. Perhaps it is pride; you cannot bear an affront; you will not confess a fault. Perhaps it is personal vanity, ready, to sacrifice everything to display. Perhaps it is a sharp tongue. Perhaps it is some sensual appetite, bent on its unclean gratification. Then you are to gather up your moral forces just here, and till that darling sin is brought under the practical law of Christ, you are shut out from Christs kingdom. I have no right to love anything so well that I cannot give it up for God. God knows where the trial must be applied. And we are to know that wherever it is applied, there is the one thing lacking, unless we can say Thy will be done, and bear it. The gospel does not propose itself as an easy system&#8211;easy in the sense of excusing from duty. Were we not right then, in the ground taken at the outset, that the power of Christianity over the character is proved by the thoroughness of its action rather than by the extent of surface over which its action spreads? It displays its heavenly energy in dislodging the one cherished sin, in breaking down the one entrenched fortress that disputes its sway. At the battle of Borodino, Napoleon saw that there was no such thing as victory till he had carried the great central redoubt on the Russian line. Two hundred guns and the choicest of his battalions were poured against that single point, and when the plumes of his veterans gleamed through the smoke on the highest embrasures of that volcano of shot, he knew the field was won. It matters very little that we do a great many things morally irreproachable, so long as there is one ugly disposition that hangs obstinately hack. It is only when we come to a point of real resistance that we know the victory of faith overcoming the world. Finally, our renewing and redeeming religion delights to reach down to the roots of the sin that curses us, and spread its healing efficacy there. It yearns to yield us the fulness of its blessing; and this it knows it cannot do till it brings the heart under the completeness of its gentle captivity to Christ. Submission first; then peace, and joy, and love. Jesus beholding him, loved him; yet sent him away sorrowing. How tender, and yet how true! tender in the sad affection&#8211;true to the stern unbending sacrifice of the Cross! It is because He would have us completely happy that He requires a complete submission. One thing must not be left lacking. Whosoever would enter into the full strength and joy of a disciple must throw his whole heart upon the altar. (<em>Bishop F. D. Huntington.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>How hardly shall they that have riches enter<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The danger of riches<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Rather, if one asked, What peril have riches? one might ask, What peril have they not? First, then, they are wholly contrary to the life of Christ and His passion. That cannot be the safe, the happy lot, which is in all things most opposite to His. Unlike Him, we must ever here be; for we are sinners, He alone, as man, was holy; we are His creatures, He our God. But can it be safe not to be aiming, herein also, to be less unlike? Can it be safe to choose that which in all its pomp and glory was brought before His eye as man, to be wholly rejected by Him; to choose what He rejected, and shrink back from what He chose? This, then, is the first all-containing peril of riches. They are, in themselves, contrary to the Cross of Christ. I speak not now of what they may be made. As we, being enemies, were, through the Cross, made friends, so may all things, evil and perilous in themselves, except sin, become our friends. The Cross finds us in desolation, and they, He says, have received their consolation; it finds us in evil things, and they are surrounded by their good things; it comes in want, and they have abundance; in distress, and they are at ease; in sorrow, and they are ever tempted even to deaden their sorrows in this worlds miserable joys. Happy only in this, that He who chasteneth whom He loveth, sprinkles His own healthful bitterness over lifes destructive sweetness, and by the very void and emptiness of vanity calls forth the unsatisfied soul no more to spend money on that which is not bread, or its labour on that which satisfieth not. But if it be so hard for the rich to seek to bear the cross, it must be hard for them truly to love Him who bore it. Love longeth to liken itself to that it loves. It is an awful question, my brethren; but how can we love our Lord if we suffer not with Him? <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> Then it is another exceeding peril of riches and ease that they may tend to make us forget that here is not our home, Men on a journey through a strangers, much more an enemys, and linger not. Their hearts are in their home; thither are their eyes set; they love the winds which have blown over it; they love the very hills which look upon it, even while they hide it; days, hours, and minutes pass quickly or slowly as they seem to bring them near to it; distance, time, weariness, strength, all are counted only with a view to this, are they nearer to the faces they love? can they, when shall they reach it? What then, my brethren, if our eyes are not set upon the everlasting hills, whence cometh our help? what if we cherish not those inward breathings which come to us from our heavenly home, hushing, refreshing, restoring, lifting up our hearts, and bidding us flee away and be at rest? What if we are wholly satisfied, and intent on things present? can we be longing for the face of God? or can we love Him whom we long not for? or do we long for Him, if we say not daily, When shall I come and appear before the presence of God? <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> Truly there is not one part of the Christian character which riches, in themselves, do not tend to impair. Our Lord placed at the head of evangelic blessings, poverty of spirit, and, as a help to it and image of it, the outward body of the soul of true poverty, poverty of substance too. <\/p>\n<p>The only riches spoken of in the New Testament, except as a woe, are the unsearchable riches of the glory and grace of Christ, the riches of the goodness of God, the depth of the riches of His wisdom, or the riches of liberality, whereto deep poverty abounded. <\/p>\n<p><strong>4.<\/strong> Poverty is, at least, a fostering nurse of humility, meekness, patience, trust in God, simplicity, sympathy with the sufferings of our Lord or of its fellow (for it knows the heart of those who suffer). What when riches, in themselves, hinder the very grace of mercifulness which seems their especial grace, of which they are the very means? What wonder that they cherish that brood of snakes, pride, arrogance, self-pleasing, self-indulgence, self-satisfaction, trust in self, forgetfulness of God, sensuality, luxury, spiritual sloth, when they deaden the heart to the very sorrows they should relieve? And yet it is difficult, unless, through self-discipline, we feel some suffering, to sympathize with those who suffer. Fulness of bread deadens love. As a rule, the poor show more mercy to the poor out of their poverty, than the rich out of their abundance. But if it be a peril to <em>have <\/em>riches, much more is it to <em>seek <\/em>them. To have them is a trial allotted to any of us by God; to seek them is our own. Through trials which He has given us He will guide us; but where has He promised to help us in what we bring upon ourselves? In all this I have not spoken of any grosser sins to which the love of money gives birth: of what all fair men would condemn, yet which, in some shape or other, so many practise. Such are, hardness to the poor or to dependents; using a brothers services for almost nought, in order to have more to spend in luxury; petty or more grievous frauds; falsehood, hard dealing, taking advantage one of another, speaking evil of one another, envying one another, forgetting natural affection. And yet in this Christian land many of these are very common. Holy Scripture warns us all not to think ourselves out of danger of them. (<em>E. B. Pusey, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The deceitfulness of riches<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Notice the deceitfulness of all kinds of riches. Riches may corrupt the very simplest of you. Take care. How many men have received hold of the gallows and hanged themselves just through the deceitfulness of riches. We could trace the history of many a man, and see how he died in the bank, that great mortuary. The man began simply, and was a right genial soul. He brought with him morning light and fresh air wherever he came; and as for cases of poverty, his hand knew the way to his pocket so well that he could find that pocket in the dark. As for religious services, he was there before the door was opened. He never thought the Sabbath day too long. He loved the sanctuary, and was impatient until the gates were opened unto him. He even went to the weekevening services. But then he was only a working man, and only working men should go out into the night air! What does it matter about a few working men being killed by the east wind? The man whose course we are tracing doubled his income and multiplied it by five, and then doubled it again, and then found that he must give up the prayer-meeting. Certainly. Then he proceeded to double his income, and then he gave up the Sunday evening service. There was a draught near where he sat, or there was some person in the third pew from his the appearance of whom he could not bear. How dainty my lord is becoming! Oh, what a nostril he has for evil savour! He will leave presently altogether. He will not abruptly leave, but he will simply not come back again, which really means practically the same thing. He will attend in the morning, and congratulate the poor miserable preacher on the profit of the service. Did he mean to do this when he began to get a little wealthier? Not he. Is he the same man he used to be! No. Is he nearer Christ? He is a million universes away from Christ. He is killed by wealth. He trusted in it, misunderstood, misapplied it. It is not wealth that has ruined him, but his misconception of the possible uses of wealth. He might have been the leader of the Church. There was a lady, whose husbands personalty was sworn at millions, who was unable to attend one of the ladies meetings organized for the purpose of making garments for the poor, and she said that she could no longer attend, and therefore her subscription would lapse. Let it lapse. If it were a case in connection with this Church I would not have named it. It is because distance of space and time enable me to refer to it without identification that I point the moral, and say that where such wealth is, or such use of wealth, there is rottenness of soul. (<em>J. Parker, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>You cannot take your riches with you into the kingdom if you are going to trust in them<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If you are going to offer them to Christ and sanctify them to His use, let us know of it. You cannot bring your intellectual pride with you. If you are going to consecrate your intellect to the study of the profoundest mysteries, if you are going to cultivate the child-like spirit&#8211;for the greater the genius the greater the modesty&#8211;bring it all! You can bring with you nothing of the nature of patronage to Christ. It is because He has so little, He has so much; because He is so weak, He is so strong. You cannot compliment Him: He lies beyond the range of eulogy. We reach Him by His own way&#8211;sacrifice, self-immolation, transformation. A great mystery, outside of words and all their crafty uses, but a blessed, conscious, spiritual experience. Blessed are those to whom that experience is a reality. (<em>J. Parker, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who, then, can be saved?<\/strong><em>&#8212;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Who, then, can be saved?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The difficulties of salvation, however, do not arise from the want of power in God, for nothing is too hard for Him; He can as easily save a world as He could at first create one. Nor does it arise from any want of sufficiency in Christ, for He is able to save to the uttermost them that come unto God by Him; yes, to the uttermost of our desires and necessities, and in the last extremity. The difficulties therefore arise from the nature of salvation itself, and our sinful aversion to It. <\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>LET US NOTICE MORE PARTICULARLY SOME OF THE DIFFICULTIES IN THE WAY OF OUR SALVATION. <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> The truths to be believed are some of them very mysterious, and, as Peter says, Hard to be understood. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> The sacrifices to be made are also in some degree painful. That which cost our Saviour so much must surely cost us something. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> The dispositions to be exercised are such as are contrary to the natural bias of our depraved hearts. <\/p>\n<p><strong>4.<\/strong> The duties to be performed. Is there no difficulty more especially in renouncing a customary or constitutional evil, and keeping ourselves from our own iniquity? <\/p>\n<p><strong>5.<\/strong> The trouble and danger to which religion exposes its professors. <\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>ATTEMPT TO ANSWER THE INQUIRY IN OUR TEXT. Who, then, can be saved? If men were left to themselves, either in a natural or renewed state, and if God were not to work, or to withhold His hand after He had begun to work, none would be saved, no, not one. <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> Such shall be saved as are appointed to it. Of some it is said, God hath chosen them to salvation, through sanctification of the Spirit, and belief of the truth. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> Those shall be saved who are truly desirous of it. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> Those who come to Christ for salvation shall be sure to obtain it. <\/p>\n<p><strong>4.<\/strong> Such as endure to the end shall be saved. (<em>B. Beddome, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lo, we have left all and followed Thee<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The happiness of self-denial<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>SELF-DENIAL IS TO BE EXPLAINED. <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> In the first place, it does not consist in giving up one temporal and personal good for a greater temporal and personal good. For this is self-gratifying instead of self-denying. Any entirely selfish person would be willing to do this. One man will sacrifice his property to gratify his ambition, which he esteems a greater good. Another man will sacrifice his property to gratify his appetite, which he esteems a greater good. Another will sacrifice his property to gratify his revenge, which he esteems a greater good. But none of these persons, in these cases, exercise the least self-denial. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> Nor, secondly, does self-denial consist in giving up a less temporal and personal good for a greater personal and eternal good. The most corrupt and selfish men in the world are willing to give up any or all their temporal and personal interests for the sake of obtaining future and eternal happiness. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> But, thirdly and positively, self-denial consists in giving up our own good for the good of others. Such self-denial stands in direct contrariety to selfishness. <\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>TRUE SELF-DENIAL IS PRODUCTIVE OF THE HIGHEST PRESENT AND FUTURE HAPPINESS. This will appear if we consider&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> The nature of true self-denial. It consists, as we have seen, in giving up a less private or personal good for a greater public good; or in giving up our own good for the greater good of others. And this necessarily implies disinterested benevolence, which is placing our own happiness in the greater happiness of others. When a man gives up his own happiness to promote the greater happiness of another, he does it freely and voluntarily, because he takes more pleasure in the greater good of another than in a less good of his own. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> Those who have denied themselves the most have found the greatest happiness resulting from their self denial. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> The great and precious promises which are expressly made to self denial by Christ Himself. <\/p>\n<p>Conclusion: <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> It appears, then, that self-denial is necessarily a term or condition of salvation. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> It appears, also, that the doctrine cannot be carried too far. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> If Christianity requires men to exercise true self denial, then the Christian religion is not a gloomy, but a joyful, religion. It affords a hundredfold more happiness than any other religion can afford. <\/p>\n<p><strong>4.<\/strong> It appears from the nature of that self-denial which the gospel requires that the more sinners become acquainted with the gospel, the more they are disposed to hate it and reject it. All sinners are lovers of their own selves, and regard their own good supremely and solely, and the good of others only so far as it tends to promote their own private, personal, and selfish good. <\/p>\n<p><strong>5.<\/strong> It appears from the nature of that self-denial which the gospel requires why sinners are more willing to embrace any false scheme of religion than the true. (<em>N. Emmons, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Christian discipleship<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>TO BE THE FOLLOWERS OF THE SAVIOUR, IS TO SUSTAIN A CHARACTER OF HIGH AND ESSENTIAL IMPORTANCE. <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> We cannot hold this relationship to the Son of God without believing the testimony given concerning Him, in the Scriptures. <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> Believing in Christ, we must be excited to a practical obedience to His commands, and an imitation of the excellences displayed as an example to man. <\/p>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> That same principle of faith will excite also to public profession of the Saviours name, and active exertion in His cause. <\/p>\n<p><strong>4.<\/strong> Combine in your own characters the principles and the conduct to which we have now adverted. Believe on the Son of God; give an obedience to His perceptive will, and imitate the excellences He displayed; profess publicly that you will be His, and be active and zealous in the promotion of His designs; and then will you indeed and honourably be among those who follow Him. <\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>THAT IN SUSTAINING THIS CHARACTER, PAINFUL SACRIFICES MUST OFTEN BE MADE. Sacrifices for the names sake of the Son of God are justified and called for, by reasons which might be expanded in very extensive illustration. Remember for whom they are made. For whom? For Him who built the fabric of the universe, and over whose wondrous creation the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy. For whom? For Him who is the brightness of the Fathers glory, and the express image of His person, in whom dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. For whom? For Him who was rich, but for your sakes became poor, etc. Remember for what these sacrifices are made. They are made for the enjoyment of peace of conscience. They are made for a restoration to the image and the friendship of God. They are made for the refinement and ennobling of the nature. It is to be observed again&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>THAT PRESENT SACRIFICES IN THE CAUSE, AND AS THE FOLLOWERS OF THE SAVIOUR, ARE TO ISSUE IN A GLORIOUS REWARD. <\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> The Saviour promises advantage to be possessed in the present life. In following Christ, we are blessed with repose of conscience; we are exalted to fellowship with God; we are endowed with capacities for improving in the knowledge of mysteries, identified with the highest welfare of our being; we become the companions of the excellent of the earth, and the innumerable company of angels; we are urged to a rapid increase in the graces which dignify the character, and are a pledge of the sublimity of the final destiny; we are supplied with strong consolation for sorrow, and firm support for death; and prospects are opened which stretch away to the immensities of immortality. Are not these a hundredfold? Here is the pearl of great price: and well may we resolve to be as the merchant, and sell or forsake all we have, and buy it! <\/p>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> The Saviour promises advantage to be possessed in the life to come. It is a wise regulation in the decisions of Providence, that our chief reward is reserved for another state of existence. The Almighty intends that, in this world, our lives shall be those of trial; and that the stability of our graces should be proved, by the rigid and sometimes painful discipline to which we are exposed. (<em>J. Parsons.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Christian relationships<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Homes, parents, brethren, wives, children, are things to be desired, because they call forth the highest and purest affections, the exercise of which sheds abroad in the heart the highest and sweetest human joy and satisfaction. Now a mans conversion to the faith of Christ, though it at times, perhaps almost always, estranged him from a heathen home and family, gave him another home, and a far wider family, attached to him in far firmer and closer, and withal more holy bonds, and these were brethren and sisters, fathers and mothers in Christ. The exercise of purified love and affection, and, we may add, reverence towards these, would diffuse through his heart a far holier and deeper joy than he had ever experienced in his former unholy heathen state. Take, for instance, the last chapter of the Epistle to the Romans; look at the number of Christians to whom the apostle sent salutation. In no one case were these salutations a mere heartless form. In every case they were accompanied by the overflow of Christian love, by memories of how they had laboured and suffered together in the same holy cause; in most cases, perhaps, they were the greetings of a father to his children in the faith. What a sea of satisfaction and holy joy does all this disclose! And so it was, though, of course, in different degrees, and under various forms, with every Christian who had given up any worldly advantage for Christs sake. (<em>M. F. Sadler.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> Verse <span class='bible'>18. &#8211; 23<\/span>. <I><B>A certain ruler<\/B><\/I>] See the case of this person largely explained on <span class='bible'>Mt 19:16-22<\/span>, and <span class='bible'>Mr 10:21-22<\/span>.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>We have met with this story at large, <span class='bible'>Mat 19:16-26<\/span>; and with (if not the same) very like to it. <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17-27<\/span>. See Poole on &#8220;<span class='bible'>Mat 19:16<\/span>&#8220;, and following verses to <span class='bible'>Mat 19:26<\/span>. See Poole on &#8220;<span class='bible'>Mar 10:17<\/span>&#8220;, and following verses to <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17<\/span>. The history is of great use to us. <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.85em;text-indent: -0.85em\"> 1. To show how far a man may go, that yet is a great way short of a truly good and spiritual state. He may know that nothing in this life will make him perfectly happy. He may desire eternal life, and salvation. He may go a great way in keeping the commandments of God, as to the letter of them. He may come to the ministers of the gospel to be further instructed. But herein he will fail, he will not come to Christ that he may have life, but fancy he should do something meritorious of it; he doth not aright understand the law, and that there is no going to heaven that way, but by the perfect observation of it, and therefore fancies himself in a much better state than he is. <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.85em;text-indent: -0.85em\"> 2. It instructs us in this, that there is no coming to heaven by works, but by a full and perfect obedience to the whole revealed will of God. <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.85em;text-indent: -0.85em\"> 3. That every hypocrite hath some lust or other, in which he cannot deny himself. This rulers lust was his immoderate love of the world, and the things thereof. <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.85em;text-indent: -0.85em\"> 4. That it is a mighty difficult thing for any persons, but especially such as have great possessions on earth, to get to heaven. <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.85em;text-indent: -0.85em\"> 5. As difficult and almost impossible as it may appear to men, yet nothing is impossible with God. He can change the heart of the rich, and incline it to himself; as well as the, heart of the poor. The rich man hath more impediments; but be men rich or poor, without the powerful influence of God upon the heart, without his free grace, no soul will be saved. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>And a certain ruler asked him<\/strong>,&#8230;. A young man,<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Mt 19:20<\/span> a ruler among the Jews, a civil magistrate, and a very rich man; he ran after Jesus, and overtook him in the way, as he was going towards Jericho, <span class='bible'>Mr 10:17<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>saying, good master<\/strong>; &#8220;Rabbi&#8221;; or doctor,<\/p>\n<p><strong>what shall I do to inherit eternal life<\/strong>?<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>[See comments on Mt 19:16]<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">Riches a Spiritual Hindrance.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border-top: none;border-bottom: 1px solid #ffffff;border-left: none;border-right: none;padding: 0in;font-style: normal;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <BR> <\/P> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-style: normal;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <BR> <\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR> <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 18 And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? &nbsp; 19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none <I>is<\/I> good, save one, <I>that is,<\/I> God. &nbsp; 20 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother. &nbsp; 21 And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up. &nbsp; 22 Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me. &nbsp; 23 And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich. &nbsp; 24 And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful, he said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! &nbsp; 25 For it is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. &nbsp; 26 And they that heard <I>it<\/I> said, Who then can be saved? &nbsp; 27 And he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God. &nbsp; 28 Then Peter said, Lo, we have left all, and followed thee. &nbsp; 29 And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or wife, or children, for the kingdom of God&#8217;s sake, &nbsp; 30 Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; In these verses we have,<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I. Christ&#8217;s discourse with a ruler, that had a good mind to be directed by him in the way to heaven. In which we may observe,<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1. It is a blessed sight to see persons of distinction in the world distinguish themselves from others of their rank by their concern about their souls and another life. Luke takes notice of it that he was a <I>ruler.<\/I> Few of the rulers had any esteem for Christ, but here was one that had; whether a church or state ruler does not appear, but he was one <I>in authority.<\/I><\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2. The great thing we are every one of us concerned to enquire after is what we shall do to get to heaven, <I>what we shall do to inherit eternal life.<\/I> This implies such a belief of an eternal life after this as atheists and infidels have not, such a concern to make it sure as a careless unthinking world have not, and such a willingness to comply with any terms that it may be made sure as those have not who are resolvedly devoted to the world and the flesh.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3. Those who would inherit eternal life must apply themselves to Jesus Christ as their <I>Master,<\/I> their <I>teaching<\/I> Master, so it signifies here (<I><B>didaskale<\/B><\/I>), and their <I>ruling<\/I> Master, and so they shall certainly find him. There is no learning the way to heaven but in the school of Christ, by those that enter themselves into it, and continue in it.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4. Those who come to Christ as their Master must believe him to have not only a <I>divine mission,<\/I> but a <I>divine goodness.<\/I> Christ would have this ruler know that if he understood himself aright in calling him good he did, in effect, call him <I>God<\/I> and indeed he was so (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 19<\/span>): &#8220;<I>Why callest thou me good?<\/I> Thou knowest <I>there is none good but one, that is, God;<\/I> and dost thou then take me for God? If so, thou art in the right.&#8221;<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 5. Our Master, Christ himself, has not altered the way to heaven from what it was before his coming, but has only made it more plain, and easy, and comfortable, and provided for our relief, in case we take any false step. <I>Thou knowest the commandments.<\/I> Christ came not to destroy the law and the prophets, but to establish them. Wouldest thou inherit eternal life? Govern thyself by the commandments.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 6. The duties of the second table must be conscientiously observed, in order to our happiness, and we must not think that any acts of devotion, how plausible soever, will atone for the neglect of them. Nor is it enough to keep ourselves free from the gross violations of these commandments, but we must <I>know these commandments,<\/I> as Christ has <I>explained them<\/I> in his sermon upon the mount, in their extent and spiritual nature, and so observe them.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 7. Men think themselves <I>innocent<\/I> because they are <I>ignorant;<\/I> so this ruler did. He said, <I>All these have I kept from my youth up,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 21<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. He knows no more evil of himself than the Pharisee did, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 11<\/span>. He boasts that he began <I>early<\/I> in a course of virtue, that he had continued in it to this day, and that he had not in any instance transgressed. Had he been acquainted with the extent and spiritual nature of the divine law, and with the workings of his own heart,&#8211;had he been but Christ&#8217;s disciples awhile, and learned of him, he would have said quite the contrary: &#8220;<I>All these have<\/I> I broken from my youth up, in thought, word, and deed.&#8221;<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8. The great things by which we are to try our spiritual state are how we stand affected to Christ and to our brethren, to this world and to the other; by these this man was tried. For, (1.) If we have a true <I>affection to Christ,<\/I> he will <I>come and follow him,<\/I> will attend to his doctrine, and submit to his discipline, whatever it cost him. None shall inherit eternal life who are not willing to take their lot with the Lord Jesus, to follow the Lamb whithersoever he goes. (2.) If he have a true <I>affection to his brethren,<\/I> he will, as there is occasion, <I>distribute to the poor,<\/I> who are God&#8217;s receivers of his dues out of our estates. (3.) If he think meanly of <I>this world,<\/I> as he ought, he will not stick at <I>selling what he has,<\/I> if there be a necessity for it, for the relief of God&#8217;s poor. (4.) If he think highly of the other world, as he ought, he will desire no more than to have <I>treasure in heaven,<\/I> and will reckon that a sufficient abundant recompence for all that he has left, or lost, or laid out for God in this world.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 9. There are many that have a great deal in them that is very commendable, and yet they perish <I>for the lack of some one thing;<\/I> so this <I>ruler<\/I> here; he broke with Christ upon this, he liked all his terms very well but this which would part between him and his estate: &#8220;In this, I pray thee, have me excused.&#8221; If this be the bargain, it is no bargain.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 10. Many that are loth to leave Christ, yet do leave him. After a long struggle between their convictions and their corruptions, their corruptions carry the day at last; they are very sorry that they cannot serve God and mammon both; but, if one must be quitted, it shall be their God, not their worldly gain.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. Christ&#8217;s discourse with his disciples upon this occasion, in which we may observe, 1. Riches are a great hindrance to many in the way to heaven. Christ took notice of the reluctancy and regret with which the rich man broke off from him. He <I>saw that he was very sorrowful,<\/I> and was sorry for him; but thence he infers, <I>How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 24<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. If this ruler had had but as little of the world as Peter, and James, and John had, in all probability he would have left it, to follow Christ, as they did; but, having a great estate, it had a great influence upon him, and he chose rather to take his leave of Christ than to lay himself under an obligation to dispose of his estate in charitable uses. Christ asserts the difficulty of the salvation of rich people very emphatically: <I>It is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 25<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. It is a proverbial expression, that denotes the thing to be extremely difficult. 2. There is in the hearts of all people such a general affection to this world, and the things of it, that, since Christ has required it as necessary to salvation that we should sit loose to this world, it is really very hard for any to get to heaven. If we must <I>sell all,<\/I> or break with Christ, <I>who then can be saved?<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 26<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. They do not find fault with what Christ required as hard and unreasonable. No, it is very fit that they who expect an eternal happiness in the other world should be willing to forego all that is dear to them in this world, in expectation of it. But they know how closely the hearts of most men cleave to this world, and are ready to despair of their being ever brought to this. 3. There are such difficulties in the way of our salvation: as could never be got over but by pure omnipotence, by that grace of God which is almighty, and to which that is <I>possible<\/I> which exceeds all created power and wisdom. The <I>things which are impossible with men<\/I> (and utterly impossible it is that men should work such a change upon their own spirits as to turn them from the world to God, it is like <I>dividing the sea,<\/I> and <I>driving Jordan back<\/I>), these things are <I>possible with God.<\/I> His grace can work upon the soul, so as to alter the bent and bias of it, and give it a contrary ply; and it is he that <I>works in us both to will and to do.<\/I> 4. There is an aptness in us to speak too much of what we have left and lost, of what we have done and suffered, for Christ. This appears in Peter: <I>Lo, we have left all, and followed thee,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 28<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. When it came in his way, he could not forbear magnifying his own and his brethren&#8217;s affection to Christ, in <I>quitting<\/I> all to follow him. But this we should be so far from boasting of, that we should rather acknowledge it not worth taking notice of, and be ashamed of ourselves that there should have been any regret and difficulty in the doing of it, and any hankerings towards those things afterwards. 5. Whatever we have left, or laid out, for Christ, it shall without fail be abundantly made up to us in this world and that to come, notwithstanding our weaknesses and infirmities (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 18:30<\/span>): <I>No man has left<\/I> the comfort of his estate or relations <I>for the kingdom of God&#8217;s sake,<\/I> rather than they should hinder either his services to that kingdom or his enjoyments of it, <I>who shall not receive manifold more in this present time,<\/I> in the graces and comforts of God&#8217;s Spirit, in the pleasures of communion with God and of a good conscience, advantages which, to those that know how to value and improve them, will abundantly countervail all their loses. Yet that is not all; in the world to come they <I>shall receive life everlasting,<\/I> which is the thing that the ruler seemed to have his eye and heart upon.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>Ruler <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>). Not in <span class='bible'>Mark 10:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Matt 19:16<\/span>.<\/P> <P><B>What shall I do to inherit? <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">  ;<\/SPAN><\/span>). &#8220;By doing what shall I inherit?&#8221; Aorist active participle and future active indicative. Precisely the same question is asked by the lawyer in <span class='bible'>Lu 10:25<\/span>. This young man probably thought that by some one act he could obtain eternal life. He was ready to make a large expenditure for it.<\/P> <P><B>Good <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>). See on <span class='bible'>Mark 10:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Matt 19:16<\/span> for discussion of this adjective for absolute goodness. Plummer observes that no Jewish rabbi was called &#8220;good&#8221; in direct address. The question of Jesus will show whether it was merely fulsome flattery on the part of the young man or whether he really put Jesus on a par with God. He must at any rate define his attitude towards Christ. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Robertson&#8217;s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>Ruler. Peculiar to Luke.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Vincent&#8217;s Word Studies in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>THE RICH YOUNG RULER V. 18-30<\/p>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1) <strong>&#8220;And a certain ruler asked him, saying,&#8221; <\/strong>(kai eperotesen tis auton archon legon) &#8220;And a certain ruler questioned him, saying at length,&#8221; a synagogue ruler, one who presided over religious synagogue services; <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17<\/span> indicates that he came to Him running and kneeled before Him, <span class='bible'>Mat 19:16-30<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>2) <strong>&#8220;Good master,&#8221; <\/strong>(didaskale agathe) &#8220;Ideal teacher;&#8221; Matthew describes him also as a young man who was wealthy; He regarded Jesus as a man of virtue and wisdom, <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>3) <strong>&#8220;What shall I do to inherit eternal life?&#8221; <\/strong>(ti poiesas zoen aionion kleronomeso) &#8220;Just what may I do to inherit eternal life?&#8221; He was theologically wrong, for eternal life is the gift of God, even in the resurrection body, not something one may acquire by good works or deeds of moral and ethical nature, <span class='bible'>Joh 10:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph 2:8-9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 6:23<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>Butlers Comments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>SECTION 4<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Parsimonious (<\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Luk. 18:18-30<\/span><\/strong><strong>)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>18 And a ruler asked him, Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 19And Jesus said to him, Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone. 20You know the commandments: Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother. 21And he said, All these I have observed from my youth. 22And when Jesus heard it, he said to him, One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me. 23But when he heard this he became sad, for he was very rich. 24Jesus looking at him said, How hard it is for those who have riches to enter the kingdom of God! 25For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. 26Those who heard it said, Then who can be saved? 27But he said, What is impossible with men is possible with God. 28And Peter said, Lo, we have left our homes and followed you. 29And he said to them, Truly, I say to you, there is no man who has left house or wife or brothers or parents or children, for the sake of the kingdom of God, 30who will not receive manifold more in this time, and in the age to come eternal life.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Luk. 18:18-19<\/span><\/strong><strong> Righteousness of God:<\/strong> There are crucial lessons for every believer in this confrontation between Jesus and the rich, young ruler. The primary lesson is the one Jesus concluded with, How hard it is for those who have riches to enter the kingdom of God! (<span class='bible'>Luk. 18:24<\/span>). Another very important lesson has to do with evangelism. Some have entitled this incident, The big one that got away. Look at this prospects potential:<\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>He was a rich, young, ruler.<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>He was courteous (<span class='bible'>Mar. 10:17<\/span>He ran up to Jesus and kneeled before Him.).<\/p>\n<p>c.<\/p>\n<p>He had a deep interest in religion (What must I do to inherit eternal life?), he did not wait to be called on or found.<\/p>\n<p>d.<\/p>\n<p>He was enthusiastic in the pursuit of spiritual help.<\/p>\n<p>e.<\/p>\n<p>He was unafraid of public opinion (seeking help from Jesus, who was already in disfavor with most Jewish rulers).<\/p>\n<p>f.<\/p>\n<p>He was a man of moral action (He had kept more commandments of God than most men.).<\/p>\n<p>g.<\/p>\n<p>He had lived a life of purity. h. He was honest in business.<\/p>\n<p>i.<\/p>\n<p>He respected his parents.<\/p>\n<p>j.<\/p>\n<p>He was no liar or slanderer.<\/p>\n<p>k.<\/p>\n<p>He was successful in the world.<\/p>\n<p>l.<\/p>\n<p>He was a man of influence and authority.<\/p>\n<p>He is the preachers dream-prospect. Most preachers would have had him signing a commitment card immediately. What a great statistic he would makehe could get celebrity billing. But Jesus disappoints us by handling this prime prospect rather roughly. He begins with a rebuke to the ruler; then challenges him about his faithfulness to the commandments of God; demands that he make an immense financial sacrifice; and finally lets the prospect get away.<br \/>The young man knelt, flatteringly, before Jesus and said, flatteringly, Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit, eternal life? Jesus did not answer his question, but began with a rebuke. Paraphrased, Jesus would say, The goodness of any man (which you take me to be) is not worthy to be noticed. It is God alone who is essentially good! Jesus began His attempt to redirect this mans mind from worldliness by solemnly fixing his attention on Gods characterinfinite holiness. This young ruler had traveled so long in the company of those who reveled in the flattery of one another (calling one another Master, Rabbi, Ruler) (cf. <span class='bible'>Mat. 23:6-7<\/span>) that he could no longer see himself or any other man in proper perspective. He needed to see that God alone should be praised. Men must see themselves in relationship to Gods absolute holiness before they can see themselves as they really are (cf. <span class='bible'>Isa. 6:1<\/span> ff.) in need of grace. It is almost shocking to realize that Jesus first concern here is not the young ruler himself, but seeing that God is glorified. The glorification of God was Christs first priority (cf. <span class='bible'>Isa. 48:9-11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze. 20:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze. 20:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze. 20:44<\/span>, etc.). That was Jesus primary goal in every instance of His ministry (cf. <span class='bible'>Joh. 17:1<\/span> ff.). The young ruler centered attention on his own needJesus insisted that glorifying God was of first priority. This is the foundation of all evangelism, of all conversion. Mans salvation depends upon this fundamental principle. Evangelism is preaching who God is! Converting people must be preceded by establishing the character and nature of God as manifested in Jesus Christ. Without knowing God the sinner does not know whom he has offended. Without knowing Gods faithfulness the sinner is left to trust his own abilities to justify himself. The gospel is not what man must do, but what God has done! God is Creator. God is Holy and His law demands (necessitates) judgment upon sin. The Bible speaks more of Gods holiness than it does of His love! That is probably because men are more prone to concentrate on that which makes them feel at ease than on that which threatens or humiliates them. Much evangelism today is based in an insipid sentimentality which begins, God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life. Jesus did not begin that way! He said, Young man you had better get straightened out first in your own mind who God is!<\/p>\n<p>In the concept of most people today there is no room for the idea that God is holy. Most people think of God, C.S. Lewis once wrote, as an aged, indulging grandfather-type-person. Much of modern evangelism has lost touch with the divine method. Jesus did not speak soothing positive clichs to this manHe stirred up the fear of God in his heart by preaching that God alone is holy! We do not bring any sinner before God with the right attitude at all until we bring him bowing in humility and praise for Gods holiness and penitence for his own sinfulness. We approach God for His own sake first, not ours. If Gods absolute holiness and omnipotence is not validated and confirmed in our own mind, first, we are lost! Our salvation depends not on our goodness, but on His! (cf. <span class='bible'>Dan. 9:17-19<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Luk. 18:20-21<\/span><\/strong><strong> Regulations of God: <\/strong>Finally Jesus said, If you would enter life, keep the commandments, (<span class='bible'>Mat. 19:17<\/span> b). The commandments (law) of God reveal the character and nature of God. The second important thing this self-righteous young man needed preached to him was the law of God. How can he know where he stands in relation to Gods demands on his life if he does not have the law of God preached to him. Jesus reminded him of the first nine commandments. The absence of Gods law from modern preaching is as responsible as any other factor for the evangelistic impotence of our churches:<\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>The word sin makes no sense apart from Gods holy law. How can we convince todays sinners to really recognize they are sinners since most of them are totally ignorant of Gods law for all mankind? Jesus continued to press the law at the rich young ruler.<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>The cross of Christ means nothing apart from the law. If Jesus did not die to atone for the penalty of the law, then His death is tragic and senseless. And that is exactly how many people see His death today because they are not made cognizant of the demands of Gods law.<\/p>\n<p>Jesus used Gods law as a primary tool of evangelism. Many Christians today consider the law a relic of the past and of no use in evangelism. Satan has subtlety deceived us into thinking law and love are contradictory. Precisely the opposite is true. Love cannot be expressed without the guidelines of divine law, and law cannot be kept spiritually except by the motive of love (cf. <span class='bible'>1Jn. 5:3<\/span>). Law and love are not opposed to one another. The conflict arises between law and grace as a means of salvation. The law cannot be the means of salvationsalvation for sinful man is grace by faith. Men are not turning to Christ today because they have no sense of who He is and what He has done. They have no concept of sinning against God and therefore they do not think they need salvation. They do not know they are sinning because the law of God is not being preached. God is faithful. He keeps every word He utters. This was the burden of the Old Testament prophets. To turn Israel back to God so that He might redeem them and use them for His messianic plan of redemption, the prophets preached the law of Jehovah. A remnant recognized themselves as sinners and turned to the Lord in faith, repentance and covenant-keeping. A remnant was saved.<\/p>\n<p>Jesus found the rulers knowledge of the commandments to be superficial. He recognized the laws outward demands but not their spirituality. The law of God was spiritual. He intended it to be written on the spirits of men (on their hearts). But they perverted Gods law by making a pretense of keeping the outward commandment while violating the spiritual principle of it in their hearts. Jesus did not come to destroy the law and the prophets (<span class='bible'>Mat. 5:17<\/span>). He came to bring Gods law to its spiritual fulness. It is in the Sermon on the Mount that Jesus puts His finger on the real spirit within Gods law. Now Jesus puts His finger on the rulers real sin. He says, Go sell all. . . . Jesus preaches the tenth commandment in all its incisive spirituality. He used Gods commandment, Thou shalt not covet as a scalpel to lance the festering sore of greed in the rich rulers heart. The young mans sin was invisible to the human eye. It was even invisible to him! It did not show on the surface of his life. Had Jesus merely said, Keep the tenth commandment, Thou shalt not covet. . . . the rich man would probably have replied, I do not desire anyone elses property or wealth, I am satisfied where I am and with what I have. That was the trouble, he was satisfied with his wealth and was not rich toward God (cf. <span class='bible'>Luk. 12:21<\/span>). So Jesus translated the tenth commandment into its spiritual reality by demanding that he abandon his riches, give it to the poor, and follow His way of having not where to lay His head. The rich ruler loved his riches more than Gods holy law. So all the time he had been keeping commandments from his youth up it was really hypocrisy. He kept only those commandments that did not demand complete renunciation of self and whole-hearted trust in God.<\/p>\n<p>Totally out of character with worldly-mindedness, Jesus, rather than compromise the truth of Gods holy law in the name of false love, allowed the ruler to depart! Had Jesus ignored the inviolable character of the perfect law to try to enlist this sinner, He would have lost him, because in compromising Gods faithfulness Jesus would have destroyed love. True love for God is inseparably bound up in the keeping of His commandments (cf. <span class='bible'>Joh. 14:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 14:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 14:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 15:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Jn. 2:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Jn. 3:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Jn. 1:6<\/span>; etc.). True love will never negotiate against the truth upon which it is established. Much of Christendom through the centuries and even today has tried to see how little it could demand in keeping Gods commandments and still get converts. Many take the position that they do not want to offend, to divide, to lose fame or a thousand other things. Yet Jesus came to the world for the very purpose of judging, dividing, and casting a sword. The gospel is Gods great sieve through which He sifts all mankind. Those who keep His Word have His Spirit, those who do not are of the devil. The kingdom of God is, after all, the rule of God in the hearts of men. The law of God is to be the arbiter (umpire) in our heart (cf. <span class='bible'>Col. 3:15<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Luk. 18:22<\/span><\/strong><strong> a Repentance: <\/strong>Go, and sell all that you possess, . . . said Jesus. Now Jesus is telling the rich young ruler what he must do to inherit eternal lifehe must repent. He must change his mind about what he trusts most. He must turn from his god of gold and surrender to the mind of God as expressed in the tenth commandment. The one thing the young man lacked was the reversal of all his priorities. He must allow Gods word to transform his whole viewpoint, revolutionize his fundamental philosophy of life. Telling people today, Just accept Jesus as your personal Savior, will not save! People must repent! Christ cannot save anyone whose mind is still under the rule of carnality (worldliness). It is scripturally necessary, of course, to tell people to confess Christ and be immersed in water for the remission of sin. But it is not scripturally correct to tell them to do so without preaching repentance to them. Doubtlessly this ruler would have gladly accepted an invitation to become a follower of Jesus if Jesus had not demanded that he give up his wealth. He had come running to Jesus. But he is not willing to forsake mammon! His security was in mammonnot in Jesus. Churches are being filled with people willing to have Christ and financial success (mammon) today. They are never told they must renounce all they possess. They are never told they must repent of such double-mindedness. So their converts are as worldly after their joining the church as before. No one has the authority to lower the requirement for discipleship from what Jesus required here, of this rich, young, ruler, or what He required in many other places (cf. <span class='bible'>Luk. 14:25-33<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk. 9:57-62<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat. 10:34-39<\/span>, etc.). Christ has not revealed a revised gospel for the twentieth century!<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Luk. 18:22<\/span><\/strong><strong> b Regeneration: <\/strong>By asking the ruler to sell all he possessed and give it to the poor, Jesus was asking him to abandon his fundamental philosophy of life. He was urging the man to sweep his heart clean of all allegiance to any other priority. But the heart cannot tolerate a vacuum. It will inevitably yield its allegiance to someone or something. When the heart is rid of unworthy affection, it must deliberately choose the worthiest affection. So, Jesus invited the young man, Come, follow me! Jesus did not offer this rich man an easy discipleship. He offered Himself to be followed, imitated, learned from and obeyed. The ruler had called Jesus, Master, now Jesus is urging him to accept the portion of a servant. There is too much easy discipleship today. So-called contemporary Christian music tends to promote a discipleship of subjectivism rather than one of active servanthood. Jesus invitation here contradicts much modern evangelism. Much of that seems to imply that Jesus is a personal Savior to help people get out of burdens and difficult circumstances and give good feelings. Not much is ever said about Jesus being Almighty Master to be obeyed. Not much is ever said about Jesus giving us His strength to bear heavy burdens and difficult circumstances. Jesus is sometimes pictured as standing ready and anxious for us to crook our finger and say to Him, Come, follow me, and keep all trouble out of my life.<\/p>\n<p>Jesus will not deceive this lad. Eternal life is had by bowing down to the Lordship of Christ in active, obedient service to Him. It is a matter of the gospel record that many more turned away from Jesus than became obedient disciples (cf. <span class='bible'>Joh. 6:66<\/span> :, etc.)because He insisted men renounce all they had. Only on those terms does Jesus offer eternal life. Eternal life is being saved from sin. Faith is following Christ away from sin toward obedience to Gods law. This is a strange doctrine in some places today. Many talk about accepting His helpbut few say anything about accepting His rule in every thought, motive and action of life. Following Jesus involves sacrifice. Jesus was absolutely honest with this young man. To preach to people any other way is either unconscious failure or deliberate deceit. Would-be disciples must be challenged concerning the discipline which Christ demands. There must be complete honesty about the sacrifice, persecution, humility and self-surrender involved. It is not surprising that today when so many go forward to try the Jesus-high they are never seen again. Often the convert, after a few days or weeks of professing Christ wakes up to discover that everyday troubles have been compounded by the very fact that he now calls himself a Christian. He finds himself being treated like Jesus was treatedand that was not what he was led to believe. The psychological honeymoon has ended so quickly.<\/p>\n<p>Integrity and honesty demand that we evangelize like Jesus did. The modern sinner deserves to be treated like the rich young ruler. He must be told that the Lord to whom we are calling him will expect him to sell all and follow Him. People must be impressed with the gravity of deciding to be a disciple of Christ. Most evangelistic programs or meetings give one the impression that we should never let a prospect do any prolonged, serious thinking about answering the call to Jesus. We prefer to psyche them up emotionally, keep the sell all requirement low profile, and get them down the aisle before they do have time to think about real discipleship. We are afraid to do anything that might hinder immediate success or victory, Jesus wasnt! There is no evidence that the ruler ever trusted Christ and followed Him by giving up all he had. But he was honestly confronted with the gospel and its implications for his life. He was not tricked, psyched, high-pressured, manipulated or emotionalized into a statistic. When he went away, he really knew the full answer to his initial questionWhat must I do to inherit eternal life. He must be regenerated.<\/p>\n<p>A few ancient manuscripts add after Jesus statement, Come, follow me, the words, taking up the cross. But the best manuscripts omit these words. The word Luke uses to describe the young mans countenance is perilupos, meaning pained. Mark uses the word stugnasas which means gloomy, hateful, threatening or lowering (cf. <span class='bible'>Mat. 16:3<\/span>). The young man was shocked, stunned and agitated. He was very rich and what Jesus had demanded of him seemed altogether unreasonable, unheard of, unprincipled and even insane! This ruler did not just hang his head and slink awayhe went away upset!<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Luk. 18:24-30<\/span><\/strong><strong> Rewards:<\/strong> Jesus looked with love at the young man as he was walking away in a disturbed mood (and at His disciples) and said: How hard it is for those who have riches to enter the kingdom of God! Why? Because wealth means power and a false sense of security and this is more likely to create pride and self-sufficiency than it is to create poverty of spirit. Actually, it is more than hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God, it is practically impossible. Jesus went on to say, . . . it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. The Greek words Luke used were tramatos which means hole or eye and belones which means dart or needle. Jesus was not talking about a small gate in a city wall, He was talking literally about the eye of a sewing needle.<\/p>\n<p>Matthew records that the disciples were greatly astonished at Jesus statement. The Greek words used here are exeplessonto sphodra and mean literally, violently stricken in mind. They were floored! What Jesus had said stunned them. It was inconceivable in contemporary Judaism that wealth should be a hindrance to entering the kingdom of God since this was considered to be a sign of Gods favor! When God allowed Satan to take Jobs possessions and children, Jobs friends could only conclude that Job was guilty of some terrible sin against God. Poverty, physical illness (<span class='bible'>Joh. 9:1<\/span> ff.) and other forms of catastrophic misfortune were considered a sign of sinfulness by most Jews. So the disciples were exceedingly amazedand so is the rest of mankind. The disciples asked, Then who can be saved? If freedom from the wish to be rich and to hold on to ones hard earned wealth is the only route to salvation, who can be saved? There is not a man that would not be rich if he could. Most men, at one time or another, have day-dreamed about being rich. And if the desire for riches keeps us from salvation (cf. <span class='bible'>1Ti. 6:6-10<\/span>) who can be saved? The disciples are probably being honest and expressing the unspoken affirmation of their own hearts that if they could have had the rich, young rulers wealth they would have gladly accepted it. They were chagrined because they knew Jesus was not pointing His statement only at those who were rich in fact, but also to everyone who would prefer riches above almost anything elsewhich includes most of the people in the world!<\/p>\n<p>Jesus first reply was, The things impossible with men are possible with God. What men cannot do meritoriously through human motivation, God can do by His grace in their heart when they believe Him. It is impossible for a man to renounce all he possesses until he allows his whole mental process to be taken captive unto obedience to Christ (cf. <span class='bible'>2Co. 10:3-5<\/span>). And mans whole mentality will not be surrendered to the rule of Christ until he resigns himself to the grace of God by faith. The difficulty of saving a rich man is not with God, it is with the man who resists Gods grace by faith and insists on trusting in his own wealth as his sufficiency.<\/p>\n<p>Christ has told the ruler that if he wished to fill the real void in his life and be perfect (complete) (see <span class='bible'>Mat. 19:21<\/span>), he should sell all he had, give it to the poor and follow Him. When he would do this he would have treasure in heaven. That last statement stimulated Peters mind, he immediately declared, Lo, we have left our homes and followed you, what then shall we have? (see <span class='bible'>Mat. 19:27<\/span>). Peter apparently felt that he, and his comrades, stood in a much superior relationship to Jesus than the rich, young ruler. Peters question implied, We have done what you told himwe are the first of your disciples. This young ruler has turned his back on You, Lord, and if he should come back at the last moment, remember, we were working for you first, and we have left all and followed you.<\/p>\n<p>Peter anticipated earthly rewards, Jesus declared the rewards for sacrificial service in His Kingdom would be spiritual. The essence of Gods kingdom is of the spirit (<span class='bible'>Rom. 14:17<\/span>). Jesus promised that everyone who labors will be rewarded, but many who are first will be last and the last will be first. The student should read the parallel accounts of this discussion in <span class='bible'>Mat. 19:23<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Mat. 20:16<\/span> and <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:23-31<\/span>. Matthews account notes that Jesus first said, . . . in the new world . . . you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. In other words, the disciples will have the privilege of letting the Jews into the kingdom of Christ by the preaching of the gospel and writing the New Covenant scriptures. Whatever these apostles shall one day preach will be the keys to the kingdom (cf. <span class='bible'>Mat. 16:18-20<\/span>) and whatever they loose or bind on earth shall already have been loosed or bound in heaven (cf. also <span class='bible'>Mat. 18:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 20:22-23<\/span>). They will declare the terms of forgiveness, salvation and citizenship in Gods kingdom. What they preach shall be the criteria (judgment). Then Jesus said, anyone who leaves worldly riches for Christ will receive all of Gods world working toward his redemption, plus eternal life (cf. <span class='bible'>1Co. 3:21-22<\/span>). God will work everything for good to them that love him and are called according to His purposes (<span class='bible'>Rom. 8:28<\/span>). Wherever a Christian goes in this world God will have available for him brothers, sisters, mothers and fathers in the spiritual family of God. Everywhere a Christian goes in this world God will use from His great storehouse of creation all that the disciple needs to serve Him. But what does a Christian need to serve God? Sometimes he needs chastening, deprivation and struggle. The believer does not always need bread and never needs indulgence. He does need faith, hope and steadfastness. God can supply that richly. Whatever is needed, God will supply. And what He supplies will always be more than whatever the believer has given up to serve Him.<\/p>\n<p>We would be remiss if we did not insert here a brief comment on <span class='bible'>Mat. 20:1-16<\/span> because it is the parabolic conclusion to this subject of rewards. When Peter asked, What then shall we have. . . . Jesus answered with the Parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard (<span class='bible'>Mat. 20:1-16<\/span>). This parable does not intend to teach that a man may foolishly waste his life and come to work for Jesus at the eleventh hour and expect a reward. Nor does it teach anything about socialism or communism or share-and-share-alike economic systems for nations or the world. It teaches one simple truth: In the kingdom of God a mans reward will be, not according to length of service, or notoriety of service, but according to his faithfulness to the opportunity which is given him. The owner of the vineyard rewarded according to his own judgment. The householder kept His promiseeach person who chooses to labor for God will be graciously and generously rewarded. If the last are first and the first are last, it is none of the laborers business. If those who went to work first had the right attitude, they would consider it a reward to be given opportunity to be first or longest out in the vineyard! God rewards on the basis of the spirit and attitude in which the work was donenot on volume. The last workers had not been at work before because no one had hired themthey had not the opportunities the first had. But when the householder sent them out they were faithful and true to their only opportunity. Their reward was what the owner decided to give themthe same as that given to those faithful to their earlier opportunity, Neither long nor short service is pleasing to God if done for wrong motives. Remember the Prodigal and Elder Son of <span class='bible'>Luk. 15:1-32<\/span>. Men will be rewarded in Gods kingdom not for what volume of work they accomplish but, what they would have done if they had had the opportunity. Of course we all show what we would do by our attitudes and actions toward the little opportunities we do have! He who is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much; and he who is dishonest in a very little is dishonest in much (<span class='bible'>Luk. 16:10<\/span>; cf. also <span class='bible'>Luk. 16:11-12<\/span>). God does not reward according to human standards (volume)He looks on the heart (motives).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Appleburys Comments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Rich Young Ruler<br \/>Scripture<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk. 18:18-30<\/span> And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, even God. 20 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor thy father and mother. 21 And he said, All these things have I observed from my youth up. 22 And when Jesus heard it, he said unto him, One thing thou lackest yet: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me. 23 But when he heard these things, he became exceeding sorrowful; for he was very rich. 24 And Jesus seeing him said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! 25 For it is easier for a camel to enter in through a needles eye, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. 26 And they that heard it said, Then who can be saved? 27 But he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God. 28 And Peter said, Lo, we have left our own, and followed thee. 29 And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or wife, or brethren, or parents, or children, for the kingdom of Gods sake, 30 who shall not receive manifold more in this time, and in the world to come eternal life.<\/p>\n<p>Comments<br \/>And a certain ruler.The account of the Rich Young Ruler is given in all three synoptic gospels. Matthew calls him a young man, probably in his thirties. As a ruler he would have responsibilities that called for some maturity. References to age are usually relative and should be understood in their context.<\/p>\n<p>There can be no question about the sincerity of this young man, for Mark says that he ran to Jesus and knelt before Him and asked Him, Good Teacher, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life? See <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:17<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Why callest thou me good?Jesus question pointed to the only source of eternal life. He added, No one is good except One, even God. The answer to the question of eternal life cannot be separated from God. Jesus, who answered the question, is clearly identified with Him. It is doubtful if the ruler was able to see through this. But it becomes clear as the conversation progresses.<\/p>\n<p>Thou knowest the commandments.Eternal life, since they were under the Old Covenant, depended on keeping the commandments (<span class='bible'>Lev. 18:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal. 3:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom. 10:5<\/span>). For the answer to the question under the New Covenant, see <span class='bible'>Act. 2:26-42<\/span> and the other cases of conversion recorded in the Book of Acts.<\/p>\n<p>Then Jesus recited the commandments, mentioning five of the six that have to do with mans duties to man and significantly leaving out those that had to do with duties to God. The young man said, I have done all these since I was a boy. Except for his own word, we have no way of knowing whether he had or not. But Jesus did not question his statement; He seems to have accepted it at face value. It was not impossible for him to do what God commanded, even though theologians through the centuries have said that man is incapable of doing such a thing.<\/p>\n<p>One thing thou lackest.There were two tables of the law. The first said, Thou shalt have no other gods before me. It is quite evident that the ruler had neglected to observe this first table of the Law. What was the god he was worshipping instead of the Lord God under whose covenant he was living?<\/p>\n<p>Jesus said, Sell everything you have; distribute it to the poor, and you will have treasures in heaven, and come follow me, He made the issue clear: the young ruler was worshipping gold rather than God. He had to remove the false god and follow the Lord Jesus. Now we see why Jesus asked, Why do you call me good? Only God is good.<\/p>\n<p>When he heard these things.A storm cloud swept over his face like the dark clouds that blot out the light of the sun, The price was too great, for he was very rich. Although Jesus loved him for his clean life, He could not offer eternal life at a discount (<span class='bible'>Mar. 10:21<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>And Jesus seeing him.The struggle that went on in the young mans soul was plain for Jesus to see, He said, With what difficulty those who have riches enter into the kingdom of God! His problem was in putting God first in his life. He made the fatal decision to let gold be first.<\/p>\n<p>It is easier for a camel.Jesus was speaking of a literal camel and a literal needles eye; to assume otherwise is to ruin the lesson Jesus taught, The ruler was making gold his god; that made it impossible for him to enter the kingdom of God.<\/p>\n<p>Who then can be saved?Man cannot save himself, not even with all his gold. But God can save the one who turns to Him by obeying His commands.<\/p>\n<p>Lo, we have left our own, and followed thee.Peter was quick to respond in face of the refusal of the rich ruler to comply with Jesus demands. He said, We have left our things, and have followed you. According to Matthew, he added, What then shall we have? They were far from being unselfish in following Jesus. Their dream of an earthly kingdom had much to do with it.<\/p>\n<p>for the kingdom of Gods sake.Jesus said that anyonenot just the Rich Rulerwho has left possessions or family for the sake of the kingdom of God will receive many times more in this life, and in the age to come eternal life.<\/p>\n<p>Matthew also adds these words of Jesus: But many shall be last that are first and first that are last. See <span class='bible'>Mat. 19:30<\/span>. Jesus illustrated His meaning with the parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard. At the end of the day, all received exactly the same amountnot as wages but as the gift of the master. As He closed the parable, Jesus repeated the words, So the last shall be first, and the first last (<span class='bible'>Mat. 20:16<\/span>). This suggests that the story of the Rich Ruler, Peters question about the reward of the apostles, and the parable of the Vineyard constitute three phases of Jesus lesson on eternal life. It is not a question of rich or poor, apostle or other worker, for all who follow Christ and serve Him faithfully will have the same gift, eternal life.<\/p>\n<p>The work of the apostles in the kingdom was different, for they were to sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel, but the reward was no greater than for the least in the kingdom. See <span class='bible'>Luk. 22:30<\/span> for further discussion of meaning of judging the twelve tribes of Israel.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(18-23) <strong>And a certain ruler asked him, . . .<\/strong>See Notes on <span class='bible'>Mat. 19:16-25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar. 10:17-22<\/span>. St. Luke alone describes the inquirer as a ruler. As used without any defining genitive, and interpreted by <span class='bible'>Luk. 23:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk. 23:35<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Joh. 3:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 7:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 7:48<\/span>, <em>et al.,<\/em> it seems to imply that he was a member of the Council or <em>Sanhedrin.<\/em> The term youth, in <span class='bible'>Mat. 19:20<\/span>, is not at variance with this inference. It is defined by Philo as including the period between twenty-one and twenty-eightan age at which a place in the Council was probably open to one who was commended both by his wealth and his devotion. St. Paul obviously occupied a position of great influence at a time when he is described as a young man (<span class='bible'>Act. 7:58<\/span>).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> &lsquo;And a certain ruler asked him, saying, &ldquo;Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Luke tells us that the man was a ruler, either a ruler of the synagogue or someone in authority locally. He may even have been a member of the Sanhedrin (compare <span class='bible'>Joh 3:1<\/span>). But he neither tells us that he was rich nor that he was young. The stress is all on his being a man of status faced up with the possibility of greater status, and missing out because he was rich.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;Good teacher&rsquo; was an unusual way of addressing a Rabbi. The adjective &lsquo;good&rsquo; was usually retained for speaking about God, although there are a number of examples in the Old Testament of men being called &lsquo;good&rsquo;. Never, however, as having been addressed as such. So either this man was very discerning, or he was using flattery. Or perhaps he was simply impressed by Jesus&rsquo; pure goodness which shone out from Him in a way that made Him different from all others, and thus could not help what he said.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;What shall I do to inherit eternal life?&rsquo; This was the burning question of the day among pious Jews, how to ensure that they partook of the life of the age to come by being reckoned as good Israelites. He wanted to know what the standard was by which he could judge his and their acceptance.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> The Wealthy Young Ruler And The Use of Possessions (18:18-30).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Following on the delightful response of these children we have a classic example of one who was not ready to receive the Kingly Rule of God as a little child. For he had become tangled up in his riches. This was in complete contrast with little children, and with the blind beggar in the story that follows. Most would have envied him his riches, but here we are to learn that they were his downfall.<\/p>\n<p> In the chiastic analysis of this whole section this passage parallels that of the rich man and Lazarus (<span class='bible'>Luk 16:19-31<\/span>). There too wealth was the rich man&rsquo;s downfall, while Lazarus, like the Apostles, benefited by the fact that riches, of which he had none, were not around to prevent him from coming to God.<\/p>\n<p><strong> Analysis.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> a <\/strong> A certain ruler asked Him, saying, &ldquo;Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?&rdquo;, and Jesus said to him, &ldquo;Why do you call me good? none is good, save one, even God&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:18-19<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> &ldquo;You know the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour your father and mother.&rdquo; And he said, &ldquo;All these things have I observed from my youth up&rdquo; When Jesus heard it, he said to him, &ldquo;One thing you yet lack, sell all that you have, and distribute it to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven, and come, follow me&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:20-22<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> But when he heard these things, he became exceedingly sorrowful, for he was very rich&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:23<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> d <\/strong> And Jesus seeing him said, &ldquo;How hard it will be for those who have riches to enter into the Kingly Rule of God!&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:24<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> e <\/strong> &ldquo;For it is easier for a camel to enter in through a needle&rsquo;s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the Kingly Rule of God&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:25<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> d <\/strong> And those who heard it said, &ldquo;Then who can be saved?&rdquo; But He said, &ldquo;The things which are impossible with men are possible with God&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:26-27<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> And Peter said, &ldquo;Lo, we have left our own, and followed you&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:28<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> &lsquo;And He said to them, &ldquo;Truly I say to you, There is no man who has left house, or wife, or brethren, or parents, or children, for the Kingly Rule of God&rsquo;s sake&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:29<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> a <\/strong> &ldquo;Who will not receive a great deal more in this time, and in the world to come eternal life&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:30<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p> Note that in &lsquo;a&rsquo; the question was concerning how to receive eternal life, and the parallel describes who will receive eternal life. In &lsquo;b&rsquo; we have the posing of the commandments and the one thing lacking, and in the parallel the contrast with those who did forsake all. In &lsquo;c&rsquo; the ruler is sorrowful at the thought of losing his riches, while in the parallel Peter rejoices in it. In &lsquo;d&rsquo; Jesus confirms how hard it is for a rich man to enter under the Kingly Rule of God, and in the parallel He explains that it is possible with God. In &lsquo;e&rsquo; is the central point stressing the difficulty for the rich in entering under the Kingly Rule of God. Here was direct evidence of the truth at which the Pharisees had laughed (<span class='bible'>Luk 16:14<\/span>). Of course, they would never have dreamed of selling all and giving it to the poor. But the failure to be willing to do this was keeping this ruler back from his dream. And the whole point of what Jesus had said was that their obedience to God, and especially their compassion, was similarly lacking.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> Teaching on Covetousness: The Story of the Rich Young Ruler (<span class='bible'><strong> Mat 19:16-30<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> , <span class='bible'><strong> Mar 10:17-31<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ) &#8211; <\/strong> In <span class='bible'>Luk 18:18-30<\/span> Jesus takes a question from a rich young ruler and teaches on the dangers of pursuing earthly riches. A person must be willing to forsake all and follow Jesus. The emphasis in this story is the importance of having a heart without covetousness the Kingdom of God while awaiting Christ&rsquo;s Second Coming.<\/p>\n<p> Although this man was saddened by the Lord&rsquo;s request for him to forsake all and follow him, we have Matthew, who was also wealthy, responding positively to the same request. Matthew was sitting at his job collecting tax money when Jesus called him to leave his table and follow Him.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em> The Response of the Rich Young Ruler <\/em><\/strong> <strong> <\/strong> The call to salvation can be presented to each of us in a slightly different manner. The one vice that the rich young ruler needed to lay down in order to make things right with God was a covetousness heart. For my grandfather, the Lord spoke to him in the form of a bright light and told him to throw away his cigarettes. He did so and gave his heart to the Lord. One of my friends was asked by a couple to come pray for their son, whose wife had just left him. When Jack Emerson laid hands upon him to pray for him, the Lord gave him a word of knowledge about his vices. Jack stopped and had this young man renounce this vice. Before Jack prayed with him, the Lord revealed to him a number of other vices, all of which Jack led this young man into renouncing. Then he was led into a pray to give his life to Jesus. The Lord led Jack in this manner because it was the parents who initiated this ministry to their son, but God had to get the son to yield to this pray from his heart. Otherwise, Jack&rsquo;s ministry to him would have been in vain. In other words, there is no established formula for coming to Jesus. It simply must be done from a sincere heart with faith in the redemptive work of Calvary.<\/p>\n<p> Note the insight into this story from the book <em> At the Master&rsquo;s Feet<\/em> by Sadhu Sundar Singh.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&ldquo;There are many who have learnt from experience that man&rsquo;s natural goodness cannot give true peace of heart, nor can it give him a certainty of salvation or eternal life. The young man who came to Me seeking eternal life is a case in point. His first thought with regard to Me was wrong, as is that of some worldly-wise men and their followers at the present day. He thought Me to be one of those teachers who are like whited sepulchres, and in whose lives there is not a particle of true goodness. Therefore I said to him, &ldquo;Why do you ask Me about goodness? There is none good but One.&rdquo; But he failed to see in Me the one giver of goodness and life; and when I sought to admit him to My companionship and make him a truly good man, and bestow life upon him, he became sad and left Me. His life, however, makes one thing perfectly clear, and that is that his keeping the commandments and his goodness did not satisfy him or give him the assurance of eternal life. If his good works had given him peace he would not have come to inquire of Me, or had he come he would not have left Me in sorrow, but, believing My words, would have gone away rejoicing.&rdquo; [265]<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3em'> [265] Sadhu Sundar Singh, <em> At the Master&rsquo;s Feet<\/em>, translated by Arthur Parker (London: Fleming H. Revell Co., 1922) [on-line], accessed 26 October 2008, available from http:\/\/www.ccel.org\/ccel\/singh\/feet.html; Internet, &ldquo;II Sin and Salvation,&rdquo; section 2, part 10.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Luk 18:18-19<\/strong><\/span> <strong> <\/strong> <strong><em> Comments None is Good but God &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> Jesus was not saying that He Himself was not good. Instead, this rich young ruler did not see Jesus as God, but rather as a good rabbi. Therefore, Jesus asked him a question to steer the young man into recognizing that He was God. In other words, Jesus wanted the man to see that the goodness that he recognized in Jesus was a testimony of his divinity. Jesus was saying, &ldquo;If only God was good, and this young man recognized that Jesus was good, then Jesus must be good.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Luk 18:20<\/strong><\/span> <strong> <\/strong> <strong><em> Comments <\/em><\/strong> Jesus give the rich young ruler a difference response regarding salvation than He gave to Nicodemus. To the ruler Jesus gave him that law in order to expose his sins. For it was by the Law that man could see his sinful condition and then look to God&rsquo;s grace by faith. But to Nicodemus Jesus reveals the way of salvation by being born of the Spirit, because Nicodemus was seeking the truth<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Luk 18:23<\/strong><\/span> <strong><em> Comments <\/em><\/strong> Sorrow is a response to loss. This rich young ruler believed that giving his goods to the poor was a loss, rather than a gain.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Luk 18:29<\/strong><\/span> <strong> <\/strong> <strong><em> Comments <\/em><\/strong> Jesus is not saying that God does not care about our families when we must leave them in order to serve the Lord. As a missionary in Africa for thirteen years, I was willing to leave my family and go overseas. I watched God take care of my family through divine providence and provision through the course of those years. He loves our parents, brothers, wives, and children and longs to take care of them, but He needs those who are willing to make great sacrifices for the sake of the Kingdom of God.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Everett&#8217;s Study Notes on the Holy Scriptures<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong> Denying All for Christ&#8217;s Sake.<\/p>\n<p><\/strong> The rich young ruler:<\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 18<\/strong>. <strong> And a certain ruler asked Him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 19<\/strong>. <strong> And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou Me good? None is good save one, that is, God.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 20<\/strong>. <strong> Thou knowest the commandments: Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 21<\/strong>. <strong> And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 22<\/strong>. <strong> Now when Jesus heard these things, He said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>v. <strong> 23<\/strong>. <strong> An\/d when he heard this, he was very sorrowful; for he was very rich.<\/p>\n<p><\/strong> See <span class='bible'>Mat 19:16-22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17-22<\/span>. Jesus was still on the eastern side of the Jordan when the incident occurred which is here narrated. A young rich ruler of a local synagogue came to him and asked him, with all marks of respect and esteem: Good Master, by the doing of what. will I inherit eternal life? The question gave Jesus one of the best opportunities of confessing Himself to be coequal with God the Father. For He did not decline the honor which lay in the word &#8220;good. &#8221; But He called the attention of the ruler to the word he had used. Jesus was not only good in the sense commonly associated with the word, that of a virtuous man and wise teacher. He is the Good in the absolute sense. So much for the form in which the young man had addressed Him. As for his question, he had mentioned works, he had expressed his belief that the inheriting of eternal life depended upon something that he could do. Jesus takes him up at this point. He reminds him of the commandments which, as ruler of the synagogue, he certainly must be familiar with. Note: Jesus does not quote the commandments in the order which is generally followed, thus showing that not the order of the precepts of God, but the keeping of their contents, is the important matter. But when Jesus had named five of the commandments, all of them from the second table of the Law, the ruler made the astounding statements: These all have I kept from my youth, thereby proving that he had no true idea of the spiritual understanding of the Law of God. His conception of his duty according to the commandments was that universally held among the Jews, namely, that a mere outward observance of the letter of the Law was equal to its fulfillment; Only transgressions in deeds and, under certain circumstances, in words were accounted sin; transgressions in desires and thoughts were not taken into consideration. The ruler had evidently made his declaration in good faith, and Jesus loved him for it, <span class='bible'>Mar 10:21<\/span>. Nevertheless, it was necessary for the great Physician to cut deeply in this case, in order to lay bare the tumor of false sanctity. So Jesus told him that he still lacked one thing in order to be perfect and thus to lay claim to the inheritance of heaven. Everything that he had he should distribute to the poor; then he would have a treasure safely laid away in heaven, then, also, he could be the Lord&#8217;s disciple in truth. The Lord&#8217;s object was to show the man how far he still was from keeping the commandments as he should, how far from perfect his love toward God and his neighbor was, how completely his heart was still bound up in the things of this world. The advice of Jesus strikes the heart of the matter, and finds its application in the case of every person. We should love God above all things, and if He demands it, if the welfare of the kingdom of God makes it necessary, we should be ready to sacrifice all earthly goods and life itself; and we should at all times serve our neighbor with our money. The test was too much for the young man. He was deeply grieved, he became very sorrowful on account of the words of Jesus. He had been touched in his weakest spot; he was very rich. In giving up his riches he would be denying himself that which his heart placed even above the love and service of Jesus. Thus many people that once heard the Word of God and were attracted by some phase of church work, have turned their backs upon the Church, and everything it stands for and offers, because their Pharisaic hearts were struck by some sermon concerning their special sinful hobby. It is necessary at all times that the Word of God, the Law, tear the mask of self-righteousness from the face of the sinner before he can become a disciple of Jesus in deed and in truth.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Luk 18:18-27<\/span> . See on <span class='bible'>Mat 19:16-26<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17-27<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> ] perhaps a ruler of the synagogue; comp. <span class='bible'>Mat 9:18<\/span> . Luke alone has this more precise designation of the man from tradition, and herein diverges from <span class='bible'>Mat 19:20<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> In the answer of Jesus, <span class='bible'>Luk 18:19<\/span> , Luke simply follows Mark, abbreviating also at <span class='bible'>Luk 18:20<\/span> . The Marcionite reading:      ,     , is nothing but an old gloss (in opposition to Volkmar, Hilgenfeld), not more Marcionite than the reading of the text, and this latter is no anti-Marcionite alteration. Both forms of the expression are already found in Justin, and our Gospel of Luke is to be regarded (Zeller, <em> Apostelg<\/em> . p. 32 f.) as his source for the form which agrees with the passage before us ( <em> c<\/em> . <em> Tryph<\/em> . 101). Comp. on <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Luk 18:22<\/span> .     ] does not presuppose the <em> truth<\/em> , but only the <em> case<\/em> of what is affirmed by the  . It does not, moreover, assert the necessity of selling one&rsquo;s goods and distributing them to the poor, in order to be perfect in general, but only for the person in question, in accordance with his special circumstances, for the sake of special trial. See on <span class='bible'>Mat 19:21<\/span> . Hence there is not to be found, with de Wette, in the words an application of the saying of Jesus that gives any pretext for mistaken representations.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer&#8217;s New Testament Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2. Jesus and the Rich Young Man (<span class='bible'>Luk 18:18-30<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>(Parallels: <span class='bible'>Mat 19:16-30<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17-31<\/span>.)<\/p>\n<p>18And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master [Teacher], what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 19And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none <em>is<\/em> good, save one, <em>that is<\/em>, God. 20Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy 21mother. And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up. 22Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute<span class=''>4<\/span> unto the poor, and thou shalt have [a] treasure in heaven [the heavens<span class=''>5<\/span>]: and come, follow me. 23And when he heard this, he was [became] very sorrowful: for he was very rich. 24And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful [saw him<span class=''>6<\/span>]: he said, How hardly shall [do<span class=''>7<\/span>] they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! 25For it is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. 26And they that heard <em>it<\/em> said, Who then can be saved? 27And he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God. 28Then Peter said, Lo, we have left all [what was ours<span class=''>8<\/span>], and followed thee. 29And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or wife, or children, for the kingdom of Gods sake, 30Who shall not receive [back] manifold more [many times as much] in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:18<\/span>. <strong>A certain ruler<\/strong>., more particular specification of the indefinite  in Matthew and Mark; perhaps the president of a neighboring synagogue, who, concealed among the people, had heard the instruction of the Saviour, been present at the blessing of the children, and excited by both to address himself with a weighty question to Jesus. According to no one of the Synoptics does he come , like so many before and after him, but on the contrary with a good intention. Noticeable is the comparatively great fulness with which the three Synoptics communicate this occurrence; it has, as is evident, left a deep impression in the circle of the disciples.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Good Teacher<\/strong>.It is not hard to sketch a somewhat vivid portrait of the youthful speaker. He is as little lacking in emotion and enthusiasm, as in fluency of speech and demonstration of honor before Jesus. He is better than the common dependers on works [<em>Werkheiligen<\/em>, lit., work-saints] of that time, under whose self-righteousness there flowed not seldom a current of hypocrisy, but he stands far below to God-fearing men of the Old Testament, in whose hearts, along with the strictest conscientiousness, there ever remained alive the feeling of the necessity of atonement. What he seeks is not grace but reward;the eternal life in which he, probably a member of the sect of the Pharisees, believes, he will earn by his own virtue. Yet still an obscure feeling is ever saying to him that the treasure of his good works is not yet great enough; to his righteousness he wishes to add something more, altogether extraordinary, in order then to be able to be sure of the perfect certainty of his salvation. Before the Saviour departs, he wishes for once to hear from Him the answer to this great question of life. Thus does he stand before us as a man full of good intentions, but without deep self-knowledge; who takes pleasure in the law of God, but at the same time also has complacency in himself, whose words not only express his thoughts, but in a certain sense anticipate them; more worthy of love than of envy,a curious mixture of honesty and of pitiable self-deceit. Not until he is considered from this point of view, is it possible wholly to understand the wisdom and love with which the Saviour treats him. He is in a certain sense the Nicodemus character of the Synoptics, comp. <span class='bible'>Joh 3:2<\/span>, although his history, alas, ends less satisfactorily than that of this teacher in Israel.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:19<\/span>. <strong>Why callest thou me good?<\/strong>Luke simply follows Mark, in giving this answer of our Lord. Respecting the famous various reading in Matt. <em>ad loc. see<\/em> Lange. We for our part are of the opinion that in Matthew the <em>Recepta<\/em> must be retained, and that the reading of Lachmann and Tischendorf has no higher value than that of an old <em>interpretamentum.<\/em> The grounds for this persuasion do not belong here, but as respects the Marcionitic reading of the second part of the answer in Luke:  ,    , it is nothing but a gloss, which does not even bear a strongly Marcionitic character.As to the rest, we scarcely need to remark that the Saviour by this answer: ., &#8230;, is as far from indirectly expressing His own Godhead (the old Dogmatici), as He is from decidedly denying it (the later Rationalists). He contents Himself with declining an epithet which in this mouth would have had no meaning whatever, even as He previously also did not wish from every one to be greeted as the Messiah. Thus does He here give on the one hand an example of modest humility, which contrasts not a little with the self-praise of the young man, and on the other hand He points him, if he will really do what is good, to the highest ideal of perfection.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:20<\/span>. <strong>The commandments<\/strong>.The Saviour names the commandments of the second table, because when the rich man had once seen his lack of love to his neighbor, the conclusion as to his lack of love to <em>God<\/em> could not be difficult. According to Mark and Luke, the   stands first, with internal probability, if we direct our regard to the youth of the questioner. According to the statement of Luke, the Saviour names only five commandments, the  of Mark and the .  .   . of Matthew, being wanting.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:21<\/span>. <strong>All these<\/strong>.In vain hitherto has the Saviour endeavored to draw the attention of the young man to the contrast between his duty and his own ability. The youth is still so taken up with his own virtue, that he thinks that he is able to point courageously to his whole past life, although at the same time, in the obscure foreboding that he may yet perhaps come short, he adds (Matthew):   . The answer of the Saviour does not confirm the truth of his declaration, but only tells him what he, in case it is really so with him, has yet to do.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:22<\/span>. <strong>Distribute<\/strong>., <em>see<\/em> the notes on the text. By the peculiar form of the injunction, the salutary strictness of the command becomes evident. He must not only sell his treasure, never to see it again;even that perhaps in an heroic and high-wrought moment might have been possible;but to distribute the precious wealth with his own hand, piece by piece, among the poor, and thus see the source of his earthly joy, pride, hope, as it were, drop by drop dry up. <em>Distribue, ipse id magnam ltitiam afferre solet piis.<\/em> Bengel. Only when he has in this way killed his selfishness even to the root, may he view himself as perfect in love. Then is the Master ready to give him his recompense and highest good, the place of a disciple, His cross, His heavenly treasure.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:23<\/span>. <strong>Very sorrowful<\/strong>.: Matthew, ; Mark, , . These are all expressions which show that the answer of Jesus produces an intense impression upon the young man. No wonder, it was also very fitting to cure him forever of his foolish self-conceit. Up to this moment, he had thought that the external observance of the manifold commandments might open for him the way to heaven, while he yet had left the <em>commune vinculum<\/em>, the highest principle of all the requirements of God, until now unconsidered. And now it appears that his selfishness is mightier than his seemingly noble love, and that he his life through had already transgressed the first commandment, inasmuch as he offered base worship to Mammon. He becomes aware that to his fabric of virtue even the foundation is yet wanting, and still he had already been hoping to be able to put the capstone on his perfected work. The chasm which lies between knowing and willing, and between willing and doing, becomes to him now plain; he goes away, and it is not impossible that he afterwards returns again; but even though he saw Jesus no more, he has received an instruction which he his whole life long can no more forget. He knows now what is lacking to him, and even though the look of sadness which the Saviour let fall upon the departing one had been a look of irrevocable farewell, yet the lasting loss of this young man would still have been to the rest a gain, on account of the heart-Searching instructions and warnings which Jesus connected with this occurrence.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:24<\/span>. <strong>How hardly<\/strong>.<em>See<\/em> on <span class='bible'>Mat 19:17-29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17-30<\/span>. That the Saviour here teaches, it is true, a relative but by no means absolute impossibility that the rich man should be saved, shows again how far He, in the gospel of Luke, is removed from all Ebionitic contempt of riches. Only when money has us, instead of our possessing the money, does it close against us the entrance to the kingdom of heaven. Comp. besides the well-known golden tractate of Clemens Alexandrinus, <em>Quis dives salvetur<\/em>, also <em>Pdagogus<\/em>, lib. iii. Luke 6. The double form in which Mark (<span class='bible'>Luk 10:23-24<\/span>) communicates the saying of our Lord, is especially adapted to explain more exactly His actual meaning.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:25<\/span>. <strong>A camel<\/strong>.<em>See<\/em> Lange on <span class='bible'>Mat 19:24<\/span>, and Lightfoot, <em>ad loc.<\/em> Beyond doubt there here hovers before the Saviours soul, in particular, the image of the many rich and mighty in His day, whose earthly temper hindered them from receiving Him, while He in the rich young man saw a type of thousands, to whom the disciples in their Chiliastic dreams had already conceded a place of honor in the kingdom of heaven, but with reference to whom it was soon to appear that they, on account of their love to earthly goods, were not fit for the kingdom of God.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:26<\/span>. <strong>Who then can be saved?<\/strong>As well this scene with the ruler, as also this earnest utterance of the Saviour, has taught the disciples to cast a deeper look into their own heart. They feel now that not earthly good in itself closes the entrance into the kingdom of heaven, but that it does so only when one hangs his heart upon it, and that one therefore, even without being in possession of riches, may yet be shut out as a rich man. In the living consciousness that even the poorest may have something of this earthly-mindedness which causes the  to go sorrowful away, they now all, instead of surprise at others, feel concern about themselves, and venture the great question, which the Saviour answers with His compassionate look and a comforting word. Comp. <span class='bible'>Job 42:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 32:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Zec 8:6<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:18<\/span>. <strong>Peter said<\/strong>.According to all three Evangelists, it is Peter with whom first, in the place of concern, there follows not only recovered composure, but even self-complacency. Very characteristic is it, but at the same time amiable, that he here does not place himself exclusively first, but utters it as the collective consciousness of the apostolic circle, that all more or less had done what had proved too hard for the . The peculiar form of his utterance in Luke, we have left  . that which is ours, brings the greater difficulty of the sacrifice made still more strongly into view. Instead of the fear of not being able to be saved, there now springs up within them the hope of extraordinary reward; and it is entirely unmistakable that in this whole utterance, an egoistic love of reward expresses itself, of which it is even more easily conceivable how it could arise in the heart of Peter, than how it could be approved by Jesus. Before, however, we find difficulty in this latter fact, let us notice first that the assertion of Peter was no idle vaunt, but pure truth; that the Saviour Himself had just before attached to the renunciation of earthly good the possession of the heavenly treasure, and that with Peter the craving of reward did not exclude love, but was most intimately connected therewith; and secondly, that our Lord not only approves the hope of recompense, inasmuch as He promises to it the richest satisfaction, but also tempers it and sanctifies it, by the immediately following parable, <span class='bible'>Mat 21:1-16<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:29<\/span>. <strong>Verily I say unto you<\/strong>.Luke gives the answer of the Saviour less precisely and less in detail than Matthew and Mark, yet with all, the chief thoughts are the same, in which, however, we have to consider that the strictly Israelitish form in which the hope of hundredfold reward is uttered in Matt. <span class='bible'>Luk 19:28<\/span>, is less prominent in the Hellenistic gospel of Luke.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Luk 18:30<\/span>. <strong>Receive back<\/strong>, .<em>See<\/em> notes on the text. A still stronger form than in Matthew, and a fitting expression to intimate that he receives what belongs to him as a reward. Afterwards the Saviour expressed the same thought in another form, <span class='bible'>Luk 22:25-30<\/span>. The clause: Many last shall be first, which Matthew and Mark subjoin here, Luke had already given, <span class='bible'>Luk 13:30<\/span>. As a proverb, its frequent repetition is easily intelligible.<\/p>\n<p><strong>In this time, and in the world to come life everlasting<\/strong>.This passage is one of those in which the distinction between the common Synoptic and the Johannean signification of the word   appears most strongly marked. Here, also, as, <em>e.g.<\/em>, <span class='bible'>Mat 19:29<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 25:46<\/span>, and elsewhere, it is something absolutely of the other world.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. <em>See<\/em> on the parallel passages in Matthew and Mark.<\/p>\n<p>2. In the Pauline gospel of Luke also, the history of the rich young man occupies a prominent place, inasmuch as this word serves as a palpable proof of the absolute impossibility of being justified by the works of the law. When the Saviour says to a sinner, in view of the requirements of the law: Do this and thou shalt live, this is done for the very purpose of awakening, by the despair of fulfilling such a requirement, the consciousness of deep sinfulness, and the slumbering longing for grace. In this respect also, the history of the rich young man is a rarely equalled type of the pdagogic wisdom of our Lord, and at the same time a key to the Pauline declaration, <span class='bible'>Rom 7:7-24<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>3. For the apologetics of the Evangelical history, it is of moment to compare the form in which this occurrence is related in the gospel of the Hebrews. Comp. on this the happy remark of Neander, <em>L. J. ad loc.,<\/em> and respecting this whole narrative, the dissertation of K. Wimmer, <em>Stud. u. Krit.<\/em> 1845, i. p. 115.<\/p>\n<p>4. The evangelical idea of the sinlessness of our Lord is in no way endangered by the negative:   . The declaration is the expression of the same humble subordination to God, penetrated by which Jesus also, although knowing Himself one with the Father, yet designates the Father as the One sending Him, teaching Him, sanctifying Him, glorifying Him,in one word, as the greater. Ever, indeed, is the Father the original source, as of all being, so of all goodness; the absolutely Good, in His holiness ever the same, while in contrast with Him even the Son, as Man, is one developing in goodness and holiness, perfecting Himself through prayers, conflicts, sorrows, and suffering, unto Divine glory. Ullmann.<\/p>\n<p>5. The whole history of the rich young man is a powerful testimony to the spirit of the first commandment in the Decalogue. Evidently the Saviour was not concerned with the wealth of the  in itself,for some misfortune or other might then have easily freed him from his possessions; but He wished to detach him from the idol to which his heart was bound. If his idol had been something else, <em>e.g.<\/em>, ambition, the Saviour would not have given him this commandment; he would have fulfilled it without trouble, nay, perhaps would even have boasted of his beneficence; but since his weak side is the love of money, the commandment of self-denial approaches him precisely in this relatively accidental form, that it may become evident to. him how only he who can renounce that which is highest, is on the way to gain that which is best. Hard was the requirement, but it was the severity of love.<\/p>\n<p>[After all, our Lord only required of this young man what the apostles, as Peter declares, had already done; and even worldly wisdom does not now venture to dispute that the preminent honor which they have gained to all ages of the world thereby, has of itself been a hundred times over worth the sacrifice. What emperor in Christendom would dare for a moment to compare his dignity with that of an apostle, or an evangelist, or even the helper of an apostle? And certainly we may believe that the young ruler, who could have made a still greater sacrifice, and whom Jesus, even at His first and only meeting with him, came to regard with so peculiar an affection, was fitted to occupy no mean place in the kingdom of God. So true is it, that even as respects this world, he missed the opportunity of placing himself on such an eminence, as no potentate of his age ever came within sight of.C. C. S.]<\/p>\n<p>6. The promise of manifold reward for the sacrifice made for the kingdom of heaven, had already been given to the disciples in another form, <span class='bible'>Luk 6:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 12:35-37<\/span>. Here, In particular, must be considered how the Saviour, after He had promised them more than the most glowing imagination could expect, makes haste to oppose every narrow self-seeking and false rest in their soul. He takes from them therewith at once the fancy of their being the only ones so highly distinguished. In an entirely general way He promises for all following times to all a hundredfold recompense who should renounce anything for the kingdom of heavens sake. They should not lack companions of the high fortune which they desired above all things. But that they might not now too early rest upon their laurels, they are on the other hand disquieted by the thought: Those who are now the first, may afterwards very possibly become the last. How thoroughly in earnest, moreover, the Saviour was as to this promise of the hundredfold recompense even in this life, appears from the history of the kingdom of God in all times, comp. <em>e.g.<\/em>, what Paul offered for its sake and afterwards gained. Or consider the French refugees who for the cause of truth and reformation left their native country, and even yet in their posterity are visibly and wonderfully blest! [What blood more honorable in our country than the blood of the Huguenots?C. C. S.]<\/p>\n<p>7. The whole instruction of our Lord, as well concerning the dangers of riches as concerning the rich recompense of that which is offered up for Him, acquires an additional and peculiar importance if we consider that this was uttered in the presence of Judas, only a few days before the germinating in him of the dark plan of betrayal.<br \/>[8. We must bear in mind that while as yet the might of Christian love had scarcely begun to be felt in the world, riches were to their possessors a temptation to hard-hearted voluptuousness in a degree scarcely possible now. In Christendom, imperfect as it is, even a worldly man, in spite of himself, is forced in some measure to take a Christian view of his wealth. This does not, by any means, remove the danger of riches, but it increases the probability, in each particular case, that those dangers will be surmounted.C. C. S.]<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sacrifices for the kingdom of heaven are: 1. Required, <span class='bible'>Luk 18:18-22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luke 2<\/span>. refused, <span class='bible'>Luk 18:23-27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luke 3<\/span>. made, <span class='bible'>Luk 18:28<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luke 4<\/span>. rewarded, <span class='bible'>Luk 18:29-30<\/span>.The ruler of the synagogue at the feet of Him who is the Lord of the temple.Jesus, over against the rich young man, truly the Good Master, although He declines this honorable appellation.The rich young man the type of the man who has much that is needed for his salvation, but not all: 1. His portrait; 2. his fate.How little even the knowing of the commandments helps us.The strictness of the Saviour towards the virtuous, His mildness towards the deeply-fallen sinner, and in both cases His heavenly love.The advantage of an untroubled retrospect upon a well-spent and unspotted youth: 1. A rare; 2. an inestimable; 3. a dangerous, advantage.One thing thou yet lackest: 1. A kindly intended felicitation, because only <em>one thing<\/em>; 2. an earnest warning, because in the one <em>all<\/em> is lacking to him.What the rich young man really lacks is love to God above all things.Whoever will teach others to recognize their own sins against God, does best when he begins with their duties towards their neighbor, <span class='bible'>1Jn 4:20<\/span>.The treasure in heaven: 1. Its high value; 2. its dear price.True care for the poor must be a personal one.The rich young man: 1. Trebly rich, <em>a<\/em>. in treasures, <em>b<\/em>. in virtues, <em>c<\/em>. in self-conceit; 2. trebly poor, <em>a<\/em>. in self-knowledge, <em>b<\/em>. in love, <em>c<\/em>. in heavenly possessions.The ruinous power of a single darling sin, <span class='bible'>Ecc 10:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 5:29-30<\/span>.How earthly-mindedness: 1. Contemns the King of the kingdom of God; 2. despises the fundamental law of the kingdom of God; 3. forfeits the blessedness of the kingdom of God.How the Saviour will cure man of his earthly-mindedness by leading him to the way: 1. Of self-knowledge; 2. of self-denial; 3. of self-surrender to Him.The love of Christ over against the might of the <em>ego<\/em>: 1. How deep it looks; 2. how much it requires; 3. how richly it rewards.Why is it harder for the rich than for so many others to enter into the kingdom of heaven?How hardly, &amp;c.: 1. A word of terror for the earthly-minded wealthy; 2. a word of comfort for the heavenly-minded poor; 3. a word of thanksgiving for rich and poor who have really overcome the difficulty and have entered into the kingdom of heaven.The being saved: 1. On its humanly impossible; 2. on its Divinely possible and easy, side.How far the question, What shall we have therefore? from the Christian point of view is permitted or censurable.The recompense in the kingdom of heaven: 1. Its extent, <em>a<\/em>. in this, <em>b<\/em>. in the future, life; 2. its conditions: one must, <em>a<\/em>. really have left all, and this then, <em>b<\/em>. not out of mercenariness, but out of love.<\/p>\n<p>Starke:Canstein:Our first and chiefest question should be concerning everlasting life.Brentius:The law is spiritual, and requires internal and external obedience.In religion nature and grace must be well distinguished.Let man be taught to distinguish well the general and the special calling of God.Hedinger:Woe to you, ye rich, <span class='bible'>Luk 6:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ti 6:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jam 5:1<\/span>.<em>Bibl. Wirt<\/em>:Let not thy mouth water too much after worldly goods, because they are more a hindrance than a help to salvation, <span class='bible'>Pro 30:8<\/span>.Rising concern for salvation must be regarded and welcomed as a messenger of grace.Hedinger:All lost, all gained.Brentius:The lust of reward here cleaves even, it seems, to the best dispositions.To the children and servants of God belongs all the good which the kingdom of grace and glory possesses; what would they more? <span class='bible'>1Co 3:21-23<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Palmer:What lack I yet? 1. What answer our own heart would be glad to give; 2. what the Lord answers thereto.Of the unhappy contradiction in which so many men are involved with themselves.W. Hofacker:Good labor brings noble recompense.C. J. Nitzsch:No one is good saving God alone: 1. In what sense the expression is meant; 2. how in the light of it Jesus Himself appears to us; 3. whether, then, where it holds good, there yet can be any well-grounded confidence in our neighbor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[4]<\/span><span class='bible'>Luk 18:22<\/span>.. The simple , which A., D., L., M., ., and some others have, and also Lachmann, is taken from the parallels.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[5]<\/span><span class='bible'>Luk 18:22<\/span>.According to B., D.,   . [Cod. Sin.,  .] The singular of the <em>Recepta<\/em> is from Matthew and Mark.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[6]<\/span><span class='bible'>Luk 18:24<\/span>.E. V.: saw that <em>he was very sorrowful.<\/em> [    . , according to B., Cod. Sin., L. Accepted by Tischendorf, Tregelles, Alford.C. C. S.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[7]<\/span><span class='bible'>Luk 18:24<\/span>. [according to B., L. Cod. Sin. has .C. C. S.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[8]<\/span><span class='bible'>Luk 18:28<\/span>.  (without ), according to Griesbach, Lachmann, [Tischendorf, Tregelles, Alford,] on the authority of B., L., 157.  is taken from the parallels.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> (18) And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? (19) And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is God. (20) Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother. (21) And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up. (22) Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing; sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me. (23) And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich. (24) And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful: he said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! (25) For it is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. (26) And they that heard it, said, Who then can be saved? (27) And he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God. (28) Then Peter said, Lo, we have left all, and followed thee. (29) And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or wife, or children for the kingdom of God&#8217;s sake, (30) Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life ever-lasting.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> Both Matthew and Mark have recorded, and nearly in the same words, this interview which Jesus had with this ruler. <span class='bible'>Mat 19:16<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17<\/span> . I refer to the observations there offered upon it. Every incident in our Lord&#8217;s ministry becomes interesting, but to notice the whole would lead into endless discourses. Truly it must be said, and without a figure concerning the person and work of the Lord Jesus, there is no end of his greatness.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong> XIV<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> THE RICH YOUNG RULER; DEATH AND RESURRECTION FORETOLD; THE SELFISH AMBITION OF JAMES AND JOHN REBUKED<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> Harmony, pages 132-136 and <span class='bible'>Mat 19:16-20:28<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ; <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17-45<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ; <span class='bible'>Luk 18:18-34<\/span><\/strong> <strong> .<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> This section commences on page 132 of the Harmony; the first three pages of the section constitute a distinct subsection, because all that is said in it arises from the coming of the young ruler to Christ. This coming of this rich young man to Christ, related by Matthew, Mark, and Luke, is the occasion of four distinct lessons, which I group around four passages of Scripture: The first, &#8220;One thing thou lackest&#8221;; the second, &#8220;It is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God&#8221;; the third, Peter said, &#8220;Lo, we have left all, and followed thee&#8217; what then shall we have?&#8221;; and the fourth, &#8220;But many shall be last that are first; and first that are last.&#8221; Everything in this section may be arranged around these four scriptures.<\/p>\n<p> The teaching of the Bible, especially the teaching of our Lord, on the subject of riches, calls for careful interpretation. The teaching is very abundant and manifold in both Testaments. Probably no other subject is more extensively discussed. We may accept as safe the following conclusions on these teachings: To be rich or to be poor is not in itself a sin; either may be a token of divine favor. Exceptional temptations and dangers, however, attend either great riches or extreme poverty. Agur&#8217;s prayer was wise (<span class='bible'>Pro 30:8-9<\/span> ) : Give me neither poverty nor riches; Feed me with the food that is needful for me: Lest I be full, and deny thee, and say, Who is Jehovah? Or lest I be poor, and steal, And use profanely the name of my God.<\/p>\n<p> But we may pray for others as John prayed for Gaius: &#8220;I pray that in all things thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.&#8221; This expresses the great law and standard. Be as rich as you please, even as your soul prospers; keep your soul on top, but do not love wealth more than God, nor trust in uncertain riches. Wealth is a trust which brings blessings rightly used or curses wrongly used. We are perfectly safe in accepting those conclusions concerning the manifold teachings in both Testaments on the subject of wealth.<\/p>\n<p> Jesus said to this young ruler, &#8220;One thing thou lackest.&#8221; This young ruler&#8217;s sin is discovered to him by the throbbing heart of our Lord and is found to be his refusal to accept God&#8217;s paramount authority and sovereignty in one point alone: &#8220;One thing thou lackest: go, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me.&#8221; There seems to be more than one point here, but they are different sides to the same thought &#8220;selling all&#8221; is the negative side; &#8220;following Jesus&#8221; is the positive side. Heavenly treasure must be preferred to earthly treasure. This young man preferred the earthly treasure. Following Christ must be preferred to following mammon. This young man preferred to follow mammon. Let the reader observe that this case is introduced with the answer, &#8220;Keep the commandments.&#8221; This young man, relying upon salvation through obedience to the law, supposed that he had kept the Commandments all his life. It was necessary to prove to him that he had not kept them perfectly: &#8220;If thou wouldst be perfect.&#8221; We are not to understand our Lord to teach that the universal condition of eternal life is that men must actually give all their possessions to the poor, nor that fallen man can keep the law of God perfectly, but the soul must accept God&#8217;s sovereignty in all things. It must love treasure in heaven more than the treasure on earth. It must follow Jesus. There must not be even one thing reserved from God&#8217;s supremacy; there must be a complete surrender of our mind to God&#8217;s mind. These are great matters: The question of sovereignty, the question of true objects upon which affections should be placed, and the question of obedience. We may not satisfy ourselves with compromise or reservation. We may not Compound with sins we are inclined to, By damning those we have no mind to.<\/p>\n<p> The next part of this discussion hinges on &#8220;the camel and a needle&#8217;s eye.&#8221; The camel was the largest animal familiarly known to the Jews of Palestine in Christ&#8217;s day and a needle&#8217;s eye one of the smallest openings. To say, then, that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for &amp; rich man to enter the kingdom of God, naturally expresses not something difficult, but something that is impossible, and is so meant here; the disciples so understood it, and our Lord, later in his explanation, confirmed their construction. It was the custom of our Lord that when he desired to attract attention and to so impress the memory that his hearers would never forget, to employ very striking sayings, but men when they come to interpret these sayings, are tempted to take all the snap out of them by trying to soften the meaning, for example (See Harmony, middle column, page 133, Mark&#8217;s account, latter part of <span class='bible'>Mar 10:24<\/span> ): &#8220;How hard it is for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God.&#8221; That seems to be an explanation of what k he says, and yet that is a gloss, a human gloss. I mean to say, that verse does not appear in the two oldest Greek manuscripts, the Sinaitic and the Vatican, and that its appearance in later manuscripts is easier to account for as a marginal gloss by the copyist (he is doing it according to his opinion of what it means), than it is to suppose that such a statement as that would have been left out of the oldest manuscripts. The interpolating copyist is trying to soften Christ&#8217;s hard saying. It is true that they that trust in riches cannot enter the kingdom of heaven. The interpolated doctrine is taught in other scriptures, but it is not a part of this scripture and should not be so received. It is one of the passages that is certainly spurious. Consider another gloss:<\/p>\n<p> When I was a child in Sunday school, all the Sunday school lessons had this explanation: The Jaffa-gate at Jerusalem had a little side-gate much smaller than the other, and over that little gate was its name written, &#8220;The Needle&#8217;s Eye,&#8221; and no camel could go through that little gate without getting on its knees and having its load taken off. That seemed to be, and is, a most beautiful illustration. The rich man must kneel and have his load taken off him before he can get in, but it is probable that the gate of the Sunday school lesson got its name as a development of this text, rather than being its cause.<\/p>\n<p> Another explanatory gloss in this, that the Greek word of the text should not be <em> kamelos<\/em> , &#8220;a camel,&#8221; but <em> kamilos<\/em> , &#8220;a cable.&#8221; Those who have been about wharves or vessels and have noted the eye or loop of a cable in comparison with a needle&#8217;s eye may see how much this play upon words relieves the difficulty. It would then mean for a camel to go through the eye of a cable. But as every text has <em> kamelos<\/em> , and not <em> kamilos<\/em> , we need not believe any of it.<\/p>\n<p> The disciples were exceedingly amazed and they rightly said, &#8220;Who then can be saved?&#8221; They had been taught that riches are a blessing sent from God, and that he promises prosperity to those who love and obey him. If it be impossible for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God, &#8220;Who then can be saved?&#8221; Our Lord&#8217;s answer practically says, &#8220;It is impossible for anybody to enter the kingdom of heaven,&#8221; that is, in themselves. Impossible with men, but possible with God. His teaching seems to be this: That in order to enter into the kingdom of heaven there must be something apart from any power in us. Now this rich young man had been well taught, but he had never been regenerated. He was trying to keep the law of God perfectly, and a camel might just as well try to go through the eye of a needle. It is an impossibility for any man in himself, apart from an extraneous power, to enter into the kingdom of God. We may try to set our affections on heavenly treasures, but we have to be regenerated before we can do it. Christ&#8217;s questions were designed to show him just where his difficulty lay. He must be willing at least to give up everything and follow Jesus. To show that they thus understood it, it is manifest from Peter&#8217;s words: &#8220;Then answered Peter and said unto him, Lo, we have left all, and followed thee; what then shall we have?&#8221; He claims that what was required of this rich man is just what they had done. Christ found them engaged in the fishing business, making a living by it, and said to them, &#8220;Leave this business and come, follow me. I will make you fishers of men.&#8221; &#8220;If then the rich man when obedient shall have treasure in heaven, what shall we have?&#8221; Or, &#8220;What shall we have hereafter, and what shall we have in this world?&#8221; Listen to the answer: &#8220;And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, that ye who have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit on the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, (or wife), or children, or lands, for my sake, shall receive a hundred fold, and shall inherit eternal life&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Mat 19:28-29<\/span> ).<\/p>\n<p> This does not mean, &#8220;you that have followed me in the regeneration,&#8221; but &#8220;you that follow me now shall have in the regeneration.&#8221; The phrase, &#8220;in the regeneration,&#8221; marks the time of the reward and not of the following. He is telling first what they shall have hereafter. What then, is the meaning of the word &#8220;regeneration&#8221; here? Precisely the same word, <em> paliggenesia<\/em> , is found in <span class='bible'>Tit 3:5<\/span> and there refers to the new birth of a man, but here to the new birth of the world, which in <span class='bible'>Act 3:21<\/span> Peter calls the times of the restoration of all things and which in his second letter he describes as the destruction and renewal of the material universe (<span class='bible'>2Pe 3:7-13<\/span> ). To the same great climax of the world&#8217;s history Paul refers in <span class='bible'>Rom 8:19-23<\/span> where the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together with us waiting for the redemption of our bodies. It is the clear teaching of the Bible that this earth, which was cursed on account of man&#8217;s sin, shall itself have a regeneration; not only shall man be redeemed, but his habitat shall be redeemed. There shall be a new heaven and a new earth. There shall come a great fire in which the heavens shall be rolled together as a scroll and the earth wrapped in flame shall be burned, not annihilated, for out of the purgation of that fire in the dissolution of the material universe there shall come the new heaven and the new earth, like that which was pronounced good when God originally made it. &#8220;Now, you ask me what you shall have,&#8221; says Jesus. &#8220;I tell you what ye shall have: in the regeneration [that is, hereafter], when the Son of man comes in his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.&#8221; And Paul says, &#8220;Know ye not that the saints shall judge the world? . . . Know ye not that we shall judge angels?&#8221; Now, when Christ comes again he takes his own people to himself at his right hand. They sit down with him, sit on his throne and share in the judgment that he pronounces upon wicked men and fallen angels. See a similar promise in <span class='bible'>Rev 2:26-27<\/span> . In other words, Christ, the Son of man, shall lift up by his redemption, all of his people who have suffered, to sit with him on his throne, sharing with him as co-heirs of God, and that is why man, who for a little season is made lower than angels, will be lifted up above them and shall have all dominion and everything shall be in subjection to him. &#8220;Now, you apostles left your possessions, quit your business, dropped your nets and left your homes! left everything, you twelve apostles; when I said follow me, you followed me. So you will have a reward for that hereafter.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> Then he goes on to show what they shall have now, and that not only is to the apostles, but to every Christian: &#8220;There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or mother, or father, or children, or lands, for my sake, and for the gospel&#8217;s sake, but he shall receive a hundred fold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions: and in the world to come eternal life&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Mar 10:29-30<\/span> ). A hundredfold now. The question arises here, what did Jesus mean by that? If you leave one acre of land, that you will in this life receive a farm of 100 acres? That is not his meaning, but you do in this world receive some of these things in a sense. Let us suppose, for instance, that your father and mother and brother and sister and wife, every one of them, opposed your being a Christian, and that to be a Christian, you must lose the affection of every one of them. Now in this world you will receive the affection of 100 fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, and wives. You will find that a new family and a new kingdom exists among the people of God. You will recall when Jesus was so intensely interested in teaching on one occasion that he would not even stop to eat, that his mother and his brothers came to arrest him under a writ of lunacy. Somebody said to him, &#8220;Your mother and your brothers are standing out there.&#8221; He answered, &#8220;Who is my mother? Who are my brothers?&#8221; and raising his hands to his disciples, he said, &#8220;Behold, my brothers and my mother and my sisters.&#8221; You get into a new spiritual family. The old earthly kinsfolk may go against you, the spiritual kinsfolk will be for you. That is what it means as to this world. In other words, &#8220;Godliness with contentment is great gain. It has the promise of the life that now is and of the world to come,&#8221; both of them. Receive that deep into your heart, but receive it in the sense that the Lord meant it.<\/p>\n<p> We now come to another one of the scriptures around which lessons are grouped: &#8220;But many shall be last that are first, and first that are last.&#8221; This proverb he explains by a parable. The time that you have been in the service of God does not count, so much as the spirit and the quality of your services. One may say, &#8220;Here is a young Christian; he was converted only three years ago and behold how exalted, while I am still at the bottom, though I have been a member of the church forty-five years [and asleep all the time].&#8221; Who shall be the first of these twelve disciples? Is it the one that Christ called first in order of time? Is that the one? Here in the parable are some men that commenced work the first hour of the day and some that commenced the eleventh hour of the day, and these eleventh-hour men were paid first and received just as much as the ones who, as they said, had borne the burden and the heat of the day.<\/p>\n<p> I heard Dr. Tom Eaton, who, by the way, was a marvelous expounder of God&#8217;s Word, before my prayer meeting in Waco deliver a lecture on this parable of the laborers. He said:<\/p>\n<p> I want to inquire on what principle Christ paid the eleventh-hour men as much as he paid those that had worked longer. I think this may be recognized as the principle: These later men explain why they are not at work. They say &#8220;No man hath hired us. We have had no opportunity. We reported ready for work; we went to the place where workmen are employed. We have wanted to work we have needed the work we held ourselves in readiness to work but there were no openings.&#8221; David&#8217;s men detailed to stay in camp and watch over the baggage, received an equal portion with those who went and fought the battle. They would have gone if they had been commanded to go and how many hundreds of their brethren, brokenhearted men, are begging for work I They want work. It is enough to make one weep to see a man who feels that he is called to preach, whose soul is on fire to preach, longing and hungering for the care of a church and no church calls him. Perhaps he has not the attractive qualities of some other men, perhaps the modern standard of employment is not of the right kind. Some churches have itching ears and they want preachers who will preach something pleasing to them, and daub with untempered mortar, and it does not follow that every man that is idle, is sinfully idle.<\/p>\n<p> That was Tom Eaton&#8217;s explanation, and there is sense in it. But this parable gives another explanation: The sovereignty of God. If I give a man that only came at the last hour as much as I give a man who commenced at the beginning of the day on a special contract, what is it to that first man? Can&#8217;t I do as I please with my own? In other words, God is the sovereign and we must never lose sight of that.<\/p>\n<p> The next section (of two pages) has two great lessons arising from one occasion. <span class='bible'>Mar 10:32<\/span> thus gives the occasion: &#8220;And they were in the way, going up to Jerusalem; and Jesus was going before them: and they were amazed; and they that followed were afraid.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> What excited that amazement and fear? He was saying nothing. It was something startling and marvelous in his appearance. The shadow of an awful coming event invested his face with a pathetic solemnity, a realization of the approaching tragedy, and a sublime purpose of resignation. More than once the historians refer to this bearing of Jesus, this majestic presence, radiating his glory in a way to separate him from all other men and to put him above all other men. His disciples once saw him praying, and something in his manner convinced them that they knew not how to pray. They saw him on the mount of transfiguration radiating his glory, and they were as drunken men at the sight. Later, in Gethsemane, his presence or bearing, caused the company of soldiers who came to arrest him to fall back as if smitten with lightning.<\/p>\n<p> On the occasion we are considering he answers their unspoken amazement and fear. He explains the handwriting of tragedy on his own face. He foretells minutely his approaching arrest in Jerusalem and all its attendant indignities; his crucifixion and his resurrection. But they understood it not. How blind they were, not to understand that the crosses must precede the crown! Their minds kept leaping forward to a glorious earth kingdom with its high places of honor. So Peter, immediately after his great confession at Caesarea Philippi, had said of Christ&#8217;s humiliating death: &#8220;Be it far from thee, Lord.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> So here two of his disciples, James and John, working through their ambitious mother, are petitioning for the places of honor at his right hand and left hand, in his kingdom.<\/p>\n<p> My old friend, Mr. Bartlett, of Marlin, once put into my hands a newspaper clipping which related a remarkable occurrence at the Pan-Episcopal Convention in London. The clipping set forth that Dean Stanley put up to preach in Westminster Abbey the bishop of Haiti, a coal black, thicklipped Negro, who, unawed by storied urn and animated bust, or the representatives of royalty, nobility, boundless wealth and aristocratic pride, calmly took this text: &#8220;The mother of Zebedee&#8217;s children said, Lord give my son John the place at thy right hand in thy kingdom and give my son James a place at thy left hand in thy kingdom,&#8221; and then said, &#8220;Let us pray:<\/p>\n<p> &ldquo;O Lord, thou who didst make of one blood all the nations of men that inhabit the earth and didst fashion their hearts alike, give thou to the sons of Shem that betrayed thee a place on thy right hand, and give to the sons of Japheth that crucified thee a place on thy left hand, but Lord, give to the sons of Ham, the sons of that Simon, the Cyrenean, that bore thy cross, a place at the outer gate where some of the light of the heavenly city may fall on them and where they can hear some of the sweet music, but where looking earthward they can see Ethiopia stretching out her hands to God and behold her dusky children coming home in penitence to God and be the first to welcome them there.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> It is a marvelous prayer, if correctly reported.<\/p>\n<p> One very important lesson we may deduce from this petition of the mother of Zebedee&#8217;s children. The Romanists claim that Peter received away back yonder, that is, at Caesarea Philippi, the primacy; that he received from the hands of Christ the first place; that he was made Pope. But if indeed that question was settled then, how could John and James here suppose that the highest places were yet to be assigned, and how could the same matter of honor or precedence arise again at the last Passover supper? But look at our Lord&#8217;s reply: &#8220;Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink the cup that I am about to drink?&#8221; The sons prompted the mother to make the request and were with her. So Bathsheba, who came to David requesting that Solomon, her son, should succeed him upon the throne. Ambitious mothers! Our Lord rebukes the ambitious sons: &#8220;You ask for the high places, but high places must be preceded by high service. Are you able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of? Are you able to be baptized with that baptism that I am baptized with? Are you able to establish your title to precedence, and to do the services that obtain primacy in the kingdom of heaven?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> When the ten heard this application they were moved with indignation. The ten includes Peter; the ten includes nine others. What does it show? Virgil once asked, when he was describing how the gods intervened to destroy Troy, &#8220;Can such ire exist in celestial minds?&#8221; So here we may ask, &#8220;Can such envy exist in apostolic minds?&#8221; Did you ever notice at conventions an ambitious desire to be made prominent?<\/p>\n<p> Now comes the great lesson (p. 136), <span class='bible'>Mat 20:25-28<\/span> : &#8220;Ye know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. Not so shall it be among you; but whosoever would become great among you shall be your minister; and whosoever would be first among you shall be your servant: even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.&#8221; Now, I solemnly assure you that instead of craving the prominent places and positions, it is far better to crave the spirit of service and sacrifice, that will entitle you to the prominent places.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> QUESTIONS<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. What are the four scriptures around which the four lessons occasioned by the rich young ruler&#8217;s coming to our Lord are grouped?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. What may be regarded as safe conclusions on the teachings of our Lord concerning riches?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. What was Agur&#8217;s prayer relative to riches?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. What was John&#8217;s prayer for Gaius and its lesson?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. What was the one thing the &#8220;rich young ruler&#8221; lacked, or what was his one sin?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. What was the double idea in Christ&#8217;s language to him, &#8220;Go, sell,&#8221; etc., and what the application?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. Had he kept the Commandments? If not, in what point had he failed?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. What are three great questions for every soul?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. What couplet cited in point, and who wrote it?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. What is the meaning of the &#8220;needle&#8217;s eye,&#8221; negatively and positively?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. What question did the illustration call forth from the disciples, what Christ&#8217;s answer and what his meaning?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 12. What question did this call forth from Peter, and Christ&#8217;s reply?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 13. What did Christ mean both negatively and positively by &#8220;in the regeneration&#8221;?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 14. Give the Bible teaching on the &#8220;regeneration&#8221; of the earth.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 15. What is the meaning of &#8220;sit upon twelve thrones,&#8221; etc., and how does the thought apply to all Christians?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 16. How are we to receive a hundredfold for the sacrifices we make here in this world for Christ and what was Christ&#8217;s own illustration of this thought?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 17. What is the point illustrated by the parable of the laborers and Dr. Baton&#8217;s explanation of it?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 18. What other point explained by this parable?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 19. Explain the amazement of the disciples on the way to Jerusalem and illustrate by other scriptures.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 20. How does Christ answer their amazement and fear and how did they receive the explanation?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 21. How does the ambition of James and John here manifest itself? Relate the incident of the Pan-Episcopal Convention in London.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 22. What lesson from this incident of the mother of Zebedee&#8217;s children relative to Peter and the papacy?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 23. What was our Lord&#8217;s answer to this request and its lessons?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 24. How did this request of Zebedee&#8217;s sons affect the other ten, and what does it show?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 25. What is the great law of promotion in the kingdom of God?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: B.H. Carroll&#8217;s An Interpretation of the English Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 18 And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? <strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Ver. 18. <strong> And a certain ruler<\/strong> ] St Mark, <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17<\/span> , saith that this ruler came running, which argues his earnestness, and in a man of quality was unusual, for such walk softly for most part, and in state, <em> Gressu grallatorio.<\/em> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 18 30.<\/strong> ] QUESTION OF A RICH RULER: OUR LORD&rsquo;S ANSWER, AND DISCOURSE THEREUPON. <span class='bible'>Mat 19:16-30<\/span> . <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17-31<\/span> . The only addition in our narrative is that the young man was <em> a ruler<\/em> , perhaps of the synagogue: see notes on Matt. and Mark.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Henry Alford&#8217;s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Luk 18:18-23<\/span> . <em> The young ruler<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Mat 19:16-22<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Mar 10:17-22<\/span> ). From a didactic point of view this narrative is closely connected with the two preceding. The three set forth conditions of entrance into the Kingdom of God self-abasement, childlikeness, and single-mindedness.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Luk 18:18<\/span> .  , a ruler; this definite statement in Lk. only.   . instead of  <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Luk 18:18-27<\/p>\n<p> 18A ruler questioned Him, saying, &#8220;Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?&#8221; 19And Jesus said to him, &#8220;Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone. 20You know the commandments, &#8216;Do not commit adultery, Do not murder, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother.'&#8221; 21And he said, &#8220;All these things I have kept from my youth.&#8221; 22When Jesus heard this, He said to him, &#8220;One thing you still lack; sell all that you possess and distribute it to the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.&#8221; 23But when he had heard these things, he became very sad, for he was extremely rich. 24And Jesus looked at him and said, &#8220;How hard it is for those who are wealthy to enter the kingdom of God! 25For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.&#8221; 26They who heard it said, &#8220;Then who can be saved?&#8221; 27But He said, &#8220;The things that are impossible with people are possible with God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:18 &#8220;A ruler&#8221; It is uncertain exactly what this title (archn) means, though in Joh 3:1 it refers to Nicodemus being a member of the Sanhedrin (cf. Luk 23:13; Luk 23:35; Luk 24:20). It may refer to the person who was in charge of the local synagogue (cf. Luk 8:41; Luk 14:1). It obviously refers to a well respected leader, possibly a judge (cf. Luk 12:58).<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life&#8221; This is exactly the same question that the Scribe asked in Luk 10:25 with an emphasis on personal performance. This is exactly the opposite of Luk 18:17. Eternal life and the Kingdom of God are parallel. See note on eternal life at Luk 18:30.<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:19 &#8220;Why do you call Me good&#8221; We must remember that this is not a theological passage dealing with the person of Jesus Christ. Many try to use this as a proof-text that Jesus did not consider Himself to be divine. This question and statement of Jesus reflects this man&#8217;s understanding about his ability to be right with God based on his own efforts. This passage is similar to Mat 19:16, which reads &#8220;teacher, what good things shall I do to obtain eternal life.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:20 The Ten Commandments are listed in Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5. They basically break into two aspects: (1) human&#8217;s view of and relationship to God and (2) human&#8217;s view of and relationship with Covenant brothers and sisters. This list is out of order from the Masoretic Text of both Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5 as they relate to the proper relationship between Covenant people.<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:21 &#8220;And he said, &#8216;All these things I have kept from my youth&#8221; This man was not lying. He is asserting that he had lived up to all the religious requirements and traditions of his day since his bar mitzvah at age 13. Paul asserts this very same truth in Php 3:6.<\/p>\n<p>We know from Rom 1:18 through Luk 3:23 that all men have sinned. We must remember that only the Spirit of God reveals this truth to the human heart.<\/p>\n<p>This is the first required truth of the gospel. No one needs a savior until they recognize their need. Self-righteousness is a cruel and deceptive taskmaster. The gospel is only &#8220;good news&#8221; when one recognizes the bad news of Genesis 3 and human rebellion. No human will boast before God (cf. Eph 2:8-9).<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:22 &#8220;One thing you still lack; sell all that you possess&#8221; This is an aorist active imperative. Jesus recognized this man&#8217;s priority structure. The parallel in Mar 10:21 and some ancient uncial manuscripts of Luke (A and W) tell that Jesus had great care and love for this man, but he would not lower the standard of the gospel to allow him to receive eternal life. This is not a universal requirement for all humans (cf. Zaccheus, Luke 19). But it is a recurring statement (cf. Luk 18:28; Luk 12:33-34). Jesus realized that this man&#8217;s heart was not fully turned to God. Anything in our lives that keeps us from fully trusting God is an idol and must be dealt with (cf. Mat 6:24).<\/p>\n<p>It is possible that Jesus was calling this man to be a disciple like the Twelve (cf. Mat 19:21; Mar 10:21). This man could have been a significant Christian leader, but the pull of riches (cf. Luk 8:14) paralyzed the possibilities! Jesus used this very command (&#8220;come, follow Me&#8221;) to call others:<\/p>\n<p>1. Levi (Matthew), Mar 2:14; Luk 5:27; Mat 9:9<\/p>\n<p>2. Peter and Andrew, Mat 4:19<\/p>\n<p>3. Philip, Joh 1:43<\/p>\n<p>However, it must also be said that this is a call to discipleship for all followers, not just the Twelve (cf. Mat 8:22; Mat 16:24; Mar 8:34; Luk 9:23; Luk 9:59; Joh 10:27; Joh 12:26; Joh 21:22). The gospel is<\/p>\n<p>1. the welcoming of a person (Jesus)<\/p>\n<p>2. believing truth about that person (the gospel, the NT)<\/p>\n<p>3. living a life like that person (Christlikeness)<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;distribute it to the poor&#8221; This is an aorist active imperative. Jesus cares for the poor. He always had time for them. The issue here is not the poor as a social problem, but this man&#8217;s priority structure (cf. Mat 6:24). Remember the Jews of this day saw wealth as a gift from God for righteous living (cf. Deuteronomy 27-29). Paul uses this very illustration in 1Co 13:3.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;treasure in heaven&#8221; This reminds one of Mat 6:19-21. What one considers &#8220;treasure&#8221; reveals that person&#8217;s value structure.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;come, follow Me&#8221; &#8220;Come&#8221; is an adverb used in the sense of an imperative (cf. Mat 19:21; Mar 10:21). &#8220;Follow Me&#8221; is a present active imperative which emphasizes an ongoing following. Notice how Jesus switched the question from &#8220;doing good&#8221; to &#8220;following Him.&#8221; He, not human performance, is the key to eternal life.<\/p>\n<p>The NT emphasis is not on an initial decision, although that is certainly important, but on continuing faith and discipleship. The NT emphasizes relationship even before doctrinal content and lifestyle. These three criteria form the triad of assurance in the NT (cf. Mar 2:14; Mar 8:34; Mar 10:21; Mat 4:19; Mat 8:22; Mat 9:9; Mat 16:24; Mat 19:21; Luk 5:17; Luk 9:23; Luk 9:59; Luk 18:22; Joh 1:43; Joh 10:27; Joh 12:26; Joh 21:22).<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:24 &#8220;How hard it is for those who are wealthy to enter the kingdom of God&#8221; The disciples&#8217; reaction recorded in Luk 18:26 shows us how surprised they were that wealth was not a sign of God&#8217;s blessing. Notice that the singular verbs and pronouns starting in Luk 18:18 now become plurals (general statement). Jesus is asserting here that those who have worldly things and positions tend to trust in their own resources and not in God (cf. Mat 19:23-30; Mar 10:23-31). Jesus is addressing the problem of wealth and salvation using this ruler as an example.<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:25 &#8220;For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle&#8221; There have been several theories to describe this statement.<\/p>\n<p>1. the term &#8220;needle&#8217;s eye&#8221; refers to a small gate in the wall of Jerusalem only a pedestrian could walk through<\/p>\n<p>2. the term &#8220;camel&#8221; (kamlon) has been mistranslated and is really the term &#8220;rope&#8221; (kamilon)<\/p>\n<p>3. this is Oriental exaggeration to make a point (cf. Luk 6:41) <\/p>\n<p>4. this was a common proverb for the impossible<\/p>\n<p>I believe either # 3 or #4 is correct. Number 1 has no historical corroboration (see Fee and Stuart, How To Read the Bible For All Its Worth, p. 25) and #2 is first found in one late uncial Greek manuscript (MS S) and a few minuscule manuscripts (i.e., #13, 59, 124, 130, 437, 472, 543). The UBS4 gives &#8220;camel&#8221; and &#8220;A&#8221; rating (certain).<\/p>\n<p>Matthew and Mark record this same teaching and use the Greek term rhaphis (needle) from rhapt, to sew, but Luke, the physician, uses belon, which was used of a needle to sew up wounds (a medical term).<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:26 &#8220;Then who can be saved&#8221; This is the issue! It was especially the issue of traditional Judaism which interpreted wealth and social position as evidence of God&#8217;s blessing and acceptance (cf. Deuteronomy 27-29). This parable directly addresses this false assumption, as do Job and Psalms 73. In this context, however, obedience and faith in Jesus is the key to eternal life, not human performance of Mosaic laws, personal wealth, or social status.<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:27 This may be an allusion to an OT characterization of YHWH (cf. Gen 18:14; Job 42:4; Jer 32:17; Jer 32:27; Zec 8:6; Mat 19:26; Mar 10:27; Luk 1:37).<\/p>\n<p>God loves rich people. Abraham (and all the Patriarchs), David (and all the godly Jewish kings), Nicodemus, and Joseph of Arimathea are good biblical examples. The key is where their faith and trust are put, in possessions or in God? See SPECIAL TOPIC: WEALTH  at Luk 12:21.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>And a, &amp;c. As in Mat 19:16-30. Mar 10:17-31. <\/p>\n<p>ruler. Supplemental. Not so described in Matthew or Mark. <\/p>\n<p>Master = Teacher. App-98. Luk 18:1. <\/p>\n<p>eternal. See App-151. <\/p>\n<p>life. Greek. zoe. App-170. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>18-30.] QUESTION OF A RICH RULER: OUR LORDS ANSWER, AND DISCOURSE THEREUPON. Mat 19:16-30. Mar 10:17-31. The only addition in our narrative is that the young man was a ruler,-perhaps of the synagogue: see notes on Matt. and Mark.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Luk 18:18. , a ruler) and that ruler a youth, Matthew 19, 20. [It was not so much the dignity of his rank, as his personal wealth, that influenced him, a young man though he was (whose besetting sin is not usually love of money), to draw back from the Saviour.-V. g.]<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Luk 18:18-30<\/p>\n<p>29. THE RICH RULER<\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:18-30<\/p>\n<p>18 And a certain ruler asked him,-Matthew and Mark give parallel records of this event. (Mat 19:16-26; Mar 10:17-27.) In both Matthew and Mark we have the same setting with what precedes and with what follows; the salient points of the case are the same in all the records. Mark adds a new feature by saying that &#8220;there ran one to him, and kneeled to him&#8221;; Mark also records the fact that Jesus &#8220;was going forth into the way&#8221; when this &#8220;certain ruler&#8221; came to him. (Mar 10:17.) Mark also records that &#8220;Jesus looking upon him loved him&#8221; (Mar 10:21), and that the disciples were astonished at his word. He addressed Jesus as &#8220;Good Teacher,&#8221; or &#8220;Master,&#8221; as some translations have it. He came with a very important question: &#8220;What shall I do to inherit eternal life?&#8221; This is the same way that Mark records the question, but Matthew records it, &#8220;What good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?&#8221; (Mat 19:16.) We do not know how much he knew about &#8220;eternal life.&#8221; Sometimes the word &#8220;archon&#8221; means a chief, sometimes a magistrate, sometimes prince, counselor. (Mat 20:25; Luk 12:58; Joh 14:30; Act 7:27; Act 16:19.) &#8220;Inherit&#8221; means possess or enjoy; &#8220;eternal life&#8221; may have been borrowed from Dan 12:2, the only place where it occurs in the Old Testament. It implies everlasting happiness.<\/p>\n<p>19 And Jesus said unto him,-Jesus promptly replied to the young ruler to teach him something of God. He asked &#8220;Why callest thou me good?&#8221; And then he said there is none good &#8220;save one, even God.&#8221; Mat 19:17 represents Jesus as saying: &#8220;Why askest thou me concerning that which is good?&#8221; It is a matter of controversy as to what Jesus meant by this question. Some think that he meant to say that no one except God is originally, essentially, infinitely, and independently good. Here Jesus makes no reference to his own divinity, but shows the young ruler how vain are his thoughts of doing an absolutely good thing; this was the first blow to his self-righteousness.<\/p>\n<p>20, 21 Thou knowest the commandments,-Matthew records Jesus as saying: &#8220;Keep the commandments,&#8221; and the ruler asked, &#8220;Which?&#8221; Mark&#8217;s record is the same as that of Luke. Jesus proceeded to enumerate some of the commandments as found in Exo 20:12-16 and Deu 5:16-20. The rich young ruler was a Jew and was instructed in the law. Jesus enumerated five of the six commandments of the Decalogue, which regulated man&#8217;s duty to his fellow man. &#8220;Thou shalt not covet&#8221; is the one omitted here by Jesus. Mark records the six commandments and gives the one that Matthew and Luke omit as &#8220;do not defraud.&#8221; (Mar 10:19.) The commandments are not given in their order as found in Exodus. The seventh commandment is put first, then the sixth, then the eighth, then the ninth, and last of all the fifth. Matthew gives the sixth first and then the seventh, but Mark the same as Luke. Some think that the fifth is placed last because it is a positive command. Matthew adds, &#8220;Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself,&#8221; a positive summary of the second table. Mark adds &#8220;defraud not&#8221; by covetousness or any dishonest act, which appears to be a brief summary of the tenth commandment. (Exo 20:17.) The young man replied that he had observed all answered his question: &#8220;What lack I yet?&#8221; Mark tells us that Jesus loved the young man and sathese commandments &#8220;from my youth up.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>22 And when Jesus heard it,-Jesus heard the young man&#8217;s reply and id: &#8220;One thing thou lackest yet.&#8221; If the young man desired to have moral completeness and lack nothing, if he would &#8220;be perfect and entire, lacking in nothing&#8221; (Jas 1:4) he should &#8220;sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor,&#8221; in order that he should &#8220;have treasure in heaven&#8221;; then he should &#8220;come, follow me.&#8221; Jesus touched the weak point in the young man&#8217;s character he placed before him a perfect standard; he must deny himself, sell his goods, distribute them to the poor, take up his cross and follow Jesus. This was the answer that Jesus gave to his question as to what he should do to inherit eternal life.<\/p>\n<p>23 But when he heard these things,-The young man had honestly inquired as to what he should do; Jesus plainly and simply told him what he should do. There was pointed out only one way for him to inherit eternal life; no alternative was offered him; it was do what Jesus commanded him to do or refuse and be lost. The young man &#8220;became exceeding sorrowful&#8221; when he heard what Jesus had told him. Matthew says that &#8220;he went away sorrowful&#8221; (Mat 19:22), while Mark says that &#8220;his countenance fell at the saying, and he went away sorrowful&#8221; (Mar 10:22). The record adds an explanation to his sorrow: &#8220;For he was very rich.&#8221; Matthew says that he &#8220;had great possessions&#8221; Mark makes about the same statement. The test of his faith was now put to him; he must part with his possessions or with Jesus; he chose to remain with his earthly possessions.<\/p>\n<p>24 And Jesus seeing him said,-Jesus saw the young man turn to his riches and go away from him; he saw the struggle that the young man had and he saw the decision that the young ruler had made. Jesus &#8220;looked round about, and saith unto his disciples&#8221;: &#8220;How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!&#8221; Matthew records Jesus as saying, &#8220;It is hard for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven,&#8221; while Mark uses about the same words. Jesus says that it is exceedingly difficult for a rich man to become the subject and attain the blessings and honors of the new dispensation.<\/p>\n<p>25 For it is easier for a camel to enter in through a needle&#8217;s eye,-Some consider this as a current proverb for the impossible; the Talmud speaks twice of an elephant passing through the eye of a needle as being impossible. It is similar to the statement in Jer 13:23; it expresses the greatest conceivable difficulties, the greatest human impossibility of a rich man entering the kingdom of God. A needle&#8217;s eye being very small and the camel being very large, the proverb well expresses an impossibility. (See Mat 23:24.) Some think that there is an allusion here to the low gateways through which camels were forced on their knees; and it is said that an opening of this sort is called the eye of a needle. The simple teaching of Jesus is that it is as impossible for a rich man who trusts in his riches to go to heaven as it is for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye.<\/p>\n<p>26 And they that heard it said,-The disciples of Jesus and others who were present asked the question: &#8220;Then who can be saved?&#8221; The disciples were poor men themselves and thoroughly familiar with the ills of poverty and accustomed to look at the bright side only of the rich man&#8217;s case; it was simply amazing to them and unaccountable that salvation should come so hard to the rich man; what can the poor man do if the rich man cannot go to heaven? If the way of life was so difficult, they asked, who can be saved? It was usually considered that the rich men acquired merit by their deeds of charity and gifts to the temple.<\/p>\n<p>27 But he said, The things which are impossible with men-It is a human impossibility for one to save himself in the absolute; he can do so only by doing what God teaches him to do. It is God who saves. It is beyond human power for any to he saved, and especially those who are surrounded with the dangers and difficulties of wealth. The truth of God can break the spirit of covetousness, purify the heart by faith in the truth, and make the rich humble. In this way, that which is impossible with man is possible with God. Jesus has in mind the illustration that he has just given; the human impossibility of the camel going through the needle&#8217;s eye has become possible with God.<\/p>\n<p>28 And Peter said, Lo, we have left our own,-Matthew records Peter as saying that &#8220;we have left all, and followed thee; what then shall we have?&#8221; (Mat 19:27.) When the apostles were called they left all, their property and business, and followed Jesus as personal attendants. (Mar 1:16-20; Mar 2:14.) This may have been suggested to Peter by what Jesus had commanded the rich young ruler to do: &#8220;Sell that which thou hast&#8221; and come and follow me. Peter was not boasting; if he had been boasting he would have received a different answer from Jesus. Peter was always quick to see and to speak and apply a new thought.<\/p>\n<p>29, 30 And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you,-Jesus kindly answered Peter&#8217;s question. &#8220;There is no man that hath left house, or wife, or brethren, or parents, or children, for the kingdom of God&#8217;s sake&#8221; but that will receive his reward. The enumeration of various family ties indicates that the self-denial must he complete, that consecration to the kingdom of God must be supreme. The one who does this has been promised blessings here, in self-denial for Christ, and in his kingdom. He shall receive &#8220;manifold more in this time&#8221; than the things which he leaves behind, and &#8220;in the world to come eternal life.&#8221; Life here means not merely existence, but existence in its right relation to God and truth, hence holy and happy existence. Physical life consists in certain connections of soul and body; so spiritual life consists in certain connections of the soul with God. The reward for leaving all and following Christ begins in this world, but has its greatest realization in the life to come.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>the One Thing Needful <\/p>\n<p>Luk 18:18-30<\/p>\n<p>The young ruler was a man of irreproachable character. He might have said of himself all that the Apostle Paul says in Php 3:4, etc. But he was restless and unsatisfied. He felt that Jesus had the key to a life deeper than he had experienced, and he longed to possess it. He was so much in earnest that he knelt in the crowded thoroughfare before the despised Nazarene, Mar 10:17.<\/p>\n<p>He did not know himself. He thought he possessed that love which fulfills the Law, Rom 13:10. Our Lord desired to prove to him that he was deficient in that love, and therefore could not have the eternal life which is love. He did this by suggesting that the young ruler should renounce all and accompany Him in a self-giving for others that must end in a cross. But he shrank back. He dared not face a life of simple faith in God for the supply of temporal needs, and of absolute self-giving to a cross. For all who dare this, whatever is right and good is given back to be held and used under Gods direction.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: F.B. Meyer&#8217;s Through the Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>The Great Refusal &#8212; Luk 18:18-30<\/p>\n<p>And a certain ruler asked Him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou Me good? None is good, save One, that is, God. Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother. And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up. Now when Jesus heard these things, He said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow Me. And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very ri_ And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful, He said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! For it is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they that heard it said, Who then can be saved? And He said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God. Then Peter said, Lo, we have left all, and followed Thee. And He said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or wife, or children, for the kingdom of Gods sake, who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting- Luk 18:18-30.<\/p>\n<p>The Lord Jesus Christ is not only a Saviour from judgment, but He is also the Lord of our life. In our unconverted days we lived for ourselves; we lived in different ways; we chose our own paths, but our one great object was to please self.<\/p>\n<p>I lived for myself, for myself alone,<\/p>\n<p>For myself and none beside,<\/p>\n<p>Just as if Jesus had never lived,<\/p>\n<p>And as if He had never died.<\/p>\n<p>So our blessed Saviour came into this world to do more than to redeem us from our sins and from the judgment of God. He came to make us His own in a practical sense, that in all our ways down here on earth we might live to His glory. Instead of being self-centered, the child of God should be Christ-centered, able to say with the Apostle Paul, For me to live is Christ. This comes out very clearly in the passage before us.<\/p>\n<p>First we have the story of the rich young ruler: And a certain ruler asked Him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? I do not know exactly what was in the mind of this young man when he used the term eternal life. It certainly could not mean to him all that it means to us. Our Lord Jesus said, This is life eternal, that they might know Thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom Thou hast sent. Eternal life is that which gives the ability to enter into and enjoy fellowship with Divine Persons: the Father and the Son by the power of the Holy Spirit. Evidently this young man thought of eternal life as a happy experience and prolongation of human life here on earth, and assurance of happiness after death. He spoke from the standpoint of the law of Moses when he asked, What shall I do to inherit eternal life? What must I do in order to be the possessor of this great blessing? Notice the way he addressed the Lord Jesus, Good Master. He acknowledged the Lord to be a Master, a Teacher, as thousands do today. Jesus said, Why callest thou Me good? None is good, save One, that is, God. Was He saying, I am not God, and therefore you should not address Me as Good Master? No; the Lord was testing this young ruler. No one is intrinsically good but God, and God was manifest in Christ. The question was, did this young man recognize Jesus as such? He did not. Then our Lord said to him, Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother. Now the law says that the man who obeys these commands shall live. The Lord Jesus mentioned only the commandments that have to do with the outward life, our relation to our fellow-men; He did not mention those that have to do with our relation to God. It was not what he was before God but what he appeared to be before his fellows that concerned the young man. He looked up complacently and said, All these have I kept from my youth up. Probably he was honest in saying that; possibly he had never been guilty of violating any of these commandments, but the Lord Jesus saw that he was resting in his own self-righteousness. To keep these commandments as they should be kept means more than simply refraining from overt acts of evil; it means to love our neighbor as we love ourselves, and so the Lord now put this young man to the test by saying, Yet lackest thou one thing. Your life may be outwardly pure; it may be comparatively clean; in the eyes of your fellow-men you may be a very noble personage, but if you are living for self rather than for God, you are under the condemnation of the law. The Lord Jesus tested this young man in this way, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow Me. Did He mean that the way to obtain eternal life is by giving everything one possesses to the poor? Not at all; but He was testing this young man, who was egotistic and self-satisfied. Certainly there was nothing to be said against his moral character, but his life had been a selfish life; he had vast possessions; he had great riches, and men and women were living in poverty all about him; yet he continued to go on as he was and did not realize that God had entrusted him with this wealth that he might use it for Him. If God entrusts wealth to you, He makes you a steward, and you are to use your riches to the glory of God and to the blessing of mankind. If we fully surrender our lives and our possessions to the Lord Jesus we shall not be concerned about ourselves; we shall be concerned about the needs of others, and our one object will be to glorify the One who has redeemed us. So the test here is, will you let Christ be Lord of your life? We read that when the ruler heard these words he was very sorrowful, for he had great possessions, and he turned away. He did not meet the test which the Lord put to him. He refused the path of subjection to Christ. Many have taken the same course.<\/p>\n<p>It is not wrong to be rich, but it is a terrible thing if riches keep you out of heaven. God giveth us richly all things to enjoy, but it is a catastrophe if one becomes so occupied with earthly treasure that he misses the path of eternal life as this man did.<\/p>\n<p>And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful, He said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! It is difficult for one who has plenty of this worlds goods to realize his need and to come to God as a poor, poverty-stricken sinner. We know this is true practically, for there are very few of the great and wealthy of this world who have turned to Christ and put their lives under His control. Jesus said, For it is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. You know the illustration that has been used so often- I presume it is correct: There is a little gate in one of the larger doors called the needles eye-I saw such gates when I was in Palestine-it was possibly the same in the time of our Lord. If a traveler reaches the city late at night and knocks at the gate, the guard from within will allow him to pass through the needles eye, but his camel has to kneel down in order to crawl through. The travelers goods have to be left outside until morning. So Jesus said, It is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. The rich man has to unload; he has to turn over all he has to the authority of the Lord Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n<p>The disciples were amazed when they heard this. They thought, as many think today, that it is poverty that keeps people out of the kingdom of God. If we could only do away with poverty, if we could eliminate the slums of our cities, then we could get people to turn to Christ! But it does not work that way. We read of the poor of this world who are rich in faith. Riches often prove a real hindrance to the salvation of the soul. The disciples asked, Who then can be saved? And our Lord replied, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God. It is not impossible for the rich to be saved. It is possible for the wealthy to know Christ if they are willing to repent and trust Him and own Him as Lord, which will mean a complete revolution in the way they have lived.<\/p>\n<p>Thank God there are those among the rich who have put their whole lives and riches in subjection to Christ. We have recently lost a man of God of our own city to whom the Lord entrusted ability and riches. He turned all he had over to the Lord. I refer to that merchant-prince, Mr. Henry P. Crowell. And there are other men like him; men whom the Lord can entrust with great wealth because they use it not for themselves but to the glory of God. On the other hand, because we are poor, we must not think that poverty is a title to heaven. Nothing of the kind. The poor and the rich meet together; they all need to be saved in the same way: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking for the apostles, Peter said, Lo, we have left all, and followed Thee. There was not very much to leave. If I remember correctly, it was a boat and a broken net that Peter left behind, but it meant a lot to him-that fishing business in Capernaum. Jesus said, Verily, I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or wife, or children, for the kingdom of Gods sake, who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting. Make Christ the Lord of your life; trust Him as your Saviour; yield your all to Him, and you will eventually receive more than you have ever left. God will see that it is made up to you in an abundant measure, for He tells us that He gives an hundredfold to all who yield themselves to Him; and one hundredfold is 10,000 per cent. Most of us are satisfied, in these days, if we can get three or four per cent on our investments. Yet we shrink from making an investment that would yield us 10,000 per cent! We are afraid to submit our lives into the hands of the Lord, but He never fails those who submit to Him. And when we come to the end of the way, how we shall praise Him that we ever heard His voice calling us to trust Him and to acknowledge His authority over our lives. We have eternal life now through faith, but when we reach the heavenly city we shall enter into everlasting life in all its glory.<\/p>\n<p>There will be no one in that day who will look back and say, I wish I had been more self-centered; I wish I had not been so devoted; I wish I had not yielded so much to Jesus Christ. There will be no one who will speak like that in the coming day; but there will be many of us who will say, I wish I had been more unselfish; I wish I had been more devoted; I wish I had yielded myself more definitely to the Lord Jesus Christ. God grant that everyone of us may surrender our lives to Him and acknowledge Him in all our ways, that we may walk as He would have us walk as we go through this scene. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentaries on the New Testament and Prophets<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Chapter 24<\/p>\n<p>Yet Lackest Thou One Thing<\/p>\n<p>This story of the rich young ruler is reported three times in the four gospels. Matthew, Mark, and Luke were all inspired of God to record the history of the rich man who came to Christ. That fact alone is enough to call our attention to its importance. It tells us that there are lessons in the story that demand special attention. When the Lord Jesus restored Peter, he compelled him to confess his love for him three times (John 21). When the Lord God would impress upon that same disciple his commission to preach the gospel to the Gentiles, he sent him a vision which was repeated three times (Acts 10).<\/p>\n<p>The Rich Ruler<\/p>\n<p>Here is a man who is anxious about his soul and concerned about eternal life. Such men are rare. He was rich; but he was concerned about his soul. He was young; but he was interested in eternity. He was a ruler among men; but he came to be taught by the Lord Jesus. This rich young ruler comes running up to the Lord Jesus, and says, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? Our Lord knew the mans heart. He knew that this young man was thoroughly familiar with the law of Moses. And he knew that the young man thought, like most people do, that eternal life could be gained by outward morality, that is to say, by obedience to the law. Therefore, he answered this young man according to the law. He told him to keep the commandments. The rich young ruler responded, All these have I kept from my youth up. Then, the Master said to him, Yet lackest thou one thing. <\/p>\n<p>Some who read these lines are, I do not doubt, like this rich young ruler. Yet lackest thou one thing. You are very moral. Yet lackest thou one thing. You are quite respectable in the eyes of men. Yet lackest thou one thing. You believe in God. You believe the Bible to be the Word of God. And it can be said, at least in some sense, that you believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. You believe that he is God. You believe in his death, burial, and resurrection as the sinners Substitute. You even know that Jesus Christ the Lord is the sinners only hope of salvation before God. Yet, for all that, you know that you are not a child of God, a saved person, and an heir to eternal life. Yet lackest thou one thing. Many there are, who are outwardly good, moral, respectable, religious people, who yet lack that one thing which is essential to eternal life.<\/p>\n<p>The Rulers Question<\/p>\n<p>And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? This is a question people often ask when they are faced with eternity, when they hear the gospel preached, when their sin is exposed, and they are terrified with the thought of everlasting hell. We have heard it many times. The Jews, the publicans, and the soldiers, one after another, asked the Saviour, What shall we do then? (Luk 3:10; Luk 3:12; Luk 3:14). The men of Judea asked Peter and the disciples, What shall we do? (Act 2:37). The Philippian jailer asked Paul and Silas, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? (Act 16:30)<\/p>\n<p>Looking at this question by itself, it appears to be a very noble one, one that we all should ask. We have seen this question many times in the scriptures. And many who asked it became believers and were saved by the grace of God. They were given eternal life. On the day of Pentecost, a large number of men, after they heard the gospel message, were pricked in their hearts and cried, Men and brethren, What shall we do? The Philippian jailer, with a broken and submissive heart, cried, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?<\/p>\n<p>But there was a great difference as this rich young ruler asked this question. His heart was not broken with conviction. His soul was not humbled with a sense of sin. He was proud and self-righteous. He felt that he was sufficient in himself to meet whatever might be required of him. In essence, he was saying to the Lord Jesus, You tell me what God requires, and I will do it! He had a zeal of righteousness and going about to establish his own righteousness, he had not submitted (and would not submit) himself to the righteousness of God (Rom 9:31 to Rom 10:4). How many there are like those Jews described by Paul and like this rich young ruler: very moral, very proud, and very lost!<\/p>\n<p>There is much about this young man that is commendable. He was not a base, profligate rebel. He was moral, religious, and devout. He had been a respectful and obedient son to his parents. If he was married, we may be sure he was a good husband, a good father, and a good provider for his family. He was a hardworking, honest man who had acquired much wealth. He was a good neighbour, a respected community leader.<\/p>\n<p>In a day of abounding unbelief, he came to Christ of his own accord. He came not to have some disease healed, not to plead for a helpless child, not to see some great miracle, but out of concern for his immortal soul. He was earnest and sincere. Mark tells us that he came running to Christ. He was orthodox in his creed. He was a highly respected religious leader. He believed in God. He believed the holy scriptures. He believed in the reality of eternal life. He was very strict and devout in his practice of religion. Since the days of his youth, he had outwardly kept the law of God. His life was meticulously moral and precise. And he even worshipped Christ. Again, Mark tells us that when he came to Christ, he kneeled down before him. Like Nicodemus, this young man realized that Jesus Christ was a teacher come from God.<\/p>\n<p>He seems even to have acknowledged our Lords Deity. When the Lord asserted that no man is good, but God only, the young ruler did not withdraw his statement. He seems to have acknowledged that Christ is God.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, this young man demonstrated two very sorrowful characteristics. Two things about this rich young rulers character show us that he was a lost, ruined, unregenerate man. First, he was ignorant of all spiritual truth. He knew much in a natural sense, but spiritually, regarding spiritual things, he was as ignorant as a man who had never heard of God. He was ignorant of Gods holy character. He was ignorant of his own sinfulness. He was ignorant of the laws spiritual nature. He thought that the law only required outward obedience. And he was altogether ignorant of the gospel of Christ (Eph 2:8-9).<\/p>\n<p>And, second, this rich young ruler was dreadfully self-righteous. Beware of self-righteousness! No sin is more deadly, and more likely to keep you from Christ than the sin of self-righteousness. And no sin is more common to man.<\/p>\n<p>The Lord Jesus answered this mans question plainly. The man asked what he could do to win Gods favour, and Christ told him if you want salvation by human merit, you have got to keep the law.<\/p>\n<p>And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God. Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother (Luk 18:19-20).<\/p>\n<p>As far as he understood the law in its outward requirement, he had kept it. He was like Paul, as touching the law, blameless. And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up (Luk 18:21).<\/p>\n<p>But he was not all that he thought he was. He did not in reality keep the commandments at all. The law must be kept perfectly, or it is not kept at all. The law must be kept in all points, or it is not kept at all. The law must be kept at all times, or it is not kept at all. The law must be kept outwardly, or it is not kept at all. The law must be kept inwardly, or it is not kept at all.<\/p>\n<p>God never intended the law to be a means of salvation. Its design is to show man Gods holy character and his own condemnation and guilt. The law condemns, but can never give life. The law demands, but can never give grace (Rom 3:20; Gal 2:16; Gal 3:10).<\/p>\n<p>Run, do, and work, the law commands,<\/p>\n<p>But gives me neither feet nor hands.<\/p>\n<p>God requires truth in the inward parts; but we break the commandments of the law in our hearts and thoughts, even when we do not break them in outward actions (Psa 51:6; Mat 5:21-28). To be delivered from blindness regarding ourselves is one of the first things needful to our salvation. The eyes of our understandings must be enlightened by the Holy Spirit (Eph 1:18). We must learn to know ourselves. No man who is taught of the Spirit will ever talk of having kept Gods holy law. Those who are taught of God confess with Paul, The law is spiritual, but I am carnal. I know that in me dwells no good thing (Rom 7:14-18).<\/p>\n<p>Yet Lackest Thou<\/p>\n<p>Second, the Lord Jesus said to this rich young ruler. Yet lackest thou one thing (Luk 18:22). If one of our modern soul-winners could find a young man like this, he would have him under the water, dried off, and in the pulpit in no time. But our Lord was not trying to get another decision to put on his promotional charts as a soul-winning evangelist. He laboured for the souls of men. He was both compassionate and honest. Therefore, he showed the young man exactly what he lacked. He was not lacking in morality, in religious duty, in orthodoxy, in sincerity, or in zeal. But he was lacking one essential thing. What was that one thing he lacked? What is that one thing we must have if we would inherit eternal life? Faith in Christ!<\/p>\n<p>The young man boasted that he loved his neighbour as himself, that he honoured his parents, that he kept the commandments. Therefore Christ put him to a test. The Lord Jesus said to him, Sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me (Luk 18:22).<\/p>\n<p>Look at this command for a moment. It is a fourfold commandment. Our Lord commanded this young man to surrender to his authority as his Lord. Sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor. The Lord Jesus commanded the man to trust him. He said, come. To come to Christ is to believe him. It is the exercise of faith in him. He that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is the Rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Mark adds these words: take up thy cross. That is to say, our Lord commanded the man to confess him. And he commanded this young man to obey him. He said, follow me. These are the things which our Lord requires of all his people: Submission, Faith, Confession, and Obedience.<\/p>\n<p>The Master had a good reason for giving this command to this particular man. He was probing at the young mans heart. He wanted to expose his point of rebellion. He was determined to show this young man exactly what he was lacking. This mans money was his god. That was his point of rebellion. God always meets the sinner at his point of rebellion. J. C. Ryles observation on this passage may be alarming; but it is true. We will be wise to heed it.<\/p>\n<p>We must be willing to part with anything, however dear it may be, if it stands between us and our salvation. We must be ready to cut off the right hand and pluck out the right eye, to make any sacrifice, and to break any idol. Life, we must remember, eternal life is at stake! One leak neglected, is enough to sink a mighty ship. One besetting sin, obstinately clung to, is enough to shut a soul out of heaven. The love of money, secretly nourished in the heart, is enough to bring a man, in other respects moral and irreproachable, down to the pit of hell.<\/p>\n<p>Our Lords command was intended to expose the evil of this young mans heart. It was designed to destroy his self-confidence and pride. It was our Lords purpose to show the impossibility of salvation by works. This command was designed to show this sinner the necessity of the gospel. By this one, pointed command our Lord stripped away the fig leaves of his self-righteousness, exposed the foolishness of his pride, and showed him his need of the grace of God and his need of a Substitute.<\/p>\n<p>The rich young rulers one fatal deficiency was a deficiency of the heart. Like Simon Magus, his heart was not right in the sight of God. He was yet unregenerate. He was in the gall of bitterness and in the bond of iniquity. His heart was not broken. His Spirit was not humbled. He would not surrender to Christ as Lord. God met him at his point of rebellion, and he would not bow. He would not come to Christ alone, trusting him alone for salvation. He would not confess Christ as Lord. He would not obey Christ as his Lord. And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich.<\/p>\n<p>Are you like this young man? Might our Saviours words to him be addressed to you? Yet lackest thou one thing. You have one fatal deficiency. Your heart is not right before God. If ever you are saved, your heart must be broken (Psa 51:17; Isa 66:2). And the only way for your heart to be broken is for God to reveal himself to you and in you in the fulness of his grace and glory in Christ (Zec 12:10). Unless God himself breaks your heart, it will never be broken; and you will never be saved. You must be born again by almighty grace. A new heart must be created within you.<\/p>\n<p>An Impossible Task<\/p>\n<p>And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful, he said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! For it is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God (Luk 18:24-25).<\/p>\n<p>This is a fact we see confirmed on every side. Our own eyes will tell us that grace and riches seldom go together. Not many mighty, not many noble, are called (1Co 1:26). It is a plain matter of fact that comparatively few rich men are to be found in the way of life. I cannot tell you exactly why that is so; but for one thing, riches incline their possessors to pride, self-will, self-indulgence, and love of the world. For another thing, the rich are seldom dealt with faithfully about their souls. They are generally flattered and fawned over by preachers. The rich hath many friends (Pro 14:20). Few people have the courage to tell a rich man the whole truth. They are flattered, bragged on, and doted over. The result is that while their hearts are choked with the things of the world, their eyes are blinded to their own condition before God.<\/p>\n<p>We are fools to envy the rich of this world and their possessions. If we had what they have, we would probably be like them, as the stalled ox being fattened for the slaughter. Money craved, longed for, coveted, and adored is money that keeps myriads of souls out of heaven! Those who will be rich fall into temptation and a snare. Happy is he who has learned to pray, Give me neither poverty nor riches, and is really content with such things as he has (1Ti 6:9; Pro 30:8; Heb 13:5).<\/p>\n<p>Many try to make our Masters words mean less than they do; but they mean exactly what they appear to mean. No more and no less. How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! For it is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.<\/p>\n<p>Who Then?<\/p>\n<p>When the disciples saw and heard these things, they were astonished, and cried Who then can be saved? Our Lord gives us a plain answer to that question. And they that heard it said, Who then can be saved? And he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God (Luk 18:26-27).<\/p>\n<p>The word of God gives us many striking instances of rich men who were saved. Abraham, David, Solomon, Hezekiah, Jehoshaphat, Josiah, Job and Daniel were all very great and wealthy men in this world. Yet they were all sinners saved by the grace of God. And what God did for them by his grace, he can do for any, even for you and for me.<\/p>\n<p>With men, any men and all men, salvation is impossible. But, blessed be God, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God! That means my case is not hopeless. That means your case is not hopeless. It matters not who we are, where we live, what our position in this world is, whether rich or poor, moral or immoral, great or insignificant, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God! Grace, and not place, is the hinge upon which salvation turns (Joh 1:12-13; Rom 9:15-16; Eph 2:8-9; Psa 65:4; Psa 110:3).<\/p>\n<p>If ever the Almighty God puts his hand upon you, you will be saved. Who then can be saved? I will tell you who can and shall be saved. All who were chosen of God in electing love, all who were redeemed by the blood of Christ, all who are born-again by God the Holy Spirit, all who are called by almighty grace, all who come to Christ in faith can be saved and most assuredly shall be saved.<\/p>\n<p>Who then can be saved? If you are not saved, it is not because there is no love in Christ for sinners. It is not because Christ is not able, willing, and ready to save sinners. If you are not saved, it is because, Ye will not come to Christ, that ye might have life. It is because yet lackest thou one thing. It is because you refuse to choose that one thing needful, the One Thing you must have, Christ Jesus the Lord (Luk 10:42).<\/p>\n<p>If you do come to Christ, if you choose that one thing needful, if you are saved, it will be due entirely to the grace of God. May God give you his grace and cause you to choose that good part, Christ Jesus. If he will, you will possess him forever. He is the one thing that shall not be taken away from you.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Discovering Christ In Selected Books of the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>a certain: Mat 19:16-30, Mar 10:17-31 <\/p>\n<p>Good: Luk 6:46, Eze 33:31, Mal 1:6, Joh 13:13-15 <\/p>\n<p>what: Luk 10:25, Act 2:37, Act 16:30 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Mat 9:18 &#8211; ruler Luk 7:40 &#8211; Master Heb 9:15 &#8211; eternal 1Pe 3:9 &#8211; that<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>7<\/p>\n<p>This group of verses is almost identical with Mat 19:16-26. To conserve space, let the reader examine those verses and the comments.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>THE story we have now read is three times reported in the Gospels. Matthew, Mark and Luke were all moved by the Holy Ghost to record the history of the rich man who came to Christ. This fact should be noticed. It shows us that there are lessons before us which demand special attention. When God would impress on Peter his duty towards the Gentiles, He sent him a vision which was repeated &#8220;three times.&#8221; (Act 10:16.)<\/p>\n<p>We learn, firstly, from these verses, to what lengths men may go in self-ignorance. We are told of &#8220;a certain ruler,&#8221; who asked our Lord what he should &#8220;do to inherit eternal life.&#8221; Our Lord knew the ruler&#8217;s heart, and gave him the answer which was most likely to bring to light the real state of his soul. He reminds him of the ten commandments. He recites some of the principal requirements of the second table of the law. At once the spiritual blindness of the inquirer was detected. &#8220;All these,&#8221; said the man, &#8220;I have kept from my youth up.&#8221;-An answer more full of darkness and self-ignorance it is impossible to conceive! He who made it could have known nothing rightly, either about himself, or God, or God&#8217;s law.<\/p>\n<p>Does the case of this rich ruler stand alone? Do we suppose there are none like him at the present day?-If we do, we are greatly deceived. There are thousands, it may be feared, in all our congregations, who have not the least idea of the spiritual nature of God&#8217;s law, and consequently know nothing of their own sinfulness. They do not see that God requires &#8220;truth in the inward parts,&#8221; and that we may break commandments in our heart and thoughts, even when we do not break them in outward actions. (Psa 51:6. Mat 5:21-28.) To be delivered from such blindness is one of the first things needful to our salvation. The eyes of our understandings must be enlightened by the Holy Ghost. (Eph 1:18.) We must learn to know ourselves. No man really taught of the Spirit will ever talk of having &#8220;kept all God&#8217;s commandments from his youth.&#8221; He will rather cry with Paul, &#8220;The law is spiritual, but I am carnal.&#8221; &#8220;I know that in me dwelleth no good thing.&#8221; (Rom 7:14-18.)<\/p>\n<p>We learn, secondly, from these verses, what harm one master-sin may do to a soul. The desires which the rich ruler expressed were right and good. He wanted &#8220;eternal life.&#8221; There seemed at first sight no reason why he should not be taught the way of God, and become a disciple. But there was one thing, unhappily, which be loved better than &#8220;eternal life.&#8221; That thing was his money. When invited by Christ, to give up all that he had on earth, and seek treasure in heaven, he had not faith to accept the invitation. The love of money was his master-sin.<\/p>\n<p>Shipwrecks like this are sadly common in the Church of Christ. Few are the ministers who could not put their finger on many cases like that of the man before us. Many are ready to give up everything for Christ&#8217;s sake, excepting one darling sin, and for the sake of that sin are lost for evermore. When Herod heard John the Baptist, he &#8220;heard him gladly and did many things.&#8221; But there was one thing he could not do. He could not part with Herodias. That one thing cost Herod his soul. (Mar 6:20.)<\/p>\n<p>There must be no reserve in our hearts, if we would receive anything at Christ&#8217;s hands. We must be willing to part with anything, however dear it may be, if it stands between us and our salvation. We must be ready to cut off the right hand and pluck out the right eye, to make any sacrifice, and to break any idol. Life, we must remember, eternal life is at stake! One leak neglected, is enough to sink a mighty ship. One besetting sin, obstinately clung to, is enough to shut a soul out of heaven. The love of money, secretly nourished in the heart, is enough to bring a man, in other respects moral and irreproachable, down to the pit of hell.<\/p>\n<p>We learn, thirdly, from these verses, how great is the difficulty of a rich man being saved. Our Lord declares this in the solemn comment which He makes on the ruler&#8217;s case: &#8220;How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the Kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through a needle&#8217;s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The truth which our Lord lays down in this place, is one which we may see confirmed on every side. Our own eyes will tell us that grace and riches seldom go together. &#8220;Not many mighty, not many noble, are called.&#8221; (1Co 1:26.) It is plain matter of fact, that comparatively few rich men are to be found in the way of life. For one thing, riches incline their possessors to pride, self-will, self-indulgence, and love of the world. For another thing, the rich man is seldom dealt with faithfully about his soul. He is generally flattered and fawned upon. &#8220;The rich hath many friends.&#8221; (Pro 14:20.) Few persons have the courage to tell him the whole truth. His good points are grossly exaggerated. His bad points are glossed over, palliated, and excused. The result is, that while his heart is choked up with the things of the world, his eyes are blinded to his own real condition. What right have we to wonder that a rich man&#8217;s salvation is a hard thing?<\/p>\n<p>Let us beware of envying rich men and coveting their possessions. We little know what we might come to if our desires were granted. Money, which thousands are constantly wanting and longing for,-money, which many make their god,-money keeps myriads of souls out of heaven! &#8220;They that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare.&#8221; Happy is he who has learned to pray, &#8220;Give me neither poverty nor riches,&#8221; and is really &#8220;content with such things as he has.&#8221; (1Ti 6:9. Pro 30:8. Heb 13:5.)<\/p>\n<p>We learn, lastly, from these verses, how mighty is the power of God&#8217;s grace. We see this in the words which our Lord addressed to those who heard Him speaking of the rich man&#8217;s danger. They said, &#8220;who then can be saved?&#8221; Our Lord&#8217;s reply is broad and full: &#8220;The things which are impossible with men are possible with God.&#8221; By grace a man may serve God and reach heaven in any condition of life.<\/p>\n<p>The word of God contains many striking instances in illustration of this doctrine. Abraham, and David, and Hezekiah, and Jehoshaphat, and Josiah, and Job, and Daniel, were all great and rich. Yet they all served God and were saved. They all found grace sufficient for them, and overcame the temptations by which they were surrounded. Their Lord and Master still lives, and what He did for them He can do for others. He can give power to rich Christians to follow Christ in spite of their riches, as well as He did to rich Jews.<\/p>\n<p>Let us beware of allowing ourselves to suppose that our own salvation is impossible, because of the hardness of our position. It is too often a suggestion of the devil and our own lazy hearts. We must not give way to it. It matters not where we live, so long as we are not following a sinful calling. It matters not what our income may be, whether we are burdened with riches or pinched with poverty. Grace, and not place, is the hinge on which our salvation turns. Money will not keep us out of heaven if our hearts are right before God. Christ can make us more than conquerors. Christ can enable us to win our way through every difficulty. &#8220;I can do all things,&#8221; said Paul, &#8220;through Christ which strengtheneth me.&#8221; (Php 4:13.)<\/p>\n<p>==================<\/p>\n<p>Notes- <\/p>\n<p>     v18.-[A certain ruler asked him, &amp;c.] The connection between the history of the rich ruler and the verses which immediately precede it ought not to be overlooked. Matthew, Mark, and Luke all relate it as following the account of our Lord&#8217;s sayings about little children. It seems intended to show us how a man may miss heaven for want of a childlike indifference to worldly riches.<\/p>\n<p>The man before us appears to have been one of a far better spirit than the Scribes, and Pharisees, and Sadducees. He was anxious about salvation. He had evidently a feeling of respect for our Lord. Yet through love of money, his one besetting sin, he lost his soul.<\/p>\n<p>     [What shall I do to inherit.] The literal rendering of the Greek words in this place brings out the legality of the ruler&#8217;s mind more forcibly than our translation. It would be literally translated, &#8220;What, having done, shall I inherit?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>     v19.-[Why callest thou me good?] The paraphrase of Whitby on this verse is worth noticing:-&#8220;Why gavest thou me a title not ascribed to your reverend rabbins, nor due to any mere man? Thinkest thou there is anything in me more than human, or that the Father dwelleth in me? This thou oughtest to believe if thou conceivest the title &#8216;good&#8217; doth truly belong to me, seeing there is none good but one, that is God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>     v20.-[Thou knowest the commandments.] Gualter here remarks, that our Lord treats the ruler as a wise physician treats a sick patient. He administers the medicine most likely ultimately to conduce to his spiritual health. He addresses him in the way most likely to bring him to self-knowledge. As the ruler spoke of &#8220;doing,&#8221; Jesus begins by speaking of God&#8217;s commandments. <\/p>\n<p>     [Do not commit adultery &amp;c.] Let it be noted that our Lord does not recite the commandments in the exact order in which they are given in Exodus. It is a singular fact that in the Septuagint version of the Old Testament the seventh commandment is put before the sixth.<\/p>\n<p>     v22.-[Yet lackest thou one thing.] The process by which our Lord convinces the ruler of sin should not be overlooked. He shows him that whatever he might think of his obedience to the second table of the law, he was certainly a breaker of the first table. He did not keep either the first commandment or the second. His money was his god, and he was guilty of covetousness, which is idolatry.<\/p>\n<p>     [Sell all&#8230;distribute&#8230;poor.] We are not to understand that our Lord meant all Christians to do what he here enjoins the rich ruler to do. The language of Peter to Annanias contradicts the idea. (Act 5:4.) Reason itself shows that if all acted on this system, idleness would be encouraged, and all men would ultimately come to poverty. &#8220;If any man will not work,&#8221; says Paul, &#8220;neither shall he eat.&#8221; (2Th 3:10.)<\/p>\n<p>Our Lord prescribed according to the disease before him. It was a case of desperate and idolatrous love of money. There was but one remedy,-&#8220;Sell all and distribute.&#8221; Like Paul and his companions on board ship, he must cast overboard the lading of the ship if he would save his life.<\/p>\n<p>     v23.-[When he heard&#8230;very sorrowful.] We hear of this ruler no more. Some have conjectured that after all he obeyed our Lord&#8217;s commands, and became a disciple. It seems far more probable that he could not stand the test which our Lord imposed on him, and lost his soul. Mark says, &#8220;He went away.&#8221; (Mar 10:22.)<\/p>\n<p>     v24.-[They that have riches.] These words should always be compared with the fuller account of this history which Mark gives. He says that our Lord repeated this saying twice, and on the second occasion said, &#8220;How hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>     v25.-[It is easier for a camel, &amp;c.] Some commentators have labored to prove that the word we translate &#8220;camel&#8221; ought to be rendered &#8220;a cable.&#8221; The alteration wished for seems needless. The expression used by our Lord was probably proverbial, and familiar to his hearers. The camel was the largest animal which the Jews were accustomed to use, and a &#8220;camel passing through a needle&#8217;s eye,&#8221; according to some rabbinical writings, signified a thing absolutely impossible. Michaelis says, that a similar proverb about an elephant passing through a needle&#8217;s eye is in use in India.<\/p>\n<p>Harmer remarks, &#8220;In the East the doors are frequently made extremely low, sometimes not more than three or four feet high, to prevent the plundering Arab from riding into the inner court. Still they train their camels to make their way, though with difficulty, through these door ways. It was probably in allusion to this practice that this proverbial expression was formed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>     v27.-[Things&#8230;impossible, &amp;c.] This is a general proverbial expression. But the application is clear and plain. The salvation even of a rich man is possible with the grace of God.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ryle&#8217;s Expository Thoughts on the Gospels<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>We have here a considerable person, a ruler, coming to Christ, with an important question in his mouth, What must I do to inherit eternal life? <\/p>\n<p>Where note,<\/p>\n<p>1. He believes the certainty of a future state.<\/p>\n<p>2. He professes a desire of an eternal happiness in that state.<\/p>\n<p>3. He declares his readiness and willingness to do some good thing in order to the obtaining of that happiness.<\/p>\n<p>Hence learn, that the light of nature, or natural religion, teaches men, that good works are necessary to salvation; or that some good thing must be done by them who at death expect eternal life; it is not talking well, and professing well, but living well, that entitles us to heaven and eternal life.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Luk 18:18-30. And a certain ruler  The following account is given us both by Matthew and Mark; from whom we learn, that he was a young man, and very rich: but only Luke informs us that he was a ruler, or magistrate. For an explanation at large of this whole paragraph, see notes on Mat 19:16-30; Mar 10:17-27. Yet lackest thou one thing  Namely, to love God more than mammon. Our Saviour knew his heart, and presently put him upon a trial which laid it open to the ruler himself. And to cure his love of the world, which could not in him be cured otherwise, Christ commanded him to sell all that he had. But he does not command us to do this; but to use all to the glory of God.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>5. The Rich Young Man: Luk 18:18-30.<\/p>\n<p>In the three Syn. this piece immediately follows the preceding (Mat 19:16; Mar 10:17). Oral tradition had connected the two, perhaps because there existed between them a real chronological succession.<\/p>\n<p>Three parts: 1 st. The conversation with the young man (Luk 18:18-23); 2 d. The conversation which takes place in regard to him (Luk 18:24-27); 3 d. The conversation of Jesus with the disciples regarding themselves (Luk 18:28-30). <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>C. <\/p>\n<p>THE RICH RULER. PERIL OF RICHES. REWARD OF SACRIFICE. <\/p>\n<p>PARABLE OF THE LABORERS IN THE VINEYARD. <\/p>\n<p>(In Pera.) <\/p>\n<p>aMATT. XIX. 16-XX. 16; bMARK X. 17-31; cLUKE XVIII. 18-30. <\/p>\n<p>   b17 And when he was going forth into the way, abehold, bthere ran {acame} bone ca certain ruler bto him, and kneeled to him, and asked aand said, {csaying,} bGood Teacher, awhat good thing shall I do, that I may have {bmay inherit cto inherit} eternal life? [The action of this young man in running and kneeling shows that he was deeply anxious to receive an answer to his question, and also that he had great reverence for Jesus. He seemed to think, however, that heaven could be gained by performing some one meritorious act. He made the mistake of thinking that eternal life is a reward for doing rather than for being, a mistake from which the Roman Catholic Church [543] developed the doctrine of &#8220;works of supererogation.&#8221;]  19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good save one, even God: aWhy askest thou me concerning that which is good? One there is who is good [To the address of the young man, viz.: &#8220;Good Master,&#8221; Jesus replies, &#8220;Why callest,&#8221; etc., and to his question, &#8220;What good thing,&#8221; etc. Jesus replies, &#8220;Why askest,&#8221; etc. The ruler using the inconsiderate, conventional language of the thoughtless, had taken an unwarrantable freedom with the word &#8220;good.&#8221; Jesus shows that if his language had been used sincerely it would have committed him to a declaration of great faith, for he had addressed Jesus by a title which belongs only to God, and he had asked Jesus the question concerning that of which God alone was fitted to speak. As the ruler had not used this language sincerely Jesus challenged his words. The challenge showed the ruler that he had unwittingly confessed the divinity of Jesus, and thus startled him into a consideration of the marvelous fact which his own mouth had stated. This is done because the young man would need to believe in the divinity of Jesus to endure the test to which he was about to be subjected&#8211; 1Jo 5:5.] but if thou wouldest enter into life, keep the commandments. [By referring the ruler to the commandments, Jesus not only answered the question as to obtaining life, but he emphasized the confession of his divinity contained in the question, &#8220;Why askest,&#8221; etc. God, who knows what is good, had revealed that good in the commandments which he had given. Yet the ruler had asked Jesus to be wise above God&#8217;s revelation, and to propound a law or rule of goodness in addition to that already given, and of such a nature as to more fully insure the attainment of life by obeying it. The ruler&#8217;s question reveals that common weakness in man which prompts him to look to his fellow-men for religious and moral instruction; forgetting that only God can propound the absolute standards of goodness. We should note, too, that the young man, being under the law given through Moses, was bidden to attain life by keeping the law. After the death of Christ a new law [544] was given. Had the man waited until that time, he would have been directed to this new law, and obedience to it would have been required. Compare Act 2:37, Act 2:38, 2Th 1:8, et al.]  18 He saith unto him, Which? And Jesus said,  c20 Thou knowest the commandments, Do {aThou shalt} cnot commit adultery, Do {aThou shalt} cnot kill, Do {aThou shalt} cnot steal, Do {aThou shalt} cnot bear false witness, bDo not defraud,  a19 Honor thy father and thy mother; and, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. [The ruler still sought for some prominent commandment, but was referred to the last six of the Decalogue, these being at that time more frequently violated than the first four. For the last commandment, &#8220;Thou shalt not covet,&#8221; Jesus substitutes its equivalent, &#8220;Do not defraud,&#8221; and &#8220;Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself,&#8221; the last being a summary of all the six&#8211; Rom 13:9.]  b20 And he  a20 The young man saith {bsaid} unto him, Teacher, cAll these things have I observed from my youth up. awhat lack I yet? [He had kept these commandments as far as he knew his heart and as far as he understood their import.]  b21 And Jesus cwhen he heard it, blooking upon him [gazing earnestly and searchingly at him] loved him [&#8220;agapan.&#8221; See Jam 2:10], go, sell that which thou hast, csell all bwhatsoever thou hast, cand distribute {bgive} cunto {ato} the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me. [The command to sell all is not a general one, but a special precept needed in this case, 1. To dispel the ruler&#8217;s self-deception. On the negative side his character was good, but on the positive it was deficient. He had done his neighbor no harm, but he had also done him very little good. 2. To show impartiality. The invitation of Jesus shows that the ruler desired to be in some manner a disciple, and hence he is subjected to the same [545] test which the other disciples had accepted, and of which Peter soon after speaks. Paul also was rich in self-righteousness like this man, but cheerfully sacrificed all, that he might follow Christ ( Phi 3:6-9). Moreover, the reference to treasure in heaven and the invitation to follow Christ tested the ruler&#8217;s obedience to the first four commandments of the Decalogue as condensed in the great summary or first commandment. ( Mat 22:37, Mat 22:38.) Though the ruler perhaps did not fully realize it, those who heard the conversation must afterwards have been impressed with the great truth that the ruler was called upon to make his choice whether he would love Christ or the world, whether he would serve God or mammon. The whole scene forms an illustration of the doctrine expressed by Paul, that by the law can no flesh be justified ( Rom 3:20), for perfection is required of those who approach God along that pathway; those, therefore, who have done all, still need Christ to lead them.]  a22 But when the young man heard that saying, {cthese things} bhis countenance fell at the saying, che became exceeding sorrowful; band he went away sorrowful: cfor he was very rich. bhe was one that had great possessions. [He was not offended at the extravagance of Jesus&#8217; demands, for he was not one of the most hardened of the rich. He belonged to that class which hold Christ and their wealth in nearly an even balance. The narrative shows us how uncompromisingly Jesus held to principle. Though the ruler was sorry to turn away, and though Jesus loved him, yet the Lord did not modify his demand by a hair&#8217;s-breadth to gain an influential disciple.]  c24 And Jesus seeing him blooked round about, and saith {asaid} unto his disciples, bHow hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! aVerily I say unto you, It is hard for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven. [ 1Ti 6:9, 1Ti 6:10, 1Ti 6:17-19. It should be remembered that Judas heard these words only a few days before he sold his Lord.]  b24 And the disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in [546] riches to enter into the kingdom of God! [The possession and use of riches is permitted to the Christian, but their possession becomes a sin when the one who owns them comes to trust in them or in any way suffers them to interfere with his duties toward or relations to God.]  a24 And again I say unto you,  c25 For it is easier for a camel to enter in {bto go} through a needle&#8217;s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. [The needle&#8217;s eye here is that of the literal needle, and the expression was a proverbial one to indicate that which was absolutely impossible. Lord George Nugent (1845-6) introduced the explanation that Jesus referred to the two gates of a city, the large one for beast of burden, and the small one for foot-passengers. This smaller one is now called &#8220;The Needle&#8217;s Eye,&#8221; but there is no evidence whatever that it was so called in our Saviour&#8217;s time. In fact, as Canon Farrar observes, we have every reason to believe that this smaller gate received its name in late years because of the efforts of those who were endeavoring to soften this saying of Jesus.]  a25 And when the disciples heard it, they were astonished exceedingly,  c26 And they that heard it said, {bsaying} unto him, aWho then {bThen who} can be saved?  a26 And Jesus blooking upon them saith, {c27 But he said,} bWith men this is impossible, but not with God: for all things are possible with God. cThe things which are impossible with men aree possible with God. [The Jews were accustomed to look upon the possession of riches as an evidence of divine favor, and the heads of the apostles were filled with visions of the riches and honors which they would enjoy when Jesus set up his kingdom. No wonder, then, that they were amazed to find that it was impossible for a rich man to enter that kingdom, and that, moreover and worse than all, riches appeared to exclude from salvation itself: that even this virtuous rich man, this paragon of excellence, could not have eternal life because he clung to his riches. But they were comforted by the assurance of Jesus that though the salvation of some men might present more difficulties than the salvation of others [547] &#8211;might, as it were, require a miracle where others only required simple means, yet the gracious, mighty God might still be trusted to overcome the obstacles. It is impossible for any man to save himself, so that in every case of salvation God is called upon to assist man in accomplishing the impossible. God can so work upon the rich man&#8217;s heart as to make him a dispenser of blessings.]  a27 Then answered Peter  c28 And bbegan to say unto him, {aand said unto him,} bLo, we have left all, {cour own,} band have followed thee. awhat then shall we have? [The negative conduct of the rich man reminded the disciples of their own positive conduct when confronted with a similar crisis ( Luk 5:11), and the &#8220;all&#8221; which they had left was by no means contemptible, though perhaps none of them could have been said to have held great possessions. The mention of treasure in heaven, therefore, set Peter to wondering what manner of return would be made to them to compensate them for their sacrifice.]  28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, that ye who have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit on the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. [By the term &#8220;regeneration,&#8221; Jesus in this case means the period in which the process of regenerating men would be in progress; i. e., the period of the mediatorial reign. After his ascension Jesus sat upon his throne ( Act 2:33-35, Heb 1:13, Mat 25:31, 1Co 15:24-28). And on the day of Pentecost next following, he began this process of regeneration. Having enthroned himself, Jesus enthroned the apostles also, not as kings but as judges, having jurisdiction over all questions of faith and practice in the earthly kingdom. During their personal ministry, they judged in person; and since then they judge through their writings. True, we have written communications from only a part of them, but judgments pronounced by one of a bench of judges with the known approval of all, are the judgments of the entire bench. Moreover, the passage must be construed metaphorically, for the apostles are [548] judges in the church of Christ&#8211;the true Israel&#8211;and not over the literal twelve tribes of Jacob. And again, the twelve who then heard Jesus speak were not all enthroned, Judas having fallen from his position before the day of enthronement, and Matthias and Paul were afterwards added to the group. Jesus here causes the number of the judges to correspond to the number of the tribes, to indicate that there will be a sufficiency of judgment commensurate to the need.]  29 And every one {bThere is no man that} ahath left houses, {bhouse,} cor wife, or brethren, bor sisters, or mother, or father, cor parents, bor children, or lands, for my sake, {amy name&#8217;s sake,} band for the gospel&#8217;s sake, cfor the kingdom of God&#8217;s sake,  30 who shall not receive manifold more in this time, and in the world to come eternal life.  b30 but he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come ashall inherit eternal life. [The rewards of Christian self-denial are here divided into two parts&#8211;the temporal and the eternal. The earthly joys&#8211;the rewards &#8220;in this time&#8221;&#8211;shall outweigh the sacrifices made for the kingdom. The return, of course, will not be in kind, houses for house, and fathers for father, etc., but spiritual relationships and blessings which compensate abundantly for whatever has been resigned ( Mat 12:49, 1Ti 4:8). But these joys shall be mingled with the bitterness of persecution, for no pleasure is perfected in this world, but only in the inheritance which lies beyond&#8211; 1Pe 1:4.]  30 But many shall be last that are first; and first that are last.  b31 But many that are first shall be last; and the last first. [The promise of large recompense which Jesus had just given was apt to tempt some to labor not for love, but for the rewards which might be reaped thereby. Jesus corrects this spirit by the statement, and the parable that follows which illustrates it, and which ends with the same sentiment. See Lev 19:13, Deu 24:15], the lord of the vineyard saith unto his steward [his overseer], Call the laborers, and pay them their hire, beginning from the last unto the first. [Thus following the order indicated by Mar 7:22, 1Sa 18:9, Pro 23:6-8, Pro 28:22, Deu 15:9). The lord had done no wrong to those who had labored longest, for he had paid them what they had bargained for and earned. If he chose to be generous with those whose misfortune had prevented them from being hired earlier in the day, no one had any just cause to murmur.]  16 So the last shall be first, and the first last [The meaning of this parable has often been misunderstood by those who fail to note the maxim with which Jesus begins and ends it. This maxim acts as a safeguard in the interpretation of it; the parable also in turn guards against misunderstanding the maxim. The maxim can not be applied to Judas; for, though he then stood high in honor and afterwards fell into disgrace, yet he stands outside the pale of the maxim as interpreted by the parable, for in the parable both the first and the last were received and rewarded by their master, while Judas was rejected of Christ and received no reward. The term &#8220;last,&#8221; therefore, must be applied to those who were included among the accepted laborers, and not those who were excluded from that class. In the parable, the denarius or shilling stands for the gift of [551] eternal life. The vineyard represents the Lord&#8217;s field of work in the world. The evening is the close of the Christian dispensation, and the coming of Christ to judgment. The parable as it unfolds and develops suggests that in no case was the reward earned by the inherent merits and toil of the laborers, but was rather bestowed because of a desire on the part of the householder to that effect, just as eternal life is bestowed, not by merit, but by covenant grace ( Rom 2:6, Rom 2:7, Rom 4:3-5, Rom 5:16-21). The main object of the parable is to show that longer labor does not necessarily, as the apostles and others might think, establish a claim to higher reward. Degrees of difference there no doubt will be, but they form no account in the general covenant of grace in which the one great gift is offered to us all. As the gift can be no less than eternal life, there must of necessity be a difference in the ratio of service which is rendered for it, since it will be bestowed on the octogenarian and the child, upon Paul who made good the confession of his faith through years of toil, and the dying thief who passed to his reward while his voice of confession was, as it were, still ringing in the ears of those who heard it ( 1Co 15:8-11, 2Ti 4:6-9). The murmuring and envy of those who had labored longest is merely part of the parabolic drapery, introduced to bring out the answer of the householder, and to make plain the point to be illustrated. There will be no envy among those who inherit eternal life. By thus speaking of the envy, however, and showing how ineffectual it was, Jesus warns us to be prepared not to cherish it. The parable is not intended to teach that the characters of men will be exactly similar in the world to come. Paul will not be Peter, nor will Martin Luther be identical with Hugh Latimer and John Knox. God may award eternal life to the character which we are forming, but we should be careful what kind of character we bring to receive the gift. The lesson is that works are valued qualitatively and not quantitatively. Nor may the parable be rightly used to encourage hope in death-bed repentance. It certainly does teach that, however little the labor which a man does in the Lord&#8217;s vineyard, he will receive the final reward if only he [552] be really in the vineyard; that is, if he be really a child of God. But whether a man who repents on his death-bed actually becomes a child of God is a different question, and is not touched by the parable. Certainly the eleventh-hour laborer who had stood idle all day only because no man had hired him, and who came into the vineyard as soon as he was called, can not represent the man who has been called by the gospel every hour of his life, but has rejected every call until his sun has sunk so low that he knows he can do but little work when he comes. In order to represent this class of sinners, the eleventh-hour men should have been invited early in the morning, and should have replied, &#8220;No, it is too early; we will not go now.&#8221; Then they should have been invited at the third, the sixth, and the ninth hours, and should have made some equally frivolous excuse each time, then, finally, at the eleventh hour, they should have said, &#8220;Well, as you pay a man just the same for an hour&#8217;s work as for a day&#8217;s work, and as we are very anxious to get your money, we believe we will now go.&#8221; Had they acted thus, it is not likely that they would have found the vineyard gates open to them at all. Yet such is the sharp practice which some men attempt in dealing with God.]<\/p>\n<p> [FFG 543-553]<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>THE RICH YOUNG MAN<\/p>\n<p>Mat 19:16-30; Mar 10:17-31; Luk 18:18-30. Mark: And He, traveling along the road, one running and kneeling clown asked Him, Good Teacher, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life? Jesus said to him, Why do you call Me good? No one is good but One; God. This statement of our Savior is generally woefully misunderstood and erroneously construed, even preachers, standing up in the pulpit, having the audacity to look the people in the face and find here an unanswerable argument against holiness, alleging that even Jesus refused to be called good, deducing the conclusion, with an air of triumph, that nobody can be good, much less holy. May the blessed Holy Spirit now flash the light through your mind, and give you the true exposition of this passage! Jesus was almost constantly turning the edge of His opponents argument into the admission of His own Divinity. The high and primitive sense of the adjective good is only applicable to Go. The word God is a contraction of good, because God is the very essence, quintessence, and concentration of all good. Now when the young man calls Jesus good, instead of correcting him, He accepts the situation: You call Me good, and so I am. Now since God alone is good, you call Me God, which is right, thus turning the admission of the young man into the substantial affirmation of His Divinity; not only for his benefit, but that of the multitude who followed Him from day to day. While in the primitive sense, God alone is good, and all goodness emanates from Him (as John says, God is light; yet the sun shines, but he shines by the light which God gives him); and while no man is good in a primary sense, because a good man would mean one who had never sinned; yet we may be righteous, because a righteous man is simply a justified sinner; and it is equally true that we may be holy, because a holy man is nothing but a sanctified sinner. The term good is variously used in subordinate senses, and not only applied to saints, but in common parlance even to sinners, animals, and things without life; however, in those cases, all the good they have has emanated from God.<\/p>\n<p>You know the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not murder, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor thy father and thy mother. Matthew says, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. And he, responding, said to Him, Teacher, I have kept all these from my youth. Jesus looking on him loved him, and said to him, One thing is wanting unto thee. Here Matthew says, If thou dost wish to be perfect, go, sell as many things as you have, and give to the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven. This interview took place out in Perea, east of the Jordan.<\/p>\n<p>Though our Savior is constantly surrounded by the Pharisees, you must not conclude that this young man is one of them. The truth of the matter is, he is far from them, even at the opposite pole of the battery. While the Pharisees were full of pride, haughtiness, and self-righteousness, this young man is very humble, as we see him come kneeling down before Jesus, and making earnest inquiry, What shall I do that I may inherit eternal life? Luke tells us he is a ruler of the people. He certainly shows up a very beautiful, moral, and religious character, in the fact that he has kept the commandments of the Decalogue from his youth. No wonder Jesus loved him. The simple solution of the whole problem recognizes this young man as a paragon Old Testament saint, walking in all the commandments of the law and the prophets blameless. He evidently has lived up to all the light of his day and dispensation. So he has nothing to do but receive Jesus, and move forward into the gospel dispensation  i.e., the kingdom of God whose normal standard is perfection, as you here see specified. Jesus responds to him, If you wish to be perfect, illustrating the fact that His dispensation requires perfection i.e., spiritual manhood, the standard of the old dispensation being spiritual infancy. There was no trouble in the case of this amiable and promising young ruler till he declined to accept the Saviors condition of discipleship, thus halting in the old dispensation after it had expired and become null and void. He was certainly a very fine subject of gospel grace, having nothing to do but meet the condition, which is Christian perfection, and pass from the law and the prophets into the kingdom of heaven.<\/p>\n<p>And he, being grieved at the word, went away sorrowful; for he had great possessions. Jesus knew his heart, and went for his idol unhesitatingly. Adam the First must die before you can become a perfect Christian, with Adam the Second enthroned to reign without a rival. All the unsanctified have their besetting sin, in which the diversified appetites and passions, constituting the members of old Adam, concentrate their forces, make a general rally, and turn loose all the impetuosity of earth and hell to break the power of grace and ruin the soul, world without end. While this young man, having kept all of these commandments faithfully from his youth, living in beautiful harmony with his dispensation, exhibits the irreproachable character of a paragon Old Testament saint, yet that phase of inbred sin which he was weakest to resist, as it held a tighter grip on him than any other, was the love of money, which had been augmented and intensified by his vast possessions.<\/p>\n<p>When the contractors began the Queen &amp; Crescent Railway, they went to Kings Mountain, because they had a solid mile of tunnel to excavate, by far the heaviest job on the route of fifteen hundred miles. A wise general, invading a country, always attacks the chief citadel first. Jesus knew that money-love was the serious trouble of this young man, and if he yielded there, victory flashed all along the embattled line, and He could rely on him as a paragon disciple. O how many preachers studiously avoid those things against which they feel assured their people will kick! Jesus, our only Exemplar, gives the trumpet no uncertain sound. This young man would have yielded outright if He had not put the sword to the throat of his idol. Luke says, He went away very sad. O how wonderfully history repeats itself! This young man lost his justification because he refused to consecrate all his possessions, the necessary antecedent to Christian perfection. Multitudes of the Jewish Church, in a similar attitude, enjoying justification before God because they walked in all the light they had, keeping all of the commandments, living under the law, without reprehension, faithfully anticipating the coming Messiah, forfeited their justification because they did not walk in the new light thrown on their way by the Shiloh of prophecy. If this young man had not met Jesus, doubtless he would have lived and died an irreproachable Old Testament saint and made his way to Abrahams bosom.<\/p>\n<p>God holds us responsible for all the light we receive. If we do not walk in it appreciatively, we invariably backslide. Therefore Jesus is called the Stone of stumbling, because multitudes, like this young man, stumbled over Him and fell, and they are still doing the same. God raised up Luther to pour new light upon the Church in his day and time. While his reformation was a blessing to many, it was the occasion of many stumbling and falling. The same is true of every great revival. While the present holiness movement is a God-send to myriads, it is the death-knell to multitudes, who unfortunately reject the light it brings, like this man stumbling over entire consecration.<\/p>\n<p>Jesus, looking round, says to His disciples, How shall those having riches with difficulty enter the kingdom of God! But the disciples were amazed at His words. Jesus again, responding, says to them, Children, how difficult is it for those having put their confidence in riches to enter into the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished exceedingly, saying to one another, Indeed who is able to be saved? And Jesus, looking on them, says, With men it is impossible, but not with God; for all things are possible with God. So far as the record warrants, there is not a presumption in favor of the salvation of this amiable young man, who is not only a member, but an officer in the Church, and, most consolatory of all, his religious character utterly irreproachable. It is a simple case of stumbling over perfection, and thus failing to pass from the dispensation of the law and the prophets into that of Christ  i.e., the kingdom of heaven whose standard is perfection. I believe, the reason why the disciples were so astonished over the utterances of Jesus, in reference to the difficulty in the way of salvation to the rich, was because the patriarchs in many instances were very wealthy; e.g., Abraham and Job, millionaires. There has been an awful squirming and dodging, twisting and floundering, especially on the part of the popular clergy, to evade and explain away these plain statements of Jesus relative to the difficulties in the way of saving the rich. Some have said that camel means rope, used about a ship, which of course could go through the eye of a large needle. Kamilos means rope. Though that word looks much like kamelos, a camel, you see they are entirely different words. Hence there is no truth in the exegesis. It is a miserable dodge to evade a square issue.<\/p>\n<p>Again, I have heard, over and over, that there are small gates entering through the wall of Jerusalem, called the Needles-eye. This is utterly untrue. I have made two visits to Jerusalem  the one ten days, and the other seven  in which I was very active, running all over it and round it repeatedly, so that I am this day better acquainted with Jerusalem than any other city in the world. As it symbolizes heaven, whither I am a pilgrim journeying, I studied it with a flaming enthusiasm, diligently investigating everything that could throw light on the Word of God. The city has but eight gates leading through the wall: The Joppa gate, on Mount Zion, looking westward, opening through the west wall, a short distance from the northwest corner. Then, as we proceed, turning eastward, we next come to the New Gate, leading through the north wall. Then, proceeding eastward, we come to the Damascus Gate, looking toward the north. Pursuing the north wall, we next arrive at Herods Gate. Now, passing the northeast corner and turning southward, we come to St. Stephens Gate, so called because it is said that the mob dragged him out through that gate when they stoned him to death. It is known in Scripture as the Sheep Gate. (John 5.) Proceeding southward, we next arrive at the Beautiful Gate. (Act 3:2.) This gate has been closed twelve hundred and sixty years, since the Mohammedans captured the city, on account of a Moslem prophecy that they can hold the city no longer than that gate is kept closed. Now the wall is on the high summit of Mount Moriah, the deep and impassable Valley of Jehoshaphat yawning beneath. Consequently there are no gates in this region, as there could be neither egress nor ingress. Pursuing the wall southward, turning the corner, we now travel westward, along the south wall, still on the summit of Moriah, till we reach a high valley between Moriah and Zion, where we arrive at the Excrement Gate, which leads out into the deep Valley of Jehoshaphat, and is used to carry, the offal out of the city; hence its name. Now the wall ascends Mount Zion westward, with a number of angles and offsets southward, by way of accommodation to the trend of the mountain. High up on the summit, in the City of David, we come to Davids Gate. These are the only entrances through the wall, with the exception which was made in 1898, when the emperor of Germany visited the city. They actually removed a section of the wall near the Joppa Gate for his convenient royal ingress and egress. Hence, you see, the report about the Needles-eye and the camel, ex necessitate divested of his burden in order to enter, is a fond fabrication to comfort the rich, but utterly untrue.<\/p>\n<p>I hope you have no sympathy with any attempt to explain away the plain Word of God. What an insult to Jesus thus utterly to emasculate, eviscerate, and excoriate His Word till it is utterly divested of all its force! Remember you have to meet it at the judgment-bar precisely as it is. So I entreat you to take it now, without addition or subtraction, and never encourage any attempt to explain it away. I emphasize this point because I have heard more preaching on this subject than any other; i.e., a labored effort to explain away the plain and unmistakable Word of God. All such evasion is foolish, fanatical, and Satanic. Jesus specifies in this paragraph that, while the salvation of the rich is impossible with man, with God all things are possible. What is the solution of this? God can give the millionaire grace to consecrate all on His altar, unreservedly and eternally to be used for His glory. In that case the millionaire becomes as poor as Lazarus. Without the sanctification no one shall see the Lord. (Heb 12:14.) Hence, as God is no respecter of persons, we all stand on the same platform. If we do not consecrate all to God, we can not be perfect, as Jesus here tells the young man. Heaven is a perfect world, consequently nothing imperfect can enter there. In this statement we do not mean Divine perfection, which belongs to God only, nor angelic perfection, which belongs to angels alone; but Christian perfection, which means a complete work of grace in the elimination of all evil out of the spiritual organism. As Jesus alone can do this, we must unreservedly consecrate all to Him, in order that He may sanctify us wholly. As Jesus here says, the impossibility is with man, in case he does not make a perfect consecration, which God can not do for him, as that would ignore his free agency; but He can and will give him all the grace he needs to do it himself, of his own free will and accord. Then, when man puts all on Gods altar, there is no trouble about sanctification, as that is the work of Omnipotent Grace. This whole subject, as delivered by the Savior, is perfectly lucid and consistent. O how many, like this rich young Church officer, hesitate to put all their possessions on Gods altar, and go away sorrowing! Happy is the poor man who has s~ little to consecrate! Yet multitudes of them fail just like the rich. Jesus saves none but beggars. If you own a gold-mine, and do not turn it over to God to be used for His glory, you can not be saved.<\/p>\n<p>Mat 19:27. Then Peter, responding, said to him, Behold, we have left all things, and followed Thee; what then shall be to us? Jesus said to them, Truly I say unto you, that you who have followed Me in the regeneration, when the Son of man may sit upon the throne of glory, you also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. The regeneration here mentioned does not mean that personal spiritual birth peculiar to all the children of God, but it is a continuation of the subject under consideration with reference to this rich young Church officer, whose life was so beautiful under the law and the prophets; and his qualification to pass out into the new dispensation, receiving his own Christ with joyful enthusiasm, and becoming a citizen of His kingdom, a bona fide member of the gospel Church, had all failed because of his delinquency in meeting the condition, i.e., consecrating all his vast wealth to God  and thus getting in position for the fiery baptism to sanctify him gloriously at the Pentecost then speedily coming on. So the regeneration here means the transition out of the old into the new dispensation. As Peter well knew that he and his apostolical comrades had forsaken their fishing-boats, nets, companions, homes, employment, and everything to follow Jesus, and now having seen the sad failure of this eminently promising young man, at the very point of total abandonment where Peter knew that he and his brethren had succeeded, he proceeds to interview the Savior in reference to what is coming. There, amid the contrast of the two diametrically opposite attitudes the faithful disciples, on the one side, meeting the condition; and the young ruler signally failing and going away  our Lord proceeds to answer Peters inquiry by the thrilling assurance that when He shall sit upon the throne of his glory, they shall all sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. We know that our Lord was soon glorified when He ascended from Mount Olivet; and in due time these apostles did divide up the world, and go to their diversified fields of labor  the Jameses taking Judea; Matthew, Ethiopia; Mark, Egypt; Matthias, Judass successor, Abyssinia; Thomas, India; Jude, Tartary; Bartholomew, Phrygia; Philip, Syria; Simon Zelotes, the British Islands; Andrew, Armenia; John, Ephesus; Peter, Rome; and Paul, Western Asia and Eastern Europe. Of course, they all enjoyed episcopal supremacy in their diversified fields of labor.<\/p>\n<p>But you must bear in mind that this wicked world did not let them live very long till they all suffered martyrdom, John being miraculously delivered, and, as we believe, finally translated. Hence this was but a preliminary fulfillment of our Saviors glorious promise, whose verification is evidently reserved for the Millennial Theocracy, when the saints will rule with Christ (Rev 20:6), the apostles in their normal attitude enjoying the supremacy, and Israel populating the whole earth, Satan having been removed, and the glory of the Lord inundating the world, and, as He says here, when He shall sit upon the throne of His glory, then shall you sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel; i.e., ruling them. Christ came the first time, in His humiliation, to suffer and to die; but He comes the second time, on the throne of His glory, to conquer and to reign. Here we certainly do see a recognition of apostolical supremacy in the rulership of the world. There are now just about twelve national divisions on the globe. So the world seems to be getting ready for these twelve apostolical thrones. Of course, our Lord must come in His glory, cast out Satan, raise the dead members of the bridehood, and reunite soul and body and translate the living. The first resurrection, at the pre-millennial coming of our Lord, will prepare the way for His glorious kingdom, when He shall sit on the throne of His glory, and the saints will judge the world (1Co 6:2); i. e., rule the world. I am so glad that I believe the whole Bible. Therefore I am looking for wonderful things.<\/p>\n<p>And every one, whosoever has left houses, brothers, sisters, father, mother, wife, children, or lands, for My names sake, shall receive a hundred fold, and inherit eternal life. But many first shall be last, and last shall be first. Here you see again that the Jews are coming into the kingdom after all of the Gentiles. One of the cheering omens of the Lords near coming is the rapid gathering of the Jews into the Holy Land, and their conversion to Christianity in all the world. Luke says that the one leaving all and following Jesus shall receive a hundred-fold at this time, and in the age to come eternal life. We find some people certifying that there is no coming age after the present. Here, in Luk 18:30, we have it positively specified. You find the same in Heb 6:5, and also in Mat 12:32. I am satisfied it occurs elsewhere in the New Testament, but certainly three clear and unequivocal witnesses are sufficient. In these passages, the E. V. says world to come; but the Greek used by our Savior is not cosmos, world, but aion, age. Hence these are certainly plain allusions, not only to the coming millennium, which will be the Edenic Age of the world restored back, but the Celestial Age, that shall follow the final glorification of the earth subsequently to its purification by the great fiery baptism simultaneously with the final judgment, the glorification following, transforming it into a new earth and a new heaven, or firmament<\/p>\n<p>(Revelation 21), and finally conferred, as a soldiers bounty, on the glorified saints, here to enjoy an eternity of heavenly bliss with myriads of unfallen angels, with whom, as our loving escorts, we will wing our flight from world to world, admiring the glory of Omnipotence, bespangling millions of bright celestial spheres which never knew sin nor sorrow. At the same time, with our angelic escorts, and accompanied by our sainted friends, always delighted to visit the New Jerusalem, the celestial metropolis, honored with Jehovahs throne, and the center of universal gravitation, around which all celestial worlds speed their flight, and which this world, on her final restitution and celestialization, will so approximate as to enjoy a grand and conspicuous view, and to receive the copious illuminations of the Divine glory. (Rev 21:9-27.)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: William Godbey&#8217;s Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Luk 18:18-30. The Great Refusal and the Obstacle of Riches (Mar 10:17-31*, Mat 19:16-30*).Lk. describes the inquirer as a ruler (probably of the local synagogue), and unlike Mt. keeps Mk.s words in Luk 18:18 f. Luk 18:27 is a wider saying than the parallels. In 29 Lk. adds wife and gives for the Kingdom of Gods sake in place of for the Gospels sake (Mk.), or for my names sake (Mt.).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Peake&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline\">3. The handicap of wealth 18:18-30<\/span><\/p>\n<p>This is another lesson on riches that Luke recorded (cf. Luk 6:24; Luk 8:14; Luk 11:41; Luk 12:13-34; Luke 16), but the context here is instruction on wealth as it pertains to entering into salvation and the kingdom. Someone might conclude from the previous incident that salvation depends only on the proper human attitude. This teaching clarifies that while the correct attitude is crucial, salvation is the work of God for man, not man&rsquo;s work for himself. This is important revelation for unbelievers but also for disciples charged with bearing the gospel message to the ends of the earth.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;The religious leaders have repeatedly been presented as people who exalt themselves (Luk 11:43; Luk 14:7-11; Luk 16:15; Luk 18:9-14) and as greedy rich people who neglect the poor (Luk 11:39-41: Luk 14:12-14; Luk 16:14; Luk 16:19-31). However, Jesus has not given up all hope that some of these people will change. This is apparent in the scene in Luk 18:18-27.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Tannehill, The Narrative . . ., 1:187.] <\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold\">Jesus&rsquo; encounter with the rich young ruler 18:18-23 (cf. Matthew 19:16-22; Mark 10:17-22)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The rich young ruler with his pride contrasts dramatically with the humble infants in the last pericope.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>The young man believed he could do something to earn eternal life, and he wanted to make sure he had not overlooked it (cf. Luk 10:25). Joh 3:3-15 shows that eternal life includes life in the messianic kingdom. To obtain eternal life meant to enter the kingdom (Joh 3:3-5). Luke and Mark both have him using the word &quot;inherit&quot; (Gr. <span style=\"font-style:italic\">kleronomeso<\/span>) while Matthew wrote &quot;obtain&quot; (Gr. <span style=\"font-style:italic\">scho<\/span>). This difference probably reflects Matthew&rsquo;s use of the young man&rsquo;s original word. Mark and Luke probably used the word &quot;inherit&quot; for their Gentile readers to clarify what was in the rich young ruler&rsquo;s mind. He was talking about getting something that he as a Jew thought that he had a good chance of obtaining because of his ethnic relationship to Abraham.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Chapter 22<\/p>\n<p>THE ETHICS OF THE GOSPEL.<\/p>\n<p>WHATEVER of truth there may be in the charge of &#8220;other-worldliness,&#8221; as brought against the modern exponents of Christianity, such a charge could not even be whispered against its Divine Founder. It is just possible that the Church had been gazing too steadfastly up into heaven, and that she had not been studying the science of the &#8220;Humanities&#8221; as zealously as she ought, and as she has done since; but Jesus did not allow even heavenly things to obliterate or to blur the lines of earthly duty. We might have supposed that coming down from heaven, and familiar with its secrets, He would have much to say about the New World, its position in space, its society and manner of life. But no; Jesus says little about the life which is to come; it is the life which now is that engrosses His attention, and almost monopolizes His speech. Life with Him was not in the future tense; it was one living present, real, earnest, but fugitive. Indeed, that future was but the present projected over into eternity. And so Jesus, founding the kingdom of God on earth, and summoning all men into it, if he did not bring commandments written and lithographed, like Moses, yet He did lay down principles and rules of conduct, marking out, in all departments of human life, the straight and white lines of duty, the eternal &#8220;ought.&#8221; It is true that Jesus Himself did not originate much in this department of Christian ethics, and probably for most of His sayings we can find a synonym struck from the pages of earlier, and perhaps heathen moralists; but in the wide realm of Right there can be no new law. Principles may be evolved, interpreted; they cannot be created. Right, like Truth, holds the &#8220;eternal years&#8221;; and through the millenniums before Christ, as through the millenniums after, Conscience, that &#8220;ethical intellect&#8221; which speaks to all men if they will but draw near to her Sinai and listen, spoke to some in clear, authoritative tones. But if Jesus did no more, He gathered up the &#8220;broken lights&#8221; of earth, the intermittent flashes which had played on the horizon before, into one steady electric beam, which lights up our human life outward to its farthest reach, and onward to its farthest goal.<\/p>\n<p>In the mind of Jesus conduct was the outward and visible expression of some inner invisible force. As our earth moves round its elliptic in obedience to the subtle attractions of other outlying worlds, so the orbits of human lives, whether symmetrical or eccentric, are determined mainly by the two forces, Character and Circumstance. Conduct is character in motion; for men do what they themselves are, i.e. as far as circumstances will allow. And it is just at this point the ethical teaching of Jesus begins. He recognizes the imperium in imperio, that hidden world of thought, feeling, sentiment, and desire which, itself invisible, is the mould in which things visible are cast. And so Jesus, in His influence upon men, worked outward from within. He sought, not reform, but regeneration, molding the life by changing the character, for, to use His own figure, how could the thorn produce grapes, or the thistle figs?<\/p>\n<p>And so when Jesus was asked, &#8220;What shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?&#8221; He gave an answer which at first sight seemed to ignore the question entirely. He said no word about &#8220;doing,&#8221; but threw the questioner back upon &#8220;being,&#8221; asking what was written in the law: &#8220;Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbor as thyself&#8221;. {Luk 10:27} And as Jesus here makes Love the condition of eternal life, its sine qua non, so He makes it the one all-embracing duty, the fulfilling of the law. If a man love God supremely, and his neighbor as himself, he cannot do more; for all other commandments are included in these, the subsections of the greater law. Jesus thus sought to create a new force, hiding it within the heart, as the mainspring of duty, providing for that duty both aim and inspiration. We call it a &#8220;new&#8221; force, and such it was practically; for though it was, in a way, embedded in their law, it was mainly as a dead letter, so much so that when Jesus bade His disciples to &#8220;love one another&#8221; He called it a &#8220;new commandment.&#8221; Here, then, we find what is at once the rule of conduct and its motive. In the new system of ethics, as taught and enforced by Jesus, and illustrated by His life, the Law of Love was to be supreme. It was to be to the moral world what gravitation is to the natural, a silent but mighty and all-pervasive force, throwing its spell upon the isolated actions of the common day, giving impulse and direction to the whole current of life, ruling alike the little eddies of thought and the wider sweeps of benevolent activities. To Jesus &#8220;the soul of improvement was the improvement of the soul.&#8221; He laid His hand upon the hearts innermost shrine, building up that unseen temple four-square, like the city of the Apocalypse, and lighting up all its windows with the warm, iridescent light of love.<\/p>\n<p>With this, then, as the foundation-tone, running through all the spaces and along all the lines of life, the thoughts, desires, words, and acts must all harmonize with love; and if they do not, if they strike a note that is foreign to its key-note, it breaks the harmony at once, throwing jars and discords into the tousle. Such a breach of the harmonic law would be called a mistake, but when it is a breach of Christs moral law it is more than a mistake, it is a wrong.<\/p>\n<p>Before passing to the outer life Jesus pauses, in this Gospel, to correct certain dissonances of mind and soul, of thought and feeling, which put us in a wrong attitude towards our fellows. First of all, He forbids us to sit in judgment upon others. He says, &#8220;Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: and condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned&#8221;. {Luk 6:37} This does not mean that we close our eyes with a voluntary blindness, working our way through life like moles; nor does it mean that we keep our opinions in a state of flux, not allowing them to crystallize into thought, or to harden into the leaden alphabets of human speech. There is within us all a moral sense, a miniature Sinai, and we can no more suppress its thunders or sheath its lightnings than we can hush the breakers of the shore into silence, or suppress the play of the Northern Lights. But in that unconscious judgment we pass upon the actions of others, with our condemnation of the wrong, we pass our sentence upon the wrong-doer, mentally ejecting him from the courtesies and sympathies of life, and if we allow him to live at all, compelling him to live apart, as a moral incurable. And so, with our hatred of the sin, we learn to hate the sinner, and calling from him both our charities and our hopes, we hurl him down into some little Gehenna of our own. But it is exactly this feeling, this kind of judgment, the Law of Love condemns. We may &#8220;hate the sin, and yet the sinner love,&#8221; keeping him still within the circle of our sympathies and our hopes. It is not meet that we should be merciless who have ourselves experienced so much mercy; nor is it for us to hale others off to prison, or ruthlessly to exact the uttermost farthing, when we ourselves at the very best are erring and unfaithful servants, standing so much and so often in need of forgiveness.<\/p>\n<p>But there is another &#8220;judging&#8221; that the command of Christ condemns, and that is the hasty and the false judgments we pass on the motives and lives of others. How apt we are to depreciate the worth of others who do not happen to belong to our circle! We look so intently for their faults and foibles that we become blind to their excellences. We forget that there is some good in every person, some that we can see if we only look, and we may be always sure that there is some we cannot see. We should not prejudge. We should not form our opinion upon an ex parte statement. We should not leave the heart too open to the flying germs of rumor, and we should discount heavily any damaging, disparaging statement. We should not allow ourselves to draw too many inferences, for he who is given to drawing inferences draws largely on his imagination. We should think slowly in our judgment of others, for he who leaps to conclusions generally takes his leap in the dark. We should learn to wait for the second thoughts, for they are often truer than the first. Nor is it wise to use too much &#8220;the spur of the moment&#8221;; it is a sharp weapon, and is apt to cut both ways. We should not interpret others motives by our own feelings, nor should we &#8220;suppose&#8221; too much. Above all, we should be charitable, judging of others as we judge ourselves. Perhaps the beam that is in a brothers eye is but the magnified mote that is in our own. It is better to learn the art of appreciating than that of depreciating; for though the one is easy, and the other difficult, yet he who looks for the good, and exalts the good, will make the very wilderness to blossom and be glad; while he who depreciates everything outside his own little self impoverishes life, and makes the very garden of the Lord one arid, barren desert.<\/p>\n<p>Again, Jesus condemns pride, as being a direct contravention of His Law of Love. Love rejoices in the possessions and gifts of others, nor would she care to add to her own if it must be at the cost of theirs. Love is an equalizer, leveling up the inequalities the accidents of life have made, and preferring to stand on some lower level with her fellows than to sit solitary on some lofty and cold Olympus. Pride, on the other hand, is a repelling, separating force. Scorning those who occupy the lower places, she is contented only on her Olympian summit, where she keeps herself warm with the fires of her self-adulation. The proud heart is the loveless heart, one huge inflation; if she carries others at all, it is only as a steadying ballast; she will not hesitate to throw them over and throw them down, as mere dust or sand, if their fall will help her to rise. Pride like the eagle, builds her nest on high, bringing forth whole broods of loveless, preying passions, hatreds, jealousies, and hypocrisies. Pride sees no brotherhood in man; humanity to her means no more than so many serfs to wait upon her pleasure, or so many victims for her sacrifice! And how Jesus loved to prick these bubbles of airy nothings, showing up these vanities as the very essence of selfishness! He did not spare His words, even though they stung, when &#8220;He marked how they chose out the chief seats&#8221; at the friendly supper; {Luk 14:7} and one of His bitter &#8220;woes&#8221; He hurled at the Pharisees just because &#8220;they loved the chief seats in the synagogues,&#8221; worshipping Self, when they pretended to worship God, so: making the house of God itself an arena for the sport and play of their proud ambitions. &#8220;He that is least among you all,&#8221; He said, when rebuking the disciples lust for preeminence, &#8220;the same is great.&#8221; And such is Heavens law: humility is the cardinal virtue, the &#8220;strait&#8221; and low gate which opens into the very heart of the kingdom. Humility is the one and the only way of heavenly preferments and eternal promotions; for in the life to come there will be strange contrasts and inversions, as he that exalted himself is now humbled, and he that humbled himself is now exalted. {Luk 14:11}<\/p>\n<p>Tracing now the lines of duty as they run across the outer life, we find them following the same directions. As the golden-milestone of the Forum marked the center of the empire, towards which its roads converged, and from which all distances were measured, so in the Christian commonwealth Jesus makes Love the capital, the central, controlling power; while at the focal point of all the duties He sets up His Golden Rule, which gives direction to all the paths of human conduct: &#8220;And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise&#8221;. {Luk 6:30} In this general law we have what we might call the ethical compass, for it embraces within its circle the &#8220;whole duty of man&#8221; towards his fellow; and it only needs an adjusted conscience, like the delicately poised needle, and the line of the &#8220;ought&#8221; can be read off at once, even in those uncertain latitudes where no specific law is found. Are we in doubt as to what course of conduct to pursue, as to the kind of treatment we should accord to our fellow? We can always find the via recta by a short mental transposition. We have only to put ourselves in his place, and to imagine our relative positions reversed, and from the &#8220;would&#8221; of our supposed desires and hopes we read the &#8220;ought&#8221; of present duty. The Golden Rule is thus a practical exposition of the Second Commandment, investing our neighbor with the same luminous Atmosphere we throw about ourselves, the atmosphere of a benevolent, beneficent love.<\/p>\n<p>But beyond this general law Jesus gives us a prescript as to the treatment of enemies. He says, &#8220;Love your enemies, do good to them that hate you, bless them that curse you, pray for them that despitefully use you. To him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other: and from him that taketh away thy cloak withhold not thy coat also&#8221;. {Luk 6:27-29} In considering these injunctions we must bear in mind that the word &#8220;enemy&#8221; in its New Testament meaning had not the wide and general signification it has today. It then stood in antithesis to the word &#8220;neighbor&#8221; as in Mat 5:43; and as the word &#8220;neighbor&#8221; to the Jew included those, and those only, who were of the Hebrew race and faith, the word &#8220;enemy&#8221; referred to those outside, who were aliens from the commonwealth of Israel. To the Hebrew mind it stood as a synonym for &#8220;Gentile.&#8221; In these words, then, we find, not a general and universal law, but the special instructions as to their course of conduct in dealing with the Gentiles, to whom they would shortly be sent. No matter what their treatment, they must bear it with an uncomplaining patience. Stripped, beaten, they must not resist, much less retaliate; they must not allow any vindictive feelings to possess them, nor must they take in their own hot hand the sword of a &#8220;sweet revenge.&#8221; Nay, they must even bear a good-will towards their enemies, repaying their hate with love, their spite and enmity with prayers, and their curses with sincerest benedictions.<\/p>\n<p>It will be observed that no mention is made of repentance or of restitution: without waiting for these, or even expecting them, they must be prepared to forgive and prepared to love their enemies, even while they are shamefully treating them. And what else, under the circumstances, could they have done? If they appealed to the secular power it would simply have been an appeal to a heathen court, from enemies to enemies. And as to waiting for repentance, their &#8220;enemies&#8221; are only treating them as enemies, aliens and foreigners, wronging them, it is true, but ignorantly, and not through any personal malice. They must forgive just for the same reason that Jesus forgave His Roman murderers, &#8220;for they know not what they do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We cannot, therefore, take these injunctions, which evidently had a special and temporary application, as the literal rule of conduct towards those who are unfriendly or hostile to us. This, however, is plain, that even our enemies, whose enmity is directly personal rather than sectional or racial, are not to be excluded from the Law of Love. We must bear them neither hatred nor resentment; we must guard our hearts sacredly from all malevolent, vindictive feelings. We must not be our own avenger, taking vengeance upon our adversaries, as we let loose the barking Cerberus to track and run them down. All such feelings are contrary to the Law of Love, and so are contraband, entirely foreign to the heart that calls itself Christian. But with all this we are not to meet all sorts of injuries and wrongs without protest or resistance. We cannot condone a wrong without being accomplices in the wrong. To defend our property and life is just as much our duty as it was the wisdom and the duty of those to whom Jesus spoke to offer an uncomplaining cheek to the Gentile smiter. Not to do this is to encourage crime, and to put a premium upon evil. Nor is it inconsistent with a true love to seek to punish, by lawful means, the wrong-doer. Justice here is the highest type of mercy, and pains and penalties have a remedial virtue, taming the passions which had grown too wild, or straightening the conscience that had become warped.<\/p>\n<p>And so Jesus, speaking of the &#8220;offences,&#8221; the occasions of stumbling that would come, said, &#8220;If thy brother sin, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive.&#8221; {Luk 17:3} It is not the patient, silent acquiescence now. No, we must rebuke the brother who has sinned against us and wronged us. And if this is vain, we must tell it to the Church, as St. Matthew completes the injunction; {Mat 18:17} and if the offender will not hear the Church, he must be cast out, ejected from their fellowship, and becoming to their thought as a heathen or a publican. The wrong, though it is a brother who does it, must not be glossed over with the enamel of an euphemism; nor must it be hushed up, veiled by a guilty silence. It must be brought to the light of day, it must be rebuked and punished; nor must it be forgiven until it is repented of. Let there be, however, a genuine repentance, and there must be on our part the prompt and complete forgiveness of the wrong. We must set it back out of our sight, amongst the forgotten things. And if the wrong be repeated, if the repentance be repeated, the forgiveness must be repeated too, not only for seven times seven offenses, but for seventy times seven. Nor is it left to our option whether we forgive or no; it is a duty, absolute and imperative; we must forgive, as we ourselves hope to be forgiven.<\/p>\n<p>Again, Jesus treats of the true use of wealth. He Himself assumed a voluntary poverty. Silver and gold had He none; indeed, the only coin that we read He handled was the borrowed Roman penny, with Caesars inscription upon it. But while Jesus Himself preferred poverty, choosing to live on the outflowing charities of those who felt it both a privilege and an honor to minister to Him of their substance, yet He did not condemn wealth. It was not a wrong per se. In the Old Testament it had been regarded as a sign of Heavens special favor, and amongst the rich Jesus Himself found some of His warmest, truest friends-friends who came nobly to the front when some who had made louder professions had ignominiously fled. Nor did Jesus require the renunciation of wealth as the condition of discipleship. He did not advocate that fictitious egalite of the Commune. He sought rather to level up than to level down. It is true He did say to the ruler, &#8220;Sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor&#8221;; but this was an exceptional case, and probably it was put before him as a test command, like the command to Abraham that he should sacrifice his son-which was not intended to he carried out literally, but only as far as the intention, the will. There was no such demand made from Nicodemus, and when Zacchaeus testified that it had been his practice (the present tense would indicate a retrospective rather than a prospective rule) to give one-half of his income to the poor, Jesus does not find fault with his division, and demand the other half; He commends him, and passes him up, right over the excommunication of the rabbis, among the true sons of Abraham. Jesus did not pose as an assessor; He left men to divide their own inheritance. It was enough for Him if He could put within the soul this new force, the &#8220;moral dynamic&#8221; of love to God and man; then the outward relations would shape themselves, regulated as by some automatic action.<\/p>\n<p>But with all this, Jesus recognized the peculiar temptations and dangers of wealth. He saw how riches tend to engross and monopolize the thought, diverting it from higher things, and so He classed riches with cares, pleasures, which choke the Word of life, and make it unfruitful. He saw how wealth tended to selfishness; that it acted as an astringent, closing up the valves of the heart, and thus shutting down the outflow of its sympathies. And so Jesus, whenever He spoke of wealth, spoke in words of warning: &#8220;How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!&#8221; He said, when He saw how the rich ruler set wealth before faith and hope. And singularly enough, the only times Jesus, in His parables, lifts up the curtain of doom it is to tell of &#8220;certain rich&#8221; men-the one, whose soul swung selfishly between his banquets and his barns, and who, alas! had laid up no treasures in heaven; and the other, who exchanged his purple and fine linen for the folds of enveloping flames, and the sumptuous fare of earth for eternal want, the eternal hunger and thirst of the after-retribution!<\/p>\n<p>What, then, is the true use of wealth? And how may we so hold it that it shall prove a blessing, and not a bane? In the first place, we must hold it in our hand, and not lay it up in the heart. We must possess it; it must not possess us. We may give our thought, moderately, to it, but our affections must not be allowed to center upon it. We read that the Pharisees &#8220;were lovers of money,&#8221; {Luk 16:14} and that argentic passion was the root of all their evils. The love of money, like an opiate, little by little, steals over the whole frame, deadening the sensibility, perverting the judgment, and weakening the will, producing a kind of intoxication, in which the better reason is lost, and the confused speech can only articulate, with Shylock, &#8220;My ducats, my ducats!&#8221; the true way of holding wealth is to hold it in trust, recognizing Gods ownership and our stewardship. Bank it up, give it no outlet, and your wealth becomes a stagnant pool, breeding malaria and burning fevers; but open the channel, give it an outlet, and it will bring life and music to a thousand lower vales, increasing the happiness of others, and increasing your own the more. And so Jesus strikes in with His frequent imperative, &#8220;Give&#8221;-&#8220;Give, and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, shall they give into your bosom&#8221;. {Luk 6:38} And this is the true use of wealth, its consecration to the needs of humanity. And may we not say that here is its truest pleasure? He who has learned the art of generous giving, who makes his life one large-hearted benevolence, living for others and not for himself, has acquired an art that is beautiful and Divine, an art that turns the deserts into gardens of the Lord and that peoples the sky overhead with unseen singing Ariels. Giving and living are heavenly synonyms, and tie who giveth most liveth best.<\/p>\n<p>But not from the words of Jesus alone do we read off the lines of our duty. He is in His own Person a Polar Star, to whom all the meridians of our round life turn, and from whom they emanate. His life is thus our law, His example our pattern. Do we wish to learn what are the duties of children to their parents? The thirty silent years of Nazareth speak in answer. They show us how the Boy Jesus is in subjection to His parents, giving to them a perfect obedience, a perfect trust, and a perfect love. They show us the Divine Youth, still shut in within that narrow circle, ministering to that circle, by hard-manual toil becoming the stay of that fatherless home. Do we wish to learn our duties to the State? See how Jesus walked in a land across which the Roman eagle had cast its shadow! He did not preach a crusade against the barbarian invaders, tie recognized in their presence and power the ordination of God-that they had been sent to chastise a lapsed Israel. And so Jesus spoke no word of denunciation, no fiery word, which might have proved the spark of a revolution. He took Himself away from the multitudes when they would by force make Him King. He spoke in respectful terms of the powers that were; He even justified the payment of tribute to Caesar, acknowledging his lordship, while at the same time He spoke of the higher tribute to the great Over-Lord, even God. When upon His trial for life or death, before a Roman tribunal, He even stayed to apologize for Pilates weakness, casting the heavier sin back on the hierarchy that had bought Him and delivered Him up; while upon the cross, amid its untold agonies, though His lips were glued by a fearful thirst, He opened them to breathe a last prayer for His Roman executioners: &#8220;Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But was Jesus, then, an alien from His kinsmen according to the flesh? Was patriotism to Him an unknown force? Did He know nothing of love of country, that inspiration which has turned common men into heroes and martyrs, that love which oceans cannot quench, nor distance weaken, which throws an auroral brightness around the most sterile shores, and which makes the emigrant sick with a strange &#8220;Heimweh?&#8221; Did the Son of man, the ideal Man, know nothing at all of this? He did know it, and know it well. He identified Himself thoroughly with His people; He placed Himself under the law, observing its rites and ceremonies. After the Childhood exile in Egypt, He scarcely passed out of the sacred bounds; no storms of rough persecution could dislodge the heavenly Dove, or send Him wheeling off from His native hills. And if He did not preach rebellion, He did preach that righteousness which gives to a nation its truest wealth and widest liberty. He did denounce the Pharisaic shams, the hollow hypocrisies, which had eaten away the nations heart and strength. And how He loved Jerusalem, forgetting His own triumph in the vision of her humiliation, and weeping for the desolations which were coming sure and fast! This, the Holy City, was the center to which He ever returned, and to which He gave His last bequest-His cross and His grave. Nay, when the cross is taken down, and the grave is vacant, He lingers to give His Apostles their commission; and when He bids them, &#8220;Go ye out into all the world,&#8221; He adds, &#8220;beginning at Jerusalem.&#8221; The Son of man is the Son of David still, and within His deep love for humanity at large was a peculiar love for His &#8220;own,&#8221; as the ark itself was enshrined within the Holy of Holies.<\/p>\n<p>And so we might traverse the whole ethical domain, and we should find no duty which is not enforced or suggested by the words or the life of the great Teacher. As Dr. Dorner says, &#8220;There is only one morality; the original of it is in God; the copy of it is in the Man of God.&#8221; Happy is he who see this Polar Star, whose light shines clear and calm above the rush of human years and the ebbs and flows of human life! Happier still is he who shapes his course by it, who reads off all his bearings from its light! He who builds his life after the Divine model, reading the Christ-life into his own, will build up another city of God on earth, foursquare and compact together, a city of peace, because a city of righteousness and a city of love.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 18-30. The Great Refusal. The Young Ruler who loved Riches more than Christ. 18. a certain ruler ] St Matthew (Mat 19:20) only calls him &ldquo;a young man.&rdquo; He was probably the young and wealthy ruler of a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-luke-1818\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 18:18&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25688","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25688"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25688\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}