And as they were loosing the colt<\/strong>,…. In order to bring it away, as Christ bid them:<\/p>\n the owners thereof said unto them, why loose ye the colt<\/strong>? Mark takes notice of this, but does not tell us who they were, only that they were persons that stood there; but this evangelist informs us who they were: and it seems by this, that there were more owners of the colt than one, which might have made the taking away of the colt the more difficult; since, though one might agree to it, another might not; but Christ, who is God, and has the hearts of all men in his hands, could, as he did, dispose the minds of these men to let the colt go freely, and quietly, with his disciples;<\/p>\n [See comments on Mr 11:5]<\/span>.<\/p>\n As they were loosing <\/B> ( <\/SPAN><\/span>). Genitive absolute.<\/P> The owners thereof <\/B> ( <\/SPAN><\/span>). The same word <\/SPAN><\/span> used of the Lord Jesus in verse 31<\/span> (and 34<\/span>) and which these “owners” would understand. See on Matt 21:3<\/span>; Mark 11:3<\/span> for <\/SPAN><\/span> used by Jesus about himself with the expectation that these disciples would recognize him by that title as they did. The word in common use for the Roman emperor and in the LXX to translate the Hebrew Elohim<\/I> (God). <\/P> <\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n 1) “And as they were loosing the colt,” <\/strong>(luonton de auton ton polon) “Then as they were loosening the colt,” God’s property, as described, Psa 50:10<\/span>.<\/p>\n 2) “The owners thereof said unto them,” <\/strong>(elpon hoi kurioi autou pros autous) “The owners of it said directly to them,” confronting them for what they were doing. The owners were just really “stewards” who had some of God’s property in their trust that His Son needed at this time, Ps 241; 1Co 10:26<\/span>.<\/p>\n 3) “Why loose ye the colt?” <\/strong>(ti luete ton polon) “Just why are you all loosening the colt?” It was a normal question for an owner or trustee or steward who saw property in his care being taken.<\/p>\n (33) The owners thereof.<\/strong>In<\/strong> this instance St. Luke, though less graphic in his narrative generally, is more specific than St. Mark, who represents the question as coming from some of those that stood by. The use of the same Greek word for owner and for the Lord affords a striking example of the elasticity of its range of meaning.<\/p>\n ‘And as they were loosing the colt, its owners said to them, “Why do you loose the colt?” And they said, “The Lord has need of him”.’<\/p>\n Luke then tells us that the arrangements worked smoothly and were followed word for word. ‘Its owners.’ This may possibly confirm that the ass was available for hiring out (along with other asses) so that the business was jointly owned.<\/p>\n “The Lord has need of him.” This has been repeated twice for emphasis, underlying the importance that Luke sees in it. The One Who is Lord of all is exercising His authority.<\/p>\n Luk 19:33<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>The owners thereof said<\/em><\/strong><\/strong> Perhaps had not the owners of the beasts happened to be by, and had not St. Luke expressly mentioned them, the malice of ancient or modern infidels would have found some occasion for raising an outcry on the ambiguity of the words, The Lord hath need of him. <\/em>Its being a weak and contemptible cavil would not have prevented their use of it, as we learn from abundant experience. If the people here spoken of, were not, as they possibly might be, the acquaintances of Christ, they might easily meet with him at Jerusalem, if they had a mind to inquire after the ass and colt. Or, they might be left, agreeably to the owner’s direction, at some house in the city, or be sent back by some of our Lord’s attendants, though the evangelists do not descend to such minute particulars. <\/p>\n 33.<\/strong> ] said this, as in the probably more concise account of Mark; <\/strong> .<\/strong> is the natural inference<\/em> as to who they were.<\/p>\n the owners. Greek. kurioi. See App-98. <\/p>\n 33.] said this, as in the probably more concise account of Mark;- . is the natural inference as to who they were.<\/p>\n [33. , as they were loosing) in public, without having accosted or asked leave of any man.-V. g.]<\/p>\n Luk 19:33. The owners. Peculiar to Luke, but fairly implied in Mar 11:5.<\/p>\n And as they were loosing the colt, the owners thereof said unto them, Why loose ye the colt? And as they were loosing the colt,…. In order to bring it away, as Christ bid them: the owners thereof said unto them, why loose ye the colt? Mark takes notice of this, but does not tell … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 19:33”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"