{"id":27448,"date":"2022-09-24T12:13:18","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T17:13:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-acts-166\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T12:13:18","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T17:13:18","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-acts-166","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-acts-166\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 16:6"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 6<\/strong>. <em> Now when they had gone throughout<\/em> ] The oldest MSS. merely say <strong> and they went through<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><em> Phrygia and the region of Galatia<\/em> ] Scarcely the direction, so far as population was concerned, which would have been chosen by them of their own accord, but the inner admonition of the Holy Ghost kept them from entering Proconsular Asia. The news of the events at Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost were known to some in Phrygia already (<span class='bible'>Act 2:10<\/span>), but of Galatia the history has yet made no mention, though we know from St Paul&rsquo;s Epistle to that church that he afterwards had the warmest interest in and greatest anxiety concerning the Christians there, among whom Judaizers wrought like mischief with that done in Antioch. From some expressions of St Paul (<span class='bible'>Gal 4:19<\/span>) it seems likely that it was from his own preaching at this time that churches in Galatia were founded.<\/p>\n<p><em> and were forbidden<\/em> ] Better, <em> having been forbidden<\/em>. As they had been forbidden the one route, they went by the other. Probably St Luke says little about the events in this part of the journey, for his language below (<span class='bible'><em> Act 16:10<\/em><\/span>) seems to shew that he only joined St Paul at Troas.<\/p>\n<p><em> in Asia<\/em> ] See note on <span class='bible'>Act 2:9<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Throughout Phrygia &#8211; <\/B>This was the largest province of Asia Minor. It had Bithynia north; Pisidia and Lycia south; Galatia and Cappadocia east; and Lydia and Mysia west.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>And the region of Galatia &#8211; <\/B>This province was directly east of Phrygia. The region was formerly conquered by the Gauls. They settled in it, and called it, after their own name, Galatia. The Gauls invaded the country at different times, and no less than three tribes or bodies of Gauls had possession of it. Many Jews were also settled there. It was from this cause that so many parties could be formed there, and that so much controversy would arise between the Jewish and Gentile converts. See the Epistle to the Galatians.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>And were forbidden &#8211; <\/B>Probably by a direct revelation. The reason of this was, doubtless, that it was the intention of God to extend the gospel further into the regions of Greece than would have been done if they had remained in Asia Minor. This prohibition was the means of the first introduction of the gospel into Europe.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>In Asia &#8211; <\/B>See the notes on <span class='bible'>Act 2:9<\/span>. This was doubtless the region of proconsular Asia. It was also called Ionia. Of this region Ephesus was the capital; and here were situated also the cities of Smyrna, Thyatira, Philadelphia, etc., within which the seven churches mentioned in Rev. 13 were established. Cicero speaks of proconsular Asia as containing the provinces of Phrygia, Mysia, Carla, and Lydia. In all this region the gospel was afterward preached with great success. But now a more important and a wider field was opened before Paul and Barnabas in the extensive country of Macedonia.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act 16:6-10<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em> <\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Pauls first visit to Galatia, A.D. 51 or 52<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The form of the Greek expression implies that Phrygia and Galatia are not to be regarded as separate districts&#8211;but the land originally inhabited by Phrygians, but subsequently occupied by Cauls. Paul does not appear to have had any intention of preaching the gospel here. He was perhaps anxious at once to bear his message to the more important and promising district of proconsular Asia. But he was detained by a return of his old malady the thorn in the flesh&#8211;some sharp and violent attack which humiliated him and prostrated his physical strength. To this the Galatians owed their knowledge of Christ. Though a homeless, stricken wanderer might seem but a feeble advocate of a cause so momentous, yet it was the Divine order that in the preaching of the gospel strength should be made perfect in weakness. The zeal of the preacher and the enthusiasm of his hearers triumphed over all impediments. They did not despise the temptation in his flesh. They received him as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus. They would have plucked out their very eyes if they could and have given them to him. It can scarcely have been any predisposing religious sympathy which attracted them so powerfully. The gospel as a message of mercy and a spiritual faith stood in direct contrast to the gross and material religions in which the race had been nurtured. But if we picture to ourselves the apostle, as he appeared before the Galatians, a friendless outcast, writhing under the tortures of a painful malady, yet instant in season and out of season, by turns denouncing and entreating, perhaps also, as at Lystra, enforcing his appeals by some striking miracle, we shall be at no loss to conceive how the fervid temperament of the Gaul might have been aroused. In the absence of all direct testimony we may conjecture that it was at Ancyra, now the capital of the Roman province, as formerly of the Gaulish settlement, the most illustrious metropolis, as it is called in formal documents; at Pessinus under the shadow of Mount Dindimus, the cradle of the worship of Cybele, and one of the principal commercial towns of the district; at Tavium, at once a strong fortress and a great emporium, situated at the point of convergence of several important roads; perhaps also at Juliopolis, the ancient Gordium, formerly the capital of Phrygia, almost equidistant from the three seas, and from its central position a busy mart; at these, or some of these places, that Paul founded the earliest Churches of Galatia. (<em>Bp. Lightfoot.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>And were forbidden of the Holy Spirit to preach the Word in Asia.<\/strong><em>&#8212;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>The guidance of the Spirit<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Who can read this account without being tempted to ask&#8211;Why should the Holy Ghost forbid the apostles to preach in Asia? Why not suffer them to go into Bithynia? Were not the inhabitants sitting in darkness and in the shadow of death? And did not Christ die for them? Now as God giveth no account of His matters; and as the Lord of the harvest may send forth labourers into whatever part of His harvest He pleases, it might he enough to answer that it belongs not to us to pry into those reasons which it has pleased Him to keep secret. But the matter admits of a most satisfactory explanation. No doubt the souls in Asia and Bithynia were dear to God; but Paul and Silas could not be labouring both in Asia and Macedonia at the same time; and He, who knew the hearts of all, knew in which country the minds of men were most prepared to receive the gospel. That there was such a preparation in Macedonia is intimated by the very nature of the vision. The whole may be illustrated by a familiar image. A farmer perceives his fields white for the harvest, and hires labourers to reap the corn. They go into one field, and prepare to cut it down, but he forbids them; they look to another, and attempt to enter it; but he suffers them not: he conducts them to a third which is most fully ripe, and says, This is the field, work here. Would any say that he did not care for the corn in the other fields because he passed them by? Would not everyone be sure that he only took the third before them because it was most ready for the sickle, and that he would take the others in due time? So when the Lord forbad His servants to preach in Asia and Bithynia it was not that He did not care for the souls there, but that Macedonia was the most prepared. How well prepared it was appears from Pauls epistles to the Churches in that country, at Philippi and Thessalonica. But were Asia and Bithynia therefore neglected? No. We find Paul afterwards preaching in Troas, the very port of Asia whence he sailed to Macedonia. In Ephesus also, the principal city of that Asia where he had been forbidden to preach the Word, he abode two full years, so that all they, both Jews and Greeks, that dwelt in Asia, heard the Word of the Lord Jesus. We may observe, too, that the first epistle of Peter is addressed to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia. Yes! the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon Him. His tender mercies are over all His works: and we have the authority of Paul for saying that He will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth. (<em>J. Fawcett, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Divine guidance<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>You want to know what to do, how to act, where to go. There is one safe and sure method&#8211;and only one. It is Pauls. He thought, he used his natural reason; his instinct was to travel on, his inclination was to visit Asia, then Bithynia. Having done his best to choose, he submits his choice to a higher guidance. He carries the question in prayer to God, then he feels he is not to go&#8211;knows not where to go, obeys this intuition which happens to be opposed to his own wishes, waits, but waits not long. The vision and the voice follow speedily. It is at length from these that he assuredly gathers&#8211;infers truly his next step. It is even so. Use your faculties, submit your judgment to the highest, be true to what seems to you the highest leading, and the Divine message will grow clearer and clearer&#8211;the intuition, the vision, the voice&#8211;but, mark you, clearer only for the next step. The whole of Pauls journey was not mapped out. He could not see far, but he was not left in doubt. He assuredly gathered the next move. Perhaps he thought he was now bound for Rome&#8211;Rome attracted him far more powerfully than Athens. Yet he was not to go to Rome that time, nor could he have guessed, when he started for Philippi, that he was going to Athens and preach there to the scoffing, subtle Greeks. (<em>H. R. Haweis, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Paul called to Europe<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>All Asia had heard the gospel. Now it was brought to that Europe which has furnished to the world its civilised energy. Probably in Pauls mind the European passage was but one of many journeys. But to the eye of history, seeing before and after, it was the challenge of Christianity to civilisation, to intellect, to world-controlling energy, to come and be ruled by Christ. Before this journey, however, there went&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>The time of waiting. Proconsular Asia and Bithynia were before Paul and his companions; they were without the gospel; they needed it; Paul was ready to give it. And yet the gospel was not preached. It was not a time to labour, but a time to wait.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Yet it was a time of endeavour to labour. Paul did not choose the waiting for himself. He honestly and earnestly tried to preach the gospel. He went to the frontier of the province of Asia Minor intending to enter and preach. Prevented there, he tried Bithynia next. Preaching was the one word that summed up all Pauls life. Every Christian is called to work. His mission in life is to proclaim Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Pauls endeavour to do his work was thwarted. He wanted to labour for Christ, and he was prevented from doing so. He went into many a place only to be driven out with stones. He planned great journeys and found himself in prison. It would be a very instructive thing to look over the Scriptural records of Pauls life and tabulate the thwarted plans recorded. No man makes every Christian endeavour he undertakes a success. As God makes the flower cast many a seed to the ground that one or two plants may spring up, so He gives it as a law of spiritual accomplishment that there shall sometimes be many failures to one success. And Paul, like a wise man, did not quarrel with law.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>The strange part of Pauls experience at this point was that the thwarting of his purpose to preach the gospel in proconsular Asia and Bithynia was directly due to God. Some of Paul s failures were due to the interference of Satan (see <span class='bible'>1Th 2:18<\/span>), who we may believe goes about endeavouring to hinder Gods people in Gods work. What are we to think of this?<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> God was leading Paul away from the conversion of Asia Minor to the conversion of Europe. Paul, having but one human life and one mans natural power, could not do both. God set before him the larger work. To accomplish it involved the exclusion of the smaller.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> Asia Minor was undoubtedly approached more advantageously by the gospel from the westward, when the weight of European success added a new commendation to Pauls teaching, which it lacked when it came from the eastward. If you want to win a man to anything it is better to await the favourable moment than to rush in at first sight. It was better for Asia Minor and Bithynia not to have the gospel preached to them just yet.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> Gods thwarting of Pauls plans would have been all right even if we could see no reason whatever in it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>The Holy Spirit was present with Paul, directing and equipping him, quite as well in the time of waiting as in the time of work.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>The call. Paul had found his intentions foiled; Asia Minor and Bithynia were closed to him; Europe remained. Should he seek those shores? He needed direction, and it was given. The vision of the Macedonian, perhaps authenticated as from God in some way unknown to us, showed Paul where his labour lay.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The vision was that of a pleading man. The gospel is for the world, and the whole world.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The figure in the vision voiced the need of help; it did not define just what was needed. The call that rises from the human race is a cry for help, whatever the help be. It is not always a cry for the gospel; for many times when the gospel is offered it is blindly refused. It is the function of the gospel sometimes to create desire as well as to satisfy it. When Paul landed in Macedonia he found no crowd standing with outstretched hands to welcome him. No, he tarried certain days before there was any sign of the gospel being wanted, and then the sign came only to Pauls search for it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>The Macedonian was a representative. He said not Come over and help me, but Come over and help us. All needed Christ, and not only the few souls who were already near to the kingdom&#8211;like Lydia, the first convert.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>The request that was made by the pleading man of the vision was in Pauls power to grant. He could go over and help them if he wanted to. So can we help the nations who seem to stand before us in vision beseeching us to help them.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>The answer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Paul was led to make an answer by using the mind God had given him. He and his companions consulted together and concluded that God had called them for to preach the gospel unto them. The supernatural vision seems to separate Pauls experience from ours. We are not so led in our work. But his consulting with his friends and reasoning out as well as he could the conclusion which God wanted him to make, brings his way of being led back into similarity with our own.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Having made up his mind that he ought to go to Macedonia, Paul sought to carry out that purpose. Assurance of success and the accomplishment of success are in Gods hands, but we can at least try. If God is willing to bless, and we are able at least to try, if Christian work sometimes does not greatly prosper, what is the reason?<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Pauls answer to the meaning of the vision was immediate. Straightway we sought to go. The reaction of Pauls converted soul in the presence of spiritual need was instant. If he responded instantly to the call of need we can respond so too, if we will.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>The calls being from God was what made Pauls reply so quick. Obedience was a primal element in Pauls religious life, and so he is seen to be truly of the company of Him who was an obedient Son.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>IV. <\/strong>The result.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>It was not visible at once. Over in Troas there was the exciting vision of the pleading Macedonian. But in Macedonia there was nothing but indifference. Paul was received, as the missionary of the cross is almost always received, with perfect indifference.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Paul used means to bring a result about. He did not sit down with folded hands, saying to himself, Macedon has cried to me for help; I have come a long way at great trouble in order to give help: now if the Macedonians want me let them speak out. Paul assumed that the Macedonians needed everything and acted as though they desired nothing. He waited not for them to seek him, he sought them. Work is a spiritual as well as a natural condition of success.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>A small beginning was made. Paul was not disheartened at its smallness, but content with its being a beginning. No heathen were allured to the gospel at all. No men were reached. One woman, and she half converted already before Pauls appearance, was the harvest of Pauls effort. The beginning is not yet the end, but it surely has the end hidden in it, in however small circumference.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>Fellowship was established. Lydia brought her household into the faith and took Paul and his friends into the sweet communion of this new Christian home. When that Christian fellowship was formed the success of Pauls Philippian mission was assured. A group of real Christian friends can leaven a city.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>V. <\/strong>Lessons concerning missionary work.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The relation of God and man in gospelising. God calls; mans imperative and immediate duty is to obey. God sends the Holy Spirit to direct and empower in Christian work. For it is God that worketh in you. God sends us to try all plans in the world with His gospel. He only knows where we shall succeed in planting it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The laws of gospelising. Persuading for Christ is like other persuading. Paul did not preach when he made his first European convert. What a spectacle he would have made if he had proceeded to deliver a thunderous oration like that on Mars Hill to these half-dozen women! He sat down and talked with them. The gospel begins its work in small ways. Europes conquest for Christ is heralded in the saving of one woman. The gospel uses the God-made relations of human life for its propagation. Lydia brought her household to Christ. The family is recognised and utilised by the gospel. (<em>D. J. Burrell, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Permission to preach the gospel strangely conveyed<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Rev. John Thomas, who may be regarded as the founder of the Friendly Islands mission, had laboured for some time at Hihifo, in Tonga, with but little fruit, being continually thwarted and persecuted by the Pagan chief Ata: when, having heard that the paramount chief of Haabai had renounced idolatry, and was anxious to have a missionary, he made up his mind to remove thither. But as the commencement of a new mission in another group of islands would involve considerable expense, he wished first to hear from the missionary committee in London, who had some time before been written to on the subject. Whilst waiting at Nukualofa, in a state of considerable anxiety and suspense, in the month of January 1830, an incident occurred which clearly shows the superintending providence of God in the affairs of the missionary enterprise. A small box was washed on shore and brought to Mr. Turner by one of the natives. On being opened it was found to contain a letter from the missionary secretaries, giving the sanction of the committee for the extension of the mission in the Friendly Islands, and the appointment of a missionary to Haabai without further delay. The vessel by which this communication had been sent, a schooner from Sydney, had foundered at sea, and all on board were lost. It is said that neither vessel, nor crew, nor any of the goods with which she had been freighted were ever seen or heard of again. The package containing that letter alone, a messenger of mercy for a people waiting for the law of the Lord, guided by Him whom wind and seas obey, escaped the general wreck, and was cast on shore at the right place and the right time to relieve the minds of the anxious missionaries, and to enable them to go forward and enter the openings which appeared before them for the proclamation of the glorious gospel of the blessed God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Spirits direction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That you may know the Divine plan for you, go to God Himself, and ask for it; for as certainly as He has a plan or calling for you, He will somehow guide you into it. And this is the proper office and work of His Spirit. By this private teaching He can show us, and will, into the very plan that is set for us. And this is the significance of what is prescribed as our duty&#8211;namely, living and walking in the Spirit; for the Spirit of God is a kind of universal presence, or inspiration, in the worlds bosom; an unfailing inner light, which if we accept and live in, we are guided thereby into a consenting choice, so that what God wills for us we also will for ourselves, settling into it as the needle to the pole. By this hidden union with God, or intercourse with Him, we get a wisdom or insight deeper than we know ourselves; a sympathy, a oneness with the Divine will and love. We go into the very plan of God for us, and are led along in it by Him, consenting, cooperating, answering to Him we know not how, and working out, with nicest exactness, that good end for which His unseen counsel girded us and sent us into the world. In this manner, not neglecting other methods, but gathering in all their separate lights, to be interpreted in the higher light of the Spirit, we can never be greatly at a loss to find our way into Gods counsel and plan. The duties of the present moment we shall meet as they rise, and these will open a gate into the next, and we shall thus pass on, trusting and securely, almost never in doubt as to what God calls us to do. (<em>Horace Bushnell.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The supernatural element in labour<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><strong><em>. <\/em><\/strong>Here is the direct action of the Holy Ghost. The early Christians realised that they were living in the age of the Holy Spirit. Why should there be any difficulty in believing that spirit may affect spirit? We believe that matter affects matter. It is quite scientific to believe that; yet to believe that mind can affect mind, that spirit can touch spirit, is fanaticism! I have not so learned life. It is easy for me, having seen the action of metal upon metal, to believe that there may be a kindred action of soul upon soul, God upon man.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The action of the Spirit is as morally mysterious as it is personally direct. Why should the Holy Ghost forbid the apostles to preach the Word anywhere? That we cannot explain; but then you cannot explain yourself. We are forbidden to do certain things. The things themselves are good, but the time is wrong, or the place is ill-chosen, or another opportunity is greater and ought to be absorbent. It is not enough that you are in a good place, doing a good work; your object should be to live and move and have your being in the Spirit of God, so that wherever He may point, your heart may outrun your feet in attaining the destination. Where life is bounded by programmes and outlines, and purposes merely human, life will be a succession of mistakes and stinging disappointments.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>It is, to our degenerate piety, quite difficult to believe that the early apostles&#8211;yea, the prophets ages before them&#8211;could live so familiarly in the presence of the supernatural. Everything depends upon the level of your life. It is possible to live so high up in intellectual and spiritual companionship as to receive with grateful ease and friendly recognition appearances and communications which at one time would have affected us with the surprise of a miracle.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>What did Paul see, then, in his vision?<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> A man. He who truly sees a man must ever be moved by the pathetic sight. We do not see one another whilst we are in the crowd performing the days jugglery. We do not see the man, but having once seen him under favouring lights, we must feel that man is a name high up in the register of life.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> A man in earnest prayer, praying to a fellow man. It was all, perhaps, the Macedonian suppliant could then do. We are allowed to pray at such altars as we can find. If you fell down before the least flower, before your mothers old armchair, it would be shrine enough. And by and by you will want a whole heaven for a church and altar. Begin where you can.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> A man in earnest, and a man seeking help. There are cowards that run away when poor, ill-used people call for help. Christianity is help or it is nothing. This is a typical instance. If the Church could have its eyes opened today, it would see every unevangelised country and every land in sore strait or difficulty typified in this Macedonian man.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. <\/strong>And after he had seen the vision, immediately we endeavoured&#8211; Luke here joins the company. Up to this time the narrative has been written in the third person; it will now be written in the first. The missionaries came to Philippi. There is a city plan of evangelisation; the apostles followed that plan. They did not hide themselves in obscure places; we find great names in their record. What is the justification of these metropolitan names? This&#8211;and higher there is none&#8211;Beginning at Jerusalem. So we shall find in these missionary records Jerusalem, Antioch, Corinth, Philippi, Athens, Ephesus, name upon name of local eminence and dignity, yet all the names put together are not equal to London! Give us London, and we have the key of the world. Converted London would seem to mean converted England; and converted England would be almost equal to a converted world!<em> <\/em>(<em>J. Parker, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> Verse <span class='bible'>6<\/span>. <I><B>Were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in<\/B><\/I><B> <\/B><I><B>Asia.<\/B><\/I>] The Asia mentioned here could not be <I>Asia Minor<\/I> in general, for Galatia, Phrygia, Pisidia, Lycaonia, and Pamphylia, were provinces of it, and in these the apostles preached; but it was what was called <I>Proconsular Asia<\/I>, which included only <I>Ionia,<\/I> <I>AEolia<\/I>, and <I>Lydia<\/I>. The apostles were not suffered to visit these places at this time; but they afterwards went thither, and preached the Gospel with success; for it was in this <I>Proconsular<\/I> <I>Asia<\/I> that the seven Churches were situated. God chose to send his servants to another place, where he saw that the word would be affectionately received; and probably those in Proconsular Asia were not, as yet, sufficiently prepared to receive and profit by it.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> Phrygia and <\/P> <P>Galatia were parts of Asia Minor. They <\/P> <P>were forbidden of the Holy Ghost by some revelation, though the manner is not known, <\/P> <P>to preach the word in Asia, for that time; though afterwards Paul preached there about two years together, <span class='bible'>Act 19:10<\/span>. Thus God (the great Householder) orders the candle to be removed from one room unto another; sends, or takes away, the light of the gospel, to whom, and as often, as he pleaseth. Our calling, as well as our election, is free; and we may say with our Saviour, <span class='bible'>Mat 11:26<\/span>, Even so, Father; for so it seemed good in thy sight. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P><B>6-8. Now when they had gonethroughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia<\/B>proceeding in anorthwesterly direction. At this time must have been formed &#8220;thechurches of Galatia&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Gal 1:2<\/span>;<span class='bible'>1Co 16:1<\/span>); founded, as we learnfrom the Epistle to the Galatians (particularly <span class='bible'>Ga4:19<\/span>), by the apostle Paul, and which were already in existencewhen he was on his <I>third<\/I> missionary journey, as we learn from<span class='bible'>Ac 18:23<\/span>, where it appearsthat he was no less successful in Phrygia. <I>Why<\/I> theseproceedings, so interesting as we should suppose, are not heredetailed, it is not easy to say; for the various reasons suggestedare not very satisfactory: for example, that the historian had notjoined the party [ALFORD];that he was in haste to bring the apostle to Europe [OLSHAUSEN];that the main stream of the Church&#8217;s development was from Jerusalemto Rome, and the apostle&#8217;s labors in Phrygia and Galatia lay quiteout of the line of that direction [BAUMGARTEN].<\/P><P>       <B>and were forbidden of theHoly Ghost<\/B>speaking by some prophet, see on <span class='bible'>Ac11:27<\/span>. <\/P><P>       <B>to preach the word inAsia<\/B>not the great Asiatic continent, nor even the richpeninsula now called Asia Minor, but only so much of its westerncoast as constituted the Roman province of Asia.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown&#8217;s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia<\/strong>,&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>[See comments on Ac 2:10]<\/span> To which may be added, that this country had its name either from the river Phryx, as Pliny w observes, or from the word Phrygios, which signifies &#8220;dry&#8221;; this being a very dry and sandy country: it was famous for marble stone; hence we read x of Phrygian Stone or marble, of which pillars and statues were made: according to Josephus y, the original of the Phrygians was Togarmah the son of Gomer, and grandson of Japheth, <span class='bible'>Ge 10:3<\/span>, whom he calls Thygrammes, and his people from him, Thygrammeans, and who, adds he, as it seems by the Greeks, are called Phrygians. Herodotus z reports, that the Phrygians (as the Macedonians say) were called Briges or Brygians, so long as they were Europeans, and dwelt with the Macedonians: but when they went into Asia, together with the country, they changed their names, into Phrygians: of one Philip a Phrygian, whom Antiochus left governor at Jerusalem, mention is made in:<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;And he left governors to vex the nation: at Jerusalem, Philip, for his country a Phrygian, and for manners more barbarous than he that set him there;&#8221; (2 Maccabees 5:22)<\/p>\n<p> here dwelt Jews, as appears from <span class='bible'>Ac 2:10<\/span> and here the apostle preached and made converts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>And the region of Galatia<\/strong>: in Asia Minor: it had Cappadocia on the east, Bithynia on the west, Pamphylia on the south, and the Euxine sea on the north. The inhabitants of this country were originally Gauls, who under Brennus their captain, came out of some parts of France, and invaded Italy, and came to Rome, and took it all but the capitol; from whence being sallied out upon by the Romans at an unawares, they were obliged to retire; and from thence they sailed into Greece, and went into Asia, into this part of it where they settled, which was first called after them Gallo Graecia, and in process of time Galatia; though some say the Grecians called them Galatians from Gala, which signifies &#8220;milk&#8221;, because of their milky colour: of the Galatians, mention is made in,<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;And he told them of the battle that they had in Babylon with the Galatians, how they came but eight thousand in all to the business, with four thousand Macedonians, and that the Macedonians being perplexed, the eight thousand destroyed an hundred and twenty thousand because of the help that they had from heaven, and so received a great booty.&#8221; (2 Maccabees 8:20)<\/p>\n<p> here the Gospel was preached, and many believed; for we afterwards read of disciples both in this country and in Phrygia, <span class='bible'>Ac 18:23<\/span> and here were churches formed, and to whom the apostles preached, and delivered the decrees of the apostles and elders.<\/p>\n<p><strong>And were forbidden of the Holy Ghost<\/strong>; not by an articulate voice, but by a secret and powerful impulse upon their minds;<\/p>\n<p><strong>to preach the word in Asia<\/strong>: that is, in that country which was properly called Asia, or pro-consular Asia, otherwise Phrygia, and Galatia, were provinces in Asia Minor. Beza&#8217;s most ancient copy, and the Vulgate Latin and Syriac versions read, &#8220;the word of God&#8221;: the reasons why it was prohibited to be preached here, at this time, cannot be said, and must be referred to the sovereign will of God; it seems, that at this instant, there were no chosen ones to be called by grace, and there was work for the apostle and his companions to do elsewhere, namely, in Macedonia.<\/p>\n<p>w Nat. Hist. l. 5. c. 29. x Pausanias, l. 1. sive Attica, p. 32. y Antiqu. l. 1. c. 6. sect. 1. z Polymnia, c. 73. Vid. Plin. l. 5. c. 32.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">Paul Invited into Macedonia; The Conversion of Lydia.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border-top: none;border-bottom: 1px solid #ffffff;border-left: none;border-right: none;padding: 0in;font-style: normal;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <BR> <\/P> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-style: normal;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <BR> <\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR> <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, &nbsp; 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not. &nbsp; 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas. &nbsp; 9 And a vision appeared to Paul in the night; There stood a man of Macedonia, and prayed him, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us. &nbsp; 10 And after he had seen the vision, immediately we endeavoured to go into Macedonia, assuredly gathering that the Lord had called us for to preach the gospel unto them. &nbsp; 11 Therefore loosing from Troas, we came with a straight course to Samothracia, and the next <I>day<\/I> to Neapolis; &nbsp; 12 And from thence to Philippi, which is the chief city of that part of Macedonia, <I>and<\/I> a colony: and we were in that city abiding certain days. &nbsp; 13 And on the sabbath we went out of the city by a river side, where prayer was wont to be made; and we sat down, and spake unto the women which resorted <I>thither.<\/I> &nbsp; 14 And a certain woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the city of Thyatira, which worshipped God, heard <I>us:<\/I> whose heart the Lord opened, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul. &nbsp; 15 And when she was baptized, and her household, she besought <I>us,<\/I> saying, If ye have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house, and abide <I>there.<\/I> And she constrained us.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; In these verses we have,<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I. Paul&#8217;s travels up and down to do good. 1. He and Silas his colleague went throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, where, it should seem, the gospel was already planted, but whether by Paul&#8217;s hand or no is not mentioned; it is likely it was, for in his epistle to the Galatians he speaks of his <I>preaching the gospel to them at the first,<\/I> and how very acceptable he was among them, <span class='bible'>Gal. iv. 13-15<\/span>. And it appears by that epistle that the judaizing teachers had then done a great deal of mischief to these churches of Galatia, had prejudiced them against Paul and drawn them from the gospel of Christ, for which he there severely reproves them. But probably that was a great while after this. 2. They were forbidden at this time to preach the gospel in Asia (the country properly so called), because it did not need, other hands being at work there; or because the people were not yet prepared to receive it, as they were afterwards (<span class='bible'><I>ch.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> xix. 10<\/span>), when <I>all those that dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord;<\/I> or, as Dr. Lightfoot suggests, because at this time Christ would employ Paul in a piece of new work, which was to preach the gospel to a Roman colony at Philippi, for hitherto the Gentiles to whom he had preached were Greeks. The Romans were more particularly hated by the Jews than other Gentiles; their armies were the <I>abomination of desolation;<\/I> and therefore there is this among other things extraordinary in his call thither that he is forbidden to preach the gospel in Asia and other places, in order to his preaching it there, which is an intimation that the light of the gospel would in aftertimes be directed more westward than eastward. It was the Holy Ghost that forbade them, either by secret whispers in the minds of both of them, which, when they came to compare notes, they found to be the same, and to come from the same Spirit; or by some prophets who spoke to them from the Spirit. The removals of ministers, and the dispensing of the means of grace by them, are in a particular manner under a divine guidance and direction. We find an Old-Testament minister forbidden to preach at all (<span class='bible'>Ezek. iii. 26<\/span>): <I>Thou shalt be dumb.<\/I> But these New-Testament ministers are only forbidden to preach in one place, while they are directed to another where there is more need. 3. They would have gone into Bithynia, but were not permitted: <I>the Spirit suffered them not,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 7<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. They came to Mysia, and, as it should seem, preached the gospel there; for though it was a very mean contemptible country, even to a proverb (<I>Mysorum ultimus,<\/I> in Cicero, is <I>a most despicable man<\/I>), yet the apostles disdained not to visit it, owning themselves debtors both <I>to the wise and to the unwise,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Rom. i. 14<\/I><\/span>. In Bithynia was the city of Nice, where the first general council was held against the Arians; into these countries Peter sent his epistle (<span class='bible'>1 Pet. i. 1<\/span>); and there were flourishing churches here, for, though they had not the gospel sent them now, they had it in their turn, not long after. Observe, Though their judgment and inclination were to go into Bithynia, yet, having then extraordinary ways of knowing the mind of God, they were overruled by them, contrary to their own mind. We must now follow providence, and submit to the guidance of that pillar of cloud and fire; and, if this <I>suffer us not<\/I> to do what we assay to do, we ought to acquiesce, and believe it for the best. <I>The Spirit of Jesus<\/I> suffered them not; so many ancient copies read it. The servants of the Lord Jesus ought to be always under the check and conduct of the <I>Spirit of the Lord Jesus,<\/I> by whom he governs men&#8217;s minds. 4. They <I>passed by Mysia,<\/I> or passed <I>through it<\/I> (so some), sowing good seed, we may suppose, as they went along; and they came down to Troas, the city of Troy, so much talked of, or the country thereabouts, which took its denomination from it. Here a church was planted; for here we find one in being, <span class='bible'><I>ch.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> xx. 6, 7<\/span>, and probably planted at this time, and in a little time. It should seem that at Troas Luke fell in with Paul, and joined himself to his company; for henceforward, for the most part, when he speaks of Paul&#8217;s journeys, he puts himself into the number of his retinue, <I>we<\/I> went, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 10<\/span>.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. Paul&#8217;s particular call to Macedonia, that is, to Philippi, the chief city, inhabited mostly by Romans, as appears, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 21<\/span>. Here we have,<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1. The vision Paul had, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 9<\/span>. Paul had many visions, sometimes to encourage, sometimes, as here, to direct him in his work. An angel appeared to him, to intimate to him that it was the will of Christ he should go to Macedonia. Let him not be discouraged by the embargo laid upon him once and again, by which his designs were crossed; for, though he shall not go where he has a mind to go, he shall go where God has work for him to do. Now observe, (1.) The person Paul saw. There stood by him <I>a man of Macedonia,<\/I> who by his habit or dialect seemed so to Paul, or who told him he was so. The angel, some think, assumed the shape of such a man; or, as others think, impressed upon Paul&#8217;s fancy, when between asleep and awake, the image of such a man: he dreamt he saw such a one. Christ would have Paul directed to Macedonia, not as the apostles were at other times, by a messenger from heaven, to send him thither, but by a messenger thence to call him thither, because in this way he would afterwards ordinarily direct the motions of his ministers, by inclining the hearts of those who needed them to invite them. Paul shall be called to Macedonia by a man of Macedonia, and by him speaking in the name of the rest. Some make this man to be the tutelar angel of Macedonia, supposing angels to have charge of particular places as well as persons, and that so much is intimated <span class='bible'>Dan. x. 20<\/span>, where we read of the <I>princes of Persia and Grecia,<\/I> that seem to have been angels. But there is no certainty of this. There was presented either to Paul&#8217;s eyes or to his mind a man of Macedonia. The angel must not preach the gospel himself to the Macedonians, but must bring Paul to them. Nor must he by the authority of an angel order him to go, but in the person of a Macedonian court him to come. A man of Macedonia, not a magistrate of the country, much less a priest (Paul was not accustomed to receive invitations from such) but an ordinary inhabitant of that country, a plain man, that carried in his countenance marks of probity and seriousness, that did not come to banter Paul nor trifle with him, but in good earnest and with all earnestness to importune his assistance. (2.) The invitation given him. This honest Macedonian <I>prayed him, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us;<\/I> that is, &#8220;Come and preach the gospel to us; let us have the benefit of thy labours.&#8221; [1.] &#8220;<I>Thou hast helped many;<\/I> we have heard of those in this and the other country to whom thou hast been very useful; and why may we not put in for a share? O come and help us.&#8221; The benefits others have received from the gospel should quicken our enquiries, our further enquiries, after it. [2.] &#8220;It is thy business, and it is thy delight, to help poor souls; thou art a physician for the sick, that art to be ready at the call of every patient; O come and help us.&#8221; [3.] &#8220;We have need of thy help, as much as any people; we in Macedonia are as ignorant and as careless in religion as any people in the world are, are as idolatrous and as vicious as any, and as ingenious and industrious to ruin ourselves as any; and therefore, O come, come with all speed among us. <I>If thou canst do any thing, have compassion on us, and help us.<\/I>&#8221; [4.] &#8220;Those few among us that have any sense of divine things, and any concern for their own souls and the souls of others, have done what can be done, by the help of natural light; I have done my part for one. We have carried the matter as far as it will go, to persuade our neighbours to fear and worship God, but we can do little good among them. <I>O come come, thou over, and help us.<\/I> The gospel thou preachest has arguments and powers beyond those we have yet been furnished with.&#8221; [5.] &#8220;Do not only help us with thy prayers here: this will not do; thou must come over and help us.&#8221; Note, People have great need of help for their souls, and it is their duty to look out for it and invite those among them that can help them.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2. The interpretation made of the vision (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 10<\/span>): They <I>gathered assuredly from this that the Lord had called them to preach the gospel<\/I> there; and they were ready to go wherever God directed. Note, We may sometimes infer a call of God from a call of man. If a man of Macedonia says, <I>Come and help us,<\/I> Paul thence gathers assuredly that God says, Go an help them. Ministers may go on with great cheerfulness and courage in their work when they perceive Christ calling them, not only to preach the gospel, but to preach it at this time, in this place, to this people.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; III. Paul&#8217;s voyage to Macedonia hereupon: He <I>was not disobedient to the heavenly vision,<\/I> but followed this divine direction much more cheerfully, and with more satisfaction, than he would have followed any contrivance or inclination of his own. 1. Thitherward he turned his thoughts. Now that he knows the mind of God in the matter he is determined, for this is all he wanted; now he thinks no more of Asia, nor Bithynia, but <I>immediately we endeavoured to go into Macedonia.<\/I> Paul only had the vision, but he communicated it to his companions, and they all, upon the credit of this, resolved for Macedonia. As Paul will follow Christ, so all his will follow him, or rather follow Christ with him. They are getting things in readiness for this expedition immediately, without delay. Note, God&#8217;s calls must be complied with immediately. As our obedience must not be disputed, so it must not be deferred; do it to-day, lest thy heart be hardened. Observe, They could not immediately go into Macedonia; but they immediately endeavoured to go. If we cannot be so quick as we would be in our performances, yet we may be in our endeavours, and this shall be accepted. 2. Thitherward he steered his course. They <I>set sail<\/I> by the first shipping and with the first fair wind <I>from Troas;<\/I> for they may be sure they have done what they had to do there when God calls them to another place. They <I>came with a straight course,<\/I> a prosperous voyage, <I>to Samothracia;<\/I> the <I>next day they came to Neapolis,<\/I> a city on the confines of Thrace and Macedonia; and at last they landed at <I>Philippi,<\/I> a city so called from Philip king of Macedon, the father of Alexander the Great; it is said (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 12<\/span>) to be, (1.) <I>The chief city of that part of Macedonia;<\/I> or, as some read it, <I>the first city,<\/I> the first they came to when they came from Troas. As an army that lands in a country of which they design to make themselves masters begin with the reduction of the first place they come to, so did Paul and his assistants: they began with the first city, because, if the gospel were received there, it would the more easily spread thence all the country over. (2.) It was a colony. The Romans not only had a garrison, but the inhabitants of the city were Romans, the magistrates at least, and the governing part. There were the greatest numbers and variety of people, and therefore the most likelihood of doing good.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; IV. The cold entertainment which Paul and his companions met with at Philippi. One would have expected that having such a particular call from God thither they would have had a joyful welcome there, as Peter had with Cornelius when the angel sent him thither. Where was the man of Macedonia that begged Paul to come thither with all speed? Why did not he stir up his countrymen, some of them at least, to go and meet him? Why was not Paul introduced with solemnity, and the keys of the city put into his hand? Here is nothing like this; for, 1. It is a good while before any notice at all is taken of him: <I>We were in that city abiding certain days,<\/I> probably at a public house and at their own charge, for they had no friend to invite them so much as to a meal&#8217;s meat, till Lydia welcomed them. They had made all the haste they could thither, but, now that they are there, they are almost tempted to think they might as well have staid where they were. But so it was ordered for their trial whether they could bear the pain of silence and lying by, when this was their lot. Those eminent and useful men are not fit to live in this world that know not how to be slighted and overlooked. Let not ministers think it strange if they be first strongly invited to a place, and then looked shyly upon when they come. 2. When they have an opportunity of preaching it is in an obscure place, and to a mean and small auditory, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 13<\/span>. There was no synagogue of the Jews there, for aught that appears, to be a door of entrance to them, and they never went to the idol-temples of the Gentiles, to preach to the auditories there; but here, upon enquiry, they found out a little meeting of good women, <I>that were proselytes of the gate,<\/I> who would be thankful to them if they would give them a sermon. The place of this meeting is out of the city; there it was connived at, but would not be suffered any where within the walls. It was a place <I>where prayer was wont to be made;<\/I><I><B> proseuche<\/B><\/I>&#8212;<I>where an oratory or house of prayer was<\/I> (so some), a chapel, or smaller synagogue. But I rather take it, as we read it, where prayer was appointed or accustomed to be. Those that worshipped the true God, and would not worship idols, met there to pray together, and, according to the description of the most ancient and universal devotion, <I>to call upon the name of the Lord.<\/I> Each of them prayed apart every day; this was always the practice of those that worshipped God: but, besides this, <I>they came together on the sabbath day.<\/I> Though they were but a few and discountenanced by the town, though their meeting was at some distance, though, for aught that appears, there were none but women, yet a solemn assembly the worshippers of God must have, if by any means it be possible, on the sabbath day. When we cannot do as we would we must do as we can; if we have not synagogues, we must be thankful for more private places, and resort to them, <I>not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together,<\/I> according as our opportunities are. This place is said to be <I>by a river side,<\/I> which perhaps was chosen, as befriending contemplation. Idolaters are said <I>to take their lot among the smooth stones of the stream,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Isa. lvii. 6<\/I><\/span>. But these proselytes had in their eye, perhaps, the example of those prophets who had their visions, one by the <I>river of Chebar<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Ezek. i. 1<\/span>), another by <I>the great river Hiddekel,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Dan. x. 4<\/I><\/span>. Thither Paul and Silas and Luke went, and <I>sat down,<\/I> to instruct the congregation, that they might the better pray with them. They <I>spoke unto the women who resorted thither,<\/I> encouraged them in practising according to the light they had, and led them on further to the knowledge of Christ.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; V. The conversion of <I>Lydia,<\/I> who probably was the first that was wrought upon there to believe in Christ, though not the last. In this story of <I>the Acts,<\/I> we have not only the conversion of places recorded, but of many particular persons; for such is the worth of souls that the reducing of one to God is a great matter. Nor have we only the conversions that were effected by miracle, as Paul&#8217;s, but some that were brought about by the ordinary methods of grace, as Lydia&#8217;s here. Observe,<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1. Who this convert was that there is such particular notice taken of. Four things are recorded of her:&#8211;<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (1.) Her name, <I>Lydia.<\/I> It is an honour to her to have her name recorded here in the book of God, so that <I>wherever the scriptures are read there shall this be told concerning her.<\/I> Note, The names of the saints are precious with God, and should be so with us; we cannot have our names recorded in the Bible, but, if God open our hearts, we shall find them <I>written in the book of life,<\/I> and this is better (<span class='bible'>Phil. iv. 3<\/span>) and more to <I>be rejoiced in,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Luke x. 20<\/I><\/span>.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (2.) Her calling. She was <I>a seller of purple,<\/I> either of purple dye or of purple cloth or silk. Observe, [1.] She had a calling, an honest calling, which the historian takes notice of to her praise; she was none of those women that the apostle speaks of (<span class='bible'>1 Tim. v. 13<\/span>), <I>who learn to be idle, and not only idle, c.<\/I> [2.] It was a mean calling. She was <I>a seller of purple,<\/I> not a wearer of purple, few such are called. The notice here taken of this is an intimation to those who are employed in honest callings, if they be honest in the management of them, not to be ashamed of them. [3.] Though she had a calling to mind, yet she was a worshipper of God, and found time to improve advantages for her soul. The business of our particular callings may be made to consist very well with the business of religion, and therefore it will not excuse us from religious exercises alone, and in our families, or in solemn assemblies, to say, We have shops to look after, and a trade to mind for have we not also a God to serve and a soul to look after? Religion does not call us from our business in the world, but directs us in it. Every thing in its time and place.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (3.) The place she was of&#8211;<I>of the city of Thyatira,<\/I> which was a great way from Philippi; there she was born and bred, but either married at Philippi, or brought by her trade to settle there. The providence of God, as it always appoints, so it often removes, <I>the bounds of our habitation,<\/I> and sometimes makes the change of our outward condition or place of our abode wonderfully subservient to the designs of his grace concerning our salvation. Providence brings Lydia to Philippi, to be under Paul&#8217;s ministry, and there, where she met with it, she made a good use of it; so should we improve opportunities.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (4.) Her religion before the Lord opened her heart. [1.] She worshipped God according to the knowledge she had; she was one of the devout women. Sometimes the grace of God wrought upon those who, before their conversion, were very wicked and vile, publicans and harlots; <I>such were some of you,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> 1 Cor. vi. 11<\/I><\/span>. But sometimes it fastened upon those who were of a good character, who had some good in them, as the eunuch, Cornelius, and Lydia. Note, It is not enough to be worshippers of God, but we must be believers in Jesus Christ, for there is no coming to God as a Father, but by him as Mediator. But those who worshipped God according to the light they had stood fair for the discoveries of Christ, and his grace to them; for <I>to him that has shall be given:<\/I> and to them Christ would be welcome; for those that know what it is to worship God see their need of Christ, and know what use to make of his mediation. [2.] She heard the apostles. Here, where prayer was made, when there was an opportunity, <I>the word was preached;<\/I> for hearing the word of God is a part of religious worship, and how can we expect God should hear our prayers if we will not hearken to his word? Those that worshipped God according to the light they had looked out for further light; we must improve <I>the day of small things,<\/I> but must not rest in it.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2. What the work was that was wrought upon her: <I>Whose heart the Lord opened.<\/I> Observe here, (1.) The author of this work: it was <I>the Lord,<\/I>&#8211;the Lord Christ, to whom this judgment is committed,&#8211;the Spirit of the Lord, who is the sanctifier. Note, Conversion-work is God&#8217;s work; it is he <I>that works in us both to will and to do;<\/I> not as if we had nothing to do, but of ourselves, without God&#8217;s grace, we can do nothing; nor as if God were in the least chargeable with the ruin of those that perish, but the salvation of those that are saved must be wholly ascribed to him. (2.) The seat of this work; it is in the heart that the change is made, it is to the heart that this blessed turn is given; it was the heart of Lydia that was wrought upon. Conversion-work is heart-work; it is a <I>renewing of the heart, the inward man, the spirit of the mind.<\/I> (3.) The nature of the work; she had not only her heart touched, but her heart opened. An unconverted soul is shut up, and fortified against Christ, <I>straitly shut up,<\/I> as Jericho against Joshua, <span class='bible'>Josh. vi. 1<\/span>. Christ, in dealing with the soul, knocks at the door that is shut against him (<span class='bible'>Rev. iii. 20<\/span>); and, when a sinner is effectually persuaded to embrace Christ, <I>then the heart is opened for the King of glory to come in<\/I>&#8211;the understanding is open to receive the divine light, the will opened to receive the divine law, and the affections opened to receive the divine love. When the heart is thus opened to Christ, the ear is opened to his word, the lips opened in prayer, the hand opened in charity, and the steps enlarged in all manner of gospel obedience.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3. What were the effects of this work on the heart. (1.) She took great notice of the word of God. Her heart was so <I>opened that she attended to the things that were spoken by Paul;<\/I> she not only gave attendance on Paul&#8217;s preaching, but gave attention to it; <I>she applied to herself<\/I> (so some read it) <I>the things that were spoken by Paul;<\/I> and then only the word does us good, and makes an abiding impression upon us, when we apply it to ourselves. Now this was an evidence of the opening of her heart, and was the fruit of it; wherever the heart is opened by the grace of God, it will appear by a diligent attendance on, and attention to, the word of God, both for Christ&#8217;s sake, whose word it is, and for our own sakes, who are so nearly interested in it. (2.) She gave up her name to Jesus Christ, and took upon her the profession of his holy religion; <I>She was baptized,<\/I> and by this solemn rite was admitted a member of the church of Christ; and with her <I>her household<\/I> also was baptized, those of them that were infants in her right, for if <I>the root be holy so are the branches,<\/I> and those that were grown up by her influence and authority. She and her household were baptized by the same rule that Abraham and his household were circumcised, because the seal of the covenant belongs to the covenanters and their seed. (3.) She was very kind to the ministers, and very desirous to be further instructed by them in <I>the things pertaining to the kingdom of God: She besought us saying &#8220;If you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord,<\/I> if you take me to be a sincere Christian, manifest your confidence in me by this, <I>come into my house, and abide there.<\/I>&#8221; Thus she desired an opportunity, [1.] To testify her gratitude to those who had been the instruments of divine grace in this blessed change that was wrought upon her. When her heart was open to Christ, her house was open to his ministers for his sake, and they were welcome to the best entertainment she had, which she did not think too good for those of whose spiritual things she had reaped so plentifully. Nay, they are not only welcome to her house, but she is extremely pressing and importunate with them: <I>She constrained us;<\/I> which intimates that Paul was very backward and unwilling to go, because he was afraid of being burdensome to the families of the young converts, and would study <I>to make the gospel of Christ without charge<\/I> (<span class='bible'>1Co 9:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act 20:34<\/span>), that those who were without might have no occasion given them to reproach the preachers of the gospel as designing, self-seeking men, and that those who were within might have no occasion to complain of the expenses of their religion: but Lydia will have no nay; she will not believe that they take her to be a sincere Christian unless they will oblige her herein; like Abraham inviting the angels (<span class='bible'>Gen. xviii. 3<\/span>), <I>If now I have found favour in thy sight, pass not away from thy servant.<\/I> [2.] She desired an opportunity of receiving further instruction. If she might but have them for awhile in her family, she might hear them daily (<span class='bible'>Prov. viii. 34<\/span>), and not merely on sabbath days at the meeting. In her own house she might not only hear them, but ask them questions; and she might have them to pray with her daily, and to bless her household. Those that know something of Christ cannot but desire to know more, and seek opportunities of increasing their acquaintance with his gospel.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>The region of Phrygia and Galatia <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">    <\/SPAN><\/span>). This is probably the correct text with one article and apparently describes one &#8220;Region&#8221; or District in The Province of Galatia which was also Phrygian (the old-ethnographic name with which compare the use of Lycaonia in <span class='bible'>14:6<\/span>). Strictly speaking Derbe and Lystra, though in the Province of Galatia, were not Phrygian, and so Luke would here be not resumptive of the record in verses <span class='bible'>1-5<\/span>; but a reference to the country around Iconium and Antioch in Pisidia in North Galatia is not included. This verse is hotly disputed at every point by the advocates of the North Galatian theory as represented by Chase and the South Galatian theory by Ramsay. Whatever is true in regard to the language of Luke here and in <span class='bible'>18:23<\/span>, it is still possible for Paul in <span class='bible'>Ga 1:2<\/span> to use the term Galatia of the whole province of that name which could, in fact, apply to either South or North Galatia or to both. He could, of course, use it also in the ethnographic sense of the real Gauls or Celts who dwelt in North Galatia. Certainly the first tour of Paul and Barnabas was in the Province of Galatia though touching only the Regions of Pisidia, Phrygia, and Lycaonia, which province included besides the Gauls to the north. In this second tour Lycaonia has been already touched (Derbe and Lystra) and now Phrygia. The question arises why Luke here and in <span class='bible'>18:23<\/span> adds the term &#8220;of Galatia&#8221; (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>) though not in <span class='bible'>13:14<\/span> (Pisidian Antioch) nor in <span class='bible'>14:6<\/span> (cities of Lycaonia). Does Luke mean to use &#8220;of Galatia&#8221; in the same ethnographic sense as &#8220;of Phrygia&#8221; or does he here add the province (Galatia) to the name of the Region (Phrygia)? In itself either view is possible and it really matters very little except that the question is raised whether Paul went into the North Galatian Region on this occasion or later (<span class='bible'>18:23<\/span>). He could have done so and the Epistle be addressed to the churches of South Galatia, North Galatia, or the province as a whole. But the Greek participle <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span> (&#8220;having been forbidden&#8221;) plays a part in the argument that cannot be overlooked whether Luke means to say that Paul went north or not. This aorist passive participle of <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>, to hinder, can only express simultaneous or antecedent action, not subsequent action as Ramsay argues. No example of the so-called subsequent use of the aorist participle has ever been found in Greek as all Greek grammarians agree (Robertson, <I>Grammar<\/I>, pp. 860-63, 1112-14). The only natural meaning of <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span> is that Paul with Silas and Timothy &#8220;passed through the region of Phrygia and Galatia&#8221; because they were hindered by the Holy Spirit from speaking the word in Asia (the Province of Asia of which Ephesus was the chief city and west of Derbe and Lystra). This construction implies that the country called &#8220;the region of Phrygia and Galatia&#8221; is not in the direct line west toward Ephesus. What follows in verse <span class='bible'>7<\/span> throws further light on the point. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Robertson&#8217;s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>Asia. See on ch. <span class='bible'>Act 2:9<\/span>.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Vincent&#8217;s Word Studies in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>THE SPIRIT BOTH HINDERED PAUL AND GAVE HIM A VISION MESSAGE V. 6-11<\/p>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1) <strong>&#8220;Now when they had gone throughout,&#8221;<\/strong> (dielthon de) &#8220;Then they went through,&#8221; passed thru on their continuing mission tour, <span class='bible'>Act 18:23<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>2) <strong>&#8220;Phrygia and the region of Galatia,&#8221;<\/strong>(ten phrugian kai Galatiken choran) &#8220;The Phrygian and Galatian country or territory,&#8221; a part of the west central region of Asia Minor, with no fixed boundaries in the times of the apostles. It then contained Troy, Heirapolis, Colossae and Laodicea, later became a part of the Persian Empire, 537 A.D., then a Turkish province, 1139 A.D., <span class='bible'>Act 2:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act 18:25<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>3) <strong>&#8220;And were forbidden of the Holy Ghost,&#8221;<\/strong> (koluthentes hupo tou hagiou pneumatos) &#8220;Being restrained, prevented, or obstructed by the Holy Spirit; How they were restrained or forbidden by inward monitions, outward obstacles or circumstances, regarded as providential warnings, or by prophetic indications, is not stated, but that they were obstructed, as revealed by the Holy Spirit, is certified, <span class='bible'>Rom 8:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 8:16<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>4) <strong>&#8220;To preach the word in Asia,&#8221;<\/strong> (lalesai ton logon en te Asia) &#8220;From speaking forth the word in the territory of Asia;&#8221; It appears that human desires here yielded to special Divine intervention, to the effect that the Gospel message moved into Europe, westward, rather than deeper into Asia, eastward, <span class='bible'>Act 16:9-13<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> &#8722; <\/p>\n<p> 6.  When they had gone throughout.  Luke showeth here how diligent and careful Paul and his companions were in the office of teaching; for he saith that they journeyed through divers regions of the Lesser Asia that they might preach the gospel. But he reciteth one thing which is worth remembering, that they were forbidden by the Spirit of God to speak of Christ in some places, which serveth not a little to set forth the apostleship of Paul; as undoubtedly he was not a little encouraged to proceed, when he knew that the Spirit of God was his guide in his way, and the governor of his actions. And whereas whithersoever they came they prepared themselves to teach, they did that according to their calling, and according to the commandment of God. For they were sent to preach and publish the gospel to the Gentiles without exception; but the Lord revealed his counsel in governing the course of their journey which was before unknown, even in a moment. &#8722; <\/p>\n<p> Notwithstanding, the question is, If Paul taught nowhere by whither he was led by the Spirit, what certainty shall the ministers of the Church have at this day of their calling, who are certified by no oracles when they must speak or hold their peace? I answer, Seeing that Paul&#8217;s province and charge was so wide, he had need of the singular direction of the Spirit. He was not made the apostle of one particular place, or of a few cities, but he had received commandment to preach the gospel through Asia and Europe; which was to sail in a most wide sea. Wherefore, there is no cause why we should wonder that in that confused wideness God beckoned unto him, as it were by reaching forth his hand, how far he would have him go, or whither. But here ariseth another harder question, why the Lord did forbid Paul to speak in Asia, and suffered him not to come into Bithynia? For, if answer be made that these Gentiles were unworthy of the doctrine of salvation, we may again demand why Macedonia was more worthy? Those who desire to be too wise, do assign the causes of this difference in men, that the Lord vouchsafeth every man of his gospel, as he seeth him bent unto the obedience of faith; but he himself saith far otherwise, to wit, that he appeared plainly to those which sought him not, and that he spake to those who asked not of him. For whence cometh aptness to those to be taught, and a mind to obey, but from his Spirit? Therefore, it is certain that some are not preferred before other some by their merit, seeing that all men are naturally like backward and wayward from faith. Therefore, there is nothing better than to leave free power to God to vouchsafe and deprive of his grace whom he will. And surely as his eternal election is free, so his calling is also free which floweth thence, and is not grounded in men, seeing that he is not indebted to any. &#8722; <\/p>\n<p> Wherefore, let us know that the gospel springeth and issueth out to us out of the sole fountain of mere grace. And yet God doth not want a just reason, why he offereth his gospel to some, and passeth over other some. But I say that that reason lieth hid in his secret counsel. In the mean season, let the faithful know that they were called freely when others were set aside, lest they take that to themselves which is due to the mercy of God alone. And in the rest, whom God rejecteth for no manifest cause, let them learn to wonder at the deep depth of his judgment, which they may not seek out. And here the word Asia is taken for that part which is properly so called. When Luke saith that Paul and his companions essayed to come into Bithynia until they were forbidden by oracles, save only when need required, as they Lord useth to be present with his in doleful &#8722;  (178) and uncertain matters. &#8722; <\/p>\n<p>  (178) &#8722; <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>  Dubiis,&#8221; doubtful. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Calvin&#8217;s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><em>CRITICAL REMARKS<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span>. <strong>Phrygia and the region of Galatia<\/strong> should probably be, <em>the Phrygian and Galatian region<\/em>; but whether one or two distinct districts is intended is presently under debate. The commonly accepted interpretation (Hackett, Alford, Plumptre, Holtzmann, Zckler, and others) holds that Paul and Silas, having visited the Churches in Derbe, Lystra, Iconium, and Antioch, directed their steps first in a north-easterly direction towards Phrygia, and then turned north-west towards Northern Galatia, which was bounded on the north by Paphlagonia and Bithynia, on the east by Pontus and Cappadocia, on the south by Cappadocia and Phrygia, and on the west by Phrygia and Bithynia (Hackett), and inhabited by a Celtic population; but a different view (Zeller, Renan, Hausrath, Weizscker, Wendt, Ramsay, and others) considers the Phrygian and Galatian region to be the district alluded to in <span class='bible'>Act. 16:1-4<\/span>, in which the above-named Churches were situatedviz., Southern, as distinguished from Northern Galatia. (See further in Homiletical Analysis.) That Paul again visited the Churches in this district, or these districts, at the beginning of his third journey is afterwards mentioned (<span class='bible'>Act. 18:23<\/span>). <strong>Forbidden of the Holy Ghost.<\/strong>Not through the exercise of ordinary prudence on the part of the apostles (De Wette), but by some special Divine intimation, as in <span class='bible'>Act. 13:2<\/span> (Alford), but whether conveyed by the Bath-Kol (Renan), or through some prophetic voice, as in <span class='bible'>Act. 20:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act. 21:11<\/span> (Holtzmann), cannot be determined. That this prohibition extended to preaching in Phrygia and Galatia is against the presupposition contained in <span class='bible'>Act. 18:23<\/span>. <strong>Asia.<\/strong><em>I.e.<\/em>, Proconsular Asia, or the western coastland.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:7<\/span>. <strong>Mysia<\/strong> was situated in the north-east corner of Asia Minor, <strong>Bithynia<\/strong> in the north and west of Mysia. Why they were prevented from preaching in Asia and Bithynia cannot be known, though <span class='bible'>Rom. 15:20<\/span> and <span class='bible'>2Co. 10:15-16<\/span> may shed some light on the problem. Perhaps it should suffice to say that in this way the Spirit designed to turn their steps and faces westward in the direction of Europe. But see further in Hints. <strong>The Spirit<\/strong>.The oldest authorities read, <em>The Spirit of Jesus<\/em>. As in the <em>Filioque<\/em> controversy at the Synod of Toledo, A.D. 589 neither party quoted this phrase, the inference is that by that time the text had been long corrupted.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:8<\/span>. <strong>Passing<\/strong> or <em>having passed<\/em> <strong>by Mysia.<\/strong>Not having passed along the border of Mysia, but having passed it by so far as their work was concerned<em>i.e.<\/em>, having not stopped to preach in, but hastened through it. <strong>Troas<\/strong>.Called <em>Alexandria Troas,<\/em> in honour of Alexander, founded by Alexanders successors, and situated on the Hellespont. Now <em>Eski-Stamboul.<\/em> Visited twice again by Paul (<span class='bible'>Act. 20:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Co. 2:12<\/span>). The home of Carpus, who perhaps acted as his host (<span class='bible'>2Ti. 4:13<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:9<\/span>. Whether Pauls <strong>vision in the night<\/strong> (compare <span class='bible'>Act. 18:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act. 23:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act. 27:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Co. 12:1<\/span>) occurred in a dream or in an ecstasy cannot be decided. <strong>A man of Macedonia<\/strong>.Paul would know this, if not from the mans appearance, from his words Come over. Ramsay (<em>St. Paul the Traveller, etc.<\/em>, pp. 202, 203) maintains that the man of Macedonia was Luke.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:10<\/span>. <strong>We<\/strong>.The commencement of the We passages of this book (<span class='bible'>Act. 16:10-17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act. 20:5-15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act. 21:1-18<\/span> : <span class='bible'>Act. 27:1<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Act. 28:16<\/span>), which shows that the writer of the Acts (Luke) joined Pauls company at Troas. Tradition makes Luke to have been an Antiochian.<\/p>\n<p><em>HOMILETICAL ANALYSIS<\/em>.<em><span class='bible'>Act. 16:6-10<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Regions Beyond; or, the Vision of the Man of Macedonia<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>I. The hindering Spirit<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Who this was<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>(1) The Holy Ghost. The third person of the Trinity, who proceedeth from the Father and the Son (<span class='bible'>Joh. 15:26<\/span>), and whom Christ promised to send after His departure from the earth (<span class='bible'>Joh. 16:7<\/span>), who came according to promise, on the day of Pentecost (<span class='bible'>Act. 2:4<\/span>), and had ever since been guiding the development of the Church and the footsteps of its apostles and evangelists (see <span class='bible'>Act. 8:29<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Act. 10:19<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Act. 11:12<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Act. 13:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act. 13:4<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>(2) The Spirit of Jesus<em>i.e.<\/em>, the Spirit whom Jesus had sent. A valuable statement, the genuineness of which must be conceded (see Critical Remarks), confirming the well-known dogma of the Creed that the Spirit bears the same relation to the Son as to the Father. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>When He interposed<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>(1) After the two missionaries Paul and Silas had gone through the Phrygian and Galatian region, lying on the west and north of Lycaonia. The route pursued by them can only be conjectured. Probably from Lystra they proceeded to Iconium, and from that to Antioch in Pisidia, where Paul had on his previous journey founded a Church, after leaving which they would most likely cross the hills, and, merely touching Phrygian territory, enter the district of Galatia towards the north. (See, however, Critical Remarks and Hints on <span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span>.) Whether they evangelised any towns in Phrygia cannot be determined. Coloss, situated in the south of Phrygia, it is not certain the apostle ever visited; but that he published the gospel to the Phrygians and made disciples seems the obvious deduction from <span class='bible'>Act. 18:23<\/span>. That he preached in Galatia and founded Churches there himself declares (<span class='bible'>Gal. 1:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal. 4:19<\/span>). No Galatian cities are specially mentioned in connection with the spread of Christianity in this province; hence the inference that the Christian communities were scattered about the rural parts. Pauls preaching in Galatia was, in a manner, brought about against his will, through an attack of bodily sickness which detained him in that province, when possibly he intended to push eastwards to Pontus. What this sickness was is not recorded, though most likely it was ophthalmia, and presumably had to do with his thorn or stake in the flesh (compare<span class='bible'> <\/span><span class='bible'>2Co. 12:7-10<\/span> with <span class='bible'>Gal. 4:13-15<\/span>); and see also <span class='bible'>Act. 13:14<\/span>; Homiletical Analysis and Hints) <\/p>\n<p>(2) Again when they assayed to go into Bithynia. This they did when they had come over against Mysia, which lay north of Asia, and, like it, looked out on the gean. Arrived thither, they contemplated turning north-east to Bithynia, a province located between Mount Olympus and the Euxine, when once more they were mysteriously arrested. <br \/>3. <em>How He signified His will<\/em>. This also can only be surmised. It may have been by an outward voice (Renan), such as probably directed Philip (<span class='bible'>Act. 8:20<\/span>), or by an inward impression, such as Paul had already experienced (<span class='bible'>Gal. 2:2<\/span>), by a dream or by a vision, by the voices of prophets, as in <span class='bible'>Act. 20:23<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Act. 21:11<\/span> (Holtzmann, Nsgen), or simply, though less likely, by some natural occurrence, unrecorded, which rendered it impossible to carry out their intentions first of going into Asia and next of moving north into Bithynia. Pauls rule (<span class='bible'>2Co. 10:15-16<\/span>) was not the hindrance. (See Hints on <span class='bible'>Act. 16:7<\/span>.) <\/p>\n<p>4. <em>What course He appointed.<\/em> <\/p>\n<p>(1) That they should not speak the word in Asia. Politically considered, Asia meant the western portion of Asia Minor, which included Mysia, Lydia and Caria, Galatia, Phrygia, Bithynia, Cilicia, Pamphylia and Lycia, but, popularly viewed, it signified the territory situated west of Phrygia and south of Mysia. Why the missionaries were prevented from entering it can only have been that the hour was not yet arrived for its inhabitants to hear the gospel. <br \/>(2) That they should not pass into Bithynia. This seemed the natural direction for them to take, if their mission was not to cross the gean. But the Spirit, unconsciously to them, was conducting their steps towards Europe. Accordingly, once more stopped (at Mysia) and turned westward, they passed through but did not preach in (the meaning of passing by) the country, till they came down to Troas on the Hellespont, about four miles from the site of ancient Troy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. The midnight vision<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>The form it assumed<\/em>. A man of Macedonia appeared before the eye of the apostle, standing, beseeching him, and saying, Come over into Macedonia and help us. The apparition and the voice were both supernatural (compare<span class='bible'> <\/span><span class='bible'>Act. 11:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Act. 10:30<\/span>). Whether Paul recognised the man as a Macedonian by his appearance, dress, or speech is not related; but as Pauls thoughts the day before had probably been much occupied with the Macedonian land which lay beyond the gean, and as the vision, though not created by, had been fitted to, his thoughts, it is not difficult to understand how his soul, lying in the hand of God, quickly leapt to the interpretation of the scene. The strange figure wore the aspect of a Macedonian manperhaps, from his upright posture, a soldier (Farrar); the outstretched hands evoked a mute appeal for aid; the voice sounded like a summons to hurry over with that help which the men across the water greatly needed, not alone because of the corrupt and decaying civilisations in the midst of which they were perishing, but because of the magnificent potentialities for good which lay within them, notwithstanding their environment as members of the most advanced and active races on the face of the globe. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The inference it suggested<\/em>. The apostles at once perceived the reason of that mysterious hindrance they had twice suffered, and, concluding that God had called them to preach the gospel in Europe, at once took steps to obey. Straightway, we sought to go forth into Macedonia. Like the good soldier of Jesus Christ that he was (<span class='bible'>2Ti. 2:3<\/span>), Paul always obeyed his marching orders with military promptitude and precision.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lessons<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>1. The real, though unseen, presence of the Holy Spirit in the Church and with the true servants of Jesus Christ. <br \/>2. The development of the Christian Church the proper care of the Holy Ghost. <br \/>3. The duty of Christian people, but especially of Christian ministers, to wait upon and follow the leading of the Spirit. <br \/>4. The certainty that guidance will never fail those prepared to accept it. <br \/>5. The loud call of the heathen world to the servants of Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n<p><em>HINTS AND SUGGESTIONS<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span>. <em>The Region of Galatia<\/em>.The view that this was not Northern but Southern Galatia, the district in which lay the Churches of Derbe, Lystra, Iconium, and Antioch, has been recently championed by Professor Ramsay, who offers in its support the following consideration:<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. The phrase<\/strong>,     , <strong>describes a single district<\/strong>, the land or territory which is both Phrygian and Galatiana description which the professor maintains to be strictly true, and perfectly inapplicable to Northern Galatia, which could have been thought of had the discarded reading of the Textus Receptus,      , been retained.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. Roman documents of<\/strong> <strong>the first century<\/strong> <strong>show that the district<\/strong> in which the above-named Churches were situated <strong>might be accurately described as Phrygian-Galatic.<\/strong> In some inscriptions, writes the professor, the Governor of Galatia (in the larger sense) is called simply the Governor of Galatia, while in others he is styled Governor of Galatia, Pisidia, Phrygia, Lycaonia, Isauria, Pontus Galaticus, etc.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. No traveller from North Galatia to Bithynia could come to a point over against Mysia,<\/strong> still less to the frontier of Mysia. A glance at a map (preferably a large map) will make this clear to all; while everything is natural, if, after leaving Phrygian Galatia, the apostle was making for Asia when his course was arrested, and again was heading northwards to Bithynia, when he was a second time checked and turned westwards to Mysia and Troas.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. South Galatia is favoured by the chronology of Acts<\/strong>.The process of preaching in the great cities of Galatia needed in any case a considerable time; an invalid, as St. Paul is supposed on the North Galatian theory to have been, would require a long time in that vast and bare country. But the period allotted on any of the proposed systems of chronology to this journey leaves no room for the evangelisation of Galatia. We may safely assume that Paul left Antioch on his second journey in the spring. No one who knows the Taurus will suppose that he crossed it before the middle of May; June is a more probable time. Say, he passed the Cilician Gates on the 1st of June. If we calculate his journey by the shortest route, allowing no detention for unforeseen contingencies, but making him rest always on the Sundays, and supposing a stay of two Sundays each at Derbe, Iconium, and Antioch, and of at least five weeks at Lystra (which is required to select Timothy as comrade, to perform the operation on him, and to wait his recovery), we find that even if he did not touch North Galatia, October would be begun before he reached Philippi. Eleven months may be fairly allotted to the events recorded at Philippi, Thessalonica, Brea, and Athens; and then Paul went to Corinth where he resided a year and a half. He would then sail for Jerusalem in spring. Thus three entire years are required as the smallest allowance for this journey, even if it was done in the way our theory supposes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>V. Pauls sickness makes for the South Galatian theory<\/strong>.It is required by the North Galatian theory that St. Paul, stricken at Ancyra by the severe illness, referred to in <span class='bible'>Gal. 4:13<\/span>, took that opportunity to make the long, fatiguing journeys needed in order to preach in Tavium and Pessinus. Those who know the bare, black uplands of Galatia, hot and dusty in summer, covered with snow in winter, will appreciate the improbability and want of truth to nature which are involved in the words because of an infirmity of the flesh I preached unto you. Professor Ramsay thinks Pauls infirmity was the fever which he caught at Perga, and which determined him to visit the highlands of Pisidia and Lycaonia.<em>The Church in the Roman Empire<\/em>, chaps. 3, 4.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:6-7<\/span>. <em>Forbidden to preach in Asia and Bithynia<\/em>.The reason suggested for this by Hausrath is that Pauls visit to Galatia, and indeed his entire progress hitherto, had been one of controversy and struggle. Controversy in Jerusalem, controversy at Antioch, controversy in Galatia: that had been the way which lay behind him. Perhaps it was just for this reason that in the year 5354 the Spirit suffered him not to turn either west to Proconsular Asia, where Ephesus was already in the struggle with Jewish Christians, or to Bithynia in the north, where in the days of Pliny at least a strongly coloured Jewish Christianity prevailed, but called him by a vision to Europe, where a freer development of his own peculiar foundation principle was possible among the Jews of the Diaspora who were less closely bound up with Jerusalem (<em>Der Apostel Paulus<\/em>, p. 266).<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:7<\/span>. <em>The Spirit of Jesus<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. The personality of this Spirit<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Implied in the actions here ascribed to Him<\/em>suffering not, hindering. Impossible to be explained as a merely human, moral spirit, or even as the power of the true religion or of the fellowship in life which the human spirit has with God, which has proceded from Jesus Christ and continues to work in the Christian Church (Pfleiderer, <em>Grundriss der Christlichen Glaubens- und Sittenlehre<\/em>, p. 163). Throughout Acts the Spirit is a Divine person. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Confirmed by other Scripture representations<\/em>. <span class='bible'>Joh. 14:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 15:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 16:7<\/span>; John 13-15; <span class='bible'>Rom. 8:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co. 2:10-11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Co. 13:14<\/span>, etc. With Paul the Holy Spirit is that Spirit which, according to its origin, is Divine, but in Christians is Divine human, as becoming the peculiar and permanent principle of the new man (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal. 5:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom. 5:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom. 8:1-15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co. 2:10-15<\/span>). With John also the Holy Spirit, corresponding to and in consequence of the Divine Logos personality in Christ is definitely conceived of as a separate Divine being (<em>Ibid.<\/em>, pp. 159, 160).<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. The relation of this Spirit to Jesus<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Equal in essence with Christ<\/em>. This implied in His association with Christ in the baptismal formula (<span class='bible'>Mat. 28:19<\/span>) and the Christian benediction (<span class='bible'>2Co. 13:14<\/span>). As the principle of mans life fellowship with God, says Pfleiderer (<em>Grundriss<\/em>, p. 159), the Holy Spirit with Paul is thought of at one time as of the same essence with God and Christ, at another time as distinguished from both as the gift of God intermediated through Christ. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Distinguished in personality from Christ<\/em>. This also involved in the biblical doctrine of the Holy Spirit. Yet the distinction in personality must not be so held as to contradict the unity of essence. The existence of such relations in the Godhead may transcend human reason, but is not on that account to be denied. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Proceeding forth from Christ<\/em>. Not merely from the Father (<span class='bible'>Joh. 15:26<\/span>), but also from the Son. Though not so stated in the New Testament, this has been accepted by the Christian Church as the necessary consequence of the doctrine of the divinity of the Son, and therefore of the Sons essential equality with the Father. <\/p>\n<p>4. <em>Dispensed by Christ<\/em>. In the days of His flesh Christ claimed that after His glorification He would send forth the Spirit from the Father (<span class='bible'>Joh. 15:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 16:7<\/span>), and this promise He fulfilled at Pentecost (<span class='bible'>Act. 2:33<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>5. <em>Representative of Christ<\/em>. That the Holy Ghost should be the personal vicegerent and plenipotentiary of Jesus after His departure from the world was likewise distinctly taught (<span class='bible'>Joh. 16:16<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. The functions of this Spirit in the Church<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>The creator and sustainer of its life<\/em>. The new moral and spiritual nature which belongs to every individual member of the Church is a direct production of the indwelling of the Holy Ghost in the soul of the believer (<span class='bible'>Joh. 3:5<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph. 2:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph. 2:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Co. 5:17<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The revealer and interpreter of its truth<\/em>. Whatever spiritual understanding the believing soul attains to, he owes to the inward illumination of the Holy Spirit (<span class='bible'>Joh. 16:13-14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co. 2:9-14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph. 1:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Jn. 2:20<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>The inspirer and guide of its movements<\/em>. As the footsteps of Paul and Silas were directed by the Holy Ghost, so are those of believers superintended by the same Divine leader (<span class='bible'>Rom. 8:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal. 5:16<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:9<\/span>. <em>The Cry of the HeathenCome over and help us<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. The significance of the cry<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>1. The cry of a perishing humanity. <br \/>2. Which has begun to realise its danger. <br \/>3. For that succour which alone can relieve distressviz., the salvation of the gospel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. The parties to whom it is<\/strong> <strong>directed<\/strong>.To the Christian Church<em>i.e.<\/em>, to those <\/p>\n<p>(1) who have that salvation in their possession; <br \/>(2) who themselves received it as a free gift; and <br \/>(3) who also have been commanded to make it known to others.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. Reasons why the cry should be listened to<\/strong>.Because <\/p>\n<p>(1) it is urgent, and has been long sounding in the Churchs ear; <br \/>(2) those crying are the Churchs brethren, who, like themselves, belong to Jesus Christ; <br \/>(3) ordinary gratitude for mercy received, if not love to Jesus Christ, should impel the Christian Church to respond to it; and <br \/>(4) without the Churchs aid the heathen world cannot be recovered for Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Cry of the Nations.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>I. All nations ignorant of the gospel need help<\/strong>.Arising from: <\/p>\n<p>1. Their <em>ignorance<\/em> <\/p>\n<p>(1) of God, and the way in which He is to be worshipped; <br \/>(2) of the Saviour, and the manner in which He is to be approached. <br \/>2. Their <em>condition<\/em>, represented in Scripture as a state of <\/p>\n<p>(1) darkness (<span class='bible'>Mat. 4:16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph. 5:8<\/span>); <\/p>\n<p>(2) disease (<span class='bible'>Isa. 1:6<\/span>); <\/p>\n<p>(3) bondage (<span class='bible'>Rom. 6:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph. 2:2<\/span>); and <\/p>\n<p>(4) death (<span class='bible'>Eph. 2:1<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. All nations needing help utter the same cry as the men of Macedonia<\/strong>.Evident from <\/p>\n<p>(1) the knowledge we have of their condition; <br \/>(2) our connection with them in the way of commerce; and <br \/>(3) the political relations in which we stand towards them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. It is the duty of the Church of Christ to respond to this cry<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>1. God has done everything to facilitate our exertions. <br \/>2. He has committed the care of the inhabitants of the world to the Christian Church. 3. Christ commands us to love our neighbours as ourselves and to preach the gospel to every creature imply the obligation here referred to. <br \/>4. Reason and equity say we should send to others that which we ourselves received from others.<em>Bogue<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:10<\/span>. <em>The Call to Macedonia<\/em>.The <em>cause<\/em> which led to the apostle Pauls crossing from Asia into Europe, and the <em>object<\/em> which he had in view in coming here.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. As to the causes which led to his coming<\/strong>.While one is referred to in the text, you will find others mentioned in the verses which go before (<span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span>). Thus, even so far, Paul might have felt himself guided to this continent. But he was not left to judge of it merely in that way. It was so important a step, and such great consequences were to follow on it, that a vision was given him.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. And for what object did they come?<\/strong>They drew the conclusion, we are told, that the Lord had called them <em>to preach the gospel<\/em> in that place. This was the object for which all the journeys of the apostle Paul were undertaken.<\/p>\n<p>What are the lessons which we may learn for ourselves from this history? <\/p>\n<p>1. From the way in which the apostle Paul was more than once kept from going where he intended, kept from going into the province of Asia, and kept from entering into Bithynia, and was led on where he seems never to have intended to go, to accomplish a mighty purpose, we learn how God may disappoint His people now in regard to some plan of usefulness which they have in view. <br \/>2. Another truth which we are reminded of is, that as this vision was given to Paul, the man of Macedonia calling on him to help them, so there are calls of the same kind continually made upon all Christian people, which we need no vision to remind us of, because they are a reality with which we are acquainted. <br \/>3. And there is one other lesson closely connected with this, which we may learn from what we have been considering to-daythe exceeding value of the gospel. This was shown by Pauls object in coming over to Macedonia.<em>M. F. Day<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>6.<\/p>\n<p><strong>THROUGH THE REGION OF PHRYGIA AND GALATIA. <\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span><\/strong> a. Cf. <span class='bible'>Gal. 4:13-15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co. 16:1-2<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span> a<\/p>\n<p>And they went through the region of Phrygia and Galatia,<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span><\/strong><strong> a <\/strong>Although it is not mentioned in the book of Acts we could conclude from the account given in Galatians that during the time that Paul was in the region of Galatia he contracted some type of illness that made it necessary for him to remain here for some time. During the period of his convalescence he was enabled to do a wonderful work for Christ among the inhabitants of Galatia, much to his surprise, we are led to believe. The words of Canon Farrar are very much to the point. We reproduce them for their fine expression:<\/p>\n<p>The providential cause which led to St. Pauls stay in the country was, as he himself tells us, a severe attack of illness, and the manner in which he alludes to it gives us reason to infer that it was a fresh access of agony from that stake in the flesh which I believe to have been acute ophtalmia (inflammation of the eye or eyeball), accompanied, as it often is, by violent cerebral disturbance (pertaining to the brain). In his letter to his Galatian converts he makes a touching appeal which in modern phraseology might run as follows:<\/p>\n<p>Become as I am, brethren, I beseech you (i.e. free from the yoke of external and useless ordinances), for I, too, made myself as you are. Jew that I was, I placed myself on the level of you Gentiles, and now I want you to stand with me on that same level, instead of trying to make yourselves Jews. I do not wish to speak by way of complaint about you. You never did me any personal wrong. Nay, you know that when I preached the gospel among you on my first visit, it was in consequence of an attack of sickness which detained me in the midst of a journey; you could not, therefore, feel any gratitude to me as though I had come with the express purpose of preaching to you; and besides, at that time weak, agonized with pain, liable to fits of delirium, with my eyes red and ulcerated by that disease by which it pleases God to let Satan buffet me, you might well have been tempted to regard me a deplorable object. My whole appearance must have been a trial to youa temptation to you to reject me. But you did not. You were very kind to me. You might have treated me with contemptuous indifference; you might have regarded me with positive loathing; but instead of this you honored, you loved me, you received me as though I were an angelnay, even as though I were the Lord of angels, as though I were even He whom I preached unto you. How glad were you to see me. How eagerly you congratulated yourselves and me on the blessed accidentnay, rather, on the blessed providence of God, which had detained me amongst you. So generous, so affectionate were you towards me that I bear you witness that to aid me as I sat in misery in the darkened rooms, unable to bear even a ray of light without excruciating pain, you would, if that could have helped me, have plucked out your eyes and given them to me. (<span class='bible'>Gal. 4:12-15<\/span>). <strong>Life Of Paul,<\/strong> p. 264266).<\/p>\n<p>545.<\/p>\n<p>What did Paul and Silas do when they arrived in Antioch and Iconium? What was the result?<\/p>\n<p>546.<\/p>\n<p>What happened in the regions of Galatia and Phrygia?<\/p>\n<p>547.<\/p>\n<p>Was Galatia a town, city, country, province or what?<\/p>\n<p>It might be well to turn to the book of Galatians and read its six short chapters to learn of the concern of Paul for these Christians in the section where he bestowed so much effort.<br \/>It appears from the text that this tour and stay in Galatia only occurred as a result of the prevention of the Holy Spirit from speaking the Word in Asia. Get a good look at the map so you will know the location of Asia and of Galatia. This whole trip was a long and difficult one; for a detailed account of the terrain read the comments upon it by Conybeare and Howson (<strong>Life And Epistles Of The Apostle Paul,<\/strong> pp. 233238).<\/p>\n<p>548.<\/p>\n<p>Of what nationality were the Galatians?<\/p>\n<p>549.<\/p>\n<p>Did Paul establish one church, many churches, or no churches there?<\/p>\n<p>550.<\/p>\n<p>When, why and where did he write to those in Galatia?<\/p>\n<p>551.<\/p>\n<p>Was it the original intent of the apostle to go into Galatia? If not, what was his original plan?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>7.<\/p>\n<p><strong>WHILE IN THE ABOVE STATED REGIONS THEY WERE FORBIDDEN BY THE HOLY SPIRIT TO SPEAK THE WORD IN ASIA. THEY PASSED THROUGH THE PRO-VINCE OF MYSIA AND ASSAYED TO GO INTO THE PROVINCE OF BITHYNIA BUT THEY WERE AGAIN FORBIDDEN.<\/strong> <span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span> b  <span class='bible'>Act. 16:8<\/span> a.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span> b<\/p>\n<p>having been forbidden of the Holy Spirit to speak the word in Asia;<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and when they were come over against Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia; and the Spirit of Jesus suffered them not;<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:8<\/span> a<\/p>\n<p>and passing by Mysia,<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Act. 16:6<\/span><\/strong><strong> b<\/strong> The province of Asia would surely be the most obvious of development in the gospel, so thought the apostle Paul, There were more cities in this province, hence more people to whom to bring the glad tidings. There were more favorable natural conditions; i.e., the terrain was not so rough as in the neighboring provinces and to this province he had tried to go once before.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Act. 16:7-8<\/span><\/strong><strong> a<\/strong> But the leader of these men looked not upon the outward appearances but upon the will of God. Knowing the mind of God, the Holy Spirit made it known to the apostles in some way that would let them know that God did not want the Word preached by them in Asia at this time; nor even in the more northerly province of Bithynia. Every door was shut in their faces and their path was hedged in with refusals. There was no way to go but straight ahead.<\/p>\n<p>Once again we need a little clarification as to the location and meaning of the statements made in these verses. A reference to the map will give some idea as to their location. Note please the circumstances in <span class='bible'>Act. 16:7<\/span> over against Mysia which means right at the border of the province, then second, from the position at the border of Mysia they planned or began to travel toward the northern province of Bithynia. There were several large towns here in which the gospel could have been preached. Once again we read the rather strange words but the Spirit of Jesus suffered them not. Just how the Holy Spirit communicated this information we have no way of knowing. Whether subjectively or objectively it would be impossible to say. Then note: Passing by Mysia, this can also be translated passing through Mysia. A look at the map will clear this up. Thus were they driven straight across the country to the seaport of Troas.<\/p>\n<p>552.<\/p>\n<p>Give two reason why the province of Asia would seem to be the most obvious place to go for preaching.<\/p>\n<p>553.<\/p>\n<p>To what does the term Bithynia refer?<\/p>\n<p>554.<\/p>\n<p>What is the meaning of the phrase over against Mysia?<\/p>\n<p>555.<\/p>\n<p>The meaning of Passing by Mysia?<\/p>\n<p>8.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AT TROAS.<\/strong> <span class='bible'>Act. 16:8<\/span> b  <span class='bible'>Act. 16:10<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:8<\/span> b<\/p>\n<p>they came down to Troas.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>And a vision appeared to Paul in the night: There was a man of Macedonia standing, beseeching him, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>And when he had seen the vision, straightway we sought to go forth into Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel unto them.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Act. 16:8<\/span><\/strong><strong> b, <\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Act. 16:9<\/span><\/strong> The location and history of these towns is very important to a thorough understanding and appreciation of the story. Look it up and read it.<\/p>\n<p>When Paul, Silas and Timothy arrived in Troas they very shortly knew why God had forced them along in the way He had. It happened that on a certain night a visitor appeared unto the apostle. A man from across the Aegean Sea. His visit in this visionary form was to earnestly request that Paul cross the waters and come into Macedonia and help us.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Act. 16:10<\/span><\/strong> Here it is that the pronoun of the author of Acts changes from they to we and us. Note the change in verses eight through eleven. The conclusion, of course, is that here in Troas the physician, Luke, joined the evangelistic party. Whether this was his home or not we cannot say, but we personally like to believe that it was, Paul must have spoken to Luke, Silas and Timothy about the vision. They all concluded that the circumstances pointed in just one direction and that was over into Europe. God himself had commissioned them to bear the glad tidings to Macedonia.<\/p>\n<p>9.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AT<\/strong> <strong>SAMOTHRACE.<\/strong> <span class='bible'>Act. 16:11<\/span> a.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:11<\/span> a Setting sail therefore from Troas, we made a straight course to Samothrace,<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Act. 16:11<\/span><\/strong><strong> a<\/strong> In passing it does seem from what happens in Troas upon the return trip (<span class='bible'>Act. 20:6-12<\/span>) that some work for God must have been done here, by Luke perchance, even before Paul and company arrived. Or maybe the foursome had a meeting that is not recorded by Luke.<\/p>\n<p>Here is a brief description of that charming little isle of Samothrace at which they anchored the first night out from Troas . . . On the first day they sailed past Tenedos and Imbros straight for Samothrace and anchored for the night to leeward of it. Did Paul as he gazed by starlight, or at early dawn on the towering peak which overshadows that ancient island, think at all of its immemorial mysteries or talk to his companions about the Cabiri, or question any of the Greek or Roman sailors about the strange names of Axiocheros, Axiochersos, and Axiochersa? We would gladly know, but we have no data to help us, and it is strongly probable that to all such secondary incidents he was habitually indifferent. (<strong>The Life Of Paul,<\/strong> Farrar, p. 273).<\/p>\n<p>10.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AT<\/strong> <strong>NEAPOLIS.<\/strong> <span class='bible'>Act. 16:11<\/span> b.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Act. 16:11<\/span> b<\/p>\n<p>and the day following to Neapolis;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class='bible'>Act. 16:11<\/span><\/strong><strong> b<\/strong> Cunningham Geikie says concerning Neapolis: We can infer the appearance of the port, in some measure, from that of Levantine coast-towns now. There would be the same mixture of East and West, the same provision for harbourage, and the same style of houses; but also, I fear, a little of the neglect which seems to mark all places in the East or near it.<\/p>\n<p>Philippi, to which the travelers were going, lay about ten miles inland, but was easily reached from Neapolis, as that town was the coast-ending of the great Egnatian Road which crossed Macedonia arid Thrace, on the one hand, and stretched away, on the other, to Thessalonica on the west. Climbing a defile through the hills which lie close behind Neapolis, by the massive squarely paved causeway of that military highway, between precipices almost overhanging the sea, the missionaries would have a glorious view behind them on gaining the crest, if they chose to interest themselves in anything but their errand . . . Looking down them toward Philippi, a plain, level as the sea, lay at their feet, framed, in the nearer and further distance, in a background of mountains, of which some, within a sweep of thirty miles rose to a height of from four to eight thousand feet. (Geikie, op. cit. pp. 377378).<br \/>Neapolis was a city of Considerable size. With such a city was it not passing strange that the word was not preached here? Strange unless we understand the purposes of the preachers. To the Jew first, and also to the Greek was the order. Finding no opening here they went on to the next city.<\/p>\n<p>556.<\/p>\n<p>How can we say that to go into Macedonia was to enter Europe?<\/p>\n<p>557.<\/p>\n<p>What is significant in the change of pronouns in <span class='bible'>Act. 16:8-11<\/span>?<\/p>\n<p>558.<\/p>\n<p>What does <span class='bible'>Act. 20:6-12<\/span> have to do with the Lords work in Troas?<\/p>\n<p>559.<\/p>\n<p>What is Samothrace?<\/p>\n<p>560.<\/p>\n<p>Why no description of the country through which the missionaries were passing?<\/p>\n<p>561.<\/p>\n<p>How far was Philippi from Neapolis?<\/p>\n<p>562.<\/p>\n<p>What is the Egnatian Road?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(6) <strong>When they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia.<\/strong>In the previous journey St. Paul, when he was at Antioch in Pisidia, was just on the border of the two provinces, but had not travelled through them, Phrygia lying to the west, and Galatia to the north-east. The former name was used with an ethnological rather than a political significance, and did not, at this period, designate a Roman province. It does not possess any special points of interest in connection with St. Pauls work, except as including the churches of the valley of the Lycus, Coloss, Laodicea, and Thyatira, but the latter was the scene of some of his most important labours. The province, named after the Galat, or Gauls, who had poured over Greece and Asia Minor in the third century B. 100, as they had done over Italy in the fourth, and to whom it had been assigned by Attalus I., King of Pergamus, had been conquered by the Romans under Manlius (the name appearing a second time in connection with a victory over the Gallic races) in B.C. 189; and under Augustus it had been constituted as a Roman province. The inhabitants spoke a Keltic dialect, like that which the people of the same race spoke in the fourth century after Christ, on the banks of the Moselle, and retained all the distinctive quickness of emotion and liability to sudden change which characterised the Keltic temperament. They had adopted the religion of the Phrygians, who had previously inhabited the region, and that religion consisted mainly in a wild orgiastic worship of the great Earth-goddess Cybele, in whose temples were found the Eunuch-priests, who thus consecrated themselves to her service. (See Note on <span class='bible'>Gal. 5:12<\/span>.) The chief seat of this worship was at Pessinus. The incidental reference to this journey in <span class='bible'>Gal. 4:13-15<\/span>, enables us to fill up St. Lukes outline. St. Paul seems to have been detained in Galatia by severe illness, probably by one of the attacks of acute pain in the nerves of the eye in which many writers have seen an explanation of the mysterious thorn in the flesh of <span class='bible'>2Co. 12:7<\/span>, which led to his giving a longer time to his missionary work there than he had at first intended. In this illness the Galatians had shown themselves singularly devoted to him. They had received him as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus. They had not shrunk from what would seem to have been repulsive in the malady from which he suffered; they would have plucked out their own eyes, had it been possible, and given them to replace those which were to him the cause of so much suffering. Then they thought it their highest blessedness to have had such a one among them. If the memory of that reception made his sorrow all the more bitter when, in after years, they fell away from their first love, it must at the time have been among the most cheering seasons of the Apostles life.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia.<\/strong>It is obviously implied in this that their own plans would have led them to turn their steps to the region from which they were thus turned. The pro-consular province of Asia, with its teeming cities, like Ephesus, Smyrna, and Sardis, its large Jewish population, its great centres of idolatrous worship, was naturally attractive to one who was seeking with all his energy a rapid expansion of the kingdom of his Lord. But in ways which we are not told, by inner promptings, or by visions of the night, or by the inspired utterances of those among their converts who had received the gift of prophecy, as afterwards in <span class='bible'>Act. 21:4<\/span>, they were led on, step by step, towards the north-western coast, not seeing their way clearly as yet to the next stage of their labours. Their route through the Galatian region (the phrase, perhaps, indicates a wider range of country than the Roman province of that name) must have taken them through Pessinus, the great centre of the worship of Cybele, and Ancyra, famous for its goats-hair manufactures, and for the great historical marble tablets which Augustus had erected there.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 6, 7<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> Our historian here passes hastily, and with large omissions, over an extensive ground of work and travel. Olshausen uniquely remarks that he is &ldquo;impatient&rdquo; to get to Europe! The real truth, we think, is, <em> first, <\/em> that Luke believed he had given a sufficient specimen of the Asiatic work in the former missionary tour; and, <em> second, <\/em> narrating, as we have maintained, the Gentilizing of the Church down to its establishment in Rome, he recognises the need of brevity in the Eastern field, and wisely hastens to the transit into Europe. There he forthwith deals in minute details and full pictures.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 6<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> <strong> Throughout Phrygia<\/strong> The boundary lines of the provinces of Asia Minor were very vague, and by political changes constantly varying both in name and extent. Phrygia was an extensive range of territory, extended at great length east and west, lying on the north of Cilicia and Pisidia. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Galatia<\/strong> Lying yet north of Phrygia. (See map.)<\/p>\n<p><strong> Forbidden of the Holy Ghost<\/strong> By three separate monitions is Paul warned that his field is no longer Asia, but Europe. Two of these monitions are negative, warning him away; one is positive, inviting him onward. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Asia<\/strong> To our modern ear this word covers the whole continent between Europe and the Pacific. The first known use of the word is in Homer, where the adjective Asian is applied to the meadows near Ephesus. Thence the term enlarged with the enlarged knowledge, by the Greeks, of the eastern regions. At first they distinguished <em> Asia this side the Halys <\/em> from <em> Asia beyond the Halys. <\/em> When the Romans conquered western Asia, and governed it by proconsuls, we have <em> proconsular Asia, <\/em> which included the provinces lining the AEgean, namely Mysia, Lydia, and Caria. The New Testament Asia, the Asia of John&rsquo;s seven Churches, seems to have coincided with this.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> Paul Is Guided By The Spirit to Europe And Arrives in Philippi (16:6-12).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;And they went through the region of Phrygia and Galatia, having been forbidden of the Holy Spirit to speak the word in Asia, and when they were come over against Mysia, they made an attempt to go into Bithynia; and the Spirit of Jesus suffered them not, and passing by Mysia, they came down to Troas.&rsquo;<\/p>\n<p> As they passed through &lsquo;the region of Phrygia and Galatia&rsquo;, presumably confirming churches he had previously visited, his intention of going to the province of Asia (and to Ephesus) was somehow hindered. It may have been as a result of prophecy, or because something got in the way. Then he decided to aim for Bithynia, and again he was prevented. Thus he moved on and came to Troas (an Aegean port a few miles from the site of ancient Troy), not sure what to do next.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;The Spirit of Jesus.&rsquo; This phrase is only used here. It emphasises that Jesus has something especially in mind for Paul&rsquo;s party in the fulfilment of His commission (<span class='bible'>Act 1:8<\/span>), something new and beyond the ordinary. Jesus was now in special and personal control of this party. Note the close linking of Jesus with the Holy Spirit. It is interesting to note that we have in the same context &lsquo;forbidden of the Holy Spirit&rsquo;, &lsquo;the Spirit of Jesus suffered them not&rsquo;, and &lsquo;God had called us to preach the gospel to them.&rsquo; Three seen as acting as One. And all are united in ensuring that Paul now go to Europe.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;The region of Phrygia and Galatia&rsquo;. The two names are adjectival forms limiting &lsquo;region&rsquo;, only the first carrying the article. This probably therefore means &lsquo;Galatian Phrygia&rsquo; in contrast to wider Phrygia, or &lsquo;the Phrygian-Galatic region&rsquo; within the province of Galatia. It is doubtful whether it refers to the ethnic kingdom of Galatia. &lsquo;Mysia&rsquo; was in north-west Asia Minor, and further north moving north-eastward around the Black Sea were the Black Sea ports of Bithynia. Paul was seeking to move northwards using the Roman roads. He was, however, somehow prevented and arrived in the Aegean port of Troas.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> The Mission to Europe (16:6-19:20).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Paul&rsquo;s plans now seemed to begin to go awry. All doors seemed to be closing to him as in one way or another he was first hindered from going one way, and then another. But unknown to him it was to be the commencement of the mission to Europe. Why then does Luke emphasise these negative responses? It was in order to underline that when the move to go forward did come it was decisively under God&rsquo;s direction. He was saying, &lsquo;the Spirit bade him go&rsquo;.<\/p>\n<p> We need not doubt that new Christians had already entered Europe, as converts at Pentecost and other feasts had returned to their home cities taking the Good News with them, and that Christian traders and travellers also spread the Good News, but as far as we know this was the first direct Spirit-impelled attempt to evangelise Europe as a whole. Europe, as it were, now lay within God&rsquo;s sights. It was a prepared Europe, a Europe using one main language, Greek, with good main roads and an established system of justice. What it lacked was the truth.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> The Macedonian Call <\/strong> In <span class='bible'>Act 16:6-10<\/span> Luke records Paul&rsquo;s vision of a man calling him to bring the Gospel of Jesus Christ to Macedonian. This event is popularly called &ldquo;The Macedonian Call.&rdquo; Paul&rsquo;s original intent on his second missionary journey was to strengthen the churches that he had planted in Asia Minor on his first missionary journey (<span class='bible'>Act 15:36<\/span>). He had no idea that God would lead him into Europe and beyond. Kenneth Hagin teaches how God will often give us a divine encounter in order to strengthen us for the journey that lies ahead. [213] This encounter becomes a source of strength that we can lean upon during difficult day ahead. We can draw strength from that divine experience for difficult times to come. This vision gave Paul direction and assurance (<span class='bible'>Act 16:10<\/span> &ldquo;assuredly&rdquo;) that he was in God&rsquo;s will despite the hardships that lay ahead. Paul and his companions certainly faced persecutions when founding his first churches in Macedonia. He stood strong knowing that God had supernaturally spoken to him to go into Macedonia. Paul could lean upon this vision for strength in the days and months ahead assured that he was in the will of God despite the persecutions.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3em'> [213] Kenneth Hagin, <em> Following God&rsquo;s Plan For Your Life <\/em> (Tulsa, Oklahoma: Faith Library Publications, c1993, 1994), 118.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Act 15:36<\/span>, &ldquo;And some days after Paul said unto Barnabas, Let us go again and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the Lord, and see how they do.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Paul&rsquo;s call to Macedonia was the open door that brought the Gospel of Jesus Christ into Europe. Although the church at Rome has been established earlier, Paul&rsquo;s journey into Macedonia was the first effort to evangelize Europe and lay a foundation for these early churches to become established, and later spread across Europe. Of all the major places on earth where Christianity spread during the early centuries, the people of Europe embraced the Gospel most readily. The Middle East was soon overran by Islam and forced into human traditions and bondages, keeping their societies in a primitive state of social development until modern times. Neither did the African and Asian continents embrace Christianity on a large enough scale to transform their societies. Only in Europe did Christianity become rooted in their society so as to transform the people&rsquo;s moral fiber, leading the way to modern civilization as we know it today. Although the European governments and churches leaders would corrupt the teachings of the Gospel through Roman Catholicism and other Orthodox sects, the light of the Gospel would shine through the Dark Ages and explode into the hearts of men during the Reformation. This explosion of Christianity led men into the period called the Renaissance, where men were free to expand their knowledge through inventions and modern sciences. This explosion of knowledge led to a modern civilization that practiced the Christian faith in nations like Germany, Britain and the United States. This environment of human development combined with Christian values allowed Europe to become the major portal, or gateway, of human achievement in many aspects of life, while much of the world lay bound in primitive superstitions and witchcraft. Paul&rsquo;s Macedonian call was the doorway to transforming Europe and the world with Christianity.<\/p>\n<p> Many parts of the world are saying, &ldquo;Come.&rdquo; We need a vision in order to go.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Act 16:6<\/strong><\/span> <strong> &ldquo;Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia&rdquo; <\/strong> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> What did the districts of Phrygia and Galatia have in common? Ancient Roman history tells us that groups of the Gauls from France made their way eastward conquering marauding through the land. A large group of them eventually settled in the north central region of Asia Minor after having disposed the Phrygians, who were the ancient inhabitants of this land. Although overcome by the Gauls, who later became known as &ldquo;Gallo-Graecians,&rdquo; or Galatians, these Phrygians still inhabited portions of their ancestral land and had learned to co-exist with their ancient conquerors.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Act 16:6<\/strong><\/span> <strong> &ldquo;and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia&rdquo; &#8211;<\/strong> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> Note Paul&#8217;s comment years later to Timothy about the region of Asia.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>2Ti 1:15<\/span>, &ldquo;This thou knowest, that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me ; of whom are Phygellus and Hermogenes.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Act 16:6<\/strong><\/span> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> Paul was close to Asia. Man&rsquo;s reason would lead them this way, but God had different plan.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Act 16:7<\/strong><\/span> <strong> <\/strong> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> Again, the Holy Spirit says, &ldquo;No&rdquo;. The Holy Spirit must lead us in the work of the ministry.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Act 16:9<\/strong><\/span> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> The Scriptures tell us that the Lord has a voice that we can hear (<span class='bible'>Joh 10:27<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Joh 10:27<\/span>, &ldquo; My sheep hear my voice , and I know them, and they follow me:&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Time and again in the Scriptures, the Lord spoke to His servants.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Gen 22:9<\/span>, &ldquo; And they came to the place which God had told him of ; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Act 9:11<\/span>, &ldquo; And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the street which is called Straight, and enquire in the house of Judas for one called Saul, of Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth,&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Act 22:10<\/span>, &ldquo;And I said, What shall I do, Lord? And the Lord said unto me, Arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things which are appointed for thee to do.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Act 16:10<\/strong><\/span> <strong> <\/strong> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <span class='bible'>Act 16:10<\/span><\/em><\/strong> begins the first of several &ldquo;we&rdquo; passages in which we know the writer of the book of Acts was with Paul on the journey. We know that Silas had begun the journey with Paul (<span class='bible'>Act 15:40<\/span>) and that Timothy had joined them at Derbe and Lystra (<span class='bible'>Act 16:1-3<\/span>). From this verse in <span class='bible'>Act 16:10<\/span> we can conclude that Luke joined this team as they crossed the Aegean Sea into Macedonia.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Act 16:10<\/strong><\/span> <strong> <\/strong> <strong><em> Comments &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> It is important to note that after Paul had seen the vision, those who were under his leadership became a part of his calling, for they said, &ldquo;assuredly gathering that the Lord had called us for to preach&rdquo; They identified their calling by following their leader&rsquo;s calling. A leader&rsquo;s vision should define the calling of those who are set under him. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Everett&#8217;s Study Notes on the Holy Scriptures<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> Paul at Philippi <span class='bible'>Act 16:6-40<\/span><\/strong> records Paul&#8217;s work in the city of Philippi. Luke gives us three incidents of Paul&rsquo;s work in Philippi to illustrate how God was confirming Paul&rsquo;s ministry and decision to go over into Macedonia (<span class='bible'>Act 16:6-10<\/span>): the story of the conversion of Lydia (<span class='bible'>Act 16:11-15<\/span>), the casting out of a spirit of divination (<span class='bible'>Act 16:16-18<\/span>) and their miraculous deliverance from prison and conversion of the Philippian jailer (<span class='bible'>Act 16:19-40<\/span>). These three stories reveal how Paul&rsquo;s ministry touched the lives of all social levels. The jailer was perhaps of military status and a Roman citizen, while Lydia was of the working class and the Greek female slave who was delivered from a demonic spirit of divination was of the lowest class.<\/p>\n<p><em> Outline <\/em> Here is a proposed outline:<\/p>\n<p> 1. The Macedonian Call <span class='bible'>Act 16:6-10<\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> 2. The Conversion of Lydia <span class='bible'>Act 16:11-15<\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> 3. Paul Cast into Prison and Miraculously Delivered <span class='bible'>Act 16:16-40<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><em> Paul&rsquo;s Affection Towards the Philippians &#8211; <\/em><\/strong> Paul wrote his most affectionate letter to the church at Philippi and they became his most avid supporter, especially through their sacrificial financial contributions. Everywhere Paul went, he commended the Philippian church for their labor of love (<span class='bible'>2Co 8:1-6<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>2Co 8:1<\/span>, &ldquo;Moreover, brethren, we do you to wit of the grace of God bestowed on the churches of Macedonia;&rdquo;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Everett&#8217;s Study Notes on the Holy Scriptures<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><em><span class='bible'>Act 16:6<\/span><\/em><\/strong><strong>. <\/strong><strong><em>To preach the word in Asia,<\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong> That is, in Asia Proper, or Proconsular Asia, as all the places mentioned in the former verses lay in Asia Minor. It is also apparent that flourishing churches were afterwards planted there; particularly at Colosse, Laodicea, Sardis, Thyatira, and Philadelphia; so that it seems to have been the determination of Providence, that, instead of going through this region now, by such a leisurely progress as that in which they proceeded in their former journey through Pamphylia, Pisidia, Lycaonia, &amp;c. they should hasten to Europe directly, and preach the gospel first in Philippi, which was a Roman colony, and then in the neighbouring parts; while, in the mean time, the Asiatic provinces now passed over, might hear some report of it from their neighbours, and so be prepared to receive with greater advantage the labours of the apostles, when they should return to them, as St. Paul afterwards did: ch. <span class='bible'>Act 18:23<\/span>, &amp;c. By this means the spread of the gospel would, in any given time, be wider than (other circumstances being equal) it would have been, had they taken all the interjacent places in their way. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Act 16:6-7<\/span> . According to the reading  and, <span class='bible'>Act 16:7<\/span> ,   (see the critical remarks): <em> Now they went through Phrygia and Galatia, after they had been withheld by the Holy Spirit from preaching in Asia; but having come toward Mysia, they attempted<\/em> , etc. Observe (1) that this hindrance of the Spirit to their preaching in Asia induced them, instead of going to Asia, to take their route through Phrygia and Galatia, and therefore the founding of the Galatian churches is correctly referred to this period; [48] indeed, the founding of these may have been the immediate <em> object aimed at<\/em> in that hindrance. The fact that Luke so silently passes over the <em> working<\/em> in Phrygia and Galatia, is in keeping with the unequal character of the information given by him generally an inequality easily explained from the diversity of his documents and intelligence otherwise acquired so that it appears arbitrary to impute to him a special set purpose (Olshausen: he was hastening with his narrative to the European scene of action; Baumgarten: because the main stream of development proceeded from Jerusalem to Rome, and the working in question lay out of the line of this direction, comp. also Zeller, p. 383; and quite erroneously Schneckenburger: because there were no Jews to be found in those regions, and therefore Luke could not have illustrated in that case how Paul turned first to the Jews). Further, (2) Asia cannot be the quarter of the world in contrast to Europe, but only the <em> western coast of Asia Minor<\/em> , as in <span class='bible'>Act 2:9<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Act 6:9<\/span> . To that region his journey from Lycaonia (Derbe and Lystra, <span class='bible'>Act 16:1<\/span> ) was directed; but by the hindrance of the Spirit it was turned elsewhere, namely, to Phrygia and Galatia (the latter taken in the usual narrower sense, not according to the extent of the Roman province at that time, as Bttger, Thiersch, and others suppose; comp. on <em> Gal<\/em> . Introd.  1).<\/p>\n<p> The <em> hindering of the Spirit<\/em> , taken by Zeller in the sense of the apostle&rsquo;s own <em> inward tact<\/em> , is in <span class='bible'>Act 16:6-7<\/span> to be regarded as an influence of the Holy Spirit (that is, of the <em> objective<\/em> Divine Spirit, not of &ldquo;the holy spirit of <em> prudence<\/em> , which judged the circumstances correctly,&rdquo; de Wette) on their souls, which internal indication, they were conscious, <em> was<\/em> that of the Spirit.<\/p>\n<p>  .  ] not: <em> at<\/em> (see <span class='bible'>Act 16:8<\/span> ), but <em> toward<\/em> Mysia, <em> Mysia-wards<\/em> , in the direction of the border of that land. They wished from this to go northeastward to Bithynia; for in Mysia (which, along with Lydia and Caria, belonged to <em> Asia<\/em> ) they were forbidden to preach.<\/p>\n<p>   ] <em> i.e<\/em> . the   , <span class='bible'>Act 16:6<\/span> ; see on <span class='bible'>Rom 8:9<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3em'> [48] Whether he also planted churches in Phrygia, is unknown to us. The founding of the church in Colossae and Laodicea took place by means of others, <span class='bible'>Col 2:1<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> REMARK.<\/p>\n<p> According to the Received text (    ), the rendering must be: <em> having journeyed through Phrygia and Galatia, they endeavoured, after they had been withheld by the Holy Spirit from preaching in Asia, on coming toward Mysia, to journey to Bithynia<\/em> , etc. Comp. Wieseler, p. 31; Baumgarten, p. 489; and see regarding the asyndetic participles, which &ldquo;mutua temporis vel causae ratione inter se referuntur,&rdquo; Khner, <em> ad Xen. Anab<\/em> . i. 1. 7; Dissen, <em> ad Dem. de cor<\/em> . p. 249; Buttmann, <em> neut. Gr<\/em> . p. 255 (E. T. 297).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer&#8217;s New Testament Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, (7) After they were come to Mysia, they attempted to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not. (8) And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas. (9) And a vision appeared to Paul in the night; there stood a man of Macedonia, and prayed him, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us. (10) And after he had seen the vision, immediately we endeavored to go into Macedonia, assuredly gathering that the Lord had called us for to preach the gospel unto them. (11) Therefore loosing from Troas, we came with a straight course to Samothracia, and the next day to Neapolis; (12) And from thence to Philippi, which is the chief city of that part of Macedonia, and a colony: and we were in that city abiding certain days. (13) And on the sabbath we went out of the city by a river side, where prayer was wont to be made; and we sat down, and spake unto the women which resorted thither.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> I do entreat the Reader to remark what is here said of the Holy Ghost. What can be an higher proof of His Almighty Ministry in the Church? He forbids to preach in one place. He sends to another. Can anything more strongly define distinguishing grace? So the Prophet speaks, in the name of the Lord, I caused it (said the Lord,) to rain upon one city, and caused it not to rain upon another city, <span class='bible'>Amo 4:7<\/span> . And I entreat the Reader to observe with me, that when the persons of his people are concerned, then it is no longer the place which is objected to. This Bithynia, when the Lord&#8217;s people are there, the Lord will send to. Hence Peter, directed so to do by the Holy Ghost, sends his Epistle to Bithynia. See <span class='bible'>1Pe 1:1<\/span> , See <span class='bible'>Jer 3:14<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> Chapter 54<\/p>\n<p> Prayer<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Almighty God, for the Sabbath day we bless thee. It is quiet, solemn; always lifting itself towards the heaven whence it came. May our spirits be lifted up and see the Lord with the vision of their love. This is the day the Lord hath made; thy finger-prints are upon it; thy smile is its light, thy love its seal and warranty of peace. This is the day of resurrection; today we think of death despoiled, of opened graves, of life and immortality, incorruption and heavenly triumph. To-day all mean thought is out of place. In such a light as this our souls would put on their beauty, and with the holiness given by Christ would shine out with a radiance above the brightness of the sun. Show us that this is Christ&#8217;s day, Gospel day, triumph day; time that might be envied of all other time. May we enter into the spirit of the golden day, and be ourselves full of light and grace and truth and love. Standing before God, near the Cross, by which alone we are saved, worshipping the Three-in-One, the One-in-Three, not to be understood, but to be loved with all the passion of the heart, sanctify the day again, and sanctify us to be worthy of its memories, and fill us with the Holy Spirit. May this house be unlike all others. May the speech we hear in this place have nothing in it of the accent of earth, or time or measurable things. May the music of the Spirit steal upon the listening soul, that we may be glad with sevenfold Sabbath the deepest peace of God himself. If we have brought with us any of the stain of the week, if we are travel-worn, if even upon our sandals or our staff there be signs of earth, take away such debasement and make our feet clean as our head and our heart are pure. Read thy book to us, Father of all thought and spirit; we cannot read it except as we read common books; come thou and read it, even thou who didst write the eternal page, and let our souls hear thy reading and they shall never be grief-stricken any more. Regard us as burden-bearers, travellers, hard workers, suffering many things every day, to whom life is often only a pain, sometimes a weight we cannot carry, and occasionally a very ecstasy of Christian joy. Command thy blessing to rest upon us in every relation which we sustain. May the house be happy, yea, quite a home, sacred because of thy triune presence. Send light into every window, wherever it may look. Keep thou every door of the house, and let no enemy enter therein, and no friend go away. Make our bed in our affliction, and when human voices grate and jar upon our wounded hearing speak with thine own voice, thine own tender speech. Let the husband work harder than ev. Let the wife be filled with a new gladness. Let the little child sing song upon song, as if its very life were music, and may all the household, from the eldest to the youngest, from the highest to the lowest, be as a gathered Church singing doxologies and receiving benedictions. Go out with us when we go to business hard, mocking, weary trade, full of lies and hypocrisy so often, sometimes nearly honest, rarely a thing that may be spoken of without shame. Help us to win what bread we want with an honest hand, and to eat it with the appetite of thankfulness, and enjoy it because it has passed through thy hands. Heal our sick ones; the poor child that is withering away, and to whom the parents tell lies of love every morning. The Lord give the physician wisdom and tenderness, that he may treat the case wisely and sympathetically. The Lord turn the mourning of the bereaved into the joy of the expectant; may they look across the little river which separates the spaces of thy universe, and see what is to be the Sabbath of immortality. Bless our friends every one, here and there, with us today, or not with us because of sickness, or travel, or divers arrangements of thine own providence. Bless the stranger within our gates. Look upon our friends from Madagascar who are worshipping with us. We thank thee for their Christian character and Christian steadfastness, and though they may not follow us in the unknown language of this prayer, behold their lifting up of heart, and let the turning of their eyes unto heaven be unto thee as a prayer. Prosper their good cause. In due time take them home again; and may England often be enabled to point to Madagascar as a miracle of the Cross of Christ. Regard all who are missionaries abroad men who have hazarded their lives for the Lord Jesus. Make every land their home, and in every man may they find a Christian brother. God save the Queen, the <em> best<\/em> of her race and line! Establish her throne, and make her life begin again to-morrow, and continue it long and happily. Disappoint all her enemies; prosper all her counsellors that are inspired of God, and bring to naught the machinations and selfishness of corrupt and miserable men.<\/p>\n<p> The Lord be with us this holy day, and at night may we be filled with a strange wonder, a singular joy, a gladdening of heart which will make us think of heaven more than of earth. Amen.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:6.12em'> Act 16:6-12<\/p>\n<p> 6. And they went through the region of Phrygia and Galatia [although Paul travels <em> in the same direction,<\/em> these names are introverted in <span class='bible'>Act 18:23<\/span> . Hence Galatia is the <em> political,<\/em> Phrygia an <em> ethnographical<\/em> term. The <em> local<\/em> name of <em> this<\/em> part of the region was Lycaonia (ch. 14); of the <em> next,<\/em> Pisidia (Antioch): the common people still spoke a Phrygian dialect ( Act 14:11 ). Paul called these people Galatians when he wrote to them from a distance, Galatia being their province], having been forbidden of the Holy Ghost to speak the word in Asia [<span class='bible'>Act 2:9<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Act 6:9<\/span> , and <span class='bible'>Act 20:16<\/span> . The <em> west coast<\/em> of Asia Minor. At Antioch the road branched off leading to Ephesus and South-western Asia. Farther on another road branched off to Northwestern Asia (Mysia). <em> All Asia<\/em> being forbidden, Paul and Silas were for keeping on to Bithynia];<\/p>\n<p> 7. and when they were come over against Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia; and the Spirit of Jesus [<span class='bible'>Act 20:6<\/span> , Rom 8:9 ] suffered them not;<\/p>\n<p> 8. And passing by [G. &#8220;along the side of&#8221;] Mysia, they came down to Troas.<\/p>\n<p> 9. And a vision [<span class='bible'>Act 9:10<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Act 10:3<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Act 18:9<\/span> ; <em> not<\/em> a dream] appeared to Paul in the night. There was a man of Macedonia standing beseeching him, and saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us.<\/p>\n<p> 10. And when he had seen the vision, straightway we [Luke joined Paul here at Troas, probably a circumstance of which Theophilus was well aware] sought to go forth into [looked out a vessel sailing for] Macedonia, concluding that God had called us for to preach the Gospel unto them [and <em> so <\/em> &#8220;help&#8221;].<\/p>\n<p> 11. Setting sail, therefore, from Troas, we made a straight course [ Act 21:1 ] to Samothrace [<span class='bible'>Act 27:4<\/span> , Act 27:7 ], and the day following to Neapolis [then a <em> Thracian<\/em> town];<\/p>\n<p> 12. And from thence to Philippi, which [was their destination, as it] is a city of Macedonia, the first [in rank] of the district [milius Paulus had divided Macedonia into four districts], a Roman colony; and we were in this city tarrying certain days.<\/p>\n<p><strong> The Supernatural Element In Labour<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> HERE is the direct action of the Holy Ghost. In early Christian times men spoke with reverent familiarity of the ministry of the Spirit. There is nothing roundabout in their speech. The Spirit is mentioned by name, his action is described, responsibility is charged upon him, his inspiration and direction are familiarly and continually invoked. The Apostles and early Christians realized that they were living in the age of the Holy Spirit. Why should there be any difficulty in believing that spirit may affect spirit? We believe that matter affects matter. Is there no higher law, or no higher application of the same law, or no religious use of actual affairs, or parabolic suggestions? Let a child understand me here, for the theme is great, and the charm of it upon my own mind has for years amounted to a fascination and a spell namely, this wondrous action of the Holy Ghost upon the individual mind. Here is a piece of metal lying quite at rest. I would ask the child who is following me to fix his eyes upon that metal. Is it stirring? &#8220;No.&#8221; You are sure of that? &#8220;Perfectly sure.&#8221; Now watch the action of my right hand. I will bring the piece of metal which I am holding nearer to the metal you are looking at as lying quite still. See! I think the metal that you said was lying quite still is now moving? &#8220;Yes.&#8221; Am I touching it? &#8220;No.&#8221; Are you touching it? &#8220;No.&#8221; See how it trembles, palpitates it will presently leap up and be, as it were, part of the magnet I am holding over it. I am told that it is quite a matter of science to believe that; yet to believe that mind can affect mind, that spirit can touch spirit, is fanaticism! I have not so learned life. Shutting out all merely technical theologies, with their various definitions, it is easy for me, having seen the action of metal upon metal, to believe that there may be a kindred action of soul upon soul, mind upon mind, God upon man. There is a spiritual magnetism. Let all scientific and mechanical operations be so many ladders, whose foot is on the earth, whose head is in the clouds. &#8220;If men, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto their children, how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit unto them that ask him?&#8221; Ask, and ye shall receive. Discoveries of material relations and operations are themselves a kind of outside Bible, which helps me to read the inner book inscribed by invisible fingers.<\/p>\n<p> The action of the Spirit is as morally mysterious as it is personally direct. Why should the Holy Ghost forbid the Apostles to preach the word anywhere? That we cannot explain; but then you cannot explain yourself, your own nature, mind, thought, force, purpose. When you have settled the mysteries of selfhood, you may begin to consider the enigmas of Providence and grace. We are forbidden to do certain things. The things themselves are good, but the time is wrong, or the place is ill-chosen, or another opportunity is greater and ought to be absorbent It is not enough that your are in a good place, doing a good work; your object should be to live and move and have your being in the very Spirit of God, so that wherever he may point, your very heart may outrun your feet in attaining the appointed and sacred destination. The Holy Spirit is always to be consulted. Pray without ceasing; walk with God. Be so near him that a whisper will reach his heart. Be the friend of God; have no self; be sanctified wholly body, soul, and spirit. Be quick all over, answering instantaneously with eagerest love every commandment of the Divine will. Do not be your own idol. Have no judgment, preference, prejudice, that you cannot take up and cut in two with a double-edged knife, if God should so will it. &#8220;Not my will, but Thine, be done.&#8221; I will work here or there, on this side the sea or yonder side both sides are thine. &#8220;Lead, kindly Light.&#8221; Where that is the spirit, the life can never go wrong. Where life is bounded by programmes and outlines and purposes merely human, life will be a succession of mistakes and stinging disappointments. &#8220;O rest in the Lord, and wait patiently for him, and he will give thee thine heart&#8217;s desire.&#8221; The Apostles thus lived in the Holy Spirit; they walked in the very company of God; they knew no will but his; therefore their very breathing was a religion, their unuttered word was a conquest, and the lifting of their hand was a battle half won. It is, to our degenerate piety, quite difficult to believe that the early Apostles yea, the prophets ages before them could live so familiarly in the presence of the supernatural. They were not afraid when a door opened at midnight they expected it! When a white figure dawned upon the darkness of night they did not cringe and shiver in great fear, as if God had forsaken them they expected messages. We run to meet the letter-carrier now. In the olden time they seemed to expect letters, messages, from heaven to be brought by angels; yea, to be fetched by God! We cannot understand this; we muse about it, and find fault with it, and point out flaws in the crude philosophy which asserts it. Everything depends upon the level of your life. It is possible to live so high up in intellectual and spiritual companionship as to receive with grateful ease and friendly recognition appearances and communications which at one time would have afflicted us with the surprise of a miracle. We must ourselves be miracles; then every opening of Providence, how bright soever or startling, will be accepted as one of the assured blessings of daily life. Shall we so live? The stupendous rocks, ten thousand feet high, look infinite to the man who gazes at them from a low level. Could we be lifted up as on the wings of eagles, the rock so towering, so sublime, would be but a speck of dust in the dim distance! If we eat and drink until our very souls are buried within us, then the miracles of nature, the gracious surprises of the sky, will be lost upon us; there will be no apocalypse in the clouds and no special writing or message in the summer. But if we keep down the lower and exalt the higher, we shall come to know what is meant by Divine companionship, walking with God, having friendly intercourse with the Divine heart, and having only to ask that we may receive. To the blind, dumb, dead soul, to ask and receive is impossible; to the man almost in heaven it is the glad commonplace of a lofty experience.<\/p>\n<p> What did Paul see, then, in his vision? It was quite a typical vision. He saw a <em> man.<\/em> Was that a common sight? Only to those who look upon it with a common eye. We do not always see one another; sometimes we see the man within the man the <em> inner<\/em> man with marks of God upon him; the fallen king, the uncrowned, dethroned prince, in one flash of the eye we saw him, and he went back into depths we cannot penetrate! We should pray that we may see one another as we really are. He who truly sees a <em> man<\/em> must ever be moved by the pathetic sight. We do not see one another whilst we are in the crowd, jostling in the great multitude, passing from side to side, doing the day&#8217;s business, performing the day&#8217;s jugglery. We do not see the man, but having once seen him under favouring lights, we must feel that man is a name high up in the register of life. Paul saw a man in earnest prayer, praying to a fellow-man. It was all, perhaps, the Macedonian suppliant could then do. We are allowed to pray at such altars as we can find. God does not say, &#8220;Build the altar seventy feet high and then begin to pray.&#8221; If you fell down before the least flower, it would be altar enough. If you could bend before your mother&#8217;s old arm-chair, it would be shrine enough. And by-and-by you will want a whole heaven for a church and altar because of the unutterableness of your ecstatic joy! Begin where you can. Paul saw a man in earnest, and a man seeking <em> help.<\/em> The man said, &#8220;Come over into Macedonia and help us.&#8221; There are cowards that run away when poor, ill-used people call for &#8220;help.&#8221; There are men, women, and children calling all over the land today for &#8220;help,&#8221; and we put our fingers in our ears, and go home and say, &#8220;Behold, we knew it not,&#8221; &#8220;If thou forbear to deliver him that is drawn unto death, and say, Behold, I knew it not, doth not he that knoweth the heart understand, and will not he make inquisition for blood?&#8221; Christianity is &#8220;help&#8221; or it is nothing active service, co-operation, sympathy, a common sacrifice for a common good. This is a typical instance. If the Church could have its eyes opened today, it would see every unevangelized country and every land in sore strait or difficulty typified in this Macedonian man. From every land &#8220;they call us to deliver their souls from error&#8217;s chain.&#8221; The Macedonian man represents a large population. Let us regard him as a man who has heard of Christianity, or who is dissatisfied with Pagan teaching, or who feels the pain of a great void which the firmament itself could not fill with all its wealth of light he cries for something more; that man is not far from the kingdom of God. Do not believe that Pagans who are struggling after virtue and calling for &#8220;Light, more light! Light, more light!&#8221; are far from the kingdom of heaven. &#8220;Other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also must I bring.&#8221; &#8220;In every nation he that feareth God and worketh righteousness is accepted with Him.&#8221; But that is a reason why those who believe they have the true light should hasten with it, that they may scatter the shadows and establish the day.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;And after he had seen the vision, immediately we endeavoured &#8221; Luke here joins the company. Up to this time the narrative has been written in the third person; it will now be written in the first. Luke himself has joined the missionary band, and he will speak of things which he personally saw. We hasten to say that the missionaries came &#8220;to Philippi, which is the chief city of that part of Macedonia,&#8221; and a colonial or military station. There is a city plan of evangelization; the Apostles followed that plan. They did not hide themselves in obscure places; we find great names in their record. What is the justification of these metropolitan names? This and higher there is none &#8220;Beginning at Jerusalem.&#8221; So we shall find in these missionary records Jerusalem, Antioch, Corinth, Philippi, Athens, Ephesus, name upon name of local eminence and dignity, yet all the names put together are not equal to <em> London!<\/em> Give us London, and we have the key of the world. Converted London would seem to mean converted England; and converted England empress of nations! converted England! lady of the seas, majestic, all but omnipotent, with millions and hundreds of millions under her proud banner! converted England: it would be almost equal to a converted <em> world!<\/em> Far be it from any of us to say a word that would be even apparently contemptuous of villages and hamlets and rural spots; they all belong to the great house. London is not our city, speaking as residents in the capital; it is the Imperial city; &#8220;it belongs to every shepherd on the mountain-side, to every ploughman ripping up his fields for the seed, to every one on the sea; it is the Mother City the metropolis. Give us London Christianized London praying four millions of souls concurring in one appeal to Heaven, and surely there would dawn upon the whole world the day of jubilee and Christian festival.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The People&#8217;s Bible by Joseph Parker<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, <strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Ver. 6. <strong> And were forbidden, &amp;c.<\/strong> ] This was a heavier judgment upon those coasts than to be denied a harvest, or the light of the sun. Prize the preaching of the gospel as a singular privilege. They that are without a teaching priest are without God,<span class='bible'>2Ch 15:3<\/span><span class='bible'>2Ch 15:3<\/span> . There were ambassadors sent out of Nubia in Africa to the king of Habassia, to entreat him for a supply of ministers to instruct their nation, and repair Christianity gone to ruin among them; but they were rejected. <em> a<\/em> Amos&rsquo;s famine of the word is far more deplorable than Samaria&rsquo;s famine of bread in that strait siege.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><em> a<\/em> Alvarez Hist. Aethiop, c. 137. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 6 9.<\/strong> ] This very cursory notice of a journey in which we have reason to think so much happened, the founding of the Galatian and Phrygian churches (see ch. <span class='bible'>Act 18:23<\/span> , where we find him, on his second visit,     ); the sickness of the Apostle alluded to <span class='bible'>Gal 4:13<\/span> ; the working of miracles and imparting of the Spirit mentioned <span class='bible'>Gal 3:5<\/span> ; the warmth and kindness of feeling shewn to Paul in his weakness, <span class='bible'>Gal 4:13-15<\/span> , seems to shew that the narrator was not with him during this part of the route; an inference which is remarkably confirmed by the sudden resumption of circumstantial detail with the use of the first person, at <span class='bible'>Act 16:10<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Henry Alford&#8217;s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 6. <\/strong> <strong> <\/strong> ] There were two tracts of country called by this name: &lsquo;Phrygiam utramque (alteram ad Hellespontum, <em> majorem<\/em> alteram vocant). Eumeni restituerunt.&rsquo; Livy, xxxviii. 39. It is with &lsquo;Phrygia Major&rsquo; that we are here concerned, which was the great central space of Asia Minor, yet retaining the name of its earliest inhabitants, and on account of its being politically subdivided among the contiguous provinces, impossible to define accurately (see C. and H. i. p. 280, note 1).<\/p>\n<p> The Apostle&rsquo;s route must remain very uncertain. It is probable that he may have followed the great road (according to his usual practice and the natural course of a missionary journey) from Iconium to Philomelium and perhaps as far as Synnada, and thence struck off to the N.E. towards Pessinus in Galatia. That he visited Coloss, in the extreme S.W. of Phrygia, on this journey, as supposed by some, and maintained with some ingenuity by Mr. Lewin (Life and Epistles of St. Paul i. 191 ff.), is very improbable (see Wieseler, Chron. d. Apostgsch. pp. 28 ff.).<\/p>\n<p><strong>  <\/strong> <strong> .<\/strong> ] The midland district, known as Galatia, or Gallo-grcia, was inhabited by the descendants of those Gauls who invaded Greece and Asia in the third century B.C., and after various incursions and wars, settled and became mixed with the Greeks in the centre of Asia Minor. They were known as a brave and freedom-loving people, fond of war, and either on their own or others&rsquo; account, almost always in arms, and generally as cavalry. Jerome (in the introduction to book ii. of his comm. on Galatians, vol. vii. p. 429) says that their speech was like that of the Germans in the neighbourhood of Treves: and perhaps  , ch. <span class='bible'>Act 14:11<\/span> , spoken of the neighbouring district, may refer to this peculiardialect. But Greek was extensively spoken. They were conquered by the consul Cn. Manlius Vulso, 189 B.C. (Livy xxxviii. 12, see 1Ma 8:2 ), but retained their own governors, called as before tetrarchs, and afterwards kings (for one of whom, Deiotarus, a protg of Pompey&rsquo;s, Cicero pleaded before Csar); their last king, Amyntas, passed over from Antony to Augustus in the battle of Actium. Galatia, after his murder, A.D. 26, became a Roman province. The principal cities were Ancyra, which was made the metropolis of the province by Augustus, Tavium, and Pessinus: in all, or some of which, the Apostle certainly preached. He was detained here on account of sickness (      , Gal 4:13 ). See further in Prolegg. to Gal.  ii.<\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong> ] By some special intimation, like that in ch. <span class='bible'>Act 13:2<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong> ] This name, applied at first to the district near the river Cayster in Lydia (    ,    , Hom. Il.  . 461), came to have a meaning more and more widely extended, till at last it embraced, as at present, the whole vast continent, forming one of the quarters of the globe. But we never find this meaning in Scripture. The Asia of the Acts is not even our Asia Minor, which name is not used till Orosius (i. 2, p. 16) in the fourth century A.D., but only a portion of the western coast of that great peninsula. (A full account of the history of the territory and its changes of extent will be found in C. and H., i. pp. 275 ff., and in Wieseler, pp. 32 35. I confine myself to its import in the Acts.) This, which was <em> the Roman province of Asia<\/em> , Asia Propria, Plin. <span class='bible'>Act 16:28<\/span> , as spoken of in the Acts, includes only Mysia, Lydia, and Caria, <em> excluding<\/em> Phrygia (ch. Act 2:9 and here: 1Pe 1:1 it must be <em> included<\/em> ) as in Pliny l. c., Galatia, Bithynia, Cilicia, Pamphylia, Lycia. See ch. <span class='bible'>Act 19:26<\/span> , &amp;c.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Henry Alford&#8217;s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Act 16:6<\/span> .     .    .  , see critical notes, and also additional note at the end of chap. 18. If we follow R.V. text and omit the second  , and regard both  . and  . as adjectives with Ramsay and Lightfoot (so Weiss and Wendt, <em> cf.<\/em> adjective  , <span class='bible'>Act 13:14<\/span> ; but see also <span class='bible'>Act 18:23<\/span> ), under the <em> vinculum<\/em> of the one article we have one district, &ldquo;the Phrygo-Galatic country,&rdquo; <em> i.e.<\/em> , ethnically Phrygian, politically Galatian; see also Turner, &ldquo;Chronology of the N.T.,&rdquo; Hastings&rsquo; B.D., i., 422, and &ldquo;The Churches of Galatia,&rdquo; Dr. Gifford, <em> Expositor<\/em> , July, 1894. But Zahn, <em> Einleitung<\/em> , i., 134, objects that if Ramsay sees in <span class='bible'>Act 16:6<\/span> a recapitulation of the journey, and action in <span class='bible'>Act 16:4-5<\/span> , and includes under the term Phrygo-Galatia the places visited in the first missionary journey, we must include under the term not only Iconium and Antioch, but also Derbe and Lystra. But the two latter, according to <span class='bible'>Act 14:6<\/span> , are not Phrygian at all, but Lycaonian. Ramsay, however, sufficiently answers this objection by the distinction which he draws between the phrase before us in <span class='bible'>Act 16:6<\/span> and the phrase used in <span class='bible'>Act 18:23<\/span> :      . In the verse before us reference is made to the country traversed by Paul after he left Lystra, and so we have quite correctly the territory about Iconium and Antioch described as Phrygo-Galatic; but in <span class='bible'>Act 18:23<\/span> Lystra and Derbe are also included, and therefore we might expect &ldquo;Lycaono-Galatic and Phrygo-Galatic,&rdquo; but to avoid this complicated phraseology the writer uses the simple phrase: &ldquo;the Galatic country,&rdquo; while Phrygia denotes either Phrygia Galatica or Phrygia Magna, or both, and see Ramsay, <em> Church in the Roman Empire<\/em> , pp. 77 and 91 93, and <em> Expositor<\/em> , August, 1898. Dr. Gifford, in his valuable contribution to the controversy between Prof. Ramsay and Dr. Chase, <em> Expositor<\/em> , July 1894, while rejecting the North-Galatian theory, would not limit the phrase &ldquo;the Phrygian and Galatian region&rdquo; to the country about Iconium and Antioch with Ramsay, but advocates an extension of its meaning to the borderlands of Phrygia and Galatia northward of Antioch.  : a favourite word in St. Luke, both in Gospel and Acts, six times in each, <em> cf.<\/em> <span class='bible'>Act 8:36<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Act 10:47<\/span> . How the hindrance was effected we are not told, whether by inward monitions, or by prophetic intimations, or by some circumstances which were regarded as providential warnings: &ldquo;wherefore they were forbidden he does not say, but that they were forbidden he does say teaching us to obey and not ask questions,&rdquo; Chrys., <em> Hom.<\/em> , xxxiv. On the construction of  . with  (see critical notes) <em> cf.<\/em> Ramsay, <em> Church in the Roman Empire<\/em> , p. 89; <em> St. Paul<\/em> , p. 211; <em> Expositor<\/em> (Epilogue), April, 1894, and Gifford, <em> u. s.<\/em> , pp. 11 and 19. Both writers point out that the South Galatian theory need not depend upon this construction, whether we render it according to A.V. or R.V., see further Askwith, <em> Epistle to the Galatians<\/em> , p. 46, 1899.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Act 16:6-10<\/p>\n<p> 6They passed through the Phrygian and Galatian region, having been forbidden by the Holy Spirit to speak the word in Asia; 7and after they came to Mysia, they were trying to go into Bithynia, and the Spirit of Jesus did not permit them; 8and passing by Mysia, they came down to Troas. 9A vision appeared to Paul in the night: a man of Macedonia was standing and appealing to him, and saying, &#8220;Come over to Macedonia and help us.&#8221; 10When he had seen the vision, immediately we sought to go into Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them.<\/p>\n<p>Act 16:6 &#8220;passed through the Phrygian and Galatian region&#8221; In this text Luke is speaking more of racial, linguistic groupings than of Roman political divisions or provinces. This idiom would refer to the unofficial boundary between these ethnic groups.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;having been forbidden&#8221; This is an aorist passive participle. It is a common term in the Septuagint and in the NT. The Spirit was intimately involved in the actions and decisions of the early church (cf. Act 2:4; Act 8:29; Act 8:39; Act 10:19; Act 11:12; Act 11:28; Act 15:28; Act 16:6-7; Act 21:4; Rom 1:13). The modern church has lost the dynamism of the early church.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;in Asia&#8221; This refers to the Roman Province of Asia Minor, which was the western end of modern Turkey. <\/p>\n<p>Act 16:6-7 &#8220;the Holy Spirit. . .Spirit of Jesus&#8221; For the personality of the Spirit, see Special Topic at Act 1:2. See Special Topic following.<\/p>\n<p>SPECIAL TOPIC: JESUS AND THE SPIRIT <\/p>\n<p>Act 16:7 &#8220;Mysia&#8221; This was an ethnic area in the northwest of the Roman Province of Asia Minor. It was mountainous with several major Roman roads. Its major cities were Troas, Assos, and Pergamum.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Bithynia&#8221; This region was also in northwest Asia Minor, northeast of Mysia. This was not a Roman Province in Luke&#8217;s day, but was combined with Pontus as one political unit. Peter later evangelized this area (cf. 1Pe 1:1). We learn from Philo that there were many Jewish colonies in this area.<\/p>\n<p>Act 16:8 &#8220;passing by Mysia&#8221; In this context, it must mean &#8220;passing through&#8221; or &#8220;around&#8221; (cf. BAGD 625). Remember, context determines meaning and not lexicons\/dictionaries.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Troas&#8221; This city was four miles from ancient Troy. It was founded about 400 years earlier and remained a free Greek city until it became a Roman colony. It was the regular port of departure from Mysia to Macedonia.<\/p>\n<p>Act 16:9 &#8220;A vision appeared to Paul&#8221; God led Paul several times by supernatural means.<\/p>\n<p>1. bright light and Jesus&#8217; voice, Act 9:3-4<\/p>\n<p>2. a vision, Act 9:10<\/p>\n<p>3. a vision, Act 16:9-10<\/p>\n<p>4. a vision, Act 18:9<\/p>\n<p>5. a trance, Act 22:17<\/p>\n<p>6. an angel of God Act 27:23<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;a man of Macedonia&#8221; How Paul knew he was from Macedonia is uncertain. Possibly it was because of accent, clothes, ornaments, or simply stated in the vision. Some commentators think the man was Luke (cf. Act 16:10).<\/p>\n<p>This was a major geographical decision. The gospel turns to Europe!<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Come over. . .help us&#8221; The first is an aorist active participle, used as an imperative, the second is an aorist active imperative. The vision was very specific and forceful.<\/p>\n<p>Act 16:10 &#8220;we&#8221; This is the first occurrence of the &#8220;we&#8221; sections in Acts. This refers to Luke&#8217;s addition to the missionary group of Paul, Silas, and Timothy (cf. Act 16:10-17; Act 20:5-15; Act 21:1-18; Act 27:1 to Act 28:16). Some commentators have thought that the man Paul saw in Act 16:9 was Luke, the Gentile physician and author of the Gospel and Acts.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Macedonia&#8221; Modern Greece was divided into two Roman Provinces.<\/p>\n<p>1. Achaia in the south (Athens, Corinth, Sparta)<\/p>\n<p>2. Macedonia in the north (Philippi, Thessalonica, Berea)<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;concluding&#8221; This is the term sumbibaz, which literally means to bring together or unite. Here it has the implication that all that happened was God&#8217;s leadership to go to Macedonia.<\/p>\n<p>1. the Spirit not letting them preach in Asia, cf. Act 16:6<\/p>\n<p>2. the Spirit closing off Bythinia, cf. Act 16:7<\/p>\n<p>3. and the vision of Act 16:9<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;God has called&#8221; This is a perfect passive indicative. The Spirit&#8217;s leadership was not for safety, but for evangelism. This is always God&#8217;s will.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Now, &amp;c. The texts read, &#8220;They went through&#8221;. <\/p>\n<p>the region of Galatia = the Galatian country. <\/p>\n<p>forbidden = hindered. <\/p>\n<p>the Holy Ghost. App-101. <\/p>\n<p>preach = speak. Greek. laleo. App-121. <\/p>\n<p>word. Greek. logos. App-121. <\/p>\n<p>Asia. See note on Act 2:9. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>6-9.] This very cursory notice of a journey in which we have reason to think so much happened,-the founding of the Galatian and Phrygian churches (see ch. Act 18:23, where we find him, on his second visit,    ); the sickness of the Apostle alluded to Gal 4:13; the working of miracles and imparting of the Spirit mentioned Gal 3:5; the warmth and kindness of feeling shewn to Paul in his weakness, Gal 4:13-15,-seems to shew that the narrator was not with him during this part of the route; an inference which is remarkably confirmed by the sudden resumption of circumstantial detail with the use of the first person, at Act 16:10.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Act 16:6. ) when they had travelled through, the Spirit not forbidding them: for the Galatian region was not a part of the Asia that is here named. Phrygia was a part of Asia, and in it already they had spoken all that was necessary.-, having been forbidden) by some internal dictation (suggestion). Often the reluctance of the mind, the cause of which the ungodly cannot see, is not to be despised. Again, as to the impulse to any course of action, see ch. Act 18:5, Act 17:16.-, to speak) Not yet was it the ripe time: they were now appointed to make Macedonia their destination: other preachers might come to the people of Asia; nay, even Lydia was one belonging to Asia, Act 16:14. And afterwards it was done most abundantly: ch. Act 19:10.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Act 16:6-12<\/p>\n<p>PAUL ENTERS EUROPE<\/p>\n<p>Act 16:6-12<\/p>\n<p>6 And they went through the region of Phrygia and Galatia,-Phrygia at this time was a broken portion of Asia Minor, under the jurisdiction of three or four distinct governors; it was west of Antioch in Pisidia; its chief cities mentioned in the New Testament are Colosse, Laodicea, and Hierapolis. Galatia was a great midland district of Asia Minor, east of Phrygia, inhabited by the descendants of the Gauls, who invaded Greece and Asia in the third century B.C. It became a formal province of Rome in A.D. 26. Paul laid the foundation of the Galatian churches, to which he wrote his epistle to the Galatians on this missionary tour. While he was in Galatia he was attacked by sickness. (Gal 4:13-14.) He was not permitted by the Holy Spirit to speak the word or preach in Asia on this trip. Asia represents the provinces of Lydia, Mysia, and Caria.<\/p>\n<p>7-8 and when they were come over against Mysia,-The territories or provinces then were not very well defined or outlined ; hence, it is difficult to set the boundaries of these provinces. Luke here says that Paul had been hindered by the Holy Spirit from going west into Asia, but went northward so as to come in front of Bithynia; this journey would take him directly through Phrygia and the north Galatian country. Bithynia was a district on the Black Sea; Paul was not allowed to deviate from the course that led directly to Europe. It should be noticed that the Holy Spirit led Paul away from the scene of his former labors and into new fields. He had been warned not to preach in Asia, and he had taken this as a sign to continue in the peninsuala and to return to Galatia by Bithynia; he was checked again; he had now only one way to travel, and that was westward to the seacoast; so he and his companions went along the southern border of Mysia, and passing by that region he came to Troas.<\/p>\n<p>9 And a vision appeared to Paul in the night:-Troas bears the name of the ancient Troy which was a seaport on the Helles- point. This Troas was about four miles from the site of the ancient Troy. Paul and his company were led westward to this city, and here the Lord caused Paul to have a vision one night, and in this vision he saw a man of Macedonia, standing and beseeching him by saying: Come over into Macedonia, and help us. Vision is from the Greek horama, and includes something that is seen. We are reminded here of the vision of Peter and Cornelius. Some think that this man of Macedonia was Luke; we know that Luke joins Pauls company at Troas. Paul was miraculously granted this vision, as he had been divinely prohibited visiting other places; he is now divinely guided to go into Europe. This vision does not come in the form of a command from Christ, but it comes in the form of a petition from man. Paul understood the vision and at once made preparation to go into Europe.<\/p>\n<p>10 And when he had seen the vision,-Paul straightway, or immediately, sought to go forth into Macedonia, for he concluded that God had called us to preach the gospel unto them. Pauls answer to the call was earnest and instant; he was a man of action and was ready to obey the call at once. Luke introduces himself into the narrative by the pronoun we; he was a physician (Col 4:14) and a Gentile (Col 4:11 Col 4:14); it is possible that this means that Luke had been preaching the gospel in those regions and that he was happy to join the company with Paul. Luke accompanied Paul into Macedonia, and was with him at Samothrace, Neapolis, and Philippi. The way Luke introduces himself with the pronouns we and us shows that he was a preacher of the gospel as well as a physician. The clause, that God had called us to preach the gospel, shows that he included himself with Paul, Silas, and Timothy as preachers of the gospel. Nothing is said here about their preaching the gospel in Troas, yet Paul makes reference to the church there in 2Co 2:12. Act 20:6 shows that there was a church at Troas.<\/p>\n<p>11-12 Setting sail therefore from Troas,-Samothrace was an island in the Aegean Sea on the Thracian coast, about sixty miles in a direct line from Troas. Samothrace is one of the most ancient names of the island of Samos, but in order to distinguish it from another Samos, in the sea, it was called by the come, or Samos of Trace, it being not far from the country of Thrace. Neapolis was a seaport in Macedonia. Luke was familiar with terms of travel by water. On this trip they had the wind in their favor and were able to take a straight course. They went from Neapolis to Philippi, a distance of about twelve miles inland. Philippi was a Roman colony, and was the capital or chief city of Macedonia. They tarried at this place certain days.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>45.  THE MACEDONIAN CALL<\/p>\n<p>Act 16:6-13<\/p>\n<p>After establishing the churches in Lystra and Derbe in the faith of the gospel, Paul and Silas went throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia preaching the grace of God in Christ. Paul wanted to carry the good news of redeeming, saving grace into Asia, but the Holy Spirit gave him no liberty to do so (Act 16:6). So he travelled on to Mysia and tried to go into Bithynia, but the Spirit of God closed the door again (Act 16:7). Following the direction of God&#8217;s providence and the leadership of the Holy Spirit, Paul and his companions &#8220;came down to Troas&#8221; (Act 16:8). In the evening, as Paul was seeking God&#8217;s direction for his ministry, a vision was given to him. By the special, supernatural revelation of God the Holy Spirit he saw a man from Macedonia standing before him, who said, &#8220;Come over into Macedonia, and help us&#8221; (Act 16:9).<\/p>\n<p>Paul took this to be a call from God (Act 16:10). He had earnestly sought the will of God, and now he knew it. God had called him to preach the gospel to the perishing men and women of Macedonia. Immediately, he went to Philippi, the first city he could get to in Macedonia (Act 16:11-12). There he went to the place in that city where he was most likely to get a hearing and preached the gospel to a gathering of a few women (Act 16:13). Paul did not stop to do deputation work to raise money. He did not seek the approval or permission of a mission board. He knew that God had called him and trusted God both to provide for him and to make his labor effectual. It was his responsibility to preach the gospel to the perishing sinners of Macedonia. That was the one thing he knew he must do. He had to be obedient to the call of God (1Co 9:16).<\/p>\n<p>Here is the Macedonian call &#8211; &#8220;Come over and help us.&#8221; It is a call that has application to the church of God today. There is much for us to learn from this call and Paul&#8217;s response to it about the evangelistic, missionary responsibilities of the church.<\/p>\n<p>First, MEN AND WOMEN WHO DO NOT KNOW THE GOSPEL OF CHRIST ARE LOST, PERISHING IN IGNORANCE, UNDER THE WRATH OF GOD. The lost condition of perishing sinners is, to the people of God, a cry for help. This man of Macedonia represented a people who had everything imaginable in a natural sense. He represented a country and empire of incomparable greatness. Macedonia was the land of Philip, king of Macedonia and his son, Alexander the Great. This man represented the Greek world, the world of refinement, learning, wealth, and culture. The Greeks were also a very religious people. No one could question their devotion, fervency, and sincerity as religious people. They gave a great portion of their time, labor, and money to religious work and worship. They built the famous Parthenon in Athens and the great temple at Ephesus. In Athens alone the Greeks had 30,000 gods! When Paul saw their worship and devotion, he said, &#8220;I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious (religious)&#8221; (Act 17:22). The Greeks had every advantage socially and economically. Yet, like the rich young ruler, they lacked one thing. They had no knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ. They were ignorant of soul-saving gospel truth. The lost condition of the refined Greeks demonstrates one fact with clarity &#8211; All who are ignorant of the gospel of Christ are lost, perishing in their sins under the wrath of God! The ignorant barbarian is lost (Rom 1:18-21). Our religious and irreligious relatives, neighbors, and friends who know not the Lord Jesus Christ are lost (Rom 10:1-17). Their lost condition is a cry for help. It is our responsibility to preach the gospel to them.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, THE GREATEST BLESSING GOD CAN EVER BESTOW UPON ANY PEOPLE IS TO SEND THEM A FAITHFUL GOSPEL PREACHER (Isa 52:7). The Holy Spirit would not let Paul go to Asia or Bithynia. But he sent him to Macedonia. What a blessing! There were some chosen sinners in Macedonia whom Christ had redeemed. The time had come when they must be called to life and faith in Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit through the preaching of the gospel. &#8220;Ministers,&#8221; wrote John Trapp, &#8220;are those by whom God helpeth his perishing people, and putteth them out of the devil&#8217;s danger. Hence they are called saviors (Oba 1:21; 1Ti 4:16), redeemers (Job 33:24; Job 33:28), co-workers with Christ (2Co 6:1).&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>God saves his elect through the instrumentality of gospel preaching. He who ordained the salvation of chosen sinners also ordained the means whereby it must be accomplished (Rom 10:17; 1Co 1:21; 2Th 2:13-14; Jas 1:18; 1Pe 1:23-25). Wherever an elect sinner is found, at the time appointed, a gospel preacher will be sent. One sign of God&#8217;s anger, wrath, and displeasure upon reprobate men is that he sends them no gospel preacher, or that he withdraws from them the ministry of a faithful man (Hos 4:17).<\/p>\n<p>Thirdly, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF BELIEVERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY AS LOCAL CHURCHES, TO PREACH THE GOSPEL OF CHRIST TO ETERNITY BOUND SINNERS (Mar 16:15-16). Every gospel preacher is responsible to keep the charge of God upon him (1Ti 4:12-16; 2Ti 4:1-5). Every local church must devote itself to the furtherance of the gospel (Mat 28:18-20). And every believer must assume his responsibility to make the gospel of Christ known in his own generation. God has given you the light that you may show others the way. He has given you the message of his free and sovereign grace in Christ. It is your responsibility to get it out, to make it known in the generation in which you live. You cannot make anyone believe the gospel. That is not your responsibility. But you can see that they hear it. And that is your responsibility (Act 1:8).<\/p>\n<p>Fourthly, AS YOU ENDEAVOR TO MAKE THE GOSPEL KNOWN, SEEK AND SUBMIT TO THE DIRECTION OF GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT (Act 16:6-10). If you truly seek the will of God and wait upon the Lord that you may know how to serve him, he will show you his will (Pro 3:5-6). By the direction of his Word, the impulses of his Spirit, and the indications of his providence, God will make his will known to all who seek it. When God reveals his will to you, you will know it. And when you know you are doing the will of God you can do it with boldness, without fear of failure. If God is in the initiation of a thing, he will be in the execution of it, and he will see it through to its appointed end. Whether God shuts a door or opens a door, we must readily follow his direction.<\/p>\n<p>Fifthly, GOD WILL BOTH DIRECT AND HONOR THE EFFORTS OF HIS PEOPLE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF THE GOSPEL. God always honors those who honor him (1Sa 2:30). You do not labor in vain, if you seek to serve Christ (1Co 15:58). When Paul went to Macedonia he was thrown in jail, but God honored his labor in the saving of two precious souls, Lydia and the Philippian Jailor. His ministry there was a great success! He did exactly what God sent him there to do.<\/p>\n<p>Be faithful to the work God has trusted to your hands, whatever it is. You will not fail. God is with you. His Word, which he sends out through you, will not return unto him void (Isa 55:11).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Discovering Christ In Selected Books of the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Phrygia: Act 2:10, Act 18:23 <\/p>\n<p>region: Act 18:23, 1Co 16:1, Gal 1:2, Gal 3:1, 2Ti 4:10, 1Pe 1:1 <\/p>\n<p>forbidden: Act 16:7, Act 10:19, Act 11:12, Act 13:2-4, Act 20:28, 2Ch 6:7-9, Isa 30:21, Amo 8:11, Amo 8:12, 1Co 12:11, Heb 11:8 <\/p>\n<p>Asia: Act 19:10, Act 19:26, Act 19:27, Act 20:4, Act 20:16, 2Co 1:8, 2Ti 1:15, 1Pe 1:1, Rev 1:4, Rev 1:11 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Mar 2:2 &#8211; and he Joh 14:26 &#8211; Holy Ghost Act 2:9 &#8211; Asia Act 6:9 &#8211; Asia Act 8:29 &#8211; General Act 16:13 &#8211; and we Act 19:21 &#8211; purposed Act 19:31 &#8211; the chief Act 21:11 &#8211; Thus Rom 1:13 &#8211; but Rom 15:19 &#8211; so that Gal 4:11 &#8211; lest Gal 4:13 &#8211; at<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Act 16:6-8. Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia. Phrygia denoted at this time broken portions of a territory under the jurisdiction of three or four distinct governors. It roughly represented the great central space of Asia Minor. Its chief cities mentioned in the books of the New Testament are Colossae, Laodicaea, and Hierapolis. Josephus speaks of numerous Jews who had settled in Phrygia in the times of the Maccabees.<\/p>\n<p>And the region of Galatia. This was a great midland district of Asia Minor inhabited by the descendants of those Gauls who invaded Greece and Asia in the third century B.C. Many of these seem to have settled and become mixed with the Greeks in the centre of Asia Minor. Galatia became a formal province of Rome A.D. 26. Its principal cities were Ancyra, the capital, Tavium, and Pessinus. It was in this missionary journey, accompanied by Silas and Timothy, that Paul laid the foundation of the flourishing Galatian Church. The grave sickness of the apostle, alluded to in such touching terms in the Galatian letter, must have attacked Paul during this sojourn in the country so briefly alluded to in this sixth verse.<\/p>\n<p>It has been often asked why the writer of the Acts passes over thus abruptly the story of one of Pauls most successful missionary works. Various reasons have been suggested for this silence, such asthe absence of any record of this period; the definite plan of the Acts, which was to recount the march of Christianity from Jerusalem to Romea plan which would exclude all relations of events outside the track marked out. One commentator suggests there were no Jewish residents in these districts, but the argument of the Galatian Epistle plainly contradicts this latter hypothesis. Whatever may have been the reason which determined the writer of the Acts to omit the preaching to and founding of the Galatian Church, it is plain that the writer, under the inspiration of the Spirit, exercised his discretion concerning what acts of Paul and Peters life he wove into his history, which we clearly see only professes to recount but a very small portion of the Acts of the more distinguished servants of Christ in the early days of the faith.<\/p>\n<p>Were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, Act 16:7. They assayed to go into Bithynia, but the Spirit suffered them not. Act 16:9. And a vision appeared to Paul in the night: There stood a man of Macedonia, and prayed him, saying, Come over into Macedonia and help us. Among the supernatural signs which were vouchsafed to the first generation of believers, and, with very rare exceptions, to the first generation only,to men and women, many of whom, be it remembered, had seen Jesus, and had had personal contact with Him,must be reckoned those mysterious intimations of the will of the Holy Spirit which guided and directed the course of the infant Church. These intimations came apparently in varied formsto the Twelve, in the form of the fiery tongues (Act 2:1-12), when the house rocked as though under the influence of an earthquake, and the Spirit filled each one present in the praying assembly (Act 4:31); when the Spirit spoke to Peter on the occasion of the conversion of Cornelius when he was in a trance (Act 10:16), and then when he was awake and musing on the vision (Act 10:19-20); when Paul was on his Second Missionary Journey, on the three occasions discussed in this note; through a prophet (as in Act 21:10-14), etc. See also Pauls own words in Act 20:23, where he refers to many such voices and heavenly intimations.<\/p>\n<p>Underlying the brief relation contained in Act 16:6-9, we can trace a wish of the apostle to preach his Masters Gospel in eastern lands in preference to the unknown West. Nothing was more natural than such a desire. For an Oriental to pass, on such a mission as Paul was bent, into far western lands, was indeed a difficult and hazardous under-taking. The conditions under which hitherto he had carried out so successfully his arduous task, would have at once been changed; in the western countries across that broad Mediterranean AEgean Sea which washed the land of his forefathers, he knew that he would have to face, in addition to the perils and obstacles which hitherto he had combated with success, new difficulties which would meet him, such as difference of climate, changed habits of life, another race, another language, ideas all strange to him, very formidable considerations to an oriental Jew like Paul, whose life-work was to make known a new religion. The eastern stranger naturally shrank at first from doing this in the far western countries across the sea.<\/p>\n<p>Three distinct intimations from Heaven seem to have been necessary to show Paul in this juncture in his life what was the will of his Master. The first mentioned is in Act 16:6, where Paul was forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, Asia here signifying the western portion only of the great peninsula known now as Asia Minor. It roughly included the ancient provinces of Lydia, Mysia, and Caria, and perhaps a portion of the broad region in the interior known as Phrygia.<\/p>\n<p>Some such Divine intimation as we read of in Act 4:31 was probably given to the apostle and his companions, on which occasion we read, as they prayed, they were filled with the Holy Ghost.<\/p>\n<p>The second supernatural sign of direction seems to have been a more definite one, and is alluded to in Act 16:7 as the Spirit of Jesus, for that is the reading of the older authorities. We can form no conception respecting the nature of this special warning voice. The expression, &#8216; Spirit of Jesus, does not occur elsewhere in the New Testament. Ewald refers to Rev 19:10 as giving us a possible hint as to the manner in which the warning revelation was given to Paul.<\/p>\n<p>The third voice from heaven to Paul came in the visions of the night, when by him there stood a man of Macedonia, or more accurately rendered, a certain man of Macedonia. Various explanations have been suggested respecting this supernatural visitant. Commentators have asked how Paul recognised the country of which his heavenly visitor was a representative? Some have suggested the peculiar dress, others the affecting words spoken by him to Paul, Come over, or better rendered, Cross over into Macedonia and help us. Grotius suggests, not without reason, that the one who appeared to him was the representative or guardian angel of Macedonia, as the Prince of Persia, in Daniel 10 It was no doubt an angel sent by the King of Heaven to directly guide His devoted servant into western countries.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Observe here, How the apostle and his companions had a desire and design to propagate the gospel in several provinces, but were forbidden by a secret impulse of the Holy Spirit. <\/p>\n<p>Learn thence, That the frustrating our attempts, and disappointing our designs to preach the gospel to particular places, which we were purposed to go unto, doth sometimes arise from the Holy Ghost: the apostle intended to go into Bithynia, but the Spirit suffered him not. The very journeyings of the apostles, and first preachers of the gospel, as well as their divine exercises, were all ordered by the wisdom and will of God; they might neither speak, nor act, nor walk, but according to divine directions: They were forbidden by the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia. Thus Almighty God at pleasure orders the candle of the gospel to be removed out of one room into another, sends it from one place and people to another, and accordingly ought all places and persons to prize it highly, and improve it faithfully.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>The Macedonian Call<\/p>\n<p>Just west of the cities in south Galatia was the Roman province of Asia. At this time, Luke says Paul was forbidden by the Holy Spirit to enter that region to teach. This might have been done directly or through the agency of a prophet inspired by the Spirit (compare Act 20:23 ; Act 21:10-11 ). Later in Act 19:1-41 , Paul did get his opportunity to preach in Asia and the church grew there in a fine way, as is evidenced by the Lord&#8217;s letters in Rev 2:1-29 ; Rev 3:1-22 . Apparently, Paul and those with him continued to work their way along until they came to Mysia, which was at the northern border between Asia and Bithynia. They would have gone into Bithynia, but the Spirit again forbade them to go, so they turned westward to Troas. Bithynia may have later heard the word through the preaching of Peter ( 1Pe 1:1 ).<\/p>\n<p>Paul and his company determined, after a vision the apostle had in the night, that the Lord wanted them to preach in Macedonia. So, they immediately made arrangements and set sail from Troas to Samothrace, then Neapolis and, finally, Philippi ( Act 16:6-12 ), which Luke described as &#8220;the foremost city of that part of Macedonia, a colony.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Act 16:6-8. Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia  Greek,    ,    , having passed through Phrygia and the Galatian country, and spoken there what was sufficient, and delivered to the churches in those parts the decrees above mentioned, in order to their establishment in the true faith of the gospel; and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost (probably by an inward dictate) to preach the word in Asia  That is, in the proconsular Asia: for, as all the places mentioned in the former verses lay in Asia Minor, it is evident that the word Asia must be thus understood. The reason for this prohibition seems to have been, that the time for preaching in that province was not yet come. But it is certain that flourishing churches were afterward planted there, particularly at Colosse, Laodicea, Sardis, Thyatira, and Philadelphia. It seems therefore to have been the determination of Providence, respecting Paul and his companions, that, instead of going through this region now, by such a leisurely progress as that in which they proceeded in their former journey, through Pamphylia, Pisidia, Lycaonia, &amp;c., they should hasten to Europe directly, and preach the gospel first in Philippi, which was a Roman colony, and then in the neighbouring parts; while, in the mean time, the Asian provinces, now passed over, might hear some report of it from their neighbours and so be prepared to receive, with greater advantage, the labours of the apostles, when they should return to them, as Paul afterward did, chap. Act 18:23, &amp;c. By this means the spread of the gospel would, in any given time, be wider than (other circumstances being equal) it would have been, had they taken all the interjacent places in their way.  Doddridge. After they were come into Mysia  Which was the most western province of the Lesser Asia, and lay on the coast of the gean sea; they assayed to go northward into Bithynia  A country bounded on the west by a part of the Propontis and the Thracian Bosphorus, and on the north by the Euxine sea. Probably their intention was to visit the flourishing cities of Nice, Nicomedia, and Chalcedon, and so pass from thence into Europe. But the Spirit suffered them not  Forbidding them as before. Many manuscripts and versions of undoubted authority read here, The Spirit of Jesus. And so passing by the Lesser Mysia  Which separated Bithynia from the country of Troas; they came to the city Troas  A noted seaport, where travellers from the upper coasts of Asia commonly took ship to pass into Europe. Here Paul and his assistants were joined by Luke, (Act 16:10,) the writer of this history, and a native of Antioch, as is generally believed, who, to the profession of a physician, had joined that of a Christian minister, or evangelist.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>6-8. The neighboring cities of Derbe and Lystra, where Paul was joined by Timothy, constituted the limit of his former tour with Barnabas into this region of country. He makes them now the starting point for an advance still further into the interior, and to the western extremity of Asia Minor. (6) &#8220;Now when they had gone through Phrygia and the district of Galatia, being forbidden by the Holy Spirit to speak the word in Asia, (7) they went to Mysia, and attempted to go on through Bythinia, and the Spirit did not permit them. (8) So passing by Mysia they went down to Troas.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>From this hurried sketch of the tour through Phrygia and Galatia, it might be inferred that nothing of special interest occurred during its progress. But we learn from Paul himself that it was far otherwise in Galatia. In his epistle to the Churches there, he lifts the vail of obscurity thrown over this part of his life, and brings to light one of the most touching incidents in his eventful career. More than one congregation sprang up under his personal labors there, who owed their knowledge of salvation to an afflicting providence affecting himself. He writes to them: &#8220;You know that on account of infirmity of the flesh I preached the gospel to you at the first.&#8221; This statement does not mean merely that he was suffering in the flesh at the time; but the expression di asthenian indicates that the infirmity was the cause which led him to his preaching to them. The infirmity was evidently that &#8220;thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet him,&#8221; which he had prayed in vain to the Lord to take from him. For he says to them: &#8220;My temptation which was in my flesh you despised not, nor rejected, but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.&#8221; It is probable that he had intended to pass through this region without stopping, but some unusual violence of the humiliating and irritating malady compelled him to forego the more distant journey, and make some stay where the Word was so gladly received by these brethren. Though Paul felt that strangers like these would be likely to despise him and reject him, on perceiving the malady with which he was afflicted, yet this people listened to his annunciation of eternal truth as if they heard an angel of God, or Jesus Christ Christ himself. His distress of mind and weakness of body were calculated to give a mellower tone to his preaching, and to awaken a livelier sympathy in truly generous hearts, and such was the effect on them. He says: &#8220;I bear you witness, that if it had been possible, you would have plucked out your own eyes and have given them to me.&#8221; Thus, out of the most unpropitious hour in which this faithful apostle every introduced the gospel to a strange community, the kind providence of God brought forth the sweetest fruits of all his labors; for there are no other Churches of whose fondness for him he speaks in terms so touching. This serves to illustrate the meaning of the Lord&#8217;s answer, when Paul prayed that the thorn might depart from his flesh: &#8220;My favor is sufficient for you; for my strength is made perfect in weakness.&#8221; His weakest hour, wherein he expected to be despised and rejected, he found the strongest for the cause he was pleading, and the most soothing to his own troubled spirit. It was experience like this which enabled him, in later years, to exclaim, &#8220;Most gladly, therefore, will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ&#8217;s sake; for when I am weak, then am I strong.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Paul&#8217;s own judgment seems to have been much at fault, during this period, in reference to the choice of a field of labor. Contrary to his purpose, he had been delayed in Galatia, &#8220;on account of infirmity of flesh;&#8221; and then, intending to enter the province of Asia, of which Ephesus was the capital, he was &#8220;forbidden by the Holy Spirit to speak the Word there.&#8221; Finally they attempted to go into Bythinia, &#8220;and the Holy Spirit did not permit them.&#8221; Feeling his way around the forbidden territory, he finally went down to Troas, on the shore of the gean Sea. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>6. We find here Paul again travels through Galatia and Phrygia, where he had preached the gospel about A. D. 35-38, during his stay at Tarsus, whither he was sent by the brethren at Jerusalem to save his life. Being forbidden by the Holy Ghost to speak the word in Asia. This was from the simple reason that God wanted him now to leave Asia, where he had spent all his life, go and establish the gospel in Europe.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: William Godbey&#8217;s Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Act 16:6-10. Journey through Asia Minor to Macedonia.Here we come to the Travel-document, which is followed henceforward. It was till recently the custom to speak of the We-Passages, which are found in Act 16:10-18, Act 20:5-16, Act 21:1-18, Act 27:1 to Act 28:16, and to ascribe to these the highest degree of authenticity. The pieces in the third person lying among these were thought to have been written later by the diarist himself when he came to make up his book, or to have been taken from other sources. But see Introd., p. 776. The speeches are to be ascribed to the editor, who also fills up lacun in his source, but he employs a more considerable and authentic source than hitherto. The style is short and dry; the writer has a curious power of ignoring what is most interesting in the Pauline churches and in Pauls thought.<\/p>\n<p>What comes first in time in the sentence in Act 16:6 f. is that the party was prevented, by the higher power that directed their journey, from preaching in Asia, i.e. Ephesus and the W. parts of Asia Minor, including the islands. This, it is plainly intimated, was the intention with which Paul set out on this journey; but when it was frustrated they went through Phrygia and Galatia, a phrase which does not exclude preaching (Act 9:32, Act 14:24). But of Pauls experience in Galatia, and of the Galatian churches, should they be in the north, as the present writer believes they were (see on the other hand, pp. 857, 769), the editor is quite silent. The much-debated phrase, the Phrygian and Galatian land conveys no clear impression. Probably the writer is summing up in brief phrases things which had taken place before he joined the party. After passing through Phrygia and Galatia they found themselves near Mysia and tried to go northwards into Bithynia, another land lying on the sea, but this also the guiding power would not allow. Straight west apparently it directed them to go, through Mysia, without lingering in it, to Troas. The district probably is meant, not the town of Alexandria-Troas, which lay on the coast, opposite Tenedos. Paul tells us (2Co 2:12 f.) of a fruitful mission there a few years later.<\/p>\n<p>Act 16:9. Who is the person who appears to Paul and brings him finally to the step which the foregoing geographical statement shows to have attracted and yet daunted him? Ramsay thinks it was Luke, already known to Paul, and the reading of the Peshitta, Come over and help me, would agree with that view (p. 770). But a letter would have served the purpose in that case. The party is now complete, diarist and all; As soon as he saw the vision we . . .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Peake&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>16:6 {4} Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were {d} forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia,<\/p>\n<p>(4) God appoints certain and determinate times to open and set forth his truth, so that both the election and the calling may proceed of grace.<\/p>\n<p>(d) He does not show why they were forbidden, but only that they were forbidden, teaching us to obey and not to enquire.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline\">C. The extension of the church to the Aegean shores 16:6-19:20<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The missionary outreach narrated in this section of the book took place in major cities along the Aegean coastline that major Roman roads connected.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline\">1. The call to Macedonia 16:6-10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Luke recorded Paul&rsquo;s vision of the Macedonian man to explain God&rsquo;s initiative in encouraging Paul and his companions to carry the gospel farther west into what is now Europe.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;. . . this section [Act 6:6-10] makes it overwhelmingly clear that Paul&rsquo;s progress was directed by God in a variety of ways, so that the missionaries were led into new areas of work.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Marshall, The Acts . . ., p. 261.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&quot;His [Luke&rsquo;s] subject is the rapid extension of Christianity among the Gentiles, especially in three great provinces of the empire, Macedonia, Achaia, and Asia; and he describes the firm establishment of the church in their capitals, Thessalonica, Corinth, and Ephesus .&nbsp;.&nbsp;. These three great provinces embraced respectively the northern, western and eastern coasts of the Aegean Sea, and they were all members of one great Roman empire, and all enjoyed one great Hellenic civilization .&nbsp;.&nbsp;.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;The foundation of the churches of Macedonia, Achaia, and Asia was the work of S. Paul, and it was his greatest achievement. Ch. xvi 11-xix 19 is really the record of his life work. It filled a period of five years from 49 to 54; and in the composition of the book it corresponds to the ministry of the Lord in the Gospel (Lk iv 16 to xvii 10 or xviii 30) and of S. Peter in the church of Jerusalem in the first part of the Acts (ii 14-xi 26).&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Rackham, p. 272.] <\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Phrygia was a geographical region, and Galatia was a Roman province. Phrygia was part of Galatia as well as part of the province of Asia that lay west of Galatia. The province of Asia was one of several Roman provinces that occupied the larger district of Asia Minor. Asia Minor was ancient Anatolia and modern western Turkey. Paul evangelized Asia later (Act 18:19 to Act 19:20). The time was not right for him to go there yet. Probably Paul intended to follow the Via Sebaste westward to Ephesus, the chief city and capital of Asia. Luke did not record how the Holy Spirit closed the door to Asia at this time. His emphasis was on the One who directed Paul, not how He did it (cf. Act 13:1-3).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left:36pt\">&quot;The missionary journeys of Paul reveal an extraordinary combination of strategic planning and sensitivity to the guidance of the Holy Spirit in working out the details of the main goals. This is especially noticeable here.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Longenecker, p. 456.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left:36pt\">&quot;Paul may have had visions or dreams (cf. Act 16:9; Act 23:11), or inward prompting. Silas, a prophet (Act 15:32), may have been moved to utter words of warning, or they may have had to change their plans by force of circumstances (e.g. Jewish opposition), which they afterwards recognized as the overruling intervention of Providence.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Neil, p. 179.] <\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>6<\/p>\n<p>Chapter 11<\/p>\n<p> APOSTOLIC QUARRELS AND THE SECOND TOUR.<\/p>\n<p>Act 15:36; Act 15:39; Act 16:6; Act 16:8-9<\/p>\n<p>THE second missionary tour of St. Paul now claims our attention, specially because it involves the first proclamation of Christianity by an apostle within the boundaries of Europe. The course of the narrative up to this will show that any Christian effort in Europe by an apostle, St. Peter or any one else prior to St. Pauls work, was almost impossible. To the Twelve and to men like-minded with them, it must have seemed a daring-innovation to bring the gospel message directly to bear upon the masses of Gentile paganism. Men of conservative minds like the Twelve doubtless restrained their own efforts up to the time of St. Pauls second tour within the bounds of Israel, according to the flesh, in Palestine and the neighbouring lands, finding there an ample field upon which to exercise their diligence. And then when we turn to St. Paul and St. Barnabas, who had dared to realise the free-ness and fulness of the gospel message, we shall see that the Syrian Antioch and Syria itself and Asia Minor had hitherto afforded them scope quite sufficient to engage their utmost attention. A few moments reflection upon the circumstances of the primitive Christian Church and the developments through which Apostolic Christianity passed are quite sufficient to dispel all such fabulous incrustations upon the original record as those involved in St. Peters episcopate at Antioch or his lengthened rule over the Church at Rome. If the latter story was to be accepted, St. Peter must have been Bishop of Rome long before a mission was despatched to the Gentiles from Antioch, if not even before the vision was seen at Joppa by St. Peter when the admission of the Gentiles to the Church was first authorised under any terms whatsoever. In fact, it would be impossible to fit the actions of St. Peter into any scheme whatsoever, if we bring him to Rome and make him bishop there for twenty-five years beginning at the year 42, the time usually assigned by Roman Catholic historians. It is hard enough to frame a hypothetical scheme, which will find a due and fitting place for the various recorded actions of St. Peter, quite apart from any supposed Roman episcopate lasting over such an extended period. St. Peter and St. Paul had, for instance, a dispute at Antioch of which we read much in the second chapter of the Galatian epistle. Where shall we fix that dispute? Some place it during the interval of the Synod at Jerusalem and the second missionary tour of which we now propose to treat. Others place it at the conclusion of that tour, when St. Paul was resting at Antioch for a little after the work of that second journey. As we are not writing the life of St. Paul, but simply commenting upon the narratives of his labours as told in the Acts, we must be content to refer to the Lives of St. Paul by Conybeare and Howson, and Archdeacon Farrar, and to Bishop Lightfoots &#8220;Galatians,&#8221; all of whom place this quarrel before the second tour, and to Mr. Findlays &#8220;Galatians&#8221; in our own series, who upholds the other view. Supposing, however, that we take the former view in deference to the weighty authorities just mentioned, we then find. that there were two serious quarrels which must for a time have marred the unity and Christian concord of the Antiochene Church.<\/p>\n<p>The reproof of St. Peter by St. Paul for his dissimulation was made on a public occasion before the whole Church. It must have caused considerable excitement and discussion, and. raised much human feeling in Antioch. Barnabas too, the chosen friend and companion of St. Paul, was involved in the matter, and must have felt himself condemned in the strong language addressed to St. Peter. This may have caused for a time a certain amount of estrangement between the various parties. A close study of the Acts of the Apostles dispels at once the notion men would fain cherish, that the apostles and the early Christians lived just like angels without any trace of human passion or discord. The apostles had their differences and misunderstandings very like our own. Hot tempers and subsequent coolnesses arose, and produced evil results between men entrusted with the very highest offices, and paved the way, as quarrels always do, for fresh disturbances at some future time. So it was at Antioch, where the public reproof of St. Peter by St. Paul involved St. Barnabas, and may have left traces upon the gentle soul of the Son of Consolation which were not wholly eradicated by the time that a new source of trouble arose.<\/p>\n<p>The ministry of St. Paul at Antioch was prolonged for some time after the Jerusalem Synod, and then the Holy Ghost again impelled him to return and visit all the Churches which he had founded in Cyprus and Asia Minor. He recognised the necessity for supervision, support, and guidance as far as the new converts were concerned, The seed might be from heaven and the work might be Gods own, but still human effort must take its share and do its duty, or else the work may fail and the good seed never attain perfection. St. Paul therefore proposed to Barnabas a second joint mission, intending to visit &#8220;the brethren in every city wherein they had proclaimed the word of the Lord.&#8221; Barnabas desired to take with them his kinsman Mark, but Paul, remembering his weakness and defection on their previous journey, would have nothing to say to the young man. Then there arose a sharp contention between them, or as the original expression is, there arose a paroxysm between the apostles, so that the loving Christian workers and friends of bygone years, &#8220;men who had hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,&#8221; separated the one from the other, and worked from henceforth in widely different localities.<\/p>\n<p>I. There are few portions of the Acts more fruitful in spiritual instruction, or teeming with. more abundant lessons, or richer in application! to present difficulties, than this very incident. Let us note a few of them. One thought, for instance, which occurs at once to any reflecting mind is this: what an extraordinary thing it is that two such holy and devoted men as Paul and-Barnabas should have had a quarrel at all; and. when they did quarrel, would it not have been far better to have hushed the matter up and never! have let the world know anything at all about it?<\/p>\n<p>Now I do not say that it is well for Christian people always to proclaim aloud and tell the world at large all about the various unpleasant circumstances of their lives, their quarrels, their misunderstandings, their personal failings and backslidings. Life would be simply intolerable did we live always, at all times, and under all circumstances beneath the full glare of publicity. Personal quarrels too, family jars and bickerings, have a rapid tendency to heal themselves if kept in the gloom, the soft, toned, shaded light of retirement. They have an unhappy tendency to harden and perpetuate themselves when dragged beneath the fierce light of public opinion and the outside world. Yet it is well for the Church at large that such a record has been left for us of the fact that the quarrel between Paul and Barnabas waxed so fierce that they departed the one from the other, to teach us what we are apt to forget-the true character of the apostles. Human nature is intensely inclined to idolatry. One idol may be knocked down, but as soon as it is displaced the heart straightway sets to work to erect another idol in its stead, and men have been ready to make idols of the apostles. They have been ready to imagine them supernatural characters tainted with no sin, tempted by no passion, weakened by no infirmity. If these incidents had not been recorded-the quarrel with Peter and the quarrel with Barnabas-we should have been apt to forget that the apostles were men of like passions with ourselves, and thus to lose the full force-the bracing, stimulating force-of such exhortations as that delivered by St. Paul when he said to a primitive Church, &#8220;Follow me, as I, a poor, weak, failing, passionate man, have followed Christ.&#8221; We have the thorough humanity of the apostles vigorously presented and enforced in this passage. There is no suppression of weak points, no accentuation of strong points, no hiding of defects and weaknesses, no dwelling Upon virtues and graces. We have the apostles presented at times vigorous, united, harmonious; at other times weak, timorous, and cowardly.<\/p>\n<p>Again, we note that this passage not only shows us the human frailties and weaknesses which marked the apostles, and found a place in characters and persons called to the very highest places; it has also a lesson for the Church of all time in the circumstances which led to the quarrel between Paul and Barnabas. We do well to mark carefully that Antioch saw two such quarrels, the one of which, as we have already pointed out, may have had something to say to the other. The quarrel between St. Paul and St. Peter indeed has a history which strikingly illustrates this tendency of which we have just now spoken. Some expositors, jealous of the good fame and reputation and temper of the apostles, have explained the quarrel at Antioch between St. Paul and St. Peter as not having been a real quarrel at all, but an edifying piece of acting, a dispute got up between the apostles to enforce and proclaim the freedom of the Gentiles, a mere piece of knavery and deception utterly foreign to such a truth-loving character as was St. Pauls. It is interesting, however, to note as manifesting their natural characteristics, which were not destroyed, but merely elevated, purified, and sanctified by Divine grace, that the apostles Paul and Barnabas quarrelled about a purely personal matter. They had finished their first missionary tour on which they had been accompanied by St. Mark, who had acted as their attendant or servant, carrying, we may suppose, their luggage, and discharging all. the subordinate offices such service might involve. The labour and toil and personal danger incident to such a career were too much for the young man. So with all the fickleness, the weakness, the want of strong definite purpose we often find in young people, he abandoned his work simply because it involved the exercise of a certain amount of self-sacrifice. And now, when Paul and Barnabas are setting out again, and Barnabas wishes to take the same favourite relative with them, St. Paul naturally objects, and then the bitter, passionate quarrel ensues. St. Paul just experienced here what we all must more or less experience, the crosses and trials of public life, if we wish to pass through that life with a good conscience. Public life, I say-and I mean thereby not a political life, which alone we usually dignify by that name, but the ordinary. life which every man and every woman amongst us must live as we go in and out and discharge our duties amid our fellow-men, -public life, the life we live once we leave our closet communion with God in the early morning till we return thereto in the eventide, is in all its department most trying. It is trying to temper, and it is. trying to principle, and no one can hope to pass through it without serious and grievous temptations. I do not wonder that men have often felt, as the old Eastern monks did, that salvation was more easily won in solitude than in living and working amid the busy haunts of men where bad temper and hot words so often conspire to make one return home from a hard days work feeling miserable within on account of repeated falls and shortcomings. Shall we then act as. they did? Shall we shut out the world completely and cease to take any part in a struggle which seems to tell so disastrously upon the-equable calm of our spiritual life? Nay, indeed, for such a course would be unworthy a soldier of the Cross, and very unlike the example shown by the blessed apostle St. Paul, who had to battle not only against others, but had also to. battle against himself and his own passionate. nature, and was crowned as a victor, not because-he ran away, but because he conquered through the grace of Christ.<\/p>\n<p>And now it is well that we should note the special trials he had to endure. He had to fight against the spirit of cowardly self-indulgence in others, and he had to fight against the spirit of jobbery. These things indeed caused the rupture in the apostolic friendship. St. Barnabas, apostle though he was, thought far more of the interests of his cousin than of the interests of Christs mission. St. Paul with his devotion to. Christ may have been a little intolerant of the weakness of youth, but he rightly judged that one who had proved untrustworthy before should not be rapidly and at once trusted again. And St. Paul was thoroughly right, and has left a very useful and practical example. Many young men among us are like St. Mark. The St. Marks of our own day are a very numerous class. They have no respect for their engagements. They will undertake work and allow themselves. to be calculated upon, and arrangements to be made accordingly. But then comes the stress of action, and their place is found wanting, and the work undertaken by them is found undone. And then they wonder and complain that their lives are unsuccessful, and that men and women who are in earnest will not trust or employ them in the future! These are the men who are the social wrecks in life. They proclaim loudly in streets and highways the hard treatment which they have received. They tell forth their own misery, and speak as if they were the most deserving and at the same time the most ill-treated of men; and yet they are but reaping as they have sown, and their failures and their misfortunes are only the due and fitting rewards of their want of earnestness, diligence, and self-denial. To the young this episode proclaims aloud. Respect your engagements, regard public employments as solemn contracts in Gods sight. Take pains with your work. Be willing to endure any trouble for its sake. There is no such thing as genius in ordinary life. Genius has been well defined as an infinite capacity for taking pains. And thus avoid the miserable weakness of St. Mark, who fled from his work because it entailed trouble and self-denial on his part.<\/p>\n<p>Then, again, we view St. Paul with admiration because he withstood the spirit of jobbery when it displayed itself even in a saint. Barnabas in plain language wished to perpetrate a job in favour of a member of his family, and St. Paul withstood him. And how often since has the same spirit thus displayed itself to the injury of Gods cause! Let us note how the case stood. St. Barnabas was a good pious man of very strong emotional feelings. But he allowed himself to be guided, as pious people often do, by their emotions, affections, prejudices, not by their reason and judgment. With such men, when their affections come into play, jobbery is the most natural thing in the world. It is the very breath of their nostrils. It is the atmosphere in which they revel. Barnabas loved his cousin John Mark, with strong, powerful, absorbing love, and that emotion blinded Barnabas to Marks faults, and led him on his behalf to quarrel with his firmer, wiser, and more vigorous friend. Jobbery is a vice peculiar to no age and to no profession. It flourishes in the most religious as in the most worldly circles. In religious circles it often takes the most sickening forms, when miserable, narrow selfishness assumes the garb and adopts the language of Christian piety. St. Pauls action proclaims to Christian men a very needful lesson. It says, in fact, Set your faces against jobbery of every kind. Regard power, influence, patronage as a sacred trust. Permit not fear, affection, or party spirit to blind your eyes or prejudice your judgment against real merit; so shall you be following in the footsteps of the great Apostle of the Gentiles, with his heroic championship of that which was righteous and true, and of One higher still, for thus you shall be following the Masters own example, whose highest praise was this: &#8220;He loved righteousness, and hated iniquity.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We have now bestowed a lengthened notice upon this quarrel, because it corrects a very mistaken notion about the apostles, and shows us how thoroughly natural and human, how very like our own, was the everyday life of the primitive Church. It takes away the false halo of infallibility and impeccability with which we are apt to invest the apostles, making us view them as real, fallible, weak, sinful men like ourselves, and thereby exalts the power of that grace which made them so eminent in Christian character, so abundant in Christian labours. Let us now apply ourselves to trace the course of St. Pauls second tour.<\/p>\n<p>The effect of the quarrel between the friends was that St. Paul took Silas and St. Barnabas took Mark, and they separated; the latter going to Cyprus, the native country of Barnabas, while Paul and Silas devoted themselves to Syria and Asia Minor and their Churches. The division between these holy men became thus doubly profitable to the Church of Christ. It is perpetually profitable, by way of warning and example, as we have just now shown; and then it became profitable because it led to two distinct missions being carried on, the one in the Island of Cyprus, the other on the continent of Asia. The wrath of man is thus again overruled to the greater glory of God, and human weakness is made to promote the interests of the gospel. We read, too, &#8220;they parted asunder, the one from the other.&#8221; How very differently they acted from the manner in which modern Christians do! Their difference in opinion did not lead them to depart into exactly the same district, and there pursue a policy of opposition the one against the other. They sought rather districts widely separated, where their social differences could have no effect upon the cause they both loved. How very differently modern Christians act, and how very disastrous the consequent results! How very scandalous, how very injurious to Christs cause, when Christian missionaries of different communions appear warring one with another in face of the pagan world! Surely the world of paganism is wide enough and large enough to afford scope for the utmost efforts of all Christians without European Christendom exporting its divisions and quarrels to afford matter for mockery to scoffing idolaters! We have heard lately a great deal about the differences between Roman Catholic and Protestant missionaries in Central Africa, terminating in war and bloodshed and in the most miserable recriminations threatening the peace and welfare of the nations of Europe. Surely there must have been an error of judgment somewhere or another in this case, and Africa must be ample enough to afford abundant room for the independent action of the largest bodies of missionaries without resorting to armed conflicts which recall the religious wars between the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Cantons of Switzerland! With the subsequent labours of Barnabas we have nothing to do, as he now disappears from the Acts of the Apostles, though it would appear from a reference by St. Paul- 1Co 9:6, &#8220;Or I only, and Barnabas, have we not a right to forbear working?&#8221;-as if at that time, four or five years after the quarrel, they were again labouring together at Ephesus, where First Corinthians was written, or else why should Barnabas be mentioned in that connection at all.<\/p>\n<p>Let us now briefly indicate the course of St. Pauls labours during the next three years, as his second missionary tour must have extended over at least that space of time. St. Paul and his companion Silas left Antioch amid the prayers of the whole Church. Evidently the brethren viewed Pauls conduct with approbation, and accompanied him therefore with fervent supplications for success in his self-denying labours. He proceeded by land into Cilicia and Asia Minor, and wherever he went he delivered the apostolic decree in order that he might counteract the workings of the Judaisers. This decree served a twofold purpose. It relieved the minds of the Gentile brethren with respect to the law and its observances, and it also showed to them that the Jerusalem Church and apostles recognised the Divine authority and apostolate of St. Paul himself, which these &#8220;false brethren&#8221; from Jerusalem had already assailed, as they did four or five years later both in Galatia and at Corinth. We know not what special towns St. Paul visited in Cilicia, but we may be sure that the Church of Tarsus, his native place, where in the first fervour of his conversion he had already laboured for a considerable period, must have received a visit from him. We may be certain that his opponents would not leave such an important town unvisited, and we may be equally certain that St. Paul, who, as his Epistles show, was always keenly alive to the opinion of his converts with respect to his apostolic authority, would have been specially anxious to let his fellow townsmen at Tarsus see that he was no unauthorised or false teacher, but that the Jerusalem Church recognised his work and teaching in the amplest manner.<\/p>\n<p>Starting then anew from Tarsus, Paul and Silas set out upon an enormous journey, penetrating, as few modern travellers even now do, from the southeastern extremity of Asia Minor to the northwestern coast, a journey which, with its necessarily prolonged delays, must have taken them at least a year and a half. St. Paul seems to have carefully availed himself of the Roman road system. We are merely given the very barest outline of the course which he pursued, but then, when we take up the index maps of Asia Minor inserted in Ramsays &#8220;Historical Geography of Asia Minor,&#8221; showing the road systems at various periods, we see that a great Roman road followed the very route which St. Paul took. It started from Tarsus and passed to Derbe, whence of course the road to Lystra, Iconium, and Antioch had already been traversed by St. Paul. He must have made lengthened visits to all these places, as he had much to do and much to teach. He had to expound the decree of the Apostolic Council, to explain Christian truth, to correct the errors and abuses which were daily creeping in, and to enlarge the organisation of the Christian Church by fresh ordinations. Take the case of Timothy as an example of the trouble St. Paul must have experienced. He came to Derbe, where he first found some of the converts made on his earlier tour; whence he passed to Lystra, where he met Timothy, whose acquaintance he had doubtless made on his first journey. He was the son of a Jewess, though his father was a Gentile. St. Paul took and circumcised him to conciliate the Jews. The Apostle must have bestowed a great deal of trouble on this point alone, explaining to the Gentile portion of the Christian community the principles on which he acted and their perfect consistency with his own conduct at Jerusalem and his advocacy of Gentile freedom from the law. Then he ordained him. This we do not learn from the Acts, but from St. Pauls Epistles to Timothy. The Acts simply says of Timothy, &#8220;Him would Paul have to go forth with him.&#8221; But then when we turn to the Epistles written to Timothy, we find that it was not as an ordinary companion that Timothy was taken. He went forth as St. Paul himself had gone forth from the Church of Antioch, a duly ordained and publicly recognised messenger of Christ. We can glean from St. Pauls letters to Timothy the order and ceremonies of this primitive ordination. The rite, as ministered on that occasion, embraced prophesyings or preachings by St. Paul himself and by others upon the serious character of the office then undertaken. This seems plainly intimated in 1Ti 1:18 : &#8220;This charge I commit unto thee, my child Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee&#8221;; while there seems a reference to his own exhortations and directions in 2Ti 2:2. where he writes, &#8220;The things which thou hast heard from me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men.&#8221; After this there was probably, as in modern ordinations, a searching examination of the candidate, with a solemn profession of faith on his part, to which St. Paul refers in 1Ti 6:12, &#8220;Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on the life eternal, whereunto thou wast called, and didst confess the good confession in the sight of many witnesses. I charge thee in the sight of God who quickeneth all things, and of Christ Jesus, who before Pontius Pilate witnessed the good confession; that thou keep the commandment without spot, without reproach, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ.&#8221; And finally there came the imposition of hands, in which the local presbyters assisted St. Paul, though St. Paul was so far the guiding and ruling personage that, though in one place {1Ti 4:14} he speaks of the gift of God which Timothy possessed, as given &#8220;by prophecy with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery,&#8221; in another place he describes it as given to the young evangelist by the imposition of St. Pauls own hands. {2Ti 1:6} This ordination of Timothy and adoption of him as his special attendant stood at the very beginning of a prolonged tour throughout the central and northern districts of Asia Minor, of which we get only a mere hint in Act 16:6-8 : &#8220;They went through the region of Phrygia and Galatia, having been forbidden of the Holy Ghost to speak the word in Asia; and when they were come over against Mysia, they essayed to go into Bithynia; and the Spirit of Jesus suffered them not; and passing by Mysia, they came unto Troas.&#8221; This is the brief sketch of St. Pauls labours through the northwestern provinces of Asia Minor, during which he visited the district of Galatia and preached the gospel amid the various tribal communities of Celts who inhabited that district.<\/p>\n<p>St. Pauls work in Galatia is specially interesting to ourselves. The Celtic race certainly furnished the groundwork of the population in England, Ireland, and Scotland, and finds to this day lineal representatives in the Celtic-speaking inhabitants of these three islands. Galatia was thoroughly Celtic in St. Pauls day. But how, it may be said, did the Gauls come there? We all know of the Gauls or Celts in Western Europe, and every person of even moderate education has heard of the Gauls who invaded Italy and sacked Rome when that city was yet an unknown factor in the worlds history, and yet but very few know that the same wave of invasion which brought the Gauls to Rome led another division of them into Asia Minor, where-as Dr. Lightfoot shows in his Introduction to his Commentary about three hundred years before St. Pauls day they settled down in the region called after them Galatia, perpetuating in that neighbourhood the tribal organisation, the language, the national feelings, habits, and customs which have universally marked the Celtic race, whether in ancient or in modern times. St. Paul on this second missionary tour paid his first visit to this district of Galatia. St. Paul usually directed his attention to great cities. Where vast masses of humanity were gathered together, there St. Paul loved to fling himself with all the mighty force of his unquenchable enthusiasm. But Galatia was quite unlike other districts with which he had dealt in this special respect. Like the Celtic race all the world over, the Gauls of Galatia specially delighted in village communities. They did not care for the society and tone of great towns, and Galatia was wanting in such. St. Paul, too, does not seem originally to have intended to labour amongst the Galatians at all. In view of his great design to preach in large cities, and concentrate his efforts where they could most effectually tell upon the masses, he seems to have been hurrying through Galatia when God laid His heavy hand upon the Apostle and delayed his course that we might be able to see how the gospel could tell upon Gauls and Celts even as upon other nations. This interesting circumstance is made known to us by St. Paul himself in the Epistle to the Gal 4:13 : &#8220;Ye know that because of an infirmity of the flesh I preached the gospel unto you for the first time.&#8221; Paul, to put it in plain language, fell sick in Galatia. He was delayed on his journey by the ophthalmia or some other form of disease, which was his thorn in the flesh, and, then, utilising the compulsory delay, and turning every moment to advantage, he evangelised the village communities of Galatia with which he came in contact, so that his Epistle is directed, not as in other cases to the Church of a city or to an individual man, but the Epistle in which he deals with great fundamental questions of Christian freedom is addressed to the Churches of Galatia, a vast district of country. Mere accident, as it would seem to the eye of sense, produced the Epistle to the Galatians, which shows us the peculiar weakness and the peculiar strength of the Celtic race, their enthusiasm, their genuine warmth, their fickleness, their love for that which is striking, showy, material, exterior. But when we pass from Galatia we know nothing of the course of St. Pauls further labours in Asia Minor. St. Luke was not with him during this portion of his work, and so the details given us are very few. We are told that &#8220;the Spirit of Jesus&#8221; would not permit him to preach in Bithynia, though Bithynia became afterwards rich in Christian Churches, and was one of the districts to which St. Peter some years later addressed his first Epistle. The Jews were numerous in the districts of Bithynia and Asia, and &#8220;the Spirit of Jesus&#8221; or &#8220;the Holy Ghost&#8221;-for the sacred writer seems to use the terms as equivalent the one to the other-had determined to utilise St. Paul in working directly among the Gentiles, reserving the preaching of the gospel to the Dispersion, as the scattered Jews were called, to St. Peter and his friends. It is thus we would explain the restraint exercised upon St. Paul on this occasion. Divine providence had cut out his great work in Europe, and was impelling him westward even when he desired to tarry in Asia. How the Spirit exercised this restraint or communicated His will we know not. St. Paul lived, however, in an atmosphere of Divine communion. He cultivated perpetually a sense of the Divine presence, and those who do so experience a guidance of which the outer world knows nothing. Bishop Jeremy Taylor, in one of his marvellous spiritual discourses called the &#8220;Via Intelligentiae,&#8221; or the Way of Knowledge, speaks much on this subject, pointing out that they who live closest to God have a knowledge and a love peculiar to themselves. And surely every sincere and earnest follower of Christ has experienced somewhat of the same mystical blessings! Gods truest servants commit their lives and their actions in devout prayer to the guidance of their heavenly Father, and then when they look back over the past they see how marvellously they have been restrained from courses which would have been fraught with evil, how strangely they have been led by ways which have been full of mercy and goodness and blessing. Thus it was that St. Paul was at length led down to the ancient city of Troas where God revealed to him in a new fashion his ordained field of labour. A man of Macedonia. appeared in a night vision inviting him over to Europe, and saying, &#8220;Come over into Macedonia and help us.&#8221; Troas was a very fitting place in which this vision should appear. Of old time and in days of classic fable Troas had been the meeting-place where, as Homer and as Virgil tell, Europe and Asia had met in stern conflict, and where Europe as represented by Greece had come off victorious, bringing home the spoils which human nature counted most precious. Europe and Asia again meet at Troas, but no longer in carnal conflict or in deadly fight. The interests of Europe and of Asia again touch one another, and Europe again carries off from the same spot spoil more precious far than Grecian poet ever dreamt of, for &#8220;when Paul had seen the vision, straightway we sought to go forth into Macedonia, concluding that God called us for to preach the gospel unto them.&#8221; Whereupon we notice two points and offer just two observations. The vision created an enthusiasm, and that enthusiasm was contagious. The vision was seen by Paul alone, but was communicated by St. Paul unto Silas and to St. Luke, who now had joined to lend perhaps the assistance of his medical knowledge to the afflicted and suffering Apostle. Enthusiasm is a marvellous power, and endows a man with wondrous force. St. Paul was boiling over with enthusiasm, but he could not always impart it. The two non-apostolic Evangelists are marked contrasts as brought before us in this history. St. Paul was enthusiastic on his first tour, but that enthusiasm was not communicated to St. Mark. He turned back from the hardships and dangers of the work in Asia Minor. St. Paul was boiling over again with enthusiasm for the new work in Europe. He has now with him in St. Luke a congenial soul who, when he hears the vision, gathers at once its import, joyfully anticipates the work, and &#8220;straightway sought to go forth into Macedonia.&#8221; Enthusiasm in any kind of work is a great assistance, and nothing great or successful is done without it. But above all in Divine work, in the work of preaching the gospel, the man devoid of enthusiasm begotten of living communion with God, such as St. Paul and St. Luke enjoyed, is sure to be a lamentable and complete failure.<\/p>\n<p>Then, again, and lastly, we note the slow progress of the gospel as shown to us by this incident at Troas. Here we are a good twenty years after the Crucifixion, and yet the chief ministers and leaders of the Church had not yet crossed into Europe. There were sporadic Churches here and there. At Rome and at possibly a few Italian seaports, whence intercourse with Palestine was frequent, there were small Christian communities; but Macedonia and Greece were absolutely untouched up to the present. We are very apt to overrate the progress of the gospel during those first days of the Churchs earliest Church life. We are inclined to view the history of the Church of the first three centuries all on a heap as it were. We have much need to distinguish century from century and decennium from decennium. The first ten years of the Churchs history saw the gospel preached in Jerusalem and Palestine, but not much farther. The second decennium saw it proclaimed to Asia Minor; but it is only when the third decennium is opening that Christ despatches a formal mission to that Europe where the greatest triumphs of the gospel were afterwards to be won. Ignorance and prejudice and narrow views had been allowed to hinder the progress of the gospel then, as they are hindering the progress of the gospel still; and an express record of this has been handed down to us in this typical history in order that if we too suffer the same we may not be astonished as if some strange thing had happened, but may understand that we are bearing the same burden and enduring the same trials as the New Testament saints have borne before us.  <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, 6. Now when they had gone throughout ] The oldest MSS. merely say and they went through. Phrygia and the region of Galatia ] Scarcely the direction, so far as &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-acts-166\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 16:6&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27448\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}