{"id":28838,"date":"2022-09-24T12:58:43","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T17:58:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-corinthians-515\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T12:58:43","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T17:58:43","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-corinthians-515","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-corinthians-515\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Corinthians 5:15"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> And [that] he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again. <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> 15. <em> that they which live should not  live unto themselves<\/em> ] Cf. <span class='bible'>Rom 5:8-11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 6:10-13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 14:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 2:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 5:24-25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 6:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Col 3:1-4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Jn 5:18<\/span> See also note on ch. <span class='bible'>2Co 4:10-11<\/span>. Christ&rsquo;s death is our life, because He thus made atonement for sin, reconciled us to the Father, shewed how He could be &lsquo;both just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus,&rsquo; and thus made obedience possible for us on the principle that we were &lsquo;reconciled to God,&rsquo; and that henceforth there would be &lsquo;no condemnation for our past sins or present sinfulness, provided we set ourselves to &lsquo;walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.&rsquo; His death was the means of freeing us from our bondage to sin. His lift was the enabling power which wrought our conversion.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>And that he died for all &#8230; &#8211; <\/B>This verse is designed still further to explain the reasons of the conduct of the apostle. He had not lived for himself. He had not lived to amass wealth, or to enjoy pleasure, or to obtain a reputation. He had lived a life of self-denial, and of toil; and he here states the reason why he had done it. It was because he felt that the great purpose of the death of the Redeemer was to secure this result. To that Saviour, therefore, who died for all, he consecrated his talents and his time, and sought in every way possible to promote his glory.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>That they which live &#8211; <\/B>They who are true Christians, who are made alive unto God as the result of the dying love of the Redeemer. Sinners are dead in sins. Christians are alive to the worth of the soul, the presence of God, the importance of religion, the solemnities of eternity; that is, they act and feel as if these things had a real existence and as if they should exert a constant influence upon the heart and life.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(They which live. This spiritual life, doubtless, implies that a man is alive to the worth of the soul, the presence of God, etc.; but it intimates something deeper too, which is the foundation of those things, and without which they could not exist. Scott paraphrases thus, were quickened and pardoned, and so passed from death to life; and Guyse still more explicitly, were made supernaturally alive by his quickening spirit and by faith in him. This is the root; the things mentioned in the comment, the fruit; this the cause, these only the effects.)<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">It is observable that Paul makes a distinction here between those for whom Christ died and those who actually live, thus demonstrating that there may be many for whom he died who do not live to God, or who are not savingly benefitted by his death. The atonement was for all, but only a part are actually made alive to God. Multitudes reject it; but the fact that he died for all; that he tasted death for every man, that he not only died for the elect but for all others, that his benevolence was so great as to embrace the whole human family in the design of his death, is a reason why they who are actually made alive to God should consecrate themselves entirely to his service. The fact that he died for all evinced such unbounded and infinite benevolence that it should induce us who are actually benefitted by his death, and who have any just views of it, to devote all that we have to his service.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Should not henceforth live unto themselves &#8211; <\/B>Should not seek our own ease and pleasure; should not make it our great object to promote our own interest, but should make it the grand purpose of our lives to promote his honor, and to advance his cause. This is a vital principle in religion, and it is exceedingly important to know what is meant by living to ourselves, and whether we do it. It is done in the following, and perhaps in some other ways:<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(1) When people seek pleasure, gain, or reputation as the controlling principle of their lives.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(2) When they are regardless of the rights of others, and sacrifice all the claims which others have on them in order to secure the advancement of their own purposes and ends.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(3) When they are regardless of the needs of others, and turn a deaf ear to all the appeals which charity makes to them, and have no time to give to serve them, and no money to spare to alleviate their needs; and especially when they turn a deaf ear to the appeals which are made for the diffusion of the gospel to the benighted and perishing.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(4) When their main purpose is the aggrandizement of their own families, for their families are but a diffusion of self. And,<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(5) When they seek their own salvation only from selfish motives, and not from a desire to honor God. Multitudes are selfish even in their religion; and the main purpose which they have in view, is to promote their own objects, and not the honor of the Master whom they profess to serve. They seek and profess religion only because they desire to escape from wrath, and to obtain the happiness of heaven, and not from any love to the Redeemer or any desire to honor him, Or they seek to build up the interests of their own church and party, and all their zeal is expended on that and that alone, without any real desire to honor the Saviour. Or though in the church, they are still selfish, and live wholly to themselves. They live for fashion, for gain, for reputation. They practice no self-denial; they make no effort; to advance the cause of God the Saviour.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>But unto him &#8230; &#8211; <\/B>Unto the Lord Jesus Christ. To live to him is the opposite to living unto ourselves. It is to seek his honor; to feel that we belong to him; that all our time and talents; all our strength of intellect and body; all the avails of our skill and toil, all belong to him, and should be employed in his service. If we have talents by which we can influence other minds, they should be employed to honor the Saviour. If we have skill, or strength to labor by which we can make money, we should feel that it all belongs to him, and should be employed in his service. If we have property, we should feel that it is his, and that he has a claim upon it all, and that it should be honestly consecrated to his cause. And if we are endowed with a spirit of enterprise, and are suited by nature to encounter perils in distant and barbarious climes, as Paul was, we should feel like him that we are bound to devote all entirely to his service, and to the promotion of his cause.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">A servant, a slave, does not live to himself but to his master. His person, his time, his limbs, his talents, and the avails of his industry are not regarded as his own. He is judged incapable of holding any property which is not at the disposal of his master. If he has strength, it is his masters. If he has skill, the avails of it are his masters. If he is an ingenious mechanic, or labors in any department; if he is amiable, kind, gentle, and faithful, and adapted to be useful in an eminent degree, it is regarded as all the property of his master. He is bound to go where his master chooses; to execute the task which he assigns; to deny himself at his masters will; and to come and lay the avails of all his toil and skill at his masters feet. He is regarded as having been purchased with money; and the purchase money is supposed to give a right to his time, his talents, his services, and his soul. Such as the slave is supposed to become by purchase, and by the operation of human laws, the Christian becomes by the purchase of the Son of God, and by the voluntary recognition of him as the master, and as having a right to all that we have and are. To him all belongs; and all should be employed in endeavoring to promote his glory, and in advancing his cause.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Which died for them, and rose again &#8211; <\/B>Paul here states the grounds of the obligation under which he felt himself placed, to live not unto himself but unto Christ.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(1) The first is, the fact that Christ had died for him, and for all his people. The effect of that death was the same as a purchase. It was a purchase; see the note, <span class='_0000ff'><U>1Co 6:20<\/U><\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co 7:23<\/span>; compare <span class='bible'>1Pe 1:18-19<\/span>.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(2) The second is, that he had risen again from the dead. To this fact Paul traced all his hopes of eternal life, and of the resurrection from the dead; see <span class='bible'>Rom 4:25<\/span>. As we have the hope of the resurrection from the dead only from the fact that he rose; as he has brought life and immortality to light, and hath in this way abolished death <span class='bible'>2Ti 1:10<\/span>; as all the prospect of entering a world where there is no death and no grave is to be traced to the resurrection of the Saviour, so we are bound by every obligation of gratitude to devote ourselves without any reserve to him. To him, and him alone should we live; and in his cause our lives should be, as Pauls was, a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable in his sight.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Co 5:15<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>He died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>New life in Christ<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>By virtue of Christs death and resurrection Christians obtain the grace of a new life.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>There is a spiritual life. Note&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The correspondence between common life and this life of grace.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> The natural life supposes generation, so does the spiritual (<span class='bible'>Joh 3:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Jn 2:27<\/span>),<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> Where there is life there is sense and feeling, especially if wrong and violence be offered to it, and so is the spiritual life bewrayed by the tenderness of the heart and the sense that we have of the interest of God. Can a man be alive and not feel it? And can you have the life of grace and not feel the decays and interruptions of it, and neither be sensible of comforts or injuries?<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> Where there is life there is appetite, an earnest desire after that which may feed and support this life. So spiritually (<span class='bible'>1Pe 2:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh 6:27<\/span>). The new nature hath its proper supports, and there will be something relished besides such things as gratify the animal life. In correspondence with this there will be a desire that carrieth us to that which is food to the soul, to Christ especially, and to the ordinances in which He is exhibited to us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(4)<\/strong> Where there is life there will be growth; so do the children of God grow in grace (<span class='bible'>Psa 92:13<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>(5)<\/strong> Life is active and stirring. So spiritual life hath its operations; it cannot well be hid. Some only have a name to live, and are dead.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The differences. They differ&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> In dignity. Natural life is but a wind, a vapour, a continued sickness, but this is the life of God, and was a life bought at a dearer rate than the life of nature (<span class='bible'>Joh 6:51<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> In origin. The natural life is brought down unto us by many generations from the first Adam. All that our parents could do was to make way for the union of soul and body together. But by this life we mid Christ are united together, and He becomes a life-making spirit unto us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> In duration. All our labour here is to maintain a lamp that soon goes out, or to prop up a tabernacle that is always falling. But the spiritual life begins in grace and ends in glory.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>The respect that is between this life and Christs resurrection. Christs resurrection is&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>An example of it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> Christ died before He rose, and usually God killeth us before He maketh us alive. The word is a killing letter before it is a word of life (<span class='bible'>Rom 7:9<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> The same Spirit of holiness that quickened Christ quickeneth us (<span class='bible'>Rom 1:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 8:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>(3)<\/strong> Christ, being raised from the dead, dieth no more (<span class='bible'>Rom 11:9<\/span>). So is a Christian put into an unchangeable state; sin hath no more dominion over him (<span class='bible'>Joh 11:25-26<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>A pledge of it. And therefore He is called the firstfruits from the dead (<span class='bible'>1Co 15:20<\/span>). His resurrection was in our name; therefore we are said to be raised with Christ (<span class='bible'>Col 3:1<\/span>), and quickened together with Christ (<span class='bible'>Col 2:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph 2:4-5<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>A cause of it. That Spirit of power by which Christ was raised out of the grave is the very efficient cause of our being raised and quickened (<span class='bible'>1Pe 1:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph 1:19-20<\/span>). (<em>T. Manton, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The end of Christs death for all men<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Now what applies to the Old Testament Church applies also to the New Testament Church, for, if the love which God bestowed of old upon His people were to be compared to a drop, His love as now exhibited might be compared to an ocean. Much more, then, may God now look for fruits from those who compose that Church. Now the nature of the fruit which He expects is specified in the text, and it is this: a life which must be a life not unto ourselves, but unto Him who died for us and rose again.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>What is the manner of life which should not be; or, what is by nature the life unto self? The text is pretty clear in its condemnation of such a life, That they should not live unto themselves. We may, then, usefully inquire, What is life to, or living to, oneself? It may be said to consist in following or pursuing our own wills, glory, ends, and lusts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The will of man is by nature in direct opposition to the will of God.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>But, besides following his own will, the natural man follows his own glory.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>But we may be so unambitious, perhaps, as that the word glory may seem to be utterly inapplicable in our case; yet all have ends in view, though there may be no glory in them&#8211;plans, or something to which Gods great end, for us, and which He sets before us in the Bible, is subordinated. First and foremost is selfs end; it may be a lawful or reasonable end in itself, except as it is brought unduly and unlawfully forward.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>There is a fourth following, which is neither glorious nor profitable, yet common, and the grossest; it is lust. Christ died that they who lived might live to some purpose.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>As to the manner of life which should be, or life not to self, but to Christ.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The pattern Saint&#8211;with reverence be it said&#8211;whom God proposed for our imitation in the matter of the will, as in all things else, is an example. He was subjected to sufferings that He might, in the entire subjection of His own will to His Fathers, teach us by example as well as precept. Our blessed Lord says, I came not to do Mine own will, but the will of Him that sent Me.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>To live to Christ, also, they must seek not their own glory, but the glory of God. This did Christ Himself.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Living to Christ will also involve seeking the interests of Christ&#8211;not our own, but Christs ends.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>And there is a fourth pursuit if the believer is to crucify and to mortify the old man with his lusts and affections. Rejoice in the Lord alway, and again I say rejoice, And among the fruits of the Spirit enumerated by St. Paul in writing to the Galatians (6.) are joy and peace. But you will observe an important clause of our text to have been as yet unnoticed&#8211;That they which live. A third and coneluding inquiry should be made concerning this life.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>What is it? Whence comes it? It is the Spirits work, and it is Christs work, for the Son quickeneth whom He will, and it is the Spirit that quickeneth. Christ is called a quickening Spirit because of the power He exercises in this matter, and perhaps the first indication of His work is giving liberty to the will. (<em>O. W. W. Forester, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Self not the chief end of life<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><strong><em>. <\/em><\/strong>Self is the chief end of every natural man. That they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves&#8211;implying that all men living, who are not under the actual benefit and efficacy of our Saviours death, do live to themselves.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The end of our Saviours dying and rising again was to change the corrupt end of the creature.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Therefore we must be taken off from ourselves as our end, and be fixed upon another, even upon Christ, else we answer not the end of Christs death and resurrection.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>It is highly equitable that, if Christ died for us and was raised for us as our happiness, we should live to His glory, and make Him our end in all our actions and the whole course of our lives. The apostle uses this consideration as an argument, and as a copy and exemplar. Therefore, as He rose to justify us, we must rise to glorify Him. (<em>Bp. Hackett.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fully consecrated to Christ<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Mr<em>.<\/em> Moody, in one of his addresses, said, I see a man on this platform&#8211;I do not know if he remembers it&#8211;but when I was here in 1867, there was a merchant who came over from Dublin, and was talking with this business man in London; and as I happened to look in, this business man in London introduced me to the man from Dublin. The Dublin man said to the London man, alluding to me, Is this young man all O O? Said the London man, What do you mean by O O? Said the Dublin man, Is he Out and Out for Christ? I tell you it burned down into my soul. This friend said, I was a little ashamed, but I thought I was not, though I was a young man then.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Living to Christ<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Living to Christ in small things and living for Christ every day is the secret of large fruitfulness. A peach-tree or an orange does not leap into bounty of fruit by one spasmodic effort; an orchard does not ripen under a single days sunshine. Every rain-drop, every sunbeam, every inch of subsoil does its part. A fruitful Christian is a growth. To finish up a godly character by a mere religion of Sundays and sermons and sacraments and revivals and special seasons is impossible. A man may be converted in an instant, but he must grow by the year. The tough fibre of the slender branch that can hold up a half-bushel of oranges is very different from a little willow-switch; it is the steady, compacting process that makes that little limb like a steel wire. Such is a healthy and holy believers life. (<em>T. L. Cuyler, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Henceforth<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In passing over a mountainous country the traveller comes at length to the water-shed. Up till he reached that elevation the brook has been meeting him; but so soon as he has crossed it a new-born rivulet runs dancing along with him. The external features of this ridge may be different in different cases. In one they may be clearly defined; in another they may be so little marked that it may be difficult to say where precisely the transition has been made, and the tourist can only tell that he has made it when he sees the new direction which the water is taking. But however it may be outwardly indicated, the fact remains that at such a ridge a few yards will determine whether the water falling from the clouds will find its destination in one ocean or another. Now the moment of conversion is the water-shed of life. Sometimes the transition is distinctly defined; sometimes it is hardly discernible; yet always it is the turning-point of a mans eternity. This is the point which is indicated by the henceforth of my text. Mark&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>What precedes it. There are three descriptions of the life before conversion given by Paul.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>In the verse before us. To live unto ourselves is to make self the ruler, and selfishness the motive of our existence. Everybody hisses at the miser, but many actions which are accounted noble are just as selfish as his.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>In <span class='bible'>Eph 4:7<\/span>. Walking as other Gentiles walk exactly delineates the kind of life which multitudes are leading. They do as other people do; and if a thing is customary, that is held by them to be a sufficient reason for their practising it. They never ask what is the will of God in the matter. Is a man asked to contribute to some good object, then instead of inquiring whether in Gods sight he ought to give, and if so, how much, he will say, Let me see who are subscribing, and what amounts. Is he besought to help some struggling cause, then his inquiry will be, not what Christ would have him do, but whether any persons of respectability are connected with it. Is he in doubt as to the propriety of some course of conduct, his scruples are removed when you tell him that this one and that one of the fashionables do the same.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>In <span class='bible'>Rom 6:6<\/span>. Up to the henceforth they had been serving sin; and, indeed, this is said in so many words in the<strong> <\/strong>17th verse. This is the most terrible description of the three&#8211;Ye were the slaves of sin, and the meaning is that in the unconverted sin has the entire mastery. By habitual indulgence in it they have given it the upper hand, and now it holds them in chains which they themselves have formed.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>What follows it. We have no such variety as in the former case, for though error is manifold, truth is one. There are different ways to perdition, but there is only one to glory. There may be diversity of phase, but the same root principle exists in every true believer. To me to live is Christ; I live, yet not I, but Christ liveth in me. These profound utterances imply that what before was self in the apostle was now Christ. What things before were gain to him, those he counted loss for Christ. Now it is the same with every real Christian. When a man truly passes this henceforth, his whole being runs Christward. The volume of the river may be small at first; but, small as it is, its direction is decided, and it gathers magnitude as it flows. He has Christ enthroned in his heart as the Lord of his love; over his intellect as his instructor in knowledge; over his will as the guide of his choice; over his life as the director of his conduct; yea, he can say with truth that he is Christs, as well as that Christ is his.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>What produces it. The influence on a mans heart of the love of Christ as that is manifested in His atoning death for him. Look at the history of Pauls own conversion, and you will see that the change in him was brought about through his belief that Jesus died for his sins and rose again for his justification. Now it is the same with the convert yet. It is his faith that Jesus Christ the Son of God loved him and gave Himself for him, which through the agency of the Holy Ghost brings about this transformation. Christ is only a Saviour, or at most the Saviour, till I appropriate Him, but when I do that He is my Saviour; and that moment is the henceforth of my life. Conclusion: But some one may ask, Why should I seek to pass this henceforth? What is there about conversion that makes it of such importance?<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>It is essential to your reconciliation with God, and your enjoyment of the blessedness of heaven.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>It will intensify your happiness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>It will increase your usefulness. (<em>W. M. Taylor, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ.<\/strong>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Christian has new views<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>Of men.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>He once estimated them by their earthly circumstances.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>He now esteems them according to their moral and religious worth.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>Of Christ.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>He once despised and lightly esteemed Him.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>He now regards Him as his Saviour and Lord. (<em>J. Lyth, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Spiritual knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>Of Christ.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Is not that the same as wanting to forget the Saviours humanity? Should we have only a glorified Christ as the object of our contention? No. Paul simply refuses to boast, as did those false teachers who troubled his ministry, of having known Christ in Judaea; he knows Christ only according to the spirit&#8211;<em>i.e.<\/em>, as his Saviour, which is the essential thing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Let us draw from this thought an important lesson. Who has not envied Christs contemporaries? It seems to us that had we seen and heard Him, our hearts would have been more moved, and doubt would have been impossible.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> Now listen to Christ Himself. A woman cries out, Blessed is the womb that bare Thee. He answers, Rather blessed are they that hear the Word of God and keep it. A man says, Thy mother and Thy brethren stand without. He answers, My mother and My brethren are those who hear the Word of God and do it. His apostles would like to retain Him. He says, It is expedient for you that I go away. Mary Magdalene would lay hold on Him. Jesus answers her, Touch Me not! What does all this mean if not that it is by the soul, before everything, by faith that Jesus would be known and possessed. This, then, is the consoling conclusion, that neither time nor distance hinders Jesus from being known and His presence felt. And is not all this bright with evidence? Was not the Church which saw Christ feeble, timid, and sluggish, and did not Christ have to leave her that she might receive the baptism from on high? Did His discourses ever produce the wonderful effect which they have produced since? Why, He touches more hearts in a single day now than during the three years of His ministry!<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> You envy the privilege of His disciples. Are you certain that His mean condition would not have turned you from Him? Who knows if you would not have denied Him? Supposing, however, that you had remained faithful to Him, would you have understood His work? Would you not have been attached to His earthly person more than to His Divine mission&#8211;would you have loved Him according to the spirit, as He would have Himself loved?<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>What is knowing Christ after the flesh to-day? This: To melt at the<strong> <\/strong>recollection of Jesus with an emotion entirely human; to weep over Him as the victim of human fanaticism; to honour His relics and memory. He is known according to the spirit. When at the foot of His Cross, it is not over Him, but over ourselves, that people weep; when in His death they contemplate not His sufferings merely, but more especially His sacrifice; when they act in union with His work, rejoice in His triumphs, and prepare for His coming.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>Of men.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>A signification has been given to these words which provokes a righteous protest. We see Christians, under the pretext of an imaginary perfection, break in sunder all the ties of flesh and blood, renounce their families, and, having put before them the wall of monastic vows, say to them, I know you no longer! Spiritual heroism, people exclaimed&#8211;brilliant triumphs gained over the flesh! Is that what the gospel teaches us? No! St. Paul tells us that the Christian who neglects his kindred is worse than an infidel. If, then, under pretext of renouncing the flesh, people should violate or neglect natural laws, they have against them not only Natures voice, but Gods. There will be cited here the numerous passages in which our Lord unsparingly condemns all those who, before following Him, consult flesh and blood. If any man hate not, etc. But He speaks of choosing between duty and delight&#8211;between the law of God and the affections of the family. Here our conscience gives Christ a full assent. But far from this be the system which condemns the life of the heart, the joys of existence and the flesh, as evil in themselves.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>What must, then, be understood by I know no one after the flesh? In every man there are two natures&#8211;flesh and spirit. To the eyes of flesh you are rich, poor&#8211;a master, a servant, etc.; to the eyes of the spirit you are a child of God. Now, St. Paul declares to us that henceforth what he would know in every man is the spiritual and immortal nature. Before Christ, what was a poor man, a slave, a publican? Now, to the eyes of Jesus the soul of the lowest harlot weighs as much when put in the scales as the soul of Caesar. Everywhere He only sees sinners to be saved; to all He offers the same language, grants the same love. In the school of Christ Paul learnt to see in the Festuses and Agrippas only lost souls, whom he will cause to hear the truth which saves without being preoccupied with their sceptre or their crown; it is there that he learnt to preach the gospel to an Aquila and a Lydia, with the very same love as had it been the soul of the Pro-consul Sergius or the Governor Publius. It is thus that we must know men. The world has its distinctions of rank, of learning, of fortune, and they are necessary. Should you overturn them to-day they would reappear to-morrow. Let us respect them. But let us know men by what they have that is great and immortal. (<em>E. Bersier, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Men not to be known after the flesh<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Not to know men after the flesh is not to judge of men according to endowments, though never so glittering, which arise only from fleshly principles. To esteem man by inward grace. Men esteem not their fields for the gay wild flowers in them, but for the corn and fruit; yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we Him no more. We do not glory in Him, because He was of kin to us, according to the flesh. We look upon Him no more, only as a miraculous man; but we know Him as the great Redeemer of the world. We consider Him in those excellent things He hath done, those excellent graces which He hath communicated, those excellent offices He doth exercise; we know Him, after a spiritual manner, as the Author of all grace.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Natural men have no delight in anything but secular concerns; love nothing but for their own advantage; admire not any true spiritual worth.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>An evidence of being taken<strong> <\/strong>off from ourselves and living to Christ is our valuation either of ourselves or others, according to holiness. And as a new creature is framed after the image of God, so his affections and valuations of men or things are according to Gods esteem of them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Our professions of Christ, serving Him and loving Him barely for ourselves and for fleshly ends doth not consist with regeneration. Such a love is a love to ourselves, not to Christ.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>We should eye Christ and arise to the knowledge of Him, as He is advanced and exalted by God. (<em>Bishop Hackett.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The new knowledge of Christ and man<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Paul had just said, One died for all, therefore all died&#8211;<em>i.e.,<\/em> according to Gods thoughts and purpose, the whole race, when Christ died, ceased to belong to the visible and transient world; and we, entering into the thought of God, henceforth know no man after the flesh. In death all earthly distinctions disappear. The rich man is rich, the poor man is poor no longer, etc. But further, Even though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now we know Him so no more. There were Christian people then living who had seen Christ, and this was surely a great distinction and blessedness; but it may have been a peril to them. I can imagine them assuming a certain superiority over their brethren. We did not receive the gospel from Paul, or Apollos, or Peter, but from the Christ Himself. And I can also imagine that others, when the memory of our Lords earthly life was so fresh, would feel an absorbing interest in all that they could learn about Christ as a man among men, and would come to think of Him under the common conditions of human life. There are some of us, Paul seems to<strong> <\/strong>say, who have known Christ after the flesh; but what does it matter that we remember His face, voice, manner, dress? To us He is not first of all a fellow-countryman, whom we used to see in the Synagogue on the Sabbath, and whose brethren and sisters and friends we knew; or a wonderful religious teacher, who in our presence said many wonderful things and did many wonderful works. To us He is the Eternal Son of God, the Brother of all men. His earthly life has passed into a larger, mightier, and more glorious life. Pauls gospel began where the gospel of those who knew Christ after the flesh ended&#8211;with the suffering and the death of Christ. I delivered unto you among the first things that Christ died for your sins according to the Scriptures. All that went before Paul passed over very lightly. Consider:<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>The new knowledge of Christ. To Paul, Christ was infinitely more than an august and pathetic tradition, and He must be infinitely more to us if we are to preach the gospel with any effect.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>We shall miss the substance of our message if we know Christ after the flesh. From the materials given to us in His teaching and history, we may construct a beautiful system of ethics and a noble conception of God, but we shall still miss the most animating and effective part of the gospel. Christianity is a historical religion; but the history on which our faith is founded did not come to an end eighteen hundred years ago. Through sixty generations men of every land have discovered for themselves that He is living still. Not in the remembrance of Christ, but in the living, personal Christ&#8211;a great multitude whom no man can number have found God. The life of every Christian man adds to the great story new miracles of mercy and power wrought by Christ. The Canon is not closed. Every age contributes material for new gospels. We have not to teach men a mere method of salvation revealed by Christ eighteen centuries ago. The Christian method of salvation is the method by which Christ Himself saves men now. With a dead Christ, belonging to a remote age, and not able and eager to save men now, the Christian method of salvation would be worthless.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>To have seen the Lord after He had risen, was one of the qualifications for the apostleship; and the apostles were not merely witnesses that Christ had died and had risen again. When Christ rose He passed into new and higher regions of life. His appearances during the forty days had this among other purposes, to bring home to them the immense change through which He had passed, and to discipline their faith in the reality of His presence in the invisible and eternal order. They saw that the limitations of His human life had been dissolved, and they were gradually prepared to receive His own wonderful words, All authority hath been given unto Me in heaven and on earth. Not till they had this new knowledge of Christ could they be sent to make disciples of all nations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Now, have we that kind of knowledge of Christ which is necessary both for our work at home and for our missions to the heathen? Do we think it enough to know Christ after the flesh? During the last forty years there has been a remarkable awakening of interest in the earthly history of our Lord. There are tens of thousands who have been reading the four gospels from their childhood who feel as if they had come to know Jesus of Nazareth for the first time. They have been able to place Him in His true relations to His age and to His country. The whole story has become real and solid to them. They know Him almost as well as the men and women knew Him who actually saw and heard Him. There is a real value in knowledge of this kind. But if our most effective conception of Christ is a mere historical conception, then we know Christ after the flesh. And our knowledge is rudimentary and imperfect. We must see Him descend into the mystery of death, wait for His emergence from darkness, join in the songs which hail His resurrection, see Him ascending to the throne of God, rejoice that He belongs, not merely to the distant past, but that He is the contemporary of all generations; rejoice that He is here, not under the limitations of His earthly life, but in the glorious fulness of Divine power, surrounded with the splendour of Gods eternal kingdom.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>It was one of the innumerable evils which Romanism inflicted on Christendom that it held constantly before the eyes the exhausted, agonised form of Christ on the Cross, and so deprived men of the animation and courage inspired by the knowledge that He is now on the throne of the Eternal. A similar loss may be inflicted on ourselves if our thoughts are imprisoned within the limits of His earthly life, and if we do not exult in His resurrection and in His constant presence in the Church. Are we, then, to forget His earthly history? Ah, no! But we know Him, not as His contemporaries knew Him, but with a larger and deeper knowledge. That poverty, that homelessness, that physical exhaustion, that agony&#8211;behind them all we see the Divine glory. In Christ, even during His earthly years, we look not at the things which are seen and temporal, but at the things which are not seen and eternal.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. <\/strong>And there are times when, if the story of the historic Christ is to command confidence, it must be sustained by the testimony of living men who have been delivered by the living Christ from the consciousness of guilt, from evil passion, and habit, and eternal death. Indeed, according to the ordinary methods of the Divine mercy, it is this personal testimony that moves the hearts of men to repent and inspires them with faith.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>The new knowledge of man. It is not enough that we cease to know Christ after the flesh. The fires of missionary enthusiasm will burn low unless we are also able to say we henceforth know no man after the flesh. We must see men not merely in their place in the visible and temporal order, but environed with the invisible and the eternal order.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>This man has immense wealth, but has he risen with Christ and made sure of the everlasting inheritance? If not, how poor! That man is poor, ill-clad, lives a hard and cheerless life, but is he in Christ? Yes; then how rich, for he is the heir of Gods eternal righteousness and glory! So with regard to princes and paupers, learned and ignorant, moralists and profligates, to achieve the dignity to which the eternal purpose of God destined even the obscurest of mankind. That man is a slave, but is he one with Christ? If he is, eternal glories sit already on his brow, and he may stand at last among the principalities and powers of the kingdom of heaven. This man has learning, keen and vigorous intellect, genius which will give him fame through many generations, but does he know the Eternal? If not, he has missed the knowledge which it supremely concerns him to possess. That man, as men deem, knows nothing, his mind is dull and uninstructed, he has never mastered even the elements of science, the songs of great poets have never kindled his imagination, he has never heard even the names of the great teachers of the race; but does he know Christ? Yes? Then he has been taught of God and received the illumination of the Holy Ghost, and has a wisdom transcending all the wisdom of the schools.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>And in the presence of races degraded through a long succession of generations, we must not despair, for they are living in a redeemed world; every man is dear to God, and by the power of His Spirit may rise to unknown heights of righteousness and glory. We must know no man after the flesh.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>We must not know ourselves after the flesh if we are to have the strength which the great tasks to which we are called demand. Who are we that we should hope to change the religious faith of hundreds of millions of men? What resources have we for so immense a work? We should lose all heart and courage if we measured ourselves against the difficulties, the impossibilities of our enterprise. But we are greater than we seem. We are one with Christ, who descended from the heights of God to seek and to save the lost, and who, now that He has returned to His glory, is seeking and saving them still. And it is He that is seeking, He that is saving them, through us. His power sustains our weakness, and in our very weakness is perfected. Let us be of good courage; all things are possible to us, for we are one with Him. (<em>R. W. Dale, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>How to view our fellow-men<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As a new creature (verse 17), he who is in Christ takes a new view of almost all the objects by which he is surrounded. The eyes of his understanding being enlightened, he sees them in new light, and that a true light. He gets a new view of sin, of Christ, of time, of this world, of himself, and, lastly, of his fellow-men. Henceforth he knows no man after the flesh.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>We see the worth of our own souls, and that the souls of others are of equal worth. The father realises that his children have souls, which, like his own, will exist for ever. The mother, as she rocks her infant to rest on her bosom, knows that the heart which has begun to beat in that little frame will not find rest till it is laid on the breast of Jesus. We are not surrounded by the mere creatures of a day, but by responsible and undying men, whose souls shalt exist as long as God Himself.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>We see that as by nature we are under the sentence of condemnation, so others are under the same sentence. When is it that we think most of an earthly friend, and are most deeply interested in his welfare? Is it when he is known to be in safety, or is it not rather when he is in peril? When is it that the wife thinks most of the husband, and the sister feels the deepest interest in the brother? Is it not when laid on a bed of distress, or when fighting with the billows of death? It was to seek and save that which was lost that Christ left the bosom of the Father and came to this cold world, and died amidst the agonies of the Cross. Those who have the same mind in them which was also in Christ Jesus will hasten to be fellow-workers with Him in saving souls from death.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>As having attained the enjoyment of Christs peace, we seek that others may share it with us. As long as we were without Christ and Christs peace, we did not know the value of them, and so could not be expected heartily to<strong> <\/strong>recommend them to others. But when we have tasted that the Lord is good, then we can enlarge upon our own experience, and we feel that if we were but the instruments of communicating that peace to others, we would be conveying a greater amount of good than by the largest temporal benefits.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>IV. <\/strong>When we love Christ ourselves, then our hearts are drawn towards those who, like us, love the Lord Jesus. Man is, in his very nature, a social being. It is this principle abused which congregates the wicked. It is the same attraction, now sanctified, which brings together the children of God. And how often has it happened that, when holding sacred converse with one another, Jesus Himself has joined us, as He did the two disciples on the road to Emmaus?<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>V. <\/strong>These views and motives will impel those who are swayed by them to do good as God may give thee opportunity. All genuine religion begins within, but while it begins within, it does not end there; it begins within only as all streams commence in some mountain where are their heaven-fed fountains; but it flows out like the stream, and carries with it a refreshing and fertilising influence. Watering, in this way, the objects immediately around them, Christian faith and zeal will flow towards more distant objects, towards the world at large. The prayer will be that, beginning at Jerusalem&#8211;that is, at home&#8211;the gospel be preached to every creature. Conclusion: From this survey we see&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>What is the grand function of the organised Church; it is to proclaim the way, sustain the truth, and propagate the life.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The grand aim of Church ordinances. We are to secure, in regard to them, that they be in thorough accordance with the Word of God, and that they be employed to edify the Church, and not for the purpose of gratifying the senses or stimulating the imagination.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>What is the style of preaching most fitted to advance the kingdom of God? It is preaching founded on Scripture, that speaks of Christ, and speaks to all&#8211;to rich and poor, to rich and barbarian, to old and young. It is a great evil in our community, the separation of rich and poor, especially in our great cities. But it is vastly greater when it is permitted to enter the house of God, which is meant to counteract and soften the severances of the world. (<em>J. McCosh, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>St. Pauls gospel<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I wonder what impression that strange sentence produces upon the mind of an average Englishman. Does it give him any intelligible idea at all? Yet St. Paul undoubtedly regarded that sentence as one of the most important he ever wrote. It reminds us of the striking difference between him and the other apostles. While Christ lived on earth St. Paul never knew Him. Now the apostles and the Jewish Christians generally attached the very greatest importance to the fact that they had thus known Christ. St. Paul, on the other hand, instead of bewailing his disqualification, as they represented it, declared with special emphasis it made no difference at all. You will remember how emphatically in a characteristic passage in Galatians he repudiated the idea that he owed anything at all to the other apostles. They were in no sense his superiors. They were in no sense better qualified for their office because they had known Christ after the flesh and he had not. When he met these apostles who had known Christ in the flesh he declared, They, I say, who were of repute imparted nothing to me (<span class='bible'>Gal 2:6<\/span>). He declares that their knowledge of Christ after the flesh was no advantage to them; and in the passage before us he goes so far as to say that if he himself had known Christ after the flesh he would have rid himself of the knowledge, for that knowledge at that particular time was a danger and a temptation. It led men to exaggerate the importance of those things about Christ which were seen and temporal, and to overlook to some extent those things which alone were of everlasting importance. As a matter of fact, those who did thus know Christ after the flesh either never realised His true glory, or were many long years in coming to the knowledge of Him. Have you ever realised the startling fact that St. Paul never once refers to the lovely life of our Lord as recorded in the gospels? He never mentions any of His miracles, parables, words, or deeds. His silence teaches us, even more significantly than his speech, that the essence of the gospel lies far below the mere details, incomparable as they are, of the human life of our Lord. You and I are particularly interested in this remarkable feature of St. Pauls experience, for we are like him. We are not like St. Peter, who was a disciple from the beginning. We never met Christ, we never heard His loving voice. We may have an immeasurably better knowledge of Him. We may know Him as St Paul himself knew Him, in the deepest sense of the word, better than any one else, except St. John. How did he know Him? His knowledge is expressed in that ever-memorable phrase, It was the good pleasure of God, who separated me from my mothers womb, to reveal His Son in me. Not outside of me, but in me. O, what does that mean? It means that there are two totally different ways of contemplating Jesus Christ. We may dwell on the known incidents of that lovely life just as we might dwell upon Platos incomparable account of the trial and death of Socrates. Any such study of the mere fragmentary history of the beautiful incidents in the human life of our Lord is as inspiring as it is ennobling. But it is outside of us. It does not stir the depths of our being. Or, on the other hand, we may think of Jesus Christ in a totally different way&#8211;as the Risen Christ, the Living Christ, the Christ in whom we all at this very moment live and move and have our being; the Christ who is literally in every one of us. This, indeed, is what St. Paul called my gospel&#8211;the gospel which God sent to him by revelation, the gospel which he was better qualified to propound, because he was not confused by any knowledge of Christ after the flesh. St. Paul himself was amazed and perplexed and agitated, and said, What is the matter with me? I am a Hebrew of the Hebrews. I have kept all the law, and yet I am as wretched as I can be. Then he discovered that it was Christ who made him wretched. At last, he said, It pleased God to reveal Himself in me. Then I realised that there could be no happiness for me until I submitted to the Divine Saviour. Thank God, I did not know Him after the flesh, for I might then have been prevented from knowing as I know now, that He is the great light of God, who lighteth every man that cometh into the world. Take the case of an agnostic, who declares that he never felt the least religious emotion, a man of high character and very scrupulous conscience. You say to me, How do you reconcile that case with your theory of Christ being in the heart of every man? Quite easily. If in midwinter you wander with me into the wood, would you say it was dead? Not a leaf, not a bud, not a blade of grass. But you are not deceived by the superficial appearance. You wait for the sunshine and the rain, and you shall see the summer. And in the case of this agnostic, wait until your Father in heaven has sent him the sunshine of His love and the rain of His grace, and you shall find strange stirrings in the depths of his soul, for Christ is in him, as He is in all of us. This is, indeed, what St. Paul meant in the first part of my text, where he says, We henceforth know no man after the flesh. He not only refused to know Christ after the flesh, but he refused to know anybody else after the flesh. He could not think of any man apart from the Divine Christ. He never thought of any man without realising that Christ was in every man. You are not a mere man or woman to me. You are men and women redeemed by the precious blood of Christ. You are human beings dear to God, dearer than you are to yourself or anybody else. (<em>H. Price<\/em> <em>Hughes, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The perpetuity of the Divine incarnation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>Consider what the apostle meant. It is very probable that he had in view those who underrated his authority because he had not been one of the original disciples, and so seen Christ face to face. And it was of course but natural, that as years stole on, greater interest and authority would attach to those who, like Peter and John, had held converse with the Redeemer. Whether St. Paul ever beheld the Saviour has been questioned. On the one hand, if he had seen Him, we should expect some mention of it; on the other, brought up at the feet of Gamaliel, he could scarcely, we imagine, have failed to have his attention drawn to the miracles and teaching of Christ, and if so would scarcely have failed to obtain a sight of Him. The text sounds as though he were himself uncertain about the matter. And it is quite easy to imagine that he may have been in one of the many crowds which at various seasons gathered round our Lord; and yet have been so situated as to be uncertain whether he had really caught sight of His sacred form. However this be, he declares at any rate that henceforth he would neither build nor exalt himself upon that knowledge.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>But did the apostle mean that from that time he would cease to think of Him as clothed with flesh and meditate only upon His Divinity? Surely not. So to have done would have been to lose sight of one of the most stupendous truths of the gospel&#8211;viz., that Christ Jesus is at this moment in the likeness of man. The Eternal Word when He became incarnate became so for ever. Oh! if we desired to set before you in all its marvellousness the great miracle of the incarnation, it is not through the dimness of past centuries to the valleys of Judah that we would try to lead your thoughts. Beyond the third heaven, where the cherubim and seraphim are ever waiting, where the song that none can learn is ever swelling, and the<strong> <\/strong>unspeakable words which it is not lawful for men to utter are ever sounding, in the centre of the light inaccessible, we would teach you to behold the form of Man. And we cannot but observe how thorough recognition of the present manhood of Christ satisfies the longing of the human heart for a sympathetic being in the object of worship.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Think you it was this truth, so rich in consolation for all who are partakers of human nature, that St. Paul resolved to put from his mind? Rather was it this truth on which he purposed to build exclusive of all others. He would not in completing the Incarnation be ever going back to the remembrance of the Saviour in His body of weakness, when he might fill his soul with the thought of that same body radiant in beauty, the centre of the heavenly host. The form of the Sob of Man as seen at Jerusalem, was but the first and most transitory revelation of the great miracle of Marys conception; the nobler and more lasting results of the same Divine child-bearing were the sight by faith of the same form of a man for ever enthroned on high. Who wonders then that the inspired apostle, thus looking to the present and the future, was ready to forget the past, and that as the vision of the excellent glory rose up in his mind, he cast behind him the remembrance of his God in His humiliation?<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>The lessons for us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>There is amongst us a great tendency to view the days of Christs personal sojourn upon earth as days of extraordinary privilege.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Now in opposition to these ideas, we conceive Scripture to intimate that we are the more highly favoured. Christ Himself said, It is expedient for you that I go away.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> We can hardly fail to perceive that the sight of God must have been itself a temptation to unbelief. Was there, think you, nothing hard in realising the fact, that the Being to whom they spoke as man to man was very God? If, therefore, His bodily presence was a source of joy, so also was it a source of temptation. Many a man who believes Christ is God, now that He is unseen, would have disbelieved if he had beheld Him in the form of a servant.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> And this being so, we would remind you that Christ is really present with His redeemed now, as He was with His disciples in Galilee. An object is not less real because it is unseen. What spiritual advantages did the disciples reap from proximity to their Master? He was their counsellor; and will He not teach us? He was their support; and are not His everlasting arms around us? Now, moreover, He is not only present, but omnipresent. They could be separated from Him for awhile; we can never be parted. (<em>Bp. Woodford.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The brotherhood of man<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Henceforth know we no man after the flesh. In these words St. Paul is evidently contrasting the view he had been accustomed to entertain respecting his fellow-men before his conversion to Christ, with that he took now that he had been brought under the influence of Christian truth. Then he estimated men after the flesh, <em>i.e.,<\/em> he judged them by earthly standards. These were the questions he would doubtless have asked himself respecting any upon whom he wished to pass judgment: What is his descent? Where has he been instructed? Has he passed through the schools of philosophy sitting at Gamaliels feet? What are his professions? Does he fast twice a week? But now that he had been brought into contact with Christ Jesus, and had become the recipient of His salvation, he estimated men according to a very different standard. Then, after the flesh, but now after the spirit. And these, we may reasonably suppose, are the inquiries which would rise within him: Have they the spirit of Christ? Are their hearts right in the sight of God? Do they love and practice the principles of the gospel of peace? This twofold method of estimating men prevails still. If you judge men after the flesh, the undoubted effect will be to narrow and to contract your sympathies. Adopting such a test as this, society will necessarily be broken up into fragments, each caring only for itself; the man of rank caring only for those of noble descent, the man of wealth for those of large possessions, or the man of culture for those of educated tastes, while the mass of those who possess none of the enrichments will be left to themselves. Only let men be judged, not after the flesh, but according to their character, and large-heartedness, and world-embracing love will take the place of that exclusiveness which the opposite course engenders. The Lord looketh at the heart. He recognised in the fallen those who were capable of being raised from their degradation, and of loving and serving Him in holiness and righteousness. And beholding thus their moral and spiritual capabilities, His heart yearned for their uplifting. The fulness of time at length arrived. Or think of St. Paul. He resolved that he would henceforth judge men after their character, and not after the<strong> <\/strong>flesh, and the effect of this decision was that he saw some around him who had clearly become renewed in the spirit of their minds&#8211;who had become new creatures in Christ Jesus. And even so with ourselves, if we only view men in the light of their spiritual character and capacities, the effect will unquestionably be that we shall find among all classes in society men whose lives are marked by the principles of righteousness, and beholding what the truth as it is in Jesus has wrought for them, and conscious that it can effect similar results wherever it is received, we shall be constrained to labour for its extension throughout the world, that thus the entire moral aspect of the universe may be changed, the desert rejoicing and blossoming as the rose, earth becoming like heaven. And thus we see theft the religion of Christ calls forth the sympathy and love of men towards the entire race to which they belong. The apostle adds: Yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we Him no more. In this early Church gathered in the city of Corinth there were several parties. In condemning the divisions which had thus arisen, the apostle uses the words: Every one of you saith, I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas, and I of Christ. Now the question is naturally suggested, what could be the meaning of any who said, I am of Christ. It would appear that the persons who said this were converts from Judaism, and who claimed some special relationship to Christ, arising from the fact that they had seen Him when He sojourned upon earth. We are now prepared to apprehend the meaning of St. Paul in the words before us. He felt theft he might as justly as any of them rejoice in having seen Christ in the flesh; but he would not, in that he felt there was a far higher view of Christ than that of gazing upon His outward form, even the apprehension by faith of the spiritual presence of the Redeemer; the contemplation of His character and spirit, and the so beholding of this as to enter into it, and to be changed into the same from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord. It was after this that his noble spirit aspired. It must not be supposed that the apostle was indifferent to the great fact of the humanity of the Son of God; indeed, is there any writer, save the Evangelist John, who refers more frequently or touchingly to this than St. Paul? Does he not remind the Galatians how that in the fulness of time, God sent forth His Son, made of a woman, etc. And, in this respect, the apostle presents a worthy pattern to us. Like him, let us not look so much to that which is material, as to that which is spiritual in relation to Christ Jesus. It behoves us, therefore, to be careful that we do not lose sight of that spiritual apprehension of the Saviour which alone can meet the requirements, and satisfy the aspirations of the soul of man. It is even so. He is the eternal One. He is the very Son of God. And having been made perfect through suffering, He has entered into His glory. His humiliation is past, and He is now exalted at Gods right hand. The kingly diadem encircles His brow. We have known Him after the flesh, battling with poverty, and with temptation and sin, with woe and death, but henceforth we know Him thus no more. He is the victor now&#8211;the King of glory. (<em>S. D. Hillman.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>  Verse 15.  <I><B>And that he died for all, that they which live<\/B><\/I>, c.] This <I>third<\/I> position he draws from the preceding: <I>If all were dead<\/I>, and in danger of endless perdition and if <I>he died for all<\/I>, to save them from that perdition; then it justly follows that they <I>are not their own<\/I>, that they are bought by his blood; and <I>should<\/I> <I>not live unto themselves<\/I>, for this is the way to final ruin; <I>but<\/I> <I>unto him who died for them<\/I>, and thus made an atonement for their sins, and <I>rose again<\/I> for their justification.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> And he died for all those for whom he died, not only to redeem them from the guilt of sin, but also from their vain conversation; that they which live by his grace, might not make themselves the end of their life, and live to serve themselves, and gratify their own corrupt inclinations; but might make the service of Christ, the honour and glory of him who died for them, and also rose again from the dead, the end of their lives; arguing the reasonableness of a holy and Christian life, from the love and end of Christ in dying for them; according to that, <span class='bible'>Rom 14:7<\/span>,<span class='bible'>8<\/span>; <I>For none of us, liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself. For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto the Lord: whether we live, therefore, or die, we are the Lords.<\/I> This is one way by which a believer fetcheth strength from the death of Christ to die unto sin, and from his resurrection to live unto newness of life; he concluding: If Christ died, and rose again for him, that then he was once dead in trespasses and sins; and therefore he judgeth himself obliged, now that he is made spiritually alive, not to live to himself, or serve his own profit, honour, reputation, lusts, or passions, but to live in obedience to him, and to the honour and glory of him, who died to redeem him from the guilt and power of sin, and rose again to quicken him to newness of life and conversation, to the honour and glory of his Redeemer. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P><B>15. they which live<\/B>in thepresent life (<span class='bible'>2Co 4:11<\/span>, &#8220;wewhich live&#8221;) [ALFORD];or, they who are thus indebted to Him for life of soul as well asbody [MENOCHIUS]. <\/P><P>       <B>died for them<\/B>He doesnot add, &#8220;rose again for them,&#8221; a phrase not found inPaul&#8217;s language [BENGEL].He died <I>in their stead,<\/I> He arose again <I>for their good,<\/I>&#8220;<I>for<\/I> (<I>the effecting of<\/I>) their justification&#8221;(<span class='bible'>Ro 4:25<\/span>), and that He might betheir Lord (<span class='bible'>Ro 14:7-9<\/span>).ELLICOTT and ALFORDjoin &#8220;for them&#8221; with both &#8220;died&#8221; and &#8220;roseagain&#8221;; as Christ&#8217;s death is <I>our death,<\/I> so Hisresurrection is <I>our resurrection; Greek,<\/I> &#8220;Who for themdied and rose again.&#8221; <\/P><P>       <B>not henceforth<\/B><I>Greek,<\/I>&#8220;no longer&#8221;; namely, now that His death for them has takenplace, and that they know that His death saves them from deatheternal, and His resurrection life brings spiritual and everlastinglife to them.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown&#8217;s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>And that he died for all, that they which live<\/strong>,&#8230;. The end of Christ&#8217;s dying for men was that they might live; live, in a legal sense, live a life of justification; and that they which live in such a sense,<\/p>\n<p><strong>should not henceforth live unto themselves<\/strong>: to their own lusts, and after their own wills, to either sinful self, or righteous self:<\/p>\n<p><strong>but unto him which died for them, and rose again<\/strong>; that is, for them, for their justification; for all those for whom Christ died, for them he rose again; and who were justified, acquitted, and discharged when he was; which cannot be said of all mankind; and which is an obligation on such persons to live to Christ, to ascribe the whole of their salvation to him, and to make his glory the end of all their actions. Some copies read, &#8220;which died for them all&#8221;.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>Should no longer live unto themselves <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">   <\/SPAN><\/span>). The high doctrine of Christ&#8217;s atoning death carries a correspondingly high obligation on the part of those who live because of him. Selfishness is ruled out by our duty to live &#8220;unto him who for their sakes died and rose again.&#8221; <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Robertson&#8217;s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1) <strong>&#8220;And that he died for all,&#8221;<\/strong> (kai huper panton apethanen) &#8220;and he died on behalf of all,&#8221; He died instead of all, for all, <span class='bible'>1Ti 2:3-6<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>2) <strong>&#8220;That they which live,&#8221;<\/strong> (hina hoi zontes) &#8220;In order that the ones living (in him),&#8221; for the holy purpose that the saved, the born again, should seek the holy plane of living and service that their Lord pursued, <span class='bible'>Col 3:1-3<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>3) <strong>&#8220;Should not henceforth live unto themselves.&#8221;<\/strong> (meketi heautois zosin) &#8220;Should nevermore live to or toward themselves,&#8221; selfishly, in greed, as egocentrics, <span class='bible'>1Co 6:19-20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co 10:31<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 6:33<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>4) <strong>&#8220;But unto him which died for them,&#8221;<\/strong> (alla to huper auton apothanonti) &#8220;But to the one who died on their behalf;&#8221; This is why after one is baptized he is said to be raised &#8220;to walk in the newness of life,&#8221; <span class='bible'>Rom 6:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph 5:15<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>5) <strong>&#8220;And rose again.&#8221;<\/strong> (kai egerthenti) &#8220;and is having been raised (again);&#8221; that men might walk in His light, no longer in darkness of past sins, <span class='bible'>Joh 8:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Jn 3:1-3<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(15) <strong>Should not henceforth live unto themselves.<\/strong>St. Paul was not writing a theological treatise, and the statement was accordingly not meant to be an exhaustive presentment of all the purposes of God in the death of Christ. It was sufficient to give prominence to the thought that one purpose was that men should share at once His death and His life; should live not in selfishness, but in love; not to themselves, but to Him, as He lived to God. (Comp. <span class='bible'>Rom. 6:9-11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eph. 2:5-7<\/span>.) Now we see the full force of the love of Christ constraineth us, and we love Him because He first loved us. If He died for us, can we, without shame, frustrate the purpose of His death by not living to Him?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 15<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> <strong> That<\/strong> Omit, as unnecessarily supplied by the translators. <strong> And he died for all <\/strong> for this purpose, that those living through his death should consecrate life to him. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Live live unto themselves<\/strong> Both <strong> lives <\/strong> signify one literal conscious life. As Christ bought our life by his death, so the life we live is rightfully his. And it was this St. Paul&rsquo;s living a life that belonged to Christ, that subjected him to the charge of being beside himself, <span class='bible'>2Co 5:13<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><strong> For them<\/strong> The preposition for does not necessarily in itself signify <em> instead of; <\/em> but it acquires that meaning, as it often does, from the context.<\/p>\n<p> Christ&rsquo;s death as the substitute for ours is the very reason why our life is rightfully his. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Rose again<\/strong> This does not, as Meyer argues, show that if Christ died as our substitute he rose as our substitute. Paul&rsquo;s clear meaning is, Christ died in our stead, and <strong> rose again<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>2Co 5:15<\/span> . Continuation or second part of the judgment, in consequence of which the love of Christ   .<\/p>\n<p> has the emphasis, whereas in <span class='bible'>2Co 5:14<\/span> the stress lay on  and  . &ldquo; <em> And<\/em> (that) <em> He died for the benefit of all<\/em> (with the purpose) <em> that<\/em> (because otherwise this  would be frustrated) <em> the living should no mere<\/em> (as before the death they had died with Christ) <em> live to themselves, i.e<\/em> . dedicate their life to selfish ends, <em> but<\/em> ,&rdquo; etc. Comp. <span class='bible'>Rom 14:7<\/span> ff.<\/p>\n<p>  ] Paul might also have said   ; but   is purposely chosen with retrospective reference to    , and that as <em> subject (the living<\/em> ), not as apposition ( <em> as<\/em> the living, Hofmann), in which view the life meant is held to be the <em> earthly<\/em> one, which Jesus left when He died; but this would only furnish a superfluous and unmeaning addition (it is otherwise at <span class='bible'>2Co 4:11<\/span> ), and so also with de Wette&rsquo;s interpretation: <em> so long as we live<\/em> . No; it is <em> the<\/em> life, which has <em> followed<\/em> on the  . He, namely, who has <em> died<\/em> with Christ is <em> alive<\/em> from death, as Christ Himself has died and become alive (<span class='bible'>Rom 14:9<\/span> ); He who has become  with His <em> death<\/em> , is so also with His <em> resurrection<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Rom 6:5<\/span> ). Thus the dead are necessarily the  , by sharing ethically the same fate with Christ, <span class='bible'>Gal 2:19<\/span> f. Their  is, consequently, doubtless in substance the life of <em> regeneration<\/em> (Erasmus, Beza, Flatt, and others); it is not, however, regarded under this form of conception, but as   (<span class='bible'>Rom 6:4<\/span> ), <em> out of death<\/em> . Comp. <span class='bible'>Rom 6:8-11<\/span> . Rckert, in accordance with his incorrect taking of  in the sense of  (see on <span class='bible'>2Co 5:14<\/span> ), explains: &ldquo;those, for whom He has died, on whom, therefore, death has no more claims.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>  ] is correlative to the   , in so far as these are just the living out of death, whose life is to belong to the Living One; and   belongs also to  ., since Christ is raised     (<span class='bible'>Rom 4:25<\/span> ). Comp. on <span class='bible'>Phi 3:10<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>1Co 15:17<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> Note, further, that Paul in <span class='bible'>2Co 5:15<\/span> writes in the <em> third<\/em> person (he does not say <em> we<\/em> ), because he lays down the whole judgment beginning with  as the great, universally valid and fundamental <em> doctrine<\/em> for the collective Christian life, that he may then in <span class='bible'>2Co 5:16<\/span> let himself emerge in the  . He would not have written differently even if he had meant by   .  <em> his<\/em> love <em> to<\/em> the Lord (in opposition to Hofmann). Much <em> that is significant<\/em> is implied in this doctrinal, objective form of confession.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer&#8217;s New Testament Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 15 And <em> that<\/em> he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again. <strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Ver. 15. <strong> Should not henceforth<\/strong> ] <em> Servati sumus ut serviamus.<\/em> The redeemed among the Romans were to observe and honour those that ransomed them as parents, all their days. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 15.<\/strong> ] [ <strong> having judged this<\/strong> (i.e.] <strong> because we formed this judgment<\/strong> , viz. at our conversion: learned to regard this as a settled truth) <strong> that One died on behalf of all<\/strong> (not only, for the <em> benefit<\/em> of all, as Meyer, but <em> instead of<\/em> all, suffered death in the root and essence of our humanity, as the second Adam. This death on behalf of <em> all men<\/em> is the absolute objective fact: that <em> all<\/em> enter not into the benefit of that Death, is owing to the non-fulfilment of the subjective condition which follows), <strong> therefore all died<\/strong> (i.e. therefore, in the death of Christ, <em> all, the<\/em> all for whom He died,   , <em> died too<\/em> : i.e. see below, became planted in the likeness of His death, died to sin and to self, that they might live to Him. This was true, <em> objectively<\/em> , but <em> not subjectively<\/em> till such death to sin and self is realized in each: see <span class='bible'>Rom 6:8<\/span> ff.). The other renderings, &lsquo; <em> ought to die<\/em> ,&rsquo; as Thomas Aq., Grot., Estius, al., &lsquo; <em> were under sentence of death<\/em> ,&rsquo; as Chrys., Theodoret, Beza, al.; &lsquo; <em> as good as died<\/em> , Flatt; are shewn to be erroneous by carefully noticing the construction, with or without  . The <em> verb<\/em> is common to both members of the sentence; the correspondent emphatic words in the two members being (1) <strong>   <\/strong> , (2) <strong> <\/strong> : &lsquo;( <em> One on behalf of all<\/em> ) died, therefore ( <em> all<\/em> ) died: if <em> One<\/em> died the death of (belonging to, due from) all, then all died (in and with Him).&rsquo;<\/p>\n<p> Meyer&rsquo;s rendering of  <em> because<\/em> , can hardly be right as it would leave   standing awkwardly alone. <strong> And He died for all, in order that they who live<\/strong> (in <em> this life<\/em> , see    , ch. <span class='bible'>2Co 4:11<\/span> ; = in sense, &lsquo; <em> as long as they are in this state<\/em> ,&rsquo; as De W.: not, &lsquo;those who live <em> spiritually<\/em> ,&rsquo; as Beza, Flatt, which would altogether strike out the sense, for it is, <em> that they may<\/em> live spiritually, &amp;c.: nor, &lsquo; <em> superstites<\/em> ,&rsquo; they whom He left behind at His death,  in contrast with Him who  , as Meyer; for, not to insist on the more general reference to <em> all time<\/em> , many to whom the Apostle was now writing were <em> not born at the time of His Death<\/em> ) <strong> should no longer<\/strong> (now that His Death has taken place: or, as they did before they apprehended that Death as theirs, but I prefer the former, see    below) <strong> live to themselves<\/strong> (with <em> self<\/em> as their great source and end of action, to please and to obey) <strong> but to Him that died and rose again for them<\/strong> ( <strong> <\/strong> , not merely even as connected with  &lsquo; <em> for the benefit of<\/em> ,&rsquo; as Meyer again; but strictly &lsquo; <em> in the place of<\/em> :&rsquo; as the Death of Christ is <em> our death<\/em> , so His Resurrection is <em> our resurrection<\/em> ).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Henry Alford&#8217;s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>2Co 5:15<\/span> .      .  .  .: <em> judging this; that One died for all<\/em> ( <em> cf.<\/em> <span class='bible'>Rom 5:15<\/span> ), <em> therefore all died, and He died for all, that they who live<\/em> (see <span class='bible'>2Co 3:11<\/span> ) <em> should no longer live unto themselves, but unto Him who died and rose again for them<\/em> . To die     is the greatest proof that anyone can offer of his love (<span class='bible'>Joh 15:13<\/span> ). The proof to us of the Love of Christ to all is that He died   . Of this Death two consequences are now mentioned: ( <em> a<\/em> ) one objective and inevitable, quite independent of our faith and obedience; ( <em> b<\/em> ) another subjective and conditional. ( <em> a<\/em> )     , <em> then all died, sc.<\/em> , in Him who is the &ldquo;recapitulation&rdquo; of all humanity, Jew and Greek, bond and free, faithless or believing. We must not weaken the force of   : the Incarnation embraces all men ( <em> cf.<\/em> <span class='bible'>1Co 15:22<\/span> ). The A.V. &ldquo;then were all dead&rdquo; (the same mistranslation occurs <span class='bible'>Rom 6:2<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Col 3:3<\/span> ) does not bring out the sense, which is that the Dying of Christ on the Cross was in some sort the dying of all mankind. But ( <em> b<\/em> ) the purposes of the Atonement are not completely fulfilled without the response of man&rsquo;s faith and obedience; <em> He died for all<\/em> ,     .  .  . This is the frequent exhortation of St. Paul (<span class='bible'>Rom 6:11<\/span> and see <span class='bible'>1Pe 3:18<\/span> ); the purpose of Christ&rsquo;s Death is to lead us to Life, a life &ldquo;unto God&rdquo; ( <em> cf.<\/em> <span class='bible'>Rom 6:11<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Rom 14:7-8<\/span> ) the &ldquo;life indeed&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>1Ti 6:19<\/span> ) which must be begun here if it is to be perfected hereafter. The preposition  , &ldquo;on behalf of&rdquo; ( <em> cf.<\/em> chap. <span class='bible'>2Co 12:10<\/span> ), employed in these verses is the one usually employed in the N.T. to express the relation between Christ&rsquo;s Atoning Death and our benefit: it was &ldquo;for our sake,&rdquo; &ldquo;on our behalf&rdquo; ( <em> e.g.<\/em> , <span class='bible'>Luk 22:19-20<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Joh 10:15<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Joh 11:51<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Rom 5:6<\/span> , <span class='bible'>1Co 1:13<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Gal 3:13<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Eph 5:2<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Heb 2:9<\/span> , <span class='bible'>1Jn 3:16<\/span> ). It is not equivalent to  , &ldquo;instead of&rdquo; (although in <span class='bible'>Phm 1:13<\/span> its meaning approximates thereto), and ought not to be so translated; although the preposition  is used of our Lord&rsquo;s Atoning Work in three places (<span class='bible'>Mat 20:28<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Mar 10:45<\/span> , <span class='bible'>1Ti 2:6<\/span> ), and the implied metaphor must have a place in any complete theory of the Atonement. But here  is (as usual) used, and the rendering &ldquo;instead of,&rdquo; even if linguistically possible (which it is not), is excluded by the fact that in the phrase      ,   is governed by <em> both<\/em> participles. Christ rose again &ldquo;on our behalf&rdquo;; He is never said to have risen &ldquo;instead of us&rdquo;.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>they which lives = the living, as 2Co 4:11. <\/p>\n<p>live. See App-170. <\/p>\n<p>not henceforth = no longer (meketi). <\/p>\n<p>rose. App-178. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>15.] [having judged this (i.e.] because we formed this judgment, viz. at our conversion:-learned to regard this as a settled truth) that One died on behalf of all (not only, for the benefit of all, as Meyer,-but instead of all, suffered death in the root and essence of our humanity, as the second Adam. This death on behalf of all men is the absolute objective fact: that all enter not into the benefit of that Death, is owing to the non-fulfilment of the subjective condition which follows),-therefore all died (i.e. therefore, in the death of Christ, all, the all for whom He died,  , died too: i.e. see below, became planted in the likeness of His death,-died to sin and to self, that they might live to Him. This was true, objectively, but not subjectively till such death to sin and self is realized in each: see Rom 6:8 ff.). The other renderings,-ought to die, as Thomas Aq., Grot., Estius, al.,-were under sentence of death, as Chrys., Theodoret, Beza, al.;-as good as died, Flatt;-are shewn to be erroneous by carefully noticing the construction, with or without . The verb is common to both members of the sentence; the correspondent emphatic words in the two members being (1)   , (2) : (One on behalf of all) died, therefore (all) died: if One died the death of (belonging to, due from) all, then all died (in and with Him).<\/p>\n<p>Meyers rendering of  because, can hardly be right as it would leave   standing awkwardly alone. And He died for all, in order that they who live (in this life, see   , ch. 2Co 4:11; = in sense, as long as they are in this state, as De W.:-not, those who live spiritually, as Beza, Flatt, which would altogether strike out the sense, for it is, that they may live spiritually, &amp;c.: nor, superstites, they whom He left behind at His death,  in contrast with Him who , as Meyer;-for, not to insist on the more general reference to all time, many to whom the Apostle was now writing were not born at the time of His Death) should no longer (now that His Death has taken place: or, as they did before they apprehended that Death as theirs,-but I prefer the former, see    below) live to themselves (with self as their great source and end of action, to please and to obey) but to Him that died and rose again for them (, not merely even as connected with  for the benefit of, as Meyer again; but strictly in the place of: as the Death of Christ is our death, so His Resurrection is our resurrection).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2Co 5:15. , judging) with a most true judgment. Love and judgment are not opposed to each other in spiritual men.- , for all) for the dead and living.-  , then these all) Hence the full force of the , for and the utmost extent of the mystery is disclosed; not only is it just the same as if all had died, but all are dead; neither death, nor any other enemy, nor they themselves have power over themselves: they are entirely at the disposal and control of the Redeemer.- has a force relative to , for all. An apt universality. The teachers urge; and the learners are urged, because Christ died for both.-, are dead) and so now no longer do they regard themselves. The generous lovers of the Redeemer apply that principally to themselves, which belongs to all. Their death was brought to pass in the death of Christ.-, and) this word also depends on , because. First, the words, one, and, for all, correspond; in the next place, died, and, that they should live.- , they that live) in the flesh.-, but) namely, that they should live, viz., in faith and a newly acquired vigour, Gal 2:20.-) he does not say,  . It is the dative of advantage, as they call it; , denotes something more than this.- , and rose again) Here we do not supply, for them; for it is not consonant with the phraseology of the apostle; but there is something analogous to be supplied, for example, [that He might be Lord both of the dead and the living] from Rom 14:9.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2Co 5:15<\/p>\n<p>2Co 5:15 <\/p>\n<p>and he died for all, that they that live should no longer live unto themselves,-Christ died that he might deliver those dead in sins from the bondage of sin, and lead them to live for his honor and glory. Unless we live such a life as to afford a stepping-stone to a higher life to those who come after us, our life is a failure. Jesus gave his life to lift up others and he expects his disciples to follow his example. In dying for us, he has done something for us so immense in love that we ought to be his forever. To make us his was the very object of his death.<\/p>\n<p>but unto him who for their sakes died and rose again.-All owe their redemption from death to Christ; and whether they love and obey him or not, they should do so, and should live no longer unto themselves, but unto him who for their sakes died and rose again; for none are their own. We love, because he first loved us. (1Jn 4:19). The goodness of God leads men to repentance, and every one who does not repent despises the riches of his goodness and forbearance and long- suffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance. (Rom 2:4). <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Why Christ Died<\/p>\n<p>2Co 5:14-21<\/p>\n<p>For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead: and that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again. Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we him no more. Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; to wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation. Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christs stead, be ye reconciled to God. For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. (vv. 14-21)<\/p>\n<p>In this section of the epistle Paul brings before us in a very clear, definite way, the supreme reason for the death of our Lord Jesus Christ. We see not merely One who loved God His Father and loved the truth, and was therefore willing to die as a martyr for truth, but we see One who took His place as a vicarious sacrifice, suffering instead of others, bearing the judgment that sinners deserved in order that they might be delivered from that judgment, and that they might be brought into a new creation, a new relationship with God altogether, and then might go forth with hearts aflame with love for Christ to carry the story of His grace to all men everywhere. This is the way that Christianity has been propagated down through the centuries. Islam was propagated by the sword. Its advocates said, Accept the religion of Mohammed or die. Other systems have been advanced by appeal to selfish interests. But Christianity has been propagated down through all the centuries in the power of the Holy Spirit, through the setting forth of the death, the burial, and the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, calling upon men through Christ to be reconciled to God, and what marvels this gospel has wrought!<\/p>\n<p>The apostle says, The love of Christ constraineth us. Spurred on by his own sense of that mighty, all-conquering love, he went out into a world of sinners to win men for Christ, because, he tells us, we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead. That is, mankind as a whole was under sentence of death, that came in with the fall of the first man. Adam stood there before God as our federal head. He was the head of the old creation, and that old creation was on trial in Adam. God said to him, Thou shaft not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof [dying thou shalt die] (Gen 2:17). Adam deliberately disobeyed this command of God, and he fell under sentence of death, and of course took the entire human race down with him, for all were represented in him as he stood before God. And so all mankind now are in the place of death.<\/p>\n<p>I have sometimes tried to illustrate it like this. Think of the top of this reading desk as representing paradise, that place in which God put man when He first created him. This hymn book which I hold erect on the desk may speak to you of Adam as the head of the race. There our first father stood in the position of responsibility before God, a sinless man in Eden. Had he been obedient, he would never have come under the sentence of death, but through disobedience he fell under that sentence. Sinning against God he went down into the place of death; just as I drop this book from the top of the reading desk to the platform, you may think of Adam falling from that place of sinlessness, where he was free of all condemnation, down into the place of death because of sin. And mark, every person who has ever come into the world since, has come into the world down there in the place of death. Not one has come into the world up here on this plane of sinlessness. Therefore, all are dead, as God looks at men, dead in trespasses and sin. But now think of our Lord Jesus Christ. He comes into the world as the sinless One; He stands not only on the plane where Adam was, the plane of innocence, but He is absolutely holy. But He has come to save men. He cannot find any men on this plane of sinlessness; He does not find men enjoying life and fellowship with God. Where does He have to go to find them? He goes down into the place of death where man is. And that he died for all. Because men were dead He went down into death, and now He brings believers up with Him in resurrection life. To put them here on the same plane where Adam was before he fell? Oh, no, to lift them infinitely higher, that they may be made members of a new creation of which He is the exalted Head in heaven: He hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus (Eph 2:6).<\/p>\n<p>If [Christ] died for all, then were all dead. No man has title to life in himself, but Christ died for all that they which live, those who have put their trust in Him, those to whom He has spoken life, now possessors of eternal life through faith, should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again. Why did Christ die? Not only that we should be delivered from death and judgment, but that we should be brought up from our state of death into newness of life. Now our redeemed lives should be devoted to Him that we should live henceforth to the glory of God alone. And so we now look out upon the world through altogether different eyes from those we used when we belonged to it. When men of the world, we made much of the flesh and all that was linked with it. We thought of men as great, or as rich, or as powerful, talented or able, as superior one to another. Some men we despised because they were poor and ignorant and degraded, with little intelligence, and less talented, but now all that is changed. Henceforth know we no man after the flesh. We look out now upon this world, not thinking of the different distinctions between man and man, but as seeing a world of sinners for whom Christ died, and we realize that all men, whether rich or poor, foolish or wise, whether barbarian or civilized, whether morons or highly talented, are dear to the heart of God, that God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life (Joh 3:16). So, in touch with Christ Himself, we are prepared to suffer, to give, to deny ourselves, we are prepared to die, if need be, in order to bring others to a saving knowledge of this redemption which means so much to us.<\/p>\n<p>Yea, the apostle continues, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we him no more. He is not saying that he personally ever did know Christ after the flesh, but uses the we here in order to take in others with him who were actually acquainted with our Lord when here on earth. He is telling us that it is not the incarnate Christ with whom we are linked, it is the resurrected Christ. Incarnation apart from His death would never have saved one poor sinner. We do not think of Him merely as the promised Messiah of Israel, as a great prophet sent of God, as the greatest of all ethical and spiritual teachers, but look far beyond the cross and the grave into the glory, and see Him there exalted at Gods right hand, a Prince and a Savior, and we go to men in His name to proclaim remission of sins, knowing that when they trust Him, when they believe the message, If any man be in Christ, [it] isnew creation. He, the risen, exalted Christ, has now become the Head of an altogether new creation. Who belong to that new creation? All who, though once in death because of sin, have now been quickened into newness of life through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. That is, we enter that new creation by being born again.<\/p>\n<p>Does any one say, How may I know definitely whether I belong to that new creation or not? Listen to what our Lord Himself says, Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life (Joh 5:24). I am very fond of the Roman Catholic translation of that verse, the translation that you will find in the Rheims-Douay Version of the Bible. There you read, Amen, amen, I say unto you, He who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and comes not into judgment; but is passed out of death into life. Is not that a wonderful translation? Do you sense the meaning of it? The Word of God speaks with that double affirmation which is equivalent to the divine oath: Amen, amen, truly, truly, I say unto you, if you hear My word, and you believe Him that sent Me, you have eternal life, and shall not come into judgment; but you are passed out of death into life. That is, if you receive the gospel message in your heart, you have everlasting life. It is not something you have to work for, or pray for, it is something that God gives instantaneously when you put your trust in the One who is revealed in the gospel. You will never come into judgment, but already God sees you as having passed out of that condition of death into life, and thus linked with Christ as the Head of the new creation.<\/p>\n<p>If any man be in Christ, [it] isnew creation. And in this new creation old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. We are finished with our old state and condition. The old creation fell in Adam; the new creation stands in Christ; and once in Him we are in Him forever. The moment you put your trust in Him God links you up with Him. If Christ fails, the new creation will go down, as the old one did when its head fell. But Christ will never fail. Christ is already seated on the throne of God in heaven, and we are linked with Him, and there in this new creation all things are of God. Do not try to read into this what some New Thought advocates seek to read into it. They will take a statement like this and will tell us it means that there is nothing evil in the universe, and so we must not even think of Satan as evil. Satan, they tell us, is only the personification of our wrong thoughts, but we know from the Word of God that our adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour (1Pe 5:8). There is a great deal of evil in this universe, but it all belongs to the old creation. The apostle is speaking of the new creation, and it is in the new creation that all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ. This reconciliation is even more than justification. When we come to Christ, all our sins are forgiven; more than that, we are justified from all things. God looks upon us as though we had never sinned at all. Justification is the sentence of the judge in favor of the prisoner, it is God saying, I declare this man not guilty, No wonder the apostle tells us, Being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ (Rom 5:1). Reconciliation goes a step farther; it is not only that our sins are forgiven and that divine justice has nothing against us, but it is that He has received us as His own to His loving heart, and we are reconciled to God and we joy in Him.<\/p>\n<p>In our unconverted state we would not have thought such a thing possible. We were happy only when we could get God out of our minds, but now we find our joy in the Lord. It was not the life merely of Jesus that reconciled us, but we were reconciled to God by the death of His Son. God in His love and grace had come out to seek us in the Person of the Lord Jesus, and actually in Christ went to the cross and settled the sin question for us. The Lord Jesus loved us and gave Himself for us, and that broke down all the enmity and won our hearts to Him. Henceforth we are reconciled to the God from whom at one time we turned away.<\/p>\n<p>Now He has given to us a ministry, the ministry of reconciliation. This ministry of reconciliation is Gods call to lost men everywhere to come to Him with all their sins, with all their griefs, with all their burdens, and be reconciled to Him. Mark, it is not that God has to be reconciled to us.<\/p>\n<p>God never had one hard thought toward me. Sinner, He has never had one hard thought toward you. You have had hard thoughts toward Him, and because of that you have taken it for granted that of course God felt the same toward you, but He loves you in spite of all your sin and folly and iniquity. Gods heart goes out toward you in love. Jesus did not die in order to enable God to love sinners, but He died because God loves sinners. God so lovedthat he gave. He so loved a world of sinners that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. And so it is not God who needs to be reconciled to us, but we as sinners need reconciliation to Him. If you have never yet turned to Him, you need to go to Him, and when you realize something of His grace toward you, you will be reconciled to Him. It is a wonderful thing when all enmity disappears and you can joy in the Lord and rejoice in the God of your salvation. This is reconciliation.<\/p>\n<p>But in the next verses the apostle unfolds this ministry of reconciliation. He says, And hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; [namely], that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself. The Lord Jesus Christ was no ordinary man; He was not simply the best of men; but He was God manifest in flesh. God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself; that is, God in Christ was going out after men to try to win them back. They had gone away from Him, trampling on His goodness, spurning His love, actually assailing His righteousness, but here God in Christ goes out after them, pleads with them to return to God, offers to forgive them, to put away all their sins and make them His own. God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them. Christ did not come to charge mans sins against him but to pay mans debt. We read of that poor woman in the eighth chapter of Johns gospel and get such a conception of the cruelty and hardness of mans heart. She had fallen into a heinous sin, and they dragged her into the temple where the people were gathered, and pointed the finger of scorn at her as she stood there with downcast eyes, trembling, overwhelmed with shame. They told the story of her sin and degradation, but what did Jesus do? He stooped down and with His finger wrote on the ground. Why did He do that? In Jeremiah it is written, They that depart from me shall be written on the earth (Jer 17:13). They were saying of this woman, What a sinner she is, how vile, how guilty! but Jesus, by His very act, is saying, You are all guilty; you are all to be written in the earth. From dust you came, and to dust you go because of sin, and then lifting Himself up He said, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her (Joh 8:7), and then stooped to the dust again. I think that twice going down to the dust suggested that He Himself was about to descend into the place of death to bring poor sinners up to this sphere of life, but as He wrote again upon the dust they turned and went away, from the eldest even until the least. The oldest rascal there, with all his piety, knew he had sins enough to sink his soul to the depths of hell, and the next, until the youngest was gone, and the woman was left alone with Jesus, and of course the multitude standing around. And when Jesus looked up He said, Hath no man condemned thee? (Joh 8:10). She said, No man, Lord (v. 11). By that term, Lord, she expressed her faith in Him, for no man can [call] JesusLord, but by the Holy Ghost (1Co 12:3). And He said, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more (Joh 8:11).<\/p>\n<p>Not imputing their trespasses unto them. The Son of Man came not to condemn the world but to save the world. What! you say, does He not condemn a sin like that? Does He make light of uncleanness and unchastity and licentiousness? No, but for all that sin He was going to the cross. The condemnation was to fall on Him, and because He was to bear that poor womans sin, when she trusted in Him, He could send her away uncondemned. God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them, and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation. He has entrusted the administration of the gospel message to us; and Paul says, We are ambassadors for Christ. We go to men on Gods behalf, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christs stead, be ye reconciled to God. How can we be reconciled to God? We may be ashamed of our sins, we may grieve over our past, but will not sin ever remain, will it not ever rise up between our souls and God in spite of our deepest repentance? No, because in the cross that question has been fully met to the divine satisfaction, God has made Christ to be sin for us. He hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might become the righteousness of God in Him. And upon the cross Christ took the sinners place, He was treated as though guilty of all the sin and iniquity and unrighteousness of the ages. He was there as the great Sin Offering.<\/p>\n<p>            On Him almighty vengeance fell,<\/p>\n<p>            That would have sunk a world to hell;<\/p>\n<p>            He bore it for a chosen race,<\/p>\n<p>            And thus becomes our Hiding-Place.<\/p>\n<p>And because He, the sinless One, has died in the place of sinners, we, the sinful, may enter into life, may become the righteousness of God in Him.<\/p>\n<p>This last verse of our chapter epitomizes the deepest meaning of the cross. It shows the One who was sinless inwardly and outwardly, enduring the wrath of God which we deserved. Our sins put Him on the cross. But, having settled the sin-question to the divine satisfaction, He has been raised from the dead and seated as the glorified Man at Gods right hand. There on the throne He is our righteousness. The Father sees every believer in Him, free from all condemnation, made the display of the righteousness of God in Him. He Himself is our righteousness. We are complete in Him. God is satisfied and our consciences are at peace. What a salvation is this!<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentaries on the New Testament and Prophets<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>that they: 2Co 3:6, Eze 16:6, Eze 37:9, Eze 37:14, Hab 2:4, Zec 10:9, Joh 3:15, Joh 3:16, Joh 5:24, Joh 6:57, Rom 6:2, Rom 6:11, Rom 6:12, Rom 8:2, Rom 8:6, Rom 8:10, Rom 14:7, Rom 14:8, 1Co 6:19, 1Co 6:20, Gal 2:20, Gal 5:25, Eph 5:14, Col 2:12, Col 3:1, 1Pe 4:6, 1Jo 4:9 <\/p>\n<p>henceforth: 2Co 5:16, 2Ki 5:17, Rom 6:6, Eph 4:17, 1Pe 1:14, 1Pe 1:15, 1Pe 4:2-4 <\/p>\n<p>live unto: Luk 1:74, Rom 6:13, Rom 12:1, Rom 14:7-9, 1Co 6:20, 1Co 10:33, Gal 2:19, Phi 1:20, Phi 1:21, Col 3:17, Col 3:23, 1Th 5:10, Tit 2:14, Heb 13:20, Heb 13:21, Rev 1:18 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Exo 21:5 &#8211; And if Deu 6:5 &#8211; God with all Deu 32:6 &#8211; requite Jdg 16:15 &#8211; when thine 1Sa 12:10 &#8211; deliver 1Ch 11:18 &#8211; brake Psa 26:3 &#8211; For Psa 116:12 &#8211; General Pro 23:26 &#8211; give Son 5:2 &#8211; my head Son 7:12 &#8211; there will I give thee Son 8:6 &#8211; love Son 8:12 &#8211; thou Zec 7:5 &#8211; did Mat 10:37 &#8211; that loveth father Mat 25:40 &#8211; Inasmuch Mar 12:17 &#8211; and to Luk 4:39 &#8211; and ministered Luk 7:43 &#8211; I Luk 15:24 &#8211; this Joh 13:17 &#8211; happy Joh 14:15 &#8211; General Joh 14:21 &#8211; that hath Joh 21:15 &#8211; lovest Rom 6:10 &#8211; he liveth unto 1Co 1:13 &#8211; Paul 1Co 6:13 &#8211; but for 1Co 13:13 &#8211; charity 1Co 16:22 &#8211; love 2Co 4:5 &#8211; and 2Co 8:5 &#8211; first Eph 3:17 &#8211; being Eph 4:20 &#8211; General Eph 5:2 &#8211; as Phi 2:21 &#8211; the Col 2:13 &#8211; dead 1Th 1:3 &#8211; and labour 1Ti 2:6 &#8211; gave 1Ti 5:6 &#8211; dead 2Ti 3:2 &#8211; lovers Heb 2:9 &#8211; for every 1Pe 1:8 &#8211; ye love 1Jo 4:19 &#8211; General<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>THE SUMMING-UP OF LIFE<\/p>\n<p>He died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto Him Which died for them, and rose again.<\/p>\n<p>2Co 5:15<\/p>\n<p>Have you ever considered the meaning of life? You say to me, It is a mystery which no man can explain, and you are quite right. Of all the wise men that have lived up to the present not one yet has been able to explain to us the mystery of life. We can speak of the power of thought, the gift of speech, and the wonderful gift of action, but we are no nearer explaining the mystery of life.<\/p>\n<p>If God has given to us this wonderful gift of life, then you and I will be held responsible for its use. Around one of two pivots every human life revolves: the one pivot is self and the other pivot is Christ. But true life may be summed up in three short sentences: letting go, taking hold, and keeping hold.<\/p>\n<p>I. There is the letting go.Before we can live the life we must get rid of certain things, and this, of course, by the power of the Holy Ghost. There must be a letting go. If you have seen a balloon inflated you have seen it floating now to the right and now to the left, and only held down to the earth by a number of small weights in the form of sand-bags. How many a Christian has named the name of Christ, but not departed yet from iniquity! He is kept down by the sand-bags! I do not know what your sandbag may be; perhaps it is a quick temper, or it may be that there is a tendency to make merry at the expense of some one who is trying to follow Christ. (It is easy to laugh and scoff at a brother, a professing Christian!) With some it may be that drink is a snare, or it may be lust. I do not know; God only knows our hearts. But every sand-bag must be slipped. It is not till the sand-bags are gone that the balloon rises. Every balloon I see reminds me of those words in the New Testament, Let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us  looking unto Jesus the Author and Finisher of our faith. It is only thus that we can rise. Now it is for you to say whether you are letting go; you will never make progress in the heavenly journey until you are willing to let go, because until you let go your hands are full of iniquity, and you have to make them clean before you can get hold.<\/p>\n<p>II. There is the taking hold.When you are free you can make a fresh start and make progress. You say, How can I make progress? You say, How can I take hold? The fingers of the hands which lay hold of God are these, f-a-i-t-h and t-r-u-s-t, and the hands which lay hold of heavenly things lay hold of God. Without them you can make no progress. Lay hold of God. If any man has lost the light, or the power, or the life, lay hold of God afresh to-day. But it will not be your hold of God so much as His hold of you. Nothing comforts me more than this, not that I have chosen God, but that God has chosen me. It is God the Fathers grip of the child, not the childs grip of the Father, though both are necessary. It is the Fathers grip which means salvation, keeping from falling.<\/p>\n<p>III. There is the keeping hold.Then let me say to each, Keep hold, do not let go. How shall I keep hold?<\/p>\n<p>(a) First of all, by reverencing and using and reading and feeding upon Gods holy Word. There are men who will speak and there are writers who have written against this precious Word of God, but it is still the Sword of the Spirit, it is still the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth. Do not neglect to read your Bible; if it is only one text before you go to work in the morning, that text will keep you and strengthen you and help you all the day. If you are going to keep hold, if you are going to live not unto yourselves, but unto Him, you must do your part. The sparrows that we feed out of our windows, every bird has to pick up his own crumb. God feedeth the birds, and God has provided food for your soul and mine, but every man, like every bird, has to pick up his own crumb. And not only must you do your part, but there is one other word of advice I would give you. It is this:<\/p>\n<p>(b) See that you keep near to Jesus all the way, and to the death. Make everything a matter of prayer. Every man we meet is either a bother or a brother. God grant that we may look upon him as a brother, and try to win him for our Master Christ. And the very sins that have possessed you in the pastthat fiery temper, Christ shall turn to zeal. Everything that hindered you in the past, when it has been turned round and consecrated, becomes useful in the Masters service.<\/p>\n<p>Bishop J. Taylor Smith.<\/p>\n<p>Illustrations<\/p>\n<p>(1) Under a palm tree in one of the islands of the Pacific there was sitting a poor black man who once had been a cannibal, and he was reading his Bible, and there came along a French trader, smoking his cigar. He went up to the poor black man, and he said, What is that you are reading? The man said, I am reading the Bible. Then the Frenchman said, Reading the Bible? That is out of date. Why, we have given up that long ago in our country. You are a foolish man to be reading the Bible. And the Christian man who had once been a cannibal went to him and said, Not so much out of date, sir, for if it had not been for this Book you would have been eaten long ago. <\/p>\n<p>(2) The impetuous Peter, he led the way on the day of Pentecost to the conversion of three thousand. During the French War the cannon that were captured were turned into church bells, and even the empty shells from the war in South Africa are now being turned into dinner gongs. Oh, what a splendid change, to change these destructive forces into the most helpful ministrations!<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Church Pulpit Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2Co 5:15. The death of Christ was done that all humanity might be brought from the dead (1Co 15:22). But it was for the additional and far more important purpose of inducing men to live such lives while in this world, that when they are brought alive from the grave they may live in joy in the eternal world.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>If one died for all, then were all dead. Some understand it of a death in sin; all were in a state of sin and death when Christ died for them. Others understand it mystically, when Christ died for all, all were then dead; that is, dead in Christ unto sin; intimating, that when Christ died, all believers were dead in him to sin and the world. As Christ died for sin, so ought all to die unto sin. <\/p>\n<p>Farther, Christ dying once for all, proveth the verity of his satisfaction, and the sufficiency of his satisfaction. What virtue was there in that death which merited life for all! And what love was there in our God to appoint one for all, and to accept one for all! That some so worthy in himself, that one so dear to God, should die, should die so willingly, should die so painfully, should die so shamefully, should die under a curse, to absolve from guilt, and discharge from condemnation! Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed upon us!<\/p>\n<p>Observe next, The great end and design of Christ in his death and resurrection for us; namely,<\/p>\n<p>1. Negatively declared, that we should not live unto ourselves, to our own ease, profit, or honour; gratifying our own wills, inclinations, and corrupt desires, serving our own interests and ends: but, positively, to live unto him, according to his word and will, in obedience to his commands, and with an eye at this glory, who died for our sins, and rose again for our justification.<\/p>\n<p>Had Christ only died for us, the favour had been inexpressible and unrequitable, and required us to live to his name and glory; but when he not only died for us, but rose again, and lives forever in heaven, to pour down fresh benefits upon us, and to do good offices daily and hourly for us, how endearing are our obligations to love him, and to live unto him!<\/p>\n<p>Learn hence, 1. That by virtue of Christ&#8217;s death and resurrection, Christians are both obliged to, and have obtained the grace of, newness of life, and holiness of conversation.<\/p>\n<p>Learn, 2. That it is the duty, and will be the endeavour, of all those that are quickened by the Spirit of Christ unto newness of life, to refer all their actions not to themselves, but unto him: none can do both, live to Christ and self together. His we are already; by creation, by redemption, by sanctification, by voluntary resignation, we live by him. Our spiritual life is from him; we expect hereafter to live with him; let us therefore now live unto him, even unto him that died for us, and rose again.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong> Verse 15<\/strong> <strong> <\/strong> Since Christ died for us, we ought to live for Him. ( Rom 12:1-2 ) <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>and he died for all, that they that live should no longer live unto themselves, but unto him who for their sakes died and rose again. [Paul&#8217;s life was devoted to Christ, and to man for Christ&#8217;s sake. When tempted to swerve from either of these services, Christ&#8217;s love for him confined him within the limits of the life of sacrifice which he has described, and which he regarded as prescribed for him by the Lord. His reasons for regarding this life as prescribed for him grew out of his view of the death of Christ. He regarded the death of Christ as representative. As Christ had died as the head of the race, therefore all men had died with him to their sins, and so were obligated to lead self-sacrificing, unselfish, sinless lives for the sake of him who, on their behalf, had died and risen again. Compare Rom 6:1-11; Gal 5:4; Gal 2:19-20; Col 3:3] <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>5:15 And [that] he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth {n} live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again.<\/p>\n<p>(n) See Rom 6:1 to Rom 7:25<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And [that] he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again. 15. that they which live should not live unto themselves ] Cf. Rom 5:8-11; Rom 6:10-13; Rom 14:7; Gal 2:20; Gal 5:24-25; Gal 6:14; Col 3:1-4; 1Jn 5:18 See &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-corinthians-515\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Corinthians 5:15&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28838","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28838"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28838\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}