{"id":29116,"date":"2022-09-24T13:07:56","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T18:07:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-galatians-513\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T13:07:56","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T18:07:56","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-galatians-513","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-galatians-513\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Galatians 5:13"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only [use] not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 13 15<\/strong>. Liberty must not be abused<\/p>\n<p><strong> 13<\/strong>. St Paul seems to be recurring to what he had said in <span class='bible'><em> Gal 5:7<\/em><\/span>, the intermediate verses being a sort of parenthesis in which he wanders from the main line of thought. &lsquo;This submission cometh not from Him that <em> calleth<\/em> you a little leaven, &amp;c. for ye were <em> called<\/em> unto freedom brethren&rsquo;.<\/p>\n<p><em> unto liberty<\/em> ] lit. &lsquo;on condition of freedom.&rsquo; The terms (and so the object) of your calling were freedom.<\/p>\n<p><em> an occasion to the flesh<\/em> ] By the word &lsquo;flesh&rsquo; we must understand not merely sensual indulgence, but that natural selfishness which finds expression in the disregard of other people&rsquo;s rights and interests, &lsquo;hatred, variance, emulations&rsquo;, and the like. Patristic expositors take occasion to point out that &lsquo;the flesh&rsquo; does not mean &lsquo;the <em> material<\/em> body&rsquo;, for many of the sins enumerated below as &lsquo;works of the flesh&rsquo; have their seat in the soul. The effects of the Fall have extended to the whole man, that unrenewed nature which &lsquo;is become corrupt in accordance with the lusts of deceit&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>Eph 4:22<\/span>) and &lsquo;which is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be&rsquo;, see <span class='bible'>Rom 8:5-7<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><em> by love serve one another<\/em> ] The service of God, and of man for His sake, is alone perfect freedom. Too much stress cannot be laid on the expression, &lsquo; <em> serve<\/em> one another&rsquo;. Act as the <em> slaves<\/em> of your fellow-men. This is true Christian liberty.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty &#8211; <\/B>Freedom from Jewish rites and ceremonies; see the notes at <span class='bible'>Gal 3:28<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 4:9<\/span>, note, <span class='bible'>Gal 4:21-31<\/span>, note. The meaning here is, that Paul wished the false teachers removed because true Christians had been called unto liberty, and they were abridging and destroying that liberty. They were not in subjection to the Law of Moses, or to anything else that savored of bondage. They were free; free from the servitude of sin, and free from subjection to expensive and burdensome rites and customs. They were to remember this as a great and settled principle; and so vital a truth was this, and so important that it should be maintained, and so great the evil of forgetting it, that Paul says he earnestly wishes <span class='bible'>Gal 5:12<\/span> that all who would reduce them to that state of servitude were cut off from the Christian church.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Only use not liberty &#8230; &#8211; <\/B>The word use here introduced by our translators, obscures the sense. The idea is, You are called to liberty, but it is not liberty for an occasion to the flesh. It is not freedom from virtuous restraints, and from the laws of God. It is liberty from the servitude of sin, and religious rites and ceremonies, not freedom from the necessary restraints of virtue. It was necessary to give this caution, because:<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(1) There was a strong tendency in all converts from paganism to relapse again into their former habits. Licentiousness abounded, and where they had been addicted to it before their conversion, and where they were surrounded by it on every hand, they were in constant danger of falling into it again. A bare and naked declaration, therefore, that they had been called to liberty, to freedom from restraint, might have been misunderstood, and some might have supposed that they were free from all restraints.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">(2) It is needful to guard the doctrine from abuse at all times. There has been a strong tendency, as the history of the church has shown, to abuse the doctrine of grace. The doctrine that Christians are free; that there is liberty to them from restraint, has been perverted always by Antinomians, and been made the occasion of their indulging freely in sin. And the result has shown that nothing was more important than to guard the doctrine of Christian liberty, and to show exactly what Christians are freed from, and what laws are still binding on them. Paul is, therefore, at great pains to show that the doctrines which he had maintained did not lead to licentiousness, and did not allow the indulgence of sinful and corrupt passions.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>An occasion &#8211; <\/B>As allowing indulgence to the flesh, or as a furtherance or help to corrupt passions; see the word explained in the notes at <span class='bible'>Rom 7:8<\/span>.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>To the flesh &#8211; <\/B>The word flesh is often used in the writings of Paul to denote corrupt and gross passions and affections; see the notes at <span class='bible'>Rom 7:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 8:1<\/span>, note.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>But by love serve one another &#8211; <\/B>By the proper manifestation of love one to another strive to promote each others welfare. To do this will not be inconsistent with the freedom of the gospel. When there is love there is no servitude. Duty is pleasant, and offices of kindness agreeable. Paul does not consider them as freed from all law and all restraint; but they are to be governed by the law of love. They were not to feel that they were so free that they might lawfully give indulgence to the desires of the flesh, but they were to regard themselves as under the law to love one another; and thus they would fulfil the law of Christian freedom.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Christian liberty<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>The nature of that liberty of which the apostle here speaks. There is a charm in the very sound of liberty; it awakens many grateful recollections. But the word is employed in various acceptations. Civil liberty is that freedom which is our birthright as men. Spiritual liberty is that freedom, which belongs to us, not as men, but as Christians.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>The great value of that spiritual liberty to which all believers of gospel truth are called. Political freedom, important as it is, may be overrated. It is highly advantageous to a nation, but not essential to the happiness of individuals. Good men have been happy in exile or in prison, and bad men cannot be so under any circumstances however favourable; the cause of the difference is to be referred to the state of the mind.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The measure of spiritual liberty, which a Christian even now attains, removes or alleviates some of the keenest and heaviest sorrows to which man is subject.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The measure of spiritual liberty, which a Christian now possesses, greatly heightens and refines all his enjoyments. Countermanding the original curse, it brings back some of the productions of paradise. It opens the noblest faculties and animates the best feelings of the mind.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>It is but the beginning and pledge of that complete deliverance from all sin and sorrow, to which he is looking with lively hope. The best state on earth bears the marks of imperfection. Even where grace reigns, sin, like a rebel dethroned but <em>not<\/em> destroyed, is too near <em>to<\/em> leave any long interval of peace. In that kingdom to which we are hastening, no tumults or temptations will rise; no sickness or sighing, death or danger, will be known. No law in the members will be found warring against the law of the mind, or bringing us into captivity to sin. Even creation itself shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the sons of God (<span class='bible'>Rom 8:21<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>III. <\/strong>The way in which the liberty to which the believer is called may be duly improved. All the principles of our holy religion have a practical bearing. We see a beautiful harmony in its doctrines and precepts. This is one of the great excellencies of Christianity. Paul was a wise master-builder, equally concerned to lay a good foundation, and to carry up the superstructure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>He gives a word of salutary warning&#8211;Use not liberty, etc. There is hardly any good but is liable to abuse. Every sacred privilege has been and may be perverted. We must be on our guard against this. To use Christian liberty for an occasion to indulge the flesh is the best thing in the world turned to the worst purpose.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The apostle, in our text, gives a suitable word of direction&#8211;By love serve one another. Love is the first and best of all the Christian graces. The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, etc. Love finds out many means of serving our brethren. It prompts and animates the mind-it makes us cheerful, active, tender, kind, forbearing. (<em>Essex Congregational Remembrancer.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>By love serve one another&#8211;Christianity a system of love<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Look at the operations of charity, or the love of benevolence. It was this which existed in the mind of Deity from eternity, and in the exercise of which He so loved our guilty world as to give His only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. It was on the wings of charity that the Son of God flew from heaven to earth, on an errand of mercy to our lost world; it<strong> <\/strong>was charity that moved in the minds and hearts of the apostles, and urged them with the glad tidings of salvation, from country to country. The whole missionary enterprise is founded, not of course on the basis of brotherly kindness, but on that of charity. All those splendid instances that have been presented to us of the exercise of philanthropy are the operations of this Divine charity. See Howard, leaving the seclusion of a country gentleman, giving up his elegant retreat and all its luxurious gratifications, pacing to and fro through Europe, plunging into dungeons, battling with pestilence, weighing the fetters of the prisoner, gauging the disease of the pest-house&#8211;all under the influence of heavenly charity. See Wilberforce, through twenty years of his eventful life, lifting up his unwearied voice, and employing his fascinating eloquence against the biggest outrage that ever trampled on the rights of humanity. What formed his character, sketched his plan, inspired his zeal, but charity? See that illustrious woman, lately departed, so ripe for glory and so richly invested with it, who interested herself amidst the prisoners of Newgate&#8211;to chain their passions, to reclaim their vices, and to render them more meet for society, which had condemned them as its outcasts. What was it that gave to Mrs. Fry her principle of action, what indeed was the principle itself, but charity? (<em>J. Angell James.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>One another<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>What is a Christian Church?<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>Not a club, an association of persons belonging to the same rank in life, but a Divine society<strong> <\/strong>embracing all classes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Not a republic where majorities rule, but a society where the will of the Divine Head is the governing power.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Two or three, met in Christs name, and loyal to His will, are sufficient to constitute a Christian Church.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>What are the conditions of happy Church life?<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The root of all is obedience to the law. Love one another.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Love gives rise to mutuality in everything.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>Mutual feeling branches out in various ways.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> Where help is wanted&#8211;Bear ye one anothers burdens, Edify one another, Admonish one<strong> <\/strong>another.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> Where wounded feelings prevail&#8211;Confess to one another, Pray for one another, Forbearing one another, Forgiving one another.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>From the whole proceeds the Christian law of courtesy and etiquette&#8211;Be subject to one another, In honour prefering one another, In lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than himself. (<em>E. Johnson,<\/em> <em>M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Law and liberty<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There is a great mistake about liberty from law. Some religious persons think it means free, so that though you sin, the law will not punish. This is the liberty of devils: free to do as much evil as you will, and yet not suffer. True Christian liberty is this, self-command; to have been brought to Christ; to do right and to love right without a law of compulsion to school you into doing it. If we have not got so far, the law has all its power hanging over us still. (<em>F. W. Robertson.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>To preach justification by the law as a covenant is legal, and makes void the death and merits of Jesus Christ. But to preach obedience to the law as a rule is evangelical; and it savours as much of a New Testament spirit to urge the commands of the law as to display the promises of the gospel. (<em>Bishop Hopkins.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>True liberty is only realized in obedience. The abuse of freedom is bondage, from which there is no self-deliverance.<em> <\/em>(<em>T. T. Lynch.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The joy of liberty<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dr<em>.<\/em> Fletcher was passing the Old Bailey one day, and saw a couple of boys turning somersaults, standing on their heads, making wheels of themselves, and all sorts of things; and he stopped, and said, Why, boys, whatever are you at? You seem to be delighted; to which one of them replied, Ah! and you would be delighted, too, if you had been locked up in that jail three months. You would jump when you came out. And the good old doctor said he thought it was very likely he should. And the man who has been called unto liberty by Christ, knows the sweets of freedom, because aforetime the iron had entered his soul. (<em>C. H. Spurgeon.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Loving service<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A train from the Far West of America was once passing through Saratoga, having among other passengers a man with an infant child. The mans garments showed him to be poor, and the crape on his hat showed the child to be motherless. The infant was restless, and the father handled it clumsily; with all his efforts he could not quiet it. He wiped the tears from its eyes, and then from his own. All who saw him pitied him. At length a richly-dressed lady, whose infant lay in the arms of its nurse, said, with motherly tenderness in her tone, Give me the child. The poor man gave her his boy, whose coarse and soiled robes rested for once on costly silk; his head disappeared under her shawl, and all was still. She held him mile after mile, and did not relinquish him until her own child required attention. (<em>Biblical Treasury.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Liberty through love<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>The nature of this liberty.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>This liberty is freedom from the burden of a religion of ordinances.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>It is liberty from the moral law as the awakener of sin, and from the fear of its punishment, which is death.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>To keep this liberty pure, we should know its dangers, and avoid them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>It may be so used as, to allow the lower nature to rule&#8211;as an occasion to the flesh.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> We are freed from ceremonies, but we cannot live without some forms. Spiritual life, left to silence, unsymbolized, unused, fades away.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> We err if we use liberty to despise those who love ceremonial; or if we bind ourselves never to use it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>Our liberty from coercive law is produced in us by a love which obeys the law. If we do not love to obey, we are not in Christian liberty at all. St. Paul calls such despisers of law the servants of sin.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>The use of freedom must be in subordination to love. It is the<strong> <\/strong>habit of many to placard their freedom; to violate the scruples of others. What sort of Christianity is that which uses the freedom of Christ to do violence to the love of Christ? The rule is&#8211;Use your liberty, not for your own gratification, but for the good of others. Liberty is not a principle of action; it is a mode of action. Love is its principle, and love is the test which tells whether we are free or enslaved. (<em>S. A. Brooke,<\/em> <em>M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>  Verse 13.  <I><B>Ye have been called unto liberty<\/B><\/I>] A total freedom from all the burthensome rites and ceremonies of the Mosaic law. <I>Only<\/I> use <I>not that liberty for an occasion to the flesh<\/I>. By <I>flesh,<\/I> here, we may understand all the unrenewed desires and propensities of the mind; whatsoever is not under the influence and guidance of the Holy Spirit of God.  Your liberty is from that which would <I>oppress the spirit<\/I>; not from that which would lay <I>restraints<\/I> on the <I>flesh<\/I>. The Gospel proclaims liberty from the <I>ceremonial<\/I> law: but binds you still faster under the <I>moral law<\/I>. To be freed from the <I>ceremonial<\/I> law is the <I>Gospel liberty<\/I>; to pretend freedom from the <I>moral<\/I> law is <I>Antinomianism<\/I>.<\/P> <P> <\/P> <P>  <I><B>By love serve one another.<\/B><\/I>] Having that faith which worketh by love, serve each other to the uttermost of your power: , serve each other, when necessary, as <I>slaves<\/I> serve their masters. Several excellent MSS. and <I>versions<\/I>, instead of   , <I>by<\/I> <I>love<\/I>, have    , <I>in the love of the Spirit serve<\/I> <I>one another<\/I>.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>Ye have been called unto liberty; <\/B>a liberty from the covenant of the law, and the curse of the law, as <span class='bible'>Gal 3:13<\/span>; from servile fear, as <span class='bible'>Luk 1:74<\/span>; and from sin, <span class='bible'>Rom 6:7<\/span>. <\/P> <P><B>Only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh; <\/B>but you must take heed that you do not abuse this liberty by making it an occasion for sin, so as from thence to conclude, that you may give your flesh more liberty in obeying the lusts of it: you must not think, that the gospel hath set you at liberty from the obedience of the law; the gospel liberty to which you are called, doth not set you free from the duty of love, either to God or men. Therefore <\/P> <P><B>by love serve one another.<\/B> Our Christian liberty neither freeth us from the serving of God, nor from our mutual serving each other by love, according to <span class='bible'>Rom 8:8<\/span>; <I>Owe no man any thing, but to love one another.<\/I> <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P><B>13.<\/B> The &#8220;ye&#8221; isemphatical, from its position in the <I>Greek,<\/I> &#8220;Yebrethren&#8221;; as opposed to those legalists &#8220;who trouble you.&#8221;<\/P><P>       <B>unto liberty<\/B>The <I>Greek<\/I>expresses, &#8220;on a footing of liberty.&#8221; The <I>state<\/I> or<I>condition<\/I> in which ye have been called to salvation, is one ofliberty. Gospel liberty consists in three things, freedom from theMosaic yoke, from sin, and from slavish fear. <\/P><P>       <B>only,<\/B> c.Translate,&#8221;Only turn not <I>your<\/I> liberty into an occasion for theflesh.&#8221; Do not give the flesh the handle or pretext (<span class='bible'>Ro7:8<\/span>, &#8220;occasion&#8221;) for its indulgence which it eagerlyseeks for do not let it make Christian &#8220;liberty&#8221; itspretext for indulgence (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:16<\/span>;<span class='bible'>Gal 5:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Pe 2:16<\/span>;<span class='bible'>2Pe 2:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 1:4<\/span>).<\/P><P>       <B>but by love serve oneanother<\/B><I>Greek,<\/I> &#8220;Be servants (be in bondage) to oneanother.&#8221; If ye must be <I>servants,<\/I> then <I>be servants toone another in love.<\/I> While free as to legalism, be <I>bound<\/I>by Love (the article in the <I>Greek<\/I> personifies love in theabstract) to serve one another (<span class='bible'>1Co9:19<\/span>). Here he hints at their unloving strifes springing out oflust of power. &#8220;For the lust of power is the mother of heresies&#8221;[CHRYSOSTOM].<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown&#8217;s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>For brethren, ye have been called unto liberty<\/strong>,&#8230;. He calls them &#8220;brethren&#8221;, to testify his affection to them, and to put them in mind of their relation to one another, which required mutual love, a thing he is about to press them to; he asserts that they were &#8220;called&#8221; not merely externally, but internally, by the effectual grace of God, out of bondage to sin, Satan, and the law, unto the liberty of the Gospel and of the grace of God; that liberty wherewith Christ had made them free, <span class='bible'>Ga 5:1<\/span> this he said in a judgment of charity, hoping well of them:<\/p>\n<p><strong>only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh<\/strong>; corrupt nature, which in unregenerate men takes encouragement from, and makes an ill use of the best of things, as the mercy and patience of God; and not only takes an occasion by the law, forbidding sin to work and stir up all manner of concupiscence; but also by the Gospel, and the doctrines of it, such as eternal election, free justification, c. which though the source and fountain, the barrier and security, of all true and real holiness, are improved and abused by wicked minds, under the influence and instigation of Satan, to vile purposes and though regenerate persons are not in the flesh, and do not live after it, yet that is in them, and there is a proneness in them to sin; and Satan is watching all opportunities and advantages against them; so that there is need for such a caution as this, that they do not misuse their Christian liberty by indulging the flesh and the lusts of it, which is apt to take an occasion to cherish its lusts, and especially when given: Christ&#8217;s free men should not do so, for that is to disgrace the doctrine of Christian liberty, to enthral themselves in, bondage instead of using their liberty aright, and to give the enemy occasion to blaspheme: the doctrine of Christian liberty may bc abused, or used as an occasion to the flesh, and to fulfil the lusts of it; when under a pretence thereof men think themselves exempt from obedience to the civil magistrate, which is using this liberty as a cloak of maliciousness; or that they are free from obedience to the law of God, as a rule of walk and conversation; or from subjection to the ordinances of the Gospel; or when they use the creatures God has given them the free use of without thankfulness, and in an immoderate manner; and when they make things indifferent which are not, or use indifferent things to the prejudice of others; and their liberty becomes a stumblingblock to weak Christians, which the apostle seems greatly to regard here; since he adds,<\/p>\n<p><strong>but by love serve one another<\/strong>: the Vulgate Latin version reads, &#8220;by the love of the Spirit&#8221;: and so some copies; Gospel liberty and the service of the saints are not at all inconsistent; as it becomes them to love one another, as the new command of Christ, their profession of religion, and their relation to each other, require, so they should show their love by their service; as by praying one with and for another, by bearing each other&#8217;s burdens, sympathizing with and communicating to each other in things temporal and spiritual; in forbearing with and forgiving one another; by admonishing each other when there is occasion for it, in a meek, tender, and brotherly way; by instructing and building up one another on their most holy faith, and by stirring up one another to all the duties of religion, private and public.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">Practical Godliness Enforced; Works of the Flesh and of the Spirit; The Fruits of the Spirit.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <TD VALIGN=\"BOTTOM\"> <P ALIGN=\"RIGHT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in\"> <SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><FONT SIZE=\"1\" STYLE=\"font-size: 8pt\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">A.&nbsp;D.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">&nbsp;56.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/FONT><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR>  <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 13 For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only <I>use<\/I> not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. &nbsp; 14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, <I>even<\/I> in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. &nbsp; 15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another. &nbsp; 16 <I>This<\/I> I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. &nbsp; 17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. &nbsp; 18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law. &nbsp; 19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are <I>these;<\/I> Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, &nbsp; 20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, &nbsp; 21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told <I>you<\/I> in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. &nbsp; 22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, &nbsp; 23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. &nbsp; 24 And they that are Christ&#8217;s have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts. &nbsp; 25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. &nbsp; 26 Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; In the latter part of this chapter the apostle comes to exhort these Christians to serious practical godliness, as the best antidote against the snares of the false teachers. Two things especially he presses upon them:&#8211;<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I. That they should not strive with one another, but love one another. He tells them (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 13<\/span>) that <I>they had been called unto liberty,<\/I> and he would have them to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ had made them free; but yet he would have them be very careful that they did not <I>use this liberty as an occasion to the flesh<\/I>&#8211;that they did not thence take occasion to indulge themselves in any corrupt affections and practices, and particularly such as might create distance and disaffection, and be the ground of quarrels and contentions among them: but, on the contrary, he would have them <I>by love to serve one another,<\/I> to maintain that mutual love and affection which, notwithstanding any minor differences there might be among them, would dispose them to all those offices of respect and kindness to each other which the Christian religion obliged them to. Note, 1. The liberty we enjoy as Christians is not a licentious liberty: though Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, yet he has not freed us from the obligation of it; the gospel is a <I>doctrine according to godliness<\/I> (<span class='bible'>1 Tim. vi. 3<\/span>), and is so far from giving the least countenance to sin that it lays us under the strongest obligations to avoid and subdue it. 2. Though we ought to stand fast in our Christian liberty, yet we should not insist upon it to the breach of Christian charity; we should not use it as an occasion of strife and contention with our fellow Christians, who may be differently minded from us, but should always maintain such a temper towards each other as may dispose us by love to serve one another. To this the apostle endeavours to persuade these Christians, and there are two considerations which he sets before them for this purpose:&#8211; (1.) <I>That all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 14<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. Love is the sum of the whole law; as love to God comprises the duties of the first table, so love to our neighbour those of the second. The apostle takes notice of the latter here, because he is speaking of their behaviour towards one another; and, when he makes use of this as an argument to persuade them to mutual love, he intimates both that this would be a good evidence of their sincerity in religion and also the most likely means of rooting out those dissensions and divisions that were among them. It will appear that we are the disciples of Christ indeed when we have love one to another (<span class='bible'>John xiii. 35<\/span>); and, where this temper is kept up, if it do not wholly extinguish those unhappy discords that are among Christians, yet at least it will so far accommodate them that the fatal consequences of them will be prevented. (2.) The sad and dangerous tendency of a contrary behaviour (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 15<\/span>): <I>But,<\/I> says he, if instead of serving one another in love, and therein fulfilling the law of God, <I>you bite and devour one another, take heed that you be not consumed one of another.<\/I> If, instead of acting like men and Christians, they would behave themselves more like brute beasts, in tearing and rending one another, they could expect nothing as the consequence of it, but that they would be consumed one of another; and therefore they had the greatest reason not to indulge themselves in such quarrels and animosities. Note, Mutual strifes among brethren, if persisted in, are likely to prove a common ruin; those that devour one another are in a fair way to be consumed one of another. Christian churches cannot be ruined but by their own hands; but if Christians, who should be helps to one another and a joy one to another, be as brute beasts, biting and devouring each other, what can be expected but that the God of love should deny his grace to them, and the Spirit of love should depart from them, and that the evil spirit, who seeks the destruction of them all, should prevail?<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. That they should all strive against sin; and happy would it be for the church if Christians would let all their quarrels be swallowed up of this, even a quarrel against sin&#8211;if, instead of biting and devouring one another on account of their different opinions, they would all set themselves against sin in themselves and the places where they live. This is what we are chiefly concerned to fight against, and that which above every thing else we should make it our business to oppose and suppress. To excite Christians hereunto, and to assist them herein, the apostle shows,<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1. That there is in every one a struggle between the flesh and the spirit (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 17<\/span>): <I>The flesh<\/I> (the corrupt and carnal part of us) <I>lusts<\/I> (strives and struggles with strength and vigour) <I>against the spirit:<\/I> it opposes all the motions of the Spirit, and resists every thing that is spiritual. On the other hand, <I>the spirit<\/I> (the renewed part of us) strives <I>against the flesh,<\/I> and opposes the will and desire of it: and hence it comes to pass <I>that we cannot do the things that we would.<\/I> As the principle of grace in us will not suffer us to do all the evil which our corrupt nature would prompt us to, so neither can we do all the good that we would, by reason of the oppositions we meet with from that corrupt and carnal principle. Even as in a natural man there is something of this struggle (the convictions of his conscience and the corruption of his own heart strive with one another; his convictions would suppress his corruptions, and his corruptions silence his convictions), so in a renewed man, where there is something of a good principle, there is a struggle between the old nature and the new nature, the remainders of sin and the beginnings of grace; and this Christians must expect will be their exercise as long as they continue in this world.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2. That it is our duty and interest in this struggle to side with the better part, to side with our convictions against our corruptions and with our graces against our lusts. This the apostle represents as our duty, and directs us to the most effectual means of success in it. If it should be asked, What course must we take that the better interest may get the better? he gives us this one general rule, which, if duly observed, would be the most sovereign remedy against the prevalence of corruption; and that is to walk in the Spirit (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 16<\/span>): <I>This I say, then, Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.<\/I> By the <I>Spirit<\/I> here may be meant either the Holy Spirit himself, who condescends to dwell in the hearts of those whom he has renewed and sanctified, to guide and assist them in the way of their duty, or that gracious principle which he implants in the souls of his people and which lusts against the flesh, as that corrupt principle which still remains in them does against it. Accordingly the duty here recommended to us is that we set ourselves to act under the guidance and influence of the blessed Spirit, and agreeably to the motions and tendency of the new nature in us; and, if this be our care in the ordinary course and tenour of our lives, we may depend upon it that, though we may not be freed from the stirrings and oppositions of our corrupt nature, we shall be kept from fulfilling it in the lusts thereof; so that though it remain in us, yet it shall not obtain a dominion over us. Note, The best antidote against the poison of sin is to walk in the Spirit, to be much in conversing with spiritual things, to mind the things of the soul, which is the spiritual part of man, more than those of the body, which is his carnal part, to commit ourselves to the guidance of the word, wherein the Holy Spirit makes known the will of God concerning us, and in the way of our duty to act in a dependence on his aids and influences. And, as this would be the best means of preserving them from fulfilling the lusts of the flesh, so it would be a good evidence that they were Christians indeed; for, says the apostle (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 18<\/span>), <I>If you be led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.<\/I> As if he had said, &#8220;You must expect a struggle between flesh and spirit as long as you are in the world, that the flesh will be lusting against the spirit as well as the spirit against the flesh; but if, in the prevailing bent and tenour of your lives, you be <I>led by the Spirit,<\/I>&#8211;if you act under the guidance and government of the Holy Spirit and of that spiritual nature and disposition he has wrought in you,&#8211;if you make the word of God your rule and the grace of God your principle,&#8211;it will hence appear that you are not under the law, not under the condemning, though you are still under the commanding, power of it; for <I>there is now no condemnation to those that are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit;<\/I> and <I>as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God,<\/I>&#8221; <span class='bible'>Rom. viii. 1-14<\/span>.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3. The apostle specifies the works of the flesh, which must be watched against and mortified, and the fruits of the Spirit, which must be cherished and brought forth (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 19<\/span>, c.) and by specifying particulars he further illustrates what he is here upon. (1.) He begins with <I>the works of the flesh,<\/I> which, as they are many, so they are manifest. It is past dispute that the things he here speaks of are the works of the flesh, or the product of corrupt and depraved nature; most of them are condemned by the light of nature itself, and all of them by the light of scripture. The particulars he specifies are of various sorts; some are sins against the seventh commandment, such as <I>adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,<\/I> by which are meant not only the gross acts of these sins, but all such thoughts, and words, and actions, as have a tendency towards the great transgression. Some are sins against the first and second commandments, as <I>idolatry<\/I> and <I>witchcraft.<\/I> Others are sins against our neighbour, and contrary to the royal law of brotherly love, such as <I>hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife,<\/I> which too often occasion <I>seditions, heresies, envyings,<\/I> and sometimes break out into <I>murders,<\/I> not only of the names and reputation, but even of the very lives, of our fellow-creatures. Others are sins against ourselves, such as <I>drunkenness and revellings;<\/I> and he concludes the catalogue with an <I>et cetera,<\/I> and gives fair warning to all to take care of them, as they hope to see the face of God with comfort. Of these and <I>such like,<\/I> says he, <I>I tell you before, as I have also told you in times past,<\/I> that <I>those who do such things,<\/I> how much soever they may flatter themselves with vain hopes, <I>shall not inherit the kingdom of God.<\/I> These are sins which will undoubtedly shut men out of heaven. The world of spirits can never be comfortable to those who plunge themselves in the filth of the flesh; nor will the righteous and holy God ever admit such into his favour and presence, unless they be first <I>washed and sanctified, and justified in the name of our Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> 1 Cor. vi. 11<\/I><\/span>. (2.) He specifies the fruits of the Spirit, or the renewed nature, which as Christians we are concerned to bring forth, <span class='bible'>Gal 5:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 5:23<\/span>. And here we may observe that as sin is called <I>the work of the flesh,<\/I> because the flesh, or corrupt nature, is the principle that moves and excites men to it, so grace is said to be <I>the fruit of the Spirit,<\/I> because it wholly proceeds from the Spirit, as the fruit does from the root: and whereas before the apostle had chiefly specified those works of the flesh which were not only hurtful to men themselves but tended to make them so to one another, so here he chiefly takes notice of those fruits of the Spirit which had a tendency to make Christians agreeable one to another, as well as easy to themselves; and this was very suitable to the caution or exhortation he had before given (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 13<\/span>), that they should <I>not use their liberty as an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.<\/I> He particularly recommends to us, <I>love,<\/I> to God especially, and to one another for his sake,&#8211;<I>joy,<\/I> by which may be understood cheerfulness in conversation with our friends, or rather a constant delight in God,&#8211;<I>peace,<\/I> with God and conscience, or a peaceableness of temper and behaviour towards others,&#8211;<I>long-suffering,<\/I> patience to defer anger, and a contentedness to bear injuries,&#8211;<I>gentleness,<\/I> such a sweetness of temper, and especially towards our inferiors, as disposes us to be affable and courteous, and easy to be entreated when any have wronged us,&#8211;<I>goodness<\/I> (kindness, beneficence), which shows itself in a readiness to do good to all as we have opportunity,&#8211;<I>faith,<\/I> fidelity, justice, and honesty, in what we profess and promise to others,&#8211;<I>meekness,<\/I> wherewith to govern our passions and resentments, so as not to be easily provoked, and, when we are so, to be soon pacified,&#8211;and <I>temperance,<\/I> in meat and drink, and other enjoyments of life, so as not to be excessive and immoderate in the use of them. Concerning these things, or those in whom these fruits of the Spirit are found, the apostle says, <I>There is no law against them,<\/I> to condemn and punish them. Yea, hence it appears that they are not under the law, but under grace; for these fruits of the Spirit, in whomsoever they are found, plainly show that such are <I>led by the Spirit,<\/I> and consequently that they are not <I>under the law,<\/I> as <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 18<\/span>. And as, by specifying these works of the flesh and fruits of the Spirit, the apostle directs us both what we are to avoid and oppose and what we are to cherish and cultivate, so (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 24<\/span>) he informs us that this is the sincere care and endeavour of all real Christians: <I>And those that are Christ&#8217;s,<\/I> says he (those who are Christians indeed, not only in show and profession, but in sincerity and truth), <I>have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.<\/I> As in their baptism they were obliged hereunto (for, being baptized into Christ, they were baptized into his death, <span class='bible'>Rom. vi. 3<\/span>), so they are now sincerely employing themselves herein, and, in conformity to their Lord and head, are endeavouring to die unto sin, as he had died for it. They have not yet obtained a complete victory over it; they have still flesh as well as Spirit in them, and that has its affections and lusts, which continue to give them no little disturbance, but as it does not now <I>reign in their mortal bodies, so as that they obey it in the lusts thereof<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Rom. vi. 12<\/span>), so they are seeking the utter ruin and destruction of it, and to put it to the same shameful and ignominious, though lingering death, which our Lord Jesus underwent for our sakes. Note, If we should approve ourselves to be Christ&#8217;s, such as are united to him and interested in him, we must make it our constant care and business to crucify the flesh with its corrupt affections and lusts. Christ will never own those as his who yield themselves the servants of sin. But though the apostle here only mentions the crucifying of the flesh with the affections and lusts, as the care and character of real Christians, yet, no doubt, it is also implied that, on the other hand, we should show forth those fruits of the Spirit which he had just before been specifying; this is no less our duty than that, nor is it less necessary to evidence our sincerity in religion. It is not enough that we cease to do evil, but we must learn to do well. Our Christianity obliges us not only to die unto sin, but to live unto righteousness; not only to oppose the works of the flesh, but to bring forth the fruits of the Spirit too. If therefore we would make it appear that we do indeed belong to Christ, this must be our sincere care and endeavour as well as the other; and that it was the design of the apostle to represent both the one and the other of these as our duty, and as necessary to support our character as Christians, may be gathered from what follows (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 25<\/span>), where he adds, <I>If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit;<\/I> that is, &#8220;If we profess to have received the Spirit of Christ, or that we are renewed in the Spirit of Christ, or that we are renewed in the spirit of our minds, and endued with a principle of spiritual life, let us make it appear by the proper fruits of the Spirit in our lives.&#8221; He had before told us that the Spirit of Christ is a privilege bestowed on all the children of God, <span class='bible'><I>ch.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> iv. 6<\/span>. &#8220;Now,&#8221; says he, &#8220;if we profess to be of this number, and as such to have obtained this privilege, let us show it by a temper and behaviour agreeable hereunto; let us evidence our good principles by good practices.&#8221; Our conversation will always be answerable to the principle which we are under the guidance and government of: as <I>those that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh,<\/I> so <I>those that are after the Spirit do mind the things of the Spirit,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Rom. viii. 5<\/I><\/span>. If therefore we would have it appear that we are Christ&#8217;s, and that we are partakers of his Spirit, it must be by our <I>walking not after the flesh, but after the spirit.<\/I> We must set ourselves in good earnest both to mortify the deeds of the body, and to walk in newness of life.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4. The apostle concludes this chapter with a caution against pride and envy, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 26<\/span>. He had before been exhorting these Christians <I>by love to serve one another<\/I> (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 13<\/span>), and had put them in mind of what would be the consequence if, instead of that, they did <I>bite and devour one another,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 15<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. Now, as a means of engaging them to the one and preserving them from the other of these, he here cautions them against being desirous of vain-glory, or giving way to an undue affectation of the esteem and applause of men, because this, if it were indulged, would certainly lead them to provoke one another and to envy one another. As far as this temper prevails among Christians, they will be ready to slight and despise those whom they look upon as inferior to them, and to be put out of humour if they are denied that respect which they think is their due from them, and they will also be apt to envy those by whom their reputation is in any danger of being lessened: and thus a foundation is laid for those quarrels and contentions which, as they are inconsistent with that love which Christians ought to maintain towards each other, so they are greatly prejudicial to the honour and interest of religion itself. This therefore the apostle would have us by all means to watch against. Note, (1.) The glory which comes from men is vain-glory, which, instead of being desirous of, we should be dead to. (2.) An undue regard to the approbation and applause of men is one great ground of the unhappy strifes and contentions that exist among Christians.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>Ye were called for freedom <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">&#8216;  <\/SPAN><\/span>). The same point as in <span class='bible'>5:1<\/span> made plainer by the use of <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">&#8216;<\/SPAN><\/span> (on the basis of, for the purpose of). See <span class='bible'>1Th 4:7<\/span> for this use of <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>.<\/P> <P><B>Only use not <\/B> (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"> <\/SPAN><\/span>). No word for &#8220;use&#8221; in the Greek. Probably supply <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span> or <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>, &#8220;turn not your liberty into an occasion for the flesh&#8221; (<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">   <\/SPAN><\/span>), as a spring board for license. On <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"><\/SPAN><\/span>, see on <span class='bible'>2Co 5:12<\/span>. Liberty so easily turns to license. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Robertson&#8217;s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>For [<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">] <\/SPAN><\/span>. Well may I speak thus strongly of those who thus overthrow your whole polity and enslave you, for ye are called for freedom. <\/P> <P>Unto liberty [<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"> ] <\/SPAN><\/span>. Better, for freedom. See on unto uncleanness, <span class='bible'>1Th 4:7<\/span>. Epi marks the intention. <\/P> <P>Only [<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">] <\/SPAN><\/span>. For a similar use of the word, qualifying or limiting a general statement, comp. <span class='bible'>1Co 7:39<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 2:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Phi 1:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Th 2:7<\/span>. <\/P> <P>Brethren. Rev. rightly puts the word at the end of the verse. The position is unusual. It would seem as if Paul intended to close this severs letter with an assurance that the &#8220;foolish Galatians&#8221; were still his brethren : They are addressed as &#8220;brethren,&#8221; chapter <span class='bible'>Gal 4:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 5:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 6:1<\/span>. Comp. <span class='bible'>1Co 16:24<\/span>. <\/P> <P>Use not liberty [<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"> ] <\/SPAN><\/span>. Use is not in the Greek. We may supply hold or make or turn. <\/P> <P>Occasion [<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">] <\/SPAN><\/span>. See on <span class='bible'>Rom 7:8<\/span>. Almost exclusively in Paul. To the flesh [<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"> ] <\/SPAN><\/span>. See on <span class='bible'>Rom 7:5<\/span>. The flesh here represents lovelessness and selfishness. Christian freedom is not to be abused for selfish ends. Paul treats this subject at length in <span class='bible'>1Co 8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 12:25<\/span>, <span class='bible'>26<\/span>. Individual liberty is subject to the law of love and mutual service. Comp. <span class='bible'>1Pe 2:16<\/span>. <\/P> <P>By love [<span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\">  ] <\/SPAN><\/span>. Or through love, through which faith works (ver. 6).<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Vincent&#8217;s Word Studies in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1 ) <strong>&#8220;For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty,&#8221;<\/strong> (humeis gar ep&#8217; eleutheria eklethete, adelphoi) &#8220;For brethren you all were called for freedom,&#8221; not bondage to the law, but liberty to confess, follow, and serve Jesus Christ, <span class='bible'>Joh 8:31-36<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 5:1<\/span>. Freedom is an essential element of Christian life and love, not for self-indulgence, but for willing service and labors of love for Christ, <span class='bible'>Gal 5:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar 8:34<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>2) <strong>&#8220;Only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh,&#8221;<\/strong> (monon me ten eleutherian eis aphormen te sarki) &#8220;Only (use) not the freedom or emancipation for an advantage to the flesh,&#8221; <span class='bible'>1Co 8:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co 9:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Pe 2:16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Pe 2:19<\/span>. Do not disregard the rights and interests of others simply because you are free in Christ, Paul contended, <span class='bible'>Psa 40:1-3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Psa 51:12-13<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>3) <strong>&#8220;But by love serve one another,&#8221;<\/strong> (alla dia tes agapes douleuete allelois) &#8220;But through love serve ye one another like slaves,&#8221; <span class='bible'>Joh 13:34-35<\/span>; Do good to all men &#8220;especially to those of the household of faith,&#8221; <span class='bible'>Gal 6:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom 15:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Th 5:14<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Liberty or emancipation from the bondage of sin and the law is not one toward self-indulgence but to loving bondage of service to Jesus Christ, <span class='bible'>1Co 7:22<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 13.  Ye have been called to liberty. He now proceeds to show in what way liberty must be used. In the course of expounding the First Epistle to the Corinthians, we have pointed out that liberty is one thing, and that the use of it is another thing. Liberty lies in the conscience, and looks to God; the use of it lies in outward matters, and deals not with God only, but with men. Having exhorted the Galatians to suffer no diminution of their liberty, he now enjoins them to be moderate in the use of it, and lays down as a rule for the lawful use, that it shall not be turned into pretext or occasion for licentiousness. Liberty is not granted to the flesh, which ought rather to be held captive under the yoke, but is a spiritual benefit, which none but pious minds are capable of enjoying. <\/p>\n<p> But by love. The method here explained of restraining liberty from breaking out into wide and licentious abuse is, to have it regulated  by love. Let us always remember that the present question is not, in what manner we are free before God, but in what manner we may use our liberty in our intercourse with men. A good conscience submits to no slavery; but to practice outward slavery, or to abstain from the use of liberty, is attended by no danger. In a word, if &#8220;by love we serve one another,&#8221; we shall always have regard to edification, so that we shall not grow wanton, but use the grace of God for his honor and the salvation of our neighbors. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Calvin&#8217;s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><em>CRITICAL AND EXPLANATORY NOTES<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13<\/span>. <strong>Use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh.<\/strong>Do not give the flesh the handle or pretext for its indulgence, which it eagerly seeks for. <strong>By love serve one another.<\/strong>If ye must be in bondage, be servants to one another in love.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:15<\/span>. <strong>If ye bite and devour one another,  consumed.<\/strong>Figures taken from the rage of beasts of prey. The <em>biting<\/em> of controversy naturally runs into the devouring of controversial mood waxing fierce with indulgence. And the controversialists, each snapping at and gnawing his antagonist, forget the tendency is to <em>consume<\/em> the Christian cause. Strength of soul, health of body, character, and resources are all consumed by broils.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:18<\/span>. <strong>If ye be led by the Spirit, ye are not under the law.<\/strong>Under no irksome restraint. To him who loves, law is not irksome bondage but delightful direction. Active spiritual life is a safeguard against lawless affection.<\/p>\n<p><em>MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.<\/em><em><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13-18<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Love the Highest Law of Christian Liberty<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. <strong>Love preserves liberty from degenerating into licence.<\/strong>Only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13<\/span>). Christian liberty is a great boon, but it is also a solemn responsibility. It is hard to win, and is worth the most gigantic struggle; but the moment it is abused it is lost. Men clamour for liberty when they mean licencelicence to indulge their unholy passions, unchecked by the restraints of law. Christian liberty is not the liberty of the flesh, but of the Spirit, and love is the master-principle that governs and defines all its exercises.<\/p>\n<p>He is the freeman whom the truth makes free,<br \/>And all are slaves besides.<\/p>\n<p>We know no truth, no privilege, no power, no blessing, no right, which is not abused. But is liberty to be denied to men because they often turn it into licentiousness? There are two freedomsthe false, where a man is free to do what he likes; the true, where a man is free to do what he ought. Love is the safeguard of the highest liberty.<\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>Love is obedience to the highest law.<\/strong>For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:14<\/span>). By love serve one another (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13<\/span>). We may be as orthodox as Athanasius and as scrupulous as Jerome, we may be daily and ostentatiously building to God seven altars and offering a bullock and a ram on every altar, and yet be as sounding brass and as a clanging cymbal, if our life shows only the leaves of profession without the golden fruit of action. If love shows not itself by deeds of love, then let us not deceive ourselves. God is not mocked; our Christianity is heathenism, and our religion a delusion and a sham. Love makes obedience delightful, esteems it bondage to be prevented, liberty to be allowed to serve.<\/p>\n<p>Serene will be our days and bright,<\/p>\n<p>And happy will our nature be,<\/p>\n<p>When love is an unerring light,<\/p>\n<p>And joy its own security.<\/p>\n<p><em>Wordsworth<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>III. <strong>Love prevents the mutual destructiveness of a contentious spirit.<\/strong>But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:15<\/span>). The condition of the Galatians at this time was very different from the ideal Paul set before them. The quick, warm temperament of the Gauls was roused by the Judaistic controversy, and their natural combativeness was excited. It was easy to pick a quarrel with them at any time, and they were eloquent in vituperation and invective. The biting describes the wounding and exasperating effect of the manner in which their contentions were carried on; devour warns them of its destructiveness. If this state of things continued, the Churches of Galatia would cease to exist. Their liberty would end in complete disintegration. Love is the remedy propounded for all illsthe love of Christ, leading to the love of each other. Love not only cures quarrels, but prevents them.<\/p>\n<p>IV. <strong>Love by obeying the law of the Spirit gains the victory in the fend between the flesh and the Spirit.<\/strong>Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh:  these are contrary the one to the other (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:16-17<\/span>). The flesh and the Spirit are rivals, and by their natures must be opposed to and strive with each other. The strong man is dispossessed by a stronger than hethe Spirit. The master must rule the slave. This soul of mine must rule this body of mine, said John Foster, or quit it. The life of a Christian is lived in a higher sphere, and governed by a higher lawwalking in the Spirit. Christianity says, Be a man, not a brute. Not do as many fleshly things as you can, but do as many spiritual things as you can. All prohibitions are negative. You cant kill an appetite by starvation. You may kill the flesh by living in the higher region of the Spirit; not merely by ceasing to live in sin, but by loving Christ. The more we live the spiritual life, the more sin becomes impossible. Conquest over the sensual is gained, not by repression, but by the freer, purer life of love.<\/p>\n<p>V. <strong>Love emancipates from the trammels of the law.<\/strong>If ye be led by the Spirit, ye are not under the law (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:18<\/span>). The Spirit of love does not abolish the law, but renders it harmless by fulfilling all its requirements, without being compelled to it by its stern commands. Law does not help the soul to obey its behests, but it has nothing to say, nothing to threaten, when those behests are obeyed. To be under the law is to be under sin; but yielding to the influence of the Spirit, and living according to His law, the soul is free from sin and from the condemnation of the law. Freedom from sin, and freedom from the trammels of the Mosaic lawthese two liberties are virtually one. Love is the great emancipator from all moral tyrannies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lessons.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Love is in harmony with the holiest law<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Love silences all contention<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Love honours law by obeying it<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>GERM NOTES ON THE VERSES<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13-14<\/span>. <em>The Service of Love<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I. <strong>Is the noblest exercise of Christian liberty<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>Preserves Christian liberty from degenerating into selfish indulgence<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>III. <strong>Is the fulfilment of the highest law<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>Gal. 5:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13<\/span>. <em>The Abuse of Christian Liberty<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. <strong>To use it as an occasion of fleshly and carnal liberty.<\/strong>When men make more things indifferent than God ever made. Thus all abuses of meat, drink, apparel, rioting, gaming, dicing, and carding are excused by the names of things indifferent.<\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>Our liberty is abused by an immoderate use of the gifts of God.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. Many gentlemen and others offend when they turn recreation into an occupation. <br \/>2. When men exceed in eating and drinking. <br \/>3. They offend who, being mean persons and living by trades, yet for diet and apparel are as great gentlemen and gentlewomen.<\/p>\n<p>III. <strong>Liberty is abused when the blessings of God are made instruments and flags and banners to display our riot, vanity, ostentation, and pride.<\/strong>It is the fashion of men to take unto themselves a toleration of sinning. Some presume on the patience of God, others on the election of grace, and others on the mercy of God. A certain dweller in Cambridge made away with himself. In his bosom was found a writing to this effect: that God did show mercy on great and desperate sinners, and therefore he hoped for mercy though he hanged himself. Of this mind are many ignorant persons, who persevere in their sins, yet persuade themselves of mercy.<em>Perkins<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Right Use of Christian Liberty<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. <strong>We ourselves must be renewed and sanctified.<\/strong>The person must first please God before the action can please Him.<\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>Besides the lawful use of the creatures we must have a spiritual and holy use of them.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. The creatures of God must be sanctified by the word and prayer. <br \/>2. We must be circumspect lest we sin in the use of the creatures. In these days there is no feasting or rejoicing unless all memory of God be buried, for that is said to breed melancholy. <br \/>3. We must use the gifts of God with thanksgiving. <br \/>4. We must suffer ourselves to be limited and moderate in the use of our liberty. <br \/>5. Our liberty must be used for right endsthe glory of God, the preservation of nature, and the good of our neighbour.<\/p>\n<p>III. <strong>We must give no occasion of sinning by means of Christian liberty.<\/strong><em>Ibid.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:14<\/span>. <em>The Law fulfilled in Love to Others<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. <strong>The end of mans life is to serve God in serving others.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>True godliness is to love and serve God in serving man.<\/strong>To live out of all society of men, though it be in prayer and fasting in monkish fashion, is no state of perfection, but mere superstition. That is true and perfect love of God that is showed in duties of love and in the edification of our neighbour. It is not enough for thee to be holy in church; thou mayest be a saint in church and a devil at home.<em>Ibid.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Regard for a Neighbours Rights<\/em>.Speaking of the early American prairie settlements a modern historian says: Theft was almost unknown. The pioneers brought with them the same rigid notions of honesty which they had previously maintained. A man in Mancoupin county left his waggon loaded with corn stuck in the prairie mud for two weeks near a frequented road. When he returned he found some of his corn gone, but there was money enough tied in the sacks to pay for what was taken.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:15<\/span>. <em>Church Quarrels<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>1. When schism in a Church is not only maintained on the one hand with passion, strife, reproaches, and real injuries, but also impugned on the other hand, not so much with the sword of the Spirit as with the same fleshly means, then is it the forerunner and procuring cause of desolation and ruin to both parties and to the whole Church. 2. As it is a matter of great difficulty to make men of credit and parts, being once engaged in contentious debates, to foresee the consequence of their doing so further than the hoped-for victory against the contrary party, so it were no small wisdom, before folk meddle with strife, seriously to consider what woeful effects may follow to the Church of God.<em>Fergusson<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:16<\/span>. <em>The Positiveness of the Divine Life<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. <strong>There are two ways of dealing with every vice.<\/strong>One is to set to work directly to destroy the vice; that is the negative way. The other is to bring in as overwhelmingly as possible the opposite virtue, and so to crowd and stifle and drown out the vice; that is the positive way. Everywhere the negative and positive methods of treatment stand over against each other, and men choose between them. A Church is full of errors and foolish practices. It is possible to attack those follies outright, showing conclusively how foolish they are; or it is possible, and it is surely better, to wake up the true spiritual life in that Church which shall itself shed those follies and cast them out, or at least rob them of their worst harmfulness. The application of the same principle is seen in matters of taste, matters of reform, and in matters of opinion.<\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>In St. Paul and in all the New Testament there is nothing more beautiful than the clear, open, broad way in which the positive culture of human character is adopted and employed.<\/strong>We can conceive of a God standing over His moral creatures, and, whenever they did anything wrong, putting a heavy hand on the malignant manifestation and stifling it, and so at last bringing them to a tight, narrow, timid goodnessthe God of repression. The God of the New Testament is not that. We can conceive of another God who shall lavish and pour upon His children the chances and temptations to be good; in every way shall make them see the beauty of goodness; shall so make life identical with goodness that every moment spent in wickedness shall seem a waste, almost a death; shall so open His Fatherhood and make it real to them that the spontaneousness of the Fathers holiness is re-echoed in the child; not the God of restraint, but the God whose symbols are the sun, the light, the friend, the fireeverything that is stimulating, everything that fosters, encourages, and helps. When we read in the New Testament, lo, that is the God whose story is written there, the God whose glory we see in the face of Jesus Christ. The distinction is everywhere. Not merely by trying not to sin, but by entering further and further into the new life in which, when it is completed, sin becomes impossible; not by merely weeding out wickedness, but by a new and supernatural cultivation of holiness, does the saint of the New Testament walk on the ever-ascending pathway of growing Christliness and come at last perfectly to Christ.<\/p>\n<p>III. <strong>This character of the New Testament must be at bottom in conformity with human nature.<\/strong>The Bible and its Christianity are not in contradiction against the nature of the man they try to save. They are at war with his corruptions, and, in his own interest, they are for ever labouring to assert and re-establish his true self. Mans heart is always rebelling against repression as a continuous and regular thing. There is a great human sense that not suppression but expression is the true life. It is the self-indulgence of the highest and not the self-surrender of the lowest that is the great end of the gospel. The self-sacrifice of the Christian is always an echo of the self-sacrifice of Christ. Nothing can be more unlike the repressive theories of virtue in their methods and results than the way in which Christ lived His positive life, full of force and salvation. The way to get out of self-love is to love God. Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.<em>Phillips Brooks<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Flesh and the Spirit<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. When St. Paul talks of mans flesh <strong>he means by it mans body, mans heart and brain, and all his bodily appetites and powers<\/strong>what we call a mans constitution, the animal part of man. Man is an animal with an immortal spirit in it, and this spirit can feel more than pleasure and pain; it can feel trust, hope, peace, love, purity, nobleness, independence, and, above all, it can feel right and wrong. There is the infinite difference between an animal and man, between our flesh and our spirit; an animal has no sense of right and wrong.<\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>There has been many a man in this life who had every fleshly enjoyment which this world can give, and yet whose spirit was in hell all the while, and who knew it;<\/strong> hating and despising himself for a mean, selfish villain, while all the world round was bowing down to him and envying him as the luckiest of men. A mans flesh can take no pleasure in spiritual things, while mans spirit of itself can take no pleasure in fleshly things. Wickedness, like righteousness, is a spiritual thing. If a man sins, his body is not in fault; it is his spirit, his weak, perverse will, which will sooner listen to what his flesh tells him is pleasant than to what God tells him is right. This is the secret of the battle of life.<\/p>\n<p>III. <strong>Because you are all fallen creatures there must go on in you this sore lifelong battle between your spirit and your flesh<\/strong>your spirit trying to be master and guide, and your flesh rebelling and trying to conquer your spirit and make you a mere animal, like a fox in cunning, a peacock in vanity, or a hog in greedy sloth. It is your sin and your shame if your spirit does not conquer your flesh, for God has promised to help your spirit. Ask Him, and His Spirit will fill you with pure, noble hopes, with calm, clear thoughts, and with deep, unselfish love to God and man; and instead of being the miserable slave of your own passions, and of the opinions of your neighbours, you will find that where the Spirit of the Lord is there is liberty, true freedom, not only from your neighbours sins, but, what is far better, freedom from your own.<em>C. Kingsley<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>Walking in the Spirit<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. <strong>The Spirit is a divine nature, quality, or condition whereby we are made conformable to Christ.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. <em>It is a rich and liberal grace of God<\/em>. It contains the seeds of all virtues. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Its largeness<\/em>. The Spirit is in all the powers of them who are regenerate in mind, conscience, will, affections, and in the sensual appetite. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Its sincerity<\/em>. The grace of God is without falsehood or guile. <\/p>\n<p>4. <em>Its excellency<\/em>. The spirit of grace in Christians is more excellent than the grace of creation, in respect of the beginning thereof, and in respect of constancy. <\/p>\n<p>5. <em>Its liveliness<\/em>, whereby the Spirit is effectual in operation. <\/p>\n<p>(1) The Spirit works in and by the word of God. <br \/>(2) Works by degrees, to make us feel our need of Christ, and to kindle in us a desire for reconciliation with God. <br \/>(3) Works to write the law in our hearts.<\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>Walking in the Spirit is to order our lives according to the direction and motion of the Spirit.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. <em>The Spirit renews our nature<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>(1) Makes us put a further beginning to our actions than nature can, causing us to do them in faith. <br \/>(2) To do our actions in a new manner, in obedience to the word. <br \/>(3) Makes us put a new end to our actionsto intend and desire to honour God. <br \/>2. <em>We must become spiritual men<\/em>. Must do things lawful in a spiritual manner. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>We must not judge any mans estate before God by any one or some few actions<\/em>, good or bad, but by his walking, by the course of his life.<em>Perkins<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:17<\/span>. <em>The Strife of the Flesh and Spirit<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. <strong>Man, under the influence of corruption, is called flesh.<\/strong>He may be said to be a spiritual being because he is possessed of an immortal spirit; but the term flesh seems to be awfully appropriate, because he is wholly and exclusively under the dominion of matter. In the text it implies the evil principle that inhabits the bosom of man. It is the mighty autocrat of humanity in the wreck of the Fall. Sin is such a mighty monster that none can bind him in fetters of iron and imprison Him but God Himself. In the operation of weaving, different materials cross each other in the warp and woof in order to make one whole, and this is the case with the family of heaven here below. Sin and grace are perpetually crossing each other.<\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>The spiritual offspring which is born of God is called the new man.<\/strong>It is the junior offspring, the junior disposition, the offspring of the second Adam. Corruption has its root only in humanity. Not so with grace. This springs alone from God. The new man lives in him; his head is above the skies, his feet lower than hell; and the reason why he is destined to be conqueror is that he fights in and under the inspiration of Heaven.<\/p>\n<p>III. <strong>These two principles are in a state of ceaseless warfare, ever opposed to each other.<\/strong>They are like two armies, sometimes encamped, at others engaged in terrible conflict; but, whether apparently engaged or not, each seeks the destruction of the other perpetually. They are and must be ever opposed, till one fall; one must perish and the other live eternally. Where there is no conflict there can be no grace.<\/p>\n<p>IV. <strong>Consider the wisdom and valour evinced by this new principle.<\/strong>It is illumined by the Spirit and by the truth of God. The sun does not give me an eye. God alone can confer this organ; yet it is equally true my eye must attain its full vigour in the light of the sun: so the external means are necessary to teach us what God is, and to develop all the principles of the new man, to clothe it with the panoply of Deity, and to lead it on from battle to battle, and from victory to victory, till the last battle is eventually fought, the last victory won, and the fruits of triumph enjoyed for ever.<em>William Howels<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal. 5:18<\/span>. <em>The Leading of the Spirit<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>1. The new man performs the office of guide to the godly in all actions truly spiritual. <br \/>(1) As it is ruled by the word, which is the external light and lantern to direct our steps. <br \/>(2) The work of grace itself is the internal light whereby the regenerate man spiritually understands the things of God. <br \/>(3) The same work of grace being actuated by the continual supply of exciting grace from the Spirit is a strengthening guide to all spiritual actions. <br \/>2. The natural man is so much a slave to his sinful lusts that the things appointed by God to curb and make them weaker are so far from bringing this about that his lusts are thereby enraged and made more violent. The rigidity of the law, which tends to restrain sin, is turned by the unregenerate man into an occasion for fulfilling his lusts.<em>Fergusson<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Guidance of the Spirit<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I. <strong>Preservation<\/strong>, whereby the Holy Ghost maintains the gift of regeneration in them that are regenerate.<\/p>\n<p>II. <strong>Co-operation<\/strong>, whereby the will of God, as the first cause, works together with the regenerate will of man, as the second cause. Without this co-operation mans will brings forth no good action; no more than the tree which is apt to bring forth fruit yields fruit indeed till it have the co-operation of the sun, and that in the proper season of the year.<\/p>\n<p>III. <strong>Direction<\/strong>, whereby the Spirit of God ordereth and establisheth the mind, will, and affections in good duties.<\/p>\n<p>IV. <strong>Excitation,<\/strong> whereby the Spirit stirs and still moves the will and mind after they are regenerate, because the grace of God is hindered and oppressed by the flesh.<\/p>\n<p>V. <strong>Privilege of believers not to be subject to the ceremonial law.<\/strong>Ye are not under the law. Not under the law respecting its curse and condemnation, though we are all under law, as it is the rule of good life.<em>Perkins<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>B.<\/p>\n<p>LIMITATIONS AND POWER OF FREEDOM <span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13-26<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>No fleshly License <span class='bible'>Gal. 5:13-15<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>TEXT 5:1315<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>(13) For ye, brethren, were called for freedom; only use not your freedom for an occasion to the flesh, but through love be servants one to another. (14) For the whole law is fulfilled in one word, even in this: Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. (15) But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>PARAPHRASE 5:1315<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>13 Now ye, brethren, have been called by the gospel into freedom from the law of Moses as the rule of your justification. Nevertheless, use not this liberty as a pretext for gratifying those appetites, and exercising those passions, which have their seat in the flesh. But, agreeably to the law of Christ, assiduously serve one another in all things innocent.<br \/>14 They who stickle for the law ought to be zealous in the offices of love. For the whole law, as it respects our neighbour, is fulfilled by obeying one precept, even this: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as sincerely as thou lovest thyself.<br \/>15 But, if, from your zeal for, or your zeal against the law of Moses, ye wound and destroy one anothers characters, have a care lest ye bring everlasting destruction on one another.<\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENT 5:13<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>For ye, brethren<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>Paul called the Galatian Christian converts brethren even though he speaks strongly against their false teachers.<\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>How long could they apostatize and be brethren?<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>Who among the sects, denominations, and division are our brethren?<\/p>\n<p>c.<\/p>\n<p>How wrong must a Christian be to be out of the fellowship as a brother?<\/p>\n<p>d.<\/p>\n<p>Is the follower of a false teacher a brother, while the false teacher is not to be considered so?<\/p>\n<p>e.<\/p>\n<p>The problem of fellowship is not easily settled.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>There are times when lines are to be drawn.<\/p>\n<p>Anathema. Cf. <span class='bible'>Gal. 1:8-9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>receive him not into your house. Cf. <span class='bible'>2Jn. 1:10<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>were called for freedom<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>A freedom from the burdensome rites and ceremonies of the law. <span class='bible'>Gal. 5:1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>Freedom from the captivity of sin. <span class='bible'>Rom. 6:18<\/span><\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>A Christian is the only free person.<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>God does not want us to be like Adam and Eve, hiding from him.<\/p>\n<p>3.<\/p>\n<p>Freedom from death. <span class='bible'>Rom. 8:2<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>only use not your freedom for an occasion to the flesh<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>The devil would turn freedom to licentiousness.<\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>The flesh reasons If we are without the law, we may as well indulge.<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>For there are certain men crept in privily, even they who were of old written of beforehand unto this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness. <span class='bible'>Jud. 1:4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>c.<\/p>\n<p>Not using your freedom for a cloak of wickedness. <span class='bible'>1Pe. 2:16<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>Freedom is not given for a person to act without restraint.<\/p>\n<p><strong>but through love be servants one to another<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>Folks want to be important; here is the way.<\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>Whosoever would be first among you shall be your servant. <span class='bible'>Mat. 20:27<\/span><\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant. <span class='bible'>Mat. 23:11<\/span><\/p>\n<p>c.<\/p>\n<p>Good and faithful servant . . . enter thou into the joy. <span class='bible'>Mat. 25:21<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>This is a debt.<\/p>\n<p>Owe no man anything, save to love one another.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Rom. 13:8-10<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENT 5:14<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>For the whole law is fulfilled in one word, love <\/strong>(<span class='bible'>Lev. 19:18<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>People get worked up over ceremoniesrituals, when one word carefully carried out, is worth all the ritual possible.<\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>Leave off all this foolishness and get down to business.<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>One thing will fulfill all the lawlove.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>This new commandment sounds short and easy.<\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>It is never accomplishedamong men.<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>Loving wayward men is not easily accomplished.<\/p>\n<p>c.<\/p>\n<p>Intolerance for sin is sometimes accompanied by intolerance for the sinner.<\/p>\n<p><strong>as thyself<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>You cant find a nearer example than yourself.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>If you were in trouble you know how you would want to be treated.<\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENT 5:15<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>But if ye bite and devour one another<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>When the one faith in Christ is overthrown, peace and unity come to an end in the church.<\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of being motivated by love, jealousy and strife prevail.<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>Backbiters are condemned by the Word: <span class='bible'>Rom. 1:30<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Pro. 25:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Co. 12:20<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>False teaching causes strife, etc. Cf. <span class='bible'>2Ti. 2:23<\/span>, <span class='bible'>1Ti. 6:4<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>take heed that ye be not consumed one of another<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>Nothing is so destructive as religious disputes.<\/p>\n<p>a.<\/p>\n<p>Both groups feel they are on Gods side and the other is possessed of the devil.<\/p>\n<p>b.<\/p>\n<p>Both have invested time and money and they do not want to see it turned to the enemys advantage.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>It consumes like a fire until Christians who are to give reasonable service become unreasonable.<\/p>\n<p>3.<\/p>\n<p>The Churchs greatest enemy is itself.<\/p>\n<p><strong>BITING AND DEVOURING ONE ANOTHER 5:15<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We Christian people must not be like dogs and wolves. Dogs bite and run away. Wolves devour and destroy.<\/p>\n<p>When we read the warning in <span class='bible'>Gal. 5:15<\/span> against biting and devouring one another, we must realize that it is in the area of conversation that we bite. We are being warned with a flashing light that there is danger when we depart from talking with love, kindness, longsuffering, concern, compassion, and a desire to help rather than to hinder others.<\/p>\n<p>Harm can take place in an evenings careless conversation as doubts and bitterness, gossip and criticism poison people against brethren.<br \/>We are responsible for our use of our time, and perhaps doubly so for our use of other peoples time. If we start a rumor, or continue one, we have taken unfair advantage of time that should have been given to exhortation to love and to good works.<br \/>One of the greatest faults of false teaching is what it does to brethren. Men fight over words and opinions and when the church is divided, it is a disgrace to God and in the community.<br \/>It is foolish to say, it doesnt make any difference what you believe, just as long as you are sincere. Division is sinful. Human doctrines divide people.<\/p>\n<p>Paul says to Timothy in <span class='bible'>2Ti. 2:14<\/span>, Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers. I think Paul is talking about conversation and peripheral questions that use up time during which the hearers need some positive help. He is warning all of us who are children of the living God to show forth our love and compassion for one another and for the lost ones of the world when we sit conversing, and asking questions. He goes on to urge and command in <span class='bible'>Gal. 5:23-24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal. 5:26<\/span> :<\/p>\n<p>Foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes. And the servant of the Lord must not strive, but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, in meekness instructing those that oppose themselves . . . that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.<\/p>\n<p>There is to be a positive result in conversation and in question-and-answer times, as well as in teaching and preaching times.<\/p>\n<p><strong>STUDY QUESTIONS 5:1315<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>669.<\/p>\n<p>Paul again emphasized freedom. Does he mean freedom from burdensome rites?<\/p>\n<p>670.<\/p>\n<p>Were they in danger of misunderstanding freedom?<\/p>\n<p>671.<\/p>\n<p>Do people tend to lawlessness if you free them from law?<\/p>\n<p>672.<\/p>\n<p>Compare <span class='bible'>1Pe. 2:16<\/span> on this subject.<\/p>\n<p>673.<\/p>\n<p>Is freedom for people with restraint or without it?<\/p>\n<p>674.<\/p>\n<p>What influence should restrain us?<\/p>\n<p>675.<\/p>\n<p>If love is our motive what will a man do?<\/p>\n<p>676.<\/p>\n<p>If a person breaks fellowship in acceptance of false teaching, is he serving his brethren in love?<\/p>\n<p>677.<\/p>\n<p>What one law is worth more than all the rituals and ceremonies combined?<\/p>\n<p>678.<\/p>\n<p>What one word fulfills all the law?<\/p>\n<p>679.<\/p>\n<p>Did Christ fulfill the law?<\/p>\n<p>680.<\/p>\n<p>Are you able to do it? Do you love your neighbors, friends, relatives, enemies?<\/p>\n<p>681.<\/p>\n<p>Is intolerance for sin often accompanied by intolerance for sinners too?<\/p>\n<p>682.<\/p>\n<p>Do you consider yourself a good example of how all men would like to be treated?<\/p>\n<p>683.<\/p>\n<p>Is this commandment one of the ten commandments?<\/p>\n<p>684.<\/p>\n<p>Is this commandment as easy as it is short?<\/p>\n<p>685.<\/p>\n<p>Was Peter demonstrating the commandment when he severed fellowship?<\/p>\n<p>686.<\/p>\n<p>Was Paul showing love when he withstood Peter face to face?<\/p>\n<p>687.<\/p>\n<p>Does love require sternness as well as warmth?<\/p>\n<p>688.<\/p>\n<p>How do people bite and devour without being cannibals?<\/p>\n<p>689.<\/p>\n<p>Where is this spirit condemned?<\/p>\n<p>690.<\/p>\n<p>Will the motive of love destroy this sin?<\/p>\n<p>691.<\/p>\n<p>How consuming is a church fight?<\/p>\n<p>692.<\/p>\n<p>Is the innocent party to be careful too?<\/p>\n<p>693.<\/p>\n<p>Do you feel that a church may be its own worst enemy?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(13) <strong>For.<\/strong>This connecting particle supplies the reason for the Apostles severe treatment of the Judaisers.<\/p>\n<p><strong>An occasion to the flesh.<\/strong>Do not, under the name liberty, give way to sensual excesses. This was the especial danger of the Gentile churches, such as Corinth, from which, as we have seen, the Apostle may have been writing. Galatia, too, was a Gentile church; and though it was for the present subject rather to Judaising influences, the character of the people was fickle, and St. Paul may have thought it well to hint a caution in this direction.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Serve.<\/strong>There is a stress upon this word. The Apostle had been dissuading the Galatians from submitting to other forms of servitude. This one he will permit them.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(13-15) The Judaisers would deserve such a fate; for they are undoing the whole object with which you were called. You were called, not to legal bondage, but to <em>freedom.<\/em> This caution only is needed: Do not make freedom a pretext for self-indulgence. One servitude you may submit tothe service of love. So doing, you will fulfil the Law without being legalists. He who loves his neighbour as himself will need no other rule. On the other hand, dissensions will be fatal, not to one party only, but to all who take part in them.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 2<\/strong>. <strong> But this freedom from circumcision, legalism, and ritualism must not pass into license<\/strong>, <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13-26<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p> Now follows a beautiful section on Christian morals. Absolved from old stereotype forms, let your Christian holiness be based on pure and simple <em> right. <\/em> Yet not natural and economic rectitude merely, but love, under aid of the divine <strong> Spirit<\/strong>, will lift you into the region of a divine purity. And then St. Paul draws us, under the contrast of spirit and flesh, two opposing pictures. The one is the summation of Christian virtues, the other of fleshly vices. Look first on this picture and then on that, and see how a true Christian morality in the midst of heathenism is shaped, and how a true Christian life may be lived. Ages may progress, civilization may advance, the same virtues may be variously modified, but the virtues themselves are eternal, and the character formed by them is truly immortal.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 13<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> <strong> Called unto liberty<\/strong> From the burdensome artificialities of the old system ye are emancipated into a pure and simple heart-deep religion. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Use not liberty to the flesh<\/strong> St. Paul&rsquo;s liberty offers no man an exemption from the law of right. Let no man say, that under Paul&rsquo;s gospel I am lawless, and nothing I do is sin. Such make their <strong> liberty <\/strong> an <strong> occasion<\/strong>, that is, means, or chance, or pretext, for indulging <strong> the flesh<\/strong>. By <strong> flesh <\/strong> here is meant, all opposed to <strong> the spirit<\/strong>; all that is unholy in man, whether of mind or body. It does not imply that all evil lies in matter or in the body. But as flesh is the transitory element of man, so the word is used for all that is low, earthly, or unholy. <\/p>\n<p><strong> By love serve<\/strong> As faith works by <strong> love<\/strong>, so actions produced by love have a true freedom in them. If we <strong> serve <\/strong> another from love we feel that in that <strong> service <\/strong> we are <strong> free<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> &lsquo;For you, brothers ,were called for freedom. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity (a base of operations) for the flesh to express itself, but through love be servants to one another. For the whole law is fulfilled in one word, even this, &ldquo;You shall love your neighbour as yourself&rdquo;.&rsquo;<\/p>\n<p> As he has previously argued, they were called by God with the purpose of their being made free. Free from the Law and its charges, free from its restrictions, free from final condemnation (<span class='bible'>Rom 5:1<\/span>). But now he asks them to recognise that this does not give them the freedom to behave just as they like. It does not mean that they can give the flesh free rein. For if Christ dwells in them how can they possibly do that (<span class='bible'>Gal 2:20<\/span>)? Was that the way in which Christ lived?<\/p>\n<p> Thus they can now turn and make use of the Law. For the Law can help them to know the mind of God. And he quotes them an example to prove it. He points out that Jesus does want them to fulfil the Law in a positive way, and that that can be expressed in terms of loving their neighbours as themselves. Therefore they must demonstrate this in the first place by being servants to each other &lsquo;through love&rsquo;. This seems to suggest that there was some friction in the church through feelings of superiority that needed to be put right. And he will shortly show them how they can do this, for this is indeed what the Spirit is seeking to work within them.<\/p>\n<p> The command &lsquo;you shall love your neighbour as yourself&rsquo; comes in <span class='bible'>Lev 19:18<\/span>. It was prominent in Jewish thinking (<span class='bible'>Luk 10:27<\/span>), although as Jesus had to point out they put too great a restriction on who was their neighbour (<span class='bible'>Luk 10:30-37<\/span>). But it was not a command that any could fulfil completely and thus it was another finger pointing at them under the Law. On the other hand, now that they are free from the condemnation of the Law, Christians can again take it up as a guide for living. And that is what they must do. But this does not necessarily mean having natural affection for my neighbour. It is difficult sometimes to have such affection for some people. Rather it means behaving towards them as we would want others to behave towards us. It means behaving towards them as Christ Himself would behave, regardless of how we feel.<\/p>\n<p> It is true that God calls us to be free, to enjoy freedom from the bondage of the Law. But this is not to be looked on as an opportunity for gratifying fleshly desires. We are not free from seeking to be righteous. Our freedom is rather to be seen as an opportunity to be free to demonstrate Christian love. Through love Christians will be &lsquo;slaves&rsquo; to each other, because their love makes them want to serve each other. They will be love-slaves. Indeed paradoxically this results in fulfilling the Law, for to obey the command &lsquo;you shall love your neighbour as yourself&rsquo;, if genuinely carried out, results in fulfilling all the moral requirements of the Law and more. It means we consider other people&rsquo;s happiness and satisfaction as being of equal, if not greater, concern than our own.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;As an opportunity.&rsquo; The word basically meant the base of operations for an attack or an expedition. Thus it signifies supplying an opportunity to do what was desired.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;For the flesh to express itself.&rsquo; Paul does not view the flesh as essentially evil in itself. The flesh is essentially neutral. It is simply man&rsquo;s human body. But sadly it has tendencies which, if not properly controlled, will lead to sin. It is the animal part of us that has to be controlled. But it is man who, by his own wilful free choice, follows the downward pull of the flesh. In the end we cannot blame the flesh. We must blame ourselves.<\/p>\n<p>&lsquo;Servants through love.&rsquo; This contrasts with the &lsquo;yoke of bondage&rsquo; in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:1<\/span>. It is now a service of love rather than an enforced servitude. But what does it mean to be a servant? Jesus Christ Himself was the perfect example. He came not to be served but to serve, and this included the sacrifice of His life <span class='bible'>Mar 10:45<\/span>). It means living a life of concern for others. It means being willing to perform the lowly service, even as Jesus did for His disciples (<span class='bible'>Joh 13:1-10<\/span>). It means consideration and thoughtfulness for the needs of others. It means helping them to grow in the grace of God and in the word of God.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> Freedom is Not to Be Misinterpreted as Licence. They Must Walk in Love and By the Spirit (<span class='bible'><strong> Gal 5:13-26<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Paul now goes on to deal with the charge that the Gospel he is presenting gives men licence to do as they like. What he is teaching, he points out, will not result in licentious living, but rather the opposite. It will result in living by the Spirit, in producing the fruit of the Spirit in their lives.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><em><span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span><\/em><\/strong><strong>. <\/strong><strong><em>Only use not liberty<\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong> From the mention of <em>liberty, <\/em>to which St. Paul tells them they are called under the gospel, he takes occasion to caution them respecting the use of it, and so exhorts them to a spiritual or true Christian life; shewing the difference and contrariety between that and a carnal life, or a life after the flesh, <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13-26<\/span>. The word , rendered <em>serve, <\/em>has a greater force in the Greek than our English word <em>serve <\/em>expresses, in the common acceptation; for it signifies the opposite to , <em>liberty; <\/em>and so the Apostle elegantly informs them, that, though by the gospel they are called to a state of liberty from the law, yet they were still as much bound and subjected to their brethren, in all the offices and duties of love and good-will, as if in that respect they were their vassals and bondmen. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span> . &ldquo;It is with justice that I speak so indignantly against those men; for <em> ye<\/em> , who are being worked upon by them to bring you under the bondage of the law, have received God&rsquo;s call to the Messianic kingdom for an object entirely different, in order that ye may be free.&rdquo; Thus the apostle again reminds his readers of the great benefit already indicated in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:1<\/span> , but now with the view of inculcating its single necessary moral limitation.<\/p>\n<p>  ] <em> that ye should be free;<\/em>  used of the ethical <em> aim<\/em> of the  . Comp. <span class='bible'>1Th 4:7<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Eph 2:10<\/span> ; Soph. <em> Oed. C<\/em> . 1459:     .<\/p>\n<p>   .  .  .] Limiting exhortation. But the verb, which is obvious of itself (  , perhaps, or even  ), is omitted, the omission rendering the address more compact and precise. Comp. <span class='bible'>Mat 26:5<\/span> ; Buttmann, <em> neut. Gr<\/em> . 338. This also corresponds (in opposition to Hofmann&rsquo;s groundless doubt) to the usage of the Greeks after the prohibitory  . See Heindorf, <em> ad Plat. Prot<\/em> . p. 315 B; Hartung, <em> Partikell<\/em> . II. p. 153; Klotz <em> ad Devar<\/em> . p. 669; Winer, p. 554 f. [E. T. 745].<\/p>\n<p>    ] <em> for an occasion to the flesh;<\/em> do not use your liberty so that it may serve as an occasion for the nonspiritual, psychico-corporeal part of your nature to assert its desires which are contrary to God. Comp. <span class='bible'>Rom 7:8<\/span> . As to  in the ethical sense, see <span class='bible'>Rom 4:1<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Rom 6:19<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Rom 7:14<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Joh 3:6<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p>     .  .] but let <em> love<\/em> (through which your faith must work, <span class='bible'>Gal 5:6<\/span> ) be that by means of which ye stand in a <em> relation<\/em> of mutually rendered <em> service<\/em> . An ingenious juxtaposition of <em> freedom<\/em> and <em> brotherly serviceableness<\/em> in that freedom. Comp. <span class='bible'>Rom 6:18<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Rom 6:22<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>1Co 9:19<\/span> ; 1Pe 2:16 ; <span class='bible'>2Pe 2:19<\/span> . The <em> special<\/em> contrast, however, which is here opposed to the <em> general<\/em> category of the  , has its <em> ground<\/em> in the circumstances of the Galatians, and its <em> warrant<\/em> in what is about to be said of love in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer&#8217;s New Testament Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>G. Extended exhortation to the Qalatians, instead of turning back from Faith to works of the Law, to give activity to their Faith (in a right understanding of Christian freedom) by ministering Love, as the best fulfilment of the Law<\/strong><\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Gal 6:10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1. More generalreverting to the principle of ethical opposition between Spirit and Flesh, in a discussion, partly didactic<\/p>\n<p>(<span class='bible'>Gal 5:13-24<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>(<span class='bible'>Gal 5:16-24<\/span>.<em>Epistle for<\/em> 14<em>th Sunday after Trinity<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>13For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty [ye were called unto liberty, brethren];<span class=''>14<\/span> only <em>use<\/em> not liberty [or your liberty] for an occasion to the flesh, but by [or by means of your] love serve one another. 14For all the [the whole] law is fulfilled<span class=''>15<\/span> in one word,<span class=''>16<\/span> <em>even<\/em> in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.<span class=''>17<\/span> 15But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another. 16 <em>This<\/em> I say then [Now I say], Walk in [by]<span class=''>18<\/span> the Spirit and ye shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh. 17For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and [for]<span class=''>19<\/span> these are contrary [opposed] the one to the other; so that 18ye cannot do the things that ye would [that<span class=''>20<\/span> ye may not do what things ye would]. But if ye be led of [by] the Spirit, ye are not under the law. 19Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are <em>these<\/em> [of which kind are],<span class=''>21<\/span> adultery [omit adultery],<span class=''>22<\/span> 20fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness [wantonness], idolatry, witchcraft [sorcery], hatred [hatreds], variance [strife],<span class=''>23<\/span> emulations [jealousy], wrath, strife, seditions, 21heresies [caballings, dissensions, factions], envyings, murders,<span class=''>24<\/span> drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told <em>you<\/em> in time past [I forewarn you as I did forewarn you], that they which do such things [as these]<span class=''>25<\/span> shall not inherit the kingdom of God. 22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, 23longsuffering, gentleness [benignity], goodness, faith [or trustfulness], Meekness, 24temperance: against such [as these] there is no law. And [Now]<span class=''>26<\/span> they that are Christs have crucified the flesh with the [its] affections and lusts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span>. <strong>For ye were called unto liberty, brethren<\/strong>.For: Paul justifies the strong expression, he has used in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:12<\/span>, against the false teachers. They deserved this rebuke, forthey seek to deprive you of your freedom, and yetye are called to that (by God through your conversion to Christ); therefore they strive against the counsel and will of God Himself.To this thought: ye were called unto liberty, Paul however now adds a restriction, a warning against misunderstanding and misuse of this liberty (which in all that precedes he had vindicated with such decision for Christians, and which he had made it their duty not to surrender): <strong>only use not your liberty for an occasion to the flesh<\/strong>,   . . . We must supply, say =Turn not, use not liberty as a pretext for the flesh=let not the flesh (your sinful human nature) obtain in this freedom (from the law) an occasion to pretend that it is therefore now allowed to man to do what he will, and therefore it also may claim indulgence with its sinful lusts. This of course would be an entire perversion of Christian freedom, were the flesh thus allowed to take advantage of it. The antithesis shows distinctly, what Paul regards as the essence of the sarcical state; not by any means the corporeal nature, properly so called, but the selfish Egoism. For he exhorts: <strong>but by your love serve one another<\/strong>; love being conceived as the means of serving. in happy antithesis to the  of Christians. Christians are not to be servants to the law; in this sense they are free; but on the other hand this freedom does not exclude but includes  in the sense of serving one another. [Lightfoot: Both  and  are emphatic. St. Pauls meaning may be expressed by a paraphrase thus; you desire to be in bondage: I too recommend to you a bondage, the subservience of mutual <em>love<\/em>. Temper your liberty with this bondage, and it will not degenerate into license.R.]<\/p>\n<p>With this verse a new section, of course, begins, but it is incorrect to begin here, as is variously done, a second or third main division. Above all it is not to be supposed that the Apostle henceforth addresses himself to those Galatian Christians who had held fast the principle of evangelical freedom; on the contrary he has throughout the whole Epistle the same individuals in mind, namely, those led astray by Judaism, and his present exhortation also is immediately connected with the leading thought of the Epistle. How nearly? This he, himself, plainly sets forth in the first place with  : the energetic admonition to the maintenance of freedom receives its needful complement in the warning against misuse of the same, by the reference to its ethical character.But this is unquestionably only one side, hardly more than the mere point of attachment. Paul gives his exhortation to serviceable love not merely as a precaution in case the Galatians, perceiving the inadmissibleness of the legal position, should desire to return to the freer one, but this also belongs, together with the entire explication which it receives in the following verses, to the polemics against their present erroneous view. To that legalism, which he combatted, as slighting faith, and surrendering Itself into false bondage, he opposes as the truth, the fulfilling of the law by the activity of faith in love (comp. <span class='bible'>Gal 5:6<\/span>), where we make ourselves servants, more generally in a walk by the Spirit, in which one is free from the law in the very fulfilling of it (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 5:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 5:23<\/span>). He is the more earnest in holding this up to them, because the Galatians especially, in spite of (or on account of) their legal zeal, were wanting in this fulfilment of the law through a walk by the Spirit, a fulfilment which obliges Christians also (comp., especially <span class='bible'>Gal 5:15<\/span>). The same persons who wanted to impose the law upon themselves, were content to be lacking in that which is the heart of the law; those who wished to make themselves servants to the law, would not be servants to one another. It was therefore of moment, to exclaim to these: Behold, what you need, is not in any way to turn yourselves away from faith, as if this were too little, to the law, but simply to make faith active through a walk in the Spirit, in love. Comp. <span class='bible'>Gal 5:6<\/span>, and also chap. 6, where the more detailed exhortations follow. We thus see plainly how impossible it is to disconnect this section from the preceding one, how on the other hand it concurs with the entire polemics of the Apostle, nay, how these find in it their true, convincing culmination.It is of course incorrect to oppose this section, as hortatory, to the preceding part of the Epistle, as didactic, for this reason that the preceding part also includes exhortation (especially ver.1); this however was dogmatic, and now comes ethical exhortation. Unquestionably therefore this section might with some propriety be called the Ethical part, in distinction from the Doctrinal; but if by this were meant, as commonly, that Paul now leaves the controversy concerning the relation of the Law to Faith, and, having no longer in mind the defection of the Galatian churches, merely proceeds to exhort to a walk of Christian morality, with reference to ethical short-comings, this too must be deemed incorrect according to what has been remarked. Moreover, even if such a distinction into a dogmatic and an ethical part is not unwarranted in fact, it is at all events not exact in form; this section cannot be formally contrasted with all that precedes. For certainly the discourse proceeds without interruption; Paul is speaking hortatively to the Galatians (especially from ver.1 on), but on the ground of the doctrinal exposition, and now he merely gives a sudden ethical turn to this exhortation, bringing, as has been remarked, the whole to an appropriate conclusion.<span class=''>27<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span>. <strong>For the whole law is fulfilled<\/strong>.It is not easy to determine either the meaning of this clause, or its connection with what precedes. The first explanation, which offers itself on account of   , taken  as= , <em>comprehenditur<\/em>, as <span class='bible'>Rom 8:9<\/span>. [So Luther, Calvin, Olshausen, <em>et al<\/em>.R.] But this must be rejected as lexically untenable. Besides with the reading [now generally adopted],  it becomes at once incorrect.As little does  . have here the same sense as in <span class='bible'>Mat 5:17<\/span>=to bring out, to make evident the deeper sense, the ideal substance in distinction from the literal form. Doubtless it is not a  in the doctrine that is here in question, and in reality, if . were taken in this sense, the explanation would come back again to the one already disapproved, namely, that the commandment of love to our neighbor is the substance of   , since that which is substance, in another aspect, is also foundation.  is to be understood of fulfilment by deed, conformity, <em>satisfacere legi<\/em>. [Ellicott: The perfect  suitably points to the completed and permanent act.R.] It is peculiar then, no doubt, that this is said to be <strong>in one word<\/strong>,   , and this to be regarded as an abbreviated expression for; By conformity to the one word, precept (from <span class='bible'>Lev 19:18<\/span>), immediately follows: <strong>Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.<\/strong>[Meyer: <em>Neighbor<\/em> is for the Christian, who rightly (<span class='bible'>Mat 5:17<\/span>) applies this Mosaic command to himself, his fellow-Christian (comp. <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span>, ), as for the Jew it was fellow-Jew; but how little this is to be taken as <em>excluding any one<\/em> whatever, is shown by the whole spirit of Christianity, which finds its most beautiful expression in the case of the Samaritan (<span class='bible'>Luke 10<\/span>); Paul himself was such a Samaritan toward Jew and Gentile.R.] But how far does Paul declare obedience to the one commandment of love to our neighbor, an obedience to the whole law? Not in the sense in which Love is styled   (<span class='bible'>Rom 13:8-10<\/span>). Nearly related as the two passages appear to be, they must by no means be confounded. For in <span class='bible'>Romans 13<\/span> it is expressly stated what is to be understood by , namely, the individual commandments of the Decalogue which respect conduct towards our neighbor, and love is called the  of those, because, whoever has the <em>dispositions<\/em> of love, and in truth only such a one, will of course fulfil also the duties of love commanded by the law. But that the whole law in this passage is not to be arbitrarily turned into second table of the Decalogue, nor even interpreted generally = Moral law, is plain; on the contrary, it doubtless signifies nothing else than: the whole Mosaic law. But in the second place it is also clear, that Paul cannot mean to say, that in love to our neighbor is found the pledge of the fulfilment of the whole law. For this latter Paul has not at all in mind, it is precisely the opposite that he is aiming at; his meaning is, that on him who does this there is no future requirement made in respect to observance of the law, that from this he is free. The sense of  can therefore only be: He is to be regarded as if he had fulfilled the law, and therefore the law can exact nothing further of him. By no means therefore is the commandment of love to our neighbor regarded by Paul as the summary of the whole law; this would be entirely incorrect. He will rather say this, that if any one fulfils this, all the rest comes no more into account; of course, with reference to his emphatic demonstration in what precedes, that the law has lost its binding force for the believer. If the believer now does not take this faith to be a dead one, but quickens it through love, he has done all; there can be of further claims of the law upon him no mention, but he <em>ought<\/em> on the other side to have and exercise love, for only then can he regard himself as free from the claims of the whole land besides, only then, in fact, is he a believer.If it is asked how Paul <em>could<\/em> view the whole law as fulfilled in love to our neighbor, especially without even mentioning love to God, this question is mostly raised with the understanding that he means to designate the commandment of love to our neighbor as the summary, or the fulfilment of it as the condition and principle of the fulfilment of the whole law; and if he meant it so, his assertion must unquestionably be declared unwarranted.<span class=''>28<\/span> (Where the former is in question, Jesus in <span class='bible'>Mat 21:34<\/span> sq. places the two commandments together; and where the latter, Paul, <span class='bible'>Romans 13<\/span>., restricts the law to the second table.) But this understanding of his proposition has been already designated as incorrect. He doubtless means to say: Of him who has love to his neighbor the law can exact nothing more. The question, rightly stated, is therefore only this: How could Paul attribute to love towards our neighbor so eminent a position, that he designates him who should fulfil it as free from all else? Must he not also, nay, above all, demand of the believer a fulfilling of the commandment of love to God, and could he, except on condition that both were found in a man, esteem it equivalent to a fulfilment of the whole law? As to this it is simply to be remarked, that (1) he conceives Faith as essentially comprehending love to God, and (2) cannot conceive love to our neighbor without love to God, and therefore in demanding the former from Christians, he of course does not mean to release them from the latter. He does not, however, mention love to God, for his exhortation has not respect to a merely inward fulfilling of the law, belonging to the disposition, but to that fulfilling of the law which comes into manifestation, and shows itself forth in the walk, to the true ethical conduct of the life, and especially of the common life, and this rests upon love to our neighbor. Therefore this only is made the subject of discourse.If now the Apostle uses this proposition to establish the preceding exhortation (), this is not in the sense that he means thereby to represent the serving by love (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span>), as a divine duty because commanded by the law; after he has previously denied so decidedly that Christians are under the law, he cannot make the fact that it is commanded in the law a motive for the exercise of love. The principal emphasis lies rather upon  and ., on the circumstance that through serving love the whole law is fulfilled, in the sense given=enough has been done for the law, <em>i. e.,<\/em> negatively, they are therewith absolved from the rest of the law. Therefore nearly=Love one another: for therewith the whole ground of controversy, respecting the observance of the law, whether this or that precept is to be observed, is taken away. The whole sentence, therefore, serves rather to strengthen his exhortation than to give, strictly speaking, a reason for it. The commandment of love to our neighbor, although expressed by a citation from the law (Leviticus):   . . . , does not therefore come into consideration as <em>a particular commandment of the law,<\/em> as if Paul from the other commandments, as being abrogated, excepts this one as remaining in force; only the commandment to exercise love towards our neighbor remains in fact valid for the Christian (and if it is done, the law has no further claim upon him); but <em>to him<\/em> it is a commandment not on account of the law, but <em>because<\/em> he is a Christian, on account of his faith in Christ, or because (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:6<\/span>) in Christ alone faith working through love availeth anything. Into the question how far the faith in Christ <em>obliges<\/em> to love, Paul does not enter, but he then goes on to show that this love is the operation of the Spirit, which faith brings.While the proposition serves primarily to commend the exhortation, and while such an argument must have had the more weight for this end with those zealous for the law, yet of course at the same time it deals a blow against this zeal for the law, and exhibits its emptiness; for all the rest, the many observances are, according to it, purely superfluous; with the one thing. Love to our neighbor, all is done. [Meyer Paul looked down from a lofty spiritual level, and saw all other commands of the law subordinated to the law of love, that whoever had fulfilled <em>this<\/em> command, must be treated as having fulfilled the whole. The fact that Paul chose this particular expression, the whole law is fulfilled, places his teaching in opposition to antinomian tendencies, just as the Sermon on the Mount shows Christs position to the law, viewed as a purely ethical rule of life. The whole law, <em>i. e.,<\/em> the Mosaic law, regarded in this light, was fulfilled in the case of the believer by this love to his neighbor; for the whole law of Moses had an ethical purpose, which purpose is now fulfilled to its full extent only when the believer, because he as a believer, is living by the Spirit. has that temper of heart to God, which enables him to obey this one word.Schmoller insists too strongly on the idea that all the rest are superfluous. It is doubtful whether this is implied even in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:18<\/span>. The Doctrinal Notes show his meaning more clearly.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:15<\/span>. <strong>But if ye bite and devour one another<\/strong>.This is = if ye intend of serving one another through love, do just the opposite: bear ill will towards and hate one another, and let this come into act, plot mischief against one another, yea, seek to destroy one another; something like this is the sense of these strong expressions borrowed from ravening beasts. Then <strong>take heed<\/strong>, adds Paul with incisive words, that the result be not the opposite of what you intend, <strong>that ye be not consumed of one another<\/strong>.Each might be disposed to supplant the other, but in the end it will come to this, all will be wasted away. The sentence thus coperates <em>per contrarium<\/em> to the establishment of <span class='bible'>Gal 5:12<\/span>. The explanation: your Christian community will go to pieces, I am inclined to regard as too special. It is not improbable, indeed, that this influence of the Judaizers occasioned divisions among the Galatians, and threw them into controversies upon the question of the law; yet I should not be disposed to refer this    so definitely to that, as is commonly done. For this is at least intimated nowhere else in the Epistle.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:16<\/span>. <strong>Now I say, walk by the Spirit<\/strong>.With   Paul conducts his exhortation to serve one another by love (agreeably to the warning already given in the first half of <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span>.) back to a more general, fundamental exhortation to walk by the Spirit (for in the Spirit he sees the Agent that leads to love), and then designates Spirit and Flesh as the two ethical principles opposite to one another, expressing themselves in opposite workings.. Dative of instrument; properly: walk through the Spirit, so that He is (not the path in whichWieseler, but) the power, through which they walk=, <span class='bible'>Gal 5:18<\/span>. [The dative may be instrumental, as in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:18<\/span>, but it is better, perhaps, with Meyer, Alford, Ellicott, to consider it a normal dative, that by which, according to which they are to walk (almost = ), for the reason that Spirit is contrasted in this passage not merely with flesh, but also with law, and the double contrast is best brought out thus, since under the idea of the normal dative, that of rule or direction is included. Wieseler brings out the same meaning, but takes the dative as instrumental.R.]  is here also doubtless =The Holy Ghost; it is this, that overcomes the . He enters, it is true, into the hearts of believers, and works only by impelling and determining the walk, as He who dwells in the believers. But yet  is not on this account=the new disposition of the believer himself, sanctified by the Spirit, but remains ever distinct from the individual human spirit as Divine, transcending it. [Meyer adopts this view, and remarks that the absence of the article is not against it. The distinction affirmed by Harless, that   means the <em>objective<\/em> Holy Ghost,  without the article the <em>subjective<\/em>, cannot be justified, since  has the nature of a proper name, and always, even when it dwells and reigns in the human spirit, remains <em>objective<\/em>, as the <em>Divine<\/em>  specifically distinct from the human (<span class='bible'>Rom 7:16<\/span>).R.]<\/p>\n<p><strong>And ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh<\/strong>.We are led to construe this clause, as one of result, both by grammatical considerations ( with   and the subjunctive or future after an imperative has this force commonly) and by the context. In walk by the Spirit he indicates the means of victory over the lust of the flesh. [On the grammatical point urged above, see the note of Ellicott <em>in loco<\/em>. He claims that the clause <em>might<\/em> be imperative, but as there is no distinct instance of such a construction in the New Testament, and still more as the next verses seem more naturally to supply the reasons for the assertion than for the command, it seems best to adopt the future translation. (So E. V., Meyer also in 4th ed., and above.) This future with   is strong: shall in no wise (Lightfoot).On the word flesh, see Doctrinal Note 4.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:17<\/span>. <strong>For<\/strong>.This introduces, in the first place, simply the proof of a lust of the flesh (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:16<\/span>)=of such an one I speak, for <strong>the flesh lusteth<\/strong>. Paul does not stop, however, but is led further to the antagonistic idea  .<strong>Against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh<\/strong>.Each principle combats the other, and seeks to wrest the dominion from it, and on the other hand to place itself in the possession of this. [It is scarcely proper to supply the verb  with , but the Apostles meaning is obvious. Lightfoot suggests strives, fights against.R.] This is explained by what follows: <strong>these are opposed the one to the other, that<\/strong> =with the design, that <strong>ye may not do what things ye would<\/strong>, bring into effect precisely the desire which you have admitted into your will.  is neither to be restricted to the good nor to the evil will. The inquiry whether the two powers in the cases in question, attain the object desired by them or not, is not proposed here, since the only purpose is to bring vividly to view the irreconcilable antagonism of their tendencies. Wieseler.  is therefore not at all to be understood in an ecbatic sense. [Alford: The necessity of supposing an ecbatic meaning for  in theology is obviated by remembering, that with God results are all purposed.R.] The contest moreover is by no means to be conceived as an interminable one. The context shows that on the contrary there is expected of the Christian a complete surrendering of himself in order to be actuated by the one principle, the Spirit, and a <em>refusal to give way<\/em> to the lust of the flesh, whose motions, it is true, must still be experienced. The passage therefore, is entirely different from <span class='bible'>Rom 7:17<\/span> sq. [The reference is to the free-will in its ordinary acceptation, subject only to this necessary and obvious limitation, that this conflict must be only predicated in its full extent, of the earlier and more imperfect stages of a Christian course. The state of the true believer is conflict, but with final victory. Ellicott.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:18<\/span> then speaks of the <em>victoy<\/em> of this principle: <strong>But if ye be led by the Spirit<\/strong>=if the combat becomes a victory, and that on the right side; if the . of the . becomes an . [Bengel: <em>ubi<\/em> vero <em>spiritus vincit, acie res decernitur<\/em>. The dative here is instrumental.R.]<strong>Ye are not under the law<\/strong>.This is according to <span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span>; there it was only stated specially of love, here generally of the being led by the Spirit, which correspondence makes evident, how Paul regards its relation to the exercise of love; the two are to him essentially one, that is, the former is the principle of the latter. What in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span> is called somewhat enigmatically a fulfilling of the whole law, is here simply and literally described as a not being under the law. The latter is essentially identical with the former; the sense is: The law then can exact nothing more of you; implying naturally: for you are then in the right ethical condition beseeming the Christian, even though not carrying out every detail prescribed in the law. But if youis the thought impliedare not led by the Spirit, you are then still under obligation to the law; for you are then in fact not yet all in Christ. [Meyer: Through the impelling power of the Spirit you find yourselves in such a moral condition of life (newness of life, <span class='bible'>Rom 6:4<\/span>) that the law has no power to find fault with you, to condemn and punish you. This explanation is the only correct one according to <span class='bible'>Gal 5:23<\/span> : and this freedom is the true <em>moral<\/em> freedom from the law. So Ellicott, who remarks: The more obvious conclusion might have seemed, ye are not under the influence of the flesh, but as the law was confessedly the principle which was ordained the influences and works of the flesh, the Apostle (in accordance with the general direction of his argument) draws his conclusion relatively rather to the principle, than to the mere state and influences against which that principle was ordained. It must be borne in mind that Pauls use of the phrase under the law usually regards the law as a judge and pedagogue; here the Christian is viewed as one led by the Spirit, and thus taken from under the law, but so led according to the law, as a guide to our new life of gratitude, that of the fruit of the Spirit it is ever true against such there is no law (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:23<\/span>).R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:19-21<\/span>. <strong>Now the works of the flesh are manifest<\/strong>., evident=plainly conspicuous and therefore of course undeniable. This  is the main point, and therefore placed first. For Paul wishes to furnish the Galatians inducement for being led by the Spirit, and therefore he not only calls the works of the flesh evident, but moreover carefully enumerates them, portrays them before their eyes (puts them in the pillory); so that every one may know, what conversely belongs to being led by the Spirit, that one may not practice such things, if he will be one led by the Spirit and not under the law. The positive side is then given <span class='bible'>Gal 5:22<\/span> sq.That Paul does not mean to say that all of these things are found among the Galatians, is easily understood.Works of the flesh=that which is brought to pass when the flesh, <em>i. e<\/em>., the sinful human nature, and not the Holy Ghost, is the actuating principle. Meyer. Therefore naturally many sins are here enumerated, which are by no means carnal sins in the common acceptation, but rather in a very special sense sins against love, agreeably to the context. There are four classes: 1. Lust (..) 2. Idolatry (., .), 3. Contentiousness (). 4. Intemperance (). The third class is treated the most in detail. [While we must not regard this specification as a charge against the Galatians in particular, it is extremely improbable that the Apostle would not choose such sins as most easily beset his readers. Lightfoot very properly observes: From early habit and constant association a Gentile church would be exposed to sins of the first two classes. The third would be a probable consequence of their religious dissensions, inflaming the excitable temperament of a Celtic people. The fourth seems to be thrown in to give a sort of completeness to the list, though not unfitly addressed, to a nation whose Gallic descent perhaps disposed them too easily to these excesses.R.]<strong>Uncleanliness<\/strong>, ., lustful impurity in general after the special <strong>fornication<\/strong>, ; <strong>wantonness<\/strong>, ., lustful wantonness. [Lightfoot: The same three words occur together in a different order, <span class='bible'>2Co 12:21<\/span>. The order here is perhaps the more natural:  a special form of impurity;<span class=''>29<\/span>  uncleanness in whatever guise,  an open reckless contempt of propriety. A man may be  and hide his sin; he does not become  until he shocks public decency. As the reference in the New Testament is usually to sensuality, wantonness is the best rendering, standing as it does, by the double meaning which it has, in remarkable ethical connexion with this word . See Trench, Syn. <em>New Testament<\/em>  xvi.R.]The transition from the first class to the second is easily found in the fact that with idolatrous worship many forms of unchastity were connected; but <strong>idolatry<\/strong> is not on that account to be considered as a species of lustful indulgence. [Yet the two forms of sin are so frequently joined together in the New Testament and the latter is so common a metaphor for the former in the Old Testament, as to suggest a more intimate connection than the simple fact that sensual excesses usually accompanied idolatrous worship. This fact must be regarded as an indication of some underlying affinity.R.], here apparently, in juxtaposition with idolatry=<strong>Sorcery<\/strong>, not poisoning, [Lightfoot: Idolatry, the open recognition of false gods, sorcery, the secret tampering with the powers of evil. It is a striking coincidence, if nothing more, that  were condemned by a very stringent canon of the council held at Ancyra, the capital of Galatia, about A. D. 314.R.]Third class: the substantives up to  have reference to dissension, the first four as shown in individual conduct, among which however, <strong>jealousy<\/strong>,  and <strong>wrath<\/strong>, , refer to the inner aspect, the source. [The latter is rendered displays of wrath by Ellicott, and thus referred to outward manifestations, which seems preferable, since the plural is used, serving to denote the concrete form of the abstract sin (so too the plurals which follow); were the reference to the source the singular were more appropriate. See Trench, Syn. <em>New Testament<\/em>,  xxvii., on the precise meaning of the word.R.] The three following, <strong>caballings, dissensions, factions<\/strong> refer to the dissension of bodies of men.<strong>Envyings, murders<\/strong> follow these, evidently named together mainly on account of the paronomasia, since  would otherwise belong with ; murders, however, fittingly closes the list as the culmination of discord. Besides, the two are perhaps put in juxtaposition with reference to the concurrence of envy and murder in the first murder, comp. <span class='bible'>1Jn 3:12<\/span>. [Lightfoot: A principle of order may be observed in the enumeration: 1. , a general expression opposed to , breaches of charity in feeling or in act; from this point onward the terms are in an ascending scale: 2.  strife, not necessarily implying self-interest; 3.  rivalry in which the idea of self-assertion is prominent: 4.  wraths, a more passionate form of ; 5. <span class=''>30<\/span> factious cabals, a stronger development of : 6, 7. hostility has reached the point where the contending parties separate; such separation is either temporary ( divisions), or permanent ( sects, heresies): 8. , a grosser breach of charity than any hitherto mentioned, the wish to deprive another of what he has; 9. , the extreme form which hatred can take, the deprivation of life.<strong>On drunkenness, revellings<\/strong>, Ellicott remarks: the latter is the more generic and inclusive, to which the former was the usual accompaniment.R.]In order to brand still further the works of the flesh, and to restrain from them, he points moreover to the punishment decreed against them, in words which are meant to express: that however often one might come to speak of them, he would always have to render the same judgment, and to express moreover that this judgment might be rendered in advance with perfect distinctness. in  and =before it comes; the preterite in =during my presence among you.<strong>Shall not inherit the kingdom of God<\/strong>.Just as in <span class='bible'>1Co 6:9<\/span> sq.; <span class='bible'>Eph 5:5<\/span>, of course with the pre-supposition: If no conversion intervenes.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:22-23<\/span>. After the negative exposition, Paul now states explicitly in what the being led by the Spirit consists, or, more particularly, reveals itself.<strong>The fruit of the Spirit<\/strong>.  , essentially the same as , works, <span class='bible'>Gal 5:19<\/span> : That which comes to pass, which is brought into effect, when the Holy Ghost is the impelling principle. But in what follows it is only qualities that are mentioned, and not works, and so of course  was not appropriate. And certainly it is not unintentional, that Paul in the first place names only the inward fruit of the Spirit, consisting in the disposition of the soul, for the reason that the Spirit primarily and principally changes and must change the inward disposition. When this is done, there is a genuine leading by the Spirit, living by the Spirit, which then finds external manifestation also in a walking by the Spirit.The singular  also is significant, proceeding from the conception of the inward unity and ethical continuity of all that the Spirit works. As Spirit in this connection is conceived as the principle from which serving love proceeds, the enumeration of precisely these virtues is easily explicable. That many things besides are effected by the Spirit, does not need to be said. At the head stands <strong>Love<\/strong>, as the most general, and at the same time the chief virtue of Christians (comp. <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13-14<\/span>). Gal 10: , one is inclined to take as <strong>Joy<\/strong> with the brethren, opposed to , . It is no objection that this incidental idea is not contained in the word itself; the connection might easily indicate in what particular sense  is here to be taken. Yet the explanation of it as the inward joyfulness of the Christian in the consciousness of the love of God may also be justified, as this too stands in close connection with his conduct towards his brethren, and is incompatible with an unloving behavior. At all events the following words from  to  belong together, as designating the fruits of love, unselfish love;  therefore denotes <strong>peace<\/strong> with others,  patience under injuries, . gracious, friendly character, . is nearly related to this: Benevolence (Luther); not so generally as, good dispositions (the special meaning is quite frequent in the Septuagint):  here of course not=justifying faith, but either <strong>trustfulness<\/strong>, as opposed to mistrust, or faithfulness.Finally, <strong>temperance<\/strong>, , is added in antithesis particularly to the sins of lust and intemperance (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:19-21<\/span>).[Here again Lightfoot is excellent: The difficulty of classification in this list is still greater than in the case of the works of the flesh. Nevertheless some sort of order may be observed. The catalogue falls into three groups of three each. The first of these comprises Christian habits of mind in their more general aspect, love, joy, peace. (The fabric is built up story upon story. Love is the foundation, joy the superstructure, peace the crown of all.) The second gives special qualities affecting a mans intercourse with his neighbor, long-suffering, kindness, beneficence. (This triad is again arranged in an ascending scale;  is <em>passive<\/em>, patient endurance under injuries inflicted by others; , <em>neutral<\/em>, a kindly disposition towards ones neighbors not necessarily taking a practical form;<span class=''>31<\/span> , <em>active<\/em>, goodness, beneficence as an energetic principle.) The third, again general in character like the first, exhibits the principles which guide a Christians conduct.Ellicott: , temperance, is distinguished by Diog. Laert, from  as implying a control over the <em>stronger<\/em> passions, whereas the latter implies a self-restraint in what is less vehement.R.]<strong>Against such as these there Is no law<\/strong>. is neuter, as in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:21<\/span>, and the sense is: Such virtues the law condemns not. This, however, implies of course: Against those that possess such qualities the law is not, and this is the same thought, only more specially conceived, as in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 5:18<\/span>. The law requires nothing more of them, and therefore also it can bring no accusations against them. [Or rather, because the law can find nothing to oppose or restrain in such things (which fulfil its ethical purpose), the law has no power over those who bring forth the fruit of the Spirit. Schmoller presses too strongly the implied thought. Beza and others make a <em>meiosis<\/em> here: these are pleasing to God, but as Meyer remarks: Paul wishes to explain only what he has said in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:18<\/span> of those led by the Spirit. He sets forth the fruit of the Spirit and says: <em>against virtues and states such as these the law is not<\/em>, and he thus makes clear, how those led by the Spirit by virtue of their moral condition are not subject to the Mosaic law. For whoever is so circumstanced, that a law is not against him, over him it has no power.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:24<\/span>. <strong>And they that are Christs<\/strong>.Another proposition weighty in itself, and especially also in the connection. It joins on well to what precedes, with which it is probably better to connect it, although on the other hand what follows naturally connects itself with this. That is, as Paul went back from the exhortation to the exercise of love towards our neighbor to the exhortation to a walk in the Spirit, as the principle of love, so now he goes back beyond that again, and shows how this walk in the Spirit is itself grounded in fellowship with Christ. As thus, in the first place he spoke of the fruit of the Spirit, and then says: Now it is those that are Christs, who have crucified their flesh, <em>etc<\/em>.; who therefore have crucified the very disposition opposed to the aforesaid fruit of the Spirit, the disposition from which the works of the flesh proceed, so that the opposite disposition, the fruit of the Spirit, can find a place. [Ellicott: The connection of the whole paragraph appears to be as follows:The Spirit and the flesh are contrary to each other; if the flesh prevail, man is given over to all sin, and excluded from the kingdom of God: if the Spirit be the leading principle, man brings forth good fruits, and is free from the curse of the law. <em>Now<\/em> the distinguishing feature of the true Christian is the crucifixion of the flesh; consequently, it must be obvious from what has been said, the living in and being led by the Spirit.R.]<strong>Have crucified<\/strong>, .This is conceived as something accomplished, and is therefore apparently to be referred to an individual act, the act of becoming a Christian through faith and baptism. The meaning, to be sure, is not, that now <strong>the flesh, with its affections and lusts<\/strong>, is not any longer present at all with those that have become Christians. But yet at least a walk in the flesh <em>should not<\/em> any longer exist in the case of Christians; we may declare to these that such a walk is in <em>contradiction<\/em> to their essential character as Christians, and that a walk in the Spirit may rightly be <em>expected<\/em> of them; yet this is only possible because we may urge this upon them: You now have crucified the flesh. It is to be noted also, that the language is not: slain, but, crucified. The former could not so well be said, as it is conceived rather as a task of the Christian to be accomplished only by continual effort (<span class='bible'>Col 3:5<\/span>). In crucified, however, the simple slaying is not the main idea, but the condemning, giving sentence, surrendering to infamous death; and this has necessarily taken place in becoming Christs. [Ellicott: Though this ethical crucifixion is here designated as an act <em>past<\/em>, it really is and must be a continuing act as well. This however the aorist, with its usual and proper force, leaves unnoticed; it simply specifies, in the form of a general truth, the act as belonging to the past, without affirming or denying any reference to the present. In all such cases the regular reference of the tense to the past may be felt in the kind of summary way in which the action is stated,the sort of implied dismissal of the subject, and procedure to something fresh.R.]. naturally alludes to the cross of Christ, and the fellowship with Christ involves a crucifixion of the flesh for the very reason that it is fellowship with Christs death on the cross; for through this the fact that mens  deserves condemnation and is obnoxious to death, is demonstrated and set forth in a way of irresistible force; for Christ indeed has only suffered what men have deserved on account of their sinful flesh, and therefore what this itself has deserved. Whoever therefore appropriates to himself in faith Christs death upon the cross, regards the flesh in himself no longer; for him in Christs death this has been crucified. (Comp. <span class='bible'>Rom 6:6<\/span>.) [Meyer: Have crucified the flesh, expresses: to have divested themselves of all vital fellowship with sin, whose seat the  is, so that, as Christ was objectively crucified, we, by means of the entrance into the fellowship of this death on the cross, crucify the  subjectively, moral consciousness of faith, <em>i.e<\/em>., have made it entirely lifeless and inoperative through faith as the new vital element, to which we have passed over. To Christians considered <em>ideally<\/em> as here, this ethical slaying of the flesh is something which <em>has<\/em> taken place, in <em>reality<\/em> however, it is also something <em>taking place<\/em> and <em>continuing<\/em>.R.]  are passions, aroused by the  in the sensibility; these then show themselves active in definite sinful lusts, . In the . the man is, as is implied in the word passive; but this passivity becomes activity in the . [Comp. <span class='bible'>Col 3:5<\/span>, and see Trench, <em>Syn. New Testament<\/em>, 2d series,  xxxvii.R.]<\/p>\n<p><strong>DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. Men are pointed away from the law and to faith, first and above all, because only faith in Christ and not the keeping of the precepts of the law, or the doing of works of the law, is the way to the attaining of justification and of the divine inheritance (subjectively: to the attaining of the comfort of the forgiveness of sins, of the adoption of children and the hope of the eternal inheritance). For him who has this faith, the law loses its importance, for the reason that a <em>usus justificatorius<\/em> it has not, while it has already fulfilled its <em>usus pdagogicus<\/em>, of impelling to faith, in the case of such a one.But nevertheless the Apostle is the farthest possible from meaning that the believer on Christ is dispensed from giving a truly moral (ethico-religious) character to his inward disposition and his life (from the doing of good works), and is entitled to persevere in sin, that is, to indulge the flesh. So far is this from being true that this, despite his faith and despite the fact that faith is the condition of salvation, nevertheless excludes him from the kingdom of God and from eternal life (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gal 6:8<\/span>). And, indeed, this <em>cannot<\/em> be the opinion of the Christian, for this his faith in Christ involves not merely an impulse and power to the avoidance of sin, to the willing and doing of good, but because it is a coming into fellowship with Christs death, it immediately involves also the arising of a hatred against sin, a condemning of the flesh (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:21<\/span>), and because it is a receiving of Christ, it involves also the beginning of a life for God (comp. <span class='bible'>Gal 2:19<\/span> sq. and the Doctrinal Notes on that section). The latter fact, the new life, which arises or is given with faith on Christ, receives in this section its exact expression; there begins in man a working of the Spirit (), who, overcoming the flesh (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:16<\/span>), brings forth fruit in an ethically good, God-pleasing disposition of heart and life (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:22<\/span> sq.). Nay, it is <em>only<\/em> this faith in Christ which leads to this goal, as it is only this which leads to the other goal of justification. The law cannot effect this second, and quite as little can it effect the first. On the contrary, it arouses the  (and the  dwelling therein), but does not assist to the receiving of the Spirit (comp. <span class='bible'>Gal 2:2<\/span>, and <span class='bible'>Rom 7:8<\/span>). So little therefore does faith in Christ dispense from a disposition and course of action pleasing to God, that it is just this, nay more, only this which leads thereto. If any one is disposed to call this disposition and activity to the Christian, thus conformed to Gods will, a fulfilling of the law, he does not name it wrongly; only in doing it he is to keep in mind (1) that it is not to be understood in a formal, but only in a material relation: a doing of that which the law commands, yet not <em>because<\/em> the law commands it, but in the strength and on the impulse of faith, or more properly, of the Spirit, something therefore entirely different from what Paul calls works of the law; it is that which he so often names , works of the Spirit, rather than of the law; (2) that in this appellation law is taken in a quite restricted sense, of the properly ethical commandments (see <span class='bible'>Rom 13:8<\/span> sq., where it plainly appears <em>what<\/em> Paul means by the ; when he speaks generally, he uses the expression  , <span class='bible'>1Co 7:19<\/span>). Fulfilling of the law will therefore always be an only partially adequate expression for a Christian life, a conformity of the life to Gods will. Entirely abandoning the Old Testament point of view therefore, Paul speaks directly of an     (<span class='bible'>Gal 6:2<\/span>).<span class=''>32<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2. But it is true that the doing of good works the making faith active in a walk and mind pleasing to God, does not come to pass, as it were, of itself (as might appear from what precedes), even with the believer (even though, as of course is pre-supposed, his faith is an actual one of inward persuasion, and not merely nominal, is actually equivalent to a   , and therefore bears within it the energy perfectly adequate to a moral renewal of the life). Even with the believer the  has not disappeared. Therefore, although abstractly we must say: the believer <em>cannot<\/em> dispense himself from a genuine ethical renewal of his life, yet <em>in concreto<\/em> we are rather to say: He <em>ought<\/em> not. The thou oughtest comes back even to him who stands on the foundation of faith. This appears in the case of the believer, in a twofold manner. In the first place and chiefly on the side of the , which he receives in faith; for this works not merely as it were physically, in the form of an energy of nature, converting the will of man into agreement with the mind of God (and the figure of the  must be understood <em>cum grano salis<\/em>: a bare <em>growing up<\/em> it certainly is not); the result is brought about ethically and not physically; the  also approaches the will with requirements, which it is true are far more intensive, which have as it were a quite different power of bending the will from the requirements of the law or of the conscience (the law of the letter or of the conscience); for they are strengthened by the persuasion which is received along with faith into the heart, of the condemnation of sin as well as the forgiveness of it, of the holiness as well as the compassion inhering in the grace of God in Christ. But it is with an ought, however intensive, that the  in the believer approaches the will of man, and seeks to <em>determine<\/em> it to let itself be guided by him, to determine it to the  and then also to the  : and in doing this he meets with many hindrances on the side of the  (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:17<\/span>).This is the immediate, inward ought that has place and is needful even with the believer. But to this inward monition and impulse of the Spirit, there must be added, in order to keep it ever alive and guard it against all impure admixture, one coming from without. Of this we have in this very section the speaking proof. The Apostle sees occasion given him to <em>admonish<\/em> the Galatian Christians with earnest words to a disposition and course of life answerable to their faith; he approaches them with an Ought: So ought it to be with Christians = <em>because you believe<\/em> in Christ! And his admonition here and elsewhere holds good also for us; it is the testimony of the Spirit conveyed through the <em>wordtestimonium externum<\/em> (in distinction from <em>internum<\/em>)the comprehensive exposition of which is the function of New Testament ethics.<\/p>\n<p>3. That even the believer is not and cannot be spared the earnestly admonishing and impelling ought because even with him there is not found a steady will (on account of the old Adam), is the meaning of the church doctrine of the <em>tertius legis usus, the usus legis<\/em> with the <em>renatus<\/em> (the us. <em>didact. or normal<\/em>.), and understood in this sense it is correct. But as it is expressed it is distorted and incorrect, and is in conflict with the indisputable Pauline doctrine, that the believer is not  , that he may not be placed nor place himself under it. He is indeed under a law of the Spirit, so far as the Spirit admonishes, requires, rebukes, yet the Spirit does by no means merely this, but far more; this is the very least that he does. But especially is the believer in no sense whatever under the law of the letter, the Old Testament law, the proper <em>lex<\/em>, and with all its generalizing of the conception of <em>lex<\/em>, the <em>Formula Concordi<\/em>, nevertheless, in the section touching this matter does not really go beyond the Mosaic law. It does not arrive at the conception of the law of the Spirit (the law of faith), whether this is entirely inward, or expressed also in the word of Scripture (in the New Testament word of Scripture, which for the fulfilment of the ethical requirement presupposes the faith in Christ with what it has and gives). The law of the letter (the proper <em>lex<\/em>), has, it is true, its great significance for the believer but it has its place not, so to speak, <em>after<\/em> Faith, but only <em>before<\/em> the same, as <em>pdagogus<\/em> (see above on <span class='bible'>Gal 3:19<\/span> sq.); and in this sense it permanently <em>retains<\/em> its importance, and is indispensable for faith. That is, the sinfulness and imperfection of the new life even in the believer, make it needful that the law should not once only, but ever afresh, awaken in him the knowledge of sin and the impossibility of himself attaining salvation and eternal life, and by that very means drive him to assure himself of it in. <em>faith<\/em> in Christ; and so ever impel him anew to faith. So far, therefore, as a <em>usus<\/em> of the <em>lex<\/em>, strictly so called, can be predicated even as to the <em>renatus<\/em>, it falls under the <em>usus pdagogicus<\/em>, as <em>usus secundus<\/em>. But in this pedagogy its function is continually exhausting itself again; <em>this function only does Paul ascribe to it<\/em>, and another, the function <em>docere, ut in vera pietate vivemus et ambu-lemus, we<\/em> have no right to attribute to it, especially as we thereby come into conflict with the definite assurance that the law only stirs up sin and the , and of itself continually hinders anew the Spirits gaining dominion and therewith the attainment of the <em>vera pietas<\/em>. The law contributes directly neither to justification nor to the new life, and cannot therefore be directly the means of maintaining the latter. What it can and should do, was and is, to open the way for that which does lead to justification and to the new life, namely, Faith. As this is its work at first, so is it ever after. The <em>accomplishment<\/em> of these two things it must then leave to faith, first as that which lays hold of Gods gracefor justification, then as that which has laid hold of it and therewith receives the Spirit. This Holy Ghost now, and not the , is alone in condition as the spirit of faith to assist to ever renewed victory over the , partly through His teaching, partly through His monition, partly through His persuasion and drawing. For if the believer did right because admonished by the law, he would only attain again to  , but not to veritable .Only so much is true, that <em>in concreto<\/em> very many a Christian, because faith has been with him from the beginning or has become only a name, allows himself to be guided merely by the law of the letter, at least if he has moral earnestness of temper, and thereby accomplishes nothing more than  , as to which he simply deceives himself, in accounting them perhaps for   . More or less, moreover, does he seek in these   his justification also, and his hope; half-way at least, reckoning as the other half the merit of Christ, yet more in name than in reality. [It is only necessary to remark here, that Paul uses the word  as covering the whole Mosaic law. That this whole Mosaic law has not the third use, of teaching us how we may live and walk in true piety, is very evident. So also, that the new life of the believer is only a new life, in so far as it is through the teaching, monition, persuasion and drawing of the Spirit, must be believed and felt by the Christian. Still what does that Spirit teach and admonish us to do? To walk even as he walked, all will agree. And how did He walk, that Master whom we follow?He fulfilled all righteousness, He obeyed the law for us. Clearly then the Spirit, which receives of the things of Christ and shows them unto us, will show us as our duty, what Christ did, the complete obedience to Gods requirements, and this will include all of permanent ethical value in the Mosaic law.That may be <em>but<\/em> a part, yet it <em>is<\/em> a part, for what was in itself <em>right<\/em> at Sinais foot is right at the foot of the cross. The Spirit is the Holy Spirit, Holiness is opposed to sin, Sin is opposition to God, it expresses itself in disobedience to His moral law,the Holy Spirit must teach, admonish, persuade and draw us to the observance of whatever has been at any time an expression of Gods moral law. The law cannot have a <em>usus pdagogicus<\/em> still, did it not convict us of sin; it cannot convict us of sin, unless its requirements are holy, and just and good; and as such the Spirit of Holiness must teach us the <em>moral<\/em> law still.The controversy about the third use of the law, between the Lutherans and Reformed, seems to be one of terms. The only practical question that can arise out of it, is one respecting the obligation to observe the Fourth Commandment.R.]<\/p>\n<p>4. <em>Spirit and Flesh<\/em>.  and  are the two polar antithesis, as the Apostle most vividly shows in this section, <span class='bible'>Gal 5:17<\/span>.  is the Holy Ghost, the Divine principle, that enters along with faith in Christ into the man, generating in him a divine temper and divine life, and that in conflict with the  and its  and .  is in itself simply (in antithesis to the Divine principle), human nature, of course the whole because the living nature, and embraces therefore body and soul. But it is not human nature on the side of its relation to God, but on the side of its alienation from God, on which side man with relation to God draws himself back upon himself, seeks himself and takes honor to himself, withdrawing it from God; in short human nature as sinful.The use of flesh to denote human nature in general, is grounded in the Hebrew idiom, according to which  is used by synecdoche for the whole man, and this idiom itself is in its turn, without doubt, grounded in the experience and Scriptural doctrine of the frailty of man, which induced the sacred writers to derive the designation for man generally, from that part of man in which his frailty is most conspicuous. As this frailty again has its ground, according to Biblical teaching, in mans alienation from God, there became connected with , the established designation of human nature, the accessory idea of alienation from God=sinfulness. This took place in the proportion in which this view into mans alienation from God even from birth, as the deepest ground of his frailty, became clear, and in the New Testament, therefore, more than in the Old.The expression , therefore gives us no right whatever, to think of the bodily organism more than of the soul, and (with reference to the accessory notion of sinfulness,) to find intimated in the expression either the view of the derivation of sin from the body, or an especial reference to so-called fleshly sins more than others. (Comp. Wieselers thorough exposition of this conception.)The essential element in the idea of the  is the turning away from God and referring ourselves to ourselves, the self-seeking, egoistic element. This is primarily in respect to God, but immediately connected with it is the fact that a man in reference to other men also seeks himself, his enjoyment or his gain. It is easily explicable therefore why love appears as the first effect of the , being the temper and act opposed to selfishness. In this section the Apostle has, it is true, special occasion to exhort to the love of our neighbor, but his speaking of love is not on this account merely casual. [Comp. on , J. Mller, <em>Christian doctrine of sin<\/em>.R.]<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span>. Luther:The natural man understands nothing of the doctrine of grace; therefore comes it, when he hears this doctrine, that he straightway draws it down to his own lust and lewdness, and concludes on this wise; If the law concerns us not and has no right to us, then will we live as we list.How we at this time have seen in all ranks that all will fain be evangelical and enjoy the Christian liberty, and yet nevertheless the great crowd goes its own way; this one follows his avarice, the other his lewdness, the third his pride and haughtiness, <em>etc<\/em>.Rieger:The liberty to which we are called by the gospel, is not so intended that we may tear ourselves loose from the law at our own will and please the flesh.Into such a freedom the law can with honor dismiss man; for through Christ and the curse borne on the cross the law has its highest honor, and sin or the flesh wins thereby no advantage. For precisely that which was impossible to the law, namely, to bring to pass an inward enduring hatred against evil and an inward cleaving to good, from a willing heart, is accomplished by faith in Christ, and therefore the liberty of faith is not against the law.Heubner:By the side of the highest good stands the highest evil, by the side of freedom, lawlessness. No word has been so abused and desecrated, as Freedom.<\/p>\n<p>Luther:By love serve one another. We must diligently teach in religion both sorts of doctrine, of Faith and Works; yet so that we carry neither too far. Else, where one teaches Works alone, he loses Faith, but if one teaches concerning Faith alone, forthwith gross, carnal men begin to dream that works are not necessary. Yet must the doctrine of Faith be planted first, or it cannot be understood what good works really are.Although we have been justified, yet have we still sin in us, which rhymes as ill with good works as with faith, but draws us away from both. Besides flesh and reason is so disposed that it has by nature all its delight and pleasure in Pharisaic and superstitious works, and does those works with far greater earnestness which itself has chosen, than those which God has commanded. Therefore have rightminded preachers as much to do, in admonishing the people to genuine love and really good works, as in teaching genuine faith.Christians must consider thus, that in their conscience they are indeed free from the curse of the law, sin and death, but as to the body they are servants, for therein should one serve another by love.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span>. It is needless for any one to trouble you with circumcision and Moses ceremonies; see to this before all things, that you remain steadfast in the doctrine of faith. Will you after that do good works, as indeed you should, I will with a single word point out to you the noblest and greatest of all works, which ye should do, that ye may fulfil all laws: Love one another! Therefore the true, perfect doctrine and Christian theology of Faith and Love is in long and in short this: Believe on Christ, love thy neighbor as thyself! It is most short, to look upon the words, but if it is to be practical, it is broader, higher and deeper than heaven and earth.The reason imagines it a very low thing, to say nothing of its being an act of Gods service, for one to help the other by love, <em>i. e<\/em>., for one to instruct and set aright a wanderer, comfort a mourner and afflicted, support the weak, for every one to help his neighbor, as he can, and make up for that which he lacks; <em>item<\/em>, for one to be obedient to government, hold his parents in honor, to have patience at home and bear with a whimsical, strange-tempered yoke-fellow, with ill-mannered servants, <em>etc<\/em>.; all which amounts to this: By love serve one another. But believe me, they are not contemptible and mean, but excellent and precious works, because God has commanded them and they please Him. It is of no concern therefore, whether the world looks upon them as mean and contemptible or not.It is a short word, but excellently and powerfully spoken: Love thy neighbor as thyself! We cannot give any one a better, more certain and more exact example, how he should love his neighbor, than if we say to him that he should love him so as he loves himself. Nor can one have a better, nor nobler virtue than Love, and this high virtue can be directed towards nothing better than towards our neighbor.If thou wouldst know how thou shouldst love thy neighbor, consider diligently how dear thou art to thyself, that thou wouldst gladly have help and counsel given thee, if thou wert in distress and necessity, as much as all creatures could. Therefore needest thou no book, out of which to learn how thou shouldst love thy neighbor.Rieger:The call of the gospel to Christ and the grace which has come by Him, the sense of being one Spirit with Christ, brings us under the law of Christ, where in love we have all at once, and assumes also the willingness to serve one another through love. The warding off the claims of faith in the gospel with the pretext of love to man, is a critical sign of our times.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:15<\/span>. Starke:Hatred, envy and reviling are as the teeth of snakes and lions. What shame, that among Christians there is such an evil kind of people!What mean these wearisome, and mischievous lawsuits?Lange:Each vice brings in time some punishment with it, as every virtue has in advance some recompense. For even as love does him good that cherishes it, so does hatred and contention bring nothing but disquiet and ill-content, and indeed injures the body also in health.Rieger:The biting begins on good pretexts; but men easily go further, to do mischief to the property, to disparage the merits, <em>etc<\/em>.Roos:To bite and devour one another, is not only the wont of the populace, but also the way of many learned men, whereof their learned journals, reviews, <em>etc<\/em>., bear witness. And so do they devour one another mutually, <em>i. e.<\/em>, they destroy altogether one anothers credit and the usefulness which each yet had, perhaps also a part of their life. Their <em>esprit<\/em> is flesh, what may then the rest be?<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:16-17<\/span>. Luther:Paul means by lust of the flesh not alone unchastity, but also all other sinful cravings, whereby the saints are tempted.It is impossible that you can follow the Spirit in all things whatever and not also feel the flesh, and that you should remain unhindered by it; yea, it will hinder you and so hinder you that you will not be able to do what you gladly would do. In this all that you can do is to withstand the flesh, which quickly becomes inflamed with anger, impatience, <em>etc<\/em>.; murmurs, hates, bites, becomes angry against God, falls into doubting; and to follow the Spirit, which admonishes you to peace, patience, hope, faith. To know this is for believers most profitable and comforting. When I was yet a monk, I often thought that I must be lost, when I felt an evil temptation. Then undertook I many kinds of discipline, confessed every day, and yet it all helped me nothing. For the same temptations evermore recurred; therefore tormented I myself perpetually with such thoughts: See, there you have committed such and such a sin, <em>etc<\/em>., therefore there is no help for you, all your good works are come to nothing. Had I then rightly understood St. Pauls words, I would not have tormented myself so severely, but would have considered with myself, as I am now wont to do: Dear Martin, it amounts to nothing, your leading an angelical life here on earth; so long as you live in the flesh, it will not give over its way. Yet do not therefore despond, but withstand it through the Spirit, that thou mayest not fulfil its lust, and it cannot hurt thee, because thou art in Jesus Christ.Whoever thinks that a Christian must have no fault at all in him, and yet feels that in himself there are many and manifold shortcomings, such a one must at the last be consumed of melancholy. But whoever understands it, him must such temptation of the flesh, <em>i. e.,<\/em> evil, serve for his best good. For when the flesh will tempt to sin, he is led with earnestness to pray, to seek forgiveness of sins through Christ, to lay hold of the righteousness of the law, after which perhaps he would never have so greatly longed.It is to Christians profitable and good that they feel such troublesomeness of the flesh, that they may not become proud over the supposed righteousness of their works, as if they were in favor with God on account of the same.<\/p>\n<p>Starke:The contest of the flesh and the Spirit exists alone in the regenerate. The conflict which exists in an unregenerate man, so that he does not fulfil all evil lusts that stir in him, is only a conflict of the reason with its natural impulses and gross sensual desires. This is to be carefully distinguished from the former, that one may not, because he feels within himself a struggle against sin, immediately reckon himself regenerate.The strife of the Spirit against the flesh is an infallible token of regeneration and a state of grace, and is distinguished from the strife which is waged by the mere powers of reason in this, that the former always wins the victory.These words are misused by the children of the world to this effect, that it is vain to strive after a holy character, because we cannot, after all, do what we would. But mark, what the regenerate, who are spoken of here, will according to the Spirit, and what according to the flesh. They are not aiming first to obtain the dominion over sin, for this they have already, but they would fain quench and be rid of everything sinful; but this, on account of the flesh cleaving to them, they cannot do. According to the flesh they would fain let sin come to dominion again, but that they do not, because the Spirit strives against it and overcomes the flesh. Therefore it follows from this, that a believer can by all means live holy, but here can arrive at no perfection.<\/p>\n<p>Rieger:The flesh and the sin which cleaves to the same, lust and its allurements and enticements we indeed experience, nay more, there may also occur cases where it is not as plain as we could wish that the lust hats not been admitted and treacherously taken the will with it. But by renewal in the spirit of tile mind one may always count himself to be no debtor to the flesh, to fulfil its lusts, but may take the curse from Christs cross and hang it upon the flesh, and from Christs Spirit may gain the willingness to separate therefrom. Between the strivings of the Spirit and of the flesh against each other it must become evident, which way the man, after receiving sufficient strength, is bending his will, and on which side he takes his stand. If the Spirits impulses and leadings continue with a man and if he is honestly minded to obey the Spirit and its holy opposition to the flesh, he does not indeed deny the law the right to show him his imperfections, but he is not under it, and is not at the last judged by it. Christ has taken the believer under His atoning shield against the curse of the law, and has moreover bestowed on him His spirit, which impels him as to all other good, so also to combat for this faith, although there is many a conflict and many a doubt before he can without ceasing so believe and act.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:19<\/span>. Luther:It is a very different thing to be tempted by the flesh, and yet not to follow its lusts, but to Walk in the Spirit and strive against them, from what it is to consent to the lust of the flesh and abide therein and nevertheless to make great boast of the Spirit, and to make as though one lived Christianly. The former St. Paul comforts, in that he says: Because they are ruled by the Spirit they are not under the law; but the others he threatens with everlasting damnation, in that he declares: They that do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of heaven.Spener:By works of the flesh, Paul, it is true, understands principally actual outward, out-breaking deeds, but he does not thereby exclude inward vices, which are also rightly called works of the flesh. Nay, as respects the outward sins themselves, their sinfulness consists not merely in the outward deed itself, but in the evil and prevailing inclination thereto. Therefore is one guilty of adultery, fornication, gluttony, drunkenness, quarrelsomeness, <em>etc<\/em>., who allows such vices to gain the upper hand in his soul, even though from want of opportunity, or fear of infamy or trouble he restrains himself from the outward act; for God looks on the heart and its longings.<\/p>\n<p>Drunkenness, revellings. In Starke:The Apostle is not speaking merely of the habit and custom of drinking; therefore it is a false excuse if any one thinks that a debauch is no sin if only one does not make a business of it. The devil invented this excuse. When any one so overfills himself that he is unfit for prayer and the business of his calling, that is drunkenness; what then are we to think of the respectable world with its sinful and damnable Christian drinking bouts? and what too of this continual drinking of healths, than as of a temptation to swill down liquor?They which do such things. It is not said: They that do such things daily; for even though one does any such thing only now and then, on certain occasions, yea even only once, but voluntarily, he forfeits the kingdom of God, so long as he remains under the dominion of this work of the flesh. Nor is it said: They that do all this. It is not needful for a man to do all these sins or many such, to fall under the penalty, but it is enough, if a man lets one single sin rule over him, let it be what it will. Now it rules over him, not only while he is committing it, but so long as the purpose never to commit it again, is not yet fully fixed.They shall not only not procure eternal life by their works of the flesh (as may well be supposed), but, if they set their hopes, not upon earning eternal life by their works, but receiving it as a gift to be received by faith, they will not, leading a dissolute life, inherit it any more than earn it.He inherits not the kingdom of grace, still less the kingdom of glory, even though his funeral sermon extols him as blessed, surely, very, or even most blessed.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:22<\/span>. It is not enough to flee the manifest works of the flesh, but we must bring true virtues to take their place. The Spirit of Christ must water and warm the hearts of men with His heavenly consolation, if they are to be fruitful to good works.Works of the flesh, said Paul, as being what comes into view and can be apprehended by reason alone, as to what they are, and that they are evil; but he does not use this term of the fruits of the Spirit as being for the most part internal, and although they express themselves in outward works, yet they cannot be comprehended and judged by the mere reason; nay, reason, should she pronounce a judgment, would be more apt to pronounce a judgment against them. Indeed, the fruits of the Spirit often exist in good measure in those, who yet in true poverty of Spirit complain of the lack of them.Roos:All these fruits are found in every spiritual man, although in one this, in another that fruit is more richly possessed.<\/p>\n<p>Luther:<em>Joy<\/em>. This means the loving discourse of the bridegroom and his bride, <em>i. e<\/em>., the joyful, loving thoughts, which a believing heart has concerning Christ, the wholesome admonitions, the joyful hymns, thanksgiving psalms and songs of praise, with which Christians admonish and cheer one another. The Scripture testifieth once and again, that God had no pleasure in the sadness of the spirit, but wills, that we be joyful in Him. Therefore also He sent His Son, not to make us perturbed and mournful, but joyful. Therefore do the Prophets, Apostles and Christ Himself admonish, yea, command us, that we be glad and joyful. Where this spiritual joy is, there does the heart inwardly rejoice through faith in Christ, and moreover shows forth such joy outwardly with words and gestures; yea, it can be joyful even in the midst of affliction and death. Such joy is to the world unknown.<em>Patience<\/em>. This is a virtue of such sort, that one does not alone endure and suffer waywardness, ill-luck, wrong, <em>etc<\/em>., but also bears long with those that do him such evil, and waits if perchance they may at some time amend themselves. The devil has this way, that when he cannot in tempting us overcome by main force and might, he watches nevertheless with wearisome continuance, and worries us out if he can, for he knows well what weak, earthen vessels we are, that cannot at the last endure violence and repeated hard strokes; therefore he oft gains great advantage, in that he perseveres so long and diligently.<em>Gentleness<\/em>.This is: that one is so disposed, that every one gets on well with him and loves to deal with him. For Christians should not be unfriendly and cross-tempered people, but mild, courteous, friendly, such as every one loves to consort with, who bear with others faults, are easy to give way to others, and can put up with the whim of others. Such a courteous friendly man was our Lord Jesus Christ, as we see in the Gospel from beginning to end.<\/p>\n<p>In Starke:<em>Goodness<\/em>All nature is to us a mirror of kindness. For where is there a creature that does not serve and do good to man? For us the sun shines, for us the earth bears fruit, us does the heaven cover, to us does the air minister breath, everything stands at our command; should we then be the only ones not to practice kindness?Luther:<em>Faith<\/em>.He that has this faith, such an one suspects no evil of other people, but has a loving, simple heart towards every man; and although he be deceived, he yet remains long-suffering and kind, and forbears with him that hath deceived him. <em>In summa<\/em>, he believes every man and yet puts his confidence in no man but alone in God.Roos:Against spiritual men the law is not, for although they are not without fault yet they are wholly under grace (<span class='bible'>Rom 6:14<\/span>), and are partakers of the blessing in Christ Jesus (<span class='bible'>Gal 3:13-14<\/span>). There are people, who imagine themselves to have preached the gospel, when they encourage others, by a human persuasion, to let go the Jewish way of thinking, not anxiously to count this or that for a sin, and to entertain no scruple about permitted things. But although such persuasions, addressed to a natural man, may bring about a show of freedom, and such a man may then imagine that he is no longer under the law, though he really is, yet the great question remains, whether the law is not against him. The right of the law to curse him, is not an usurpation, but a well-founded, sacred right, to which there is nothing to oppose but Christs death on the cross. Has then every one who boasts of freedom become a believer in this crucified Saviour? And has he also, by means of this faith, become spiritual, so that he exhibits the fruit of the Spirit within him? It is only against such that the law is not.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:24<\/span>. Have crucified the flesh.Starke:This word well expresses how sin must, little by little, be disabled and slain, for the crucified man did not die at once; he was first made fast with nails to the cross and then kept there, till through the loss of blood and through hunger and thirst he became weaker and weaker, and finally died. In the beginning of repentance the old man is nailed to the cross, and then in conversion he is fastened to it anew, when he gets a hand or a foot free; the soul carefully avoiding all occasions whereby evil lusts can be aroused, until indwelling sin is more and more disabled by all manner of acts of repentance and devotion, which are contrary to corrupt nature, which acts must extend through the whole life. But now all power to crucify the flesh is to be derived from Christs death on the cross.<\/p>\n<p>Rieger:They that have ceased from the law and all endeavors to obtain life and righteousness therefrom, and on the other hand belong to Christ and accept Him as the source of their life and holiness, such keep their flesh crucified. They are and live yet in the flesh, to be sure, and so experience how close sin cleaves and how heavy it weighs; they experience the enticements of inward lust, but they have learned from the gospel the meaning of God in the cross of Christ, and have believed it, and can believe the judgment executed on the body of their Redeemer as in Gods eyes in force also against their own flesh. And indeed they desire no rest for the flesh, but impose on it the curse, which through Christs cross is imposed thereon, and behold this wearisome and painful dying with a hope gathered out of the gospel.<\/p>\n<p>On <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13-15<\/span>. Christianity and Freedom: (1) How little we have occasion, on behalf of freedom, to repent of being Christians and becoming Christians more and more; (2) how deeply we must rue that freedom which we do not establish and confirm by the power of Christ.The Christian is free and yet a servant of all.The right union of Freedom and Love (1) needful (2) difficult.By love serve one another! (1) An actual (2) but also a blessed service.<\/p>\n<p>On <span class='bible'>Gal 5:16-24<\/span> : Walk in the Spirit, <em>etc<\/em>., ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh: (1) the lust of the flesh, (2) the resisting of it in the Spirit.The walk in the Spirit; (1) is not accomplished without conflict (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:17<\/span>) (2) but saves from destruction (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:19-21<\/span>), (3) leads to a glorious goal (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:22<\/span>).With his exhortations to walk in the Spirit (1) the Apostle places us upon a fearful battle-field (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:17<\/span>), (2) gives us the view into a frightful abyss (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:19<\/span> sq.), (3) leads us into a lovely garden (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:22<\/span> sq.). The conflict of the flesh and the Spirit: (1) in what does it consist? (2) to what should it impel?Temptations through the flesh must come: despond not!but must be combatted and overcome through the Spirit: be not careless!There is no believer so holy or strong that he does not feel his flesh, but also none so weak that he cannot withstand it.The motions of the flesh a damper to pride, a testimony against self-devised spiritualism.Three times three fruits of the Spirit; a lovely garland.To have crucified the flesh a token that one is Christs.Who can crucify his flesh? Only he who is Christs.The crucifying of the flesh (1) takes place indeed, when one is Christs, but (2) does not of itself make certain that one is Christs.<\/p>\n<p>Kapff:Under what law is the believer? (1) Not under that of the flesh, (2) not under that of Moses, but (3) under that of the Spirit.Rautenberg:The crucifixion of the flesh: a token of true Christianity, a work of the Holy Ghost, a victory of Christian freedom, a progress to inward peace.In Lisco:The conflict of the Spirit with the flesh: (1) Where does it arise? Only where a life in the Spirit is begun. (2) Why is it necessary? <em>a<\/em>) On account of the inward incompatibility of flesh and Spirit, <em>b<\/em>) on account of the consequences, which proceed therefrom, good or evil fruits. (3) How should it end? By the Spirits overcoming the flesh.The walk in the Spirit: (1) It kills the works of the flesh, (2) it brings in its place the fruits of the Spirit.Flesh or Spirit? Choose! (1) The flesh is thy destruction; (2) the Spirit creates divine life; (3) as Christians we are bound to the life of the Spirit.(<em>Fast-day Sermon<\/em>): The call on Fast-day: the works of the flesh are manifest. (1) What works are works of the flesh: (2) what those have to expect, who do such works.(<em>Whit-Sunday Sermon<\/em>): We are partakers of the Holy Spirit only when we do the works of the Spirit.Genzken:What do we yet lack of a walk in the Spirit? (1) The beginning is, that the flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh, and many have not even advanced so far; (2) the next step is, that we no more fulfil the lusts of the flesh, and many are not even ashamed of the manifest works of the flesh; (3) the consummation is, that we bring forth the fruits of the Spirit, and from that we are all yet far distant.Greiner:Flesh and Spirit: (1) they are contrary one to the other; (2) their ways lead asunder in time and eternity.Engelhard:The life of that man, who is ruled by the Spirit of God: (1) He breaks with sin and mortifies daily the old man; (2) he is filled with the fruits of righteousness, which do not conflict with the law, but which can never be accomplished under the dominion of the law; (3) and receives accordingly the most excellent of all rewards, the inheritance of the kingdom of God.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:13-24<\/span>. Frantz:Beware that ye do not, through freedom, give a handle to the flesh, for (1) freedom in Christ is not without law; it has its law, only not in the members, but in Christ, which law is love. (2) It is not without control; but its control is exercised not by the flesh, but by the Spirit.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[14]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span>.[It seems better to retain the Greek order, which places  at the end of the clause. The aorist  may be rendered by the English perfect, but Ellicott gives the simple past tense as above.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[15]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span>.Rec: . The correct reading is that of Lachmann,Tischendorf: . So . [A.B.C. and modern editors.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[16]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span>.  before    is not sufficiently supported.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[17]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:14<\/span>.[Lightfoot: The received text has  which some would retain against the authority of the best MSS., on the ground that it was altered by scribes ignorant of this usage of  for the first and second persons. The case however with respect to the New Testament seems to stand thus; that whereas (1) in the plural we always find . <em>etc<\/em>., never  ,   <em>etc<\/em>., as mere reflexives, yet (2) in the singular there is not one decisive instance of  in the first or second persons; the authority of the best MSS. being mostly against it. See A. Buttmann, p. 99.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[18]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:16<\/span>.[. The normal dative (Meyer); the instrumental dative (Schmoller). In either case by not in.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[19]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:17<\/span>.   is to be preferred to  , as better attested. [The latter which is the reading of the Rec., and Lachmann is probably a correction, to avoid the repetition of . The Rec. and Lachmann also read . , on insufficient authority; . K. L.: the order is reversed in most MSS. and by the best modern editors.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[20]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:17<\/span>.[ is considered telic here as usually, by the best commentators. So that must be rejected. See Exeg. Notes.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[21]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:19<\/span>.[ has here a <em>classifying<\/em> force (Ellicott).R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[22]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:19<\/span>. of the Rec. is to be rejected with Iachmann, Tischendorf. [So . A.B.C. Meyer, Alford, Ellicott, Wordsworth, Lightfoot.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[23]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:20<\/span>.Rec: , ; the singular changed into the plural, apparently on account of the neighboring plurals. . has , . [The variations are great; the best editors now adopt the singular in both these cases. On the meaning of the words in these lists ot vices and virtues, see Exeg. Notes.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[24]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:21<\/span>. is to be retained, the preponderance of authority is in its favor. [Omitted in . B. by Tischendorf, bracketted by Lachmann, Alford and Lightfoot. Retained by Meyer and Ellicott, on the authority of A. C. D. E. F. G. K., most cursives and versions. The similarity in souud to the preceding word is quite as much an argument for retaining as for rejecting it.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[25]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:21<\/span>.[ . Such things as these, all such things. The article with  denotes a known person or thing, or the whole class of such, but not an undefined individual out of the class; as in that case  is anarthrous (Ellicott). So in <span class='bible'>Gal 5:23<\/span>.R.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>[26]<\/span><span class='bible'>Gal 5:21<\/span>.[ must be rendered now or but, not and. The two classes of deeds have been set forth, and this verse is a practical application.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[27]<\/span>[On the division of the Epistle, see Introd.  4. While we must guard agaunst too formal division of the Epistle, we may distinguish it into parts without separating them or breaking the current of thought. The memory is much assisted by the convenlent division of Lightfoot: personal, doctrinal and practical. Whether the last named part begins with <span class='bible'>Gal 5:1<\/span>, or here, is perhaps immaterial, since such distinction into parts involves neither the supposition that the Apostle made such formal distinction, nor an arbitrary view of the Epistle as a whole. We may mar the unity quite as much by insisting on too strict sub-division into sections.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[28]<\/span>[Schmoller probably means to make an argument <em>ab impossibili<\/em> here, but the form of it is not pleasing. Certainly it were better to say: Paul could not mean this, for it is contrary to the teachings of his Master and inconsistent with his own statements elsewhere. Meyer remarks: That, by citing only the command of love to our neighbour, Paul does not exclude the command of love to God, is self-evident to the Christian consciousness from the necessary connection of love to God and to our neighbor (comp. <span class='bible'>1Jn 4:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Co 8:1-3<\/span>); the context (<span class='bible'>Gal 5:13-15<\/span>) led Paul to speak of the latter only.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[29]<\/span>[Observe the prominence always given to condemnations of this deadly sin, it being one of the things which the old pagen world deemed as merely .Ellicott.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[30]<\/span>[Wordsworth:The word  is from , a laborer for hire, 1. a mercenary; and 2. one who hires him self to a cabal for party purpose; and therefore signifies 3. a <em>venal partisan<\/em>; such as the factions of <em>gladiators<\/em>, and other ruffians hired by rival candidates at elections to intimidate the voters in the Roman forum. Hence  signifies <em>venal partisanship<\/em>.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[31]<\/span>[Hence well expressed by benignity. So Jerome, who renders this and the following word respectively: <em>benignitas, bonitas<\/em>. See Trench, <em>Synon<\/em>. 2d series.The remarks of Lightfoot are collated; the parts included in parenthesis are taken from his comments on the separate triads.R.]<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[32]<\/span>[Whether theologians agree about terms or not, they all must recognize the fact that in so far as any law of God has a directly ethical purpose, it must continue to be binding on those who are Christs, not binding as a law, with condemnatory power, so as to bring us again into bondage, after Christ has made us free, nor even binding on the conscience, so far as its punitive functions are concerned, but binding us with the cords of love, the bands of a man, a rule for the loving children of a Father, a guide for the glad gratitude of those whom Christ has made free. Thus far all that was of those whom Christ has made free. Thus far all that was of permanent ethical purpose in the Old Testament law must remain the law of Christ; to admit a change in Gods ethics is repugnant to our souls. How much this includes is the practical questions, which the New Testament itself answers in the life of Christ and the teachings of His Apostles. That it includes the Decalogue, that each and all of those Commandments are still in force, as a law, in the sense indicated above, there can be no reasonable doubt.R.]<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 8<\/p>\n<p><strong> VII<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> SPECIAL WARNINGS AND TEACHINGS<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Gal 5:13-6:18<\/span><\/strong> <strong> .<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> This discussion commences with <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span> . Throughout the rest of this chapter there are warnings against false conclusions from the doctrines of justification by faith apart from works. The first warning is that our liberty is not to be construed or used as a license to do any kind of evil. The liberty referred to is freedom from the law, which does not mean freedom from the law as a standard, but it is freedom from the law as a way of life. This same subject comes up again for discussion in the letter to the Romans where Paul avows that he has liberty to eat meat offered to idols since these idols are no gods to him; that personally it would not hurt him, but he said that we would refrain from it if it was harmful to other people.<\/p>\n<p> One of the most infamous propositions ever made was that made by a Baptist preacher who said that when a man and a woman were engaged they could commit a sin for which they would not be held responsible. This is exactly what Paul warns against: &#8220;Ye were called for freedom; only use not your freedom for an occasion to the flesh.&#8221; The Arminians and Romanists unite in denying the doctrine of salvation by grace through faith and not of works, because they say it is demoralizing in its tendencies; that a man will draw false conclusions from it; that he will use the liberty wherewith Christ made him free as a license to do evil. Just at this point Paul raises his first warning cry in the letter to the Romans. He puts it in the form of an answer to a supposititious question. He had affirmed that grace abounded above sin, then the questioner says, &#8220;Shall we sin the more that grace may abound still more? And in reply to that he said, &#8220;God forbid,&#8221; or as he very strongly presented it in the letter to Titus (<span class='bible'>Tit 2:12<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Tit 3:4-8<\/span> ).<\/p>\n<p> I once heard an Antinomian (that means, anti, &#8220;against,&#8221; noma, &#8220;the law&#8221; against the law) preach. He was one who believed that a Christian is free from all law that is he is not even under the law to Christ. I had to follow him that afternoon. He took as a text <span class='bible'>Tit 3:4-7<\/span> : &#8220;But when the kindness of God our Saviour, and his love toward man, appeared, not by works done in righteousness, which we did ourselves, but according to his mercy he saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit, which he poured out upon us richly, through Jesus Christ our Saviour; that, being justified by his grace, we might be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.&#8221; His theme was the grace of God that bringeth salvation. That afternoon I took my text from <span class='bible'>Tit 2:11-12<\/span> : &#8220;For the grace of God hath appeared, bringing salvation to all men, instructing us, to the intent that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly and righteously and godly in this present world.&#8221; He presented the grace of God, but he presented a conclusion that the grace of God does not teach. I showed that that very grace of God that he commended so highly taught that right here in this present evil world we should live soberly and righteously and godly. He stopped at <span class='bible'>Tit 3:7<\/span> , and I read on a little: &#8220;Faithful is the saying, and concerning these things I desire that thou affirm confidently, to the end that they who have believed God may be careful to maintain good works.&#8221; So I preceded his text with <span class='bible'>Tit 2:11<\/span> ff., and followed it with the next verse and caught him between the upper and nether millstones and ground him to powder. Finding that he was irreformable, I never did rest satisfied until that Baptist preacher was out of the ministry.<\/p>\n<p> I would not make the impression for one moment that we are not saved by grace through faith and that not of ourselves; it is the gift of God, and our works must not be associated with grace in order to our justification in God&#8217;s sight but I would teach that this doctrine of salvation by faith has this end in view, that the justified man should perform good works; that we are created unto good works. So those are the first warnings. I might select another scripture: &#8220;If any man be in Christ, he is a new creation.&#8221; There was an old man that he derived through Adam. In Christ there was a new man. Having shown that by the creative power of God&#8217;s Spirit, we pass from the old man to the new man, he immediately adds, &#8220;put on therefore the new man in righteousness and holiness.&#8221; It is easy to see as a conclusion from this salvation by grace, that we should render loving service to each other. We are children of God by faith. What then? Shall we fight? Shall we devour each other, or shall we render to each other the service of love? Those Galatian churches were as much noted for fighting each other as the Irishmen at a wake are said to be a regular &#8220;Kilkenny cat&#8221; fight. Paul says that that is a false deduction from the doctrine he had been teaching. While on that point he used this expression, &#8220;The whole law is fulfilled in one word, even in this: Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.&#8221; What is meant there by &#8220;fulfilled&#8221;? Does it mean that if I love my neighbor that I have obeyed the commandment, &#8220;Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart&#8221;? If it doesn&#8217;t mean that, what does it mean? The whole law is filled up, filled full in this, &#8220;Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself&#8221; that is, this is the last part of the summary that Moses gives. The first part is, &#8220;Love the Lord thy God, etc.,&#8221; that is, we fill it full if we love our neighbor as ourselves. It is the commonest thing to hear people that want to evade duty to God say that religion consists of being honest, paying our debts, etc. But that is not the sense of this &#8220;fulfill.&#8221; It completes, fills full the other half of it that had been filled before. For instance, if it takes four pecks to make a bushel, the fourth peck fills the measure, if the other three have been put in. There is a remarkable passage misinterpreted by Alexander Campbell, viz.: <span class='bible'>1Ti 1:5<\/span> (King James Version): &#8220;But the end of the commandment is love out of a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned.&#8221; What is meant by &#8220;the end of the commandment&#8221;? When we say the end we are not denying that there is a beginning. The end of a commandment is love out of a pure heart, out of a good conscience, out of faith unfeigned. There we get the other element that shows the idea of filling up, filling full. The love that the outsider talks about is unknown in the Bible. Here it is a love that springs from faith; faith brings a good conscience and that good conscience leads to a pure heart and a pure heart leads to love. So the end of the commandment is love out of a pure heart, out of a good conscience, out of faith unfeigned.<\/p>\n<p> The third warning that he gives is that being justified by faith our walk must be in the Spirit not in the flesh. We are not justified by faith if we walk after what is fleshly and not the spiritual, and if we have drawn from the doctrine of justification by faith any such conclusion as that, then we have misinterpreted the doctrine.<\/p>\n<p> He presents two kinds of fruit, as follows: &#8220;Walk in the Spirit but not in the flesh.&#8221; What is it to walk in the Spirit? &#8220;The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness) goodness, faithfulness, meekness, self-control; against such there is no law.&#8221; What is the fruit of the flesh? &#8220;The works of the flesh are manifest, which are these: fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousies, wraiths, factions, divisions, parties, envies, drunkenness, revels, and such like.&#8221; And to cap the climax he says that the man that does these things shall never enter the kingdom of heaven. He is saying to them, &#8220;You must not make the mistake that by mere intellectual perception of doc trial truth you have therefore exercised the faith of the gospel.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> We may put it down as settled that no religion is worth a cent that does not make a man better than he was before; a son a better son, a father a better father, a mother a better mother, a daughter a better daughter.<\/p>\n<p> If it doesn&#8217;t produce good fruits, John the Baptist tells us that &#8220;every tree that bringeth forth not good fruit shall be hewn down and cast into the fire.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> We now come to <span class='bible'>Gal 6<\/span> , which is divided into two paragraphs. The first paragraph is <span class='bible'>Gal 6:1-10<\/span> , and presents a case of discipline, or a case where the man, though a Christian, has committed an offense: &#8220;Brethren, even if a man be overtaken in any trespass, ye who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness; looking to thyself, lest thou also be tempted.&#8221; We must not draw the conclusion that because Paul said just before, &#8220;I forewarn you that they that practice these things shall not inherit the kingdom of God,&#8221; he means that to step aside once is fatal. As proof that he doesn&#8217;t mean that, he supposes a case of a man that has been overtaken by a fault.<\/p>\n<p> I was at a church conference once and three cases were presented, all of which claimed to be cases &#8220;overtaken in a fault.&#8221; They asked my opinion and I said, &#8220;Brethren, there is such a thing as being overtaken by a fault, and there is such a thing as a man overtaking a fault; when he sees it plainly and follows it until he overtakes it then he is not overtaken in a fault. One of your cases is a case of &#8216;overtaken by a fault,&#8217; another case the fellow overtakes the fault, and your third case is a mixture. It reminds me of a McClelland saddle. We don&#8217;t know when we see it whether we are meeting it or overtaking it. It is the same in the rear as in the front.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> The second thing is to harmonize <span class='bible'>Gal 6:2<\/span> with <span class='bible'>Gal 6:5<\/span> : &#8220;Bear ye one another&#8217;s burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ . . . For each man shall bear his own burden.&#8221; Is there any contradiction in the meaning? One case is evidently different in the meaning from the other case. What is the difference in the meaning?<\/p>\n<p> The third point that he presents is this <span class='bible'>Gal 6:6<\/span> : &#8220;But let him that is taught in the word communicate unto him that teacheth in all good things.&#8221; Or I will put it in plainer language: &#8220;Let the church member who is spiritually instructed contribute in money or kindness, to the one that instructs him.&#8221; There are some people who are so afraid of being misunderstood that what they preach will be assigned to a motive that they do not have, they leave it out of their preaching.<\/p>\n<p> I heard a man say once, &#8220;I just simply can&#8217;t preach on the money question; I will be misunderstood. If the brethren want to help me they can do it; if they don&#8217;t want to help me, then it can go.&#8221; Paul was Just as sensitive a man as we are, and he knew that they that preached the gospel should live of the gospel. One of the principal things that the Galatians were trying to do was to stop this collection. He says, &#8220;See that ye abound in that grace as well as those other graces.&#8221; I have seen Christians that could shout, &#8220;Fly abroad, thou mighty gospel,&#8221; and when the contribution box was passed around they shut their eyes for fear they would see the wings with which it is to fly.<\/p>\n<p> A man is sent with a message for God and the responsibility on him is not to vary one jot or tittle on that message. He ought to be able, as Paul said he was, to be free from the blood of all men because he had not shunned to declare the whole counsel of God.<\/p>\n<p> They accused him of manipulating a big collection; while he did not do it himself, they said he did it through Titus. He knew these questions would arise because those who are evil-minded do suspect. They would suspect the Lord or the angels from heaven.<\/p>\n<p> We cannot evade being suspected of evil. We are to take pains to live right, and so live that we may appear to live right, but that will not exempt us from being criticized.<\/p>\n<p> I have oftentimes wondered at the goodness of this man, that he could say upon that subject what he did concerning the crowd that hated him, even the church at Ephesus. See <span class='bible'>1Ti 6:17<\/span> : &#8220;Charge them that are rich in this present world, that they be not high-minded nor have their hope set on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy.&#8221; And he charges them, &#8220;that they be ready to distribute, that they be willing to contribute.&#8221; It took pluck to preach that to these people, for they were high-minded, because they were rich, but he was to present that to them as if putting them on their oath: &ldquo;O rich man, in the name of Christ, I put you on your oath before God, be not high-minded but rich in good works as well as in money. Be ready to distribute as well as to make the money.&#8221; Plucky man!<\/p>\n<p> The next thought is in <span class='bible'>Gal 6:7-8<\/span> : &#8220;Be not deceived.&#8221; A point upon which we might be deceived is what follows that doctrine. &#8220;Be not deceived; God is not mocked.&#8221; He is not fooled. &#8220;For whatsoever a man soweth that shall he also reap.&#8221; We can&#8217;t reverse the natural law, and we can&#8217;t reverse the spiritual law. In both the spiritual and the natural realm there is a crop between the sowing and the harvest. If we sow weeds we cannot look for a barley crop. The crop is going to be according to the seed that we put in the ground, and let us not be deceived; we can&#8217;t fool God. He applies that: &#8220;He that soweth unto his own flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; he that soweth unto the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap eternal life.&#8221; The harvest is going to correspond with what we sow.<\/p>\n<p> He advances to another thought of incalculable importance. We are justified by faith, and in view of that justification by the grace of God which teaches us not only to live soberly and righteously and godly in this present world, but also to do well, he exhorts; &#8220;Be not weary in well doing, for in due season we shall reap if we faint not.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> I remember once preaching from that text on an important occasion. We had just had a great meeting; hundreds of people had sturdily commenced to do right from a motive of love to God. Then they began to drop off; they got tired. &#8220;Let us not weary in well doing.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> It is that great persistence that wins, notwithstanding that it is an uphill path; notwithstanding that we have wind and tide against us. Anybody can float down stream, a dead fish can do that, but it takes a live fish to go up stream. &#8220;Let us not be weary in well doing.&#8221; He gives the reasons: first, we shall reap; second, we shall reap in due season. We may not reap tomorrow, or next week or next year, but at the appointed season (and every seed has its season), in due season we shall reap.<\/p>\n<p> Having expounded that section I associate it with <span class='bible'>1Co 15:58<\/span> : &#8220;Wherefore, my beloved brethren, be ye steadfast, unmovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labor is not vain in the Lord.&#8221; Then with that I put the psalm which says, &#8220;They that sow in tears shall reap in joy. He that goeth forth and weepeth bearing precious seed, shall doubtless come again with rejoicing, bringing his sheaves with him.&#8221; I comment on that passage in Psalms. First, there is activity; the people go forth; we must venture out. Second, they went bearing precious seed; we must go out with the word of God, which is the seed &#8220;he that goeth forth bearing precious seed and weeping.&#8221; We must go in earnest. Some people think tears are unmanly, and some tears are, but not all. &#8220;Jesus wept.&#8221; Did Christ o&#8217;er sinner weep, And shall our cheeks be dry? It was one of the most glorious testimonies of Henry of Navarre by Macaulay: He looked upon the foeman and his glance was stern and high; He looked upon his comrades and a tear was in his eye.<\/p>\n<p> That is his exhortation against weariness in well-doing, because the labor is not in vain. We may fail in other things, but if we take the gospel, if we take it earnestly, if we sow in tears, the heavens may fall, but our harvest will come without a shadow of a doubt. &#8220;Doubtless he shall return, bringing his sheaves with him.&#8221; It is that harvest home, when the laborer comes bringing his sheaves with him, to which the mind of the preacher should be often turned.<\/p>\n<p> Paul says to the Thessalonians, &#8220;Ye are my crown of rejoicing in the time of Jesus Christ&#8221; &#8220;bringing his sheaves with him,&#8221; not coming up to heaven empty-handed. Coming up he says, &#8220;Lord, this man in yonder world I led to thee; Lord, this broken heart I healed; Lord, this orphan I comforted, bringing his sheaves with him.&#8221; His association with him of every rightful tear that is shed, every good deed that he has accomplished, is one of the most precious things in connection with the gospel of Jesus Christ. Then he says, &#8220;As we have opportunity, let us work that which is good toward all men, and especially toward them that are of the household of the faith.&#8221; &#8220;As we have opportunity.&#8221; Opportunity! Dr. Richard Fuller, in a great sermon before the Southern Baptist Convention, gave a picture of opportunity as with swift wing, no bird of the air flying so fast, passing by and never coming back. &#8220;Wherefore as we have opportunity&#8221; means that we must be wide-awake.<\/p>\n<p> We come now to the last paragraph, and what is the meaning of it? &#8220;See with how large letters I write unto you with mine own hand.&#8221; The King James version says, &#8220;You see how large a letter I have written, etc.&#8221; Galatians isn&#8217;t a big letter, but what Paul says is, &#8220;See with how large letters I write you with mine own hand.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> I have been very much amused in contrasting the views of Farrar and Lightfoot. Generally, Lightfoot is much better than Farrar, but Farrar gets the best of him on the meaning of that passage. Lightfoot says the meaning is &#8220;I am writing to you about weighty matters, and I wrote you a great big letter.&#8221; He had to force that into it. It isn&#8217;t there. Paul&#8217;s acute eye trouble is evident from a previous expression. He says, &#8220;You would have taken your eyes and given them to me, if you could.&#8221; He was writing with his own hand, and a man that is nearly blind has to make big sprawling letters, and there is a touching thought in it. &#8220;Do you remember why I have to write with large letters? Don&#8217;t you remember when I was groping in my blindness, and your sympathy was so tender you would have given me your eyes? Now you see with what large letters I am writing.&#8221; I think Farrar&#8217;s explanation much more reasonable. Quickly Paul takes up his argument! He would take up an argument in the midst of his &#8220;amen&#8221; if he thought of something that he should have said that he had not said. He is giving a contrast between himself and these that insist on being circumcised. He says, (1) that they do this to avoid Jewish persecution, (2) that they do it that they may glory in the flesh, and (3) that they don&#8217;t do it from love of the law, for they know that they don&#8217;t keep the law; that circumcision obligates one to keep the whole law.<\/p>\n<p> Then he represents his glory in contrast with theirs: &#8220;But far be it from me to glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world hath been crucified unto me, and I unto the world. For neither is circumcision anything nor uncircumcision.&#8221; Then he adds, that they should so walk according to this canon (canon means rule) and as they should walk by this rule, circumcision or uncircumcision would avail nothing, but a new creature, everything.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Henceforth [that is, having presented this attack on me in 2 Corinthians, and in Galatians, and having made this reply 1 let no man trouble me,&#8221; as if to say, &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to go into this matter any more.&#8221; &#8220;Now why ought not ye trouble me?&#8221; &#8220;Because,&#8221; he says, &#8220;I bear branded on my body the marks of Jesus.&#8221; In other words, &#8220;I am covered all over with scars; the Roman lictors have smitten me with rods; the Jews have scourged me and left me for dead; once I fought with wild beasts in the arena, and I count these marks of Jesus as Christ&#8217;s brand of ownership.&#8221; It is a very beautiful thought.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> QUESTIONS<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. What warning does Paul give against false conclusions from the doctrine of justification by faith?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. What is antinomianism?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. Give several scriptures which disprove it.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. What is meant by &#8220;fulfilled&#8221; in &#8220;The law is fulfilled in &#8216;Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself &#8220;?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. Explain &#8220;end of the commandment&#8221; in &#8220;The end of the commandment is love.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. Contrast the fruits of the flesh and the fruits of the Spirit.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. Explain &#8220;overtaken in a fault.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. Harmonize &#8220;Bear ye one another&#8217;s burdens&#8221; and &#8220;Each man shall bear his own burden.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. What is the teaching here on ministerial support?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. Give the law of sowing and reaping.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. Take <span class='bible'>Gal 6:9<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>1Co 15:58<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Psa 126:5-6<\/span> and give a brief outline of an evangelistic address.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 12. What is opportunity? Illustrate it.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 13. What is the meaning of &#8220;large letters&#8221; in <span class='bible'>Gal 6:11<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 14. Give three reasons for circumcision on the part of those who were troubling the Galatians.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 15. Contrast Paul&#8217;s glory with theirs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 16. What the meaning of &#8220;henceforth let no man trouble me&#8221;?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: B.H. Carroll&#8217;s An Interpretation of the English Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 13 For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only <em> use<\/em> not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. <strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> Ver. 13. <strong> Only use not your liberty<\/strong> ] <em> In maxima libertate, minima licentia.<\/em> In the greatest freedom is the least amount of licence. Therefore  , are men the worse, because they should be better. Christ came to call sinners, not to licentiousness, but to repentance, <span class='bible'>Mar 2:17<\/span> , to take his yoke upon them,<span class='bible'>Mat 11:29<\/span><span class='bible'>Mat 11:29<\/span> , to hire out their members servants to righteousness,<span class='bible'>Rom 6:16<\/span><span class='bible'>Rom 6:16<\/span> . Hence it is, that as St Paul&rsquo;s Epistles largely prove free election and justification by Christ; so the Epistles of James, Peter, and John, press to love and new obedience, lest any should argue from mercy to liberty. <em> Nemo sit liber in fraudem fisci, <\/em> Let no one be free in mishandling the treasury, saith the civil law. (Valer. Max. ii. 1.) It was enacted among the Athenians, that whosoever, having been a bondman, was convicted of ingratitude for his manumission, should lose his liberty: the Romans made such slaves again; which punishment they term <em> Maximam capitis diminutionem, <\/em> The greatest demotion of a person. (Justin Instit. i. 16.) <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 13<\/strong> CH. <span class='bible'>Gal 6:5<\/span> .] THE THIRD or HORTATORY PORTION OF THE EPISTLE, not however separated from the former, but united to it by the current of thought: and, <strong> 13 15<\/strong> .] <em> Though free, be one another&rsquo;s servants in love<\/em> .<\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong> gives the reason why the Apostle was so fervent in his denunciation of these disturbers; because they were striking at the very root of their Christian calling, which was <strong> for<\/strong> (on condition of; hardly, for the purpose of; see reff.) <strong> freedom. Only (make not)<\/strong> (so  with the verb omitted and an accusative in     , Aristoph. Vesp. 1179;    , Soph. Antig. 577;       , Demosth. <span class='bible'>Phi 1<\/span> .  19. See more examples in Hartung, ii. 153) <strong> your liberty into<\/strong> (or, use it not for) <strong> an occasion<\/strong> (opportunity) <strong> for the flesh<\/strong> (for giving way to carnal passions), <strong> but by means of<\/strong> (your) <strong> love, be in bondage<\/strong> (opposition to  ) <strong> to one another<\/strong> . Chrys. remarks,    ,    .   .   .         <strong>          <\/strong> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Henry Alford&#8217;s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13-15<\/span> . FREEDOM IS AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT OF CHRISTIAN LIFE, TO BE USED NOT FOR SELF-INDULGENCE, BUT FOR WILLING SERVICE TO THE LAW OF LOVE.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Gal 5:13<\/span> .   . Our versions render this <em> unto<\/em> ( <em> for<\/em> R.V.) <em> freedom<\/em> , as though it were the design of the Gospel to lead to freedom. But the Greek text affirms rather that God&rsquo;s call was based upon freedom, and so makes it an essential element in spiritual life and the inalienable right of every true Christian.   . A warning is added that freedom, essential as it is to spiritual life, is open to abuse by carnal men, and that it is subject to the demands of the higher Law of mutual love. &ldquo;Only do not treat it as an opening for carnal self-indulgence, but for loving service to each other.&rdquo;  is used in the same elliptical way in <span class='bible'>Gal 2:10<\/span> and <span class='bible'>2Th 2:7<\/span> ; and the ellipsis of the verb after  is common in rhetorical passages.  . This term was applied in military language to a base of operations, and generally to any starting-point for action. In <span class='bible'>Rom 7:8<\/span> ; <span class='bible'>Rom 7:11<\/span> , <span class='bible'>2Co 11:12<\/span> it denotes an opening for sin, as it does here.  . This injunction contains an instructive paradox. Christians are freed from the trammels of outward Law, not that they may please themselves, but that they may become slaves to the Law of mutual love. The true ideal of the Christian is not freedom, but unfettered service to the love of God and man, which annihilates self, and subordinates all selfish desires to perfect love. A similar paradox is found in <span class='bible'>1Co 7:22<\/span> , <em> he that was called, being free, is the bondservant of Christ<\/em> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Gal 5:13-15<\/p>\n<p> 13For you were called to freedom, brethren; only do not turn your freedom into an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. 14For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, &#8220;You shall love your neighbor as yourself.&#8221; 15But if you bite and devour one another, take care that you are not consumed by one another.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:13 &#8220;For you were called to freedom, brethren&#8221; This begins a new stage of the argument. The term &#8220;brethren&#8221; usually marks a change of subject. As Gal 5:1-12 have dealt with the perversion of legalism, Gal 5:13-15 deal with the perversion of antinomianism. We must not use our freedom as a license for indulging the sinful passions of fallen human nature (cf. Rom 14:1 to Rom 15:13).<\/p>\n<p>NASB&#8221;only do not turn your freedom into an opportunity for the flesh&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NKJV&#8221;only do not use liberty as an opportunity for the flesh&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NRSV&#8221;only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for self-indulgence&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>TEV&#8221;But do not let this freedom become an excuse for letting your physical desires rule you&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NJB&#8221;but be careful, or this liberty will provide an opening for self-indulgence&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Opportunity&#8221; is a military term for a military, assault-staging area (cf. Rom 6:1-14). Several English translations translate &#8220;flesh&#8221; with the phrase &#8220;lower nature.&#8221; This latter rendering agrees with Paul&#8217;s use of &#8220;flesh&#8221; (see Special Topic at Gal 1:16) in this context as the natural propensities of mankind which have been twisted toward the self ever since the fall, recorded in Genesis 3. The same polarization between the Adamic nature and the Spirit-led life is expressed in Rom 8:1-11.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;but through love serve one another&#8221; This verb is present active imperative. Previously Paul asserted that they should not be slaves to legalism, but he now balances this with the command that they must be slaves to one another in love (cf. Gal 5:6; Joh 13:34-35; Eph 5:21; Php 2:3-4). This entire context is communal (the church), not individual (cf. Gordon D. Fee, To What End Exegesis? pp. 154-172). Modern western interpretation has been deeply influenced by individualism. The Bible is primarily a corporate book.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:14<\/p>\n<p>NASB&#8221;For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NKJV&#8221;For all the law is fulfilled in one word&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NRSV&#8221;For the whole law is summed up in a single commandment&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>TEV&#8221;For the whole Law is summed up in one commandment&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NJB&#8221;since the whole of the Law is summarized in a single command&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This same truth is expressed in Rom 13:8; Jas 2:8. This is the &#8220;law&#8221; as God&#8217;s revealed will (cf. Mat 5:17-20), not a works righteousness system of salvation. There is still a proper function for the OT in Christianity! This was a quote of Lev 19:18 from the Septuagint. It may have functioned as a rabbinical summary regarding the purpose of the Law. It was also used by Jesus in a very similar way in Mat 5:43-48; Mat 22:39 and in Mar 12:29-31; Luk 10:25-28. This is a Perfect tense verb, which emphasizes a culmination of a past act into a continuing state or condition. It can be understood as (1) a summary of the law or (2) a fulfillment of the law.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:15 This is a first class conditional sentence, assumed to be true from the author&#8217;s perspective or for his literary purposes. This verse uses violent imagery describing wild animals devouring each other, which is a picture of the terrible reality the false teachers had caused in the Galatian churches. This interpretation is reinforced by the equally strong statement in Gal 5:26. This is a corporate problem, not an individual focus.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>unto = upon. Greek. epi. App-104. Liberty is the foundation. <\/p>\n<p>for. Greek. eis. App-104. <\/p>\n<p>occasion. Greek. aphorme. See Rom 7:8. <\/p>\n<p>serve. he, douleuo. App-190. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>13-CH. Gal 6:5.] THE THIRD or HORTATORY PORTION OF THE EPISTLE, not however separated from the former, but united to it by the current of thought:-and, 13-15.] Though free, be one anothers servants in love.<\/p>\n<p> gives the reason why the Apostle was so fervent in his denunciation of these disturbers; because they were striking at the very root of their Christian calling, which was for (on condition of; hardly, for the purpose of; see reff.) freedom. Only (make not) (so  with the verb omitted and an accusative in   , Aristoph. Vesp. 1179;   , Soph. Antig. 577;      , Demosth. Philippians 1.  19. See more examples in Hartung, ii. 153) your liberty into (or, use it not for) an occasion (opportunity) for the flesh (for giving way to carnal passions), but by means of (your) love, be in bondage (opposition to ) to one another. Chrys. remarks,   ,   .  .  .                 .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Remember, beloved brethren, that the Epistle to the Galatians is one in which Paul, with especial clearness, proves the doctrine of justification by faith alone. So much is this the case, that the famous Commentary of Martin Luther upon this Epistle is perhaps the strongest work extant upon the doctrine of salvation by grace through faith. But that doctrine was never intended to be separated from the Scriptural teaching concerning the fruit of faith, namely, good works; and, hence, we find, in the close of this very Epistle, the strongest possible declaration that, if men live in sin, they will reap the result of sin; and that only if, by grace, they are brought to walk in holiness, will they win the rewards of grace.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:13. For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, <\/p>\n<p>Do not make licence out of your liberty. Remember that liberty from sin is not liberty to sin.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:13-14. But by love serve one another. For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.<\/p>\n<p>The condensation of the whole law is contained in that one word love. In the first table, we are taught to love God; and the commands of the second table teach us to love our neighbor.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:15. But if ye bite and devour one another,<\/p>\n<p>Finding fault, slandering, injuring, bearing malice, and so on: If ye bite and devour one another,<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:15. Take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.<\/p>\n<p>You will eat one another up; you will, each one, condemn his neighbor. Paul represents the great Judge coming, and waiting outside the door; and when he hears two men condemning one another, he says to himself, I will confirm their verdict; they have mutually condemned each other, I will say Amen to it. What a sad thing it is if professed Christians are found thus condemning one another!<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:16. This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh.<\/p>\n<p>Walk under the Spirits power, following his guidance. The Spirit never leads a man into sin. He never conducts him into self-indulgence and excess.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:17. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.<\/p>\n<p>How often that is the case! Ye would be perfect, but ye cannot do the things that ye would. We would, if possible, escape from every evil thought; we would not even hear of anything sinful, if we could help it.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:18-19. But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law. Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, <\/p>\n<p>Any kind of sensual indulgence  whatever it may be  a lustful glance, the cherishing of an unclean desire, the utterance of a foul expression, all this is condemned, as well as the overt acts of adultery and fornication.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:20-21. Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness,<\/p>\n<p>Is drunkenness actually put by the apostle after murder, as though it were something worse than that terrible crime? Or is it not, oftentimes, the case that drunkenness lies at the bottom of the murder?<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:21. Revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. <\/p>\n<p>Paul never said, nor ever thought of saying, that a man might live in sin, that grace might abound. No, no; these evil things must be given up. Christ has come to save us from every evil work. And this is the salvation that we preach, not simply salvation from hell, but salvation from sin, which is the very fire that has kindled the infernal flame. But how different from all this evil is the fruit of the Spirit!<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:22. But the fruit of the Spirit is love,<\/p>\n<p>Universal love; first, to God; next, to his people; and, then, to all mankind. Have we that fruit of the Spirit? If so, it will make us of a very amiable disposition; it will dethrone selfishness, and set up holy affections within our heart.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:22-23. Joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance:<\/p>\n<p>Joy and peace seem to blossom and ripen out of love. Longsuffering, too, is part of the fruit of the Spirit. You will be hourly tried, but the Spirit of God will give you patience to suffer long and to endure much. You will also have gentleness. Some people are very hard, stern, severe, quick-tempered, passionate; but the true follower of Christ will be gentle and tender, even as he was.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:23. Against such there is no law.<\/p>\n<p>Neither God nor man has ever made a law against these things; the more there is of them, the better will it be for everybody. Oh, that they prevailed all over the world!<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:24. And they that are Christs have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.<\/p>\n<p>A crucified Christ is the leader of a crucified people. Oh, to have all the affections and lusts of the flesh nailed up! They may not be actually dead; for those who are crucified may still live on for some hours, but they are doomed to die, their life is a very painful one, and it is hastening to a close. A man who is crucified cannot get down from the cross to do what he wills; and, oh! it is a great blessing to have our sinful self thus nailed up. Ah, sir! you may struggle, but you cannot get down; you may strive and cry, but your hands and feet are nailed; you cannot go into active, actual sin. The Lord grant that the nails may hold very fast, that none of the strugglings of our old nature may be able to pull out those nails that have fastened it up to the cross!<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:25. If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.<\/p>\n<p>If that be our real life, let it also be our course of action.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:26. Let us not be desirous of vain glory,<\/p>\n<p>Do not let us want to be accounted as somebody; for, if we do, we prove that we are really nobody. Nobody is anybody till he is willing to be nobody; as long as he wants to be somebody, he is nobody and nothing.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:26. Provoking one another, envying one another.<\/p>\n<p>God save us from that and every other form of evil! <\/p>\n<p>This exposition consisted of readings from Gal 5:13-26; and Gal 6:1-10.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Spurgeon&#8217;s Verse Expositions of the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Gal 5:13. , ye) So far am I from preaching circumcision, that I would rather show you liberty.- , [unto] concerning[50] liberty) that you might rejoice in liberty. Your calling is not to , self-imposed restraints, but to liberty.- ) An ellipsis of the imperative, having the , pious precaution, subjoined,      , &#8230;, only ye were not made free with this freedom, etc. [for an occasion to the flesh]: or else the accusative,  , is put absolutely.-, an occasion) for which the flesh is eager.- , to the flesh) Gal 5:16-17.-  , by love) Gal 5:14; Gal 5:22.-, serve) A beautiful antithesis.[51]<\/p>\n<p>[50] Super libertate. With respect to, with a view to a state of liberty.-ED.<\/p>\n<p>[51] If you will have the bondage of service, then serve one another: in antithesis to .-ED.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Gal 5:13<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:13<\/p>\n<p>For ye, brethren, were called for freedom;-He reminds them that they had been called from under the bondage of the law into the liberty of the children of God.<\/p>\n<p>only use not your freedom for an occasion to the flesh,-Only do not so use that liberty for the purpose of exalting the fleshly relations of Judaism above the spiritual relations of Christians. Or do not so use this as to give rule to the passions, lusts, and appetites of the flesh. The fleshly appetites and feelings involve men in bitterness, wrath, and strife. These had manifested their fruits among them in the course pursued on the question of circumcision. Instead of following these fleshly passions and desires, moved by love for each other, serve and help one another.<\/p>\n<p>but through love be servants one to another.-Love as a principle seeks the good of others. In its workings it does good to them. Love practiced is doing the thing required in the law of God to be done. Because to do what Gods law requires of us to do to man is to do to him the greatest good possible. [The love that fulfills the law is that given by the Lord: All things therefore whatsoever ye would that men should do unto you, even so do ye also unto them: for this is the law and the prophets. (Mat 7:12). This is loves law, to put oneself in anothers place and to act toward him as though he were oneself. Thus will the Christian not merely work no ill to his neighbor, he will, as need arises and as opportunity offers, spend himself in his neighbors service, for would not he have his neighbor do the like for him? This is what James calls the perfect law, the law of liberty (Jas 1:25), the royal law (Jas 2:8). By it is the Christian bound, and in it he finds that a life of self-renouncing love is a life of liberty.]<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Produce the Fruit of the Spirit <\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:13-26<\/p>\n<p>That Christ has freed us from the Law as a means of salvation does not free us from moral restraint, but brings us under the constraint of a higher law, the law of love. We do not keep this law to be saved; but, being saved, we keep it out of love toward Christ. The power of the new life is the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Unite yourself with His life that you find rising up within you. Live in the Spirit. A child was much disappointed because when she took a cupful of water out of the blue lake, it did not look blue in the cup; so her teacher told her to throw the cup into the midst of the lake and leave it there. As we live and walk in the Spirit, we are safe.<\/p>\n<p>The Holy Spirit brings influences to bear which act upon the germs of sin, as a disinfectant upon the germs of disease. If we yield ourselves to these influences, and are filled with the Spirit of Jesus, we shall be delivered from the self-life, which the Apostle describes as the flesh. As Jesus is more and more formed in us, the new flower and fruitage of the risen life will appear, while the corrupt works of the flesh will shrink and drop away,<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: F.B. Meyer&#8217;s Through the Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Chapter 28<\/p>\n<p>A More Excellent Way<\/p>\n<p>For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.  For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.  But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.<\/p>\n<p>(Gal 5:13-15)<\/p>\n<p>These verses begin a very important passage that extends into the opening verses of chapter 6. In this section of Galatians Paul gives us much needed, clear, and practical instruction about walking in the Spirit in the blessed liberty of faith in Christ. Here he tells us that this liberty is the liberty of love. The life into which believers have been delivered is a life of love.<\/p>\n<p>There are two great evils to which our fallen human nature is constantly drawn, evils that must be consciously avoided. The one is the horrid evil of legalism. The other is the equally horrid evil of licentiousness. Both are evil products of the flesh. Paul has devoted the larger part of this epistle to the Galatians to the task of exposing and denouncing the legalistic, self-righteousness, and arrogance of the Judaizers who ever attempt to bring Gods saints under the oppressive yoke of legal bondage. Now he turns to the subject of licentiousness.<\/p>\n<p>It may appear to be a strange paradox to many that legalism, when it is most prominent, produces licentiousness; paradoxical perhaps, but it is not a self-contradiction. Legalism is the mother of malice, strife, heresy, and slander. Who was ever more legalistic than the Pharisee? He prayed three times a day. He fasted twice in a week. He gave tithes of all that he had. He kept the sabbath. He ate no unclean thing. He was a legalistic moralist! But who was ever more licentious than the Pharisee? He slandered the Son of God. He tried to trick the Savior into speaking against the law of Moses and against Caesar. It was a band of religious legalists who took a woman in the act of adultery to be condemned, but left their fellow Pharisee in his tent unaccused. Religious legalists took up stones to slay the Lord Jesus. They crucified the Lord of glory to satisfy their own lusts. It is not at all surprising therefore that Paul brings in a solemn warning against licentiousness right upon the heels of such strong condemnations of legality. We are free in Christ; but our freedom in Christ is not a license to sin. Rather, our freedom in Christ is the blessed liberty of love.<\/p>\n<p>A Better Way<\/p>\n<p>Paul has shown the excellence of the gospel. He has thoroughly denounced all possibility that sinners can be justified by works. He has shown us that once a person is justified by the free grace of God in Christ, he is not then sanctified and made perfect by his own efforts. He asks in chapter 3, Are ye so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? Paul has shown us that our entire standing before God is the result of his free-grace and not the result of human merit.<\/p>\n<p>Now, lest anyone should say, Shall we then continue in sin that grace may abound? (See Rom 6:1-22) Paul gives a solemn warning against licentiousness. He tells us that our liberty in Christ is not licentiousness, but love. We are free from the bondage of the Mosaic law. And, being made free from the law, we are now free to live by the law of Christ. Believers are not antinomians, though legalists love to hurl that slanderous accusation against us. We do not live by the carnal rule of the Mosaic law, but by the law of love to Christ. In all things, the love of Christ constraineth us (2Co 5:14). Legalistic duties can never fulfill the law, but love does. We have been brought under the law to Christ. What is the law of Christ? It is the law of love. Love not only fulfills the law, as legalism never can, but it also prevents the bitter strife that legalism produces.<\/p>\n<p>This is what Paul has called, a more excellent way (1Co 12:31 to 1Co 13:13). Love is the law of Christianity. The commandment of Christ is love. The fruit of the Spirit is love. Faith works by love. The joy of heaven is love. Peace on earth is love. That which sanctifies our every deed is love. Tongues are nothing without love. Prophecy is nothing without love. Understanding is nothing without love. Faith is nothing without love. Self-sacrifice is nothing without love. The charter, the continuance, and the consummation of Christs kingdom is love. God is love. And Gods people reflect that love. Wherever God is there is love. Wherever love is absent, God is absent.<\/p>\n<p>How sweet, how heavenly is the sight,<\/p>\n<p>When those that love the Lord<\/p>\n<p>In one anothers peace delight,<\/p>\n<p>And so fulfill His Word.<\/p>\n<p>When each can feel his brothers sigh,<\/p>\n<p>And with him bear a part;<\/p>\n<p>When sorrow flows from eye to eye,<\/p>\n<p>And joy from heart to heart.<\/p>\n<p>When free from envy, scorn, and pride,<\/p>\n<p>Our wishes all above,<\/p>\n<p>Each can his brothers failings hide,<\/p>\n<p>And show a brothers love.<\/p>\n<p>When love, in one delightful stream,<\/p>\n<p>Through every bosom flows;<\/p>\n<p>And union sweet, and dear esteem,<\/p>\n<p>In every action glows.<\/p>\n<p>Love is the golden chain that binds<\/p>\n<p>The happy souls above;<\/p>\n<p>And hes an heir of heaven who finds<\/p>\n<p>His bosom glow with love.<\/p>\n<p>Called unto Liberty<\/p>\n<p>For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another (Gal 5:13). Whenever religious legalists hear or read about the blessed liberty Gods saints have in Christ from the law of Moses, red flags immediately arise in their minds. When we assert, in Bible language, that Christ is the end of the law, that we are not under the law, but under grace, and ye are dead to the law, they are terrified that such gospel declarations will lead people professing godliness to live in licentiousness. Because they know that they are ruled and motivated by legal threats and rewards, because their religion is nothing more than mercenary duty, they presume the same is true of Gods children. Shall we, therefore, refuse to assure Gods saints of their liberty in Christ? Perish the thought! Instead of that, Paul asserts, Brethren, ye have been called unto liberty. Then he gives us this admonition, only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh. We must take care that we do not use (or abuse) our liberty in Christ to indulge the lusts of the flesh.<\/p>\n<p>Paul again calls the Galatian saints &#8220;brethren.&#8221; He does so to express his own affection for them and to remind them (and us) of their relationship to one another in Christ, a loving family relationship. Then he reminds us that we have been called to liberty by the effectual grace and power of God the Holy Spirit. <\/p>\n<p>The work-mongers at Galatia were frustrating the grace of God by their doctrine (Gal 3:21). They taught that the rule of the Mosaic law was still in effect, that men and women make themselves righteous by their obedience to the law, and, thereby, taught that the sacrifice of Christ and the grace of God were meaningless (Gal 5:1-4). Paul here reminds us that Christ has given all who trust him freedom from the law, calling us to liberty.  Ye have been called unto liberty. Our liberty in Christ includes freedom from condemnation by the law and from the consciousness of guilt because of sin (Rom 8:1). Christ has freed us from the carnal ordinances and ceremonies of the law (Col 2:16-23). He has freed us from the oppressive rule of the law (Rom 6:14-15; Rom 7:4; Rom 10:4). And he has given us the liberty of access to and assured acceptance with God as his own dear children (Gal 4:6-7; Heb 10:19-22).<\/p>\n<p>An Occasion to the Flesh<\/p>\n<p>Only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh.  The corrupt, depraved nature of fallen, unregenerate men is so base and vile that it finds encouragement to licentiousness in the goodness, mercy and grace of God in Christ to licentiousness. The sweet, blessed doctrines of grace revealed in the gospel (unconditional election, everlasting love, free justification, the non-imputation of sin, immutable grace, absolute security in Christ, etc.), though the very source and inspiration for all true godliness, are perverted and abused by ungodly religionists and made to be a covering and excuse for evil. This was the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which our holy Savior hates (Rev 2:14-15).<\/p>\n<p>Pauls comments here are not addressed to lost religionists. They are addressed to the saints of God. Believers are no longer in the flesh (Rom 8:9), and do not live after the flesh (Rom 8:12-13). Yet the flesh, the old nature of the flesh, is in us and is constantly at war against us. That old nature that is in us is prone to the same evils that the unregenerate practice. That makes Pauls admonition needful. We must not give in to the flesh. We must take care that we do not indulge the flesh, abusing the liberty that is ours in Christ to gratify the lusts of the flesh. Christs free men must not give way to such evil lusts. To do so is both to bring reproach upon our Savior and upon the gospel of the grace of God. Let us, rather, adorn the doctrine of God our Savior in all things (Tit 2:10).<\/p>\n<p>Our liberty in Christ is abused, or used as an occasion to the flesh whenever we begin to live for the gratification of our fleshly lust. In this context Paul is particularly telling us that we must not excuse, or attempt to justify any conduct that injures our brethren. To use this liberty as an excuse to indulge the old nature is, wrote Edgar Andrews, a contradiction in terms. Any who do so have not understood the meaning of Christian liberty, for liberty and lawlessness are bitter enemies, not companions.<\/p>\n<p>Christian liberty is not a spring board, or incentive for the sinful human nature to assert itself. The doctrine of Christ is a doctrine according to godliness (1Ti 6:3). It is freedom to walk with and serve our God. We are free to use all things lawfully, but we are not to be in bondage to any (1Co 6:12). And our liberty must never be so pressed as to become a stumbling block to a weaker brother (1Co 8:9; 1Co 8:13). We are to use this liberty for the good of men and the glory of Christ (1Co 9:12; 1Co 9:22; 1Co 10:23-24; 1Co 10:31; 1Co 11:1), not to gratify ourselves.<\/p>\n<p>By Love Serve<\/p>\n<p>But by love serve one another.  Gospel liberty and the service of the saints go hand in hand. Faith works by love. Our Savior commands us to love one another. Our profession of faith in Christ and our family relation to one another in Christ, the grace of God that we have experienced, and the love of God revealed to us in the sacrifice of his own dear Son for us all teach us to devote ourselves to and serve one another in love. Throughout the New Testament good works are set before us, not as deeds by which we attempt to show how good, devoted, and holy we are (That is ever the practice of Pharisees.), but by acts of kindness, love, and mercy: visiting the fatherless and the afflicted, giving a cup of cold water, bearing one anothers burdens, etc.<\/p>\n<p>Let every child of God make it his goal in life to help his brothers and sisters in Christ in their pilgrimage through this world. That is what it is to serve one another by love. Believers ought always to pray for one another, sympathize with one anothers needs, and provide for one anothers needs. We ought to be forgiving, forbearing, and long-suffering with one another, patient, kind, and gentle toward one another. We are to think well of and speak well of one another, each esteeming his brother and sister in Christ better than himself (Php 2:1-4). Love is a debt we owe to one another (Rom 13:8). If we were more concerned about loving and less concerned about being loved, that would put an end to resentment, strife and division, envy, malice, and feuds in the church of God.<\/p>\n<p>Our Example<\/p>\n<p>The love Paul is speaking of here is not mere human affection. It is the love of God revealed to us in Christ and shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit. The great example of serving one another by love that is held before us in the Book of God is Christ himself (Joh 13:13-15; Eph 4:32 to Eph 5:1; 1Jn 3:16-17). He said, I am among you as he that serveth. He came into the world in the form of a servant (Php 2:7). When he arose from supper, he put a towel around his waist, poured water into a basin, and washed his disciples feet (Joh 13:4-5). The Prophet called the Messiah a Servant (Isa 42:1; Isa 50:4-11; Isa 52:13 to Isa 53:12).<\/p>\n<p>What is this love? It is a deep affection, but more than affection. Love is devotion, self-sacrificing tenderness, genuine care, and a readiness to help. It is free, spontaneous giving and forgiving. William Hendriksen tells us that, When Paul warns the Galatians not to turn freedom into an opportunity for the flesh, but through love to be serving one another, he is placing service over against selfishnessVice can only be conquered by virtue, which is the Spirits gift, mans responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>Savior, give me grace that I may<\/p>\n<p>Love Your people as I ought,<\/p>\n<p>Ever serve them, and defend them,<\/p>\n<p>And with care offend them not. <\/p>\n<p>May the grace You have imparted,<\/p>\n<p>In releiving me of woe,<\/p>\n<p>Make me kind and tenderhearted;<\/p>\n<p>Give me grace Your grace to show. <\/p>\n<p>As You laid down Your life, Savior,<\/p>\n<p>For the people that You love,<\/p>\n<p>Help me to my own life lay down<\/p>\n<p>For my brethren, whom I love.<\/p>\n<p>The Law Fulfilled by Love<\/p>\n<p>For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself (Gal 5:14).  Paul, by divine inspiration, reduces the whole Mosaic system to one commandment.  Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Legalists take great offense at this, saying that such a view of the law makes every man a law unto himself and gives no real direction for life. Nothing could be further from the truth. The law of love is the new commandment of the gospel (Eph 5:2; 1Th 4:9; Jas 2:8, 1Pe 1:22; 1Jn 3:23; 1Jn 4:21). This love is not natural to men. It is the fruit of the indwelling Spirit making manifest the fact that Christ dwells in us (Gal 5:22; 1Jn 3:9-24). Pastor Henry Mahan wrote<\/p>\n<p>When I consider what I can do, should do and am required to do in word, thought and deed toward others, it is all fulfilled in the word &#8216;love&#8217; (Mat 7:12). My love for the Lord will control my personal conduct and behavior, and my love for others will control my public conduct where others are concerned. As far as a man loves aright, so far he fulfils the law.<\/p>\n<p>Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. What more needs to be said? If I want to know how I ought to love my neighbor, I need only to ask, How do I love myself? When I am in trouble, or danger, or need of any kind, I welcome the help of others who are able to help. We do not need a book of instructions to teach us how to love our neighbor. All we need to do is look to our own enlightened hearts. If any ask, as the lawyer in Luke 10, Who is my neighbor? the answer is given in the parable that followed his question. My neighbor is anyone who needs my help (Luk 10:25-37). Let us so love our neighbors, especially our brothers and sisters in Christ. But our responsibility (our great privilege of love) reaches beyond the household of faith. We are to love all men, even those who despise and abuse us (Gal 6:10). My neighbor is anyone with whom God in his providence brings me into contact, anyone I can help in anyway, even though he hates me and is my enemy (Mat 5:43-48). My neighbor is especially my brother in Christ.<\/p>\n<p>Most people talk glibly about love and boast that they practice it, but love is a rare, very rare, thing in this world. Love is more than a feeling, a sentiment, or an emotion. To love my neighbor is to serve him. We are to by love serve one another. Love is not merely putting up with people, or refraining from injuring them. It is doing them good (Gal 6:10). To serve one another in love is to instruct the erring, comfort the afflicted, raise the fallen, and help one another in every possible way. If I love my neighbor, I bear his burdens, and forgive his offenses. I am patient with his infirmities, weaknesses, and ignorance, and am long-suffering with him in all things. Love forgives the unforgiving, is patient with the impatient, merciful to the unmerciful, and kind to the mean-spirited. Love makes children honor their parents and parents to be patient with unruly children, causes husbands to be patient with nagging wives and wives to be patient with obstinate husbands. If I love my neighbor as myself, I will not defraud him, betray his trust, lie to him, cheat him, slander him, or reveal his faults, weaknesses, and failures to others.<\/p>\n<p>These things are not regarded as good works by most people; but they are the very things our God speaks of as good works. They are such excellent things that the unregenerate cannot possibly estimate them at their true value. Religious legalist vainly imagine that good works are the observance of rituals, ceremonies, holy days, dress codes, dietary laws, fastings, and countless other things seen, approved of, and applauded by men. Their religion is street corner and market place religion. Nothing more. While they strenuously observe the outward duties of religious laws and customs, they are filled with violence and hatred.<\/p>\n<p>What greater example of this horrid spirit of legalism could be found than in the fact that those very men who crucified the Lord of glory because of their envy and hatred insisted that his body be taken down from the cross (Joh 19:31), lest their sabbath day be polluted? The Old Testament as well as the New is replete with examples that show how highly our God values love. When David and his men had no food they ate the showbread, though the law forbade them to eat it. Our Saviors disciples broke the legal sabbath law when they plucked ears of corn and ate it as they followed the Master, resting in him who is our Sabbath. The Lord Jesus himself broke the sabbath day, as far as the Jews could see, by healing the sick on the sabbath day. In all these things, we are taught that the holy Lord God calls for mercy, not sacrifice. The law itself was designed to teach us this blessed doctrine  Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. Therefore, Paul urges us to serve one another by love. He says to them and to us, If you want to do good works and honor Gods holy law, by love serve one another. The world is full of people who need your help. Yet, those who teach that righteousness comes by works never mention such things.<\/p>\n<p>A Needed Warning<\/p>\n<p>But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another (Gal 5:15).  Here Paul is saying, If you are critical, unforgiving, unkind, and filled with bitterness and strife, you will destroy the unity and peace of Gods church. Love is the cement that binds us together and enables us to live and labor together in peace (Eph 4:1-7; Col 3:12-14).<\/p>\n<p>In the church at Galatia, as in countless churches today, there was much strife and division, backbiting and slander, bitterness, and jealousy. The fact that Paul gives us the warning in Gal 5:15 in the context of Galatians 5 tells us that the root cause of these evils is the carnal, fleshly spirit of legalism and self-righteousness. One of the problems with living by law is the fact that once the explicit duties of the law have been fulfilled in the mind of the legalist, he vainly imagines that he is holier than other people and sets himself up as a judge over them. Those who walk in the Spirit (That is to say, those who live by faith in Christ) do not fulfill such lusts of the flesh. They know themselves to be sinners in constant need of mercy, whose only hope before God is the blood and righteousness of Christ. If we truly know that, if truly we have experienced the grace of God and know something of the evil of our own hearts, we will esteem our brothers and sisters better than ourselves, and by love serve one another.<\/p>\n<p>Let us hear and heed Pauls warning.  If ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another. Here people, church members at that, are pictured in the act of rushing upon one another as wild beasts. Strife and divisions are always carnal and ungodly (1Co 3:3). It is not strange to see dogs and wolves biting and devouring sheep; but it is unthinkable that sheep should bite and devour one another. He that soweth discord among brethren is an abomination to the Lord. Strife and division destroy the peace of churches (1Co 3:17). It is by these things that we quench the Spirit of God (Eph 4:30) and destroy our usefulness in the cause of Christ.<\/p>\n<p>Here are quotations taken from the writings of four men on this 15th verse. Each is tremendously insightful.<\/p>\n<p>Christian churches cannot be ruined but by their own hands; but if Christians, should be helps to one another and a joy to one another, be as brute beasts, biting and devouring each other, what can be expected but that the God of love should deny his grace to them, and the Spirit of love should depart from them, and that the evil spirit that seeks the destruction of them all should prevail? (Matthew Henry)<\/p>\n<p>Strife, contention, bickering, detraction, and the biting of hard, unjust words will rend a church in pieces quicker than all the assaults of men and devils from outside. (G. S. Bishop).<\/p>\n<p>How distressing, how mad it is that we, who are members of the same body, should be leagued together, of our own accord, for mutual destruction! (John Calvin)<\/p>\n<p>When faith in Christ is overthrown peace and unity come to an end in the church. Diverse opinions and dissensions about doctrine and life spring up, and one member bites and devours the other, i.e., they condemn each other until they are consumed. To this the Scriptures and the experience of all times bear witness. The many sects at present have come into being because one sect condemns the other. When the unity of the spirit has been lost there can be no agreement in doctrine or life. New errors must appear without measure and without end. For the avoidance of discord Paul lays down the principle: &#8220;Let every person do his duty in the station of life into which God has called him. No person is to vaunt himself above others or find fault with the efforts of others while lauding his own. Let everybody serve in love. (Martin Luther)<\/p>\n<p>For the glory of God our Savior, for the furtherance of the gospel, and for the sake of our brethren, let us endeavor to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace by our conduct toward one another (Eph 4:2-3). Let us ever take care that we do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God by treating the objects of Gods love with contempt (Eph 4:30 to Eph 5:2). May God give us grace to love and serve one another, taking no offense at anything done to us by others. If another person will not walk in peace, but insists upon stirring up strife and division in the family of God, for the sake of Christ and his kingdom and the gospel of his grace, we must simply avoid them (Rom 16:17; 2Th 3:6; 2Th 3:14-15).<\/p>\n<p>Read Pauls words of wise instruction one more time and ask God the Holy Spirit who inspired them to graciously apply them to your heart, for Christs sake.  For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.  For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.  But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Discovering Christ In Selected Books of the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>ye: Gal 5:1, Gal 4:5-7, Gal 4:22-31, Isa 61:1, Luk 4:18, Joh 8:32-36, Rom 6:18-22 <\/p>\n<p>only: 1Co 8:9, 1Pe 2:16, 2Pe 2:19, Jud 1:4, Jud 1:10 -12 <\/p>\n<p>but: Gal 5:14, Gal 5:22, Gal 6:2, Mar 10:43-45, Joh 13:14, Joh 13:15, Act 20:35, Rom 15:1, Rom 15:2, 1Co 9:19, 1Co 13:4-7, 2Co 4:5, 2Co 12:15, 1Th 1:3, Jam 2:15-17, 1Jo 3:16-19 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Gen 18:6 &#8211; three Gen 18:8 &#8211; stood Lev 25:10 &#8211; proclaim Lev 25:55 &#8211; my servants Jos 1:15 &#8211; Until Isa 14:2 &#8211; and the house Dan 4:27 &#8211; by showing Mal 4:4 &#8211; the law Mat 5:43 &#8211; Thou Mat 7:12 &#8211; for Mat 23:11 &#8211; General Mat 25:40 &#8211; Inasmuch Luk 10:27 &#8211; and thy Joh 13:34 &#8211; That ye love Act 16:33 &#8211; washed Rom 6:22 &#8211; But now Rom 12:10 &#8211; kindly Rom 13:9 &#8211; love Rom 14:15 &#8211; now 1Co 7:22 &#8211; is the 1Co 9:21 &#8211; not 1Co 13:5 &#8211; seeketh 1Co 13:13 &#8211; the greatest 1Co 16:14 &#8211; General 2Co 2:8 &#8211; that Gal 2:4 &#8211; liberty Gal 4:31 &#8211; we Gal 5:19 &#8211; the works Eph 1:4 &#8211; love Eph 4:16 &#8211; edifying Phi 3:2 &#8211; evil 1Th 3:12 &#8211; love 1Ti 1:5 &#8211; the end Heb 6:10 &#8211; work Heb 10:24 &#8211; love Heb 13:1 &#8211; General Jam 2:14 &#8211; though 2Pe 1:9 &#8211; lacketh 1Jo 2:7 &#8211; but 1Jo 3:18 &#8211; let 2Jo 1:6 &#8211; this is love<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Gal 5:13.     , -For ye for your part were called to liberty, brethren- being emphatic from its position.  is not merely a particle of transition (Brown); nor is it to be referred to a more remote sentiment-Let them not revolutionize you, for ye were called to freedom (Webster and Wilkinson); nor is it connected with -Would that the offence of the cross were done away; would that the Jews no longer rejected the doctrine that the law cannot justify, for ye were called (Bagge). Gwynne needlessly throws the connection back to the last verse of the previous chapter. But  refers back to the immediately preceding statement, and is a justification of the strong and indignant feeling expressed against the Judaizers, since they were fighting against the very freedom into which they had been called. Some difficulty about the meaning and reference of  seems to have suggested the alteration into , as in F, G, and in Chrysostom. The  expresses the object or design of the verb-called that you might be free. 1Th 4:7; Eph 2:10; Xenophon, Anab. 7.6, 3; Winer,  48, c; Jelf, 634, 3. It is the state for which, or for the permanent enjoyment of which, they had been called. To a state of liberty, permanent and unvarying, had they been summoned-freedom from that legal yoke under which the reactionists would bind them, and from which they had been delivered so wholly that they were under no obligation to conform either occasionally or partially, for such conformity impaired the breadth and fulness of their liberty. Law and its bondage were in direct antagonism to faith and its freedom. For , see under Gal 1:6, Eph 4:1. And he names them brethren, in affectionate counsel. Possibly  here was suggested by the previous phrase,   : the persuasion to bow to the servitude of the law did not come from Him who called them to freedom. But he adds the salutary caution- <\/p>\n<p>       -only turn not your liberty into an occasion for the flesh. The ellipse is emphatic in its conciseness. F, G supply  after ; and so Jerome and the Vulgate, detis. Meyer proposes , De Wette , and Hofmann . The want of a verb in similar cases with  is not uncommon. Winer,  64, 6; Mat 26:5; Sophocles, Antig. 577; Klotz-Devarius, 2.669; Hartung, 2.153. Some versions get out of the difficulty by recurring to the nominative. Thus the Syriac-Only let not your liberty be for an occasion to the flesh; and similarly Tyndale and the Genevan. The noun  signifies in martial phrase, a base of operations, as in Thucydides, 1:90; then a starting-point, an occasion or opportunity-with  to take it, or with  to afford it. The dative  is that of dativus commodi-the flesh taking advantage of the occasion. Rom 7:8; Rom 7:11; 2Co 5:12; 2Co 11:12; 1Ti 5:14. The  is man&#8217;s unrenewed nature,-not simply his corporeal organism with its passions and appetites, but his whole nature ethically viewed as under the dominion of sin-sense and selfishness. See under Gal 5:19, and under Eph 2:3. See also Wieseler&#8217;s long note. They had been exhorted to stand fast in the liberty, but they are specially cautioned not to abuse it. They were to be on their guard against antinomian licentiousness; for, though they were not under the law as a means of justification, they were still under it as their rule of life. The probable reference, as the succeeding context hints, is to whatever is opposed to the mutual service of love enjoined in the next clause,-perhaps that selfishness and self-importance which some among them seem to have cherished,-and to their contemptuous disregard for such as had not arrived at their cherished independence. The making freedom an occasion for the flesh is an extravagance which has been often witnessed; as with the German Anabaptists in the peasant wars of the days of Luther, and among the Fifth Monarchy men of the English Puritans. In the quaint words of a recent Irish theologian, If the devil cannot stop the coach, he mounts the box and drives. Compare Romans 6, Jud 1:4. <\/p>\n<p>     -but by love be in bondage to, or be serving, one another. A different reading,    , is found in D, F, 31, in the Claromontane, Vulgate, Gothic, and Coptic versions; but it is evidently an emendation, or an attempt to express a contrast to . The article  emphasizes the love as possessed and manifested by them, and  points it out as the instrument of this mutual service. While there was , there was also to be ; not that of fear, as under the law, but that which springs from a faith working by love. Mutual service in their spiritual freedom was to be the result of mutual love, each serving and being served in turn,-a result which could not be obtained if they remained apart in cold and haughty isolation. Comp. Rom 16:8; Rom 16:22; 1Co 9:19; 1Pe 2:16; 2Pe 2:19. The law had occasioned no little disputation among them, was the source out of which had sprung those factious alienations; and yet what is the spirit of that very law? Is it not as follows? <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Greek Text of Galatians, Ephesians, Colossians and Phillipians<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Gal 5:13. From here to the close of the epistle Paul will make only a few references to the law, the main argument of the letter having been given a thorough treatment. Matters of interest to Christians in their personal lives will receive attention. This verse warns that the liberty of which Paul has said so much, must not be abused and made an occasion to gratify the desires of the flesh. Serve one another is said in the sense of rendering loving service to each other in the work of Christ.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Gal 5:13. For ye were called unto freedom, brethren. The word for justifies the indignant scorn of the preceding verse. Unto denotes the object of the Christian calling.<\/p>\n<p>Only (turn) not your freedom into in occasion (or, opportunity) for the flesh. A sudden check: freedom, but not license. True freedom is self-government and inseparable from law; it is a law to itself. How often has the word freedom been abused and perverted into its diabolical caricature! So also the truly Christian ideas of equality and fraternity. Gentile churches, like that of Corinth, were especially liable to the abuse of freedom and sensual excesses. The verb turn or make or use must be supplied (as often in animated passages of the classical writers). An occasion, a starting-point, an Opportunity (comp. Rom 8:8; Rom 8:11; 2Co 5:12; 2Co 11:12; 1Ti 5:14).<\/p>\n<p>But by love serve one another. By faith we are lords, by love we are servants of all. Show your freedom by love, and your love by service. This kind of bondage is honorable and delightful. To serve God is true freedom (Augustine).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Our apostle having finished the former part of the chapter, which contains an exhortation to stand fast in that liberty which Christ had purchased for them; he now enters upon the second part of it, namely, to caution them against abusing of their Christian liberty, and by no means to apprehend or suppose as if they were thereby freed from all obligation to serve God or man, in the duties particularly required of them. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Brethren, says he, ye are called unto liberty, that is, to the enjoyment of evangelical liberty, which consists in a freedom from the obligation of the ceremonial law, and the curse of the moral law: use it then so as not to abuse it; use it neither to sin nor scandal; not to sin, to allow yourselves the least liberty in indulging any carnal lust, or sinful affection, nor yet to scandalize the weak, who at present scruple the forsaking of circumcision, and the rest of the ceremonial rites; Use not your liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but in love serve one another.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Learn hence, 1. That our liberty and freedom, purchased for us by Christ, doth not dissolve any tie or obligation which we lie under either to God or man; the yoke of duty is very consistent with our Christian liberty.<\/p>\n<p>Learn, 2. That one of the great occasions of the sins we commit in the course of our lives, is the too free use of our Christian liberty: the using our liberty to the utmost pitch and extent of that which we call lawful, is the occasion of our running into that which is certainly sinful. Religion most certainly allows us all reasonable liberty in the gratification of our natural appetites and passions; but all excesses and immoderate liberties are forbidden by religion. And accordingly one good rule for securing ourselves from falling into sin, in the using our Christian liberty, is this, namely, that in matters of duty, we should rather take too little of our liberty than too much.<\/p>\n<p>For instance, prayer and almsgiving are indispensible duties; but how oft we should pray, and how much we should give, is not positively declared; in this case to pray very frequently, and to give alms very liberally and largely, is our wisdom and duty; no damage will come by doing too much, but both damage and danger will accrue by doing too little.<\/p>\n<p>Learn, 3. That it is not sufficient, in order to the right use of our Christian liberty, that we do not from thence take occasion to sin ourselves;: but we ought to take care, lest by any indiscreet use of our own liberty, we give offence, and minister occasion of sin and stumbling unto others. This truth is implied in the second injunction, By love serve one another.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Gal 5:13-15. Ye have been called  By the gospel; into liberty  From the bondage of the Mosaic ceremonies, as well as of sin and misery: only use not liberty for an occasion of the flesh  So as to nourish or gratify any corrupt principle in yourselves or others. But by love serve one another  Use your liberty as may best manifest your love to your neighbour, seeking his edification, or at least doing nothing contrary thereto, Rom 14:13; Rom 14:15. And hereby show that Christ has made you free indeed. For all the law  With which we believers in Christ have any concern; is fulfilled in one word  Or precept; even in this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself  Inasmuch as none can do this without loving God, (1Jn 4:12,) and the love of God and man includes all perfection. But if  On the contrary, from your zeal for, or your zeal against, the Mosaic ceremonies, and in consequence of the divisions which those troublers have occasioned among you; ye bite and devour one another  By evil speaking, railing, and clamour; take heed that ye be not consumed one of another  That your divisions do not end in the total destruction of religion among you, and the entire ruin of your church: for it is certain, by these mutual contentions, you take the readiest way to produce these effects. By bitterness, strife, and contention, mens health and strength, both of body and soul, are consumed, as well as their substance and reputation.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>For ye, brethren, were called for freedom; only use not your freedom for an occasion to the flesh, but through love be servants one to another. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Gal 5:13 to Gal 6:10. Practical appendix to the epistle; in the form of guarding the doctrine of free grace against antinomian abuse.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Peake&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Verse 13 <\/p>\n<p>For an occasion to the flesh; for the indulgence of sinful propensities.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Abbott&#8217;s Illustrated New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only [use] not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. <\/p>\n<p>There are three items of truth here. We are free, but we are not to use the freedom to sin; rather we should serve one another. <\/p>\n<p>Now, that &#8220;serve one another&#8221; is a phrase that is a study of its own. If you want an introduction to the thought look for &#8220;one another&#8221; in my writings (In the book Notes On Lots of Other Things). Or better yet, just study it yourself, the New Testament speaks of many things that we are to do for one another &#8211; take time to study this important topic. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Mr. D&#8217;s Notes on Selected New Testament Books by Stanley Derickson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>5:13 For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; {12} only [use] not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.<\/p>\n<p>(12) The third part of this epistle, showing that the right use of Christian liberty consists of this, that being delivered and set at liberty from the slavery of sin and the flesh, and being obedient to the Spirit, we should through love help each other to mature in their salvation.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline\">2. Living without license 5:13-15<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Paul urged his readers to live unbound to the Law of Moses (Gal 5:1-12). He also warned them against using their liberty as a license to sin to prevent them from overreacting.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Christian freedom is not licence [<span style=\"font-style:italic\">sic<\/span>] for the simple but tremendous reason that the Christian is not the man who has become free to sin, but the man, who, by the grace of God, has become free <span style=\"font-style:italic\">not to sin<\/span>.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Barclay, p. 50.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&quot;The theme of love .&nbsp;.&nbsp;. informs all of Paul&rsquo;s exhortations vis-&agrave;-vis the Galatians&rsquo; libertine tendencies .&nbsp;.&nbsp;.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Yet undergirding all of Paul&rsquo;s admonitions regarding love and service is the reality of life lived &rsquo;by the Spirit,&rsquo; with references to the Spirit being more frequent in Gal 5:13 to Gal 6:10 than references to either love or service.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Longenecker, p. 236.] <\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>The &quot;flesh&quot; is the sinful human nature that every person, saved and unsaved, possesses. It is possible to conclude that since it is unnecessary to keep the Law to be saved, it is unnecessary to pay attention to the Law for any reason. However, Paul was not urging his converts to burn their Old Testaments. The Law has values, as he previously pointed out, one of which is to reveal how to express love for God and other people. Really the whole Law is a revelation of how to love (Lev 19:18; cf. Mar 12:28-31). Under grace we are free to fulfill the Law by loving one another. For the Christian the Mosaic Law has <span style=\"font-style:italic\">revelatory<\/span> value (2Ti 3:16-17) even though it does not have <span style=\"font-style:italic\">regulatory<\/span> value, controlling our behavior.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: See J. Dwight Pentecost, &quot;The Purpose of the Law,&quot; Bibliotheca Sacra 128:511 (July-September 1971):227-33.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p>If his readers insisted on living in slavery, Paul wished they would enslave themselves to love of one another. If they wanted to live under law, let it be the law of Christ (Gal 6:2) impelled by the indwelling Spirit rather than by an external code. There is no external entity that can enable us to love our neighbors as ourselves, but the Holy Spirit can produce that love within us.<\/p>\n<p>In what sense does Lev 19:18 fulfill the whole Mosaic Law?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left:36pt\">&quot;There is a play on two meanings of the Greek word <span style=\"font-style:italic\">peplerotai<\/span>, translated &rsquo;summed up&rsquo; [NIV, or fulfilled, NASB]. On the one hand, it refers to the fact that the law can aptly be summarized by the words of Lev 19:18. This idea was a commonplace of rabbinic opinion and Jesus endorsed it in Mat 22:39 and Luk 10:25-28. On the other hand, the word can also mean &rsquo;fulfilled&rsquo; (as in Rom 13:8), and in this sense Paul is suggesting that it is actually out of the new life of love made possible within the Christian community through the Spirit that the law finds fulfillment.&quot;<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Boice, p. 493.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left:36pt\">&quot;. . . the primary meaning is not that we must properly love ourselves before we can love others (although this is true in itself), but that we are to love our neighbor with the same spontaneity and alacrity with which we love ourselves.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Fung, p. 246. Cf. Ridderbos, pp. 201-2.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p>Paul wrote, &quot;no one ever hated his own flesh but nourishes and cherishes it&quot; (Eph 5:29). By this he meant that it is not normal behavior to hate oneself but to love oneself. We only hate ourselves because bad experiences or influences have that effect on us.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Chapter 22<\/p>\n<p>THE PERILS OF LIBERTY.<\/p>\n<p>Gal 5:13-15<\/p>\n<p>OUR analysis has drawn a strong line across the middle of this chapter. At Gal 5:13 the Apostle turns his mind in the ethical direction. He has dismissed &#8220;the troublers&#8221; with contempt in Gal 5:12; and until the close of the Epistle does not mention them again; he addresses his readers on topics in which they are left out of view. But this third, ethical section of the letter is still continuous with its polemical and doctrinal argument.<\/p>\n<p>It applies the maxim of Gal 5:6, &#8220;Faith works through love&#8221;; it reminds the Galatians how they had &#8220;received the Spirit of God&#8221;. {Gal 3:2-3; Gal 4:6} The rancours and jealousies opposed to love, the carnal mind that resists the Spirit-these are the objects of Pauls dehortations. The moral disorders which the Apostle seeks to correct arose largely out of the mischief caused by the Judaisers. And his exhortations to love and good works are themselves indirectly polemical. They vindicate Pauls gospel from the charge of antinomianism, while they guard Christians from giving occasion to the charge. They protect from exaggeration and abuse the liberty already defended from legalistic encroachments. The more precious and sacred is the freedom of Gentile believers, the more on the one hand do those deserve punishment who would defraud them of it; and the more earnestly must they on their part guard this treasure from misuse and dishonour. In this sense Gal 5:13 a stands between the sentence against the Circumcisionists in Gal 5:12 and the appeal to the Galatians that follows. It repeats the proclamation of freedom made in ver. I, making it the ground at once of the judgment pronounced against the foes of freedom and the admonition addressed to its possessors. &#8220;For you were called (summoned by God to enter the kingdom of His Son) with a view to liberty- not to legal bondage; nor, on the other hand, that you might run into license and give the reins to self-will and appetite-not liberty for an occasion to the flesh.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>1. Here lies the danger of liberty, especially when conferred on a young, untrained nature, and in a newly emancipated community.<\/p>\n<p>Freedom is a priceless boon; but it is a grave responsibility. It has its temptations, as well as its joys and dignities. The Apostle has spoken at length of the latter: it is the former that he has now to urge. Keep your liberties, he seems to say; for Christs sake and for truths sake hold them fast, guard them well. You are Gods regenerated sons. Never forego your high calling. God is on your side, and those who assail you shall feel the weight of His displeasure. Yes, &#8220;stand fast&#8221; in. the liberty wherewith &#8220;Christ made you free.&#8221; But take care how you employ your freedom; &#8220;only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh.&#8221; This significant only turns the other side of the medal, and bids us read the legend on its reverse front. On the obverse we have found it written, &#8220;The Lord knoweth them that are His.&#8221; {2Ti 2:19; comp. Gal 4:6; Gal 4:9} This is the side of privilege and of grace, the spiritual side of the Christian life. On the reverse it bears the motto, &#8220;Let every one that nameth the name of the Lord depart from iniquity.&#8221; This is the second, the ethical side of our calling, the side of duty, to which we have now to turn.<\/p>\n<p>The man, or the nation that has won its freedom, has won but half the battle. It has conquered external foes; it has still to prevail over itself. And this is the harder task. Men clamour for liberty, when they mean license; what they seek is the liberty of the flesh, not of the Spirit, freedom to indulge their lusts and to trample on the rights of others, the freedom of outlaws and brigands. The natural man defines freedom as the power to do as he likes; not the right of self-regulation, but the absence of regulation is what he desires. And this is just what the Spirit of God will never allow (Gal 5:17). When such a man has thrown off outward constraint and the dread of punishment, there is no inward law to take its place. It is his greed, his passion, his pride and ambition that call for freedom; not his conscience. And to all such libertarians our Saviour says, &#8220;He that committeth sin is the slave of sin.&#8221; No tyrant is so vile, so insatiable as our own self-indulged sin. A pitiable triumph, for a man to have secured his religious liberty only to become the thrall of his vices!<\/p>\n<p>It is possible that some men accepted the gospel under the delusion that it afforded a shelter for sin. The sensualist, deterred from his indulgences by fear of the Law, joined in Pauls campaign against it, imagining that Grace would give him larger freedom. If &#8220;where sin abounded grace did super abound,&#8221; he would say in his heart, Why not sin the more, so that grace might have a greater victory? This is no fanciful inference. Hypocrisy has learned to wear the garb of evangelical zeal; and teachers of the gospel have not always guarded sufficiently against this shocking perversion. Even the man whose heart has been truly touched and changed by Divine grace, when the freshness of his first love to Christ has passed away and temptation renews its assaults, is liable to this deception. He may begin to think that sin is less perilous, since forgiveness was so easily obtained. He may presume that as a son of God, sealed by the Spirit of adoption, he will not be allowed to fall, even though he stumble. He is one of &#8220;Gods elect&#8221;; what &#8220;shall separate him&#8221; from the Divine love in Christ? In this assurance he holds a talisman that secures his safety. What need to &#8220;watch and pray lest he enter into temptation,&#8221; when the Lord is his keeper? He is Gods enfranchised son; &#8220;all things are lawful&#8221; to him; &#8220;things present&#8221; as well as &#8220;things to come&#8221; are his in Christ. By such reasonings his liberty is turned into an occasion to the flesh. And men who before they boasted themselves sons of God were restrained by the spirit of bondage and fear, have found in this assurance the occasion, the &#8220;starting-point&#8221; () for a more shameless course of evil.<\/p>\n<p>In the view of Legalism, this is the natural outcome of Pauline teaching. From the first it has been charged with fostering lawlessness. In the Lutheran Reformation Rome pointed to the Antinomians, and moralists of our own day speak of &#8220;canting Evangelicals,&#8221; just as the Judaists alleged the existence of immoral Paulinists, whose conduct, they declared, was the proper fruit of the preaching of emancipation from the Law. These, they would say to the Apostle, are your spiritual children; they do but carry your doctrine to its legitimate issue. This reproach the gospel has always had to bear; there have been those, alas! amongst its professors whose behaviour has given it plausibility. Sensualists will &#8220;turn the grace of our God into lasciviousness&#8221;; swine will trample under their feet the pure pearls of the gospel. But they are pure and precious none the less.<\/p>\n<p>This possibility is, however, a reason for the utmost watchfulness in those who are stewards in the administration of the gospel. They must be careful, like Paul, to make it abundantly clear that they &#8220;establish&#8221; and do not &#8220;make void law through faith&#8221;. {Rom 3:31} There is an evangelical Ethics, as well as an evangelical Dogmatics. The ethics of the Gospel have been too little studied and applied. Hence much of the confessed failure of evangelical Churches in preserving and building up the converts that they win.<\/p>\n<p>2. Faith in Christ gives in truth a new efficacy to the moral law. For it works through love; and love fulfils all laws in one (Gal 5:13-14). Where faith has this operation, liberty is safe; not otherwise. Loves slaves are the true freemen.<\/p>\n<p>The legalist practically takes the same view of human nature as the sensualist. He knows nothing of &#8220;the desire of the Spirit&#8221; arrayed against that of the flesh (Gal 5:17) nothing of the mastery over the heart that belongs to the love of Christ. In his analysis the soul consists of so many desires, each blindly seeking its own gratification, which must be drilled into order under external pressure, by an intelligent application of law. Modern Utilitarians agree with the ancient Judaists in their ethical philosophy. Fear of punishment, hope of reward, the influence of the social environment-these are, as they hold, the factors which create character and shape our moral being. &#8220;Pain and pleasure,&#8221; they tell us, &#8220;are the masters of human life.&#8221; Without the faith that man is the child of God, formed in His image, we are practically shut up to this suicidal theory of morals. Suicidal we say, for it robs our spiritual being of everything distinctive in it, of all that raises the moral above the natural; it makes duty and personality illusions.<\/p>\n<p>Judaism is a proof that this scheme of life is impracticable. For the Pharisaic system which produced such deplorable moral results was an experiment in external ethics. It was in fact the application of a highly developed and elaborate traditional code of law, enforced by the strongest outward sanctions, without personal loyalty to the Divine Lawgiver. In the national conscience of the Jews this was wanting. Their faith in God, as the Epistle of James declares, was a &#8220;dead&#8221; faith, a bundle of abstract notions. Loyalty is true law-keeping. And loyalty springs from the personal relationship of the subject and the law-making power. This nexus Christian sonship supplies, in its purest and most exalted form. When I see in the Lawgiver my Almighty Father, when the law has become incarnate in the person of my Saviour, my hearts King and, Lord, it wears a changed aspect. &#8220;His commandments are not grievous.&#8221; Duty, required by Him, is honour and delight. No abstract law, no &#8220;stream of tendency&#8221; can command the homage or awaken the moral energy that is inspired by &#8220;the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Here the Apostle traverses antinomian deductions from his doctrine of liberty. In the Epistle to the Romans (6) he deals at length with the theoretical objection to his teaching on this subject. He shows there that salvation by faith, rightly understood and experienced, renders continuance in sin impossible. For faith in Christ is in effect the union of the soul with Christ, first in His death, and then consequently in His risen life, wherein He lives only &#8220;to God.&#8221; Nay, Christ Himself lives in the believing man. {Gal 2:20} Instead of our sinning &#8220;because we are not under the law, but under grace,&#8221; this is precisely the reason why we need not and must not sin. Faith joins us to the risen Christ, whose life we share-so Paul argues-and we should not sin any more than He. Here, from the practical standpoint, he lays it down that faith works by love; and love casts out sin, for it unites all laws in itself. Faith links us to Christ in heaven (Romans); faith fills us with His love on earth (Galatians). So love, marked out in Gal 5:6 as the energy of faith, now serves as the guard of liberty. Neither legalist nor lawbreaker understands the meaning of faith in Christ.<\/p>\n<p>At this point Paul throws in one of his bold paradoxes. He has been contending all through the Epistle for freedom, bidding his readers scorn the legal yoke, breathing into them his own contempt for the pettiness of Judaistic ceremonial. But now he turns round suddenly and bids them be slaves: &#8220;but let love,&#8221; be says, &#8220;make you bondmen to each other&#8221; (Gal 5:13). Instead of breaking bonds, he seeks to create stronger bonds, stronger because dearer, Paul preaches no gospel of individualism, of egotistic salvation seeking. The self-sacrifice of Christ becomes in turn a principle of sacrifice in those who receive it. Pauls own ideal is, to be &#8220;conformed to His death&#8221;. {Php 3:10} There is nothing anarchic or self-asserting in his plea for freedom. He opposes the law of Pharisaic externalism in the interests of the law of Christian love. The yoke of Judaism must be broken, its bonds east aside, in order to give free play to &#8220;the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus.&#8221; Faith transfers authority from flesh to spirit, giving it a surer seat, a more effective, and in reality more lawful command over mans nature. It restores the normal equipoise of the soul. Now the Divine law is written on &#8220;the tablets of the heart&#8221;; and this makes it far more sovereign than when engraved on the stone slabs of Sinai. Love and law for the believer in Christ are fused into one. In this union law loses nothing of its holy severity; and love nothing of its tenderness. United they constitute the Christian sense of duty, whose sternest exactions are enforced by gratitude and devotion.<\/p>\n<p>And love is ever conqueror. To it toil and endurance that mock the achievement of other powers, are a light thing. Needing neither bribe nor threat, love labours, waits, braves a thousand dangers, keeps the hands busy, the eye keen and watchful, the feet running to and fro un-tired through the longest day. There is no industry, no ingenuity like that of love. Love makes the mother the slave of the babe at her breast, and wins from the friend for his friend service that no compulsion could exact, rendered in pure gladness and free-will. Its power alone calls forth what is best and strongest in us all. Love is mightier than death. In Jesus Christ love has &#8220;laid down life for its friends&#8221;; the fulness of life has encountered and overcome the uttermost of death. Love esteems it bondage to be prevented, liberty only to be allowed to serve.<\/p>\n<p>Without love freedom is an empty boon. It brings no ease, no joy of heart. It is objectless and listless. Bereft of faith and love, though possessing the most perfect independence, the soul drifts along like a ship rudderless and masterless, with neither haven nor horizon. Wordsworth, in his &#8220;Ode to Duty&#8221; has finely expressed the weariness that comes of such liberty, unguided by an inward law and a Divine ideal:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Me this unchartered freedom tires; I feel the weight of chance desires; My hopes no more must change their name; I long for a repose that ever is the same.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But on the other hand,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Serene will be our days and bright, And happy will our nature be, When love is an unerring light And joy its own security.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This &#8220;royal law&#8221; {Jam 2:8} blends with its sovereignty of power the charm of simplicity. &#8220;The whole law,&#8221; says the Apostle, &#8220;hath been fulfilled in one word-Love&#8221; (Gal 5:14). The Master said, &#8220;I came not to destroy the law, but to fulfil.&#8221; The key to His fulfilment was given in the declaration of the twofold command of love to God and to our neighbour. &#8220;On these two hang all the law and the prophets.&#8221; Hence the Apostles phrase, &#8220;hath been fulfilled.&#8221; This unification of the moral code is accomplished. Christs life and death have given to this truth full expression and universal currency. Loves fulfilment of law stands before us a positive attainment, an incontestable fact. Paul does not speak here as Rom 13:9, of the comprehending, the &#8220;summing up&#8221; of all laws in one; but of the bringing of law to its completion, its realisation and consummation in the love of Christ. &#8220;O how I love Thy law,&#8221; said the purer spirit of the Old Testament. &#8220;Thy love is my law,&#8221; says the true spirit of the New.<\/p>\n<p>It is remarkable that this supreme principle of Christian ethics is first enunciated in the most legal part of the Old Testament. Leviticus is the Book of the Priestly Legislation. It is chiefly occupied with ceremonial and civil regulations. Yet in the midst of the legal minutiae is set this sublime and simple rule, than which Jesus Christ could prescribe nothing more Divine: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. {Lev 19:18} This sentence is the conclusion of a series of directions (Lev 19:9-18) forbidding unneighbourly conduct, each of them sealed with the declaration, &#8220;I am Jehovah.&#8221; This brief code of brotherly love breathes a truly Christian spirit; it is a beautiful expression of &#8220;the law of kindness&#8221; that is on the lips and in the heart of the child of God. We find in the law book of Mosaism, side by side with elaborate rules of sacrificial ritual and the homeliest details touching the life Of a rude agricultural people, conceptions of God and of duty of surpassing loftiness and purity, such as meet us in the religion of no other ancient nation.<\/p>\n<p>The law, therefore, opposed and cast out in the name of faith, is brought in again under the shield of love. &#8220;If ye love Me,&#8221; said Jesus, &#8220;keep my commandments.&#8221; Love reconciles law and faith. Law by itself can but prohibit this and that injury to ones neighbour, when they are likely to arise. Love excludes the doing of any injury; it &#8220;worketh no ill to its neighbour, therefore love is the fulfilling of the law&#8221;. {Rom 13:10} That which law restrains or condemns after the fact, love renders impossible beforehand. It is not content with the negative prevention of wrong; it &#8220;overcomes&#8221; and displaces &#8220;evil with good.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;What law could not do,&#8221; with all its multiplied enactments and redoubled threats, faith &#8220;working by love&#8221; has accomplished at a stroke. &#8220;The righteousness of the law is fulfilled in those who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit&#8221;. {Rom 8:3-4} Gentile Christians have been raised to the level of a righteousness &#8220;exceeding that of scribes and pharisees&#8221;. {Mat 5:20} The flesh, which defied laws terrors and evaded its control, is subdued by the love of Christ. Law created the need of salvation; it defined its conditions and the direction which it must take. But there its power ceased. It could not change the sinful heart. It supplied no motive adequate to secure obedience. The moralist errs in substituting duty for love, works for faith. He would make the rule furnish the motive, the path supply strength to walk in it. The distinction of the gospel is that it is &#8220;the power of God unto salvation,&#8221; while the law is &#8220;weak through the flesh.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Paul does not therefore override the law in the interest of faith. Quite the contrary, he establishes, he magnifies it. His theology rests on the idea of Righteousness, which is strictly a legal conception. But he puts the law in its proper place. He secures for it the alliance of love. The legalist, desiring to exalt law, in reality stultifies it. Striving to make it omnipotent, he makes it impotent. In the Apostles teaching, law is the rule, faith the spring of action. Law makes the path, love gives the will and power to follow it. Who then are the truest friends of law-Legalists or Paulinists, moralists or evangelicals?<\/p>\n<p>3. Alas, the Galatians at the present moment afford a spectacle far different from the ideal which Paul has drawn. Instead of &#8220;serving each other in love,&#8221; they are &#8220;biting and devouring one another.&#8221; The Church is in danger of being &#8220;consumed&#8221; by their jealousies and quarrels (Gal 5:15).<\/p>\n<p>These Asiatic Gauls were men of a warm temperament, quick to resent wrong and prone to imagine it. The dissensions excited by the Judaic controversy had excited their combative temper to an unusual degree. &#8220;Biting&#8221; describes the wounding and exasperating effect of the manner in which their contentions were carried on; &#8220;devour&#8221; warns them of its destructiveness. Taunts were hurled across the field of debate; vituperation supplied the lack of argument. Differences of opinion engendered private feuds and rankling injuries. In Corinth the spirit of discord had taken a factious form. It arrayed men in conflicting parties, with their distinctive watchwords and badges and sectional platforms. In these Churches it bore fruit in personal affronts and quarrels, in an angry, vindictive temper, which spreads through the Galatian societies and broke Out in every possible form of contention. {Gal 5:20}<\/p>\n<p>If this state of things continued, the Churches of Galatia would cease to exist. Their liberty would end in complete disintegration.<\/p>\n<p>Like some other communities, the Galatian Christians were oscillating between despotism and anarchy; they had not attained the equilibrium of a sober, ordered liberty, the freedom of a manly self-control. They had not sufficient respect either for their own or for each others rights. Some men must be bridled or they will &#8220;bite&#8221;; they must wear the yoke or they run wild. They are incapable of being a law unto themselves. They had not faith enough to make them stedfast, nor love enough to be an inward guide, nor the Spirit of God in measure sufficient to overcome the vanity and self-indulgence of the flesh. But the Apostle still hopes to see his Galatian disciples worthy of their calling as sons of God. He points out to them the narrow but sure path that leads between the desert of legalism on the one hand, and the gulf of anarchy and license on the other.<\/p>\n<p>The problem of the nature and conditions of Christian liberty occupies the Apostles mind in different ways in all the letters of this period. The young Churches of the Gentiles were in the gravest peril. They had come out of Egypt to enter the Promised Land, the heritage of the sons of God. The Judaists sought to turn them aside into the Sinaitic wilderness of Mosaism; while their old habits and associations powerfully tended to draw them back into heathen immorality. Legalism and license were the Scylla and Charybdis on either hand, between which it needed the most firm and skilful pilotage to steer the bark of the Church. The helm of the vessel is in Pauls hands. And, through the grace of God, he did not fail in his task. It is in the love of Christ that the Apostle found his guiding light. &#8220;Love,&#8221; he has written, &#8220;never faileth.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Love is the handmaid of faith, and the firstborn fruit of the Spirit of Christ (Gal 5:6; Gal 5:22). Blending with the law, love refashions it, changing it into its own image. Thus moulded and transfigured, law is no longer an exterior yoke, a system of restraint and penalty; it becomes an inner, sweet constraint. Upon the child of God it acts as an organic and formative energy, the principle of his regenerated being, which charges with its renovating influence all the springs of life. Evil is met no longer by a merely outward opposition, but by a repugnance proceeding from within. &#8220;The Spirit lusteth against the flesh&#8221;. {Gal 5:17} The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus becomes the law of the mans new nature. God known and loved in Christ is the central object of his life. Within the Divine kingdom so created, the realm of love and of the Spirit, the soul henceforth dwells; and under that kingdom it places for itself all other souls, loved like itself in Christ.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only [use] not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. 13 15. Liberty must not be abused 13. St Paul seems to be recurring to what he had said in Gal 5:7, the intermediate verses being a sort of parenthesis in &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-galatians-513\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Galatians 5:13&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29116"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29116\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}