{"id":29151,"date":"2022-09-24T13:09:07","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T18:09:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-ephesians-16\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T13:09:07","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T18:09:07","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-ephesians-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-ephesians-16\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Ephesians 1:6"},"content":{"rendered":"

To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n

6<\/strong>. To the praise<\/em>, &c.] I. e., that the grace<\/em> of Redemption might be adored and praised<\/em> in respect of that glory<\/em> of God which is the harmony of His attributes, His Character. See Rom 3:23<\/span> and note in this Series. Possibly, but far less probably, the meaning is “that praise may be rendered for the (coming) glory given by<\/em> His grace.”<\/p>\n

wherein he hath made us<\/em>, &c.] The tense is aorist; so that if the A.V. is otherwise retained it should be modified wherein He made<\/strong>, &c. But the rendering of the Greek verb is a question. It is a very rare verb, and occurs elsewhere (in N. T.) only Luk 1:28<\/span> (A. V. “highly favoured”). Analogy of verb-forms suggests the meaning “to make gracious<\/em>,” “to make<\/em> ( us<\/em>) recipients of grace<\/em>,” and as the “grace” specially in view here is that of adoption and acceptance<\/em> in Christ, the A. V. would thus be very nearly in point, though rather as a paraphrase than as a translation. R. V., “which He freely bestowed on us;” margin, “wherewith He endued us.”<\/p>\n

in the beloved<\/em> ] of the Father. This designation of the Son (cp. Isa 42:1<\/span>; Mat 3:17<\/span>; Mat 17:5<\/span>; Mar 12:6<\/span>; Joh 1:18<\/span>; Joh 17:24<\/span>; Col 1:3<\/span>, where lit. “the Son of His love;” &c.) is specially appropriate here, where the greatness and graciousness of salvation is in view. Cp. Rom 8:32<\/span>. “The Son, loveable in Himself, is essentially The Beloved;<\/em> we, unloveable in ourselves, are accepted because of, and in, the Beloved; and if we are called beloved<\/em> in our turn (ch. Eph 5:1<\/span>, &c.), it is because God sees us in His Son” (Adolphe Monod [30] ).<\/p>\n

[30] Explication de l’ ptre aux Ephsiens<\/em> (Paris, 1867); a book often referred to in these notes.<\/p>\n

redemption<\/em> ] Lit., “ the redemption<\/em>.” The Greek article (often refusing transference into English idiom) is here probably to be represented by our redemption<\/strong>, as R. V. “ Redemption:<\/em> ” this word and its Greek equivalent point by derivation to the idea of rescue by ransom<\/em>, whatever the ransom may be. This meaning in usage often vanishes, or at least retires, as where in O. T. a deliverance by mere force is called a redemption (Exo 6:6<\/span>, &c.). But it is always ready to assert itself as the native meaning, and certainly so here, close to the mention of the Redeemer’s blood<\/em>. Cp. esp. Rom 8:24-25<\/span>; and for illustration see Mat 20:28<\/span>; Heb 9:15<\/span>; 1Pe 1:18-19<\/span>.<\/p>\n

The order of thought at this point descends from the pre-mundane Covenant to the actual Work of Redemption; the accomplished deliverance of the saints through the Death of Christ.<\/p>\n

through his blood<\/em> ] I. e. through, by means of, His Death<\/em>, viewed as the ransom-price. Cp. for the supremely important thought, Mat 26:28<\/span>; Act 20:28<\/span>; Rom 3:25<\/span>; Rom 5:9<\/span>; Hebrews 9<\/span> passim;<\/em> 1Pe 1:18-19<\/span>; Rev 5:9<\/span>, &c.<\/p>\n

We are now (see last note) on the level of the actual state and needs of the persons contemplated in Eph 1:3<\/span>, &c. They are found to need redemption<\/em>, rescue by ransom, and the ransom must be death<\/em>. In other words, their lives are forfeit<\/em>, for they are sinners; and a sacrificial Death is needed, and is provided. On this great subject it is enough here to say that a careful review of N. T. passages under the word Blood<\/em> will shew that the prevalent and leading<\/em> ideas associated with it, in religious connexions, are expiation of guilt, ransom of person, and ratification of covenant. In all these can be traced the uniting idea of forfeiture of life as the due of sin. Cp. further the great range of passages, in both O. T. and N. T., where the Death of Christ (apart from the special phrase “His Blood<\/em> ”), is seen in prophecy, history, or doctrine, as not one great Incident of His redeeming Work, but its absolute Essential.<\/p>\n

the forgiveness of sins<\/em> ] Lit., of the<\/strong> ( our<\/strong>) trespasses<\/strong>. See last note but one. Observe this account of Redemption; it is Forgiveness, Remission. Not that it does not involve immensely more, both for soul (Tit 2:14<\/span>) and body (Rom 8:3<\/span>); but all else is so inseparably bound up with Forgiveness as its sine qu non<\/em>, (a fact which gives a colour of its own to all the rest,) that the whole<\/em> is often practically identified with this great part<\/em>. For illustration of this primary position of Forgiveness, cp. Mat 26:28<\/span>; Luk 1:77<\/span>; Luk 24:47<\/span>; Act 2:38<\/span>; Act 5:31<\/span>; Act 10:43<\/span>; Act 13:38<\/span>; Act 26:18<\/span>; Col 1:14<\/span>. “ Sins:<\/em> ” better, trespasses<\/strong>, as above. The original word, by derivation, means “a falling out” of the way, or the like; and is occasionally used for sin or fault in its lighter aspects. But this cannot be pressed; and very often, as here, the reference is to all kinds and degrees of sins, which are all “fallings out” of the straight line of the will of God. For this deep and universal reference of the word cp. Rom 4:25<\/span>; 2Co 5:19<\/span>; Col 2:13<\/span>. In Heb 6:6<\/span> the cognate verb is used to indicate very grievous sin, as apostasy. See further on Eph 2:1<\/span> below.<\/p>\n

the riches of his grace<\/em> ] “Riches” is a frequent idea with St Paul, in reference to Divine grace and gifts. Cp. Eph 1:18<\/span>, Eph 2:4<\/span>; Eph 2:7<\/span>, Eph 3:8<\/span>; Eph 3:16<\/span>; Rom 2:4<\/span>; Rom 9:23<\/span>; Rom 10:12<\/span>; Rom 11:12<\/span>; Rom 11:33<\/span>; 1Co 1:5<\/span>; 2Co 8:9<\/span>; 2Co 9:11<\/span>; Php 4:19<\/span>; Col 1:27<\/span>; Col 2:2<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Observe in this verse the contrasted but harmonious aspects of the gift of Redemption: it flows from a Divine wealth of love and goodness; it flows through, not any channel, but the Death of Christ.<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

To the praise of the glory of his grace – <\/B>This is a Hebraism, and means the same as to his glorious grace. The object was to excite thanksgiving for his glorious grace manifested in electing love. The real tendency of the doctrine in minds that are properly affected, is not to excite opposition to God, or to lead to the charge of partiality, tyranny, or severity; it is to excite thankfulness and praise. In accordance with this, Paul introduced the statement Eph 1:3<\/span> by saying that God was to be regarded as blessed for forming and executing this plan. The meaning is, that the doctrine of predestination and election lays the foundation of adoring gratitude and praise. This will appear plain by a few considerations.<\/P>

(1) It is the only foundation of hope for man. If he were left to himself, all the race would reject, the offers of mercy and would perish. History, experience, and the Bible alike demonstrate this.<\/P>

(2) All the joys which any of the human race have, are to be traced to the purpose of God to bestow them. Man has no power of originating any of them, and if God had not intended to confer them, none of them would have been possessed.<\/P>

(3) All these favors are conferred on those who had no claim on God. The Christian who is pardoned had no claim on God for pardon; he who is admitted to heaven could urge no claim for such a privilege and honor; he who enjoys comfort and peace in the hour of death, enjoys it only through the glorious grace of God.<\/P>

(4) all that is done by election is suited to excite praise. Election is to life, and pardon, and holiness, and heaven. But why should not a man praise God for these things? God chooses people to be holy, not sinful; to be happy, not miserable; to be pure, not impure; to be saved, not to be lost. For these things he should be praised. He should be praised that he has not left the whole race to wander away and die. Had he chosen but one to eternal life, that one should praise him, and all the holy universe should join in the praise. Should he now see it to be consistent to choose but one of the fallen spirits, and to make him pure, and to readmit him to heaven, that one spirit would have occasion for eternal thanks, and all heaven might join in his praises. How much more is praise due to him, when the number chosen is not one, or a few, but when millions which no man can number, shall be found to be chosen to life; Rev 7:9<\/span>.<\/P>

(5) The doctrine of predestination to life has added no pang of sorrow to anyone of the human race. It has made millions happy who would not otherwise have been, but not one miserable. It is not a choice to sorrow, it is a choice to joy and peace.<\/P>

(6) No one has a right to complain of it. Those who are chosen assuredly should not complain of the grace which has made them what they are, and which is the foundation of all their hopes. And they who are not chosen, have no right to complain; for,<\/P>

(a)They have no claim to life;<\/P>

(b)They are in fact unwilling to come.<\/P>

They have no desire to be Christians and to be saved. Nothing can induce them to forsake their sins and come to the Saviour.<\/P>

Why then should they complain if others are in fact willing to be saved? Why should a man complain for being left to take his own course, and to walk in his own way? Mysterious, therefore, as is the doctrine of predestination; and fearful and inscrutable as it is in some of its aspects, yet, in a just view of it, it is suited to excite the highest expressions of thanksgiving, and to exalt God in the apprehension of man. He who has been redeemed and saved by the love of God; who has been pardoned and made pure by mercy; on whom the eye of compassion has been tenderly fixed, and for whom the Son of God has died, has abundant cause for thanksgiving and praise.<\/P>

Wherein he hath made us accepted – <\/B>Has regarded us as the objects of favor and complacency.<\/P>

In the Beloved – <\/B>In the Lord Jesus Christ, the well-beloved Son of God; notes, Mat 3:17<\/span>. He has chosen us in him, and it is through him that these mercies have been conferred on us.<\/P><\/p>\n

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 1:6<\/span><\/p>\n

To the praise of the glory of His grace.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Gods glory in mans salvation<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>All that God did from eternity intend about man has no end but His own glory. The reason is plain. God, who is wisdom itself, cannot work without an end. A wise man will do nothing but to some purpose. Gods object in making all things must be better than all those things which are done to attain that object, for the end is better than that which serves for it, as the body is better than food, raiment, etc. But, except God Himself, there is nothing better than the works of God; nothing better than every creature, save the Creator Himself. If, then, He must needs have an end why He makes things, and this end must needs be better than the things made for it, and nothing is better than all the creatures save only their Creator, it follows that God must needs have Himself as His end in everything he does. Since this is so, let us in all things labour to yield Him glory; whatever we are, let us be that in Him, and through Him, and for Him.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>God generally intends the praise of His grace in all who are predestinated by Him. Let this stir us up to glorify Him in regard of His grace to us. Even as waters come from the sea, and return again to it, so from this Divine Ocean comes every blessing, and every benefit should, by praising this grace, be duly acknowledged with thankfulness.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>The attributes of God are His essential glory. This should make us endeavour to know the properties of God, and view as far as we may the reflection which we have in His word and works of such infinite glory.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>The grace which now works all good things for us, is the same which before all time purposed them to us.<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>The grace of God brings us to receive favour and grace in and through His Beloved. Christ has satisfied justice, so that grace may be freely bestowed upon us. (Paul Bayne.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The grace of God<\/strong><\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>In salvation as a whole we see the glory of Gods grace. The praise of the glory of His grace in rescuing man from the deep ruin into which he had fallen, in leading our captivity captive, in uplifting us into heaven, and giving us to be partakers of His glory through the merit of Jesus Christ our Lord–in all this grace is as glorious as was power at the Red Sea. No stinted thing then, no small matter, but something great and grand and glorious will that salvation be, which is to the praise of the glory of so great and favourite an attribute as the grace of God. I have tried if I could to think of what grace at its utmost must be; but who by searching can find out God? It is not possible for the human mind to conceive of power at its utmost. Pharaohs overthrow gives you but a guess at what the omnipotence of the Lord can accomplish, it can shake all worlds to dust, dissolve the universe, and annihilate creation. Power at its utmost, who shall compass it? And grace, my brethren, grace at its utmost! When all the chosen ones shall be gathered together, and the Church of God in heaven shall be perfect, not one living stone lacking of the entire fabric, then across that edifice shall this inscription be written in letters of light, To the praise of the glory of His grace. The work of salvation from first to last, as a whole, was devised and carried out, and shall be perfected to the praise of the glory of the grace of God.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>This is true of each detail of salvation. I gather that from the position of my text. The fifth verse speaks of predestination and adoption, and the sixth verse speaks of acceptance in the Beloved, and the position of my text puts all three of these under the same mark, they are all to the praise of the glory of His grace. Brethren, the sea is salt as a whole, and every drop of it is salt in its degree: if the whole work of salvation be of grace, every detail of that work is equally of grace. The rays of the sun as a whole possess certain properties, analyse one single sunbeam and you shall find all those properties there. I have just now said that the whole of salvation might be resembled to a great temple, and that across its front would be written, To the praise of the glory of His grace; now, some of the ancient Eastern buildings were erected by certain monarchs, and were dedicated to them, and not only was the whole pile set up to their honour, but each separate brick was stamped with the royal cartouche <\/em>or coat of arms; not only the whole structure but each separate brick bore the impress of the builder; so is it in the matter of salvation: the whole is of grace, and each particular portion of it equally manifests in its measure the free favour of God.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Election.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Redemption.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Effectual calling.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>Pardon and justification.<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>Mark you well that the next series of steps, which we call sanctification, or perseverance, or, better still, gracious conservation, all of these must be of grace too.<\/p>\n

No man has any claim upon God to keep him from going into sin. Thus, from foundation to pinnacle, the temple of our salvation is all of grace.<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>The peculiar glories of this grace ought to be pointed out.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>It is sovereign. Given to man according to the absolute will of the Almighty.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Free. Man is not expected to do anything to earn or obtain the grace of God; he would not, if he were expected; he could not, if he were required.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Full. Grace to cover all the mans sins, whatever they may be.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>Unfailing in continuance. The gifts of God are without repentance. Grace is no intermittent brook flowing today and dried up tomorrow, no fleeting meteor dazzling all beholders and then vanishing in thick darkness.<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>Unalloyed and unmingled. Gods grace in saving souls rules alone. Human merit does not intrude here and there to make a patchwork of the whole. Grace is Alpha, grace is Omega. It is graces glory that no mortal finger touches her work, and no human hammer is lifted up thereon.<\/p>\n

6. <\/strong>Need I say that it is one glory of this grace that while it thus reveals itself so fully, it never interferes with any other attribute of God? On the contrary, it only tends to illustrate all the other glories of the Divine character.<\/p>\n


IV. <\/strong>This grace ought to be the subject of praise.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Praise God while your mind surveys the whole plan of salvation.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Let all men see the result of grace in you.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Add to your holy living your own personal testimony.<\/p>\n


V. <\/strong>The great ground of hope for sinners. My last word shall briefly indicate what is the privilege of each sinner who would rejoice in the sovereign grace of God. Often as we explain faith, yet still we need to explain it again. I met with an illustration taken from the American war. One had been trying to instruct a dying officer in what faith was. At last he caught the idea, and he said, I could not understand it before, but I see it now. It is just this–I surrender, I surrender to Jesus. That is it. You have been fighting against God, standing out against Him, trying to make terms more or less favourable to yourself; now here you stand in the presence of God, and you drop the sword of your rebellion and say, Lord, I surrender, I am Thy prisoner. I trust to Thy mercy to save me. I have done with self, I fall into Thy arms. (C. H. Spurgeon.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The glory of Jehovahs grace<\/strong><\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>The glory of grace is its freeness: it fixes upon objects that are most unworthy; bestows upon them the richest blessings; raises them to the highest honour; promises them the greatest happiness; and all for its own glory. Nothing can be freer than grace.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>The glory of grace is its power: it conquers the stubbornest sinners; subdues the hardest hearts; tames the wildest wills; enlightens the darkest understandings; breaks off the strongest fetters; and invariably conquers its objects. Grace is omnipotent.<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>The glory of grace is its benevolence: it never injured one; it has delivered, supplied, conducted, supported, and glorified thousands; it brings the inexhaustible fulness of God to supply the creatures wants. Grace gives away all it has, reserving nothing for itself but the praise and glory of its acts. Jesus is grace personified; in Him it may be seen in all its beauty, excellence, and loveliness; by Him it is displayed in all its native dignity. O Jesus! glorify Thy free, powerful, and benevolent grace in me! (Essex Remembrancer.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Grace is all<\/strong><\/p>\n

Payson, when dying, expressed himself with great earnestness respecting the grace of God as exercised in saving lost men, and seemed particularly affected that it should be bestowed on one so ill-deserving as himself. Oh, how sovereign! Oh, how sovereign! Grace is the only thing that can make us like God. I might be dragged through heaven, earth, and hell, and I should be still the same sinful, polluted wretch, unless God Himself should renew and cleanse me. (C. H. Spurgeon.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

We muse glorify Gods grace<\/strong><\/p>\n

Had I all the faith of the patriarchs, all the zeal of the prophets, all the good works of the apostles, the constancy of the martyrs, and all the flaming devotion of seraphs, I would disclaim them all in point of dependence, and rely only on free grace. I would count all but dung and dross when put in competition with the infinitely precious death and meritorious righteousness of my dear Saviour Jesus Christ; and, if ever a true and lasting reformation of manners is produced amongst us, it must (under the influence of the Eternal Spirit) be produced by the doctrines of free grace. Till these doctrines are generally inculcated, the most elegant harangues from the pulpit, or the most correct dissertations from the press, will be no better than a pointless arrow or a broken bow. (Hervey.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Glorifying Gods grace<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dr. Kane, finding a flower under the Humboldt glacier, was more affected by it because it grew beneath the lip and cold bosom of the ice than he would have been by the most gorgeous garden bloom. So the most single, struggling grace in the heart of one far removed from Divine influence may be dearer to God than a whole catalogue of virtues in the life of one more favoured of heaven. (H. W. Beecher.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Accepted in the Beloved<\/strong>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Accepted of the great Father<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gods love of His dear Son covers all believers, as a canopy covers all who come beneath it. As a hen covereth her chickens with her wings, so Gods love to Christ covers all the children of promise. As the sun shining forth from the gates of the morning gilds all the earth with golden splendour, so this great love of God to the Well-beloved, streaming forth to Him, enlightens all who are in Him. God is so boundlessly pleased with Jesus that in Him He is altogether well pleased with us.<\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>I will begin by treating the text by way of contrast. Brethren and sisters, the grace of God hath made us to be this day accepted in the Beloved; but it was not always so.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>What a contrast is our present condition of acceptance to our position under the law through Adams fall. By actual sin we made ourselves to be the very reverse of accepted, for we were utterly refused. It might have been said of us, Reprobate silver shall men call them, because God hath rejected them. Mark, it is not said that we are acceptable, though that were a very great thing, but we are actually accepted; it has become not a thing possible that God might accept us, but He has accepted us in Christ. Lay this to your soul, and may it fill you with delight.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Think, again, of the contrast between what you are now, and what you would have been had not grace stepped in. Left out of Christ, we might at this time have been going on from sin to sin.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>One more point I cannot quite pass over, and that is, the contrast between what we now are and all we ever could have been in the most favourable circumstances apart from the Beloved. If it had been possible for us out of Christ to have had desires after righteousness, yet those desires would all have run in a wrong direction; we should have had a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge, and so, going about to establish our own righteousness, we should not have submitted ourselves to the righteousness of God. At this moment the prayers we offered would never have been received at the throne; the praises we presented would have been an ill savour unto God; all that we could have aimed to accomplish in the matter of good works, had we striven to our utmost, would have been done in wilfulness and pride, and so must necessarily have fallen short of acceptance. We should have heard the voice of the Eternal saying, Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto Me; for out of Christ our righteousness is as unacceptable as our unrighteousness, and all our attempts to merit acceptance increase our unworthiness.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>Secondly, we will say a little by way of explanation, that the text may sink yet deeper into your hearts, and afford you richer enjoyment. He hath made us accepted in the Beloved. Much went before this, but, oh, what a morning without clouds rose upon us when we knew our acceptance and were assured thereof. Acceptance was the watchword, and had troops of angels met us we should have rejoiced that we were as blest as they. Understand that this acceptance comes to us entirely as a work of God–He hath made us accepted in the Beloved. We never made ourselves acceptable, nor could we have done so, but He that hath made us first in creation, hath now new made us by His grace, and so hath made us accepted in the Beloved. That this was an act of pure grace there can be no doubt, for the verse runs thus, Wherein He hath made us accepted in the Beloved, that is, in His grace. There was no reason in ourselves why we should have been put into Christ, and so accepted; the reason lay in the heart of the Eternal Father Himself.<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>Can we get a step farther? Will the Holy Spirit help us while I say a few words by way of enlargement?<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>If we are accepted in the Beloved, then, first, our persons are accepted: we ourselves are well pleasing to Him. God looks upon us now with pleasure.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Being ourselves accepted, the right of access to Him is given us. When a person is accepted with God he may come to God when he chooses. He is one of these courtiers who may come even to the royal throne and meet with no rebuff. No chamber of our great Fathers house is closed against us; no blessing of the covenant is withheld from us; no sweet smile of the Fathers face is refused us.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>And, being accepted ourselves, our prayers are also accepted. Children of God, can you sincerely believe this? When God delights in men He gives them the desires of their hearts.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>It follows, as a pleasant sequence, that our gifts are accepted, for those who are accepted with God find a great delight in giving of their substance to the glory of His name. Then let us try what we can do for Him. Here is a great lump of quartz, but if the Lord can see a grain of gold, He will save the quartz for the sake of it. He says, Destroy it not, for a blessing is in it. I do not mean that the Lord deals thus with all men. It is only for accepted men that He has this kind way of accepting their gifts. Had you seen me, when a young man, and an usher, walking through the streets with rolls of drawings from a boys school, you would have guessed that I considered them of no value and fit only to be consigned to the fire; but I always took a great interest in the drawings of my own boy, and I still think them rather remarkable. You smile, I dare say, but I do so think, and my judgment is as good as yours. I value them because they are his, and I think I see budding genius in every touch, but you do not see it because you are so blind. I see it since love has opened my eyes. God can see in His peoples gifts to Him and their works for Him a beauty which no eyes but His can perceive. Oh, if He so treats our poor service, what ought we not to do for Him? What zeal, what alacrity should stimulate us! If we are ourselves accepted our sacrifices shall be acceptable.<\/p>\n


IV. <\/strong>We have thus pursued our train of thought in a contrast, an explanation, and an enlargement; let us now indulge in a few reflections. Accepted in the Beloved. May not each believer talk thus with himself–I have my sorrows and griefs, I have my aches and pains, and weaknesses, but I must not repine, for God accepts me. Ah me! How one can laugh at griefs when this sweet word comes in, accepted in the Beloved. I may be blind, but I am accepted in the Beloved: I may be lame, I may be poor, I may be despised, I may be persecuted, I may have much to put up with in many ways, but really these troubles of the flesh count for little or nothing to me since I am accepted in the Beloved. Is not this a word to die with? We will meet death and face his open jaws with this word, Accepted in the Beloved. Will not this be a word to rise with amidst the blaze of the great judgment day?<\/p>\n


V. <\/strong>And now I wish to finish with this one practical use. If it be so that we are accepted in the Beloved, then let us go forth and tell poor sinners how they can be accepted too. (C. H. Spurgeon.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Accepted in the Beloved<\/strong><\/p>\n

There is implied here a twofold ground of acceptance–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>On account of our relation to His person.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>On account of His atonement for our sins. This word accepted only occurs twice in the New Testament. The Spirit of God applies it here to believers in Christ. The same expression is applied to the Virgin Mary, when He proclaims her highly favoured (Luk 1:28<\/span>). He hath made us His Hephzibahs–<\/em>made us dear to Him in the Beloved–made us His delights, a joy to Himself in the Beloved. Not the Righteous One, though that is true. Not the Holy One, though that is true; nor through His blood and merits, although He has so done. But there is a deeper truth still: accepted in His person before He became man. Accepted in Him who is the brightness of the Fathers glory, and the express image of His person. Accepted in the Beloved. It is not the whole truth that we are accepted for His merits and His atonement, though that is true. But here the record calls us back to a past eternity, and tells us of our being made accepted in the Beloved. And yet there are multitudes of professing Christians who do not trust, or know, or believe that they are accepted in Him, and who do not enjoy the blessedness and rest of looking up into their Fathers face and recognizing the love bestowed on them in the Fathers Beloved, and the security that that love has surrounded them with! They think they are only accepted according to the measure of their prayers, their merits, their good works, and their faith, instead of according to the measure of the Fathers everlasting love for His Son. Yes! we are here plainly taught that our acceptance in the first place was not even on account of Christs own merits, or prayers, or blood, or sacrifice, much less ours, but solely and only on account of our relation to His person as Gods Beloved One; and the subsequent interference of sin only brought out the resources of redemption, forgiveness, salvation, and adoption in Him in whom all fulness dwells. (M. Rainsford, B. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Accepted in the Beloved<\/strong><\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>Positive union.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>In the heart of Christ, and in His heart from all eternity. With prescient eye Christ beheld His people before they were yet formed. Hath He not said, I have loved thee with an everlasting love; therefore with the bands of My kindness have I drawn thee. As the Father hath loved me, even so have I loved you.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>We are also in Christs book. Having loved us we were chosen in Him and elected by His Father. We were not chosen separately and distinctly, and as individuals alone and apart. We were chosen in Christ. Blessed fact! the same register which includes Christ as first born, includes all the brethren.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>We are in Christs hand. All those whom the Father gave to Christ were bestowed upon Christ as a surety; and in the last great day, at the Redeemers hand will God require the souls of all that were given to Him. Just as the Apostle Paul argues concerning Levi, that Levi is inferior to Christ; for he says, Abraham was less than Melchisedec, for without doubt the less is blessed of the greater, so also Levi was less than Melchisedec, for he was in the loins of Abraham when Melchisedec met him. So, beloved, as Levi was in the loins of Abraham and paid tithes to Melchisedec, so we were in the loins of Christ and paid the debt due to Divine justice, gave to the law its fulfilment, and to wrath its satisfaction. In the loins of Christ we have passed through the tomb already, and have entered into that which is within the veil, and are made to sit down in heavenly places, even in Him. This day the chosen of God are one with Christ and in the loins of Christ.<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>As we are in the heart of Christ, in the book of Christ, in the hand of Christ, and in the loins of Christ, there is yet another thought dearer and sweeter still. We are in the person of Christ; for we are members of His body, of His flesh, and of His bones. By the mysterious operations of the quickening Spirit the sinner begins to live a spiritual life. Now, in the moment when the spiritual life was first given, there commenced in that soul a vital and personal union with the person of Christ Jesus. There had always been in that soul a secret mystical union in the Divine purpose; but now there comes to be a union in effect, and the soul is in Christ from that hour, in a sense in which it never was before.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>Accepted in the Beloved. What does our acceptance include?<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Justification before God. We stand on our own trial. When we stand in Christ we are acquitted; while standing in ourselves the only verdict must be condemnation.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Divine complacency.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Divine delight.<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>Divine operations; made accepted. All of God, not of man. (C. H. Spurgeon.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Jesus Christ the Beloved One, and sinners accented of God freely in Him<\/strong><\/p>\n

Jesus Christ is the Beloved, the eminently Beloved One. In discoursing from this doctrine, I shall–<\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>Show in what respects Christ is the eminently Beloved One.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>Make some improvement.<\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>I am to show in what respects Christ is the eminently Beloved One.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>He is the Beloved of the excellent ones of the earth. Who these are, ye may see (Psa 16:3<\/span>). They are the saints. Him all the saints love with a love above all persons and all things (Luk 14:26<\/span>). And–<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> They meet altogether in Him in love, however they are scattered through the world; hence is He called, the desire of all nations (Hag 2:7<\/span>). So that lovers of Christ and saints are of equal latitude (Eph 6:24<\/span>); Grace be with all them that love our Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity.<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> Each one of them loves Him with a superlative and transcendent love (Psa 73:25<\/span>).<\/p>\n

(3)<\/strong> They love other persons and things for His sake (Rom 15:2-3<\/span>; Tit 3:3-5<\/span>).<\/p>\n

(4)<\/strong> The liker anything is to Him, they love it the more.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Christ is the Beloved of the glorious ones in heaven. All eyes are upon Him there, for He is there the light of the pleasant land (Rev 21:23<\/span>), as the sun is in this world. And He is there–<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> The Beloved of the glorified saints, who now love Him in perfection (Rev 7:10<\/span>).<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> The Beloved of the holy angels (Rev 5:11-12<\/span>). In the Temple the cherubims were posted, looking towards the ark or mercy seat, a type of Christ; which signified the angels looking to Jesus with love and admiration (1Pe 1:12<\/span>). They behold His glory, and cannot but love Him.<\/p>\n

(3)<\/strong> The Fathers Beloved (Mat 17:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n

(a) <\/strong>In respect of His Person.<\/p>\n

(b) <\/strong>In respect of His office. I shall conclude this point with a word of application.<\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>Hereby ye may try whether ye be saints or not, partakers of the Divine nature. If so, Christ will be your eminently Beloved One.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>Of reproof to those who love Him not eminently, above all. It is an evidence, that–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Ye know Him not (Joh 4:10<\/span>). None can be let into a discovery of Christ in His glory, but must love Him (Mat 13:44-46<\/span>). It is to the blind world only there is no beauty in Him for which He is to be desired.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>That ye are in love with your sins and a vain world. For who would loath the physician but he that loves his disease and cannot part with it?<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>Let him be your Beloved then, and give Him your heart.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>He is best worth your love. None has done so much for sinners as Christ has, dying for them.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>If ye love Him not, ye will be constructed haters of Him, and enemies to Him (1Co 16:22<\/span>). Doctrine<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>The way how a sinner comes to be accepted of God is freely in Christ.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>What is implied in this.<\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>A state of non-acceptance, or unacceptableness with God, that sinners are in while they are not in Christ. And we may take up this in these following things:<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>They are offenders.<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> Sinners in Adam (Rom 5:12<\/span>). The root was corrupted, and all the branches withered and rotted in him.<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> Sinners in their own persons, who are capable of actual sinning.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Unpardoned offenders.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>God is not pleased with them; for His being pleased with any of mankind is in His Son Jesus Christ, and without Him He can be pleased with none of them (Mat 3:1-17<\/span>, ult.; Heb 11:5-6<\/span>).<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>He is highly displeased with them. There is a cloud of Divine displeasure ever upon them (Joh 3:1-36<\/span>, ult.).<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>He cannot endure to have any communion or intercourse with them, farther than in the way of common providence (Psa 5:5<\/span>). He and they are at enmity, He legally, they really; so there can be no communion (Amo 3:3<\/span>). And they cannot have it till they come to Christ (Joh 14:6<\/span>).<\/p>\n

6. <\/strong>He loathes them, His soul abhors them, as abominable. They are abominable in their persons unto God, as wholly corrupt and defiled (Tit 1:15-16<\/span>).<\/p>\n

7. <\/strong>The wrath of God is upon them, and they lie under His curse.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>A way provided how sinners may be accepted.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>God is ready to accept of them now that will come to Him in His own way (2Co 5:19<\/span>).<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>There is ready for sinners what may procure them acceptance with a holy God (Mat 22:4<\/span>).<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>There is open proclamation made in the gospel, that all may have the benefit of that sacrifice, and be accepted of God.<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>The sinners bestirring himself for acceptance with God. There is a way to acceptance, but the sinner must take that way, else he will not get acceptance. He cannot sit still careless, and be accepted. The sinners bestirring himself in this matter, takes in these three things.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>A conviction of unacceptableness to God (Joh 16:8<\/span>). Men must be convinced of their being unacceptable to God, ere they will come to Christ. It is their not seeing their own loathsomeness, that makes them slight the sacrifices of sweet savour; and think to be accepted of God, while yet they are not in Christ.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>A weighty concern and uneasiness about it.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Anxiety of heart for it (Act 2:37<\/span>). There must be earnest longings to be accepted of Him, yea, the soul must be brought to esteem and so prize it, as to be content with it upon any terms (Act 9:6<\/span>).<\/p>\n


IV. <\/strong>The next general head is to consider the nature of a sinners acceptance with God.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>I shall consider the nature of a sinners acceptance with God in itself. And in itself it is a great and unspeakable benefit, and implies these following things:–<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> In general, it implies an acceptance of the sinner with God, as a righteous person. The Lord reputes, accounts, and accepts him into favour as a righteous person (2Co 5:21<\/span>; Rom 4:6<\/span>; Rom 5:19<\/span>).<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> More particularly it implies–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>The ceasing of wrath against the soul (Hos 14:4<\/span>).<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>The curse is removed (Gal 3:13<\/span>).<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>He is fully pardoned (Isa 43:25<\/span>).<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>He is reconciled to God (Rom 5:1<\/span>).<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>God is pleased with him (Heb 11:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n

6. <\/strong>He is admitted to communion with God.<\/p>\n

7. <\/strong>God has a delight and complacency in him.<\/p>\n

He looks on him in His own Son, and takes pleasure in him, as covered with His righteousness.<\/p>\n


V. <\/strong>Let us consider this acceptance in its effects and consequents. It is in these an unspeakable privilege. By means of it–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>The springs of mercy are opened to the sinner, that rivers of compassion may flow towards him (Rom 5:1<\/span>, etc.).<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>He is adjudged to eternal life (2Th 1:6-7<\/span>; Act 26:18<\/span>). Life was promised in the first covenant, upon the fulfilling of the law; now the believer being accepted of God as a righteous person, for whom the law is fulfilled, is accordingly adjudged to live forever.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>The channel of sanctification is cleared for him, and the dominion of sin is broken in him (Rom 6:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>He is privileged with peace of conscience.<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>Access to God with confidence.<\/p>\n

6. <\/strong>His works accepted.<\/p>\n

7. <\/strong>The sting removed from afflictions and death.<\/p>\n

8. <\/strong>All things working for good (Rom 8:28<\/span>).<\/p>\n


VI. <\/strong>I proceed to show the way of a sinners acceptance with God.<\/p>\n

First, <\/em>It is freely. There is nothing in the sinner himself to procure it, or move God to it (Rom 3:24<\/span>). It is done freely, in that–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>It is without respect to any work done by the sinner (Tit 3:5<\/span>). Grace and works are inconsistent in this matter.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>It is without respect to any good qualification or disposition wrought in the sinner (Rom 4:5<\/span>). For–<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> The way of a sinners acceptance with God excludes all boasting (Rom 3:27<\/span>).<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> What good qualities can there be in the sinner before he be accepted in Christ? (Heb 11:6<\/span>).<\/p>\n

(3)<\/strong> When the man comes to be endued with gracious qualities, as he is by that time already accepted, so if his acceptance depended on them, he would come short; for still they are imperfect, having a great mixture of the contrary ill qualities, that need to be covered another way. And how can one expect acceptance on that, for which he needs a pardon?<\/p>\n

Secondly, <\/em>It is in Christ the sinner is accepted. It implies–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>The cause of a sinners acceptance with God. It is for Christs sake (Rom 3:24-25<\/span>).<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>The state of acceptableness of a sinner, wherein he may, and will be, and cannot but be accepted of God; it is being in Christ, united to Him by faith. One must not think to be accepted for Christs sake while out of Christ; no more than the branch of one tree can partake of the sap of another, while not ingrafted into it; or the slayer could be safe, while he was not yet got within the gates of the city of refuge. But in Christ the sinner is in a state of acceptableness to God.<\/p>\n

We take up this in these five things following:–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>In Christ the sinner may be accepted of God (2Co 5:19<\/span>).<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>In Christ the sinner will be accepted. Any, even the worst of sinners shall certainly be accepted in Christ (Act 16:31<\/span>). Whosoever shall make their escape into this city of refuge shall be safe. Christ will refuse none that come to Him; and God will reject none that are in Christ.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>In Christ the sinner cannot but be accepted. It is impossible it should fail or miscarry (Heb 6:18<\/span>).<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>That moment a sinner is in Christ, he is accepted (Rom 8:1<\/span>, There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus)<\/p>\n

I come now to the improvement of this subject.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Then the door of acceptance with God is open to all; none are excluded (Isa 55:1-2<\/span>).<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Seek then acceptance with God, that ye may find favour with Him. This should be your main aim (2Co 5:9<\/span>). Here your happiness lies in time and eternity.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Seek it freely, without pretending to anything in yourselves to recommend you to His acceptance or favour.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>Seek it through Jesus Christ only, that is, by faith in Him, laying the whole stress of your acceptance on His righteousness.<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>Therefore as ever ye would have acceptance or favour with God, seek to be in Christ; to be united to Him. For as there is no acceptance with God, but for His sake; so there is no acceptance for His sake, but to those that are in Him (Col 1:27<\/span>). There is salvation in Christ, but none partake of it that are not in Him; a righteousness in Him, but it covers none but the members of His body. (T. Boston, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The central doctrine–accepted in the Beloved<\/strong><\/p>\n

The doctrine of justification by faith, the central doctrine of Protestantism as it is sometimes called, is, as it is often presented, a hard, dry, formal statement of a most precious and inspiring truth. The truth is in its very nature so full of tenderness, of affection, of the most sacred and intimate experience, that it is quite impossible to put it into a formula. Let us imagine some doctor of the law going to the home of the prodigal after the feast was over, taking the father and the son aside, and questioning them, notebook in hand: A very remarkable and beautiful reconciliation has taken place here, he says: the rebel against parental authority is pardoned: the wanderer has returned to his home; favour and plenty and peace have been restored to one who has long been deprived of them; will you not have the goodness now to condense into a statement not more than five or six lines in length the real nature of this transaction? The crude and stupid absurdity of such a proposition would be evident enough to all who have read the touching story. As if all the regret, the gratitude, the hopes, the fears, the doubts, the confidences, the anguish, the dread, the thankfulness, the peace of that deep human experience could be reduced to a logical definition! And yet men undertake to put into concise theological propositions the whole truth concerning the return of the sinner to the favour of God. What is justification? asks the Shorter Catechism. Justification, answers the Shorter Catechism, is an act of Gods free grace, wherein He pardoneth all our sins, and accepteth us as righteous in His sight, only for the righteousness of Christ imputed to us and received by faith alone. That is the scientific definition of justification by faith, perhaps as good a definition as ever was framed. And it may help us a little toward a right understanding of what justification is, just as Weisbachs great books on hydraulics might help us a little toward understanding the ministry of water; just as Bishops two big volumes on marriage and divorce may throw some light on the nature of the family relation; but he who depends on such a formulary as this for his knowledge of the way in which the sinner is restored by faith in Christ to the favour of God, must remain in profound ignorance of the whole matter. In some way, it is clear, the New Testament represents God as accepting men through Christ. In some way Christ is regarded by the believer as his substitute. He is the Mediator between God and men. By faith in Him we are justified. These words meant something to the men who used them, and they ought to mean something to us. What is their meaning? They cannot, of course, describe any legal transfer of moral qualities. Moral qualities cannot be legally transferred from one person to another. My demerits cannot be lawfully transferred to another, nor can the merits of another be lawfully transferred to me. My guilt is my own, and can by no possibility be imputed to another being. Can anyone else in the universe be blamed for a sin of mine in which he had no part? On the other hand it is equally impossible that I should be regarded as entitled to praise for a good act performed by another person, of which I had no knowledge, and in which I had no part. Every one of you shall give an account for himself unto God. The entire and absolute personality of moral qualities, of guilt or innocence, of praise or blame, is the fundamental truth of morality. Any legal interference with this fundamental principle would be subversive of all righteousness. But it is said that though moral quality cannot be transferred, legal liability can be; that though Christ cannot be morally guilty on account of our sins, God regards Him as legally responsible for them; that though His merits cannot be legally transferred to us, God does consider us as blameless before the law on His account. We are justified because we claim Him as our substitute. Now there is under all these phrases a great truth. Take the following story as an illustration of it. John Goodman is a citizen of noble character and of large philanthropy. He has a son, whom he loved as the apple of his eye, and who is justifying his fathers affection by growing up into blameless manliness One night a young desperado, the offspring of criminals, whose life has been spent among the worst classes of our cities, breaks into John Goodmans house, with the intent of robbery, and nearly kills his son. The father comes to the rescue, captures the young burglar, binds him fast, and waits for the morning to deliver him up to justice. In the meantime the son revives, and, seeing the youth of the criminal, is touched with pity for him, a sentiment that has already begun to kindle the fathers heart. Before morning father and son have resolved to make a great venture to save this wretched boy from his life of crime and shame. They tell him that if he will turn from his evil ways, he may have a home with them, sharing their comfort and their plenty; that they will protect him, so far as they can, from the consequences of his past misdeeds; that they will guard him from bad influences, and open to him paths of integrity and honour; that he shall be recognized as an equal in the family, and shall be joint heir to the estate. All this is offered him by the father, and urged upon him, even with tears, by the son whose life he had attempted. Of course it is very difficult for the wretch to believe that these assurances are sincere. He thinks at first that they are mocking and taunting him, and his lips curl with scorn and resentment as he listens. But by and by he perceives that they are in earnest, and he is overwhelmed by their marvellous goodness. He casts himself down before them; he kisses their feet; he tells them in broken words the story of his gratitude. And he does honestly try to live the better life toward which they seek to lead him. It is the deepest purpose of his life to be upright and faithful and pure. But, as anyone might easily foretell, this is a purpose hard for such a boy to shape in act. He is indolent, and profane, and reckless by habit; his mind is full of gross and foul thoughts: his temper is untamed; his whole nature has been warped and corrupted by his early training. This ingrained evil finds expression in many ways. After a time the good man begins to despair of ever making anything of this unfortunate youth; he begins to regret that, instead of trying to reclaim him, he had not handed him over to the police. But while he is thus wavering in his purpose, he chances to enter the room of his protege, and there he finds upon the table a picture of his own son, soiled with much handling, evidently left in sight by accident–and on the back of it, in the rude handwriting and doubtful orthography of the waif, these words written: I want to be like him. I pray God to help me to be nearer like him. Im far enough from it now, God knows; but I watch him all the while, and try to live as good a life as he lives. God bless him for all his goodness to me! The fathers eyes fill with tears as he reads these simple words. He discerns in them the deep purpose of the poor boy whose faulty performance has so tried him. His heart cannot but be touched by the lads choice of a hero. He knows that the choice is a worthy one, and he knows that the lads love for his own son will have in it a regenerating power. He has no more misgivings concerning the wisdom of his attempt to save this lost one; and always after this he couples the lad in his thoughts with his own son; and feels toward him something of the tenderness with which he regards his own son. Since the poor lad cherishes for the other this passionate friendship, since he takes the fathers pride as his own ideal and pattern, how else can the father regard him? He is accepted in the belayed. (Washington Gladden, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Provision for eternity<\/strong><\/p>\n

Accepted in the Beloved. The phrase is simple, but not, at a mere glance, immediately obvious. To feel its force, we must enter in and survey its interior, and see as far as our short-sighted faculties can reach, what it takes within its range. It is a summary and simple form for gathering up everything we need to have, in a provision for the world to come.<\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>Where is the provision laid up? It is laid up in a living Person. It is with a living Person that we have to do from first to last. And the fulness and suitableness of that Person comes forth here in a vivid and peculiar manner–for you observe how He is named. By a name of holy endearment and of Divine tenderness He is called here, the Beloved. Lovely and Beloved He is in Himself, because from Him emanate whatever qualities of good are possible in a creature–because in Him, as the God-man mediator, all excellencies, both created and uncreated, are centred and combined. In the prospect, moreover, of what He was to fulfil on earth, as the Redeemer of mankind, beheld and set apart from all eternity as the object of the Fathers infinite complacency and delight–the name in the text belongs to Him in a peculiar manner. But further observe, He is the Beloved, because through Him alone could a holy God find the fitting channel for His love to man. He is the Beloved, moreover, specially because of the perfect fulfilment in Him of the relations in which He stands, at once to God and to man; for whatever is due to God, and everything requisite for the deliverance and happiness of man, are found in infinite fulness in Him. His person communicates to everything He did and still does, in our stead, a value, a worth, which never can be measured, and to which no limits can be set.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>What provision has been laid up for us in the Beloved. The text proclaims it in terms so simple, that some may be apt to pass them by without much consideration. It is acceptance in the Beloved. To be accepted–to have our acceptance before God–what is this? It is first of all–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>To be cleared and acquitted in the eye of the law–to be, in the judgment of a holy God, discharged and set free. It has its foundation broad and deep in the precious fact, which is immediately connected with it in the words following the text, at verse seven–it rests upon Redemption–Redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace. You see how deep down it goes–as deep as the humiliation of the Son of God from heaven to earth, even to the utmost extremity of His abasement beneath the curse!<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>But there is something more in the acceptance wherewith we are accepted in Christ. It is also to be fitted for service. It is to be put into the position of those whose worship, whose free-will offerings of grateful obedience are well pleasing to God. It is to have liberty to serve Him all our days without fear, and from the blessed motives of love and thankfulness.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>The holiness of character which has its beginning in the acceptance of our persons. To be accepted in the Beloved is to begin to be holy. To have your feet planted on the foundation of God, which standeth sure, is to depart from iniquity. (J. S. Muir.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The acceptation of free grace<\/strong><\/p>\n

A <\/em>ship was sailing in the southern waters of the Atlantic, when another was sighted which was making signals of distress. They bore towards the distressed ship, and hailed them. What is the matter? We are dying for want of water, was the response. Dip it up then, was the answer, you are in the mouth of the Amazon River. Those sailors were thirsting, and suffering, and fearing death, and longing intensly for water, and all the while they were supposing that there was nothing but the oceans brine around them; when, in fact, they had sailed unconsciously into the broad mouth of the mightest river on the globe, and did not know it: and though to them it seemed that they must perish with thirst, yet there was at least a hundred miles of fresh water all around them; and they had nothing to do but as they were bidden to dip it up.<\/p>\n

The freeness of grace<\/strong><\/p>\n

If you say, I do not know why He should save me; I am not worthy to be saved, that is a fact; you are not. If you say, I do not think I have a right to look to Him for salvation; I have not done anything that should give me a claim on Him for so great a blessing, that is true; you have not. It is not because you deserve Divine mercies that you have a right to expect them. I take a dozen beggar boys out of the street, and they say, I do not know why you should like me; I am unlovely, and there is nothing attractive about me. That is so. And I take you that you may become lovely. But I am filthy and ragged. Yes, you are; and I take you that you may be washed and clothed. But I am stupid and ignorant. So you are; and I take you to educate you. But I am full of all manner of wickedness. I know that; and it is because you are so wicked that I am determined, with Gods help, to rescue you. Now, Christ does not take us because we are so pure and sweet, and virtuous and lovely. He takes us because He cannot bear to see a soul that is destined to immortality less than high and noble; and because He means to make us what He would have us to be, He sends us to school. They that are well, He tells us, need not a physician; but they that are sick. If you are sick, and will accept Him for your physician, He will cure you. (H. W. Beecher.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Christ a propitiation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Plutarch tells us that when Themistocles in the hour of his exile wished to be reconciled with Admetus, King of the Molossians, whom he had previously offended, he took the kings son in his arms, and kneeled down before the household gods. The plea was successful, in fact it was the only one the Molossians looked upon as not to be refused, and so the philosopher found a refuge among them. And do not we come in this way when we approach the Majesty on High? We take hold of the Kings Son, and hope to find acceptance through Him alone–we hope to be accepted in the Beloved.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Verse 6<\/span>. To the praise of the glory of his grace<\/B><\/I>] The glory of his grace<\/I>, for , his<\/I> glorious<\/I> or illustrious grace<\/I>, according to the Hebrew idiom. But the grace or mercy of God is peculiarly illustrated and glorified in the plan of redemption by Christ Jesus. By the giving of the LAW, God’s justice<\/I> and holiness<\/I> were rendered most glorious; by the giving of the GOSPEL, his grace<\/I> and mercy<\/I> are made equally conspicuous.<\/P>

<\/P>

Wherein he hath made us accepted in the Beloved<\/B><\/I>] This translation of is not clear; with which he has graciously favoured us through the Beloved<\/I>, is at once more literal and more intelligible. Whitby, Macknight<\/I>, and Wakefield<\/I> translate the passage in nearly the same way.<\/P>

<\/P>

In the Beloved<\/I> must certainly mean in Christ<\/I>, who is termed God’s beloved Son<\/I>, Mt 3:17<\/span>; but several excellent MSS., such as D*EFG, the later Syriac<\/I>, the AEthiopic, Vulgate, Itala<\/I>, with several of the fathers<\/I>, add, , his beloved Son<\/I>. This is the meaning<\/I>, whether the reading<\/I> be received or rejected.<\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

To the praise of the glory of his grace<\/B>: glory of his grace, <\/I>by a usual Hebraism, for glorious grace, i.e. large, abundant, admirable. The praise of this grace the apostle makes the end of Gods choosing and predestinating us to the adoption of children. God hath chosen us, &c., and therein manifested his grace to us, that such as it is in itself, such it may be acknowledged to be; and therefore praised and adored by us. <\/P>

Wherein; <\/B>in, or through, or by the same grace out of which he chose us. <\/P>

He hath made us accepted in the beloved; <\/B>having chosen us in Christ, he likewise favours us, is well pleased with us in Christ, to whom we are united, whose members we are, and in whom God looks upon us. We are hateful in ourselves as sinners, but accepted in Christ as sons. <\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

6.<\/B> (Eph 1:7<\/span>;Eph 1:17<\/span>; Eph 1:18<\/span>).The end aimed at (Ps 50:23<\/span>),that is, that the glory of His grace may be praised by all Hiscreatures, men and angels. <\/P>

wherein<\/B>Some of theoldest manuscripts read, “which.<\/I>” Then translate,”which He graciously bestowed on us.” But EnglishVersion<\/I> is supported by good manuscripts and the oldest versions.<\/P>

us accepted<\/B>a kindredGreek<\/I> word to “grace”: charitos, echaritosen:<\/I>translate, “graciously accepted”; “made us subjects ofHis grace”; “embraced us in the arms of His grace”(Rom 3:24<\/span>; Rom 5:15<\/span>).<\/P>

in the beloved<\/B>pre-eminentlyso called (Mat 3:17<\/span>; Mat 17:5<\/span>;Joh 3:35<\/span>; Col 1:13<\/span>).Greek,<\/I> “Son of His love.” It is only “INHIS BELOVED”that He loves us (Eph 1:3<\/span>;1Jn 4:9<\/span>; 1Jn 4:10<\/span>).<\/P><\/p>\n

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

To the praise of the glory of his grace<\/strong>,…. The grace of God manifestly appears in the predestination of men to adoption; in that God had no need of sons, he having a dear and well beloved one; in whom he is well pleased; and in that those he adopts are so unworthy of the relation; and in that men, and not angels, should be taken by him into his family; and that some, and not others of the same race; and that this should be before the world was; and in providing Christ as a Redeemer, to open the way for the reception of this grace and happiness; and in appointing the grace of faith to be the receiver of it: and the glory of the grace of God appears herein; the glory of God is the supreme end of all he does; and the glory of his grace, and not his power, or other perfections of his, and the manifestative glory of that is here intended; yea, the “praise” of that glory: and this end is answered, when the children of God ascribe their adoption to the free grace of God; and when they admire it, and are thankful for it, and walk worthy of the relation they are brought into:<\/p>\n

wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved<\/strong>; the Vulgate Latin and Ethiopic versions read, “his own beloved Son”, and so the Claromontane exemplar; the Lord Jesus Christ, who is the beloved of God the Father; and was so from everlasting, and will be so to everlasting; which has appeared by his nearness to him, lying in his bosom; by his being privy to all his counsels, purposes, and designs; in putting all things into his hands, and in showing him all that he does; and by his giving him honour and glory, as man and Mediator: and he is the beloved of the saints, for the transcendent excellencies that are in him, and for his love to them, and for what he has done for them, and is unto them; and in him is their acceptance: which is to be understood of the acceptance of their persons, as founded in the blood and righteousness of Christ, and so of their services in him; of God’s act of delight and complacency in them, as considered in Christ; who looks upon them, and is well pleased with them, and rests in his love towards them; which is an amazing instance of grace: it was grace that gave them a being in Christ, and which has provided in predestination everything to make them grateful to God; and the very act of acceptance is of mere grace; for internal grace, or grace infused, is not here meant, but the free favour of God: some read not “in which”, but “which”<\/p>\n

, “he freely gave us in the beloved”; so the Alexandrian copy, and some others, and the Syriac and Arabic versions.<\/p>\n

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

To the praise <\/B> ( <\/SPAN><\/span>). Note the prepositions in this sentence.<\/P>

Which <\/B> (<\/SPAN><\/span>). Genitive case of the relative <\/SPAN><\/span> (cognate accusative with <\/SPAN><\/span> (he freely bestowed), late verb <\/SPAN><\/span> (from <\/SPAN><\/span>, grace), in N.T. attracted to case of antecedent <\/SPAN><\/span> only here and Lu 1:28<\/span>.<\/P>

In the Beloved <\/B> ( <\/SPAN><\/span>). Perfect passive participle of <\/SPAN><\/span>. This phrase nowhere else in the N.T. though in the Apostolic Fathers. <\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

To the praise of the glory of His grace. The ultimate aim of foreordained. Glory is an attribute of grace : that in which grace grandly and resplendently displays itself. Praise is called forth from the children of God by this divine glory which thus appears in grace. The grace is not merely favor, gift, but it reveals also the divine character. In praising God for what He does, we learn to praise Him for what He is. Glory is another of the ruling words of the epistle, falling into the same category with riches and fullness. The apostle is thrilled with a sense of the plenitude and splendor of the mystery of redemption. <\/P>

Wherein He hath made us accepted [ ] <\/SPAN><\/span>. The correct reading is h=v which, referring to grace. The meaning is not endued us with grace, nor made us worthy of love, but, as Rev., grace – which he freely bestowed. Grace is an act of God, not a state into which He brings us. <\/P>

The beloved. Christ. Beloved par excellence. Compare the Son of His love, Col 1:13<\/span>; also Mt 3:17<\/span>; Mt 17:5<\/span>.<\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

1) “To the praise”<\/strong> (eis epainon) “Unto or to be toward the praise.” No man may glory in anything he has done or does to obtain or retain salvation. For God takes the initiative by His word, His spirit, and the witness of His church to call men from sin and death to repentance and life, and though each must and may choose to obey or disobey God’s call, one can neither glory in what he is or does, but in God for his salvation.<\/p>\n

2 ” Of the glory of his grace”<\/strong> (dokses tes charitos autou) “Of(the) glory of the grace of Him.” One should offer continual praise and glory to God for salvation, made available through His grace, unmerited provisional favor of salvation to all men, impartially, without respect, Rom 11:6<\/span>; Eph 2:8-10<\/span>; Tit 3:4-7<\/span>. <\/p>\n

3 “Wherein he hath made us”<\/strong> (hes echaritosen hemas) r with which he favored us.” God favored all the human race “in Christ” by providing in or through Him an escape for every responsible man for the guilt and consequence of his sins; a) He did not so favor the devil, b) He did not so favor demons or fallen angels. He did not provide for their redemption “in Christ,” but He did for all men to His praise and glory. What favor!! Angels desire to look into it! 1Pe 1:10-12<\/span>.<\/p>\n

4 “Accepted in the beloved”<\/strong> (en to egapemeno) “in the one (he who) has been loved.” Jesus Christ, the beloved of the Father, sent for the salvation of all men, and in whom all men are accepted, contingent upon their voluntary, volitional acceptance of His call to repentance and faith in His Son, Joh 1:11-12<\/span>; Joh 1:14<\/span>; Joh 1:17<\/span>. See also Joh 3:14-18<\/span>. In the beloved one is accepted and shall be like Him when He appears, 1Jn 3:1-3<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

(6) To the praise of the glory of his grace.<\/strong>That is, for the acknowledgment by all Gods creatures of the gloriousness of His grace; or, in other words, for the acknowledgment that Gods essential glory is best manifested in His gracethat He declares His almighty power most chiefly in showing mercy and pity. So in Exo. 33:18-19<\/span>, to the request, Show me Thy glory, the answer is, I will make my goodness<\/em> to pass before thee . . . and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious. (Comp. <\/span>Exo. 34:5-7<\/span>.) He is pleased to consider His glory best realised in the spectacle of souls redeemed and regenerate by His grace, and to decree that it should be thus realised for our sakes. Wherefore would He have us praise and glorify Him? It is that our love to Him may be kindled more fervently. He desires not our service, nor our praise, nor anything else except our salvation (Chrysostoms First Homily<\/em> on the Ephesians).<\/p>\n

Wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.<\/strong>The verb here rendered made us accepted, is the same verb used in Luk. 1:28<\/span> (and nowhere else in the New Testament), where we translate highly favoured. Etymologically it means to bestow grace upon; the tense here is the past tense, not the perfect Hence the meaning is (in connection with the previous clause), His grace, which He bestowed upon us in the Belovedin virtue of our unity with His beloved Son, in whom He is well pleased (Mat. 3:17<\/span>). This special title is given to our Lord to mark a connection with the love declared in the last verse to be the source of Gods predestination. It is a love to all mankind, as in Gods foreknowledge already made one with His beloved Son. (See Joh. 17:23<\/span>; Joh. 17:25<\/span>, Thou hast loved them, as Thou hast loved Me . . . for Thou lovedst Me before the foundation of the world.)<\/p>\n

(2 b.<\/em>) Eph. 1:7-10<\/span> form the second section of this Introduction to the Epistle, linked to the former by the words, in the Beloved. From the declaration in the former section of the source of salvation in Gods love, it leads us on to the mystery of the Mediation of Jesus Christ, in Whom all Being is gathered up for redemption.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

6<\/strong>. <\/strong> Praise of the glory of his grace<\/strong> The glory<\/strong>, is the quality of the grace<\/strong>; the praise<\/strong>, is the response of all God’s glorified ones in the contemplation of the glory <\/strong> of that grace<\/strong>. Perhaps praise of the gloriousness of his grace, <\/em> gives the exact meaning. <\/p>\n

The beloved<\/strong> Perhaps an allusion to David, the type of the Messiah, whose name signifies beloved<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

‘To the praise of the glory of His grace with which He freely engraced us in the Beloved.’<\/p>\n

This activity of God will result in the praise of His glorious grace. All universes, if such there be, will wonder at His gracious condescension to those who had proved themselves totally unworthy. For when the whole plan of salvation has been carried through, and the redeemed finally share the new Heaven and the new earth with Him in the glory of Christ, and all that mars creation has been done away, then will the fullness of His grace, His active, unbounded, undeserved love and favour shown to the totally unworthy, have been fully revealed and be the focus of the worship of Heaven, as to some extent it is indeed already (Rev 5:12-13<\/span>).<\/p>\n

For it is through His grace, active and undeserved, that all this will come about. Thus will the universe know and appreciate the grace and graciousness of God, a grace which is beyond all measure and beyond all comprehension, for they will have seen it enacted before their eyes. And yet amazingly it is that grace that we experience, and, yes, if we are His, experience daily.<\/p>\n

‘He freely engraced us.’ His grace, His undeserved love and favour, is freely bestowed on us (’echaritosen – ‘He engraced, He fully and abundantly revealed grace’. Compare its use in Luk 1:28<\/span>. As Mary was ‘engraced’ in bearing Jesus, so we also are ‘engraced’, surrounded by divine mercy and active love. Thus we can say, ‘Hail, believer, full of grace, the Lord is with you’). It is bestowed in Christ, in all He is and has done for us, and in all His activity on our behalf. There was not one jot of worthiness in us, not one jot of deserving. But in Christ He has surrounded us with His active love, enveloped us in His merciful and unrestrained goodness, and poured out on us His unsparing favour, for He has given us all things ‘in Christ’.<\/p>\n

He is the beginning (Col 1:18<\/span>) before ever the world was. He is the Source of all things (Col 1:16<\/span>). He is the One Who is over all (Eph 1:22<\/span>). All that has marred creation is the sin of men and of angels, our sin and theirs, but by His amazing grace, His active, undeserved love and favour, He is acting to remove that stain and blemish by the redemption of His chosen ones and the final destruction of all that offends. So all that is will in the end be ‘to the praise of His glorious grace’.<\/p>\n

‘In the Beloved.’ All that He has done for us is ‘in (Christ) the Beloved’ . Every spiritual blessing is in Christ (Eph 1:3<\/span>), our being chosen was in Him (Eph 1:4<\/span>), our adoption as sons is through Jesus Christ (Eph 1:5<\/span>), through His blood we have our redemption and forgiveness (Eph 1:7<\/span>), everything will finally be summed up in Him (Eph 1:10<\/span>), and in Him we have been made God’s inheritance (Eph 1:11<\/span>). But here He is called, not by name, but as ‘the Beloved’. For the title ‘the Beloved’ compare (Mat 3:17<\/span>; Mat 12:18<\/span>; Mat 17:5<\/span>; Mar 12:6<\/span>; Luk 20:13<\/span>; 2Pe 1:17<\/span>; Col 1:13<\/span>). The idea behind ‘the Beloved’ is the only beloved Son of the Father, the One beloved before all worlds, the One specially sent by the Father as His only Son. Who else could have ‘freely engraced’ us in this mighty way apart from Him?<\/p>\n

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

The manifestation of God’s grace according to His counsel:<\/p>\n

v. 6<\/strong>. Wherein He hath made us accepted in the Beloved,<\/strong><\/p>\n

v. 7<\/strong>. in whom we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace;<\/strong><\/p>\n

v. 8<\/strong>. wherein He hath abounded toward us in all wisdom and prudence;<\/strong><\/p>\n

v. 9<\/strong>. having made known unto us the mystery of His will, according to His good pleasure, which He hath purposed in Himself;<\/strong><\/p>\n

v. 10<\/strong>. that in the dispensation of the fullness of times He might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth, even in Him.<\/p>\n

<\/strong> The apostle here resumes the thought of v. 3<\/strong>, concerning the blessings which have been given to us in Christ: With which He has graced us in the Beloved. That is the historic unfolding of the grace of God in time: He has freely bestowed upon us His grace. All merit and worthiness on our part is excluded: the bestowal of God’s grace and favor is a measure of His merciful goodness alone, in His Beloved, in and with Christ Himself, Col 1:13<\/span>; Mat 3:17<\/span>. Through the grace of God in Jesus, whose entire work is an expression of the love of God toward us, we become both the objects and the recipients of His love.<\/p>\n

How the eternal decree was put into execution, Paul explains: in whom we have the redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace. In Christ me have that redemption which had long been promised and expected. He paid the ransom for the sins of all men, and the believers have accepted His vicarious activity; they know that His blood paid the guilt of all men’s sins, that it has expiated the guilt, that it has borne the punishment. The result is a permanent possession of the Christians, the forgiveness of sins. In Christ, once and for always, there is complete redemption, perfect forgiveness of sins, for all men; in Him their trespasses are no longer charged to their account. In Christ all believers have forgiveness and therefore salvation, and that not in small measure, leaving a doubt as to the sufficiency of the substitute ransom, but according to the wealth of His grace. The entire fullness of His gracious riches has been poured down upon us. “Plenteous grace with Thee is found.”<\/p>\n

Lest anyone still have misgivings as to the limitless wealth of God’s loving favor, the apostle adds: Which He made to abound toward us in all wisdom and discernment. When God dispenses spiritual gifts, He does not observe an anxious restriction, but furnishes them in such rich abundance that there is much more than enough. Upon us and into us His grace flows in a superabundant stream, teaching us the right wisdom and understanding, enabling us to find that path, to follow that course which is in accordance with the will of God. Such enlightened intelligence to know the will of God is found where the grace of God has been active in the heart of a man. The sequence of thought, therefore, is the following. The possession of the redemption through the blood of Christ is coincident with our adoption into the sonship of God. Our sins and trespasses, which separated between us and God, have been forgiven, the Lord will remember them no more. As children of God we cheerfully and confidently lift up our eyes to our heavenly Father and expect from Him all the spiritual gifts for a life according to His good pleasure. And the wisdom and discernment given to us by God make us ready and perfect for a holy, blameless conduct in love. All these gifts, everything that we are and possess in spiritual matters, we owe entirely and alone to the free grace of God, to the election of grace.<\/p>\n

The apostle now takes up the thought of v. 5<\/strong>. thus adding a new moment to the entire preceding section: In that He made known to us the mystery of His will, according to His good pleasure, which He determined in Himself for the dispensation of the fullness of the times, to place everything under one head in Christ that in the heavens and also that on the earth, in Him. God revealed to all Christians, all believers, the secret to show us why He bestowed on us the full riches of spiritual gifts. It is a secret concerning His will, His good pleasure, for in the matter of His choice God had in no manner been influenced by anything outside of Himself. God determined upon His course in and by Himself; His own free determination originated in His own gracious mind. And what He thus planned, His course of action, looked forward to the dispensation of the fullness of the times, all the periods of the earth’s existence and history being taken together in the figure of a vessel which is filled. When God sent His Son, born of a woman, then the last period had begun, the period which is to perfect and fulfill the times of the world. The eternal counsel of God, therefore, although ever present in prophecy and type, is brought out in its glorious beauty in God’s management in the time of the New Testament, the time in which we now live. It is now that the intention of God is being carried out to bring together under one heading, under one Head, all things in Christ, heavenly as well as earthly, to sum up the aggregate of heavenly and earthly things. The totality of the children of God, all those that have been chosen unto the adoption of sons, God brings together in Christ, to form His body, with all its members and organs. That was God’s eternal loving thought: a holy family of His children, united in Christ, the first-born Son, in whom He, the Father, might be well pleased the one holy Christian Church, the communion of saints. See Col 1:18-20<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 1:6<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>Wherein he hath made us accepted<\/em><\/strong><\/strong> Nothing can be imagined of greater force to raise the minds of the Ephesians above the Jewish ritual, and to keep them steady in the freedom of the gospel, than what St. Paul says here; namely, that God, before the foundation of the world, freely determined within himself to admit the Gentiles into his gospel kingdom, for the manifestation of his free grace to all the world; and this only for the sake of his beloved Son Jesus Christ. Therefore, it was to mistake or pervert the end of the gospel, and to debase this glorious dispensation, to make it subservient to the Jewish ritual, or to suppose that the law of Moses was to support, or be supported, by the kingdom of the Messiah; which was to be of larger extent, and settled upon another foundation, whereof the Mosaical institution was but a narrow, faint, and typical representation. <\/p>\n

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 1:6<\/span> . As love was the disposition serving as motive for the divine predestination<\/em> (Eph 1:5<\/span> ), so is the glorifying of the divine love (which, however, is here designated in accordance with its distinctive peculiarity, because it refers to sinners<\/em> , Eph 2:1<\/span> ff., as grace<\/em> ) its divinely conceived ultimate aim, not, as Grotius would have it, consequens aliud.<\/em> Comp. 2Co 1:20<\/span> ; Phi 1:11<\/span> .<\/p>\n

(not ) means neither to the glorious praise of His grace<\/em> (Grotius, Estius), nor to the praise of His glorious grace<\/em> (Luther, Castalio, Beza, and most expositors, including Morus, Koppe, Flatt, Holzhausen, Meier), the one of which is just as arbitrary as the other; but: to the praise of the glory of His grace<\/em> . The quality<\/em> of the grace, its glory its greatness laudably evincing itself is brought into prominence as the object of the praise to be bestowed on it. Comp. Bernhardy, p. 53 f.; Held, ad Timol.<\/em> p. 368. Bengel already in his day aptly distinguished the notions: “Primum nascitur laus gratiae, Eph 1:5<\/span> , inde laus gloriae.”<\/p>\n

without the article<\/em> may not surprise us on account of the genitival definition that follows. See Winer, p. 118 f. [E. T. 155 f.].<\/p>\n

.] is attracted by the preceding ( is conceived of as , Eph 2:4<\/span> ; Joh 17:26<\/span> ; comp. Dem. 306, 28: ) instead of . Comp. Eph 4:1<\/span> ; and see on 2Co 1:4<\/span> ; Hom. Il.<\/em> xxii. 649; Arist. Pl<\/em> . 1044: . means: gratia aliquem afficere<\/em> ; and, according as the is conceived of subjectively as love-worthiness<\/em> , or objectively as the divine grace<\/em> , the sense may either be: to make love-worthy<\/em> , as Chrysostom [98] and his followers (comp. also Luther), Cornelius a Lapide, and many Roman Catholics (including Bisping), have taken it, understanding thereby not merely the reconciliation, but also the positive sanctifying, the justitia inhaerens<\/em> ; or: to grant grace<\/em> (as it is taken usually). In the former sense (see Wetstein, I. p. 651), the word occurs, Niceph. Prog<\/em> . ii. 2; Symm. Ps.<\/em> xvii. 28; Sir 18:17 ; also Sir 9:8 in Cod. A; and Clem. Alex. Paed.<\/em> iii. 11; in the latter sense, in Luk 1:28<\/span> ; Test. XII. Patr<\/em> . p. 698. The latter is here decidedly correct, since the preceding , especially with as the reading, permits no deviation from that meaning, just as Eph 1:7<\/span> sets forth simply the work of pardoning grace<\/em> .<\/p>\n

] Christ as the , Col 1:13<\/span> (comp. Mat 3:17<\/span> ), is the beloved<\/em> of God, and in Him<\/em> has God shown us grace, i.e.<\/em> in the fact that He gave Him up to death for us (Eph 1:7<\/span> ), He has brought home to us His grace. Comp. Eph 2:13<\/span> ; Rom 8:39 ; 2Co 5:19<\/span> . The designation of Christ by makes us feel the greatness<\/em> of the divine grace. Comp. Rom 8:32<\/span> ; Rom 5:8<\/span> ff.; Joh 3:16<\/span> ; 1Jn 4:9<\/span> f.<\/p>\n

[98] Chrysostom says: just as if one were to make a sick or famished man into a beautiful youth, so has God made our soul beautiful and love-worthy for the angels and all saints and for Himself.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

6 To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ver. 6. To the praise of the glory<\/strong> ] This is the end whereunto it is destined; and hence it is called predestination. Note here, that all the causes of predestination are merely without us. The efficient, God; the material, Christ; the formal, the good pleasure of his will; the final, the praise of God’s glorious grace.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Wherein he hath made us accepted<\/strong> ] Gr. , He hath ingratiated us, he hath justified us, made us gracious in his beloved Son our Mediator, gratificavit.<\/em> And although there be an inequality of expressions in duty, quoad nos, <\/em> in us, yet there is a constancy of worth and intercession by Christ, propter nos, <\/em> for us. Pareus rendereth these words thus, Nos sibi gratis effecit gratos, <\/em> He hath freely made us well thought of. <\/p>\n

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

6<\/strong> .] to<\/strong> (with a view to, as the purpose of the predestination) the praise<\/strong> (by men and angels all that can praise) of the glory of His grace<\/strong> (beware of the miserable hendiadys, ‘ His glorious grace<\/em> ,’ by which all the richness and depth of meaning are lost. The end, God’s end, in our predestination to adoption, is, that the glory, glorious nature, brightness and majesty, and kindliness and beauty, of His grace might be an object of men and angels’ praise: both as it is in HIM, ineffable and infinite, and exemplified in us<\/em> , its objects; see below, Eph 1:12<\/span> . “Owing to the defining genitive, the article (before ) is not indispensable: see Winer, edn. 6, 19. 2, b: compare Madvig, Synt. 10. 2.” Ellic.) which<\/strong> (there is some difficulty in deciding between the readings, , and . The former would be the most naturally substituted for an attraction found difficult: and the existence of , as a reading, seems to point this way. The latter, on the other hand, might perhaps be written by a transcriber carelessly, having just preceded. But I own this does not seem to me very probable. A relative following a substantive, is as often in a different case, as in the same: and there could be no temptation to a transcriber to write here, which could hardly occur at all unless by attraction, a construction to which transcribers certainly were not prone. I therefore, with Lachm., Mey., Rck., al., adopt . Considerations of the exigencies of the sense, alleged by Harl., al., do not come into play unless where external authorities are balanced (which is<\/em> the case here), and probabilities of alteration also (which is not<\/em> ) He bestowed upon us<\/strong> (the meaning of is disputed. The double meaning of , favour, grace bestowed<\/em> , and that which ensures favour<\/em> , viz. grace inherent, beauty<\/em> , has been supposed to give a double meaning to the verb also, to confer grace<\/em> , and to render gracious<\/em> , or beautiful<\/em> , or acceptable<\/em> . And this latter sense is adopted, here and in Luk 1:28<\/span> (where see note), by many, e.g. by Chrys., , , , Erasm., Luth., all. But the meaning of , on which this is founded, does not seem to occur in the N. T., certainly not in St. Paul. And , both here and in I. c., according to the analogy of such verbs, will be ‘to bestow grace.’ Another reason for this sense is the indefinite aorist, referring to an act of God once past in Christ, not to an abiding state which He has brought about in us. This, as usual, has been almost universally overlooked, and the perfect sense given. Another still is, the requirement of the context. Harl. well remarks, that, according to the sense ‘ bestowed grace<\/em> ,’ Eph 1:7 is the natural answer to the question, ‘ How<\/em> hath He bestowed grace?’ whereas, on the other rendering, it has only a mediate connexion with this verse. Stier would unite both meanings; but surely this is impossible. The becoming may be a consequence<\/em> of being , but must be quite independent of its verbal meaning. Conyb. remarks that it may be literally rendered ‘ His favour, wherewith He favoured us<\/em> :’ but ‘ favour<\/em> ’ would not reach deep enough for the sense) in<\/strong> (see above on , Eph 1:3<\/span> . Christ is our Head and including Representative) the Beloved<\/strong> (i.e. Christ: = , Col 1:13<\/span> . He is God’s , cf. Mat 3:17<\/span> ; Joh 3:16 ; 1Jn 4:9-11 ).<\/p>\n

Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 1:6<\/span> . : to the praise of the glory of his grace<\/em> . Twice again in the same context we have the phrase “to the praise of his glory” (Eph 1:12<\/span> ; Eph 1:14<\/span> ). Here it is the glory specifically of God’s grace, and the praise of that is now stated to be the ultimate end of God’s foreordination of us unto adoption, as our adoption itself has been declared to be the object of the foreordination. God’s final purpose in His eternal determinations, and the supreme end to which all that He wills regarding us looks, are the manifestation and adoring recognition of His grace in its gloriousness. So Chrys. puts it briefly . The phrase means more than “the praise of his glorious grace”. It expresses the setting forth on God’s part, and the joyful confession on man’s part, of what the Divine grace in these eternal counsels is in the quality of its splendour, its magnificence. That this is the idea is shown by the subsequent mention of the “riches” of the same grace (Eph 1:7<\/span> ). : with which he freely gifted us<\/em> ; literally, with which he graced us<\/em> . The AV follows Beza’s in qua nos acceptos sibi effecit<\/em> in rendering it “wherein he made us accepted”. The RV, which gives “wherewith he endued us” in the margin, deals better with it in the text, “which he freely bestowed on us”. The reading of the TR, supported by such MSS. as [15] [16] [17] [18] , the mass of the cursives, the Vulg., etc., must give place to , which is given by [19] [20] [21] , Eth., Syr., etc., and is adopted by LT (eighth ed.) TrWHRV. The is by attraction for ( cf.<\/em> similar genitives by attraction in Eph 4:1<\/span> ; 2Co 1:4<\/span> ), the explanation being found in the influence of such usages as , , , . See Win.-Moult., Gram.<\/em> , p. 203; Buttm., Gram.<\/em> , p. 289. The verb , following the analogy of other verbs in – , means gratia aliquem afficere<\/em> . But this may have two senses ( cf.<\/em> Harl., Ell.), either to make one agreeable, possessed of grace<\/em> ( Sir 18:17 ; Ps. 17:26 (Symmachus), Clem. Alex., Paed.<\/em> , iii., 11), or to bestow grace on one<\/em> , to compass one with favour<\/em> (Test. xii Patr., Jos. i.). The verb is of rare occurrence, whether within or without the NT. It is commonest in ecclesiastical and Byzantine Greek. In the NT it is found only twice, here and in Luk 1:28<\/span> . In both instances some would give it the former sense. In the present passage, e.g.<\/em> , Chrys. makes it , and so substantially Cornel, a Lapide, Bisping, and various RC interpreters. The latter sense, however, is rightly preferred by Beng., Ell., Alf., Light., Mey., Haupt, etc., as more in harmony with the general sense of in the Pauline Epistles, and with the fact that the main idea in the context is what God in His gratuitous goodness does for us. : in the Beloved<\/em> . The doubtful explanatory term is added by some ancient authorities ( [22] [23] [24] [25] , Vulg., Goth., Jer., etc.). Again it is not “ through<\/em> him,” but “ in<\/em> him”. The grace is bestowed in and with Christ Himself. It is in the gift of the Son that the gift of grace becomes ours and that the splendour of the grace is seen. The designation as applied to Christ is peculiar to this one passage so far as the NT is concerned. In the NT its nearest equivalent is the title in the somewhat similar passage in Col 1:13<\/span> . Cf.<\/em> also (Mat 3:17<\/span> ; Mat 17:5<\/span> ; Mar 1:11<\/span> ; Mar 9:7<\/span> ; Luk 3:22<\/span> ; Luk 9:35<\/span> ), (Mat 12:18<\/span> ); and in the OT Psa 27:6<\/span> (LXX); Isa 5:1<\/span> . Outside the NT the term is used of Christ in the Ep. of Barn.<\/em> (3, 4). Light. points also to similar designations in Ignatius, Clem. Rom., and the Ascensio Isaiae<\/em> ( Notes, ut sup.<\/em> , 316).<\/p>\n

[15] Codex Claromontanus (sc. vi.), a Grco-Latin MS. at Paris, edited by Tischendorf in 1852.<\/p>\n

[16] Codex Sangermanensis (sc. ix.), a Grco-Latin MS., now at St. Petersburg, formerly belonging to the Abbey of Saint-Germain-des-Prs. Its text is largely dependent upon that of D. The Latin version, e (a corrected copy of d), has been printed, but with incomplete accuracy, by Belsheim (18 5).<\/p>\n

[17] Codex Boernerianus (sc. ix.), a Grco-Latin MS., at Dresden, edited by Matthi in 1791. Written by an Irish scribe, it once formed part of the same volume as Codex Sangallensis ( ) of the Gospels. The Latin text, g, is based on the O.L. translation.<\/p>\n

[18] Codex Angelicus (sc. ix.), at Rome, collated by Tischendorf and others.<\/p>\n

[19] Codex Sinaiticus (sc. iv.), now at St. Petersburg, published in facsimile type by its discoverer, Tischendorf, in 1862.<\/p>\n

[20] Codex Vaticanus (sc. iv.), published in photographic facsimile in 1889 under the care of the Abbate Cozza-Luzi.<\/p>\n

[21] Codex Alexandrinus (sc. v.), at the British Museum, published in photographic facsimile by Sir E. M. Thompson (1879).<\/p>\n

[22] Codex Claromontanus (sc. vi.), a Grco-Latin MS. at Paris, edited by Tischendorf in 1852.<\/p>\n

[23] Codex Sangermanensis (sc. ix.), a Grco-Latin MS., now at St. Petersburg, formerly belonging to the Abbey of Saint-Germain-des-Prs. Its text is largely dependent upon that of D. The Latin version, e (a corrected copy of d), has been printed, but with incomplete accuracy, by Belsheim (18 5).<\/p>\n

[24] Codex Augiensis (sc. ix.), a Grco-Latin MS., at Trinity College, Cambridge, edited by Scrivener in 1859. Its Greek text is almost identical with that of G, and it is therefore not cited save where it differs from that MS. Its Latin version, f, presents the Vulgate text with some modifications.<\/p>\n

[25] Codex Boernerianus (sc. ix.), a Grco-Latin MS., at Dresden, edited by Matthi in 1791. Written by an Irish scribe, it once formed part of the same volume as Codex Sangallensis ( ) of the Gospels. The Latin text, g, is based on the O.L. translation.<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

praise. See Rom 2:29. <\/p>\n

glory. Greek. doxa. See p. 1511. <\/p>\n

wherein. The texts read which. <\/p>\n

made . . . accepted = literally en-graced. App-184. Compare Luk 1:28. <\/p>\n

Beloved. App-135. Compare Mat 3:17, Mat 17:5; &c. and see App-99. <\/p>\n

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

6.] to (with a view to, as the purpose of the predestination) the praise (by men and angels-all that can praise) of the glory of His grace (beware of the miserable hendiadys, His glorious grace, by which all the richness and depth of meaning are lost. The end, Gods end, in our predestination to adoption, is, that the glory,-glorious nature, brightness and majesty, and kindliness and beauty,-of His grace might be an object of men and angels praise: both as it is in HIM, ineffable and infinite,-and exemplified in us, its objects; see below, Eph 1:12. Owing to the defining genitive, the article (before ) is not indispensable: see Winer, edn. 6, 19. 2, b: compare Madvig, Synt. 10. 2. Ellic.) which (there is some difficulty in deciding between the readings, , and . The former would be the most naturally substituted for an attraction found difficult: and the existence of , as a reading, seems to point this way. The latter, on the other hand, might perhaps be written by a transcriber carelessly, having just preceded. But I own this does not seem to me very probable. A relative following a substantive, is as often in a different case, as in the same: and there could be no temptation to a transcriber to write here, which could hardly occur at all unless by attraction, a construction to which transcribers certainly were not prone. I therefore, with Lachm., Mey., Rck., al., adopt . Considerations of the exigencies of the sense, alleged by Harl., al., do not come into play unless where external authorities are balanced (which is the case here), and probabilities of alteration also (which is not) He bestowed upon us (the meaning of is disputed. The double meaning of ,-favour, grace bestowed, and that which ensures favour, viz. grace inherent, beauty,-has been supposed to give a double meaning to the verb also,-to confer grace, and to render gracious, or beautiful, or acceptable. And this latter sense is adopted, here and in Luk 1:28 (where see note), by many,-e.g. by Chrys., , , ,-Erasm., Luth., all. But the meaning of , on which this is founded, does not seem to occur in the N. T., certainly not in St. Paul. And , both here and in I. c., according to the analogy of such verbs, will be to bestow grace. Another reason for this sense is the indefinite aorist, referring to an act of God once past in Christ, not to an abiding state which He has brought about in us. This, as usual, has been almost universally overlooked, and the perfect sense given. Another still is, the requirement of the context. Harl. well remarks, that, according to the sense bestowed grace, Eph 1:7 is the natural answer to the question, How hath He bestowed grace? whereas, on the other rendering, it has only a mediate connexion with this verse. Stier would unite both meanings; but surely this is impossible. The becoming may be a consequence of being , but must be quite independent of its verbal meaning. Conyb. remarks that it may be literally rendered His favour, wherewith He favoured us: but favour would not reach deep enough for the sense) in (see above on , Eph 1:3. Christ is our Head and including Representative) the Beloved (i.e. Christ: = , Col 1:13. He is Gods ,-cf. Mat 3:17; Joh 3:16; 1Jn 4:9-11).<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 1:6. , to) The end aimed at.- , the praise of the glory of His grace) The praise of His glory, Eph 1:12; Eph 1:14. The praise of grace takes its rise first in order, Eph 1:7, then afterwards the praise of the glory [concerning the glory, comp. Eph 1:6; Eph 1:17-18.-V. g.]- ) . Words that are conjugate [-], as -, ch. Eph 2:4.-) , of the same form as , , , , , , , , …, signifies to render acceptable, to embrace in the arms of grace; of which the immediate consequence is blessing: comp. Luk 1:28 [ , which is followed by the blessing ]. To this refer of His grace, here, and in Eph 1:7.-, in the Beloved) the Only Begotten Son. A suitable Antonomasia.[8] Love signifies more than grace. See 1Pe 2:10, where, concerning those who have obtained mercy, things are spoken such as that the title, The beloved, stands far pre-eminent above them. , mercy, necessarily presupposes previous misery, but not so love.<\/p>\n

[8] The substitution of a descriptive name for a proper name, by way of pre-eminence. See App.-ED.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 1:6<\/p>\n

Eph 1:6<\/p>\n

to the praise of the glory of his grace,-Those adopted as sons are to bring praise and honor to the glory of his grace. The riches of grace manifested in the blessings brought to man by Jesus Christ are entitled to praise, honor, and glory to God on earth and in heaven.<\/p>\n

which he freely bestowed on us in the Beloved:-In or by that grace we are accepted in Christ, the beloved of God. This all teaches that all those in Christ are blessed.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Accepted in the Beloved (Eph 1:6)<\/p>\n

You will at once recognize the fact that this verse does not in itself constitute a complete sentence. It is a part of a rather lengthy sentence that began with the third verse. We have been climbing one of Gods wonderful mountain peaks from verse Eph 1:3, and now we have reached the top. Standing here at verse 6, we are privileged to look below us and see the depths from which we have come, and then look beyond and see the glory that is before us.<\/p>\n

There is no room for human boasting. Our salvation is according to the good pleasure of Gods will, to the praise of the glory of His own grace, and no man may give himself any credit whatsoever. It is to the praise of the glory of Gods grace that He has accepted us in the Beloved. I hope we are all clear about grace. We are constantly preaching about it, singing about it, and reading about it, and yet how few there are who really understand the precious fact that our salvation is altogether of grace. No matter how many times one may preach on salvation by grace, every time he rises to face an audience there are many who are still strangers to the grace of God. Let us never forget that grace is Gods free unmerited favor lavished on those who deserve nothing but His judgment. You cannot earn grace, you cannot earn His lovingkindness.<\/p>\n

You may remember the case of the woman who attempted the assassination of Queen Elizabeth I. She was dressed as a page, and had hid herself in the queens boudoir awaiting the convenient moment to stab her to death, not realizing that the queens attendants would be very careful to search the rooms before her majesty was permitted to retire. Hidden there among the gowns they found this woman and brought her into the presence of the queen. They took from her the dagger that she had hoped to plant in the heart of her sovereign. She realized that her case, humanly speaking, was hopeless, and so she threw herself down on her knees and pleaded and begged the queen to have compassion on her and show her grace. Queen Elizabeth looked at her quietly, and coolly said, If I show you grace, what promise will you make for the future? The woman looked up and said, Grace that hath conditions, grace that is fettered by precautions, is no grace at all. Queen Elizabeth understood immediately and said, You are right; I pardon you of my grace, and they led her away a free woman. History tells us that from that moment Queen Elizabeth had no more faithful devoted servant than that woman who had intended to take her life.<\/p>\n

Remember, grace that has conditions, grace that is bound by precautions, that insists on pledges and promises for the future, is no grace at all. Grace is favor freely shown to those who deserve only judgment, and so we read that our salvation is to the praise of the glory of His grace. When at last we get home to Heaven, He will have all the praise and all the glory. We will gratefully acknowledge in His glorious presence that left to ourselves we would have gone on to everlasting judgment, that it was He who showed us our deep, deep need. Looking down on us He pitied us as we were hurrying on to endless woe and He gave His Son to die. This is the grace of our Lord Jesus that led Him to go to Calvarys cross and settle the claim that we never could have settled. And so by grace, and by grace alone, have we been saved.<\/p>\n

Observe that we have been made accepted in the beloved. The saved sinner does not stand before God in any righteousness of his own, nor does he plead any merit of his own before the divine throne. Not merely forgiven, not merely justified, not merely washed from his sins or cleansed from his defilement, he is received in lovingkindness to the very heart of God according to the Fathers estimate of His own beloved Son. In John Chapter 17 we read our Lords prayer to the Father for His own-you and me, if we have believed in Him, for He was praying for those who shall believe on me through their word. Thus He included all believers to the very end of time, and speaking of such He said to the Father, That the world may know that thouhast loved them, as thou hast loved me. I could not believe that statement if it were not in my Bible. I could not believe that God the holy One loves me, a poor sinner in myself, as He loves the Lord Jesus Christ, His spotless Son.<\/p>\n

We do not have far to go for the proof of His love. It is seen in that God commended His love toward us by sending His Son to be the propitiation for our sins. If He gave His Son for me, then He must love me as greatly as He loves His Son, or He never would have permitted Him to die for me. Also in 1Jn 4:17 we read a similar passage: That we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world, that is, as He is in relation to judgment. He has already passed through the judgment and will never have to go into it again. He will never again know the forsaking of God, the enshrouding of His soul with the blackness of darkness, the taste of the bitter cup, the agony, shame, and curse of the cross. All that is in the past. He went through it all for us and now so truly are we linked up with Him that as he is, so are we in this world.<\/p>\n

A very interesting volume was published, giving the story of the life and work of Dr. Usher, who for a great many years carried on medical missionary work in Turkey. In this wonderful story he related an incident mat illustrates in a striking way what we have before us. He told how a notable member of the Turkish movement had become governor of a certain province in which the mission hospital and schools were located. This man was very learned and of great determination, but a very rigid Muslim. He had made up his mind to carry out one of the old laws of Turkey stating that foreigners coming into the country should be allowed to live there for one year, but if at the end of that time they had not become Mohammedans, they would have to leave Turkey. That law had been a dead issue for a great many years, but he made up his mind that he would banish all the missionaries, Catholic and Protestant, from his province.<\/p>\n

However, he decided that to be fair he would give them all an opportunity to become Mohammedans, and so during the month of Ramadan, their annual fast, he invited all these missionaries to a great feast in his home. They were allowed to feast at night but not in the daytime. As all these missionaries received the message, they knew it to be a summons. According to Turkish law it would never do to make excuses, for the invitation to dine with the governor was tantamount to a command. Dr. Usher sat on the left hand of the governor, and the Catholic bishop sat on his right hand, with the other missionaries on either side, and a number of the attendants of the governor in waiting.<\/p>\n

After a while turning to the Catholic bishop, the governor said, My lord bishop, will you tell me how you think a man can enter paradise? The bishop answered, I will say that I believe through the merits of Jesus Christ, God can forgive my sins and take me to paradise. Not at all, said the governor; I cannot believe that God is less righteous than I am, and I do not believe it would be righteous for God because of His friendship for another, to forgive a sinner and take him to paradise. If someone here had become indebted to the government and I had to put him in prison, and someone said, That man is a friend of mine, for my sake I beg you let him go free, no matter how much I would desire to please my friend, I would be an unrighteous governor to let him go free simply because of my friendship for someone who was interested in him. I do not believe that God is less righteous than I. The bishop had not another word to say and sat there looking puzzled.<\/p>\n

Dr. Usher felt that something tremendous was at stake, and he knew that he would be questioned next, so he lifted his heart to God, remembering the verse, When they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak (Mat 10:19). He prayed, Lord, by Thy Spirit give me now the message.<\/p>\n

The governor turned and said, What would you say? How may a man be assured of an entrance into paradise? Dr. Usher replied, Your Excellency, will you permit me to use your own illustration, only to change it slightly? Let us think of you not merely as the governor of this province, but as the king. You have one son, the prince, whom you love tenderly. Suppose that I am the man who is in debt to the government, owing a sum so vast that I could not pay one part out of a thousand. In accordance with the law, I am cast into prison. Unworthy as I am, your son is a friend of mine: he has a deep interest in me and a real love for me. He seeks you out and says, My father, my friend is in prison for a debt which he owes the government, and which he cannot pay. Will you permit me to pay it all for him in order that he may go free? And you say to him, My son, since you are so interested and willing to pay the debt yourself, I am willing that it should be so, and more than that, I will participate with you in it.<\/p>\n

And so the prince goes to the proper authority and pays my debt in full, leaving nothing to be demanded. He takes the receipt, and comes down to me in my prison cell. I could treat him in three ways. When he comes to me and says, Brother, your debt is paid and you may go free, I could turn in haughtiness and say, No; I refuse to be under obligation to anybody, forgetting that my debt is already an obligation and that I am now only entering into one of lovingkindness, whereas I was before obligated by law. And suppose I continue, I will never leave this prison unless I can pay the debt myself. I would have to remain in the prison, for I could not settle the debt.<\/p>\n

Or I might look at the receipt and say, I cant believe it; there is some mistake about it. I cant believe that you would take such an interest in me. I dare not leave; let me remain here. I am afraid to go out lest I be arrested again. But the prince might say, Man, it is foolish for you to talk like that. And if he should insist on drawing me out of the prison, I would go slinking down the street and trembling as I thought of my debt, and my home would become a prison, for I would be afraid to look out of the window or go to the door. I would have no assurance if I did not believe the message that your son brought.<\/p>\n

But in the third place I could rise up and fall at the feet of the prince, your son, and say, I can never repay you for what you have done for me, but I will seek to show by my life how grateful I am to you. And so I would go free. Let us suppose that on some later day I see the prince riding down one of the streets of the city, and I notice that someone has left a great pile of wood in the street that prevents him from going by. Would I try to get someone to get this out of the way? No, rather I myself would be glad to run out and clear a passage for the prince. If he says, Thank you; let me pay for your labor, I would say, Oh, no; you paid my debt; it is a joy for me to do something to show my gratitude.<\/p>\n

The Turkish governor was listening carefully and watching intently, and suddenly a light shone, and he said, Oh, then, Dr. Usher, is this the reason why you have a hospital here in Turkey? Is this why you establish these schools and why you missionaries are giving your lives for our people? You are not trying to earn your way into paradise? No, said Dr. Usher, our way into paradise is settled because Jesus has paid the debt, and now we serve because we love Him.<\/p>\n

The Turkish governor was thoughtful again and then looked up and said, You used the illustration of my son paying the debt, and you suggested that God has a Son. But God is one God; He does not beget, and He is not begotten. I cannot accept the idea that God would come down to this world and beget a Son. Dr. Usher said, But, Your Excellency, when God speaks to us He has to use our language. His thoughts are above our thoughts and His words above our words. We speak to one another in different tongues. If I were to say to you in English, In a little while I am going home, it would mean something altogether different from the message that would be conveyed in Turkish, for in Turkish there is a no word for home. I would have to say, In a little while I am going to the house. But I do not mean that I am going to the building, I mean that I am going to the love of my wife and children whether there is a building or not. That constitutes home for me. And, you see, our poor human language has no word to express the infinite mystery of the relation between the Father and the Son, for it is not such a relationship as you and I know; it is one that existed from all eternity.<\/p>\n

The governor felt he could not banish the missionaries, and allowed the work to go on and was himself dismissed from his position because of his grace and kindness in protecting them. They have always hoped that deep in his heart he turned to Christ.<\/p>\n

Our Lord saw us in our great need. He paid for us, and having settled the debt He has now brought us into the royal family, washed us from every stain of sin, robed us in garments of glory and beauty, and given us a seat at the table of the King. He has taken us into favor in the Beloved so that the Fathers thoughts of Christ are His thoughts of love for us who trust Christ. Out of our appreciation for this, springs the obedience of faith. Out of our gratitude for His love springs the earnest desire to so labor, so work, so live for God that in that coming day when we meet our Savior in glory, we will be acceptable to Him and will hear Him say to us, Well done, thou good and faithful servant; enter thou into the joy of thy lord (Mat 25:21). He does not mean that we enter paradise because of our service, but that entering Heaven in all the infinite value of the Person and work of Christ we share His joy through the ages to come.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Commentaries on the New Testament and Prophets<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

praise: Eph 1:7, Eph 1:8, Eph 1:12, Eph 1:14, Eph 1:18, Eph 2:7, Eph 3:10, Eph 3:11, Pro 16:4, Isa 43:21, Isa 61:3, Isa 61:11, Jer 33:9, Luk 2:14, Rom 9:23, Rom 9:24, 2Co 4:15, Phi 1:11, Phi 4:19, 2Th 1:8-10, 1Ti 1:14-16, 1Pe 2:9, 1Pe 4:11 <\/p>\n

he: Isa 45:24, Isa 45:25, Jer 23:6, Rom 3:22-26, Rom 5:15-19, Rom 8:1, 2Co 5:21, Phi 3:9, 1Pe 2:5 <\/p>\n

in: Psa 22:20, Psa 60:5, Pro 8:30, Pro 8:31, Isa 42:1, Isa 49:1-3, Zec 13:7, Mat 3:17, Mat 17:5, Joh 3:35, Joh 10:17, Col 1:13 <\/p>\n

Reciprocal: Gen 4:7 – If thou doest well Gen 14:19 – Blessed be Exo 28:38 – accepted Exo 33:19 – all my goodness Exo 40:6 – General Lev 4:35 – and the priest shall make Lev 15:15 – an atonement Lev 15:28 – General Lev 24:7 – pure Num 6:18 – and put it 1Sa 12:22 – for his great 2Sa 7:23 – make him 2Ki 19:34 – for mine 1Ch 16:28 – glory Neh 9:17 – gracious Job 42:8 – him Psa 6:4 – for Psa 23:3 – for his Psa 25:7 – for thy Psa 31:16 – save Psa 51:1 – O God Psa 59:16 – sing aloud Psa 79:9 – for the Psa 85:11 – righteousness Psa 86:5 – plenteous Psa 89:2 – Mercy Psa 108:6 – That thy Psa 111:3 – honourable Psa 111:4 – gracious Psa 115:1 – unto us Psa 116:5 – Gracious Psa 138:5 – for great Psa 145:8 – Lord is gracious Pro 8:35 – favour Pro 20:3 – an Son 8:10 – then Isa 1:18 – though your Isa 30:18 – will he be Isa 37:35 – for mine Isa 43:7 – for my Isa 43:25 – for mine Isa 44:23 – glorified Isa 46:13 – Israel Isa 49:3 – General Isa 49:8 – In an Isa 55:7 – for Isa 60:21 – that I Isa 63:7 – according to his Isa 63:14 – to make Jer 14:7 – do Eze 20:14 – General Eze 20:44 – when I Eze 43:27 – I will accept Dan 9:9 – To the Lord Dan 9:19 – thine Hos 14:2 – receive Hos 14:4 – I will love Zec 4:7 – Grace Mat 12:18 – my beloved Mat 20:9 – they received Luk 1:28 – highly favoured Luk 19:38 – glory Luk 24:47 – beginning Joh 1:16 – and grace Joh 17:23 – and hast Joh 17:26 – that Act 10:35 – is Act 15:11 – that Act 20:24 – the gospel Rom 1:5 – for his name Rom 3:24 – through Rom 5:8 – commendeth Rom 5:19 – so by Rom 5:20 – But Rom 9:18 – hath Rom 11:5 – election of grace Rom 15:7 – to 2Co 1:20 – unto 2Co 5:9 – accepted 2Co 8:9 – the grace Eph 3:21 – be 2Th 1:10 – to be glorified 1Ti 1:11 – glorious 1Ti 1:16 – for this Tit 2:11 – the grace Tit 3:5 – according Heb 2:10 – it Heb 12:28 – we may Jam 2:13 – and Jam 5:11 – the Lord is<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

(Eph 1:6.) -To the praise of the glory of His grace. occurs thrice in the sentence-first pointing out the object of predestination-then, in immediate sequence, marking the connection of the adopted with God-and now designating the final end of the process-relations objective, personal, and teleological, different indeed, yet closely united. has not the article, being defined by the following genitive, which with its pronoun is that of possession. Winer, 19, 2, b;Madvig, 10, 2. This verse describes not the mere result, but the final purpose, of God’s . The proximate end is man’s salvation, but the ultimate purpose is God’s own glory, the manifestation of His moral excellence. 2Co 1:20; Php 1:11; Php 2:11. It was natural in an ascription of praise to introduce this idea, the apostle’s offering of praise- -being at that moment a realization of this very purpose, and therefore acceptable to Him. Some critical editors read , but without valid reason. <\/p>\n

The reduction of the phrase to a Hebraism is a feeble exegesis. That reduction has been attempted in two ways. Some, like Grotius and Estius, resolve it into -to the glorious praise of His grace. Others, as Beza, Koppe, Winer, Holzhausen, and Meier, construe it as . But it is not generally His glorious grace, but this one special element of that grace which is to be praised. Winer, 30, 3, 1; Bernhardy, p. 53. is favour, Divine favour, proving that man has not only no merit, but that, in spite of demerit, he is saved and blessed by God. (See under chap. Eph 2:5-8.) Its glory is its fulness, freeness, and condescension. It shrinks from no sacrifice, averts itself from no species or amount of guilt, enriches its objects with the choicest favours, and confers upon them the noblest honours. It has effected what it purposed-stooping to the depths, it has raised us to the heights of filial dignity. Still further: this grace, with its characteristic glory, is a property in God’s nature which could never have been displayed but for the introduction of sin, and God’s design to save sinners. This, then, was His great and ultimate end, that the glory of His grace should be seen and praised, that this element of His character should be exhibited in its peculiar splendour, for without it all conceptions of the Divine nature must have been limited and unworthy. And as this grace lay in His heart, and as its exhibition springs from choice, and not from essential obligation, it is praised by the church, which receives it, and by the universe, which admires it. Therefore to reveal Himself fully, to display His full-orbed glory, was an end worthy of God. The idea of Stier, that the words have a subjective refer ence, is far-fetched, as if the apostle had said that we are predestined to be ourselves the praise of His glory. All that is good in this interpretation is really comprised in the view already given. <\/p>\n

, or .-The former reading has in its favour D, E, F, G, K, L. The Vulgate and Syriac cannot be adduced as decided authorities, as they have often characteristic modes of translation in such places. For we have the two old MSS. A and B, and Chrysostom’s first quotation of the clause. Authorities are pretty nearly balanced, and editors and critics are therefore divided-Tischendorf and Ellicott being for the first, Lachmann and Alford for the second-but the meaning is not affected whichever reading be adopted. While is well supported, would seem to be quite in harmony with Pauline usage, and is the more difficult of the two readings, tempting a copyist on that account to alter it. It stands so by attraction, Bernhardy, p. 299; Winer, 24, 1; Eph 4:1; 2Co 1:4; see also under Eph 1:8. Two classes of meanings have been assigned to the verb:- <\/p>\n

1. That of Chrysostom, and the Greek fathers, who usually follow him, Theodoret, Theophylact, and OEcumenius; also of many of the Catholic interpreters, and of Beza, Luther, Calvin, Piscator, Olshausen, Holzhausen, Passavant, and the English version. The verb is supposed by them to refer to the personal or subjective result of grace, which is to give men acceptance with God-gratos et acceptos reddidit. Men filled with gratia are gratiosi in the eye of God. Luther renders angenehm gemacht, as in our version, made accepted. Chrysostom’s philological argument is, the apostle does not say , that is, the apostle does not say, which He has graciously given, but with which He has made us gracious. He further explains the term by -He has made us objects of His love; and He employs this striking and beautiful figure-It is as if one were to take a leper, wasted with malady and disease, with age, destitution, and hunger, and were to change him all at once into a lovely youth, surpassing all men in beauty, shedding a bright lustre from his cheeks, and eclipsing the solar beam with the glances of his eyes, and then were to set him in the flower of his age and clothe him in purple, and with a diadem, and all the vestments of royalty. Thus has God arrayed and adorned our soul, and made it an object of beauty, delight, and love. But the notion conveyed in this figure appears to us to be foreign to the meaning of the term. The word occurs, indeed, with a similar meaning in the Septuagint, Sir 18:17, where is a man full of grace and blandness; and the same book, Sir 9:8, according to Codex A and Clement’s quotation, has the same participle, as if it were synonymous with -comely, well-shaped. Opera, p. 257; Coloniae, 1688. Such a sense, however, is not in harmony with the formation of the verb or the usage of the New Testament. Yet Mhler, in his Symbolik, 13, 14, uses the clause as an argument for the justitia inhaerens of the Romish Church. <\/p>\n

2. The verb , a word of the later Greek, signifies, according to the analogy of its formation-to grace, to bestow grace upon. So some of the older commentators, as Cocceius, Rell, and most modern ones. Verbs in signify to give action or existence to the thing or quality specified by the correlate noun, have what Khner appropriately calls eine factitive Bedeutung, 368. Thus, – I set on fire, -I put to death, that is, I give action to and . Buttmann, 119. will thus indicate the communication or bestowment of the . The grace spoken of is God’s, and that grace is liberally conferred upon us. To maintain the alliteration it may be rendered, The grace with which He graced us, or the favour with which He favoured us. The Vulgate has gratificavit, and the Syriac -which He has poured out. has an objective meaning here, as it usually has in the Pauline writings, and , applied to the Virgin (Luk 1:28, Valcknaer, ap. Luk 1:28), signifies favoured of God, the selected recipient of His peculiar grace. Test. xii. Patr. p. 698. The use of a noun with its correlate verb is not uncommon. Eph 1:3; Eph 1:19-20; Eph 2:4; Eph 4:1; Donaldson, 466; Winer, 24, 1. The spirit of the declaration is-To the praise of the glory of His grace, which He so liberally conferred upon us-the aorist referring to past indefinite time and not to present condition. The liberal bestowment of that grace is its crown and glory. It was with no stinted hand that God gave it, as the following context abundantly shows. This glory of grace which is to be lauded is not its innate and inoperative greatness, but its communicated amount. The financial prosperity of a people is not in useless and treasured bullion, but the coined metal in actual circulation. The value is not in the jewel as it lies in the depth of the mine, in the midst of unconscious darkness, but as it is cut, polished, and sparkling in the royal diadem. So it is not grace as a latent attribute, but grace in profuse donation, and effecting its high and holy purpose; it is not grace gazed at in God’s heart, but grace felt in ours, felt in rich variety and continuous reception-it is the grace with which He graced us, that is to be praised for its glory. And it is poured out- <\/p>\n

-in the Beloved. Some MSS., such as D, E, F, G, add , an evident gloss followed by the Vulgate and Latin fathers. The Syriac adds the pronoun, in his Beloved-.. The reference is undoubtedly to Christ. Mat 3:17; Mat 17:5; Joh 3:16; 1Jn 4:9-11; or Col 1:13 – . Jesus is the object of the Father’s love-eternal, boundless, and immutable; and in Him as the one living sphere, not for His sake only, men are enriched with grace. But what suggested such an epithet here? 1. The apostle had said, In love having predestinated us to the adoption of children. We, as adopted children, are indeed loved, but there is another, the Son, the own beloved Son. It was not, therefore, affection craving indulgence, or eager for an object on which to expend itself, that led to our adoption. There was no void in His bosom, the loved One lay in it. 2. The mediatorial representative of fallen humanity is the object of special affection on the part of God, and in Him men are also loved by God. Bengel suggests that the we enjoy is different from this . Still the apostle affirms, that we share in love as well as grace. 3. The following verse tells us that redemption comes to us -by His blood, for the Beloved One is the sacrifice. What love, therefore, on the Father’s part to deliver Him up-what praise to the glory of His grace-and what claim has Jesus to be the loved One also of His church, when His self-sacrificing love for them has proved and sustained its fervour in the agonies of a violent and vicarious death! For the next thought is- <\/p>\n

Fuente: Commentary on the Greek Text of Galatians, Ephesians, Colossians and Phillipians<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 1:6. The grace or favor of being adopted into the family- of God is a glory to Him as well as a credit of praise for His great benevolence. Receiving men into the close relationship of members in the divine family is an unspeakable blessing to man, but the Lord ordained that such a situation was to be fully acceptable to all parties concerned, and not merely one that was tolerated through a spirit of pity.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 1:6. Unto the praise of the glory of his grace. This is the refrain of the passage. The election and predestination were not only in accordance with Gods freedom, but also for this end: that those who become sons of God by adoption (and with them all sinless creatures) should praise the Divine glory which is the special characteristic of His grace that makes it worthy of praise. We are to praise Him, not simply for His favor to us, but for that exhibition of grace which exalts us to a higher knowledge of His glory, so that, even in praising Him for what He does for us, we learn to praise Him for what He is. This phrase must not, therefore, be weakened into His glorious grace. Comp. the phrase, unto the praise of His glory (Eph 1:12; Eph 1:14).<\/p>\n

Which he freely bestowed on us. The E. V. is quite faulty here, following an incorrect reading and misinterpreting the verb. This word has two senses: (1.) To graciously bestow; (2.) to endue with grace. The latter sense is objectionable, both here and in Luk 1:28 (the only other N. T. passage where the word occurs). In fact, grace is used by Paul of Divine grace, not of the human result, and here the reference is to an act of God once past in Christ, not to an abiding state which He has brought about in us (Alford). Hence hath is to be omitted. At the same time the thought of the Apostle here turns toward the carrying out of the purpose of redemption.<\/p>\n

In the Beloved. We, as adopted children, are indeed loved, but there is another, the Son, the own beloved Son. It was not, therefore, affection craving indulgence, or eager for an object on which to expend itself, that led to our adoption. There was no void in His bosom, the loved one lay in it (Eadie). We become the objects of Gods love through His grace, which has in Christ its sphere, and becomes ours through union with Him.<\/p>\n

Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Verse 6 <\/p>\n

Of his grace; of his goodness and mercy.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. <\/p>\n

Paul is praising the glory of God’s grace. God acted on our behalf in grace, and that exhibits glory of its own in some manner, so Paul praises that glory. Glory can speak to the “glory” as we understand it, but it is also the thought of opinion of something. Paul is giving high regard, or commendation, or praise to our opinion or estimation of the “grace” of God in our salvation. <\/p>\n

We know how great a salvation God has brought to our lives, and we know it is because of Him and nothing that we have done, so we really honor and respect the “grace” which He showed in our lives – it is natural to have a high opinion of God’s grace, thus we should “praise” or give high regard to all that He has done. <\/p>\n

How can we do this aside from verbal praise? By sharing that message of grace with all that we meet. By living a life that is honoring to a God that has done so much for us. Be thankful for all that God has done for us in salvation and our everyday life. <\/p>\n

There is a significance in the verbs “accepted” which is an aorist, or one time occurrence, and “in” which is a perfect tense, something that has continuing action to a future culmination. We were accepted at a point in time – we are in the beloved now, and will continue in the beloved until eternity when all things are culminated. It is also of note that the construction of “in the beloved” is such that we are not involved in the action – it is something that is done from without our being. <\/p>\n

We are accepted, but due to no action of our own. <\/p>\n

Now, there is an application that I should really not have to make but the idea of “accepted in the beloved” needs some of our attention. Just how accepted is the believer in the church today? I know some believe this relates to the beloved as in Christ, but even if that is the thought of the text, it has the overall thought of the believer being accepted. In Christ we are one – His body and we certainly should be accepted as part of the body. <\/p>\n

Are we really accepting of other believers in our churches? We visited one church recently and as we sat down we were given a doctrinal statement by the pastor – “This is what we believe.” was his comment. In our time there we were not greeted, other than by the pastor, and we felt as though we were totally outside the fellowship and further more, we felt that the exclusion was on purpose, until they could determine whether we agreed with them or not. This was in a fundamental church. <\/p>\n

Also recently we have visited another fundamental church and our presence is kind of acknowledged with a faint hello by the pastor’s wife, and later by the pastor, as he finalizes all of his wanderings around and shuffling of papers. The people of the church made little effort to acknowledge us – of course until the greeting time, when we were actually greeted by a few of the people. As we left the church, the pastor did come over and say hello again, but I had the feeling it was more out of “I really should say something to them.” than a desire to accept us as fellow believers – well since there was no opportunity for them to know this of us, why would they accept us \ud83d\ude41 <\/p>\n

Even in churches where we have been members for a long time there is a real lack of acceptance. We do little to promote unity among believers in this day. What are some things we might do to promote unity and acceptance between believers? <\/p>\n

1. Set up settings where they can spend time with one another to get to know one another. In most of our churches we are total strangers, we know nothing of the others, and even if we know some, we do not share our needs and accomplishments with them. <\/p>\n

a. How about pot lucks, how about small group dinners or deserts before or after church. Coffee times before or after Sunday school class – include foods all can eat. We have many people on special diets today and coffee and donuts won’t draw some into fellowship, they will avoid it so they don’t have to say no to something they dearly desire to eat. <\/p>\n

b. Small groups during prayer times. This develops closeness that may foster openness. <\/p>\n

c. Small Bible study groups also will bring closeness. Maybe even have them during Sunday school now and then, for the entire hour – maybe have a few minutes of conclusion at the end. <\/p>\n

2. The pastor needs to set the example. If he gets to know people then others may catch the interest. I don’t mean the surface news, weather and sports – where do you work stuff, though that is a good place to start, but I mean a getting to know some of the church folks. Finding out their dreams, finding out their ministry, their spiritual gift, and maybe even their problems, and maybe praying with some of them. <\/p>\n

We tend to not want to get to know in the church today – partly because we know we will be the pastor s illustrations in his next pastorate if we have problems and talk to him. The same goes for the congregation – few want to open up to others due to the knowledge that spreading of information is the next step in many cases. <\/p>\n

3. Assure confidentiality when you start getting closer to someone. This will be the best key to building unity. <\/p>\n

4. Sermons on the subject as well as studies on the how and why of unity. People can’t always build unity without some know-how. <\/p>\n

Much unity comes automatically when we love one another. Realization of this might go far in bringing closeness to a group. I suspect this was one of the reasons Christ said what He said about loving one another. He mentioned in Joh 15:14 in the context of loving one another, “Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.” <\/p>\n

Now, that is a promise we ought to want to make use of – if we love one another we can know that we are “friends” of Christ. What a deal and love doesn’t even cost, nor is it fattening. Verse seventeen mentions that we are to love one another. Love brings unity and closeness. <\/p>\n

Fuente: Mr. D’s Notes on Selected New Testament Books by Stanley Derickson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

1:6 {9} To the {i} praise of the glory of his grace, {10} wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.<\/p>\n

(9) The uttermost and chiefest final cause is the glory of God the Father, who saves us freely in his Son.<\/p>\n

(i) That as his bountiful goodness deserves all praise, so also it should be set forth and proclaimed.<\/p>\n

(10) Another final cause more near is our justification, in that he freely accounted us as being righteous in his Son.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

The ultimate goal of predestination and election is that believers will contribute to the praise of the magnificence of God’s undeserved favor that He has shown toward humankind (cf. Eph 1:12; Eph 1:14). This grace was "freely bestowed" or "given" in the sense that the elect need do nothing to merit it. It comes to us through Jesus Christ, described here as the Beloved of the Father (cf. Col 1:13). Since God loves His Son, believers who are in Christ can rejoice that we too are the objects of God’s love.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Chapter 3<\/p>\n

THE BESTOWMENT OF GRACE<\/p>\n

Eph 1:6-12<\/p>\n

THE blessedness of men in Christ is not matter of purpose only, but of reality and experience. With the word grace in the middle of the sixth verse the apostles thought begins a new movement. We have seen Grace hidden in the depths of eternity in the form of sovereign and fatherly election, lodging its purpose in the foundation of the world. From those mysterious depths we turn to the living world in our own breast. There, too, Grace dwells and reigns: “which grace He imparted to us, in the Beloved, -in whom we have redemption through His blood.” The leading word of this clause we can only paraphrase; it has no English equivalent. St. Paul perforce turns grace into a verb; this verb occurs in the New Testament but once besides, in Luk 1:28, the angels salutation to Mary: “Hail thou that art highly favoured (made-an-object-of-grace).” If we could employ our Verb to grace in a sense corresponding to that of the noun grace in the apostles dialect and nearly the opposite of to disgrace, then graced would signify what he means here, viz., treated with grace, made its recipients.<\/p>\n

God “showed us grace in the Beloved”-or, to render the phrase with full emphasis, “in that Beloved One”-even as He “chose us in Him before the worlds foundation” and “in love predestined us for adoption.” The grace is conveyed upon the basis of our relationship to Christ: on that ground it was conceived in the counsels of eternity. The Voice from heaven which said at the baptism of Jesus and again at the transfiguration, “This is My Son, the Beloved,” uttered Gods eternal thought regarding Christ. And that regard of God toward the Son of His love is the fountain of His love and grace to men.<\/p>\n

Christ is the Beloved not of the Father alone, but of the created universe. All that know the Lord Jesus must needs love and adore Him-unless their hearts are eaten out by sin. Not to love Him is to be anathema. “If any man love Me,” said Jesus, “My Father will love him.” Nothing so much pleases God and brings us into fellowship with God so direct and joyous, as our love to Jesus Christ. About this at least heaven and earth may agree, that He is the altogether lovely and loveworthy. Agreement in this will bring about agreement in everything. The love of Christ will tune the jarring universe into harmony.<\/p>\n

I. of grace bestowed, the first manifestation, in the experience of Paul and his readers, was “the forgiveness of their trespasses”. {comp. Eph 2:13-18} This is “the redemption” that “we have.” And it comes “through His blood.” The epistles to the Galatians and Romans expound at length the apostles doctrine touching the remission of sin and the relation of Christs death to human transgression. To “redemption” we shall return in considering Eph 1:4, where the word is used, as again in Eph 4:30, in its further application.<\/p>\n

Rom 3:22-26 “the redemption that is in Christ Jesus” is declared to be the means by which we are acquitted in the judgment of God from the guilt of past transgressions. And this redemption consists in the “propitiatory sacrifice” which Christ offered in shedding His blood-a sacrifice wherein we participate “through faith.” The language of this verse contains by implication all that is affirmed there. In this connection, and according to the full intent of the word, redemption is “release by ransom.” The life-blood of Jesus Christ was the “price” that He paid in order to secure our lawful release from the penalties entailed by our trespasses. This Jesus Christ implied beforehand, when He spoke of “giving His life a ransom for many”; and when He said, in handing to His disciples the cup of the Last Supper: “This is My blood, the blood of the covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” Using another synonymous term, St. Paul tells us that “Christ bought us out of the curse of the law”; and he bases on this expression a strong practical appeal: “You are not your own, for ye were bought with a price.” These sayings, and others like them, point unmistakably to the fact that our trespasses as men against Gods inflexible law, apart from Christs intervention, must have issued in our eternal ruin. By His death on the cross Christ has made such amends to the law, that the awful sentence is averted, and our complete release from the power of sin is rendered possible.<\/p>\n

On rising from the dead our Saviour commissioned the apostles to “proclaim in His name repentance and remission of sins to all nations.” {Luk 24:47} It was thus He proposed to save the world. This proclamation is the “good news” of the gospel. The announcement meets the first need of the serious and awakened human spirit. It answers the question which arises in the breast of every man who thinks earnestly about his personal relations to God and to the laws of his being. We cannot wonder that St. Paul sets the remission of sins first amongst the bestowments of Gods grace, and makes it the foundation of all the rest.<\/p>\n

Does it occupy the like position in modern Christian teaching? Do we realise the criminality of sin, the fearfulness of Gods displeasure, the infinite worth of His forgiveness, and the obligations under which it places us, as St. Paul and his converts did? or even as our fathers did a few generations ago. “It is my impression,” writes Dr. R. W. Dale, “that both religious people and those who do not profess to be religious must be conscious that Gods Forgiveness, if they ever think of it at all, does not create any deep and strong emotion The difference between the way in which we think of the Divine Forgiveness and the way in which it was thought of by David and Isaiah, by Christ Himself, by Peter, Paul, and John; by the saints of all Christian Churches in past times, both in the East and in the West; by the leaders of the Evangelical Revival in the last century-the difference, I say, between the way in which the Forgiveness of sins was thought of by them, and the way in which we think of it, is very startling. The difference is so great, it affects so seriously the whole system of the religious thought and life, that we may be said to have invented a new religion The difference between our religion and the religion of other times is this-that we do not believe that God has any strong resentment against sin or against those who are guilty of sin: And since His resentment has gone, His mercy has gone with it. We have not a God who is more merciful than the God of our fathers, but a God who is less righteous; and a God who is not righteous, a God who does not glow with fiery indignation against sin, is no God at all.”<\/p>\n

These are solemn words, to be deeply pondered. They come from one of the most sagacious observers and justly revered teachers of our time. We have made a real advance in breadth and human sympathy; and there has been throughout our Churches a genuine and much-needed awakening of philanthropic activity. But if we are “departing from the living God,” what will this avail us? If “the redemption through Christs blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses,” is no longer to us the momentous and glorious fact that it was to the apostles, then it is time to ask whether our God is in truth the same as theirs, whether He is still the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ-whether we are not, haply, fabricating for ourselves another gospel. Without a piercing sense of the shame and ruin involved in human sin, we shall not put its remission where St. Paul does, at the foundation of Gods benefits to men. Without this sentiment, we can only wonder at the passionate gratitude with which he receives the atonement and measures by its completeness the riches of Gods grace.<\/p>\n

II. Along with this chief blessing of forgiveness, there came another to the apostolic Church. With the heart the mind, with the conscience the intellect, was quickened and endowed: “which (grace) He shed abundantly upon us in all wisdom and intelligence.”<\/p>\n

This sequel to Eph 1:7 is somewhat of a surprise. The reader is apt to slur over Eph 1:8, half sensible of some jar and incongruity between it and the context. It scarcely occurs to us to associate wisdom and good sense with the pardon of sin, as kindred bestowments of the gospel. Minds of the evangelical order are often supposed, indeed, to be wanting in intellectual excellences and indifferent to their value. Is it not true that “not many wise after the flesh were called”? Do we not glory above everything in preaching a “simple gospel”?<\/p>\n

But there is another side to all this. “Christ was made of God unto us wisdom.” This attribute the apostle even sets first when he writes to the wisdom-seeking Greeks, mocked by their worn-out and confused philosophies. {1Co 1:30} To a close observer of the primitive Christian societies few things must have been more noticeable than the powerful mental stimulus imparted by the new faith. These epistles are a witness to the fact. That such letters could be addressed to communities gathered mainly from the lower ranks of society-consisting of slaves, common artisans, poor women-shows that the moral regeneration effected in St. Pauls converts was accompanied by an extraordinary excitement and activity of thought. In this the apostle recognised the work of the Holy Spirit, a mark of Gods special favour and blessing. “I give thanks always for you,” he writes to the Corinthians, “for the grace of God that was given you in Christ Jesus, that in everything you were enriched by Him, in all word and all knowledge.” The leaders of the apostolic Church were the profoundest thinkers of their day; though at the time the world held them for babblers, because their dialect was not in its schools. They drew from stores of wisdom and knowledge hidden in Christ, which none of the princes of this world knew. Of such wisdom our epistle is full, and God “has made it to abound” to the readers in these inspired pages. Pauls “understanding in the mystery of Christ” was always deepening. In his lonely prison musings the length and breadth of the Divine counsels are disclosed to him as never before. He sees the course of the ages and of the universe being illuminated by the light of the knowledge of Christ. And what he sees, all men are to see through him. {Eph 3:9} Blessed be God who has given to His Church through His apostles, and through the great Christian teachers of every age, His precious gifts of wisdom and prudence, and made His grace richly to overflow from the heart into the mind and understanding of men!<\/p>\n

This intellectual gift is twofold: phronesis as well as sophia, -the bestowment not only of deep spiritual thought, but of moral sagacity, good sense, and thoughtfulness: This is a choice charism – a mercy of the Lord. For want of it how sadly is the fruit of other graces spoilt and wasted. How brightly it shines in St. Paul himself! What luminous and wholesome views of life, what a fund of practical sense, there is in the teaching of this letter.<\/p>\n

St. Paul rejoices in these gifts of the understanding and claims them for the Church, having in his view the false knowledge, the “philosophy and vain deceit” that was making its appearance in the Asian Churches. {Col 2:4,Col 2:8, etc.} Our safeguard against intellectual perils lies not in ignorance, but in deeper heart-knowledge. When the grace that bestows redemption through Christs blood adds its concomitant blessing of enlightenment, when it elevates the mind as it cleanses the heart, and abounds to. us in all wisdom and prudence, the winds of doctrine and the waves of speculation blow and beat in vain; they can but bring health to a Church thus established in its faith.<\/p>\n

Eph 1:9-10 describe the object of this. new knowledge. They state the doctrine which gave this powerful mental impulse to the apostolic Church, disclosing to it a vast field of view, and supplying the most fertile and vigorous principles of moral wisdom. This impulse lay in the revelation of Gods purpose to reconstitute the universe in Christ. The declaration of “the mystery of His will” comes in at this point episodically, and by the way; and we reserve it for consideration to the end of the present chapter.<\/p>\n

But let us observe here that our wisdom and prudence lie in the knowledge of Gods will. Truth is not to be found in any system of logical notions, in schemes and syntheses of the laws of nature or of thought. The human mind can never rest for long in abstractions. It will not accept for its basis of thought that which is less real and positive than itself. By its rational instincts it is compelled to seek a Reason and a Conscience at the centre of things, -a living God. It craves to know “the mystery of His will.”<\/p>\n

III. Eph 1:2 fills up the measure of the bestowment of grace on sinful men. The present anticipates the future; faith and love are lifted to a glorious hope. “In whom also (i.e., in Christ) we received our heritage, predestinated to it, according to His purpose who works all things according to the counsel of His will.”<\/p>\n

Following Meyer and other great interpreters, we prefer in this passage the rendering of the English Authorised Version (“we obtained an inheritance”) to that of the Revised (“we were made a heritage”). “Fore-ordained” carries us back to Eph 1:5 – to the phrase “foreordained to sonship.” The believer cannot be predestinated to sonship without being predestinated to an inheritance. “If children, then heirs”. {Rom 8:17} But while in the parallel passage we are designated heirs “with” Christ, we appear in this place, according to the tenor of the context, as heirs “in” Him. Christ is Himself the believers wealth, both in possession and hope: all his desire is to gain Christ. {Php 3:8} The apostle gives thanks here in the same strain as in Col 1:12-14, “to the Father who qualified us (by making us His sons) to partake of the inheritance of the saints in the light.” In that thanksgiving we observe the same connection as in this between our “forgiveness” (Eph 1:7) and our “enfeoffment,” or investment with the forfeited rights of sons of God (Eph 1:5, Eph 1:11).<\/p>\n

The heritage of the saints in Christ is theirs already, by actual investiture. The liberty of sons of God, access to the Father, the treasures of Christs wisdom and knowledge, the sanctifying Spirit and the moral strength and joy that He imparts, these form a rich estate of which ancient saints had but foretastes and promises. In the all-controlling “counsel of His will,” God wrought throughout the course of history to convey this heritage to us. We are children of “the fulness of the times,” heirs of all the past. For us God has been working from eternity, on us the ends of the world have come. Thus from the summit of our exaltation in Christ the apostle looks backward to the beginning of Divine history.<\/p>\n

From the same point his gaze sweeps onward to the end. Gods purpose embraces the ages to come with those of the past. His working will not cease till the whole counsel is fulfilled. What we have of our inheritance, though rich and real, holds in it the promise of infinitely more; and the Holy Spirit is the “earnest of our inheritance” (Eph 1:14). God intends “that we should be to the praise of His glory.” As things are, His glory is but obscurely visible in His saints. “It doth not yet appear what we shall be,” – and will not appear until the unveiling of the sons of God. {Rom 8:18-25} One day Gods glory in us will burst forth in its splendour. All beholders in heaven and earth will then sing “to the praise of His glory,” when it is seen in His redeemed and godlike sons. Eph 1:9-10 (“which He purposed upon the earth”) are, as we have said, a parenthesis or episode in the passage just reviewed. Neither in structure nor in sense would the paragraph be defective, had this clause been wanting. With the “in Him” repeated at the end of Eph 1:10, St. Paul resumes the main current of his thanksgiving, arrested for a moment while he dwells on “the mystery of Gods will.”<\/p>\n

This last expression (Eph 1:9), notwithstanding what he has said in Eph 1:4 and Eph 1:5, still needs elucidation. He will pause for an instant to set forth once more the eternal purpose, to the knowledge of which the Church is now admitted. The communication of this mystery is, he says, “according to Gods good pleasure which he purposed in Christ (comp. Eph 1:4), for a dispensation of the fulness of the times, intending to gather up again all things in the Christ-the things in the heavens, and the things upon the earth.”<\/p>\n

God formed in Christ the purpose, by the dispensation of His grace, in due time to re-unite the universe under the headship of Christ. This mysterious design, hitherto kept secret, He has made known unto us. Its manifestation imparts a wisdom that surpasses all the wisdom of former ages. Such is the drift of this profound deliverance.<\/p>\n

The first clause of Eph 1:10 supplies a datum for its interpretation. “The fulness of the times,” in St. Pauls dialect, can only be the time of Christ. The dispensation which God designed of old is that in which the apostle himself is now engaged; it is the dispensation, or administration (“economy”), of the grace and truth that came by Jesus Christ, whether God be conceived as Himself the Dispenser, or through the stewards of His mysteries. The Messianic end was to Pauls Jewish thought the denouement of antecedent history. How long this age would continue, into what epochs it might unfold itself, he knew riot; but for him the fulness of the times had arrived. The Son of God was come; the kingdom of God was amongst men. It was the beginning of the end. It is a mistake to relegate this text to the dim and distant future, to some far-off consummation. We are in the midst of the Christian reconstruction of things, and are taking part in it. The decisive epoch fell when “God sent forth His Son.” All that has followed, and will follow, is the result of this mission. Christ is all things, and in all; and we are already complete in Him.<\/p>\n

What, then, signifies this “gathering-into-one” or “summing-up” of all things in Christ? Our “recapitulate” is the nearest equivalent of the Greek verb, in its etymological sense. In Rom 13:8-9 the same word is used, where the several commands of the second table of the Decalogue are said to be “comprehended in this word, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.” This summing up is not a generalisation or compendious statement of the commands of God; it signifies their reduction to a fundamental principle. They are unified by the discovery of a law that underlies them all. And while thus theoretically explained, they are made practically effective: “For love is the fulfilling of the law.”<\/p>\n

Similarly, St. Paul finds in Christ the fundamental principle of the creation. For those who think with him, God has by the Christian revelation already brought all things to their unity. This summing up-the Christian inventory and recapitulation of the universe-the apostle has formally stated in Col 1:15-20 : “Christ is Gods image and creations firstborn. In Him, through Him, for Him all things were made. He is before them all; and in Him they have their basis and uniting bond. He is equally the Head of the Church and the new creation, the firstborn out of the dead, that He might hold a universal presidence-charged with all the fulness, so that in Him is the ground of the reconciliation no less than of the creation of all things in heaven and earth.” What can we desire more comprehensive than this? It is the theory and programme of the world revealed to Gods holy apostles and prophets.<\/p>\n

The “gathering into one” of this text includes the “reconciliation” of Col 1:20, and more. It signifies, beside the removal of the enmities which are the effect of sin, {Eph 2:14-16} the subjection of all powers in heaven and earth to the rule of Christ (Eph 2:21-22), the enlightenment of the angelic magnates as to Gods dealings with men, {Eph 3:9-10} -in fine, the rectification and adjustment of the several parts of the great whole of things, bringing them into full accord with each other and with their Creators will. What St. Paul looks forward to is, in a word, the organisation of the universe upon a Christian basis. This reconstitution of things is provided for and is being effected “in the Christ.” He is the rallying point of the forces of peace and blessing. The organic principle, the organising Head, the creative nucleus of the new creation is there. The potent germ of life eternal has been introduced into the worlds chaos; and its victory over the elements of disorder and death is assured.<\/p>\n

Observe that the apostle says “in the Christ.” He is not speaking of Christ in the abstract, considered in His own Person or as He dwells in heaven, but in His relations to men and to time. The Christ manifest in Jesus, {Eph 4:20-21} the Christ of prophets and apostles, the Messiah of the ages, the Husband of the Church, {Eph 5:23} is the author and finisher of this grand restoration.<\/p>\n

Christs work is essentially a work of “restoration.” We must insist, with Meyer, upon the significance of the Greek preposition in Pauls compound verb (ana-, equal to re-in “restore” or “resume”). The Christ is not simply the climax of the past-the Son of man and the recapitulation of humanity, as man is of the creatures below him, summing up human development and lifting it to a higher stage-though He is all that. Christ “rehabilitates” man and the world. He re-asserts the original ground of our being, as that exists in God. He carries us and the world forward out of sin and death, by carrying us back to Gods ideal. The new world is the old world repaired, and in its reparation infinitely enhanced-rich in the memories of redemption, in the fruit of penitence and the discipline of suffering, in the lessons of the cross. “All things” in heaven and earth it was Gods good pleasure in the Christ to gather again into one. Is this a general assertion concerning the universe as a whole, or may we apply it with distributive exactness to each particular thing? Is there to be, as we fain would hope, no single exception to the “all things”-no wanderer lost, no exile finally shut out from the Holy City and tree of life? Are all evil men and demons, willing or against their will, to be embraced somehow and at last-at last-in the universal peace of God?<\/p>\n

It is impossible that the first readers should have so construed Pauls words. {Eph 5:5} He has not forgotten the “unquenchable fire,” the “eternal punishment,” nor dare we. “If any thing is certain about the teaching of Christ and His apostles, it is that they warned men not to reject the Divine mercy, and so to incur irrevocable exile from Gods presence and joy. They assumed that some men would be guilty of this supreme crime, and would be doomed to this supreme woe” (Dale). There is nothing in this text to warrant any man in presuming on the mercy or the sovereignty of God, nothing to justify us in supposing that, deliberately refusing to be reconciled to God in Christ, we shall yet be reconciled in the end despite ourselves.<\/p>\n

St. Paul assures us that God and the world will be reunited, and that peace will reign through all realms and orders of existence. He does not, and he could not, say that none will exclude themselves from the eternal kingdom. Making men free, God has made it possible for them to contradict Him, so long as they have any being. The apostles words have their note of warning, along with their boundless promise. There is no place in the future order of things for aught that is out of Christ. There is no standing-ground anywhere for the unclean and the unjust, for the irreconcilable rebel against God. “The Son of man shall send forth His angels, and they shall gather out of His kingdom all things that offend and them that do iniquity.”<\/p>\n

Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. 6. To the praise, &c.] I. e., that the grace of Redemption might be adored and praised in respect of that glory of God which is the harmony of His attributes, His Character. See Rom 3:23 and … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Ephesians 1:6”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}