{"id":29180,"date":"2022-09-24T13:10:04","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T18:10:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-ephesians-213\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T13:10:04","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T18:10:04","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-ephesians-213","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-ephesians-213\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Ephesians 2:13"},"content":{"rendered":"

But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n

13<\/strong>. but now<\/em> ] under the changed conditions of actual and accepted Redemption.<\/p>\n

in Christ Jesus<\/em> ] In living union with the true Messiah. Just before, Eph 2:12<\/span>, we have “without Christ<\/em> ” merely; here, “in Christ Jesus<\/em>.” The Messiah of Prophecy is now known as also the Jesus<\/em> of the Gospel.<\/p>\n

sometimes<\/em> ] Once<\/strong>, as R. V. The A. V. uses a word now antiquated in this sense, or appearing only as “sometime” the word used here in Wiclif’s Version (1382), in “The Great Bible” (1539), and the Rhemish Version (1582).<\/p>\n

far off nigh<\/em> ] That is, from and to the Citizenship of Israel and the Covenants of promise; the realm, in fact, of Messiah. Cp. Act 2:39<\/span>, and see Isa 57:19<\/span>. The thought of remoteness and nearness in respect of God<\/em> is of course implied, and comes out clearly in Eph 2:18<\/span>; but it is not the immediate thought of this passage, which rather speaks of the incorporation of once heathen souls into the true Israel<\/em>. But the two views cannot be quite separated. “Nigh” and “far” were familiar terms with the Rabbis in the sense of having or not having part in the covenant. Wetstein on this verse quotes, inter alia<\/em>, the following from the Talmud: “A woman came to R. Eliezer, to be made a proselyte; saying to him, Rabbi, make me nigh<\/em>. He refused her, and she went to R. Joshua, who received her. The scholars of R. Joshua therefore said, Did R. Eliezer put her far off, and dost thou make her nigh?<\/em> ”<\/p>\n

by the blood of Christ<\/em> ] Lit. and better, in the blood<\/strong>, &c. To illustrate the phrase cp. Heb 9:22<\/span>; Heb 9:25<\/span>; “almost all things according to the law are purged in blood;<\/em> ” “the High Priest entereth the Holy Place in blood<\/em> not his own.” Whatever the first use of the phrase, it had thus become an almost technicality of sacrificial language, nearly equalling “ with<\/em> (shed) blood” as the accompanying condition of acceptable approach. It is not necessary to import into the idea here the other, though kindred, idea of washing in blood, or even of surrounding with a circle of sprinkled blood. The “ in<\/em> ” is, by usage, as nearly instrumental<\/em> as possible. The sacred bloodshedding of the Messiah’s sacrificial death for His true Israel was the necessary condition to, and so instrument of, the admission of the new Gentile members. It is the “blood of the covenant<\/em> ” (Exo 24:8<\/span>; quoted Heb 9:20<\/span>); and cp. the all-important words of the Lord Himself (Mat 26:28<\/span>), “This is My blood of the new Covenant<\/em>, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.”<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

But now, in Christ Jesus – <\/B>By the coming and atonement of the Lord Jesus, and by the gospel which he preached.<\/P>

Ye who sometimes were afar off – <\/B>Who were formerly – <\/SPAN><\/span> pote Tyndale translates it, a whyle agoo. The phrase afar off – <\/SPAN><\/span> makran – means that they were formerly far off from God and his people. The expression is derived from the custom of speaking among the Hebrews. God was supposed to reside in the temple. It was a privilege to be near the temple. Those who were remote from Jerusalem and the temple were regarded as far off from God, and hence as especially irreligious and wicked; see the notes at Isa 57:19<\/span>.<\/P>

Are made nigh – <\/B>Are admitted to the favor of God, and permitted to approach him as his worshippers.<\/P>

By the blood of Christ – <\/B>The Jews came near to the mercy seat on which the symbol of the divine presence rested (the notes at Rom 3:25<\/span>), by the blood that was offered in sacrifice; that is, the high priest approached that mercy-seat with blood and sprinkled it before God. Now we are permitted to approach him with the blood of the atonement. The shedding of that blood has prepared the way by which Gentiles as well as Jews may approach God, and it is by that offering that we are led to seek God.<\/P><\/p>\n

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 2:13<\/span><\/p>\n

But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Sin, the separator<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sin has its dark offices–offices which it is always fulfilling. For sin is that dividing element, which, where it comes in, breaks up the harmony of all things, and sends them out into the distance of chaos and dismay. God, at the beginning, made the heaven to be subservient to the earth; and the earth to be subservient to the harvest; and the harvest to be subservient to His people. But sin has broken the beautiful chain of the material universe. When man fell, nature fell; and the links were severed by the fall. There is an interval, and an interruption now, between the right causes and the right effects in Gods creation. And worse than this, man is divided from man; every one from his fellow. The very Church is broken up–Christian from Christian. And St. James traces it out: From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? The lust of pride, the lust of an opinionated mind–the lust of prejudice–the lust of jealousy–the lust of selfishness–the lust of a worldly ambition: these are the fabricators of all discord. These make foes out of hearts which were meant to love as brethren. And what are these, but some of sins many forms which it loves to take, that it may then better work as a separator between man and man? No wonder, for sin separates a man from himself. I question whether any man is at variance with his brother, till he has first been at variance with himself. But sin takes away a mans consistency. A man is not one; but he is two–he is many characters. What he is one time, that is just what he is not another. Passions within him conflict with reason–passions with passions–feelings with feelings–he is far off from himself. And this the separator does. But never does he do that, till he has done another act of separation–and because he has done that other–he separates man from God. If you wish to know how far sin has thrown man away from God–you must measure it by the master-work which has spanned the gulf. The eternal counsel–the immensity of a Divine nature clothing Himself in manhood–love, to which all other love is as a drop to the fountain, from whence it springs–a life, spotless–sufferings, which make all other sufferings a feathers weight in the balance–a death, which merged all deaths–all this, and far more than this, has gone to make the return possible. And when it was possible; then the life of discipline and struggle–a work of sanctification, going on day by day–many crucifixions–the seven-fold operations of the Holy Ghost–death–resurrection–these must make the possible return a fact. By all these you must make your calculation, if you wish to measure the distance of that far off, which we ewe to that great separator–sin. And this is the reason why God so hates sin, because it has put so far away from Him those He so dearly loves. And now let us deal with this matter a little more practically. Since Christ died, there is no necessary separation between any man and God. Without that death, there was. (J. Vaughan, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Nearness to God<\/strong><\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>We commence, by endeavouring to explain the meaning of the two key words–In Christ Jesus, and, by the blood of Christ. We who sometimes were far off are made nigh.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>First, because we are in Christ Jesus. All the elect of God are in Christ Jesus by a federal union. He is their Head, ordained of old to be so from before the foundation of the world. This federal union leads in due time, by the grace of God, to a manifest and vital union, a union of life, and for life, even unto eternal life, of which the visible bond is faith.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>The other key word of the text is, by the blood of Christ.<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> If it he asked what power lies in the blood to bring nigh, it must be answered, first, that the blood is the symbol of covenant. Ever in Scripture, when covenants are made, victims are offered, and the victim becomes the place and ground of approach between the two covenanting parties. The blood of our Lord Jesus Christ is expressly called the blood of the everlasting covenant, for God comes in covenant near to us by the blood of His only begotten Son. Every man whose faith rests upon the blood of Jesus slain from before the foundation of the world, is in covenant with God, and that covenant becomes to him most sure and certain because it has been ratified by the blood of Jesus Christ, and therefore can never be changed or disannulled.<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> The blood brings us near in another sense, because it is the taking away of the sin which separated us. When we read the word blood as in the text, it means mortal suffering; we are made nigh by the grief and agonies of the Redeemer. The shedding of blood indicates pain, loss of energy, health, comfort, happiness; but it goes further still–the term blood signifies death. It is the death of Jesus in which we trust. We glory in His life, we triumph in His resurrection, but the ground of our nearness to God lies in His death. The term blood, moreover, signifies not a mere expiring, but a painful and ignominious and penal death. It refers directly to the crucifixion of Christ.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Experimentally we are brought nigh by the application of the blood to our conscience. We see that sin is pardoned, and bless the God who has saved us in so admirable a manner, and then we who hated Him before come to love Him; we who had no thought towards Him desire to be like Him. The great attracting loadstone of the gospel is the doctrine of the Cross.<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> The first illustration is from our first parent, Adam. Adam dwelt in the garden, abiding with God in devout communion. The Lord God walked in the garden in the cool of the day with Adam. As a favoured creature, the first man was permitted to know much of his Creator, and to be nigh to Him; but, alas! Adam sinned, and at once we see the first stage of our own distance from God as we perceive Adam in the garden without his God. But, ah! brethren, you and I were farther off than that–much farther off than that, when love made us nigh.<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> Let me now give you a second illustration, which may place this wonder of love in a still clearer light. It shall be taken from the children of Israel travelling through the wilderness. If an angel had poised himself in mid air, and watched awhile in the days of Moses, gazing down upon the people in the wilderness and all else that surrounded them, his eye would have rested upon the central spot, the tabernacle, over which rested the pillar of cloud and fire by day and night as the outward index of the presence of God. Now, observe yonder select persons, clad in fair white linen, who come near, very near, to that great centre; they are priests, men who are engaged from day to day sacrificing bullocks and lambs, and serving God. They are near to the Lord, and engaged in most hallowed work, but they are not the nearest of all; one man alone comes nearest; he is the high priest, who, once every year, enters into that which is within the veil. Ah, what condescension is that which gives us the selfsame access to God. The priests are servants of God, and very near to Him, but not nearest; and it would be great grace if God permitted the priests to enter into the most holy place; but, brethren, we were not by nature comparable to the priests; we were not the Lords servants; we were not devoted to His fear; and the grace that has brought us nigh through the precious blood was much greater than that which admits a priest within the veil. Every priest that went within the veil entered there by blood, which he sprinkled on the mercy seat. If made nighest, even from the nearer stage, it must be by blood, and in connection with the one only High Priest. If the angel continued his gaze, he would next see lying all round the tabernacle the twelve tribes in their tents. These were a people near unto God, for what nation hath God so nigh unto them? (Deu 4:7<\/span>). But they are nothing like so near as the priests, they did not abide in the holy court, nor were they always occupied in worship. Israel may fitly represent the outward Church, the members of which have not yet received all the spiritual blessing they might have, yet are they blessed and made nigh. If ever an Israelite advanced into the court of the priests, it was with blood; he came with sacrifice; there was no access without it. It was great favour which permitted the Israelite to come into the court of the priests and partake in Divine worship; but, brethren, you and I were farther off than Israel, and it needed more grace by far to bring us nigh. By blood alone are we made nigh, and by blood displayed in all the glory of its power.<\/p>\n

(3)<\/strong> A third illustration of our nearness to God will be found around the peaks of the mount of God, even Sinai, where the various degrees of access to God are set forth with singular beauty and preciseness of detail. The nineteenth chapter of the Book of Exodus tells us that the Lord revealed Himself on the top of Sinai with flaming fire, and the smoke thereof ascended as the smoke of a furnace. Jehovah drew near unto his people Israel, coming down in the sight of all the people upon Mount Sinai, while the tribes stood at the nether part of the mount. No, remember that our natural position was much more remote than Israel at the foot of the mount, for we were a Gentile nation to whom God did not appear in His glory, and with whom He spake not as with Israel. We were living in darkness, and in the valley of the shadow of death; but Israel was privileged to come very near as compared with us; hence the apostle in the chapter from which the text is taken, speaks of the circumcised as nigh. I take Israel to be to us this morning the type of those who live under gospel privileges, and are allowed to hear the joyful sound of salvation bought with blood. The gospel command has come to your conscience with such power that you have been compelled to promise obedience to it: but, alas, what has been the result of your fear and your vow? You have gone back farther from God, and have plunged anew into the worlds idolatry, and are today worshipping yourselves, your pleasures, your sins, or your righteousness; and when the Lord cometh, the nearness of opportunity which you have enjoyed will prove to have been to you a most fearful responsibility, and nothing more.<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>Let us note some of the displays of the realizations of this nearness to God as granted to us by blood through our union with Christ. We perceive and see manifestly our nearness to God in the very first hour of our conversion. The father fell upon the prodigals neck and kissed him–no greater nearness than that; the prodigal becomes an accepted child, is and must be very near his fathers heart; and we who sometimes were far off are as near to God as a child to his parents. We have a renewed sense of this nearness in times of restorations after backsliding, when, pleading the precious blood, we say, Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean; wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow. We come to God, and feel that He is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart. We come near to God in prayer. Our nearness to God is peculiarly evinced at the mercy seat. But, brethren, we never get to God in prayer unless it is through pleading the precious blood.<\/p>\n


IV. <\/strong>Brief exhortation.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Let us live in the power of the nearness which union with Christ and the blood hath given us.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Let us enjoy the things which this nearness was intended to bring.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Let us exercise much faith in God.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>Let our behaviour be in accordance with our position. (C. H. Spurgeon.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The Christians retrospect<\/strong><\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>A state of nature.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Moral darkness.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Spiritual blindness and deafness.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Moral and spiritual death.4. <\/strong>Enmity to and alienation from God.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>A state of grace.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Light.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Peace.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Joy.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>Unclouded faith and hope.<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>The characteristics of a natural man.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>The depravity of his heart and the sinfulness of his unholy affections are stronger than the impulses of his soul.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>He is destitute of proper knowledge.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>He is satisfied with this world. He has not raised his affections above temporal joys.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>He is ignorant, blind, naked, condemned in sin, the slave of his lusts, the servant of Satan, the heir of hell.<\/p>\n


IV. <\/strong>The characteristics of a spiritual man.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>He is penitent. The sins of the past he hopes are forgiven, the sins of the present he daily implores God may be pardoned.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>He is humble. He is not self-complacent over discharge of known duty.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>He is dependent upon God.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>He is a man of active Christianity. He locks up, and is ever moving onward and upward.<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>He is a man of love and forbearance. He wears Gods image, looks like His Son, has the spirit of an angel, and the praise for his God of a seraph.<\/p>\n


V. <\/strong>The change of our condition as affected by the application of the text. It intimates that a certain time we were without Christ (verses 11 and 12). At that time ye were without Christ refers to the condition of the heathen. They were without God and hope in the world. The science of Egypt, Chaldea, Greece, and Rome had discovered much as to things pertaining to the present life; but in respect of a hereafter all was enveloped in gross darkness. The text intimates the mode of the great change. Having asserted that those who sometimes were afar off are brought nigh to God, the apostle affirms that this is accomplished in Christ, and through the application of His blood. Therefore–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>The blood of Christ is the means, when preached, through which sinners are brought near to God. Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day, and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>By the bleed of Christ, as shed upon the cross, atonement was made, sin was expiated, and a way opened for God to draw near to the sinner, and the sinner to God, This is a proposition of Andrew Fuller. God sent His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin (or by a sacrifice for sin) condemned sin in the flesh. He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things? This proposition and this passage are a summary of gospel truth.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>We are brought into sacred nearness to God, and enter a state of salvation through the blood of Christ. This is applied spiritually, and is the true remission of sins. Divine grace applies spiritually the Divine Redeemers blood, to cleanse from sin. (W. C. Crane, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Brought nigh through death<\/strong><\/p>\n

A mother in New York whose son had got into dissipated and abandoned habits, after repeated remonstrances and threats, was turned out of doors by his father, and he left vowing he would never return unless his father asked him, which the father said would never be. Grief over her son soon laid the mother on her dying bed, and when her husband asked if there was nothing he could do for her ere she departed this life, she said, Yes; you can send for my boy. The father was at first unwilling, but at length, seeing her so near her end, he sent for his son. The young man came, and as he entered the sick room his father turned his back upon him. As the mother was sinking rapidly, the two stood on opposite sides of her bed, all love and sorrow for her, but not exchanging a word with each other. She asked the father to forgive the boy; no, he wouldnt until the son asked it. Turning to him, she begged of him to ask his fathers forgiveness; no, his proud heart would not let him take the first step. After repeated attempts she failed, but as she was just expiring, with one last effort she got hold of the fathers hand in one hand, and her sons in the other, and exerting all her feeble strength, she joined their hands, and, with one last appealing look, she was gone. Over her dead body they were reconciled, but it took the mothers death to bring it about. So, has not God made a great sacrifice that we might be reconciled–even the death of His own dear Son? <\/em>(D. L. Moody.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Jesus the only hope<\/strong><\/p>\n

A Christian Hindoo was dying, and his heathen comrades came around him, and tried to comfort him by reading some of the pages of their theology; but he waved his hand, as much as to say, I dont want to hear it. Then they called in a heathen priest, and he said, If you will only recite the Numtra <\/em>it will deliver you from hell. He waved his hand, as much as to say, I dont want to hear that. Then they said, Call on Juggernaut. He shook his head, as much as to say, I cant do that. Then they thought perhaps he was too weary to speak, and they said, Now, if you cant say Juggernaut, think of that god. He shook his head again, as much as to say, No, no, no. Then they bent down to his pillow, and they said, In what will you trust? His face lighted up with the very glories of the celestial sphere as he cried out, rallying all his dying energies, Jesus! <\/em>(Dr. Talmage.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The blood of Christ<\/strong><\/p>\n

Captain <\/em>Hedley Vicars, when under deep conviction of sin, one morning came to his table almost broken hearted, and bowed to the dust with a sense of his guilt. Oh, wretched man that I am! he repeated to himself, at the same time glancing at his Bible, which lay open before him. His eyes suddenly rested on that beautiful verse, The blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanseth from all sin. Then, said he, it can cleanse me from mine; and he instantly believed with his heart unto righteousness, and was filled with peace and joy. From that time to the hour in which he lay bathed in his own blood, in the trenches before Sebastopol, he never doubted his forgiveness, or Gods ability and willingness to pardon the chief of sinners. (S. M. Haughton.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Aliens brought nigh to God<\/strong><\/p>\n

1<\/strong>. <\/em><\/strong>We must so look on our misery as to remember our estate by mercy. The devil will labour to swallow up in sorrow, as well as to kill by carnal security. This teaches ministers how to dispense the Word in wisdom, and Christians how to carry themselves; they must not be all in one extreme, like those philosophers that are either always weeping, or else always laughing; but, if there be heaviness with them in the evening, they must look to that which may bring, joy in the morning; and as a man after hard labour delights to take the air m a garden, so must they, when they have humbled their souls, in viewing their mercy, refresh themselves in walking among those sweet flowers, even the benefits of God.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>The Lord brings such as are furthest estranged from Him to be near unto Him. If the king pardon one whose goodwill is doubtful, and take him into his favour, it is much; but when one has lived in making attempts on his person, then to forget and to forgive were more than credible clemency. Yet this is what God has done.<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> None, then, need despair of himself.<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> No, nor of others, however bad.<\/p>\n

(3)<\/strong> Comfort to those already converted.<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>A wonderful change is made in those who are in Christ.<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> Nearness to God. God dwells with Christ; we, therefore, being in Him, must needs have communion with the Father and the Holy Spirit.<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> And to our fellow Christians. Christ is the head of His members; we must therefore needs be near to those who are in affinity with Christ, as in wedlock.<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>It is by the blood of Christ that we are reconciled to God. When we think of Christ crucified and shedding of His blood, there we may see–<\/p>\n

(1)<\/strong> Our sins punished to the full.<\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong> Our sins pardoned to the full.<\/p>\n

(3)<\/strong> Our sins crucified and mortified by His blood.<\/p>\n

(4)<\/strong> The flesh crucified (Gal 5:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n

(5)<\/strong> Ourselves crucified to the world, and the world to us (Gal 6:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n

(6)<\/strong> There we behold how patient we should be in affliction, even to the death.<\/p>\n

(7)<\/strong> There is the picture of our whole life, which must be a continual course of mortification.<\/p>\n

(8)<\/strong> There is the seasoning of our death, that whenever it comes it shall be a sweet passage to a better life.<\/p>\n

(9)<\/strong> There we see all evils turned to our good.<\/p>\n

(10)<\/strong> Therein we see all good things purchased for us: grace, mercy, peace, eternal salvation, yea, a heaven of treasures and riches gathered for us, and that we are made partakers of, by a due view of meditation of Christ crucified. (Paul Bayne.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The nearness of God<\/strong><\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>A <\/em>reconciled God. We are all naturally far from God, not as being out of His reach, or out of His sight, or out of His presence, but as differing from Him, as being out of sympathy with Him–as forgetting or not thinking about Him–as disobeying Him, and disliking Him, and thus having incurred His displeasure. Such things as these create a distance between one and another. They need to he brought near, or, as our text puts it, made nigh to each other. And how is that to be done? By their being in some way reconciled; by some one coming between them and making them friends–making them one. That might he done in various ways. I might appeal to them, as a friend of both of them, to lay aside their enmity for my sake, and be friends. I might put the hand of the one in that of the other, and take both in my own; and so they might be said to be made nigh by me. Or if one had wronged the other, I might offer to be responsible for the wrong, and to put it right. If the one had taken money that belonged to the other, and had spent it or lost it, and could not make it good, I might offer to replace it. And so they might be made nigh through me. I have heard of a devoted Christian minister, who lay on his deathbed, getting two friends who were visiting him, and who had quarrelled with each other, to shake hands over his body, as they stood at opposite sides of his bed; and so they were made nigh through him. They did not need to move from where they were standing before in order to be thus made nigh. Or I might illustrate it in another way. In Shetland, between the mainland and a small island rising up into a lofty rock, there is a deep and awful-looking gorge. Looking over the edge you see and hear the sea rushing and foaming below. It makes one dizzy to look down. Two people standing on each side of that gorge, though they could almost join hands across it, might be far enough apart from each other. For many years there was a kind of basket bridge. A basket was swung across by means of a rope, The people got into the basket and slid across in it. They were made nigh by means of it. Two of you wish to meet each other at a canal. You stand one on each side. The drawbridge is up, and though the water is only a few yards in breadth, you cannot get to each other except by going nearly a quarter of a mile round about, which makes it all one as if the canal were a quarter of a mile broad. You may be said to be all that distance apart from each other. But the bridge comes down, and at once makes you nigh. Little more than a step brings you together. Now, as I have said, the sinner and God are thus apart from each other–separated from each other, wide, wide apart. The sinner is without God. His sins have hid Gods face from him. God is not in all his thoughts. How shall they be made nigh? The sinner cannot make himself nigh. He can only get farther away from God. And so the Lord Jesus comes in as the Mediator.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>God able to see us. That is implied in His being near us–His being not far from every one of us. When we are very far away, we cannot see things at all. If some one were holding out a book to you at a distance, you could not see the letters, you could not read them even though the print were pretty large. You would say, It is too far off; I must have it nearer. And when you get near to it, you can read, without difficulty, even the smallest print. When we are at sea, the land in the distance is seen very dimly. But for being told, we should not know it to be land at all. It is more like cloud. But as we come nearer we can distinguish mountains, and fields, and houses, and as we enter into the harbour we can see everything and everybody. Our being near enables us to see. You cannot distinguish peoples faces at a distance, you cannot tell what people are doing. But when you come near–when you are standing beside them–you see all. Now just so it is with God. He is near. He is a God at hand. He sees your thoughts. He sees your acts–every one of them. He sees every letter you write–every line you write. He can see everything about you, for He is near you wherever you are. Think what it would be if a person were constantly beside you, all through the night and day, never sleeping, his wakeful eye ever upon you. What a knowledge of you he would have! When travelling in the country, I saw a policeman and another man keeping very close together. They went into the railway carriage together and came out together. They sat together, they walked on the platform together. And then I noticed that the one was chained to the other. The handcuff round the wrist of each told how it was. The prisoner could do nothing which the policeman could not see. So it was with Paul when he was chained to the soldier during his imprisonment at Rome. What a knowledge of the great apostle that soldier must have had! So near–so constantly near you is God.<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>As He sees all, as we should with the microscope, so He hears all, as we should with the microphone or telephone–every sound we utter, every word we speak. I saw a very curious thing one day. An old lady whom I knew was very deaf. I could not make her hear a word. But when I was calling at her house, her daughter spoke to her, and though she did not hear a word, she was able to understand the movement of the lips so thoroughly that it was as if she had heard every word, which indeed she repeated exactly as it was spoken. In this way some people do not need to hear in order to know what is being said or done. But, as I have said, it is nearness that is the great help to hearing. People in church who cannot hear well, wish to get as near the pulpit as possible. Deaf people in a room bring their chair close to you, or draw you close to them, and so, if at all possible, they hear. If anything is certain, it is that God hears–hears every one–hears everything, for He is not far from every one of us. If you knew that some one whom you stand in awe of were near, would it not influence you in all that you said? I was one day travelling in a railway carriage, when the conversation of my fellow travellers turned on a particular friend of mine. Suddenly there was silence. One of the party had recognized me, and, with a look and a shrug, indicated that they had better take care what they said. How often that might be done in a different way! If I were at your elbow, might I not often gently whisper, Hush! He is here! Who? God. Or I might point upward–as much as to say, He is listening!–take care what you say.<\/p>\n


IV. <\/strong>God able to help us. One reason why friends cannot help us, even when they would, is that they are too far away. This can never happen with God. He is always close at hand, always within reach. The doors of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh are never locked. Above the principal entrance there are two panels. On the one are inscribed the words, I was sick and ye visited Me: and on the other, I was a stranger and ye took me in; and between the panels is the crest of the infirmary, Patet omnibus,<\/em> which may be rendered, Open to all. And at any hour, night or day, if any accident occurs, there is instant admittance. Might I not say, Gods door is never locked, and it is close to every one of us. At any hour of the day or of the night, He is near–able and willing to help. (J. H. Wilson, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Sinners brought nigh by the blood of Christ<\/strong><\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>We were sometime far off. Distance = ignorance of God, and under His displeasure. What the peculiar nature of our erroneous path, our remote situation, was, is comparatively of little consequence. Some of us were lost in the cares of the world. Some were deluded by the deceitfulness of riches. The lust of other things held some captive. While others were intoxicated by pleasure, or enchanted by worldly science, or drawn away by the meaner things which attract the attention of sordid souls. It is enough, more than enough, that we were far from God. Let us now turn our attention to our present situations.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>Now are we made nigh. These words convey to the mind ideas of Relationship, Friendship, Union, and Communion. Thus we are made nigh; and our text leads us, in the next place, to consider how this blessed, this important, change has been effected.<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>In Christ Jesus–by the blood of Christ.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>In Christ Jesus. He is our Mediator–God with God; man with men (see 1Ti 2:5<\/span>; Heb 12:24<\/span>). It is here the distant parties meet. Here the Gentile meets the Jew (verse 14). Here the returning sinner meets a gracious, a merciful, a forgiving God (Eph 1:6-7<\/span>, and Eph 1:18<\/span>). Here persons that were distant, that were hostile, meet, cordially unite, and perfectly agree (see Gal 3:28-29<\/span>; Col 3:11<\/span>; Joh 10:16<\/span>). Here even Saul of Tarsus meets the followers of Jesus of Nazareth on amicable terms. Here all real Christians of every sect and name meet; and here all men may know that they are disciples of Christ, because they love one another (Joh 13:35<\/span>). Here, too, they all ascribe their salvation to Jesus, and glory in being made nigh.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>By the blood of Christ. Under the old dispensation this blood was yearly typified by that of the paschal lamb (Exo 12:4-5<\/span>; 1Co 5:7<\/span>); daily by that of the sacrificial lamb (Exo 29:38-39<\/span>; Joh 1:29<\/span>); and frequently by that of other sacrifices (Heb 9:1-28<\/span>; Heb 10:1-39<\/span>). Covenants were ratified by blood (Exo 24:8<\/span>; Heb 9:18-20<\/span>); and without shedding of blood is no remission<\/em> <\/em>(Heb 9:22<\/span>). We enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus (Heb 10:19<\/span>). Almost every important circumstance connected with our salvation has reference to the blood of Christ. We are redeemed by His blood (chap. 1:7; Col 1:14; 1Pe 1:19<\/span>; Rev 5:9<\/span>). Justified by His blood (Rom 5:9<\/span>); washed, cleansed by His blood (1Jn 1:7<\/span>; Rev 1:5<\/span>; Rev 7:14<\/span>); we conquer through His blood (Rev 12:11<\/span>); we are made nigh by His blood. (Theological Sketchbook.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Brought nigh by Christs blood<\/strong><\/p>\n


I. <\/strong>What is meant by being afar off.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>It intimates distance (Eph 4:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Being destitute of His image (Eph 4:22<\/span>).<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Under Gods revealed displeasure (Eph 1:1-3<\/span>).<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>Unconnected with Christ.<\/p>\n


II. <\/strong>What is meant by being made nigh. The renegade is reclaimed; the outlaw is captured; the rebel has Rounded his arms; the ferocious lion is now changed into a placid lamb; and the stoner is now reconciled to, and made one with, God in Jesus Christ our Lord. Hence, being made nigh signifies–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Relationship (2Co 3:17-18<\/span>).<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>Union–the vine and its branches (Joh 15:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>Unity or oneness (1Co 12:13<\/span>).<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>Stones builded on Christ (Eph 2:22<\/span>).<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>Friendship (Joh 15:15<\/span>).<\/p>\n

6. <\/strong>Communion (Rom 8:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n


III. <\/strong>The instrument of bringing us nigh: his blood. That which effects such wonderful achievements must itself be astonishingly magnificent. The effect is Godlike, and the cause is with God. To accomplish an union between two opposite and repulsive bodies is beyond the reach of philosophical ingenuity, with all its power. But this is done by–<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>Gods decree in Jesus Christ (Eph 1:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>In whom Jew and Gentile meet (Eph 2:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n

3. <\/strong>By Christs blood we are reconciled (Heb 9:28<\/span>).<\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>Thus we enter into the holiest (Heb 10:19<\/span>).<\/p>\n

5. <\/strong>Redeemed by His blood (Col 1:14<\/span>).<\/p>\n

6. <\/strong>Justified by His blood (Rom 5:9<\/span>).<\/p>\n

7. <\/strong>Washed by His blood (1Jn 1:7<\/span>).<\/p>\n

8. <\/strong>We conquer through His blood (Rev 12:11<\/span>). (T. B. Baker.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Made nigh in a new bond<\/strong><\/p>\n

The one gospel of God to the whole world, is that dark and distant spirits can not only be brought nigh, but made nigh in the blood of Christ, as grafts are not simply brought nigh, but made nigh to the tree from which they are to derive their life. The graft is made nigh, taken up into unity with the tree, by the life blood of the tree. Man is made nigh, taken up into unity with God, by receiving the life blood of Jesus into his spirit. As the sun gives out of himself to the earth, and thus brings the earth into fellowship with himself, so Christ gives out of Himself to the human soul and makes man one with God. (John Pulsford.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Atonement in Christs blood<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Atonement is the great fact of the Bible, and Scripture and history alike bear witness to it.<\/p>\n

1. <\/strong>The universal practice of sacrifice points to the atonement of Christ, and shows out the moral sentiments of the nations in the dark but distinct consciousness that expiation is necessary before the sinner can approach God.<\/p>\n

2. <\/strong>The whole Jewish economy is based upon the principle of sacrifice, and is to be looked upon as a providential preparation for the gospel, in which the sacrifice of the Cross holds such a conspicuous place, and both Testaments unite in declaring that without shedding of blood there is no remission of sins (Heb 9:22<\/span>; Exo 24:8<\/span>; Mat 26:28<\/span>). Hence the spirit of the Old Testament is realized in the New Testament Victim, offered up upon the cross for the sin of the world. Hence the blood of Christ is presented to our faith as the vindication of Jehovahs love, and the refuge in which our souls may safely await the issues of eternity. (W. Graham, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Need of the blood of Jesus<\/strong><\/p>\n

I once heard a very earnest minister say that he had been accosted by a man who had heard him preach, with this criticism: I dont like your theology at all–its too bloody. It savours so of the shambles, its all blood, blood, blood. I like a pleasanter gospel. He replied to his objector: My theology is bloody, I allow; it recognizes as its foundation a very sanguinary scene–the death of Christ, with bleeding hands and feet and side. And I am quite content that it should be bloody, for God hath said, that without shedding of blood there is no remission of sins. (C. D. Foss.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Value of Christs brood<\/strong><\/p>\n

I dare assert, without fear of successful contradiction, that the inspired writers attribute all the blessings of salvation to the precious blood of Jesus Christ. If we have redemption, it is through His blood; if we are justified, it is by His blood; if washed from our moral stains, it is by His blood, which cleanseth us from all sin; if we have victory over the last enemy, we obtain it, not only by the word of the Divine testimony, but through the blood of the Lamb; and, if we gain admittance into heaven, it is because we have washed our robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. Everything depends on the blood of Christ, who paid it as the price of cur redemption to eternal life and glory. (Dr. R. Newton.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Toplady, the writer of the hymn, Rock of Ages, cleft for me, was converted through hearing a working man preach in a barn from Eph 2:13<\/span>, But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Verse 13. Ye who sometimes were far off<\/B><\/I>] To be far off<\/I>, and to be near<\/I>, are sayings much in use among the Jews; and among them, to be near<\/I> signifies,<\/P>

1. To be in the approbation<\/I> or favour<\/I> of God; and to be far off<\/I> signifies to be under his displeasure<\/I>. So a wicked<\/I> Jew might be said to be far off<\/I> from God when he was exposed to his displeasure<\/I>; and a holy man<\/I>, or a genuine penitent,<\/I> might be said to be nigh to God<\/I>, because such persons are in his favour<\/I>.<\/P>

2. Every person who offered a sacrifice<\/I> to God was considered as having access<\/I> to him by the blood<\/I> of that sacrifice:<\/I> hence the priests, whose office it was to offer sacrifices, were considered as being nigh to God<\/I>; and all who brought gifts to the altar were considered as approaching<\/I> the Almighty.<\/P>

3. Being far<\/I> off<\/I>, signified the state of the Gentiles<\/I> as contradistinguished from the Jews<\/I>, who were nigh. And these expressions were used in reference to the tabernacle, God’s dwelling-place among the Israelites, and the sacrifices there offered. All those who had access<\/I> to this tabernacle<\/I>, or were nigh to it<\/I> or encamped about it, were said to be nigh to God<\/I>; those who had no access<\/I> to it were said to be far off<\/I>.<\/P>

Hence the latter phrase is used to distinguish the Gentiles<\/I> from the Jewish<\/I> people; and this appears to be the meaning of the prophet, Isa 57:19<\/span>: I create the fruit of the lips; Peace, peace to<\/I> him that is far<\/I> off, and to<\/I> him that is near, saith the Lord<\/I>; i.e. I give cause of praise<\/I> and rejoicing<\/I> to the Gentile<\/I> as well as to the Jew<\/I>. And to this scripture, and to this thing, the apostle seems here to allude. You Gentiles, who were unacquainted<\/I> with God, and were even without God in the world<\/I>, are brought to an acquaintance<\/I> with him; and are now, through Christ Jesus, brought into the favour and fellowship of God. And as the Jews of old approached<\/I> God by the blood<\/I> of their sacrifices<\/I>, so you approach<\/I> him by the blood<\/I> of Christ<\/I>.<\/P><\/p>\n

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

But now in Christ Jesus; <\/B>either in the kingdom of Christ, or gospel administration, Gal 5:6<\/span>; or, ye being in Christ, united to him by the Spirit and faith. Being <\/P>

in Christ, <\/B>here, is opposed to being in the world, <\/I>Eph 1:12<\/I><\/span>. <\/P>

Ye who sometimes were far off; <\/B>far from God, from his church, from his promises, &c., having no communion with him by his Spirit. He means a spiritual distance, yet seems to allude to Isa 49:1<\/span>,12<\/span>; those Gentiles there mentioned being estranged from God in their hearts, as well as removed from his people in place. <\/P>

And made nigh; <\/B>brought into a state of communion with God and his people, and participation of their privileges, and right to the promises. <\/P>

By the blood of Christ; <\/B>the merit of his death expiating sin, (which caused this distance), and so making way for their approach to God, and enjoyment of gospel blessings. <\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

13. now<\/B>in contrast to “atthat time” (Eph 2:12<\/span>). <\/P>

in Christ Jesus<\/B>“Jesus”is here added, whereas the expression before (Eph2:12<\/span>) had been merely “Christ,” to mark that they knowChrist as the personal<\/I> Saviour, “Jesus.” <\/P>

sometimes<\/B>Greek,<\/I>“aforetime.” <\/P>

far off<\/B>the Jewishdescription of the Gentiles. Far off from God and from the people ofGod (Eph 2:17<\/span>; Isa 57:19<\/span>;Act 2:39<\/span>). <\/P>

are<\/B>Greek,<\/I> “havebeen.” <\/P>

by<\/B>Greek,<\/I> “in.”Thus “the blood of Christ” is made the seal of a covenantIN which their nearness to God consists. In Eph1:7<\/span>, where the blood is more directly spoken of as theinstrument,<\/I> it is “through<\/I> His blood”[ALFORD].<\/P><\/p>\n

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

But now in Christ Jesus<\/strong>,…. Being openly and visibly in Christ, created in him, and become believers in him; as they were before secretly in him, as chosen and blessed in him before the foundation of the world:<\/p>\n

ye who sometimes were far off<\/strong>; who in their state of unregeneracy were afar off from God, and from his law, and from any spiritual knowledge of him and fellowship with him; and from Jesus Christ, and from the knowledge of his righteousness, and the way of salvation by him; and from the Spirit, and any acquaintance with the things of the Spirit, and from minding them, and from walking after him; and from the saints and people of God, and from any love to them, and communion with them; and from any solid hopes of happiness, or real peace and comfort; which distance was owing both to Adam’s sin and to their own transgressions: it is an observation of a Jewish writer a on Ge 3:9<\/span> “where art thou?” he (God) knew where he was, but he said so to show him that he was , “afar off from” God by his sin: see Isa 59:2<\/span>, and yet<\/p>\n

are made nigh by the blood of Christ<\/strong>: so as to have nearness of access to and communion with God, Father, Son, and Spirit, and the saints, in virtue of the blood of Christ; which gives boldness and speaks peace; by which their persons are justified, the pardon of their sins is procured, reconciliation is made, and their garments are washed, and made white; and so they draw nigh with confidence by the faith of him.<\/p>\n

a R. Abraham Seba, Tzeror Hammor, fol. 7. 2.<\/p>\n

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

But now <\/B> ( <\/SPAN><\/span>). Strong contrast, as opposed to “at that time.”<\/P>

Afar off <\/B> (<\/SPAN><\/span>). Adverb (accusative feminine adjective with <\/SPAN><\/span> understood). From the <\/SPAN><\/span> and its hope in God.<\/P>

Are made nigh <\/B> ( <\/SPAN><\/span>). First aorist passive indicative of <\/SPAN><\/span>, a sort of timeless aorist. Nigh to the commonwealth of Israel in Christ.<\/P>

In the blood of Christ <\/B> ( <\/SPAN><\/span>). Not a perfunctory addition, but essential (1:7<\/span>), particularly in view of the Gnostic denial of Christ’s real humanity. <\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Now in Christ Jesus. Now, in contrast with at that time. In Christ Jesus, in contrast with alienated from, etc. Jesus is added because the Christ who was the subject of promise, the Messiah, has come into the world under that personal name. The phrase includes the promised Messiah and the actual Savior.<\/P> <\/p>\n

Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

1) “But now in Christ Jesus”<\/strong> (nuni de en christo iesou) “But now (and hereafter) in Christ Jesus.” The Greek “nuni” rendered “now” refers to a state or condition of continuity, without end. Those in Christ, redeemed, have a life that shall never end, 2Co 5:17<\/span>; Joh 10:27<\/span>; 1Jn 5:13<\/span>.<\/p>\n

2) “Ye who sometimes were far off”<\/strong> (humeis oi pote ontes makron) “The ones then being afar off,” without Christ as Savior and any part in worship, covenants, and promises to Israel. While there has been only one way of salvation in all times, for all men, there was only “outer-court” worship privilege for Gentiles in Old Testament worship, Exo 12:43<\/span>; Exo 12:45<\/span>; Rev 11:2<\/span>.<\/p>\n

3) “Are made nigh by the blood of Christ”<\/strong> (egenethete engus en to hainati tou christou) Became near by the blood of Christ” The Gentiles, who had no primary provision for hearing, salvation, or worship in Israel and her promises and covenants, had become included in His blood redemption and program of worship and service in the church, which Jesus called from among the Gentiles in Galilee, as a program people for His name’s sake, Mat 4:13-21<\/span>; Act 15:14-17<\/span>; Act 10:34<\/span>; Act 20:28<\/span>; Eph 5:25<\/span>. Christ died “without the camp” as an heathen or Gentile, outside the city walls, accursed on the tree, for the salvation of Jews and Gentiles, and the purchase of the church, new institution of worship, with His own blood, Heb 13:12-13<\/span>; Gal 3:10<\/span>; Gal 3:13<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

13. But now in Christ Jesus. We must either supply the verb, now that ye have been received in Christ Jesus, or connect the word now with the conclusion of the verse, now through the blood of Christ, — which will be a still clearer exposition. In either case, the meaning is, that the Ephesians, who were far off from God and from salvation, had been reconciled to God through Christ, and made nigh by his blood; for the blood of Christ has taken away the enmity which existed between them and God, and from being enemies hath made them sons. <\/p>\n

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

CRITICAL AND EXPLANATORY NOTES<\/em><\/p>\n

Eph. 2:13<\/span>. Ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh.<\/strong>The Gentile may sing his hymn in Jewish words: Doubtless Thou art our Father, though Abraham be ignorant of us, and Israel acknowledge us not: Thou, O Lord, art our Father, our Redeemer; from everlasting is Thy name. Lo-ammi (not My people) is no longer their name (Hos. 2:23<\/span>; Rom. 9:24-25<\/span>).<\/p>\n

Eph. 2:14<\/span>. For He is our peace, who hath made both one.<\/strong>Not the Peacemaker merely, for indeed at His own great cost He procured peace, and is Himself the bond of union of both (Jew and Gentile). The middle wall of partition.<\/strong>M. Ganneau, the discoverer of the Moabite Stone, found built into the wall of a ruined Moslem convent a stone, believed to be from the Temple, with this inscription: No stranger-born (non-Jew) may enter within the circuit of the barrier and enclosure that is around the sacred court; and whoever shall be caught [intruding] there, upon himself be the blame of the death that will consequently follow. Josephus describes this fence and its warning inscription (Wars of the Jews<\/em>, Bk. V., ch. v., 2). It is rather the spirit of exclusiveness which Christ threw down. The stone wall Titus threw down and made all a common field, afterwards.<\/p>\n

Eph. 2:15<\/span>. Having abolished in His flesh the enmity.<\/strong>The enmity of Jew and Gentile; the abolition of their enmity to God is mentioned later. First be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift, for reconciliation to God. The law of commandments contained in ordinances.<\/strong>The slave whose duty it was to take the child to his teacher might say, Dont do that. St. Paul does not regard the function of the law as more than that (Gal. 3:23-25<\/span>). One new man.<\/strong>Trench, in an admirable section, distinguishes between the new in time (recens<\/em>) and the new in quality (novum<\/em>). The word here means new in quality, as set over against that which has seen service, the outworn. It is not an amalgam of Jew and Gentile (Meyer<\/em>).<\/p>\n

Eph. 2:16<\/span>. That He might reconcile both unto God.<\/strong>The word reconcile implies a restitution<\/em> to a state from which they had fallen, or which was potentially theirs, or for which they were destined (Lightfoot<\/em>, Col. 1:20<\/span>). The cross having slain the enmity.<\/strong>Gentile authority and Jewish malevolence met in the sentence to that painful death; and both Gentile and Jew, acknowledging the Son of God, shall cease their strife, and love as brethren.<\/p>\n

Eph. 2:17<\/span>. Came and preached peace.<\/strong>By means of His messengers, as St. Paul tells the Galatians that Christ was evidently set forth crucified amongst them. To you afar off, and to them that were nigh.<\/strong>Isaiahs phrase (Isa. 57:19<\/span>). The Christ uplifted out of the earth draws all men<\/em> to Him.<\/p>\n

Eph. 2:18<\/span>. For through Him we both have access.<\/strong>St. Pauls way of proclaiming His Masters saying, I am the door: by Me if any man<\/em> enter in he shall be saved; including the other equally precious, I am the way: no man cometh unto the Father but by Me. Access here means introduction.<\/p>\n

MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.<\/em>Eph. 2:13-18<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Christ the Great Peacemaker<\/em>.<\/p>\n

I. His mission on earth was one of peace.<\/strong>And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh (Eph. 2:17<\/span>). His advent was heralded by the angelic song, Peace on earth, and goodwill toward men. The world is racked with moral discord; He is constantly striving to introduce the music of a heavenly harmony. It is distracted with war; He is propagating principles that will by-and-by make war impossible. The work of the peacemaker is Christ-like. Shenkyn, one of whose anomalies was that with all his burning passions he was a notorious peacemaker, and had means of pouring oil upon troubled waters, once upon a time was deputed to try his well-known skill upon a Church whose strife of tongues had become quite notorious. He reluctantly complied, and attended a meeting which soon proved to his satisfaction that the people were possessed by a demon that could not easily be expelled. The peacemaker got up, staff in hand, paced the little chapel, and with his spirit deeply moved, cried out, Lord, is this Thy spouse? Faster and faster he walked, thumping his huge stick on the floor, and still crying out, Lord, is this Thy spouse? Slay her! Then there came, as it were from another, a response, No, I will not. Sell her, then! No, I will not. Deny her, then! Still the answer came, I will not. Then he lifted up his voice, saying, I have bought her with My precious blood; how can I give her up? How can I forsake her? The strife had now ceased, and the people looked on with amazement, crying out for pardon.<\/p>\n

II. He made peace between man and man.<\/strong>For He is our peace, who hath made both one; to make in Himself of twain one new man, so making peace (Eph. 2:14-15<\/span>). The hostility of Jew and Gentile was conquered; the new spritual nature created in both formed a bond of brotherhood and harmony. The Jew no longer despised the Gentile; the Gentile no longer hated and persecuted the Jew. Where the Christian spirit predominates personal quarrels are speedily adjusted.<\/p>\n

III. He made peace between man and God.<\/strong>That He might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross (Eph. 2:16<\/span>). The enmity of man against God is disarmed and conquered by the voluntary suffering of Jesus in mans stead, and by His thus opening up the way of reconciliation of man with God. God can now be just, and the justifier of him that believeth in Jesus. The violated law is now atoned for, and the violater may obtain forgiveness and regain the forfeited favour of the offended God. There is peace only through forgiveness.<\/p>\n

IV. His death removed the great barrier to peace.<\/strong>This paragraph is very rich and suggestive in the phrases used to explain this blessed result: Ye are made nigh by the blood of Christ (Eph. 2:13<\/span>). By the cross, having slain the enmity thereby (Eph. 2:16<\/span>). Hath broken down the middle wall of partition, having abolished in His flesh the enmity (Eph. 2:14-15<\/span>). It is not the calm, silent, featureless, helpless, forceless peace of death<\/em>, but a living, active, aggressive, ever-conquering peace. The death was the result of agonising struggle and intense suffering, and the peace purchased is a powerfully operating influence in the believing soul.<\/p>\n

A peace is of the nature of a conquest;
For there both parties nobly are subdued,
And neither party losers.<\/p>\n

Shakespeare<\/em>.<\/p>\n

V. True peace is realised only in Christ.<\/strong>But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ (Eph. 2:13<\/span>). For He is our peace (Eph. 2:14<\/span>). For through Him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father (Eph. 2:18<\/span>). Christ takes us by the hand, and eads us to the Father. Men seek peace in the excitements of worldly pleasures, or in the pursuit of ambitious aims, but in vain. They only stimulate the malady they seek to cure. Christ is the restful centre of the universe, and the sin-tossed soul gains peace only as it converges towards Him. The efforts of men to find rest independent of Christ only reveal their need of Him, and it is a mercy when this revelation and consciousness of need does not come too late.<\/p>\n

Lessons.<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Sin is the instigator of quarrels and strife<\/em>. <\/p>\n

2. Only as sin is conquered does peace become possible<\/em>. <\/p>\n

3. Christ introduces peace by abolishing sin<\/em>.<\/p>\n

GERM NOTES ON THE VERSES<\/em><\/p>\n

Eph. 2:13-18<\/span>. Nearness to God<\/em>.<\/p>\n

I. They were brought into the Church of God, and admitted to equal privileges with His ancient people the Jews.<\/strong><\/p>\n

II. They were brought near to God as they were admitted to enjoy the gospel, which is a dispensation of grace and peace.<\/strong><\/p>\n

III. They were brought near to God by the renovation of their souls after His image.<\/strong><\/p>\n

IV. This nearness to God implies a state of peace with Him.<\/strong><\/p>\n

V. Another circumstance of the nearness is access to God in prayer.<\/strong><\/p>\n

VI. Another is the presence of His Holy Spirit.<\/strong>Let us be afraid of everything that tends to draw us away from God, and love everything which brings us nearer to Him. Let us seek Him with our whole heart, preserve daily communion with Him, choose His favour as our happiness, His service as our employment, His word as our guide, His ordinances as our refreshment, His house as the gate of heaven, and heaven as our eternal home.Lathrop<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Eph. 2:13<\/span>. Our State by Nature and by Grace<\/em>.<\/p>\n

I. Our state by nature.<\/strong>The distance from God here spoken of is not a local distance, neither is it that which separates us from Him as an infinite Being. <\/p>\n

1. It is legal. Banished by a righteous sentence and by a sense of guilt and unworthiness.
2. It is moral. Estrangement. Absence of sympathy. Want of harmony.
3. In both these respects it is ever-widening.
4. It is miserable and dangerous.<\/p>\n

II. Our state by grace.<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. The legal barriers are removed by the blood of Christ shed on the cross.
2. The moral alienation is removed by the blood of Christ as applied to the believer by the Holy Spirit.
3. The nearness to God thus effected is a valuable privilege. It includes reconciliation, friendship, communion. Sinner, apply now to be made nigh. Believer, remember thy obligations.G. Brooks<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Eph. 2:14-15<\/span>. Death a Peacemaker<\/em>.The struggle between the Northern and Southern States of America closed for ever at the funeral of General Grant. The armies of rebellion surrendered twenty years before; but the solemn and memorable pageant at the tomb of the great Union soldier, where the leading generals of the living Union and of the dead Confederacy stood shoulder to shoulder and mingled their tears in a common griefthis historical event marked the absolute conclusion of sectional animosity in America.<\/p>\n

Eph. 2:16<\/span>. The Power of the Gospel to dissolve the Enmity of the Human Heart against God<\/em>.<\/p>\n

1. The goodness of God destroys the enmity of the human mind. When every other argument fails, this, if perceived by the eye of faith, finds its powerful and persuasive way through every barrier of resistance. Try to approach the heart of man by the instruments of terror and of authority, and it will disdainfully repel you. There is not one of you skilled in the management of human nature who does not perceive that, though this may be a way of working on the other principles of our constitutionof working on the fears of man, or on his sense of interestthis is not the way of gaining by a single hair-breadth on the attachments of his heart. Such a way may force, or it may terrify, but it never, never can endear; and after all the threatening array of such an influence as this is brought to bear upon man, there is not one particle of service it can extort from him but what is all rendered in the spirit of a painful and reluctant bondage. Now this is not the service which prepares for heaven. This is not the service which assimilates men to angels. This is not the obedience of those glorified spirits, whose every affection harmonises with their every performance, and the very essence of whose piety consists of delight in God and the love they bear to Him. To bring up man to such an obedience as this, his heart behoved to be approached in a peculiar way; and no such way is to be found but within the limits of the Christian revelation. There alone you see God, without injury to His other attributes, plying the heart of man with the irresistible argument of kindness. There alone do you see the great Lord of heaven and of earth, setting Himself forth to the most worthless and the most wandering of His childrenputting forth His own hand to the work of healing the breach which sin had made between themtelling them that His word could not be mocked, and His justice could not be defied and trampled on, and that it was not possible for His perfections to receive the slightest taint in the eyes of the creation He had thrown around them; but that all this was provided for, and not a single creature within the compass of the universe He had formed could now say that forgiveness to man was degrading to the authority of God, and that by the very act of atonement, which poured a glory over all the high attributes of His character, His mercy might now burst forth without limit and without control upon a guilty world, and the broad flag of invitation be unfurled in the sight of all its families.
2. Let the sinner, then, look to God through the medium of such a revelation, and the sight which meets him there may well tame the obstinacy of that heart which had wrapped itself up in impenetrable hardness against the force of every other consideration. Now that the storm of the Almightys wrath has been discharged upon Him who bore the burden of the worlds atonement, He has turned His throne of glory into a throne of grace, and cleared away from the pavilion of His residence all the darkness which encompassed it. The God who dwelleth there is God in Christ; and the voice He sends from it to this dark and rebellious province of His mighty empire is a voice of the most beseeching tenderness. Goodwill to men is the announcement with which His messengers come fraught to a guilty world; and, since the moment in which it burst upon mortal ears from the peaceful canopy of heaven, may the ministers of salvation take it up, and go round with it among all the tribes and individuals of the species. Such is the real aspect of God towards you. He cannot bear that His alienated children should be finally and everlastingly away from Him. He feels for you all the longing of a parent bereaved of his offspring. To woo you back again unto Himself He scatters among you the largest and the most liberal assurances, and with a tone of imploring tenderness does He say to one and all of you, Turn ye, turn ye; why will ye die? He has no pleasure in your death. He does not wish to glorify Himself by the destruction of any one of you. Look to Me, all ye ends of the earth, and be saved, is the wide and generous announcement by which He would recall, from the outermost limits of His sinful creation, the most worthless and polluted of those who have wandered away from Him.
3. Now give us a man who perceives, with the eye of his mind, the reality of all this, and you give us a man in possession of the principle of faith. Give us a man in possession of this faith; and his heart, shielded as it were against the terrors of a menacing Deity, is softened and subdued, and resigns its every affection at the moving spectacle of a beseeching Deity; and thus it is that faith manifests the attribute which the Bible assigns to it, of working by love. Give us a man in possession of this love; and, animated as he is with the living principle of that obedience, where the willing and delighted consent of the inner man goes along with the performance of the outer man, his love manifests the attribute which the Bible assigns to it when it says, This is the love of God, that ye keep His commandments. And thus it is, amid the fruitfulness of every other expedient, when power threatened to crush the heart which it could not softenwhen authority lifted its voice, and laid on man an enactment of love which it could not carrywhen terror shot its arrows, and they dropped ineffectual from that citadel of the human affections, which stood proof against the impression of every one of themwhen wrath mustered up its appalling severities, and filled that bosom with despair which it could not fill with the warmth of a confiding attachmentthen the kindness of an inviting God was brought to bear on the heart of man, and got an opening through all its mysterious avenues. Goodness did what the nakedness of power could not do. It found its way through all intricacies of the human constitution, and there, depositing the right principle of repentance, did it establish the alone effectual security for the right purposes and the right fruits of repentance.Dr. T. Chalmers<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Eph. 2:18<\/span>. The Privilege of Access to the Father<\/em>.In the Temple service of the Jews all did not enjoy equal privileges. The court of the Gentiles was outside that of the Jews and separated from it by a marble screen or enclosure three cubits in height, beautifully ornamented with carving, but bearing inscriptions, in Greek and Roman characters, forbidding any Gentile to pass within its boundary. Such restricted access to God the new dispensation was designed to abolish. The middle wall of partition is now broken down, and through Christ we, both Jews and Gentilesall mankindhave equal access by one Spirit unto the Father. Observe:<\/p>\n

I. The privilege of access unto the Father.<\/strong>That God is the proper object of worship is implied in our text, and more explicitly declared in other portions of the sacred writings. According to the nature of the blessings desired, prayer may be addressed to any one of the three Persons in the God-head; but the Bible teaches that prayer generally is to be presented to the Father through Christ and by the Holy Spirit. And so appropriate are the offices of the Persons in the Trinity that we cannot speak otherwise. We cannot say that through the Spirit and by the Father we have access to Christ, or through the Father and by Christ we have access to the Spirit. We must observe the apostles orderthrough Christ and by the Spirit we have access to the Father. Access unto the Father implies:<\/p>\n

1. His sympathy with us<\/em>.God is our Creator and Sovereign, but His authority is not harsh or arbitrary. He does not even deal with us according to the stern dictates of untempered justice. On the contrary, in love and sympathy He has for our benefit made His throne accessible. He will listen to our penitential confessions, our vows of obedience, our statements of want. He has sympathy with us.<\/p>\n

2. His ability to help us<\/em>.That access is permitted to us, taken in connection with Gods perfections, prove this. He raises no hope to disappoint, does not encourage that He may repel, but permits access that He may help and bless.<\/p>\n

3. His permission to speak freely<\/em>.There is nothing contracted in Gods method of blessing. We are introduced to His presence not to stand dumb before Him, nor to speak under the influence of slavish fear. We have such liberty as those enjoy who are introduced to the presence of a prince by a distinguished favourite, or such freedom as children have in addressing a father. We are brought into the presence of our King by His own Son; to our heavenly Father by Christ, our elder Brother. The results of this access to ourselves: <\/p>\n

1. It teaches dependence;
2. Excites gratitude;
3. Produces comfort;
4. Promotes growth in grace.<\/p>\n

II. The medium of access.<\/strong>Under the law the high priest was the mediator through whom the people drew near to God. He went into the holiest of all, once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors of the people (Heb. 9:7<\/span>). Under the new covenant boldness to enter into the holiest is by the blood of Jesus (Heb. 10:19<\/span>). But as the mediation of the Jewish high priest, though done away in Christ, was typical, it may serve to teach us how we are to come to God. He sprinkled the blood of the sin-offering on the mercy-seat, and burnt incense within the veil (Leviticus 16<\/span>), thus symbolising the sacrifice and intercession of Christ.<\/p>\n

1. We, then, have access to God through Christ as a sacrifice<\/em>.Without shedding of blood is no remission (Heb. 9:22<\/span>). But, that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us, we could never, as suppliants, have found acceptance with God.<\/p>\n

2. Through Christ as an intercessor<\/em>.But this man, etc. (Heb. 10:12<\/span>). A disciple in temptation cries for deliverance from evil, and Christ prays, Holy Father, keep through Thine own name those whom Thou hast given Me (Joh. 17:11<\/span>). A dying saint asks for an entrance into the heavenly kingdom, and Christ pleads, Father, I will that they also, whom Thou hast given Me, be with Me where I am (Joh. 17:24<\/span>). None need deem himself too unworthy to call on God who comes to Him through Christs sacrifice and intercession.<\/p>\n

III. The assistance afforded by the Holy Spirit.<\/strong>As we have access unto the Father through Christ pleading for<\/em> us, so we have access unto the Father by the Spirit pleading in<\/em> us.<\/p>\n

1. The Spirit kindles holy desire<\/em>.It is the work of the Spirit to draw off the hearts of men from the world and raise them to God in prayer. As in playing on a musical instrument no string sounds untouched, so without this influence of the Spirit man would never look heavenward, or his heart fill with desire toward God.<\/p>\n

2. Prompts to immediate application<\/em>.Blessings are often desired but feebly. The Spirit rebukes this hesitancy, and urges on to immediate application.<\/p>\n

3. Aids in that application<\/em>.Without the Spirit we know not what we should pray for (Rom. 8:26<\/span>). Our thoughts wander, our affections chill, the fervour of our importunity flags, unless the Spirit helpeth our infirmities.<\/p>\n

Reflections.<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Those who do not enjoy this privilege are highly culpable<\/em>. <\/p>\n

2. Those who do enjoy this privilege are indeed happy.The Lay Preacher<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Access to God, revealing the Trinity in Unity<\/em>.<\/p>\n

I. The end of human salvation is access to the Father.<\/strong>That is the first truth of our religionthat the source of all is meant to be the end of all, that as we all came forth from a divine Creator, so it is into divinity that we are to return and to find our final rest and satisfaction, not in ourselves, not in one another, but in the omnipotence, the omniscience, the perfectness, and the love of God. Now we are very apt to take it for granted that, however we may differ in our definitions and our belief of the deity of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, we are all at one, there can be and there is no hesitation, about the deity of the Father. God is divine. God is God. And no doubt we do all assent in words to such a belief; but when we think what we mean by that word God; when we remember what we mean by Father, namely, the first source and the final satisfaction of a dependent nature; and then when we look around and see such multitudes of people living as if there were no higher source for their being than accident and no higher satisfaction for their being than selfishness, do we not feel that there is need of a continual and most earnest preaching by word and act, from every pulpit of influence to which we can mount, of the divinity of the Father. The divinity of the Father needs assertion first of all. Let men once feel it, and then nature and their own hearts will come in with their sweet and solemn confirmations of it. But nature and the human heart do not teach it of themselves. The truest teaching of it must come from souls that are always going in and out before the divine Fatherhood themselves. By the sight of such souls others must come to seek the satisfaction that comes only from a divine end of lifemust come to crave access to the Father. So we believe, and so we tempt other men to believe, in God the Father.<\/p>\n

II. And now pass to the divinity of the method.<\/strong>Through Jesus Christ. Man is separated from God. That fact, testified to by broken associations, by alienated affections, by conflicting wills, stands written in the whole history of our race. And equally clear is it to him who reads the gospels, and enters into sympathy with their wonderful Person, that in Him, in Jesus of Nazareth, appeared the Mediator by whom was to be the Atonement. His was the life and nature which, standing between the Godhood and the manhood, was to bridge the gulf and make the firm bright road over which blessing and prayer might pass and repass with confident golden feet for ever. And then the question isand when we ask it thus it becomes so much more than a dry problem of theology; it is a question for live, anxious men to ask with faces full of eagernessOut of which nature came that Mediator? Out of which side of the chasm sprang the bridge leaping forth toward the other? Evidently on both sides that bridge is bedded deep and clings with a tenacity which shows how it belongs there. He is both human and divine. But from which side did the bridge spring? It is the most precious part of our belief that it was with God that the activity began. It is the very soul of the gospel, as I read it, that the Fathers heart, sitting above us in His holiness, yearned for us as we lay down here in our sin. And when there was no man to make an intercession, He sent His Son to tell us of His love, to live with us, to die for us, to lay His life like a strong bridge out from the divine side of existence, over which we might walk fearfully but safely, but into the divinity where we belonged. Through Him we have access to the Father. As the end was divine, so the method is divine. As it is to God that we come, so it is God who brings us there. I can think nothing else without dishonouring the tireless, quenchless love of God.<\/p>\n

III. The power of the act of mans salvation is the Holy Spirit.<\/strong>Through Christ Jesus we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father. What do we mean by the Holy Spirit being the power of salvation? I think we are often deluded and misled by carrying out too far some of the figurative forms in which the Bible and the religious experience of men express the saving of the soul. For instance, salvation is described as the lifting of the soul out of a pit and putting it upon a pinnacle, or on a safe high platform of grace. The figure is strong and clear. Nothing can overstate the utter dependence of the soul on God for its deliverance; but if we let the figure leave in our minds an impression of the human soul as a dead, passive thing, to be lifted from one place to the other like a torpid log that makes no effort of its own either for co-operation or resistance, then the figure has misled us. The soul is a live thing. Everything that is done with it must be done in and through its own essential life. If a soul is saved, it must be by the salvation, the sanctification, of its essential life; if a soul is lost, it must be by perdition of its life, by the degradation of its affections and desires and hopes. Let there be nothing merely mechanical in the conception of the way God treats these souls of ours. He works upon them in the vitality of thought, passion, and will that He put into them. And so when a soul comes to the Father through the Saviour, its whole essential vitality moves in the act. When this experience is reached, then see what Godhood the soul has come to recognise in the world. First, there is the creative Deity from which it sprang, and to which it is struggling to returnthe divine End, God the Father. Then there is the incarnate Deity, which makes that return possible by the exhibition of Gods lovethe divine Power of salvation, God the Holy Spirit. To the Father, through the Son, by the Spirit. This appears to be the truth of the Deity as it relates to us. I say again, as it relates to us. What it may be in itself; how Father, Son, and Spirit meet in the perfect Godhood; what infinite truth more there may, there must, be in that Godhood, no man can dare to guess. But, to us, God is the end, the method, and the power of salvation; so He is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. It is in the perfect harmony of these sacred personalities that the precious unity of the Deity consists. I look at the theologies, and so often it seems as if the harmony of Father, Son, and Spirit has been lost, both by those that own and by those that disown the Trinity. One theology makes the Father hard and cruel, longing as it were for mans punishment, extorting from the Son the last drops of life-blood which mans sin had incurred as penalty. Another theology makes the Son merely one of the multitude of sinning men, with somewhat bolder aspirations laying hold on a forgiveness which God might give but which no mortal might assume. Still another theology can find no God in the human heart at all; merely a fermentation of human naturo is this desire after goodness, this reaching out towards Divinity. The end is not worthy of the method. I do not want to come to such a Father as some of the theologians have painted. Or the method is not worthy of the end. No man could come to the perfect God through such a Jesus as some men have described. Or the power is too weak for both; and all that Christ has done lies useless, and all the Fathers welcome waits in vain for the soul that has in it no Holy Ghost. But let each be real and each be worthy of the others, and the salvation is complete. But each cannot be worthy of the others unless each is perfect. But each cannot be perfect unless each is divine; that is, our faith is in the Trinitythree Persons and one God.Philips Brooks<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The Christian Law of Prayer<\/em><\/p>\n

I. To the Father.<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. How honourable! Right of entry to an earthly sovereign.
2. How delightful! Our pleasures may be graduated according to the part of our nature in which they have their rise. The pleasures of devotion are the highest taste for devotion.
3. How profitable! God is able to bestow all temporal and spiritual blessings.
4. How solemn! The intercourse of our spirit with the Father of our spirits. Heart to heart.<\/p>\n

II. Through the Son.<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Through His atonement. Legal barriers to our access must be removed. Have been removed by the death of Christ as a satisfaction to divine Justice. He has demolished the wall, He has constructed a bridge across the chasm, He has laid down His own body as the medium of approach. 2. Through His intercession. It perpetuates His sacrifice. The Jewish high priest entering the holy of holies on the Great Day of Atonement. Amyntas, mother of Coriolanus; Philippa after the siege of Calais.<\/p>\n

III. By the Spirit.<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. He teaches us what are our wants. For the most part we are likely to be aware of our temporal wants. In spiritual things the greater our need the less our sense of need.
2. He makes us willing to ask the supply of our wants. Aversion to beg. Aversion to lay bare the symptoms of humiliating disease.
3. He gives us power to spread our wants before God. One person employed to write a letter or a petition for another.
4. He inspires us with confidence to plead with importunity and faith. Confidence in the Father, in the Son, in the power of prayer.G. Brooks<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

(13) This verse speaks of the restoration of the heathen as taking place, first, in Christ Jesusin virtue, that is, of union with Him through all the acts of His mediation; and next, by the blood of Christthat is, through that especial act of mediation, which is emphatically an atonement for sinsuch sin as St. Paul had been declaring above to be the cause of spiritual deadness. They had power now to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus (Heb. 10:19<\/span>).<\/p>\n

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

13<\/strong>. <\/strong> But now<\/strong> O yes, now! <\/strong> What a glorious contrast between those times past <\/strong> and this now! <\/strong> With what pity from this now <\/strong> may these Christian Ephesians look back upon the heathen Ephesians they were in times past! <\/strong> And with what pity should all Christians look upon the hapless heathens who are still in those sad and hopeless times past! <\/strong> Being in Christ<\/strong>, these Ephesians have every point of contrast to their former miseries. They are not afar, but nigh, unified with the holy Israel, Eph 2:14-18<\/span>. They are, with Israel, builded into one edifice, Eph 2:19-20<\/span>; nay, into a temple<\/strong>, where the Holy Spirit resides, Eph 2:21-22<\/span>. <\/p>\n

In Christ Jesus<\/strong> As identified with him, (note, Rom 6:3<\/span>,) and incorporated with his mystical person; reverse of without Christ above<\/strong>. <\/p>\n

Far off nigh<\/strong> In soul and nature. These were habitual terms with the Jews to designate those who were residents near <\/strong> the temple and the holy of holies, and those who resided at a distance from the temple and the grand altar, and especially pagans of foreign blood. And these terms were in accordance with Isaiah’s magnificent words: “Listen, O isles from far,” Isa 49:1<\/span>; and “Peace, peace, to him that is afar off, and to him that is near, saith the Lord,” Isa 57:19<\/span>. By the blood of Christ<\/strong>, which had fulfilled, and so dismissed, the sacrificial rites of the Old Covenant.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

The Uniting of Jew and Gentile Through the Cross. The Establishing of the New Israel.<\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

‘But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off are made near by the blood of Christ.’<\/p>\n

Now all is changed. In the Christ Who died for them all these benefits are theirs. They have been brought near to God, the invisible God proclaimed by the Jews, through His shed blood. Through His sacrifice of Himself for sin, which cancels out the old ordinances, He has removed the barrier of sin, making them ‘holy’ and righteous so they can approach Him without fear.<\/p>\n

‘Made near.’ In Eph 2:17<\/span> the Jews are ‘near’. Thus in Christ Jesus and through the blood of the cross the believing Gentiles are, in being ‘made near’, united with the believing Jews in their ‘nearness’. They are reconciled both to God and to each other (Eph 2:16<\/span>). The implication is that physical circumcision has been replaced by being united in His death.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 2:13<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>Are made nigh by the blood of Christ.<\/em><\/strong><\/strong> There seems to be an evident allusion here to the privilege of those Israelites who were not under any ceremonial pollution, or who were cleansed from their guilt by the blood of atonement; and so had free liberty of entering the temple, and conversing with God: upon which account they are called “A people near unto him;” <\/em>Psa 148:14<\/span> comp. Exo 19:4-6<\/span>. Lev 10:3<\/span>. Psa 65:4<\/span> and see Col 2:13-14<\/span>. <\/p>\n

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 2:13<\/span> . But now in Christ Jesus ye, once afar off, are made nigh by the blood of Christ<\/em> .<\/p>\n

] contrast to , Eph 2:12<\/span> : but as your relation now stands<\/em> . Comp. Rom 6:22<\/span> ; Rom 7:6<\/span> ; Col 1:21<\/span> ; Col 3:8<\/span> .<\/p>\n

] not to be supplemented by (Baumgarten-Crusius), nor yet a more precise definition of (Rckert: “under the new constitution, founded by Christ”), in which case several, proceeding more accurately, supply (Calvin: “postquam in Christo estis recepti,” Koppe, Harless, Bleek). But such a more precise definition would be very unnecessary, and would have significant weight only if a special emphasis rested upon as in contradistinction to , Eph 2:12<\/span> , which, however, cannot be the case, since there is not again used merely , but . The of the readers, moreover, was not prior<\/em> to the , but its immediate consequence<\/em> ; hence we should have at least to explain it, not: postquam<\/em> in Christo estis recepti, but: cum<\/em> in Christo sitis recepti, wherewithal there would still remain the very unnecessary character of this more precise definition, or of this conditional accessory clause (de Wette). Accordingly . . is to be connected with .: ye are in Christ Jesus<\/em> , in whom this has its efficient cause, made near<\/em> ; and . is then the more precise definition of the mode of . . Comp. , Eph 1:7<\/span> . Hence we have not to place a comma, as Lachmann and Tischendorf have done, either before or after . .<\/p>\n

] could not be added at Eph 2:12<\/span> , but might be added here, where the Christ who historically appeared in the person of Jesus is intended.<\/p>\n

] figurative description of the same relation as was expressed in Eph 2:12<\/span> by . ., and . .<\/p>\n

. . . .] For, by the fact that Christ shed His blood, the separation of the Gentiles from the Jews was done away, and consequently the fellowship of the former with the community of God’s people (which the true Christian Israel henceforth was) was effected. See Eph 2:14<\/span> ff. The bringing to participation in the blessings of the theocracy<\/em> is, after the precedent of Isa 49:1<\/span> ; Isa 57:19<\/span> , expressed often also among the Rabbins by the figurative propinquum facere<\/em> (which with them is, with special frequency, equivalent to proselytum facere<\/em> ), and in that case the subject to whom the approach is made is always to be derived from the context; as e.g.<\/em> Vayikra R.<\/em> 14, where God<\/em> , and Mechilta<\/em> , f. 38. 12, where, as here, the theocracy<\/em> is to be thought of. See, in general, the passage in Wetstein and Schttgen, Horae<\/em> , p. 761 ff.<\/p>\n

, to come near<\/em> ; only here in the N.T., frequent in the classic writers (Xen. Anab.<\/em> v. 4. 16, iv. 7. 23; Thuc. iii. 40. 6).<\/p>\n

Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ver. 13. Are made nigh by the blood<\/strong> ] Christ hath paved us a new and living way to the throne of God’s grace by his own most precious blood. Oh, happy lapidi pavium!<\/em> jewel of the peacock. Oh, Golgotha become our Gabbatha!Joh 19:13<\/span>Joh 19:13<\/span> ; Joh 19:17<\/span> . <\/p>\n

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

13<\/strong> .] But now<\/strong> (contrast to ) in Christ<\/strong> (not merely as you were , but more in a personal Messiah, whom you know as) Jesus<\/strong> (there is hardly a reference to the meaning<\/em> of Jesus<\/em> much rather to its personal<\/em> import q.d. ‘Now in Jesus the Christ’) ye who once were far off were brought<\/strong> (keep the historic tense: it is the effect of a definite event of which he is speaking. The passive sense<\/em> of the passive form is well kept where the context justifies it, but must not always be pressed: see Ellic.’s note on ch. Eph 3:7 ) near<\/strong> (it was a common Jewish way of speaking, to designate the Gentiles as ‘ far off<\/em> .’ So Bereshith rabba, in Schttg., Hor. Heb. in locum, ‘Quicunque gentilem appropinquare facit, eumque ad religionem Judaicam perducit, idem est ac si creasset ipsum.’ See also reff. Isa. and Dan.) in<\/strong> (or the instrument by which, but more the symbol of a fact in<\/em> which the seal of a covenant in<\/em> which, your nearness to God consists. I prefer ‘in’ to ‘by,’ as wider, and better representing the Apostle’s idea. The difference between <\/strong> here and in ch. Eph 1:7 is, that there the blood of Christ is spoken of specifically, as the medium of our here inclusively, as representing<\/em> the . would have served there, and here, but the logical exactness of both would have been weakened by the change) the blood of Christ<\/strong> (see remarks on ch. Eph 1:7 ).<\/p>\n

Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 2:13<\/span> . : but now in Christ Jesus ye that aforetime were far off are become nigh<\/em> . In classical Greek is used only of time<\/em> , mostly with present<\/em> tenses, rarely with the future, and means at this very moment<\/em> . In the NT it is used mostly of time, but also as a logical particle, bringing a statement to a conclusion, = rebus sic stantibus, as the case stands<\/em> (Rom 7:17<\/span> ; 1Co 15:20<\/span> , etc.). Here it has the usual temporal meaning now<\/em> as contrasted with the previous period, the . The is put emphatically first and is to be connected with the (Ell., etc.) rather than with the , the point being this then<\/em> ye were separate from Christ, but now<\/em> ye are in Him, united with Him, and so are become nigh. It is difficult, if not impracticable, to discover in each case a reason for the use of instead of the simple ; and the indeed is dropped by some ancient authorities (L., Iren., Orig., Tert., etc.). But the double designation is appropriate here then<\/em> they were without Christ<\/em> , having no part in the Messiah in whom the Jew had hope; now<\/em> they are in living, present, personal fellowship with the Saviour known among men as Christ Jesus. The repeats the idea of distance and separation previously expressed by and . The expression , to come<\/em> or become near<\/em> , which is common enough in profane Greek, occurs only here in the NT. The order of the TR, , is supported by [153] [154] [155] [156] , etc.; but is the reading of [157] [158] [159] , 17, Vulg., Goth., etc., and is adopted by most (LTTrWHRV). For the designation of the Gentiles as “far off” and the use of the phrase “bring nigh” in the sense of making them members of the theocracy, cf.<\/em> Isa 57:19<\/span> ; Dan 9:7<\/span> ; and for examples in Jewish literature, see Wetst., in loc.<\/em> ; Schttg., Hor Hebr.<\/em> , i., 76. The verses which immediately follow refer to the removal of the ancient barrier between Jew and Gentile. The , however, need not be restricted to that. It is in contrast with the whole previous condition of separation from Christ, with all that that meant with regard to the commonwealth of Israel, the covenants, hope, and God. It is probably to be taken, therefore, in the large sense of being brought into the Kingdom of God, made near to God Himself and so brought to hope and privilege. : in<\/em> (or, by<\/em> ) the blood of Christ<\/em> . On the import of the phrase “the blood of Christ” see under Eph 1:7<\/span> above. The here has much the same sense as the there. They both express instrumentality<\/em> . If there is any difference between them it is that expresses simple, objective, instrumentality, while denotes what Ell. calls immanent<\/em> instrumentality, the action of the verb being regarded as existing in the means<\/em> . See Ell. on the present passage and on 1Th 4:18<\/span> . There is little to be gained, however, by attempting much finesse in such matters.<\/p>\n

[153] Codex Claromontanus (sc. vi.), a Grco-Latin MS. at Paris, edited by Tischendorf in 1852.<\/p>\n

[154] Codex Augiensis (sc. ix.), a Grco-Latin MS., at Trinity College, Cambridge, edited by Scrivener in 1859. Its Greek text is almost identical with that of G, and it is therefore not cited save where it differs from that MS. Its Latin version, f, presents the Vulgate text with some modifications.<\/p>\n

[155] Codex Mosquensis (sc. ix.), edited by Matthi in 1782.<\/p>\n

[156] Codex Angelicus (sc. ix.), at Rome, collated by Tischendorf and others.<\/p>\n

[157] Codex Vaticanus (sc. iv.), published in photographic facsimile in 1889 under the care of the Abbate Cozza-Luzi.<\/p>\n

[158] Codex Sinaiticus (sc. iv.), now at St. Petersburg, published in facsimile type by its discoverer, Tischendorf, in 1862.<\/p>\n

[159] Codex Alexandrinus (sc. v.), at the British Museum, published in photographic facsimile by Sir E. M. Thompson (1879).<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

now. Emph. <\/p>\n

sometimes = once. <\/p>\n

are = were. <\/p>\n

the blood. i.e. His death, not His life. Compare Eph 1:7 Rom 5:9. Php 1:2, Php 1:8. Col 1:14, Col 1:20. <\/p>\n

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

13.] But now (contrast to ) in Christ (not merely as you were , but more-in a personal Messiah, whom you know as) Jesus (there is hardly a reference to the meaning of Jesus-much rather to its personal import-q.d. Now in Jesus the Christ) ye who once were far off were brought (keep the historic tense: it is the effect of a definite event of which he is speaking. The passive sense of the passive form is well kept where the context justifies it, but must not always be pressed: see Ellic.s note on ch. Eph 3:7) near (it was a common Jewish way of speaking, to designate the Gentiles as far off. So Bereshith rabba, in Schttg., Hor. Heb. in locum, Quicunque gentilem appropinquare facit, eumque ad religionem Judaicam perducit, idem est ac si creasset ipsum. See also reff. Isa. and Dan.) in (or the instrument by which, but more-the symbol of a fact in which-the seal of a covenant in which,-your nearness to God consists. I prefer in to by, as wider, and better representing the Apostles idea. The difference between here and in ch. Eph 1:7 is, that there the blood of Christ is spoken of specifically, as the medium of our -here inclusively, as representing the . would have served there, and here, but the logical exactness of both would have been weakened by the change) the blood of Christ (see remarks on ch. Eph 1:7).<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Greek Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 2:13. ) far off from the people of God, and from God, Eph 2:17, note.-, by the blood) ch. Eph 1:7.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 2:13<\/p>\n

Eph 2:13<\/p>\n

But now in Christ Jesus ye that once were far off sure made nigh in the blood of Christ.-But since the gospel of Jesus Christ was preached to them, and they had believed it, these Gentiles who were far from God, far from the people of God, have been made nigh by the blood of Christ. [Jesus Christ came to break down the middle wall of partition between Jew and Gentile and to make peace between them. He came to bring all nigh to God and to one another. The way to unite people to one another is to unite them all to God. Jesus brought them to God by shedding his blood for them to reconcile them to God.] Jesus said: I lay down my life for the sheep. And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and they shall become one flock, one shepherd. (Joh 10:15-16). There were those among both Jews and Gentiles who would hear his voice, these he would call into the one fold by his bloodshed, his life laid down for them, that they might be one fold.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

in: Rom 8:1, 1Co 1:30, 2Co 5:17, Gal 3:28 <\/p>\n

were: Eph 2:12, Eph 2:17, Eph 2:19-22, Eph 3:5-8, Psa 22:7, Psa 73:27, Isa 11:10, Isa 24:15, Isa 24:16, Isa 43:6, Isa 49:12, Isa 57:19, Isa 60:4, Isa 60:9, Isa 66:19, Jer 16:19, Act 2:39, Act 15:14, Act 22:21, Act 26:18, Rom 15:8-12 <\/p>\n

are: Eph 2:16, Eph 1:7, Rom 3:23-30, Rom 5:9, Rom 5:10, 1Co 6:11, 2Co 5:20, 2Co 5:21, Col 1:13, Col 1:14, Col 1:21, Col 1:22, Heb 9:18, 1Pe 1:18, 1Pe 1:19, 1Pe 3:18, Rev 5:9 <\/p>\n

Reciprocal: Gen 9:27 – dwell Lev 3:6 – a sacrifice Lev 4:7 – all the blood Lev 19:5 – a sacrifice Num 9:10 – be unclean Num 16:5 – will cause Num 17:13 – any thing Deu 23:8 – enter into 2Ch 6:32 – the stranger Psa 119:150 – draw nigh Psa 148:14 – a people Pro 15:29 – far Son 8:8 – what Isa 46:12 – that Isa 65:1 – I am sought Eze 37:19 – Behold Eze 40:46 – which come Eze 47:22 – and to the strangers Zec 6:13 – and the Zec 6:15 – they Zec 9:10 – he shall Zec 11:7 – Bands Mat 3:9 – God Mat 27:51 – the veil Luk 15:13 – and took Luk 15:20 – But Act 10:35 – in Act 10:36 – preaching Rom 11:30 – as ye Eph 3:6 – the Gentiles Col 1:20 – having made peace Heb 7:19 – we<\/p>\n

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

(Eph 2:13.) , -But now, in Christ Jesus. The apostle now reverses the picture, and exhibits a fresh and glowing contrast. is in contrast to . The present stands in opposition to the past-. is also the joyous contrast to the previous dark and melancholy . Once apart from Messiah, from the very idea and hope of Him, they were now in Him-in Him, not only as Messiah, but as Messiah embodied in the actual Jesus of Nazareth. And the phrase stands to this entire verse as does to the verse in which it occurs. It states adverbially the prime ground or reason of the subsequent declaration. But now in Christ Jesus, that is, ye being in Christ Jesus; though there is no reason to espouse the opinion of Luther, Calvin, Harless, and Stier, and supply to supplement the construction. We understand the apostle thus: But now-through your union to Christ Jesus- <\/p>\n

, -ye, who sometime were far off, became nigh. Lachmann reads- , but without sufficient authority. The adverbs, and , had a literal and geographical meaning under the old dispensation. Isa 57:19; Dan 9:7; Act 2:39. The presence of Jehovah was enjoyed in His temple, and that temple was in the heart of Judaea, but the extra-Palestinian nations were far off from it, and this actual measurement of space naturally became the symbol of moral distance. Israel was near, but non-Israel was remote, and would have remained so but for Jesus. His advent and death changed the scene, and destroyed the wide interval, as the apostle shows in the subsequent verses. They who had been aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, were now incorporated into the spiritual community, were partakers of a better covenant established on better promises, were filled with good hope through grace, knew God, or rather were known of God, and were no longer in the world, but of the household of God. The Gentile Christians enjoyed spiritually all that was characteristic of the Hebrew theocracy. As the true circumcision, they were near, spiritually as near as the Israelites whom a few steps brought to the temple, altar, and Shechinah. The apostle, having described the position of the Ephesian convert s as being in Christ Jesus, next alludes to the means by which this nearness was secured, and the previous distance changed into blessed propinquity- <\/p>\n

-in the blood of Christ. Compare Eph 1:7, where is employed with a difference of view. The proper name, more emphatic than the simple pronoun, is repeated. The preposition is sometimes used instrumentally. Winer, 48, a, d. Still, in such a usage, the power to produce the effect is supposed to dwell in the cause. That power which has changed farness into nearness, resides in the blood of Christ, or as Alford says, but not very precisely-the blood is the symbol of a faith in which your nearness to God consists. Their being in Jesus was, moreover, the reason why the blood of Christ had produced such an effect on them. How it does so is explained in the next verses. The apostle’s object is to show that by the death of Christ the exclusiveness of the theocracy was abolished, that Jew and Gentile, by the abrogation of the Mosaic law, are placed on the same level, and that both, in the blood of Christ, are reconciled to God. <\/p>\n

The following passage is magnificent in style as well as idea. No wonder that the pious taste of Bengel has written-Ipso verborum tenore et quasi rhythmo canticum imitatur:- <\/p>\n

Fuente: Commentary on the Greek Text of Galatians, Ephesians, Colossians and Phillipians<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 2:13. The ones far off were the Ephesians and all other Gentiles; they were far off as far as the Jewish Dispensation was concerned. Made nigh by the blood of Christ. This Is said in contrast with the animal sacrifices that were offered under the Mosiac system, which were done for the benefit of the Jews only. It also is in contrast with the sacrifices that were offered upon the family altars under the Patriarchal Dispensation. It is to be understood that those sacrifices which were made under both the former dispensations, gave to the members thereof the favor of God, including the forgiveness of sins. But that was because God knew that the blood of Christ was to flow at the cross as a ransom, to make good the pledge of forgiveness that He had made to every Jew or Patriarch when he had performed his duty at the proper place of sacrifice. This is clearly shown in Heb 9:15, which the reader should see in connection with the present verse.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 2:13. But now. This too is what they should remember, but the Apostle continues the contrast in an independent sentence.<\/p>\n

In Christ Jesus, in fellowship with Him, contrasted with apart from Christ. Jesus is added, because the personal Messiah, who had come, is referred to. The phrase explains now, and qualifies the verb which follows.<\/p>\n

Once were far off; so the Jews would speak of Gentiles.<\/p>\n

Have been brought nigh; lit., became nigh. The literal form cannot be joined with now in English, but the single effect of a past act is expressed by the original. What that event was, is at once indicated by the words, in the blood of Christ. This is more than through, or by, although it includes this sense, already expressed in chap. Eph 1:7. It indicates the blood of Christ as the symbol of a fact in whichthe seal of a covenant in whichyour nearness to God consists (Alford). This is the permanent ground of the becoming nigh.<\/p>\n

Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

The apostle having set before the Ephesians the black and dark part of their lives, before their conversion to Christianity, in the foregoing verse; comes here in this to acquaint them with the blessed change which was made in their state, and by whom. Now, says he, in or by Christ Jesus, ye, who were before afar off, namely, from Christ, his church, his covenant, from saving hope, and from God himself, are made as nigh as the Jews, and have as much right to expect the aforesaid benefits as they, the blood of Christ having purchased them for you, and sealed them to you; Ye that were before afar off, are now made nigh by the blood of Christ. <\/p>\n

Where note, That persons who are most remote, and at the farthest distance from God, are sometimes unexpectedly brought home unto him: Ye who were afar off, are now made nigh.<\/p>\n

Note, 2. That it is owing to the blood of Christ, to his death and sufferings, that any soul is brought into a state of nearness unto God, and finds acceptance with him: Ye are made nigh by the blood of Christ.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Made Nigh By the Blood of Christ<\/p>\n

Like stepping into the light of midday from a room with no windows, the Gentiles who obeyed the gospel drew nigh to God. This also brought near all the blessings they once so greatly lacked. This could only be accomplished through the cleansing blood of Jesus Christ (2:13; Heb 9:22 ; 1Pe 1:18-19 ).<\/p>\n

Christ made peace between man and the God against whom he had rebelled. This was accomplished through the blood of Christ that cleansed man from sin and allowed him once more to draw nigh to God. Thereby, peace was also achieved between man (Jew) and man (Gentile). The wall that once stood between them was circumcision and the ordinances for which it stood. They were taken out of the way in Christ’s death on the cross (2:14; Col 2:8-15 ; Heb 9:14-17 ).<\/p>\n

Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

Eph 2:13-14. But now in Christ Jesus In consequence of your union with him, and your interest in him by faith, ye, who formerly were far off From God and his people, (as in Eph 2:12,) are made nigh to both, by the blood of Christ Whereby he hath atoned for your sins, and opened a free and honourable way for your approaching God, and becoming entitled to all the privileges of his people. For he is our peace Not only as he purchased it, and confers it on such as truly believe in him, but as he is the very bond and centre of the union of believers with God and each other; who hath made both Believing Jews and Gentiles, one church, one flock of Christ. This union of the Jews and the Gentiles, so as to make them one people, was foretold by our Lord, when he said, (Joh 10:16,) Other sheep I have which are not of this fold: are not Jews; and they shall hear my voice, and there shall be one fold: Greek, , one flock, though in different folds, and one shepherd. The apostle here describes, 1st, The conjunction of the Gentiles with Israel, Eph 2:14-15; and, 2d, The conjunction of both with God, Eph 2:16-18. And hath broken down the middle wall of partition The ceremonial law, which the apostle here compares to that wall in the Jewish temple, which separated the court of Israel from the court of the Gentiles. For many of the rites of that law could be performed nowhere but in the temple of Jerusalem. But Christ, having now taken away that law, and prescribed, under the gospel, a spiritual form of worship, which may be performed everywhere, he hath thereby provided for joining Jews and Gentiles in one church, and making them all one people in God: a union which could not have taken place if the Mosaic law had been continued. For the worship of God, as to various branches of it, being confined by that law to the temple at Jerusalem, the greatest part of the Gentiles could certainly not have come thither to worship with the Jews.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. <\/p>\n

Ah, there is a change in the landscape. Christ made a difference. Before Him we were way off from God, but now that Christ is a part of our life we are made close to God. <\/p>\n

As you read this passage you get the feeling that not only were there some false teachings relating to our lostness, works, but also this text seems to indicate there was a division between the Jewish converts and the Gentile converts. Paul is making the strong case that these two groups are now merged into one in Christ. <\/p>\n

Fuente: Mr. D’s Notes on Selected New Testament Books by Stanley Derickson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

2:13 {11} But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.<\/p>\n

(11) Christ is the only bond of the Jews and Gentiles, by whom they are reconciled to God.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n

"But" points to another great contrast (cf. Eph 2:4). Because of Jesus Christ’s death (blood) God has brought Gentiles near to Himself and to the Jews in a sense never before true. The rabbis spoke of Gentiles who were far from the privileges of the Mosaic Covenant as "brought near" by becoming proselytes. [Note: For the original sources, see Abbott, p. 60.] <\/span> Sin results in death and separation. However, Christ’s obedience resulted in life and reconciliation with other people as well as with God for Gentiles. Perhaps Paul referred to the blood of Christ to correct the Gnostic denial of Christ’s real humanity. [Note: Robertson, 4:526.] <\/span><\/p>\n

There is obvious continuity between the redeemed people of God in the Old Testament and the redeemed people of God in the New Testament. However here Paul stressed the differences between these two groups. [Note: See Carl B. Hoch Jr., "The New Man in Ephesians 2," in Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church, pp. 98-126.] <\/span> Covenant theology stresses the continuity between the two groups whereas dispensational theology stresses the differences between them. Many covenant theologians deny these differences.<\/p>\n

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. 13. but now ] under the changed conditions of actual and accepted Redemption. in Christ Jesus ] In living union with the true Messiah. Just before, Eph 2:12, we have “without Christ ” merely; here, “in … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Ephesians 2:13”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29180","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29180"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29180\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}