Not go out – <\/B>Because most of the houses in cities were occupied by artificers and traders whose wealth did not consist in lands.<\/P><\/p>\nFuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
The reason is from the great difference between such houses and lands. The reasons before alleged for lands do not hold in such houses; there was no danger of confusion in tribes or families by the alienation of houses. The seller also had a greater propriety in houses than in lands, as not coming to him by Gods mere gift, but being commonly built by the owners cost and diligence, and therefore had a fuller power to dispose of them. Besides, God would hereby encourage persons to buy and possess houses in such places, which frequency and fulness of inhabitants in cities was a great strength, honour, and advantage to the whole land. <\/P> <\/p>\n
And if it be not redeemed within the space of a full year<\/strong>,…. Either by the seller or any man of kin to him:<\/p>\n then the house that [is] in the walled city shall be established for ever to him that bought it, throughout his generation<\/strong>; after twelve months were elapsed it was not redeemable by any, but to be held by the purchaser and his heirs for ever:<\/p>\n it shall not go out in the jubilee<\/strong>; from the purchaser or his heirs, to the seller or his heirs; for houses were not like lands, the gift of God, and held under him, but were built by men, and were their absolute property, and therefore they could dispose of them, and they that bought them could hold them after the above mentioned time; nor was there any danger of confounding tribes and families by retaining them: this law was made to encourage persons to settle in walled towns, to make and keep them populous, and to make owners of them careful not to sell them: the Jewish canon is this; when the day of the twelfth month is come, and it (the house) is not redeemed, it is absolutely his, whether he bought it or whether it was given him, as it is said,<\/p>\n Le 25:30<\/span>; and if in the beginning of the day of the twelfth month he (the purchaser) hides himself, that it may be confirmed to him or be his absolutely; Hillel, the elder, ordered that he (the seller) should put his money in the chamber (belonging to the sanhedrim) and break open the door, and go in; and when he would, he (the purchaser) might come, and take his money i; but otherwise, if he suffers this time to pass it is irredeemable, nor will the year of jubilee help him: the Jews except the city of Jerusalem from this law, because, they say, that does not belong to any tribe k.<\/p>\n i Misn. Eracin, c. 9. sect. 4. k T. Bab. Bava Kama, fol. 82. 2.<\/p>\n (30) if it be not redeemed within the space of a full year.<\/strong>That is, either by the vendor or his son. According to the interpretation which obtained during the second Temple, the phrase full year is here used for the benefit of the seller, inasmuch as it <\/em>gives him the advantage of an intercalary year, when he has an additional month, up to the last day of which he could still effect the redemption. Moreover, as the purchaser sometimes concealed himself towards the end of the year, in order to prevent the seller from redeeming his house, it was enacted that the original proprietor should hand over the redemption money to the public authorities when the purchaser could not be found, break open the doors, and take possession of the house; and if the purchaser died during the year, the vendor could redeem it from his heir.<\/p>\n It shall not go out in the jubile.<\/strong>If the vendor, however, failed to redeem the house within the prescribed period, it was not to be subject to the laws of jubile like the land, but is to remain for ever the property of the purchaser.<\/p>\n Lev 25:30<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>The house that is in the walled city<\/em><\/strong><\/strong> In the Hebrew it is, in a city that hath not a wall: <\/em>but because this seems contrary to the former, it is written and noted in the margin of our English Bibles to be read, hath a wall. <\/em>See chap. Lev 11:22<\/span> for a like double reading. And it seems that the meaning is, that if it were in a city which some time had a wall, but for the present had none, or a very ruinous one, (as was the case of Jerusalem, 2Ki 25:10<\/span>.) then the order here given should stand for the sale of the house. Beaumont. <\/p>\n Lev 25:30 And if it be not redeemed within the space of a full year, then the house that [is] in the walled city shall be established for ever to him that bought it throughout his generations: it shall not go out in the jubile.<\/p>\n Ver. 30. And if it be not redeemed.<\/strong> ] This would make the owners the better husbands, and keep the houses in better repair.<\/p>\n the walled city = a city that hath walls. <\/p>\n redeemed <\/p>\n Heb. “goel,” Redemp. (Kinsman type). (See Scofield “Isa 59:20”). <\/p>\n 25:30 And if it be not redeemed within the space of a full year, then the house that [is] in the walled city shall be established {p} for ever to him that bought it throughout his generations: it shall not go out in the jubile.<\/p>\n (p) That is, for ever, read Lev 25:23.<\/p>\n And if it be not redeemed within the space of a full year, then the house that [is] in the walled city shall be established forever to him that bought it throughout his generations: it shall not go out in the jubilee. Not go out – Because most of the houses in cities were occupied … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Leviticus 25:30”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3508"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3508\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"