[See comments on Nu 31:32]<\/span>.<\/p>\n 37. And the Lord’s tribute of the sheep. The greatness of the victory is shewn by the result, since such an abundance of cattle could only have been collected from a wide and populous country. It is probable that it was not very fertile, and consequently only live stock, and not corn and wine, are enumerated as amongst their wealth. Still, we may conjecture that it was famous for pastures, since barren mountains could not have fed so many oxen, and goats, and sheep, and camels; besides, it is most evident, from the number of young women, that the men who were slain were more in number than their conquerors who had been sent to the battle; for suppose they each of them had an unmarried daughter, they would have almost three times outnumbered the 12,000 Israelites. Hence, again, it is manifest that the victory was effected by Divine power. It may, however, seem strange that, although the nation was almost destroyed, nevertheless their posterity existed some little time afterwards, as if new Midianites had been begotten from the ashes of their sires. For it was not a very long time that elapsed between this slaughter and the time of Gideon, when they again dared voluntarily to attack the Israelites, and in reliance on their multitude, to rush into the very heart of Canaan; nay, they had already brought all the neighboring nations into subjection. How this could have happened, since the Scriptures do not inform us, it only remains for us to make the conjecture, that many of them, as is often the case in a season of confusion, fled elsewhere, and soon afterwards returned into the land, which was now unoccupied. For the sudden irruption of the Israelites was like a storm which soon passed away; nor was flight a difficult thing for this unsettled and wandering nation. It might also have been the case, that many immigrants from various quarters flowed into the land, when stripped of its inhabitants; or even that the Israelites, having performed their work but slackly, sounded the recall sooner than they ought, and that God afterwards punished their remissness. At any rate, we are taught by this example that the wicked sprout up like foul and noxious weeds, so that, though often cut down, they soon cover the ground again. <\/p>\n “Handfuls of Purpose”<\/p>\n For All Gleaners<\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n “The Lord’s tribute.” <\/em> Num 31:37<\/p>\n The association of the words is remarkable. Who can give anything to the Lord, when the earth is his and the fulness thereof? This again, as in the former instance, is a mystery of spiritual love. It is indeed because all is his, that we are expected to give him part of it. What is ours is ours, for convenience, comfort, for passing necessity of any kind, and never ours in the sense of proprietorship. This is vividly set forth in the words, “Ye are not your own.” When the hand does not belong to the man, it is easy to see that what the hand contains cannot be his. Paul said, “I seek not your’s, but you;” and the Christians to whom he spoke soon discovered that, in securing themselves, he had in reality secured all they had. The Lord has his tribute of harvest, viz., the firstfruits; his tribute of time, the Sabbath day; his tribute of land and the sanctuary: his tribute of love, worship. “Will a man rob God? But ye say, Wherein have we wronged thee?” The answer is, “In tithes and offerings.” The withholding of the tribute thus becomes felonious. The tribute is not spontaneous, in the sense that the character is as complete without the oblation as with it. The Lord’s tribute and money appropriated to ordinary uses will not exist together, no more than the ark could stand peacefully side by side with Dagon. To spend the Lord’s tribute in self-gratification, or for any purpose not included in its original dedication, is to expose all other money to the risk of defilement and loss. No man is the poorer for paying the Lord’s tribute. It is a mistake to suppose that the payment of the tribute must always relate to work carried on at a great distance from customary action and association. Sometimes charity may justly both begin and end at home. He does not please the Lord, who allows his own children to go without spiritual culture and illumination. It will be found, however, as a rule, that they who do most for objects that are near at hand do most in response to appeals which come from afar, and also that those who are most interested in the conversion of the ends of the earth, are most deeply engaged in the evangelisation of the localities in which they reside. A sanctifying influence seems to follow the setting aside of the Lord’s tribute. The whole house is the sweeter for the place in it where prayer is most constantly offered. The whole library is made select by the presence of the Bible, which will not keep unholy or unworthy company. The whole commercial account is turned into a spiritual record, by lines here and there, which record the dedication of property to charitable uses. Men are often left wholly at liberty to find out for themselves the best way in which to spend the Lord’s tribute; some give it to the young, others to the aged, others to Christian apostles and missionaries, others to the circulation of pure literature; every-man must discover for himself what he thinks to be the worthiest field on which to expend the tribute of the Lord.<\/p>\n Reciprocal: Deu 16:10 – a tribute<\/p>\n 31:37 And the {m} LORD’S tribute of the sheep was six hundred and threescore and fifteen.<\/p>\n (m) This is the portion that the soldiers gave to the Lord.<\/p>\n And the LORD’s tribute of the sheep was six hundred and threescore and fifteen. [See comments on Nu 31:32]. Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 37. And the Lord’s tribute of the sheep. The greatness of the victory is shewn by the result, since such an abundance of cattle could only have been … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Numbers 31:37”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4710","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4710","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4710"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4710\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The People’s Bible by Joseph Parker<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"