STAT. VI.<\/P>
<\/P>
Verse 10<\/span>. Encamped by the<\/B><\/I> RED SEA.<\/B>] It is difficult to assign the place<\/I> of this encampment, as the Israelites were now on their way to Mount Sinai<\/I>, which lay considerably to the east of Elim<\/I>, and consequently farther from the sea than the former station. It might be called by the Red Sea<\/I>, as the Israelites had it<\/I>, as the principal object, still in view. This station however is mentioned nowhere else. By the Red Sea<\/I> we are not to understand a sea, the waters of which are red<\/I>, or the sand<\/I> red, or any thing else about<\/I> or in<\/I> it red<\/I>; for nothing of this kind appears. It is called in Hebrew yam suph<\/I>, which signifies the weedy sea<\/I>. The Septuagint<\/I> rendered the original by , and the Vulgate<\/I> after it by mare rubrum<\/I>, and the European versions followed these, and, in opposition to etymology and reason, translated it the Red Sea<\/I>. See Clarke on Ex 10:19<\/span>.<\/P> <\/p>\n 10. encamped by the Red Sea<\/B>Theroad from Wady Ghurundel leads into the interior, in consequence of ahigh continuous ridge which excludes all view of the sea. At themouth of Wady-et-Tayibeh, after about three days’ march, it opensagain on a plain along the margin of the Red Sea. The minute accuracyof the Scripture narrative, in corresponding so exactly with thegeographical features of this region, is remarkably shown indescribing the Israelites as proceeding by the only practicable routethat could be taken. This plain, where they encamped, was the Desertof Sin (see on Ex 16:1<\/span>).<\/P><\/p>\n And they removed from Elim, and encamped by the Red sea.<\/strong> This encampment, is omitted in the book of Exodus, see Ex 16:1<\/span> this part or arm of the Red sea, whither they came, was six miles from Elim.<\/p>\n 10<\/strong>. <\/strong> Encamped by the Red Sea <\/strong> Probably at Ras Abu Zenimeh, a flat, sandy strip of ground. “This is not given in Exodus as a station, but its distance from Elim, sixteen miles, indicates it as a fair day’s march from that point. I could imagine how the tired multitude felt, as, after a toilsome march through a net of low, barren hills and dry wadies, the sight of a broad, level beach and of the soft, quiet sea unexpectedly opened before them.” Dr. Ridgaway.<\/p>\n Num 33:10<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>And encamped by the Red Sea<\/em><\/strong><\/strong> Not by that part out of which they lately came, but more southerly, towards the Arabian desart. This station is omitted in Exodus, as well as those mentioned, Num 33:13<\/span> nothing very remarkable, it is supposed, having happened at those places. <\/p>\n Num 33:18-19<\/span><\/strong>. <\/strong>Pitched in Rithmah, <\/em><\/strong>&c.<\/strong> This and the following stages are not mentioned in Exodus. Rithmah, from chap. Num 12:16<\/span> appears to have been in the wilderness of Paran, not far from Kadesh-barnea; and the other places seem to have been also in the same wilderness. Those who would see many bold conjectures upon this subject, will find them in Calmet on the place. <\/p>\n by the Red sea. Not named before. <\/p>\n Elim: Exo 16:1, Exo 17:1<\/p>\n Num 33:10-11. By the Red sea Not by that part of it where they had lately passed over, but more southerly, toward the Arabian desert. This station is omitted in Exodus. The wilderness of Sin Where the manna first began to fall, Exo 16:1.<\/p>\n And they removed from Elim, and encamped by the Red sea. STAT. VI. Verse 10. Encamped by the RED SEA.] It is difficult to assign the place of this encampment, as the Israelites were now on their way to Mount Sinai, which lay considerably to the east of Elim, and consequently farther from the sea … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Numbers 33:10”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4779"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4779\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"