{"id":4855,"date":"2022-09-24T00:52:08","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T05:52:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-numbers-351-2\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T00:52:08","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T05:52:08","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-numbers-351-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-numbers-351-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Numbers 35:1"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> And the LORD spoke unto Moses in the plains of Moab by Jordan [near] Jericho, saying, <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 1 8<\/strong>. <em> The Levitical cities<\/p>\n<p><\/em><\/p>\n<p> The Levites are to receive 48 cities with their surrounding land (E.VV. &lsquo;suburbs&rsquo;), six of which are to be &lsquo;cities of refuge.&rsquo; The cities are to be contributed by each tribe in numbers proportionate to its size. Each plot of land is to be a square of 2,000 cubits ( <em> c.<\/em> 1,000 yards). The carrying out of this law is related in fuller detail in <span class='bible'>Joshua 21<\/span>, where the allotment is as follows: the <em> Kohathite Levites<\/em> were given 10 towns in Ephraim, Dan and western Manasseh, the <em> Gershonites<\/em> 13 in Issachar, Asher, Naphtali and eastern Manasseh, the <em> Merarites<\/em> 12 in Reuben, Gad and Zebulun, while the <em> priests<\/em> had 10 in Judah, Simeon and Benjamin.<\/p>\n<p> Two considerations, however, shew that this is a purely ideal arrangement, which could never have been actually brought about: 1st, In a hilly country like Palestine, cut with deep ravines, it would be impossible to find 48 square plots of land of such a size. 2nd, It is at variance with statements in earlier passages, ( <em> a<\/em>) In Deuteronomy the Levites are classed with widows, orphans and strangers, as poor people who are commended to the charity of Israel; cf. <span class='bible'>Deu 12:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 12:18<\/span> f., <span class='bible'>Num 14:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 14:29<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Num 16:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 16:14<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Num 26:11<\/span> ff. In a few cases, indeed, priests settled in communities, and appear to have owned property, e.g. at Anathoth (<span class='bible'>1Ki 2:26<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Jer 32:6<\/span> ff.), Nob (<span class='bible'>1Sa 21:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Sa 22:19<\/span>) and Bethel (<span class='bible'>Amo 7:10<\/span>); but the two latter towns are not included in the list in <span class='bible'>Joshua 21<\/span>. <span class='bible'>Deu 18:8<\/span> b may imply that some Levitical priests owned private property, but the passage is uncertain. ( <em> b<\/em>) In <span class='bible'>Numbers 18<\/span>, which must belong to an earlier stage of P than the present passage, the offerings to be made to the priests are expressly stated to be due to them <em> because they have no landed property<\/em>. Ezekiel (ch. 48) puts forward another ideal scheme for providing priests and Levites with land.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num 35:1-8<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Give unto the Levites . . . cities to dwell in.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Levites inheritance<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong><strong><em>. <\/em><\/strong>Cities were allowed them with their suburbs (<span class='bible'>Num 35:2<\/span>). They were not to have any ground for tillage; they needed not to sow or reap, or gather into barns, for their heavenly Father fed them with the tithe of the increase of other peoples labours, that they might the more closely attend the study of the law, and might have more leisure to teach the people; for they were not fed thus easily that they might live in idleness, but that they might give themselves wholly to the business of their profession and not be entangled in the affairs of this life.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> Cities were allotted them that they might live near together, and converse with one another about the law, to their mutual edification; and that, in doubtful cases, they might consult one another, and in all cases strengthen one anothers hands.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> These cities had suburbs annexed to them for their cattle (<span class='bible'>Num 35:3<\/span>); a thousand cubits from the wall was allowed them for out-housing to keep their cattle in, and then two thousand and more for fields to graze their cattle in (<span class='bible'>Num 35:4-5<\/span>). Thus was care taken that they should not only live, but live plentifully, and have all desirable conveniences about them, that they might not be looked upon with contempt by their neighbours.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>These cities were to be assigned to them out of the possessions of each tribe (<span class='bible'>Num 35:8<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1)<\/strong> That each tribe might thus make a grateful acknowledgment to God out of their real as well as out of their personal estates; for what was given to the Levites was accepted as given to the Lord, and thus their possessions were sanctified to them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(2)<\/strong> That each tribe might have the benefits of the Levites dwelling among them to teach them the good knowledge of the Lord. Thus that light was diffused through all parts of the country, and none left to sit in darkness (<span class='bible'>Deu 33:10<\/span>). They shall teach Jacob Thy judgments. Jacobs curse on Levis anger was, I will scatter them in Israel (<span class='bible'>Gen 44:7<\/span>); but that curse was turned into a blessing, and the Levites, by being thus scattered, were put into a capacity of doing so much the more good. It is a great mercy to a country to be replenished in all parts with faithful ministers. (<em>Matthew Henry, D. D<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Levites home<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The history of this tribe of Levi is fraught with many lessons for Christian workers. They were selected for the priesthood of the children of Israel, and on that account were separated from the rest of their brethren, and God ordained that they should have no inheritance among the children of Israel, and reminded them that God was their inheritance. But it is well for us to remember that it was not always so. At the commencement of their history this tribe of Levi lay underneath a curse (<span class='bible'>Gen 49:5<\/span>). But there came in the history of the tribe a crisis. Moses had ascended to the top of the hill, and during his forty days absence the children of Israel made a molten calf, and bowed down to the idol. Moses came down from the hill-top, and at once standing amid the camp he shouted, Who is on the Lords side, let him come over to me; and all the tribe of Levi gathered themselves together unto Moses. It was the turning-point in their lives, they seized their opportunity, and from that time they were the tribe whom God chose for His service. But the call to Levi was not simply a call to privilege, it was a call to work. God calls not to idleness. When once you feel the consecrated hand of God laid upon you, you may be sure that He has work for you, and He has already commanded the help you need. And from that time that special characteristic of the tribe of Levi, which had in former times led them into sin, now is purified by God for His own special service. What was that characteristic? If I were to sum it up in one phrase, it would be this&#8211;intense sociability. Their very name, Levi, signifies the joined ones. It was this yearning for companionship which led Levi to join himself to the bloodthirsty Simeon, and to reap the vengeance which Jacob perpetuates upon his death-bed. It is a very important characteristic; it is a characteristic which the Christian ministry needs, which every individual Christian ought to possess. A Christian man should be a man of intense sympathy, and have his tendrils going forth to all around him. But there is another characteristic which is equally necessary to a true and faithful servant of God. And it is to produce this characteristic that Gods dealing with the children of Levi seems to be bent, namely, the power to stand alone. And not until these two characteristics are blended together is the Levite fit for the service of God. These are the true Christian servants&#8211;men who are ready to go forth to all, and yet men who are able, bravely, to take their stand alone, because they are joined to God. And now I want you to think of this one ordinance laid down with regard to these men, namely, the provision God had made in this chapter for their homes. We might have imagined it would have been better, as God had appointed this tribe to be workers for Him, for them to live about the temple of Jerusalem, so that they might be at hand to minister within its sacred courts. But no, God lays down the distinct command that this tribe of Levi, which He has chosen for His own peculiar service, should be scattered among the tribes. There were four or five centres in every tribe where these Levites were to dwell. What is the reason of this strange provision? I think it was made partly for the sake of the people, and partly for the sake of the Levites. It was in the first place, because of the people. In the wilderness the children of Israel were not likely to forget God. They had the tabernacle in their centre ; the pillar of cloud or file was always to be seen in the very middle of the camp. But when they became settled down in the promised land, and received their promised inheritance, then indeed they would be scattered abroad, and then would arise the danger lest they should forget the Lord their God. And, therefore, God ordained that their teachers should go and live in the very midst of them, because He wanted to bring religion to their homes. And this, I believe, is Gods law, that His people should go and scatter themselves; not simply settle down in some place, but actually go and let their light shine before men even in the very darkest places of the earth. But if the provision was made for the tribes, I think it was actually made for the Levites. If they had all been gathered together at Jerusalem, these Levites would consider that their work began, continued, and ended in their attendance at the ordinances of the sanctuary; and God wanted to show them, as His ministers, they were not simply to deal with the sanctuary, but with the home life of His people&#8211;to carry His religion into their various towns and villages. Further than that, by thus scattering them in these different tribes, God provides here that they may learn that their homes are not to be simply for themselves, but they are to be, as it were, cities of refuge. And this ought to be a picture of our homes. Not only would God scatter us as Christian men and women throughout the nations of the world, but each one of you has your home, and you want it to be a place where there shall be fellowship&#8211;a true Hebron. True, the Christian mans home is in the midst of this world with all its defilements; but it is a home of fellowship, it is a royal city, where Jesus Christ reigns as King. (<em>E. A. Stuart, M. A<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\"> CHAPTER XXXV <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>The Israelites are commanded to give the Levites, out of their<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>inheritances, cities and their suburbs for themselves and for<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>their cattle, goods, c.<\/I>, 1-3.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>The suburbs to be 3,000 cubits round about from the wall of the<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>city<\/I>, 4, 5.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>The cities to be forty-two, to which six cities of refuge should<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>be added, in all forty-eight cities<\/I>, 6, 7.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>Each tribe shall give of these cities in proportion to its<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>possessions<\/I>, 8.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>These cities to be appointed for the person who might slay his<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>neighbour unawares<\/I>, 9-12.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>Of these six cities there shall be three on each side Jordan<\/I>,<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   13, 14.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>The cities to be places of refuge for all who kill a person<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   unawares, <I>whether they be Israelites, strangers, or sojourners<\/I>,<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   15.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>Cases of murder to which the benefit of the cities of refuge<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>shall not extend<\/I>, 16-21.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>Cases of manslaughter to which the benefits of the cities of<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>refuge shall extend<\/I>, 22, 23.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>How the congregation shall act between the manslayer and the<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>avenger of blood<\/I>, 24, 25.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>The manslayer shall abide in the city of refuge till the death<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>of the high priest he shall then return to the land of his<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>possession<\/I>, 26-28.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>Two witnesses must attest a murder before a murderer can be put<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>to death<\/I>, 29, 30.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>Every murderer to be put to death<\/I>, 31.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>The manslayer is not to be permitted to come to the land of his<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>inheritance till the death of the high priest<\/I>, 32.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">  <I>The land must not be polluted with blood, for the Lord dwells<\/I><\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.9em\">   <I>in it<\/I>, 33, 34. <\/P> <P>                     NOTES ON CHAP. XXXV<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>And the Lord spake to Moses<\/strong>,&#8230;. After he had described the borders of the land, and given instructions about the division of it among the several tribes, and named the persons that should be concerned in parting and putting it into the possession of the Israelites, he makes a provision for the Levites; for though they had no inheritance in the land as a tribe, yet it was proper they should have cities and houses to dwell in; for it would not be suitable that they should be always about the tabernacle, as they were in the wilderness; and it is concerning this the Lord is said to speak to Moses,<\/p>\n<p><strong>in the plains of Moab by Jordan, near Jericho<\/strong>: where the Israelites now were, and had been for some time:<\/p>\n<p><strong>saying<\/strong>; as follows.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Appointment of Towns for the Levites. &#8211; As the Levites were to receive no inheritance of their own, i.e., no separate tribe-territory, in the land of Canaan (<span class='bible'>Num 18:20<\/span> and <span class='bible'>Num 18:23<\/span>), Moses commanded the children of Israel, i.e., the rest of the tribes, in accordance with the divine instructions, to give (vacate) towns to the Levites to dwell in of the inheritance that fell to them for a possession, with pasturage by the cities round about them for their cattle. &ldquo;Towns to dwell in,&rdquo; i.e., not the whole of the towns as their own property, but as many houses in the towns as sufficed for the necessities of the Levites as their hereditary possession, which could be redeemed, if sold at any time, and which reverted to them without compensation in the year of jubilee, even if not redeemed before (<span class='bible'>Lev 25:32-33<\/span>); but any portion of the towns which was not taken possession of by them, together with the fields and villages, continued the property of those tribes to which they had been assigned by lot (cf. <span class='bible'>Jos 21:12<\/span>, and my commentary on this passage: also Bhr, <em> Symbolik<\/em>, ii. p. 50; <em> Ewald<\/em>, <em> Gesch<\/em>. ii. p. 403). They were also to give them  (from  , to drive, drive out), pasturage or fields, to feed their flocks upon, all round the cities; and according to <span class='bible'>Lev 25:34<\/span>, this was not to be sold, but to remain the eternal possession of the Levites.  , for their oxen and beasts of burden, and  , for their (remaining) possessions in flocks (sheep and goats), which are generally described in other cases as <em> Mikneh <\/em>, in distinction from <em> behemah <\/em> (e.g., <span class='bible'>Num 32:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 34:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 36:6<\/span>).  and for all their animals, is merely a generalizing summary signifying all the animals which they possessed.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Keil &amp; Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">The Cities of the Levites.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"RIGHT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in\"> <SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">B. C.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"> 1452.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR>  <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1 And the <B>LORD<\/B> spake unto Moses in the plains of Moab by Jordan <I>near<\/I> Jericho, saying, &nbsp; 2 Command the children of Israel, that they give unto the Levites of the inheritance of their possession cities to dwell in; and ye shall give <I>also<\/I> unto the Levites suburbs for the cities round about them. &nbsp; 3 And the cities shall they have to dwell in; and the suburbs of them shall be for their cattle, and for their goods, and for all their beasts. &nbsp; 4 And the suburbs of the cities, which ye shall give unto the Levites, <I>shall reach<\/I> from the wall of the city and outward a thousand cubits round about. &nbsp; 5 And ye shall measure from without the city on the east side two thousand cubits, and on the south side two thousand cubits, and on the west side two thousand cubits, and on the north side two thousand cubits; and the city <I>shall be<\/I> in the midst: this shall be to them the suburbs of the cities. &nbsp; 6 And among the cities which ye shall give unto the Levites <I>there shall be<\/I> six cities for refuge, which ye shall appoint for the manslayer, that he may flee thither: and to them ye shall add forty and two cities. &nbsp; 7 <I>So<\/I> all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites <I>shall be<\/I> forty and eight cities: them <I>shall ye give<\/I> with their suburbs. &nbsp; 8 And the cities which ye shall give <I>shall be<\/I> of the possession of the children of Israel: from <I>them that have<\/I> many ye shall give many; but from <I>them that have<\/I> few ye shall give few: every one shall give of his cities unto the Levites according to his inheritance which he inheriteth.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The laws about the tithes and offerings had provided very plentifully for the maintenance of the Levites, but it was not to be thought, nor indeed was it for the public good, that when they came to Canaan they should all live about the tabernacle, as they had done in the wilderness, and therefore care must be taken to provide habitations for them, in which they might live comfortably and usefully. It is this which is here taken care of.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I. Cities were allotted them, with their suburbs, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 2<\/span>. They were not to have any ground for tillage; they needed not to <I>sow, nor reap, nor gather into barns,<\/I> for their heavenly Father fed them with the tithe of the increase of other people&#8217;s labours, that they might the more closely attend to the study of the law, and might have more leisure to teach the people; for they were not fed thus easily that they might live in idleness, but that they might give themselves wholly to the business of their profession, and not be entangled in the affairs of this life. 1. Cities were allotted them, that they might live near together, and converse with one another about the law, to their mutual edification; and that in doubtful cases they might consult one another, and in all cases strengthen one another&#8217;s hands. 2. These cities had suburbs annexed to them for their cattle (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 3<\/span>), a thousand cubits from the wall was allowed them for out-houses to keep their cattle in, and then two thousand more for fields to graze their cattle in, <span class='bible'>Num 35:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 35:5<\/span>. Thus was care taken that they should not only live, but live plentifully, and have all desirable conveniences about them, that they might not be looked upon with contempt by their neighbours.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. These cities were to be assigned them out of the possessions of each tribe, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 8<\/span>. 1. That each tribe might thus make a grateful acknowledgment to God out of their real as well as out of their personal estates (for what was given to the Levites was accepted as given to the Lord) and thus their possessions were sanctified to them. 2. That each tribe might have the benefit of the Levites&#8217; dwelling among them, to <I>teach them the good knowledge of the Lord;<\/I> thus that light was diffused through all parts of the country, and none were left to sit in darkness, <span class='bible'>Deut. xxxiii. 10<\/span>, <I>They shall teach Jacob thy judgments.<\/I> Jacob&#8217;s curse on Levi&#8217;s anger was, <I>I will scatter them in Israel,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Gen. xlix. 7<\/I><\/span>. But that curse was turned into a blessing, and the Levites, by being thus scattered, were put into a capacity of doing so much the more good. It is a great mercy to a country to be replenished in all parts with faithful ministers.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; III. The number allotted them was forty-eight in all, four out of each of the twelve tribes, one with another. Out of the united tribes of Simeon and Judah nine, out of Naphtali three, and four apiece out of the rest, as appears, <span class='bible'>Josh. xxi<\/span>. Thus were they blessed with a good ministry, and that ministry with a comfortable maintenance, not only in tithes, but in glebe-lands. And, though the gospel is not so particular as the law was in this matter, yet it expressly provides that he that is <I>taught in the word<\/I> should <I>communicate unto him that teaches in all good things,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Gal. vi. 6<\/I><\/span>.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p style='margin-left:4.46em'><strong>NUMBERS &#8211; CHAPTER THIRTY-FIVE<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Verses 1-5:<\/p>\n<p>The Levites occupied a unique place in Israel&#8217;s society, by Divine decree. They were separated from the other tribes and listed separately in the first census, Nu 1:49. They were not allocated a territorial inheritance in the Land, Nu 18:20-24. Their livelihood was the tithes and offerings of the other tribes, Nu 18:25-32. These consisted of numerous livestock as well as grain, oil, and wine. It was necessary that the Levites have places to live, to pasture their livestock, and to store their produce. To meet this need, God provided that forty-eight cities be allocated to the Levites, when Israel possessed the Land of Canaan. These cities are listed in Jos 21. q.v.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;Suburbs,&#8221; migrash, <\/strong>&#8220;place for driving out cattle,&#8221; a fenced pasture or paddock where cattle were driven to feed during the day. This consisted of an area about two thousand cubits (3,000 feet) in each direction outward from the city walls. Half (one thousand cubits) was for their livestock, and half for their gardens.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 1.  And the Lord spake unto Moses.  Although there was no inheritance assigned to the tribe of Levi, yet it was necessary that they should be supplied with dwelling-places. No lands were given then where they might sow and reap; but by way of compensation the tithes were a sufficient means of subsistence, even after deducting the tithes which were paid to the poor. God now, however, makes provision for their residences; and here we must carefully remark, that they were so distributed over the whole land, as to be, as it were, guards regularly posted for the preservation of the worship of God, lest any superstition should creep in, or the people should fall into gross contempt of God. For we know that they were chosen by Him, not only to attend to the ceremonies, but to be the interpreters of the law, and to cherish sincere piety among the people. Now if all had been placed in one station, it was dangerous lest the doctrine of the Law should immediately fall into oblivion through the whole land; and thus the other tribes should grow irreligious. Wherefore the incomparable goodness of God here shone forth, since their punishment was turned as it were into a reward of virtue, and their disgrace into honor; for this dispersion of the tribe of Levi had been foretold by the holy patriarch Jacob, (<span class='bible'>Gen 46:7<\/span>,) that their posterity should be scattered in that land, which Levi the father of their race had polluted by a detestable murder and wicked perfidy. God proved eventually that this prophecy, which proceeded from Him, did not fall to the ground unfulfilled; nevertheless, although the Levites were to be banished here and there in token of their disgrace, yet were they set in various parts of the land, that they might retain the other tribes under the yoke of the Law. It was then in God&#8217;s wonderful providence that they were rather placed in peculiar and fixed residences, than allowed to mingle themselves promiscuously with the rest of the people; for the cities which God assigned to them were so many schools, where they might better and more freely engage themselves in teaching the Law, and prepare themselves for performing the office of teaching. For if they had lived indiscriminately among the multitude, they were liable to contract many vices, as well as to neglect the study of the Law; but when they were thus collected into separate classes, such an union reminded them that they were divided from the people that they might devote themselves altogether to God. Besides, their cities were like lamps shining into the very furthest corners of the land. They were therefore fortified, as it were, by walls, lest the corruptions of the people should penetrate to them. Their association together also should have stimulated them mutually to exhort each other to confinehey, decent and modest manners, temperance, and other virtues worthy of God&#8217;s servants; whilst, if they fell into dissolute habits, they were the less excusable. Thus their cities were like watch towers in which they might keep guard, so as to drive impiety away from the borders of the holy land. Hence was the light of heavenly doctrine diffused; hence was the seed of life scattered; hence were the examples to be sought of holiness and universal integrity. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Calvin&#8217;s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong>REFUGE CITIES AND SALVATION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Chapters 35, 36.<\/p>\n<p>Your reading of the Book of Numbers has familiarized you with the Divine appointment of these cities, their number, location and purpose. It was God who suggested them; He determined that they should be six in all; He saw to it that they were located so as to be within half a days journey from every man; and he fixed their purpose as a refuge for man-slayer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>They were appointed as a refuge from law. <\/strong>Not by Divine appointment but by human practice was death for the man-slayer accomplished by the next of kin. Now in this city of refuge God makes provision for the man-slayer who shall do his deed without malice aforethought. It was softening grace against inexorable law; it was the appointment of Divine love against the practice of human anger. But a few years ago the law of this land made every black man born beneath our flag, a slave of some white master. The only possible escape from that slavery was to cross the Canadian line and come under the flag that made all the people, touched by its ample folds, free. When a fugitive slave crossed the Ohio river, or the Mason and Dixon line, he came into the country of friends, but in that fact he found no certain salvation. Even there the law could lay its hand upon him and drag him back to prison or the plantation. But the law of the land did not reach one inch beyond the Canadian line. So the common law of this ancient people became inoperative at a line 2000 cubits outside the limits of the refuge cities. What a type this of the salvation that we have in Christa salvation which Paul expressly teaches to be freedom from the power of the law.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This city of refuge was easily accessible. <\/strong>Many a time I have read sermons that would speak as though the gates of the city of refuge were open day and night, and I think that likely. But it is not declared in the Word. A better access than the open gate was offered to every fleeing soul. The suburbs of these cities allotted to the priests for the grazing of their cattle were sacred grounds, and the record is that the man did not have to make his way over a closed gate or even through an open one. All he had to do was to get himself within that suburban line. What a marvelous illustration of the accessibility of Christ! No wonder Christ uttered that gracious sentence, <em>Him that cometh to Me I will in no wise cast out.<\/em> Accessible to the sinner is this God, this Saviour, this refuge from sin and the slayer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Again, these cities provided a perfect shelter. <\/strong>In the Book of Joshua we read,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>And if the avenger of blood pursue after him, then they shall not deliver the slayer up into his hand; because he smote his neighbour unwittingly, and hated him not beforetime.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>And he shall dwell in that city, until he stand before the congregation for judgment, and until the death of the high-priest that shall be in those days; then shall the slayer return, and come unto his own city, and unto his own house, unto the city from whence he fled (<span class='bible'><em>Jos 20:5-6<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>One of the first buildings erected after the founding of Rome was one to the god of refuge. That was open to all who came. Here the slave was free from his master, the debtor from his creditor, and the murderer from the avenging magistrates. Such were these cities of refuge, and yet they only promised and typified that one refuge which is yours and mine; and David said, God is our refuge. Paul, in his Epistles to the Hebrews, speaks of the<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'><em>strong consolation which we have who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul both sure and stedfast, and which entereth into that within the veil;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made an High Priest forever after the order of Melchisedec (<span class='bible'><em>Heb 6:18-20<\/em><\/span><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Beloved, if your salvation and mine is secure, so long as our High Priest lives, then indeed it is forever and ever. <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Safe in the arms of Jesus,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Safe on His gentle breast,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>There by His love oershaded,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Sweetly my soul shall rest.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Hark! tis the voice of angels,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Borne in a song to me,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Over the fields of Glory,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Over the jasper sea.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Safe in the arms of Jesus,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Safe from corroding care,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Safe from the worlds temptations, <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Sin cannot harm me there.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Free from the blight of sorrow,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Free from my doubts and fears;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Only a few more trials,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Only a few more tears.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Jesus, my hearts dear refuge,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Jesus has died for me;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Firm on the Rock of Ages,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Ever my trust shall be.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Here let me wait with patience,<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Wait till the night is oer;<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Wait till I see the morning <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:4.35em'>Break on the golden shore.<\/p>\n<p><span><\/span><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Bible of the Expositor and the Evangelist by Riley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>CRITICAL AND EXPLANATORY NOTES<\/p>\n<p>This chapter contains directions for the appointment of <\/p>\n<p>(1) cities for the Levites to dwell in; and <br \/>(2) cities of refuge for the manslayer; and laws concerning wilful murder and unintentional homicide.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:2<\/span>. <em>Suburbs. Keil<\/em> and <em>Del.<\/em> Pasturage or fields.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:3<\/span>. <em>For their cattle<\/em>, &amp;c. More strictly, for their large cattle, for their sheep and goats, and for all their beasts whatsoever they be.<em>Speakers Comm<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:4-5<\/span>. The directions given in these verses as to the extent of the suburbs have much perplexed expositors. They seem to us to mean that the suburbs should extend 1,000 cubits, or nearly one-third of a mile, from the city wall in every direction (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:4<\/span>), and that at their outward extremity they should present on every side a frontage of not less than 2,000 cubits in length (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:5<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:6<\/span>. <em>And to them ye shall add<\/em>. Margin: And above them ye shall give. Or, and in addition to them, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:8<\/span>. <em>From them that have many ye shall give many<\/em>. From the large inheritance of Judah and Simeon, the Levites received nine cities; from that of Naphtali three, and four from each of the other tribes. On the east of Jordan they had ten, and in Canaan proper, thirty-eight.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:11<\/span>. <em>At unawares<\/em>. Margin: Heb., by error. Or, by accident.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:12<\/span>. <em>The avenger<\/em>. Heb. <em>Gol<\/em>, redeemer, kinsman, &amp;c. <em>Stand before the congregation<\/em>, &amp;c. Or, before the assembly, which consisted of the elders of the city. Comp. <span class='bible'>Num. 35:24-25<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:15<\/span>. <em>Unawares<\/em>. By accident, or, unintentionally.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:16<\/span>. <em>Instrument of iron, i.e.<\/em>, a tool, <em>e.g.<\/em>, hatchet, hammer, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:17<\/span>. <em>With throwing a stone<\/em>. Margin: Heb., with a stone of the hand, <em>i.e.<\/em>, a large stone, which filled the hand.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:18<\/span>. <em>A hand weapon of wood<\/em>. Or, a wooden instrument of the hand, <em>e.g.<\/em>, a club. The suspicion would rest upon anyone who had used an instrument that endangered life, and therefore was not generally used in striking, that he had intended to take life away.<em>Knobel<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:22-23<\/span>. Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu. 19:4-5<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:25<\/span>. <em>He shall abide in it<\/em>. He was safe only within the walls of the city.<\/p>\n<p><em>Unto the death of the high priest<\/em>. The atoning death of the Saviour casts its shadow before on the statute-book of the Law and on the annals of Jewish history. The High Priest, as the head and representative of the whole chosen family of sacerdotal mediators, as exclusively entrusted with some of the chief priestly functions, as alone privileged to make yearly atonement within the Holy of Holies, and to gain, from the mysterious Urim and Thummim, special revelations of the will of God, was, pre-eminently, a type of Christ. And thus the death of each successive high priest pre-signified that death of Christ by which the captives were to be freed, and the remembrance of transgressions made to cease.<em>Speakers Comm<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:30<\/span>. <em>The murderer shall be put to death<\/em>. The cities of refuge were not instituted to screen the guilty from deserved punishment; but to secure a just sentence.<\/p>\n<p><em>By the mouth of witnesses<\/em>, &amp;c. Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu. 17:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu. 19:15<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:31<\/span>. <em>Satisfaction<\/em>. Rather, redemption money, or ransom.<\/p>\n<p>THE APPOINTMENT OF CITIES FOR THE RESIDENCE OF THE LEVITES<\/p>\n<p>(<em><span class='bible'>Num. 35:1-8<\/span><\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>The Divine provision for the maintenance of the priests and Levites has already engaged our attention twice (see pp. 8486, and 339342); and, inasmuch as most of the homiletical suggestions of this paragraph were noticed there, it is needless to point them out in this place.<\/p>\n<p>REFUGE<\/p>\n<p>(<em><span class='bible'>Num. 35:6<\/span><\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>Among the cities which ye shall give unto the Levites, there shall be six cities for refuge.<br \/>Some types of Christ appeared for a brief season, and then vanished. The guiding cloud, the manna, ended on Jordans banks. But here is a sign which lived through Canaans history. It never failed until the Cross was reared.<br \/>The story of the ordinance is brief.<br \/>Sinner, this type displays your case. The slayer is your counterpart. There may be carnage of dutiestalentstimesouls. No day passes in which this guilt is not incurred. As the man-slayer did not plot his deed, so sinners blindly commit these murders through ignorance and unwatched thought.<br \/>Take now the sinner awakened to a sense of this guilt. He is, as the slayer, rushing in terror from the kinsmans wrath. He knows himself to be pursued.<br \/>One kinsman only hunted the slayer. But many adversaries threaten the guilty soul Gods justice takes the lead. It has strong claims. Its wrongs are many. Its wrath is righteous. The law is in pursuit winged with vengeance. It demands pure, unblemished love, from the cradle to the grave, in every child of man. All who transgress become its prey. And who transgresses not? This law must have its dues. It follows sternly. The truth of God, too, points an inexorable sword. It has decreed that every sinner must die. Can it be false? Satan moreover follows with huge strides. He claims the sinning soul as his. His hate is bitter.<\/p>\n<p>These adversaries rush on apace. Who, undismayed, can hear their nearing footsteps? Do any cry, Whither shall we flee? Is there a Refuge? Yes. The sheltering cities represent our Refuge. A Refuge is prepared, fullcompletesecure. It is Christ the Lord Flee to Him. All in Him are everlastingly secure. There is therefore now no condemnation, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Rom. 8:1<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>Let faith now calmly gaze on this city, and mark its towers. Christs person is the grand pillar of security. While Jesus lives, and lives the mighty God, this safety is complete. His finished work builds up the Refuge. The wallsthe bulwarks of this cityare red with blood. There is inscribed above each gate, Christ died. Justice draws near. It sees this mark; and asks no more. The laws stern curse falls harmless here. Christ receives its weight. Satan pursues up to these gates. But here he pauses. All within these walls are purified and beautified. He must confess that they are no more his. Blessed be God for this sure Refuge!<\/p>\n<p>Mark, too, this Refuge is at hand. In Israel the slayer had to flee oft-times along a tedious road. Our city stands beside us. The righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Rom. 10:6-8<\/span>). The gates are close. Enter this hour.<\/p>\n<p>Believer, you are within this Refuge. Set not one foot beyond the holy precincts. Abide in Christ. Would you be safe through lifein deathfor ever? Then cleave to Christ, as ivy to the tree, as limpet to the rock.<br \/>And when you realize your mercies and your safe retreat, can your heart fail to loveyour lips to praiseyour life to serve? Can you now see such multitudes exposed to wrath, and not allure them to your loved Refuge? Strive by every means to call them in. Above all, agonize in prayer, that Gods all-conquering Spirit may fly speedily throughout earths bounds, opening blind eyes to see their danger, exciting anxious hearts to rush to this only Refuge.<em>H. Law, D.D<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>THE DIVINE GUARDIANSHIP OF HUMAN LIFE<\/p>\n<p>(<em><span class='bible'>Num. 35:9-34<\/span><\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>Human life, to use the words of Dean Milman, in all rude and barbarous tribes, is of cheap account; blood is shed on the least provocation; open or secret assassination is a common occurrence. The Hebrew penal law enforced the highest respect for the life of man. Murder ranked with high treason (<em>i.e.<\/em>, idolatry, blasphemy), striking a father, adultery, and unnatural lust, as a capital crime: the law demanded blood for blood (<span class='bible'>Exo. 21:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev. 24:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev. 24:21-22<\/span>). But it transferred the exaction of the penalty from private revenge, and committed it to the judicial authority. To effect this, it had to struggle with an inveterate though barbarous usage, which still prevails among the Arabian tribes. By a point of honour, as rigorous as that of modern duelling, the nearest of kin is bound to revenge the death of his relation: he is his Gol or blood avenger. He makes no enquiry; he allows no pause; whether the deceased has been slain on provocation, by accident, or of deliberate malice, death can only be atoned by the blood of the homicide. To mitigate the evils of an usage too firmly established to be rooted out, Moses appointed certain cities of retuge, conveniently situated. If the homicide could escape to one of these, he was safe till a judicial investigation took place. If the crime was deliberate murder, he was surrendered to the Gol; if justifiable or accidental homicide, he was bound to reside within the sanctuary for a certain period; should he leave it and expose himself to the revenge of his pursuers, he did so at his own peril, and might be put to death.<\/p>\n<p>The various provisions of this law afford an impressive illustration of the Divine regard for human life.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. In the institution of the cities of refuge as a provision that the life of an innocent person should not be taken away.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:9-15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num. 35:22-25<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>The adaptation of these cities for this purpose appears in<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Their accessibility from all places<\/em>. Ye shall give three cities on this side Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan, which shall be cities of refuge. And they appointed Kedesh in Galilee, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Jos. 20:7-8<\/span>). A reference to the map of Canaan will show that these cities were so situated that one of them could be reached in a few hours from any part of the country.<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Their accessibility to all persons<\/em>. These six cities shall be a refuge for the children of Israel, and for the stranger, and for the sojourner among them: that every one that killeth any person unawares may flee thither. Gods regard is not simply for the life of the Israelite, but for the life of man as man.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. In the laws by which the trial of the manslayer was to be conducted.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Divine guardianship of human life is manifested in these laws at least in two respects:<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>In the clear discrimination between intentional and unintentional manslaughter<\/em>. If he smite him with an instrument. &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:16-24<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>In the absolute necessity for the evidence of at least two witnesses before a man could be adjudged guilty of murder<\/em>. Whoso killeth any person, the murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of witnesses: but one witness shall not testify against any person to cause him to die (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:30<\/span>; comp. <span class='bible'>Deu. 17:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu. 19:15<\/span>). One witness might be mistaken in his view of the case, or might be prejudiced against the homicide; hence the importance of the testimony of at least two witnesses in the trial of such cases.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. In the punishment of the intentional manslayer.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The murderer shall surely be put to death (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:16-18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num. 35:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num. 35:30<\/span>). As an evidence of the regard of God for human life, this punishment has additional weight from two facts:<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>It could not be averted by any ransom<\/em>. Ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer, which is guilty of death; but he shall be surely put to death. The crime was too heinous to be expiated by anything less than life itself.<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>It was insisted upon for the most solemn reason<\/em>. So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are; for blood it defileth the land, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:33-34<\/span>). The argument seems to be this: that the shedding of human blood defiled the land, that such defilement could be cleansed only by the blood of the murderer; that the Lord Himself dwelt in that land, and therefore it must be kept free from defilement; if murder were committed, the murderer must be put to death. To spare the life of the murderer was to insult Jehovah by defiling the land wherein He dwelt.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. In the punishment of the unintentional manslayer.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The congregation shall deliver the slayer out of the hand of the revenger of blood, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:25-28<\/span>). When it was proved on the trial that the manslayer was perfectly free from guilty designs, that he had slain another entirely by accident, even then he had to bear no light punishment. He must leave his estate and his worldly interests, his home and his family, and dwell in the city of refuge. His dwelling there closely resembled imprisonment; for if he left the city, and its divinely appointed suburbs, the Gol, if he should come upon him, was at liberty to put him to death. He must remain there throughout his life, or until the death of the high priest should bring him release.<\/p>\n<p>What striking witness does all this bear to the sacredness of human life in the sight of God! <em>(a)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>i. <em>Respect human life<\/em>that of others, and your own also. <em>(b)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>ii. <em>Guard against anger;<\/em> for it leads to murder, and in the estimation of Heaven it <em>is murder<\/em>. Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer (<span class='bible'>1Jn. 3:15<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>iii. <em>Cultivate brotherly kindness and Christian charity<\/em>. Where these are, anger cannot come.<\/p>\n<p><em>ILLUSTRATIONS<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>(a)<\/em> In the precepts delivered to the sons of Noah, and, therefore, through them, to all their descendants, that is, to all mankind, that against murder is thus delivered: Whoso sheddeth mans blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God made He man (<span class='bible'>Gen. 9:6<\/span>). There is in this reason a manifest reference to the dignity put upon human nature, by its being endowed with a rational and immortal spirit. The crime of murder is made to lie, therefore, not merely in the putting to death the animal part of mans nature, for this is merged in a higher consideration, which seems to be, the indignity done to the noblest of the works of God; and particularly, the value of life to an immortal being, accountable in another state for the actions done in this, and which ought, for this very reason, to be specially guarded, since death introduces him into changeless and eternal relations, which were not to lie at the mercy of human passions. Such moralists as the writer above quoted (Dr. Whately), would restrain the essential characteristics of an act of murder to the hurt done to a neighbour in depriving him of life, and the insecurity inflicted upon society; but in this ancient and universal law, it is made eminently to consist in contempt of the image of God in man, and its interference with mans immortal interests and relations as a deathless spirit; and, if so, then suicide bears upon it these deep and awful characteristics of murder. It is much more wisely said by Bishop Kidder, in his remarks upon this passage, that the reason givenfor in the image of God made He manis a further aggravation of the sin of murder. It is a great trespass upon God, as it destroys His likeness; and self-murder, upon this account, is forbidden as well as the killing of others.<em>Richard Watson<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>But more than this. Man, the immortal, is man, the sinful, the guilty; and for this immortal, sinful, guilty creature, a Saviour has been provided; and it depends on his having, or not having, an interest in this Saviour, whether his never-ending existence is to be one of happiness or woe. And it is now, and herein the present life and the present world, that this interest in the Saviour must be effected, this connection with Him formed. And it is here, and now, too, that a certain change of heart and character must be wrought, a change such as alone can fit for the only description of happiness that is at all to be found in the world, and the eternity beyond. How precarious, then, is life! Short, vain, passing as it is, a vapour, a shadow, a handbreadth, a dream! Yet, viewed in this, its relation to eternity, it acquires a worth which it is far beyond all the powers of human arithmetic to compute. And it becomes, in this view of it, the more solemnly important that, though brief even when most protracted, its limit, in each case, is every moment uncertain. For when the time is precarious on which any great event materially affecting our interests depends, and every moment may be that which is to determine for us the evil or the good, the preciousness of every moment is mightily, oppressively felt. With the sarcastic coolness of a scoffing scepticism, Mr. Hume asks: Where is the crime of diverting a few ounces of blood from their channel? The question is based on the assumption of there being no hereafter; no deathless spirit lodged in the frame through which that blood circulates; no moral accountableness; no judgment to come. It is the language of a narrow-minded, heartless materialism. It is the language of an ethereal spirit endowed with divine capacities, and prostituting its Heaven-bestowed powers to disprove its own immortality; to rob itself of the highest elements of its dignity; to disfranchise itself of the noblest of its chartered privileges: to debase itself to a level with the beasts that perish.<em>Ralph Wardlaw, D. D<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>(b)<\/em> On suicide, our modern moralists have added little to what is advanced by the ethical writers of Greece and Rome to prove its unlawfulness; for, though suicide was much practised in those ancient states, and sometimes commended, especially by the Stoics, it was occasionally condemned. We men, says Plato, are all by the appointment of God in a certain prison or custody, which we ought not to break out of or run away. So likewise Cicero: God, the Supreme Governor of all things, forbids us to depart hence without His order. All pious men ought to have patience to continue in the body, as long as God shall please who sent us hither; and not force themselves out of the world before He calls for them, lest they be found deserters of the station appointed them by God. <\/p>\n<p>Whatever weight may be due to the considerations urged by moralists against this crimeand every motive which may deter men from listening to the first temptation to so direful an act, is importantyet the guards of Christianity must be acknowledged to be of a more powerful kind. For the principles of our religion cannot be understood without our perceiving, that, of almost all other crimes, wilful suicide ought most to be dreaded. It is a sin against Gods authority. He is the God of our life; in His hand our breath is; and we usurp His authority when we presume to dispose of it As resulting from the pressure of mortifications of spirit, or the troubles of life, it becomes a sin, as arraigning His providential wisdom and goodness. It implies either an atheistic denial of Gods government, or a rebellious opposition to His permissive acts or direct appointments; it cannot be committed, therefore, when the mind is sound, but in the absence of all the Christian virtues, of humility, self-denial, patience, and the fear and love of God, and only under the influence of pride, worldliness, forgetfulness of God, and contempt of Him. It hides from the mind the realities of a future judgment, or it defies them; and it is consummated by the character of unpardonableness, because it places the criminal at once beyond the reach of mercy.<em>Richard Watson<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>THE CITIES OF REFUGE, AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE SALVATION OF JESUS CHRIST<\/p>\n<p>(<em><span class='bible'>Num. 35:9-34<\/span><\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>There are certain respects in which the analogy between the cities of refuge and the salvation offered to man in the Gospel does not hold good; <em>e.g<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>i. <em>The cities of refuge afforded no lasting protection to the guilty<\/em>. By their means a fair trial was secured for the manslayer; but if he was found guilty of murder, he was given up to the Gol to be put to death. They were an abiding refuge for those only who had accidentally slain a fellow creature. But Christianity is a refuge for the guilty. Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom, saith St. Paul, I am chief. This man receiveth sinners. Him that cometh to Me I will in no wise cast out. The guiltiest soul that flies to Jesus Christ is inviolably secure.<\/p>\n<p>ii. <em>The cities of refuge did not exempt even the unintentional manslayer from death, but simply postponed it<\/em>. They rescued him from the vengeance of the Gol; but they could not screen him from that death which is appointed unto all men. But the spiritual death, which is the penalty of sin, Christianity abolishes for the believer by bestowing upon him a life which is immortal and blessed. In the city of refuge the unintentional manslayer obtained bodily security for a time; in Christ the guilty sinner obtains spiritual security and joy for ever.<\/p>\n<p>There are other respects in which the analogy is not quite complete; but in three most conspicuous features it is both clear and striking.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. A great peril.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Under this head there are three points of resemblance.<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>A broken law<\/em>. The manslayer had broken the law which guards human life. Thou shalt not kill. Every man has transgressed the holy law of God in some respects. All have sinned, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Rom. 3:23<\/span>). If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>1Jn. 1:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Jn. 1:10<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The penalty of death<\/em>. At the hand of every mans brother will I require the life of man. Whoso sheddeth mans blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God made He man. The murderer shall surely be put to death. The soul that sinneth, it shall die. Sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death. <em>(a)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>3. <em>The peril of the exaction of the penalty<\/em>. The Gol of the slain person allowed no time to elapse before setting forth to avenge the death on the manslayer; and if he overtook him before he gained the city of refuge, he put him to death. The manslayer was fleeing for his very life. And the dire penalties of sin follow hard upon the heels of the sinner. Conscience pursues him with its condemnations, and will not be silenced. Divine Justice follows him closely, crying, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. And the wrath of God, which burns with unquenchable fire against sin, speeds swiftly on the track of the guilty sinner. <em>(b)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>II. A gracious provision.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>By Divine command six cities were appointed cities of refuge; to either of these the manslayer might flee, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>The provision was of Divine appointment<\/em>. Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye be come over Jordan, &amp;c. It was this fact, that they were appointed by Gods command, that made these cities a secure refuge for the homicide;not the strength of their gates or walls, not the authority of their governors, but the authority of Him who had instituted them for this purpose. Jesus Christ is the Refuge appointed by God for the sinner. The redemption that is in Christ Jesus; whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation, &amp;c. Him hath God exalted with His right hand, a Prince and a Saviour, &amp;c Hence, they who flee to Him are perfectly secure, <em>(c)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The provision was adequate to the need<\/em>. Six cities were appointed; and were quite sufficient for the entire country. In each there was ample room, &amp;c. The provisions of Christianity for the salvation of the sinner are enough for all the needs of all men in all ages and all lands. A great multitude which no man could number have found a secure and blessed refuge in Jesus Christ; and yet there is room.<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>The provision was accessible from all places<\/em>. Three measures were adopted to secure this:<\/p>\n<p>(1) The cities were suitably situated, They appointed Kedesh in Galilee, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Jos. 20:7-9<\/span>). Our Saviour is everywhere present. He is a Refuge always near. <\/p>\n<p>(2) The roads leading to these cities were kept in good condition. Moses took care, says Dr. Jahn, that roads leading to them in straight lines should be laid out in every direction, which were to be distinguished from other streets. (Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu. 19:3<\/span>.) And, according to the Talmudists, <\/p>\n<p>(3) where two or more roads met, posts were put up with the word , REFUGE, clearly marked on them for the direction of the fugitive. All this may be viewed as illustrating the accessibility of Jesus Christ to the sinner. Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Rom. 10:6-9<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>4. <em>The provision was accessible to all persons<\/em>. These six cities shall be a refuge for the children of Israel, and for the stranger, and for the sojourner among them; &amp;c. They were accessible to every person in the land. Jesus Christ is the Saviour of all men (<span class='bible'>1Ti. 4:10<\/span>). Whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, &amp;c (<span class='bible'>Joh. 3:15-17<\/span>). Him that cometh to Me I will in no wise cast out (<span class='bible'>Joh. 6:37<\/span>). Whosoever believeth in Him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Rom. 10:11-13<\/span>). <em>(d)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>5. <em>The provision was exclusive<\/em>. No other city, except the six appointed ones, had authority to shelter and protect the manslayer. For the sinner there is no refuge but Jesus. Neither is there salvation in any other, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Act. 4:12<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. The urgent obligation.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The cities of refuge were of no advantage to the manslayer unless he gained an entrance into one of them before the Gol overtook him. It was his highest interest and imperative duty to make his way to the nearest city of refuge. It is yet more the duty and interest of the sinner to hasten to the Lord Jesus as his refuge. This obligation is<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Personal<\/em>. No one could escape to the city of refuge for the homicide; he must go himself, or be put to death. Salvation is a personal concern and duty. Repentance, faith, self-consecration, are things which no one can do for another. Work out your own salvation, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Prompt<\/em>. The manslayer had to escape at once or to perish. To linger was to be lost. Salvation must be sought at once. Behold, now is the accepted time, &amp;c. Ye know not what shall be on the morrow, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Pressing<\/em>. The manslayer may not loiter on the way, or slacken his pace until he was safe within the city. The words which were addressed to Lot were applicable to him: Escape for thy life; look not behind thee, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Gen. 19:17<\/span>). And the sinner must put forth earnest effort. Christ must be sought zealously and with all the heart. (Comp. <span class='bible'>Jer. 29:12-13<\/span>.) Salvation must be pursued diligently. So run, that ye may obtain, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>1Co. 9:24-27<\/span>). Fight the good fight of faith, &amp;c. Let us lay aside every weight, &amp;c. Give diligence to make your calling, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p>4. <em>Persevering<\/em>. The homicide must press eagerly on until he entered the city. There was no safety for him if he stopped short of the end. He that endureth to the end shall be saved. Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. Hasten, then, O sinner! to the Refuge, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p><em>ILLUSTRATIONS<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>(a)<\/em> All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God. If then you have come short of the glory of God, you must be lost; it cannot be denied, nor disputed. <em>I tell to every man now present, that he is guilty of sinning against the Almighty<\/em>that if there be no intervention of mercy so mighty and so majestic as to satisfy the demands of justice, to quench her fire, and sheathe her swordif there be not mercy, free, boundless, omnipotent, and eternal, every human being will stand before the judgment bar of God to receive the sentence of his condemnation. He must be banished for ever from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of His power; and he must go down to those abodes of torment where there are agonies unspeakable and inconceivable; where the smoke of torment ascendeth up for ever and for ever. Go, my hearers, to the brink of eternity, contemplate in imagination the scenes of that horrible pit which the word of revelation has presented to your viewcontemplate the worm that dieth notcontemplate the fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angelscontemplate the blackness of darknesscontemplate the smoke of torment that ascendeth up for ever and ever! What was it that gave to that worm its fang but <em>sin?<\/em> What was it that gave to that fire its intensity but <em>sin?<\/em> What was it that gave to that blackness its shadows but <em>sin?<\/em> What was it that gave to that torment its woe but <em>sin?<\/em> The voice is from the abyss uttering one wild cry, It was sin; <em>it was sin;<\/em> IT WAS SIN! Man <em>would<\/em> sin, and therefore man <em>must<\/em> suffer. There is a rigid equity between the one and the other. Death has passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.<em>James Parsons<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>(b)<\/em> No closer doth the shadow follow the body than the revenge of self-accusation follows sin. Walk eastward in the morning, the shadow starts behind thee; soon after it is upon thy left side; at noon it is under thy feet; lie down, it crouches under thee; towards even it leaps before thee. Thon canst not be rid of it while thou hast a body and the sunlight. No more can thy soul quit the conscience of evil. This is to thee instead of a hell of fiends, that shall ever be shaking firebrands at thee; ever torturing thee with affrights of more pains than thy nature can comprehend.<em>Hall<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>(c)<\/em> In Samoa, the manslayer, or the deliberate murderer, flies to the house of the chief of the village, or to the house of the chief of another village to which he is related by the fathers or the mothers side. In nine cases out of ten, he is perfectly safe if he only remains there. In such instances, the chief delights in the opportunity of showing his importance. In Samoa, a chiefs house is literally his fortification, except in times of open rebellion and actual war.<em>G. Turner, LL.D<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>(d)<\/em> Our Lord is the Saviour of all men, for that He hath rendered all man <em>salvabiles<\/em>, capable of salvation; and <em>salvandos<\/em>, designed to salvation, for that He hath removed all obstacles peremptorily debarring men from access to salvation, and hath procured competent furtherances to their attainment of it. He hath performed whatever on His part is necessary or fit in order to salvation, antecedently to the acceptance and compliance with those reasonable conditions, which by Gods wisdom are required toward the instating men into a full and immediate right to salvation, or to a complete and actual fruition thereof. He made the way to happiness plain and passable; levelling the insuperable cliffs, and filling up the chasms, and rectifying the obliquities, and smoothing the asperities thereof, as the prophet foretold; so that all men, who would, might conveniently walk therein. He set the doors of paradise wide open, so that who pleased might enter therein; all the bonds and restraints under which men lay, He so far loosed, that any man might be free, who would concur to his own liberty and enlargement. All the protection and encouragement which were needful toward obtaining salvation, He afforded and exhibited to every one that would embrace and make use of them. In respect to which performances He might be truly called a <em>Saviour<\/em>, although all men do not in effect become saved. For the estimation and denomination of performances are to be grounded upon their own nature and design, not upon events depending upon the contingent and arbitrary behaviour of men. As he that freely offers a rich boon is no less to be accounted a benefactor, and liberal, although his gift be refused, than if it were accepted; as he that opens the prison is to be styled a deliverer, although the captive will not go forth; as he that ministers an effectual remedy, although the patient will not use it, deserves the honour and thanks due to a physician; so is our Lord in regard to what He hath performed for men, and offered to them (being sufficient to prevent their misery and promote their happiness), to be thankfully acknowledged their Saviour, although not all men, yea although not one man, should receive the designed benefit.<em>Isaac Barrow, D.D.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE CITIES OF REFUGE, AS LEGISLATIVE ENACTMENTS, AND AS RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS<\/p>\n<p>(<em><span class='bible'>Num. 35:9-15<\/span><\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>The system of redemption as revealed in the Gospel is often exhibited to our notice as bearing decisive marks of Divine wisdom. It is styled the wisdom of Godthe wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom  which none of the princes of this world knew. The Apostle thus intimates to us that the Gospel would bear the closest inspection in all its parts; that it was worthy of our admiration, as well as of our love; that our redemption was not to be effected either by blind <em>force<\/em>, or by blind <em>affection;<\/em> that it should be accomplished in such a manner as that no rights were to be compromised, no perfections outraged, no interests overlooked, but, on the contrary, that a perfect harmony and balance should be maintained between the apparently rival attributes of the Divine character, and the apparently rival interests of earth and Heaven. Thus God was to be just, and yet the justifier of him that believeth; Mercy and Truth were to meet together; Christ crucified in humility and weakness was to present a most eminent illustration both of the wisdom and of the power of God; and thus the countless multitudes saved by grace should have reason to exclaim in time and eternityHerein He hath abounded toward us in all wisdom and prudence!<\/p>\n<p>But while these remarks are readily admitted respecting the Christian dispensation, they might be extended with equal propriety to the Jewish dispensation also. While the Gospel claims our homage on account of the wisdom it displays, we are prepared to make a similar demand on behalf of the Law. Both are the product of the same Author; both are the offspring of the same covenant of mercy; both conduce to the same happy result; and, though the Gospel confessedly has the glory that excelleth, yet the same authority assures us that that which is done away was glorious also. There are two points of view expressly in which wisdom shines in the departed economy:<br \/>First: <em>As its leading institutions were particularly adapted to the state of the Jews in the infancy of the Church<\/em>. Their ceremonial rites and observances were particularly suited to the climate in which they lived, to the circumstances in which they were placed, and to the evils to which they were exposed. Ignorant and uncultivated as they were during their four hundred years bondage, they required a religion addressed to the senses, as well as to the intellect; and hence they have a visible glory, a worldly sanctuary, animal sacrifices, symbolical institutions. Having recently been brought out of the midst of an idolatrous people, many of their regulations were intended to preserve them from a relapse into idolatry, and to keep constantly before them the worship of one God, and faith in a promised Messiah. And having to wander for forty years in the wilderness without fixed habitations, without regular communities, and without the arts and ornaments of life, some laws were enacted suited to their unsettled condition, and some preparatory to their establishment in the Promised Land. In many instances Moses adapted himself to the customs and usages which had prevailed among them from patriarchal times, in some, his institutions were altogether new; in all, there was a perpetual reference to their moral and religious intereststo encourage virtue, to diminish crime, to induce them to walk humbly with God.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly: <em>As it was expressly calculated to point to the coming of Christ, and introduce the Gospel dispensation<\/em>. The Law was a shadowa figure for the time then presenta schoolmaster to bring them to Christ. Unto them was the Gospel preached, as well as unto us. Their history in the wilderness and their worship in the Temple alike prefigured the times of the Messiah. Their sacrifices pointed to Him; the Rock that followed them was a type of Him; the scapegoat, the brazen serpent, the cities of refuge, and the manna in the wilderness, prefigured the nature of His offices, the design of His death, or the spiritual blessings of His kingdom.<\/p>\n<p>These observations apply with peculiar force to our present subject<em>the Cities of Refuge<\/em>. As civil appointments, they were calculated to prevent much mischief and misery; as religious ordinances, they serve to illustrate Gospel blessings. We shall consider them<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. As legislative enactments adapted to the habits and customs of an Eastern people in an early age of the world.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Two things require notice<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>The office of the avenger of blood and the evils consequent upon it<\/em>. This office probably had a very early origin: it may be a relic of the earliest state of civil society, for where there was no magistrate or public tribunal, murders would have been frequently perpetrated had there been no process of this kind among surviving relatives. Cain evidently was in dread of summary vengeance for his murder of Abel. (Comp. <span class='bible'>Gen. 4:14<\/span>.) Rebecca probably dreaded a similar retaliation in case Esau had murdered Jacob; for why, says she, should I be deprived also of you both in one day? It has been common among the wandering Arabs from Ishmaels time to the present hour. It probably arose out of the original law,At the hand of every mans brother will I require the life of man, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Gen. 9:5-6<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>It is evident that such a practice must give rise to many very serious evils. Besides that it fostered a spirit of relentless hatred and revenge, it was often accompanied with flagrant injustice and wrong. The Gol is governed only by his passions; and it may be that the person he suspects is not the murderer; thus an innocent person suffers, and instead of avenging one murder he commits a second. One such deed never fails to give birth to another; and so ten murders have not unfrequently their origin in one. The families on both sides take part in the quarrel, and thus under the pious pretext of avenging innocent blood, two families may be in a state of constant warfare, and transmit feuds and enmities from father to son, even to the tenth generation. Thus the office of the avenger of blood, though proper in some states of society, was subject to many abuses, and required to be placed under strong restrictions Moses could not have abolished it altogether, at least on a sudden, he therefore adopted regulations which neutralised the evil.<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The appointment of the cities of refuge, in order to secure the ends, both of mercy and of justice<\/em>. Six cities of refuge were appointedthree on the one side of Jordan, three on the otherto which the manslayer might immediately repair, and in which the individual might be safe, &amp;c. Thus provision was made both for justice and mercyfor justice if the fugitive were guilty, for mercy if he were innocent. And in order to give the innocent person every reasonable hope of escaping, the cities were placed at easy distances, to which persons might have access from any part of the land, the roads were straight and plain, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p>But even in the mercy that was shown an accidental manslayer, we see how sacred life was in Gods esteem; for the fugitive must be a prisoner and an exile, apart from all his friends, till the death of the High Priest, perhaps for many years. This was intended to punish that imprudence which had cost another man his life, and could not fail to make the people cautious against the recurrence of such accidents; for as no compensation could be taken for the life of a murderer, so no sum could rescue an innocent manslayer from the city (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:31-32<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. As a religious ordinance designedly employed by the apostle to illustrate the wisdom and goodness of God in the methods of our salvation.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here we see clearly depicted the character and office of our great Redeemer. This Redeemer is our near Kinsman; for He is not ashamed to call us brethren. To this the apostle alludes: God sent forth His Son made of a woman, &amp;c. (<span class='bible'>Gal. 4:4-5<\/span>). This illustrates the sublime passage in the book of Job: I know that my Redeemer liveth, &amp;c. He is here compared to the Gol, &amp;c. (Comp. <span class='bible'>Hos. 13:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Zec. 9:12<\/span>.) The apostle says: That I may win Christ, and be found in Him, for which, like the manslayer, he would count all things loss. And he describes Christians as having fled for refuge. There is therefore now no condemnation, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>A state of exposure is implied<\/em>. Every man who reflects upon his past life, upon the holiness of Gods law, upon the inflexibility of His government, and upon the sentence He has pronounced against sin, must be aware that he is in a state of jeopardy. The sentence has been promulgated from age to age with awful solemnity, Cursed is every one, &amp;c. If we carry the thought to its extent, it is Jehovah Himself who is the Avenger. His law we have broken, &amp;c.<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>A method of rescue has been provided<\/em>. Christ has undertaken our desperate cause. We are to flee for refuge. It is the only one. It is open to the Gentile as well as the Jew.<\/p>\n<p><em>Samuel Thodey.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE SECURITY OF THOSE WHO FLEE TO THE CITY OF REFUGE<\/p>\n<p>(<em><span class='bible'>Num. 35:24-28<\/span><\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>That the Mosaic law had a spiritual meaning, is placed beyond all doubt from the clear allusions of Scripture (<span class='bible'>Zec. 9:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Heb. 6:18<\/span>). Observe<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. Our natural state is one of imminent danger.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We are all criminals, having, ignorantly and in unbelief, rebelled against the Almighty Sovereign. As criminals, we are justly exposed to the infliction of the threatened penalty of death (<span class='bible'>Eze. 18:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rom. 6:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rev. 21:8<\/span>). Truly, then, we may observe in the situation of the manslayer a great resemblance to that of our own, as pursued by the inexorable Justice of One whose wrath we have so much provoked (<span class='bible'>Rom. 1:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Joh. 3:36<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. Nothing can deliver us from this danger but a zealous and timely flight.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We may sit at ease, bless ourselves in our heart, and feel secure; but if death overtakes us loitering in our sins, we must perish in them; and it will be vain to trust to anything as our covenant and hope, so long as we remain under that indifference to our spiritual interests, which demonstrates us to be still unchanged (<span class='bible'>Jas. 2:10<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. There is a place of safety to which we can flee.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Christ is our refuge:<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>A Refuge Divinely appointed<\/em>. God so pitied, so deeply and intensely compassionated our state, as to plan and provide a way of deliverance for us by His only begotten Son (<span class='bible'>Joh. 3:16<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>A Refuge free and open to all<\/em>. None are shut out from it, but those who, by their impenitence and obstinacy, shut out themselves. No stage, no state of guilt, can make any difference; but sinners of every rank and description, without limitation or reserve, have a place prepared in which they may find security (<span class='bible'>1Co. 6:11<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>A Refuge everywhere near to resort to<\/em>. Christ is set before us in the Gospel, and to find Him we need neither climb up into heaven, nor descend into the bottom of the sea (<span class='bible'>Rom. 10:8<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>4. <em>A Refuge easily accessible<\/em>. Every obstacle is effectually removed, God being reconciled, His justice satisfied, and His law magnified; so that nothing need hinder our trusting in Christ, the great God, and our Saviour.<\/p>\n<p>5. <em>A Refuge containing an ample supply for our wants and necessities<\/em>. For here are to be found wisdom, grace, life, liberty, peace, and joy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. Having once entered this place we must abide there.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It was not enough that the man-slayer fled to the city of refuge. Having gained this place, he must remain in it till the death of the high priest. Nor is it sufficient to have once believed in Christ. We must abide in Him, renouncing for ever all thoughts of going into any forbidden region (<span class='bible'>Isa. 30:15<\/span>). And woe be unto us, if we dare to be found without (<span class='bible'>2Pe. 2:20-21<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>Let us hence seek after a sight of our danger, abandon all means of relief not warranted in the Scripture, and resign ourselves up to Christ.<em>William Sleigh<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>D. CITIES RESERVED FOR THE LEVITES (<\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Num. 35:1-8<\/span><\/strong><strong>)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>TEXT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:1<\/span>. And the Lord spake unto Moses in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying, 2. Command the children of Israel, that they give unto the Levites, of the inheritance of their possession, cities to dwell in; and ye shall give also unto the Levites suburbs for the cities round about them. 3. And the cities shall they have to dwell in; and the suburbs of them shall be for their cattle, and for their goods, and for all their beasts. 4. And the suburbs of the cities, which ye shall give unto the Levites, shall reach from the wall of the city and outward a thousand cubits round about. 5. And ye shall measure from without the city on the east side, two thousand cubits, and on the south side two thousand cubits, and on the west side two thousand cubits, and on the north side two thousand cubits; and the city shall be in the midst: this shall be to them the suburbs of the cities. 6. And among the cities which ye shall give unto the Levites there shall be six cities for refuge, which ye shall appoint for the manslayer, that he may flee thither: and to them ye shall add forty and two cities. 7. So all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be forty and eight cities: them shall ye give with their suburbs. 8. And the cities which ye shall give shall be of the possession of the children of Israel: from them that have few ye shall give few: every one shall give of his cities unto the Levites according to his inheritance which he inheriteth.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PARAPHRASE<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num. 35:1<\/span>. And the Lord spake to Moses in the plains of Moab near the Jordan opposite Jericho, saying, 2. Command that the children of Israel give to the Levites, from the inheritance of their possession, cities in which to dwell; and you shall also give the Levites open ground around the cities. 3. And the cities shall be theirs to live in; and the open ground shall be for their livestock, and for their herds and all their animals. 4. And the open ground of the cities which you shall give to the Levites shall extend outward from the city wall one thousand cubits all around. 5. You shall also measure from outside the city on the east two thousand cubits, and on the south side two thousand cubits, and on the west two thousand cubits, and on the north two thousand cubits, with the city in the center: this shall be the open ground of the cities. 6. And the cities you shall give the Levites shall be six cities of refuge, which you shall give for the man-killer to flee unto; in addition to them, you shall give forty-two other cities. 7. All the cities which you shall give to the Levites shall be forty-eight cities, along with their open ground. 8. Regarding the cities which you shall give from the possessions of the children of Israel, you shall take more from the larger, and less from the smaller; but each one shall give some of his cities to the Levites in proportion to his inheritance which he inherits.<\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENTARY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>No single land inheritance was awarded to the Levites, in the fashion of the areas allocated to the other tribes. Instead, forty-eight cities together with their stipulated suburbs were to be designated Levitical cities. This does not mean that only Levites occupied the cities, but that they were to hold as many residences within the towns as necessary; and their pasturage requirements were to be met through use of the land immediately surrounding the city walls. The arrangement accomplishes several good ends. The Levites are removed from total dependence upon the tithes the offerings of the people; in the event of the failure of the other tribes to fulfill their lawful obligations unto the priests, the priests will not be without any sources of livelihood, since they will be able to maintain their own herds and flocks. The plan disperses the priests among the people, where they will be convenient and available for their services to the congregation. They are not to be an isolated, detached and uninvolved group; they will be able to participate in the day-by-day events of their communities, and become one with those they serve. They will have regular duties themselves to perform in caring for their animalsa responsibility not without its practical values.<br \/>The suburbs awarded the Levites were open grounds for tilling and for pasturing their animals. The measure of the first one thousand cubits (about 1500 feet), may be set up for cultivation and the second thousand cubits for grazing the animals. This is certainly the most simple method of explaining the manner in which the suburbs were established. KD, however, accepts the proposal by Michaelis that the city is to be viewed as a square with pasturage stretching one thousand cubits outward in every direction, so that the length of the extreme border of the environs would be two thousand cubits longer than the dimension of its parallel side. The total area in this latter arrangement would have been considerably smaller; but we cannot be certain which method was actually used.<\/p>\n<p>Six of the Levitical cities were to be appointed as cities of refuge, to which any manslayer should flee until proper disposition might be made of his homicide. The general regulations governing the flight of the manslayer, his confinement to the city of refuge until his trial, and the course to be followed in the event of his being found innocent or guilty are now to be given, enlarging upon the previous suggestion found in <span class='bible'>Exo. 21:13<\/span> ff. With the matter of judgment of the manslayer in the hands of the congregation, (<span class='bible'>Num. 35:24<\/span>), any of the cities of Israel might have been selected theoretically; but it is especially appropriate that the cities should be those in which there was a concentration of Levites. Such a fact should augur well toward a careful administration of justice under the Law.<\/p>\n<p><strong>QUESTIONS AND RESEARCH ITEMS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>629.<\/p>\n<p>How many cities were awarded the Levites?<\/p>\n<p>630.<\/p>\n<p>How were these cities distributed among the tribes?<\/p>\n<p>631.<\/p>\n<p>Who lived in the cities?<\/p>\n<p>632.<\/p>\n<p>Describe the manner in which the extent of the suburbs may have been laid out.<\/p>\n<p>633.<\/p>\n<p>To what uses did the Levites put the suburbs?<\/p>\n<p>634.<\/p>\n<p>List the advantages of distributing the Levites in this manner.<\/p>\n<p>635.<\/p>\n<p>What was the purpose of the cities of refuge?<\/p>\n<p>636.<\/p>\n<p>Into whose hands was the judgment of the manslayer delivered?<\/p>\n<p>637.<\/p>\n<p>What favorable results might we have expected from having the Levites living in the cities of refuge?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> THE LEVITE CITIES, <span class='bible'>Num 35:1-5<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong> 1<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> <strong> The plains of Moab <\/strong> <span class='bible'>Num 22:1<\/span>, note.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 5). Provision of Cities To Dwell In For the Levites (<span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:1-8<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ).<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p> As is regular in Numbers the regulations for the Levites follow on after the regulations for the people (compare <span class='bible'>Num 1:1-46<\/span> with <span class='bible'>Num 1:47-54<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Numbers 2<\/span> with <span class='bible'>Numbers 3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 6:1-21<\/span> with <span class='bible'>Num 8:5-22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 26:1-56<\/span> with <span class='bible'>Num 26:57-62<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p> A mark of the width and depth of the land which would be possessed was now revealed in the requirement to provide forty eight cities for the Levites to dwell in. For them to be able to do this large conquests would have to be made. Thus this confirmed the certainty of the success that would be theirs once they entered the land. Talking about something as though it was already possessed was a huge confidence booster, and expressed full belief in the certainty of the fulfilment of the promises of Yahweh. <\/p>\n<p> It also confirmed Yahweh&rsquo;s provision for their spiritual need. No Israelite would be living far from a Levitical city. There he could seek advice and guidance in respect of the Instruction of Yahweh. Information concerning these cities is found in <span class='bible'>Jos 21:1-42<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Analysis. <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> a <\/strong> Cities to be given for the Levites to dwell in with the suburbs of the cities (the surrounding land) (<span class='bible'>Num 35:1-2<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> The cities are for the Levites to dwell in (<span class='bible'>Num 35:3<\/span> a). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> The suburbs are for their beasts to dwell in (<span class='bible'>Num 35:3<\/span> b). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> The suburbs of the cities defined (<span class='bible'>Num 35:4-5<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> The cities of the Levites defined (<span class='bible'>Num 35:6-7<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> a <\/strong> How the cities to be given to the Levites are to be selected (<span class='bible'>Num 35:8<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:1<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&lsquo;And Yahweh spoke to Moses in the plains of Moab by the Jordan at Jericho, saying,&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> Note the usual statement concerning Yahweh&rsquo;s words to Moses, but reinforced by an identification of the place where the revelation was given. This reads very much like a genuine contemporary statement. Standing there on the verge of the Jordan ready for entry into the land final instructions were being given. Nothing was more important for their true survival as a covenant people than the presence among them of those whose lives were devoted to looking after the interests of Yahweh. This would enable the land to be kept pure, and was now to be provided for. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Cities To Be Given to the Levites, Along with the Suburbs of the Cities (the surrounding land). <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:2<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &ldquo;<\/strong> Command the children of Israel, that they give to the Levites of the inheritance of their possession cities to dwell in; and suburbs for the cities round about them shall you give to the Levites.&rdquo; <\/p>\n<p> Out of their inheritance that they would soon possess the children of Israel were to give &lsquo;cities to dwell in&rsquo; to the Levites. Surrounding land was also to be given to them. Note the change to the personal &lsquo;you&rsquo; (ye). This may simply be in order to distinguish the &lsquo;they&rsquo; now used of the Levites. Or it may be in order to bring home to the children of Israel the personal aspect of their gift to the Levites. All were involved, and all must give as unto Yahweh. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:3<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &ldquo;<\/strong> And the cities they shall have to dwell in, and their suburbs, shall be for their cattle, and for their substance, and for all their beasts.&rdquo; <\/p>\n<p> The cities themselves were to be for the Levites to inhabit, and the surrounding land for their cattle and other animals. <\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;The cities they shall have to dwell in.&rdquo; The Levites were not to be given the whole cities for their own possession but to have sufficient space allotted so that they would be able to build (or restore captured houses) for them to dwell in. They were to receive as many houses as were needed for their requirements, and these would become their hereditary possession, which, if sold, could be redeemed, and which reverted to them without compensation in the year of Yubile, if not redeemed before then (<span class='bible'>Lev 25:32-33<\/span>). The remainder of each such city was then available for other Israelites to dwell in once they had restored or erected their own houses. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:4-5<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &ldquo;<\/strong> And the suburbs of the cities, which you shall give to the Levites, shall be from the wall of the city and outward a thousand cubits round about. And you shall measure without the city for the east side two thousand cubits, and for the south side two thousand cubits, and for the west side two thousand cubits, and for the north side two thousand cubits, the city being in the midst. This shall be to them the suburbs of the cities.&rdquo; <\/p>\n<p> The size of the surrounding land which was to belong to the Levites was not to be left to chance but was clearly delineated. The land was to stretch 1000 cubits (450 metres, just over a quarter of a mile) in each direction, measuring from the boundaries of the cities, north, south, east and west, thus making an area of somewhat over 2000 square cubits, taking the area of the city into account. Each &lsquo;side&rsquo; would have a 2000 cubit border, making a square around the city just over 2000 cubits in length and width. Some have related this to the 2000 cubits to be allowed around the Ark at the crossing of the Jordan (<span class='bible'>Jos 3:4<\/span>), but this is doubtful. The cities did not have the holiness of the Ark. On the other hand it is probably intended to signify that these Levitical cities were &lsquo;special&rsquo;. There was, however, no limit to access, except probably to the avenger of blood when it was a city of refuge (<span class='bible'>Num 35:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 35:26-27<\/span>). This land was to belong to the Levites in perpetuity. It could not be sold for it was Yahweh&rsquo;s (<span class='bible'>Lev 25:23<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p> The figures were of course symbolic and approximate. They indicated the divine nature of the gift (the &lsquo;thousand&rsquo; was the highest symbolical number). The size of the &lsquo;city&rsquo; wall to wall would determine exactly how far they stretched. <\/p>\n<p> The &lsquo;cities&rsquo; would themselves not be overlarge. The forty eight cities would house the 22\/23 Levite clans, although not being limited to them, and would indeed house a good number of &lsquo;innocent manslayers&rsquo; for many years. The surrounding land was also not large. It would feed a minimum level of cattle and grow a minimal amount of food, possibly sufficient for survival in bad times. But while the Levites could personally own their houses (taken over or built by their own hands) they would not personally own land. The land was to be group land. Their possessions were communal. They had no individual personal inheritance in land. Yahweh was their inheritance. <\/p>\n<p> We are not told how the manslayers were catered for. Perhaps their families would provision them, and their nearer family would presumably move with them into the city of refuge and rent nearby land. But once they became &lsquo;needy&rsquo; they would have a right to receive from the common pool for the needy (<span class='bible'>Deu 14:28-29<\/span>) and take advantage of similar provisions (<span class='bible'>Lev 19:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 23:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 24:19-21<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:6<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &ldquo;<\/strong> And the cities which you shall give to the Levites, will be the six cities of refuge, which you shall give for the manslayer to flee to: and besides them you shall give forty and two cities.&rdquo; <\/p>\n<p> Of the cities given to the Levites six were to be cities of refuge, a concept dealt with in what follows. The number six (3&#215;2) indicated completeness of provision. These were for &lsquo;innocent&rsquo; manslayers to flee to. There were to be three each side of the Jordan. The remaining forty two cities were simply for the housing of the Levite families so that by living among the people they could properly carry out their functions of teaching, guiding, and collecting and storing tithes. For any of the people who might desire clarification on a matter to do with the Instruction (Law), help was always available there. <\/p>\n<p> The six cities of refuge actually appointed were Bezer, Ramoth-gilead and Golan in Transjordan and Hebron of Judah, Shechem of Ephraim and Kadesh of Galilee in Canaan proper (<span class='bible'>Deu 4:43<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 20:7-8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 21:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 21:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 21:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 21:32<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 21:36<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 21:38<\/span>). It will be noted that these were dispersed throughout both areas. <span class='bible'>Deu 19:1-6<\/span> describes it in terms of splitting Canaan into three parts and appointing a city in each. The cities had to be reachable from anywhere in Canaan, &lsquo;lest the avenger of blood pursue the (innocent) manslayer while his heart is hot, and overtake him because the way is long, and smite him mortally, whereas he was not worthy of death, inasmuch as he did not hate him (his victim) in time past.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:7<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &ldquo;<\/strong> All the cities which you shall give to the Levites shall be forty and eight cities; them shall you give with their suburbs.&rdquo; <\/p>\n<p> So the total cities given to the Levites to dwell in, along with their surrounding land for 1000 cubits every way, were forty eight. This was twelve times four. The twelve indicated the twelve tribes whom they would serve. The four stressed the &lsquo;universal&rsquo; nature of Yahweh&rsquo;s provision, just as four rivers went out from Eden to the whole world, the four winds came from every part of heaven, and north, south, east and west stretch out to the four furthest parts (corners) of the earth. The basic idea was that the spiritual needs of Israel were being fully catered for. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:8<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &ldquo;<\/strong> And concerning the cities which you shall give of the possession of the children of Israel, from the many you shall take many; and from the few you shall take few: every one according to his inheritance which he inherits shall give of his cities to the Levites.&rdquo; <\/p>\n<p> The cities were to be given in accordance with the size of tribal possession. Thus the larger tribes provided more, and the smaller tribes less. But all were to give something from their inheritance to the Levites, a kind of firstfruits of land. It was for Yahweh&rsquo;s possession so that Yahweh&rsquo;s servants might live among them and ensure the keeping of His Instruction (Torah), and, in the case of the cities of refuge, especially for the prevention of the defilement of the land as a result of the shedding of blood. <\/p>\n<p> According to <span class='bible'>Joshua 21<\/span>, the Levites received nine cities in the territory of Judah and Simeon, and four in the territory of each of the other tribes, with the exception of Naphtali, in which there were only three. Thus there were ten in Transjordan, and thirty-eight in Canaan proper. Of these the thirteen given up by Judah, Simeon, and Benjamin were available to the wider families of the priests, while the remaining thirty five were available to the three Levitical families. It will be quite apparent thaut the priests&rsquo; families would be scattered fairly thinly, at least to begin with, but provision was also being made for the future. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:6-34<\/strong><\/span> <strong> The Cities of Refuge <\/strong> In <span class='bible'>Num 35:6-34<\/span> the Lord establishes cities of refuge among the children of Israel. When a person kills someone, he has a place to go and flee for safety until a proper trial is conducted. <\/p>\n<p> Imagine a nation where the police are far and few, too few to control crime. What results is that the people in the village began to take charge of punishing a crime. Today, in Africa, when a nation cannot afford to hire many police, entire villages are left without someone to enforce the law. Therefore, the people themselves enforce the law. When they catch a criminal, they kill him. They then go and tear down his home and kill his livestock. The relatives of this victim of mob punishment learn to hide, rather than fight for their relative, lest the village people kill them also. <\/p>\n<p> This was how life was in the land of Israel. There were only judges and Levites scattered throughout each village. There were no policemen to enforce justice. Here, in this passage of Scripture about cities of refugee, the Lord makes a way so that a person could face a just trial for his crime.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Num 35:16-23<\/strong><\/span> <strong> <\/strong> <strong><em> Comments The Sixth Commandment &#8211; <span class='bible'>Num 35:16-23<\/span><\/em><\/strong> gives a clear definition of the sixth commandment of the law, which deals with the issue of murder (<span class='bible'>Exo 20:13<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'>Exo 20:13<\/span>, &ldquo;Thou shalt not kill.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Everett&#8217;s Study Notes on the Holy Scriptures<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><\/p>\n<p><\/strong> The Cities of the Levites<strong><\/p>\n<p> v. 1. And the Lord spake unto Moses in the Plains of Moab by Jordan, near Jericho, saying,<\/strong> <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 2. Command the children of Israel that they give unto the Levites of the Inheritance of their possession cities to dwell in,<\/strong> for the Levites, as a tribe, received no special territory in the land of Canaan, <span class='bible'>Num 18:20-23<\/span>; <strong> and ye shall give also unto the Levites suburbs for the cities round about them,<\/strong> meadows, pasture-land for their herds and flocks, fields which could not be sold, but remained the permanent and inalienable property of the Levites, <span class='bible'>Lev 25:34<\/span>. This does not hold true of the cities themselves, for in these it was only the houses that were given to the Levites, in regard to which the Lord had provided that they could be redeemed at any time after being sold and should always be returned to the original owners or their heirs in the Year of Jubilee, <span class='bible'>Lev 25:32-33<\/span>. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 3. And the cities shall they have to dwell in; and the suburbs,<\/strong> the meadows, the pasture-land, <strong> of them shall be for their cattle and for their goods and tor all their beasts. <\/p>\n<p>v. 4. And the suburbs of the cities which ye shall give unto the Levites shall reach from the wall of the city and outward a thousand cubits round about,<\/strong> that is, measuring directly from the city wall in a straight line. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 5. And ye shall measure from without the city,<\/strong> from its wall or boundary, <strong> on the east side two thousand cubits, and on the south side two thousand cubits, and on the west side two thousand cubits, and on the north side two thousand cubits; and the city shall be in the midst,<\/strong> and the place occupied by it should not enter into the calculations; <strong> this shall be to them the suburbs of the cities. <\/p>\n<p>v. 6. And among the cities which ye shall give unto the Levites there shall be six cities for refuge, which ye shall appoint for the manslayer,<\/strong> to the man who unintentionally takes his neighbor&#8217;s life, <strong> that he may flee thither; and to them ye shall add forty and two cities,<\/strong> making a total of forty-eight. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 7. So all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be forty and eight cities; them shall ye give with their suburbs. <\/p>\n<p>v. 8. And the cities which ye shall give shall be of the possession of the children of Israel,<\/strong> selected from the territory apportioned to the tribes; <strong> from them that have many ye shall give many; but from them that have few ye shall give few; every one shall give of his cities unto the Levites according to his inheritance which he inheriteth. <\/strong> As the plan worked out afterward, Joshua 21, there were ten cities of the Levites in the country east of the Jordan and thirty-eight in Canaan proper. By living in the midst of all the tribes, the Levites were to be an example to the entire nation, continually reminding them of their divine call and of the covenant of Jehovah, so that the fear of the Lord might be maintained in Israel. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><em><span class='bible'>Num 35:1-3<\/span><\/em><\/strong><strong>. <\/strong><strong><em>And the Lord spake unto Moses,saying<\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong> As the priests and Levites, were a distinct body from the rest of the nation, and had no share in the division of the country, God here assigns them several towns for their residence, with such a portion of ground about them as would serve for their decent subsistence. Under the name <em>Levites <\/em>are comprehended both priests and Levites, who were all of the tribe of Levi. See <span class='bible'>Jos 21:4<\/span>. Notwithstanding this provision, it was lawful for them to hire or purchase houses in any other city, particularly Jerusalem; for we find in Scripture many proofs of their dwelling in other cities besides these which are assigned to them; and in like manner, no doubt, other people, with their permission, might dwell with them in their cities. It is plain, that the suburbs of the cities were for pasturage, and for the use of their cattle. <em>Their goods <\/em>mean stables for their cattle, and stowages for their provisions of all kinds. See Bonfrere on the place. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>THIRTEENTH SECTION<br \/>Regulations for the Levitical Cities and the Cities of Refuge<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Numbers 35<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1And the Lord spake unto Moses in the plains of Moab by Jordan <em>near<\/em> Jericho, saying, 2Command the children of Israel, that they give unto the Levites, of the inheritance of their possession, cities to dwell in; and ye shall give <em>also<\/em> unto the Levites suburbs for the cities round about them. 3And the cities shall they have to dwell in; and the suburbs of them shall be for their cattle, and for their goods, and for all their beasts. 4And the suburbs of the cities, which ye shall give unto the Levites, <em>shall reach<\/em> from the wall of the city and outward a thousand cubits round about. 5And ye shall measure from without the city on the east side two thousand cubits, and on the south side two thousand cubits, and on the west side two thousand cubits, and on the north side two thousand cubits; and the city <em>shall<\/em> <em>be<\/em> in the midst: this shall be to them the suburbs of the cities. 6And among the cities which ye shall give unto the Levites <em>there shall be<\/em> six cities for refuge, which ye shall appoint for the manslayer, that he may flee thither: and <span class=''>1<\/span>to them ye shall 7add forty and two cities. <em>So<\/em> all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites <em>shall<\/em> <em>be<\/em> forty and eight cities: them <em>shall ye give<\/em> with their suburbs. 8And the cities which ye shall give <em>shall be<\/em> of the possession of the children of Israel: from <em>them that have<\/em> many ye shall give many; but from <em>them that have<\/em> few ye shall give few: every one shall give of his cities unto the Levites according to his inheritance which <span class=''>2<\/span>he inheriteth.<\/p>\n<p>9And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, 10Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye be come over Jordan into the land of Canaan, 11Then ye shall appoint you cities to be cities of refuge for you; that the slayer may flee thither, which killeth any person at <span class=''>3<\/span>unawares. 12And they shall be unto you cities for refuge from the avenger; that the manslayer die not, until he stand before the 13congregation in judgment. And of these cities which ye shall give, six cities shall ye have for refuge. 14Ye shall give three cities on this side Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan, <em>which<\/em> shall be cities of refuge. 15These six cities shall be a refuge, <em>both<\/em> for the children of Israel, and for the stranger, and for the sojourner among them; that every one that killeth any person unawares may flee thither. 16And if he smite him with an instrument of iron, so that he die, he is a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death. 17And if he smite him with throwing a <span class=''>4<\/span>stone wherewith he may die, and he die, he <em>is<\/em> a murderer: the murderer shall 18surely be put to death. Or <em>if<\/em> he smite him with a hand weapon of wood, wherewith he may die, and he die, he <em>is<\/em> a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death. 19The revenger of blood himself shall slay the murderer: when he meeteth him, he shall slay him. 20But if he thrust him of hatred, or hurl at him by laying of wait, that he die; 21Or in enmity smite him with his hand, that he die: he that smote <em>him<\/em> shall surely be put to death; <em>for<\/em> he <em>is<\/em> a murderer: the revenger of blood shall slay the murderer, when he meeteth him. 22But if he thrust him suddenly without enmity, or have cast upon him any thing without laying of wait, 23Or with any stone, wherewith a man may die, seeing <em>him<\/em> not, and cast <em>it<\/em> upon him, that he die, and <em>was<\/em> not his enemy, neither sought his harm; 24Then the congregation shall judge between the slayer and the revenger of blood according to these judgments: 25And the congregation shall deliver the slayer out of the hand of the revenger of blood, and the congregation shall restore him to the city of his refuge, whither he was fled: and he shall abide in it unto the death of the high priest, which was anointed with the holy oil. 26But if the slayer shall at any time come without the border of the city of his refuge, whither he was fled; 27And the revenger of blood find him without the borders of the city of his refuge, and the revenger of blood kill the slayer: he shall not be guilty of <span class=''>5<\/span>blood: 28Because he should have remained in the city of his refuge until the death of the high priest: but after the death of the high priest 29the slayer shall return into the land of his possession. So these <em>things<\/em> shall be for a statute of judgment unto you throughout your generations in all your dwellings. 30Whoso killeth any person, the murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of witnesses: but one witness shall not testify against any person <em>to cause him<\/em> to die. 31Moreover, ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer, which <span class='bible'>Isaiah 6<\/span> guilty of death: but he shall be surely put to death. 32And ye shall take no satisfaction for him that is fled to the city of his refuge, that he should come again to dwell in the land, until the death of the priest. 33So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye <em>are:<\/em> for blood it defileth the land: and the <span class=''>7<\/span>land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it. 34Defile not therefore the land which ye shall inhabit, wherein I dwell: for I the Lord dwell among the children of Israel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>TEXTUAL AND GRAMMATICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:3<\/span>.  not the ordinary term for sheep and goats or small cattle. Here it designates that which they had acquiredtheir movable or driven possessionsand so flocks as driven together.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:4<\/span>.  from  to driveplace to which cattle were driven.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:5<\/span>. Omit shall be.]<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:6<\/span>. The preposition is not in the original. Render with Lange: And the cities which ye shall give to the Levites are the sixsupply the verb; or better, as to the cities which ye shall give, etc. Six cities shall be for, etc.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:11<\/span>. De Wette: Convenient citiesthose easy, ready of access, and so fit.]<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:11<\/span>. . By his error or wandering; by inadvertence.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:12<\/span>.  from  to redeem, buy back. Connected with  redeemer of blood, avenger, and so the redeemer of blood was the next of kin, a kinsman.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:12<\/span>.  not the word ordinarily used for the congregation, but the local court of the city to which he fled. See <span class='bible'>Num 35:24-25<\/span>.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:19<\/span>. In his lighting upon him, wherever he meets him; the word includes even an undesigned meeting.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>[<span class='bible'>Num 35:23<\/span>. Who willed him no evil.Luther.]<\/p>\n<p><strong>EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Comp. <span class='bible'>Joshua 21<\/span>. After the directions for the purifying of the holy land from all heathen defilement, and its division among the people of Jehovah in a just and equitable manner, a positive consecration is now imparted to it, by the distribution of the Levitical cities throughout the entire land. This gleam of Levitical sanctity over the land, which takes the place of the dark or frivolous image-worship, becomes broader and brighter through the asylums for fugitives, who were pursued for the unintentional shedding of blood; places of refuge which were located among the Levitical cities, and were thus passed under the protection of the Levites, but by the law under which they were appointed, were not only bulwarks of justice and its enforcement, but also of grace and its dispensation, and thus glorified the holy land.<\/p>\n<p>This mingling of the Levitical cities with the places of refuge for those pursued by the revenger of blood, was in the first place peculiarly significant. It expresses the inward connection of righteousness and grace, and also the sharp distinction between the unintentional shedding of blood by the parricide, and the intentional and criminal shedding of blood by the murderer, between expiation by the loss of liberty and expiation by death, and thus the development from the natural thirst for vengeance, to the sacred law of justice and right. The reconciliation between justice and grace gives to this institution the morning rays of the New Testament principles and relations. Its natural basis is the relation between the blood revenger and the right of asylum among the ancients, its ecclesiastical form the refuge to the sanctuary and altars of the Church in the Middle Ages, its Christian development the idea of pardon consistent with right, a legal pardon, its caricature the radical excuse of guilt and the liberalistic dilution of the rights of the slain, or the law of murder.<br \/>1. <em>The Levitical cities<\/em>, <span class='bible'>Num 35:1-5<\/span>. The Levites receive no inheritance, no lot in Canaan; their lot and inheritance is Jehovah. But the tribes shall give them cities out of their inheritance, and in addition pasturage for their cattle; the cities only in a conditional sense, <em>i. e.<\/em>, for dwellings in connection with those who were not Levites, but with their own houses and with special rights. The pastures, lay around the cities, for their cattle and their possession (their flocks and herds), and for all their animals generally.<span class=''>8<\/span> For an inalienable possession, <span class='bible'>Lev 25:34<\/span>. The clear conception and location of the pastures which were to be given to the Levites in the environs of their cities is very difficult. We are not inclined, however, to accept the designation which Keil, after (Michaelis and Knobel) adopts and favors. In the first place, it is not probable that the cities should all be four-square; and then it is hardly supposable that the cities should all be enclosed by pastures exclusively Levite, and indeed an environ of one by two thousand cubits, so that no pasture land should have been left for the other inhabitants of the cities, unless they looked for it, outside of the Levite pastures. Then further, it would barely have been possible to lay out pastures one thousand cubits broad on every side of every city. The description is entirely clear so far, that the Levite pastures should extend one thousand cubits from the city into the fields around; then two thousand cubits, from the outer border of the one thousand () on every side of the city should be set apart for Levite pastures, thus in all eight thousand cubits. There was still room for the gardens near the city walls, and between the measured Levite pastures there was room also for the pastures of the other dwellers in the city. The eight thousand cubits appear to form a plus or minus, an indefinite quantity, to be determined in concrete cases according to the demands and number of their cattle and flocks. Thus the Levites were scattered in Israel according to the predictionor curseof Jacob (<span class='bible'>Genesis 49<\/span>). But the dispersion, which in another form hung as a doom over the Simeonites, became now, not only a blessing to the Levites, whom the whole broad country had to support, <em>viz.<\/em>, by the payment of the tithes that could not be carried far, but also for Israel, since the Levites, as teachers of the law, consecrated because of the name of Jehovah, were to be the salt of the land and people. But still they should not, as Keil rightly observes, lose their power, by too great a disintegration and dispersion through the whole land, or become burdensome to individual tribes by too great concentration. [<strong>From without.<\/strong> The demarcation here intended would run parallel to the wall of the city outside of which it was made. The object was apparently to secure that the preceding provision should be fairly and fully carried out. The suburb would thus extend for a thousand cubits, or nearly one-third of a mile from the wall. There might be danger, especially with the irregular forms which the cities might assume, and with the physical obstacles presented by the surrounding ground, that neighboring proprietors would deem the suburb sufficient, if it measured a thousand cubits in some directions, not in others, in which case it might occasionally be restricted to a very small area. To guard against this, it was ordained that the suburb should alike on north, south, east and west, present at a thousand cubits distance from the wall, a front not less than two thousand cubits in length. <em>Bib. Com.<\/em> This is better than Keils view (which implies that every Levitical city lay four-square, within the area enclosed by the four sides of a square), because it seems flexible. The two things which seem essential, are to retain the precision and definiteness of the description of the text, and yet allow for the diversity in shape and location which was sure to exist. It is very generally agreed that the first suburb was a thousand cubits broad all round the city in whatever shape its walls may have been constructed. If we regard the enumeration of the Bides north, south, east and west as used to indicate all directions, and not merely four sides, we may conceive of the outer and broader suburbtwo thousand cubits deepconformed in its shape to the walls of the city, and the configuration of the surrounding ground.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The Free cities<\/em>, <span class='bible'>Num 35:6-16<\/span> sqq. The number of free cities is limited to six, which added to the remaining Levitical cities, makes the entire number forty-eight. That the number of the cities occurs here for the first time proves the importance of the free cities. The provision, too, that the Levitical cities should be distributed among the tribes according to their strength, appears here for the first time. The most important Levitical cities, <em>i. e.<\/em>, the cities of the priests, thirteen in number, were divided among the tribes, who later were nearest the sanctuary, Judah, Simeon and Benjamin. No less care appears in the selection of the free, or refuge cities. The location of those on the farther side of Jordan, and those on this side (in Canaan) made the escape to them possible to all. These asylums were announced already in the first giving of the law (<span class='bible'>Exo 21:13<\/span>), these regulations were also fixed before this (<span class='bible'>Lev 4:2<\/span>), and the law with respect to them was more widely developed later (<span class='bible'>Deu 19:1-13<\/span>.)<\/p>\n<p>These were to be located on three circuits of the land, on both sides of the Jordan; and the roads leading to them should be well kept, so that the avenger of blood should not be able to overtake and slay the innocent fugitive through a long and wearisome and difficult road. [The Jewish tradition held that the cities east and west of the Jordan must correspond with each other; that the three on each side must be equally distant from each other; that the cities must be unwalledof considerable size, have all the necessaries and conveniences of life, both material as water, markets, <em>etc.<\/em>, and moral as teachers schools; in short, be a complete little world. Hirsch says that the  or error did not include mistakes occurring through their carelessness, but only cases which could not have been calculated upon, or which could not have been avoided by ordinary human foresight. He adds that their protective character belonged in a secondary sense to the Levitical cities, but was the prominent characteristic of these six cities. Levitical or priestly cities were chosen partly because they would be first resorted to in the administration of justice, and partly also because the land and the people were the Lords, and the priests were His representatives; and the crime of shedding blood was pre-eminently offensive to Him, and left its stain upon His land; and therefore those charged with this crime and yet innocent, were to seek refuge in His cities and under His protection. The right and duty of revenge for violations of justice was universally recognized among the ancients. It was exercised at first by every member of the family. It was later restricted in its exercise to some one member, generally the next of kin. It was greatly modified in its application by this Mosaic institution and its attendant features. The Goelis that particular relation whose special duty it was to restore the violated family integrity, who had not only to redeem landed property that had been alienated from the family (<span class='bible'>Lev 25:25<\/span> sq.), or a member of the family who had fallen into slavery (<span class='bible'>Lev 25:47<\/span>), but also the blood that had been taken away from the family by murder. Oehler in Keils <em>Com.<\/em>A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>The right of asylum created also, according to <span class='bible'>Num 35:15<\/span>, for the stranger, even those who were merely sojourners in the land. But it was only a free city actually to those who had committed manslaughter, and that without design. The murderer, on the contrary, who fled to it for refuge, ran directly to the bar of judgment and to death. Even the homicide was only protected at first from the rage and violence of the avenger.<span class=''>9<\/span> His ultimate freedom from the penalty of death depends upon a variety of conditions. The fugitive must at first stand before the gates of the city of refuge, and state his case to the elders, in order to secure admission into the city, and its protection against the avenger. He had thus to vindicate himself before a judicial investigation.<span class=''>10<\/span> Then he could not leave the city of refuge until a fixed terminus was reached. If he wandered from its jurisdiction, the avenger might slay him. As he thus stood, on the one side, under the protection of the free city, the authority of the Levites, and the special protection of Jehovah, to whom the Levite cities as peculiarly holy belonged, so he was, on the other hand, in a certain measure banished from his hearth and home. The terminus moreover for the close of this exile is very remarkable. When the high-priest dies, who is anointed with the sacred oil, he may return to his inheritance in safely. This entirely peculiar method of atonement, rests truly upon the idea that the great event of the death of the high priest covers with respect to God, a mass of sins which have risen from ignorance or mistakes, and causes them to be forgotten by men, and thus forms a terminus or bound which even the avenger of blood must respect. Thus even in a moral sense great national calamitiessuch as the death of the high priest would be regarded in Israelhave something expiatory in their nature; old enmities and dissensions are lost in the national sorrow. In the interval moreover the hope of the fugitive was kept alive awaiting this terminus, while the passion of the avenger was abated. Keil holds especially from the statement that the high priest was <strong>anointed with the holy oil<\/strong> that the death of the earthly high priest, typified that of the heavenly, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God (<span class='bible'>Heb 9:14<\/span>). It is definitely declared that the priests had to bear the sins of the people; the high priest especially making an atonement stood with his censer between the dead and the living, and his intercession, as his priestly steadfastness when in peril of death, had a somewhat atoning character, as probably also his death. Still we must emphasize the fact that this dynamic or moral efficacy of his death is not mentioned among the definite types of the Old Testament, and could not be so mentioned, since the death of the high priest was not always edifying. [Keil: In these regulations all the rigor of divine justice is manifested in the most beautiful concord with His mercy. Through the destruction of life, even when not wilful, human blood had been shed and demanded expiation. Yet this expiation did not consist in the death of the offender himself, because he had not sinned wilfully. Hence an asylum was provided for him in the free city to which he might flee, and where he might remain, not as an exile, but under the protection of God, until his sin was expiated by the death of the high priest. The fact that the death of the high priest was regarded as expiatory is evident from the clause, who has been anointed with the holy oil, which would appear unmeaning and superfluous on any other view. The anointing with the holy oil was a symbol of the communication of the Holy Ghost, by which the high priest was empowered to act as mediator and representative of the nation before God, so that he alone could carry out the yearly and general expiation for the whole nation on the great day of atonement. But as his life and work acquired a representative signification through this anointing with the Holy Ghost, his death might also be regarded as a death for the Sins of the people, by virtue of the Holy Ghost imputed to him, through which the unintentional manslayer received the benefits of the propitiation for his sins before God, so that he could return cleansed to his native town without further exposure to the avenger of blood. But inasmuch as, according to this view, the death of the high priest had the same result in a certain sense, in relation to his line of office, as his function on the day of atonement had had every year, the death of the earthly high priest became thereby a type of that of the heavenly One, who through the eternal (holy) Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, that we might be redeemed from our transgressions, and receive the promised eternal inheritance. Just as the blood of Christ wrought out eternal redemption only, because through the eternal Spirit He offered Himself without spot to God, so the death of the high priest of the Old Testament secured the complete deliverance of the manslayer from his sin, only because he had been anointed with the holy oil, the symbol of the Holy Ghost. The death of Christ our High Priest avails to release those who have fled for refuge to Him from all the penalty which their sins deserve. And as the high priest was a type of Christ, his death, as the anointed one, and anointed with the Spirit of life and holiness, had a typical efficacy, and released those who had fled for refuge from the avenger to the priestly cities, and representatively at least, to the city of the high priest. That it is not expressly mentioned as a type by no means excludes it from that relation, nor does the mode or features of the high priests death affect its typical any more than its real efficacy.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>As the acquittal of the unintentional homicide was not unconditioned, so also the restraints of the avenger are not unlimited. The Goel was legally the nearest relative, or in his default the relative next removed (see the book of Ruth), and ultimately the whole family. In actual life however it was that relative of the slain person who felt most deeply the injury which had been inflicted upon him, and would rather die with the slain, than not to claim back his blood, <em>i. e.<\/em>, leave it unavenged. The impulse of blood revenge was therefore, and still is, the original natural impulse of retributive justice, the source of all criminal jurisprudence. But since the avenger is blinded with passionand unrestrained pursuit of revenge as a passion always engenders fresh revenges, as is seen, to this day among certain tribes and peoples, <em>e.g.<\/em>, in Arabiaso the law steps in between the avenger and his victim, restrains him in the exercise of his right (and duty) by the judgment of the community, in order that the more natural form of revenge may pass more and more into the unimpassioned decision of the public court and justice. Thus the right of refuge and of revenge stand over against each other, and each exerting a modifying and shaping influence upon the other. In a legal point of view the avenger may still kill the homicide with impunity; and is indeed the executioner of the sentence of the court, if the congregation, or the court of the congregation (<em>i. e.<\/em>, the local court of the city of refuge, or perhaps the highest tribunal of the whole community), should adjudge the homicide a murderer. [The order seems to have been this. The manslayer presented himself to the elders of the city of refuge and stated his case; upon that they received him, and if the charge of crime was pressed, he was to be handed over to the community to which he belonged, and then fully tried. If they found him innocent of intentional murder, he was remitted to the protection of the city of refuge; if otherwise, he was delivered to the avenger.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>3. <strong>The distinction between homicide and murder.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num 35:16-28<\/span>. The signs of murder as to the mode. The use of a deadly weapon of iron, or, if heavy enough to cause death, a stone, or of a heavy piece of wood (Cains club). [The use of such weapons dangerous to life would imply some evil intentwere presumably proof of a malicious purpose.A. G.] The motives are hatred and enmity. The means employed an artful plan. Unintentional homicide, on the other hand, might occur from sudden thrust, a hunting around of a weapon, without enmity; or the casting of a stone without a purpose to injure, or in ignorance of any one in danger, and in cases in which it could then be known that no enmity, no ill-will existed. [See the cases illustrated <span class='bible'>Deu 19:4-5<\/span>.A. G.] In the former case the avenger takes his course, but in the latter <strong>the congregation shall judge<\/strong>, <em>i. e.<\/em>, actually determine, and so rescue the manslayer from his pursuer. As to the manslayer even the sentence <strong>the avenger may kill him whenever and wherever he meets him, lights upon him<\/strong>, comes under legal limitations, because otherwise the revenger might designate every homicide as a murderer.<span class=''>11<\/span><\/p>\n<p>4. <strong>The judgment upon the murderer and his motive.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num 35:29-34<\/span>. The manslayer can only be convicted of murder by the evidence of several (Deut.: two or three) witnesses. The testimony of a single witness is not sufficient. But if convicted, then he was not to be released upon any expiation, or ransom, or sacrifice, as was done among the heathen nations, by the old Germans, and even in the church of the middle ages. Even the mere manslayer cannot be released from his sentence, that he must remain in the city of refuge until the death of the high priest. For whoever is guilty of blood has defiled and desecrated the land; he has stained it with blood, and there is no atonement for these but the blood of the murderer. If he remains unpunished, then the judicatory itself appointed to administer retributive justice defiles the land, the holy land, in which Jehovah dwells with His peopleJehovah as the sacred personality among His people, whom He has trained to a life of sanctified personality. Thus here too the law forms a sacred pedagogica method of training by which men are led upwards from the merely natural to the spiritual life. As Moses thus provides for or regulates the oath, the offering, marriage, divorce, the vow, the revenge of jealousy, so now also the blood revenge, in order to lead it to the ideal goal, where the whole society of the people, the entire community, is made responsible for the execution of the penalty or curse resting upon the shedding of human blood. Comp. this <em>Comm<\/em>. <span class='bible'>Gen 9:5-6<\/span>. [<strong>No satisfaction.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num 35:31-32<\/span>. The permission to make compensation for murder undoubtedly mitigates in practice the system of private retaliation, but it does so by sacrificing the principle which is the basis of that retaliation itself. Resting ultimately upon that law of God, that whosoever sheddeth mans blood, by man shall his blood be shed, it bids men rest content with a convenient evasion of that law, and connects the authority given to men to act as Gods ministers in taking life for life, with a warrant for enabling the kinsmen of a murdered man to make gain out of his murder. <strong>For I the Lord dwell<\/strong>an emphatic protest against all enactment or relaxation of laws by men for their own private convenience. <em>Bib. Com.<\/em> These words too contain the very principle and sum of the whole law above, <em>viz.:<\/em> this sacredness of human blood or lifesince man is made in the image of God.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>For the literature see Winers <em>Real-Worterbuch<\/em>, art. Freistatt. Dann: <em>Ueber den Ursprung des Asylrechts, etc.<\/em>, Leipsic, 1840. Cowles <em>on the Pentateuch<\/em>, pp. 280284. J. D. Michaelis, <em>Laws of Moses<\/em>. Smiths <em>Bib. Dict<\/em>. arts. Cities of Refuge and Revenger of Blood.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Levites were specially cared for. They are to be, on the one hand, without large possessions, and, on the other, without care, but, above all, intimately connected with the people; an ideal for an ecclesiastical and spiritual class for all time. The hierarchy of the middle ages did not observe this. It took the tithes, but took with them also the landed property. It reversed the Old Testament relations. It did not dwell with the people, but left them to dwell by themselves. And while men who were pursued for an unintentional crime found safety among the Levites in the cities of refuge, under the hierarchy men who were more innocent than unintentional homicides ran directly to their death, into the very tortures of the inquisition. But the right of sanctuary which the churches offered them was a faint reflection of the Old Testament cities of refuge.<br \/>The refuge opened in the bosom of the Levitical cities for those who were pursued by the revenger of blood; how great and true a preparation to the New Testament was this union of holiness and mercy.<br \/>But the sharp distinctions which are made with respect to these fugitives, between actual murderers and real homicides, are a divine testimony against the fatuities of modern liberalism, and especially against the abominable lie of materialism, which strips all crimes of their guilt.<br \/>[The atoning death of the Saviour casts its shadow before on the statute book of the law, and on the annals of Jewish history. The High Priest as the head and representative of the whole chosen family of sacerdotal mediators, as exclusively entrusted with some of the chief priestly functions, as alone privileged to make yearly atonement within the Holy of Holies, was pre-eminently a type of Christ. And then the death of each successive high-priest presignified that death of Christ by which the captives were to be freed, and the remembrance of transgressions made to cease. <em>Bib. Com.<\/em>A. G.]<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILETICAL HINTS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The beautiful and suggestive union of the Levitical cities and the cities of Refuge, the instructive element in the regulation of the Levitical cities. The sense of justice is consecrated and sanctified in the establishment of the cities of refuge. The wisdom which shines in the union of the two institutions. The distinction between the murderer and the homicide, a fundamental distinction in all criminal jurisprudence. The justice in the limitations of the right of Asylum. Blood revenge as the root of the courts of law, and these courts as abolishing the blood revenge, just as jealousy is the root of marriage, and marriage is the destruction of jealousy. The difficult and ever new and repeated effort for the reconciliation of judgment and mercy, or even of equity and grace. The reconciliation between the rights of the dead and the rights of the living. The rights of the dead or slain one. The rights of the living. The atoning element in the occurrence of great catastrophes upon the land or on the people. Illustrated in the death of the High Priest. [The sacredness of human life in its relations to society and in its relations to God. How God guards and restrains the working of mere blind revenge, and yet cherishes and gives exercise to the sense of justice. Crimes unpunished bring guilt upon the authorities and courts. Henry: Here is a great deal of good law and of good gospel. It is here enacted, 1. That wilful murder should be punished with death, and in that case no sanctuary should be allowed, no ransom taken nor any commutation of the punishment accepted; the murderer shall surely be put to death. The redemption of the life is so precious that it cannot be obtained by the multitude of riches. 2. That if the slaying was not voluntary, nor done designedly, there was safety in the city of refuge. The protection was under law. It was a remedial law, and all its provisions must be strictly observed. There is here a great deal of good gospel couched under the type and figures of the cities of refuge. (See <span class='bible'>Heb 6:18<\/span>.) As, 1. There were several cities, so that the manslayer might easily reach them, so although there is but one Christ, yet He is a refuge at hand. 2. The manslayer was safe in any of these cities, so all who have fled to Christ are safe, <span class='bible'>Rom 8:1<\/span>. <span class='bible'>3<\/span>. Even strangers and sojourners might have the benefit of these cities, so in Christ Jesus there is no difference between Greek and Jew. 4. If the manslayer left the city to return to his own home, he lay exposed to the avenger of blood, so those that are in Christ must abide in Christ; it is at their peril if they forsake Him or wander from Him. Drawing back is to perdition. Wordsworth: Not only does blood pollute the land, but they also who connive at murder when they ought to punish it, are said here to pollute it. Is it then competent to man to abolish capital punishment for murder?A. G.]<\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[1]<\/span>Marg. <em>above them ye shall give<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[2]<\/span>Heb. <em>they inherit<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[3]<\/span>Heb. <em>by error<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[4]<\/span>Heb. <em>a stone of the hand<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[5]<\/span>Heb. <em>no blood shall be to him<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[6]<\/span>Heb. <em>faulty to die<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[7]<\/span>Heb. <em>there can be no expiation for the blood<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[8]<\/span>[  animals generally. So Keil, <em>Bib. Com.<\/em>, Wordsworth; but Hirsch suggests that the phrase is used here, not to supplement the enumeration of the pasture animals, but rather to denote every purifying arrangement necessary for health. No grave could be made in the Levite city or region, unless in the cases of those who had fled to them for refuge.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[9]<\/span>[Jewish Rabbis held that in cases of this crimewhere there was no kinsman upon whom the duty fell to revenge the blood shedthe court would appoint oneA. G.]<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[10]<\/span>[So strictly was this interpreted by the Jewish doctors, that even when committed in the presence of the court, the crime could not be punished until a judicial examination. In such a case, however, the court which was to sit and adjudicate the case must be a different one from that before which the offence was committed. The functions of a judge and a witness were in their view not lodged in the same person.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[11]<\/span>[Hirsch: At the death of the high priest, the homicide returned to his home and possessions, but not to his social position and official honor, even where these were hereditary. All other transgressors, when they were atoned for, were restored to the honors and offices they enjoyed before, and were qualified to hold new positions but the unintentional murderers were excluded.A. G.]<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> CONTENTS<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> This Chapter may be properly considered as a continuation of the former. As the sons of Levi had no portion with their brethren, because the LORD was their portion; in this Chapter we have the part which the LORD assigned in Canaan for the possession of his priests. Forty-eight cities, with their suburbs, are marked out for them. Beside these, six cities are appointed as cities of refuge for the manslayer, which this Chapter takes notice of; and other laws for regulation concerning murder, to which those cities of refuge were not to reach.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num 35:1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> Observe, those memorable plains of Moab were sanctified to this blessed purpose, that here the final instructions concerning Canaan were given.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong> Jesus Christ Our Refuge<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Num 35:6<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> I. The Cities of Refuge were so placed, three on either side of Jordan, that they provided the greatest possible readiness of access. The devout imagination has always pictured for the cities conditions almost ideal in character. The gates of the cities, like those of the New Jerusalem, were to be kept always open, both day and night.<\/p>\n<p> The refugee, whether an Israelite or a stranger, was safe the moment he entered the gate of the city of refuge.<\/p>\n<p> This merciful provision of the Cities of Refuge acted as a preventive to idolatry; the involuntary manslayer was not driven to seek a home among the heathen nations around, but was allowed to live in his own land, among his own kindred, who held like him the faith in Israel&#8217;s God.<\/p>\n<p> The Cities of Refuge were not merely civil institutions serving a local purpose. They were also types of heavenly things, and taught the people lessons of the very deepest significance.<\/p>\n<p> The Cities of Refuge embodied in themselves truths of the highest importance concerning the salvation of God, and His provision of grace and security for His children.<\/p>\n<p> II. The Cities of Refuge point to Christ as the sinner&#8217;s refuge, and that in more ways than one. They are found in careful and prayerful study to suggest Gospel principles, Gospel promises, Gospel privileges. Christ is the city of refuge.<\/p>\n<p> The six Cities of Refuge belonged to the priestly tribe of Levi. The forty-eight cities of Levi possessed the right of asylum, but the six Cities of Refuge were bound to receive and to entertain, without cost, the involuntary homicide. They were priestly cities, with peculiar privileges of their own.<\/p>\n<p> The refugee, flying from the avenger, had but to pass through the gate, and not only was he immune, free from the slightest danger, but he ranked at once as a fellow-citizen with the priests of the Most High God.<\/p>\n<p> III. Jesus Christ is our first and only Priest. The Levitical priesthood which pointed to Him has been realized and fulfilled in His life and work.<\/p>\n<p> Jesus Christ is the one eternal High Priest, through whom salvation comes to man, and in whom man has communion with God. The Christian believer stands safe and secure within this refuge.<\/p>\n<p> Jesus Christ is not only the divinely appointed way of escape, He is, in Himself, the city of refuge.<\/p>\n<p> W.J. Armitage, <em> The Cities of Refuge,<\/em> p. 7.<\/p>\n<p> References. XXXV. 9-11. C. Stowell Pedley, <em> Christian World Pulpit,<\/em> vol. liii. p. 217. XXXV. 11. Spurgeon, <em> Sermons,<\/em> vol. xlv. No. 2621.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expositor&#8217;s Dictionary of Text by Robertson<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> IX<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> ISRAEL&#8217;S SIN AND PHINEHAS&#8217; ACT OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, AND OTHER THINGS<\/p>\n<p> Numbers 25-36<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> The twenty-fifth chapter of Numbers on many accounts is one of the most remarkable chapters of the Old Testament. In its notable character it is equal to the chapters on Balaam. Here are the children of the Promised Land with their pilgrimage ended. They have reached the banks of the Jordan. They are encamped there just over against Jericho. Nothing to do but go over and possess the land when God tells them. Just at this time Balak, the king of Moab, brings Balaam to curse them by divinations. Having failed in that, he makes the horrible suggestion that the Moabitish and Midianitish women be used as instrumentalities to cause Israel to sin and go into idolatry. Among the women mentioned was a princess, daughter of one of the five kings of Midian. They did what they did under the prompting of their religious instruction and they succeeded.<\/p>\n<p> Very many of the people were seduced from their allegiance to God and not only sinned in a bodily respect but sinned in idolatrous worship and the heads of the people did not interfere to stop it. A plague went out from God on account of it. Moses, discovering the fearful demoralization of the people, gives the commandment that all the heads of the tribes shall be hanged up, either for active participation in this matter or for not using their authority to repress this very great disloyalty to God. It is as when a regiment has rebelled through connivance of its officers. There is the responsibility of leadership in a case of this kind and in military matters any officer, no matter bow high his grade, who would stand idle and see his troops go into rebellion without an effort to stay it, would be shot by the most summary process of court martial.<\/p>\n<p> So Moses commands the leaders to be killed and hung up in the sight of the people. Whoever was hanged on a tree was accursed. Having disposed of the chiefs, he ordered the judges, you remember when two sets of seventy were appointed to help Moses in administrative and judicial affairs, to put to death every man who had committed a sin in that way. But the plague did not stop, though the chiefs of the nation were hanging on a tree, all the judges punishing every man with death, all the people weeping before the tabernacle. &#8220;But drops of grief can ne&#8217;er repay the debt of love I owe.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> Just at this time a son of one of the princes of the tribes comes openly into the camp with a princess of one of the five kings of Midian, in the sight of Moses and Eleazar; in sight of the weeping people; in full view of the dead hanging up and others dying, and brings his irreligious debauchery right into the very presence of God. Whereupon Phinehas, son of Eleazar, without command from anyone, without being especially appointed officer, in his holy wrath for God&#8217;s sake and bearing in his heart that indignation against sin that God bears, and God says of him, &#8220;Having my zeal,&#8221; takes a spear and goes into the tent and thrusts both of them through and kills them.<\/p>\n<p> The most remarkable part of the transaction is in what God says. He uses language just like he uses when he said Abraham believed in Jehovah and it was counted to him for righteousness. As Abraham&#8217;s faith was counted to him for righteousness, the zeal of Phinehas so perfectly expressed God&#8217;s wrath against sin that it is reckoned unto him for eternal righteousness.<\/p>\n<p> But that is not the strangest part of it, but that this display through Phinehas of the wrath of God against sin made an atonement for his sin. You strike a use of the word &#8220;atonement&#8221; there which stalls the commentators and theological seminary professors. Offhand I am going to give you my explanation of it. It is the most remarkable scripture in the Bible. Surely atonement for sin cannot be made which does not placate the wrath of God against sin.<\/p>\n<p> A good many sentimentalist preachers tell you that the sole object of Christ&#8217;s work was to reconcile men to God, that God was already reconciled and did not have to be placated. This scripture is unquestionably the strongest in the Bible to show that Christ&#8217;s sacrifice was both toward God and toward men, toward God in that the sinner&#8217;s bodily and spiritual death for sin took place and otherwise there could have been no atonement. Hence Phinehas, in a very high sense, is a type of the Lord Jesus Christ. The everlasting priesthood is promised to him. The covenant of peace is promised to him.<\/p>\n<p> When we come to the study of the life of our Lord Jesus Christ, we will see an expression in the casting out of the money-changers from the temple, where Jesus takes a scourge and scourges out of God&#8217;s house those who are defiling that house, whereupon it is stated that the scripture was fulfilled, &#8220;The zeal for thy house shall eat me up.&#8221; Such a shame against the sanctity of that house must be punished or it can never be forgiven. There must be a penal sanction to law. We see it repeated again when he comes to cleanse the temple the second time, and then when he comes to die that death of the cross, under the wrath of God, forsaken of the Father, unsaved from the sword of divine justice, unsaved from the lion, Satan, who goeth about to devour, unsaved from the bite of the serpent, that is, to placate by expiation the death penalty of sin. Now, Phinehas could in a typical way represent that.<\/p>\n<p> What was the use for these people to come there and weep before the tabernacle with such an impious, presumptuous, daring sin committed right in the presence of God and nobody rebuking it? It wouldn&#8217;t do simply to hang a few of the officers. It wouldn&#8217;t do for the judges to put one or two, here and there, to death. There had to be some signal, sudden, utter display of divine wrath and that was furnished by Phinehas. If Phinehas had had a motive that was not exactly correspondent to God&#8217;s idea of wrath against sin, he would have been a murderer.<\/p>\n<p> The only trouble about it is that men began to imagine long afterwards that they stood in the place of Phinehas and could kill those whom they thought to be violators of the law, and with inferior motives and without an express sanction of God, they committed sin. The case of Phinehas in that respect stands alone. Samuel, when he hacked to pieces the king, David when he said that the seven sons of Saul must be hanged on a tree to make atonement, represent somewhat the idea But it is not said with reference to them that it was imputed to them for righteousness.<\/p>\n<p> In the case of Jesus, instead of striking the sinner that committed the sin, Jesus let God strike him after the sinner&#8217;s sins had been put on him. &#8220;Save me from the sword; save me from the lion. If it be possible let this cup pass from me, but nevertheless, not my will but thine be done. My God! My God! Why hast thou forsaken me?&#8221; There never could have been any forgiveness of sin that was not based upon a penal sanction. The justice of God must be vindicated in some way. People will tell you that you are not punished because you have sinned but to keep other people from sinning. But sin is demerit and merits death. &#8220;The wages of sin is death.&#8221; And that death must come to the sinner himself, or it must come to the one upon whom his transgressions have been laid. See <span class='bible'>Psa 106:28-31<\/span> .<\/p>\n<p> We turn now to Numbers 26-27 and include with them <span class='bible'>Num 36<\/span> . In this case you have the second numbering of the people. They are just ready to enter the Holy Land, and with the exception of the death of Moses, which came as a result of another principle, there is fulfilled the death threatened to all the grown men that came out of Egypt. This great sin committed on the banks of the Jordan was by the new generation and 24,000 of them perished in the plague. They did not number quite so many as in the first enumeration; then 603,550, now only 601,730. The only thing worthy of mention you can do for yourself. Take the numbers for each tribe as given in the two enumerations and put them down opposite each other. Some you will find have increased. The tribe of Simeon with others has fearfully decreased. You have the reason, viz.: this tribe suffered more than any other in this plague.<\/p>\n<p> This enumeration is not merely for war, but the basis of the land allotment. The tribe which has the most men will get the most land. The daughters of a certain man who died want to know if their name is to perish in Israel and they are to be without inheritance. They are to have their father&#8217;s inheritance, and in <span class='bible'>Num 36<\/span> it shows how to safeguard the father&#8217;s part of the inheritance to the tribe, by permitting them to marry only in their own tribe.<\/p>\n<p> In this chapter is the announcement to Moses that on account of his sin he is to die. He asks that a successor be appointed and Joshua is appointed. We come to the Numbers 28-29, which are upon one point unlike any other chapters. While they refer to a great many things in the previous books of Exodus and Leviticus, there is nothing like those two chapters anywhere else. They commence at the beginning of the year and show what offerings are to be made day by day, week by week, moon by moon, year by year, seventh year by seventh year, and Jubilee by Jubilee. These chapters constitute the basis of the poem of Keble, &#8220;The Christian Year,&#8221; as it is called by the Episcopalians, derived from the Old Testament, a matter that Paul condemns thus in the letter to the Colossians: &#8220;Ye observe months, days, weeks, seasons; touch not, taste not, handle not.&#8221; God nailed all that system to the cross of Christ.<\/p>\n<p> The only thought in <span class='bible'>Num 30<\/span> that needs to be dwelt on is the bringing up of the vow question again. If a daughter makes a vow before she has attained to full age, it cannot be exacted of her, if her father does not sanction it. A wife cannot make a vow without her husband&#8217;s sanction. This chapter discusses the principle upon which the exceptions are made, and you can read it.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Num 31<\/span> is devoted to the war against Midian. God commanded Moses to make a holy war against Midian, who, acting on the suggestion of Balaam, had through their chief women brought about this great sin, when Israel had committed no provocation. This war is unlike other wars because of the number. Only 1,000 men from each tribe, or 12,000, are sent out to conduct the war. A priest, not a general, commands them. They suffer no loss. The destruction wrought is God&#8217;s destruction. God has condemned Midian for their awful sin and they are smitten. The spoils of the war are devoted to God because it was God&#8217;s war, not man&#8217;s. Everybody that looks at it will say that it was God&#8217;s war.<\/p>\n<p> As they were encamped by the Jordan and ready to pass over, it was intensely important that they leave the rear safe. Midian is smitten clear to the Euphrates. Sihon and Og had been destroyed and Moab and Ammon and Edom are incapable of war. A vast portion of territory lying on the east of the Jordan is captured. That brings us to <span class='bible'>Num 32<\/span> . This captured land is the best pasturage in the whole country; two tribes and a half express the desire that they be allotted that eastern portion. Moses is very indignant because he understands that they mean this, that while the whole nation has captured this territory these tribes propose to stay over here and leave the other tribes to capture the remainder of the country. But they explain that they simply wanted to safeguard their women and children and villages and send their army on across the Jordan to fight with the others. So the allotment is made to Reuben, Gad, and one-half of the tribe of Manasseh.<\/p>\n<p> In <span class='bible'>Num 33<\/span> there is only one thing to which your attention needs to be called. That chapter is devoted to the whole itinerary from Egypt to the Jordan. God tells Moses to impress one fact upon the minds of the people: &#8220;No terms can be made with these inhabitants of the land, for the territory was originally yours when the division was made in the days of Peleg, after the flood. But they took possession of the country.&#8221; God has not cast them out because their iniquity was not full. But their iniquity is full now and they are going to be cast out and &#8220;you are the executors of the divine will and if you leave corners around I give you warning that they will be thorns in your side forever. When you make war they will rise up in your rear. When you relax in watchfulness, they will lead you into sin.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> I preached a sermon on that once, in which I took the matter spiritually thus: Take a Christian who is regenerated, but he stops trying to expel the old inhabitants. He says, &#8220;I am all right if I am a Christian. That is enough.&#8221; He does not continue his war against the sinful nature. A large part of him he does not seek to bring under subjection through sanctification. Then he is going to have a thorn in the flesh. Say you take an occasional spree. Whenever you quit making a fight on the lower nature, you are going to be badly fooled. By careful analysis anyone can find out his weak point. Woe to the man who does not make war on that besetting sin. I do not say he will be lost in hell, but he will get some hard falls and be badly hurt.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Num 34<\/span> is devoted to a description of the border. You can take a map and trace it out. No particular skill is required.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>Num 35<\/span> is devoted to two points well worthy of special study. It is a provision for the forty-eight Levite cities who were to have no part of the land for an inheritance, and also for the six cities of refuge; three east of the Jordan and three west. You ought carefully to note the purpose of these cities of refuge and how the roads are to be kept open.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> QUESTIONS<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. Having failed to turn Jehovah against Israel by divination, how did Balaam turn Israel against Jehovah?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. What penalty did Jehovah visit upon them and how many died?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. What two efforts were made to stay the plague and the results?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. What act of presumption was committed just at this time, the act of Phinehas and the result?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. Expound the remarkable reference to Phinehas and particularly bring out the atonement idea in connection with his zeal.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. Give result of second census. How many tribes had fewer than at first? Why the great difference in the tribe of Simeon?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. What question came up respecting Zelophehad&#8217;s daughters and how settled?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. Give the law of inheritance in Israel.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. What announcement here made to Moses and his request?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. What specially qualified Joshua for this place?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. Describe the ceremony of the appointment and what the signification of the laying on of hands?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 12. Try your hand on forming the calendar for the Jewish Holy Year.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 13. What exceptions here to the law of vows previously given?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 14. The war against Midian the character of it, why made, how unlike other wars and what was done with the spoils?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 15. Give an account of the settlement of the territory east of the Jordan.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 16. What terms were they to make with the inhabitants of the land?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 17. What was the penalty for violating this command?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 18. What right did the Israelites have thus to deal with the inhabitants?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 19. Apply the case of these people in their new relation to the individual Christian.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 20. Bound the Land of Canaan as promised to Israel. (See Atlas.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 21. What provision was made for the Levites in the land?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> 22. How many cities of refuge? Name and locate them. What was their purpose?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: B.H. Carroll&#8217;s An Interpretation of the English Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>the LORD. Hebrew. Jehovah. App-4. <\/p>\n<p>spake. See note on Num 1:1. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Chapter 35<\/p>\n<p>As we get into chapter thirty-five, it describes the cities of refuge that they were to establish, verse two,<\/p>\n<p>Command the children of Israel, that they give to the Levites of the inheritance of their possession cities to dwell in; and you shall give unto them also suburbs of the cities round about them. And the cities that they shall have to dwell in; and the suburbs of them shall be for their cattle, and their goods, and for their beasts. ( Num 35:2-3 )<\/p>\n<p>So the city itself and then extending out from the city a thousand cubits for their farm area and then out another two thousand cubits for their cattle. These were the suburbs of the city, and forty-eight of these cities were to be given to the Levites. They were not to get any huge chunks of land nor were the families given portions of land. The Levites received no inheritance. God said, &#8220;I am their inheritance&#8221;. They got the best deal. The rest of the people got property; the Levites got the Lord as their inheritance. And so they were given these forty-two cities to live in and the suburbs around the city to graze their cattle and to grow their crops and so forth, forty-two cities given to the Levites.<\/p>\n<p>Now among the forty-two cities there were to be six cities that were appointed as cities of refuge. Three on either side of the Jordan River placed strategically through the land so that no matter where you were living in the land you were never more than a half day&#8217;s run from the city of refuge. Now the purpose of the city of refuge was to take care of a cultural practice that was deeply ingrained within the people.<\/p>\n<p>You know one of the hardest things to become free of is tradition. There are certain cultural things that are so deeply embedded in our whole thinking processes that they are the hardest things in the world to root out. And I can give you one offensive illustration. Christmas is a pagan holiday. It has nothing to do with the birthday of Jesus Christ in its original forms. They celebrated Christmas long before Jesus ever came along. They called it by a different name. The Romans called it Saturnalia, but it is-you can trace its origin clear on back to Nimrod shortly after the time of Noah.<\/p>\n<p>The decking of trees, all of the customs are not Christian in origin at all. And yet to suggest that we abandon the celebration of this pagan holiday would bring great incense and censure from the church. &#8220;You mean you&#8217;re not gonna celebrate Christmas?&#8221; Because it&#8217;s so deeply imbedded in our whole traditional patterns, we hold on to it though we recognize that it is becoming more paganized all the time.<\/p>\n<p>How many people really honor Jesus Christ on Christmas? If it was His birthday, it wasn&#8217;t, but if it was His birthday how many are truly honoring Christ? As we look at the celebration the police department have to put on extra duty. All of the reserves are called in. Why? Because there are gonna be so many drunks on the road. People going home from the Christmas party &#8220;We&#8217;ve been celebrating Jesus is Born. Ha ha ha&#8221;. And yet we find extreme difficulty in trying to divorce ourselves from it because it&#8217;s so much a part of our culture. Tradition, the hardest things in the world to root out.<\/p>\n<p>And so God, rather than seeking to root out totally the tradition, though he wasn&#8217;t in favor of it, placed restrictions upon it. And to these people, a part of their cultural process was revenge killing. That was just a part of their whole culture. If a member of your family was killed by someone else, you were honor-bound to kill him. You owed it to your dead relative; the honor of the family is at stake and you must pursue him until you find him and put him to death. And the family honor cannot be maintained until his blood has been spilt. And if you&#8217;re the oldest son in the house then you become the avenger of blood and it&#8217;s your duty, your family duty, to avenge the blood of your dead brother or sister or mother or father. And this idea of revenge killing was deeply embedded in their whole cultural process.<\/p>\n<p>Now, in some cases the killing was totally accidental. There was no malice, there was no anger, there was no premeditation; it was just an accident. But this idea of revenge killing was so deep that even though it was an accident, the avenger of blood was prone to catch the guy and kill him anyhow. &#8220;I didn&#8217;t mean to do it. It was just an accident, friend. I didn&#8217;t-&#8221; You know you had it anyhow, they had no mercy. It&#8217;s honor, it&#8217;s duty, I&#8217;ve gotta kill you.<\/p>\n<p>So in order to modify this deeply ingrained practice, God established the cities of refuge so that if you, by accident, should kill someone you could flee to the city of refuge. And if you could get to the city of refuge before the avenger caught up with you, if you could come within the borders of the city you were safe. He could not come into the city to take your life. And the Levites, it was the city of the Levites, the Levites would shelter you and protect you and they would guarantee your opportunity to have a free trial and a fair trial. Now unless you got to the city, you didn&#8217;t have a fair trial at all. It was the law of vengeance and revenge and they would catch you and kill you. So you had to flee to the city of refuge. There, you would have a fair trial.<\/p>\n<p>Now if it could be proved that it was not an accident, that you have been planning it, that you had hatred and animosity and it was a-and it could be proved that it was an action and it was done in anger, malice on your part, then you were delivered from the city of refuge and the avenger put you to death. But if you could show that it was purely an accident, you had no intention of doing it, it was just an accident, then you could remain in the city of refuge and they could not touch you. You would then live in the city of refuge. And as long you stayed in the city of refuge you were protected, but if you should leave the city of refuge, then if the avenger would catch you he would put you to death. You were only safe as long you stayed within the borders of that city of refuge.<\/p>\n<p>There was another provision because man needs hope and living in a city can feel like living in a prison and you can soon despair &#8220;I&#8217;m away from my family. I want to be home and all. And I&#8217;m never gonna go home again.&#8221; So there was another provision to give hope for that person; and that is, if the high priest should die then you were freed and you could go home. God was making these options and all because really he was opposed to the whole practice of revenge killing but it was so deeply ingrained in their culture he then created the limitations and loopholes for the innocent parties. That became then a part of the tradition and the culture of the people.<\/p>\n<p>I believe that God is not incensed or angry if you celebrate Christmas, if you have a Christmas tree. I thank God that I have great liberty in Jesus Christ. And when we celebrate Christmas we are not thinking of Tammuz or Nimrod or Summeramus??? or the pagan gods that are usually celebrated this time of the year, nor Saturn nor the sun. I think that it is good to remember that &#8220;God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten Son&#8221; and as much as we don&#8217;t know when Jesus was born, it really doesn&#8217;t matter which day you might set aside to celebrate his birth. The date itself isn&#8217;t important.<\/p>\n<p>But I thank God that I have that freedom to celebrate with a family a day of giving, a day of expressions of love. But I&#8217;m also thankful that I have the freedom not to enter into certain pagan aspects of the holiday, if I don&#8217;t want to. It&#8217;s great to have freedom in Christ. I&#8217;m free to have a tree or I&#8217;m free not to have a tree, and it doesn&#8217;t condemn me if I have one and it doesn&#8217;t make me more righteous if I don&#8217;t have one.<\/p>\n<p>But these things are tradition, they become deeply embedded in our whole family culture processes and God understands how deeply embedded they&#8217;re in and so he just, you know, makes the rules whereby oftentimes He modifies some of the poorer aspects of those practices. So where traditionally Christmas is a time for getting drunk, the Lord modifies that and he says, &#8220;Be not drunk with wine wherein excess, be filled with the spirit&#8221; ( Eph 5:18 ). It teaches us moderation in all things.<\/p>\n<p>So, here God deals with a cultural practice, modifying it, bringing it within borders, within limitations, providing for the innocent. And yet the murderer was in no way to be set free. They were not to actually put to death a man with one witness. There had to be at least two witnesses. They could not take the testimony of one witness and put to a man to death; in the mouth of two witnesses, at least, it had to be established. Then if it was established they were not to take any ransom for the guilty. In other words, he was not to be able to buy his way out. Thus, the guilty were to be put to death and the land would be free from pollution.<\/p>\n<p>Now, we&#8217;ve got a lot of sociologists today that say that the death penalty is no deterrent against crime; it&#8217;s a horrible thing to put men to death and all this kind of stuff. And so what has happened? We say the law of God really isn&#8217;t valid, it really isn&#8217;t good. With our social sciences we know much better than the law of God and we&#8217;re able to establish law that is superior to the law of God. How would you describe our land today? Pretty polluted; isn&#8217;t it? That&#8217;s what God said, He established a force so the land wouldn&#8217;t be polluted. And we have found out that rather than knowing better than God, he knew best but we&#8217;ve gone so deep into it there seems to be now no way out. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Through the Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>It will be remembered that the Levites were not permitted to hold, any inheritance in the land. Jehovah was the portion of their inheritance. Provision was now made for them. Forty-eight cities scattered throughout the whole land were to be the places of their abode. This scattering of the servants of the Tabernacle through the length and breadth of the land was a beneficent arrangement. Nothing is said of religious service to be rendered by them in their own cities. They were rather to go up in courses to the center of worship. According to the divine purpose, their residence would have an influence for right on the whole life of the nation.<\/p>\n<p>Among these forty-eight cities of the Levites six were to be set apart as cities of refuge. This was a tender and just provision among a people naturally fierce and vindictive. The law of God had made life sacred, and the punishment of taking it had been solemnly declared in the words, &#8220;Whoso sheddeth man&#8217;s blood, by man shall his blood be shed.&#8221; Nevertheless, there might be extenuating circumstances. For premeditated murder there was to be no final refuge or forgiveness. For killing in haste, that is, unpremeditated killing, provision was made. These cities were not provided that men might evade justice, but rather that justice might be ensured. The fact that a man slayer reached one of these cities did not ensure him against inquiry and investigation. It rather made such inquiry necessary and thus gave him opportunity of explanation and ensured the certainty of just action. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: An Exposition on the Whole Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>the Cities of Refuge for the Manslayer<\/p>\n<p>Num 35:1-15<\/p>\n<p>This chapter is full of provision for the Levites, the chosen ministers of Gods house. They who serve there may be at rest about their maintenance. He is not unrighteous to forget their labor of love.<\/p>\n<p>These forty-eight cities must have been centers of religious influence throughout the land. As cities set on a hill that could not be hid, as salt staying corruption, as lights along a rock-bound coast-so must they have stood in the Holy Land. So should our homes be in our land.<\/p>\n<p>Six of the Levite cities were set apart for those who were guilty of manslaughter-i.e., those who had killed some one unwittingly. They were within easy access from all parts of the land, and offered sanctuary until a judicial inquiry could be held. In Jesus we find refuge, Heb 6:18. No avenger following the track of past sin can hurt the soul that shelters in Him. Only we must never venture beyond the precincts of His salvation.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: F.B. Meyer&#8217;s Through the Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>11. The Cities of Refuge<\/p>\n<p>CHAPTER 35<\/p>\n<p>1. The provision of the Levites: Forty-eight cities (Num 35:1-8)<\/p>\n<p>2. The cities of refuge (Num 35:9-34)<\/p>\n<p>The cities of the Levites were scattered through the land. Gen 49:7 is therefore fulfilled. The provision of cities for refuge is full of interest. The careful study of the purpose of these cities is recommended. Note especially that they were provided to give shelter for those who had killed a person unawares. The avenger of blood (Hebrew: _goel, which means to redeem) pursued the person and the city of refuge gave shelter. The death of the high priest resulted in liberty for all who were in the cities of refuge. It was the signal that they could return to their possessions (verse 28).<\/p>\n<p>Israels history may be easily read in this chapter in connection with the cities of refuge. The innocent blood shed is the blood of Christ. Blood guiltiness is upon the nation. They did it ignorantly, even as He prayed on Calvarys cross, Father, forgive them for they know not what they do. They are on account of this blood-guiltiness kept out of their inheritance, and yet they have had their city of refuge and have been preserved till the time comes when they are set free and return to the possession in the land. And that will be when the Priesthood of Christ as now exercised by Him in glory ends, when He comes forth as the King-Priest to exercise the Melchisedek priesthood. The names of the cities are not given in the book of Numbers. They were: Bezer, Ramoth, Golan, Kedesh, Shechem and Hebron (Deu 4:41-43; Jos 20:7). The cities are also types of Christ because they gave shelter. He is our refuge and our hiding place.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Gaebelein&#8217;s Annotated Bible (Commentary)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Num 22:1, Num 26:63, Num 31:12, Num 33:50, Num 36:13 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Num 26:3 &#8211; General Jos 21:41 &#8211; within 1Ch 6:54 &#8211; these are Eze 48:10 &#8211; for the priests<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>CITIES OF THE LEVITES, CITIES OF REFUGE<\/p>\n<p>We may conclude our exposition of Numbers with this chapter, as the final one contains no difficulties not dealt with in previous lessons, or that are not explained in the text itself. <\/p>\n<p>THE CITIES OF THE LEVITES (Num 35:1-5) <\/p>\n<p>As the Levites were to have no domain like the other tribes, they were to be distributed throughout the land in certain cities appropriated to their use; and these cities were to be surrounded by extensive suburbs. <\/p>\n<p>There is an apparent discrepancy between Num 35:4-5 with regard to the extent of these suburbs; but the statements refer to different things the one to the extent of the suburbs from the walls of the city, the other to the space of 2,000 cubits from their extremity. <\/p>\n<p>In point of fact, there was an extent of ground, amounting to 3,000 cubits, measured from the wall of the city. One thousand were probably occupied with out-houses for the accommodation of shepherds and other servants, with gardens, or olive yards. And these, which were portioned out to different families (1Ch 6:60), might be sold by one Levite to another, but not to any individual of another tribe (Jet. 32:7). The other two thousand cubits remained a common for the pasturing of cattle (Lev 25:34). <\/p>\n<p>THE CITIES OF REFUGE (Num 35:6-29) <\/p>\n<p>The practice of Goelism i.e., of the nearest relation of an individual who was killed being bound to demand satisfaction from the author of his death &#8211; existed from a remote antiquity (Gen 4:14; Gen 27:45). <\/p>\n<p>It seems to have been an established usage in the age of Moses; and, although in a rude state of society it is a natural principle of criminal jurisprudence, it is liable to great abuses. The chief of the evils inseparable from it are that the kinsman, who is bound to execute justice, will often be precipitate, little disposed in the heat of passion to discriminate between the premeditated purpose of the assassin and the misfortune of the unintentional homicide. <\/p>\n<p>Moreover, it had a tendency not only to foster a vindictive spirit, but, in case of the Goel being unsuccessful in finding his victim, to transmit animosities and feuds against his descendants from one generation to another. This is exemplified among the Arabs in the present day. <\/p>\n<p>This practice of Goelism obtained among the Hebrews to such an extent that it was not expedient to abolish it; and Moses, while sanctioning its continuance, was directed to make special regulations, which tended to prevent the consequences of personal vengeance, and, at the same time, to afford an accused person time and means of proving his innocence. <\/p>\n<p>This was the humane end contemplated in the institution of cities of refuge. There were to be six, three on the east of Jordan, both because the territory<\/p>\n<p>there was equal in length, though not in breadth, to Canaan, and because it might be more convenient for some to take refuge across the border. They were appointed for the benefit, not of the Israelites only, but of all resident strangers. <\/p>\n<p>ANALYSIS OF THE TEXT<\/p>\n<p>How many of these cities were there (Num 35:6)? For whom appointed? From among what other cities? What important qualification is made in Num 35:11? And what further one in Num 35:12? How were these cities arranged with reference to the Jordan (Num 35:14)? On this side Jordan should be rendered beyond Jordan, and the idea is that three were especially for those tribes which so recently had elected to stay on the east side of the river. Was this refuge limited to the Israelites (Num 35:15)? <\/p>\n<p>THE AVENGER OF BLOOD<\/p>\n<p>What three cases of premeditated murder are mentioned (Num 35:16-18)? What three in Num 35:20-21. What name is given him whose duty it was to slay the murderer (Num 35:19)? The word revenger or avenger (see Num 35:12), is the translation of the Hebrew word Gaal from which comes Goelism. It means a kinsman, the nearest of kin. It was he, only, who could perform this office. <\/p>\n<p>In the case of premeditated murder was there any escape for the guilty? But in the case of unpremeditated murder what protection did these cities provide (Num 35:22-24)? What was the method of operation (Num 35:24-25)? What condition was necessary for the man-slayer to observe (Num 35:26-28)? Once having reached the nearest city, for one or other of them was within a days journey of all parts of the land, he was secure. But he had to abide in it. His confinement was a wise rule, designed to show the sanctity of human blood in Gods sight, as well as to protect the man-slayer himself, whose presence in society might have provoked the passions of the deceaseds relatives. But the period of his release from confinement was not until the death of the high priest. That was a season of public affliction, when private sorrows were overlooked under a sense of the national calamity, and when the death of so eminent a servant of God naturally led all to serious consideration about their own mortality. <\/p>\n<p>We meet this subject again in Deuteronomy 19 and Joshua 20, all of the passages put together furnishing rich material for a Bible reading or a sermon on the cities of refuge as a type of Christ. They are a type in the following ways; that is, in their:<\/p>\n<p>1. origin, since they were divinely ordained<\/p>\n<p>2. necessity, for without them there was no hope for the pursued<\/p>\n<p>3. accessibility, for being on both sides of the Jordan, and within a days journey of all parts of the land, they might be easily reached<\/p>\n<p>4. security, for the manslayer once received within their walls could not be assailed<\/p>\n<p>5. applicability, for they were designed for all, Jew and Gentile, friend and alien, without distinction<\/p>\n<p>Any able to use such an outline will not need to be reminded of the New Testament Scriptures which parallel the different divisions. In working out the details it might be well to show that like our salvation in Christ, the value of these cities of refuge was limited to those that remained in them. Also, point the contrast, that whereas they were restricted to the innocent man-slayer, Christ receives the guilty. The man-slayer had to be judged first, we believers are already judged, condemned, and yet free in Christ. <\/p>\n<p>It is proper to say also that the avenger of blood or the kinsman redeemer is a beautiful type of Christ, some think more fitting than the cities of refuge themselves, but of this we shall speak in the next lesson. <\/p>\n<p>QUESTIONS <\/p>\n<p>1. How is the supposed discrepancy between verses 4 and 5 explained? <\/p>\n<p>2. What is meant by the word Goelism?<\/p>\n<p>3. Of what is Gaal or Goel the translation? <\/p>\n<p>4. What is the meaning of the word? <\/p>\n<p>5. To what abuses was Goelism liable? <\/p>\n<p>6. In what ways was the Mosaic legislation intended to restrain them? <\/p>\n<p>7. Where were the cities of refuge located with reference to the Jordan, and why? <\/p>\n<p>8. How comprehensive were their benefits? <\/p>\n<p>9. Why should the manslayer be confined in them? <\/p>\n<p>10. In how many ways may they be considered typical of Christ? <\/p>\n<p>THE KINSMAN REDEEMER<\/p>\n<p>In fulfillment of the promise in the last lesson there is here a consideration of the kinsman redeemer as a type of Christ, being an abridgment from the Rev. Henry Melvill, D.D., an eloquent English University preacher of an earlier generation. Our object is not only to open up the subject to those who have never considered it, but also to furnish material for a Gospel sermon to those who have opportunities in that direction. <\/p>\n<p>Great Truths Taught by Common Things<\/p>\n<p>Melvill begins by speaking of the close connection between the Jewish and Christian dispensations as we have discovered in our study of the Pentateuch. We have seen this especially in regard to redemption, the redeemer under the law being the type of the Redeemer under the Gospel. There may be no distinct allusions to Christ, but whenever you meet with a transaction of redemption, either of land or of a person, the matter is so ordered as to be typical of the person and work of Christ. Thus the Jews were taught even through the common dealings of life the great spiritual deliverance that was wrought out in the fullness of time. <\/p>\n<p>There are three conditions marked in the Old Testament as requiring the interposition of a redeemer: (1) if there had been a forfeiture of an inheritance, (2) if there had been a loss of personal liberty, or (3) if there had been the shedding of blood. <\/p>\n<p>In each it was enjoined that the Goel or redeemer should interfere on behalf of the distressed individual. Moreover, the occasions which necessitated the interference of the Goel, and the manner in which it was conducted, bear so close a likeness to the Gospel redeemer that we can scarcely doubt it to have been the purpose of the Holy Spirit to keep the scheme of human redemption always before Israel. <\/p>\n<p>The Forfeiture of an Inheritance<\/p>\n<p>To begin with the forfeiture of an inheritance alluded to in the twenty-fifth chapter of Leviticus. If an Israelite had become poor, and sold some of his possessions, the Goel was directed, if possible, to redeem the land. In that<\/p>\n<p>case it became the property of the Goel until the year of Jubilee, when it returned to the original proprietor. The forfeited possession might be redeemed by the latter at any time were he able to pay the price of it; but were he not, then only the Goel could redeem it for him, and if he did or could not do so, no stranger might interfere, the possession must remain unredeemed. <\/p>\n<p>We see the typical character of this transaction indicated first in the fact that only a kinsman could fill the office of Goel. Some other individual might be ready to render aid, but had he the rights of the closest kinman- ship? If not, the law refused to allow his interposition. In laying down this principle, God taught that He who should arise as the Goel or Redeemer of a lost world, must be bone of our bone, and flesh of our flesh. No angel could redeem us (Hebrews 10-18). <\/p>\n<p>In the next place, if you wish to describe mans natural condition and the change effected in it by the work of Christ, where can you obtain a better illustration than from the directions of this law in regard to a forfeited inheritance? Who is the Israelite that has grown poor and alienated himself from the possession of his fathers if it be not the sinner originally made in the image of God, and who has destroyed that image by an act of rebellion? An eternity of happiness was our possession, but we threw it away, bringing upon ourselves the curse of death of body and soul. We became poor, and who shall measure our spiritual poverty? Have we a solitary fraction of our own to pay for our redemption? Therefore, the inheritance must be forfeited forever, unless a kinsman redeemer shall arise. God has provided this redeemer in a man, and yet infinitely more than a man, the God-man Christ Jesus. <\/p>\n<p>But furthermore, as in the case of the impoverished Israelite, what Christ had redeemed He has not instantly restored. The year of jubilee has not yet come for us, but with a mightier trumpet peal than could be heard upon the mountains of Israel shall that jubilee year be introduced. The resurrection and glorifying of our bodies will be their completion for entrance on the fullness of the purchased possession. <\/p>\n<p>The Loss of Personal Liberty<\/p>\n<p>To pass now to the second instance of redemption where there has been a loss of personal liberty, and where all that has been spoken of in regard to the forfeiture of an inheritance applies with only a light change. The same chapter shows that for the discharge of a debt or the procurement of subsistence an Israelite might sell himself either to another Israelite or a stranger. Should he become the servant of an Israelite, there was no right of redemption, but he must remain in the house of his master till the jubilee. But should he become the servant of a stranger and cause arise for the interposition of the Goel the law ran: After that he is sold he may be redeemed again; one of his brethren may redeem him. If he were able to redeem himself he might do so but were the ability lacking then his kinsman must interpose, no stranger could discharge the office. <\/p>\n<p>Observe that the Goel had no right to interfere unless the Israelite had sold himself to a stranger. The reason is that if his master was an Israelite like himself, then he had not become separated from Gods people and the exigency had not arisen for his redemption in the same sense. It were only when the master were a stranger that the servicing became typical of mans bondage to Satan. It was in such a case only that we find the illustration of the New Testament, saying that the servant of sin has been made captive by Satan at his will.<\/p>\n<p>Thank God in such a case the sinner need not languish forever in bondage. The chain need not be eternal, for there advances his kinsman, made of a woman, made under the law, and in the likeness of sinful flesh, to pay down the price of redemption and to bid the prisoner come forth into the glorious liberty of the children of God. <\/p>\n<p>The Shedding of Blood<\/p>\n<p>The third case of redemption, where there had been the shedding of blood, differs from the two already examined. <\/p>\n<p>This is referred to in Numbers 35, and in connection with the appointment of the cities of refuge. <\/p>\n<p>The King James translation speaks only of the avenger of blood, but the original is Goel or the kinsman redeemer. You will recall that the latter must pursue the murderer and take vengeance if he overtake him before reaching the city of refuge. But if the Goel were not at hand to follow him no stranger had the right to do so. This feature of the Goel therefore stands out as prominently here as in the other instances. <\/p>\n<p>It is the common idea that the cites of refuge were typical of Christ and the murderer was the human race pursued by the justice of God. There is some fidelity in this figure, and under certain limitations it may be considered as a type, but the standing type of Christ under the Mosaic law was the Goel, or kinsman redeemer. It is for this reason we seek the figure of Christ, not in the cities of refuge, but in the avenger of blood. <\/p>\n<p>For example, those who were really guilty fled in vain to the city and must be delivered up to the punishment due their crime. Who can find in this any emblem of the flying of sinners for refuge to Christ? <\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, observe that the human race, created deathless, was slain by Satan when he moved our first parents to the act prohibited in the words in the day that thou doest it, thou shalt surely die. It was with reference to this slaughter of mankind that Christ said of him: He was a murderer from the beginning. It was through Satan that death, whether of body or soul, gained footing in this creation, and we count it therefore proper to describe him as the great manslayer. <\/p>\n<p>Our Nearest of Kin<\/p>\n<p>But who pursued the murderer? Who took on him the vengeance which drew the wonder of the universe and through death destroyed him that had the power of death? Who but the kinsman redeemer? Who but that seed of the woman predicted to bruise the serpents head? Though Satan for a while may be permitted to roam over this creation, there has been gained a mastery over him which has reduced him to the bond-slave of our kinsman. And He is only reserving the full taking of vengeance until the year of jubilee arrives, when the enemy will be hurled into the lake of fire forever and ever. <\/p>\n<p>Finally, we should not suppose that in pleading for the typical character of the Goel we plead for the existence of a figure hidden from the men of the old dispensation. When Job exclaims, I know that my redeemer liveth, what he really says is, I know that my Goel, my kinsman, liveth. And if the saints among the Jews could describe Christ as the Goel, would they not naturally turn to the offices of the Goel that they might ascertain the offices of Christ? <\/p>\n<p>Who is there that is not the kinsman of Christ, since that kinsmanship resulted in His taking human nature upon Him? It is enough to be a man to know oneself Christs kinsman. He tasted death for every man. He redeemed every mans inheritance. He regained every mans liberty. He avenged every mans blood. Will anyone put from him through unbelief the benefits of His interposition? If ye will not believe, surely ye shall not be established.<\/p>\n<p>This is the glorious Gospel of the Son of God, and nothing but belief can exclude the poorest, the meanest, the wickedest among men from a full and free share in the perfect redemption. <\/p>\n<p>QUESTIONS <\/p>\n<p>1. What great truth were the Jews taught even in the common duties of life? <\/p>\n<p>2. What three conditions in the Old Testament required the interposition of a redeemer? <\/p>\n<p>3. What relation must this redeemer bear to the distressed person? <\/p>\n<p>4. Could any other person act in this capacity? <\/p>\n<p>5. What great principle of our redemption is illustrated in this case? <\/p>\n<p>6. How long might the Goel retain a redeemed possession, and what does this illustrate? <\/p>\n<p>7. Why, in the second case, might not the Goel interpose unless an Israelite had sold himself to a stranger? <\/p>\n<p>8. Can you quote Job 19:25-27? <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: James Gray&#8217;s Concise Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Num 35:4-5. A thousand cubitson the east side two thousand cubits. A line of one thousand cubits extending from the centre of the city, east, west, north, and south, would make each side of the square two thousand cubits. This would make the levites happy in gardens, and convenient retreats. God would have his ministers easy in domestic cares, that they may care for the church alone; and from the care he takes of his ministers, they may learn what care they ought to take of his flock.<\/p>\n<p>Num 35:24. The congregation shall judge; that is, the elders surrounded by the people, as appears from Deu 19:12.<\/p>\n<p>Num 35:25. He shall abide in it to the death of the highpriest, who was regarded as the spiritual father of all Israel; and while a man was mourning for the death of a father, he could not think of avenging a case of manslaughter with the blood of a brother.<\/p>\n<p>Num 35:33. Blood defileth the land. Therefore it must be purged by the blood of him that shed it. This principle seems fully to justify the war against Amalek and Moab. By consequence every man-slayer was tried by the elders in the gate, before he could be admitted to the asylum.<\/p>\n<p>REFLECTIONS.<\/p>\n<p>The Lord having made the levites comfortable by the tithe, and by forty eight cities, next made them protectors of the man who might have the calamity to kill his neighbour without design. Three cities of refuge lay to the east, and three to the west of the Jordan, and almost parallel with its stream. It was the business of the sanhedrim, says Maimonides, as quoted by Dr. Lightfoot, to keep the roads of those cities in good repair, and thirty two cubits wide. No hillock, or river destitute of a bridge was allowed; and at every cross or parting road, the word Refuge, Refuge, was inscribed on a finger post in large letters. Maccoth, as quoted above, says, that the mother of the highpriest used to feed and clothe the manslayers, that they might not pray for the death of her son. It is also added, that if a man slew the highpriest, he was never more to return to his place. And surely this law has been awfully enforced against the Jews for slaying the Lord of glory. We may farther observe, that the refuge provided for men guilty of homicide, was highly expressive of the refuge which God has provided in Christ and the church, for poor sinners. See that soul awakened and alarmed by the terrors of the law. A life of folly and sin stands unveiled to his view. He grieves for having grieved the Lord, but he can no more undo his sin than the man-slayer could restore his neighbour to life, though he would give all the world to do it. See, on the other hand, justice, as the avenger of blood, brandishing her sword against the offender, and menacing his soul with death. What shall the sinner do? Whether can he flee; where can he find a refuge, when heaven is the assailant? Let him now turn his eyes, hopeless and desponding as he is, to Christ crucified for sinners. He has died the death for man, he has disarmed the terrors of justice, and now opens the refuge of his wounded side to receive the penitent and believing soul. In him we have redemption, mercy, and love. In him we have the new covenant, branching forth with a thousand promises; a covenant confirmed by an oath to Abraham, that by virtue of two immutable things, the promise and oath of God, we might have strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold on the hope set before us. Heb 6:18. See not only the Saviour, but likewise the church, with her arms and her gates extended to receive the poor and afflicted sinner. Here is a sanctuary, not in Hebron, not in Shechem, or Kadesh, but in Mount Zion, the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalemand God is known in her palaces for a refuge.<\/p>\n<p>The way to the city was plain, and the distance short. When a man is not in a proper frame to be blest, conversion seems difficult, or impossible. But when the mind is deeply impressed, God is easy of access. The sinner has but to ask, and he shall receive; but to seek, and he shall find. He may come with all his misery to obtain mercy, with all his wants to be supplied. The way is so plain, that he who runs may read; and the wayfaring man, though a fool, shall not err therein.<\/p>\n<p>It was a consciousness of the sure approach of danger, which drove the manslayer to the sanctuary. The case is parallel with the sinner. While a man fancies himself safe in his sins; while he believes that the evil day is distant, or shall never come; while health and affluence smile around, he glides with the stream, and despises fear. But let him remember, that heaven is already armed against the guilty; that the tempest sometimes bursts at noon; for the Son of man cometh at an hour when we are not aware. No man could take refuge in those cities in his sins, no murderer could find a sanctuary there; and even in a case of chancemedley, when a man fell by an accidental blow, his case was cautiously heard. Here the superior glory and liberty of the gospel appear over the law. Sinners of the foulest class may find life and refuge in Christ, provided they hate and renounce their sins; provided their repentance is accompanied with all the fruits of restitution and reparation in their power, and with the purest purposes of piety for the future. Oh how happy is the sinner, sheltered in the arms and protected with the covenant of God. Let him for ever abide in his refuge, for his Highpriest having once died, liveth for ever in glory with the Father. If he leave this city, the divine justice is ready to punish his apostasy, and all his former sins. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Sutcliffe&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Numbers 35<\/p>\n<p>The opening lines of this most interesting chapter set before us the gracious provision which Jehovah made for His servants the Levites. Each of the tribes of Israel was privileged &#8211; that we say not bound &#8211; to furnish the Levites with a certain number of cities with their suburbs, according to their ability. &#8220;All the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be forty and eight cities: them shall ye give with their suburbs. And the cities which ye shall give shall be of the possession of the children of Israel: from them that have many ye shall give many; But from them that have few ye shall give few: every one shall give of his cities unto the Levites, according to his inheritance which he inheriteth.&#8221; Verses 7, 8.<\/p>\n<p>The Lord&#8217;s servants were wholly cast upon Him for their portion. They had no inheritance or possession saving himself. Blessed inheritance! Precious portion! None like it, in the judgement of faith. Blessed are all those who can truly say to the Lord, &#8220;Thou art the portion of my cup, and the lot of my inheritance.&#8221; God took care of His dependent servants, and permitted the whole congregation of Israel to taste the hallowed privilege &#8211; for such it most assuredly was &#8211; of being co-workers with Him in providing for those who had willingly devoted themselves to His work, abandoning all besides.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, then, we learn that, out of the twelve tribes of Israel, forty and eight cities, with their suburbs, were to be given over to the Levites; and out of these again, the Levites had the privilege of furnishing six cities to be a refuge for the poor manslayer. Most lovely provision! Lovely in its origin! Lovely in its object!<\/p>\n<p>The cities of refuge were situated, three on the eastern and three on the western side of Jordan. whether Reuben and Gad were right or wrong in settling east of that significant boundary, God in His mercy would not leave the slayer without a refuge from the avenger of blood. On the contrary, like Himself, He ordained that those cities which were designed as a merciful provision for the slayer should be so situated that wherever there was need of a shelter that shelter might be near at hand. There was always a city within reach of any who might be exposed to the sword of the avenger. This was worthy of our God. If any slayer happened to fall into the hands of the avenger of blood, it was not for want of a refuge near at hand, but because he had failed to avail himself of it. All necessary provision was made; the cities were named, and well defined, and publicly known. Everything was made as plain, as simple, and as easy as possible. Such was God&#8217;s gracious way.<\/p>\n<p>No doubt, the slayer was responsible to put forth all his energy to reach the sacred precincts; and, no doubt, he would. It is not at all likely that any one would be so blind or so infatuated as to fold his arms, in cool indifference, and say, &#8220;If I am fated to escape, I shall escape, my efforts are not needed. If I am not fated to escape, I cannot escape, my efforts are of no use.&#8221; We cannot fancy a manslayer using such silly language, or being guilty of such blind fatality as this. He knew too well that if the avenger could but lay his hand upon him, all such notions would be of small account. There was but the one thing to be done, and that was to escape for his life &#8211; to flee from impending judgement to find his safe abode within the gates of the city of refuge. Once there, he could breathe freely. No evil could overtake him there. The moment He crossed the threshold of the gate, he was as safe as God&#8217;s provision could make him. if a hair of his head could be touched, within the bounds of the city, it could but be a dishonour and a reproach upon the ordinance of God. True, he had to keep close. He dared not venture outside the gate. Within, he was perfectly safe. Without, he was thoroughly exposed. He could not even visit his friends. He was an exile from his Father&#8217;s house. He was a prisoner of hope. Absent from the home of his heart&#8217;s affections, he waited for the death of the high priest, which was to set him perfectly free and restore him, once more, to his inheritance and to his people.<\/p>\n<p>Now, we believe that this beautiful ordinance had special reference to Israel. They have killed the Prince of life; but the question is, As which are they viewed by God, as the murderer or as the slayer? If the former, there is no refuge, no hope. No murderer could be sheltered within the city of refuge. Here is the law of the case, as stated in Joshua 20, &#8220;The Lord also spake unto Joshua, saying, Speak to the children of Israel, saying, Appoint out for you cities of refuge, whereof I spake unto you by the hand of Moses: that the slayer that killeth any person unawares and unwittingly may flee thither: and they shall be your refuge from the avenger of blood. And when he that doth flee unto one of those cities shall stand at the entering of the gate of the city, and shall declare his cause in the ears of the elders of that city, they shall take him into the city unto them, and give him a place, that he may dwell among them. And if the avenger of blood pursue after him, then they shall not deliver the slayer up into his hand; because he smote his neighbour unwittingly, and hated him not beforetime, And he shall dwell in that city, until he stand before the congregation for judgement, and until the death of the high priest that shall be in those days: then shall the slayer return, and come unto his own city, and unto his own house, unto the city from whence he fled.&#8221; Vv 1-6.<\/p>\n<p>But with respect to the murderer; the law was rigid and unbending &#8220;The murderer shall surely be put to death. The revenger of blood himself shall slay the murderer, when he meeteth him.&#8221; Numbers 35.<\/p>\n<p>Israel, then, through the marvellous grace of God, will be treated as a slayer and not as a murderer. &#8220;Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.&#8221; These potent words ascended to the ear and to the heart of the God of Israel. They were heard and answered; nor are we to suppose that the answer was exhausted in its application on the day of Pentecost. No; it still holds good, and its efficacy will be illustrated in the future history of the house of Israel. That people are now under God&#8217;s keeping. They are exiles from the land and the home of their fathers. But the time is coming when they shall be restored to their own land, not by the death of the high priest &#8211; blessed be His deathless name! He can never die &#8211; but He will leave His present position, and come forth, in a new character, as the Royal Priest, to sit upon His throne. Then shall the exile return to his long-lost home, and his forfeited inheritance. But not till then, else it would be ignoring the fact that they killed the Prince of life, which were impossible. The manslayer mast remain out of his possession until the appointed time; but he is not to be treated as a murderer, because he did it unwittingly. &#8220;I obtained mercy&#8221; &#8211; says the Apostle Paul, speaking as a pattern to Israel because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.&#8221; &#8220;And now, brethren,&#8221; says Peter, &#8220;I wot that through ignorance ye did it, as did also your rulers.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>These passages, together with the precious intercession of the slain One, do, in the most distinct manner, place Israel on the ground of the manslayer, and not on the ground of the murderer. God has provided a refuge and a shelter for His much-loved people, and in due time they shall return to their long-lost dwellings, in that land which Jehovah gave as a gift to Abraham his friend for ever.<\/p>\n<p>Such we believe to be the true interpretation of the ordinance of the city of refuge. Were we to view it as bearing upon the case of a sinner taking refuge in Christ, it could only be in a very exceptional way, inasmuch as we should find ourselves surrounded, on all hands, by points of contrast rather than by points of similarity. For in the first place, the manslayer, in the city of refuge, was not exempt from judgement, as we learn from Joshua 20: 6. But for the believer in Jesus there is and can be no judgement, for the simplest of all reasons, that Christ has borne the judgement instead.<\/p>\n<p>Again, there was a possibility of the slayer&#8217;s falling into the hands of the avenger, if he ventured outside the gates of the city. The believer in Jesus can never perish; he is as safe as the Saviour himself.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, as regards the slayer, it was a question of temporal safety and life in this world. As regards the believer in Jesus, it is a question of eternal salvation and life everlasting in the world to come. In fact, in almost every particular, it is striking contrast rather than similarity.<\/p>\n<p>One grand point there is common to both, and that is, the point of exposure to imminent danger and the urgent need of fleeing for refuge. If it would have been wild folly on the part of the slayer to linger or hesitate for a moment, until he found himself safely lodged in the city of refuge, it is surely still wilder folly, yea, the very height of madness, on the part of the sinner, to linger or hesitate in coming to Christ. The avenger might perhaps fail to lay hold on the slayer even though he were not in the city; But judgement must overtake the sinner out of Christ. There is no possibility of escape, if there is the thickness of a gold leaf between the soul and Christ. Solemn thought! May it have its due weight in the heart of the reader who is yet in his sins! May he find no rest &#8211; not one moment&#8217;s rest, until he has fled for refuge to lay hold of the hope set before him in the gospel. Judgement impends, certain, solemn judgement. It is not only that the avenger may come, but judgement must come upon all who are out of Christ.<\/p>\n<p>Oh! unconverted, thoughtless, careless reader &#8211; should this volume fall into the hands of such &#8211; hear the warning voice! Flee for thy life! Tarry not, we entreat thee! Delay is madness. Every moment is precious. You know not the hour in the which you may be cut down, and consigned to that place in the which a single ray of hope, not even the faintest glimmer, can ever visit you &#8211; the place of eternal night, eternal woe, eternal torment &#8211; the place of a deathless worm and an unquenchable flame. Beloved friend, do let us entreat thee, in these few closing lines of our volume, to come now, just as thou art, to Jesus, who stands with open arms and loving heart, ready to receive thee, to shelter, to save, and to bless, according to all the love of His heart, and the perfect efficacy of His name and His sacrifice. May God the Holy Spirit, by His own resistless energy, lead thee, just now, to come. &#8220;Come unto me,&#8221; says the loving Lord and Saviour, &#8220;all ye that labour and are heavy laden and I will give you rest.&#8221; Precious words! May they fall, with divine power, upon many a weary heart!<\/p>\n<p>Here we close our meditations upon this marvellous section of the volume of God;* and, in doing so, we are impressed with a profound sense of the depth and richness of the mine to which we have sought to conduct the reader, and also of the excessive feebleness and poverty of the suggestions which we have been enabled to offer. However, our confidence is in the living God, that He will, by His Holy Spirit, lead the heart and mind of the Christian reader into the enjoyment of His own precious truth, and thus fit him, more and more, for His service in these last evil days, that the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be magnified, and His truth maintained in living power. May God, in His abounding mercy, grant this, for Jesus Christ&#8217;s sake!<\/p>\n<p>{*Chapter 36 has been referred to in our meditation on chapter 17} <\/p>\n<p>C. H. M. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Mackintosh&#8217;s Notes on the Pentateuch<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Num 35:1-8. Appointment of Levitical Cities and Cities of Refuge.This law must be supplementary to, and later than, the law in Num 18:8-32, which does not contemplate the assignment to the Levites of cities in addition to the tithes, and indeed, definitely denies to them any territorial possessions (Num 18:20; cf. Deu 18:1). The cities here bestowed on the Levites are forty-eight in number, and are enumerated in Joshua 21; but the facts (a) that some did not come fully under Israelitish ownership until after Joshuas death (e.g. Gezer, see p. 28, Jdg 1:29*, 1Ki 9:16*), and (b) that priests (who naturally shared the lands conferred upon the tribe of Levi) dwelt at a later time in several places (e.g. Nob and Shiloh) which are not included in the list of cities named in Jos 21:13-19, render the grant of such cities extremely doubtful. In the delimitation of the pasture grounds (Num 35:2 mg.) of the cities, there is a curious oversight, for since they are to extend 1000 cubits from each city in every direction, forming a square of which each side is only 2000 cubits, the city within the square is reduced to a point, Included within the forty-eight cities were six cities of refuge where involuntary homicides could find protection. In Deu 19:7 f. only three cities (which are named in Deu 4:41-43) are represented as assigned at once, it being directed that other three are to be added if Israels territory should be enlarged, whilst in Jos 20:7 f. the selection of all of them is ascribed to Joshua. Historically, however, the limitation of asylum to particular cities was doubtless introduced at a later date even than Joshuas age. At first any altar of Yahweh afforded refuge (Exo 21:13 f.; cf. 1Ki 1:50; 1Ki 2:28); but after the abolition of the local altars and the centralisation of worship enjoined in Dt., the right of asylum was reserved for certain ancient sacred places. The connexion of the right of asylum with sanctuaries was common in antiquity, and existed (for example) among the Phnicians at Tyre, Paphos, and Amalthus, among the Syrians at Daphn, near Antioch, and among the Greeks at Tegea. The privilege belonged to Christian churches in the Middle Ages; and some Indian tribes in N. America also have places where man-slayers are protected (Frazer, Pausanias, iii. p. 315). See further Deu 19:1-13*, Joshua 20*.<\/p>\n<p>Num 35:6. Read, And as for the cities which ye shall give unto the Levites, six cities of refuge ye shall give, etc.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Peake&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>CITIES GIVEN TO THE LEVITES<\/p>\n<p>(vs.1-8)<\/p>\n<p>The Levites had no tribal possession, but were to be scattered among the tribes so as to serve and teach the ways of the Lord (Deu 33:10). Therefore the tribes were required to give cities to the Levites where they might have tribes were required to give cities to the Levites where they might have land around the cities where they could care for their livestock (vs.1-3). Among these cities six were to be appointed as cities of refuge (v.6), and 42 were to be added to these, making 48 in all. The number of cities in each tribe depended on the size of the tribe, some having more, some having less to give to the Levites (vs.7-8). The Levites being present in all the tribes ought to have served to maintain unity in Israel, through their presence did not preserve the tribes from division in the time of Rehoboam (1Ki 12:1-23). In fact, sad to say, there seemed to be little realization among the Levites themselves of the great dignity conferred on them in being chosen by God for the work given them, and rather than being drawn together in unity, we see in the book of judges an independent spirit in Levites that only sought their own will (Jdg 17:7-13; Jdg 19:1-2).<\/p>\n<p>SIX CITIES OF REFUGE<\/p>\n<p>(vs.9-34)<\/p>\n<p>Verse 6 has told us these six cities belonged to the Levites. The name of these cities are found in Jos 20:1-9. A refuge was in this way provided for one who had accidentally killed a person, for it might well be that a relative or friend of the victim would seek retaliation by killing the person responsible. In that city that person would be safe until such time as there was an investigation into the case. If it proved to be a case of actual murder, he must be delivered up to the avenger (vs..9-12).<\/p>\n<p>Three of the cities were to be appointed on the east of the Jordan River and three on the west (v.14). But a deliberate murderer could not count on the protection of the city of refuge. If one struck another with an iron instrument, or stone or wooden weapon purposely, this was murder and the murderer was to be sentenced to death (vs.16-18). In fact, the avenger of blood was to put the murderer to death (v.19).<\/p>\n<p>If a case was not fully clear as to whether there was intent to cause harm or not, when the manslayer came to the city of refuge, &#8220;then the congregation shall judge between the manslayer and the avenger of blood according to these judgments&#8221; (v.24). &#8220;There judgments&#8221; involve the question of whether the case was one of murder, as seen in verses 16-21, or whether it was unintentional manslaughter, as in verses 22-23.<\/p>\n<p>The slayer was safe inside the city until this judgment took place. Then, if the person was found guilty of murder he was to be delivered to the avenger of blood, who was to put him to death. If not found guilty, he was to be allowed to remain in the city of refuge without fear of death. Then he must remain there until the death of the high priest, for if found outside the city, the avenger of blood was allowed to kill him.<\/p>\n<p>After the death of the high priest he could return to his own home, and would be safe from any reprisal by the avenger of blood (vs.25-28).<\/p>\n<p>All of this emphasizes God&#8217;s care for the life of mankind. But there is here also a typical lesson as regards Israel&#8217;s guilt in the death of the Lord Jesus. While on the cross He pled, &#8220;Father forgive them, for they do not know what they do&#8221; (Luk 23:34). Thus, Israel was given the benefit of whatever doubt there might be, not considered as guilty of murder but of unintentional manslaughter. Certainly there were some who proved to be murderers, as Stephen witnesses in Act 7:52. However, for centuries now Israel has been allowed to remain in a refuge and will not be free until the time typified by the death of the high priest.<\/p>\n<p>In the Numerical Bible (Numbers &#8212; Page 519) F.W.Grant writes, &#8220;Through shut out from their inheritance in the meantime, the time will come in which they (Israel) shall be restored to it. And that time will be when the priesthood of the Lord as now exercised in heaven shall be at an end, and He shall come forth, Priest and King in one, to bring in the times of the restitution of which the prophets speak. This, then, would seem to answer to the death of the high priest, while it may be none the less true that His being &#8216;anointed with the holy oil&#8217; here points Him out as the One whose work has been to make atonement. The special high priestly work of &#8216;the day of atonement&#8217; would seem referred to, with its ordinance of the scapegoat and its blessing for Israel, when He who went into the holy place comes forth. It is on the day of atonement that the trumpet of jubilee sounds, and every man returns to his possession.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In the New Testament the willful murderer, even today, is indicated in Heb 10:26 : &#8220;If we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful expectation of judgment and fiery indignation.&#8221; Verse 29 shows this refers to one who &#8220;has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace.&#8221; One therefore who has a malicious attitude toward the Lord Jesus, after having been intellectually enlightened as to Christ&#8217;s own character, shows himself guilty of the murder of the Son of God.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Grant&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold\">Levitical cities 35:1-8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The previous chapter dealt with the general borders of the land and its tribal boundaries. This one gives regulations concerning special towns in the land.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: See Menahem Haran, &quot;Studies in the Account of the Levitical Cities,&quot; Journal of Biblical Literature 80:1 (March 1961):45-54, and 80:2 (June 1961):156-65.] <\/span> According to the plan of revelation established previously in Numbers, directions regarding the Levites follow directions regarding the other tribes (cf. Num 1:1-54; ch. 2 and Num 3:1-49; Num 26:1-62).<\/p>\n<p>The Levites received four towns for each of the 12 tribal areas. However there were more Levitical towns in the larger tribes and fewer in the smaller tribes. The writer of the Book of Joshua identified these towns in Joshua 21.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: See my notes on Joshua 21 for a map showing these cities.] <\/span> Very few Israelites lived more than 10 miles from a Levitical town. God provided these so that the Levites, whose responsibilities included the teaching and counseling of the other Israelites in the Law, would not live far from anyone in Israel.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: See Jacob Milgrom, &quot;The Levitical Town: An Exercise in Realistic Planning,&quot; Journal of Jewish Studies 33:12 (Spring-Autumn 1982):185-88.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p>The pasture lands provided the Levites with a small agricultural income, but they received most of their support from the tithes and offerings of God&rsquo;s people.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>THE CITIES OF REFUGE<\/p>\n<p>Num 35:1-34; Num 36:1-13<\/p>\n<p>1. THE INHERITANCE OF THE LEVITES<\/p>\n<p>The order relating to the Levitical cities may be said to describe an ideal settlement. We have, at all events, no evidence that the command was ever fully carried out. It was to the effect that in forty-eight cities, scattered throughout the whole of the tribes in proportion to their population, dwellings were to be allotted to the Levites, who were also to have the suburbs of those cities; that is to say, the fields lying immediately about them, &#8220;for their cattle, and for their substance, and for all their beasts.&#8221; It is assumed that closely surrounding each of the cities there shall be pasturage, and that a regular or fairly regular boundary can be made at the distance of one thousand cubits from the city. Singularly, nothing whatever is said as to the duties of the Levites thus distributed throughout the land on both sides Jordan, from Kedesh Naphtali in the north, to Debir in the south, according to Jos 21:1-45. It is not said that they were to perform any ecclesiastical functions or instruct the people in the Divine Law. Yet something of the kind must have been intended, since many of them were at a great and inconvenient distance from Shiloh and other places at which the ark was stationed.<\/p>\n<p>According to this statute, there is, for one thing, to be no seclusion of the Levites from the rest of the people. If clergy and laity, as we say, are distinguished, the distinction is made as small as possible. From the terms of the present order {Num 35:2, ff.} it might appear that the towns given to the Levites were to be occupied by them exclusively. In parallel passages, however, it is clear that the Levites dwelt along with others in the cities; and in this way, as well as by engaging in pastoral work, they were kept closely in touch with the men of the tribes. The land allotted to them was not sufficient for farms; but the tithes and offerings were to a large extent for their support. And the arrangement thus sketched is held with some reason to be an ideal for every order of men called to similar duty. The Levites, indeed, were not at first spiritual. Neither the nature of their work at the sanctuary, nor the conditions of their life, implied any special consecration of heart. But the general tone of a religious ministry advances; and even in Davids time there were Levites who served God in no mere routine, but with earnest mind, with a measure of inspiration. The ordinance here is in behalf of a consecrated order devoted to the service of God.<\/p>\n<p>The suburbs, or pasture lands about the cities, are measured a thousand cubits broad, and are to be two thousand cubits along each of the four boundaries. If the figures given are correct it would seem that, although the wall of the city is spoken of, the measurement must really have begun in the centre of the city; otherwise there could never have been a square of land, cities not taking that form; nor could a boundary of two thousand cubits on each aspect, north, south, east, and west, be made out. The cities must often have been small, a cluster of poor huts built of clay or rude brick, with a wall of similar material. We need imagine no stately dwellings or fine pleasure grounds when we read here of the provision for the Levites. Within the wall they had their bare, mean cottages; outside, there might be a breadth of perhaps four hundred yards of poor enough ground which they could claim. But as the tithes were not always paid, so the dwellings and the pasturage may not always have been allotted. There is not much reason to wonder that in a short time after the settlement in Canaan the Levites, finding no special work at the sanctuary, and obtaining little support from the offerings, gradually became part of the tribes in which they happened to have their abode. Hence we read in Jdg 17:7 of &#8220;a young man out of Bethlehem-judah, of the family of Judah, who was a Levite.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The main purpose of the present statute, so far as it refers to the dwellings of the Levites, would appear to have been economic, not religious. It was that all the tribes might have their share of maintaining the servants of the sanctuary. But it seems likely that a class half priestly would, in lack of other duty, attach itself to the high places, and set up a worship not contemplated by the law. And if this is to be regarded as a misfortune, the choice of the Levitical cities is in some cases difficult to account for. Kedesh in Naphtali had been a famous holy place of the Canaanites; so probably were others, as Gibeon, Shechem, Gath-rimmon. The special symbol of Jehovah was the ark; and where the ark was the principal national rites were always performed. But in a time of pioneer work and constant alarms the central sanctuary could not always be visited, and the Levites appear to have lent themselves to worship of a local kind.<\/p>\n<p>An ecclesiastical order needs great faithfulness if it is not to become irreligious through poverty, or proud and domineering through assumption of power with God. To live poorly as those Levites were expected to live, without the opportunity of earthly gain, while often the share of national support which was due fell to a very low and wholly inadequate amount, would try the fidelity of the best of them. No large claim need be made in behalf of men specially engaged in the work of the Christian Church; and great wealth seems inappropriate to those who represent Christ. But what is their due should at least be paid cheerfully, and the more so if they give earnest minds to the service of God and man. With all faults that have at various periods of the Churchs history stained the character of the clergy, they have maintained a testimony on behalf of the higher life, and the sacredness of duty to God. A materialistic age will make light of that service, and point to ecclesiastical pride and covetousness as more than counterbalancing any good that is done. But a broad and fair survey of the course of events will show that the witness-bearing of a special class to religious ideas has kept alive that reverence on which morality depends. True, the ideal of a theocracy would dispense with an order set apart to teach the law of God and to enforce His claims on men. But for the times that now are, even in the most Christian country, the witness-bearing of a gospel ministry is absolutely needful. And we may take the statute before us as anticipating a general necessity, that necessity which the apostles of our Lord met when they ordained presbyters in every Church, and gave them commission to feed the flock of God.<\/p>\n<p>2. THE CITIES OF REFUGE<\/p>\n<p>Among the forty-eight cities that provide dwellings for the Levites, six are to be cities of refuge, &#8220;that the man-slayer which killeth any person unwittingly may flee thither.&#8221; Three of these cities are to be on the east and three on the west side of Jordan. According to other enactments they are to be distributed so as to be reached quite easily from all parts of the country. They were sanctuaries for any one fleeing from the &#8220;avenger of blood&#8221;; but the protection found in them was not by any means absolute. Only if there appeared to be good cause for admitting a fugitive was he afforded refuge even for a time, and his trial followed as soon as possible. The laws of protection and judgment are here laid down not fully, though with some detail.<\/p>\n<p>We notice first that the statutes regarding the manslayer are frankly based on the primitive practice of blood revenge. It was the duty of the nearest male relation of one who had been slain to seek the blood of the man who slew him. The duty was held to be one which he owed to his brother, to the community, and to God; and the principle of retribution in such cases was embodied in the saying, &#8220;Whoso sheddeth mans blood, by man shall his blood be shed.&#8221; The goel, or redeemer, whose part it was to recover for a family land that had been alienated, or a member of the family who had fallen into slavery, had it also laid on him to seek justice on behalf of the family when one belonging to it had been killed. The evils of this method of punishing crime are very evident. All the heat of personal affection for the man put to death, the keen desire to maintain the honour of family or clan, and the bitter hatred of the tribe to which the homicide belonged, made the pursuit of the criminal swift and the stroke fierce and unrelenting. A goel put on a false track might easily strike to the ground an innocent person; and he would feel himself bound to incur all risks in avenging his kinsman. Often whole tribes of Arabs are involved in the blood feud beginning in a single stroke, and wherever the custom prevails there is the gravest danger of wide and sanguinary strife. The enactments of our passage are intended to counteract in part these abuses and dangers.<\/p>\n<p>We may wonder that the Hebrew law, enlightened on many points, did not wholly abolish the practice of blood revenge. Justice is not the private affair of any man, even the nearest kinsman of one who has been injured. We have learned that the administration of law, especially in cases of murder or supposed murder, is best taken out of the hands of a private avenger, whose aim is to strike as soon and as effectually as possible. It remains of course for those whose friend has died by violence to institute inquiries and do their utmost to bring the criminal to justice. But even when a mans guilt seems clear his trial is before an impartial judge by whom all relevant facts are elicted. In Hebrew law there was no complete provision for such an administration of justice. The ancient custom could not be easily set aside, for one thing; the passionate Oriental nature would cling to it. And for another, there was no organisation for repressing disorder and dealing with crime. A certain risk had to be run, in order that the sanctity of human life might be clearly kept before a people too ready to strike as well as to curse. But if the man-slayer was able to reach a city of refuge he had his trial. The old custom was checked by the right of the fugitive to claim sanctuary and to have his case investigated.<\/p>\n<p>As for the sanctuary cities, there may also have been some imperfect custom which anticipated them. In Egypt there certainly was; and the Canaanites, who had learned not a little from Egypt, may have had sacred places that afforded protection to the fugitive. But the Mosaic law prevented abuse of the means of evading justice. He who had killed another was a criminal before God. The blood of the brother he had slain defiled the land and cried to Heaven. No sanctuary must protect a man who had with homicidal purpose struck another. There was to be neither priestly protection, nor sanctuary, nor ransom for him. The Divine principle of justice took up the cause.<\/p>\n<p>In Num 35:16 ff. there are examples of cases which are adjudged to be murder. To smite one with an instrument of iron, or with a stone grasped in the hand presumably large enough to kill, or with a weapon of wood, a heavy club or bar, is adjudged to be deliberate homicide. Then if hatred can be proved, and one known to have cherished enmity towards another is shown to have thrust him down, or hurled at him, lying in wait, or to have smitten him with the hand, such a one is to be allowed no sanctuary. On the other hand, the cases of inadvertent homicide are defined: &#8220;if he thrust him suddenly without enmity, or hurled upon him anything without lying in wait, or with any stone, whereby a man may die, seeing him not.&#8221; These, of course, are simply instances, not exhaustive categories.<\/p>\n<p>It is not here stated, but in Jos 20:4 the statute runs that the manslayer who fled to a sanctuary city was to state his cause before the elders, no doubt at the gate. Their preliminary decision had to be given in his favour before he could be admitted. But the real trial was by the &#8220;congregation,&#8221; Num 35:24, some assembly representing the tribe within whose territory the crime has been committed, or more likely a gathering of headmen of the whole nation. Further, at Num 35:30 it is enacted that the charge of the avenger of blood against any one must be substantiated by two witnesses at least. These provisions form the basis of a sound judicial method. The rights of refuge and of revenge stand opposed to each other, and between the two a large and authoritative court gives judgment. It will be observed, moreover, that the judiciary was not ecclesiastical. Where power was to be exercised in the name of God, the priests were not to wield it, but the people. The form of government is far nearer a democracy than a hierocracy.<\/p>\n<p>A singular point in the law is the term during which the unwitting manslayer who had been acquitted by the court of justice must remain in sanctuary. He is in danger of being put to death by the avenger of blood until the acting high priest dies. Till that event he must keep within the border of his city of refuge. And here the idea seems to be that the official memory of the crime which had ceremonially defiled the land rested with the high priest. He was supposed to keep in mind, on Gods behalf, the bloodshed which even though unintentional was still polluting. His death accordingly obliterated the recollection that kept the man-slayer under peril of the goals revenge. The high priest had no power to acquit or condemn a criminal, nor to enforce against him the punishment of his fault. But he was the guardian of the sacredness of the land in the midst of which Jehovah dwelt.<\/p>\n<p>With regard to the symbolical meaning of the cities of refuge, it is needful to exercise great care at every point. The man-slayer, for instance, fleeing from the avenger of blood, is not a type of the sinner fleeing for his life from the justice of God. If guilty of murder, a man could find no safety even in the city of refuge. It was only if he was not guilty of premeditated crime that he found sanctuary. The refuge cities, however, represented Divine justice as in contrast to the justice or rather the vengeance of manta that Divine justice which Christ came to reveal, giving Himself for us upon the cross. Human righteousness errs sometimes by excess, sometimes by defect. Certain offences it would never condemn, others it would passionately and remorselessly punish. The sanctuary cities show a higher idea of justice. But all men are guilty before God. And there is mercy with Him not only for the unwitting transgressor, but for the man who has to confess deliberate sin, the forfeiture of his life to Divine law.<\/p>\n<p>The singular opinion has been expressed that the death of the high priest was expiatory. This is said to be &#8220;unmistakably evident&#8221; from the addition of the clause, &#8220;who has been anointed with the holy oil&#8221; (Num 35:25). The argument is that as the high priests life and work &#8220;acquired a representative signification through this anointing with the Holy Ghost, his death might also be regarded as a death for the sins of the people by virtue of the Holy Ghost imparted to him, through which the unintentional manslayer received the benefits of the propitiation for his sins before God, so that he could return cleansed to his native town without further exposure to the vengeance of the avenger of blood.&#8221; And thus, it is said, &#8220;The death of the earthly high priest became a type of that of the Heavenly One, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, that we might be redeemed from our transgressions.&#8221; But although many of the Rabbins and fathers held this view as to the expiatory nature of the high priests death, there is absolutely nothing in Scripture or reason to support it. All the expiation, moreover, which the Mosaic law provided for was ceremonial. If the death of the high priest was efficacious only so far as his functions were, then there could be no atonement or appearance of atonement for moral guilt, even that of culpable homicide for instance. The death of the high priest was therefore in no sense a type of the death of Christ, the whole meaning of which lies in relation to moral, not ceremonial, offences.<\/p>\n<p>While it cannot be said that &#8220;light is thrown by the provisions regarding cities of refuge on the atonement of Christ&#8221;-for that would be the morning star shedding light on the sun-still there are some points of illustration; and one of these may be noted. As the protection of the sanctuary city extended only to the boundaries or precincts belonging to it, so the defence the sinner has in Christ can be enjoyed only so far as life is brought within the range of the influence and commands of Christ. He who would be safe must be a Christian. It is not mere profession of faith -&#8220;Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Thy name?&#8221;-but hearty obedience to the laws of duty coming from Christ that gives safety. &#8220;Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect?&#8221; -and the elect are those who yield the fruit of the Spirit, who are lovers of God and their fellowmen, who show their faith by their works. It is a misrepresentation of the whole teaching of Scripture to declare that salvation can be had, apart from life and practice, in some mystical relation with Christ which is hardly even to be stated in words.<\/p>\n<p>3. TRIBAL INHERITANCE<\/p>\n<p>Already we have heard the appeal of the daughters of Zelophehad to be allowed an inheritance as representing their father. Now a question which has arisen regarding them must be solved. The five women have not cared to undertake the work of the upland farm allotted to them, somewhere about the head waters of the Yarmuk. They have, in fact, as heiresses been somewhat in request among the young men of different tribes; and they are almost on the point of giving their hands to husbands of their choice. But the chiefs of the family of Manasseh to which they belong find a danger here. The young women may perhaps choose men of Gad, or men of Judah. Then their land, which is part of the land of Manasseh, will go over to the tribes of the husbands. There will be a few acres of Judah or of Gad in the north of Manassehs land. And if other young women throughout the tribes, who happen to be heiresses, marry according to their own liking, by-and-by the tribe territories will be all confused. Is this to be allowed? If not, how is the evil to be prevented?<\/p>\n<p>The national centre and general unity of Israel could not in the early period be expected to suffice. Without tribal coherence and a sense of corporate life in each family the Israelites would be lost among the people of the land. Especially would this tend to take place on the eastern side of Jordan and in the far north. Now the clan unity went with the land. It was as those dwelling in a certain district the descendants of one progenitor realised their brotherhood. Hence there was good reason for the appeal of the Manassites and the legislation that followed. Women who succeeded to land were to marry within the families of their fathers. Men were apparently not forbidden to marry women of another tribe if they were not heiresses. But the possession of land by women carried with it a responsibility and deprived them of a certain part of freedom. Every daughter who had an inheritance was to be wife to one of her near kin; so should no inheritance remove from one family to another; the tribes should cleave every one to his own inheritance.<\/p>\n<p>The exigencies of the early settlement appear to have required this law; and it was maintained as far as possible, so that he who lived in a certain region might know himself not only a Reubenite or a Benjamite as the case might be, but a son of Hanoch of the Reubenites, or a son of Ard among the Benjamites. But we may doubt whether the unity of the nation was not delayed by the means used to keep the land for each tribe and each tribe on its own land. The arrangement was perhaps inevitable; yet it certainly belonged to a primitive social order. The homogeneity of the people would have been helped and the tribes held more closely together by interchange of land. In every law made at an early stage of a peoples development there is involved something unsuitable to after periods. And perhaps one error made by the Israelites was to cling too long and too closely to tribal descent and make too much of genealogy. The enactment regarding the marriage of heiresses within their own families was an old one, bearing the authority of Moses. There came a time when it should have been revoked and everything done that was possible to weld the tribes together. But the old customs held; and what was the result? The tribes east of Jordan, as well as Dan and Asher, were well-nigh lost to the Confederacy at an early date. Subsequently a division began between the northern and southern peoples. We cannot doubt that partly for want of family alliances between Judah and Ephraim, and subordination of tribal to national sentiment, there came the separation into two kingdoms.<\/p>\n<p>For the tribe idea and the other of making inheritance of land a governing matter, the Israelites would seem to have paid dearly. And there is danger still in the attempt to make a nation cohere on any mere territorial basis. It is the spirit, the fidelity to a common purpose, and the pervasive enthusiasm that give real unity. If these are wanting, or if the general aim is low and material, the security of families in the soil may be exceedingly mischievous. At the same time the old feeling is proved to have a deep root in fact. Territorial solidarity is indispensable to a nation; and the exclusion of a people from large portions of its land is an evil intolerable. Christianity has not done its work where the Church, the teacher of righteousness, is unconcerned for this great matter. How can religion flourish where brotherhood fails? And how can brotherhood survive in a nation when the right of occupying the soil is practically denied? First among the economic questions which claim Christian settlement is that of land tenure, land right. Christianity carries forward the principles of the Mosaic law into higher ranges, where justice is not less, but more-where brotherhood has a nobler purpose, a finer motive.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And the LORD spoke unto Moses in the plains of Moab by Jordan [near] Jericho, saying, 1 8. The Levitical cities The Levites are to receive 48 cities with their surrounding land (E.VV. &lsquo;suburbs&rsquo;), six of which are to be &lsquo;cities of refuge.&rsquo; The cities are to be contributed by each tribe in numbers proportionate &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-numbers-351-2\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Numbers 35:1&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4855","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4855","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4855"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4855\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}