4<\/strong>. Howbeit there shall be no poor with thee<\/em> ] Dillm. etc. transl.: should be no poor<\/em>. But this is not a correct rendering of the Heb. which uses the positive form of the vb.; and it weakens the writer’s confident emphasis on his ideal. He is stating not so much what should be<\/em> as what shall be, if only<\/em> ( ra<\/em>: see on Deu 10:15<\/span>) Israel obeys the law ( Deu 15:5<\/em><\/span>). See introd. note above. The rest of Deu 15:4<\/em><\/span> is a parenthesis, and probably a later expansion.<\/p>\n for the Lord will surely bless thee<\/em> ] Sam., LXX add thy God<\/em>; cp. Deu 2:7<\/span>, Deu 28:8<\/span>.<\/p>\n giveth thee for an inheritance<\/em>, etc.] See on Deu 4:21<\/span>.<\/p>\n Deu 15:4-11<\/span><\/p>\n Save when there shall be no poor among you.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n Rural poverty<\/strong><\/p>\n These two sentences (Deu 15:4<\/span>; Deu 11:1-32<\/span>) seem, at first sight, to contradict one another. There are three ways of reading the fourth verse. Save<\/em> when <\/em>there shall be no poor among you, says the text. To the end that <\/em>there be no poor, reads the margin. Howbeit, <\/em>there shall be no poor with thee, runs the Revised Version. The explanation may be briefly put thus: There would always be poor people among them; howbeit, they must not let them be poor, i.e.<\/em> not let them sink down in poverty.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>That prevention is better than cure. There was never to be a bitter cry of outcast Canaan.<\/p>\n (1)<\/strong> We may use our influence to encourage better education. With the next generation more intelligent, temperate, and capable, pauperism will be less.<\/p>\n (2)<\/strong> We may exert our influence towards giving the labourer a heartier interest in the land he tills.<\/p>\n (3)<\/strong> We may inculcate a love of independence. Poverty is no sin, but pauperism is a reproach, and should be felt as such.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>That each nation, or community, or church, should care for its own poor.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>That charity should be systematic. The time was precise–every third year; the quantity was precise–one tenth; the object was precise–thy poor brother.<\/p>\n Contrast with these laws of Moses the teaching of Christ.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>The law of Moses aimed at preventing poverty. Christ came and found men poor. He did more than prevent; He cured. To heal sickness is a harder task than to maintain health. To deliver the needy when he crieth is often more difficult than to preserve him before he has had occasion to cry. Moses provided for keeping people up who were not overthrown; Christ actually went down to the low dark depths, and raised those who were sunk there.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>Moses taught that each nation, or community, or church, should care for its own. To go beyond that was permitted, but not enjoined. Christ taught a much broader truth than that–charity without distinction. Our neighbour is not the person who lives next door to us, or who has most affinity with us; but the person who is nearest to our helping hand, even though he be a Jew and we are Samaritans. Our first duty is to our own, but not our last. Charity begins at home, but does not end there.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>Moses was systematic, but Christ was above systems. There was no fixed standard with Him, except this. Sell all that thou hast and distribute unto the poor. There was no stint in His giving. It was not certain objects of His kindness whom He blessed: Whosoever will, let him come. It was not every few years merely that He was benevolent; but yesterday, today, and forever. (Charles T. Price.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The poor laws of the Bible; or, rules and reasons for the relief of the distressed<\/strong><\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>Contiguity. It is the poor in thy land. Those living nearest us, other things being equal, have the first claim on our charity. Let it bless as it goes; work as the leaven in the meal, from particle to particle, until it gives its spirit to the mass.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>Heartiness. Thou shalt not harden, etc. The heart must go with the deed.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>Liberality. Open thine hand wide unto him. The liberality of men is not to be judged by the sums they subscribe, but by the means they possess.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>Your relationship to the poor. He is thy brother. He has the same origin, the same nature, the same great Father, the same moral relationships, as thyself.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>The imprecation of the poor. And he cry, etc.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>The blessedness insured to the friend of the poor.<\/p>\n 4. <\/strong>The Divine plan as to the permanent existence of the poor. (Homilist.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n General Gordons benevolence<\/strong><\/p>\n A poor dragoman told me that General Gordon used to come often to his house in Jerusalem when he and his wife lay ill, and that he would take any cushion or mat and put it on the floor as a seat, there being no chairs or furniture, and sit down with his Testament to read and speak to them about Christ. But his zeal did not end with such easy philanthropy. Ascertaining that a doctors account had been incurred to the amount of three pounds, he went off secretly and paid it. Far away at Khartoum, he still thought of one whom he had thus striven to lead into the fold of Christ, and sent a letter to him which reached Jerusalem almost at the same time as the news of its writers death. That letter, said the poor Copt, I would not part with for all that is in the world. General Gordon was a real Christian. He gave away all he had to the poor in Jerusalem and the villages round, and the people mourn for him as for their father.<\/p>\n Kindness to the poor<\/strong><\/p>\n A poor sewing girl, who went to the late Dr. John F. Gray for advice, was given a, phial of medicine and told to go home and go to bed. I cant do that, doctor, the girl replied, for I am dependent on what I earn every day for my living. If thats so, said Dr. Gray, Ill change, the medicine, a little. Give <\/em>me back that phial. He then wrapped around it a ten-dollar bill, and returning it to her, reiterated his order, Go home and go to bed, adding, take the medicine, cover and all. He who takes account of the cups of cold water will not forget such deeds of kindness and charity. Oh to hear Him say at the last, Ye have done it unto Me!<\/p>\n The misery of a niggardly spirit<\/strong><\/p>\n In Rochester there lived a wealthy man who made a great profession of religion; he knelt at communion seasons and attended church with great regularity, but be would not give one shilling to the poor, nor to any other person. In the year 1862, I asked a trifle of money from him to relieve some families who were in great distress, but he refused, saying, I am a poor man, sir; I am a poor man. Listen to what this thorny-ground hearer said, as he lay with glazing, dying eyes, to a clergyman who, noticing his lips move, bent down to catch the whisper, Ninety thousand pounds, and I must leave it all behind me! If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren.<\/p>\n Brotherly love<\/strong><\/p>\n As God had chosen all Israel, so He desired that they should love as brethren. Each was to stand by the other, and all were to be zealous for the Divine honour. Thus they would bear, in contradistinction to the heathen, the character of a people consecrated to God. But even in Israel there were rich and poor, happy and unhappy. Wherever men went the poor and afflicted would be met with. Therefore the people were exhorted to hold heart and hand open–not to harden the heart nor shut the hand. Each was to be ready to stand by his fellow to see that his brother should not suffer.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>If we belong to the people of God–if this were so in Israel, much more should it be among Christians–then there will be in our hearts a tender feeling toward our fellow men–a feeling implanted by God Himself. The heart will say: This is thy brother; help him. This results from Gods love in the heart, which leads the brethren to love one another.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>But this tender-heartedness can be destroyed and the heart be hardened, even among Christians, and this against the light of conscience. They often do as it is rumoured the New Zealanders did with their children. They pressed down the necks of the children under a flinty stone in order to harden them, so Christians make their hearts sometimes hard as flints through avariciousness. The avaricious heart ever thinks: This belongs to me and to no one else, and none shall share it.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>This is not well-pleasing to God. He sees that by covetousness men are led to destruction, and to reject His love toward them. For when men are so hard-hearted, how can they have the love of God in them?<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>When this is so, then the love of God has full scope in their hearts; and thus He causes through those open hands and hearts much good to flow out into this evil world. For to His children who are ever ready to give to those who need He will give yet more, so that from their increased store they may give yet more fully to others, and that thus these also may learn to praise God.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>Therefore he who has a kind heart and open hand will experience and receive a blessing. As he gives, so he receives. It is with such as with Cornelius: Thy prayers and thine alms are come up before God. Thus, too, the way is made open for the reception of Gods gifts both temporal and spiritual. Let us all, then, endeavour to preserve a tender heart, arid not let our heart be hardened. (J. C. Blumhardt.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n And he cry unto the Lord against thee.–<\/strong><\/p>\n The cry of the poor<\/strong><\/p>\n The poor cry to heaven–from the scenes of oppressive labour, from wretched hovels, from beds of straw, shivering in the cold, from the depths of starvation, they cry! Many a poor mother in these blood-freezing nights hugs to her shivering bosom her starving infant, and tries to hush its cries of cold and hunger with the wails of her own broken heart. God alone knows the cries that rise and pierce the heavens every night from this great country–as the cant is. Alas! Alas! that from this land, overflowing with luxuries and burdened with wealth, such wails of wretchedness should rise! Against whom do they cry? Against their Maker? No! The most unobservant of them can scarcely fail to discover that He sends food enough for all. Besides, deep and ineradicably rooted in the heart of all is the sentiment that God is good–a sentiment this, which seems to me the core of conscience. Against the overreaching monopolist, the iron-hearted miser, the ruthless oppressor, the man who has the power to help but not the heart. Against all selfish men and unrighteous laws that grind the people down, they cry–and cry with unremitting vehemence too. Will He hear? Is the ear of Him who heard of old the cries of the enslaved millions in Egypt, and interposed with avenging thunders for their rescue, grown heavy? Nay, modern oppressor! Those cries shall be answered; not a solitary wail shall die away unheeded. Woe to the nation that oppresses the poor! Woe! and again, woe! when retribution comes, as come it must. (Homilist.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The poor shall never cease out of the land.<\/strong>—<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Gods ordinance of rich and poor<\/strong><\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>For instance, to begin, our own mercies are made use of under the Gospel to impel us to show mercy to others. Freely ye have received, our Lord says, freely give. Now look at this chapter. Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor and to thy needy–why? For the Lord thy God, the sixth verse says, is opening His hand wide unto thee; He is blessing thee, and blessing thee as abundantly as He said He would; the Lord thy God blesseth thee as He promised thee.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>But again, the special love of God to the poor is another reason why our hands should be opened to them. Of all the books that were ever written, no book manifests such care for the poor as the Bible. This has often been noticed by those who have closely studied this book, and many others with it, as one of the many internal evidences of its Divine original. But turn to the tenth chapter of the part of it now before us, the nineteenth verse. Love ye therefore the stranger, says God. And why? Ye yourselves, He adds, were strangers in the land of Egypt. But this is not the only reason; read what goes before. The Lord Himself loveth the stranger. The Lord loveth the stranger, love ye therefore the stranger, says God. And this applies with much greater force to the widow and fatherless. If natural feeling, as we call it–if our own parental feelings–do not incline us to open our hand to them, let the feelings of God towards them incline us to do so. I love the fatherless, He says; let us, for His sake, because He loves them, love them also.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>But here is a third motive pressed on you; this opening of our hand to the poor will lead the Lord to open His hand to us. For this thing, we read in the verse before the text–for this thing the Lord thy God shall bless thee in all thy works, and in all that thou puttest thine hand unto. This is the legal promise, you may say. And true, it is; but the Lord is not less bountiful or less generous under the Gospel than under the law. (U. Bradley, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Duty of the Church towards the poor<\/strong><\/p>\n Consider–<\/p>\n Poverty no accident<\/strong><\/p>\n The poor shall never cease out of the land. That is a remark which is not understood. Poverty is not an accident; there is a moral mystery connected with poverty which has never yet been found out. The sick chamber makes the house, the infirm member of the family rules its tenderest thinking. Poverty has a great function to work out in the social scheme, but whilst we admit this we must not take the permanence of poverty as an argument for neglect; it is an argument for solicitude, it is an appeal to benevolence, it is an opportunity to soften the heart and cultivate the highest graces of the soul. It is perfectly true that the bulk of poor people may have brought their poverty upon themselves, but who are we that we should make rough speeches about them? What have we brought upon ourselves? If we are more respectable than others, it is still the respectability of thieves and liars and selfish plotters. We, who are apparently more industrious and virtuous and regardful, are not made of different clay, and are not animated by a different blood. It is perfectly true that a thousand people may have brought todays poverty upon themselves, and they will have to suffer for it; but beyond all these accidents or incidents there is the solemn fact that poverty is a permanent quantity, for moral reasons which appeal to the higher instincts of the social commonwealth. We have that we may give, we are strong that we may support the weak, we are wise that we may teach the ignorant. Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus. No man has the slightest occasion or reason for reproaching any other man, except in relation to the immediate circumstance. If the assize were on a larger scale, and we were all involved in the scrutiny, the issue would be this, There is none righteous, no, not one. (J. Parker, D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Open thine hand wide unto thy brother<\/strong>.–<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n The duty of Christian charity<\/strong><\/p>\n The best mode of charity<\/strong><\/p>\n It is of importance not only that we should do good, but that we should do it in the best manner. A little judgment and a little reflection added to the gift does not merely enhance the value, but often gives to it the only value which it possesses, and even prevents that mischief of which thoughtless benevolence is sometimes the cause.<\/p>\n 1. <\/strong>Mankind can never be too strongly or too frequently cautioned against self-deception. If a state of vice be a state of misery, a state of vice of which we are ignorant is doubly so, from the increased probability of its duration. It is surprising how many men are cheated by flighty sentiments of humanity into a belief that they are humane, how frequently charitable words are mistaken for charitable deeds, and a beautiful picture of misery for an effectual relief of it.<\/p>\n 2. <\/strong>Another important point in the administration of charity is a proper choice of the objects we relieve. To give promiscuously is better, perhaps, than not to give at all, but instead of risking the chance of encouraging imposture, discover some worthy family struggling up against the world, a widow with her helpless children, old people incapable of labour, or orphans destitute of protection and advice; suppose you were gradually to attach yourselves to such real objects of compassion, to learn their wants, to stimulate their industry, and to correct their vices; surely these two species of charity are not to be compared together in the utility or in the extent of their effects, in the benevolence they evince or in the merits they confer.<\/p>\n 3. <\/strong>The true reason why this species of charity is so rarely practised is that we are afraid of imposing such a severe task upon our indolence, though, in truth, all these kinds of difficulties are extremely overrated. When once we have made ourselves acquainted with a poor family, and got into a regular train of seeing them at intervals, the trouble is hardly felt and the time scarcely missed; and if it is missed, ought it to be missed?<\/p>\n 4. <\/strong>These charitable visits to the poor, which I have endeavoured to inculcate, are of importance, not only because they prevent imposture by making you certain of the misery which you relieve, but because they produce an appeal to the senses which is highly favourable to the cultivation of charity. He who only knows the misfortunes of mankind at second hand and by description has but a faint idea of what is really suffered in the world. We feel, it may be said, the eloquence of description, but what is all the eloquence of art to that mighty and original eloquence with which nature pleads her cause; to the eloquence of paleness and of hunger; to the eloquence of sickness and of wounds; to the eloquence of extreme old age, of helpless infancy, of friendless want! What pleadings so powerful as the wretched hovels of the pool, and the whole system of their comfortless economy!<\/p>\n 5. <\/strong>You are not, I hope, of opinion that these kinds of cares devolve upon the clergy alone, as the necessary labours of their profession, but upon everyone whose faith teaches And whose fortune enables him to be humane.<\/p>\n 6. <\/strong>Nor let it be imagined that the duties which I have pointed out are much less imperative because the law has taken to itself the protection of the poor; the law must hold out a scanty relief, or it would encourage more misery than it relieved: the law cannot distinguish between the poverty of idleness and the poverty of misfortune; the law degrades those whom it relieves, and many prefer wretchedness to public aid; do not, therefore, spare yourselves from a belief that the poor are well taken care of by the civil power, and that individual interference is superfluous. Many die in secret,–they perish and are forgotten.<\/p>\n 7. <\/strong>Remember that every charity is short-lived and inefficacious which flows from any other motive than the right. There is a charity which originates from the romantic fiction of humble virtue and innocence in distress, but this will be soon disgusted by low artifice and scared by brutal vice. The charity which proceeds from ostentation can exist no longer than when its motives remain undetected. There is a charity which is meant to excite the feelings of gratitude, but this will meet with its termination in disappointment. That charity alone endures which flows from a sense of duty and a hope in God. This is the charity that treads in secret those paths of misery from which all but the lowest of human wretches have fled; this is that charity which no labour can weary, no ingratitude detach, no horror disgust; that toils, that pardons, that suffers, that is seen by no man, and honoured by no man, but, like the great laws of nature, does the work of God in silence, and looks to future and better worlds for its reward. (Sydney Smith, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n Verse 4<\/span>. There shall be no poor<\/B><\/I>] That is, comparatively; see De 15:11<\/span>.<\/P><\/p>\n When there shall be no poor:<\/B> so the words are an exception to the foregoing clause, which they restrain to the poor, and imply that if his brother was rich, he might exact his debt of him in that year. And indeed this law seems to be chiefly, if not wholly, designed and given in favour to the poor and to the borrower, as is manifest from Deu 15:6-11<\/span>. But the words are and may be rendered thus, as in the margin of our Bibles, To the end that there be no poor among you<\/I>. And so they contain a reason of this law, to wit, that none be impoverished and ruined by a rigid and unseasonable exaction of debts. They may also be translated thus, Nevertheless of a truth<\/I>, or assuredly<\/I>, (as the particle chi<\/I> is oft used,) there shall be no poor along you<\/I>; and the sense may be this, Though I impose this law upon you, which may seem hard and grievous, yet the truth is, supposing your performance of the conditions of Gods covenant, you shall not have any great occasion to exercise your charity and kindness in this matter, for God will greatly bless you, &c., so as you shall be in a capacity of lending, and few or none of you will have need to borrow, and thereby to expose his brethren to the inconvenience and burden of this law. Thus the connexion is plain and easy, both with the foregoing and following words. <\/P> Object.<\/B> It is said, the poor should never cease<\/I>, Deu 15:11<\/span>. <\/P> Answ.<\/B> That also is true, and affirmed by God, because he foresaw they would not perform their duty, and therefore would bereave themselves of the promised blessing. <\/P> The Lord shall greatly bless thee; <\/B>and therefore this will be no great inconvenience nor burden to thee. <\/P> <\/p>\n 4. Save when there shall be no poorman among you<\/B>Apparently a qualifying clause added to limit theapplication of the foregoing statement [De15:3<\/span>]; so that “the brother” to be released pointed toa poor borrower, whereas it is implied that if he were rich, therestoration of the loan might be demanded even during that year. Butthe words may properly be rendered (as on the Margin<\/I>) tothe end, in order that there may be no poor among you<\/I>that is,that none be reduced to inconvenient straits and poverty byunseasonable exaction of debts at a time when there was no labor andno produce, and that all may enjoy comfort and prosperity, which willbe the case through the special blessing of God on the land, providedthey are obedient.<\/P><\/p>\n Save when there shall be no poor among you<\/strong>,…. Then such a law could not take place, there would be no debts to be released; for this was never designed to screen rich persons from the payment of their just debts, or whoever were in a capacity of so doing, only such as were really poor, and unable to pay; and it supposes that this might sometimes be the case, that there were none poor in Israel, or needed the benefit of such a law; and, according to the Targum of Jonathan, it is suggested there would be none, if they were observant of the commands of God: and some take it for a promise, rendering the words “nevertheless” c, notwithstanding such a law,<\/p>\n there shall be no poor among you<\/strong>; but then it must be understood conditionally: others interpret this as the end to be answered by this law, “to the end d there may be no poor among you”; by observing this law, all debts being released once in seven years, it would prevent persons falling into distress and poverty, to such a degree as to be in want, and become beggars; and Julian the emperor observes, that none of the Jews begged e, which he attributes to the care that was taken of their poor:<\/p>\n for the Lord shall greatly bless thee in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it<\/strong>; which is either a reason why there would be no poor, should they observe the commandments of the Lord; or a reason why they should release the debts of the poor because they were so greatly blessed with a fruitful land, which brought them such an increase, as enabled them to free their poor debtors, when in circumstances unable to pay them.<\/p>\n c “veruntamen”, Munster. d “To the end that there be not”, Ainsworth; so the margin of the Bible. e Opera, par. 2. Ep. 49. p. 204.<\/p>\n “ Only that there shall be no poor with thee<\/em>.” is jussive, like the foregoing imperfects. The meaning in this connection is, “Thou needest not to remit a debt to foreigners in the seventh year; thou hast only to take care that there is no poor man with or among thee, that thou dost not cause or increase their poverty, by oppressing the brethren who have borrowed of thee.” Understood in this way, the sentence is not at all at variance with Deu 15:11<\/span>, where it is stated that the poor would never cease out of the land. The following clause, “for Jehovah will bless thee,” etc., gives a reason for the main thought, that they were not to press the Israelitish debtor. The creditor, therefore, had no need to fear that he would suffer want, if he refrained from exacting his debt from his brother in the seventh year.<\/p>\n (4) Save when there shall be no poor (man) among you.<\/strong>This clause is the source of a very interesting passage in the Acts of the Apostles, Deu. 4:34<\/span>, Great grace was upon them all, for neither was there among them any <\/em>(one<\/em>) that lacked <\/em>The words at the beginning of the verse in Hebrew, save when may also be rendered (as in the Margin) to the end that, or to such an extent that there shall be no poor man among you. Those who can well afford to pay need not be excused from their obligations.<\/p>\n For the Lord thy God shall greatly bless thee.<\/strong>So in Act. 4:33<\/span>, Great <\/em>grace was upon them all. The blessing need not be equal and universal prosperity, if those who have the good things of this world will always remember the poor to such an extent that no member of the community shall be left in want.<\/p>\n 4<\/strong>. <\/strong> Save when there shall be no poor among you <\/strong> The literal rendering of the passage is, Except that there shall yet be with thee a poor man. <\/em> The meaning seems simply to be, “Thou must release the debt for the year except when there be no poor person concerned, a contingency which may happen, for the Lord shall greatly bless thee.” Speaker’s Commentary.<\/p>\n ‘<\/strong> Howbeit there shall be no poor with you, (for Yahweh will surely bless you in the land which Yahweh your God is giving to you for an inheritance to possess it), if only you diligently listen to the voice of Yahweh your God, to observe to do all this commandment which I command you this day.’ <\/p>\n A further reason for the release is that the need for it would only arise if Israel had been disobedient to Yahweh. For if they listened diligently to His voice, to observe all the commandments given by Moses, there would be no poor, and therefore no borrowers, among them, for Yahweh would then bless the land, which He had given them as an inheritance that they could possess, to such an extent that poverty would be ruled out. Thus the fact that there was a debtor would indicate Israel’s failure, and release of the debtor would be a kind of partial atonement for that failure. <\/p>\n However, the chiasmus clearly brings out that the reason that there will be no poor will be because of God’s blessing of the land so that the third year tithe will be of such munificence that there will be sufficient for all, and none will be poor. But this will only be so if they are faithful to the covenant so that God blesses the land. <\/p>\n Ver. <\/em><\/strong>4, 5. <\/strong>Save when, <\/em><\/strong>&c.<\/strong> Houbigant follows the marginal reading of our Bibles, joining the first clause of the 4th verse to the end of the 3rd, as explanatory, he observes, of the law: as if it had been said, “Thou shalt not exact thy debt from thy brother; for this reason, that there may not be a poor man among you through your severity.” He asserts, that the words epes-ki, <\/em>can signify here no other than to the end that: asin que, <\/em>in the French. <\/p>\n Spiritually considered, what a mercy would this be, when that scripture shall be fulfilled, in which it is said, GOD’S people shall all be righteous; Isa 60:21<\/span> . In JESUS the very poorest are so. But it should seem to refer to the latter day glory. Who doth not join in that prayer of the Psalmist, Psa 53:6<\/span> ?<\/p>\n Deu 15:4 Save when there shall be no poor among you; for the LORD shall greatly bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee [for] an inheritance to possess it:<\/p>\n Ver. 4. Save when there shall be no poor.<\/strong> ] Here, as in sundry other places of the new translation, the margin is better than the text, as giving a good reason of the former law, To the end that there be no poor amongst you, that is, extreme poor by your exactions. Of a cruel creditor it is said, Psa 10:9 that “he lieth in wait to catch the poor; he doth catch the poor when he draws him into his net,” that is, into bonds, debts, mortgages, as Chrysostom expounds it.<\/p>\n Save when. This rendering not in any ancient version. Authorized Version margin has “that there be no poor”, &c. Revised Version = howbeit. Compare Deu 15:11, shall never cease: i.e. or die from your neglect; which would be the case if these laws were not carried out. <\/p>\n God. Hebrew. Elohim. App-4. <\/p>\n Save: etc. or, To the end that there be no poor among you, Houbigant follows this marginal reading, to which he joins the end of the Deu 15:3, considering it as explanatory of the law; as if he had said, “Thou shalt not exact the debt that is due from thy brother, but thy hand shall release him, for this reason, that there may be no poor among you through your severity.” He justly contends that the phrase ephes kee, can here only mean, “to the end that,” being equivalent to the French afin que. <\/p>\n greatly bless: Deu 14:29, Deu 28:1-8, Deu 28:11, Pro 11:24, Pro 11:25, Pro 14:21, Pro 28:27, Isa 58:10, Isa 58:11 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Deu 15:10 – because 2Co 8:2 – the riches<\/p>\n Deu 15:4. Save when there shall be no poor The words may be rendered thus, as in the margin of our Bibles: To the end that there be no poor among you. And so they contain a reason of this law; namely, that none be empoverished and ruined by a rigid exaction of debts. For the Lord shall greatly bless thee If in this and other things you be obedient, God will so abundantly bless you that you shall be well able to forbear the requiring of your debts on the sabbatic year.<\/p>\n 15:4 {b} Save when there shall be no poor among you; for the LORD shall greatly bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee [for] an inheritance to possess it:<\/p>\n (b) For if your debtor is rich, he may be forced to pay.<\/p>\n Save when there shall be no poor among you; for the LORD shall greatly bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee [for] an inheritance to possess it: 4. Howbeit there shall be no poor with thee ] Dillm. etc. transl.: should be no poor. But this is not a correct … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Deuteronomy 15:4”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5332"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5332\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
I. <\/strong>The existence of poverty. My own experience has been that those who are most hurt cry out least. The most deserving, and generally the most pitiful, cases of distress have to be looked for. But, say some, is it not their own fault that they are so badly off? No doubt it often is so. Idleness, drink, waste, folly, incapableness may all cause poverty; but what of that? We cannot stand by and see people starve. It would be easier to die by hanging than hunger; but we do not even hang people except for high treason or murder. Much more must we not by any sin of omission condemn the innocent to suffer with the guilty–the hardworking wife or the helpless children for the sake of the worthless husband or father. The fact is that poverty is largely the consequence of an unequal struggle between the strong and the weak.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>The duty of relieving poverty. Look at what Moses taught the Israelites.<\/p>\n
I.<\/strong> <\/em><\/strong>The rules that are here suggested for the relief of the poor.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>The reasons that are here suggested for the relief of the poor.<\/p>\n
I. <\/strong>Gods people ever have sympathy with their brethren.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>The hearts and hands of Gods people are open toward their brethren.<\/p>\n
I.<\/strong> <\/em><\/strong>The perpetual existence of the poor amongst us. You must become reconciled to your poverty. And if you would become really reconciled to it do not regard it as something inflicted by the misgovernment or the management of your fellow men. Put it before you in the light this text puts it, as Gods ordinance and Gods will concerning you; as something that rulers and governors can no more drive out of the world than they can drive midnight out of it, or sickness, or pain, or sorrow. Poverty is to be alleviated, and it is to be removed if honest industry will remove it; but if not so, it is to be welcomed and borne. I could tell you where it often comes from. From the poor mans own idleness, improvidence, intemperance, and waste; from the foolish indulgence of children; from the still more criminal indulgence of self. But even then it is from God; it is Gods way of showing displeasure against these things. And when it comes not from these things, where does it come from? Often from a love that neither you nor I, nor any angel above us, can measure. The same love that provided a Saviour and built a heaven for sinners now sends poverty often to sinners, to turn them to that Saviour and heaven.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>Our duty towards the poor. Now if we looked only at the declaration in the first part of the text, and were disposed to reason on it, we might say, Be our duty to the poor what it may, we must not interfere with their poverty; it is Gods will they should be poor, and we must not interfere with His will. This would be like saying, God has sent sickness amongst us, and we must not make use of any means to cure or relieve it; or, He has made the winter, and we will do nothing to mitigate the rigour of it; or, He has created the darkness, and it is wrong to have lights in our dwelling to enlighten it. Many of what we call the evils of our condition are designed of God to bring into lawful and healthy action the powers of mans mind and the feelings of mans heart, and this evil of poverty among the number. The poor shall never cease out of the land; that is My will, says God. Therefore I command thee–what? to let the needy alone in their poverty? No; I have placed them in the land to call forth and exercise thy bounty. The painful work is Mine–I have ordained poverty; the pleasant work shall be thine–thou shalt relieve it. Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor and to thy needy in thy land. It is a touching circumstance that not only is the general duty of what we call charity to the poor enjoined in Scripture, but so great is the interest God takes in it that the measure and manner of it are strongly enjoined. Here we are told, in the first place, that it must be liberal. Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother. And it must be extensive charity; that is, as extensive as we can make it. I will not give my money, we sometimes say, to this man or that; he has no claim on me; I must keep the little I have to spare for those who have claims on me. But look again, Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother–to thy brother first, to those who from relationship or from some other cause seem to have claims on thee; but not to thy brother only, to thy poor and to thy needy in thy land. The words are multiplied; to those who have no claims whatever on thee but their poverty and their need. And it must be also a cheerful charity.<\/p>\n
III. <\/strong>We may go on now to the motives by which we are urged to the exercise of this grace. For these, some of you may be ready to say, I must turn to the Gospel. But no, the God of the Gospel is the God of the law also, the God of the Christian Church was the God of the ancient Church, and there is no motive urged now on us in these Gospel days which was not urged in substance on the Jews in the days of old.<\/p>\n
I. <\/strong>That poverty is a real evil which, without any impeachment of the goodness or wisdom of providence, the constitution of the world actually admits.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>That providential appointment of this evil in subservience to the general good, brings a particular obligation upon men in civilised society to concur for the immediate extinction of the evil wherever it appears. (Bp. Horsley.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
I.<\/strong> <\/em><\/strong>It is due to the constitution of society. The poor always ye have with you. We shall perhaps think correctly on the subject if we admit as the will of God that in every state of society there shall be poor, and that a provision for the production of this fact is laid in the gifts of His providence, in the constitution of men, and in the scheme of His moral government.<\/p>\n
II. <\/strong>Charity is due to ourselves. It is due to ourselves, as we would wish with uprightness to discharge the duties of that station in which we are placed. To administer relief to the poor is graciously connected with our present comfort and our future well-being. The very act of charity is accompanied with the most refined complacency; it is answering that sympathy which is born in the heart of every man, and which, unless stifled by unnatural discipline, calls loudly for gratification. They are happy who are the objects of your bounty, but ye who have experienced it can tell that it is more blessed to give than to receive. Connected with this is that blessing over our worldly concerns which maketh rich, and to which is added no sorrow. And let it be remembered, that prosperity is but for a season; now, therefore, it is time to lay up a store of good deeds, the remembrance of which shall be the best support when misfortune overtakes the prosperous. Let it be remembered yet again that what possessions men have are not their own, but are the property of their Master, who hath committed it to their stewardship. All their opportunities, and all their means of doing good, must he accounted for.<\/p>\n
III. <\/strong>It is due to religion–to a religion which is in its origin, its effects, its principle, and its precepts a system of charity; a religion which, originating in the love of God, proposes to restore to happiness and dignity those who are poor, and miserable, and wretched, and blind, and naked. They to whom mercy is shown should be merciful. This is what Christianity requires, nay, what it affirms to be the amount and the criterion of a genuine profession.<\/p>\n
IV. <\/strong>It is due to the poor. As a something voluntary is implied in the idea of charity, it may sound paradoxical to speak of the rights of the poor on the charity of the rich. But the incongruity is only in sound, for it is an acknowledged maxim of civil economy that the poor (the industrious poor, of whom only I now speak) have an absolute right to be supported by the State, whose agriculture, commerce, and manufactures have benefited by their exertions. Further, the poor have a right as brethren, and this is a right which the heart of a Christian cannot deny.<\/p>\n
V. <\/strong>It is due to the age in which we live–an age characterised for beneficence, an age distinguished above all others for the magnitude of its political events, for the advancement of science, for the general diffusion of literature, and more especially for a spirit that has amalgamated all classes of society, the most opposite ranks and professions, into one mass, and stamped the whole with benevolence. (A. Waugh, M. A.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\nFuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"