{"id":5524,"date":"2022-09-24T01:11:17","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T06:11:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-deuteronomy-2315\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T01:11:17","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T06:11:17","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-deuteronomy-2315","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-deuteronomy-2315\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Deuteronomy 23:15"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee: <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">The case in question is that of a slave who fled from a pagan master to the holy land. It is of course assumed that the refugee was not flying from justice, but only from the tyranny of his lord.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Deu 23:15-16<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The escaped slave<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A Flemish artist was painting a picture when two friends noticed the high finish of a broom which was only an insignificant item in the composition. He told them he should spend three more days in working on the broom, intending to be mindful of detail in the general effect of his picture. Moses gave grand laws to the Israelites. His legislation as to the religious duties of the people is sublime. But he was not indifferent to regulations touching their common life, and bent his mind to the task of showing the minute as well as the vast in the order of right-doing. The word servant as used by Moses meant slave. Remembering what the Israelites had to endure in their Egyptian bondage, he had great sympathy with those who were held in servitude and compelled to work without remuneration. He could well understand that a man or woman in slavery, badly treated, and with no hope of an ameliorated lot, would, if possible, get away from the cruel owner and make a desperate rush for liberty. He did not blame the slave for stealing away from the owner. If technically there was theft in such an action, there was no dishonesty. The slaves who at one time escaped from southern plantations to Canada did no wrong. The masters suffered loss, but they lost what did not belong to them by any righteous law. There is a moral and spiritual application of this. Many people are in slavery. It is true they have not lost their civil liberty; they have not been sold in any slave market; they know nothing of literal chains, scourges, and labour for which there is no payment. They are proud of the freedom which is one of the glories of their native land. But they are slaves, for they are in bondage to evils which they have allowed to obtain mastery over their souls. There are powers in them which make them feeble for action when they would do good, and almost force them to transgression of Divine law. They have a right to break loose from the enthralling powers of sin, for sin holds nothing by legal proprietorship. Every sinner has a right to freedom, and is urged to rush to Jesus as a refuge from tyranny. The escaped slave was to be kept from the pursuer. When in the morning the master called for the slave, and there was no answer, and looked for him, but could not find him, he would conclude at once that the slave had gone away. Making inquiries, the master would ascertain the direction the fugitive had gone, and follow him until he found the place in which he was hiding. He would say to the elders: My slave is here, and I must have him. Give him up to me. No, no was to be the reply; we shall never give him up, and so long as these walls stand the poor man shall be kept out of your hands. We rejoice that our country has long been what the Israelitish village and city were to be to the escaped slave in the old time. The footprint of the slave on British soil is the certificate of his manumission. When the slaves of sin get loose from their bonds, and escape into Immanuels land, they at once experience the blessedness there is in the liberty of the children of God. Christ never gives up to any old master those who have fled for refuge to His land; He loves them so much that He does not wish to have them out of His sight; and to defend them from the powers which would tear them back to sin He throws around them the awful grandeur and radiant blaze of His own perfections. The escaped slave was to be kindly treated. The man who had made a rush for freedom was not to rush into a new slavery. Those to whom he fled for refuge were not to take advantage of his necessities and use him in compulsory labour for their own profit; no service or tax was to be levied on him as the price of security from his old master. He was to be treated as a free Israelite, and to be allowed to live and work where he liked. The sinner who escapes from slavery to Immanuels land is to be welcomed and cared for by members of the Church. He is to be recognised as having a claim to brotherly love, and to all the dignities and privileges that distinguish the Christian life. Even if members of the Church do look shyly on a newly converted sinner, Jesus does not, but bids him welcome to the palace of love, and opens to him immensities of blessing. (<em>J. Marrat.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P>  Verse <span class='bible'>15<\/span>. <I><B>Thou shalt not deliver &#8211; the servant which is<\/B><\/I><B> <\/B><I><B>escaped &#8211; unto thee<\/B><\/I>] That is, a servant who left an idolatrous master that he might join himself to God and to his people.  In any other case, it would have been injustice to have harboured the runaway.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> This is not to be understood universally, as if all servants that flee from their masters, though without any sufficient cause or colour of justice, might be detained from them by any person to whom they fled for refuge, for this is apparently contrary to all the laws of religion, and justice, and charity, and would open a door to infinite disorders and mischiefs; but it is to be understood, <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.85em;text-indent: -0.85em\"> 1. Of the servants of strangers, because it follows, <span class='bible'>Deu 23:16<\/span>, <I>he shall dwell with thee<\/I>, even <I>among you<\/I>, which shows that he had dwelt with and belonged to another people. <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.85em;text-indent: -0.85em\"> 2. Of such as belonged to the Canaanites, or other neighbouring nations, because if he had lived in remote countries, it is not probable that he would flee so far to avoid his master, or that his master would follow him so far to recover him. And for the Canaanites this sentence was most just, because both they and theirs were all forfeited to God and to Israel, and whatsoever they enjoyed was by special indulgence. And for the other neighbours it may seem just also, partly, because some of them were within the larger limits of the land belonging to Israel by Gods grant or deed of gift, <span class='bible'>Gen 15:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 1:4<\/span>; partly, because by their hostile carriages they had given Israel a right to much more of theirs than a few servants that might possibly run away from their masters; and especially, because both masters and servants of these and other nations are unquestionably at the dispose of the Lord their Maker and sovereign Ruler. <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.85em;text-indent: -0.85em\"> 3. Of such as upon inquiry appear to have been unjustly oppressed by their masters, as is implied by that phrase of his, making an escape, which supposeth a deliverance from danger or vexation. Now it is not strange nor unjust, if the great God, who hates all tyranny, and styles himself the refuge of the oppressed, doth interpose his authority, and help to rescue such persons from their cruel masters, who otherwise would be too strong for them. <\/P> <P STYLE=\"margin-left: 0.85em;text-indent: -0.85em\"> 4. Of such as came to them out of a desire to embrace the true religion, which possibly his master perceiving endeavoured by force to restrain him from, as it may be probably thought from his choosing and liking to live among the Israelites, expressed <span class='bible'>Deu 23:16<\/span>. Now if this great and supreme Master, to whom all other masters are but servants, and they and theirs are absolutely in his power, shall receive and protect one that gives up himself to his service against the will of the under-master, who in this case rebels against his sovereign Lord, what shadow is there of injustice in the case? <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P><B>15, 16. Thou shalt not deliver untohis master the servant which has escaped from his master untothee<\/B>evidently a servant of the Canaanites or some of theneighboring people, who was driven by tyrannical oppression, orinduced, with a view of embracing the true religion, to take refugein Israel.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown&#8217;s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>Thou shall not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee.<\/strong> That is, one that has been used ill by a cruel and tyrannical master, and was in danger of his life with him, or of being lamed by him, and therefore obliged to make his escape from him on that account; such an one, when he fell into the hands of an Israelite, was not to be taken and bound, and sent back to his master again, but was to be retained till his master&#8217;s anger subsided; or however until inquiry could be made into the cause of the difference between him and his master, and matters be made up between them to mutual satisfaction; or if it appeared that the flight of the servant was just, and it was not safe for him to return to his master, then he was to be used as hereafter directed; for it cannot be thought that this law was made to encourage and protect every idle, disobedient, and fugitive servant, which would be very sinful and unjust: the Jewish writers generally understand it of the servants of idolaters fleeing for the sake of religion; Onkelos renders it,<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;a servant of the people,&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> of Heathen people; the Targum of Jonathan is,<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;thou shalt not deliver a stranger (i.e. a proselyte of righteousness, as Maimonides w calls this servant) into the hands of those that worship idols, but he shall be delivered by you, that he may be under the shadow of my Shechinah, because that he fled from the worship of his idol.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> Jarchi makes mention of another sense; that it may be understood of<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;a Canaanitish servant of an Israelite that flees (from his master) without the land, where he was not obliged to go with him, and serve him against his will; but I suppose a proselyte is meant;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> and much more then will this hold good of an Hebrew servant in such circumstances. Aben Ezra interprets this of a servant not an Israelite, who, in time of war, flees from his master, not an Israelite also, unto the camp of Israel, and that for the glory of the divine name which is called upon Israel; such an one, though a servant, might not be delivered to his master.<\/p>\n<p>w Hilchot Abadim, c. 8. sect. 11.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Toleration and Non-Toleration in the Congregation of the Lord. &#8211; <span class='bible'>Deu 23:15<\/span>, <span class='bible'>Deu 23:16<\/span>. A slave who had escaped from his master to Israel was not to be given up, but to be allowed to dwell in the land, wherever he might choose, and not to be oppressed. The reference is to a slave who had fled to them from a foreign country, on account of the harsh treatment which he had received from his heathen master. The plural `adoniym denotes the rule.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Keil &amp; Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">Protection of Fugitives; The Law Concerning Usury.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"RIGHT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in\"> <SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><FONT SIZE=\"1\" STYLE=\"font-size: 8pt\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">B. C.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"> 1451.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/FONT><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR>  <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 15 Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee: &nbsp; 16 He shall dwell with thee, <I>even<\/I> among you, in that place which he shall choose in one of thy gates, where it liketh him best: thou shalt not oppress him. &nbsp; 17 There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel. &nbsp; 18 Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a dog, into the house of the <B>LORD<\/B> thy God for any vow: for even both these <I>are<\/I> abomination unto the <B>LORD<\/B> thy God. &nbsp; 19 Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury: &nbsp; 20 Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the <B>LORD<\/B> thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it. &nbsp; 21 When thou shalt vow a vow unto the <B>LORD<\/B> thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for the <B>LORD<\/B> thy God will surely require it of thee; and it would be sin in thee. &nbsp; 22 But if thou shalt forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in thee. &nbsp; 23 That which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform; <I>even<\/I> a freewill offering, according as thou hast vowed unto the <B>LORD<\/B> thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth. &nbsp; 24 When thou comest into thy neighbour&#8217;s vineyard, then thou mayest eat grapes thy fill at thine own pleasure; but thou shalt not put <I>any<\/I> in thy vessel. &nbsp; 25 When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbour, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand; but thou shalt not move a sickle unto thy neighbour&#8217;s standing corn.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Orders are here given about five several things which have no relation one to another:&#8211;<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I. The land of Israel is here made a sanctuary, or city of refuge, for servants that were wronged and abused by their masters, and fled thither for shelter from the neighbouring countries, <span class='bible'>Deu 23:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 23:16<\/span>. We cannot suppose that they were hereby obliged to give entertainment to all the unprincipled men that ran from service; Israel needed not (as Rome at first did) to be thus peopled. But, 1. They must not deliver up the trembling servant to his enraged master, till upon trial it appeared that the servant has wronged his master and was justly liable to punishment. Note, It is an honourable thing to shelter and protect the weak, provided they be not wicked. God allows his people to patronise the oppressed. The angel bid Hagar return to her mistress, and Paul sent Onesimus back to his master Philemon, because they had neither of them any cause to go away, nor was either of them exposed to any danger in returning. But the servant here is supposed to escape, that is, to run for his life, to the people of Israel, of whom he had heard (as Benhadad of the kings of Israel, <span class='bible'>1 Kings xx. 31<\/span>) that they were a merciful people, to save himself from the fury of a tyrant; and in that case to deliver him up is to throw a lamb into the mouth of a lion. 2. If it appeared that the servant was abused, they must not only protect him, but, supposing him willing to embrace their religion, they must give him all the encouragement that might be to settle among them. Care is taken both that he should not be imposed up on in the place of his settlement&#8211;let it be <I>that which he shall choose<\/I> and <I>where it liketh him best,<\/I> and that he should not exchange one hard master for many&#8211;<I>thou shalt not oppress him.<\/I> Thus would he soon find a comfortable difference between the land of Israel and other lands, and would choose it to be his rest for ever. Note, Proselytes and converts to the truth should be treated with particular tenderness, that they may have no temptation to return.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. The land of Israel must be no shelter for the unclean; no whore, no Sodomite, must be suffered to live among them (<span class='bible'>Deu 23:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 23:18<\/span>), neither a whore nor a whoremonger. No houses of uncleanness must be kept either by men or women. Here is, 1. A good reason intimated why there should be no such wickedness tolerated among them: they were Israelites. This seems to have an emphasis laid upon it. For a daughter of Israel to be a whore, or a son of Israel a whoremaster, is to reproach the stock they are come of, the people they belong to, and the God they worship. It is bad in any, but worst in Israelites, a holy nation, <span class='bible'>2 Sam. xiii. 12<\/span>. 2. A just mark of displeasure put upon this wickedness, that the hire of a whore, that is, the money she gets by her whoring, and the price of a dog, that is, of the Sodomite, pimp, or whoremaster (so I incline to understand it, for such are called <I>dogs,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Rev. xxii. 15<\/I><\/span>), the money he gets by his lewd and villainous practices, no part of it shall be <I>brought into the house of the Lord<\/I> (as the hire of prostitutes among the Gentiles was into their temples) <I>for any vow.<\/I> This intimates, (1.) That God would not accept of any offering at all from such wicked people; they had nothing to bring an offering of but what they got by their wickedness, and therefore their sacrifice could not but be <I>an abomination to the Lord,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Prov. xv. 8<\/I><\/span>. (2.) That they should not think, by making and paying vows, and bringing offerings to the Lord, to obtain leave to go on in this sin, as (it should seem) some that followed that trade suggested to themselves, when their offerings were admitted. <span class='bible'>Pro 7:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Pro 7:15<\/span>, <I>This day have I paid my vows, therefore came I forth to meet thee.<\/I> Nothing should be accepted in commutation of penance. (3.) That we cannot honour God with our substance unless it be honestly and honourably come by. It must not only be considered what we give, but how we got it; God hates robbery for burnt-offerings, and uncleanness too.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; III. The matter of usury is here settled, <span class='bible'>Deu 23:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 23:20<\/span>. (1.) They must not lend upon usury to an Israelite. They had and held their estates immediately from and under God, who, while he distinguished them from all other people, might have ordered, had he so pleased, that they should have all things in common among themselves; but instead of that, and in token of their joint interest in the good land he had given them, he only appointed them, as there was occasion, to lend to one another without interest, which among them would be little or no loss to the lender, because their land was so divided, their estates were so settled, and there was so little of merchandise among them, that it was seldom or never that they had occasion to borrow any great sums, only what was necessary for the subsistence of their families when the fruits of their ground had met with any disaster, or the like; and, in such a case, for a small matter to insist upon usury would have been very barbarous. Where the borrower gets, or hopes to get, it is just that the lender should share in the gain; but to him that borrows for his necessary food pity must be shown, and we must lend, hoping for nothing again, if we have wherewithal to do it, <span class='bible'>Luke vi. 35<\/span>. (2.) They might lend upon usury to a stranger, who was supposed to live by trade, and (as we say) by turning the penny, and therefore got by what he borrowed, and came among them in hopes to do so. By this it appears that usury is not in itself oppressive; for they must not oppress a stranger, and yet might exact usury from him.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; IV. The performance of the vows wherewith we have bound our souls is here required; and it is a branch of the law of nature, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 21-23<\/span>. (1.) We are here left at our liberty whether we will make vows or no: <I>If thou shalt forbear to vow<\/I> (some particular sacrifice and offering, more than was commanded by the law), <I>it shall be no sin to thee.<\/I> God had already signified his readiness to accept a free-will offering thus vowed, though it were but a little fine flour (<span class='bible'>Lev. ii. 4<\/span>, c.), which was encouragement enough to those who were so inclined. But lest the priests, who had the largest share of those vows and voluntary offerings, should sponge upon the people, by pressing it upon them as their duty to make such vows, beyond their ability and inclination, they are here expressly told that it should not be reckoned a sin in them if they did not make any such vows, as it would be if they omitted any of the sacrifices that God had particularly required. For (as bishop Patrick well expresses it) God would have men to be easy in his service, and all their offerings to be free and cheerful. (2.) We are here laid under the highest obligations, when we have made a vow, to perform it, and to perform it speedily: &#8220;<I>Thou shalt not be slack to pay it,<\/I> lest if it be delayed beyond the first opportunity the zeal abate, the vow be forgotten, or something happen to disable thee for the performance of it. <I>That which has gone out of thy lips<\/I> as a solemn and deliberate vow must not be recalled, but <I>thou shalt keep and perform it,<\/I> punctually and fully.&#8221; The rule of the gospel goes somewhat further than this. <span class='bible'>2 Cor. ix. 7<\/span>, <I>Every one, according as he purposeth in his heart,<\/I> though it have not gone out of his lips, <I>so let him give.<\/I> Here is a good reason why we should pay our vows, that if we do not <I>God will require it of us,<\/I> will surely and severely reckon with us, not only for lying, but for going about to mock him, who cannot be mocked. See <span class='bible'>Eccl. v. 4<\/span>.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; V. Allowance is here given, when they passed through a cornfield or vineyard, to pluck and eat of the corn or grapes that grew by the road-side, whether it was done for necessity or delight, only they must carry none away with them, <span class='_0000ff'><U><span class='bible'>Deu 23:24<\/span><span class='bible'>Deu 23:25<\/span><\/U><\/span>. Therefore the disciples were not censured for plucking the ears of corn (it was well enough known that the law allowed it), but for doing it on the sabbath day, which the tradition of the elders had forbidden. Now, 1. This law intimated to them what great plenty of corn and wine they should have in Canaan, so much that a little would not be missed out of their fruits: they should have enough for themselves and all their friends. 2. It provided for the support of poor travellers, to relieve the fatigue of their journey, and teaches us to be kind to such. The Jews say, &#8220;This law was chiefly intended in favour of labourers, who were employed in gathering in their harvest and vintage; their mouths must not be muzzled any more than that of the ox when he treads out the corn.&#8221; 3. It teaches us not to insist upon property in a small matter, of which it is easy to say, <I>What is that between me and thee?<\/I> It was true the grapes which the passenger ate were none of his own, nor did the proprietor give them to him; but the thing was of so small value that he had reason to think were he present, he would not deny them to him, anymore than he himself would grudge the like courtesy, and therefore it was no theft to take them. 4. It used them to hospitality, and teaches us to be ready to distribute, willing to communicate, and not to think every thing lost that is given away. Yet, 5. It forbids us to abuse the kindness of our friends, and to take the advantage of fair concessions to make unreasonable encroachments: we must not draw an ell from those that give but an inch. They may eat of their neighbour&#8217;s grapes; but it does not therefore follow that they may carry away.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>Verses 15, 16:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The text refers to the case of a slave who had fled from a foreign master to escape his harsh treatment. Such an one who came to Israel for sanctuary must not be surrendered to his master. He was to be allowed to choose a place anywhere in Israel&#8217;s land that he might desire, and dwell there in safety.<\/p>\n<p>This illustrates the safety and refuge which the oppressed may find in the sanctuary and among the people of God, <span class='bible'>Psa 84:1-4<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Although this Law has a tendency to humanity and kindness, it still does not appear to be altogether just. Since many masters oppressed their slaves with tyrannical arrogance, their wickedness rendered it necessary to afford some alleviation to the poor creatures. Thus slaves were permitted to take refuge in temples, and at Rome at the statues of the Caesars, so that if they proved themselves to have been treated with injustice and inhumanity, they might, when their case was proved, be transferred by sale to merciful masters. This, indeed, was endurable, but the refuge which is here granted to slaves defrauds their masters of their just right; since, without their case being heard, they have liberty given them to reside in the land of Canaan; thus, too, the law of nations is violated, since the land is opened to every fugitive. Besides, since runaway slaves are generally wicked and criminal, whatever place may be their asylum, it will be filled with many sources of infection. I know not whether there is sufficient foundation for the opinion of some who think that the slaves were exempted by privilege from their former servitude,  (49) in order that they might give themselves up to God&#8217;s service, and that thus true religion might be propagated. It certainly does not seem consistent that filth and refuse of every sort should be received into the Church, because, in the end, it would have been filled with all kinds of corruptions; and besides, it was by no means decorous that whatever crime had been elsewhere committed should be sheltered under God&#8217;s name. For, suppose a thief, or an adulterer, or a murderer, should leave his master, and seek for an asylum in the Holy Land, what else would it have been to receive and protect such guests, but to overthrow law and justice, and to set up a state of foul barbarism? I think, therefore, that more is to be understood than the words express, viz., that, if it should be found that the slaves had not fled in consequence of their own evil doings, but on account of the excessive cruelty of their masters, the people should not drive them away, which would have been tantamount to giving them up to butchery. And, in fact, it may be inferred that judicial proceedings were to be instituted, because a choice is given as to the city in which they prefer to dwell. <\/p>\n<p> Religion, indeed, stood them in some stead, because those who sought a place and home in the land of Canaan, were obliged to dedicate themselves to God, and to be initiated in His worship; still, God would never have allowed His name to be profaned by the reception of wicked persons without discrimination. Wherefore, as I briefly slated before, God inculcates humanity upon His people, lest, by the extradition of fugitive slaves, they should be necessary to the cruelty of others; because their masters would have been their executioners; and, since lie forbids the people from ill-treating them, He implies, by these words, that He only so far provides for the safety of these wretched beings, as to allow them to defend their innocence in a court of justice; wherefore I have thought fit to place this law amongst the Supplements of the Sixth Commandment. <\/p>\n<p>  (49) &#8220;The Chaldee addeth,  a   servant   of   the   peoples,  i.  e. , of the Gentiles, who for the religion of God cometh from his master to the Church of Israel.  This   servant   that   fleeth   to   the   land  (of Israel)  he   is   a   righteous   stranger, (that is, a proselyte come unto the faith and covenant of God,) saith Maimony.&#8221; &#8212; Ainsworth  in   loco. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Calvin&#8217;s Complete Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>LESSON EIGHTEEN <\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Deu. 23:15<\/span><\/strong><strong> to <\/strong><strong><span class='bible'>Deu. 24:22<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>m. LAWS OF SOCIETY AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS (<span class='bible'>Deu. 23:15<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Deu. 26:19<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>(1) TREATMENT OF ESCAPED SLAVES (<span class='bible'>Deu. 23:15-16<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>Thou shalt not deliver unto his master a servant that is escaped from his master unto thee: 16 he shall dwell with thee, in the midst of thee, in place which he shall choose within one of thy gates, where it pleaseth him best: thou shall not oppress him.<\/p>\n<p>THOUGHT QUESTIONS 23:15, 16<\/p>\n<p>393.<\/p>\n<p>No such provision was made for a runaway Hebrew servant. Cf. <span class='bible'>Deu. 15:12-18<\/span>. Why such a provision for outsiders?<\/p>\n<p>394.<\/p>\n<p>The motive for running away is at least suggested. What is it?<\/p>\n<p>AMPLIFIED TRANSLATION 23:15, 16<\/p>\n<p>15 You shall not give up to his master a servant who has escaped from his master to you;<br \/>16 He shall dwell with you in your midst, where he chooses in one of your towns, where it pleases him best. You shall not defraud or oppress him.<\/p>\n<p>COMMENT 23:15, 16<\/p>\n<p>The reference is to a foreign slave who had fled from the harsh treatment of his master to seek refuge in Israel, as is evident from the expression . . . in one of thy gates, i.e. in any part of the land. (Pulpit) No such provision is made for runaway Hebrew servants, about which see 15:.1218 and notes; compare <span class='bible'>Deu. 22:1-3<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>Deu. 23:15-16<\/span>.<strong>REFUGEES.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Thou shalt not deliver . . . the servant.<\/strong>Even on Israelitish ground the escaped slave was free. Rashi adds, Even a Canaanitish slave who has escaped from abroad into <em>the land <\/em>of Israel.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 15, 16<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> <strong> The servant which is escaped <\/strong> The fugitive from oppression was to be received. A slave who had fled from a heathen master was not to be sent back into bondage.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> Other Aspects Of Attitude and Behaviour (<span class='bible'><strong> Deu 23:15-25<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ).<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p> Analysis in the words of Moses: <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> a <\/strong> You shall not deliver to his master a slave who is escaped from his master to you, he shall dwell with you, in the midst of you, in the place which he shall choose within one of your gates, where it pleases him best. You shall not oppress him. <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> There shall be no cult prostitute (holy one) of the daughters of Israel, neither shall there be a cult sodomite (holy one) of the sons of Israel. <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> You shall not bring the hire of a prostitute, or the wages of a dog, into the house of Yahweh your God for any vow, for even both these are an abomination to Yahweh your God <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> d <\/strong> You shall not lend on interest to your brother; interest of silver, interest of victuals, interest of anything that is lent on interest <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> d <\/strong> To a foreigner you may lend on interest, but to your brother you shall not lend on interest, that Yahweh your God may bless you in all that you put your hand to, in the land to which you go in to possess it. <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> When you shall vow a vow to Yahweh your God, you shall not be slack to pay it, for Yahweh your God will surely require it of you, and it would be sin in you. But if you shall forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in you <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> What is gone out of your lips you shall observe and do; according as you have vowed to Yahweh your God, a freewill-offering, which you have promised with your mouth. <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> a <\/strong> When you come into your neighbour&rsquo;s vineyard, then you may eat of grapes your fill at your own pleasure, but you shall not put any in your vessel. When you come into your neighbour&rsquo;s standing grain, then you may pluck the ears with your hand, but you shall not move a sickle to your neighbour&rsquo;s standing grain. (This command is based on the principle that the land is Yahweh&rsquo;s. He is the master and Israel were His servants (<span class='bible'>Deu 32:36<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 25:55<\/span>), and thus Yahweh could make for the land what provisions He would). <\/p>\n<p> Note that in &lsquo;a&rsquo; a slave who escapes from a foreign master (and is now in someone else&rsquo;s land) must be welcomed. He may live where he chooses among them and must not be oppressed. In the parallel someone who is in someone else&rsquo;s field may partake of what is in it as long as he only takes what is necessary at the time in order to satisfy his hunger (he must thus not be disapproved of). And this was based on the fact of Yahweh&rsquo;s ownership of the land, and the fact that He was the master and Israel His &lsquo;slaves&rsquo;. Compare <span class='bible'>Isa 1:3<\/span>). It was also based on the fact that they had been slaves to a cruel foreign master in Egypt and must therefore now show compassion (compare <span class='bible'>Deu 24:22<\/span>). In &lsquo;b&rsquo; &lsquo;holy ones&rsquo; in terms of prostitutes both male and female are forbidden in Israel, and in the parallel men and women shall be truly holy by observing their vows. In &lsquo;c&rsquo; the wages of male and female prostitutes are not to be accepted for a vow, and in the parallel a truly made vow must be performed in timely fashion. In &lsquo;d&rsquo; it is forbidden to lend on interest to a brother, but in the parallel such lending to foreigners is allowed. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Escaped Slaves Shall Not Be Forced To Return To Their Masters (<span class='bible'><strong> Deu 23:15-16<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ). <\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> This would apparently refer to slaves who escaped from another country. The point was almost certainly that Israel themselves were in a sense escaped slaves and should therefore treat other escaped slaves well and not return them to their place of origin. Rather they must be welcomed. This would forbid extradition clauses which were a feature of some treaties. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> Deu 23:15-16<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &lsquo;<\/strong> You shall not deliver to his master a slave who is escaped from his master to you, he shall dwell with you, in the midst of you, in the place which he shall choose within one of your gates, where it pleases him best. You shall not oppress him.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> An escaped slave who came among them must be free to choose where he would live. This fact is emphasised. He was to be a totally free man. Note the threefold emphasis so common in Deuteronomy, &lsquo;in the midst of you (as one of you), in the place which he shall choose within your gates, where it pleases him best.&rsquo; He would probably also be welcome into the assembly of Israel if he was willing to commit himself to the covenant. <\/p>\n<p><strong> &ldquo;In the place which he shall choose.&rdquo;<\/strong> It can hardly be a coincidence that this phrase was used. Thus the freedom of the escaped slave is compared with the freedom of Yahweh to choose His own place. He was under Yahweh&rsquo;s special care. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Various Duties Within the Congregation. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 15. Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant,<\/strong> the slave, <strong> which is escaped from his master unto thee. <\/strong> This rule concerned the case of a slave from one of the heathen nations, who had fled from his master on account of inhuman treatment. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 16. He shall dwell with thee, even among you, in that place which he shall choose in one of thy gates,<\/strong> in any of the cities of Israel, <strong> where it liketh him best,<\/strong> he was at liberty to make such changes frequently, until he found a place which suited him in every respect; <strong> thou shalt not oppress him,<\/strong> he should be treated as a fellow-dweller in the good land of Jehovah, and there was always chance of his becoming a member of God&#8217;s people. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 17. There shall be no whore,<\/strong> a so-called consecrated prostitute, <strong> of the daughters of Israel, nor a Sodomite of the sons of Israel,<\/strong> both of whom prostituted their bodies in the service of the Phenician goddess Astarte, a most shameful practice. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 18. Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore,<\/strong> namely, one engaged in such unnatural excesses, <strong> or the price of a dog,<\/strong> what was usually paid to a Sodomite for one service, <strong> into the house of the Lord, thy God, for any vow,<\/strong> for the heathen even went to the extent of paying such money, the fruits of their lewdness, to their idols; <strong> for even both these are an abomination unto the Lord, thy God,<\/strong> both the gift and the giver. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 19. Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother,<\/strong> take any interest for a necessary loan; <strong> usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of anything that is lent upon usury,<\/strong> since this would not agree with the demands of unselfish love. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 20. Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury,<\/strong> perhaps one passing through Israel for purposes of trade; <strong> but unto thy brother,<\/strong> a member of the children of Israel, <strong> thou shalt not lend upon usury,<\/strong> the peculiar circumstances of the chosen people of God demanding the strictest insistence upon the law of love; <strong> that the Lord, thy God, may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it. <\/p>\n<p>v. 21. When thou shalt vow a vow unto the Lord, thy God,<\/strong> <span class='bible'>Num 30:2<\/span>, <strong> thou shalt not slack to pay it,<\/strong> <span class='bible'>Lev 27:1-13<\/span>; <strong> for the Lord, thy God, will surely require it of thee;<\/strong> and it would be sin in thee, for it was a sacred obligation and demanded payment. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 22. But if thou shalt forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in thee,<\/strong> for it is better not to make a vow than to vow and then not to pay, <span class='bible'>Ecc 5:3-4<\/span>. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 23. That which is gone out of thy lips,<\/strong> in the form of a sacred promise to the Lord, <strong> thou shalt keep and perform; even a free-will offering, according as thou hast vowed unto the Lord, thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth. <\/p>\n<p>v. 24. When thou comest into thy neighbor&#8217;s vineyard, then thou mayest eat grapes thy fill,<\/strong> enough to satisfy the demands of hunger, <strong> at thine own pleasure,<\/strong> according to the appetite and desire; <strong> but thou shalt not put any in thy vessel,<\/strong> to carry away a supply. <strong><\/p>\n<p>v. 25. When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbor,<\/strong> into the maturing grain, <strong> then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand,<\/strong> <span class='bible'>Mat 12:1<\/span>; Luke 6 :l; <strong> but thou shalt not move a sickle,<\/strong> in the act of reaping, <strong> unto thy neighbor&#8217;s standing corn. <\/strong> It was a privilege granted to the traveler, to the passer-by, who might feel hunger, but it was not to be abused by avaricious neighbors. With Christians the law of love regulates all the affairs of their lives, and they gladly submit to its guidance. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><em>Ver. <\/em><\/strong><strong>15. <\/strong><strong><em>Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant, <\/em><\/strong><strong>&amp;c.<\/strong> i.e. <em>A foreign servant, <\/em>says Houbigant, not one of the Jewish nation; for it is not added, <em>the servant of thy brother, or of thy neighbour: <\/em>besides, Moses addresses the whole nation, as appears from the words, <em>in one of thy gates <\/em>[<em>or cities:<\/em>] so that there is little doubt, that the meaning of the law is, to appoint an asylum for foreign servants; either because the neighbouring nations would not restore the Israelitish servants who should fly to them, or because it concerned not the Israelites to judge those who were without. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>Israel at Home<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Chaps. <span class='bible'>Deu 23:15<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Deu 25:19<\/span><\/p>\n<p>15Thou shalt not deliver<span class=''>5<\/span> unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee: 16He shall dwell with thee, <em>even<\/em> among you in that place which he shall choose in one of thy gates where it liketh [good for him, <em>so<\/em> margin] him best: thou shalt not oppress him. 17There shall be no whore<span class=''>6<\/span> [consecrated, devoted one] of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel. 18Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a dog into the house of the Lord thy God for any vow: for even both these <em>are<\/em> abomination unto the Lord thy God. 19Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother [lay upon thy brother]: usury<span class=''>7<\/span> of money, usury of victuals, usury of anything that is lent [accustomed to be lent] upon usury: 20Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it. 21When thou shalt vow a vow unto the Lord thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for the Lord thy God will surely require it of thee; and it would be [and it is] sin in thee. 22But if thou shalt forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in thee. 23That which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform; <em>even<\/em> a free-will offering [freely, voluntarily] according as thou hast vowed unto the Lord thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth. 24When thou comest into thy neighbors vineyard, then thou mayest eat grapes thy fill at thine own pleasure [as thy desire (soul) is]; but thou shalt not put <em>any<\/em> in thy vessel. 25When thou comest into the standing-corn of thy neighbor, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand: but thou shalt not move a sickle unto thy neighbors standing-corn.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Deu 24:1<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Deu 22:1<\/span> When [If] a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that [if] she find no favor in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness [nakedness of a thing] in her: then let him write her a bill of 2divorcement,<span class=''>8<\/span> and give <em>it<\/em> in her hand, and send her out of his house. And when 3she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another mans <em>wife<\/em>. And <em>if<\/em> the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement [a separating writing], and giveth <em>it<\/em> in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her <em>to be<\/em> his wife; 4Her former husband which sent her away, may not take her again [return to take her] to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that <em>is<\/em> abomination before the Lord: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin [make it sinful] which the Lord thy God giveth thee <em>for<\/em> an inheritance. 5When a man hath taken a new wife, he shall not go out to war, neither shall he be charged with any business<span class=''>9<\/span>: <em>but<\/em> he shall be free at home one year, and shall cheer up his wife which he hath taken. 6No man shall take the nether [the hand-mill] or the upper<span class=''>10<\/span> mill-stone to pledge: for he taketh <em>a mans<\/em> life to pledge. 7If a man be found stealing any of his [a soul (person) of his] brethren of the children of Israel, and maketh merchandise of him [constrain him violently] or selleth him; then that thief shall die; and thou shalt put evil away from among you. 8Take heed in the plague of leprosy, that thou observe diligently, and do according to all that [as] the priests the Levites shall teach you: as I commanded them, <em>so<\/em> ye shall observe to do. 9Remember what the Lord thy God did unto Miriam by the way, after that ye were come [in your coming] forth out of Egypt. 10When thou dost lend<span class=''>11<\/span> thy brother anything, thou shalt not go into his house to fetch<span class=''>12<\/span> his pledge: 11Thou shalt stand abroad, and the man to whom thou dost lend shall bring out the pledge abroad unto thee: 12And if the man <em>be<\/em> poor [a bound, oppressed man], thou shalt not sleep with his pledge: 13In any case thou shalt deliver him the pledge again when the sun goeth down, that he may sleep in his own raiment [over-cloak, mantle], and bless thee; and it shall be righteousness unto thee before the Lord thy God. 14Thou shalt not oppress an hired servant <em>that is<\/em> poor and needy, <em>whether he be<\/em> of thy brethren, or of thy strangers that <em>are<\/em> in thy land within thy gates: 15At his day thou shalt give <em>him<\/em> his hire, neither shall the sun go down upon it, for he <em>is<\/em> poor, and setteth his heart upon it [lifteth his soul unto it]: lest he cry [and he shall not cry] against thee unto the Lord, and it be sin unto thee. 16The fathers shall not be put to death for [with, on account of] the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for [in] his own sin. 17Thou shalt not pervert the judgment of the stranger, <em>nor<\/em> of the fatherless, nor take a widows raiment to pledge: 18But thou shalt remember that [And remember, for] thou wast a bond-man in Egypt, and the Lord thy God redeemed thee thence: therefore I command thee to do this thing [word]. When thou cuttest down thine harvest in thy field, and hast forgot a sheaf in the field, 19thou shalt not go again to fetch it: it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow: that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all the work of thine hands. 20When thou beatest thine olive-tree, thou shalt not go over the boughs again<span class=''>13<\/span> [search the boughs after thee]: it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow. 21When thou gatherest [cuttest off] the grapes of thy vineyard, thou shalt not glean <em>it<\/em> afterward [after this]: it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow. 22And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bond-man in the land of Egypt: therefore I command thee to do this thing.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Deu 25:1<\/span> to <span class='bible'>Deu 19:1<\/span> If there be a controversy between men, and they come [near (hither)] unto judgment, that [and] <em>the judges<\/em> may [omit may] judge them; 2then [and] they shall justify the righteous, and condemn the wicked. Ana [Then] it shall be, if the wicked man <em>be<\/em> worthy to be beaten [a son of stripes], that the judge shall cause him to lie down, and to be beaten before his face, according to his fault [what his fault requires] by a certain number. 3Forty stripes he may give him, <em>and<\/em> not exceed: lest <em>if<\/em> he should exceed, and beat him above these with many stripes, then thy brother should seem vile unto thee. 4Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out [lit. and marg.: in his threshing] <em>the corn<\/em>. 5If brethren dwell together, and one of them die and have no child [son], the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger: her husbands<span class=''>14<\/span> brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husbands brother unto her. 6And it shall be, <em>that<\/em> the first-born which she beareth, shall succeed in the name of his brother <em>which<\/em> is dead, that his name be not put out of Israel. 7And if the man like not to take his brothers<span class=''>15<\/span> wife, then let his brothers wife go up to the gate unto the elders, and say, My husbands brother refuseth to raise up unto his brother a name in Israel, he will not perform the duty of my husbands 8brother. Then [And] the elders of his city shall[<em>om<\/em>. shall] call him, and speak unto him: and <em>if<\/em> [<em>om. if<\/em>] he stand <em>to it<\/em>, and say, I like not to take her, 9Then shall his brothers wife come unto him in the presence of the elders, and loose his shoe from off his foot, and spit in his face, and shall answer [reply], and say, So shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brothers house. 10And his name shall be called in Israel, The house of him that hath his shoe loosed [the bare-footed]. 11When men strive together one with another [together a man and his brother], and the wife of the one draweth near for to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth him, and putteth forth her hand, and taketh him by the secrets: 12Then thou shalt cut off her hand, thine eye shall not pity <em>her<\/em>. 13Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights [stone and a stone. So the marg.], a great and a small: 14Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures [an ephah and an ephah, marg.], 15a great and a small: <em>But<\/em> thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect and just<span class=''>16<\/span> measure shalt thou have; that thy days may be 16lengthened in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee. For all [every one] that do such things, <em>and<\/em> all [every one] that do unrighteously, <em>are<\/em> an abomination unto the Lord thy God. 17Remember what Amalek did unto thee by the way, 18when ye were come forth out of Egypt; How he [who] met thee by the way, and smote the hindmost of thee, <em>even<\/em> all <em>that were<\/em> feeble behind thee, when thou <em>wast<\/em> faint and weary: and he feared not God. Therefore [And] it shall be, when the Lord thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about, in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee <em>for<\/em> an inheritance to possess it, <em>that<\/em> thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; 19thou shalt not forget <em>it<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.<span class='bible'> Deu 23:15-18<\/span>. The previous directions for war, offer the point of union here, since in the time of war servants might easily escape from the enemy. It occurs, however, when Israel was abroad in the field; but now he is at home, <span class='bible'>Deu 23:16<\/span>; hence there is a return so far to <span class='bible'>Deu 23:1-8<\/span>, as (<span class='bible'>Deu 23:15<\/span>) the dwelling of a heathen servant might be hazardous as to the sacred character of the people of God. But <strong>the escaped<\/strong> (who will rescue himself) to Israel desires the very same thing which Israel himself had experienced at the hand of God (<span class='bible'>Deu 23:15<\/span>, ); without considering, that the individual ownership, the right of possession, even according to Egyptian ideas, ceases when that of the whole people comes to an end. (Schultz). If Jehovah delivers the enemy before Israel, Israel should not deliver any one, even a slave, into hostile, and at the same time arbitrary power.  Hiphil delivered to be shut up, in order to be held more securely, perhaps even at first to be cruelly punished. <span class='bible'>Deu 23:16<\/span>. But even in Israel itself such a fugitive should not be made to feel his position by oppression, fraud, defamation, <em>etc.<\/em>, (<span class='bible'>Exo 22:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 19:33<\/span>), but should be permitted to do as he likes, as a fellow-dweller in the good land of Jehovah. Comp. upon <span class='bible'>Deu 1:16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 10:18<\/span> sq.; <span class='bible'>Deu 14:29<\/span> (<span class='bible'>Deu 14:21<\/span>). No active efforts for the conversion of the heathen were enjoined. Baumgarten. Such a reception of one escaping from the heathen meets however, <span class='bible'>Deu 23:17<\/span>, immediately its limitations. This <strong>consecrated (prostitute)<\/strong> belonged to the Phnician, Syrian goddess of love (Astarte, Mylitta). Prostitution might awaken in Israel a like religious service with that existing of old in Canaan (<span class='bible'>Gen 38:21<\/span>) so that the designation (Kedeshah) becomes an honorable title for a prostitute, (<span class='bible'>Lev 19:29<\/span>). There were Sodomites also, <span class='bible'>Lev 18:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job 36:14<\/span> (<span class='bible'>1Ki 14:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki 23:7<\/span>). Still less should they deliver to Jehovah (<span class='bible'>Deu 23:18<\/span>) the gift or hire.  from  to depart from the true form of the sexual life, marriage; to digress, to commit excesses. Such gifts were a reward for religious iniquity, a present in which the God of Israel was treated as a lust idol. The special gift was a kid of the goats, <span class='bible'>Gen 38:17<\/span> sq., but also money, hence <strong>the price of a dog<\/strong>, not the money received for a dog sold, but the reward of gain of Kadesh () a Sodomite, one who endured, what one dog suffers from another. Knobel. Used here figuratively, because it had grown into a <em>terminus technicus<\/em> (<span class='bible'>Rev 22:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rev 21:8<\/span>). Upon <strong>house of the Lord<\/strong>. Comp. Intro.,  4, I. 23. <strong>For any vow<\/strong>, as Phnician lewdness, dedicated especially these fruits of the body to idols. <strong>Even both these<\/strong>, the gift and the giver.<\/p>\n<p>2.<span class='bible'> Deu 23:19-20<\/span>. The discourse passes from God to our neighbor, as in <span class='bible'>Deu 23:20<\/span>, at the close, back again to God, in a genuine deuteronomic way, showing the profound understanding of the law, of the connection between the two tables. <span class='bible'>Deu 23:19<\/span>.  (from  to bite) literally something biting, oppressive, the Hiphil is not to give interest, but to take, as <span class='bible'>Exo 22:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 25:36<\/span> sq.; for if the taking was forbidden, the obligation not to give is of course evident, especially since only the necessity of a brother could bring him to borrow, in the simple relations of Israel, and unselfish love should have arranged for this. We are not to think here of the speculations of trade. <span class='bible'>Deu 23:20<\/span>. Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 15:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 15:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 14:21<\/span>; for the rest <span class='bible'>Deu 12:7<\/span>. <strong>The stranger<\/strong> is perhaps one passing through Israel for purposes of trade, not one () remaining or dwelling for a time among Israel. The Phnicians, Arabians certainly, took interest from Israel. [The permission to take usury (interest) from the stranger carries with it of course the principal. And it is probable that the loaning of money at fair and easy rates, to aid or accommodate a brother, is not here prohibited. And even if prohibited here, it is only for the special cases, and in the peculiar circumstances of the ancient people of God.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p>3.<span class='bible'> Deu 23:21-23<\/span>. , kindred with  to set apart, in Niphal: to abstain from anything, to consecrate oneself to anything, hence  a devoted thing. The fulfilling must follow. Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 15:9<\/span>. If sin, then of course the demand with penalty. On the other hand the vow, even when near at hand, and customary, may be discontinued. For it is, <span class='bible'>Deu 23:23<\/span>, voluntary, or a free-will offering; but the freedom before it is uttered, makes the obligation still stronger afterwards.  as always to preserve.  voluntariness, here without the  (<span class='bible'>Hos 14:5<\/span>), merely voluntary, from  to move, to give freely, intrans. movable, to be willing, generous,  generally what was vowed, especially the utterance, or vow. Comp. moreover <span class='bible'>Leviticus 27<\/span>; Num 6:30.<\/p>\n<p>4.<span class='bible'> Deu 23:24-25<\/span>. The freedom over against God (with respect to that belonging to Him) leads now again to a corresponding freedom in regard to the property of our neighbor: the more comprehensible as Jehovah is the literal and permanent owner of the promised land. These verses relate to the thirsting and hungry, the former standing first here as the deepest and most painful necessity. The needy one therefore is not the laborer, but rather the traveller, the passer by. It is expressly forbidden that any one should make out of this freedom a means of support. The literal poverty in Israel is not in view here. Comp. further <span class='bible'>Deu 12:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 12:20<\/span> sq.; <span class='bible'>Deu 14:26<\/span>. Fill thy desire. , full, be satisfied, satisfaction. Accusative of the closer limitation. <span class='bible'>Deu 23:25<\/span>. Comp. upon <span class='bible'>Deu 16:9<\/span>.  the ears as standing out. [Ges.: as cut off], (<span class='bible'>Mat 12:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 6:1<\/span>). Usually roasted, <span class='bible'>Lev 23:14<\/span>. Thus take no store along with them.<\/p>\n<p>5.<span class='bible'> Deu 24:1-5<\/span>. This chapter leads us into the home of the Israelite, into his domestic life. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:1-4<\/span>. Of divorce. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:1<\/span>. Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 22:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 21:13<\/span>. To marry a wife, according to this, is to take property into possession, hence to become her lord. The divorce was thus as a mater of fact supposed, and indeed in the case which Moses, in this view of the wife, must leave as it iswhen in the closer and daily intercourse of life she was not pleasing to the husbandand thus entirely as in subjection to him who had power over her. Her not finding favor with him must truly rest upon a previous finding on his side with regard to her, and through this has its ground and motives. While the latter finding is always put into the husbands hands alone, it must still be something that is <strong>nakedness<\/strong> (uncleanness) and not might be <strong>nakedness<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>Deu 23:14<\/span>). Thus a physical or moral occasion for divorce. The school of Hillel at the time of Christ interpreted it as    (<span class='bible'>Mat 19:3<\/span>), <em>i.e.<\/em>, any thing which may not be pleasing to the husbandpurely subjective. The stricter school of Schammai confined it to some immodesty, shamelessness, lewdness, adultery. But this latter was a capital crime. Knobel holds correctly, no doubt, to some physical defect. Upon the writing see Hengstenb. <em>Auth.<\/em> I. 460. In connection with the supposed spread of the art of writing among Israel, this divorce does not appear to have been directly made more difficult by the  (letter, writing) of divorcement, although this may have been the case when the learned priest or Levite must be brought, who would seek to reconcile the husband. Herxheimer. Such a form of divorce, gave only into the hand of the divorced wife that which would show, that she was legitimately dismissed, and so free, both generally and before other men, and over against her husband hitherto (<span class='bible'>Deu 24:4<\/span>). <span class='bible'>Deu 24:2<\/span>. Is a description of her freedom. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:3<\/span>. In direct continuance of the preceding, <span class='bible'>Deu 24:1-2<\/span>, this verse now utters more fully the case, which is literally in view here. Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 21:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 22:13<\/span>. A decided hatred alternates with what is said, <span class='bible'>Deu 24:1<\/span>, which as to the rest is repeated, except that the case of a wife freed again by the event of death is further supposed here. The apodosis now follows with the condition or limitation of the divorce. [See textual notes. The sentence should be read as one, <span class='bible'>Deu 24:1-4<\/span>. The pointing in the original makes it clear that Moses does not institute or command divorce. The pointing in our version implies that he does so. He is merely prescribing limitations or regulations to a prevailing custom, which was not in accordance with the institution of marriage, and was only permitted there in this limited sense, and under these restrictions, for the hardness of their hearts. At the same time all these directions tend evidently to prevent any hasty or passionate rupture of the marriage bond, and to guard the interests of the wife as the party most needing protection. For while it seems probable that the wife might initiate the divorce, it was very seldom done.A. G.]. It is worthy of notice, that the original husband is designated , while the second is always called merely  But although the idea of marriage according to its institution (<span class='bible'>Gen 2:23<\/span> sq.) may not be brought out in this connection, yet still the prohibition, this legal impossibility to take her again, would serve without doubt to check, a hasty divorce, the degradation of the woman, and especially the bestializing of the sexual relation of man and wife. Reconciliation is possible, indeed may be silently read between the lines (comp. <span class='bible'>2Sa 3:14<\/span>), but not the taking her again to wife, <strong>after that<\/strong> ( referring to the , <span class='bible'>Deu 24:2<\/span>), <strong>she is defiled<\/strong>. Hothpaal: Suffered herself to be defiled. <em>Polluta est alius concubitu<\/em>. J. H. Michaelis. [Thus it is clear even in these verses. As the Bib. Com. remarks that divorce whilst tolerated for the time contravenes the order of nature and of God. The divorced woman who marries again is defiled. This of course is subject to the interpretation of our Lord, who Himself makes divorce valid, and the innocent party free, on the ground of adultery. Our Lords teaching on this subject is found in <span class='bible'>Mat 5:31-32<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 19:3-9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 16:18<\/span>; and <span class='bible'>Mar 10:2-12<\/span>. It seems to be clear that we are here taught that while marriage is an indissoluble compact between one man and one woman, which cannot be dissolved at the mere arbitrary will of either party, or indeed of both parties, it may be dissolved by the sin of fornication on the part of either. If a man puts away his wife for any other cause, he commits adultery; if upon this ground he is not guilty of any offence. Where divorce takes place upon this ground there is no sin, even if the man marries again. He is free; as the bond has been annulled by the sin of the other party, and so <em>vice versa<\/em>.A. G.]. See <span class='bible'>Lev 18:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 5:13<\/span> sq., of adultery. Man and wife are one flesh, <span class='bible'>Gen 2:24<\/span>. To become the same with a third party is not barely a levitical (<span class='bible'>Lev 15:18<\/span>) but a moral desecration of the marriage union. So fundamentally and essentially, <span class='bible'>Mat 5:32<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 19:9<\/span>. As the second marriage of the divorced was defilement, so here remarriage with her first husband is <strong>abomination before (in the face of) Jehovah;<\/strong> expressively said in every case as <span class='bible'>Deu 7:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 12:31<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 22:5<\/span>. Comp. further <span class='bible'>Lev 18:25<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 3:1<\/span>. sq.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Deu 24:5<\/span>. The newly formed marriage. A new wife, in distinction from the old, just forbidden him, from whom he had divorced himself; a first or a second wife, perhaps even a divorced or a widow.  a concentration of the soldierly or warlike manhood, <span class='bible'>Deu 20:7<\/span>. While the betrothed must present himself, and then be dismissed, the newly-married is naturally not first marched out for a like release. To the previous prohibition limiting and making more difficult the marriage separation, now we have a positive relaxation in the interest of the marriage union, showing at the same time liberal indulgence to the fresh marriage band.   to break in upon, to pass over any one. <span class='bible'>Job 13:13<\/span>. Here generally no public burden.  as in <span class='bible'>Deu 23:18<\/span>. <strong>At home<\/strong>, for the good of his just established domestic life. And <strong>cheer up his wife<\/strong> instead of causing her sorrow through the exposure of his life, or burdening her with care of any kind.<\/p>\n<p>6. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:6-7<\/span>. The founding of a home leads naturally to its preservation. <span class='bible'>Deu 24<\/span>:6 to bind, by the taking of a pledge, to pledge.  the handmill, the dual, to indicate the millstones, literally the grinder, from  to rub, crush. Neither the whole was to be so taken, nor the  in the sense of fixingthe lower stationaryor in the sense of moving [or as the rider] the upper movable stone. The daily preparation of the daily bread depended upon this, and consequently the life (soul) of the poor who had only the most necessary utensils. F. Bovet, in a description of a house at the village of Bireh, says: the furniture consists of a handmill and a large earthen vessel containing the grain. The mill is a stone mortar, in which they turn a millstone by means of a handle, as in our corn-mills. [See Thomson, <em>The Land and the Book<\/em>, pp. 294296, for the structure and mode of using the mill.A. G.]. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:7<\/span>. The house should not only be preserved for the Israelite, but the Israelite at his home.  introduces the transition. Comp. further <span class='bible'>Deu 21:14<\/span>. The harsh, violent treatment, is, as a true deuteronomic and real explanation, inserted between  and  <span class='bible'>Exo 21:16<\/span>; (<span class='bible'>1Ti 1:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rev 18:13<\/span>). Comp. still <span class='bible'>Deu 13:6<\/span>. [Wordsworth: St. Paul transcribes <span class='bible'>1Co 5:13<\/span>, the words of the Sept. here, and thus teaches us to apply these Levitical laws to spiritual things.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p>7. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:8-9<\/span>. The case, when an Israelite must leave his home, is: in the time (upon the skin as from a blow) of  (from  to break forth) <em>i.e.<\/em>, of the eruption, thus at the first appearance; as more precisely explained, <span class='bible'>Leviticus 13<\/span>. sq. Schultz and Keil understand the  needlessly as if: take heed because (of the cost) of the plague of leprosy (as a punishment, <em>i.e.<\/em>, do nothing to incur it). Luther, as the Vulg., takes  for , from before. They should exactly and strictly observe () hold fast, what Moses had commanded the priests and Levites (Intro.,  4, I. 22). They thus direct only (<span class='bible'>Deu 17:10<\/span>) according to the law, when they in case of the leprosy remove any one from his home and separate him from the people (<span class='bible'>Lev 13:45-46<\/span>). The strictness of the admonition is followed by an equally stringent command to obedience, and this, <span class='bible'>Deu 24:9<\/span>, is enforced by a reference to Miriam, <span class='bible'>Num 12:10<\/span> sq. In the case of Miriam the leprosy was the punishment for her rebellion against Moses; but it is not the leprosy, but what Jehovah had done to her (<span class='bible'>Num 12:14<\/span>), her separation beyond the camp, which is here in view. The onward march of the people was at that time restrained by her course, <span class='bible'>Num 12:15<\/span>. Neither the rank nor the person could be regarded.<\/p>\n<p>8. 1013. For the rest, the home of a fellow-Israelite must be respected. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:10<\/span>. Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 15:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 15:6<\/span>. Johlson: In order to take his pledge. Herxheimer: To seize from him a pledge or security. The lender should not invade or disturb the home of the debtor, he is not to act as a landlord. It presupposes better relations than <span class='bible'>Deu 24:6<\/span>. According to <span class='bible'>Deu 24:11<\/span> the borrower defines what the pledge shall be; that he can do without it, is also presupposed according to <span class='bible'>Deu 24:6<\/span>. For if it is something which he can spare, indeed, but only for the day, so it may be taken from him only for the day. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:12<\/span> sq.; Comp. <span class='bible'>Exo 22:25-26<\/span>. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:13<\/span>. Comp. upon <span class='bible'>Deu 6:25<\/span>. [The directions here given are to guard the poor and unfortunate from oppression. Their homes could not be violated. The creditor must stand without and wait for the pledge to be brought. But the right to the pledge is recognized. It must be brought. And doubtless the law or custom would regulate what pledge was sufficient. Within these limits the creditor would have the right to judge.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p>9. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:14-22<\/span>. The mention of the debtor leads, <span class='bible'>Deu 24:14-15<\/span>, to the similarly placed laborer, but with this to the still wider and varied methods how Israel must deport itself at home. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:16-22<\/span>. For , <span class='bible'>Deu 24:14<\/span>, as <span class='bible'>Deu 24:12<\/span> (comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 15:11<\/span>), and upon the added  (comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 15:4<\/span>). , to cut, to defraud, comp. upon <span class='bible'>Lev 19:13<\/span>.  collectively. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:15<\/span>. He was usually a day-laborer (<span class='bible'>Mat 20:8<\/span>).<strong>Upon it<\/strong>, <em>i.e.<\/em> the wages which are still deferred (<span class='bible'>Eph 4:26<\/span>). So also <strong>upon it<\/strong>, <em>i.e.<\/em> he raises, lifts up his desire upon that, which to each day is its fitting reward. Comp. further <span class='bible'>Deu 15:9<\/span> (<span class='bible'>Jam 5:4<\/span>). The condition and expectation of the poor should Israel consider at home, and hence, <span class='bible'>Deu 24:16<\/span> does not confound the justice of God (<span class='bible'>Deu 5:9<\/span>) with that of men, nor visit the death-penalty upon the closest kindred of the guilty, as the physical connection carried with it the punishment among the Persians and other heathen nations.  (<span class='bible'>Deu 22:6<\/span>), upon, <em>i.e.<\/em>, on account of. In such wretched cases Israel must regard and spare the family band, which might impel to like heathen practices (<span class='bible'>2Ki 14:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 25:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jer 31:30<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze 18:20<\/span>). <span class='bible'>Deu 24:17<\/span> regards the condition of the poor in its wider relation; comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 16:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 10:18-19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 27:19<\/span>. Upon the whole passage, comp. <span class='bible'>Exo 22:21<\/span> sq.; <span class='bible'>Deu 23:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 19:33<\/span> sq. The <strong>righteousness<\/strong>, <span class='bible'>Deu 24:13<\/span>, leads at first in <span class='bible'>Deu 24:14-15<\/span>, to that which is privately right and reasonable, but then, <span class='bible'>Deu 24:16<\/span>, to the public justice; so we pass in <span class='bible'>Deu 24:17<\/span> from right generally in the private relations, to the right as connected with security or pledges (<span class='bible'>Deu 24:6<\/span>). In Israel right should be maintained publicly and privately, and indeed according to righteousness as it is love, or better still, grace and mercy, as man becomes acquainted with it in God (<span class='bible'>Deu 24:13<\/span>,  ), as Israel especially had already grown acquainted with it in his God. The <strong>widow<\/strong>, the womanly, is noticed with peculiar tenderness; her <strong>raiment<\/strong> may be viewed as a whole history of poverty (<span class='bible'>Deu 24:12<\/span>). Upon <span class='bible'>Deu 24:18<\/span>, comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 15:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 5:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 7:8<\/span>. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:19-22<\/span>. These verses respect the state and even expectation of the poor which they are justified in cherishing, from their position under Jehovah, the landlord of Canaan. Comp. <span class='bible'>Lev 19:9<\/span> sq.; <span class='bible'>Deu 23:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 14:29<\/span>. The olives, when they were not entirely ripe, were beaten off with poles, and then yielded finer oil (<span class='bible'>Isa 17:6<\/span>). <span class='bible'>Deu 24:22<\/span> as <span class='bible'>Deu 24:18<\/span>. [The three-fold repetition, 19, 20, 21, of these classes who were thus partly provided for, is calculated surely to impress the care and tenderness of God over the poor, and the humanity of the laws of Moses.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>10. Chap. 25, <span class='bible'>Deu 25:1-3<\/span>. To the wretched, not habitually, but for the time, in the ideal connection of this paragraph with the foregoing, belongs also the case of one exposed to punishment. But <span class='bible'>Deu 25:1<\/span> brings out first of all the prevailing righteousness for Israel. The poor or wretched even in this reference could only be treated righteously. Comp. <span class='bible'>Exo 23:7<\/span>. , to be firm, straight. Opposed to , to separate, to turn aside. Whoever in any given case is righteous, the opponent is unrighteous, <em>i.e.<\/em> guilty, not however in the moral sense, but <em>sensu forensi<\/em>. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:2<\/span>. , <em>i.e.<\/em> before the judge, who should observe the number and the kind of stripes, and perhaps also limit the dishonor in the case, through such a form of proceeding. Bovet, who regards the tabernacle as the tent of justice standing in the centre of the people, before which the Lord of Israel cites His people, describes the mode in which justice is pronounced and executed in Egypt to-day; the whole scene now aptly illustrating that which we may suppose to have occurred here.  (comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 15:8<\/span>), according to the measure, with reference to the number, <em>i.e.<\/em> as many as the crime demands according to the <em>jus talionis<\/em>, <span class='bible'>Deu 25:3<\/span>. Forty, <em>i.e.<\/em> 4  10. thus according to all the world, on all sides, a perfect measure. (From <span class='bible'>Gen 7:12<\/span> it is the full measure of the development of judgment. Keil.)<strong>Not exceed<\/strong>, <em>i.e.<\/em>, not more than forty. Anxious not to overstep this extreme limit, the later Jews fixed the number of stripes at thirty-nine (<span class='bible'>2Co 11:24<\/span>).[And yet they did not hesitate to use the whip or scourge, instead of the stick or rod.A. G.]Any <strong>excess<\/strong> over these would be too <strong>many stripes<\/strong>not so much in reference to what a man can endure, as with respect to its spiritual, humane side or aspect. In such a case there would be no limit to the arbitrary will; the sufferer, as to why he was still punished, would not be under the law, but barely under the rod; he would not be even under the protection of the law. Moreover, he would suffer loss in the eyes of his brethren, if it was not retribution nor even dishonor, but the stripes merely which were in view here. , from , to rub open, sweep away [Ges.: roast], <em>e.g.<\/em> by fire, hence light, to make small, despicable, so that it is not necessary to render the Niphal with Meier to be ruined.[Bib. Com.: The son of Israel was not to be lashed like a slave at the mercy of another. The judge was to see that the law was not over-passed.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>11.<span class='bible'> Deu 25:4<\/span>. The treatment of a man as a brute, if we can think of such in an unlimited scourging, gives occasion for the mention of the brutes even, according to righteousness, <span class='bible'>Deu 25:4<\/span>. If his wages are to be given to the hired laborer daily, so also the laboring animal should be permitted to eat of the grain which it treads out, or over which it draws the threshing-cart (Winer, <em>Lex. I.<\/em>, p. 276). Comp. upon this the present usage in the East; Hengst., <em>Moses and Egypt<\/em> (<span class='bible'>1Co 9:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ti 5:18<\/span>). Such a reference to animals makes the reference to the dead brother in the following paragraph to appear more appropriate.[Wordsworth dwells upon the use which the Apostle makes of this passage, not only as showing that the Levitical law has a spiritual sense, in which it is still binding upon all, but as giving us the key by which we may unlock the casket and take out of its treasures. But this opens wide the door to a very loose and fanciful exposition. It would need great sobriety and judgment to keep at all within bounds on the principle here stated. We cannot safely argue from what the apostle did, and justify ourselves in a like course. And the Apostle seems to use the words rather as illustrative of the truth he was teaching than as assigning to them a figurative and spiritual sense.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>12.<span class='bible'> Deu 25:5-10<\/span>. The Levirate marriages. It is not the dead brother alone, but the widow also, who with him claims special notice here. In the following primitive institution there is no allusion to the taking possession of the landed property, Knobel, and hence, <span class='bible'>Deu 25:5<\/span>, <strong>the dwelling together<\/strong> cannot be placed as a condition to the obligation, with Knobel, Keil [Bib. Com.], but only brings to bear from the beginning, the actual position, the local nearness of the brother-in-law as giving rise to it. It was customary to dwell together, if not in the same house, yet upon the same paternal inheritance.  , according to Jewish tradition, without child or grandchild, <span class='bible'>Mat 22:24<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar 12:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Luk 20:28<\/span>. That a son was alluded to here, and expressly in <span class='bible'>Deu 25:6<\/span>, is only natural. But if the dead left behind him even a daughter, it was, according to <span class='bible'>Num 27:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 36:8<\/span>, sufficient. The widow was not free to marry any one belonging to a family beyond the tribe or kindred (<span class='bible'>Num 36:3<\/span>). Comp. <span class='bible'>Gen 19:31<\/span>. , literally, allied, related by marriage, <em>levir<\/em> (), in the Jewish interpretation: the own brother on the fathers side, if unmarried? , Piel, act the part of the brother-in-law. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:6<\/span>. <strong>Shall succeed<\/strong> [Schroeder: <strong>stand up<\/strong>], not to the name of his own father, but to that of his dead uncle, and so be registered in the genealogical table, <em>i.e.<\/em> as is self-evident, be enrolled as his heir. Others hold that he should not only thus perpetuate the name of the dead, but that he should be literally named after him. But comp. <span class='bible'>Rth 4:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rth 4:17<\/span>, for the refutation of this view., from , to wipe off, namely, from the genealogical tables. As <em>e.g.<\/em> Ohad (<span class='bible'>Gen 46:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 6:15<\/span>; comp. with <span class='bible'>Num 26:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 4:24<\/span>). Thus also it was not so much the marriage of the widow which was in question, as much more the preservation in this way of the name, and therewith the person of the dead. But while the law makes valid this custom, coming down from the time of the patriarchs (<span class='bible'>Gen 38:8<\/span>), it is still only in its prevalent form a custom, and therefore without constraint. It leaves the inclination free, permits the refusal. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:7<\/span> delivers it from pure arbitrariness, regulates its expression (comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 21:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 16:12-14<\/span>), in the way of notice, accusation, public hearing and treatment by the magistrate, <span class='bible'>Deu 25:8<\/span>, at which the marriage of the brother-in-law, as also the loss to his own inheritance (<span class='bible'>Rth 4:6<\/span>), and even the perpetuation of his own name (<span class='bible'>Gen 38:9<\/span>), may find public utterance, and ordains, in case the disinclination continues, no strictly legal punishment, but permits a temporary disgrace through the act of the sister-in-law, <span class='bible'>Deu 25:9<\/span>, and a permanent disgrace in the community, <span class='bible'>Deu 25:10<\/span>, both of which, however, could be maintained with the custom itself, or grow feeble, if they did not fall away with it.<strong>In the presence of the elders<\/strong>, <em>i.e.<\/em> publicly, and because he must submit to what follows. The loosing of the shoe from his foot by the sister-in-lawin distinction from <span class='bible'>Rth 4:7-8<\/span>, in which case it was not the own natural brother, and in which also the redemption of the inheritance was especially in view, and thus the kinsman himself could loose his own shoedivested the unwilling brother-in-law of his rights with respect to the widow. Hupfeld: <span class='bible'>Psa 60:8<\/span> says correctly, it was the symbol of renunciation. The reproach put upon her is compensated by the <strong>spitting in his face<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>Lev 15:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 12:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Job 30:10<\/span>); she now contemns him on her side. The Talmud weakens it into: spit before him on the ground. Upon , comp. upon <span class='bible'>Deu 21:7<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 19:16<\/span>, and also <span class='bible'>Gen 16:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Gen 30:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Rth 4:11<\/span>. The founding and establishment of the family! Hence the reproachful title extends even to his <strong>house<\/strong>, and thus the occurrence becomes a lasting remembrance and reproach. But still not as Knobel, Keil, a bare-footed abject, since it is not as bare-footed, as without possessions, that he is infamous, but as one from whom his sister-in-law has loosed his shoe.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Deu 25:11-12<\/span>, limit the interference of a woman permitted in the above custom (comp.  with , <span class='bible'>Deu 25:9<\/span>); upon the other side, morality required such a limitation. Freedom, but not shamelessness, especially in regard to what the sister-in-law had precisely claimed (comp. <span class='bible'>Exo 21:22<\/span>). The attack was, moreover, dangerous to life. Hence the severe and strict penalty which the Rabbins change into a penalty corresponding to the worth of the hand. Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 19:21<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 7:16<\/span>.[It is of course to be understood that the act was wilful, and that the penalty was inflicted by the sentence of the Judges. This is the only mutilation prescribed by the law of Moses, unless we accept the retaliation prescribed as a punishment for the infliction on another of bodily injuries, <span class='bible'>Lev 24:19<\/span> sq. Bib. Com.A. G.]<\/p>\n<p>13.<span class='bible'> Deu 25:13-19<\/span>. How Israel should proceed according to righteousness in trade, <span class='bible'>Deu 25:13-16<\/span>, and in their intercourse with others, <span class='bible'>Deu 25:17-19<\/span>. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:13<\/span>. . As they usually had a purse at the girdle for this purpose, <span class='bible'>Mic 6:11<\/span>. The repetition: <strong>stone and stone<\/strong> [divers weights], (<span class='bible'>Deu 25:14<\/span> : <strong>Ephah and Ephah<\/strong> [divers measures]), as is immediately explained, designates the diverse, the two kinds of weights, the large used in the purchase, and the small in selling (<span class='bible'>Psa 12:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 8:5<\/span>). As with the weights, so it should be also with the grain-measures (from , to collect, gather, hold, whence: vessel). As in the purse, so in the house, <em>i.e.<\/em> neither to use, nor even to have. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:15<\/span>.  is unhurt, complete, whole, both all together, and each one by itself, must be just. For it concerns righteousness. Comp. <span class='bible'>Lev 19:36<\/span>. The promise the same as in <span class='bible'>Deu 5:16<\/span> at the close of the first table. The more solemn conclusion follows in <span class='bible'>Deu 25:16<\/span>; comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 28:12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 22:5<\/span>. The injunction passes from the particular trade, to every transaction of the kind generally. , to contract, distort, Arabia: to overstep the right measure. With this <span class='bible'>Deu 25:17<\/span> joins the exception, which is still however only according to the righteousness of God, and thus also forms the conclusion to this whole section. The case befel the Israelites on the way. Comp. <span class='bible'>Exo 17:8<\/span> sq. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:18<\/span> gives the closer description of the iniquitous conduct of Amalek from the recollection of an eye-witness, who had experienced it. , to extend, to swerve, in the Piel: to bend aside, injure, destroy the tail, the rear. This inhumanity shows already that there is no fear of God with Amalek. Comp. on the other hand <span class='bible'>Exo 15:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 18:1<\/span>.<span class='bible'> Deu 25:19<\/span>. Comp. <span class='bible'>Deu 12:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 17:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 9:7<\/span>. The execution follows in <span class='bible'>1 Samuel 15<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. Israel itself rescued from bondage, realizes in <span class='bible'>Deu 23:15-16<\/span>, a command to humanity (Knobel), but a humanity which appears to be stamped with the highest ideas of human nature. As according to its original destination, it was to be a blessing to all the families of the earth, so it is in Christ the asylum of enslaved humanity.<\/p>\n<p>2. From the Old Testament stand-point, the conversion of the Gentiles rests in the depths of hope and desire. Baumgarten.<\/p>\n<p>3. The element of lust in the heathen religions still in Mohammedanism. The dangerous character of religious fanaticism in this aspect. The sobriety of the religion of Israel.<br \/>4. Interest must be distinguished from usury; but also the persons, whether it is the poor borrowing from necessity, or others borrowing for gain.<br \/>5. Compare L. Wiese, <em>upon the Vow in the evangelical sense, Berlin<\/em>, 1861. Mosheim [<em>Ethics VI.<\/em>, p. 177) distinguishes: either to omit things which otherwise could be done innocently, or to perform something which (or binding to some kind and manner of observance) the law does not require. The purpose: gratitude, desire to devote ourselves to God, zeal in sanctification. Vows should be maturely considered beforehand. Ben. Pictet, <em>Morale Chret<\/em>. I. Book III., Chap. 16.: The vow is a solemn promise to God to do some special thing in His service, and to His honor. Thus not as to the general life, as in baptism and in prayer.<\/p>\n<p>6. When Moses comes to speak of divorce, the bill of divorcement is a  , a record literally of the cleaving apart, cutting away, namely, one from the other, of those who together were one flesh. Thus throughout according to the idea of marriage, which is its ethical spirit and end. The writing of divorcement is likewise also something more than the mere utterance or declaration of the husband; thou art dismissed, repudiated, as occurs among other Oriental nations. It is here treated especially in the interest of the ideality of marriage, see the Exegetical Notes. The law-giver, Knobel remarks, appears to have regarded divorce unfavorably (<span class='bible'>Deu 23:4<\/span>), and therein to have agreed with the prophets, <span class='bible'>Mal 2:16<\/span>. Israel is therein considered in its perfection, although the ordinance of Moses must imply the hardness of their hearts, as is truly the case (comp. Lange, <span class='bible'>Matthew 5<\/span> and <span class='bible'>Matthew 19<\/span>). The negative character of the divine law has, in like manner as its pre supposition, what we are ever prone, to in our evil nature. Israel according to its nature separates the kind of his wives, but that he does so in opposition to the nature of true marriage, that appears manifoldly; and therewith the rays of the full divine truth and revelation break through the dark veil, under which the actual life of Israel is permitted provisional room and scope. Baumgarten.<\/p>\n<p>7. As a militant church Israel must not however interfere with or prevent the inward peace and joy, <span class='bible'>Deu 24:5<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>8. Generally in the last discourses of Moses love is presented clearly as the innermost spirit of the law (Baumgarten). A parallel: the last discourse of Jesus in the gospel by John.<\/p>\n<p>9. How has the Mosaic law-giving obviated from the very first the violent measures which in Greece and Rome, from time to time, were found necessary to correct the hard and intolerable relations of the poor debtor!<\/p>\n<p>10. When Moses, who so strongly, and before all things, urges purity and holiness of heart, does not hesitate to consider the somewhat hard treatment of an animal (<span class='bible'>Deu 25:4<\/span>) in the midst of the most important laws, he stands at the divine central point of the world, from which straight lines lead to all creatures. (Baumgarten).<\/p>\n<p>11. The Levirate marriage has indeed no connection with the general human needs and desires of immortality (Keil), although a similar custom is found among the Mongolians, Circassians, Druses, Abyssinians, and others. This necessity was not indeed distinctly felt by Israel, (hence the Sadduceean pretence, <span class='bible'>Mat 22:24<\/span> sq.), but it is truly from Abraham on entirely included in the promise, as Christ asserts, <span class='bible'>Matthew 22<\/span>, and indeed the promise of this life, for the Word must become flesh. Thus the custom lying at the basis of the legal regulation is an old and honored one in the chosen family. Indeed the main line of the tribe of Judah, the peculiar line of promise, <span class='bible'>Mat 1:3<\/span> sq., springs from that forced or surreptitious marriage of Thamar (<span class='bible'>Genesis 38<\/span>). Leyrer, <em>Herz. Encycl<\/em>., VIII. 358. Compare beside the Levirate marriage of Ruth. In Israel all is directed with reference to the name and the house, and not so much generally to a continuous life in posterity (Schultz). Hence beyond the law, and even those more distant than the brother are allowed to act. The Goel appears as the husbands brother, <span class='bible'>Ruth 4<\/span>. Hence even against the law (<span class='bible'>Lev 18:16<\/span>), incest [Blutschande] is blood-honor; love as the fulfilling of the law. [It should be rather, that in this case and for the ends in view, to preserve the name, the house, the ordinary rules as to inter-marriage were set aside. Such a marriage was not incest.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p>12. For Amalek comp. Doct. and Eth. upon i. 6 sq. 6. What was said as to Israel at home, closes significantly with a recollection of the Edomite Amalek; for thus it is said that a mans enemies will be those of his own house, and that Israel as the people of Jehovah must remain in the camp. Israels perfection is not merely secured through the promise in the future, but in the way of duty made dependent upon its development in obedience.<\/p>\n<p><strong>HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Deu 23:15-16<\/span>. The letter of Paul to Philemon. <span class='bible'>Deu 23:18<\/span>. Luther: Thus all gains by sin are unacceptable to God; He will be honored with reverence. Berl. Bib.: Even everything devoted in some measure to the Lord, on account of currish quarrels and bitterness among each other is also an abomination to the Lord. <span class='bible'>Deu 23:19-20<\/span>. Osiander: If we decline a gain to please God He will in turn restore it to us in another place and way. <span class='bible'>Deu 23:21-23<\/span>. God loves a free-will service. Promises create obligation, and our acts should correspond with our words. <span class='bible'>Deu 23:24-25<\/span>. Wurth. Bib.: God gives the blessing upon our fields not for ourselves alone, but for our neighbors also. Berl. Bib.: See the community of goods! It is all yours. But if thou takest for thyself unreasonably, with a false freedom, it applies not to thee.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Deu 24:1<\/span>. Berl. Bib.: The tying together of Samsons foxes sets all in a flame. Wurth. Bib.: God often suffers that to happen in which He has no pleasure, in order to avoid greater evil and distress, <span class='bible'>Mat 13:30<\/span>. Berl. Bib.: Christ wills that among believers, whose disposition is not so harsh, there should be obedience to the first institution, that all opposition should be obviated by love and reasonable endurance, all crosses and sickness should be patiently borne, and the marriage state preserved in faithfulness to the end of life. Schultz: Lycurgus, Solon, and Numa, permit according to Plutarch a change of wives. Comp. <span class='bible'>Isa 1:1<\/span>. God receives back again, <span class='bible'>Jer 3:1<\/span>. [Wordsworth: Here was Gods love made manifest. He invites the people generally of spiritual adultery to return to him.A. G.]. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:5<\/span>. Osiander: Woe to those who forbid to marry, <span class='bible'>1Ti 4:3<\/span>. Berl. Bib.: God spares young Christians heavy tests, and gives them some sweet foretastes of knowledge and consolation. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:7<\/span>. Starke: Judas took his own life, <span class='bible'>Act 1:18<\/span>. Berl. Bib.: The slave trade. Osiander: We should learn prudence from the loss of others, rather than by our own misfortune. Berl. Bib.: That the whole lump may not be leavened. <span class='bible'>1Co 5:2<\/span>; 1Co 5:6; <span class='bible'>1Co 5:13<\/span>. [Wordsworth: <span class='bible'>Deu 24:13<\/span>. He who injures the poor does violence to God.A. G.]. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:15<\/span>. Baumgarten: Thus was the master put in the place of his laborers. But such feeling is possible only through love, which alone knows how to feel for others, to feel as they feel. Comp. <span class='bible'>Jam 5:4<\/span>. Osiander: He is a thief in the sight of God. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:16<\/span>. Baumgarten: If only strict righteousness rules then no child of Adam can hope for salvation or life; thus this iron link of the natural connection must be broken, which occurs only through divine grace. (<span class='bible'>Jer 31:29-30<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze 18:20<\/span>). <span class='bible'>Deu 24:17<\/span> sq. Strangers, fatherless, widows; these three classes are here four times recommended. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:19<\/span>. The forgotten sheaf the sheaf of the Lord. In this point they should not have a good remembrance, but a good conscience. Osiander: Pious generosity brings no loss. <span class='bible'>Deu 24:22<\/span>. Lange: God reveals the grounds of His will, to convince us so much more fully of its reasonableness; thus man should not require a blind obedience.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>Deu 25:1<\/span>. Richter: An image of the righteousness of God, <span class='bible'>1Ki 8:32<\/span>. Berl. Bib.: The judicial office, a characteristic of God, is often made to be a characteristic of the devil. Starke: One may thus come before the judgment with a good conscience in case of need. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:2<\/span>, Herxheimer: Every one was equal before the law in Israel. Schultz: This punishment fails in the modern idea of dignity, but not with respect to the knowledge of that worth or dignity, even in the body, grounded in the inward relation to Jehovah. The divine law requires that when a man has put off his own worth the delusive appearance of it shall be taken away also. Corporeal punishment, because of the moral earnestness and sense of truth. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:3<\/span>. The offender still a man. Schultz: The guilt of the individual should bring to mind the guilt of all. The number forty characterizes the humiliation, the temptation, and the wandering as ordained by divine power. Comp. <span class='bible'>Gen 7:12<\/span>; the forty years in the wilderness; <span class='bible'>Deu 9:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 9:18<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Lev 12:1<\/span> sq.; <span class='bible'>Jon 3:4<\/span>; Eze 4:6; <span class='bible'>1Ki 19:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mat 4:2<\/span>. Comp. Bahr II. 490. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:5<\/span> sq. Baumgarten: In the duty of mutual love and aid, the external communion first reaches its real truth and significance. The levirate marriage has ceased among the Jews. Wurtb. Bib.: Blood relatives should truly receive the widows and fatherless left behind, and aid them in word and deed. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:9-10<\/span>. Berl. Bib.: Each family should be preserved by this law, that we may better recognize the Messiah, who should be born from the entirely humbled or sunken family of David. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:11<\/span> sq. Starke: Every immodest touch is sin. <span class='bible'>Deu 25:13<\/span> sq. Schultz: The most customary and daily transactions are the most important; where there is the most sin there will be the most sighs. Mammon is always a mammon of unrighteousness. [It is noteworthy that John the Baptist puts the like duties in the fore-front of his preaching, <span class='bible'>Luk 3:12<\/span> sq.; and that the prophets, <span class='bible'>Eze 45:10-12<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Amo 8:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mic 6:10-11<\/span>, and the Psalms, insist upon these duties; Bib. Com.A. G.]. Richter: 1 Thess. <span class='bible'>Deu 4:6<\/span>. The curse of God is the righteous penalty for such secret sins. Israel must have just balances as God in His sanctuary. Berl. Bib.: Not two kinds of words in thy mouth. Baumgarten: These manifold directions of love and indulgence, end in this sharp point, that love and indulgence may never blunt in Israel the sense for the opposition to all evil. Schultz: As the development of the world cannot end but in the dualism of heaven and hell, so neither the development of the law, without this dualism of love and hatred.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[5]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 23:15<\/span>. Literally: Thou shalt not shut.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[6]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 23:17<\/span>. Margin: Sodomites. Literally: sanctified, or a holy one. Words expressive of consecration were applied by the heathen to designate those sunken in peculiar sins.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[7]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 23:19<\/span>. The Hebrew word is expressive from the root, to bite, as if any interest was biting or oppressive.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[8]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 24:1<\/span>. Literally: and he shall give unto her a roll, writing, of cutting off. The accents in the original do not justify the colon in this verse; and the construction requires that the periods at the end of <span class='bible'>Deu 23:1-2<\/span> should be removed. A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[9]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 24:5<\/span>. Margin: more literally: not any thing shall paes upon him.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[10]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 24:6<\/span>. Hebrew: the chariot or rider.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[11]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 24:10<\/span>. Margin: lend the loan of anything.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[12]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 24:10<\/span>. To pledge his pledge. Schroeder: that he may pledge his pledge.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[13]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 24:20<\/span>. Margin: Thou shalt not bough it after thee.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[14]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 25:5<\/span>. The margin: next kinsman is not so literal as the text. It is rather an interpretation than a reading.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[15]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 25:7<\/span>. The text is to be preferred to the margin.A. G.].<\/p>\n<p><span class=''>[16]<\/span>[<span class='bible'>Deu 25:15<\/span>. Literally: a full stone and righteousness shall be to thee, a fall ephah and righteousness shall be to thee. So Schroeder.A. G.].<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Wherefore was this merciful precept introduced here, but to show us, that as the land of Israel was like a city of refuge, none who took shelter in it, should be dragged thence. And is not this spiritual? If you and I have taken shelter from the service of the hard masters we once served, Sin and Satan, and are come to JESUS and the promised land; We must not be given up to our former captivity. If the SON of GOD hath made us free, we shall be free indeed. <span class='bible'>Joh 8:36<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Deu 23:15 Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee:<\/p>\n<p> Ver. 15. <strong> The servant that is escaped.<\/strong> ] A heathen servant that flees for religion, and desires to &#8220;join himself to the Lord, to serve him, and to love the name of the Lord, to be his servant,&#8221; such must have no cause given them to say, &#8220;The Lord hath utterly separated me from his people.&#8221; <span class='bible'>Isa 56:2<\/span> <em> ; <\/em> Isa 56:6 <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Deu 23:15-16<\/p>\n<p>15You shall not hand over to his master a slave who has escaped from his master to you. 16He shall live with you in your midst, in the place which he shall choose in one of your towns where it pleases him; you shall not mistreat him.<\/p>\n<p>Deu 23:15 You shall not hand over to his master a slave The central interpretive question is the nationality of a slave and of his master. To whom does this exactly refer? This must refer to a foreign slave or a foreign slave-master (or both). This does clearly show Israel&#8217;s understanding that a slave is more than an animated tool. YHWH allows servitude under certain restrictions and limits, but He also cares for the powerless, helpless, and vulnerable!<\/p>\n<p>Deu 23:16 Notice the repeated freedoms YHWH demands for the escaped foreign slave:<\/p>\n<p>1. live in your midst &#8211; BDB 442, KB 444<\/p>\n<p>2. the place which he shall choose &#8211; BDB 103, KB 119, Qal IMPERFECT<\/p>\n<p>3. where it pleases him &#8211; BDB 373 II<\/p>\n<p>4. you shall not mistreat him &#8211; BDB 413, KB 416, Hiphil IMPERFECT<\/p>\n<p>What freedom and protection! All other ancient Near Eastern law codes demanded the return (and with it probable death) of runaway slaves. The Mosaic covenant focuses on the rights and protection of the weak, powerless, socially ostracized, and poor. The catch phrase is the widow, the orphan, and the alien (cf. Deu 10:18; Deu 14:29; Deu 16:11; Deu 24:17; Deu 24:19; Deu 26:12-13; Deu 27:19).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>We cannot suppose that this law required the Israelites to entertain slaves who had robbed their masters, or left their service without cause; but such only as were cruelly treated, and fled to them for protection, especially from the neighbouring nations. To such they were commanded to afford shelter, and shew great kindness. 1Sa 30:15, Oba 1:14, Phm 1:10-19 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Pro 30:10 &#8211; Accuse not Isa 16:4 &#8211; mine<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Deu 23:15-16. The servant which is escaped from his master  It seems, from the connection, that this has a particular relation to times of war, when heathen soldiers or servants might desert and come over to the Israelites with intent to turn proselytes to the true religion. In which case, they were neither to send them back, and expose them to the severity of their heathen masters, nor use them hardly themselves, but permit them to live peaceably, and with full enjoyment of all the liberties and privileges of a proselyte in Israel, Lev 19:33; Lev 19:35. It may be understood, likewise, of such foreign servants as, upon inquiry, appeared to be unjustly oppressed by their masters. For it is not strange if the great God, who hates all tyranny, and styles himself the refuge of the oppressed, should interpose his authority to rescue such persons from their cruel masters. He shall dwell with thee in the place which he shall choose  This shows plainly that the passage is not to be understood of the servants of the Israelites their brethren, but of aliens and strangers; he is said to be escaped, and to be allowed to dwell among them, which the servant of an Israelite was supposed to do before.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>23:15 Thou shalt not {h} deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee:<\/p>\n<p>(h) This is meant of the heathen , who fled because of their masters&#8217; cruelty, and embrace the true religion.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold\">The treatment of the disadvantaged 23:15-16<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Slaves from other nations who fled to Israel for refuge should receive permanent asylum. God&rsquo;s people were to show compassion to the oppressed and were not to join with oppressors (cf. Heb 13:3; Gal 6:2). This law clarified a proper association.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee: The case in question is that of a slave who fled from a pagan master to the holy land. It is of course assumed that the refugee was not flying from justice, but only from the tyranny of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-deuteronomy-2315\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Deuteronomy 23:15&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5524","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5524","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5524"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5524\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5524"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5524"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5524"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}