2<\/strong>. And she bare him<\/em> ] The genealogy of Keturah is found again in a shortened form in 1Ch 1:32<\/span>. That we have to do with a tradition relating to tribes and places rather than to individuals, is clearly shewn by such names as Midian, Shuah, Sheba, and Dedan. In this verse six names are given. In view of other groups of twelve<\/em> (cf. notes on Gen 17:20<\/span>, Gen 22:21<\/span>), this number is hardly accidental; see Gen 25:12<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n Zimran<\/em> ] Probably from a word meaning “wild goat”: cf. Zimri, Num 25:14<\/span>.<\/p>\n Midian<\/em> ] The territory with which the Midianites are usually found associated is N.W. Arabia, the east side of the Gulf of Akaba. Groups of Midianites appear in the Sinaitic Peninsula (Exo 2:15<\/span>; Exo 3:1<\/span> Extending their influence along the eastern side of the Dead Sea, Midianites appear as the enemies of Israel on the eastern side of the Jordan (Num 22:4<\/span>; Num 25:6<\/span>; Num 25:17<\/span>; Num 31:1-12<\/span>); and in Judges 6<\/span> bands of Midianites overrun Palestine. On Midianite trade with Egypt, cf. Gen 37:28<\/span>; Gen 37:36<\/span>.<\/p>\n Shuah<\/em> ] = 1Ch 1:32<\/span>. Cf. Job 2:11<\/span>, “Bildad, the Shuhite.” It has been identified somewhat precariously with the Assyrian Suhu<\/em>, on the Euphrates, S. of Carchemish.<\/p>\n Verse 2<\/span>. Zimran<\/B><\/I>] Stephanus Byzantinus mentions a city in Arabia<\/I> Felix<\/I> called Zadram<\/I>, which some suppose to have been named from this son of Keturah; but it is more likely, as Calmet observes, that all these sons of Abraham resided in Arabia Deserta<\/I>; and Pliny, Hist. Nat., lib. vi., c. 28, mentions a people in that country called Zamarenians<\/I>, who were probably the descendants of this person.<\/P> <\/P> Jokshan<\/B><\/I>] Several learned men have been of opinion that this Jokshan was the same as Kachtan<\/I>, the father of the Arabs. The testimonies in favour of this opinion see in Dr. Hunt’s Oration, De Antiquitate<\/I>, c., Linguae Arabicae<\/I>, p. 4. Calmet supposes that the Cataneans, who inhabited a part of Arabia Deserta, sprang from this Jokshan.<\/P> <\/P> Medan, and Midian<\/B><\/I>] Probably those who peopled that part of Arabia Petraea contiguous to the land of Moab eastward of the Dead Sea. St. Jerome terms the people of this country Madinaeans<\/I> and Ptolemy mentions a people called Madianites<\/I>, who dwelt in the same place.<\/P> <\/P> Ishbak<\/B><\/I>] From this person Calmet supposes the brook Jabbok<\/I>, which has its source in the mountains of Gilead<\/I>, and falls into the sea of Tiberias, took its name.<\/P> <\/P> Shuah.<\/B><\/I>] Or Shuach<\/I>. From this man the Sacceans<\/I>, near to Batanla, at the extremity of Arabia Deserta, towards Syria, are supposed to have sprung. Bildad<\/I> the Shuhite<\/I>, one of Job’s friends, is supposed to have descended from this son of Abraham.<\/P> <\/p>\n Quest.<\/B> How could Abraham, being now about one hundred and forty years old, have so many children, when his body was dead in his hundredth year? <\/P> Answ.<\/B> Because that renewed strength which was miraculously conferred upon him, did still in a great measure remain in him, being not a temporary action, but a durable habit or power. <\/P> These persons were the heads of several people dwelling in Arabia and Syria, where we shall find evident footsteps of their names amongst ancient geographers, only a little changed, which could not be avoided in their translation into another language. <\/P> Midian, <\/B>the father of those Midianites, of whom we read Gen 36:35<\/span>; Jdg 6:2<\/span>; Isa 10:26<\/span>. From Shuah<\/B> Bildad seems to be descended, Job 2:11<\/span>. <\/P> <\/p>\n And she bare him Zimran<\/strong>,…. That Keturah should bear children who probably, was a young woman, is not strange; but that Abraham, whose body forty years before this was dead should now have any bore to him, may seem difficult to account for, and only can be attributed to the fresh vigour his body was endued with at the generation of Isaac; and which still continued for the fulfilment of the promise to him of the multiplication of his seed. But if the notion of a late learned bishop e is right, there will be no need to have recourse to any thing extraordinary; which is, that Abraham took Keturah for his concubine, about twenty years after his marriage with Sarah, she being barren, and long before he took Hagar; though not mentioned till after the death of Sarah, that the thread of the history might not be broken in upon; and there are various things which make it probable, as that she is called his concubine, 1Ch 1:32<\/span>, which one would think she should not be, if married to him after the death of Sarah, and when he had no other wife, and seeing before he died he had great grandchildren by her, and the children of her are reckoned down to the third generation; whereas there are only mention of two generations of Hagar, as in Ge 25:1<\/span>; and therefore seems to have been taken by him before Hagar, and even when he was in Haran, and the children by her are thought to be the souls gotten there; nor does it seem very probable that he should take a wife after the death of Sarah, when he was one hundred and forty years of age, and was reckoned an old man forty years before this; and Dr. Lightfoot f is of opinion, that Abraham married her long before Isaac’s marriage, or Sarah’s death; and if this was the case, the difficulty of accounting for Abraham’s fitness for generation vanishes. The first son of Keturah, born to him, was called Zimran, from whence came the Zamareni, a people in Arabia Felix mentioned by Pliny g; and hereabout the sons of Keturah settled, being sent by Abraham into the east country, even into Arabia, which lay east of the place where he then was; and very probably Zabram; or it may be rather Zamram, a royal city in the country of the Cinaedocolpites, a part of Arabia Felix, as placed by Ptolemy h, may have its name from this man: five more of Abraham’s sons by Keturah follow,<\/p>\n and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah<\/strong>: some think that the first of these is the same with Cahtan, whom the Arabs call the father of their nation; but that Cahtan rather seems to be Joktan the son of Eber, see Ge 10:25<\/span>. Philostorgius i speaks of a nation in his time, called Homerites, who were a people that sprung from Keturah, and inhabited Arabia Felix, and who used circumcision on the eighth day: and Bishop Patrick observes from Theophanes, a chronologer of the ninth century, that the Homerites, who lived in the interior parts of Arabia, descended from Jectan, which he conjectures should be read Jocshan, though perhaps he is no other than the Joktan before mentioned. From Medan and Midian sprung the Midianites, so often mentioned in Scripture; their posterity seem to be confounded together, for the same people are called Medanites and Midianites, Ge 37:28<\/span>; from these men the towns in Arabia might have their names, as the Modiana and Madiana of Ptolemy k: as for Ishbak, there is no tracing of his name anywhere, unless, as Bishop Patrick observes, some footsteps of it are to be found in Bacascami, a town of the Zamareni, who descended from his brother Zimran, and in the people Backliltae, both mentioned by Pliny l; though Junius think that Scabiosa Laodicea, in Laodicene of Syria, has its name from him; which seems not likely. The name of Shuah or Shuach may be traced in Socacia, Soaca, and Socheher, cities placed by Ptolemy m in Arabia Felix: though some think the posterity of this man are those whom the geographers call Sauchites, Sauchaeans, and Saccaeans, who settled in Arabia Deserta, and from whom Bildad the Shuhite, Job 2:11<\/span>, descended; which is not improbable. But others have been of opinion, that the town of Suez, which Pliny calls Suaza, had its name from this Shuah, situate at the extremity of the Red sea n.<\/p>\n e Dr. Clayton’s Chronology of the Hebrew Bible, p. 83, &c. f Observations on the Book of Genesis in his Works, vol. 1. p. 695. g Nat. Hist. l. 6. c. 28. h Geograph. l. 6. c. 7. i Eccl. Hist. l. 3. sect. 4. p. 477. k Ut supra. (h) l Ut supra. (g) m Ut supra. (h) n See Egmont and Heyman’s Travels, vol. 2. p. 184.<\/p>\n (2) Zimran.<\/strong>The home of Keturahs descendants is placed by Josephus and Jerome in Arabia-Felix; but the supposed traces of their names are untrustworthy.<\/p>\n Midian<\/strong> is the one son of Keturah who had a great future before him, for his race became famous traders (Gen. 37:28<\/span>); and as they are called Me danites <\/em>there in the Hebrew, in Gen. 37:36<\/span>, it is probable that Medan and Midian coalesced into one tribe. Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, belonged to them (Exo. 2:15-16<\/span>), and, enriched by commerce, they became so powerful as to be dangerous neighbours to the Israelites. (Judges 6, 7<\/span>, 8<\/span>)<\/p>\n Shuah.<\/strong>From him perhaps descended Bildad the Shuhite, Jobs friend (Job. 2:11<\/span>). The name in the Hebrew is different from that also rendered Shuah in Gen. 38:2<\/span>.<\/p>\n 2-4<\/strong>. <\/strong> Compare 1Ch 1:32-33<\/span>. Here are mentioned six sons, seven grandsons, and three great-grandsons . The subsequent history and location of the tribes that sprung from them are very uncertain, and conjectures on the subject are scarcely worth repeating . Those who wish to note them should consult the Bible Dictionaries on the several names . From Midian <\/strong> came the Midianites, often mentioned in the later history of Israel . We meet them in the history of Joseph (Gen 37:28<\/span>) and of Moses, (Exo 2:15<\/span>; Num 22:4<\/span>,) and against them Gideon waged successful war . Judges chapters 6-8 . The names of Sheba <\/strong> and Dedan <\/strong> occur among the sons of Cush, (Gen 10:7<\/span>,) but nothing can be argued from such repetition of names . Some, however, think that these tribes subsequently became intermixed by marriage . Midian, Ephah<\/strong>, and Sheba <\/strong> are mentioned together in Isa 60:6<\/span>. These tribes were nomadic, and probably for a time wandered, like Abraham, to and fro in the wide deserts south and east of Palestine. They probably, at a subsequent date, became largely intermingled with the Ishmaelites, and are represented now in the numerous Arab tribes of these same ancient deserts.<\/p>\n Gen 25:2 And she bare him Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah.<\/p>\n Ver. 2. No Text for this verse.<\/p>\n Medan and<\/p>\n Midian were half-brothers with Ishmael, and they were mixed up together in their dealings. See note on Gen 37:25, Gen 37:28. <\/p>\n am cir, 2152, bc cir, 1852 <\/p>\n she bare: 1Ch 1:32, 1Ch 1:33, Jer 25:25, Zimri <\/p>\n Midian: Gen 36:35, Gen 37:28, Gen 37:36, Exo 2:15, Exo 2:16, Exo 18:1-4, Num 22:4, Num 25:17, Num 25:18, Num 31:2, Num 31:8, Jdg 6:1 – Jdg 8:35 <\/p>\n Shuah: Job 2:11 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: 1Ki 11:18 – Midian 1Ch 1:46 – Midian Jer 25:24 – the mingled<\/p>\n And she bore him Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. 2. And she bare him ] The genealogy of Keturah is found again in a shortened form in 1Ch 1:32. That we have to do with a tradition relating to tribes and places rather than to individuals, is clearly shewn … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Genesis 25:2”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-669","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/669","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=669"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/669\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=669"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"