26<\/strong>. he is not clean<\/em> ] Persons who were ceremonially unclean were peremptorily excluded from participating in a religious festival. See Lev 7:20-21 ; 1Sa 16:5<\/span>.<\/p>\n He is not clean – <\/B>The new moon being a religious feast, and the meat to be eaten being peace-offerings, no one could assist at the feast who had any ceremonial uncleanness upon him (marginal references).<\/P><\/p>\n Something hath befallen; <\/B>some accident which hath rendered him unclean, and so unfit to partake of this feast, which consisted in part of the remainders of these peace-offerings, according to the law, Lev 7:20<\/span>; unfit also to come into any company, much more into the kings company, lest he should pollute them also. See Poole “1Sa 20:5<\/span>“. See also Le 11<\/span> Le 15<\/span>. <\/P><\/p>\n 26. he is not clean<\/B>No noticewas taken of David’s absence, as he might be laboring under someceremonial defilement.<\/P><\/p>\n Nevertheless, Saul spake not anything that day<\/strong>,…. About David’s absence, took no notice of it, said nothing about it:<\/p>\n for he thought something had befallen him<\/strong>; some impurity, some nocturnal pollution, see Le 15:16<\/span>;<\/p>\n he [is] not clean, surely he [is] not clean<\/strong>; which he repeated in his mind for the confirmation of it, and in contempt, and to the reproach of David; and in this way he accounted for his absence the first day, and so was easy, it not being lawful and fitting for an unclean person in a ceremonial sense to eat of the peace offerings, which Saul and his family were now partaking of.<\/p>\n 26<\/strong>. <\/strong> He is not clean <\/strong> Some ceremonial defilement prevents his attendance at this festival of the new moon. Compare marginal references.<\/p>\n 1Sa 20:26<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>He is not clean; surely he is not clean<\/em><\/strong><\/strong> See Lev 15:16<\/span>. Houbigant renders this; because, possibly, being unclean, he hath not purified himself: <\/em>following the LXX. The other versions vary greatly. <\/p>\n 1Sa 20:26 Nevertheless Saul spake not any thing that day: for he thought, Something hath befallen him, he [is] not clean; surely he [is] not clean.<\/p>\n Ver. 26. Something hath befallen him.<\/strong> ] Casus est,<\/em> it is some of those chances wherewith men are defiled and unfitted for holy services; such as were the touching of dead bodies, nocturnal pollutions, &c. Lev 7:19-20 <\/p>\n <\/p>\n He is not clean.<\/strong> ] Himself, then, surely was clean, sc., <\/em> from those legal pollutions; but his heart was full of filth, and his hands of blood. This is the guise of hypocrites.<\/p>\n not any thing: i.e. “nothing [concerning David’s absence] that day “. <\/p>\n he is not clean: Lev 7:21, Lev 11:24, Lev 11:27, Lev 11:31, Lev 11:40, Lev 15:5, Lev 15:16, Lev 15:17, Lev 15:19-21, Num 19:16 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Num 11:26 – went not out Ecc 10:13 – beginning Zep 1:7 – bid<\/p>\n 20:26 Nevertheless Saul spake not any thing that day: for he thought, Something hath befallen him, he [is] not {k} clean; surely he [is] not clean.<\/p>\n (k) Yet he might have some business to let him.<\/p>\n Nevertheless Saul spoke not any thing that day: for he thought, Something hath befallen him, he [is] not clean; surely he [is] not clean. 26. he is not clean ] Persons who were ceremonially unclean were peremptorily excluded from participating in a religious festival. See Lev 7:20-21 ; 1Sa 16:5. Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Samuel 20:26”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7768","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7768","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7768"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7768\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7768"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7768"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"