{"id":9078,"date":"2022-09-24T02:53:51","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T07:53:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-1-kings-915\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T02:53:51","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T07:53:51","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-1-kings-915","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-1-kings-915\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Kings 9:15"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> And this [is] the reason of the levy which king Solomon raised; for to build the house of the LORD, and his own house, and Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer. <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 15 25<\/strong>. Of the levy which king Solomon raised (<span class='bible'>2Ch 8:4-11<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p><strong> 15<\/strong>. <em> the reason of the levy<\/em> ] On the nature and amount of this compulsory service see notes on chap. <span class='bible'>1Ki 5:13<\/span> seqq. The present passage explains the whole purpose for which it was enforced.<\/p>\n<p><em> and Millo<\/em> ] This word is always found in the original with the definite article &lsquo;the Millo&rsquo; (<span class='bible'>2Sa 5:9<\/span>; 1Ki 11:27 ; <span class='bible'>2Ch 11:8<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 32:5<\/span>). Wherever it occurs it is in connexion with the walls or fortifications of Jerusalem. In <span class='bible'>2Ch 32:5<\/span> it is stated to be in the city of David. Now the most common rendering of the word in the LXX. is   = &lsquo;the citadel,&rsquo; a word which is constantly used in the Books of the Maccabees for the fortress on Mount Zion. It seems probable therefore that &lsquo;the Millo&rsquo; was some specially important, and hence strongly fortified, portion of the oldest walls where they approached most closely to Zion. From <span class='bible'>2Sa 5:9<\/span> we should conclude that the fortress was already existing before David conquered Jerusalem, and the name itself may have been given by the Jebusites.<\/p>\n<p><em> and Hazor<\/em> ] A strong city, south of Kedesh-Naphtali in the north of Palestine. When the Israelites entered Canaan it was in the possession of king Jabin, but was taken and burnt by Joshua. Standing on a lofty position it was a post of much importance for the defence of the kingdom on the north. For this reason no doubt Solomon fortified it, but it must have already been rebuilt since its destruction by Joshua, for we read of it in <span class='bible'>Jdg 4:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 4:17<\/span>, as the city of another Jabin, whose commander in chief was Sisera, slain by Jael.<\/p>\n<p><em> Megiddo<\/em> ] This city (<span class='bible'>Jos 12:21<\/span>) lay on the south side of the plain of Esdraelon, between Mt. Tabor and the modern bay of St Jean d&rsquo;Acre, and must have been important as a protection against inroads from the northern highlands and from the direction of Phnicia, commanding, as it would, the great road from the sea to the plain of the Jordan. Megiddo lay within the tribe of Issachar, but was allotted to Manasseh (<span class='bible'>Jos 17:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 7:29<\/span>). The city was famous for the overthrow of Sisera, but most especially as the place where king Josiah was slain in the war against Pharaoh-Necho (<span class='bible'>2Ki 23:29<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p><em> Gezer<\/em> ] The position of this ancient city has not been identified, and it is not clear that there were not two places of the same name. One Gezer is mentioned (<span class='bible'>Jos 10:33<\/span>) in connexion with Lachish and Eglon and other places in the south part of Canaan, but a Gezer is also spoken of as in the land assigned to the children of Joseph (<span class='bible'>Jos 16:3<\/span>), that is, the tribe of Ephraim, and as being not far from Beth-horon. If these two be references to the same place the king of Gezer came a long distance to help the king of Lachish. It seems more likely that they were distinct towns. The Gezer in Ephraim did however remain in the possession of the Canaanites (see <span class='bible'>Jos 16:10<\/span>), and so the king of Egypt may have come against it (as we read in the next verse) without being at war with Israel. Yet the fortification by Solomon of a place to protect his dominions on the south makes it perhaps a little more probable that some place nearer Eglon and Lachish is meant in the present passage, for there Canaanites might also be dwelling.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Levy &#8211; <\/B>See the marginal reference note.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>Millo &#8211; <\/B>See <span class='bible'>2Sa 5:9<\/span> note. The Septuagint commonly render the word <span class='_800000'><SPAN LANG=\"el-GR\"> <\/SPAN><\/span> <I>he<\/I> <I>akra<\/I>, the citadel, and it may possibly have been the fortress on Mount Zion connected with the Maccabean struggles (1 Macc. 4:41; 13:49-52). Its exact site has not been determined.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>And the wall of Jerusalem &#8211; <\/B>Davids fortification <span class='bible'>2Sa 5:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 11:8<\/span> had been hasty, and had now &#8211; fifty years later &#8211; fallen into decay. Solomon therefore had to repair the breaches of the city of David <span class='bible'>1Ki 11:27<\/span>.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">Hazor, Megiddo, and Gezer were three of the most important sites in the holy land. For the two first places, compare the marginal references and notes.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">Gezer was a main city of the south. It was situated on the great maritime plain, and commanded the ordinary line of approach from Egypt, which was along this low region. The importance of Gezer appears from <span class='bible'>Jos 10:33<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 12:12<\/span>, etc. Its site is near Tell Jezer, and marked now by Abu Shusheh. Though within the lot of Ephraim <span class='bible'>Jos 16:3<\/span>, and especially assigned to the Kohathite Levites <span class='bible'>Jos 21:21<\/span>, it had never yet been conquered from the old inhabitants (marginal references), who continued to dwell in it until Solomons time, and apparently were an independent people <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:16<\/span>.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\">Pharaoh took it before the marriage of Solomon with his daughter, and gave it for a present &#8211; i. e., for a dowry. Though in the East husbands generally pay for their wives, yet dower is given in some cases. Sargon gave Cilicia as a dowry with his daughter when he married her to Ambris king of Tubal: and the Persian kings seem generally to have given satrapial or other high offices as dowries to the husbands of their daughters.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> Verse <span class='bible'>15<\/span>. <I><B>This<\/B><\/I><B> is <\/B><I><B>the reason of the levy<\/B><\/I>] That is, in order to pay Hiram the sixscore talents of gold which he had borrowed from him (Hiram not being willing to take the Galilean cities mentioned above; or, having taken them, soon restored them again) he was obliged to lay a tax upon the people; and that this was a grievous and oppressive tax we learn from <span class='bible'>1Kg 12:1-4<\/span>, where the elders of Israel came to Rehoboam, complaining of their heavy state of taxation, and entreating that their yoke might be made lighter.<\/P> <P> <\/P> <P> <I><B>And Millo<\/B><\/I>] This is supposed to have been a deep valley between Mount Sion and what was called the city of Jebus, which Solomon filled up, and it was built on, and became a sort of fortified place, and a place for public assemblies.-See <I>Calmet<\/I>.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> <B>The levy which king Solomon raised; <\/B>both the levy of men, of which <span class='bible'>1Ki 5:13<\/span>, and the levy of money upon his people and subjects, which is sufficiently evident from many scriptures. And this sentence may look both backward and forward. He raised this levy, both to pay what he owed to Hiram, which is mentioned before; and to build the works here following. <\/P> <P><B>Millo<\/B> seems to have been an eminent, and large, and strong fort or castle in Jerusalem, as may be gathered from <span class='bible'>1Ki 11:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ch 32:5<\/span>. <\/P> <P><B>Hazor, <\/B>in Naphtali. See <span class='bible'>Jos 11:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 19:36<\/span>. <\/P> <P><B>Megiddo, <\/B>in that part of the tribe of Manasseh within Jordan; of which see <span class='bible'>Jos 17:11<\/span>. <\/P> <P><B>Gezer, <\/B>in Ephraim, <span class='bible'>Jos 21:21<\/span>. It now was, and long had been, in the possession of the Canaanites, <span class='bible'>Jos 16:10<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 1:29<\/span>, and permitted so to be by David and Solomon, either by neglect, or because they were busied in greater and more necessary employments. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P><B>15-24. this is the reason of thelevy<\/B>A levy refers both to men and money, and the necessity forSolomon making it arose from the many gigantic works he undertook toerect. <\/P><P>       <B>Millo<\/B>part of the fortof Jerusalem on Mount Zion (<span class='bible'>2Sa 5:9<\/span>;<span class='bible'>1Ch 11:8<\/span>), or a row of stonebastions around Mount Zion, Millo being the great corner tower ofthat fortified wall (<span class='bible'>1Ki 11:27<\/span>;<span class='bible'>2Ch 32:5<\/span>). <\/P><P>       <B>the wall of Jerusalem<\/B>eitherrepairing some breaches in it (<span class='bible'>1Ki11:27<\/span>), or extending it so as to enclose Mount Zion. <\/P><P>       <B>Hazor<\/B>fortified onaccount of its importance as a town in the northern boundary of thecountry. <\/P><P>       <B>Megiddo<\/B>(nowLeijun)Lying in the great caravan road between Egypt and Damascus,it was the key to the north of Palestine by the western lowlands, andtherefore fortified. <\/P><P>       <B>Gezer<\/B>on the westernconfines of Ephraim, and, though a Levitical city, occupied by theCanaanites. Having fallen by right of conquest to the king of Egypt,who for some cause attacked it, it was given by him as a dowry to hisdaughter, and fortified by Solomon.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown&#8217;s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>And this is the reason of the levy which King Solomon raised<\/strong>,&#8230;. Both of men to work, <span class='bible'>1Ki 5:13<\/span>, and of money to defray the expense:<\/p>\n<p><strong>it was for to build the house of the Lord<\/strong>; the temple:<\/p>\n<p><strong>and his own house<\/strong>; or palace:<\/p>\n<p><strong>and Millo<\/strong>; which he repaired: <span class='bible'>[See comments on 1Sa 5:9]<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>and the wall of Jerusalem<\/strong>; which, as Abarbinel says, was a large building, there being three walls one within another:<\/p>\n<p><strong>and Hazor<\/strong>; a city in the tribe of Naphtali, and which had been a royal city with the Canaanites; see <span class='bible'>Jos 11:1<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>and Megiddo<\/strong>; which was in the tribe of Manasseh, <span class='bible'>Jos 17:11<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>and Gezer<\/strong>; which was in the tribe of Ephraim, and formerly a royal city of the Canaanites, <span class='bible'>Jos 10:33<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">Solomon&#8217;s Buildings; Solomon&#8217;s Greatness.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"RIGHT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in\"> <SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><FONT SIZE=\"1\" STYLE=\"font-size: 8pt\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">B. C.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"> 991.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/FONT><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR>  <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 15 And this <I>is<\/I> the reason of the levy which king Solomon raised; for to build the house of the <B>LORD<\/B>, and his own house, and Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer. &nbsp; 16 <I>For<\/I> Pharaoh king of Egypt had gone up, and taken Gezer, and burnt it with fire, and slain the Canaanites that dwelt in the city, and given it <I>for<\/I> a present unto his daughter, Solomon&#8217;s wife. &nbsp; 17 And Solomon built Gezer, and Beth-horon the nether, &nbsp; 18 And Baalath, and Tadmor in the wilderness, in the land, &nbsp; 19 And all the cities of store that Solomon had, and cities for his chariots, and cities for his horsemen, and that which Solomon desired to build in Jerusalem, and in Lebanon, and in all the land of his dominion. &nbsp; 20 <I>And<\/I> all the people <I>that were<\/I> left of the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, which <I>were<\/I> not of the children of Israel, &nbsp; 21 Their children that were left after them in the land, whom the children of Israel also were not able utterly to destroy, upon those did Solomon levy a tribute of bondservice unto this day. &nbsp; 22 But of the children of Israel did Solomon make no bondmen: but they <I>were<\/I> men of war, and his servants, and his princes, and his captains, and rulers of his chariots, and his horsemen. &nbsp; 23 These <I>were<\/I> the chief of the officers that <I>were<\/I> over Solomon&#8217;s work, five hundred and fifty, which bare rule over the people that wrought in the work. &nbsp; 24 But Pharaoh&#8217;s daughter came up out of the city of David unto her house which <I>Solomon<\/I> had built for her: then did he build Millo. &nbsp; 25 And three times in a year did Solomon offer burnt offerings and peace offerings upon the altar which he built unto the <B>LORD<\/B>, and he burnt incense upon the altar that <I>was<\/I> before the <B>LORD<\/B>. So he finished the house. &nbsp; 26 And king Solomon made a navy of ships in Ezion-geber, which <I>is<\/I> beside Eloth, on the shore of the Red sea, in the land of Edom. &nbsp; 27 And Hiram sent in the navy his servants, shipmen that had knowledge of the sea, with the servants of Solomon. &nbsp; 28 And they came to Ophir, and fetched from thence gold, four hundred and twenty talents, and brought <I>it<\/I> to king Solomon.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; We have here a further account of Solomon&#8217;s greatness.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I. His buildings. He raised a great levy both of men and money, because he projected a great deal of building, which would both employ many hands and put him to a vast expense, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 15<\/span>. And he was a wise builder, who sat down first, and counted the cost, and would not begin to build till he found himself able to finish. Perhaps there was some complaint of the heaviness of the taxes, which the historian excuses from the greatness of his undertakings. He raised it, not for war (as other princes), which would spend the blood of his subjects, but for building, which would require only their labour and purses. Perhaps David observed Solomon&#8217;s genius to lie towards building, and foresaw he would have his head and hands full of it, when he penned that song of degrees for Solomon, which begins, <I>Except the Lord build the house, those labour in vain that build it<\/I> (<span class='bible'>Ps. cxxvii. 1<\/span>), directing him to acknowledge God in all his ways, and, by prayer and faith in his providence, to take him along with him in all his designs of this kind. And Solomon verily began his work at the right end, for he built God&#8217;s house first, and finished that before he began his own; and then God blessed him, and he prospered in all his other buildings. If we begin with God, he will go on with us. Let the first-fruits be his, and the after-fruits will the more comfortably be ours, <span class='bible'>Matt. vi. 33<\/span>. Solomon built a church first and then he was enabled to build houses, and cities, and walls. Those consult not their own interest that defer to the last what they design for pious uses. The further order in Solomon&#8217;s buildings is observable. God&#8217;s house first for religion, then his own for his own convenience, then a house for his wife, to which she removed as soon as it was ready for her (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 24<\/span>), then Millo, the town-house or guild-hall, then the wall of Jerusalem, the royal city, then some cities of note and strength in the country, which were decayed and unfortified, Hazor, Megiddo, c. As he rebuilt these at his own charge, the inhabitants would be not only his subjects, but his tenants, which would increase the revenues of the crown for the benefit of his successors. Among the rest, he built Gezer, which Pharaoh took out of the hands of the Canaanites, and made a present of to his daughter, Solomon&#8217;s wife, <span class='_0000ff'><U><span class='bible'>&amp;lti&gt;v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 16<\/span><\/U><\/span>. See how God <I>maketh the earth to help the woman.<\/I> Solomon was not himself a warlike prince, but the king of Egypt, who was, took cities for him to build. Then he built cities for convenience, for store, for his chariots, and for his horsemen, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 19<\/span>. And, <I>lastly,<\/I> he built for pleasure in Lebanon, for his hunting perhaps, or other diversions there. Let piety begin, and profit proceed, and leave pleasure to the last.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. His workmen and servants. In doing such great works, he must needs employ abundance of workmen. The honour of great men is borrowed from their inferiors, who do that which they have the credit of. 1. Solomon employed those who remained of the conquered and devoted nations in all the slavish work, <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:20<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:21<\/span>. We may suppose that they renounced their idolatry and submitted to Solomon&#8217;s government, so that he could not, in honour, utterly destroy them, and they were so poor that he could not levy money on them; therefore he served himself of their labour. Herein he observed God&#8217;s law (<span class='bible'>Lev. xxv. 44<\/span>, <I>Thy bondmen shall be of the heathen<\/I>), and fulfilled Noah&#8217;s curse upon Canaan, <I>A servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Gen. ix. 25<\/I><\/span>. 2. He employed Israelites in the more creditable services (<span class='bible'>1Ki 9:22<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:23<\/span>): <I>Of them he made no bondmen,<\/I> for they were God&#8217;s freemen, but he made them soldiers and courtiers, and gave them offices, as he saw them qualified, among his chariots and horsemen, appointing some to support the service of the inferior labourers. Thus he preserved the dignity and liberty of Israel and honoured their relation to God as a kingdom of priests.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; III. His piety and devotion (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 25<\/span>): <I>Three times in a year<\/I> he offered burnt-offerings extraordinary (namely, at the three yearly feasts, the passover, pentecost, and feast of tabernacles) in honour of the divine institution, besides what he offered at other times, both statedly and upon special occasions. With his sacrifices he burnt incense, not himself (that was king Uzziah&#8217;s crime), but the priest for him, at his charge, and for his particular use. It is said, He offered <I>on the altar which he<\/I> himself <I>built.<\/I> He took care to build it, and then, 1. He himself made use of it. Many will assist the devotions of others that neglect their own. Solomon did not think his building an altar would excuse him from sacrificing, but rather engage him the more to it. 2. He himself had the benefit and comfort of it. Whatever pains we take, for the support of religion, to the glory of God and the edification of others, we ourselves are likely to have the advantage of it.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; IV. His merchandise. He built a fleet of trading ships at Ezion-geber (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 26<\/span>), a port on the coast of the Red Sea, the furthest stage of the Israelites when they wandered in the wilderness, <span class='bible'>Num. xxxiii. 35<\/span>. Probably that wilderness now began to be peopled by the Edomites, which it was not then. To them this port had belonged, but, David having subdued the Edomites, it now pertained to the crown of Judah. The fleet traded to Ophir in the East Indies, supposed to be that which is now called <I>Ceylon.<\/I> Gold was the commodity traded for, substantial wealth. It should seem, Solomon had before been Hiram&#8217;s partner, or put a venture into his ships, which made him a rich return of 120 talents (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 14<\/span>), which encouraged him to build a fleet of his own. The success of others in any employment should quicken our industry; for <I>in all labour there is profit.<\/I> Solomon sent his own servants as factors, and merchants, and super-cargoes, but hired Tyrians for sailors, for they had <I>knowledge of the sea,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 27<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. Thus one nation needs another, Providence so ordering it that there may be mutual commerce and assistance; for not only as Christians, but as men, we are members one of another. The fleet brought home to Solomon 420 <I>talents of gold,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 28<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. Canaan, the holy land, the glory of all lands, had no gold in it, which teaches us that that part of the wealth of this world which is for hoarding and trading is not the best part of it, but that which is more immediately for the present support and comfort of life, our own and others&#8217;; such were the productions of Canaan. Solomon got much by his merchandise, but, it should seem, David got much more by his conquests. What were Solomon&#8217;s 420 <I>talents<\/I> to David&#8217;s 100,000 <I>talents of gold?<\/I><span class='bible'>1Ch 22:14<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch 29:4<\/span>. Solomon got much by his merchandise, and yet has directed us to a better trade, within reach of the poorest, having assured us from his own experience of both that the <I>merchandise of wisdom is better than the merchandise of silver and the gain thereof than fine gold,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Prov. iii. 14<\/I><\/span>.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>CRITICAL AND EXPLANATORY NOTES<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15-19<\/span>. Solomon fortified the border cities especially open to attacks from foes, and carried out building projects for the public health and advantage. The levy which King Solomon raisedComp. notes on chap. <span class='bible'>1Ki. 5:13<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:23<\/span> shows whom the <em>levy<\/em> included. <\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:22<\/span>. <strong>Men of war<\/strong>  = officials of the war department. <strong>Rulers of his chariots<\/strong> Rather, royal adjutantsthe royal body guard. <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:24-25<\/span> are inserted here without apparent connection with the narrative, but by referring back to the events which embarrassed Solomon at the beginning of his reign (chap. <span class='bible'>1Ki. 3:1-4<\/span>), they mark the completion of his building projects and hence the fulfilment of all his <em>desire<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:26<\/span>. <strong>Navy of ships<\/strong>The Sept., Chald. and Arab. have the singular <em>ship<\/em>, both here and <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:27<\/span>; yet  means a fleet. <em>Ezion-geber<\/em>, a port at the eastern head of the Red Sea. <em>Elioth<\/em>, Elim, where a grove of terebinth trees still stands at the head of the gulf. <\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:28<\/span>. <strong>Gold, four hundred and twenty talents<\/strong><span class='bible'>2Ch. 8:18<\/span> states 450, a mere change of the cipher  (50) into  (20): calculated to value 2,604,000.W. H. J.<\/p>\n<p><em>HOMILETICS OF <\/em><em><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15-28<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE IMPERATIVE EXIGENCIES OF REGAL MAGNIFICENCE<\/p>\n<p>Solomon had the wisdom to conceive how his little inland kingdom could be raised into greatness and importance; and it excites our admiration to observe the skilful combinations by which he accomplished his aims. His relations with Egypt, Arabia, and Tyre, by which he seemed to open up the resources of the East and the West, tended to the rapid aggrandisement of his empire. One luxury demanded another; and the increase of riches seemed to beget the desire for more. In these verses we have some indications of the manifold exigencies of regal magnificence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. There is the demand for architectural display<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:17-19<\/span>). The character of a nation is known by its public buildings. The great nations of antiquity have been famous for the grandeur of their erections. No other Israelitish king ever built so much as Solomon. The sacred narrative would not have given such prominence to his buildings but for their relation to the Theocratic kingdom. They were designed to further the greatness, power, and splendour of the Theocracy of which the Templethe House of Jehovahwas the ostensible centre. After first building the Temple, his <em>chef-duore<\/em> Solomon erected his own royal palace, fortified Jerusalem, and built cities and fortresses in different parts of his dominions. And yet where are these vast structures to-day? They have succumbed to the violence of dynastic changes, and the relentless ravages of time. From the gorgeous temple of Moriah to the massive and elaborate edifices of Tadmor in the Wilderness, whose ruins now lie lonely and forsaken, like bleached bones on a long-neglected battle-field, the same fate has overtaken them. It is not possible to conceive higher ideas of Solomons magnificence than these ruins present, nor more humiliating ideas of the vanity and weakness of all human splendour.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. There is the employment of forced labour<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:20-21<\/span>). The greater portion of the levies of men employed by Solomon in his public works were drawn from the subjugated nations; but still the Israelites were not exempt. This was, perhaps, the first time the Israelites were called upon to perform forced labour. It had been prophesied, when they desired a king, that, if they insisted on having one, he would take their men-servants and their maid-servants, and their goodliest young men, and put them to work (<span class='bible'>1Sa. 8:16<\/span>); and David had bound to forced service the strangers that were in the land of Israel (<span class='bible'>1Ch. 22:2<\/span>); but hitherto the Israelites had escaped. Solomon now, in connection with his proposed work of building the Temple, with the honour of God as an excuse, laid this burden upon them. As to the system adopted, see chap. <span class='bible'>1Ki. 5:13-14<\/span>. This, though a light form of task work, was felt by the Israelites to be a great oppression. But the great works of an imperious prince must proceed, and he who will not voluntarily help must be compelled. Every form of human slavery is degrading. Most of the great buildings of antiquity are the work of slaves. Will the works of freemen be more enduring?<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. There is the maintenance of a costly court<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:22-23<\/span>). The court of Solomon was on a scale of magnificence never attempted in Israel before or since his day. The great officers are now for the first time called by one general name<em>Princes<\/em>. The union of priestly and secular functions still continued. The Palace was next in point of splendour to the Temple, and the Porch of the Palace was the gem and centre of the whole empire. The royal banquets were of the most superb kind. All the plate and drinking vessels were of gold. There was a constant succession of guests. The train of servants was such as had never been seen before. There were some who sat in the kings presence, others who always stood, others who were his cup-bearers, others musicians. His stables were on the most splendid scale. In the midst of this gorgeous array was the sovereign himself. The king is fair, with superhuman beauty; his sword is on his thigh; he rides in his chariot, or on his war-horse; his archers are behind him, his guards are round him; his robes are so scented with the perfumes of India or Arabia that they seem to be nothing but a mass of myrrh, aloes, and cassia. The queen, probably from Egypt, the chief of all his vast establishment of wives and concubines, themselves the daughters of kings, was by his side, glittering in the gold of Ophirone blaze of glory, as she sat by him in the interior of the palace; her attendants, gorgeously arrayed, are behind her; she has left her father and her fathers house; her reward is to be in the greatness of her descendants. Such is the splendour of Solomons court, which, even down to the outward texture of their royal robes, lived in the traditions of Israel (<em>Stanley in loco<\/em>). The dignity of royalty should be maintained in accordance with the wealth and resources of the nation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. There is the call for elaborate defence<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>1. <em>A standing army must be maintained<\/em> (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:22-23<\/span>). The three military bodies remain as in the days of David. The commander of the host is the priestly warrior, Benaiah, who succeeded the murdered Joab. The six hundred heroes of Davids early life only once pass across the scene. Sixty of them attended Solomons litter, to guard him from banditti on his way to Lebanon. The guard appear only as household troops, employed on state occasions. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Strong fortifications must be erected<\/em> (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:19<\/span>). Jerusalem, the capital, is surrounded by massive walls and strengthened with a huge tower. Garrison cities are built in various parts of the country to keep the insurrectionary inhabitants in check, and to protect the nation against invaders. As a people grows in riches and in power, every necessary preparation is made at least to defend its possessions. The wealth of a nation tempts the cupidity of greedy and ambitious marauders.<\/p>\n<p><strong>V. There is the burden of an oppressive taxation<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15<\/span>, comp. with chap. <span class='bible'>1Ki. 12:1-4<\/span>). The vast levies of men raised by Solomon to build the Temple, the palace, and the fortifications of Jerusalem and other cities, must have severely taxed the people, and this grievous yoke perhaps grew heavier with Solomons advance of years. The people who once clamoured for a king, that they might be like the nations around them, now began to realize the truth of Samuels prediction as to the cost of maintaining a king and court (<span class='bible'>1Sa. 8:11-18<\/span>). This taxation was so heavy that it appears to have been the principal cause of the revolt of the ten tribes on the death of Solomon. The government of the wise king was rapidly becoming as odious to the Israelites as that of the race of Tarquin, in spite of all their splendid works, to the patricians of Rome. Matterings of the coming storm were already heard, both abroad and at home. No government can long flourish that rests on the tyranny and oppression of the people. An excessive taxation drains the fountain of a nations productive power.<\/p>\n<p><strong>VI. There is the necessity for extended commerce<\/strong> (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:26-28<\/span>). The exhaustion of the ample means left by his father, and the inadequacy of the ordinary sources of revenue to cover his vast expenses in sacred and regal building, as well us to sustain the great expense of his magnificent court and numerous household, led Solomon to turn his attention to commerce. His sagacity taught him that the Phnicians, with whom he had become acquainted, had risen to extraordinary prosperity and great wealth solely as the result of commerce. He therefore joined Hiram in building and equipping a fleet of ships which sailed from the Red Sea, and brought in the rich productions from the far East. Necessity is the mother of invention for nations as for individuals. The grandest commercial ventures have sprung out of the pressing necessity of the hour. The increase of commerce is the increase of fresh necessities: commerce begets commerce. It is the life of national prosperity.<\/p>\n<p>LESSONS:<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Royalty has its undoubted rights and privileges<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The glory of royalty is to promote the best welfare of the people<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>The government that suppresses commerce beggars itself<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>GERM NOTES ON THE VERSES<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15-19<\/span>. <strong>National architecture<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>1. Is an evidence of the wealth and genius of a nation. <br \/>2. Has a powerful influence in the culture of the national taste and character. <br \/>3. May remain when the true greatness of a nation has passed away.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15-23<\/span>. The plans and arrangements of Solomon for the benefit and protection of the land. <\/p>\n<p>1. He built the house of the Lord, forth from which would come all salvation for Israel; then he built the store-houses for times of need and famine, and as protection against the enemies of the kingdom. A wise prince cares alike for the religious and spiritual, and for the material and temporal well-being of his people, and in times of peace does his utmost to provide against every danger which may assail the land, either from without or within. For this a nation can never be grateful enough, and should uphold him with readiness and might, instead of murmuring and complaining, as is often the case. <\/p>\n<p>2. Solomons plan was, in his undertaking, to spare his nation all servile labour as far as possible. Therefore for all compulsory service he employed the conquered enemy, who, as such, were slaves. A wise prince will never impose burdensome taxes or heavy labour upon his people, and reigns much more willingly over freemen than over slaves; but a good and loyal people does not make freedom a pretext for villainy, and ever follows the kings call for arms when the defence of Fatherland is concerned. For Israel can no more say with truth, The Lord is my rock, my fortress, and my deliverer (<span class='bible'>Psa. 18:3<\/span>), if all the nation does not aid in its defences and fortifications. In the kingdom of the true and eternal Prince of Peace bondage will cease, and all men shall obtain the freedom of the children of God.<em>Lange<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:16<\/span>. Though in the East husbands generally pay for their wives, yet dower is given in some cases. Sargon gave Cilicia as a dowry with his daughter when he married her to Ambris, king of Tubal. Antiochus Soter gave his claims on Macedonia as a dowry to his stepdaughter Phila, when she married Antigonus Gonatas. Cle-Syria and Palestine were promised as dowry to Ptolemy Epiphanes when he married Cleopatra, sister of Antiochus the Great. The Persian kings seem generally to have given satrapial or other high offices as dowries to the husbands of their daughters.<em>Rawlinson<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:20-21<\/span>. <strong>The curse of slavery<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>1. <em>It is personally degrading<\/em>. It robs man of his self-respect, poisons his sense of rectitude and honour, demoralizes his sensibilities, imbrutes his entire nature, and brands him with unutterable infamy. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>It is degrading to the oppressor<\/em>. It is an insult to his own manhood, it lowers his estimate of humanity, it blunts his sympathies for the race, and leads him to the shameless commission of other wrongs. The hideous character of oppressors is depicted in a few words by Wordsworth<\/p>\n<p>The good old rule<\/p>\n<p>Sufficeth them, the simple plan,<\/p>\n<p>That they should take who have the power,<\/p>\n<p>And they should keep who can.<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>It is an element of weakness and decay in the nation<\/em>. The nations of antiquity in which slavery was maintained have come to ruin. It blights the fairest country, spoils its chivalry, and saps its strongest foundations.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:25<\/span>. <strong>The public worship of God<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>1. Is the duty of allking and subjects. <\/p>\n<p>2. Cannot be neglected without mischievous results (chap. <span class='bible'>1Ki. 3:2-4<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p>3. Should be observed with regularity and solemnity. <br \/>4. Is the secret of national prosperity and greatness. <br \/>5. Is fraught with blessing to the individual worshipper.<\/p>\n<p>A king must make religion the rule of government, and not to balance the scale; for he that casteth in religion only to make the scales even, his own weight is contained in those characters<em>Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin<\/em>; he is found too light; his kingdom shall be taken from him.<em>Bacon<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:26<\/span>. A wise government seeks not only to preserve existing prosperity, but also to discover new sources thereof. Many there are who travel over land and sea to seek gold and to become rich, and forget that the Lord hath said, I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich (<span class='bible'>Rev. 3:18<\/span>). Expeditions into far countries must serve not only to obtain gold and treasure, but also to carry thither the treasure which neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal (<span class='bible'>Mat. 6:19<\/span>). Commerce may become a rich blessing for a nation, but a greedy thirst for gold often leads to extreme luxury and neglect of God, as is many times exemplified in the history of Israel.<em>Lange<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:26-28<\/span>. <strong>Commerce<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>1. Taxes the ingenuity of a people. <br \/>2. Stimulates travel and discovery. <br \/>3. Is the source of a nations wealth. <br \/>4. Promotes international amity and brotherhood.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:28<\/span>. The controversy concerning the locality of Ophir will probably never be settled. It has been placed in Arabia, in India, in the Burmese Peninsula, at Ceylon, on the East coast of Africa, in Armenia, in Phrygia, in Iberia, and in South America, where it has been identified with Peru! Among these various opinions three predominate, all moderns, except a very few, being in favour either of Arabia, India, or Eastern Africa. Africa has comparatively few advocates, but M. Quartremere and Dean Milman are among them. India is preferred by Lassen, Thenius, Ewald, and Berthau. Arabias claims are supported by the greatest number, among whom are Winer, Keil, Kalisch, and Mr. Twistleton. The grand argument in favour of Arabia is derived from the occurrence of Ophir in the manifestly Arabian list of names in <span class='bible'>Gen. 10:25-29<\/span>. To the objection that Arabia could not produce either gold or almug trees, it is replied<\/p>\n<p>1. It has not yet been proved that she could not produce them; and <br \/>2. At any rate she might have furnished them to the Jews from an emporium.<em>Speakers Comm.<\/em> We do not contend that Ophir was a place on the Indian coast. Nay, more, we do not insist that it was <em>any<\/em> particular place. It seems to us that Heeren is quite right in his remark that Ophir, like the name of all other distant places or regions of antiquityas Thule, Tartessus, and othersdenotes no particular spot, but only a certain region or part of the world, such as the East or West Indies in modern geography. Hence Ophir was a general name for all the countries lying on the African, Arabian, or Indian seas, so far as at that time known.<em>Kitto<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Even the gold of Ophir perishes in the using; but the treasures of grace never wax old nor decay. He that is possessed of these hath that fine gold which constitutes the true riches (<span class='bible'>Rev. 3:18<\/span>).<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>B. SOLOMON AND THE CORVE 9:1525<\/p>\n<p>The second means by which Solomon was able to construct so many buildings was the compulsory labor force. The use of forced labor (Heb. hammas) was mentioned in connection with the building of the Temple (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 5:13-18<\/span>). Here it is mentioned again in connection with Solomons other building projects. The object of the forced labor was the building of public works, the Temple, palace, fortifications and strategic points in the provinces. This section lists the various construction projects of the corve (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15-19<\/span>), discusses the composition of the corve (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:20-23<\/span>), and concludes with two brief notes pointing to the completion of Solomons Jerusalem projects (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:24-25<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>1. THE PROJECTS OF THE CORVEE (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15-19<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p><strong>TRANSLATION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>(15) And this is the case with regard to the levy which King Solomon raised to build the house of the LORD, and his house, and the Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer. (16) Pharaoh, king of Egypt, had come up and captured Gezer and burned it with fire, and the Canaanites who lived in the city he had slain; and he had given it as a dowry to his daughter, the wife of Solomon. (17) And Solomon built Gezer, Beth-horon the Lower, (18) Baalath, Tamar in the wilderness of the land, (19) all the store cities which Solomon had, cities for his chariots, cities for his horses, and what Solomon was pleased to build in Jerusalem and in Lebanon and in all the land of the dominion.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENTS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The building projects of the corve fall into five categories: (1) the Jerusalem projects (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15<\/span> a); (2) the fortress cities (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15<\/span> b  <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:18<\/span>); (3) the storage cities (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:19<\/span> a); (4) the chariot cities (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:19<\/span> b); and (5) the pleasure houses (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:19<\/span> c).<\/p>\n<p>a) The Jerusalem projects. The first and foremost of the works of the manpower levy were the house of the Lord and the palace complex about which so much has already been narrated. In addition, two projects connected with Jerusalem are mentioned, the Millo and the wall of Jerusalem.<\/p>\n<p>(1) The Millo is mentioned six times in Scripture, each time with the definite article. The term literally means the filling in. The fact that Millo is mentioned in connection with the wall of Jerusalem would seem to indicate that it was part of the defense works of the city. In <span class='bible'>1Ki. 11:27<\/span> Millo is mentioned in connection with the closing of a breach in the city of David.[250] Thus the Millo may have been a bastion which filled some weak point in the walls.[251] The evidence seems to suggest that Millo stood in Davids time and even in Jebusite days (<span class='bible'>2Sa. 5:9<\/span>). If this be the case, then Solomons efforts must be viewed as either strengthening, extending or perhaps rebuilding this feature of the citys fortifications. Many theories have been put forward as to what part of the city of David was strengthened by the Millo, but in the absence of concrete archaeological evidence these theories must be regarded as pure speculation.<\/p>\n<p>[250] Others, however, feel that the closing of the breach and construction of the Millo in <span class='bible'>1Ki. 11:27<\/span> are two altogether different projects.<\/p>\n<p>[251] Others think of the Millo as a rampart of filled-in earth or a land-fill in the ravine which separated the city of David from the Temple mount.<\/p>\n<p>(2) The wall of Jerusalem. The precise extent and location of the wall of Jerusalem built by Solomon is uncertain.[252] With the expansion of the city to include the Temple and palace area, new fortifications were necessary. Solomon closed the breach of the city of David (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 11:27<\/span>) and probably extended the city wall so as to enclose the Temple mount. He may also have surrounded the lower city with a wall since David had only built a fortification round about the upper city upon Zion (cf. <span class='bible'>2Sa. 5:9<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>[252] Gray, OTL, p. 227.<\/p>\n<p>b) The fortress cities. Outside Jerusalem Solomon constructed six fortresses located at points strategic for controlling all approaches to the plateau of Judah and (what was even more important) for controlling the movement of caravans of commerce. These fortresses were Hazor, Megiddo, Gezer, Lower Beth-horon, Baalath, and Tamar.<\/p>\n<p>(1) The fortress of Hazor situated in northern Galilee occupied a position of military importance from the time of Joshua (cf. <span class='bible'>Jos. 11:10<\/span>). Located on an elevation overlooking the waters of Merom, Hazor commanded the routes from the north. Archaeological excavation on the site has unearthed a double-chambered gateway and casemate walls dating to the time of Solomon. Hazor was a rather large city, and the modern remains are strewn over twenty-two acres.<\/p>\n<p>(2) Megiddo was the great fortress which commanded one of the major passes through the mountain range which separated the costal Plain of Sharon from the Plain of Esdraelon, the great battlefield of Palestine. The main highway from Egypt to Damascus passed through Megiddo. Throughout the period of the monarchy, the city was heavily fortified until it was finally captured by the Assyrians in 734 B.C. The remains of a complex gateway and casemate walls dating to the time of Solomon have been excavated at Megiddo.[253]<\/p>\n<p>[253] BAR, II, 240247.<\/p>\n<p>(3) Gezer (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15<\/span>) was Solomons fortress guarding the southern frontier of Israel. The city stands on a spur of the Judaean foothills overlooking the major north-south highway through the coastal plains.<\/p>\n<p>The mention of Gezer among the cities built and fortified by Solomon causes the author to digress that he might relate how this city came into the possession of Israel. Though Gezer was allotted to the tribe of Ephraim (<span class='bible'>Jos. 16:3<\/span>) and designated as a Levitical city (<span class='bible'>Jos. 21:21<\/span>), the Canaanite inhabitants had never been displaced either by the Philistines or by the military efforts of David. Gezer seems to have enjoyed an independent status. Pharaoh attacked and destroyed the city and put the Canaanite inhabitants to the sword. The precise date of this conquest is uncertain, but it must certainly have been several years prior to the marriage between Solomon and this Pharaohs daughter. Pharaoh gave Gezer to his daughter as a wedding present (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:16<\/span>). The city was then rebuilt and fortified by Solomon. The incorporation of this hostile fortress into Solomons kingdom made possible the significant trade relations between Israel and Egypt which characterized Solomons reign (cf. <span class='bible'>1Ki. 10:26-29<\/span>). That this trade was important to Egypt as well as Israel may be inferred from the trouble Pharaoh went to in order to bring Gezer under Solomons control. For a suggestion as to the identity of the Pharaoh who conquered Gezer see comments on <span class='bible'>1Ki. 3:1<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>(4) Lower Beth-horon (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:17<\/span>) was situated at the foot of a ravine on a prominent hill guarding one of the main roads between Jerusalem and the seacoast. The object of the king in fortifying this spot was to protect the Judaean highlands against invasion from the Philistine plain. According to <span class='bible'>2Ch. 8:5<\/span> Upper Beth-horon, situated at the summit of the same pass, was also fortified by Solomon.<\/p>\n<p>(5) Baalath, probably the place mentioned in <span class='bible'>Jos. 19:44<\/span>, was located in the tribal territory of Dan southwest of Beth- horon.[254]<\/p>\n<p>[254] The other possibility is that Baalath is to be taken with Tamar, in which case it would be the Baalath of <span class='bible'>Jos. 15:24<\/span> or the Baalah of <span class='bible'>Jos. 15:29<\/span> which are ascribed to Simeon (<span class='bible'>Jos. 19:3<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>(6) Tamar (not Tadmor as in KJV) is mentioned in <span class='bible'>Eze. 47:19<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Eze. 48:28<\/span> as the southeastern limit of the holy land. The name Tamar means Palms, and the spot may be the same as the city of Palms mentioned in <span class='bible'>Jdg. 1:16<\/span>. No doubt this fortress protected the route to Ezion-geber, a city which was vital to Solomons economic program as <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:26-28<\/span> indicate.<\/p>\n<p>To this list of outlying fortresses the Chronicler adds Tadmor, an earlier name for Palmyra, the oasis in the Syrian desert a hundred fifty miles northwest of Damascus (<span class='bible'>2Ch. 8:4<\/span>). The major trade routes to Mesopotamia met at this important oasis which was located about midway between Damascus and the Euphrates. Palmyra continued as an important trade center until the early centuries of the Christian age.<\/p>\n<p>c) The store cities. Other cities were set aside for storage of produce. Such provisions were used for the troops and the royal household, and possibly as insurance against seasons of scarcity. These may have been the cities where Solomons twelve administrative officers lived (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 4:7<\/span>) who were responsible for supplying a months provisions to the court each year. Each would have needed large storage facilities. Archaeologists have found buildings in several citiesBeth-shemesh, Lachish, Hazorwhich seem to have served the purpose of public storage bins.[255]<\/p>\n<p>[255] Wright, BA, p. 130.<\/p>\n<p>d) Chariot cities. Other cities served as bases for Solomons chariot forces and cavalry units.[256] The remains of stables dating to the time of Solomon have been found at Hazor and at Taanach four miles south of Megiddo.[257] The great plain at Megiddo was an ideal location for training in chariot tactics. The chariot cities were probably in part identical with the store cities.<\/p>\n<p>[256] Horses is a technical expression for horses used in military operations whether for cavalry or chariots. Mould, EBH, p. 197, n. 65.<br \/>[257] The stable complex found at Megiddo for many years was thought to be Solomonic. But Yadin has now pronounced them to be from the time of Ahab. BAR, II, 247.<\/p>\n<p>e) Pleasure houses. In addition to the projects already named, Solomon constructed for himself pleasure buildings where he could relax and refresh himself. This seems to be the meaning of the phrase that which Solomon desired to build, which literally in the Hebrew reads, the desire of Solomon which he desired. Leisure houses were built in Lebanon and leisure gardens in and around Jerusalem and elsewhere in his domain (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:19<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>2. THE COMPOSITION OF THE CORVE (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:20-23<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p><strong>TRANSLATION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>(20) And all the people remaining from the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites and Jebusites which were not from the children of Israel, (21) their children which were left after them in the land which the children of Israel had not been able to destroy, them did Solomon bring up to the levy of servitude onto this day. (22) But of the children of Israel Solomon made no bondsmen; but they were men of war, his servants and his officers and his captains, his chariot commanders and his horsemen. (23) These are the chief of the officers who were over the work of Solomon, five hundred fifty who ruled over the people who did the work.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENTS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Solomons levy of bondslaves was taken from among the foreign peopleAmorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:20<\/span>)whom the Israelites had not completely destroyed[258] when they entered Canaan (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:21<\/span>). The various peoples named in <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:21<\/span> reflect the diversity of races which were to be found in Palestine prior to the Israelite invasion. Those racially closest to the Israelites would be the Amorites. The Hittites of antiquity were mainly located in Anatolia (Asia Minor), though some Hittite trading colonies seem to have been located in Palestine. The Perizzites, Gergashites and possibly the Jebusites may have been descendants of mercenaries from the northeast who had garrisoned in Palestine during the period of Egyptian domination from the fifteenth to the thirteenth century B.C.[259] The practice of subjecting these conquered peoples to servile labor originated with Joshua (<span class='bible'>Jos. 9:22-27<\/span>). Nelson Glueck, in his explorations east of the Jordan, discovered what he believed were prison camps in the vicinity of copper mines. This would seem to indicate that the copper mines were worked by forced labor.[260] The levy of servitude was also a feature of Canaanite life as the Ras Shamra texts show.[261] Since the Law of Moses forbade enslavement of Hebrews (<span class='bible'>Lev. 25:39<\/span>), no Israelites were forced to become bondslaves. The statement in <span class='bible'>1Ki. 5:13<\/span> that Solomon raised a levy out of all Israel must be interpreted in the light of the present passage. Probably there were two leviesone of Canaanite bondmen or slaves, and the other of Israelites who, though compelled to serve, were treated as hired servants.[262] Furthermore, the Canaanite bondservants were compelled to serve for a life-time whereas the Israelite levy served one month in three until the building projects were completed. By and large Solomon used Israelites for the more exalted service in the army or in the royal court as princes and officers. The word translated captains in <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:22<\/span> means literally third men and refers to a noble rank of soldiers who fought from chariots. Solomons chariots carried three men, and the third man, besides the driver and the warrior, was the armor-bearer.[263]<\/p>\n<p>[258] The term destroyed (Heb. cherem) is a technical term from the vocabulary of the holy war. The entire Canaanite population was put under the curse or ban and was to be exterminated. In the holy war the Israelites were acting as the agents of Gods judgment.<\/p>\n<p>[259] Gray, OTL, p. 233.<br \/>[260] Glueck, OSJ, chap. 3.<br \/>[261] Gray, OTL, p. 233.<\/p>\n<p>[262] See further the comments on <span class='bible'>1Ki. 5:13<\/span>. Finley (BBC, p. 384) feels that even in <span class='bible'>1Ki. 5:13<\/span> an all Canaanite levy is intended. He interprets the term all Israel to be geographical. The levy was raised from all the tribal territories of Israel; but only the Canaanites living in those regions were pressed into service.<\/p>\n<p>[263] The term third man (Heb., shalish) came to signify a royal aide-de-camp, he on whose arm the king stayed himself (<span class='bible'>2Ki. 7:2<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki. 7:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki. 7:19<\/span>). The position was of such importance that it could be used as a springboard to the crown (<span class='bible'>2Ki. 15:25<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>At the top administrative level over Solomons levy of bond-men were five hundred fifty officers (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:23<\/span>). As has been previously pointed out in the comments on <span class='bible'>1Ki. 5:16<\/span>, three hundred of these superior officers were Canaanites.<\/p>\n<p>2. FINAL CONSTRUCTION NOTICES (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:24-25<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p><strong>TRANSLATION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>(<strong>24) And the daughter of Pharaoh went up from the city of David unto her house which he had built for her; then he built Millo. (25) And Solomon offered up burnt offerings and peace offerings three times in the year upon the altar which he had built for the LORD, and he burned incense upon the altar which was before the LORD. So he finished the house.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENTS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The account of Solomons building operations is brought to a close with two notices in <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:24-25<\/span>. When Solomon married Pharaohs daughter, he brought her into the city of David (<span class='bible'>1Ki. 3:1<\/span>) until he had finished his own palace and had built for her a house of her own. After this building was built, he had her brought up from the city of David to the loftier summit where her palace was situated. Just as soon as this project was completed, Solomon built Millo (see on <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:15<\/span>). The corresponding verse in Chronicles (<span class='bible'>2Ch. 8:11<\/span>) indicates Solomons motives in moving his Egyptian wife out of the city of David. According to the Chronicler, Solomon felt that the presence of this foreign princess in the holy city would be sacrilegious. After the building of the Temple, the practice of sacrificing upon the altars of the high places could be brought to an end (cf. <span class='bible'>1Ki. 3:2<\/span>). The king was now able to offer burnt offerings and thank offerings upon the altar which he had built to the Lord in the courtyard of the Temple. This Solomon did three times a year at the three great yearly feastsPassover, Weeks and Tabernacles (<span class='bible'>2Ch. 8:13<\/span>). These words are not to be interpreted to mean that Solomon himself officiated at the sacrifice, for this was the prerogative of the Aaronic priesthood alone. Still less is it to be inferred that Solomon entered the Holy Place and offered incense upon the altar. Only priests could enter there. Rather the meaning is that Solomon as builder of the Temple provided these special offerings which were offered by the ministering priests in the name of the king (cf. <span class='bible'>2Ch. 8:14<\/span>). The words so he finished the house are repeated from <span class='bible'>1Ki. 6:22<\/span> except that here the inspired author uses a form of the verb which may carry the idea, he perfected the house, i.e., by devoting it to its proper use. It was, after all, to be a house of sacrifice.[264]<\/p>\n<p>[264] Hammond, PC, pp. 19495. Another view is that the phrase means that Solomon kept the Temple in repair.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(15) <strong>The levy.<\/strong>This (see <span class='bible'>1Ki. 5:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki. 5:15<\/span>) was both of Israelites and of the subject races, first originated for the building of the Temple, afterwards extended to the other great building works.<\/p>\n<p>The building works enumerated are, first in Jerusalem, then in various parts of the country of critical importance, either for war or for commerce.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Millo,<\/strong> or (as it always has the definite article), the Millo. The Hebrew word seems to signify piling up, or heaping up, and its most simple meaning would be a fortified mound. From the mention, however, in <span class='bible'>Jdg. 9:6<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg. 9:20<\/span>, of the house of Millo, in connection with the men of Shechem, it has been supposed to be a Canaanitish word; and it is possible that the Millo of Jerusalem may have been the name of a quarter of the old Jebusite city, especially as it is first used in connection with the narrative of its capture (<span class='bible'>2Sa. 5:9<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ch. 11:8<\/span>). That it was a part of the fortification of the city of David is clear by this passage, by <span class='bible'>1Ki. 9:24<\/span> and <span class='bible'>1Ki. 11:27<\/span>, and by <span class='bible'>2Ch. 32:5<\/span>; and the LXX. invariably renders it Acra, or the-citadel, a name always applied in the later history to the fortification on Mount Zion. Josephus, in describing the works of Solomon, merely says that he made the walls of David higher and stronger, and built towers on them. From the derivation of the word it is possible that the work was the raising a high fortification of earth crowned with a wall, where the hill of Zion slopes down unto the valley known subsequently as the <em>Tyropon<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hazor, Megiddo, and Gezer.<\/strong>These cities were all of important geographical positions, and all had belonged to the subject races.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hazor<\/strong> was in the north, on high ground near the waters of Merom. It had been the city of Jabin, head of the northern confederacy (<span class='bible'>Jos. 11:1<\/span>). After the great victory over this confederacy, Joshua burnt Hazor (<span class='bible'>Jos. 11:13<\/span>), and the territory was assigned to Naphtali (<span class='bible'>Jos. 19:36<\/span>). But it must have been regained by its old possessors, and rebuilt, for it appears again under another Jabin in <span class='bible'>Judges 4<\/span>. It was evidently important, as commanding the great line of invasion through Hamath from the north. Hence it was fortified by Solomon, and probably the native inhabitants were dispossessed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Megiddo<\/strong> lay in the great plain of Jezreel or Esdraelon, the battle-field of Northern Palestine, commanding some of the passes from it into the hill country of Manasseh, to which tribe it was assigned after the conquest (<span class='bible'>Jos. 17:11<\/span>). But it was not subdued by them (<span class='bible'>Jos. 17:12-13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg. 1:27-28<\/span>), and, with Taanach, appears as a hostile city in the Song of Deborah (<span class='bible'>Jdg. 5:19<\/span>). Now it was fortified, and is named subsequently as an Israelite city (<span class='bible'>2Ki. 9:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Ki. 23:29<\/span>). In later times the Romans seem to have occupied it, and their name for it, <em>Legio<\/em> (now <em>el-ejj<\/em><em>r<\/em>), superseded the old title.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Grezer <\/strong>or <strong>Gazer<\/strong>, was near Bethlehem, close to the maritime plain. Its king was conquered by Joshua (<span class='bible'>Jos. 10:33<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos. 12:12<\/span>), and the city was allotted to the Levites in the territory of Ephraim (<span class='bible'>Jos. 21:17<\/span>), but it remained unsubdued (<span class='bible'>Jdg. 1:29<\/span>). From the notice in the next verse, it must have been in rebellion against Israel, perhaps in the early and more troubled days of Solomon; and was accordingly taken by the Egyptian army (which could easily march up the plain, and attack it therefrom). The passes here were of critical importance, as appears in the Philistine wars (<span class='bible'>1Ch. 20:4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>2Sa. 5:25<\/span>), in relation to any advance from the plain.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 15<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> <strong> The reason of the levy <\/strong> The levy of men mentioned <span class='bible'>1Ki 5:13<\/span> was used, as we here learn, for building other works than the temple. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Millo <\/strong> The fortress on Zion, which had, perhaps, become somewhat dilapidated. See note on <span class='bible'>2Sa 5:9<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Wall of Jerusalem <\/strong> He repaired the breaches in the wall which David built, and also extended the walls, and probably in some places built entirely new and nobler ones. Compare <span class='bible'>1Ki 11:27<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Hazor <\/strong> The ancient capital of Jabin, in the north of Palestine. See on <span class='bible'>Jos 11:1<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Megiddo <\/strong> In the great plain of Esdraelon. See on <span class='bible'>Jos 12:21<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Gezer <\/strong> A city west or northwest of Jerusalem, and between it and the Mediterranean Sea. See on <span class='bible'>Jos 10:33<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> Solomon&rsquo;s Extensive Building Projects (<span class='bible'><strong> 1Ki 9:15-25<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ). <\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> The author now links the building of the Temple and the palace complex with a number of other large scale building works in which Solomon engaged, all of which required extensive slave-labour. The emphasis is on the fact that it caused the raising of the levies, suggesting the prophet&rsquo;s disapproval of the situation. Solomon obtained this slave-labour by conscripting the Canaanites who were left in the land, for while it has previously been mentioned that he pressed Israelites into part-time service while building the Temple (<span class='bible'>1Ki 5:13-14<\/span>), causing great dissatisfaction (<span class='bible'>1Ki 12:4<\/span>), he had been careful not to make them into slave-labourers. That would have gone against all the recognised customs in Israel. Instead they were made responsible for the defence of the realm as well as the oversight of the slaves. The Canaanites were, however, seen as suitable material for being turned into bond-slaves. That was the old traditional way of dealing with them (<span class='bible'>Jos 9:27<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 1:28<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 1:30<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 1:33<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 1:35<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p> Engaging in huge amounts of building works was a policy amongst great kings, who were often judged on that basis. Solomon was thus out to demonstrate his own greatness, as well as to fortify the land. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Analysis. <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> a <\/strong> And this is the reason for the levy which king Solomon raised, to build the house of YHWH, and his own house, and Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer (<span class='bible'>1Ki 9:15<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> Pharaoh king of Egypt had gone up, and taken Gezer, and burnt it with fire, and had slain the Canaanites who dwelt in the city, and given it for a portion to his daughter, Solomon&rsquo;s wife (<span class='bible'>1Ki 9:16<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> And Solomon built Gezer, and Beth-horon the nether, and Baalath, and Tamar in the wilderness, in the land, and all the store-cities that Solomon had, and the cities for his chariots, and the cities for his horsemen, and what Solomon desired to build for his pleasure in Jerusalem, and in Lebanon, and in all the land of his dominion (<span class='bible'>1Ki 9:17-19<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> d <\/strong> As for all the people who were left of the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, who were not of the children of Israel, their children who were left after them in the land, whom the children of Israel were not able utterly to destroy, of them did Solomon raise a levy of bondservants to this day, but of the children of Israel Solomon made no bondservants, but they were the men of war, and his servants, and his princes, and his captains, and rulers of his chariots and of his horsemen (<span class='bible'>1Ki 9:20-22<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> c <\/strong> These were the chief officers who were over Solomon&rsquo;s work, five hundred and fifty, who bore rule over the people who wrought in the work (<span class='bible'>1Ki 9:23<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> But Pharaoh&rsquo;s daughter came up out of the city of David to her house which Solomon had built for her (<span class='bible'>1Ki 9:24<\/span> a). <\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> a <\/strong> Then did he build Millo. And three times a year did Solomon offer burnt-offerings and peace-offerings on the altar which he built to YHWH, burning incense with them, on the altar which was before YHWH. So he finished the house (<span class='bible'>1Ki 9:24-25<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p> Note that in &lsquo;a&rsquo; Solomon engaged in building many building works including the Temple and Millo, and in the parallel he built Millo and completed the Temple. In &lsquo;b&rsquo; Pharaoh supplies a marriage portion for his daughter, and in the parallel, his daughter takes possession of her new palace. In &lsquo;c&rsquo; the many building works are described, and in the parallel the overseers of the work are described. Centrally in &lsquo;d&rsquo; we learn how Solomon obtained his slave labour, and how he behaved towards his own people. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 1Ki 9:15<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &lsquo;<\/strong> And this is the reason for the levy which king Solomon raised, to build the house of YHWH, and his own house, and Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> We note the continual references to the Temple and the palace complex, which were not necessarily required here, having been mentioned previously. This possibly indicates what pride Solomon had in them, or the point might be the cost of them in human lives (this is a prophet writing). In the chiasmus the theme also connects back to the parallel passage of building the Temple and palace complex in <span class='bible'>1Ki 5:1<\/span> to <span class='bible'>1Ki 7:12<\/span>, with a further parallel being found in the levy on the Israelites in <span class='bible'>1Ki 5:13<\/span>. Here we have an explanation of the full-scale slave levy on the previous inhabitants of the land. It is in fact almost as though the author is apologising for it. Such levies of subject peoples were common with great kings who had massive building projects planned. We can compare <span class='bible'>Exo 1:11<\/span>, and there are many parallels in inscriptions. Here Solomon is described as &lsquo;building&rsquo; not only the Temple and the palace complex, but also the Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, Megiddo and Gezer. Lists of building projects like this are common in inscriptions. <\/p>\n<p><strong> &ldquo;The Millo (filling).&rdquo;<\/strong> This is unquestionably referring to fortification work in Jerusalem. It has been suggested that it refers to the system of terraces, which consist of retaining walls with levelled filling, discovered by archaeologists on the eastern slope of Ophel Hill. This enabled the construction of defensive buildings on the slope, and would tie in with the repairs to the walls of Jerusalem. <\/p>\n<p><strong> &ldquo;Hazor, Megiddo and Gezer.&rdquo;<\/strong> These were important defensive cities from north to south. Casemate walls and six-roomed gate towers from the Solomonic period have been discovered at all three. Hazor was in northern Naphtali. It was a substantial city, eight kilometres (five miles) south of the now nearly dry Lake Huleh, and guarded the road from the north. Megiddo, an even larger city, guarded the route from Phoenicia and the important trade route through the Valley of Esdraelon. Gezer was the southernmost large city in Palestine and guarded the way to Jerusalem from the coast. It dominated the south western Philistine plain. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 1Ki 9:16<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &lsquo;<\/strong> Pharaoh king of Egypt had gone up, and taken Gezer, and burnt it with fire, and had slain the Canaanites who dwelt in the city, and given it for a portion to his daughter, Solomon&rsquo;s wife.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> Gezer had been an independent &lsquo;Canaanite&rsquo; city, but Pharaoh Siamun, a Pharaoh of the weak twenty first dynasty, who ruled around 978-959 BC, had engaged in a police action against it and had subdued it. The weakness of the twenty first dynasty is known from external sources but is apparent here in that it is clear from what is said that Egypt were making no claims on &lsquo;Canaan&rsquo;, an area which, in their strongest periods, they had looked on as containing vassal city states. They did, however, continue to conduct local actions against the Canaanites and Philistines in protecting their borders from supposed incursions, in the course of which, according to inscriptions, they &lsquo;smote Gezer&rsquo;. Thus they were not totally quiescent. A damaged triumphal relief scene at Tanis depicts Siamun smiting a foreigner, seemingly a Philistine judging by the Aegean type axe in his hand, which confirms that Siamun did engage in such &lsquo;police action&rsquo; in Philistia. But with regard to the area of Canaan as a whole Siamun was apparently quite content to make his northern border safe by means of a marriage treaty with the powerful Solomon as described here, something which would be to their mutual benefit, especially tradewise. One of the obvious benefits of this treaty to Solomon was seen in the multiplicity of horses that he later possessed, for Egypt was a well known source of such horses (<span class='bible'>1Ki 10:26-29<\/span>). There is again here the hint of disapproval. This was the &lsquo;Pharaoh&rsquo;s daughter&rsquo; of <span class='bible'>1Ki 3:1<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 1Ki 9:17-18<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &lsquo;<\/strong> And Solomon built Gezer, and Beth-horon the nether (Lower Beth-horon), and Baalath, and Tamar in the wilderness, in the land,&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> The fortification of Gezer is mentioned here again because of <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:16<\/span>. Also fortified were Lower Beth-horon (something also evidenced archaeologically) which guarded the road through the Ayalon Valley, protecting the route to Jerusalem from the Coastal Plain, together with Baalath, which was possibly south west of Beth-horon in Dan (<span class='bible'>Jos 19:44<\/span>). Alternately the Baalath in mind may have been in the southern wilderness (<span class='bible'>Jos 15:24<\/span>). &lsquo;Tamar in the wilderness&rsquo; was south of the Dead Sea, protecting trade with Southern Arabia and with the port of Elath. &lsquo;In the land&rsquo; may signify Judah, compare <span class='bible'>1Ki 4:19<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 1Ki 9:19<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &lsquo;<\/strong> And all the store-cities that Solomon had, and the cities for his chariots, and the cities for his horsemen, and what Solomon desired to build for his pleasure in Jerusalem, and in Lebanon, and in all the land of his dominion.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> As well as the great fortified cities Solomon built store cities, and cities for his chariots and horsemen, all necessary for the defence of the land. And on top of these he built many other things, both in Jerusalem, Lebanon and throughout the land. Long, pillared store places have been discovered at a number of places, and at Megiddo there is evidence of earlier Solomonic stables beneath the remains of the stables of Ahab. <\/p>\n<p> It may be that Solomon built a summer house in Lebanon, or it may be that the buildings were connected with iron mines. Alternately &lsquo;Lebanon&rsquo; is a name sometimes applied to sections of northern Canaan (southern Lebanon) which would be &lsquo;within Israel&rsquo;, and it may be building work there that is in mind here. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 1Ki 9:20-21<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &lsquo;<\/strong> As for all the people who were left of the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, who were not of the children of Israel, their children who were left after them in the land, whom the children of Israel were not able utterly to exterminate (put under the Ban), of them did Solomon raise a levy of bondservants to this day.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> The &lsquo;Canaanites&rsquo; would be used to the idea of the slave-levy as exercised by their own kings, as we discover from Ugarit. Thus they would not have been surprised as a subject people to find themselves drafted for this work. As with the Israelites in Egypt they and their families would be provided with food of a kind, and would still have their own homes. That is not to say that they found it palatable. No doubt they too groaned under their taskmasters. Nor is it likely that a prophet in 6th century BC found such slavery any more palatable as a concept. It represented the side of Solomon that he was unhappy with (<span class='bible'>1Ki 12:4<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p> Strictly these Canaanites should have been slaughtered or driven from the land. They had been &lsquo;devoted&rsquo; to YHWH as being unfit to live amongst because of their evil and perverted ways (<span class='bible'>Gen 15:16<\/span>). <\/p>\n<p><strong> &ldquo;Amorites&rdquo;<\/strong> was a term that could signify all the pre-conquest inhabitants of the land, or could alternatively signify the hill-dwellers in the hill country. The Hittites would be groups which had wandered into Canaan centuries before and were related in some way to the Hittite empire to the north (see &lsquo;the sons of Heth&rsquo; in <span class='bible'>Genesis 23<\/span>). T he Perizzites (&lsquo;villagers&rsquo;) who dwelt in the hills were probably native primitive peoples. The Hivites were principally in the Lebanon hills and the Carmel range. The Jebusites were the ancient inhabitants of the hills around Jerusalem. The population of Canaan as a land which was open to settlers had previously been a very mixed one. Compare for these names the names of the original inhabitants of the land regularly mentioned in the Law of Moses (e.g. <span class='bible'>Exo 3:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Exo 23:23<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 7:1<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 20:17<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jos 3:10<\/span>; etc.). <\/p>\n<p><strong> &ldquo;To this day&rdquo;<\/strong> may have been in the original record, the author incorporating it in order to remind people that they were still around, suggesting a date for his writing before the final Exile (say in the days of Zedekiah). <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 1Ki 9:22<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &lsquo;<\/strong> But of the children of Israel Solomon made no bondservants, but they were the men of war, and his servants, and his princes, and his captains, and the third men in his chariots and his chariot horsemen.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> The children of Israel were seen as &lsquo;free-men&rsquo; and could not be turned into bond-slaves except by personal choice for debt or in order to ensure a livelihood, even by such a tyrant as Solomon had become. They were thus called into service as soldiers, officers, commanders, captains, chariot shield-bearers and drivers. This was in fact what Samuel had warned the people would be the result of having a king (<span class='bible'>1Sa 8:12<\/span>). Again the prophet is letting us know that Solomon was the typical harsh non-YHWH-like monarch. <\/p>\n<p> This does not contradict <span class='bible'>1Ki 5:13-14<\/span>. That was only a partial levy (mas) and was in order to work on the timber for the Temple in a foreign country. That was not a task that could not entrusted to the inhabitants of the land, if only because they were not &lsquo;holy&rsquo;. These were mas-&lsquo;obed, the slave-levy. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 1Ki 9:23<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &lsquo;<\/strong> These were the chief officers who were over Solomon&rsquo;s work, five hundred and fifty, who bore rule over the people who wrought in the work.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> And over the levy were five hundred and fifty taskmasters. Seemingly there were three hundred semi- senior Canaanite taskmasters (over the three units (thousand) of ordinary taskmasters in <span class='bible'>1Ki 5:16<\/span>, making three units and three hundred) and two hundred and fifty senior Israelite taskmasters. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:24<\/span> a &lsquo;But Pharaoh&rsquo;s daughter came up out of the city of David to her house which Solomon had built for her.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> Adding to his disapproval the prophet points out that much of this work had been carried out in order to make provision for Pharaoh&rsquo;s daughter. (You can almost hear himself saying, &lsquo;that woman&rsquo;). Now that the palace complex had been completed, and the Ark had been removed from the Sacred tent in David&rsquo;s house, the Egyptian princess, with her false deities, could be allowed to live there. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:24<\/span> b &lsquo;Then did he build The Millo.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> And this was the time when he built The Millo. &lsquo;The Millo (filling)&rsquo; unquestionably referring to fortification work in Jerusalem. It has been suggested that it refers to the system of terraces, which consist of retaining walls with levelled filling, discovered by archaeologists on the eastern slope of Ophel Hill, strengthening the hillside. This enabled the construction of defensive buildings on the slope, and would tie in with the repairs to the walls of Jerusalem. <\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 1Ki 9:25<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'><strong> &lsquo;<\/strong> And three times a year did Solomon offer burnt-offerings and peace-offerings on the altar which he built to YHWH, burning incense with them, on the altar which was before YHWH. So he finished the house.&rsquo; <\/p>\n<p> The Temple having been built it was used as the Central Sanctuary to which the men of Israel gathered for the three great feasts, Passover, Sevens (Weeks) and Tabernacles. And during those feasts Solomon arranged for the offering of the burnt-offerings and peace-offerings as required by Law, and as required for the subsequent feasting. The burnt- offering was a dedicatory offering, and was wholly consumed. The peace or wellbeing offerings were also atoning, but parts of the animal could be eaten by the worshippers. These would be offered on the bronze altar. The incense would be burned by the priests &lsquo;before YHWH&rsquo; on the incense altar in the Holy Place before the veil. The reference of the original word to incense is however secondary, and the word may simply refer to &lsquo;fire-offerings&rsquo;. (There is no requirement that we see Solomon as doing this himself. It was the responsibility of the priests. Indeed if Solomon had offered all the offerings himself he would have been a very busy man). <\/p>\n<p><strong> &ldquo;The altar which he built to YHWH.&rdquo;<\/strong> The bronze altar was hollow and had to be built up inside so as to take the heat of the flames. <\/p>\n<p><strong> &ldquo;So he finished the house.&rdquo;<\/strong> Compare <span class='bible'>1Ki 6:14<\/span>; 1Ki 6:22 ; <span class='bible'>1Ki 6:38<\/span>. The House could not be considered to be &lsquo;finished&rsquo; until it had been put to its proper use in the offering of the required offerings and sacrifices, and that had awaited the transfer of Pharaoh&rsquo;s daughter to the palace complex, and the establishment of the Ark in its unique position in the Most Holy Place. Now at last it was fully operational. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong><em><span class='bible'>1Ki 9:15<\/span><\/em><\/strong><strong>. <\/strong><strong><em>And this is the reason of the levy<\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong> <em>Therefore this was the reason of the levy <\/em>or <em>tribute. <\/em>That is, the money which Solomon borrowed of Hiram, <span class=''>1Ki 9:14<\/span> was the reason of his raising the tribute upon his people. Houbigant. <\/p>\n<p><strong><em>And Millo<\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong> See <span class='bible'>2Sa 5:9<\/span>.  <em>Millo <\/em>was a place in Jerusalem in which the people of Israel assembled, when there was any consultation to be made about public affairs. It is derived from the Hebrew word  <em>male, <\/em>which signifies <em>full, <\/em>because the people filled the place. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> (15)  And this is the reason of the levy which king Solomon raised; for to build the house of the LORD, and his own house, and Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer. (16) For Pharaoh king of Egypt had gone up, and taken Gezer, and burnt it with fire, and slain the Canaanites that dwelt in the city, and given it for a present unto his daughter, Solomon&#8217;s wife. (17) And Solomon built Gezer, and Bethhoron the nether, (18) And Baalath, and Tadmor in the wilderness, in the land, (19) And all the cities of store that Solomon had, and cities for his chariots, and cities for his horsemen, and that which Solomon desired to build in Jerusalem, and in Lebanon, and in all the land of his dominion. (20) And all the people that were left of the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, which were not of the children of Israel, (21) Their children that were left after them in the land, whom the children of Israel also were not able utterly to destroy, upon those did Solomon levy a tribute of bondservice unto this day. (22) But of the children of Israel did Solomon make no bondmen: but they were men of war, and his servants, and his princes, and his captains, and rulers of his chariots, and his horsemen. (23) These were the chief of the officers that were over Solomon&#8217;s work, five hundred and fifty, which bare rule over the people that wrought in the work. (24) But Pharaoh&#8217;s daughter came up out of the city of David unto her house which Solomon had built for her: then did he build Millo.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> I detain not the Reader with any further observation upon these verses, than just to remark how much they teach us the importance of building for eternity. What a great account here is, of many cities, many inhabitants, much employment; and what is the sum total of all, but vanity and vexation of spirit. So Solomon himself draws the conclusion; and so must every wise man. <span class='bible'>Ecc 2:4<\/span> . Blessed Jesus! give me grace to build on thee, the foundation stone in Zion, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. Lord! grant that it may be found this is mine, like thy servant, <span class='bible'>2Co 5:1<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 1Ki 9:15 And this [is] the reason of the levy which king Solomon raised; for to build the house of the LORD, and his own house, and Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer.<\/p>\n<p> Ver. 15. <strong> And this is the reason of the levy,<\/strong> ] <em> sc., <\/em> That Hiram, since he would not have those cities, might have his money repaid him, that had been bestowed &#8211; and much more &#8211; upon those buildings.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>reason = account, or schedule. <\/p>\n<p>Levy: i.e. tribute of men. Same word as 1Ki 5:13-18; not the same word as 1Ki 9:21. <\/p>\n<p>Millo = the Millo. Part of Jebusite city, or the filling up between Jebus and Moriah. Hezekiah strengthened it. Shechem had a &#8220;Millo&#8221; (Jdg 9:6). Compare 1Ki 9:24; 1Ki 11:27. 2Sa 5:9. 1Ch 11:8. 2Ch 32:54. <\/p>\n<p>the wall. Begun by David (2Sa 5:9. 1Ch 11:8). Solomon closed the breaches (1Ki 11:27). <\/p>\n<p>Hazor, an old Canaanitish town (Jos 11:1). <\/p>\n<p>Megiddo, the same (Jos 12:21. Jdg 1:27; Jdg 5:19, and 1Ki 4:12). <\/p>\n<p>Gezer. Gezer was formerly under the suzerainty of Egypt. Correspondence of the time of Amen-hotep III and IV, about 1450 B.C, has been found at Tel-el-Amarnah explorations, which mentions Yapakhi as &#8220;king&#8221; of Gezer. Letters from Abdkhiba, king of Jerusalem, complain of the Gezerites. First mentioned in Jos 10:33. Conquest only partial (Jos 16:10. Jdg 1:29). Allotted to Levites (Jos 21:21). In excavation by Palestine Exploration Fund a contract was found, dated 649 B.C. (in Assyrian). Gezer then still under an Egyptian Governor. Another contract, dated 647 B. C, was found, showing an Assyrian occupation in the time of Manasseh. This may explain the &#8220;captains&#8221; of 2Ch 38:11. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>Prosperity and Wealth <\/p>\n<p>1Ki 9:15-28<\/p>\n<p>Solomon was a great builder and employed vast numbers of Canaanites, the old inhabitants of the land, as forced laborers. They performed the drudgery, while the Israelites filled the more honorable and lucrative posts. See Isa 60:10. There are Amorites and Perizzites in our lives. Let us not be mastered by them, but compel them to subserve our own growth in grace.<\/p>\n<p>Millo was the key to the fortifications of Jerusalem; Hazor and Megiddo, Baalath and Tadmor guarded the northern frontier. On the extreme south, the navies visited distant realms, and returned laden with gold. Such were Israels midsummer days. But as, in the latter days of summer, there is the faint odor of decay in the air, and we know that the autumn comes apace, so beneath all this splendor and imperial glory, as we turn to the earlier chapters of Ecclesiastes, we learn that decadence was at its heart.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: F.B. Meyer&#8217;s Through the Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>am 2989-3029, bc 1015-975 <\/p>\n<p>the reason: 1Ki 9:21, 1Ki 5:13 <\/p>\n<p>to build: 1Ki 9:10, 1Ki 6:38, 1Ki 7:1, 2Ch 8:1 <\/p>\n<p>Millo: Millo is said to have been a deep valley, between the ancient city of Jebus and the city of David on mount Zion. This Solomon filled up, and built upon; and it became a fortified place, and a place for public assemblies. 1Ki 9:24, 1Ki 11:27, Jdg 9:6, Jdg 9:20, 2Sa 5:9, 2Ki 12:20 <\/p>\n<p>the wall: Psa 51:18 <\/p>\n<p>Hazor: Probably the city Hazor in Naphtali, and the famous capital of Jabin, situated in the lake Merom or Semechon, and placed by Josephus south of Tyre, near Ptolemais. Jos 11:1, Jos 19:36, Jdg 4:2, 2Ki 15:29 <\/p>\n<p>Megiddo: 1Ki 4:12, Jos 17:11, Jdg 5:19, 2Ki 9:27, 2Ki 23:29, 2Ki 23:30, 2Ch 35:22, Zec 12:11 <\/p>\n<p>Gezer: 1Ki 9:16, 1Ki 9:17, Jos 10:33, Jos 16:10, Jos 21:21, Jdg 1:29, 1Ch 6:67, 1Ch 20:4 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Jos 16:3 &#8211; Bethhoron 1Sa 27:8 &#8211; the Amalekites 1Ki 3:1 &#8211; the wall 1Ki 4:6 &#8211; tribute 1Ki 12:4 &#8211; our yoke 1Ki 12:25 &#8211; built 1Ch 7:29 &#8211; Megiddo 1Ch 11:8 &#8211; Millo<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>1Ki 9:15. This is the reason of the levy, &amp;c.  That the raising of a great tribute upon the people, and employing so many men in his works, might not seem strange, the sacred writer here shows the cause of it; which was, his great and numerous buildings, suitable to the high dignity to which God had advanced him. The Hebrew word, , mass, here rendered levy, as Mr. Selden hath shown, by many instances, is not only used for pecuniary tribute, but also for bodily labour; it means a levy of men as well as a levy of money. And he thus interprets this clause: This is the cause of requiring the labour of so many men; it was to build, &amp;c. Having thus declared the cause, the historian proceeds (1Ki 9:20) to relate who they were that he employed in this service. And Millo  David had built round about Zion, from Millo inward, (2Sa 5:9,) but had left the structure of Millo itself imperfect, which Solomon now completed, with a particular respect to Pharaohs daughter, whose house was near it, 1Ki 9:24. It seems, from 1Ki 11:27, and 2Ch 32:5, to have been an eminent, large, and strong fort, or castle, in that part of Jerusalem termed the city of David, where the fortress which David took from the Jebusites anciently stood. Here, it is thought, the people of Israel assembled when there was any consultation to be made about public affairs. The name , Millo, appears to be derived from the word , malee, which signifies full. Kimchi thinks it was so called because it was frequently full of people, being locus amplus et latus, comitiis et conventibus publicis destinatus, a large and open place, appointed for holding public courts and assemblies. And the wall of Jerusalem  Which was a great structure: for there were three walls, one within another, as Abarbinel and Joseph Ben-Gorion explain it; the inner wall encompassing the house of God and the house of the king; the middle wall encompassing the houses of great persons; (termed the College, 2Ki 22:14;) and the third the houses of all the people. And Hazor  Which had been a very eminent city, and the head of some kingdoms before the conquest of Canaan, (Jos 11:10,) and was given to the tribe of Naphtali, Jos 19:36. Megiddo  A city in the tribe of Manasseh, Jos 17:11. And Gezer  In the tribe of Ephraim, Jos 21:21.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>9:15 And this [is] the reason of the levy which king Solomon raised; for to build the house of the LORD, and his own house, and {f} Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer.<\/p>\n<p>(f) Millo was as the town house or place of assembly which was open above.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:bold\">Solomon&rsquo;s public works 9:15-19<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Solomon was powerful enough to conscript laborers to build the Millo and a wall around Jerusalem. The Millo (lit. filling) evidently refers to the terraces on the east side of Mt. Zion (cf. 2Sa 5:9). Solomon enlarged these so they connected the City of David with the temple and palace site. He also expanded the wall that encircled the City of David so it included the temple and palace complex to the north thus doubling the size of the city (1Ki 9:15).<\/p>\n<p>Solomon also rebuilt and fortified three large strategic defense centers: Hazor in the North (cf. Jos 11:1), Megiddo in the Jezreel Valley (cf. Jos 17:11), and Gezer in the West (1Ki 9:15). Lower Beth-horon stood on a major western approach route to Jerusalem. He also fortified Baalath (site uncertain) and Tamar, south of the Salt (Dead) Sea, in Judah,<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: See Rudolph Cohen, &quot;The Fortresses King Solomon Built to Protect His Southern Border,&quot; Biblical Archaeology Review 11:3 (May-June 1985):56-70; and idem., &quot;Solomon&rsquo;s Negev Defense Line Contained Three Fewer Fortresses,&quot; Biblical Archaeology Review 12:4 (July-August 1986):40-45.] <\/span> and he strengthened other towns (2Ch 8:2-6). Solomon developed these towns to defend Jerusalem and Israel and to control the major routes into and through his empire.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Bright, p. 192.] <\/span> Were these projects partially flawed by dependence on the flesh? Possibly they were. David had evidently built defensive border cities during his reign as well.<span style=\"color:#808080\"> [Note: Y. Aharoni, &quot;The Building Activities of David and Solomon,&quot; Israel Exploration Journal 24:1 (1974):13-16.] <\/span><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And this [is] the reason of the levy which king Solomon raised; for to build the house of the LORD, and his own house, and Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer. 15 25. Of the levy which king Solomon raised (2Ch 8:4-11) 15. the reason of the levy ] &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-1-kings-915\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Kings 9:15&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9078","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9078","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9078"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9078\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9078"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}