31<\/strong>. An house of high places<\/em> ] The graven image must have its temple. So in Bethel and in Dan buildings were raised, and an eminence chosen for the site of each. Hence it is better to render the plural notion, as R.V., houses of high places<\/strong>.<\/p>\n and made priests of the lowest of the people<\/em> ] Better, as R.V. ‘ and made priests from among all the people<\/strong> ’. The noun properly means ‘an end’, ‘an extremity.’ Then in the plural, as it is here, ‘the extremities,’ which between them comprise the whole space of anything. Thus the word is rendered in Jdg 18:2<\/span> (R.V.) ‘five men from their whole number<\/em>.’ Here the idea is that Jeroboam’s priests were taken from anywhere, and so the selection differed much from that of the southern kingdom, where one tribe alone held the priest’s office. The Levites who before the division of the kingdom had been scattered among all the tribes, now, in the main, withdrew to the southern tribes (2Ch 11:13-14<\/span>).<\/p>\n He made an house of high places – <\/B>i. e., He built a temple, or sanctuary, at each of the two cities where the calves were set up. The writer uses the expression house of high places in contempt, meaning that the buildings were not real temples, or houses of God, like that at Jerusalem, but only on a par with the temples upon high places which had long existed in various parts of the land.<\/P> Made priests of the lowest of the people – <\/B>More correctly, from all ranks of the people. That the Levites did not accept Jeroboams innovations, and transfer their services to his two sanctuaries, must have been the consequence of their faithful attachment to the true worship of Yahweh. In all probability Jeroboam confiscated the Levitical lands within his dominions for the benefit of the new priestly order 2Ch 11:13-14<\/span>.<\/P> <\/p>\n Verse 31<\/span>. A house of high places<\/B><\/I>] A temple of temples; he had many high places<\/I> in the land, and to imitate the temple at Jerusalem, he made one chief over all the rest, where he established a priesthood of his own ordination. Probably a place of separate appointment<\/I>, where different idols<\/I> were set up and worshipped; so it was a sort of pantheon<\/I>.<\/P> <\/P> Made priests of the lowest of the people<\/B><\/I>] He took the people indifferently as they came, and made them priests, till he had enough, without troubling himself whether they were of the family of Aaron or the house of Levi, or not. Any priests would do well enough for such gods. But those whom he took seem to have been worthless, good-for-nothing fellows, who had neither piety nor good sense. Probably the sons of Levi<\/I> had grace enough to refuse to sanction this new priesthood and idolatrous worship.<\/P> <\/p>\n An house of high places, <\/B>or, an house<\/I> (i.e. houses, or chapels) in the high places<\/I>. Besides the famous houses, or temples, which he built at Dan and Beth-el, he built also, for his peoples better accommodation, lesser temples upon divers high places, which were esteemed sacred and venerable, because their pious ancestors had served God in them; and thereby Jeroboam might not seem to bring in a new religion, but only to revive the old. <\/P> Made priests of the lowest of the people; <\/B>which he might do, either, <\/P> 1. Because the better sort refused it, as an office below their quality. Or, <\/P> 2. Because such would be satisfied with mean allowances; and so he could put into his own purse a great part of the rich possessions and revenues of the Levites, which doubtless he seized upon when they forsook him, and went to Jerusalem, 2Ch 11:13<\/span>,14<\/span>, which also was very necessary for his present and pressing occasions; the rather, because he durst not yet lay grievous taxes upon that people, who had newly cast off Rehoboam for that very reason. Or, <\/P> 3. Because mean persons would depend upon his favour, and therefore be very pliable to his humour, and firm to his interest, and zealous to promote the worship of the calves. But the words in the Hebrew properly signify from the ends of the people<\/I>; which is and may be translated thus, out of all the people<\/I>; promiscuously out of every tribe; which exposition seems to be confirmed by the following words, which are added to explain these, <\/P> which were not of the sons of Levi; <\/B>though they were not of the tribe of Levi. And that indeed was Jeroboams sin; not that he chose mean persons, for some of the Levites were such; and his sin had not been less, if he had chosen the noblest and greatest persons, as we see in the example of Uzziah, 2Ch 26:18<\/span>,19<\/span>; but that he chose men of other tribes, contrary to Gods appointment, which restrained that office to that tribe. <\/P> Not of the sons of Levi; <\/B>to whom that office was confined by Gods express command; but he gave the priesthood promiscuously to any person of any other tribe. <\/P> <\/p>\n 31. made priests of the lowest ofthe people<\/B>literally, “out of all the people,” theLevites refusing to act. He himself assumed to himself the functionsof the high priest, at least, at the great festival, probably fromseeing the king of Egypt conjoin the royal and sacred offices, anddeeming the office of the high priest too great to be vested in asubject.<\/P><\/p>\n And he made an house of high places<\/strong>,…. Or “altars” s, built a temple at Dan, and set up several altars in it for sacrifice, both for burnt offerings, and for incense, as at Jerusalem:<\/p>\n and made priests of the lowest of the people<\/strong>; this clause seems not so well rendered; for this would have been very unpopular, and brought his new form of worship into contempt, to make the dregs of the people priests, which was not only a very sacred office, but of great honour; it was usual in some nations for kings to be priests also t, and Jeroboam himself exercised this office, 1Ki 12:33<\/span> and therefore would never put the meanest of the people into it, but rather those of higher rank: the words may be literally rendered, “from the extremities” or “ends of the people” u; meaning not merely from the extremist parts of his country, but rather out of the whole of the people; out of all sorts of them, out of any of them, without any distinction of tribe: for so it follows,<\/p>\n which were not of the sons of Levi<\/strong>; and as by this means he enriched himself, by taking the cities that belonged to the priests and Levites, which they were obliged to leave, and from whence he drove them, 2Ch 11:14<\/span> so he pleased the people by laying open the priesthood common to them, and freeing them from the payment of tithes, and the like.<\/p>\n s “altarium”, Vatablus. t Rex Anius, &c. Virgil. l. 3. Vid. Servium in ib. u “de extremitatibus populi”, Vatablus, Piscator.<\/p>\n (31, 32) Of the lowest of the people.<\/strong>This is universally recognised as a mistranslation, though a natural one, of the original, the ends of the people. The sense is from the whole mass of the people, without care for Levitical descentthe Levites having (see 2Ch. 11:13-14<\/span>) generally returned into the kingdom of Judah on the establishment of this idolatry. It is hardly likely that the king would have lacked because at Dan an unauthorised Levitical priesthood was (as has been said) forthcoming.<\/p>\n 31<\/strong>. <\/strong> House of high places <\/strong> That is, a house at the two high places just mentioned Beth-el and Dan. At each of these high places he built houses suitable to the worship that was to be established at them. So the houses of high places ( 1Ki 13:32 ; 2Ki 17:29<\/span>; 2Ki 17:32<\/span>; 2Ki 23:19<\/span>) are the temples for worship built at the high places. <\/p>\n Made priests of the lowest of the people <\/strong> Rather, from the whole of the people; <\/em> that is, the entire mass of the population without reference to tribes. The priesthood had hitherto been hereditary, and confined to the tribe of Levi; but Jeroboam annulled this Divine arrangement, probably because the Levites refused to give their sanction to the new forms of worship, and thus obliged him to do this or have no priests at all. , literally, from the ends of the people, <\/em> never has reference to the moral character or social position of the people, but to their numerical or territorial extent. The sin of Jeroboam in this was not that he selected for priests persons of low birth or infamous character, but persons taken indiscriminately from the entire population. <\/p>\n Not of the sons of Levi <\/strong> These probably opposed the king’s new devices and unauthorized innovations; and when he proceeded to make priests from the whole people, they “left their possessions,” and with “such as set their hearts to seek the Lord God of Israel, came to Jerusalem,” and by their piety and numbers they greatly “strengthened the kingdom of Judah.” See 2Ch 11:13-17<\/span>.<\/p>\n 1Ki 12:31<\/span><\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>Hemade priests of the lowest of the people, <\/em><\/strong>&c.<\/strong> Out of the bulk of the people, <\/em>&c. See Gen 47:2<\/span>. <\/span>Eze 33:2<\/span>. Of certain families which were not of the tribe of Levi. <\/em>Houbigant. <\/p>\n 1Ki 12:31 And he made an house of high places, and made priests of the lowest of the people, which were not of the sons of Levi.<\/p>\n Ver. 31. And he made a house.<\/strong> ] A mock temple, a pantheon, a place to hold his mawmets and monuments of idolatry. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n And made priests, &c.<\/strong> ] Leaden priests are well fitted to golden deities: such are those greasy hedge priests among the Papists. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Which were not of the sons of Levi.<\/strong> ] The Levites he had turned out of their places, and enriched himself with their spoils. 2Ch 11:14 <\/p>\n house = a temple. Not merely “high places”. <\/p>\n an house: 1Ki 13:24, 1Ki 13:32, Deu 24:15, Eze 16:25, Hos 12:11 <\/p>\n priests: 1Ki 13:33, Num 3:10, 2Ki 17:32, 2Ch 11:14, 2Ch 11:15, 2Ch 13:9, Eze 44:6-8 <\/p>\n Reciprocal: Jdg 17:5 – consecrated Jdg 17:12 – his priest 2Ki 17:27 – one of the priests 2Ki 23:19 – the houses Psa 78:58 – with Hos 8:14 – and buildeth Amo 7:10 – the priest<\/p>\n 1Ki 12:31. And he made a house of high places That is, saith Abarbinel, he made a house or temple at Dan, wherein there was not one altar only, as there was at Jerusalem, but a great many altars or high places, probably complaining of it as an inconvenience, that in the temple at Jerusalem there was but one. The multiplying of altars passed with some as a piece of devotion; but God, by the prophet, puts another construction upon it, Hos 8:11, Ephraim has made many altars to sin. And made priests of the lowest of the people And the lowest of the people, says Henry, were good enough, and too good, to be priests to his calves. They who understand the words in this sense suppose he did this, either, 1st, Because the better sort refused the office as below their quality; or, 2d, Because such would be satisfied with mean allowances or small wages; and so he could put into his own purse a great part of the revenues of the Levites, which doubtless he seized upon when they forsook him and went to Jerusalem, (2Ch 11:13;) or, 3d, Because mean persons would depend upon his favour, and therefore be pliable to his humour and firm to his interest. But it must be observed here, that the words , meketsoth hagnam, properly signify, from the ends of the people, and may be rendered, out of all the people, that is, promiscuously out of every tribe: an exposition which Bochart hath justified by a great many examples, showing that the same words are used in this sense in divers other places. Indeed, this exposition seems to be confirmed by the following clause, added to explain these words, which were not of the sons of Levi <\/p>\n Though they were not of the tribe of Levi, to whom the office of the priesthood was confined by Gods express command. So that Jeroboams sin, as to this particular, was not that he chose mean persons, for many of the Levites were such; and his sin would not have been the less if he had chosen the noblest and greatest persons; as we see in the example of Uzziah: but in that he chose men of other tribes, contrary to Gods appointment, which restrained that office to that tribe. Thus, as he transferred the kingdom from the house of David, so he transferred the priesthood from the family of Aaron; and left it open, that any body might be admitted to that honourable employment; which was a very popular thing, and ingratiated him, no doubt, with the people.<\/p>\n 12:31 And he made an {n} house of high places, and made priests of the lowest of the people, which were not of the sons of Levi.<\/p>\n (n) That is, a temple, where altars were built for idolatry.<\/p>\n And he made a house of high places, and made priests of the lowest of the people, which were not of the sons of Levi. 31. An house of high places ] The graven image must have its temple. So in Bethel and in Dan buildings were raised, and an eminence chosen for the site … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Kings 12:31”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9194","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9194"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9194\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible <\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"