{"id":9582,"date":"2022-09-24T03:08:23","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T08:08:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-kings-219\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T03:08:23","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T08:08:23","slug":"exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-kings-219","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-kings-219\/","title":{"rendered":"Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Kings 2:19"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 align='center'><b><i> And the men of the city said unto Elisha, Behold, I pray thee, the situation of this city [is] pleasant, as my lord seeth: but the water [is] naught, and the ground barren. <\/i><\/b><\/h3>\n<p> <strong> 19 22<\/strong>. Elisha heals the noxious water at Jericho (Not in Chronicles)<\/p>\n<p><strong> 19<\/strong>. <em> And the men of the city<\/em> ] These are the ordinary inhabitants. From the sons of the prophets they would gather that Elisha was now gifted with the spirit and power of Elijah. The situation of Jericho, near the passage of the Jordan, was such as to attract a considerable population after it was rebuilt, and for the sake of the prosperity which came to them in other ways they were content to dwell in such an unwholesome place. Now however they saw a hope of benefit and with this thought they came to Elisha. &lsquo;It is good making use of a prophet while we have him&rsquo; (Bp Hall).<\/p>\n<p><em> I<\/em> [R.V. <strong> we<\/strong> ] <em> pray thee<\/em> ] The Hebrew is a mere interjection. The change in the English is justified because the petitioners were numerous.<\/p>\n<p><em> the situation of<\/em> this <em> city<\/em> is <em> pleasant<\/em> ] Jericho was a part of that country which, in <span class='bible'>Gen 13:10<\/span>, is compared to &lsquo;the garden of the Lord&rsquo;.<\/p>\n<p><em> the water<\/em> is <em> naught<\/em> ] This word is of frequent occurrence in the English of the 16th century in the sense of &lsquo;bad&rsquo;. So too &lsquo;naughty&rsquo;. Cf. <span class='bible'>Jer 24:2<\/span>, &lsquo;naughty figs&rsquo;. And for &lsquo;naught&rsquo; cf. Shakes. <em> As You Like It<\/em>, I. 2. 68, &lsquo;The mustard was <em> naught<\/em> &rsquo;. <em> Much Ado<\/em>, v. I. 157, &lsquo;If I do not carve most curiously, say my knife&rsquo;s <em> naught<\/em> &rsquo;.<\/p>\n<p><em> and the ground barren<\/em> ] R.V. <strong> and the land miscarrieth<\/strong>. The R.V. is explained in a margin &lsquo;casteth her fruit&rsquo;. The evil effect was clearly in consequence of the hurtful water, for the healing of the spring is to bring a remedy for the other evils. It seems therefore that the water was such as caused the trees to shed their fruit prematurely and the cattle which fed on the herbage which it watered to cast their young untimely, and it may be that the mischief extended also to the human beings who drank thereof.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>The water is naught &#8211; <\/B>i. e. bad.<\/P> <P STYLE=\"text-indent: 0.75em\"><B>And the ground barren &#8211; <\/B>Translate and the land apt to miscarry. The stream was thought to be the cause of untimely births, abortions, and the like, among the cattle, perhaps also among the people, that drank of it.<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Albert Barnes&#8217; Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ki 2:19-22<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>And the men of the city said unto Elisha.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The bitter waters sweetened-Elisha the healer<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Jericho, a city of high antiquity, was one of the most important in the land of Palestine. Its walls were so broad, that at least one person&#8211;Rahab&#8211;had her house upon them. Silver and gold were so abundant that one man&#8211;Achan&#8211;could stealthily appropriate 200 shekels. Between the city and the far East, there had existed for years, before its occupation by the children of Israel, a wide and extensive commerce, of which the goodly Babylonish garment, purloined in the act of dishonesty just mentioned, may be accepted as proof. The New Testament notices of Jericho are full of interest. The lonely limestone rocks behind the city formed the scene of our Lords temptation. It was down the banks of the Jordan, at Jericho, the Master had previously gone to be baptized. Three times in Jericho did our Blessed Lord give sight to the blind. Once in Jericho, the descendant of Rahab the hostess accepted the hospitality of Zaccheus the publican. For five hundred and fifty years a doom had lain upon Jericho. She had been the first city to resist the advance of Israel under the leadership of Joshua. She was therefore not only condemned to fall before the captain of the Lords host, and amid the much ceremony with which we are all familiar&#8211;the annihilation was accompanied with a terrible curse. The man who ventured to rebuild Jericho was to lay the foundation in his first-born, and in his youngest son to set up the gates. Josephus describes the district in his day as<strong> <\/strong>quite a fairyland, with its palms and roses, and fragrant balsams and thickly dotted pleasure grounds&#8211;a perfect garden and paradise of Eastern beauty. At the period of the text, however, things were very different. The spring was still suffering from the old doom pronounced against Jericho, it was noxious, unfit for drinking, prejudicial to the soil: The men of the city said unto Elisha &#8211;who was at this time residing here in the sacred college&#8211;Behold. I pray thee, the situation of this city is pleasant, as my Lord seeth, but the water is naught, and the ground barren.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>The Gospel is a new cruse for the world. Christianity comes not in the oldness of the letter and the law, but in the newness of the Spirit. The Gospel, too, begins at the origin of the evil&#8211;the heart&#8211;that is<strong> <\/strong>the spring of the waters. What is needed is a clean heart and a right spirit; the poison is at the fountain-head, and must be dealt with there. Once again, like the salt in the cruse, how unlikely and insufficient at first sight the simple Gospel appears for the worlds conversion. The words with which Elisha accompanied tile casting in of the salt, and the consequent working of the miracle, are very noticeable: Thus saith the Lord, exclaimed the prophet, I have healed these waters. How the change was effected, we cannot tell. Means were employed to show that God in His greatest works has a place for the instrumentality of man. Elisha cast in the salt.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>In the redemption of a lost world, God has room for the<strong> <\/strong>energies of believing men. As ye go, preach. Sow beside all waters. But God is the grand agent. The power of the healing waters comes from the Great Physician. The new cruse and the salt in it, both are Gods sufficient honour for poor sinful men to be their administrators&#8211;let God be All in All. There was no mistaking the result of the Divine interposition by the hand of Elisha in relation to the bitter waters of Jericho. Thus saith the Lord, there<strong> <\/strong>shall not be from thence any more death or barren land.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>The figure is that of the Gospel again, both in its influence on society at large and the individual believing heart. Put the new cruse and the salt once really in, and a new heart leads to a new life, and the world at large, once its springs are really touched, feels<strong> <\/strong>it through all its tributaries and ramifications. What has Christianity not done for the social life of man? It has abolished polygamy. It has put honour on the marriage tie. It has created lazar-houses for the sick, and asylums for the penitent profligate. What has it not done for the cause of civil liberty? It has struck the fetters from the negro. It has proclaimed freedom of conscience. What has Christianity not done for the commercial enterprise and the outward prosperity of the world? The missionary is the pioneer of the merchant. (<em>H. J. Howat.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cleansing the fountain<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Elisha began his work as a leader of the church of his time by a deed of mercy. Elisha made no claim that he had healed the waters himself, and he did not pretend that there was any power in the salt to work the change. He was simply Gods minister, and the salt was used simply as<strong> <\/strong>a symbol of Gods presence in the cleansing of the fountain. We have in this cleansing of the fountain suggested to us: that a mans surroundings may be very pleasant, and his temporal circumstances such as to cause the envy of his neighbours, and yet his life may be embittered and his career utterly despoiled because of some malady of the spirit that takes away his peace, and ruins his happiness. Elisha assumed that it would be useless to change the water in the stream, for the evil fountain left unchanged would continue to pour forth its poisoned waters. So he went to the spring, and cast in the healing salt at the fountain-h cad. We are reminded of the words of Jesus where He declares that A good man, out of the good treasure of heart, bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil mare out of the evil treasure, bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh. And again our Saviour says, For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies: and He adds, These are the things which defile a man. The poisonous stream of conduct is poured forth because the heart is evil. It is one of Aristotles axioms that the goodness or badness of anything is determined from its principle: hence it is that we call that a good tree that hath a good root, that a good house that hath a good foundation, that good money that is made of good metal, that good cloth that is made of good wool; but a good man is not so called because he has good hands, a good head, good words, a good voice, and all the lineaments of his body similar and composed, as it were, in a geometrical symmetry, but because he has a good heart, good affections, good principles of grace, whereby all his faculties, both of body and of soul, are always in a readiness to do that which is right. Plutarch tells us that Apollodorus dreamed one night that the Scythians took him and tortured him, and as they were putting him to death in the boiling cauldron, his heart said unto him, It is I that have brought thee to this sorrow; I am the cause of all the mischief that hath befallen thee. And it is certainly true that the heart of man is the forge and the anvil where all the actions of his life are hammered out. You must give your whole heart to God and obey Him in every way, or else all pretensions to religion are hypocrisy. The secret of Christianitys great power in the world is in this transformation of the heart. Elisha made sure that the water in the stream would be clean and pure, by cleansing the fountain. Christ makes sure that the new life of the man who truly comes to Him shall be good, by cleansing the heart. (<em>L. A. Banks,<\/em> <em>D. D.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Elisha healing the water, and the means he used<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>What a true picture is here delineated of things on earth! What a living sample of its present state! Look where you will, go where you please, there is something pleasant and something unpleasant. May we not hereby learn how sin has defaced this fair creation, so that nowhere can perfection be seen. And now, therefore, the Lord will bring good out of evil. He will make this city a resting-place for his prophets.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>In what part of the waters did Elisha exert his power? It was the spring. This conveys a deep spiritual truth. We can easily perceive that, had Elishas attention been directed to the water only a few yards from the fountain-head, his labour would have been for nought. As fast as he sweetened the running water, the bitter fountain would still pour out its venom. But we do not so readily see and allow that, except the corruption of human nature be attacked at the fountain-head, the heart, all other remedial measures can only work a passing effect, since the bitter stream of innate depravity will still run out.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>The means Elisha used. And he said, Bring me a new cruse, etc. Salt is a conspicuous article in Scripture. It was a pledge of fidelity, and is so still in the East. If you once cat salt with an Arab, his life is pledged for your life, Some few grains of salt and bread pass the lips, and then the words are used&#8211;By this salt and bread I will not betray thee; and in the Book of Chronicles we read&#8211;The Lord God of Israel gave the kingdom over Israel to David by a covenant of salt (<span class='bible'>2Ch 13:5<\/span>). Salt was also a sign cf maintenance. Thus, in the Book of Ezra, the adversaries of Judah, in stating their case to Artaxerxes the king, say, Now because we have maintenance from the kings palace (<span class='bible'>Ezr 4:14<\/span>), which is literally, as rendered in the margin, because we are salted with the salt of the palace&#8211;<em>i.e.<\/em>, supported at the kings charge. When a native of the East means to say he is fed by any one, he uses the expression, I eat such an ones salt. Salt was also a constant accompaniment of the ceremonial law. Every sacrifice shall be salted with salt, are the words of Jesus; and it is in this sense that we find our Lord and His apostles using salt figuratively for grace, saying, If the salt have lost its saltness, wherewith will ye season it?  (<span class='bible'>Mar 9:49<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mar 9:1<\/span>). Thus the means used by Elisha to heal the waters point to another deep spiritual truth&#8211;they remind every one of this inquiry, Have ye salt in yourselves? Is grace working in your heart, mortifying your evil and corrupt affections, and inclining you daily to exercise all virtue and godliness of living? But there is another feature in the means here used which may convey a useful hint&#8211;they were contrary to nature, contrary to any means that man would have employed to produce a like effect. Salt, we know, renders water bitter and nauseous instead of sweet and pleasant to drink, and naturally, therefore, the salt would have served but to increase the brackishness of the fountain. The fact, then, of Elisha using a remedy opposed to the effect wanted, not only went to make the miracle more evident, more palpable, but it also confirmed a stumbling truth&#8211;namely, that grace and nature are contrary the<strong> <\/strong>one to the other&#8211;that the ways of God (so far as seen in this fallen world) and the ways of man in curing an evil are altogether different; both will use means, but the means which it pleases Jehovah to use are not those which man would choose or even think of. My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord (<span class='bible'>Isa 55:8<\/span>). Surely these opposites&#8211;these unlikely means fetching a good end&#8211;are meant to teach us something. What can it be? They were intended to humble man, and to bring him into submission to the righteousness of God. God chooses foolish things of the world, or things foolish in the worlds sight, to confound the wise (<span class='bible'>1Co 1:27<\/span>). (<em>G. L. Glyn.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>The pleasant and the painful<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>Life as it is. That is, with the pleasant and the painful associated. Now, this is a picture of every mans life.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <\/strong>It is so materially. How much we have in this material world that is pleasant to our senses, and healthful and strengthening to our bodies; but amidst all there is the painful. There are malarial swamps, pestilential winds, roaring earthquakes, and poisonous minerals and plants, etc. etc.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>It is so intellectually. There is much in the region of intellect that is pleasant&#8211;bubbling springs of thought, tempting regions of inquiry, bright visions and hypotheses bespangling the heavens. But with all this there is much that is painful&#8211;dense clouds of ignorance hanging over the scene, hideous doubts howling in the ear, terrific chasms yawning at the feet.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>It is so socially. How much in social life is pleasant&#8211;the friendly grasps, the affectionate greetings, the sweet amenities of those with whom we meet and mingle. But with all this there is much that is painful&#8211;social unchastities, hypocrisies, frauds, insolences.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>It is so religiously. The religious, where the idea of God<strong> <\/strong>fills the horizon, there is the infinitely pleasant But in this wonderful region how much of the painful do we experience, what temptation to doubt, what infidelity and blasphemy often assail us, and bring over us the horror of a great darkness.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>II. <\/strong>Life as it might become. The painful and the pleasant separated. Elisha here separates the painful from the pleasant. Two remarks here.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>I. <\/strong>The separation was a happy one. He did not take away the pleasant from the painful, but the painful from the pleasant.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <\/strong>The separation was a supernatural one. And he said, Bring me a new cruse, etc. The Gospel is the true cruse for separating the painful from the pleasant in the experience of human life. Thank God for the pleasant in your life. Seek earnestly that Gospel cruse whose salt alone can rid your life of all that is deleterious and distressing. (<em>Homilist.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> Verse <span class='bible'>19<\/span>. <I><B>The water<\/B><\/I><B> is <\/B><I><B>naught, and the ground barren.<\/B><\/I>] The barrenness of the ground was the effect of the badness of the water.<\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><P> Either it was so orignally, at least as to that part of the city where the college of the prophets was, for it is not necessary to understand this of the whole territory; or it became so from the curse of God inflicted upon it, either when Joshua first took it, or afterwards when Hiel rebuilt it. Howsoever, upon the prophets care, it grew exceeding fruitful, and therefore is commended for its fertility by later writers. <\/P> <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>And the men of the city said unto Elisha<\/strong>,&#8230;. The inhabitants of Jericho, perceiving him to be a prophet, and endowed with a power of working miracles:<\/p>\n<p><strong>behold, I pray thee, the situation of this city is pleasant, as my lord seeth<\/strong>; in a plain, surrounded with gardens and orchards, with vineyards, oliveyards, and groves of palm trees, and other odoriferous ones:<\/p>\n<p><strong>but the water is naught, and the ground barren<\/strong>; that is, that part of it where this water was, or ran, for from thence it became barren; or &#8220;caused to miscarry&#8221;, as the word signifies q; not only trees cast their fruit, which it watered, but women became abortive that drank of it, as Josephus says r, and so cattle. Abarbinel thinks it was so from the times of Joshua, being cursed by him; but, if so, it would not have been inhabited again; rather this was owing to a new curse, upon its being rebuilt; though this might affect only a small part of the ground, not the whole, as before observed.<\/p>\n<p>q  &#8220;orbans&#8221;, Montanus, Vatablus; &#8220;facit abortum&#8221;, Junius &amp; Tremellius, Piscator. r De Bello Jud. l. 4. c. 8. sect. 3.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Gill&#8217;s Exposition of the Entire Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><TABLE BORDER=\"0\" CELLPADDING=\"1\" CELLSPACING=\"0\"> <TR> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"LEFT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in;font-weight: normal;text-decoration: none\"> <span style='font-size:1.25em;line-height:1em'><I><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">The Waters of Jericho Healed; the Death of the Mocking Children.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/I><\/span><\/P> <\/TD> <TD> <P ALIGN=\"RIGHT\" STYLE=\"background: transparent;border: none;padding: 0in\"> <SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><FONT SIZE=\"1\" STYLE=\"font-size: 8pt\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\">B. C.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-style: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"font-weight: normal\"><SPAN STYLE=\"background: transparent\"><SPAN STYLE=\"text-decoration: none\"> 895.<\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/SPAN><\/FONT><\/P> <\/TD> <\/TR>  <\/TABLE> <P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 19 And the men of the city said unto Elisha, Behold, I pray thee, the situation of this city <I>is<\/I> pleasant, as my lord seeth: but the water <I>is<\/I> naught, and the ground barren. &nbsp; 20 And he said, Bring me a new cruse, and put salt therein. And they brought <I>it<\/I> to him. &nbsp; 21 And he went forth unto the spring of the waters, and cast the salt in there, and said, Thus saith the <B>LORD<\/B>, I have healed these waters; there shall not be from thence any more death or barren <I>land.<\/I> &nbsp; 22 So the waters were healed unto this day, according to the saying of Elisha which he spake. &nbsp; 23 And he went up from thence unto Beth-el: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. &nbsp; 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the <B>LORD<\/B>. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them. &nbsp; 25 And he went from thence to mount Carmel, and from thence he returned to Samaria.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Elisha had, in this respect, a double portion of Elijah&#8217;s spirit, that he wrought more miracles than Elijah. Some reckon them in number just double. Two are recorded in these verses&#8211;a miracle of mercy to Jericho and a miracle of judgment to Bethel, <span class='bible'>Ps. ci. 1<\/span>.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I. Here is a blessing upon the waters of Jericho, which was effectual to heal them. Jericho was built in disobedience to a command, in defiance to a threatening, and at the expense of the lives of all the builder&#8217;s children; yet, when it was built, it was not ordered to be demolished again, nor were God&#8217;s prophets or people forbidden to dwell in it, but even within those walls that were built by iniquity we find a nursery of piety. Fools, they say, build houses for wise men to dwell in. Here the wealth of the sinner provided a habitation for the just. We find Christ at Jericho, <span class='bible'>Luke xix. 1<\/span>. Hither Elisha came, to confirm the souls of the disciples with a more particular account of Elijah&#8217;s translation than their spies, who saw at a distance, could give them. Here he staid while the fifty men were searching for him. And, 1. The men of Jericho represented to him their grievance, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 19<\/span>. God&#8217;s faithful prophets love to be employed; it is wisdom to make use of them during the little while that their light is with us. They had not applied to Elijah concerning the matter, perhaps because he was not so easy of access as Elisha was; but now, we may hope, by the influence of the divinity-school in their city, they were reformed. The situation was pleasant and afforded a good prospect; but they had neither wholesome water to drink nor fruitful soil to yield them food, and what pleasure could they take in their prospect? Water is a common mercy, which we should estimate by the greatness of the calamity which the want or unwholesomeness of it would be. Some think that it was not all the ground about Jericho that was barren and had bad water, but some one part only, and <I>that<\/I> where the sons of the prophets had their lodgings, who are here called <I>the men of the city.<\/I> 2. He soon redressed their grievance. Prophets should endeavour to make every place they come to, some way or other, the better for them, endeavouring to sweeten bitter spirits, and to make barren souls fruitful, by the due application of the word of God. Elisha will heal their waters; but, (1.) They must furnish him with salt in a new cruse, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 20<\/span>. If salt had been proper to season the water, yet what could so small a quantity do towards it and what the better for being in a new cruse? But thus those that would be helped must be employed and have their faith and obedience tried. God&#8217;s works of grace are wrought, not by any operations of ours, but in observance of his institutions. (2.) He cast the salt <I>into the spring of the waters,<\/I> and so healed the streams and the ground they watered. Thus the way to reform men&#8217;s lives is to renew their hearts; let those be seasoned with the salt of grace; for <I>out of them are the issues of life. Make the tree good and the fruit will be good.<\/I> Purify the heart and that will cleanse the hands. (3.) He did not pretend to do this by his own power, but in God&#8217;s name: <I>Thus saith the Lord, I have healed these waters.<\/I> He is but the instrument, the channel through which God is pleased to convey this healing virtue. By doing them this kindness with a <I>Thus saith the Lord,<\/I> they would be made the more willing hereafter, to receive from him a reproof, admonition, or command, with the same preface. If, in God&#8217;s name, he can help them, in God&#8217;s name let him teach and rule them. <I>Thus saith the Lord,<\/I> out of Elisha&#8217;s mouth, must, ever after, be of mighty force with them. (4.) The cure was lasting, and not for the present only: <I>The waters were healed unto this day,<\/I><span class='_0000ff'><I><U><span class='bible'> v.<\/span><span class='bible'> 22<\/span><\/U><\/I><\/span>. What God does <I>shall be for ever,<\/I><span class='bible'><I> Eccl. iii. 14<\/I><\/span>. When he, by his Spirit, <I>heals a soul,<\/I> there shall be <I>no more death nor barrenness;<\/I> the property is altered: what was useless and offensive becomes grateful and serviceable.<\/P> <P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; II. Here is a curse upon the children of Bethel, which was effectual to destroy them; for it was not a curse causeless. At Bethel there was another school of prophets. Thither Elisha went next, in this his primary visitation, and the scholars there no doubt welcomed him with all possible respect, but the townsmen were abusive to him. One of Jeroboam&#8217;s calves was at Bethel; this they were proud of, and fond of, and hated those that reproved them. The law did not empower them to suppress this pious academy, but we may suppose it was their usual practice to jeer the prophets as they went along the streets, to call them by some nickname or other, that they might expose them to contempt, prejudice their youth against them, and, if possible, drive them out of their town. Had the abuse done to Elisha been the first offence of that kind, it is probable that it would not have been so severely punished. But <I>mocking the messengers of the Lord,<\/I> and <I>misusing the prophets,<\/I> was one of the <I>crying sins of Israel,<\/I> as we find, <span class='bible'>2 Chron. xxxvi. 16<\/span>. Now here we have, 1. An instance of that sin. The little <I>children of Bethel,<\/I> the boys and girls that were playing in the streets (notice, it is likely, having come to the town of his approach), went out to meet him, not with their hosannas, as they ought to have done, but with their scoffs; they gathered about him and mocked him, as if he had been a fool, or one fit to make sport with. Among other things that they used to jeer the prophets with, they had this particular taunt for him, <I>Go up, thou bald head, go up, thou bald head.<\/I> It is a wicked thing to reproach persons for their natural infirmities or deformities; it is adding affliction to the afflicted; and, if they are as God made them, the reproach reflects upon him. But this was such a thing as scarcely deserved to be called a blemish, and would never have been turned to his reproach if they had had any thing else to reproach him with. It was his character as a prophet that they designed to abuse. The honour God had crowned him with should have been sufficient to cover his bald head and protect him from their scoffs. They bade him <I>go up,<\/I> perhaps reflecting on the assumption of Elijah: &#8220;Thy master,&#8221; they say, &#8220;has gone up; why dost not thou go up after him? Where is the fiery chariot? When shall we be rid of thee too?&#8221; These children said as they were taught; they had learned of their idolatrous parents to call foul names and give bad language, especially to prophets. These young cocks, as we say, crowed after the old ones. Perhaps their parents did at this time send them out and set them on, that, if possible, they might keep the prophet out of their town. 2. A specimen of that ruin which came down upon Israel at last, for misusing God&#8217;s prophets, and of which this was intended to give them fair warning. Elisha heard their taunts, a good while, with patience; but at length the fire of holy zeal for God was kindled in his breast by the continued provocation, and he <I>turned and looked upon them,<\/I> to try if a grave and severe look would put them out of countenance and oblige them to retire, to see if he could discern in their faces any marks of ingenuousness; but they <I>were not ashamed, neither could they blush;<\/I> and therefore he <I>cursed them in the name of the Lord,<\/I> both imprecated and denounced the following judgment, not in personal revenge for the indignity done to himself, but as the mouth of divine justice to punish the dishonour done to God. His summons was immediately obeyed. Two she-bears (bears perhaps robbed of their whelps) came out of an adjacent wood, and presently killed forty-two children, <span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 24<\/span>. Now in this, (1.) The prophet must be justified, for he did it by divine impulse. Had the curse come from any bad principle God would not have said <I>Amen<\/I> to it. We may think it would have been better to have called for two rods for the correction of these children than two bears for the destruction of them. But Elisha knew, by the Spirit, the bad character of these children. He knew what a generation of vipers those were, and what mischievous enemies they would be to God&#8217;s prophets if they should live to be men, who began so early to be abusive to them. He intended hereby to punish the parents and to make them afraid of God&#8217;s judgments. (2.) God must be glorified as a righteous God, that hates sin, and will reckon for it, even in little children. Let the wicked wretched brood make our flesh tremble for fear of God. Let little children be afraid of speaking wicked words, for God notices what they say. Let them not mock any for their defects in mind or body, but pity them rather; especially let them know that it is at their peril if they jeer God&#8217;s people or ministers, and scoff at any for well-doing. Let parents, that would have comfort in their children, train them up well, and do their utmost betimes to drive out the foolishness that is bound up in their hearts; for, as bishop Hall says, &#8220;In vain do we look for good from those children whose education we have neglected; and in vain do we grieve for those miscarriages which our care might have prevented.&#8221; Elisha comes to Bethel and fears not the revenges of the bereaved parents; God, who bade him do what he did, he knew would bear him out. Thence he goes to Mount Carmel (<span class='bible'><I>v.<\/I><\/span><span class='bible'> 25<\/span>), where it is probable there was a religious house fit for retirement and contemplation. Thence he returned to Samaria, where, being a public place, this father of the prophets might be most serviceable. Bishop Hall observes here, &#8220;That he can never be a profitable seer who is either always or never alone.&#8221;<\/P><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Matthew Henry&#8217;s Whole Bible Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><em>It has been seen that a man from Bethel, <\/em>Hiel, rebuilt the city of Jericho in the time of King Ahab, contrary to the curse which was uttered by Joshua in the name of the Lord on the day of its fall to Israel.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>(<span class='bible'>Jos 6:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>1Ki 16:34<\/span>). Yet the city remained under a curse. It appears that the water was so polluted that it caused disease of the people and kept the land from bearing. However, its climate and situation were otherwise very conducive to habitation. It is not known how the people who dwelled there escaped its deadliness.<\/p>\n<p>The elders of Jericho came to Elisha appealing to him to intercede with the Lord to lift the curse from their city. Elisha asked for a new cruse filled with salt. Then he took to the poisonous springs, cast the salt in them, and said in the name of the Lord, &#8220;1 have healed these waters.&#8221; He promised there would be no more death or unproductive land as a result of the springs. The waters remained fresh and good at the time of the inspired record. Today Jericho is a beautiful oasis, producing beautiful flowers and fruits. Tourists are shown the spring, puportedly the very one healed by the ministration of Elisha (it is called Elisha&#8217;s spring or well), and the water is free-flowing and good.<\/p>\n<p>A modern parallel can be made to the condition in Jericho. Theirs was a civic problem, and there is scarcely a city in the world today without civic problems of crime, pollution, etc. The cure for Jericho was a new cruse filled with salt. Mayors and other civic leaders today need to try a &#8220;new&#8221; cruse filled with &#8220;salt of the earth&#8221; (<span class='bible'>Mat 5:13<\/span>). If good Godfearing people could get in control of city government, and all other governments, that would do much to cure the curse on them.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>CRITICAL AND EXPLANATORY NOTES<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:20<\/span>. <strong>A new cruse<\/strong>A symbol of the renewing power of the Word of God (<em>Keil<\/em>). <\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:21<\/span>. <strong>Death or barren <\/strong><strong><em>land;<\/em><\/strong> death or <em>abortion<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p><em>HOMILETICS OF <\/em><em><span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:19-22<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE HEALED WATERS A SYMBOL OF THE EFFICACY OF THE GOSPEL<\/p>\n<p>It is a proof of the confidence Elisha has already won that the dignitaries of the city came to consult him about a matter of great public concern; they believed he could cure the malefic waters. How potent is the influence of a good man! It is in times of distress and difficulty that his neighbours discover his real value. The transactions related in this paragraph may be used to symbolize the power of the Gospel to heal the poisoned waters of humanity. Observe<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. Humanity enjoys many privileges<\/strong>. The situation is pleasant. All travellers agree in representing the site of Jericho as exceedingly beautiful; its external surroundings were all that could be desired. So mans position in the world has its peculiar advantages. Scenes of beauty and of grandeur meet his gaze in every direction. He is rich with the wealthy accumulations of the historic past. He is surrounded by living examples of noble enterprise and chivalry. He is on the current of an ever-advancing civilization. Opportunities of usefulness open invitingly at every step, and there is everything to call out and sustain his best energies. Life on earth is a grand opportunity which, wisely used, will be fruitful in everlasting good.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. Humanity is infected with a dangerous and fatal malady<\/strong>. The water is naught, and the ground barren. In the fairest prospect there is some deformity; in the clearest and brightest crystal we may detect a flaw. So the beauties of Jericho were shadowed by the sufferings and disappointment of its inhabitants. The water was bad, and the land unfruitful. So is it with man. The springs of his being are poisoned with sin. Every part of his nature is tainted: the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. The fatal malady infects every stream, disorders every project, blackens every prospect, chills every aspiration, withers every hope. The soil of the heart is barren, and every attempt to bring forth the fruit of righteousness is abortive.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. The Gospel provides the power to heal humanity of its malady<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>1. <em>It is a Divine provision<\/em>. Thus saith the Lord, I have healed these waters. The healing power was not in Elisha, or in the cruse or the salt; but in God. So the new cruse of the Gospel, and the salt of Christian doctrine, would be ineffectual to heal humanity of its evils without the permeating presence and active power of God. We should be careful, like Elisha, to give to God all the glory of His own work. Man cannot cure himself, any more than the broken pitcher can repair itself. <\/p>\n<p><em>2. It is efficacious<\/em> So the waters were healed. The prophet cast the salt into the spring of the waters. The fountain being healed, all its streams participated in the cure. So the Gospel begins its restorative work in the heart, the fountain head of human life. True reformation should ever begin at the source of evil; it will then be thorough and permanent. If God cast into the fountain of our hearts but one cruseful of the salt of His spirit, we are whole; no thought can pass between the receipt and the remedy. If we have not streams of Divine blessing in abundance, we may have enough to refresh, to heal, and fertilize.<\/p>\n<p>If not full showers of rain, yet, Lord,<br \/>A little pearly dew afford;<br \/>A little, if it come from thee,<br \/>Will be of great avail to me.<\/p>\n<p>LESSONS:<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>The gospel has a remedy for every evil<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>The remedy must be prayerfully sought<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Must be believingly applied<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>GERM NOTES ON THE VERSES<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:19-22<\/span>. As we see in the translation of Elijah a type of Christs ascension into heaven, so may we also see in the subsequent career of Elisha a type of the holy apostolic church, clothed with the spirit of the Master, and working even greater miracles than he.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:19<\/span>. The material facts thus combined and contrasted are very suggestive to the mind of spiritual conditions. The situation in which we stand is pleasant. While so many fair regions of the earth lie in spiritual darkness, the full and blessed light of Gods truth shines upon our habitations. We have the written word of truthwe have the uttered word of truthone of the first sounds that entered our infant ears was that name which is above every name; and not a day passes in which, under some form or other, we may not see or hear the words of salvation. What situation could be more pleasant, more favourable to our spiritual progress? Surely our city stands upon the delectable mountain whence on any clear day we may have fair prospects of the goodly land that lies beyond the swelling Jordan. Yet, pleasant as all things seem, it is not well with us. The ground is barren.<em>Kitto<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A crook in every lot<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>1. True of the most pleasantly situated city. <br \/>2. Of the most highly favoured nation. <br \/>3. In the history of every individual life.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:20<\/span>. The injurious property and effect was not taken from the water by the salt poured in; for even if the salt actually possessed this power, a whole spring could not be corrected by a single dish of salt, even for one day, much less for a longer time or for ever. The pouring in of the salt was a symbolic act with which Elisha accompanied the word of the Lord, by which alone the spring was healed. Salt, on account of its power of preserving from putrescence and decay, is the symbol of incorruptibility and of life removing death. The new dish was also a symbol of purity and inviolateness.<em>Keil<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:21<\/span>. In a place where the spiritual fountains are poisoned, and the people receive to drink, from all the pulpits and school-teachers desks, not the water which streams forth unto eternal life, but the death-draught of that modern babble of deceit and falsehood, there is a more deadly curse upon the land than that which once lay upon the district of Jericho. May the Lord of Elisha raise up those who shall carry the healing salt also into these fountains.<em>Krummacher<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Moral reformation<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Begins in the soul<\/em>He went forth unto the spring of the waters. <\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Is accomplished by human agency<\/em>And cast the salt in there. <\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Is a divine work<\/em>Thus saith the Lord, I have healed these waters. <\/p>\n<p>4. <em>Is thorough and permanent<\/em>There shall not be from thence any more death or barren land.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Preacher&#8217;s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>B. THE HEALING OF THE NOXIOUS WATER 2:1922<\/p>\n<p><strong>TRANSLATION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>(19) And the men of the city said unto Elisha, Behold, I pray you, the dwelling of the city is good as my master sees; but the waters are vile and the land miscarries. (20) And he said, Take for me a new vase, and put salt therein. And they took it unto him. (21) And he went out unto the spring of water, and cast there the salt, and he said, Thus says the LORD, I have healed these waters; no more shall death and miscarrying be from that source. (22) And the waters were healed unto this day according to the word of Elisha which he spoke.<\/p>\n<p><strong>COMMENTS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Having heard of the recent miracle performed by Elisha, the civic authorities of Jericho came to the prophet to seek his aid in removing the one unfortunate drawback to their otherwise pleasant community. A bitter and poisonous spring of water gushed forth near Jericho which sent its waters in rivlets across the plain to the Jordan. Nothing could grow near this water; cattle drinking this water would abort (<span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:19<\/span>).[515]<\/p>\n<p>[515] Gray (OTL, p. 477) takes note of a recent hydrological survey in Israel in which it was discovered that certain springs there are affected by radio-activity which laboratory tests have demonstrated to cause sterility.<\/p>\n<p>The prophet called for a new vase filled with salt (<span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:20<\/span>). By this action the prophet intended to symbolically teach that impurity can only be cleansed by what is wholly pure and clean. This is the reason he called for a new vase, one that had never before been used and hence could not have been defiled. The salt must also have been emblematic of purity, for no other substance would be more inappropriate for purifying water which already contained too much salt. As he poured his vase of salt into the spring, Elisha uttered an oracle in the name of the Lord to the effect that never again would that spring produce death and miscarrying among people and stock (<span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:21<\/span>). The waters of that spring were instantly and permanently made whole (<span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:22<\/span>). The so-called Spring of the Sultan near the ancient ruins of Jericho may be the very spring referred to in this passage.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(19) <strong>The men of the city.<\/strong>Not the sons of the prophets, but the citizens make this trial of the prophets miraculous powers.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The situation of this<\/strong> (Heb.,<em> the<\/em>) <strong>city is pleasant <\/strong>(Heb.,<em> good<\/em>).Jericho, the city of palms (<span class='bible'>Deu. 34:3<\/span>), had a fine position, rising like an oasis from a broad plain of sand.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The water is naught.<\/strong>Heb., <em>bad.<\/em> Naught i.e., naughty.<\/p>\n<p><strong>And the ground barren.<\/strong><span class='bible'>2Ki. 2:21<\/span> (from thence) shows that the waters, not the soil, were the cause of the evil complained of. The ground, or rather,<em> the land<\/em> is here put for its <em>inhabitants<\/em>, including the lower animals; and what is said is either the country bears dead births, or, the country has <em>many<\/em> miscarriages (<em>piel<\/em> may be either <em>factitive<\/em> or <em>intensive<\/em>). (Comp. <span class='bible'>Exo. 23:26<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Mal. 3:11<\/span>.) The use of different waters is said to have good and bad effects upon the functions of conception and parturition (not a popular superstition, as Reuss suggests). The ground is barren, or unfruitful, is therefore an incorrect translation.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>(19-25) Elisha, as prophet, heals the waters of Jericho, and curses the scorners of Beth-el.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Ellicott&#8217;s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> ELISHA HEALS THE WATERS OF JERICHO, <span class='bible'>2Ki 2:19-22<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p> As we see in the translation of Elijah a type of Christ&rsquo;s ascension into heaven, so may we also see in the subsequent career of Elisha a type of the holy Apostolic Church, clothed with the spirit of the Master, and working even greater miracles than he.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> 19<\/strong>. <strong> <\/strong> <strong> The men of the city <\/strong> Prominent citizens of the place. Perhaps, as Bahr says, they were the elders of the city who thus applied to Elisha, and their action shows that he had their confidence. As he had now attained the highest eminence in the prophetic office, they, possibly, expected that he might be able to rid their city of its plague. <\/p>\n<p><strong> Situation of this city is pleasant <\/strong> Travellers all agree in representing the site of Jericho as exceedingly beautiful. <\/p>\n<p><strong> The water is naught <\/strong> Bad, harmful. <\/p>\n<p><strong> The ground barren <\/strong> Better, <em> The land suffers from abortions, <\/em> or <em> causes untimely births. <\/em>  , <em> the land, <\/em> refers here to the inhabitants, rather than the soil, and <span class='bible'>2Ki 2:21<\/span> shows that the bad waters caused the land to suffer from abortions.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Whedon&#8217;s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> <strong> B. The &lsquo;Healing&rsquo; of Jericho&rsquo;s Spring (<span class='bible'><strong> 2Ki 2:19-22<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong> ).<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> The new beginning for Israel resulting from Elisha&rsquo; entry into the land over the Jordan results the men of Jericho asking him to &lsquo;heal&rsquo; a spring of water at Jericho, in a similar fashion to the way in which Moses, having crossed the Red Sea (Sea of Reeds) into a new deliverance, also healed a spring of water (<span class='bible'>Exo 15:23-25<\/span>). They were beginning to see Elisha as the new Moses.<\/p>\n<p> Excavations have shown that Jericho, apart from small numbers of people, was on the whole unoccupied as a city for around four hundred years up to the time of Ahab when it was rebuilt by Hiel at the cost of his two sons (<span class='bible'>1Ki 16:34<\/span>). This was partly due to the curse that Joshua had put on it, but it may also possibly have been partly due to the problem now being exposed, which could be seen as a part of the curse. It had become recognised that the water from the spring at the foot of the mound caused excessive miscarriages. Interestingly a fairly recent scientific survey of the region has revealed a tendency for springs in the area to become contaminated with natural radioactivity, something which is known to cause miscarriages. Others see the &lsquo;miscarrying&rsquo; as referring to the land with the indication that the spring had become polluted and useless for agriculture.<\/p>\n<p> Whichever way it was those who were living there brought their problem to Elisha. It is clear that they saw Elisha in a different light from Elijah, (the problem had been there for a long time), possibly because of the way in which he had entered the land. It had probably reminded them of the incident in <span class='bible'>Exo 15:23-25<\/span>. There hope was that he might be able to &lsquo;heal&rsquo; the spring. Calling for a new dish and some salt, Elijah obliged by casting the salt into the spring. Then he assured them that YHWH had declared that He had healed the waters.<\/p>\n<p><strong> Analysis.<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'> a <\/strong> And the men of the city said to Elisha, &ldquo;See, we pray you, the situation of this city is pleasant, as my lord sees, but the water is bad, and the land miscarries&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>2Ki 2:19<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> b <\/strong> And he said, &ldquo;Bring me a new dish, and put salt in it. And they brought it to him. And he went forth to the spring of the waters, and cast salt in it, and said, &ldquo;Thus says YHWH, I have healed these waters&rdquo; (<span class='bible'>2Ki 2:20-21<\/span> a).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:3.6em'><strong> a <\/strong> &ldquo;There shall not be from there any more death or miscarrying&rdquo;. So the waters were healed to this day, according to the word of Elisha which he spoke (<span class='bible'>2Ki 2:21-22<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'> <span class='bible'><strong> 2Ki 2:19<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&lsquo;And the men of the city said to Elisha, &ldquo;See, we pray you, the situation of this city is pleasant, as my lord sees, but the water is bad, and the land miscarries.&rdquo; &rsquo;<\/p>\n<p> The city of Jericho had been known as the city of palm trees (<span class='bible'>Deu 34:3<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 1:16<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Jdg 3:13<\/span>). It was well watered by a large spring, and with a pleasant, although hot, climate. But something had happened to the waters of the spring which resulted in &lsquo;the land miscarrying&rsquo;. This could be because of radiation (hydrological surveys have shown a tendency to radiation in the area), or because of some other source of contamination. It has been suggested that the contamination was caused by a parasitic infection connected with snails. Radiation would cause miscarriages in women, while contaminated and infected water could have a bad effect on either health or the fruitfulness of the land. Whichever way it was the waters needed &lsquo;healing&rsquo;.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 2Ki 2:20<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&lsquo;And he said, &ldquo;Bring me a new dish, and put salt in it. And they brought it to him.&rsquo;<\/p>\n<p> Elisha therefore called for a new dish and some salt. The &lsquo;new dish&rsquo; would indicate to the people that what he was about to do had a holy, God-connected purpose, which was why the dish must not have been contaminated in any way by earthly contacts (compare the new cart that carried the Ark in <span class='bible'>2Sa 6:3<\/span>, and the unridden colt that carried Jesus in <span class='bible'>Mar 11:2<\/span>). Salt was seen as a means of purifying (<span class='bible'>Lev 2:13<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Num 18:19<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 2Ki 2:21<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&lsquo;And he went forth to the spring of the waters, and cast salt in it, and said, &ldquo;Thus says YHWH, I have healed these waters. There shall not be from there any more death or miscarrying.&rdquo; &rsquo;<\/p>\n<p> Elisha then went and cast the salt into the spring, and declared in the Name of YHWH, that the waters were now healed and that there would therefore in future be no death or miscarrying. Note the direct claim of YHWH that &lsquo;I have healed these waters&rsquo;.<\/p>\n<p> It has been suggested that an earth tremor might have shifted the geological strata from which the radiation infection was coming, thus naturally purifying the water for the future. But as with so many miracles, even if that were so, it was the timing and effectiveness that was special. If the problem was connected with snails than the salt could have been &lsquo;multiplied&rsquo; by YHWH and have killed off the colony of snails. Either way it was rightly seen to be the work of YHWH.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'><strong> 2Ki 2:22<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style='margin-left:1.8em'>&lsquo;So the waters were healed to this day, according to the word of Elisha which he spoke.&rsquo;<\/p>\n<p> So the waters were healed by YHWH in accordance with Elisha&rsquo;s word, and remained healed to the day of writing. There was no further trouble. This miracle was a further picture of why YHWH had raised up Elisha. It was in order to purify Israel and make it fruitful.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong>DISCOURSE: 359<br \/>ELISHA HEALING THE SPRING WITH A CRUSE OF SALT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span class='bible'>2Ki 2:19-22<\/span>. <em>The men of the city said unto Elisha, Behold, I pray thee, the situation of this city is pleasant, as my lord seeth: but the water is naught, and the ground barren. And he said, Bring me a new cruse, and put salt therein. And they brought it to him. And he went forth unto the spring of the waters, and cast the salt in there, and said, Thus saith the Lord, I have healed these waters; there shall not be from thence any more death or barren land. So the waters were healed unto this day, according to the saying of Elisha which he spake<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>THE miracles recorded in the Old Testament are replete with most important instruction. Many of them are typical; such as, the deliverance of the first-born through the blood of the paschal lamb; the passage of Israel through the Red Sea; the guidance of them by the pillar and the cloud; their supplies of manna from the clouds, and of water from the rock; their healing by the brasen serpent; and many others. Some, which were not strictly types, were of an emblematical nature, and well calculated to convey instruction beyond the mere exhibition of power or grace contained in them. Amongst these may be ranked the miracle which is recorded in my text. It cannot properly be considered as a type; yet, I think, it may well afford occasion for the following observations. I would observe then,<\/p>\n<p>I.<\/p>\n<p>That there is no evil so great, but God is both able and willing to remove it<\/p>\n<p>The evil experienced at Jericho was great<br \/>[I do not conceive that the water had originally been bad, or the ground barren: but that God had sent a curse both upon the one and the other, on account of the wickedness of those who had rebuilt the city, in direct opposition to his recorded will. Joshua having destroyed the city, had declared that the man who should presume to rebuild it should lay the foundation in the death of his first-born, and put up the gates with the loss of his youngest son. And till the days of Ahab, no one had dared to contravene the will of God respecting it. But at last Hiel, the Bethelite, presumed to restore the city: and on him had been executed the very curse denounced by Joshua [Note: Compare <u><span class=''>Jos 6:26<\/span><\/u> with <span class='bible'>1Ki 16:34<\/span>.]. At that time I suppose that the water and the ground were cursed by God, agreeably to what he had threatened by Moses [Note: <span class='bible'>Deu 28:2-4<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 28:11<\/span>; <span class='bible'>Deu 28:15-18<\/span>.]: so that in that instance was fulfilled what David has spoken, He turneth a fruitful land into barrenness, for the wickedness of them that dwell therein [Note: <span class='bible'>Psa 107:34<\/span>.]. And certainly the beauty of the situation could but ill repay the loss sustained by the infliction of this curse. But, as the miracle shews us, God was both able and willing to remove the evil, when he was applied unto in the exercise of faith.]<\/p>\n<p>But have not we far greater evils to be removed?<br \/>[Behold what has been inflicted on mankind on account of sin. How dead are the souls of men, which, at their first creation, were as living springs of all that was good! Behold, too, how barren are their lives in respect of all the fruits of righteousness, which originally, when in Paradise, were produced by them! True, indeed, there is somewhat of mans primeval beauty still adhering to him: and if we had respect only to his faculties, as compared with all other parts of the terrestrial creation, we should say of him, Behold how beautiful he is, as my lord seeth! But, his heart, alas! from whence are the issues of life, is become deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked [Note: <span class='bible'>Jer 17:9<\/span>.]; yea, it is full of evil [Note: <span class='bible'>Ecc 9:3<\/span>.], and out of it proceed all manner of abominations [Note: <u><span class=''>Mar 7:21-23<\/span><\/u>]. As to any thing truly spiritual, it is a perfect desert; so barren, that not one just work, or one good counsel, or one holy desire, is produced by it. And to what a vast extent are these evils felt! Not only those who are in immediate contact with us, but the whole world, feel the bitter consequences of the change that has taken place in us, and of the curse that has been inflicted on us: and, if a remedy be not applied, the sad effects will be continued to all eternity.<\/p>\n<p>And can these evils be removed? Yes, and shall be, if only we apply to God in prayer and faith.]<br \/>But in this miracle we further see,<\/p>\n<p>II.<\/p>\n<p>That there are no means so weak, but God can render them effectual to the desired end<\/p>\n<p>How utterly inadequate were the means by which this miracle was wrought!<br \/>[There was no power in salt to render the water sweet, or the ground fertile: or, if there had been any suitableness in the means to the end, what could a single cruse of salt have effected, in a spring of water, and in all the adjacent land? and why must it be brought in a new cruse, rather than in one which had been used? It is plain that these means were no more than the erecting of a brasen serpent to heal the wounded Israelites, or than our Lords making clay of spittle to restore to sight a man that had been born blind [Note: <span class='bible'>Joh 9:6<\/span>.].]<\/p>\n<p>Nor are the means which we use for the conversion of the world at all more adequate to the end proposed<br \/>[How is it that we attempt to operate on men, so as to sanctify their hearts and lives? It is by the simple preaching of the Gospel to them; or, as the Apostle expresses it, by the foolishness of preaching [Note: <span class='bible'>1Co 1:21<\/span>.]. How little this can effect, may be seen in the ministry of the Prophets, and Apostles, and even of our blessed Lord himself. To few, comparatively, was the word accompanied with any saving power.<\/p>\n<p>Neither Paul was any thing, nor Apollos any thing: whatever was done through their instrumentality could, if God had so pleased, been as easily effected without them, as with them. So at this day, what is any minister, but a voice crying in the wilderness? Yet, when God is pleased to make the word effectual, the dead are quickened, and the bond-slaves of Satan are sanctified unto the Lord. Behold, on the day of Pentecost, what a change was wrought by one single discourse, delivered by a poor illiterate fisherman! Methinks, as to any intrinsic power to produce the miracle which was wrought that day, the cruse of salt was on a par with the sermon of the Apostle. And it is no little encouragement to us to know, that no weakness of ours will be any bar to the efficacy of our ministrations, if only God be pleased to work by us: for he has committed his treasure to earthen vessels, on purpose that the excellency of the power may be seen to be of God, and not of us [Note: <span class='bible'>2Co 4:7<\/span>.].]<\/p>\n<p>It is certain, too,<\/p>\n<p>III.<\/p>\n<p>That there is no benefit so great, but God will confer it through the ministry of his faithful servants<\/p>\n<p>What a rich benefit was that conferred by the hands of Elisha!<br \/>[We, who are accustomed to drink of wholesome springs, and to eat in rich abundance the fruits of the land, have very little conception how great a benefit God at this time bestowed on Jericho. There was from that time no more death in the water, or barrenness in the land. Even after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, the spring continued both abundant and salubrious, as the Jewish historian informs us; yea, and to this very hour it so remains, as modern travellers have attested.]<br \/>But what was that benefit, in comparison of the blessings conferred on us by the Gospel?<br \/>[The blessings of salvation itself are imparted to us by the preaching, the simple preaching, of Christ crucified. Who can estimate this benefit? Think of a new heart being given to us, and a new spirit renewed within us. Think of the whole life and conversation as so changed, that in the place of the brier grows up the fir-tree, and instead of the thorn grows up the myrtle-tree, and all the fruits of righteousness abound to the praise and glory of God. Yet shall this be wrought through the ministry of the word, in every place, and in every heart, where the Gospel is faithfully administered, and humbly received. Yes, it is not to one town or country that this mercy shall be vouchsafed, but to every country under heaven, where the Gospel comes: nor shall the benefits be continued only through the contracted span of this life, but through the endless ages of eternity. Not that it is to be expected to any great extent, except through the intervention of his ministers: for he delights to honour his own ordinances, and his own servants, whom he has sent to minister his blessings to mankind. He might have healed the springs of Jericho, without either the use of salt, or the agency of Elisha: and so he may impart salvation to men without the ministry of a preached Gospel: but it is only in the use of his appointed means that we are authorized to expect his proffered blessings. Nevertheless, if we use the appointed means in faith, we may expect, from the abundance of his mercy, every benefit which our souls can desire.]<br \/>Address those who feel their need of Gods merciful intervention<br \/>[The men of Jericho had neglected to avail themselves of the presence of Elijah, who was now for ever withdrawn from them: and it was only through the unforeseen circumstance of Elisha waiting for the return of the men who had been sent to search for Elijah, that he was detained there a few days. Now, therefore, they seize the opportunity afforded them, and beseech his intercession with the Deity in their behalf: and thus they obtain the benefit which they so greatly needed.<br \/>Beloved Brethren, think how many opportunities you have lost of obtaining salvation to your own souls    But, blessed be God! the word of the Gospel yet sounds in your ears, and God is at this moment waiting to confer on you all the blessings both of grace and glory. But how long the advantages you now enjoy may be continued to you, or you be continued to possess them, God alone knows. Methinks what our Lord said to his hearers may now be addressed to you; A little while is the light with you: walk while ye have the light, lest darkness come upon you. While ye have the light, believe in the light, that ye may be the children of light [Note: <span class='bible'>Joh 12:35-36<\/span>.]. And who can tell what benefits may accrue to distant ages, if you yourselves obtain these blessings to your souls?   <\/p>\n<p>To those, especially, who are now before me, I would say, Cry mightily to God that the cruse of salt may be cast into this fountain, from whence so many streams are issuing [Note: The University.]; that being rendered salubrious, they may fertilize this whole land, and be the means of diffusing life and salvation to the remotest corners of the globe.]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Charles Simeon&#8217;s Horae Homileticae (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> Here Elisha enters upon his ministry. And a lovely service it was to heal the barren and corrupt waters of Jericho. Like the waters of Marah the appointed remedy cast in by the Lord&#8217;s command became efficacious to both. Reader! remark with me, that this remedy in both cases was of the Lord; and the remedy itself also typical of Christ. Is not Jesus the healer of all our Marahs, and all our barrenness? And is not Jesus all this as the Christ of God; the Sent, the Sealed of the Father! <span class='bible'>Joh 6:27<\/span> .<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Hawker&#8217;s Poor Man&#8217;s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p><strong> X<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> GATHERING UP THE FRAGMENTS THAT NOTHING BE LOST<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> The title of this chapter is a New Testament text for an Old Testament discussion. For the sake of unity the last two chapters were devoted exclusively to Elijah and Elisha. It is the purpose of this discussion to call attention to some matters worthy of note that could not very well be incorporated in those personal matters, and yet should not be omitted altogether.<\/p>\n<p> It is true, however, that the heart of the history is in the lives of these two great prophets of the Northern Kingdom. In bringing up the record we will follow the chronological order of the scriptures calling for exposition.<\/p>\n<p> Jehoshaphat&#8217;s Shipping Alliance with Ahaziah. We have two accounts of this: first, in <span class='bible'>1Ki 22:47-49<\/span> , and second, in <span class='bible'>2Ch 20:35-37<\/span> . I wish to explain, first of all, the locality of certain places named in these accounts. Tarshish, as a place, is in Spain. About that there can be no question. About Ophir, no man can be so confident. There was an Ophir in the southern part of Arabia; a man named Ophir settled there, but I do not think that to be the Ophir of this section. The Ophir referred to here is distinguished for the abundance and fine quality of its gold. Several books in the Bible refer to the excellency of &#8220;the gold of Ophir,&#8221; and to the abundance of it. Quite a number of distinguished scholars would locate it in the eastern part of Africa. Some others would locate it in India, and still others as the Arabian Ophir. My own opinion is, and I give it as more than probable, that the southeastern coast of Africa is the right place for Ophir. Many traditions put it there, the romance of Rider Haggard, &#8220;King Solomon&#8217;s Mines,&#8221; follows the traditions. The now well-known conditions of the Transvaal would meet the case in some respects.<\/p>\n<p> Ezion-geber is a seaport at the head of the Gulf of Akaba, which is a projection of the Red Sea. What is here attempted by these men is to re-establish the famous commerce of Solomon. I cite the passages in the history of Solomon that tell about this commerce. In <span class='bible'>1Ki 9:26<\/span> we have this record: &#8220;And King Solomon made a navy of ships in Eziongeber, which is beside Eloth, on the shore of the Red Sea, in the land of Edom. And Hiram (king of Tyre) sent in the navy his servants, shipmen that had knowledge of the sea, with the servants of Solomon. And they came to Ophir, and fetched from thence gold, four hundred and twenty talents, and brought it to King Solomon.&#8221; Now, <span class='bible'>1Ki 10:11<\/span> reads: &#8220;And the navy also of Hiram, that brought gold from Ophir, brought in from Ophir great plenty of Almug trees and precious stones.&#8221; This &#8220;almug-trees&#8221; is supposed to be the famous sweet-scented sandalwood. The precious stones would agree particularly with the diamond mines at Kimberly in the Transvaal.<\/p>\n<p> Then1Ki_10:22 reads: &#8220;For the king had at sea a navy of Tarshish with the navy of Hiram: Once every three years came the navy of Tarshish, bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks.&#8221; The ivory and apes would fit very well with the African coast, but we would have to go to India to get the spices, which are mentioned elsewhere, and the peacocks. A three years&#8217; voyage for this traffic seems to forbid the near-by Arabian Ophir, and does make it reasonable that the merchant fleet touched many points Arabia, Africa, and the East Indies. It is, therefore, not necessary to find one place notable for all these products gold, jewels, sandalwood, ivory, apes, spices, and peacocks. Solomon, then, established as his only seaport on the south Eziongeber, a navy, manned partly by experienced seamen of Tyre, and these ships would make a voyage every three years. That is a long voyage and they might well go to Africa and to India to get these varied products, some at one point and some at another.<\/p>\n<p> Now Jehoshaphat and Ahaziah (king of Israel) made an alliance to re-establish that commerce. The first difficulty, however, is that the Chronicles account says that these ships were to go to Tarshish, and the Kings account says that they were ships of Tarshish to go to Ophir. My explanation of that difficulty is this: It is quite evident that no navy established at Eziongeber would try to reach Spain by circumnavigating Africa, when it would be so much easier to go from Joppa, Tyre, or Sidon over the Mediterranean Sea to Spain. &#8220;Tarshish ships&#8221; refers, not to the destination of the ships, but to the kind of ships, that is, the trade of the Mediterranean had given that name to a kind of merchant vessel, called &#8220;Ships of Tarshish.&#8221; And the ships built for the Tarshish trade, as the name &#8220;lndianman&#8221; was rather loosely applied to certain great English and Dutch merchant vessels. It is an error in the text of Chronicles that these ships were to go to Tarshish. They were Tarshish ships, that is, built after the model of Tarshish ships, but these ships were built at Eziongeber for trade with Ophir, Africa, and India.<\/p>\n<p> <span class='bible'>1Ki 22:47<\/span> of the Kings account needs explanation: &#8220;And there was no king in Edom; a deputy was king.&#8221; The relevancy of that verse is very pointed. If Edom had been free and had its own king, inasmuch as Eziongeber was in Edom, Judah never could have gone there to build a navy. But Edom at this time was subject to Judah, and a Judean deputy ruled over it. That explains why they could come to Eziongeber.<\/p>\n<p> One other matter needs explanation. The account in Kings says, &#8220;Then said Ahaziah the son of Ahab unto Jehoshaphat, Let my servants go with thy servants in the ships. But Jehoshaphat would not.&#8221; Ahaziah attributed the shipwreck of that fleet to the incompetency of the Judean seamen. He did not believe that there would have been a shipwreck if he had been allowed to furnish experienced mariners, as Hiram did. So Kings gives us what seems to be the human account of that shipwreck, viz: the incompetency of the mariners; but Chronicles gives us the divine account, thus: &#8220;Because thou hast joined thyself with Ahaziah, the Lord hath destroyed thy works. And the ships were broken.&#8221; How often do we see these two things: the human explanation of the thing, and the divine explanation of the same thing. Ahaziah had no true conception of God, and he would at once attribute that shipwreck to human incompetency, but Jehoshaphat knew better; he knew that shipwreck came because he had done wickedly in keeping up this alliance with the idolatrous kings of the ten tribes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> THE TRANSLATION OF ELIJAH <\/strong> Let us consider several important matters in connection with the translation of Elijah, <span class='bible'>2Ki 2:1-18<\/span> . First, why the course followed by Elijah? Why does he go from Carmel to Gilgal and try to leave Elisha there, and from Gilgal to Bethel and try to leave Elisha there, and from Bethel to Jericho and try to leave Elisha there? The explanation is that the old prophet, having been warned of God that his ministry was ended and that the time of his exodus was at hand, wished to revisit in succession all of these seminaries. These were his stopping places, and he goes from one seminary to another. It must have been a very solemn thing for each of these schools of the prophets, when Elisha and Elijah came up to them, for by the inspiration of God as we see from the record, each school of the prophets knew what was going to happen. At two different places they say to Elisha, &#8220;Do you know that your master will be taken away to-day?&#8221; Now, the same Spirit of God that notified Elijah that his time of departure was at hand, also notified Elisha, also notified each school of the prophets; they knew.<\/p>\n<p> But why keep saying to Elisha, &#8220;You stay here at Gilgal; the Lord hath sent me to Bethel,&#8221; and, &#8220;You stay here at Bethel; the Lord hath sent me to Jericho,&#8221; and &#8220;You stay here at Jericho; the Lord hath sent me to the Jordan&#8221;? It was a test of the faith of Elisha. Ruth said to Naomi, &#8220;Entreat me not to leave thee, nor to forsake thee; for where thou goest, I will go; and God do so to me, if thy God be my God, and thy people my people, and where thou diest there will I die also.&#8221; With such spirit as that, Elisha, as the minister to Elijah, and as the disciple of Elijah, and wishing to qualify himself to be the successor of Elijah, steadfastly replied: &#8220;As the Lord liveth and thy soul liveth, I will not forsake thee.&#8221; &#8220;I am going with you just as far as I can go; we may come to a point of separation, but I will go with you to that point.&#8221; All of us, when we leave this world, find a place where the departing soul must be without human companionship. Friends may attend us to that border line but they cannot pass over with us.<\/p>\n<p> We have already discussed the miracle of the crossing of the Jordan. Elijah smote the Jordan with his mantle and it divided; that was doubtless his lesson to Elisha, and we will see that he learned the lesson. I heard a Methodist preacher once, taking that as a text, say, &#8220;We oftentimes complain that our cross is too heavy for us, and groan under it, and wish to be relieved from it.&#8221; &#8220;But,&#8221; says he, &#8220;brethren, when we come to the Jordan of death, with that cross that we groaned under we will smite that river, and we will pass over dry-shod, and leave the cross behind forever, and go home to a crown to wear.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> The next notable thing in this account is Elijah&#8217;s question to Elisha: &#8220;Have you anything to ask from me?&#8221; &#8220;Now, this is the last time; what do you want me to do for you?&#8221; And he says, &#8220;I pray thee leave a double portion of thy spirit on me.&#8221; We see that he is seeking qualification to be the successor. &#8220;Double&#8221; here does not mean twice as much as Elijah had, but the reference is probably to the first-born share of an inheritance. The first-born always gets a double share, and Elisha means by asking a double portion of his spirit that it may accredit him as successor. Or possibly &#8220;double&#8221; may be rendered &#8220;duplicate,&#8221; for the same purpose of attenuation. The other prophets would get one share, but Elisha asks for the first-born portion. Elijah suggests a difficulty, not in himself, but in Elisha ; he said, &#8220;You ask a hard thing of me, yet if you see me when I go away, you will get the double portion of my spirit,&#8221; that is, it was a matter depending on the faith of the petitioner, his power of personal perception. &#8220;When I go up, if your eyes are open enough to see my transit from this world to a higher, that will show that you are qualified to have this double portion of my spirit.&#8221; We have something similar in the life of our Lord. The father of the demoniac boy says to our Lord, &#8220;If thou canst do anything, have compassion on us and help us.&#8221; Jesus replied, &#8220;If thou canst! All things are possible to him that believeth.&#8221; It was not a question of Christ&#8217;s ability, but of the supplicant&#8217;s faith.<\/p>\n<p> The next thing is the translation itself. What is meant by it? In the Old Testament history two men never died; they passed into the other world, soul and body without death: Enoch and Elijah. And at the second coming of Christ every Christian living at that time will do the same thing. &#8220;In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, they shall be changed.&#8221; Now, what is that change of the body by virtue of which without death, it may ascend into heaven? It is a spiritualization of the body eliminating its mortality, equivalent to what takes place in the resurrection and glorification of the dead bodies. I preached a sermon once on &#8220;How Death [personified] Was Twice Startled.&#8221; In the account of Adam it is said, &#8220;And he died&#8221; and so of every other man, &#8220;and he died.&#8221; Methuselah lived 969 years, but he died. And death pursuing all the members of the race, strikes them down, whether king or pauper, whether prophet or priest. But when he comes to Enoch his dart missed the mark and he did not get him. And when he came to Elijah he missed again. Now the translations of Enoch and Elijah are an absolute demonstration of two things: First, the immortality of the soul, the continuance of life; that death makes no break in the continuity of being. Second, that God intended from the beginning to save the body. The tree of life was put in the garden of Eden, that by eating of it the mortality of the body might be eliminated. Sin separated man from that tree of life, but it is the purpose of God that the normal man, soul and body, shall be saved. The tradition of the Jews is very rich on the spiritual significance of the translation of Enoch and Elijah. In Enoch&#8217;s case it is said, &#8220;He was not found because God took him,&#8221; and in this case fifty of the sons of the prophets went out to see if when Elijah went to heaven his body was not left behind, and they looked all over the country to find his body. Elisha knew; he saw the body go up.<\/p>\n<p> Now, in Revelation we have the Cherubim as the chariot of God. This chariot that met Elijah at the death station was the chariot of God, the Cherubim. Just as the angels met Lazarus and took his soul up to heaven, and it is to this wonderful passage that the Negro hymn belongs: &#8220;Swing Low, Sweet Chariot.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> Elisha cried as the great prophet ascended, &#8220;My Father! My rather I The chariots of Israel and the horsemen thereof,&#8221; the meaning of which is that thus had gone up to heaven he who in his life had been the defense of Israel, worth more than all of its chariots and all of its cavalry. Now these very words &#8220;were used when Elisha died. &#8220;My Father! My Father! The chariots of Israel and the horsemen thereof,&#8221; signifying that he had been the bulwark of the nation as Elijah had been before him.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> ELISHA&#8217;S MINISTRY, <span class='bible'>2Ki 2:19-25<\/span> <\/strong> As Elijah went up something dropped not his body, but just his mantle his mantle fell, and it fell on Elisha, symbolic of the transfer of prophetic leadership from one to the other. Now, he wants to test it, a test that will accredit him; so he goes back to the same Jordan, folds that same mantle up just as Elijah had done, and smites the Jordan. But, mark you, he did not say, &#8220;Where is Elijah&#8221; the man, Elijah, was gone, but, &#8220;Where is the Lord God of Elijah?&#8221; and the waters divided and he came over. There he stood accredited with a repetition of the miracle just a little before performed by Elijah, which demonstrated that he was to be to the people what Elijah had been. And this was so evident that the sons of the prophets recognized it and remarked on it: &#8220;The spirit of Elijah doth rest on Elisha.&#8221; It is a touching thing to me, this account of more than fifty of these prophets, as the president of their seminary is about to disappear, came down the last hill that overlooks the Jordan, watching to see what became of him. And they witness the passage of the Jordan they may have seen the illumination of the descent of the chariot of fire. They wanted to go and get the body the idea of his body going up they had not taken in, and they could not be content until Elisha, grieved at their persistence) finally let them go and find out for themselves that the body had gone to heaven.<\/p>\n<p> I have just two things to say on the healing of the noxious waters at Jericho. The first is that neither the new cruse nor the salt put in it healed the water. It was a symbolic act to indicate that the healing would be by the power of God. Just as when Moses cast a branch into the bitter waters of Marah, as a symbolic act. The healing power comes from God. The other re-mark is on that expression, &#8220;unto this day,&#8221; which we so frequently meet in these books. Its frequent recurrence is positive proof that the compiler of Kings and the compiler of Chronicles are quoting from the original documents. &#8220;Unto this day&#8221; means the day of the original writer. It does not mean unto the day of Ezra wherever it appears in Chronicles, but it means unto the day of the writer of the part of history that he is quoting from. More than one great conservative scholar has called attention to this as proof that whoever compiled these histories is quoting the inspired documents of the prophets.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> THE CHILDREN OF BETHEL AND THE SHE-BEARS <\/strong> Perhaps a thousand infidels have referred Elisha&#8217;s curse to vindictiveness and inhumanity. The word rendered &#8220;little children&#8221; is precisely the word Solomon uses in his prayer at Gibeon when he says, &#8220;I am a little child&#8221; he was then a grown man. Childhood with the Hebrews extended over a much greater period of time than it does with us. The word may signify &#8220;young men&#8221; in our modern use of the term. And notice the place was Bethel, the place of calf worship, where the spirit of the city was against the schools of the prophets, and these young fellows call them &#8220;street Arabs,&#8221; &#8220;toughs,&#8221; whom it suited to follow this man and mock him: &#8220;Go up, thou bald bead; go up, thou bald head.&#8221; Elisha did not resent an indignity against himself, but here is the point: these hostile idolaters at Bethel, through their children are challenging the act of God in making Elisha the head of the prophetic line. He turned and looked at them and he saw the spirit that animated them saw that it was an issue between Bethel calf worship and Bethel, the school of the prophets, and that the parents of these children doubtless sympathized in the mockery, and saw it to be necessary that they should learn that sacrilege and blasphemy against God should not go unpunished. So, in the name of the Lord he pronounces a curse on them had it been his curse, no result would have followed. One man asks, &#8220;What were these she-bears doing so close to Bethel?&#8221; The answer is that in several places in the history is noted the prevalence of wild animals in Israel. We have seen how the old prophet who went to this very Bethel to rebuke Jeroboam and turned back to visit the other prophet, was killed by a lion close to the city.<\/p>\n<p> Another infidel question is, &#8220;How could God make a she bear obey him?&#8221; Well, let the infidel answer how God&#8217;s Spirit could influence a single pair of all the animals to go into the ark. Over and over again in the Bible the dominance of the Spirit of God over inanimate things and over the brute creation is repeatedly affirmed. The bears could not understand, but they would follow an impulse of their own anger without attempting to account for it.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> THE INCREASE IN THE WIDOW&#8217;S OIL, <span class='bible'>2Ki 4:1-7<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> We have already considered this miracle somewhat in the chapter on Elisha, and now note particularly:<\/p>\n<p> 1. It often happens that the widow of a man of God, whether prophet or preacher, is left in destitution. Sometimes the fault lies in the imprudence of the preacher or in the extravagance of his family, but more frequently, perhaps, in the inadequate provision for ministerial support. This destitution is greatly aggravated if there be debt. The influence of a preacher is handicapped to a painful degree, when, from any cause, he fails to meet his financial obligations promptly. In a commercial age this handicap becomes much more serious.<\/p>\n<p> 2. The Mosaic Law (<span class='bible'>Lev 25:39-41<\/span> ; see allusion, <span class='bible'>Mat 18:25<\/span> ) permitted a creditor to make bond-servant of a debtor and his children. For a long time the English law permitted imprisonment for debt. This widow of a prophet appeals to Elisha, the head of the prophetic school, for relief, affirming that her husband did fear God. In other words, he was faultless in the matter of debt. The enforcement of the law by the creditor under such circumstances indicates a merciless heart.<\/p>\n<p> 3. The one great lesson of the miracle is that the flow of the increased oil never stayed as long as there was a vessel to receive it. God wastes not his grace if we have no place to put it: according to our faith in preparation is his blessing. He will fill all the vessels we set before him.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> DEATH IN THE POT, <span class='bible'>2Ki 4:38-41<\/span> <\/strong> We recall this miracle to deepen a lesson barely alluded to in the chapter on Elisha. The seminaries at that time lived a much more simple life than the seminaries of the present time; it did not take such a large fund to keep them up. Elisha said, &#8220;Set on the great pot,&#8221; and one of the sons of the prophets went out to gather vegetables. He got some wild vegetables he knew nothing about here called wild gourd and shred them into the pot, not knowing they were poisonous. Hence the text: &ldquo;O man of God, there is death in the pot.&#8221; I once took that as the text for a sermon on &#8220;Theological Seminaries and Wild Gourds,&#8221; showing that the power of seminaries depends much on the kind of food the teachers give them. If they teach them that the story of Adam and Eve is an allegory, then they might just as well make the second Adam an allegory, for his mission is dependent on the failure of the first. If they teach them the radical criticism; if they teach anything that takes away from inspiration and infallibility of the divine Word of God or from any of its great doctrines then, &ldquo;O man of God, there is death in the pot&#8221; that will be a sick seminary.<\/p>\n<p> In a conversation once with a radical critic I submitted for his criticism, without naming the author, the exact words of Tom Paine in his &#8220;Age of Reason,&#8221; denying that the story of Adam and Eve was history. He accepted it as eminently correct. Then I gave the author, and inquired if it would be well for preachers and commentators to revert to such authorities on biblical interpretation. He made no reply. We find Paine&#8217;s words not only in the first part of the &#8220;Age of Reason,&#8221; written in a French prison without a Bible before him, but repeated in the second part after he was free and had access to Bibles. I gave this man a practical illustration, saying, &#8220;You may take the three thousand published sermons of Spurgeon, two sets of them, and arrange them, one set according to the books from which the texts are taken <span class='bible'>Gen 1:2<\/span> , <span class='bible'>Gen 1:3<\/span> , etc., and make a commentary on the Bible. By arranging the other set of them in topical order, you have a body of systematic theology.&#8221; Now this man Spurgeon believed in the historical integrity and infallibility of the Bible, in its inspiration of God, and he preached that, just that. As the old saying goes, &#8220;The proof of the pudding is in the chewing of the bag.&#8221; He preached just that, and what was the result? Thousands and thousands of converts wherever he preached, no matter what part of the Bible he was preaching from; preachers felt called to enter the ministry, orphan homes rose up, almshouses for aged widows, colportage systems established, missionaries sent out, and all over the wide world his missionaries die in the cause. One man was found in the Alps, frozen to death, with a sermon of Spurgeon in his hand. One man was found shot through the heart by bush rangers of Australia, and the bullet passed through Spurgeon&#8217;s sermon on &#8220;The Blood of Jesus.&#8221; Now, I said to this man, &#8220;Get all your radical critics together, and let them preach three thousand sermons on your line of teaching. How many will be converted? How many backsliders will be reclaimed? How many almshouses and orphanages will be opened? How many colportage systems established? Ah! the proof of the pudding is in the chewing of the bag. If what you say is the best thing to teach about the Bible is true, then when you preach, it will have the best results. But does it?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> We have considered Elisha&#8217;s miracle for providing water for the allied armies of Israel, Judah, and Edom, when invading Moab (<span class='bible'>2Ki 3:10-19<\/span> ). We revert to it to note partakelarly this passage: &#8220;And when the king of Moab saw that the battle was too sore for him, he took with him seven hundred men that drew sword, to break through unto the king of Edom: but they could not. Then he took his eldest son that should have reigned in his stead, and offered him for a burnt offering upon the wall. And there was great wrath against Israel: and they departed from him, and returned to their own land&#8221; (<span class='bible'>2Ki 3:26-27<\/span> ). On this passage I submit two observations:<\/p>\n<p> 1. Not long after this time the prophet Micah indignantly inquires, &#8220;Shall I give my firstborn for my transgressions, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?&#8221; The context is a strong denunciation of the offering of human sacrifices to appease an angry deity. The Mosaic law strongly condemned the heathen custom of causing their children to pass through the fire of Molech. Both this book of Kings and Jeremiah denounce judgment on those guilty of this horrible practice. The Greek and Roman classics, and the histories of Egypt and Phoenicia, show how widespread was this awful custom.<\/p>\n<p> 2. But our chief difficulty is to expound the words, &#8220;There was great wrath against Israel.&#8221; But what was its connection with the impious sacrifice of the king of Moab? Whose the wrath? The questions are not easy to answer. It is probable that the armies of Edom and Judah were angry at Israel for pressing the king of Moab to such dire extremity, and so horrified at the sacrifice that they refused longer to co-operate in the campaign. This explanation, while not altogether satisfactory, is preferred to others more improbable. It cannot mean the wrath of God, nor the wrath of the Moabites against Israel. It must mean, therefore, the wrath of the men of Judah and Edom against Israel for pressing Mesha to such an extent that he would offer his own son as a sacrifice.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> QUESTIONS<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> I. On the two accounts of Jehoshaphat&#8217;s shipping alliance with Ahaziah, <span class='bible'>2Ki 22<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ; <span class='bible'>2Ch 20<\/span><\/strong> <strong> , answer:<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. Where is Tarshish?<\/p>\n<p> 2. Where is Ophir?<\/p>\n<p> 3. Where is Ezion-geber?<\/p>\n<p> 4. What is the relevance of <span class='bible'>1Ki 22:47<\/span> ?<\/p>\n<p> 5. Explain &#8220;ships of Tarshish&#8221; in Kings, and &#8220;to go to Tarshish&#8221; in Chronicles.<\/p>\n<p> 6. What commerce were they seeking to revive, and what passage from 1 Kings bearing thereon?<\/p>\n<p> 7. How does the book of Kings seem to account for the wreck of the fleet, and how does Chronicles give a better reason?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> II. On the account of Elijah&#8217;s translation (<span class='bible'>2Ki 2:1-18<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ) answer:<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. Why the course taken by Elijah by way of Gilgal, Bethel, and Jericho?<\/p>\n<p> 2. How did both Elisha and the schools of the prophets know about the impending event?<\/p>\n<p> 3. What was the object of Elijah in telling Elisha to tarry at each stopping place while he went on?<\/p>\n<p> 4. What was the meaning of Elisha&#8217;s request for &#8220;a double portion&#8221; of Elijah&#8217;s spirit and why was this a hard thing to ask, i.e., wherein the difficulty? Illustrate by a New Testament lesson.<\/p>\n<p> 5. What was the meaning of Elijah&#8217;s translation, and what other cases, past or prospective?<\/p>\n<p> 6. What was the meaning of Elisha&#8217;s expression, &#8220;My Father! My Father! The chariots of Israel and the horsemen thereof,&#8221; and who and when applied the same language to Elisha?<\/p>\n<p> 7. How does Elisha seek a test of his succession to Elijah and how do others recognize the credentials?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> III. How do you explain the seeming inhumanity of Elisha&#8217;s cursing the children of Bethel?<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> IV. On the widow&#8217;s oil (<span class='bible'>2Ki 4:1-7<\/span><\/strong> <strong> ), answer:<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. What often happens to the widow of a prophet or preacher, and what circumstance greatly aggravates the trouble?<\/p>\n<p> 2. What is the Mosaic law relative to debtors and creditors?<\/p>\n<p> 3. What one great lesson of the miracle?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> V. On &#8220;Death in the Pot&#8221; answer:<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. What the incident of the wild gourds?<\/p>\n<p> 2. What application does the author make of this?<\/p>\n<p> 3. What comparison does the author make between Spurgeon and the Radical Critics?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> VI. On Elisha&#8217;s miracle, the water supply, answer:<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p> 1. What is the allusion in Micah&#8217;s words, &#8220;Shall I give my first-born,&#8221; etc.?<\/p>\n<p> 2. What the meaning of &#8220;There was great wrath against Israel&#8221;?<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: B.H. Carroll&#8217;s An Interpretation of the English Bible<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p> 2Ki 2:19 And the men of the city said unto Elisha, Behold, I pray thee, the situation of this city [is] pleasant, as my lord seeth: but the water [is] naught, and the ground barren.<\/p>\n<p> Ver. 19. <strong> Behold, I pray thee, the situation of this city, &amp;c.<\/strong> ] Say we so of such places, though never so pleasant, as have not the word and sacraments &#8211; those waters of life &#8211; purely and powerfully administered in them: and seek remedy. <\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/p>\n<p> But the water is naught, and the ground barren.<\/strong> ] Heb., Making to miscarry. The cause whereof was not either that ancient malediction of Joshua, or the neighbourhood of that noisome lake of Sodom, but the recent sins of the inhabitants, &#8211; see <span class='bible'>Psa 107:34<\/span> , &#8211; and particularly Hiel&rsquo;s presumption in rebuilding it. 1Ki 16:34 <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: John Trapp&#8217;s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2Ki 2:19-22<\/p>\n<p>2Ki 2:19-22<\/p>\n<p>ELISHA &#8220;HEALED&#8221; THE WATERS OF JERICHO<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And the men of the city said to Elisha, Behold, we pray thee, the situation of this city is pleasant, as my lord seeth: but the water is bad, and the land miscarrieth. And he said, Bring me a new cruse, and put salt therein. And they brought it to him. And he went forth to the spring of the waters, and cast salt therein, and said, Thus saith Jehovah, I have healed these waters; there shall not be from thence any more death or miscarrying. So the waters were healed unto this day, according to the word of Elisha which he spake.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The water is bad&#8221; (2Ki 2:19). The spring which produced those waters was identified in later times with, &#8220;The spring of Ain es-Sultan, just above the present day city of Jericho.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The land miscarrieth&#8221; (2Ki 2:19). This is a little misleading, because it might appear to mean that the land was unfruitful; &#8220;But the Hebrew verb here for `casting of fruit&#8217; (which is the Hebrew) is used only of human infertility and the destruction of babes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Stigers informs us that even today all of the springs that supply the city of Jericho with water are brackish, &#8220;But the principal spring is sweet and pure.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>E.M. Zerr:<\/p>\n<p>2Ki 2:19. Situation means the site of the city, that the &#8220;view&#8221; was agreeable. Naught is from RAH and defined, &#8220;bad or (as noun) evil (naturally or morally)&#8221;&#8211;Strong. Barren is from SHAKOL and Strong defines it, &#8220;A primitive root; properly to miscarry, i. e. suffer abortion.&#8221; This condition was practically admitted by Elisha, so that we need not doubt the statement by the citizens. Something must have come up to cause the condition, for Jericho was a popular city and no such complaint had been made of it. Some kind of germ had crept into the source of drinking water, causing abortion with expectants who needed to use it. The citizens would know of Elisha&#8217;s miraculous power, for he had just performed the feat of forcing a passage across the Jordan nearby. They told him of the defect in their city, with the hope that he would do something about it. <\/p>\n<p>2Ki 2:20-22. Spring of waters means the source of their drinking water, thus showing that it was the water that was infected and not the ground. This observation is important in meeting the critic who would say that salt would kill the ground instead of causing it to yield fruit. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>my Lord seeth: Num 12:11, 1Ki 18:7, 1Ki 18:13, 1Ti 5:17 <\/p>\n<p>the water: Exo 7:19, Exo 15:23, Jos 6:17, Jos 6:26, 1Ki 16:34 <\/p>\n<p>barren: Heb. causing to miscarry, Exo 23:26, Deu 28:2-4, Deu 28:11, Deu 28:15-18, Hos 9:14 <\/p>\n<p>Reciprocal: Jos 16:1 &#8211; the water 2Ki 2:15 &#8211; bowed 2Ki 4:16 &#8211; my lord Eze 47:8 &#8211; the waters Jam 3:12 &#8211; so Rev 8:10 &#8211; the fountains<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<p>2Ki 2:19. The water is naught, and the ground barren  Either it was so originally, at least as to that part of the city where the college of the prophets was; or it became so from the curse of God inflicted upon it, either when Joshua first took the city, or when Hiel rebuilt it: however, upon the prophets care it became exceeding fruitful, and therefore is commended for its fertility by later writers. Thus the ministers of the gospel should endeavour to make every place they come to some way or other the better for them; labouring to sweeten bitter spirits, and to make barren souls fruitful by a due application of Gods word.<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And the men of the city said unto Elisha, Behold, I pray thee, the situation of this city [is] pleasant, as my lord seeth: but the water [is] naught, and the ground barren. 19 22. Elisha heals the noxious water at Jericho (Not in Chronicles) 19. And the men of the city ] These are &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/exegetical-and-hermeneutical-commentary-of-2-kings-219\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Kings 2:19&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9582"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9582\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/bible-commentary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}