{"id":76779,"date":"2022-09-29T07:38:14","date_gmt":"2022-09-29T12:38:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/prades-jean-martin-de\/"},"modified":"2022-09-29T07:38:14","modified_gmt":"2022-09-29T12:38:14","slug":"prades-jean-martin-de","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/prades-jean-martin-de\/","title":{"rendered":"Prades, Jean Martin de"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Prades, Jean-Martin de<\/h2>\n<p>A theologian, born about 1720 at Castelsarrasin (Diocese of Montauban), died in 1782 at Glogau, famous through an irreligious thesis. Having finished his preliminary studies, he went to Paris, where he lived in many seminaries, especially in that of St-Sulpice. He very soon became acquainted with the principal publishers of the &#8220;Encyclop&eacute;die&#8221;, and supplied them with the article on &#8220;Certitude&#8221;. About the end of 1751, he presented himself for the doctorate, driven, as a m&eacute;moire of that time says, &#8220;by the incredulous, who, in order to justify his blasphemies, wanted to have his doctrine approved by the Faculty&#8221;. Prades wrote a very long thesis, which the examiners accepted without reading. The defence, which took place on 18 November, was very sharp, and the scandal broke out. On 15 December following, the Faculty declared several propositions to be &#8220;worthy of blame and censures&#8221;. On 15 January following, the censure was published. According to Abb&eacute; de Prades, the soul is an unknown substance; sensations are the source of our ideas; the origin of civil law is might, from which are derived all notions of just and of unjust, of good and evil; natural law is empiric; revealed religion is only natural religion in its evolution; the chronology of Moses&#8217;s books is false; the healings operated by Jesus Christ are doubtful miracles, since those operated by Esculapius present the same characteristics. The archbishop of Paris and several bishops approved the censure; afterwards, on the 2 March, Benedict XIV condemned the thesis; at last the Parliament of Paris issued a decree against the author; further, Stanislas, Duke of Lorraine, incited the Faculty against the Abb&eacute;.<\/p>\n<p>The latter found a refuge in Holland, where he published his &#8220;Apology&#8221; (1752). It consists of two parts: a third part containing &#8220;reflexions upon the Pastoral Letter of the bishop of Montauban and the Pastoral Instruction of the bishop of Auxerre&#8221; as written by Diderot. Le P&egrave;re Brotier published &#8220;the Survey of the Apology of the Abb&eacute; de Prades&#8221; (1753). The question is whether the Abb&eacute; de Prades is not the author of an &#8220;Apology of the Abb&eacute; de Prades&#8221; in verse. Upon the recommendation of Voltaire and of the Marquis of Argens, the Abb&eacute; became lector to Frederick of Prussia and went to Berlin. Frederick gave him a pension and two canonries, the one at Oppeln, the other at Glogau. From the year 1753, negotiations were entered upon between the Abb&eacute; de Prades and the Bishop of Breslau, Philip von Schaffgotsch, with a view to a recantation. Frederick himself induced the Abb&eacute; to return to &#8220;the bosom of the Church&#8221;. Benedict XIV and the Cardinal of Vencin wrote the formula of recantation which was signed by the Abb&eacute;. In 1754, the Faculty of Paris again inscribed the Abb&eacute; upon the list of bachelors. The Abb&eacute; de Prades became the archdeacon of the Chapter of Glogau, and died in that town in 1782.<\/p>\n<p>Besides the works quoted, he left an &#8220;Abr&eacute;g&eacute; de l&#8217;histoire eccl&eacute;siastique de Fleury&#8221;, tr. Berne (Berlin, 1767), II vols., with a violently anti-catholic preface written by Frederick II. This would make us doubt the sincerity of the recantation of the Abb&eacute; de Prades. To him is generally ascribed &#8220;le Tombeau de la Sorbonne&#8221; translated from Latin (1782). According to Qu&eacute;rard, he left in manuscript a complete translation of Tacitus, which remains unpublished. What has become of the manuscript is unknown. It is said also that he worked, before leaving France, at a Treatise on &#8220;the Truth of Religion&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Acta. S. Facultatis Paris. circa J. M. de Prades (Paris, 1794); CHIELAND, Souvenirs de Berlin (3rd ed., IV, 368); FEHET, La Facult&eacute; de th&eacute;ologie de Paris, VI (Paris, 1909), 183-193.<\/p>\n<p>JOSEPH DEDIEU. Transcribed by Douglas J. Potter Dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary  <\/p>\n<p>The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume XIICopyright &#169; 1908 by Robert Appleton CompanyOnline Edition Copyright &#169; 2003 by K. KnightNihil Obstat. Remy Lafort, CensorImprimatur. +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York<\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Catholic Encyclopedia<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n<h2>Prades, Jean Martin de<\/h2>\n<p>a French theologian, was born about the year 1720 at Castel-Sarrasin. He was destined to the ecclesiastical career, studied first in the country, then went to Paris and lived there in several seminaries, among others in that of Saint-Sulpice. He became acquainted with the authors of the Encyklopdie, and furnished several articles to their work. He came into repute by a thesis which he defended at the Sorbonne for the doctorate of theology (Nov. 18, 1751). It contained the boldest assertions concerning the nature of the soul, the origin of good and evil, the origin of society, natural and revealed religion, the miracles, etc. His parallel of the cures performed by Jesus and those of Esculapius seemed particularly scandalous. The thesis was condemned forthwith by several prelates and by pope Benedict XIV. The Sorbonne, after having at first approved it, reconsidered its action, and declared it impious. Parliament ordered the arrest of the author at the request of the advocate-general D&#8217;Ormesson, whereupon De Prades fled to Holland (1752), and there published his Apology (1752, 3 pts. 8vo), to which Diderot added a refutation of a mandement of the bishop of Auxerre. Voltaire recommended Prades to the king of Prussia, who appointed him his lector, and bestowed upon him a life-rent and two canonries, one at Oppeln, the other at Glogau. The bishop of Breslau finally prevailed upon him to retract solemnly the principles he had defended (April 6, 1754). He became archdeacon of the chapter of Glogau. He died in 1782. Prades left, besides, an Abrg de l&#8217;Histoire ecclesiastique de Fleuri (Berlin, 1767, 2 vols. small 8vo), supposed to be translated from the English, and to which Frederick II wrote a preface.  Hoefer, Nouv. Biog. Gneral, s.v. See Brotier, Examen de l&#8217;Apologie de l&#8217;Abb de Prudes (1753); Feller, Dict. Hist. s.v.; Jervis, Hist. of the Church of France, 2, 332-334. <\/p>\n<h4 align='right'><i><b>Fuente: Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature<\/b><\/i><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Prades, Jean-Martin de A theologian, born about 1720 at Castelsarrasin (Diocese of Montauban), died in 1782 at Glogau, famous through an irreligious thesis. Having finished his preliminary studies, he went to Paris, where he lived in many seminaries, especially in that of St-Sulpice. He very soon became acquainted with the principal publishers of the &#8220;Encyclop&eacute;die&#8221;, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/prades-jean-martin-de\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Prades, Jean Martin de&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-encyclopedic-dictionary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76779"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76779\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/dictionaries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}