{"id":30939,"date":"2022-09-10T15:10:31","date_gmt":"2022-09-10T20:10:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/how-experts-identify-biblical-remnants-in-the-dead-sea-scrolls\/"},"modified":"2022-09-10T15:10:31","modified_gmt":"2022-09-10T20:10:31","slug":"how-experts-identify-biblical-remnants-in-the-dead-sea-scrolls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/how-experts-identify-biblical-remnants-in-the-dead-sea-scrolls\/","title":{"rendered":"How Experts Identify Biblical Remnants in the Dead Sea Scrolls"},"content":{"rendered":"
Taylor Wilcox – Unsplash <\/p>\n

By Gary Manning<\/em><\/p>\n

You may have seen one of the many articles about some new fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) that were recently discovered this year. Hoping to beat looters to a great archeological find, archeologists rappelled down a cliff to reach a cave where they found ancient treasure: coins, baskets, scroll fragments and human remains! All we need to complete the story is a car chase through the desert and maybe one of the archeologists saying, \u201cThis belongs in a museum!\u201d<\/p>\n

But, what is the significance of this find? I will provide a little background here and then show you how archeologists identify scraps of ancient documents.<\/p>\n

Background on the Dead Sea Scrolls<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The Dead Sea Scrolls were originally deposited in caves near the Dead Sea, likely to protect them during the Jewish War of A.D. 70. Most were discovered in the 1940s and 50s. The DSS include nearly complete copies of almost every book of the Old Testament as well as some other ancient Jewish works. They also include the so-called \u201csectarian\u201d works that reveal much about the beliefs and practices of one sect of Judaism. The scholarly consensus is that they were a branch of the Essenes.<\/p>\n

New fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls were found after archeologists, attempting to beat looters, rappelled down a cliff to reach a cave where they found ancient treasure and human remains. Click To Tweet <\/p>\n

Almost all of the copies of books of the Bible in the DSS are in Hebrew, but there was one Greek scroll discovered in 1952, a Greek translation of the Twelve Prophets (what some call the Minor Prophets).<\/p>\n

New Scroll Fragments<\/strong><\/h3>\n

What about the new scroll fragments? A caveat: there is a lot of work yet to be done, so anything we say now about the fragments may be corrected later. <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Since this new cave includes coins from the Bar Kokhba revolt of A.D. 135, it seems likely that the scroll fragments were deposited then, almost 70 years after the other scrolls were deposited in other caves. <\/p>\n

Most of the scroll fragments are very small and only one clear photograph has been published so far. But it is clear that these fragments also come from a Greek copy of the Twelve Prophets, specifically from Zechariah and Nahum. Perhaps they are even fragments from the same scroll discovered back in 1952, although that has not yet been confirmed.<\/p>\n

Identification Methodology<\/strong><\/h3>\n

How can an archeologist identify such tiny fragments? Let me walk you through how I identified it. I am not an archeologist or a paleographer, but I like looking at ancient manuscripts, and the methods I describe here are similar to what the experts use.<\/p>\n

I started with the three lines that had the most visible letters and tried to make sense of them. (You can see the fragment close up here if you want to see what I am describing.)<\/p>\n

…\u0391\u039d\u0397\u03a1 \u03a4..\u039a\u0391\u2026 (\u2026aner t\u2026 ka\u2026)<\/p>\n

…\u03a3\u0399\u039f\u039d\u0391\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a5\u2026 (\u2026sion autou\u2026)<\/p>\n

\u2026\u0395\u039d\u03a4\u0391\u0399\u03a3\u039a\u0391… (\u2026en tais ka\u2026)<\/p>\n

The first line has \u1f00\u03bd\u03ae\u03c1, \u201cman,\u201d but not enough letters to make sense of the rest. The second line was a little easier. The first word I could think of that ends in \u2013\u03c3\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd in Greek is \u03c0\u03bb\u03ae\u03c3\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd, \u201cneighbor.\u201d It is followed by \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6, \u201chis.\u201d In the third line, \u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u03b1\u1fd6\u03c2 means \u201cin the.\u201d It is followed by \u03ba\u03b1…, which looks like it is the beginning of \u03ba\u03b1\u03c1\u03b4\u03af\u03b1\u03b9\u03c2, \u201chearts.\u201d So far we have \u201ca man\u2026 his neighbor\u2026 in the hearts.\u201d If this fragment is from the Septuagint (LXX, the Greek Old Testament), then that\u2019s probably enough information to identify it.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
See also  The Group Most Likely to Still Be Missing From Your Church<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

I used my Bible software to search for the phrases \u1f00\u03bd\u03b7\u03c1 (man), \u03c0\u03bb\u03ae\u03c3\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 (his neighbor) and \u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u03b1\u1fd6\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c1\u03b4\u03af\u03b1\u03b9\u03c2 (in the hearts). A setback: there is no place in the LXX that has that combination of phrases near each other. But there is a verse that has the last two items. Zech. 8:17 has this:<\/p>\n

\u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u1f15\u03ba\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u03ba\u03b1\u03ba\u03af\u03b1\u03bd<\/p>\n

\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c3\u03af\u03bf\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03bc\u1f74 \u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03c3\u03b8\u03b5<\/p>\n

\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u03b1\u1fd6\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c1\u03b4\u03af\u03b1\u03b9\u03c2 \u1f51\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd\u2026<\/p>\n

And each (of you), do not plan evil against his neighbor in your hearts\u2026<\/p>\n

(The colored letters are the ones that can be easily read in the scroll fragment.)<\/p>\n

Looks pretty close! The DSS fragment seems to fit Zech. 8:17, but we still have the problem of \u1f00\u03bd\u03ae\u03c1 (man) in the first line. That doesn\u2019t match up with Zech. 8:17 or the verse before. But now we learn something interesting that solves the problem. <\/p>\n

The same Hebrew word \u05d0\u05b4\u05d9\u05e9\u05c1 is sometimes translated into Greek with \u1f00\u03bd\u03ae\u03c1, man, and sometimes with \u1f15\u03ba\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2, each. Both translation choices can be found elsewhere in the LXX (for example, \u201ceach\u2026 to his neighbor\u201d vs. \u201ca man\u2026 to his neighbor\u201d). Zech. 8:17 in the LXX uses \u1f15\u03ba\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2, but this new (very old!) Dead Sea Scroll fragment has instead \u1f00\u03bd\u03ae\u03c1.<\/p>\n

Recently discovered ancient scroll fragments most likely contain portions of the Old Testament books of Zechariah and Nahum. Click To Tweet <\/p>\n

The rest of this fragment is even harder to read, but there are already some hints that there are some other slight differences from the LXX. Further photographs and observations by paleographers will bring more clarity about the rest of the verse.<\/p>\n

Bottom line is it’s a very interesting find, but only tiny fragments of an ancient Greek translation of Zechariah and Nahum survive. There are some small differences from the LXX, although the archeological team has indicated that some other small differences show up in some of the unpublished fragments.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Gary T. Manning, Jr.<\/h2>\n

\n

\n

Gary is a professor of New Testament languages and literatures and the director of the Master of Divinity program at Talbot School of Theology.\u00a0Gary is the author of\u00a0Echoes of a Prophet: The Use of Ezekiel in the Gospel of John and in Literature of the Second Temple Period<\/em>\u00a0(T&T Clark, 2004).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n