{"id":35022,"date":"2022-09-10T21:52:21","date_gmt":"2022-09-11T02:52:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/developing-topical-evangelistic-sermons-that-are-audience-driven\/"},"modified":"2022-09-10T21:52:21","modified_gmt":"2022-09-11T02:52:21","slug":"developing-topical-evangelistic-sermons-that-are-audience-driven","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/developing-topical-evangelistic-sermons-that-are-audience-driven\/","title":{"rendered":"Developing Topical Evangelistic Sermons That Are Audience-Driven"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The twenty-first<br \/> century did not begin well, nor did it bode well, for the human race. Terrorism,<br \/> wars, viruses, and tsunamis dominated news headlines worldwide. The entire world<br \/> of opinion leaders, my audience, was troubled by thoughts on the problem of<br \/> evil. However, God was opening up an annual global audience for me on primetime<br \/> secular television. What would I say to them? How could I link their experience<br \/> and questions to a presentation, and possibly a proclamation, of the Lord Jesus<br \/> Christ? Would I pursue a textual or topical message?<\/p>\n<p>That last issue<br \/> was not a real question at all, for most of my audience did not hold to the<br \/> Bible in personal authority or to Jesus as a plausible Savior. Would I be text-driven<br \/> or audience &#8211; driven in my choice of topic? I chose the latter option, since<br \/> most of my audience would not share my Christian worldview. I would have to<br \/> incorporate pre-evangelistic subject matter and assume a pre-evangelistic style<br \/> of delivery. <\/p>\n<p>Audience-driven<br \/> choices of topics arise from the needs of your audience &#8211; contemporary people<br \/> who need Jesus&#8217; salvation. These are audience-driven needs, but the only preaching<br \/> solution, of course, is text-based &#8211; the Lord Jesus Christ!<\/p>\n<p>             Text-Driven<br \/>             or Audience-Driven Topics<br \/>             Factors Text-Driven Audience-Driven   Need Shared<br \/>     worldview between preacher and audience Worldview<br \/>     distance and dissonance between preacher and audience   Sources The<br \/>     text as source: Bible-driven topics that apply to nonbelievers by<br \/>     way of embracing Jesus The<br \/>     audience as source: some audience-driven topics addressed and anticipated<br \/>     in the Bible but only resolved by embracing Jesus   Sermon<br \/>     Development &#8211; multiple thrusts to a single theme Determined<br \/>     and\/or developed by biblical texts available on a particular topic Shaped<br \/>     to meet their issues &#8211; developed in view of audience&#8217;s needs, values,<br \/>     beliefs, experiences, and behavior        <\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the distinguishing<br \/> feature of audience-driven topical preaching: your choice of the topic and<br \/> the development of the sermon (your structure) are not text-driven.<\/p>\n<p>Why? Your<br \/> sermon topic and structure are not text-based for a simple reason: some audiences<br \/> don&#8217;t hold the Bible in authority. When an audience shares the same worldview<br \/> as the preacher, he may use phrases like &#8220;the Bible says&#8221; for points<br \/> to take root, to make waves, and to incite response from the audience. You can<br \/> definitely do that with multi-text topical sermons.<\/p>\n<p>However, if preacher<br \/> and audience do not share the same world&#173;view, the preacher is left to find<br \/> audience-driven topics and develop them in terms of audience categories and<br \/> experiences via non-text&#173;based presentation. You would use biblical concepts.<br \/> You would normally not repeat, &#8220;The Bible says&#8221; to state or prove<br \/> your point. That would be like a Muslim evangelist preaching, &#8220;The Koran,<br \/> Sura 10, says&#8221; to prove his point to a Hindu or Christian audience, with<br \/> no great advantage to his presentation.<\/p>\n<p>Worldview matters<br \/> much more than you might acknowledge. We operate not out of vacuums but from<br \/> worldviews. A worldview is the comprehensive console that controls everything<br \/> about a person &#8211; his virtues and values, his beliefs and behavior. One&#8217;s worldview<br \/> answers questions of origin (where did I come from?), identity (who am I?),<br \/> meaning (why am I here?), destiny (where am I going?), and morality (what should<br \/> I do?). While &#8220;not straightforwardly verifiable or falsifiable,&#8221;1<br \/> a worldview functions to explain, evaluate, justify, integrate, and adapt to<br \/> life.2<\/p>\n<p>In contemporary<br \/> cultures, the majority worldview can change within a generation. For instance,<br \/> much was made of postmodern&#173;ism both in the academy and among the intellectual<br \/> elite in the last two decades of the twentieth century. Then came September<br \/> 11, 2001, when Western postmoderns began to debate calling anything universally<br \/> evil. Some defected back to the shredded and discarded philosophical underpinnings<br \/> of undeconstructed modernism. <\/p>\n<p>You can&#8217;t even<br \/> assume homogeneity of worldview at church anymore. Though churchgoers<br \/> are likely to share a Judeo-Christian worldview, or they most likely won&#8217;t be<br \/> at church, you still cant take worldview affinity for granted. People who have<br \/> rejected the Judeo-Christian worldview can still make sense of the preacher,<br \/> for normally they know what they have rejected (it was formally pro&#173;posed that<br \/> a person who rejected the Christian worldview be called a &#8220;bright&#8221;).3&nbsp;<br \/> But when speaking to people outside the dominant Judeo-Christian worldview,<br \/> you have to present the gospel in terms of their concepts and categories for<br \/> understanding and assimilation. Worldview distance and dissonance between preacher<br \/> and audience causes a misunderstanding of the message, not to mention a mistrust<br \/> of the preacher. In topical evangelistic preaching, you can better address the<br \/> misunderstanding problem.<\/p>\n<p>How? By<br \/> choosing audience-driven topics and developing your sermon in view of the audience&#8217;s<br \/> needs, values, beliefs, experiences, and behavior. Missionaries have long practiced<br \/> communication principles and techniques across worldview, culture, and religion,<br \/> often in one-on-one situations. Preachers also use these cross&#173;cultural missions<br \/> principles to overcome worldview distance in public and formal environments.<\/p>\n<p>Topical sermons<br \/> driven by audience needs can either be evange&#173;listic or pre-evangelistic in<br \/> form, stance, and nature (you can derive textual sermons from audience needs<br \/> too).<\/p>\n<p>Where? Where<br \/> does one find audience-driven topics, topics that are also addressed and anticipated<br \/> in the Bible but only resolved by embracing Jesus? One finds them in the breadth<br \/> of human experience &#8211; whether needs, values, beliefs, experiences, or behavior.<br \/> Actually, there is no limit to these starting points for launching a topical<br \/> evangelistic sermon. God has built into every life and culture issues and needs<br \/> that only Jesus can resolve. If you look, you&#8217;ll find. Further, the nature of<br \/> the Bible as adequate for issues that have not yet arisen, questions that have<br \/> not yet been asked, and experiences that have not yet happened allows us to<br \/> find sermonic correlation in the final movement of the topical sermon that results<br \/> in Jesus as the God who saves sinners.<\/p>\n<p>I know all this<br \/> may sound complex, and I too wish we could merely quote the Bible for people&#8217;s<br \/> quick recognition of the truth. Yet it is not as complex as it seems, nor is<br \/> it as simple as quoting the Bible to those of another worldview. Just like you<br \/> must do hard work for any preaching, you must take additional audience factors<br \/> into thoughtful and prayerful consideration as you prepare for unbelieving audiences. <\/p>\n<p>Remember, you are<br \/> not alone in the process of preparing and delivering sermons. There is One who<br \/> has gone ahead of you into the audience, and not only in the inspiration of<br \/> Scripture. He is anxious to get his salvation message to those who do not share<br \/> your worldview through you. So depend on him, exegete your audience,4<br \/> prepare your sermon, keeping the &#8220;rights of the pew&#8221; for a clear and<br \/> winsome presentation of the gospel to the audience in mind.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold\">Pre-evangelistic<br \/> Preaching<\/p>\n<p>Pre-evangelistic<br \/> preaching will always be topical in nature for the reasons just given. Since<br \/> pre-evangelistic preaching is not just Christian moralism, it will name and<br \/> point to Jesus. Christian moralism, the covert and surreptitious verbalization<br \/> of Christian principles for the challenges of life, assumes that Christian virtues<br \/> and values will assist people whether they turn to Christ or not. I place that<br \/> stealth operation in the category of pre-evangelistic presentation but<br \/> not in pre-evangelistic preaching. There we are helping people with a<br \/> Christian way of doing life, and we hope that it will take. Our motive allows<br \/> us to use the word evangelism in that pre-evangelistic witness. We give<br \/> people some right words to live by in life, leadership, or love. We may point<br \/> to Jesus as teacher without necessarily mentioning Christ as Savior. For example,<br \/> while speaking to business leaders or athletes, we talk about the value of teamwork<br \/> (a solid Christian value) or the need for integrity (a core Christian virtue).<\/p>\n<p>No more is pre-evangelism<br \/> an exotic exercise undertaken outside the church and meant only for sophisticated,<br \/> antagonistic audi&#173;ences. It is very likely that people in your own audience,<br \/> invited by friends, perhaps, to a special evangelistic event, hail from diverse<br \/> worldviews imbibed via academia, media, or relationships.<\/p>\n<p>Now, what is the<br \/> difference between pre-evangelistic and evan&#173;gelistic preaching? They fall in<br \/> a continuum of evangelism and were actually practiced by Paul where he did not<br \/> quote Scripture at all when speaking to audiences that did not share his worldview<br \/> (Acts 14, 17). To the Greek, he really became as a Greek, while he prolifi&#173;cally<br \/> peppered his talks to Jewish audiences with Scripture. The fact of the matter<br \/> is that people fall into varying spiritual and intellectual categories<br \/> &#8211; pre-faith, pre-Christ, or even pre-God.5<br \/> To pre-faith people, you preach evangelistically. To pre-Christ (and pre-God)<br \/> people, you communicate pre-evangelistically.<\/p>\n<p>In pre-evangelistic<br \/> preaching, we always pick audience-driven, salvation-compliant topics. Salvation-compliant<br \/> topics, like salva&#173;tion compliant texts, are one step away from an unbeliever&#8217;s<br \/> experi&#173;ence of Christian faith and blessings. We attach them to textual bases<br \/> or theological reasons to make them serve an evangelistic purpose. Pre-evangelistic<br \/> sermons often begin with existential entry points and problems to which<br \/> Jesus is the solution if the root problem of sin is resolved. These problems<br \/> are addressed in the Bible either by plain text or theological implication.<br \/> They are issues that simply don&#8217;t go away from the human situation.<\/p>\n<p>Some audience-driven<br \/> subjects belong to academic apologetics, but I prefer existential apologetics<br \/> simply because most audiences are not asking theoretical questions (e.g., Does<br \/> God exist? Did Jesus rise from the dead?) as their first questions. People<br \/> ask existential questions (e.g., How do I fill the spiritual hole in my heart?6)<br \/> to find order and meaning and resolution. I can always move from existential<br \/> to philosophical levels of engagement. <\/p>\n<p>Here I list some<br \/> universal spiritual needs that lend themselves to audience-driven development<br \/> and conclude with the Lord Jesus as the salvation (re) solution, because all<br \/> these needs are rooted in sin and separation from God:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>forgiveness<\/p>\n<p>peace<\/p>\n<p>stability<\/p>\n<p>hope<\/p>\n<p>afterlife<\/p>\n<p>love<\/p>\n<p>survival<\/p>\n<p>wisdom<\/p>\n<p>purpose<\/p>\n<p>spiritual quest<\/p>\n<p>demonic oppression<br \/> (supernatural evil forces)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Below is a short<br \/> list of widespread intellectual questions that can be seized for a salvation<br \/> ending. These questions have been relatively stable over history, and you can<br \/> find more subjects in theoretical apologetics books written by Christian philosophers<br \/> and apologists.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold\">Some Philosophical<br \/> Questions<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8226; What is the<br \/> nature and existence of truth? <\/p>\n<p>&#8226; Does God exist?<\/p>\n<p>&#8226; What is the<br \/> nature of God?<\/p>\n<p>&#8226; What about<br \/> the problem of evil?<\/p>\n<p>&#8226; Is religion<br \/> efficacious?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold\">Some Scientific<br \/> Questions<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8226; Are miracles<br \/> possible?<\/p>\n<p>&#8226; How do you<br \/> reconcile the religion versus science debates?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold\">Some Jesus-Related<br \/> Questions<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8226; Why is Jesus<br \/> God?<\/p>\n<p>&#8226; Why is Jesus<br \/> unique?<\/p>\n<p>&#8226; Why is Jesus<br \/> exclusive?<\/p>\n<p>&#8226; Did Jesus rise<br \/> from the dead?<\/p>\n<p>&#8226; What destiny<br \/> awaits those who have not heard about Jesus?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold\">Some Bible-Related<br \/> Questions<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8226; Is the Bible<br \/> reliable?<\/p>\n<p>&#8226; Do the Bible<br \/> and science conflict?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a list of<br \/> common existential issues that can be seized for a salvation ending in<br \/> the final movement of your sermon:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>anxiety<\/p>\n<p>fear<\/p>\n<p>inner <\/p>\n<p>conflict <\/p>\n<p>happiness <\/p>\n<p>freedom <\/p>\n<p>satisfaction <\/p>\n<p>significance <\/p>\n<p>broken <\/p>\n<p>relationships <\/p>\n<p>loneliness<\/p>\n<p>restlessness <\/p>\n<p>sense of loss <\/p>\n<p>self-concept <\/p>\n<p>victimization <\/p>\n<p>inability to<br \/> change <\/p>\n<p>adventure<\/p>\n<p>sense of limitations <\/p>\n<p>direction in<br \/> life<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>In these ideas,<br \/> questions, and issues, you are looking for the au&#173;dience&#8217;s underlying spiritual<br \/> needs and the ways they attempt to resolve or address them without Christ. Their<br \/> needs and attempts furnish topics and illustrations for preaching evangelists<br \/> (see the upcoming chapter on support material). The comprehensive nature of<br \/> the Bible allows a thousand entrees into the nonbeliever&#8217;s issues and needs<br \/> for which Christ is the only answer. If Jesus Christ is placed in human hearing,<br \/> he enters the human heart in a hundred different ways. Ask a few people what<br \/> drew them to salvation, and you&#8217;ll find various creative ways in which God showed<br \/> them their need for Christ. He uses the entire spectrum &#8211; broken hearts over<br \/> sin all the way to broken hearts over relationships &#8211; in order to bring people<br \/> to a realization of their ultimate spiritual need, with salva&#173;tion clinched<br \/> by our presentation of the gospel.<\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;ll find entry<br \/> points for topical choices and illustrations in contemporary beliefs and events.<br \/> These beliefs and events are what your audience is thinking and talking about.<br \/> Therefore, they become fodder for audience-driven, text-based, or theologically<br \/> reasoned, topical pre-evangelistic sermons.<\/p>\n<p>A cursory look<br \/> at my newspaper headlines today evokes the following topics:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Doctors<br \/> Overlook Depression, Even in Themselves&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Search<br \/> for Life Out There Gains Respect, Bit by Bit&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Practicing<br \/> Patience, A Virtue of Some Urgency&#8221;7<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>If I were preaching<br \/> on these subjects, I would see if I could at&#173;tach these audience-driven topics<br \/> to textual bases or theological reasons in order to achieve evangelistic finales.<br \/> With evangelistic experience and an observant eye, you&#8217;ll catch topics that<br \/> possess evangelistic potential. For instance, &#8220;depression&#8221; as a topic<br \/> attaches to a textual base: Jesus&#8217;s claim to give people a joyful rather<br \/> than depressing existence (John 10:10). And the news item can work as an opening<br \/> or concluding illustration, or it could conceivably help in developing the points<br \/> of the sermon.<\/p>\n<p>The topic of &#8220;the<br \/> search for life out there&#8221; attaches to a theological reason: the<br \/> yearning to make contact with extraterrestrial intelli&#173;gence as part of our<br \/> search to find God or to displace him. Then we can proceed to how Jesus brought<br \/> God from &#8220;out there&#8221; to &#8220;in here,&#8221; perhaps attaching the<br \/> theological reason to John 1:1-18, or even John 1:18. Again, the news item can<br \/> work as an opening or concluding illustration or help in developing the points<br \/> of the sermon.<\/p>\n<p>Ensure that the<br \/> topic from the text you are attaching to the audience-driven need is founded<br \/> and derived from its central proposition. In this way, you will not be taking<br \/> some obscure part of the text to make your point with your audience. Always<br \/> remember, the central proposition of the text (step 3) is derived from the text&#8217;s<br \/> structure (step 2) as the safeguard from your penchant to make the text say<br \/> whatever you want it to mean.<\/p>\n<p>Pre-evangelistic<br \/> preaching points to the Lord Jesus, mentions his name, and offers his salvation<br \/> for the human situation. The PS principle of textual preaching, a salvation-appended<br \/> text and sermon, places the evangelistic twist at the end of the sermon&#8217;s conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>In a pre-evangelistic<br \/> sermon, the evangelistic twist always arrives as the last movement of the body<br \/> of the sermon: Jesus is the answer to the human dilemma the audience faces as<br \/> a result of human sin.<\/p>\n<p>_______________<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-style: italic\">Ramesh Richard<br \/> serves as leader of Ramesh Richard Evangelism and Church Helps (RREACH) International<br \/> and teaches expository preaching at Dallas Theological Seminary.<\/p>\n<p>_______________<\/p>\n<p>Notes<br \/> 1. I borrow this phrase from Ninian Smart, &#8220;The Philosophy of Worldviews<br \/> &#8211; That Is the Philosophy of Religion Transformed,&#8221; N. Zeitschr f. syst.<br \/> Theologie 23:2, 1981.<br \/> 2. See Charles Kraft, Christianity in Culture: A Study in Dynamic Biblical<br \/> Theologizing in Cross Cultural Perspective (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books,<br \/> 1979), 33-37.<br \/> 3. Daniel C. Dennett, &#8220;The Bright Stuff,&#8221; New York Times, July<br \/> 12, 2003.<br \/> 4. I have explained a method of exegeting audiences in Preparing Expository<br \/> Sermons and more extensively in a future volume tentatively entitled Wisdom<br \/> toward Outsiders: A Manual on Cross-Cultural Apologetics and Worldwide Evangelism.<br \/> 5. More sophisticated scales of the spiritual awareness of an unbeliever toward<br \/> conversion and maturity began in contemporary evangelism with the Spiritual<br \/> Segmentation linear model of V Sogaard, Everything You Need to Know for a<br \/> Cassette Ministry (Minneapolis: Bethany, 1975),27-53, and the Engel Scale<br \/> (from awareness of supreme being and no knowledge of the gospel all the way<br \/> to Christian stewardship), in James E Engel and H. Wilbert Norton, What&#8217;s<br \/> Gone Wrong with the Harvest (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1975), 45. Many suggestions<br \/> for refinements are suggested on the Internet (type &#8220;Engel Scale&#8221;<br \/> on your search engine). The Gray Matrix, http:\/\/www.thegraymatrix.info\/, adds<br \/> the critical component of attitude (antagonism\/enthusiasm) to prior Christian<br \/> knowledge (in communication effectiveness).<br \/> 6. I used to give away a fine short book, Josh McDowell&#8217;s More Than a Carpenter,<br \/> but then I noticed that many people were not asking the academic questions about<br \/> Jesus as their first questions. After looking around for a preliminary<br \/> gift, I decided to write Mending Your Soul: The Spiritual Path to Inner Wholeness.<br \/> I still keep copies of More Than a Carpenter as a second book to lead<br \/> people into a further consideration of Jesus.<br \/> 7. All three headlines appear in the same section of &#8220;The Science Times,&#8221;<br \/> New York Times, July 8, 2003. Each day I find more topics to turn into<br \/> evangelistic themes and thrusts.<\/p>\n<div style='clear:both'><\/div>\n<div class='the_champ_sharing_container the_champ_horizontal_sharing' data-super-socializer-href=\"https:\/\/www.preaching.com\/articles\/developing-topical-evangelistic-sermons-that-are-audience-driven\/\">\n<div class='the_champ_sharing_title' style=\"font-weight:bold\">Share This On:<\/div>\n<div class=\"the_champ_sharing_ul\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style='clear:both'><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The twenty-first century did not begin well, nor did it bode well, for the human race. Terrorism, wars, viruses, and tsunamis dominated news headlines worldwide. The entire world of opinion leaders, my audience, was troubled by thoughts on the problem of evil. However, God was opening up an annual global audience for me on primetime &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/developing-topical-evangelistic-sermons-that-are-audience-driven\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Developing Topical Evangelistic Sermons That Are Audience-Driven&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sermons"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}