{"id":35027,"date":"2022-09-10T21:52:32","date_gmt":"2022-09-11T02:52:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/negotiating-the-red-zone-taking-your-sermon-to-a-successful-conclusion\/"},"modified":"2022-09-10T21:52:32","modified_gmt":"2022-09-11T02:52:32","slug":"negotiating-the-red-zone-taking-your-sermon-to-a-successful-conclusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/negotiating-the-red-zone-taking-your-sermon-to-a-successful-conclusion\/","title":{"rendered":"Negotiating The Red Zone: Taking Your Sermon To A Successful Conclusion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On<br \/> Thanksgiving Day, sprawled on my couch watching a football game, I had an epiphany<br \/> about preaching.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> The home team was scoring at every opportunity  &#8211;  moving up and down the field,<br \/> connecting on passes, breaking through lines, racking up touchdowns, and kicking<br \/> extra points. The visiting team was strong in a lot of ways, too, and able to<br \/> move the ball successfully, but with one difference. Inside the opponents&#8217; 20<br \/> yard line  &#8211;  what football people call &#8220;the red zone&#8221;  &#8211;  they ground to a halt.<br \/> By half-time, the visitors had managed only two field goals for six points,<br \/> in contrast to the 28 points for the hosts. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> I have preached sermons like that, which seemed to do everything but &#8220;score.&#8221;<br \/> The introduction worked well, but perhaps like the first 20 yards on the football<br \/> field  &#8211;  which is almost a &#8220;gimme&#8221; to each team  &#8211;  congregations generously<br \/> concede the first few minutes of a sermon to see what the preacher plans to<br \/> do today. My points were in order, the biblical exposition appropriate, and<br \/> the application right. Even my illustrations worked. What the sermon lacked,<br \/> however, was a coming together for a closing that worked  &#8211;  that &#8220;scored,&#8221; to<br \/> use our sports metaphor. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> After blazing downfield for the first 20 minutes, my sermon had fizzled out<br \/> like a spent firecracker in the red zone. I had tacked on the ending as an afterthought,<br \/> leaving the congregation confused as to what I was saying and unclear on what<br \/> I was expecting of them.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> With four decades of pastoral service behind me, a year ago I came to a new<br \/> position with our denomination that has me in different churches each Sunday.<br \/> Preaching in churches of all sizes, all situations, and all nationalities has<br \/> been a refreshing challenge. I find myself particularly enjoying those times<br \/> when I&#8217;m not the preacher, but a visitor and fellow worshiper on a back pew<br \/> hearing a local pastor do what he does every Sunday of the year. I&#8217;ve been pleased<br \/> to discover that most of the pastors do very well. I&#8217;ve not heard one sermon<br \/> that did not feed my soul. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> I have noticed, however, that just because a preacher delivers a good message<br \/> does not mean he knows how to &#8220;bring it home.&#8221; Most of our pastors could use<br \/> help in effective closings to their sermons. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> One Sunday I sat in a small congregation where the preacher was a young seminarian,<br \/> presumably still learning how to preach. His message on the Beatitudes seemed<br \/> well thought out and he brought some helpful insights to his people. Nearing<br \/> the close, it became apparent that he had no clue on how to bring his points<br \/> together to the single focus of the message. In fact, his final prayer dealt<br \/> with the five points of his sermon. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> That day I went away reflecting on what that young man had done well and where<br \/> he had missed. Like the Thanksgiving Day football team, he had moved the ball<br \/> across the field, then bogged down in the red zone and failed to score. Perhaps<br \/> because he had moved the ball, so to speak, he thought of it as a success. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> As though the Lord were working overtime to teach me on this subject, the next<br \/> sermon I heard was delivered by a veteran seminary professor who did the same<br \/> thing. An excellent message with effective exposition and apt illustrations<br \/> ground to a halt in the red zone, as though the learned preacher had given no<br \/> thought on what to do once he arrived at this end of the field. A good sermon<br \/> fizzled, the public invitation sputtered, and the congregation progressed on<br \/> to the next item in the order of worship. If anyone left church that day pondering<br \/> how close they had come to hearing a great sermon, I couldn&#8217;t tell. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> In Writer&#8217;s Digest for December, 2004, Lauren Kessler quotes Joan Didion,<br \/> &#8220;It is easier to see the beginnings of things, and harder to see the ends.&#8221;<br \/> With that line, Kessler introduces her article, &#8220;The Elegant Finish,&#8221; which<br \/> deals with writing first-class conclusions to non-fiction pieces. Some of her<br \/> insights are helpful to preachers in search of effective climaxes to their sermons.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Kessler asks why endings are so hard to write. For one thing, she finds, we<br \/> are taught in school that the opening is most important. Writers (speakers,<br \/> too) learn that they must grab people with their first words. Further, something<br \/> inside writers  &#8211;  and preachers  &#8211;  insists that once we figure out how to begin,<br \/> the rest will fall into place. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Kessler puts much of the blame on journalism schools that teach students to<br \/> tell the story, and that the story is over when they run out of material. That<br \/> way, there is no ending. It just stops, like a lot of sermons where the preacher<br \/> runs out of time or material or inspiration. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> There is an old school of thought that says speeches and sermons are made up<br \/> of three parts: an introduction in which I tell what I&#8217;m going to tell, the<br \/> main body in which I tell it, and the conclusion where I summarize what I just<br \/> told. If one is preaching to kindergartners, that may be an effective approach.<br \/> Otherwise, it&#8217;s an insult to the audience, assuming as it does that the hearers<br \/> are mentally impaired or did not listen the first time. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> A sermon which lays its points before the people without ever tying them up<br \/> again at the end fails its audience in a lot of ways. Chiefly, it never lets<br \/> the congregation see the bigger picture, how the message fits into the larger<br \/> framework of God&#8217;s plan for the world, the Kingdom, and themselves. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> With Kessler&#8217;s suggestions as our guide, I want to propose three approaches<br \/> for preachers in crafting more effective closings for sermons. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">1.<br \/> &#8220;Think of the closing as a story.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> The preacher may end with a story that brings the gist of the sermon home. The<br \/> old joke about the sermon being composed of three points and a poem is half<br \/> right. Something  &#8211;  a poem, story, illustration, something!  &#8211;  can be used at<br \/> the end to push the main message across the finish line. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> In an old sermon titled &#8220;Looking at God Through Christ,&#8221; John A. Redhead preached<br \/> on the love of God, which, he said, will not let us down, let us off, or let<br \/> us go. Toward the end, he tells the story of Harry Lauder, a Scotsman who buried<br \/> two sons killed in the First World War. In his depression, he often took long<br \/> walks. One evening, a little boy from the neighborhood who had befriended him<br \/> joined him. The child pointed out the banners hanging in the windows of homes. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> &#8220;Each<br \/> star represents a son who served in the war,&#8221; Lauder said. &#8220;And why are some<br \/> of them gold?&#8221; the boy asked. &#8220;That means the son did not come back. He was<br \/> killed in the war.&#8221; Soon the sky began to darken and a star twinkled. The child<br \/> saw it and said, &#8220;Did God send a son to the war, too?&#8221; Lauder said, &#8220;Yes. God<br \/> sent His only Son to the greatest war ever fought, the war against sin, and<br \/> it cost His life.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Redhead concludes, &#8220;For the gold star of God&#8217;s only Son, embroidered on the<br \/> service banner in the window of heaven, attests a love that has gone all-out<br \/> to seek and to save.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> At the end of a sermon called &#8220;It Pays to Pray,&#8221; David Jeremiah tells of the<br \/> time Professor Howard Hendricks stood before his seminary class and said, &#8220;My<br \/> seventy-five-year-old father received Jesus Christ as his Savior. That might<br \/> not be meaningful to you unless I tell you that for forty years, I have prayed<br \/> for his salvation. And after forty years, God finally said &#8216;yes&#8217;.&#8221; Jeremiah<br \/> concludes, &#8220;It pays to pray.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>2.<br \/> &#8220;Bring it full circle.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Go back to the front of the message where it all began, to the issue it raised,<br \/> the problem it presented, the need, the question, the allusion, and now tie<br \/> it together. Let the message end where it began. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> One of Francis Schaeffer&#8217;s most memorable sermons was &#8220;The Lord&#8217;s Work in the<br \/> Lord&#8217;s Way.&#8221; In his introduction, he quotes the first verse of a hymn which<br \/> his theological school always sang at commencements. In the conclusion, he quotes<br \/> the last verse, and ties the message together perfectly. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> In the introduction to the sermon &#8220;Jesus said, &#8216;Father&#8217;,&#8221; J. Wallace Hamilton<br \/> tells of the time G. Studdert Kennedy was walking on the seashore at night,<br \/> taking in the majesty of the stars while massive waves crashed against a nearby<br \/> cliff. Kennedy was so conscious of a divine presence nearby that he felt like<br \/> asking, &#8220;Who goes there?&#8221; Eventually, the impression was so strong he did call<br \/> out those words, and received back the answer, a single word, &#8220;God,&#8221; that imbedded<br \/> itself in his heart. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Hamilton&#8217;s sermon went on to present various ways people have answered the question,<br \/> &#8220;Who goes there?&#8221; and climaxes with the divine revelation in Jesus. He concludes<br \/> this message with the story of the prodigal son: <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Every<br \/> evening the father had watched down the road from the roof top, and one evening<br \/> there he was  &#8211;  something in the way he walked was familiar. And when<br \/> he was a great way off, the father saw him and ran. There was a heart cry in<br \/> the twilight, and the lights went on in the father&#8217;s house. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">That<br \/> is God, said Jesus. Someone out there on the road . . . calling your name. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> In his sermon &#8220;Pulling Weeds,&#8221; Alistair Begg advises couples headed for the<br \/> marriage altar to uproot unhealthy influences and patterns that have grown up<br \/> in their lives. He begins the sermon with a story from his own gardening. He<br \/> knows only one way of dealing with weeds, and that is to uproot them immediately,<br \/> ruthlessly, and consistently. The sermon lists various traits that need eradicating<br \/> from a marriage. Begg ends the sermon: &#8220;No matter how much effort goes into<br \/> the preparation and planting of a garden, it will all be in vain if the weeds<br \/> are not dealt with. Let us then resolve to tackle them immediately, ruthlessly,<br \/> and consistently.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Ralph Sockman introduced a sermon, &#8220;The Divine at the Door,&#8221; with two Scriptural<br \/> pictures he found intriguing. In the first, from John 20, the newly risen Jesus<br \/> materializes inside a locked room to meet the disciples. In the second, from<br \/> Revelation 3, Jesus stands at the door and knocks for admission into the human<br \/> heart. He enters the first without an invitation, but waits for the other to<br \/> be opened from the inside. Sockman&#8217;s sermon deals with the need for the Lord<br \/> Jesus in the affairs of men. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> He concludes: &#8220;Let us keep the two pictures of Christ before us. One, the powerful<br \/> Christ who pervades every situation, social, financial, internation. &#8216;Jesus<br \/> cometh, the doors being shut, and stood in their midst.&#8217; The other, the Christ<br \/> so personal, so patient, waiting for little people like ourselves to open the<br \/> door . . . .Christ has the keys to the world&#8217;s situations. But we have the keys<br \/> to ourselves.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">3.<br \/> &#8220;Focus on your hearers.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> What are you now wanting your audience to do? What do you wish them to carry<br \/> away, what actions to take? Listen to any sermon from Billy Graham. &#8220;I&#8217;m going<br \/> to ask you to get up from your seats and come forward and stand here and commit<br \/> your life to Jesus Christ.&#8221; Not one soul in a stadium full is in doubt as to<br \/> where Mr. Graham is going with his message or what people are being asked to<br \/> do. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Martin Niemoller ended a sermon on brotherly love with this call: &#8220;And therefore<br \/> I ask you, dear brethren, for more than your sympathy, for more than your monetary<br \/> help, on behalf of the church of Christ. We live by the fact that he laid down<br \/> his life for us, and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Martyn Lloyd-Jones ends a sermon called &#8220;Facing All the Facts&#8221; with this call:<br \/> &#8220;Do not merely go to church to consider your present prospects; consider your<br \/> latter end . . . go immediately to God and confess your blindness, your prejudice,<br \/> your folly in trusting to your own understanding, and ask Him to receive you.<br \/> Tell Him you accept His message concerning Jesus Christ His only Begotten Son,<br \/> Who came into the world to die for your sins and to deliver you, and yield yourself<br \/> to Him and rely upon Him and His power. Give yourself unreservedly to Him in<br \/> Christ and you will see life with a wholeness and a blessedness you have never<br \/> known before.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Arguably, Winston Churchill was the Twentieth Century&#8217;s greatest orator. Historians<br \/> like to say he mobilized the English language and sent it into battle. When<br \/> asked Churchill&#8217;s contribution to the successful outcome of the Second World<br \/> War, one critic remarked, &#8220;He talked.&#8221; Indeed he did, but how he talked. His<br \/> speeches are still read and marveled at today, particularly the ones from 1940<br \/> when Britain stood virtually along against Hitler and Churchill had to rally<br \/> his nation to faithfulness. What strikes us about those messages today is that<br \/> the most memorable parts, the segments which still soar and which in that day<br \/> brought audiences to their feet and drove Brits to make just one more sacrifice,<br \/> those portions are all found in the concluding words, in the final paragraph. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> On June 4, 1940, Churchill had the unenviable task of explaining his country&#8217;s<br \/> defeat at Dunkirk, when hundreds of thousands of English troops were evacuated<br \/> from the French coast and brought home across the Channel. Most of the lengthy<br \/> speech gave detailed explanations and no-nonsense analyses of what had happened,<br \/> and what Churchill expected to occur. He will not guarantee the Nazis will not<br \/> invade and so far, he had not been able to bring any other nation to their defense.<br \/> They are alone. With that, he concludes: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p> . . . we<br \/> shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France,<br \/> we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence<br \/> and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the<br \/> cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing<br \/> grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in<br \/> the hills; we shall never surrender . . . <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"justify\">People<br \/> today with no idea of the context of those remarks can practically recite them<br \/> by heart. Citizens who kept diaries in those dark days would write: &#8220;Winston<br \/> spoke by wireless tonight and rallied the nation.&#8221; A Scottish soldier, evacuated<br \/> from Dunkirk and dumped on a road outside Dover, scared and in shock, heard<br \/> Churchill on the radio that night. Later, he said, &#8220;I cried when I heard him<br \/> say &#8216;we shall never surrender&#8217; and I thought, &#8216;We&#8217;re going to win!&#8217;&#8221; <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Two weeks later, Churchill began to prepare his people for what history would<br \/> call the Battle of Britain. In a short speech, he said, &#8220;Upon this battle depends<br \/> the survival of Christian civilization . . . . The whole fury and might of the enemy<br \/> must very soon be turned on us.&#8221; Stand up to Hitler and Europe would be free,<br \/> he promised. Fail to do so and the Dark Ages would return. Then, he concluded: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p> Let us therefore<br \/> brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British<br \/> Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will say, &#8216;This<br \/> was their finest hour.&#8217; <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"justify\">Some<br \/> would object, with good reason, that Churchill had weeks to prepare a single<br \/> message, a staff to handle his research, and days to seek the ideal closing.<br \/> Pastors deliver two or more messages a week, and do not have the time, energy,<br \/> or resources to hammer out works of oratorical splendor which will be studied<br \/> in seminary classrooms of the future. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Churchill stands as the ideal. We study his speeches as prime examples of how<br \/> it is done. Anyone assigned to motivate people with words can benefit from studying<br \/> this one who overcame great obstacles in his life to learn how to speak, then<br \/> devoted a lifetime to perfecting his craft. In Churchill, we have one who knew<br \/> the value of the spoken word, who knew how to prepare a message, who knew precisely<br \/> what he was doing at the lectern or in front of a microphone, and who chose<br \/> each word, formed each sentence, for its desired effect. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> One thing Churchill did not do, however, was leave the closing of a message<br \/> to chance. Even what seemed spontaneous was the result of planning. A friend<br \/> teased, &#8220;Winston has spent the best years of his life writing impromptu speeches.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Of the three methods for crafting effective conclusions, we observe that Churchill&#8217;s<br \/> favorite was to focus on his hearers. He inserted himself into their place,<br \/> knew their fears and questions and pride in their heritage, then used all these<br \/> to rally their highest ideals and awaken their courage. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> When I began this little exercise before my computer, the obvious question confronting<br \/> me was how I would conclude. After all, a preacher advising other preachers<br \/> on improving their art must demonstrate he has a grasp of the subject. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> I have three choices. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> I can tell a story. Perhaps I should tell of hearing the inimitable Calvin Miller<br \/> compare sermonizing to flying a plane. The introduction is taxiing down the<br \/> runway for takeoff and climbing. As the sermon progresses, we make our journey<br \/> across the landscape to our destination. Finally comes the descent and landing,<br \/> and the final stop at the gate. Just as some sermons never get off the ground,<br \/> and some have trouble knowing where they are going, others keep circling the<br \/> airport unable to land. I fear I have preached every one of these sermons. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> I can come full circle. We can return to the football metaphor and talk about<br \/> bursting through red zones and scoring. We could point out that this after all<br \/> is the object of the game, and that the number of yards a team amasses, the<br \/> ratio of passing attempts to completions, and a thousand other statistics are<br \/> just so much window dressing if the team does not win. It&#8217;s all about winning. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> I can focus on the hearers. Or in this case, the readers. Those who read this<br \/> article, who subscribe to this magazine, are preachers saddled with the burden<br \/> and honored with the privilege of finding and building and delivering sermons<br \/> week after week, year after year. I think I&#8217;ll choose this conclusion. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Pastor, the next time you prepare a sermon, try this. Lay out your sermon on<br \/> paper, complete with main points and illustrations, and study it closely. Decide<br \/> first how to introduce your message. Then, move to the end and pick up that<br \/> theme again. Tie the points of your message together into a single, simple statement<br \/> concerning God&#8217;s power in the world, His plan for the kingdom, or His will for<br \/> His people. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Then, reflect on whether something has happened in your life that would be an<br \/> apt illustration of that truth. It may be something you have read, a story you<br \/> heard, a quote you have saved. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Remember this is no time to introduce new thoughts, new Scriptures, new mandates.<br \/> All you are doing is bringing it home across the finish line. Like you promised<br \/> them at first. <\/p>\n<p>____________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-style: italic\" align=\"justify\">Joe<br \/> McKeever is Director of Missions for the Baptist Association of Greater New<br \/> Orleans (LA). His cartoons frequently appear in Preaching.<\/p>\n<div style='clear:both'><\/div>\n<div class='the_champ_sharing_container the_champ_horizontal_sharing' data-super-socializer-href=\"https:\/\/www.preaching.com\/articles\/negotiating-the-red-zone-taking-your-sermon-to-a-successful-conclusion\/\">\n<div class='the_champ_sharing_title' style=\"font-weight:bold\">Share This On:<\/div>\n<div class=\"the_champ_sharing_ul\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style='clear:both'><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Thanksgiving Day, sprawled on my couch watching a football game, I had an epiphany about preaching. The home team was scoring at every opportunity &#8211; moving up and down the field, connecting on passes, breaking through lines, racking up touchdowns, and kicking extra points. The visiting team was strong in a lot of ways, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/negotiating-the-red-zone-taking-your-sermon-to-a-successful-conclusion\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Negotiating The Red Zone: Taking Your Sermon To A Successful Conclusion&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sermons"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35027"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35027\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35027"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35027"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}