{"id":35117,"date":"2022-09-10T21:56:11","date_gmt":"2022-09-11T02:56:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/leslie-d-weatherhead-the-sermon-as-psychotherapy\/"},"modified":"2022-09-10T21:56:11","modified_gmt":"2022-09-11T02:56:11","slug":"leslie-d-weatherhead-the-sermon-as-psychotherapy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/leslie-d-weatherhead-the-sermon-as-psychotherapy\/","title":{"rendered":"Leslie D. Weatherhead: The Sermon As Psychotherapy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This<br \/> preacher is of interest to all students of the craft if only because he was<br \/> one of the most widely heard English preachers in the post-World War II years.<br \/> In his masterly chronicle entitled A History of Pastoral Care in America,<br \/> E. Brooks Holifield describes the direction in this discipline in the book&#8217;s<br \/> subtitle: From Salvation to Self-Realization. A corresponding movement<br \/> within preaching saw the increasing horizontalization and psychologization of<br \/> the sermon with Leslie Weatherhead beating the loudest drum in the British Isles.<br \/> In North America the attractive and engaging preaching of the liberal Harry<br \/> Emerson Fosdick along with the &#8220;life-situation preaching&#8221; of Charles<br \/> F. Kemp (as in The Preaching Pastor) turned the focus of pulpit discourse<br \/> increasingly manward.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The<br \/> ascendency of audience-centered, problem-solving preaching in our time finds<br \/> its roots in these earlier advocates of preaching as psychotherapy. While we<br \/> would not give way for a moment to those extremists who rant and rave incessantly<br \/> against psychology (after all there is psychology and there is pop psychology),<br \/> psychological insight can never be a substitute for Scriptural Revelation. Sound<br \/> insights from this discipline are relevant for the preacher, the counsellor,<br \/> the exegete, the historian, but psychology is not theology and is severely limited<br \/> in what it can yield to us. Since &#8220;nature abhors a vacuum,&#8221; we see<br \/> in Weatherhead a tragic instance in which psychical research replaced &#8220;sound<br \/> doctrine.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Leslie<br \/> D. Weatherhead was born into a Wesleyan home near London in 1893. He early felt<br \/> the nudge to overseas ministry and matriculated at Cliff College and Richmond<br \/> College, Methodist training schools. In 1916 he went to Madras to serve the<br \/> Georgetown Church where in response to his public invitations, many stood to<br \/> be counted for Christ. In his younger son&#8217;s memoir (Leslie Weatherhead: A<br \/> Personal Portrait), we trace his growing faith in human nature and his capitulation<br \/> to liberal theology. He served briefly as a military chaplain in Basra in Iraq<br \/> in World War I, and then after marrying in India, returned in 1922 to England.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Weatherhead<br \/> served two substantial Methodist churches, in Manchester and the famous Brunswick<br \/> Church in Leeds where his successor was W.E. Sangster, a true gospel-preaching<br \/> Methodist. Weatherhead drew crowds wherever he preached. He did this even with<br \/> a rather unattractive highly-pitched voice. What was his secret? He always appealed<br \/> strongly to the emotions &#8211; he was a &#8220;feeling&#8221; preacher and would<br \/> use the proverbial tearjerker. He loved language and could turn a phrase but<br \/> was always forthright if not blunt. He had a great sense of humor and after<br \/> his preaching at St. Giles in Edinburgh it was said that it was &#8220;the first<br \/> time they had laughed in St. Giles.&#8221; His language was quite free and had<br \/> to be edited for publication. He delighted in the loud laconic whisper. But<br \/> above all, he genuinely cared for people. He could embrace a crowd of people.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In<br \/> 1936 he took the call to the venerable Congregational citadel, the three hundred<br \/> year old City Temple at Holbum Viaduct, the only non-conformist church in the<br \/> City of London itself. Tracing back to the Poultry Chapel and Thomas Goodwin<br \/> in Puritan days, this was the domicile of such worthies as Joseph Parker, R.J.<br \/> Campbell, Joseph Fort Newton and F.W. Norwood. During Weatherhead&#8217;s 24 year<br \/> incumbency, the building was destroyed in the Nazi blitz of 1941 and the congregation<br \/> wandered until the new City Temple was dedicated in 1958, built largely through<br \/> the generosity of John D. Rockefeller and American funds. He retired in 1960.<br \/> Even with a successor such as Leonard Griffiths, the City Temple did not survive<br \/> very long and today is used by a zealous group of American Presbyterian charismatics.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The<br \/> fact is that Weatherhead jettisoned historic Christianity and something had<br \/> to fill the vacuum &#8211; current events, preferring Q&amp;A to preaching in<br \/> the services and above all his deep immersion into modern psychology all made<br \/> a gallant effort for something to say. He early on denied any transactual atonement<br \/> or the efficacy of the Blood of Jesus (A Plain Man Looks at the Cross)<br \/> and the bodily resurrection of Christ (The Manner of the Resurrection in<br \/> the Light of Modern Science and Psychical Research). The Virgin Birth was<br \/> dismissed early and &#8220;the legion&#8221; of demons probably meant that the<br \/> man had been molested as a child by Roman legionnaires. He regularly attended<br \/> spiritist seances and used hypnosis in his healing practice. Like his friend,<br \/> Donald Soper, he was an ardent pacifist and a leader in the strong movement<br \/> in England in the thirties which kept England from arming itself against the<br \/> rise of Hitler. He ultimately finished his PhD at the University of London (Psychology,<br \/> Religion and Healing). This volume also includes his Beecher Lectures of<br \/> 1949 which Yale asked him to change &#8220;late in the day&#8221; because they<br \/> were so manifestly psychological and not in any way homiletical.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Privately<br \/> almost a recluse but publicly a man of immense charm and &#8220;awful nerve,&#8221;<br \/> he himself grappled with very serious physical and psychological problems throughout<br \/> his long life. The Book of Joshua was &#8220;irrelevant nonsense&#8221; to him<br \/> and the Apostle Paul was hopelessly neurotic. He inclined to believe that the<br \/> priest Zechariah was the father of Jesus and Archbishop William Temple was more<br \/> inspired than the Apostle Paul. No wonder his sermons are vacuous and empty.<br \/> In such collections as That Mortal Sea and This is the Victory<br \/> we see a good example of a brilliant preacher&#8217;s efforts who believed that we<br \/> would be advised to seek our theology more from the poets than the Church Fathers.<br \/> Of course John Wesley appeared to him in a seance so he had special sources.<br \/> In Over His Own Signature he does seek to base the message on the &#8220;I<br \/> am&#8221; sayings of Jesus, but this was very rare.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">What<br \/> strikes me as one who has kept somewhat abreast of the discipline, is that his<br \/> psychology and Freudianism are now so severely dated. No one today talks about<br \/> odic force and the leakage of psychic energy. His 55 books are virtually unread<br \/> today. Yet &#8220;the genius of the gospels&#8221; and the writings of the Apostle<br \/> Paul continue their contextualized impact around a modern and post-modern world<br \/> in the winning of many to Christ and the building up of the Church. There are<br \/> insights to be valued in a thoughtful psychological probing of human behavior,<br \/> but I doubt the sea of Galilee in John 21 is a picture of the unconscious mind<br \/> or that the psychic scar Moses bore from his exposure to the Nile as a baby<br \/> explains his striking the rock in the Book of Numbers.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In<br \/> one of his first books, After Death?, he concludes that hell is subjective,<br \/> judgment is self judgment and forgiveness is absolute. A critic of the liberal<br \/> mainline (one of their own, James D. Smart) diagnosed the problem as The<br \/> Strange Silence of the Bible in the Church. Can evangelicals expect any<br \/> different fate if there seems to be a growing &#8220;Strange Silence of the<br \/> Bible&#8221; among us? Can anything take the place of the opening of the<br \/> Word and the exposition of the Gospel of Christ?<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">_______________________________<\/p>\n<p>David<br \/> L. Larsen is Professor Emeritus of Preaching of Trinity Ev. Divinity School.<\/p>\n<div style='clear:both'><\/div>\n<div class='the_champ_sharing_container the_champ_horizontal_sharing' data-super-socializer-href=\"https:\/\/www.preaching.com\/articles\/past-masters\/leslie-d-weatherhead-the-sermon-as-psychotherapy\/\">\n<div class='the_champ_sharing_title' style=\"font-weight:bold\">Share This On:<\/div>\n<div class=\"the_champ_sharing_ul\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style='clear:both'><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This preacher is of interest to all students of the craft if only because he was one of the most widely heard English preachers in the post-World War II years. In his masterly chronicle entitled A History of Pastoral Care in America, E. Brooks Holifield describes the direction in this discipline in the book&#8217;s subtitle: &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/leslie-d-weatherhead-the-sermon-as-psychotherapy\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Leslie D. Weatherhead: The Sermon As Psychotherapy&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sermons"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35117\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.biblia.work\/sermons\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}