Annas
ANNAS
A high priest of the Jews, Luk 3:2 ; Joh 18:13,24 ; Mal 4:6 . He is mentioned in Luke as being high priest along with Caiaphas, his son in-law. He was first appointed to that office by Cyrenius, or Quirinus, proconsul of Syria, about A. D. 7 or 8, but was afterwards deprived of it. After various changes, the office was given to Joseph, also called Caiaphas, the son-in-law of Annas, about A. D. 25, who continued in office until A. D. 35 or 36. In the passages of the New Testament above cited, therefore, it is apparent that Caiaphas was the only actual and proper high priest; but Annas being his father-in-law, and having been formerly himself high priest, and being also perhaps his substitute, had great influence and authority, and could with propriety be still termed high priest along with Caiaphas. It was before him that Christ was first taken on the night of his seizure. He also assisted in presiding over the Sanhedrin which sat in judgment upon Peter and John, Mal 4:6 .
Fuente: American Tract Society Bible Dictionary
Annas
(Gr. , Heb. , merciful [in Josephus, Ananos])
Annas the son of Sethi, appointed high priest by Quirinius in a.d. 6 or 7, retained office till he was deposed by Valerius Gratus in a.d. 15 (Jos. Ant. XVIII. ii. 1, 2). Josephus tells us that he was regarded as the most fortunate of men, for he had live sons who all held the office of high priest (Ant. XX. ix. 1). From the Fourth Gospel we learn that Joseph Caiaphas, the high priest at the date of the Crucifixion, was a son-in-law of Annas (Joh 18:13). His removal from office in a.d. 15 did not by any means diminish his influence. Being extremely wealthy, he was able to exert the powers of high priest long after he was deposed. His wealth and that of his sons was acquired by the institution of the booths or bazaars of the sons of Annas, which enjoyed the monopoly for the sale of all kinds of sacrificial requirements. These booths were situated either in the temple court (Keim, Jesus of Nazara, v. 116; Edersheim, LT [Note: T Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah (Edersheim).] iii. 5) or on the Mount of Olives (J. Derenbourg, Essai sur lhistoire de la Palestine, 1867, p. 465). The words of Jesus regarding the unholy traffic (Mat 21:13, Luk 19:46) aroused the hostility of the priestly party and led to His arrest and examination by Annas (Joh 18:13-24). The Talmud accuses the sons of Annas of serpentlike hissings (or whisperings [Pes. 57a]). Probably the meaning is that they exerted private influence on the judges and perverted justice for their own ends. Their attitude towards Jesus and the apostles as revealed in the NT seems to bear out this interpretation. Although, as we have seen, Annas was deposed from the high-priestly office in a.d. 15, he retains the title all through the NT. Both Josephus and the writers of the NT uniformly give the title high priest not only to the actual occupant of the office at the time, but to all his predecessors who were still alive, as well as to all the more influential members of the families from which the high priests were selected. The phrase in Luk 3:2 in the high-priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas is unique, and may be accounted for by the fact that the combination had become so familiar in connexion with the history of the Crucifixion that St. Luke couples the two together here (Ewald, Hl, vol. vi. [1883] p. 430, n. [Note: . note.] 3).
The important and influential position held by Annas even after his deposition is proved by the fact that it was to him that Jesus was first sent before He appeared at the more formal tribunal of the Sanhedrin (Joh 18:13). The interview with Annas (Joh 18:19-23) determined the fate of the prisoner, and probably Annas was the chief instigator in compassing the death. In Act 4:6 Annas again appears as the head of the party who tried the apostles and enjoined them to keep silent about the Resurrection.
Literature.-Josephus, Antiquities, passim; A. Edersheim, LT [Note: T Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah (Edersheim).] i. [1886] 263; T. Keim, Jesus of Nazara, 1867-1882, vi. 36ff.; E. Schrer, GJV [Note: JV Geschichte des jdischen Volkes (Schrer).] 4 ii. [1907] 256, 270, 274, 275.
W. F. Boyd.
Fuente: Dictionary of the Apostolic Church
Annas
Jewish high priest A.D. 6-15, son of Seth. His son-in-law, Caiaphas, was high priest during the ministry of Our Lord, but Annas was still influential. He interrogated Our Lord and delivered Him bound to Caiaphas and the Sanhedrin for trial (John, 28).
Fuente: New Catholic Dictionary
Annas
(According to Blass and Wescott-Hort, Annas; Josephus, Ananos). Name (cf. Heb. Hãnãn, Syr. Hanãn) of same derivation as Hannah (see ANNA).
Annas, son of Seth, succeeded (A. D. 6 or 7) Joazar in the high-priesthood by appointment of Quirinius who had come to Judea to attend to the incorporation of Archelaus’s territory into the Roman province of Syria (Josephus, Ant., XVIII, ii, 1). After his deposition (A. D. 15) by V. Gratus, the high-priests followed upon one another in rapid succession: Ismael, Eleazar (son of Annas; perhaps the Alexander of Acts 4:6, Alexander being the Græcized name of Eleazar), Simon, until we come to Joseph, called Caiaphas, who knew how to retain the favour of the Roman authorities from A. D. 18 to 36 (Josephus, Ant., XVIII, ii, 2). But his deposition did not deprive Annas of his influence which must have remained considerable, to judge by the fact that beside Eleazar, his son, and Joseph Caiaphas, his son-in-law (John 18:13), four other sons, viz., Jonathan (perhaps the John of Acts 4:6, where D reads ionathas), Theophilus, Matthias, Annas (Ananos) II, obtained the dignity of high-priests (Jos., Ant., XVIII, iv, 3; v, 3; XIX, vi, 4; XX, ix, I). The New Testament references to Annas convey the same impression. His name appears with that of Joseph Caiaphas, who was the actual high-priest during the ministry of the Saviour (Matthew 26:3, 57; John 11:49, 51) in the elaborate synchronisms wherewith St. Luke introduces the public ministry of Our Lord (Luke 3:2). The commanding position of the former high-priest is attested also by the prominent place awarded to him in Acts, iv, 6; here Annas is introduced as “the High-Priest”, whilst Joseph Caiaphas’s name simply follows with those of the other members of the high-priestly race. Those formulæ, which might leave on the reader the impression that the author considered Annas and Caiaphas as discharging the functions of the high-priesthood simultaneously (Luke 3:2), or even that Annas alone was the actual high-priest (Acts 4:6), have given rise to many hypotheses — more or less plausible. They are to be considered as not strictly accurate, but they are a testimony to the ascendency of Annas. But Annas is more than a mere chronological landmark in the life of the Saviour; according to our common text of John, xviii, 13-27, Annas would have played a part at a decisive point of the life of Jesus. After His arrest, the Lord is brought directly to Annas, in whose palace a kind of unofficial, preliminary interrogatory takes place, an episode entirely omitted by the Synoptists. It must be said, however, that the common text seems to be here in a disturbed condition, as Maldonatus had already remarked (I, 427-428). If the order of Syr. Sin. (XVIII, 13, 24, 14-15, 19-23, 16-18, 25-27) be adopted, the succession of the facts gains in clearness and consistency, though the Annas episode becomes altogether secondary in the narrative. The “house of Annas”, wealthy and unscrupulous, is pronounced accursed in the Talmud, together with “the corrupt leaders of the priesthood”, whose presence defiled the sanctuary (Edersheim, Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah I, 263 f.).
———————————–
Commentaries on Luke, iii, 2, especially those of SCHANZ, PLUMMER, WEISS, and HOLTZMANN; on Acts, iv, 6. KNOWLING, Expositor’s Greek Testament (New York, 1900), II, and BLASS; on John, xxviii, 12-27, CALMES, Commentaries (Paris, 1904), 419-422; ZARN, Einl. in das N. T. (Leipzig, 1900), II, 509, 510, 524; DRUMMOND, The Authorship and Character of the Fourth Gospel (London, 1903), 434-436; MOFFATT, The Historical N. T. (Edinburgh, 1901), p. xl and 693 sqq.; BRUNEAU, Harmony of the Gospels (New York, 1898), 121 sqq. of Synopse évangélique (Paris, 1901), 165 sqq.; SCHÜRER, The Jewish People in the Time of J. C. (tr.) Div. II, I, 182 sqq., 198, and 202-206.
EDWARD ARBEZ. Transcribed by Douglas J. Potter Dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary
The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume ICopyright © 1907 by Robert Appleton CompanyOnline Edition Copyright © 2003 by K. KnightNihil Obstat, March 1, 1907. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., CensorImprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York
Fuente: Catholic Encyclopedia
Annas
(, probably a contracted form of the name Ananiah in its Greek form, ), a highpriest of the Jews mentioned in Luke (3, 2) as being high-priest along with Caiaphas his son-in-law. Our Lord’s first hearing (Joh 18:13) was before Annas, who then sent him bound to Caiaphas. In Act 4:6, he is plainly called the high-priest, and Caiaphas merely named with others of his family. He is called by Josephus Ananus (q.v.) the son of Seth; and was first appointed to that office in his 37th year by Quirinus, proconsul of Syria, about A.D. 7 (Ant. 18, 2, 1), but was afterward deprived of it by Valerius Gratus, procurator of Judaea (A.D. 14), who gave the office first to Ismael the son of Phabaeus, and a short time after to Eleazar the son of Annas (Josephus, Ant. 18, 2, 1 and 2). He held the office one year, and was then succeeded by Simon the son of Camithus, who, after another year, was followed by Joseph, also called Caiaphas, the son-in-law of Annas, A.D. ante 27, who continued in office until A.D. 37. In the passages of the New Testament above cited, therefore, it is apparent that Caiaphas was the only actual and proper high- priest; but Annas, being his father-in-law, and having been formerly himself high-priest, and being also perhaps his substitute (sagan), had great influence and authority, and could with great propriety be still termed high- priest along with Caiaphas. (See Anger, De temp. p. 185: Lightfoot, Hor. Hebrews p. 744 sq.; Rus, Harmon. Evang. 1, 313 sq.; III, 2:962 sq.; Vitringa, Observ. Sacr. 6, 529 sq.; Casaubon, Exerc. antibar. p. 216 sq.; Wieseler, Chronol. Synops. p. 186 sq.; Selden, De Synedriis, 2, 655; Saubert, De Sacerdotio Ebrceor. 1, 5; Kuinol, Comment. on Luk 3:2.) SEE HIGH-PRIEST. He died at an advanced age, and was succeeded by his first son in the sacerdotal dignity (Josephus, Ant. 20, 9, 1).
Fuente: Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature
Annas
was high priest A.D. 7-14. In A.D. 25 Caiaphas, who had married the daughter of Annas (John 18:13), was raised to that office, and probably Annas was now made president of the Sanhedrim, or deputy or coadjutor of the high priest, and thus was also called high priest along with Caiaphas (Luke 3:2). By the Mosaic law the high-priesthood was held for life (Num. 3:10); and although Annas had been deposed by the Roman procurator, the Jews may still have regarded him as legally the high priest. Our Lord was first brought before Annas, and after a brief questioning of him (John 18:19-23) was sent to Caiaphas, when some members of the Sanhedrim had met, and the first trial of Jesus took place (Matt. 26:57-68). This examination of our Lord before Annas is recorded only by John. Annas was president of the Sanhedrim before which Peter and John were brought (Acts 4:6).
Fuente: Easton’s Bible Dictionary
Annas
Son of Seth. Appointed A.D. 7, in his 37th year, to the high priesthood by Quirinius, the imperial governor of Syria; obliged to give way to Ismael by Valerius Gratus, procurator of Judaea, in the beginning of Tiberius’ reign, A.D. 14. Eleazar, son of Annas, followed Ismael; then Simon; then Joseph Caiaphas, son-in-law of Annas (Joh 18:13.) He remained until A.D. 37. Annas is put before Caiaphas, and both are called “high priests (Luk 3:2). Jesus’ case was first heard before Annas, who virtually wielded the high priest’s power, and perhaps was sagan, the high priest’s deputy; then He was tried before Caiaphas. Annas probably was president of the Sanhedrin, Caiaphas actually high priest. But in Act 4:6 Annas is called “high priest,” Caiaphas, John, and Alexander are called “of his kindred.” He lived to old age, and had five sons high priests.
Fuente: Fausset’s Bible Dictionary
Annas
ANNAS (, Heb. , Hanan, Josephus , Ananos).High priest of the Jews from a.d. 6 to 15, and thereafter exercising commanding influence through his high priestly rank and his family connexions. The son of one named Sethi, who is otherwise unknown, he was appointed high priest by Quirinius, probably in a.d. 6, and exercised that office, which involved political as well as religious headship of the nation, until he was deposed by the procurator Valerius Gratus in a.d. 15 (Josephus Ant. xviii. ii. 2). The duration of his rule, and the fact that of his sons no fewer than five succeeded him at intervals in the high priesthood (which has never happened to any other of our high priests), caused him to be regarded by his contemporaries as a specially successful man (Ant. xx. ix. 1). On the other hand, he incurred in an unusual degree the unpopularity for which the high priests were proverbial. In addition to their common faults of arrogance and injustice, Annas was notorious for his avarice, which found opportunity in the necessities of the Temple worshippers. It was he, probably, who established the bazaars of the sons of Annas (hnnyth bn Hnn), a Temple market for the sale of materials requisite for sacrifices, either within the Temple precinct (Keim, Jesus of Nazara, v. 116) or on the Mount of Olives (Derenbourg), the profits of which enriched the high priestly family. Beyond this, the house of Annas is charged with the special sin of whispering or hissing like vipers, which seems to refer to private influence on the judges, whereby morals were corrupted, judgment perverted, and the Shekinah withdrawn from Israel (Edersheim, Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, i. 263).
Annas is referred to by St. Luke and by St. John. In Luk 3:2 (in the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas) he is linked with Caiaphas, who alone was actually high priest at the time (a.d. 26). The explanation of this is found partly in the fact that the office having become to some extent the prerogative of a few families, it had acquired some degree of hereditary and indelible quality, and partly in the unusual personal authority exercised by Annas. The result was that even after his deposition he continued to enjoy much of the influence, and even to receive the title, of his former office (Schrer, HJP [Note: JP History of the Jewish People.] ii. i. 195 ff.; against this Keim, l.c. vi. 36 ff.; H. Holtzmann, Hdeom. ad Luk 3:2). In like manner in Act 4:6 Annas appears at the head of the chiefs of the Sanhedrin in its action against the Apostles, though the actual president was the high priest. See Chief Priests.
The only other passage in which Annas is referred to is in the narrative of the trial of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel (Joh 18:13-24). The Evangelist, speaking with technical accuracy, refrains from calling him high priest, and assigns as a reason for Jesus being led before Annas the relationship between Annas and Caiaphas. The ex-highpriest had probably been the chief instigator of the plot against Jesus, and before him He was brought not for trial, but only for an informal and private examination (so Schrer, l.c. p. 182). The Lord Himself is questioned, but there is no mention of witnesses, no adjuration, no sentence, no sign of any legal process (Westcott, ad loc.).
C. A. Scott.
Fuente: A Dictionary Of Christ And The Gospels
Annas
ANNAS.1. High priest from a.d. 6 to 15, an astute and powerful ecclesiastical statesman. At the time of our Lords trial he was merely high priest emeritus, and his son-in-law Caiaphas, the acting high priest, presided ex officio over the meeting of the Sanhedrin (Joh 18:24, Mat 26:67). Nevertheless, since the high priest emeritus retained not only his title (cf. Joh 18:15-16; Joh 18:19; Joh 18:22, Act 4:6), but all his obligations and many of his prerogatives, it is not surprising that the masterful Annas took an active and independent part in the proceedings. After Jesus arrest at dead of night, they led him to Annas first (Joh 18:13). The Sanhedrin might not meet until daybreak, and the interval seemed well employed in a preliminary examination of the prisoner by the skilful veteran (Joh 18:12; Joh 18:19-23). Subsequently be took part also in the trial of Peter and John (Act 4:6). 2. 1Es 9:32 = Ezr 10:31 Harim.
David Smith.
Fuente: Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible
Annas
anas (, Annas; Westcott and Hort, The New Testament in Greek Hannas; Josephus Ananos, the Greek form of Hebrew , hanan; merciful, gracious; compare Neh 8:7, etc.):
(1) A high priest of the Jews, the virtual head of the priestly party in Jerusalem in the time of Christ, a man of commanding influence. He was the son of Seth (Josephus: Sethi), and was elevated to the high-priesthood by Quirinius, governor of Syria, 7 ad. At this period the office was filled and vacated at the caprice of the Roman procurators, and Annas was deposed by Valerius Gratus, 15 ad. But though deprived of official status, he continued to wield great power as the dominant member of the hierarchy, using members of his family as his willing instruments. That he was an adroit diplomatist is shown by the fact that five of his sons (Ant., XX, ix, 1) and his son-in-law Caiaphas (Joh 18:13) held the high-priesthood in almost unbroken succession, though he did not survive to see the office filled by his fifth son Annas or Ananus II, who caused Jas the Lord’s brother to be stoned to death (circa 62 ad). Another mark of his continued influence is, that long after he had lost his office he was still called high priest, and his name appears first wherever the names of the chief members of the sacerdotal faction are given. Act 4:6, And Annas the high priest was there, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest. Annas is almost certainly called high priest in Joh 18:19, Joh 18:22, though in Joh 18:13, Joh 18:24 Caiaphas is mentioned as the high priest. Note especially the remarkable phrase in Luk 3:2, in the high-priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, as if they were joint holders of the office. The cases In which Josephus gives the title high-priest to persons who no longer held the office afford no real parallel to this. The explanation seems to be that owing to age, ability and force of character Annas was the virtual, though Caiaphas the titular, high priest. He belonged to the Sadducean aristocracy, and, like others of that class, he seems to have been arrogant, astute, ambitious and enormously wealthy. He and his family were proverbial for their rapacity and greed. The chief source of their wealth seems to have been the sale of requisites for the temple sacrifices, such as sheep, doves, wine and oil, which they carried on in the four famous booths of the sons of Annas on the Mount of Olives, with a branch within the precincts of the temple itself. During the great feasts, they were able to extort high monopoly prices for theft goods. Hence, our Lord’s strong denunciation of those who made the house of prayer a den of robbers (Mar 11:15-19), and the curse in the Talmud, Woe to the family of Annas! Woe to the serpent-like hisses (Pes 57a). As to the part he played in the trial and death of our Lord, although he does not figure very prominently in the gospel narratives, he seems to have been mainly responsible for the course of events. Renan’s emphatic statement is substantially correct, Annas was the principal actor in the terrible drama, and far more than Caiaphas, far more than Pilate, ought to bear the weight of the maledictions of mankind (Life of Jesus). Caiaphas, indeed, as actual high priest, was the nominal head of the Sanhedrin which condemned Jesus, but the aged Annas was the ruling spirit. According to Joh 18:12, Joh 18:13, it was to him that the officers who arrested Jesus led Him first. The reason given for that proceeding (for he was father-in-law of Caiaphas) lays open alike the character of the man and the character of the trial (Westcott, in the place cited). Annas (if he is the high priest of Joh 18:19-23, as seems most likely) questioned Him concerning His disciples and teaching. This trial is not mentioned by the synoptists, probably because it was merely informal and preliminary and of a private nature, meant to gather material for the subsequent trial. Failing to elicit anything to his purpose from Jesus, Annas therefore sent him bound unto Caiaphas the high priest (Joh 18:24 the King James Version is incorrect and misleading) for formal trial before the Sanhedrin, but as one already stamped with a sign of condemnation (Westcott). Doubtless Annas was present at the subsequent proceedings, but no further mention is made of him in New Testament, except that he was present at the meeting of the Sanhedrin after Pentecost when Peter and John defended themselves for preaching the gospel of the resurrection (Act 4:6).
(2) Head of a family who returned with Ezra (1 Esdras 9:32), called Harim in Ezr 10:31.
Fuente: International Standard Bible Encyclopedia
Annas
[An’nas]
High priest, appointed in A.D. 7 by Cyrenius, or Quirinus, governor of Syria. In the reign of Tiberius he was deposed, and was followed at short intervals by Ismael, Eleasar son of Ananus or Annas, Simon, and Joseph Caiaphas, son-in-law of Annas. Luk 3:2; Joh 18:13; Joh 18:24; Act 4:6. It is supposed that Annas was called high priest by courtesy, having once held the office: the Lord was taken to him first, perhaps as being the father-in-law of Caiaphas. Josephus relates that the five sons of Annas became high priests, and under the last, also named Annas, James the Lord’s brother was martyred. Ant. xx. 9, 1.
Fuente: Concise Bible Dictionary
Annas
G452
Associate high priest with Caiaphas.
Luk 3:2; Joh 18:13; Joh 18:19; Joh 18:24; Act 4:6
Fuente: Nave’s Topical Bible
Annas
Annas (n’nas), answer, response. The son of Seth, and a high priest of the Jews. He was appointed by Quirinus, governor of Syria, a.d. 7, and was removed by Valerius Gratus, procurator of Juda, a.d. 23.
The office was originally held for life, but in Juda’s degenerate and dependent position it was one of the spoils of office, to be given to the ruler’s favorite, and to be taken away upon the loss of favor. After his deposition Annas continued to hold the title; and although Caiaphas, his son-in-law, was the actual high priest, he was the ruling power. This explains the reference in Luk 3:2. This power he retained for nearly fifty years, having had five sons in succession in the high priest’s office. Our Lord was brought first before Annas on the night of his seizure. Joh 18:13; Joh 18:24. The guilt of Christ’s crucifixion rests most upon Annas, since Pilate tried to shield him, and Caiaphas was but Annas’ tool. Annas is mentioned as the president of the Sanhedrin, before whom Peter and John were brought. Act 4:6.
Fuente: People’s Dictionary of the Bible
Annas
Annas. (humble). The son of one Seth was appointed high priest, A.D. 7, by Quirinus, the imperial governor of Syria, but was obliged by Valerius Gratus, procurator of Judea, to give way to Ismael, son of Phabi, at the beginning of the reign of Tiberius, A.D. 14. About A.D. 25, Joseph Caiaphas, son-in-law of Annas, became high priest, Joh 18:13, but in Luk 3:2, Annas and Caiaphas are both called high priests.
Our Lord’s first hearing, Joh 18:13, was before Annas, who then sent him bound to Caiaphas. Some maintain that the two, Annas and Caiaphas, were together at the head of the Jewish people, Caiaphas as actual high priest, Annas as resident of the Sanhedrin. Act 4:6. Others again suppose that Annas held the office of sagin, or substitute of the high priest; others still that Annas held the title and was really the ruling power. He lived to old age, having had five sons high priests.
Fuente: Smith’s Bible Dictionary
ANNAS
High priest
Luk 3:2; Joh 18:13; Act 4:6
Fuente: Thompson Chain-Reference Bible
Annas
or ANANUS, as Josephus calls him, was the son of Seth, and high priest of the Jews. He succeeded Joazar, the son of Simon, enjoyed the high priesthood eleven years, and was succeeded by Ishmael, the son of Phabi. After he was deposed, he still preserved the title of high priest, and had a great share in the management of public affairs. He is called high priest in conjunction with Caiaphas, when John the Baptist entered upon the exercise of his mission; though Calmet thinks that at that time he did not, strictly speaking, possess or officiate in that character, Luk 3:2. On the contrary, Macknight and some others are of opinion, that at this time Caiaphas was only the deputy of Annas. He was father-in-law to Caiaphas; and Jesus Christ was carried before him, directly after his seizure in the garden of Olives, Joh 18:13. Josephus remarks, that Annas was considered as one of the happiest men of his nation, for five of his sons were high priests, and he himself possessed that great dignity many years. This was an instance of good fortune which, till that time, had happened to no person.