Commandments
COMMANDMENTS.As commandments () Jesus recognizes (1) the injunctions of the Decalogue, (2) certain other requirements of similar ethical character laid down in the Law. In one instance (Mar 10:5) the Mosaic regulation for divorce is quoted as a commandment, but its temporary provisional nature is clearly indicated. This commandment, given for a time in view of special circumstances, is implicitly contrasted with the true and abiding . In the case of a purely ritual ordinance the term is used (Mat 8:4, Mar 1:44, Luk 5:14).
The main passages in which our Lord defines His attitude to the commandments are: (1) the exposition in the Sermon on the Mount (Mat 5:17-48); (2) the criticism of Pharisaic tradition (Mat 15:1-20, Mar 7:1-23; cf. also Matthew 23); (3) the reply to the rich young ruler (Mat 19:17-21, Mar 10:19; Mar 10:21, Luk 18:20-22); (4) the dialogue with the lawyer (Mat 22:35-40, Mar 12:28-34, Luk 10:25-37). The treatment of the Sabbath commandment (Mar 2:24-27, Luk 6:1-10; Luk 13:10-16) will have to be considered under Law and Sabbath.
It is assumed by Jesus that the commandments were given directly by God, and as such they are contrasted with the traditions of men (Mat 15:6, Mar 7:8-9). This assumption of their Divine origin determines His whole attitude towards them. As ordained by God they are valid for all time and authoritative; the keeping of them is the necessary condition of eternal life (Mat 19:17, Mar 10:19); men will take rank in the Kingdom of Heaven according to their obedience to the commandments (Mat 5:19). It is objected to the Pharisees as their chief offence that they have perverted and overlaid with tradition the commandments of God (Mat 15:3, Mar 7:7).
In view, then, of the Divine origin of the commandments, Jesus accepts them as the eternal basis of morality. His own ethic is presented not as something new, but as a truer and more inward interpretation of the existing Law. It has been maintained (most notably in recent times by Tolstoi) that Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount enacts an entirely new moral code,five new laws in contrast to those ordained in old time. This, however, is opposed to His own declaration, I came not to destroy but to fulfil. The authority which He claims for Himself is not an authority to originate laws, but to explain more fully in their Divine intention those already laid down by God. It was said to them of old time,I say unto you, implies an opposition not of the Decalogue and the new Christian code, but of the ancient interpretation of the Decalogue and the Christian interpretation. Where the men of old time stopped short with the letter, Jesus unfolds the inward principle which must henceforth be accepted as the true aim of the commandment. Thou shalt not kill prohibits anger, scorn, contention. Thou shalt not commit adultery demands chastity of heart as well as of outward act. The law that forbids false swearing requires in the last resort abstinence from all oaths, and perfect simplicity and truthfulness. The case is somewhat different with the two remaining rules which are subjected to criticism (an eye for an eye, thou shalt love thy neighbour and hate thine enemy). Here our Lord indeed appears to set new laws of His own over against the imperfect maxims of the ancient morality. But He is still emphasizing what He conceives to be the real drift of the Divine legislation, in contrast to the false and limited constructions which men had placed upon it.
The ethical teaching of Jesus is thus based on the Divinely given commandments. It claims to be nothing more than a fulfilment, a reinterpretation of them in the light of their inward spirit and purpose. At the same time, they are so transformed by this unfolding of their ultimate intention, as to result in a code of morality which is radically new. This is recognized in the Fourth Gospel, where the originality of the Christian law is brought into clear prominence (see art. New Commandment). It remains to consider how Jesus, while accepting the commandments, replaced them in effect by a new ethic, different in character as well as wider in range. The process by which He thus transformed them can be traced, with sufficient distinctness, in the Synoptic teaching.
(1) The Moral Law is freed from its association with outward ritual. Jesus does not definitely abrogate the ritual ordinances (ye ought not to leave the other undone, Mat 23:23), but He makes the distinction plain between these and the higher obligations, justice, mercy, and faith. He subordinates the law of the Sabbath to the requirements of duty and humanity (Mar 2:27, Luk 6:9; Luk 13:15-16); He confronts the formal piety of His time with the Divine demand as stated by Hosea: I will have mercy and not sacrifice (Mat 9:13; Mat 12:7); He challenges the whole system of rules concerning meat and drink by His great principle, that which cometh out, not that which goeth in, defileth a man (Mat 15:11, Mar 7:15). This principle, applied to its full extent, meant the abolition of the Levitical law.
(2) In a similar manner the traditions which had gathered around the Law and obscured its genuine meaning are swept away. The ethical teaching of Jesus is directed, in the first place, to restoring the commandments to their original simplicity and purity. In the glosses and corollaries with which Pharisaic ingenuity had overlaid them, He sees an attempt to narrow the scope and weaken the full stringency of the Divine law. He instances the casuistry which made it possible to evade a strict obedience to the command, Honour thy father and mother (Mat 15:5-6, Mar 7:10-13). As against such trifling with the law of God, He insists on an honest acceptance of it in its plain and literal meaning. The ten thousand commandments into which the Decalogue had been divided and subdivided are to give place again to the simple ten.
(3) Not only is the Moral Law restored to its original purity, but it is simplified still further. While accepting the commandments as all given by God, Jesus recognizes that they are of different grades of importance. When the young ruler asked Him which of them were life-giving, He singles out the more distinctively ethical: Do not commit adultery, do not kill, do not steal, do not bear false witness, defraud not, honour thy father and mother (Mar 10:18-19, Mat 19:18-19, Luk 18:20). So the question of the lawyer, Which is the great commandment? is admitted by Jesus to be a just one. It is significant that in His answer to it He does not quote from the Decalogue itself, but from Deu 6:5 and Lev 19:18. He thus indicates that it is not the formal enactments which are sacred and binding, but the grand principles that lie behind them. Those sayings extraneous to the Decalogue, which yet lay bare its essential meaning, are greater than any of the set commandments.
(4) The two requirements thus singled out are declared to be not only the greatest, but the sum and substance of all the others. The Law in its multiplicity runs back to the two root-demands of love to God and love to men. Of these two, Jesus insists on the former as the first and great commandment. The duty of love to God is at once the highest duty required of man, and that which determines the right performance of all the rest. In this sense we must explain the words that follow: The second is like to it (Mat 22:37-39, Mar 12:29-31). Its likeness does not consist merely in its similar largeness of scope or in its similar emphasis on love, but in its essential identity with the other commandment. The love to man which it demands is the outward expression, the evidence and effect of love to God (cf. Gal 5:6 Faith that worketh by love; 1Jn 4:20 He that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?). Thus in our Lords summary of the Law we have more than a resolution of the Ten Commandments into two, corresponding broadly to the two divisions of the Decalogue. We have a clear indication that even those two are ultimately reducible to one.
(5) In this summary the Moral Law, however simplified and purified, is still presented under the form of outward enactment. The early Catholic Church so accepted it, and set the nova lex imposed by Jesus on a similar footing with the Law of Moses. Jesus Himself, however, passed wholly beyond the idea of an outward statutory law. His demand is for an inward disposition so attempered to the will of God that it yields a spontaneous obedience. This demand is implicit in the summary, couched though it is in the terms of formal enactment. It says nothing of particular moral actions, and insists solely on love, the inward frame of mind in which all right conduct has its source and motive: A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good (Luk 6:45); Either make the tree good and his fruit good, or else make the tree corrupt and his fruit corrupt (Mat 12:33). The ultimate aim of our Lords ethical teaching is to produce a morality which will be independent of outward ordinance, and arise spontaneously out of the pure heart.
Thus the Decalogue, which in appearance is only revised and expounded, is virtually superseded by Christ. He bases morality on a new principle of inward harmony with Gods will, and discards the whole idea involved in the term commandment. It follows that in three essential respects His ethic differs from that which found its highest expression in the Decalogue. (a) Its demands are positive as distinguished from the old system of prohibitory rule. The Rabbinical precept, Do not to another what would be painful to yourself, is adopted with a simple change that alters its whole character (Mat 7:12). Where there is an inward impulse to goodness, it will manifest itself in active love towards men, in positive obedience to the will of God. (b) The ethic of Jesus makes an absolute demand in contrast to the limited requirements of the ancient Law. The chief purpose of the exposition in the Sermon on the Mount is to illustrate and enforce this difference. I say unto you, Refrain not only from the forbidden act, but from evil looks and thoughts. Obey the Moral Law without condition or reservation. Be perfect as your Father in heaven is perfect (cf. the seventy times seven of Mat 18:22). This absolute demand is likewise involved in the substitution of an inward spirit for a statutory law. The moral task is no longer outwardly prescribed for us, and makes an infinite claim on our willing obedience. (c) As opposed to the Decalogue with its hard and fast requirements, the teaching of Jesus imposes a law of liberty. The moral life, springing from the inward disposition, is self-determined. It possesses in itself a power of right judgment which makes it independent of any outward direction. It originates its own rules of action, and adapts them with an endless flexibility to all changing circumstances and times.
Our Lords fulfilment of the ancient Law has thus its outcome in a new morality which cannot be separated from His gospel as a whole. What He demands in the last resort is a change of nature such as can be effected only by faith in Him and possession of His spirit. The ultimate bearing of His criticism of the commandments is well indicated in the words of Luther: Habito Christo facile condemus leges et omnia recte judicabimus. Immo novos decalogos faciemus, qui clariores erunt quam Mosis decalogus, sicut facies Christi clarior est quam facies Mosis. See also Ethics.
Literature.The various Commentaries (in their section on the Sermon on the Mount), e.g. Holtzmann (1901), J. Weiss in Meyers Com. (1901); Loisy, Le discours sur la montagne (1903); also articles on same subject in Hasting’s Dictionary of the Bible , Extra Vol. (1904) [cf. art. Decalogue in vol. i.], and Encyc. Bibl. (1903); Weizsacker, Das Apost. Zeitalter (English translation 1897), i. 35 ff.; Pfleiderer, Das Urchristenthum (1887), 489501; Wernle, Die Anfnge unserer Religion (1901), 2369; Herrmann, Ethik (1901), 124140; Harnack, Das Wesen des Christenthums, 45 ff.; Bruce, Apologetics (1895), 346 ff.; Holtzmann, Neutest. Theologie (1897), 130160. To these may be added Tolstois My Religion, and The Spirit of Christs Teaching; also books of popular or homiletical character, such as Horton, Commandments of Jesus; Gore, Sermon on the Mount; Dykes, Manifesto of the King.
E. F. Scott.
Fuente: A Dictionary Of Christ And The Gospels
Commandments
COMMANDMENTS.See Ten Commandments.
Fuente: Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible
Commandments
General references
Exo 13:8-10; Exo 20:3-17; Deu 5:6-21; Deu 4:5; Deu 4:9-10; Deu 6:4-9; Deu 11:18-21; Deu 32:46-47; Jos 8:30-35; 2Ch 17:7-9; Neh 8:2-8; Psa 78:1-7; Pro 3:3-4; Pro 6:20-21; Pro 7:1-4; Isa 57:8; Jer 11:4; Zec 7:9-10; Zec 8:16-17
Precepts of Jesus. Explicitly stated, or implied in didactic discourse
– General references
Mat 5:16; Mat 5:22-24; Mat 5:27-48; Luk 6:27-36; Mat 6:1-4; Mat 6:6-8; Mat 6:16-25; Mat 6:31-34; Luk 12:12-31; Mat 7:1-5; Luk 6:37-42; Mat 7:6-14; Luk 13:24; Mat 7:15-29; Mat 16:24; Mar 8:34; Mat 18:8-10; Mat 18:15-17; Mat 18:21-22; Mat 19:16-19; Mar 10:17-22; Mat 20:25-28; Mat 22:34-40; Luk 10:28-37; Mat 24:42-51; Mat 25:34-46; Mar 6:7-11; Mat 10:5-42; Mar 9:35; Mar 9:38-39; Mar 9:42-50; Mar 10:9; Mar 10:11-12; Mar 11:22; Mar 12:17; Mat 22:21; Mar 13:33-37; Joh 7:24; Joh 13:34-35; Joh 14:11; Joh 14:15; Joh 14:23-24; Joh 15:2; Joh 15:4-5; Joh 15:7-12; Joh 15:14; Joh 15:17; Joh 15:20-22 Decalogue; Table
Precepts of St. Paul. Explicitly stated or implied in didactic epistles
Rom 12:1-3; Rom 12:6-21; Rom 13:8-14; Rom 14:19-21; Rom 15:1-2; 1Co 8:1; 1Co 8:7-13; 1Co 10:7-10; 1Co 10:24; 1Co 10:28-32; 1Co 14:20; 1Co 16:13-14; 2Co 13:7; Gal 5:1; Gal 5:16; Gal 6:1-2; Eph 4:1-3; Eph 4:26-32; Eph 5:1-6; Eph 5:11; Eph 5:15-21; Eph 6:10-11; Eph 6:13-18; Phi 1:27-28; Phi 2:2-8; Phi 2:12-16; Phi 4:4-6; Phi 4:8-9; Col 2:6; Col 2:16; Col 2:20-23; Col 3:1-2; Col 3:5; Col 3:8-9; Col 3:12-17; Col 3:23; 1Th 3:12; 1Th 4:1; 1Th 4:3; 1Th 4:5-6; 1Th 4:9-12; 1Th 5:6; 1Th 5:8; 1Th 5:12-22; 2Th 2:15; 2Th 3:6-15; 1Ti 1:4; 1Ti 2:1-2; 1Ti 2:8-12; 1Ti 3:2-13; 1Ti 4:1-7; 1Ti 4:12-16; 1Ti 5:1-14; 1Ti 5:16-21; 1Ti 6:11-14; 1Ti 6:17-20; 2Ti 1:13-14; 2Ti 2:19; 2Ti 2:22-25; 2Ti 3:2-5; Tit 1:5-14; Tit 2:2-5; Tit 2:9-12; Tit 3:1-2; Tit 3:8; Heb 6:1; Heb 6:11-12; Heb 10:22-25; Heb 12:1-5; Heb 12:12-16; Heb 13:1-3; Heb 13:5; Heb 13:7; Heb 13:9; Heb 13:15-17
Other apostles. Precepts of, explicitly stated or implied in didactic epistles
– General references
Jas 1:16; Jas 1:19; Jas 1:21-22; Jas 2:1-4; Jas 2:8-12; Jas 3:1; Jas 4:7-11; Jas 4:13-15; Jas 5:7-12; Jas 5:16; 1Pe 1:13-17; 1Pe 2:11-25; 1Pe 3:8-12; 1Pe 3:15-17; 1Pe 4:1-15; 1Pe 5:1-3; 1Pe 5:5-9; 2Pe 1:5-7; 2Pe 1:10; 2Pe 3:14; 2Pe 3:18; 1Jn 2:15; 1Jn 2:28; 1Jn 3:10-23; 1Jn 4:1; 1Jn 4:7-8; 1Jn 4:11-12; 1Jn 4:15-16; 1Jn 4:21; 1Jn 5:21; 2Jn 1:5-6; 3Jn 1:11; Jud 1:3-4; Jud 1:20-23; Rev 3:11; Rev 3:18-19; Rev 22:17 Adultery; Children; Citizens; Homicide; Instruction; Minister, A Sacred Teacher; Obedience, Enjoined; Servant; Theft; Wife; Women
Of men
Isa 29:13; Mat 15:2-20; Mar 7:2-23; Rom 14:1-6; Rom 14:10-23; 1Ti 4:1-3