Audin J. M. Vincent
Audin, J.-M.-Vincent
Born at Lyons in 1793; died in Paris, 21 February, 1851. He first studied theology in the seminary of Argentiere, and afterwards pursued the study of law. He passed his law examination but never practiced his profession, having decided to enter on a literary career. His first publications were. “La lanterne magique” (1811); “Blanc, bleu et rouge” (1814); “Tableau historique des événements qui se sont accomplis depuis le retour de Bonaparte jusqu’au rétablissement de Louis XVII” (1815). He contributed to the “Journal de Lyon” founded by Ballanche. He soon left his native city and settled in Paris where he opened a bookstore and at the same time was active with his pen. He first published articles of a political cast, and historical tales in the style of the time, such as “Michel Morin et la Ligue”; “Florence ou la Religieuse”; Le Régicide,” and others. He then took up historical writing, his first work of this kind being “Le Conordat entre Léon X et François I” (1821), which is for the most part a translation of that document. This was followed by his “Histoire de la St. Barthélemy” (2 vols., 1826). These two works were fairly well received although some ecclesiastical critics accused him of being to favorable to the Protestants. Audin publicly defended himself against this imputation, and asserted his firm belief in the doctrines of the Catholic Church. He now began his most important work, the history of the Protestant Reformation, which he published from 1839 to 1842 in four books, as follows: (1) “Histoire de la vie, des ouvrages et de la doctrine de Luther” (2 vols., Paris, 1839; 2d ed., 3 vols., 1850); (2) “Histoire de la vie, des ouvrages et de la doctrine de Calvin” (2 vols., 1841; 2d ed., 1851); (3) “Histoire de Léon X et de son siecle” (2 vols., 1844; 2d ed., 1851); (4) “Histoire de Henri VIII et du schisme d’Angleterre” (2 vols., 1847; 2d ed., 1862). The author claims to have based his statements upon researches which he made in the archives of various European cities, especially in the archives of the Vatican. The work shows that this assertion cannot be accepted in its entirety. The volumes are written in a romantic manner, and contain many particulars which sober criticism has long proved to go false. Döllinger says of the work on Luther: “Audin’s work is written with an extraordinary, and at times almost naive ignorance of Luther’s writings and contemporary literature, and of the general condition of Germany at that period” (Kirchenlex., s.v. Luther).
———————————–
La Grande Encyclopedie, IV, 611.
J.P. KIRSCH Transcribed by Dick Meissner
The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume IICopyright © 1907 by Robert Appleton CompanyOnline Edition Copyright © 2003 by K. KnightImprimatur. +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York
Fuente: Catholic Encyclopedia
Audin J. M. Vincent
a French litterateur, was born at Lyons in 1793, and studied theology at the seminary of Argentibre. He soon abandoned theology for the study of the law, but after being admitted to the bar he never practiced. In 1814 he came to Paris and commenced bookseller, at the same time keeping up his literary pursuits. The books for which his name is mentioned here are Histoire de la St. Barthlenmy (1826, 2 vols. 12mo); Histoire de la Vie, des Ouvrages, et des Doctrines de Luther (2 vols. 8vo; translated by Turnbull, London, 1854, 2 vols. 8vo); Histoire de la Vie, etc., de Calvin (1843, 2 vols. 8vo); Henry VIII et le Schisme d’Angleterre (2 vols. 8vo; transl. by Browne, Lond. 1852, 8vo). He died February 21st, 1851. His lives of Luther and Calvin are written in a controversial spirit, and are often unjust as well as inaccurate. Brownson (Roman Catholic) says of him that, as a writer of history, he is conscientious and painstaking, but we cannot regard him as very sagacious or profound; and, under the relation of style and manner, he is not sufficiently grave and dignified to suit our taste, or to inspire us with full confidence in his judgment. He takes too much pains to be striking and brilliant, and appears to weigh the phrase more than the thought. Regarded as popular works, as they probably were designed to be, we esteem very highly Audin’s biographies; but, regarded as studies on the Reformation, they are deficient in philosophical depth and comprehensiveness. They take, in our judgment, quite too-narrow and too superficial a view of the great Protestant movement, and afford us very little aid in understanding its real causes and internal character. Hoefer, Nouv. Biog. Generale, 3, 604; Brownson’s Review, January, 1855.