ZUZIM
Taken by the Chaldee and Septuagint version as an appellative for stout and valiant men. They dwelt east of the Jordan in the time of Abraham, when they were subdued by Chedorlaomer and his allies, Gen 14:5, and are supposed to have been the same race of giants called Zamzummim in Deu 2:20 .
Fuente: American Tract Society Bible Dictionary
Zuzim
(Heb. Only in the plur and with the art. haz-Zuzim’, , the Zuzites; Sept. translates , like Jerome in Quaest. Heb. gentes fortes; but the Vulg. has Zuzim; A.V. the Zuzims), the name of an ancient people, who, lying in the path of Chedorlaomer and his allies, were attacked and overthrown by them (Gen 14:5 only). Of the etymology or signification of the name nothing is known. The Sept., Targum of Onkelos, and Samar version (perhaps reading or mistaking for
) render it strong people. The Arabic’ version of Saadiah (in Walton’s Polyglot) gives ed-Dahakin, by which it is uncertain whether a proper name or an appellative is intended. Others understand by it the wanderers (Le Clerc, from ) or dwarfs (Michaelis, Suppl. No. 606). Hardly more ascertainable is the situation which the Zuzim occupied. The progress of the invaders was from north to south. They first encountered the Rephaim in Ashteroth-karnaim (near the Leja, in the north of the Hauran); next the Zuzim in Ham; and next the Emim in Shaveh-kiriathaim. The last-named place has not been identified, but was probably not far north of the Arnon. There is therefore some plausibility in the suggestion of Ewald (Gesch. 1, 308, note), provided it is etymologically correct, that Ham, is Am, i.e. Ammon; and thus that the Zuzim inhabited the country of the Ammonites, and were identical with the Zamzummwim (q.v.), who are known to have been exterminated and succeeded in. their land by the Ammonites. See Journal of Sacred Literature, Jan. 1852, p. 363. SEE CANAANITE.
Fuente: Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature
Zuzim
ZUZIM.One of the nations defeated by Chedorlaomer and his allies when they went against the cities of the plain (Gen 14:5). It is described as being in Ham. This name is read by some as Cham (i.e. with initial heth, not he as in MT [Note: Massoretic Text.] ) and regarded as possibly Identical with Amman (interchange between the aspirates heth and ayin), the Ammonites being descended from Ben-ammi, son of Lots second daughter (Gen 19:35). This Identification of Ammon with Ham has led to the suggestion that Zuzim and Zamzummim (Deu 2:20-23) were the same, by the contraction of am and um to , which may be supported by Babylonian analogies. Robinson points out that Zuzim reminds one of Ziza (Ptol. v. xvii. 6), between Bosra and Lejn.
T. G. Pinches.
ADDITIONAL NOTE TO ARTICLE ASSYRIA AND BABYLONIA.
Since the article Assyria and Babylonia was put into type, the appearance of Mr. L. W. Kings Chronicles concerning Early Babylonian Kings, and Professor H. V. Hilprechts Chronological Tablets from the Temple Library at Nippur have made public a considerable amount of additional information as to early Babylonian and Assyrian history. A new set of synchronisms is established and new rulers are restored, while the chronology is considerably affected. A mere sketch of the new facts is all that can be attempted here. Three new rulers, Ilu-eliati, Enmennunna, and Apil-kishshu, must be placed centuries before the first dynasty of Babylonia, almost doubling the historic period. The period of Sargon and Naram-Sin is more fully made known, the latters conquest of Magan being especially important. Sargon aggrandized Agade at the expense of Babylon, already the seat of Marduk worship. The dynasty of Ur, founded by Ur-Engur (or Ur-Gur), can now be set out completely as follows:
Ur-Engurreigned18years
Dungi, his sonreigned58years
Bur-Sin, his sonreigned9years
Gimll-Sin, his sonreigned7years
Ibi-Sin, his sonreigned25years
For the reign of Dungi we have the additional information that be cared greatly for Eridu, which was on the shore of the sea, and that he sacked Babylon. Gudea was his contemporary at Shirpula. On the fall of this dynasty the power passed to Isin, where the following dynasty reigned. The place of Gungunu is not certain.
Ishbi-Urrareigned32years
Gimil-ilishu, his sonreigned10years
Idin-Dagan, his sonreigned21years
Ishme-Dagan, his sonreigned20years
Libit-Ishtar, his sonreigned11years
Ur-Ninibreigned28years
Bur-Sin, his sonreigned21years
Iter-Kasha, his sonreigned5years
?, his brotherreigned7years
Sin reigned6years
Bl-bnireigned24years
Zame reigned3years
?reigned5years
Ea reigned4years
Sin-magirreigned11years
Damki-ilishu, his sonreigned23years
This last king has been thought to he a contemporary of Ammiditana, who, in the last year of his reign, destroyed the wall of Isin which the men of Damkiilishu had erected. But the reference may be to the third king of the second dynasty; and in any case is not very clear.
Two new names, Urra-imitti and Bl-ibni, are now to be placed high in the list of Assyrian kings. The latter was a gardener whom Urra-imitti raised to be his successor. They appear to have preceded Ilu-shuma, whom we now know to have been king of Assyria and contemporary with Sumu-abi, founder of the first dynasty of Babylon. Sulili may be another form of the name of Sumu-la-ilu, the second king of this dynasty, who thus reigned over Assyria as well.
We further learn that Hammurabis conquest of Rim-Sin was not final, for Samsu-iluna had to fight with him again. Samsu-iluna also fought with Ilu-ma-ilu, who was king of the Sea-land, and Abshu later waged indecisive war with him. In the time of Samsu-satana the Hittites invaded the land of Akkad. Ea-gamll, the last king of the second dynasty apparently, and king of the Sea-land, attacked Elam, but was defeated and deposed by the brother of Bitiliashu the Kassite. Agum, son of Bitiliashu, then conquered the Sea-land. These synchronisms, if the proposed Identifications of the rulers named are correct, show that the second dynasty was contemporary partly with the first, partly with the third, and consequently that the dates of the first dynasty must be lowered. Whether the Kassite dynasty directly followed Samsu-satana is still uncertain.
Later, we learn that Adad-apliddina was an Araman usurper, and that in his reign the Sutu nomads ravaged Sumer and Akkad. The name of the Elamite who formed the seventh dynasty was Ae-aplusur. A new Tiglath-pileser has to be added to the kings of Assyria. He was the father of Ashur-dan ii. and son of Ashur-resh-ishi ii., grandson of Ashur-rabl ii. Hence the Tiglath-pileser of b.c. 731 becomes iv. Merodach-baladan, the son of Baladan, Marduk apliddina iii., was the son of Nabu-shum We get fresh information as to the troubled times in Babylonia after Sennacherib destroyed Babylon; and the name of Erba-Marduk (who dispossessed the Aramans from the estates which they had seized in Babylon and Borsippa, and restored E-sagila and E-zida, the temples of Marduk and Nabu) is, with others, rescued to history.
The changes which these new facts involve are likely to give rise to much discussion, and will probably not be settled till we have still further Information.
C. H. W. Johns.
Fuente: Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible
Zuzim
zuzim (, zuuzm; ( , ethne ischura, strong nations. So Jerome in Quaest. Hebr.: genres fortes): A people conquered by Chedorlaomer (Gen 14:5). They dwelt in Ham, a region not otherwise known but, from the connection, inferred to be East of the Jordan. It may also be inferred that they were a race of giants. They were perhaps to be identified with the Zamzummim.
Fuente: International Standard Bible Encyclopedia
Zuzim
Zuzim (z’zim). Gen 14:5. The name of a people in Ham, who were defeated in the famous invasion of Chedorlaomer. The Zuzim are believed to be the same people that the Ammonites later called the Zamzummim, and that others called the Rephaim or giants. See Deu 2:20, R. V.
Fuente: People’s Dictionary of the Bible
Zuzim
See ZAMZUMMIM.