UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS – 11TH CIRCUIT

(October 18, 1993), in the case of Chabad—Lubavitch of Georgia v. Miller, No. 92–8008 stated:

Because the religious speech is communicated in a true public forum … the state, by definition, neither endorses nor disapproves of the speech. By permitting religious speech in a public forum—whether in the heart of a core government building, in the Georgia Governor’s mansion, or in the outer reaches of some state-owned pasture—the state simply does not endorse, but rather acts in a strictly neutral manner toward, private speech.4074