Biblia

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Chronicles 10:13

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Chronicles 10:13

So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the LORD, [even] against the word of the LORD, which he kept not, and also for asking [counsel] of [one that had] a familiar spirit, to inquire [of it];

13. his transgression ] R.V. his trespass; cp. 2Ch 26:16. The reference is to Saul’s sacrifice (1Sa 13:13-14), and disobedience ( ib. 1Sa 15:23).

even against the word ] R.V. because of the word.

also for asking ] R.V. also for that he asked.

to inquire of it] R.V. to inquire thereby; cp. 1Sa 28:8.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

For his transgression – Compare 1Ch 9:1. The transgression intended is probably the disobedience with respect to Amalek, recorded in 1Sa 15:1-9 (compare 1Sa 28:17-18).

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

1Ch 10:13-14

So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the Lord.

The doom of King Saul

We have no right to understand this account of Sauls death as referring to one act of his life. It speaks as well of his general transgression against the Lord. Saul consulted the witch the night before he died; and whether it was his worst offence or no, it was the immediate precursor of his destruction, the last drop which made the cup of vengeance overflow: there remained for him no other recorded act of sin before his self-murder. Look well to the next sin you are tempted to commit. It may be your last act. If indulged it may prove a step on the road to destruction from which there is no receding. Was Saul a man who lived and died without repentance? In one sense–the highest sense of repentance–he was; in another he was not. The repentance which God acknowledges is not momentary sorrow or good resolutions, soon repented of in the wrong direction; it is that thorough change of heart which works in us the steadiness of real Christian principle; which makes us, who have been baptized and reared as Christians, to love the Lord Jesus Christ above all things; to hold His favour dearer than life itself; and to have no stronger desire than that our thoughts, feelings, life may be conformed to His will. Such a change the history leads us to believe King Saul never knew. After his first interview with Samuel, we read that God gave him another heart. But his after-life shows that this change was not an abiding change. Sin springing up, reckless self-indulgence, blighted and destroyed feelings of good which gave such hopeful promise at first. The true change of heart must be abiding. Look at the recorded acts by which Saul grieved Gods Spirit.

1. His sacrificing to the Lord (1Sa 13:9). Self-will was at the root of this act–that self-will which poisoned all Sauls after-life.

2. The rash vow by which he forbade the people to taste any food (1Sa 14:24). This showed the same unchecked impetuosity, reckless in its self-willed way of honouring God.

3. His sparing the Amalekites (1Sa 15:9) These earlier acts of Sauls rebellion were but the precursors of what was worse.

4. His yielding himself up to the one master passion of envy (1Sa 18:7-9). The king obviously is lost now, and there is no compunction, for he cherishes his sin.

5. The atrocious massacre of the priests (1Sa 22:17-18). And now his own life hurries to its miserable close. He feels that he is deserted of God, and that nothing prospers with him. Forsaken of God? Why? Because of unrepented sin. No wonder that the degraded king seeks death by his own hand, when life has become intolerable. Read here the melancholy end of the self-will and evil passions long indulged, till the soul becomes their slave, and all hope is gone, and God with it. The reckless self-willed life must lead to a death without hope. (Bp. Archibald Campbell.)

And also for asking counsel of one that had a familiar spirit.

Saul inquiring of the enchantress

Thus perished one who entered with fair promise on an arduous office, and gave indications of capacities and dispositions which seemed to ensure a prosperous career. But the root of the matter was not in Saul; he had not been renewed in the spirit of his mind, and therefore was he unable to bear himself meekly in greatness, and gave way to an arrogant and impetuous temper, forgetting that to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams. Thus was he turned into a wild and desperate man, sparing not in his rage the priests of God, and calling to his aid enchantments and sorcery. So that at length it came to pass that Saul died for his transgressions against the word of the Lord–for asking counsel of one who had a familiar spirit. There are many important lessons that might be drawn from the history thus briefly reviewed.


I.
You are carefully to observe that Saul, who here had recourse to witchcraft, had before taken measures, vigorous measures, for exterminating witchcraft; and it was at once a proof that he was far gone in iniquity, and an evidence that his ruin came on apace, when he could thus become the patron of a sin of which he had before been the opponent. There is no greater moral peril than that which surrounds an individual who, after he has given up a sinful practice, again betakes himself to it. The last state of that man is worse than the first. We cannot doubt of numbers amongst you, that they have had, and still have, their seasons of spiritual disquietude, when, obeying a mighty impulse, which is not of this earth, they break away from associations and customs which they feel to be injurious, and become, if not altogether, yet almost, Christians. Now our business with such is to announce to them their immeasurable peril, if, after being convinced of the sinfulness of a practice, and proving their conviction by temporary abstinence, they again indulge in what they profess to forsake. To resume a renounced habit is to give tenfold energy to the tyranny from which you broke loose. Are you then seared by the visit of Saul to the sorceress? do you marvel at the infatuation of the monarch as you mark him, under cover of the night, stealthily approaching the scene of foul arts and unhallowed incantations? are you ready with the sentence of stern condemnation, prepared to find Saul given over to destruction, now that you behold him tampering with witchcraft, and seeking to invade the repose of the dead? But what, after all, is the king of Israel doing, but that with which yourselves may be justly charged? He is only returning to that which he had forsaken; and the worst feature in his case (the worst, because it proves a seared conscience, and the absence of deep-wrought impressions) is just that with which your own conduct is marked–the seeking comfort where you had detected sin. If men have felt the evil of covetousness, for example, and if he have set himself vigorously against the love of money, and if, after a while, he yield himself once more to the passion for gold, what is he, if he returns to the dominion of avarice, but Saul hurrying to the cave of the enchantress? He was originally beguiled by the witchery of money, and he escaped from the witchery; and now he is again giving himself up to that witchery. If a man have been the slave of his appetites, and if he have felt the degradation, and acted on the resolve of keeping under the body, and if he then plunge back into sensuality, what is he, if he allow his passions to re-assume the lost sovereignty, but Saul consorting with the wizard? He was originally under the spell of voluptuousness, and he broke that spell; and now is again weaving that spell. If a man have lived in utter carelessness with regard to another world, and if he have been stirred from his insensibility, so that he have set himself in good earnest to the making provision for death and for judgment; and if, after awhile, he relapse into moral apathy, what is he, as he goes back to his stupor, but Saul seeking out a woman with a familiar spirit? Observe, we entreat of you, that it was not until Saul had consulted God, and God had refused to answer him by dreams, or by Urim, or by prophets, that he took the fatal resolve of applying to the necromancer. We fear for those of you on whose minds some serious impressions may have been wrought, and who have been made uneasy as to their spiritual condition, lest, not finding much comfort in religion, they should seek it once more in the world. Men are apt to forget, when roused to anxiety as to the soul, how long they have made God wait for them, and how justly, therefore, they might expect that the peace and happiness of the gospel will not be imparted at the first moment they are sought; and then there is great danger of their being quickly wearied, and turning to other and worthless sources of comfort. They have consulted God, and they have received no answer, whether by dreams, or by Urim, or by prophets; and therefore they seek peace in earthly fascinations, and strive to lull the conscience by enchantments of the sorceress. Oh! if there be any amongst you who, in order to get rid of uneasy thoughts about their souls, would bury themselves in the occupations and pleasures of the world, we stand here to arrest them in their fatal determination.


II.
There is something very touching in the fact that it was Samuel whom Saul desired the witch to call up. Samuel had boldly reproved Saul, and, as it would appear, offended him by his faithfulness. And yet Saul said, Bring up Samuel. And herein is an instance of what frequently occurs. How many who have despised the advice of a father or a mother, and grieved their parents by opposition and disobedience, long bitterly to bring them back, when they have gone down to the grave, that they may have the benefit of the counsel which they once slighted and scorned I If they could go to the necromancer in the hour of their distress, it would not be, Bring me up the companion who cheered me in my gaieties, who was with me at the revel, and the dance, and the public show, but Bring me up the father, with his grey hairs, who solemnly told me that the way of transgressors was hard; or the mother who, with weeping eyes and broken voice, admonished me against sinful indulgences. Yet if you neglect the Lord, and continue to resist the strivings of His Spirit, so that at length He departs from you as He departed from Saul, what would it avail that the grave should give up its inhabitants–that the parent, or the friend, or the minister should return at your bidding? The father or the mother could only say, Why hast thou disquieted me to bring me up? and wherefore dost thou ask of me, seeing the Lord has departed from thee, and become thine enemy? And thus also is it with your minister. He has reproved and admonished week by week, and year after year, and you have been either indifferent to his offended at their pleadings, or urgency. And then he dies; and you are, perhaps, almost pleased to be freed from his pointed remonstrances. But you may think of him again when you feel that this world is slipping from your grasp, and you have not laid hold on eternal life. You shall have your wish. An old man cometh up, and he is covered with a mantle. But what can you expect to hear from his lips? Your wretchedness is of your own making. If you have no hope, it is because God hath called a thousand times and you would not answer. If you are oppressed with terror, it is because Christ hath entreated you for many years to receive pardon through His blood; and you have set at nought the Mediator. What then, shall the minister say to you, when you exclaim with Saul, I am sore distressed, for the Philistines make war against me, and God is departed from me, and answereth me no more, neither by prophets nor by dreams? what shall he say to you if not what Samuel said to Saul–Why hast thou disquieted me to bring me up? Wherefore dost thou ask of me, seeing the Lord is departed from thee, and is become thine enemy? (H. Melvll, B. D.)

Sauls declension


I.
The possibility that a man may fall from spiritual communion with the divine and invisible.


II.
The rapidity with which a man may fall from the highest eminence.


III.
The certainty that one day the impenitent will want their old teachers. (City Temple.)

Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell

Verse 13. Saul died for his transgression] See the concluding observations on the first book of Samuel. 1Sa 31:13.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

Saul died for his transgression: the sense is, Wonder not that Saul fell by the hands of the Philistines, who were armed against him by his own sin and by Gods vengeance for it.

Against the word of the Lord; against Gods express, and plain, and positive command; which is a great aggravation of any sin.

For asking counsel of one that had a familiar spirit; which also was contrary to a manifest command, Lev 19:31, and moreover, contrary to his own conscience, which was so fully convinced hereof, that he had endeavoured the utter extirpation of all such persons, in pursuance of Gods law. See 1Sa 28:9.

To inquire of it, concerning the event of the approaching battle.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

13. Saul died for his transgressionwhich he committed against the Lordin having spared the kingof the Amalekites and taken the flocks of the people as spoils [1Sa15:9], as well as in having consulted a pythoness [1Sa28:7]. Both of these acts were great sinsthe first as aviolation of God’s express and positive command [1Sa15:3], and the second as contrary to a well-known statute of thekingdom (Le 19:31).

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

So Saul died for his transgression,….

[See comments on 1Sa 31:13] A violent and dishonourable death, which was suffered on account of the sins he was guilty of:

one was, which he committed against the Lord, even against the word of the Lord, which he kept not; both in not staying for Samuel the time appointed, and by sparing the Amalekites whom he was bid to destroy, 1Sa 13:13

and also for asking counsel of one that had a familiar spirit, to inquire of it; what he should do with respect to engaging in battle with the Philistines, 1Sa 28:8 which to do was contrary to an express command of God, Le 19:31.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

(13) Even against the word of the Lord.Sauls unfaithfulness was twofold: (1) he did not observe the prophetic word of Jehovah (comp. 1Sa. 13:13; 1Sa. 15:11); and (2) he consulted a necromancer, to the neglect of consulting Jehovah (1 Samuel 28).

And also for asking counsel.And also by consulting the necromancer in order to get a response. Turn ye not to the necromancers (Lev. 19:31). (See also Isa. 8:19.) Saul broke the general law of his people, as well as special commands addressed to himself. No allusion is made to his cruel slaughter of the priests (1Sa. 22:18), nor to his implacable hatred of David.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

(13, 14) A concluding reflection from the mind of the chronicler himself. He sums up his extract concerning the ruin of Saul by assigning the moral ground of it, viz., Sauls unfaithfulness whereby he showed himself unfaithful to Jehovah. The same charge was made against the Transjordan tribes in 1Ch. 5:25, and against the people of Judah in 1Ch. 9:1.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

13. So Saul died for his transgression and also for asking counsel of a familiar spirit These reflections on the death of Saul, and the causes of his fall, show that the writer is merely preparing the way to the history of David. Saul’s ruin is attributed particularly to two great sins: 1) in not observing Jehovah’s word, which enjoined upon him the destruction of Amalek, (see 1 Samuel 15, and 1Sa 28:17-18, and notes there;) 2) in seeking for help and counsel of the witch of Endor. See 1Sa 28:3-20, notes.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

1Ch 10:13. To enquire of it See the note on 1Sa 31:1. The two great offences of Saul, which are recapitulated in this verse, were, his sparing the Amalekites, and consulting the witch of Endor.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

Observe, Reader! the melancholy close of Saul’s history; and mark what an awful lesson he holds forth to great sinners. Alas! that any man should leave God to consult with the workers of darkness! The Philistines make war upon me, said Saul. That would have been – nothing: But when he added, and God is departed from me! this gave the finishing stroke to human misery! header! think of what vast importance that prayer, Oh, Lord, take not thine Holy Spirit from me, 1Sa 28:15 ; Psa 51:11 .

Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

1Ch 10:13 So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the LORD, [even] against the word of the LORD, which he kept not, and also for asking [counsel] of [one that had] a familiar spirit, to enquire [of it];

Ver. 13. So Saul died, &c. ] This and the subsequent verse we have here about the causes of Saul’s death, more than that we read in 1Sa 31:3-6 .; like as we meet with many remarkable passages in St Mark, that are not in Matthew or Luke.

For his transgression which he committed. ] “Adding rebellion to sin,” Job 34:37 for he was not so very bad at first, as neither is any wicked person. He first neglected the word of God, and then despised it, and then harboured in his heart hypocrisy, hatred, envy, cruelty, &c. Here he is taxed for three vices especially: (1.) For flat disobedience, which “is as the sin of witchcraft”; 1Sa 15:23 (2.) For consulting with a witch; (3.) For not inquiring of the Lord. He did not “draw nigh to God with a true heart, in full assurance of faith, having his heart sprinkled from an evil conscience, and his body washed with pure water.” Heb 10:22

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

for. In this book the reason; in 1 Samuel only the event. See App-56.

transgression = disobedience, shown in his faithlessness or defection. Hebrew. ma’al. App-44. Compare 1Sa 13:13, 1Sa 13:14; 1Sa 15:1-9; 1Sa 28:7.

the LORD. Hebrew. Jehovah. App-4. Note it is not Elohim (God).

familiar spirit. See note on Lev 19:31.

to enquire = to seek and consult. Hebrew. darash, to seek earnestly. Saul sought thus with the medium, but not with Jehovah.

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics

committed: Heb. transgressed

even against: 1Sa 13:13, 1Sa 15:2, 1Sa 15:23

for asking: 1Sa 28:7-20

a familiar: Exo 22:18, Lev 19:31, Lev 20:6, Deu 18:10-14, 2Ki 21:6, Isa 8:19, Act 8:9-11, Act 16:16-18

Reciprocal: Jos 9:14 – asked not 1Sa 28:8 – I pray thee 1Sa 28:18 – obeyedst 1Ki 22:5 – Inquire 2Ki 1:6 – therefore 2Ki 3:11 – that we may 2Ki 22:13 – inquire 2Ch 33:6 – dealt Job 15:4 – restrainest Job 35:10 – none Psa 19:13 – I shall Psa 27:4 – inquire Psa 36:2 – until Psa 125:5 – As for such Isa 2:6 – and are Isa 19:3 – and they Isa 30:1 – that take Act 1:25 – by Act 13:6 – certain Act 13:22 – when Act 19:19 – used Gal 5:20 – witchcraft 1Jo 3:4 – committeth

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

1Ch 10:13. So Saul died for his transgression The sense is, wonder not that Saul fell by the hands of the Philistines, who were armed against him by his own sin, and by Gods vengeance for it. Against the word of the Lord Against Gods express, and plain, and positive command; which is a great aggravation of any sin. For asking counsel of one that had a familiar spirit Which also was contrary to a manifest command,

(Lev 19:31,) and moreover contrary to his own conscience, which was so fully convinced of the evil of such practices, that he had endeavoured the utter extirpation of all such persons, in pursuance of Gods law, 1Sa 28:9. To inquire of it Concerning the event of the approaching battle.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments